CA1339171C - Polyesters having improved impact strength - Google Patents

Abstract

A polyester composition and method having improved unnotched Izod impact strength in which the polyester matrix is blended with an EPDM interpolymer grafted with an ester of acrylic or methacrylic acid and cross-linked with a diamine or diacid or its anhydride before or preferably after blending.

Description

This application is a division of Canadian Application Serial Number 578,882 filed on September 29, 19~8.

FIELD OE INVENTION
This invention relates to polyester polymeric materials and particularly polybutylene terephthalate having improved toughness and impact strength and to materials and methods for producing same.

DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART
As described in Olivier International apPlication W0-86/04076, published on July 17, 1986, the utility of thermo-plastic polyesters in engineering type applications is limited where toughness and high impact strength are required. Unmodified thermoplastic polyesters typically exhibit room temperature impact strength of 1 ft-lb/inch of notch or less on the Izod scale of impact strength.
Improvement of the toughness and impact strength of thermoplastic polyester has been the subject matter of consid-erable research and development by the most highly skilled in the art. Much of such earlier research and development has been addressed to the admixture of additives to the polyester, with particular attention being given to the addition of rubber-like or elastomeric materials, such as ethylene-propylene copoly-mers (EPM) or ethylene propylene-polyene terpolymers (EPDM), with a view towards improving impact strength and toughness without interfering with other of the desirable properties of , -- ~

133917~

the polyester. The desired level of improvement has not been achieved with the addition of such rubber-like or elastomeric materials by reason of the relative incompatibility between such rubber-like or elastomeric materials and polyester resins.
Attempts have been made to overcome this problem and increase the compatibility between the rubber-like or elasto-meric materials and polyester resins by modification of the rubber-like or elastomeric materials to provide sites that enable the polyester or polycarbonate resins to adhere to the elastomeric materials.
Cope, in U.S. patent No. 3,435,093, discloses blends of polyethylene terephthalate and an ionic hydrocarbon copolymer of ~-olefins of the formula R-CH=C~2 in which R is hydrogen (ethylene) or an alkyl radical of 1-3 carbon atoms (propylene-pentene) with the copolymer modified with an ~,B-ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid containing 3-5 carbon atoms. The Cope patent does not teach or suggest the components of the additive employed or the concepts employed in the practice of the invention described and claimed herein, as will hereinafter appear.
The problem was faced directly in the Epstein U.S.
patent No. 4,172,859, issued October 30, 1979. The Epstein patent is somewhat confusing in that it seeks to cover the waterfront by listing an endless number of materials and combinations thereof for use as additives to improve the touqhness and impact strength of polyester and polycarbonate resins. In the Epstein patent, emphasis is placed on the importance of the particle size and tensile modulus of the copolymer additive. While Epstein contemplates the use of ethylene-propylene copolymers and ethylene-propylene-polyene terpolymers, ~ J

from amongst the large number of other varieties of materials, and the use of ~,B-ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic and dicarboxylic acids and anhydrides as modifying agents to pro-vide sites which adhere to the matrix resin, the Epstein patent does not recognize the concepts of the invention described and claimed as will hereinafter be pointed out.
In the aforementioned copending application, of which this is an improvement, the invention described therein is based on the thought that an ethylene, C3-C16 mono-olefin, polyene interpolymer and preferably an ethylene, propylene, diene rubbery interpolymer would make a good impact modifier for thermoplastic polyester, if the two could be made compatible. The two are relatively incompatible because the rubber is a hydrocarbon while the polyester is a much more polar substance. Thus, the objective of the invention described and claimed therein was addressed to the modification of the ethylene, mono-olefin, polyene interpolymer rubber greatly to improve its compatibil-ity with polyester resins to provide an improved impact modifier for the thermoplastic polyester resin.
Briefly described, the features of the invention of the copending application are embodied in a composition comprising 60-90 percent by weight of a matrix resin in the form of a polyester blended with 10-40 percent by weight of an unsaturated rubber formed by copolymerization of ethylene - one or more mono-olefins and one or more polyenes in which the backbone rubber component has been modified with an ester of an ~,B-unsaturated acid having an epoxide functionality on the alkoxy portion, such as the ester derived from methacrylic acid and an epoxy alcohol and which attaches to the backbone rubber chiefly by way of a grafting reaction with little if any ~ f J~ -3-cross-linking reaction.
Polyesters and their method of manufacture are well known to the skilled in the art and are readily availa~le in commerce. The invention was described therein with reference to polybutylene terephthalate as a preferred polyester such as marketed by the General Electric Plastics Company under the trademark Valox 310 and Valox 315, although others of the poly-esters such as described in the above-mentioned Epstein U.S.
patent No. 4,172,859 could be used in the practice of the de-scribed invention for their improvement in toughness and impac~
strength.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
While an ethylene-propylene-polyene ~EPDM) inter-polymer which has been grafted with an epoxide functional ester of an ~,B-unsaturated acid markedly improves the notched Izod impact strength of polybutylene terephthalate (P8T) resins, deficiencies have been found to exist with respect to the unnotched Izod impact strength at the knitline. It has been found, in accordance with the practice of this invention, that controlled cross-linking of the rubber backbone phase of the modifier (grafted EPDM) provides a significant improvement in the knitline strength of the PBT-modifier blend; (1) when a cross-linking reaction is carried out after proper dispersion of the grafted rubber in the plastic matrix and (2) when the cross-linking is limited primarily to the rubber phase of the blend. Under these conditions improvement in knitline strength can be achieved while still maintaining good notched Izod im-pact strength.

~r _4_ DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Description will first be made of the preparation of the grafted backbone rubber. The backbone rubber is formed by interpolymerization of monomers of ethylene, one or more higher mono-olefins having from 3-16 carbon atoms, preferably propy-lene, plus one or more polyenes.
The polyene monomer containing a plurality of carbon-to-carbon double bonds may be selected from those disclosed in the prior art for use as third monomers in the preparation of ethylene-mono-olefin-polyene terpolymers, including open chain polyunsaturated hydrocarbons containing 4-20 carbon atoms, such as 1,4-hexadiene, monocyclic polyenes and polycyclic polyenes.
The polyunsaturated bridged ring hydrocarbons or halogenated bridged ring hydrocarbons are preferred. Examples of such bridged ring hydrocarbons include the polyunsaturated deriva-tives of bicyclo (2,2,1) heptane wherein at least one double bond is present in one of the bridged rings, such as dicyclo-pentadiene, bicyclo(2,2,1)hepta-2,5-diene, the alkylidene norbornenes, and especially the 5-alkylidene-2-norbornenes wherein the alkylidene group contains 1-20 carbon atoms and preferably 1-8 carbon atoms, the alkenyl norbornenes, and especially the 5-alkenyl-2-norbornenes wherein the alkenyl group contains about 3-20 carbon atoms and preferably 3-10 carbon atoms. Other bridged ring hydrocarbons include poly-unsaturated derivatives of bicyclo(2,2,2) octane as represented by bicyclo(3,2,1) octane, polyunsaturated derivatives of bicyclo(3,3,1) nonane, and polyunsaturated derivatives of bicyclo(3,2,2) nonane.
Specific examples of preferred bridged ring compounds include 5-methylidene-2-norbornene, 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene, ~,r 5-n-propylidene-2-norbornene, 5-isobutylidene-2-norbornene, 5-n-butylidene-2-norbornene, 5-isobutylidene-2-norbornene, dicyclopentadienes; the methyl butenyl norbornenes such as 5-(2-methyl-2-butenyl)-2-norbornene or 5-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-norbornene, and 5-(3,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-2-norbornene. The elastomer prepared from 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene is much preferred as it has outstanding properties and produces many unusual and unexpected results.
The backbone rubber may contain chemically bound therein molar ratios of ethylene to propylene or other C3-C16 mono-olefin varying between 95:5 to 5:95 ethylene:propylene, and preferably between 70:30 to 55:45 ethylene:propylene. The polyene or substituted polyene may be chemically bound therein in an amount of 0.1 to 10 mol percent, and preferably 0.3 to 1 mol percent, or in an amount to provide an actual unsaturation level of 2-15 double bonds per 1,000 carbon atoms in the polymer chain.
The interpolymerization reaction is carried out in the presence of a catalyst in a solvent medium. The polymer-ization solvent may be any suitable inert organic solvent that is liquid under reaction conditions. Examples of satisfactory hydrocarbon solvents include straight chain paraffins having from 5-8 carbon atoms, with best results often being secured by the use of hexane; aromatic hydrocarbons and preferably an aromatic hydrocarbon having a single benzene nucleus, such as benzene, toluene and the like; and saturated cyclic hydrocarbons having boiling point ranges approximating those of the straight chain paraffin hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons described above, and preferably saturated cyclic hydrocarbons having 5-6 carbon atoms in the ring nucleus. The solvent selected may be a mixture of one or more of the foregoing hydrocarbons and preferably a mixture of aliphatic and naphthenic hydrocarbons having approximately the same boiling range as normal hexane.
It i8 desirable that the solvent be dry and free of substances that will interfere with the Ziegler type catalyst used in the polymerization reaction.
The interpolymerization is carried out in the presence of a Ziegler catalyst of the type well known in the prior art. Such Ziegler type catalysts are disclosed in a large number of patents, such as U.S. patents No. 2,933,480, No. 3,093,620, No. 3,093,621, No. 3,211,709 and No. 3,113,115.
Examples of Ziegler catalysts include metal organic coordinaticn catalysts prepared by contacting a compound of a heavy metal of the group IV-a, V-a, VI-a and VII-a of the Mendeleeff periodic system of elements, such as titanium, vanadium and chromium halides with an organo-metallic compound of a metal of groups I, II or III of the Mendeleeff periodic system which contains 2' least one carbon-metal bond, such as trialkyl aluminum, and allyl aluminum halides in which the alkyl groups contain from 1-20 and preferably 1-4 carbon atoms.
The preferred Ziegler catalyst for interpolymeriza-tion is prepared from a vanadium compound and an alkyl aluminum halide. Examples of suitable vanadium compounds include vana-dium trichloride, vanadium tetrachloride, vanadium oxychloride, vanadium acetyl acetonate, etc. Activators which are especial-ly preferred include alkyl aluminum chlorides of 3,113,115, having the general formula RlAlC12 and R2AlCl and the corresponding sesquichlorides of the general formula R3A12C13, in which R is methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl or isobutyl. In the catalyst system, the aluminum to vanadium mol ratio of the alum-~ .r .,, inum and vanadium compounds may be within the range of 5/1 to 200/1 and preferably within the range of 15/1 to 60/1, with best results being secured in the ratio of 40 aluminum to 1 vanadium. These same ratios apply with respect to correspond-ing compounds of others of the heavy metals substituted for the vanadium compound and the organo-metallic compounds of groups I, II and III for the aluminum compounds. A catalyst prepared from alkyl aluminum sesquichloride, such as the methyl or ethyl aluminum sesquichloride and vanadium oxychloride is preferred in the ratio of 1 mole vanadium oxychloride per 5-300 moles of aluminum and more preferably 15-60 moles of aluminum, with 40 moles of aluminum per mole of vanadium yielding the best results.
The polymerization is preferably carried out on a continuous basis in a reaction vessel closed to the outside atmosphere, which is provided with an agitator, coolinq means and conduit means for continuously supplying the ingredients of the reaction including monomer, catalyst and accelerators and conduit means for continuously withdrawing solution containing elastomer, and the catalyst is killed by the addition of a catalyst deactivator.
The preparation of EPDM polymers is well known and is fully described in such patents as U.S. patents No. 2,933,480, No. 3,093,621, No. 3,211,709, No. 3,646,168, No. 3,790,519, No.

3,884,993, No. 3,894,999 and No. 4,059,654, amongst many others.
There are a number of factors involved in the modification of the backbone rubber for optimum use as an impact strength improver of polyester resins. It is desirable to effect modification of the backbone rubber with an agent which, when bound to the rubber, provides active sites in the form of epoxide functions. On the other hand, it is ~- ;;r ~ 8-desirable to effect modification of the unsaturated backbone rubber with a modifying agent that involves little, if any, copolymerization or cross-linking, but instead relies chiefly on a grafting reaction for attachment to become a part of the backbone rubber. Too much cross-linking at this stage of the process of this invention prevents the satisfactory dispersion of the rubber into the polyester resin, which is required for notched Izod impact strength improvement and for subsequent cross-linking $n the presence of the polyester resin. By the same token, it is desirable, in accordance with the practice of this invention, to carry out the modification of the backbone rubber using reactants and conditions which do not favor cross-linking under reaction conditions.
In these regards, the concepts described herein differ basically from the teaching of the aforementioned Ep-stein U.S. patent No. 4,192,859, which does not recognize the unique function of an epoxide modifier and which favors copoly-merization as the mechanism for binding modifying agents with the base polymer. Further, the Epstein patent does not lead one skilled in the art to make use of an unsaturated ethylene, mono-olefin, polyene rubber and minimization of a cross-linking or other reaction that would involve unsaturated carbon-to-carbon linkages of the base polymer during the reaction to modify the base rubber.
As the ester of a methacrylic acid which has an epoxide functionality on the alkoxy portion, it is preferred to make use of glycidyl methacrylate, although other epoxy compounds having the following general formula may be used:

~iq.r ~ _ g _ o R C - OR' C = C
R R
in which R' is an organic group having an epoxide functionality and R is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl, propyl or other alkyl, aralkyl, cyclic, or aromatic group. Representative of such other modifying agents are glycidyl acrylate, glycidyl 2-ethylacrylate, glycidyl 2-propylacrylate and the like.
The catalyst is one that favors grafting reaction as compared to a cross-linking reaction under the reaction condi-tions to combine the epoxide modifying agent with the unsatur-ated backbone rubber. For this purpose, it is preferred to make use of a free radical initiator such as a dialkyl per-oxide. In the grafting reaction, use can be made of the catalyst in an amount within the range of 1-5 parts per 100 parts by weight of the unsaturated rubber, and preferably in an amount within the range of 1-2 percent by weight.
The level of graft of the epoxy modifying agent onto the unsaturated backbone rubber is somewhat dependent on the amount of unsaturation in the backbone rubber. It is desirable to make use of an ethylene, mono-olefin, polyene backbone rubber having at least 1.5 unsaturated carbon-to-carbon linkages per 1000 carbon atoms and little additional benefit is derived from the use of an unsaturated backbone rubber having more than 20 carbon-to-carbon double bonds per 1000 carbon atoms. In the preferred practice of this invention, use is made of an unsaturated rubber having from 2-15 carbon-to-carbon double bonds per 1000 carbon atoms or which provide for a level of graft within the range of 1-10 percent and preferably 1.5-4 ~ercent by weight of the rubber.

- ~ /
133ql71 The preparation of unsaturated rubbers having the described characteristics are fully described in U.S. patent No. 3,894,999 and others of the aforementioned patents.
They are commercially available under the trade name EPsyr.270A
(4.5 C~C per lOOOC); EPsyn~55 (9.0 C=C per lOOOC), etc.
marketed by Copolymer Rubber and Chemical Corporation of Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
The grafting reaction is carried out in solvent solution with the unsaturated rubber present in a concentration which may range from 10-30 percent by weight, with constant stirring, at an elevated temperature within the range of 125-200~C for a time ranging from 1/2-2 hours. The reaction condition can be varied depending somewhat upon the type and amount of catalyst ar.d temperature conditions, as is well known to the skilled in the art.
For a more detailed description of the grafted rubber and its method of preparation, reference can be made to the aforementioned Olivier International application published on July 17, 1986 as W0-86/04076.
Description will hereinafter be made of the features of this invention wherein improvements in the knitline strength of the polyester-rubber blend can be achieved without notice-able loss of notched Izod impact strength. It has been found that the desired improvement results when the grafted rubber phase has been dispersed in, at least a part of, or all of the plastic phase prior to reaction to effect a cross-linking reaction and when the cross-linking reaction is caused to take place through either residual unsaturation or residual epoxy groups in the dispersed rubber phase.

,~ -11-133~t71 As the cross-linking agent which favors cross-linking through residual unsaturation in the grafted rubber, it is pre-ferred to make use of multifunctional molecules or compounds with functionalities capable of reaction with the grafted rubber. For this purpose, use can be made of diacids or their corresponding dianhydrides and/or diamines such as hexamethy-lene diamine (HDA), melamine, benzophenone tetracarboxylic dianhydride, adipic acid, maleic acid or anhydride, or other polyfunctional epoxide reactive compounds.
The described improvement in knitline strength can be achieved when the grafted rubber moiety contains from 1.5-20 unsaturated carbon-to-carbon linkages per 1000 carbon atoms in the EPDM rubber component and preferably 2.0 to 15 carbon-to-carbon double bonds per 1000 carbon atoms. The amount of cross-linking agent introduced into the dispersion for reaction will depend somewhat on the amount of unsaturation in the base rubber and its degree of graft. Improvement is achieved when the cross-linking agent is reacted in an amount within the range of 0.4-5 parts per hundred parts by weight of the grafted rubber and preferably within the range of 0.5-3 parts per 100 parts by weight of the grafted rubber moiety. The level of the cross-linking agent is adjusted according to its molecular weight and the number of functional groups per molecule as is well known to those skilled in the art.
As previously pointed out, the cross-linking reaction is preferably carried out after the grafted rubber has been dispersed by blending with the matrix plastic or polyester resin.
Improvement in knitline strength can also be obtained when the grafted rubber is cross-linked prior to b~ending with the polyester matrix resin or simultaneously with the blending of !~ ' l33ql71 - the grafted rubber with the polyester matrix resin. In cases of prior cross-linking of grafted rubber, however, the notched Izod impact strength of the blend was found to suffer.
The cross-linking reaction is preferably carried out in bulk, as by working the dispersion of grafted rubber in the plast$c material in the presence of the cross-linking agent and at elevated temperature, such as in an extruder, Banbury, Bra-bender Plasticorder or the like. The temperature for carrying out the cross-linking reaction may range from 350-500~ F and preferably within the range of 400-500~ F.
Having described the basic concepts of this inven-tion, illustration will now be made by way of the following examples:
Example 1 - Preparation of grafted EPDM.
The starting polymer is a 2.3 RSY EPDM having an ethylene/propylene molar ratio of 65/35 and having as the termonomer S-ethylidene-2-norbornene, at a level of seven weight percent.
Three hundred grams of the starting rubber, 0.3 grams of Irganox 1076 commercial phenolic antioxidant (Ciba Geigy), and 1150 grams of hexane were charged to a one-gallon Hastelloy C reactor. The ~eactor was sealed, flushed with nitrogen, and heated to 155~ C. Thirty grams ~10 parts per 100 part~ rubber) of glycidyl methacrylate in fifty grams of hexane was pressured into the reactor. This was followed by six grams (2 parts per 100 parts rubber) of dicumyl peroxide (~ercules Di-CUp T) in fifty grams of hexane. The solution was stirred at 500-600 rpm for one hour at 155~ C and 200-250 psig. After the reaction mix-ture cooled down, the product was recovered by precipitation in 3 acetone followed by drying overnight at 75~ C under vacuum.

133~171 Analysis of a purified sample of the product indicated 2.8 weight percent bound glycidyl methacrylate (GMA). The product had an ~SV of 2.2 and a melt flow of 1.2 9/lO miutes. The product was gel free.
Additional examples for preparation of suitable grafted EPDM rubbers which differ ln molecular weight, as meas-ured by viscosity, and the amount of unsaturation and with different grafting agents are given in the aforementioned co-pending Olivier application.
The procedure for blending the grafted EPDM
(EPDM-g-GMA) with the polyester and for carrying out the cross-linking reaction was as follows:
~ lends containing 20~ of the EPDM-g-GMA and 80~
polybutylene terephthalate plastic (PBT) (Valox~315 General Electric Company) were prepared using a specified number of extrusions through a 1~ 8ingle-screw extruder (Rillion~having A L/D ratio of 20/1. Temperatures used for extrusion were 45~~
F in the barrel and 425~ ~ at the die; the screw speed was approximately 35 rpm. The extruded strands were air-cooled and pelletized, and then molded into standard Izod bars (5~ x 1/2~
x 1/8~) using a plunger injection molder. The cavity tempera-ture was maintained at 540~ F, and the mold temperature at 200~ F. The knitline impact samples were molded using a double-gated mold on a screw injection molder, operated with a nozzle temperature of 510~ F, a mold temperature of 140~ F, and a cycle time of 25 secs. The molded test specimens were stored in moisture-proof polyethylene bags for 16-24 hours before test-ing. Notched Izod impact strength was measured according to ASTM D256. Rnitline impact strength was measured on unnotched double-gated samples, in a manner similar to ASTM D256.

~r~J 1 4 Example 2 - Control.
A composition containing 20 percent by weiqht EPsyn 55-g-2.8%GMA, an EPDM of Example 1 grafted to contain 2.8 percent bound qlycidyl methacrylate, and 80 percent by weiqht Valos 315, a polybutylene terephthalate of the General Electric Company of Schnectady, New York, was blended for three passes according to the conditions described in the blending procedure.
The notched Izod impact strength measured 13.5 ft-lbs/inch and the knitline unnotched Izod impact (KLUNI) was 2.2 ft-lbs/inch.
Example 3 The EPsyn 55-g-2.8% GMA from Example 2 was mixed in a Brabender at 150- C with 0.5 parts per hundred parts of rubber (phr) 1,6 hexamethylene dia~ine (HDA). Twenty parts by weight of this material was then blended with eighty parts by weight Valox 315 by three passes in the extruder. The resulting modified PBT had a notched Izod of 12.6 ft-lbs/inch, and a KLUNI of 4.0 ft-lbs/inch.
Example 4 Same procedure as in Example 3, except that 1.25 phr of 1,6 HDA was used. Notched Izod measured at 1.5 ft-lbs~inch, and KLUNI at 6.9 ft-lbs/inch.
Example 5 A blend of 20 parts of the EPsyn 5s-g-2.8~GMA of Example 1 in 80 parts by weight Valox 315 was prepared by two passes through the extruder. This blend was then added to the Brabender Plasticorde~ and mixed with 0.5 phr, 1,6 HDA. The notched Izod measured at 14.7 ft-lbs/inch, and the KLUNI rose to 18.0 ft-lbs/inch.

~r 133ql71 Example 6 Same procedure as in Example 5, except 0.5 phr 1,6 HDA was mixed with the blend in the extruder instead of the Plasticorder. Notched Izod measured at 13.6 ft-lbs/inch, and RLUNI at 16.4 ft-lbs/inch.
Example 7 Same procedure as in Example 6, but 0.36 phr melamine was used as the cross-linking agent instead of the HDA. The notched Izod measured at 13.6 ft-lbs/inch, and the KLUNI at 15.7 ft-lbs/inch.
Example 8 Same procedure as in Example 6, but 1.39 phr Benzo-phenone tetracarboxylic dianhydride (BTDA) was used instead of the 1,6 HDA as the cross-linking agent. Notched Izod measured at 13.8 ft-lbs/inch and RLUNI at 18.1 ft-lbs/inch.
Example 9 Same procedure as in Example 6, but 1.44 phr adipic acid was used instead of the HDA. Notched Izod measured at 13.5 ft-lbs/inch, and RLUNI at 15.5 ft-lbs/inch.
Example 10 Same procedure as in the control, but 0.8 phr of 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di~t-butylperoxy) hexane (DBPH) was used as the cross-linking agent. Notched Izod measured at 0.87 ft-lbs/inch, and RLUNI at 7.4 ft-lbs/inch.
Example 11 Same procedure as Example 6, but 1.6 phr of DBPH was used as the cross-linking agent instead of the 1,6 HDA.
Notched Izod measured at 12.7 ft-lbs/inch, and RLUNI at 4.5 ft-lbs/inch.

.= ~
2~ .

Example 12 Same procedure as in the control, but the modifier was 17.5% EPsyn 55-g-2.8%GMA and 2.5% EP-g-2.6~ maleic anhydride (MAH), an ethylene-propylene copolymer grafted to contain 2.6% bound maleic-anhydride. ~This anhydride functionality was used to provide "rubber-bound cross-linking sites.~) Notched Izod meas~red at 2.1 ft-lbs/inch, and RLUNI
at 11.8 ft-lbs/inch.
Example 13 Same procedure as in Example 6. However, the modifier was 17.5% EPsyn-55-g-2.8%GMA, and was blended with Valox 315 PBT for two passes in the extruder. Subsequently 2.5~ EP-g-2.6%MA~ was added and two more passes were made.
Notched Izod measured at 12.1 ft-lbs/inch, and RLUNI at 11.9 ft-lbs/inch.
The conditions of preparation and pertinent biend properties of Examples 2-13 are summarized in Table I below.

TABLE I
Equipment( 1Crosslinking Level 7 ~
ExamD'e Used Agent(phr) Timing( )Nl~ ) KLUNI~
2 BB None - . - 13.52.2 3 BB HDA(2) o 5 Before 12.64.0 4 BB HDA 1 25 Before 1.56.9 BB HDA 0.5 After 14.718.0 6 Extr. HDA 0.5 After 13.616.4 7 Extr. Melamine0.36 After 13.615.7 8 Extr. BTDA(3)1.39 After 13.818.1 9 Extr. AA(4) 1.44 After 13.5 ~ 15.5 BB DBPH(5) 0.8 Before 0.87 7.4 11 E~tr. DBPH 1.6 After 12.7 4.5 12 BB EPM-g-MAH(6) 14.3 Before2.1 11.8 13 Extr. EPM-g-MAH14.3 After 12.1 11.9 (1) BB ~ 8rabender Plasticorder; Extr. z Single Screw ex-truder.
(2) HDA ~ 1,6 ~exane diaminc.
(3) BTDA ~ Benzophenone tetracarboxylic dianhydride.
(~) AA ~ Adipic acid.

(5) DBPH ~ 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di~t-butylperoxy) hexane.

(6) EPM-g-MAH 3 Ethylene propylene copolymer qrafted to -contain 2.6~ bound maleic anhydride.

(7) Order of addition of cross-linking agent relative to dispersing the modifier in the polyester.
~8) Notched Izod lmpact strength, ft.-lbs./inch.
~9) ~nitline unnotched Izod impact strength, ft.-lbs./inch.
A comparison of the knitline unnotched impact strength of Example 2, having no cross-linking agent, and those of Exam-ples 3-13, containing a cross-linking agent, clearly demon-strates an improvement in knitline strength achieved by cross-linking the modifier phase. It-will be noted that, although improvement in knitline strength is re~lized in all cases where a cross-llnking agent is used, the improvement proceeds witho~t deterioration of notched Izod ~mpact strength, when the cross-linking agent is added to a blend containinq the predispersed modifier. Furthermore, the examples demonstrate the utility of diamines (Examples 3-6), triamines (Example 7), dianhydrides (Example 8), diacid (Example 9), peroxides (Examples 10, 11) and polymers ~Examples 12, 13) as cross-linking agents for the modified polyester blends of this invention.
As described in the aforementioned Olivier International publication W0-86/04076 on 07/17/86, when the EPDM rubber is grafted with an epoxy functional ester of acrylic acid, optimum results are incapable of being achieved, perhaps because of excess cross-linking taking place during the grafting reaction whereby the grafted rubber ~tJ~
t~ -18-133917~

becomes a poor modif~e~ for polyester ~esins. It is disclosed in the aforementioned Olivler publication W0-86/04076 that this deficiency can be overcome somewhat by minimizing the amount of cross-linking during the grafting reaction there~y to enhance use of a glycidyl acrylate or other acrylate having an epoxide functionality in modifying the backbone rub~er for use as a modifier for polyester resins. It is disclosed in the afore-mentioned Oliver publication W0-86/04076 that this can be acheived by carrying out the grafting reaction in the presence of an additional component that acts to inhibit cross-linking -~ith the graft monomer during the grafting process as by the inclusion of, for example, methyl methacrylate as an additional monomer during graftinq the unsaturated rubber with glycidyl acrylate. Such acrylate modified backbone rubbers are also suitable for post dispersion reaction with a cross-linking agent in accordance with the practice of this invention as illustrated by the following examples.
Example 14 ~ he base rubber of Example 1 was grafted with 5 parts glycidyl acrylate, S parts methyl methacrylate, and 2 parts dicumyl peroxide per 100 parts rubber in the manner of Examp!e 1. ~nalysis of a pu~ified sample of the product indicated a degree of grafting of 2.0~ GA. ~o analysis for bound methyl methacrylate was made. The product had an RSV of 2.5 and a melt flow of 0.5 9/lO minutes. The product was gel free.
Example 15 A blend is prepared in the manner and composition of Example 5, except that the grafted rubber of Example 14 is used in place of the grafted rubber of Example 1.

.. --1 9--

Claims (16)

1. A method for producing a thermoplastic composition of a polyester resin matrix having improved unnotched Izod impact strength at the knitline and improved notched Izod impact strength comprising blending 60 to 90 parts by weight of the matrix resin with 40 to 10 parts by weight of a backbone rubber formed by interpolymerization of ethylene, a mono-olefin having from 3 to 16 carbon atoms and a polyene grafted with an ester of methacrylic acid or acrylic acid having an epoxide functionality on the alkoxy portion of the ester, said ester being present in a range of about 1.5 to 20 percent by weight based on the weight of the rubber to disperse the rubber in the matrix, and then reacting the dispersion with a cross-linking agent selected from the group consisting of diamine and diacid or its anhydride to provide a cross-linking limited primarily to the rubber phase.

2. The method of Claim 1, in which the mono-olefin is propylene.

3. The method of Claim 1, in which the polyene is 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene.

4. The method of Claim 1, in which the ester of methacrylic acid is glycidyl methacrylate.

5. The method of Claim 1, in which the ester of acrylic acid is glycidyl acrylate and wherein the grafting reaction is carried out in the presence of an unsaturated monomer which suppresses undesired cross-linking during the grafting.

6. The method as claimed in Claim 5, in which the unsaturated monomer is methyl methacrylate.

7. The method as claimed in Claim 1, in which the cross-linking agent is hexamethylene diamine.

8. The method as claimed in Claim 1, in which the cross-linking agent is reacted with the grafted interpolymer before blending with the matrix resin.

9. The method as claimed in Claim 1, in which the cross-linking agent is reacted concurrently with the blending of the grafted rubber and the matrix resin.

10. A polyester having improved unnotched Izod impact strength at the knitline while retaining its notched Izod impact strength comprising 60 to 90 parts by weight of the polyester matrix resin having dispersed therein 40 to 10 parts by weight of an impact modifier in the form of an interpolymer rubber of ethylene, a mono-olefin having from 3 to 16 carbon atoms and a polyene, in which the interpolymer is grafted from 1.5 to 20 percent by weight based on the weight of the rubber with an ester of methacrylic acid or acrylic acid having an epoxide functionality on the alkoxy portion, and in which the formed dispersion is reacted with a cross-linking agent selected from the group consisting of a diamine and a diacid or its anhydride which cross-links primarily with the rubber phase.

11. A polyester as claimed in Claim 10, in which the mono-olefin is propylene.

12. A polyester as claimed in Claim 10, in which the polyene is 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene.

13. A polyester as claimed in Claim 10, in which the ester of methacrylic acid is glycidyl methacrylate.

14. A polyester as claimed in Claim 10, in which the ester of acrylic acid is glycidyl acrylate and wherein the grafting reaction is carried out in the presence of an unsaturated monomer which suppresses cross-linking during the grafting.

15. A polyester as claimed in Claim 10, in which the unsaturated monomer is methyl methacrylate.

16. A polyester as claimed in Claim 10, in which the cross-linking agent is hexamethylene diamine.