CA1337732C - Process for the production of paper - Google Patents
Process for the production of paperInfo
- Publication number
- CA1337732C CA1337732C CA000616855A CA616855A CA1337732C CA 1337732 C CA1337732 C CA 1337732C CA 000616855 A CA000616855 A CA 000616855A CA 616855 A CA616855 A CA 616855A CA 1337732 C CA1337732 C CA 1337732C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- process according
- aluminum compound
- silicic acid
- cationic
- suspension
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Paper (AREA)
Abstract
A process for the production of paper by forming and dewatering a suspension of cellulose containing fibres, and optional fillers, on a wire. The forming and dewatering is carried out in the presence of a combination of a cationic retention agent and a polymeric silicic acid having a high specific surface area. The combination of substances improves dewatering and retention of fines and fillers.
Description
The present invention relates to a process for production of paper utilizing a special combination of substances for improvement of retention and dewatering. More particularly the invention relates to the use of a special combination of polymeric silicic acid and a cationic retention agent.
The application is a divisional of Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 600,546 filed May 24, 1989.
It is well-known to utilize combinations of cationic retention agents and inorganic silica based colloids in the production of paper for improved retention and drainage. European Patent 41056 discloses the use of cationic starch in combination with silicic acid sols for this purpose and European Patent Application 218674 discloses combinations of cationic polyacrylamides and silica sols. From U.S.
Patent 4,643,801 it is further known to utilize a combination of cationic starch, anionic silica sol and an anionic high molecular weight polymer in the production of paper. The three-component system according to the U.S. patent can be used in combination with aluminum compounds such as alum, sodium aluminate and polyaluminum hydroxychloride.
The commercial silica based colloids which have been increasingly used in papermaking during the last few years are of the type which has colloidal particles generally with a particle size of from about 4nm to about 7nm, i.e. a specific surface area of from about 700 to about 300 m2/g, although it is known, for example from European Patent 41056, to use polymeric silicic acid in papermaking. It has generally been considered that colloidal silicic acid sols with particles of above given size give the best results and these have also been preferred with regard to stability.
-- 2 -- .~
According to the present invention it has surprisingly been found that a system comprising a cationic polymeric retention agent and a polymeric silicic acid, also called polysilicic acid, with very high specific surface area provides an increase in retention and dewatering effect. As a result of the improved dewatering, the speed of the paper machine can be increased and, in addition, less water has to be brought away in the press and drying sections of the paper machine and thus a substantially improved papermaking process with regard to economy is obtained. The combinations according to the invention give an improved strength of the flocks and this in turn means that higher shearing forces can be utilized in the paper production without negative effects.
Stocks containing pulp produced according to the sulphate method for the production of different kinds of paper qualities most often have high contents of salt, and particularly of the sodium sulphate, which give a high ionic strength which can have a negative influence on the effect of the paper chemicals that are used. It has been found that the present systems have a very good tolerance to such high contents of salt and that they give a considerably improved effect in such stocks in comparison with corresponding systems with silica based colloids of the commercial type. Also for wood containing stock and stocks of recycled fibres with high contents of dissolved organic substances better effects are obtained according to the present invention than with commercial silica sols.
The present invention thus relates to a process for the production of paper by forming and dewatering a suspension of cellulose containing fibres, and optionally fillers, on a wire, whereby the ~ 337732 forming and dewatering takes place in the presence of a cationic polymeric retention agent and a polymeric silicic acid having a specific surface area of at least 1050 m2/g.
An embodiment is also described herein in which the retention and dewatering effect provided by the system based on the cationic polymeric retention agent and polymeric silicic acid is considerably increased by the presence of an aluminum compound, thus forming a three-component system.
The three components can be added to the fibre suspension in arbitrary order. The best results are generally obtained if the aluminum compound is included and is added before the two other components.
The combination according to the invention can be used for stocks within a broad pH range, from about 4 to about 10. At about neutral pH, 6 to 7, almost equally good results are obtained independent of the order of addition for the cationic retention agent and the polymeric silicic acid. At a more acid pH, below 6, it is preferred to add the polymeric silicic acid before the cationic retention agent while, as a rule, better effect is obtained if the polymeric silicic acid is added after the cationic retention agent for stocks with a pH above 7.
As aluminum compound, when employed, any such compound known for use in paper production can be utilized, for example alum, polyaluminum compounds, aluminates, aluminum chloride and aluminum nitrate.
Alum and sodium aluminate are especially suitable.
Particularly ~ood results have been obtained with sodium aluminate and thus this compound, which also is cheap, is preferred as aluminum source.
~ 337732 Alum and sodium aluminate are ~well known paper chèmicals and thus do not require any further definition. Polyaluminum compounds are to be understood as compounds known per se for use in papermaking. Polyaluminum compounds are termed basic and consist of polynuclear complexes. The polyaluminum compounds, in aqueous solution, contain at least 4 aluminum atoms per ion and preferably at least 10. The upper amount of aluminum atoms in the complexes is dependent on the composition of the aqueous phase and can vary, for example depending on the concentration and the pH. Normally the amount does not exceed 30. The molar ratio of aluminum to counter ion, with the exception of hydroxide ions, should be at least 0.4:1 and preferably at least 0.6:1. As example of a suitable polyaluminum compound can be mentioned compounds with the net formula n[A12(0H)mC16-m]
which have a basicity of from 30 to 90%, preferably from 33 to 83% (m=2 and m=5, respectively). Basicity is defined as the number of OH-groups divided by the number of OH groups and chloride ions x 100, i.e.
(m:6)xl00. The polyaluminum compound can also contain other anions than chloride ions, e.g. anions from sulphuric acid, phosphoric acid, organic acids such as citric acid and oxalic acid. The most common type of polyaluminum compounds has m=3, i.e. A12(OH)3C13 with a basicity of about 50% and compounds of this type, both such containinq sulphase and such free from sulphate, are commercially available.
As cationic polymeric retention agent such which are conventionally used in papermaking can be used according to the present invention and they can be based on carbohydrates or be synthetic. As examples of suitable cationic retention agents can be mentioned cationic starch, cationic guar gum, cationic polyacrylamides, polyethyleneimines and polyamidoamines. Cationic starch and cationic polyacrylamides are the preferred cationic retention agents.
The polymeric silicic acid which is used as anionic inorganic substance in the present combination has a very high specific surface area, which at lowest is 1050 m2/g. The particles suitably have a specific surface area within the range of from 1100 to 1700 m2/g and preferably within the range of from 1200 to 1600 m2/g. The given specific surface area is measured by means of titration according to the method disclosed by Sears in Analytical Chemistry 28 (1956~
1981. The polymeric silicic acid can be prepared by acidification of alkali metal silicate, such as potassium or sodium water glass, preferably sodium water glass. These are available with varying molar ratios of SiO2 to Na2O or K2O and the molar ratio is usually within the range of from 1.5:1 to 4.5:1 and the water glass usually has an original pH around 13 or above 13. Any such alkali metal silicate or water glass can be used for the preparation of the fine particle polymeric silicic acids and this preparation is carried out by acidification of a diluted aqueous solution of the silicate. For the acidification mineral acids, such as sulphuric acid, hydrochloric acid and phosphoric acid, or acid ion exchange resins can for example be used. A number of other chemicals for acidification at production of polysilicic acid are also known and some examples of such other chemicals are ammonium sulphate and carbon dioxide.
Mineral acids or acid ion exchange resins or combinations of these are suitably used. The acidification is carried out to a pH within the range of from 1 to 9 and suitably to a pH within the range of from 1.5 to 4. The polymeric silicic acid which is termed activated silicic acid, which is prepared by partial neutralization of the alkali metal content to a pH o~ about 8 to 9 and polymerization usually during about half an hour to an hour, can be used as such directly thereafter but must otherwise be diluted to a content of not more than 1 per cent by weight for interrupting the polymerization or be acidified to the preferred pH range in order to avoid gelation.
The acidification according to the above is most suitably carried out by means of acid ion exchangers, among other things to get more stable products and to avoid that salts from the acidification are added to the stock through the polymeric silicic acid. The polymeric silicic acid which is formed at the acidification consists of macromolecules or particles of a size of the order to lnm which form voluminous chains and networks.
Compared with the silica sols of larger particle size which are used commercially in papermaking those which are utilized according to the present invention are considerably less stable both with regard to stability in relation to concentration and stability at storage.
The polymeric silicic acids should thus after the acidification suitably not be present in high concentrations than about 5 per cent by weight, and preferably not higher than 2 per cent by welght. They should not be stored for too long times but it has, nonetheless, been found that a certain storage time can be advantageous. Thus, for example, a storage of a day or a couple of days at a concentration of not more than about 4 to 5 per cent by weight is entirely acceptable with regard to stability and can even result in an improved effect. At a concentration of 1%, or below, storage for two to three weeks without impaired stability is possible and all the time with good effect, or even better effect than without storage. After storage for about three weeks at room temperature an initial gelation is noticeable. The polymeric silicic acid is principally uncharged at a pH of about 2.0 but anionically charged in the stock with increasing negative charge with increasing stock pH.
The polymeric silicic acids which are used according to the present process should thus be produced in connection with their use and such a production at the location in or close to a paper mill is per se advantageous in that cheap raw materials and simple preparation processes are used. The economy of the present process will thus be very good since the polymeric silicic acid is economically advantageous and the aluminum compounds give a considerable increase in effect.
The amount of polymeric silicic acid and cationic retention agent in paper production according to the present invention can vary within wide limits depending among other things on the type of stock, the presence of fillers and other conditions. The amount of polymeric silicic acid should be at least 0.01 kg/ton, calculated as dry on dry fibres and optional fillers, and is suitably within the range of 0.1 to 5 kg/ton and preferably within the range of from 0.1 to
The application is a divisional of Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 600,546 filed May 24, 1989.
It is well-known to utilize combinations of cationic retention agents and inorganic silica based colloids in the production of paper for improved retention and drainage. European Patent 41056 discloses the use of cationic starch in combination with silicic acid sols for this purpose and European Patent Application 218674 discloses combinations of cationic polyacrylamides and silica sols. From U.S.
Patent 4,643,801 it is further known to utilize a combination of cationic starch, anionic silica sol and an anionic high molecular weight polymer in the production of paper. The three-component system according to the U.S. patent can be used in combination with aluminum compounds such as alum, sodium aluminate and polyaluminum hydroxychloride.
The commercial silica based colloids which have been increasingly used in papermaking during the last few years are of the type which has colloidal particles generally with a particle size of from about 4nm to about 7nm, i.e. a specific surface area of from about 700 to about 300 m2/g, although it is known, for example from European Patent 41056, to use polymeric silicic acid in papermaking. It has generally been considered that colloidal silicic acid sols with particles of above given size give the best results and these have also been preferred with regard to stability.
-- 2 -- .~
According to the present invention it has surprisingly been found that a system comprising a cationic polymeric retention agent and a polymeric silicic acid, also called polysilicic acid, with very high specific surface area provides an increase in retention and dewatering effect. As a result of the improved dewatering, the speed of the paper machine can be increased and, in addition, less water has to be brought away in the press and drying sections of the paper machine and thus a substantially improved papermaking process with regard to economy is obtained. The combinations according to the invention give an improved strength of the flocks and this in turn means that higher shearing forces can be utilized in the paper production without negative effects.
Stocks containing pulp produced according to the sulphate method for the production of different kinds of paper qualities most often have high contents of salt, and particularly of the sodium sulphate, which give a high ionic strength which can have a negative influence on the effect of the paper chemicals that are used. It has been found that the present systems have a very good tolerance to such high contents of salt and that they give a considerably improved effect in such stocks in comparison with corresponding systems with silica based colloids of the commercial type. Also for wood containing stock and stocks of recycled fibres with high contents of dissolved organic substances better effects are obtained according to the present invention than with commercial silica sols.
The present invention thus relates to a process for the production of paper by forming and dewatering a suspension of cellulose containing fibres, and optionally fillers, on a wire, whereby the ~ 337732 forming and dewatering takes place in the presence of a cationic polymeric retention agent and a polymeric silicic acid having a specific surface area of at least 1050 m2/g.
An embodiment is also described herein in which the retention and dewatering effect provided by the system based on the cationic polymeric retention agent and polymeric silicic acid is considerably increased by the presence of an aluminum compound, thus forming a three-component system.
The three components can be added to the fibre suspension in arbitrary order. The best results are generally obtained if the aluminum compound is included and is added before the two other components.
The combination according to the invention can be used for stocks within a broad pH range, from about 4 to about 10. At about neutral pH, 6 to 7, almost equally good results are obtained independent of the order of addition for the cationic retention agent and the polymeric silicic acid. At a more acid pH, below 6, it is preferred to add the polymeric silicic acid before the cationic retention agent while, as a rule, better effect is obtained if the polymeric silicic acid is added after the cationic retention agent for stocks with a pH above 7.
As aluminum compound, when employed, any such compound known for use in paper production can be utilized, for example alum, polyaluminum compounds, aluminates, aluminum chloride and aluminum nitrate.
Alum and sodium aluminate are especially suitable.
Particularly ~ood results have been obtained with sodium aluminate and thus this compound, which also is cheap, is preferred as aluminum source.
~ 337732 Alum and sodium aluminate are ~well known paper chèmicals and thus do not require any further definition. Polyaluminum compounds are to be understood as compounds known per se for use in papermaking. Polyaluminum compounds are termed basic and consist of polynuclear complexes. The polyaluminum compounds, in aqueous solution, contain at least 4 aluminum atoms per ion and preferably at least 10. The upper amount of aluminum atoms in the complexes is dependent on the composition of the aqueous phase and can vary, for example depending on the concentration and the pH. Normally the amount does not exceed 30. The molar ratio of aluminum to counter ion, with the exception of hydroxide ions, should be at least 0.4:1 and preferably at least 0.6:1. As example of a suitable polyaluminum compound can be mentioned compounds with the net formula n[A12(0H)mC16-m]
which have a basicity of from 30 to 90%, preferably from 33 to 83% (m=2 and m=5, respectively). Basicity is defined as the number of OH-groups divided by the number of OH groups and chloride ions x 100, i.e.
(m:6)xl00. The polyaluminum compound can also contain other anions than chloride ions, e.g. anions from sulphuric acid, phosphoric acid, organic acids such as citric acid and oxalic acid. The most common type of polyaluminum compounds has m=3, i.e. A12(OH)3C13 with a basicity of about 50% and compounds of this type, both such containinq sulphase and such free from sulphate, are commercially available.
As cationic polymeric retention agent such which are conventionally used in papermaking can be used according to the present invention and they can be based on carbohydrates or be synthetic. As examples of suitable cationic retention agents can be mentioned cationic starch, cationic guar gum, cationic polyacrylamides, polyethyleneimines and polyamidoamines. Cationic starch and cationic polyacrylamides are the preferred cationic retention agents.
The polymeric silicic acid which is used as anionic inorganic substance in the present combination has a very high specific surface area, which at lowest is 1050 m2/g. The particles suitably have a specific surface area within the range of from 1100 to 1700 m2/g and preferably within the range of from 1200 to 1600 m2/g. The given specific surface area is measured by means of titration according to the method disclosed by Sears in Analytical Chemistry 28 (1956~
1981. The polymeric silicic acid can be prepared by acidification of alkali metal silicate, such as potassium or sodium water glass, preferably sodium water glass. These are available with varying molar ratios of SiO2 to Na2O or K2O and the molar ratio is usually within the range of from 1.5:1 to 4.5:1 and the water glass usually has an original pH around 13 or above 13. Any such alkali metal silicate or water glass can be used for the preparation of the fine particle polymeric silicic acids and this preparation is carried out by acidification of a diluted aqueous solution of the silicate. For the acidification mineral acids, such as sulphuric acid, hydrochloric acid and phosphoric acid, or acid ion exchange resins can for example be used. A number of other chemicals for acidification at production of polysilicic acid are also known and some examples of such other chemicals are ammonium sulphate and carbon dioxide.
Mineral acids or acid ion exchange resins or combinations of these are suitably used. The acidification is carried out to a pH within the range of from 1 to 9 and suitably to a pH within the range of from 1.5 to 4. The polymeric silicic acid which is termed activated silicic acid, which is prepared by partial neutralization of the alkali metal content to a pH o~ about 8 to 9 and polymerization usually during about half an hour to an hour, can be used as such directly thereafter but must otherwise be diluted to a content of not more than 1 per cent by weight for interrupting the polymerization or be acidified to the preferred pH range in order to avoid gelation.
The acidification according to the above is most suitably carried out by means of acid ion exchangers, among other things to get more stable products and to avoid that salts from the acidification are added to the stock through the polymeric silicic acid. The polymeric silicic acid which is formed at the acidification consists of macromolecules or particles of a size of the order to lnm which form voluminous chains and networks.
Compared with the silica sols of larger particle size which are used commercially in papermaking those which are utilized according to the present invention are considerably less stable both with regard to stability in relation to concentration and stability at storage.
The polymeric silicic acids should thus after the acidification suitably not be present in high concentrations than about 5 per cent by weight, and preferably not higher than 2 per cent by welght. They should not be stored for too long times but it has, nonetheless, been found that a certain storage time can be advantageous. Thus, for example, a storage of a day or a couple of days at a concentration of not more than about 4 to 5 per cent by weight is entirely acceptable with regard to stability and can even result in an improved effect. At a concentration of 1%, or below, storage for two to three weeks without impaired stability is possible and all the time with good effect, or even better effect than without storage. After storage for about three weeks at room temperature an initial gelation is noticeable. The polymeric silicic acid is principally uncharged at a pH of about 2.0 but anionically charged in the stock with increasing negative charge with increasing stock pH.
The polymeric silicic acids which are used according to the present process should thus be produced in connection with their use and such a production at the location in or close to a paper mill is per se advantageous in that cheap raw materials and simple preparation processes are used. The economy of the present process will thus be very good since the polymeric silicic acid is economically advantageous and the aluminum compounds give a considerable increase in effect.
The amount of polymeric silicic acid and cationic retention agent in paper production according to the present invention can vary within wide limits depending among other things on the type of stock, the presence of fillers and other conditions. The amount of polymeric silicic acid should be at least 0.01 kg/ton, calculated as dry on dry fibres and optional fillers, and is suitably within the range of 0.1 to 5 kg/ton and preferably within the range of from 0.1 to
2 kg/ton. The polymeric silicic acid is suitably added to the stock in the form of aqueous solutions having dry contents within the range of from 0.1 to 1 per cent by weight. The amount of cationic retention _ - 8 - ~ 337732 agent to polymeric silicic acid is highly dependent on the type of cationic retention agent and other effects desired from this. The weight ratio of cationic retention agent to polymeric silicic acid should usually be at least 0.01:1 and suitably at least 0.2:1. The upper limit for the cationic retention agent is first of all a question of economy and of charge. For retention agents with lower cationicity such as cationic starch very high amounts can thus be used, up to a ratio of 100:1 and higher, and the limit is mainly set by reasons of economy. For most other systems suitable ratios of cationic retention agent to polymeric silicic acid are within the range of from 0.2:1 to 20:1. The amount of aluminum compound can also vary within wide limits and it is suitable to use the aluminum compound in a weight ratio to the polymeric silicic acid of at least 0.01:1, whereby the aluminum compound has been calculated at A12O3.
Suitably the ratio does not exceed 3:1 and is preferably within the range of from 0.02:1 to 1.5:1 and most preferably within the range of from 0.05:1 to 0.7:1.
The present two- or three-component system can be used in the production of paper from different types of stocks of cellulose containing fibres and the stocks should suitably contain at least 50 per cent by weight of such fibres. The components can for example be used as additives to stocks from fibres from chemical pulp, such as sulphate and sulphite pulp, thermomechanical pulp, refiner mechanical pulp or groundwood pulp, from as well hardwood as softwood and can also be used for stocks based on recycled fibres.
The stocks can also contain mineral fillers of conventional types such as kaolin, titanium dioxide, gypsum, chalk and talcum. Particularly good results have been obtained with stocks which are usually considered as difficult and which contain comparatively high amounts of non-cellulose substances such as lignin and dissolved organic materials, for example different types of mechanical pulps such as groundwood pulp. The combinations according to the invention are particularly suitable for stocks containing at least 25 per cent by weight of mechanical pulp. It should also be mentioned that the combination according to the invention has shown superior properties for stock which have a high ionic strength due to the presence of salts, such as sodium sulphate, which often occur as residual chemicals from the original pulp. production, the bleaching or from recycled fibres. The terms paper and paper production which are used herein do of course include, in addition to paper, pulp sheets, board and paper board prepared from stock containing mainly cellulose containing fibers.
In the present process for the production of paper conventional other paper additives can of course be used in addition to the three components according to the invention. Fillers have been discussed above and as examples of other additives can be mentioned hydrophobing agents, based on rosin or synthetic hydrophobing agents, wet strength resins, etc.
Both the two-component and three-component systems described herein are further illustrated in the following examples which, however, are not intended to limit the same. Parts and per cent relate to parts by weight and per cent by weight respectively, unless otherwise stated.
-` 1 337732 Example 1 A polymeric silicic acid was prepared as follows.
Water glass (Na2O.3.3SiO2) was diluted with water to a SiO2 content of 5 per cent by weight. The aqueous solution was ion exchanged using ion exchange resin Amberlite*IR-120 to a pH of 2.3. The specific surface area of the obtained acid polymeric silicic acid was measured by titration according to the mentioned method and found to be 1450m2/g.
Example 2 In this test the dewatering was evaluated with a "Canadian ~reeness Tester" which is the conventional method for characterizing drainage according to SCAN-C 21:65. All additions of chemicals were made in a "Britt Dynamic Drainage Jar" with a blocked outlet at a stirring speed of 800 rpm during 45 seconds and the stock system was then transferred to the Canadian Freeness apparatus.
The stock was a groundwood pulp beaten to 120 ml CSF. The aluminum compound used was sodium aluminate and -the cationic retention agent was cationic starch. The polymeric silicic acid according to Example 1 was used and comparisons were made with a commercial silica sol produced by Eka Nobel AB and having a specific surface area of 500m2/g. The cationic starch (CS) with a D.S. of about 0.035 was in all tests added in an amount corresponding to lOkg/ton dry pulp. The polymeric silicic acid (=the polysi-licic acid) and the commercial sol for comparison were added in an amount corresponding to 1 kg, calculated as SiO2, per ton dry pulp and the amount of aluminate, calcu-lated as A12O3, was 0.15 kg/t when it was added. The tests were carried out at a pH of 8.5 and with varying addi-tions, g/l stock, of salt, Na2SO4.10H2O. The aluminate was added first in all tests, the cationic retention agent was added subsequently and lastly the polysilicic acid or the commercial sol was added.
*trade mark _ ~ I 337732 Salt A123 CS Polysilicic Commercial CSF
g/l kg/t kg/t acid kg/t . sol kg/t ml - 0.15 10 1 - 430 - - lo - 1 280 - 0.15 10 - 1 365 0.5 - 10 1 - 300 0.5 0.15 10 1 - 410 0.5 - 10 - 1 265 0.5 0.15 10 - 1 310 2.0 - 10 1 - 280 2.0 0.15 10 1 - 375 2.0 - 10 - 1 240 2.0 0.15 10 - 1 295 Example 3 Wlth the same stock, groundwood pulp beaten to 120 ml CSF, and the same procedure as in Example 2 tests were carried out at different pH of the stock and using different cationic retention agents, catlonic guar gum, (guar), cationic polyacrylamide (PAM) sold by Allied Colloids under the designation Percol*140, and polyethyl-eneimine (PEI) sold by BASF under the designation Polymin*
SK. 0.5 g/l of Na2S04.10H20 had been added to the stock.
Sodium aluminate was used as the aluminum compound. The retention agent was in all tests added to the pulp before addition of the polymeric silicic acid according to Example 1.
pH A123 Ret.agent Polysilicic CSF
kg/t type/kg/t acid kg/t ml 7.5 - guar/3.3 1 300 7.5 0.15 guar/3.3 1 375 5.5 - PEI/0.67 1 205 *trade mark 5.50.60 PEI/0.67 1 270 7.o - PAM/0.67 1 220 7.00.15 PAM/0.67 1 275 Example 4 ; In this example a standard pulp of 60% bleached birch sulphate pulp and 40% bleached pine sulphate pulp with 30%
added chalk and 0.5 g/l of added Na2SO4.10H2O was used. The pH of the stock was 8.5 and the freeness tests were carried out as in Example 2. The order of addition was as follows:
aluminum compound, cationic starch (CS) and then polysili-cic acid or commercial sol according to Example 2 for comparison. In addition to aluminate tests were also made with alum, aluminum chloride (AlC13) and polyaluminum chloride (PAC). The last mentioned compound was the poly-aluminum chloride sold by Hoechst AG under the designation Povimal* The amounts for all the aluminum compounds are given as A12O3. The original CSF for the stock was 295.
20 Al-compound CS Polysilicic Commercial CSF
type/kg/t kg/t acid kg/t sol kg/t ml aluminate/0.15 10 1 - 710 alum/0.15 10 1 - 695 AlC13/0.15 10 1 - 690 PAC/0.15 10 1 - 690 Comparison:
aluminate/0.15 10 - 1 570 The polysilicic acid, according to Example 1, which was used in this Example had been stored as a 5% solution for about one day and thereafter as a 0.15% solution for 8 hours. When the test was made with the polysilic acid according to Example 1 directly after its preparation, in an amount of 1 kg/t using 0.15 kg/t of aluminate, calcu-lated as A12O3, and 10 kg of cationic starch, the CSF was 625 ml. When the tests were repeated with the same poly-silicic acid stored for 25 and 75 hours respectively, as a 0.15~ solution, the same good results as shown in the Table above were obtained, and ln some cases even somewhat better results, and likewise so when the polyslliclc acid had first been stored as a 1% solution for 2 days and then elther as a 0.15% solution or as a 1% solution for 1 day.
Example 5 In this example the retention of fillers and fine fibres was measured. The stock was made up from 25% chemi-cal pulp and 75% groundwood pulp and contained 30% chalk.
0.5 g/l of Na2SO4.10H2O had been added to the stock which had a concentration of 5.1 g/l and a pH of 8.5. The content of fines in the stock was 48.1%. The retention measurements were made with a "Britt Dynamic Jar" at a rpm of 1000.
Aluminate was used as aluminum compound in an amount of 0.15 kg/t calculated as A12O3. The cationic retention agent was cationic starch and it was added in an amount of lOkg/t and the polysilicic acid was added in an amount of 1 kg/t. All amounts are on dry stock system (fibres and fillers). Some different polysilic acids were used: A) a polysilicic acid according to Example 1 which was used directly after its preparation. B) a polysilicic acid prepared according to the following: A water glass (Na2O.3.3SiO2) solution, 1% with regard to SiO2, was ion exchanged to pH 2.3 and stored for one week. The polysill-cic acid had a specific surface area of about 1600m2/g. C) a polysilicic acid prepared according to the following:
2.61 g of 97% H2SO4 were diluted to 250 g. 190.5g of 5.25%
Na2O.3.3SlO2 were diluted to 500.4 g. 280.5 g of the last solution were added to the diluted sulphuric acid solution and 530.5 g of polysilicic acid was hereby obtained and - this was diluted with 30.5 g of water and the resulting polysilic acid then had a SiO2 content of 1% and a pH of 2.4. The specific surface area was measu~ed to about 1500m /g. D) a polysilicic acid, activated silica, prepared according to the following: 776.70 g of 5.15% water glass (Na2O.3.3SiO2) were diluted to 1000 g. 15.40 g of 96%
sulphuric acid were diluted to 1000 g. The two solutions were mixed and hereby activated silica with an SiO2 content of 2.0% and a pH of about 8.75 was obtained. This solution was allowed to stand for about 1 hour and was then acidi-fied with additional H2SO4 to a pH of about 2.5 and diluted with water to an SiO2 content of 1.0%. The specific surface area was measured to 1540 m2/g.
A123 kg/t Polysilicic acid Retention %
- A 71.1 0.15 A 85.0 - s 68.0 0.15 B 88.0 - C 40.4 0.15 C 69.0 - D 65.0 15 0.15 D 74.0 Example 6 In this example a stock of groundwood pulp with addition of 0.5g/1 of Na2SO4.10H2O was used. The pulp had been beaten to 120 ml CSF and its pH had been adjusted to 4.5 with H2SO4. Sodium aluminate was used as aluminum compound and added in varying amounts to the given pH.
After addition of aluminate, polysilicic acid according to Example 1 and commercial silica sol according to Example 2 were added and cationic starch (CS) was added lastly. The drainage results in the tests are given in ml CSF.
pH A123 Polysilicic Comm. CS CSF
kg/t acid, kg/t sol kg/t kg/t ml 4.9 0.15 1 - 10 270 5.2 0.30 1 - 10 300 5.5 0.60 1 - 10 380 4.9 0.15 - 1 10 200 5.5 0.60 - 1 10 260 Example 7 In this example the same stock and dosage order as in Example 4 was used and the effect of varying amounts of polysilicic acid, stored as originally in Example 4, and commercial sol, respectively, according to Example 2 was _ 1 337732 investigated. Sodium aluminate was used as aluminum com-pound in all tests and the cationic retentlon agent was -cationic starch (CS). The effect on dewaterlng was evalu-ated as descrlbed earller.
5 A12O3 CS Polysiliclc Comm. CSF
kg/t kg/t acid, kg/t sol, kg/t ml - 10 - 0.25 390 - 10 - 0.5 420 0.04 10 - 0.25 410 0.075 10 - 0.5 450 0.15 10 - 1 570 0.3 10 - 2 590 - 10 0.25 - 460 - 10 0.5 - 520 0.04 10 0.25 - 510 0.075 10 0.5 - 615 0.15 10 1 - 710 0.3 10 2 - 700 Example 8 In this example the dewatering effect wlth different polysllicic acids ln combination wlth sodium aluminate and cationic retention agent, cationic starch (CS) and cationic polyacrylamide (PAM, Percol 292), was investigated. The stock was a groundwood pulp stock with a pH of 7.5 and contained 0.5 g/l of Na2SO4.10H2O. The chemicals were added to the stock in the following order: aluminum compound, cationic retention agent and finally polysilicic acid. CSF
was measured as described earlier. The polysilicic acids used in the tests were B) according to Example 5, C) according to Example 5, D) according to Example 5, E) a polysilicic acid according to B) for which pH had been ad~usted to 8.5 with NaOH and which had then after 10 minutes been diluted to a concentration of 0.15%, F) a polysilicic acid, activated silica, prepared by addition of sulphuric acid to water glass to a solution containing 2%
SiO2 and havlng a pH of 8.7. The solution was diluted to 1%
SiO2 and then used dlrectly, G) a polysillclc acid accord-ing to F) which had been stored for one hour at a pH of 8.7 and a concentration of 2% and then been diluted to 1%
before use.
A123 Cationic retention Polysilicic CSF
kg/t agent type;kg/t acid, type;kg/t ml - CS;10 B;l 310 100.15 CS;10 B;l 520 - CS;10 C;l 290 0.15 CS;10 C;l 460 - CS;10 D;l 280 0.15 CS;10 D;l 435 - CS;10 E;l 300 0.15 CS;10 E;l 485 - CS;10 F;l 295 0.15 CS;10 F;1 470 - CS;10 G;1 310 200.15 CS;10 G;1 510 - PAM;0.67 B;l 390 0.15 PAM;0.67 B;l 475 - PAM;O.67 C;l 345 0.15 PAM;0.67 C;l 430 - PAM;0.67 D;l 385 0.15 PAM;0.67 D;1 465 - PAM;0.67 E;l 370 0.15 PAM;0.67 E;l 450 - PAM;0.67 F;l 360 300.15 PAM;0.67 F;l 435 - PAM;0.67 G;l 365 0.15 PAM;0.67 G;l 460 Example 9 In this example the effect of a combination according to the invention was investigated for a pulp suspension for use in the production of pulp sheets. To half a litre of pulp (60% birch sulfate/40% pine sulfate) having a fibre concentration of 2%, ie 20 g/l, a cationic polyacrylamide was first added at a stirrer speed of 1200 rpm and after 15 seconds the pulp suspension was diluted to 1% and stirred for another 15 seconds. A polysilicic acid according to Example 1 which had been stored as a 5% solution for one day was then added as a 1% solution. After another 15 seconds the pulp was poured into a BUchner funnel. The alumlnum compound was alum, and the addition of this was made about 1 minute before the additlon of the cationic polymer. The time for suction off the water until the surface of the formed pulp sheet was free from visible water was measured.
A123 PAM Polysilicic Time kg/t kg/t acid kg/t sec _ _ - 30 - 0.5 - 22 - 0.5 0.5 16 - 0.5 ` 1.0 14 0.03 0.5 0.25 15 0.06 0.5 0.5 13 200.12 0.5 1.0 11
Suitably the ratio does not exceed 3:1 and is preferably within the range of from 0.02:1 to 1.5:1 and most preferably within the range of from 0.05:1 to 0.7:1.
The present two- or three-component system can be used in the production of paper from different types of stocks of cellulose containing fibres and the stocks should suitably contain at least 50 per cent by weight of such fibres. The components can for example be used as additives to stocks from fibres from chemical pulp, such as sulphate and sulphite pulp, thermomechanical pulp, refiner mechanical pulp or groundwood pulp, from as well hardwood as softwood and can also be used for stocks based on recycled fibres.
The stocks can also contain mineral fillers of conventional types such as kaolin, titanium dioxide, gypsum, chalk and talcum. Particularly good results have been obtained with stocks which are usually considered as difficult and which contain comparatively high amounts of non-cellulose substances such as lignin and dissolved organic materials, for example different types of mechanical pulps such as groundwood pulp. The combinations according to the invention are particularly suitable for stocks containing at least 25 per cent by weight of mechanical pulp. It should also be mentioned that the combination according to the invention has shown superior properties for stock which have a high ionic strength due to the presence of salts, such as sodium sulphate, which often occur as residual chemicals from the original pulp. production, the bleaching or from recycled fibres. The terms paper and paper production which are used herein do of course include, in addition to paper, pulp sheets, board and paper board prepared from stock containing mainly cellulose containing fibers.
In the present process for the production of paper conventional other paper additives can of course be used in addition to the three components according to the invention. Fillers have been discussed above and as examples of other additives can be mentioned hydrophobing agents, based on rosin or synthetic hydrophobing agents, wet strength resins, etc.
Both the two-component and three-component systems described herein are further illustrated in the following examples which, however, are not intended to limit the same. Parts and per cent relate to parts by weight and per cent by weight respectively, unless otherwise stated.
-` 1 337732 Example 1 A polymeric silicic acid was prepared as follows.
Water glass (Na2O.3.3SiO2) was diluted with water to a SiO2 content of 5 per cent by weight. The aqueous solution was ion exchanged using ion exchange resin Amberlite*IR-120 to a pH of 2.3. The specific surface area of the obtained acid polymeric silicic acid was measured by titration according to the mentioned method and found to be 1450m2/g.
Example 2 In this test the dewatering was evaluated with a "Canadian ~reeness Tester" which is the conventional method for characterizing drainage according to SCAN-C 21:65. All additions of chemicals were made in a "Britt Dynamic Drainage Jar" with a blocked outlet at a stirring speed of 800 rpm during 45 seconds and the stock system was then transferred to the Canadian Freeness apparatus.
The stock was a groundwood pulp beaten to 120 ml CSF. The aluminum compound used was sodium aluminate and -the cationic retention agent was cationic starch. The polymeric silicic acid according to Example 1 was used and comparisons were made with a commercial silica sol produced by Eka Nobel AB and having a specific surface area of 500m2/g. The cationic starch (CS) with a D.S. of about 0.035 was in all tests added in an amount corresponding to lOkg/ton dry pulp. The polymeric silicic acid (=the polysi-licic acid) and the commercial sol for comparison were added in an amount corresponding to 1 kg, calculated as SiO2, per ton dry pulp and the amount of aluminate, calcu-lated as A12O3, was 0.15 kg/t when it was added. The tests were carried out at a pH of 8.5 and with varying addi-tions, g/l stock, of salt, Na2SO4.10H2O. The aluminate was added first in all tests, the cationic retention agent was added subsequently and lastly the polysilicic acid or the commercial sol was added.
*trade mark _ ~ I 337732 Salt A123 CS Polysilicic Commercial CSF
g/l kg/t kg/t acid kg/t . sol kg/t ml - 0.15 10 1 - 430 - - lo - 1 280 - 0.15 10 - 1 365 0.5 - 10 1 - 300 0.5 0.15 10 1 - 410 0.5 - 10 - 1 265 0.5 0.15 10 - 1 310 2.0 - 10 1 - 280 2.0 0.15 10 1 - 375 2.0 - 10 - 1 240 2.0 0.15 10 - 1 295 Example 3 Wlth the same stock, groundwood pulp beaten to 120 ml CSF, and the same procedure as in Example 2 tests were carried out at different pH of the stock and using different cationic retention agents, catlonic guar gum, (guar), cationic polyacrylamide (PAM) sold by Allied Colloids under the designation Percol*140, and polyethyl-eneimine (PEI) sold by BASF under the designation Polymin*
SK. 0.5 g/l of Na2S04.10H20 had been added to the stock.
Sodium aluminate was used as the aluminum compound. The retention agent was in all tests added to the pulp before addition of the polymeric silicic acid according to Example 1.
pH A123 Ret.agent Polysilicic CSF
kg/t type/kg/t acid kg/t ml 7.5 - guar/3.3 1 300 7.5 0.15 guar/3.3 1 375 5.5 - PEI/0.67 1 205 *trade mark 5.50.60 PEI/0.67 1 270 7.o - PAM/0.67 1 220 7.00.15 PAM/0.67 1 275 Example 4 ; In this example a standard pulp of 60% bleached birch sulphate pulp and 40% bleached pine sulphate pulp with 30%
added chalk and 0.5 g/l of added Na2SO4.10H2O was used. The pH of the stock was 8.5 and the freeness tests were carried out as in Example 2. The order of addition was as follows:
aluminum compound, cationic starch (CS) and then polysili-cic acid or commercial sol according to Example 2 for comparison. In addition to aluminate tests were also made with alum, aluminum chloride (AlC13) and polyaluminum chloride (PAC). The last mentioned compound was the poly-aluminum chloride sold by Hoechst AG under the designation Povimal* The amounts for all the aluminum compounds are given as A12O3. The original CSF for the stock was 295.
20 Al-compound CS Polysilicic Commercial CSF
type/kg/t kg/t acid kg/t sol kg/t ml aluminate/0.15 10 1 - 710 alum/0.15 10 1 - 695 AlC13/0.15 10 1 - 690 PAC/0.15 10 1 - 690 Comparison:
aluminate/0.15 10 - 1 570 The polysilicic acid, according to Example 1, which was used in this Example had been stored as a 5% solution for about one day and thereafter as a 0.15% solution for 8 hours. When the test was made with the polysilic acid according to Example 1 directly after its preparation, in an amount of 1 kg/t using 0.15 kg/t of aluminate, calcu-lated as A12O3, and 10 kg of cationic starch, the CSF was 625 ml. When the tests were repeated with the same poly-silicic acid stored for 25 and 75 hours respectively, as a 0.15~ solution, the same good results as shown in the Table above were obtained, and ln some cases even somewhat better results, and likewise so when the polyslliclc acid had first been stored as a 1% solution for 2 days and then elther as a 0.15% solution or as a 1% solution for 1 day.
Example 5 In this example the retention of fillers and fine fibres was measured. The stock was made up from 25% chemi-cal pulp and 75% groundwood pulp and contained 30% chalk.
0.5 g/l of Na2SO4.10H2O had been added to the stock which had a concentration of 5.1 g/l and a pH of 8.5. The content of fines in the stock was 48.1%. The retention measurements were made with a "Britt Dynamic Jar" at a rpm of 1000.
Aluminate was used as aluminum compound in an amount of 0.15 kg/t calculated as A12O3. The cationic retention agent was cationic starch and it was added in an amount of lOkg/t and the polysilicic acid was added in an amount of 1 kg/t. All amounts are on dry stock system (fibres and fillers). Some different polysilic acids were used: A) a polysilicic acid according to Example 1 which was used directly after its preparation. B) a polysilicic acid prepared according to the following: A water glass (Na2O.3.3SiO2) solution, 1% with regard to SiO2, was ion exchanged to pH 2.3 and stored for one week. The polysill-cic acid had a specific surface area of about 1600m2/g. C) a polysilicic acid prepared according to the following:
2.61 g of 97% H2SO4 were diluted to 250 g. 190.5g of 5.25%
Na2O.3.3SlO2 were diluted to 500.4 g. 280.5 g of the last solution were added to the diluted sulphuric acid solution and 530.5 g of polysilicic acid was hereby obtained and - this was diluted with 30.5 g of water and the resulting polysilic acid then had a SiO2 content of 1% and a pH of 2.4. The specific surface area was measu~ed to about 1500m /g. D) a polysilicic acid, activated silica, prepared according to the following: 776.70 g of 5.15% water glass (Na2O.3.3SiO2) were diluted to 1000 g. 15.40 g of 96%
sulphuric acid were diluted to 1000 g. The two solutions were mixed and hereby activated silica with an SiO2 content of 2.0% and a pH of about 8.75 was obtained. This solution was allowed to stand for about 1 hour and was then acidi-fied with additional H2SO4 to a pH of about 2.5 and diluted with water to an SiO2 content of 1.0%. The specific surface area was measured to 1540 m2/g.
A123 kg/t Polysilicic acid Retention %
- A 71.1 0.15 A 85.0 - s 68.0 0.15 B 88.0 - C 40.4 0.15 C 69.0 - D 65.0 15 0.15 D 74.0 Example 6 In this example a stock of groundwood pulp with addition of 0.5g/1 of Na2SO4.10H2O was used. The pulp had been beaten to 120 ml CSF and its pH had been adjusted to 4.5 with H2SO4. Sodium aluminate was used as aluminum compound and added in varying amounts to the given pH.
After addition of aluminate, polysilicic acid according to Example 1 and commercial silica sol according to Example 2 were added and cationic starch (CS) was added lastly. The drainage results in the tests are given in ml CSF.
pH A123 Polysilicic Comm. CS CSF
kg/t acid, kg/t sol kg/t kg/t ml 4.9 0.15 1 - 10 270 5.2 0.30 1 - 10 300 5.5 0.60 1 - 10 380 4.9 0.15 - 1 10 200 5.5 0.60 - 1 10 260 Example 7 In this example the same stock and dosage order as in Example 4 was used and the effect of varying amounts of polysilicic acid, stored as originally in Example 4, and commercial sol, respectively, according to Example 2 was _ 1 337732 investigated. Sodium aluminate was used as aluminum com-pound in all tests and the cationic retentlon agent was -cationic starch (CS). The effect on dewaterlng was evalu-ated as descrlbed earller.
5 A12O3 CS Polysiliclc Comm. CSF
kg/t kg/t acid, kg/t sol, kg/t ml - 10 - 0.25 390 - 10 - 0.5 420 0.04 10 - 0.25 410 0.075 10 - 0.5 450 0.15 10 - 1 570 0.3 10 - 2 590 - 10 0.25 - 460 - 10 0.5 - 520 0.04 10 0.25 - 510 0.075 10 0.5 - 615 0.15 10 1 - 710 0.3 10 2 - 700 Example 8 In this example the dewatering effect wlth different polysllicic acids ln combination wlth sodium aluminate and cationic retention agent, cationic starch (CS) and cationic polyacrylamide (PAM, Percol 292), was investigated. The stock was a groundwood pulp stock with a pH of 7.5 and contained 0.5 g/l of Na2SO4.10H2O. The chemicals were added to the stock in the following order: aluminum compound, cationic retention agent and finally polysilicic acid. CSF
was measured as described earlier. The polysilicic acids used in the tests were B) according to Example 5, C) according to Example 5, D) according to Example 5, E) a polysilicic acid according to B) for which pH had been ad~usted to 8.5 with NaOH and which had then after 10 minutes been diluted to a concentration of 0.15%, F) a polysilicic acid, activated silica, prepared by addition of sulphuric acid to water glass to a solution containing 2%
SiO2 and havlng a pH of 8.7. The solution was diluted to 1%
SiO2 and then used dlrectly, G) a polysillclc acid accord-ing to F) which had been stored for one hour at a pH of 8.7 and a concentration of 2% and then been diluted to 1%
before use.
A123 Cationic retention Polysilicic CSF
kg/t agent type;kg/t acid, type;kg/t ml - CS;10 B;l 310 100.15 CS;10 B;l 520 - CS;10 C;l 290 0.15 CS;10 C;l 460 - CS;10 D;l 280 0.15 CS;10 D;l 435 - CS;10 E;l 300 0.15 CS;10 E;l 485 - CS;10 F;l 295 0.15 CS;10 F;1 470 - CS;10 G;1 310 200.15 CS;10 G;1 510 - PAM;0.67 B;l 390 0.15 PAM;0.67 B;l 475 - PAM;O.67 C;l 345 0.15 PAM;0.67 C;l 430 - PAM;0.67 D;l 385 0.15 PAM;0.67 D;1 465 - PAM;0.67 E;l 370 0.15 PAM;0.67 E;l 450 - PAM;0.67 F;l 360 300.15 PAM;0.67 F;l 435 - PAM;0.67 G;l 365 0.15 PAM;0.67 G;l 460 Example 9 In this example the effect of a combination according to the invention was investigated for a pulp suspension for use in the production of pulp sheets. To half a litre of pulp (60% birch sulfate/40% pine sulfate) having a fibre concentration of 2%, ie 20 g/l, a cationic polyacrylamide was first added at a stirrer speed of 1200 rpm and after 15 seconds the pulp suspension was diluted to 1% and stirred for another 15 seconds. A polysilicic acid according to Example 1 which had been stored as a 5% solution for one day was then added as a 1% solution. After another 15 seconds the pulp was poured into a BUchner funnel. The alumlnum compound was alum, and the addition of this was made about 1 minute before the additlon of the cationic polymer. The time for suction off the water until the surface of the formed pulp sheet was free from visible water was measured.
A123 PAM Polysilicic Time kg/t kg/t acid kg/t sec _ _ - 30 - 0.5 - 22 - 0.5 0.5 16 - 0.5 ` 1.0 14 0.03 0.5 0.25 15 0.06 0.5 0.5 13 200.12 0.5 1.0 11
Claims (55)
1.. A process for the production of paper by forming and dewatering a suspension of cellulose containing fibres, on a wire, wherein the forming and dewatering takes place in the presence of a cationic polymeric retention agent and a polymeric silicic acid having a specific surface area of at least 1050 m2/g.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the polymeric silicic acid has a specific surface area within the range of from 1100 to 1700 m2/g.
3. A process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the polymeric silicic acid is one which has been prepared by acidification of an alkali metal water glass to a pH within the range of from 1 to 9.
4. A process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the polymeric silicic acid is one which has been prepared by acidification of an alkali metal water glass to a pH within the range of from 1.5 to 4.
5. A process according to claim 3, wherein said acidification is by means of an acid cation exchanger.
6. A process according to claim 4, wherein said acidification is by means of acid cation exchanger.
7. A process according to claim 3, wherein said acidification is by means of a mineral acid.
8. A process according to claim 4, wherein said acidification is by means of a mineral acid.
9. A process according to claim 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 or 8, wherein the polymeric silicic acid is present in an amount of at least 0.01 kg/t, based on dry fibres.
10. A process according to claim 3, wherein the polymeric silicic acid is present in an amount of at least 0.01 kg/t, based on dry fibres.
11. A process according to claim 4, wherein the polymeric silicic acid is present in an amount of at least 0.01 kg/t, based on dry fibres.
12. A process according to claim 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 or 11, wherein the cationic polymeric retention agent is cationic starch or cationic polyacrylamide.
13. A process according to claim 3, wherein the cationic retention agent is cationic starch or cationic polyacrylamide.
14. A process according to claim 4, wherein the cationic retention agent is cationic starch or cationic polyacrylamide.
15. A process according to claim 9, wherein the cationic retention agent is cationic starch or cationic polyacrylamide.
16. A process according to claim 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14 or 15, wherein the cationic polymeric retention agent is present in a weight ratio to the polymeric silicic acid of at least 0.01:1.
17. A process according to claim 3, wherein the cationic retention agent is present in a weight ratio to the polymeric silicic acid of at least 0.01:1.
18. A process according to claim 4, wherein the cationic retention agent is present in a weight ratio to the polymeric silicic acid of at least 0.01:1.
19. A process according to claim 9, wherein the cationic retention agent is present in a weight ratio to the polymeric silicic acid of at least 0.01:1.
20. A process according to claim 12, wherein the cationic retention agent is present in a weight ratio to the polymeric silicic acid of at least 0.01:1.
21. A process according to claim 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19 or 20, wherein said suspension further contains filler.
22. A process according to claim 3, wherein said suspension further contains filler.
23. A process according to claim 4, wherein the suspension further contains filler.
24. A process according to claim 9, wherein the suspension further contains filler.
25. A process according to claim 12, wherein the suspension further contains filler.
26. A process according to claim 16, wherein the suspension further contains filler.
27. A process according to claim 21, wherein the polymeric silicic acid is present in an amount of at least 0.01 kg/t, based on dry fibres and filler.
28. A process according to claim 22, 23, 24, 25 or 26, wherein the polymeric silicic acid is present in an amount of at least 0.01 kg/t, based on dry fibres and filler.
29. A process according to claim 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 or 27, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, said aluminum compound being added to the suspension at a stage other than before the cationic polymeric retention agent and the polymeric silicic acid.
30. A process according to claim 3, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, said aluminum compound being added to the suspension at a stage other than before the cationic polymeric retention agent and the polymeric silicic acid.
31. A process according to claim 4, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, said aluminum compound being added to the suspension at a stage other than before the cationic polymeric retention agent and the polymeric silicic acid.
32. A process according to claim 9, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, said aluminum compound being added to the suspension at a stage other than before the cationic polymeric retention agent and the polymeric silicic acid.
33. A process according to claim 12, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, said aluminum compound being added to the suspension at a stage other than before the cationic polymeric retention agent and the polymeric silicic acid.
34. A process according to claim 16, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, said aluminum compound being added to the suspension at a stage other than before the cationic polymeric retention agent and the polymeric silicic acid.
35. A process according to claim 21, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, said aluminum compound being added to the suspension at a stage other than before the cationic polymeric retention agent and the polymeric silicic acid.
36. A process according to claim 28, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, said aluminum compound being added to the suspension at a stage other than before the cationic polymeric retention agent and the polymeric silicic acid.
37. A process according to claim 29, wherein the aluminum compound is present in a weight ratio to the polymeric silicic acid of at least 0.01:1, the aluminum compound being calculated as Al2O3.
38. A process according to claim 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 or 36, wherein the aluminum compound is present in a weight ratio to the polymeric silicic acid of at least 0.01:1, the aluminum compound being calculated as Al2O3.
39. A process according to claim 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 or 27, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, at least one of said cationic retention agent and said polymeric silicic acid being added to the suspension before said aluminum compound is added to the suspension.
40. A process according to claim 3, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, at least one of said cationic retention agent and said polymeric silicic acid being added to the suspension before said aluminum compound is added to the suspension.
41. A process according to claim 4, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, at least one of said cationic retention agent and said polymeric silicic acid being added to the suspension before said aluminum compound is added to the suspension.
42. A process according to claim 9, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, at least one of said cationic retention agent and said polymeric silicic acid being added to the suspension before said aluminum compound is added to the suspension.
43. A process according to claim 12, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, at least one of said cationic retention agent and said polymeric silicic acid being added to the suspension before said aluminum compound is added to the suspension.
44. A process according to claim 16, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, at least one of said cationic retention agent and said polymeric silicic acid being added to the suspension before said aluminum compound is added to the suspension.
45. A process according to claim 21, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, at least one of said cationic retention agent and said polymeric silicic acid being added to the suspension before said aluminum compound is added to the suspension.
46. A process according to claim 28, wherein the forming and dewatering further takes place in the presence of an aluminum compound, at least one of said cationic retention agent and said polymeric silicic acid being added to the suspension before said aluminum compound is added to the suspension.
47. A process according to claim 29, wherein the aluminum compound is selected from the group consisting of alum, aluminates, aluminum chloride, aluminum nitrate, polyaluminum chlorides, polyaluminum sulphates, polyaluminum chlorides containing sulphate and mixtures thereof.
48. A process according to claim 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 or 37, wherein the aluminum compound is selected from the group consisting of alum, aluminates, aluminum chloride, aluminum nitrate, polyaluminum chlorides, polyaluminum sulphates, polyaluminum chlorides containing sulphate and mixtures thereof.
49. A process according to claim 38, wherein the aluminum compound is selected from the group consisting of alum, aluminates, aluminum chloride, aluminum nitrate, polyaluminum chlorides, polyaluminum sulphates, polyaluminum chlorides containing sulphate and mixtures thereof.
50. A process according to claim 39, wherein the aluminum compound is present in a weight ratio to the polymeric silicic acid of at least 0.01:1, the aluminum compound being calculated as Al2O3.
51. A process according to claim 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 or 46, wherein the aluminum compound is present in a weight ratio to the polymeric silicic acid of at least 0.01:1, the aluminum compound being calculated as Al2O3.
52. A process according to claim 39, wherein the aluminum compound is selected from the group consisting of alum, aluminates, aluminum chloride, aluminum nitrate, polyaluminum chlorides, polyaluminum sulphates, polyaluminum chlorides containing sulphate and mixtures thereof.
53. A process according to claim 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 or 46, wherein the aluminum compound is selected from the group consisting of alum, aluminates, aluminum chloride, aluminum nitrate, polyaluminum chlorides, polyaluminum sulphates, polyaluminum chlorides containing sulphate and mixtures thereof.
54. A process according to claim 37, 47, 49 or 52, wherein the aluminum compound is selected from the group consisting of alum, polyaluminum chlorides, polyaluminum chlorides containing sulphate and mixtures thereof.
55. A process according to claim 37, 47, 49 or 52, wherein the aluminum compound is sodium aluminate.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| SE8801951-8 | 1988-05-25 | ||
| SE8801951A SE461156B (en) | 1988-05-25 | 1988-05-25 | SET FOR PREPARATION OF PAPER WHICH SHAPES AND DRAINAGE OWN ROOMS IN THE PRESENCE OF AN ALUMINUM SUBSTANCE, A COTTONIC RETENTION AND POLYMER SILICON ACID |
| CA000600546A CA1334325C (en) | 1988-05-25 | 1989-05-24 | Process for the production of paper |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000600546A Division CA1334325C (en) | 1988-05-25 | 1989-05-24 | Process for the production of paper |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1337732C true CA1337732C (en) | 1995-12-19 |
Family
ID=25672756
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000616855A Expired - Lifetime CA1337732C (en) | 1988-05-25 | 1994-04-21 | Process for the production of paper |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1337732C (en) |
-
1994
- 1994-04-21 CA CA000616855A patent/CA1337732C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1334325C (en) | Process for the production of paper | |
| CA2067495C (en) | Silica sols, a process for the production of silica sols and use of the sols | |
| EP0304463B1 (en) | A process for the production of paper | |
| CA2067506C (en) | Silica sols, a process for the production of the silica sols and use of the sols | |
| US4946557A (en) | Process for the production of paper | |
| EP0500770B1 (en) | A process for the production of paper | |
| JPH0327676B2 (en) | ||
| EP0357574B1 (en) | A process for the production of paper | |
| EP0394368B1 (en) | A process for the production of paper | |
| CA1337732C (en) | Process for the production of paper |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20121219 |