CA1332165C - Method and apparatus for withdrawal of small catalyst particles in fcc systems - Google Patents

Abstract

IMPROVED METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF
SMALL CATALYST PARTICLES IN FCC SYSTEMS

ABSTRACT

Disclosed is a method of and apparatus for reducing the level of extremely small catalyst particles ("fines") in an FCC
system by temporarily retaining particles separated from the secondary cyclone separator in a reactor vessel or catalyst regenerator, These particles can be intermittently withdrawn from the temporary retaining area in order to achieve particle flow at a low volume rate, which takes them out of the active catalyst inventory within the reactor/regenerator system. The intermittent withdrawing of catalyst "fines" reduces the particulate contamination both in flue gas exhausted to the atmosphere from the catalyst regenerator and in the main column bottom (MCB) products from the fractionation stage. Preferred embodiments include intermittent withdrawal of "fines" from either the regenerator or the reactor vessels and the secondary cyclones contained in each of these vessels.

Description

~ ` :
133216S ~:
F-35f)2 : ~

IMPROVED METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WIT~)RAWAL OF - :::
SMALL CAT~LYST PARTICLES IN FCC SYST~S

The present invention relates to a method of and apparatus for reducing the catalyst particulate contamination in flue gas and main column bottom liquids in a fluidic catalytic cracking (FCC) ~`
; system without resort to tertiary catalyst recovery equipment. More ~`
particularly, the present invention relates to an improved method of and apparatus for withdrawing extremeiy small catalyst particles from the catalyst inventory in an FCC system.
The field of catalytic cracking, particularly fluid catalytic cracking, has undergone significant development improvements due primarily to advances in catalyst technolo~y and ;
product distribution obtained therefrom. With the advent of high activity catalysts and particularly crystalline zeolite cracking lS ~ catalysts, new areas of operating technology have been encountered, ` -;~
requ;ring refinements in processing techniques to take advantage of the~high catalyst~activity, selectivity and operating sensitivity.
By way of background, the hydrocarbon conversion catalyst usually employed in an FCC installation is preferably a high 20 ~ activity crystall me~zeolite catalyst of a fluidizable particle ~--~
size~. The catalyst is transferred in suspended or dispersed phase condition:with~a hydrocarbon feed generally upwardly through one or ~ "
moré~riser conversion-~zones (FCC cracking zones), providing a ~ -hydrocarbon residence~time in each conversion zone in the range of 'J,,~"`''~`'.
0.5~ to~lO~seconds, and~usually less than 8 seconds. High ^`
temperature risèr hydrocarbon conversions, occurring at temperatures of~at least 538C (lOOO~F) or higher and at 0.5 to 4 seconds hydrocarbon residence time in contact with the catalyst in the ri~sér,~ are~desirable for some operations before initiating 30~ separation of vaporous~hydrocarbon product materials from the ; ; catalyst.~ ~`

--" 1332~6~
F-30~2 --2--Rapid separation of catalyst fro~ hydrocarbons discharged from a riser conversion zone is particularly desirable for restricting hydrocarbon conversion time. ~uring the hydrocarbon conversion step, carbonaceous deposits accumulate on the catalyst particles and the particles entrain hydrocarbon vapors upon removal from the hydrocarbon conversion zone. The entrained hydrocarbons are subjected to further contact with the catalyst until they are -~
removed from the catalyst by a separator, which could be a mechanical means, and/or stripping gas in a separate catalyst stripping zone. ~ydrocabon conversion products separated from and ~ materials stripped from the catalyst are combined and passed to a 1~ product fractionation step. Stripped catalyst containing deactivatin~ amounts of carbonaceous material, hereinafter referred to as coke, is then passed to a catalyst regeneration op~ration.
~; 15 Movement of catalyst particles through the riser conversion ~` zone, through various inertial and cyclone separators, through ~ catalyst stripper baffles and through the catalyst regenerator, s~ causes substantial catalyst particle breakage and over time will reduce the average size ot catalyst particles in a dense bed storage ~;
`- 20 area inventory As is well known, the smaller the particle size, the j~
more easily entrained that particle is in ?n airflow of a given velocity, and the particle can be carried by either gaseous -~
hydrocarbon effluent passing from the reactor vessel to the fractionator or by flue gas traveling from the catalyst regenerator to the atmosphere.
By reference to Fi~ure 1, a typical FCC system is illustrated together with various known tertiary catalyst recovery `~ `
systems. The hydrocarbon reactor feed is supplied to an FCC riser conversion zone lOa in a reactor vessel 10 along with regenerated catalyst from regenerator 12 and new catalyst from catalyst ` replenish 11, whereupon it travels through the riser conversion zone as previously noted and the hydrocarbons are catalytically cracked ~ as usual. U~ing separator lOb (which could be either riser cyclones - or inertial separators), and then secondary cyclones, all contained ~. . .

I :~

; r ;
within the reactor vesse] 10, catalyst particles are separated from the cracked hydrocarbon effluent and these catalyst particles pass to a dense bed storage area in the lower portion of the reactor vessel 10. There may be stripping stations located in the lower ; ,-portion of reactor vessel 10, where steam is passed through the ~
separated catalyst in order to remove as much of the entrained ~ ;
and/or entrapped hydrocarbon materials from the catalysts as is `~
possible. Then the catalyst is returned to a catalyst regenerator 12, where it is mixed with air and heated until hydrocarbon impurities remaining in and on the catalyst are burned off leaving '`
regenerated catalyst. The gases from the burning process are passed ;~
through one or more cyclone separators, where the catalyst , --particulate matter is removed and the exhaust gases are passed into '~
the atmosphere by way of stack 14.
Due to catalyst breakage during FCC conversion and regeneration, catalyst "fines" are created in the catalyst inventory ~-~ which may have particle sizes less than 10 ~icrons in diameter.
These particles are very easily entrained in any gas flow and are ~-` generally not completely removed during the first stage of separation in the regenerator. Pecause it is undesirable to permit these particles to pass into the atmosphere through stack 14, several different types of equipment have been used in the past to ~ ;
reduce the~amount of catalyst "fines" in the flue gases. An electrostatic precipitator 16 can be placed in the flue gas path c25 ~; ~ through stack l4 and by virtue of charging the catalyst particles, can attract the particles to a catalyst disposal area. ^
Additionally, a third stage cyclone separator 18 can be added in ."place of or in conjunction with the eleçtrostatic precipitator to further reduce the volume of catalyst "fines" which are transmitted to the stack 14~ and from there into the atmosphere.
The catalyst "fines" are also carried by way of the cracked hydrocarbon gaseous effluent leaving reactor vessel 10 into the ~
fractionator main column 20 where they will tend to settle into the ~ ~-lowermost portion of the column contaminating the Main Column Bottom .~

, ~ G~

r~

F-3052 -~4~~ 13~216~

(MCB) products, such as carbon black oil and/or marine diesel fuel, produced therein. Marine diesel fuel specifications generally require no more than 50 ppm of catalyst "fines", and carbon black oil specifications generally require no more than 500 ppm of "fines". Thus, in order to maintain these product specifications, it has been necessary to utilize another or third stage cyclone 22, a liquid electrostatic precipitator 24, a settlin~ tank 26, or a combination of all three, to remove catalyst "fines" fror the liquid produced by the fractionator main column 20.
The addition of any tertiary catalyst recovery equipment is ~ -;~ an expensive addition to existing systems and comprises a substantial anticipated expense with new refinery systems being built. Further, the movement of the flue gas or gaseous effl~lent through third stage cyclones and precipitators requires a certain -~ 15 amount of additional energy increasing the cost of refinery products. Furthermore, many refineries are utili~ing flue gas expanders to obtain additional energy from the flue gas prior to its release to the atmosphere and the presence of significant quantities of catalyst particulate matter erodes the blades and degrades the performance of turbinè expander systems.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, catalyst fines are removed from an FCC system by the steps of:
intermittently withdrawing a portion of the catalyst inventory containing "fines" and replacing the withdrawn portion by a si~ilar ~;`; 25 ~ amount of catalyst which includes a lower percentage of "fines".
These withdrawal and replacement steps serve to reduce the overall concentration of "fines" in the catalyst inventory.
More specifically, the present invention provides a method of removing catalyst fines in an FCC system having a reactor vessel comprising the steps of: passing the cracked hydrocarbon effluent through a riser separator and a primary cyclone separator to a secondary cyclone separator positioned within the reactor vessel;
passing at least a portion of catalyst separated by the secondary ~;
cyclone to a temporary catalyst retaining area and from there, with ,~

,............ ................................................................................ ...... ..:'', - ~ :
133216~ :
F-305Z --5-- ;
~',,. :

... . .
the remainder of the catalyst, to a catalyst stripping zone;
intermittently withdrawing from the reactor vessel a portion of catalyst in the temporary catalyst retaining area; passing the cracked hydrocarbons as an effluent from the secondary cyclone separator to a downstream fractionation apparatus; and passing the ~
separated catalyst from the stripping zone to a regeneration vessel. ~ -In accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention in an FCC system having a regenerator vessel, catalyst fines are removed by: passing a gaseous effluent in the regenerator vessel from at least a first separator through at least a primary - cyclone separator to at least a secondary cyclone separator positioned within the regenerator vessel; passing a gaseous effluent from the secondary cyclone separator to an exhaust stack outside the regenerator vessel; passing at least a portion of the catalyst -~
separated by the secondary cyclone to a temporary catalyst retaining area and from there, with the remainder of the catalyst separated by -~
the secondary cyclone, to the catalyst storage area; and intermittently withdrawing from the regenerator vessel a portion of catalyst contained in the temporary catalyst retaining area.
~ ~he present invention also provides an FCC system having a catalyst~inventory which includes "fines". A portion of the existing~catalyst inventory which includes some "fines" is intermittently withdrawn through a suitable withdrawal conduit. The withdrawn catalyst is~replaced by fresh catalyst from a catalyst 2~5~ replenishment sto~e, where the fresh catalyst has a particle size larger`than that of catalyst "fines", thus reducing the overall ~
concentration of "fines" in the catalyst inventory. ~ ~`
In a preferred embodiment, the present invention pro,vides `~ an FCC system having a reactor vessel which includes at least a ~ ~first riser separator, at least a primary cyclone separator and at least a secondary cyclo~e separator. A conduit connects the secondary separator catalyst exhaust to a temporary catalyst retaining area in the form of a catalyst withdrawal pot. The pot;
coliects catalyst particulate matter separated by the secondary ~ ~"
. ~
, , ~>~,~' f~\~
-13321~6~

cyclone. A conduit is provided in order that catalyst particulate material may be intermittently withdrawn from the withdrawal pot, with or without the aid of a fluidizing gas. The catalyst particulate matter is carried to a receiving vessel, where the catalyst particles can settle and cool before passing to a collector vessel and subsequent disposal.
In a second embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an FCC system having a regenerator vessel, w~ere catalyst containing de-activating amoul~ts of hydrocarbon is passed to a regenerator vessel for aeration and combustion of the de-activating hydrocarbon particles. Where the regenerator utilizes at least a first separator, at least a primary separator and at least a secondary separator to remove catalyst particles, at least a portion of particulate matter from the secondary cyclone separator in the regenerator vessel is passed to a temporary catalyst retaining area in the form of a catalyst withdrawal pot. A conduit connects the . ~ . , ~ .
withdrawal pot to a receiving vessel and, with the aid of fluidizing nitrogen gas if needed, catalyst can be intermittently removed from the withdrawal pot and transported to the receiving vessel. ~fter cooling in the receiving vessel, the catalyst particles are ~
transported through a valve to a collection vessel and subse~uent ~ ;;
disposal.
The invention in any of the above embodiments can be configured as an original installation or as a retrofit to an ~ ~ existing fluld catalytic cracking (FCC) reactor/regenerator system.
A more complete appreciation of the invention, and many of ~;
the attendant advantages thereof, will be readily apparent as the same becomes better understood by reference to the acco~panying drawings, wherein: ~
Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating a conventional ; ;
prior art fluid catalytic cracking reactor system with various tertiary catalyst recovery devices utilized to meet environmental and product specifications;

;- ...'~
~`'~ , .. - .
; .~
:' ~

`: :
F-iO52 7 133216~

Figure 2 is a side cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the present invention illustrating catalyst removal from a ; -re~eneration vessel; `
Figure 3 is a side cross-sectional view of a second embodiment of the present invention illustrating catalyst removal from a reactor vessel; and ;
Figure 4 is a schematic view of the catalyst "fines"
withdrawal system applicable to either the regenerator or reactor vessels.
Referring now more particularly to the drawings, wherein ~ like numerals represent like elements throughout the several views, `~ Figure 2 illustrates one embodiment of the present invention. A
reactor vessel lO at least partially encloses a riser conversion zone includin~ tubular conduit riser 30. ~ydrocarbon feed is supplied at the lower portion of riser 30 and mixed with regenerated catalyst from regenerator standpipe 32 and/or fresh catalyst from catalyst replenish ll, and the resultant mixture travels vertically upward towards the upper portion of riser 30. Upon reaching riser ` -30, the hydrocarbon feed and catalyst mixture passes into a riser -~
cyclone separator 34 as is well known. Riser separator 34 has a ca~talyst exhaust 36 which exits below the level of catalyst in dense bed storage area 38.
aseous hydrocarbon effluent from separator 34 can be passed by means of a conduit 40 Cillustrated in Fi~ure 3 but not in 25~ h~gure~2~ Into primary cyclone separator 42, or can pass directly ; into~the interior of the~reactor vessel lO and from there into the intake of separator 42. ~The catalyst particles exit from the primary cyc?one separator 42 and fall into the dense~bed storage area 38. The gaseous effluent from the primary cyclone separator 42 30 ~ passes~to the intake of reactor vessel secondary cyclone separator 44. ~Catalyst particles in the Figure 2 embodiment pass from the secondary cyclone separator 44 into the dense bed storage area 38 ;` -with exhaust effluent from the secondary separator passing into conduit 46 which carries the gaseous hydrocarbons to a quenching and/or fractionation stage.
; :

133216~ -F-3052 -~

~atalyst particles, accumulating in the dense ~ed catalyst storage area 38, travel downward past baffles 48 located in catalyst strippin~ zone 50 which is supplied with steam as the primary stripping gas. Hydrocarbon materials entrained with the catalyst particles are stripped therefrom and pass upwardly into reactor vessel 10, whereupon they can be withdrawn into the inlet of primary cyclone separator 42, as shown in Figure 2. ;~
After stripping, catalyst particles pass into the reactor ;~ standpipe 52 and from there pass to the regenerator 12 and specifically into the lower portion of regenerator 54. The catalyst particles are combined with air and sufficient heat is provided to per~it rapid oxidation of any remaining hydrocarbon particles or ~ 1 components entrained with the catalyst and the mixture travels upward through regenerator conduit 58 and into a first separator in `
the form of inertial separator 60. Here the regenerated catalyst is -permit~ed to fall down separator catalyst exhaust 62 into regenerated catalyst storage area 64. The gaseous component (hereinafter called flue gas) with some entrained catalyst particles passes into the inner portion of the upper regenerator and from there is drawn into regenerator primary cyclone separator 66, which deposits separated catalyst particles into the catalyst storage area and~provides flue gas to regenerator secondary cylone separator 68.
The secondary cyclone separator 68 removes the smaller catalyst particles from the flue gas and exhausts flue gas into plenum 70, 2s~ ; whlch travels from there to the atmosphere through stack 14 (not shown in Figure 2). ;~
`~ In accordance with the present invention, any withdrawal of `~
the catalyst inventory (catalyst contained within the regenerator, the reactor, connecting conduits and standpipes, etc.) will involve a withdrawal of "fines" from the system. If the withdrawn catalyst is replaced with catalyst from catalyst replenish 11 which contain a ;~ smaller quantity of "fines", the overall concentration of "fines" in the inventory will be reduced and fewer "fines" will be available ; ~ ~ for contaminating the regenerator flue gas or MCB products. ; - -s;'~

, . .

~owever, to the extent that non-selective catalyst withdrawal also disposes of non-"fines" or larger catalyst particles, it is preferred to withdraw only catalyst with a high concentration of "fines".
Referring again to Figure 2, and due to the two preceding - separation systems (inertial separator 60 and primary cyclone separator 66), the particle size of catalyst exiting secondary cyclone separator 68 is extremely small and thus has a high concentration of "fines". A temporary catalyst retaining area in the form of a catalyst withdrawal pot 72 is provided immediately under the catalyst exit of the secondary cyclone separator 68 to ;
temporarily retain these catalyst "fines". A withdrawal conduit 44 serves to controllably withdraw catalyst "fines" which have collected in the catalyst withdrawal pot 72. Although such catalyst withdrawal could operate continuously, in a preferred embodiment it ~ operates inter~ittently at a relatively high volume rate of flow, as`; a steady state flow rate would be difficult to maintain given the extremely small particle size and the problem of settling and packing which takes place in extremely small line sizes. When the catalyst withdrawal pot has been filled, the excess catalyst merely overflows into the regenerated catalyst storage area and can be recirculated through the regenerator by passage through the catalyst recirculation standpipe 76.
It can now~be understood that the amount of catalyst "fines" in the catalyst inventory, contained in the reactor vessel catalyst storage area 38 and in the regenerator catalyst storage area 64 can be controlled so as to effectively minimize catalyst ''fines'' which are entrained with either the hydrocarbon effluent passing out of conduit 46 towards the downstream fractionation stage ~
~ or flue gases passing through plenum 70 towards stack 14 to be ~-released to the atmosphere. ~s the percentage of catalyst "fines"
is reduced, there will be fewer particles of this size which can be entrained in either the hydrocarbon flow or flue gas flow. ~s these ~ particles are withdrawn from the closed system, the number of "~ 35 particles of this size that are available in the catalyst inventory ':-''.'''-~, . , ,. , . ' . ' , ,' ' , ' ~-3~52 --10-- 133216~ ~

for contaminating the main column bottom (MCB) products of the fractionation device or the flue gas from the regenerator, can be closely monitored and controlled. Thus, by selective withdrawal of catalyst "fines" from the catalyst inventory in an FCC system, the need for tertiary catalyst recovery systems, such as a third stage cyclone, electrostatic gas and liquid precipitators, settling tanks, etc. is reduced or eliminated completely.
It will be understood that the catalyst output from the secondary cyclone 68 is utilized to feed the withdrawal pot in Figure 2 because it would contain a much higher percentage of catalyst "fines" than would the regenerated catalyst storage area 64 which is supplied with substantially larger catalyst particles from ;~
separator exhaust 62 and from the particle exhaust of the primary cyclone separator 66. However, there is no requirement that the ;~
"fines" withdrawal be confined only to the regenerator, and indeed ~;
the secondary cyclone separator 44 in the reactor vessel could also be used as a source for withdrawing "fines", as is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3 illustrates essentially the same FCC system as in Figure 2, with the exception that the reactor vessel operates a~ a closed cyclone system with the effluent fro~ riser separator 34 ;~
passing directly through conduit 40 to the inlet of primary cyclone separator A2. The only other significant difference is the location `~
of the catalyst~withdrawal pot 72 under the reactor secondary cyclone separator 44, rather than under the regenerator secondary ; cyclone separator, as in Figure 2. Otherwise, the operation of the 25~ catalyst withdrawal system and its effect on the reduction of catalyst 'ifines" in flue gas and MC~ products would be similar to -~
that previously discussed with reference to Figure 2. In fact, in some circumstances it may be desirable to have a "fines" withdrawal - `
system in both the regenerator vessel and the reactor vessel, which would merely be a combination of Figures 2 and 3.
With respect to the specific apparatus for withdrawing "fines" from the caitalyst inventory, Figure 4 illustrates one ¦~
embodiment of such a system. In Figure 4, secondary cyclone l ~

1313216~
F-3052 --Il--separator catalyst conduit 80 could be from either reactor secondary cyclone separator 44 or from regenerator secondary cyclone separator 68 depending upon whe~her the "fines" withdrawal system is located in reactor 10 or regenerator 12. The catalyst withdrawal pot 72 is located under the catalyst conduit 80, such that catalyst flowing therethrough accumulates at least temporarily in the catalyst ; withdrawal pot 72.
It has been found that the quantity of "fines" to be withdrawn is small compared to the quantity accumulating in the - ;~-~ 10 withdrawal pot. For continuous withdrawal, the pipe is equipped ;~ with a restriction orifice with an internal diameter on the order of ` ~

3.2 mm (1/8"), and great difficulty is encountered in attempting to - ;
; cause "fines" to flow from the withdrawal pot through the small - diameter orifice. However, it has been found that an intermittent operation with a larger diameter will facilitate the desired . ~ withdrawal, while keeping the overall quantity of wi.hdrawn catalyst -within the desired limits.
As previously noted, particulate size is extremely small and because any quantity of catalyst particles is subject to 20 ~ ~ ~ compactlon and blockage of small diameter orifices or pipes, catalyst withdrawal conduit 74 in one~embodiment would be a one-inch diameter,~schedule 80, type 304 stainless steel pipe. ~n additional purge conduit 82 supplies nitrogen under pressure to ring 84 in which are~located a~plurality of holes therearound. In the event 5~ the catalyst "fines"~in the catalyst withdrawal pot 72 bridge the opening to withdrawal conduit 74, a blast of hi~h pressure nitrogen through purge conduit 82 and ring 84 and/or conduit 74 will break up the agglomerating particles facilitating flow down through the catalyst withdrawal conduit 74.
` 30 ~ Valves~86 in Figure 4 facilitate the intermittent withdrawal of "f~i es" accumulating in withdrawal pot 72. The withdrawal conduit 74 opens into receiving vessel 88 and in order to .~ withdrawal "fines" from the withdrawal pot, the receiving vessel 88 is closed off to the atmosphere. Upon opening of valves 86, "fines"

F-3052 --12-- ¦ 3 ~ 2 1 6 5 begin to flow from the withdrawal pot 72 into the receiving vessel 88 due to the higher pressure in the vessel in which the withdrawal pot is located (either the reactor vessel or the catalyst regenerator) Flow through withdrawal conduit 74 will terminate when receiving vessel 88 reaches the same pressure present in the catalyst withdrawal pot 72. Nitrogen gas is supplied through rotometer 90 to aid in particle flow in withdrawal conduit 74 and -~
fluidizing nitrogen for catalyst withdrawal pot 72 is provided through rotometer 92 and purge conduit 82. As previously noted, ~; lO blast connections 94 and 96 can be used to free blocked sections in withdrawal conduit 74 or to break up fines bridging in the ~ ;
withdrawal pot 72 or the receiving vessel 88.
After flow into the receiving vessel 88 terminates dye to ~-pressure equalization between vessel 88 and catalyst withdrawal pot lS 72, valves 86 are closed permitting catalyst "fines" transmitted to receiving vessel 88 to be cooled by the admission of cooling air or nitrogen through valve 98 and exiting through vent 100 or by simple `~
heat transmission through the walls of receiving vessel 88 into the - ^-ambient air. ;~
~ Receiving vessel 88 is emptied through valve 102 into ~-collector vessel 104 by~pre~surizing receiving vessel 88 throu~h valve 98 with vent lOO closed. If desirable, vent 100 and the .~-~
collector~vessel~vent 106 can be COM ected to dust filters or other articulate~containment~means. Both the receiving vessel 88 and -~
25~ collec~tor vessel~104 are dimensioned according to the amo~mt and frequèncy oE 'ifines"~wlthdrawal. Typically, 'ifines" flowing from one~secondary cyclone dlpleg exceed the desired withdrawal rate and ;`~ ~
thus excess "fines" overflow the withdrawal pot after it has been I i -30 ~ In view of the above disclosure, many modifications and var;iations on this catalyst "fines" withdrawal system will become ; `~
obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, the fines withdrawal system could be provided for either a reactor vessel or a regenerator vessel or both should a high volume "fines"

. .
": ~ "'' " '.:' F-3052 --13-- 133216~

withdrawal rate be desired. The "fines" withdrawal could be located in conjunction with a cata]yst supply system so as to maintain the desired inventory of catalyst in a closed reactor/regenerator system while still reducing the level of "fines" in the catalyst inventory. Various other temporary containment systems and apparatus for removing catalyst "fines" from the withdrawal pot will become obvious in view of the above disclosure. Therefore, the present invention is not limited by the above disclosure, but is only limited by the scope of the claims attached hereto.
The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
-:

., ::
~: :
;~
,. .:

-.. ~
. ~ ,. .
, ', I 1:; I i ' I ~ , !

,~
`'''.:~' .~

~' ' :,

Claims (10)

1. A method for reducing catalyst "fines" contamination in fluid bed processing, including a catalyst inventory contained in at least one of a reactor vessel and a regenerator vessel, the method comprising the steps of:
intermittently withdrawing at least a first portion of catalyst from the inventory, the portion containing at least some catalyst "fines" and replacing the first portion of catalyst with a similar second portion of catalyst containing at least a lesser percentage of catalyst "fines than the first portion.

2. A method for reducing catalyst particulate contamination in fluid catalytic cracking processing, including a reactor vessel in which a mixture of hydrocarbon feed and catalyst are passed through a riser conversion zone cracking the hydrocarbon feed, the method comprising the steps of:
passing the cracked hydrocarbon effluent through at least a primary separator to at least a secondary cyclone separator;
passing at least a portion of the catalyst separated by the secondary cyclone separator to a temporary catalyst retaining area and from there to a catalyst stripping zone;
intermittently withdrawing from the reactor vessel at least a portion catalyst retained in the temporary retaining area;
passing the cracked hydrocarbons as an effluent from the secondary cyclone separator to a downstream fractionation apparatus;
and passing the separated catalyst from the stripping zone to a regeneration vessel.

3. The method according to Claim 2, wherein prior to the passing cracked hydrocarbn step there are included the additional steps of:
passing a mixture, as a suspension, of a hydrocarbon feed and a catalyst through a riser conversion zone contained within the reactor vessel and cracking the hydrocarbon feed in the riser conversion zone;
passing the mixture from the riser conversion zone to a riser separator positioned within the reactor vessel;
separating at least a portion of the catalyst from the mixture in the riser separator;
passing a gaseous effluent from the riser separator to a primary cyclone separator positioned within the reactor vessel; and passing the catalyst separated by the primary cyclone to a catalyst stripping zone positioned within the reactor vessel, the stripping zone using a stripping gas to remove hydrocarbons entrained with the separated catalyst.

4. A method for reducing catalyst particulate contamination in fluid catalytic cracking, processing, where catalyst, having passed through a reactor vessel and accumulated deactivating hydrocarbons is passed to a regenerator vessel, the method comprising the steps of:
passing a gaseous effluent in the regenerator vessel from at least a first separator through at least a primary cyclone separator to at least a secondary cyclone separator positioned within the regenerator vessel;
passing a gaseous effluent from the secondary cyclone separator to an exhaust outside the regenerator vessel;
passing at least a portion of the catalyst separated by the secondary cyclone to a temporary catalyst retaining area and from there to a catalyst storage area; and intermittently withdrawing from the regenerator vessel a portion of catalyst contained in the temporary catalyst retaining area.

5. The method according to Claim 4, wherein prior to the passing a gaseous effluent step the method includes the further steps of:
passing a mixture, as a suspension, of a hydrocarbon feed and a catalyst through a riser conversion zone contained within a reactor vessel and cracking the hydrocarbon feed in the riser conversion zone;
passing the mixture from the riser conversion zone to a separator positioned within the reactor vessel;
separating catalyst from the mixture in the separator;
passing a gaseous effluent from the separator to a downstream fractionation apparatus;
passing the catalyst separated by the separator to a catalyst stripping zone positioned within the reactor vessel;
removing hydrocarbons entrained with the separated catalyst through the use of a stripping gas;
passing the separated catalyst from the stripping zone to a regeneration vessel:
regenerating the catalyst in the regenerator by combining the separated catalyst with air at high temperature to allow hydrocarbons retained on the catalyst to oxidize;
passing the regenerated catalyst into at least a first separator, allowing the catalyst to pass to the catalyst storage area;
pass separator effluent from the first separator to at least a primary cyclone separator positioned within the regenerator;
and passing at least a portion of the catalyst separated by the primary cyclone to the catalyst storage area.

6. An apparatus for reducing catalyst "fines"
contamination in a fluid bed processing system, the system including a catalyst inventory contained in at least one of a reactor vessel and a regenerator vessel, the apparatus comprising;

means for intermittently withdrawing at least a first portion of catalyst in the inventory, the first portion containing at least some catalyst "fines"; and means for replacing the first portion of catalyst with a similar second portion of catalyst containing at least a lesser amount of catalyst "fines" than said first portion.

7. An apparatus for reducing catalyst particulate contamination in fluid catalytic cracking processing, including a reactor vessel with at least a primary separator and at least a secondary cyclone separator located therein, where a mixture of hydrocarbon feed and catalyst are passed through a riser conversion zone in the reactor vessel cracking the hydrocarbon feed, the apparatus comprising:
means for passing cracked hydrocarbon effluent through the primary separator to the secondary cyclone separator;
means, located in the reactor vessel, for temporarily retaining catalyst supplied thereto;
means for passing at least a portion of the catalyst, separated by the secondary cyclone separator, to the temporary catalyst retaining means and from there to a catalyst stripping zone;
means for intermittently withdrawing from the reactor vessel at least a portion of catalyst contained in the temporary:
catalyst retaining means;
means for passing the cracked hydrocarbons as an effluent from the secondary cyclone separator to a downstream fractionation apparatus; and means for passing the separated catalyst from the stripping zone to a regeneration vessel.

8. The apparatus according to Claim 7, wherein the means for temporarily retaining catalyst comprises a catalyst withdrawal pot and the withdrawn means comprises:
a conduit means connecting a lower portion of the withdrawal pot to a location external to the reactor vessel; and means for fluidizing catalyst contained in the withdrawal pot.

9. An apparatus for reducing catalyst particulate contamination in FCC processing, where catalyst, having passed through a reactor vessel and accumulated deactivating hydrocarbons, is passed to a regenerator vessel, the regenerator vessel including at least a primary separator and at least a secondary cyclone separator located therein, the apparatus comprising:
means for passing a gaseous effluent in the regenerator vessel from the primary separator to said secondary cyclone separator;
means for passing a gaseous effluent from the secondary cyclone separator to an exhaust stack outside the regenerator vessel;
means, located in the regenerator vessel, for temporarily retaining catalyst supplied thereto;
means for passing at least a portion of catalyst, separated by the secondary cyclone, to the temporary catalyst retaining means and from there to a catalyst storage area; and means for intermittently withdrawing from the regenerator vessel at least a portion of catalyst contained in said temporary catalyst retaining means.

10. An apparatus according to Claim 9, wherein the means for temporarily retaining catalyst comprises a catalyst withdrawal pot and the withdrawal means comprises:
conduit means connecting a lower portion of the withdrawal pot to a location external to the regenerator vessel; and means for fluidizing catalyst contained in the withdrawal pot.