CA1326297C - Method and apparatus for measuring differential fluid power output of a pump - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for measuring differential fluid power output of a pumpInfo
- Publication number
- CA1326297C CA1326297C CA000572625A CA572625A CA1326297C CA 1326297 C CA1326297 C CA 1326297C CA 000572625 A CA000572625 A CA 000572625A CA 572625 A CA572625 A CA 572625A CA 1326297 C CA1326297 C CA 1326297C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- pump
- motor
- difference
- underload
- motor load
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F04—POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
- F04D—NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
- F04D15/00—Control, e.g. regulation, of pumps, pumping installations or systems
- F04D15/0088—Testing machines
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F04—POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
- F04D—NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
- F04D15/00—Control, e.g. regulation, of pumps, pumping installations or systems
- F04D15/02—Stopping of pumps, or operating valves, on occurrence of unwanted conditions
- F04D15/0245—Stopping of pumps, or operating valves, on occurrence of unwanted conditions responsive to a condition of the pump
- F04D15/0254—Stopping of pumps, or operating valves, on occurrence of unwanted conditions responsive to a condition of the pump the condition being speed or load
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Control Of Non-Positive-Displacement Pumps (AREA)
- Control Of Positive-Displacement Pumps (AREA)
Abstract
A B S T R A C T
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEASURING
DIFFERENTIAL FLUID POWER OUTPUT OF A PUMP
Differential motor load drops or differential pump fluid outputs are employed to indicate gas lock or pump off of an electrical submersible or other pump.
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEASURING
DIFFERENTIAL FLUID POWER OUTPUT OF A PUMP
Differential motor load drops or differential pump fluid outputs are employed to indicate gas lock or pump off of an electrical submersible or other pump.
Description
--` 1326297 METHO~ AND APPARATUS FOR MEASURING
DIFFERENTIAL FLUID POWER OUTPUT OF A PUMP
The use of soft starters for electrical sub-; mersible pumps (ESP's) within the past few years had led to an opportunity to increase production by pumping ESP's off, i.e., pumping well fluid levels down to the pump intake in order to obtain maximum production from a well by lowering its bottomhole pressure. Operating an ESP in this mode means that the ESP is continually cycled on and off as the unit is pumped off, shut down for a short period of time to allow the well to par-tially fill, and then restarted. This could not have been done prior to the use of soft starters since ESP
~ failure was common on restart.
" Besides minimizing restarting failures, a pump off '~ operation also requires reliable pump off detection and , 15 control to not allow an ESP to operate after it has ;~ become gas-locked. Failure to shut down a gas locked , ESP will result in premature failure due to over-, heating. Gas locking occurs when an ESP ingests suffi-, cient gas so as to no longer be able to pump fluid to the surface, the result of either large gas bubbles , being present in the well fluid or of the pump intake ~1' being uncovered at pump off. In accordance with the ,~ present invention an ESP pump off controller has been developed to meet the needs of reliably detecting and shutting down an ESP when gas locked or pumped off since existing ESP motor controllers have been proven to inadequately control under these critical condi-tions.
. .
,,"
,''~ ~ ,.
. .
;
., !
.
. ~' -- 2 - 132 ~297 Existing ESP motor controllers have been adapted from surface motor control packages where motor operation is more stable and motor control is less critical. For example, it is not critical for a motor controller to prevent a surface centrifugal pump from running dry since this will not damage the pump or its motor, but a downhole ESP will fail rapidly if it is run after losing fluid flow to the surface. These motor controllers monitor the running current (or power consumption) of the motor and compare it to a manually adjustable, fixed setpoint. When the current drops below this underload setpoint for a prescribed length of time, the motor is shut down.
Experience has shown that this existing method of motor control is unreliable since pumping ESP's are seen to be prematurely shutting down in underload or not at all. The reason for this unreliability is that - the manually entered setpoints are often guessed, or at best, based on varying rules of thumb which may have no correlation to what is going on downhole. As a result, setpoints are frequently set too high causing premature - shutdown and loss of production or set too low failing to shut the ESP down, causing failure of the ESP and ` loss of production.
The primary purpose of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for shutting down a pump motor when a motor underload has occurred, for example due to pump off or gas lock. Gas locking and pump off have been found, as discovered in accordance with the present invention, to be characterized by a sudden drop in motor load and fluid power output when gas enters the pump.
The method according to the invention comprises:
(a) measuring pump power consumption at timed inter-vals;
:' . .
DIFFERENTIAL FLUID POWER OUTPUT OF A PUMP
The use of soft starters for electrical sub-; mersible pumps (ESP's) within the past few years had led to an opportunity to increase production by pumping ESP's off, i.e., pumping well fluid levels down to the pump intake in order to obtain maximum production from a well by lowering its bottomhole pressure. Operating an ESP in this mode means that the ESP is continually cycled on and off as the unit is pumped off, shut down for a short period of time to allow the well to par-tially fill, and then restarted. This could not have been done prior to the use of soft starters since ESP
~ failure was common on restart.
" Besides minimizing restarting failures, a pump off '~ operation also requires reliable pump off detection and , 15 control to not allow an ESP to operate after it has ;~ become gas-locked. Failure to shut down a gas locked , ESP will result in premature failure due to over-, heating. Gas locking occurs when an ESP ingests suffi-, cient gas so as to no longer be able to pump fluid to the surface, the result of either large gas bubbles , being present in the well fluid or of the pump intake ~1' being uncovered at pump off. In accordance with the ,~ present invention an ESP pump off controller has been developed to meet the needs of reliably detecting and shutting down an ESP when gas locked or pumped off since existing ESP motor controllers have been proven to inadequately control under these critical condi-tions.
. .
,,"
,''~ ~ ,.
. .
;
., !
.
. ~' -- 2 - 132 ~297 Existing ESP motor controllers have been adapted from surface motor control packages where motor operation is more stable and motor control is less critical. For example, it is not critical for a motor controller to prevent a surface centrifugal pump from running dry since this will not damage the pump or its motor, but a downhole ESP will fail rapidly if it is run after losing fluid flow to the surface. These motor controllers monitor the running current (or power consumption) of the motor and compare it to a manually adjustable, fixed setpoint. When the current drops below this underload setpoint for a prescribed length of time, the motor is shut down.
Experience has shown that this existing method of motor control is unreliable since pumping ESP's are seen to be prematurely shutting down in underload or not at all. The reason for this unreliability is that - the manually entered setpoints are often guessed, or at best, based on varying rules of thumb which may have no correlation to what is going on downhole. As a result, setpoints are frequently set too high causing premature - shutdown and loss of production or set too low failing to shut the ESP down, causing failure of the ESP and ` loss of production.
The primary purpose of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for shutting down a pump motor when a motor underload has occurred, for example due to pump off or gas lock. Gas locking and pump off have been found, as discovered in accordance with the present invention, to be characterized by a sudden drop in motor load and fluid power output when gas enters the pump.
The method according to the invention comprises:
(a) measuring pump power consumption at timed inter-vals;
:' . .
(b) determining a recent pump motor power consumption from the measurements:
(c) determining a previous pump motor power consump-tion from the measurements;
(d) deriving the difference between steps (b) and (c);
and (e) denoting the difference as differential pump fluid power output.
The apparatus according to the invention , 10 comprises:
(a) means for measuring pump power consumption at ~ timed intervals;
,~ (b) means for determining a recent pump motor power consumption from the measurements;
(c) means for determining a previous pump motor power consumption from the measurements;
(d) means for deriving the difference between steps , , (b) and (c); and " (e) means for denoting the difference as indicative of ~'- 20 differential pump fluid power output when said difference exceeds a predetermined quantity.
, Several alternative methods and apparatus embody-~, ing the invention may be used to reliably determine if -, gas locking or pump off has occurred by measuring pump operating parameters at the surface. A preferred method i~ uses the following logic: (1) computations are per-, formed on measured motor load to determine if a drop in motor load has occurred. (2) For non-gassy pumping ~, application, the ESP is &hut down on the first indica-tion of a drop in motor load. This will occur at pump off; gas will not enter the pump and cause motor load to drop until the fluid level in the well is pumped `- down and the pump intake is uncovered. (3) For gassy pumping application, the ESP is shut down only when it gas-locks. Motor load will drop each time gas enters , ~
, , .. . .
. "
.:
(c) determining a previous pump motor power consump-tion from the measurements;
(d) deriving the difference between steps (b) and (c);
and (e) denoting the difference as differential pump fluid power output.
The apparatus according to the invention , 10 comprises:
(a) means for measuring pump power consumption at ~ timed intervals;
,~ (b) means for determining a recent pump motor power consumption from the measurements;
(c) means for determining a previous pump motor power consumption from the measurements;
(d) means for deriving the difference between steps , , (b) and (c); and " (e) means for denoting the difference as indicative of ~'- 20 differential pump fluid power output when said difference exceeds a predetermined quantity.
, Several alternative methods and apparatus embody-~, ing the invention may be used to reliably determine if -, gas locking or pump off has occurred by measuring pump operating parameters at the surface. A preferred method i~ uses the following logic: (1) computations are per-, formed on measured motor load to determine if a drop in motor load has occurred. (2) For non-gassy pumping ~, application, the ESP is &hut down on the first indica-tion of a drop in motor load. This will occur at pump off; gas will not enter the pump and cause motor load to drop until the fluid level in the well is pumped `- down and the pump intake is uncovered. (3) For gassy pumping application, the ESP is shut down only when it gas-locks. Motor load will drop each time gas enters , ~
, , .. . .
. "
.:
the pump, but will recover when the gas exits with the pump fluid. When a large amount of gas enters the pump and the pump becomes gas-locked, motor load will drop - but will not recover since the gas is trapped in the pump. In this application, the ESP is shut down if motor load drops and does not recover within an adequate length of time.
Preferably, the method (and apparatus for conduction the method) includes shutting the pump (or pump motor) down when the differential pump fluid power output exceeds a predetermined amount for a predeter-mined length of time (or when an underload is detected or alternatively, shutting the pump motor down when an underload is detected which exceeds a predetermined length of time).
Other purposes, distinctions over the art, advan-tages and features of the invention will be apparent to one skilled in the art upon review of the following description with reference to the accompanying drawing, ` 20 in which: Figure l shows a flow diagram of a preferred controller sequence of steps developed in accordance with the present invention.
In accordance with the present invention several parameters are monitored independently, or in any combination to determine if a change in electrical - submersible pump (ESP) motor load has occurred. These are apparent power, actual power, reactive power, power , factor, and current (since voltage is generally ~`- constant). Each one of these parameters will drop when ` 30 the ESP motor load drops. Ratios of combinations of these parameters may also be monitored since the ratios will change when motor load drops. If current is used to monitor motor load, voltage may also be measured as a secondary parameter to ensure current fluctuations ; 35 are not the result of voltage spikes or sags, i.e., : ~
..
' .:' .
Preferably, the method (and apparatus for conduction the method) includes shutting the pump (or pump motor) down when the differential pump fluid power output exceeds a predetermined amount for a predeter-mined length of time (or when an underload is detected or alternatively, shutting the pump motor down when an underload is detected which exceeds a predetermined length of time).
Other purposes, distinctions over the art, advan-tages and features of the invention will be apparent to one skilled in the art upon review of the following description with reference to the accompanying drawing, ` 20 in which: Figure l shows a flow diagram of a preferred controller sequence of steps developed in accordance with the present invention.
In accordance with the present invention several parameters are monitored independently, or in any combination to determine if a change in electrical - submersible pump (ESP) motor load has occurred. These are apparent power, actual power, reactive power, power , factor, and current (since voltage is generally ~`- constant). Each one of these parameters will drop when ` 30 the ESP motor load drops. Ratios of combinations of these parameters may also be monitored since the ratios will change when motor load drops. If current is used to monitor motor load, voltage may also be measured as a secondary parameter to ensure current fluctuations ; 35 are not the result of voltage spikes or sags, i.e., : ~
..
' .:' .
5 1 ~2 ~297 current can fluctuate due to other reasons than motor load. For example, the power company may not supply uniform voltages, or storms may cause variations, etc.
Motor load parameters can be measured with a variety of techniques. Parameters can be measured ~ directly or can be first subjected to filtering or "~ smoothing with a root mean square or averaging tech-nique before being measured. Measurements can be taken in an analog fashion with mathematical calculations performed with analog circuitry. Alternatively, analog measurements can be converted to digital and mathe-matical computations performed with either digital hardware or with software such as in a microprocessor.
Digital sampling rates, the length of time evaluated in computations, and data storage requirements are inter-y related but can vary widely. In a preferred embodiment, ~ the present invention used an analog-to-digital -~ sampling rate of 4 Hz, although sampling rates less than once every 15 minutes may be used at different , 20 time period, or used in the computations as described hereinafter.
, Unlike existing motor control technology that compares motor power or current to a setpoint, the control methods of the present invention utilize various techniques to determine if pump off has occurred as described hereinbelow. To determine if motor load has dropped, a comparison of the most recent motor load measurements may be made to any previous average motor load. Thus, the most recent motor load measurement can be a single data point or the average of many data points that last occurred. There is no -~ limit to the number of data points or the length of time over which the average can be calculated. Testing of the present invention was successful when using the - 35 average of the most recent one second of current and .
' .
~, .
" .
Motor load parameters can be measured with a variety of techniques. Parameters can be measured ~ directly or can be first subjected to filtering or "~ smoothing with a root mean square or averaging tech-nique before being measured. Measurements can be taken in an analog fashion with mathematical calculations performed with analog circuitry. Alternatively, analog measurements can be converted to digital and mathe-matical computations performed with either digital hardware or with software such as in a microprocessor.
Digital sampling rates, the length of time evaluated in computations, and data storage requirements are inter-y related but can vary widely. In a preferred embodiment, ~ the present invention used an analog-to-digital -~ sampling rate of 4 Hz, although sampling rates less than once every 15 minutes may be used at different , 20 time period, or used in the computations as described hereinafter.
, Unlike existing motor control technology that compares motor power or current to a setpoint, the control methods of the present invention utilize various techniques to determine if pump off has occurred as described hereinbelow. To determine if motor load has dropped, a comparison of the most recent motor load measurements may be made to any previous average motor load. Thus, the most recent motor load measurement can be a single data point or the average of many data points that last occurred. There is no -~ limit to the number of data points or the length of time over which the average can be calculated. Testing of the present invention was successful when using the - 35 average of the most recent one second of current and .
' .
~, .
" .
also using just the last single point reading of current. The previous motor load average is preferably computed over any time interval from ESP start to the first data point used in the most recent average. One method of determining the previous motor load is to continually recalculate the moving average of the motor load for any set length of time prior to the most recent average data. There is no limit to the number of data points or the length of time over which the average is calculated. Testing of the present invention has successfully used a moving 5-second average of current. The required degree of drop in the motor load parameter must be established in order to identify a potential gas lock or pump off condition. This degree ~ 15 is dependent upon which parameter is being monitored, J but is still quite flexible. In accordance with the present invention, a criteria that a current drop must be greater than 5 per cent was successfully shown but , testing has also indicated that success may be obtained with a criteria anywhere from l per cent to 20 per cent and a wider range of one-quarter per cent to 30 per i cent is possible although errors are more prone to ^~ occur in the wider range. In a gassy pumping condition, motor load must drop and remain down for a period of time before the ESP is shut down for gas locking. This required time the motor load must remain down is dependent on the length of time used in the averages in the above steps. In accordance with the present ! invention, there was successfully tested l0 seconds as - 30 one time criteria, but it was easily feasible to use anything greater than 2 seconds. However, this time limit could be cut to zero if longer time periods were used to calculate the two averages of motor loading.
~ The maximum time limit is only a function of how much ; 35 risk of damage it is possible to take with the ESP
. ~
~""' ' . .
~ ~ 7 - 1326297 -' before shutting down (for example, an hour or more would be extreme).
Computation of the differential of m~tor load with respect to time is another way to determine if motor load has dropped.
Motor load is sampled at regular intervals as stated above and the differential motor load is cal-culated by subtracting the previous motor load from the most recent motor load, and dividing the difference by time between the two measurements. The previous and most recent motor load values can each be single point ^ measurements or the averages of several measurements. A
significant negative result indicates a drop in motor load such as when an ESP is gas locked or pumped off.
` 15 The degree to which the differential must be negative depends on sampling rates and the time interval over which the differential is calculated. The ESP is pumped -` off if the differential becomes significantly negative and does not then become significantly positive. The differential method of controller calculation can be performed digitally or in an analog fashion.
- Integration of the motor load for a given period of time is yet another way to calculate average motor ~' loads.
Motor load is sampled at regular intervals as ! stated above and stored in a data array. The area under `1 the motor load versus time curve is calculated for the `~ most recent time period by using an integration tech-nique. The most recent time period can be any length specified by the user depending on the sensitivity required (the shorter the length, the more sensitive the calculation to changes in motor load).
The integration controller calculated method can ; also be performed digitally or in an analog fashion.
Gas locking or pump off is indicated if the most recent ~. .
. .
, .'~.
~' '- .
- 8 - 1 32 g297 integration of motor load is less than the previous integration be a predetermined amount. The length of time over which the integrations are performed, whether the reference integration is calculated at a fixed point in time or on a moving basis, the degree of drop required to be significant, and the time required for the drop to remain down in gassy applications will all - vary similarly as in the first method described above.
Finally, another way to determine if motor load has dropped is by performing a statistical analysis of - motor load. As in the other methods, motor load is sampled at regular intervals and stored in a data array. The sample distribution statistics are cal-culated from the previous motor load samples taken for a given length of time and the most recent motor load .;3 sample is compared to it. Drops in motor load that fall outside of control limits calculated from the previous motor load sample distribution and the desired sample confidence interval indicate a significant drop in motor load has occurred. The confidence interval that is used is dependent on the probability of error that it is possible to accept and can vary accordingly. If the most recent sample of motor load falls below the 1 calculated lower control limit for a predetermined `~ 25 length of time, then the ESP has gas locked or pumped off and is shut down. Additionally, a statistical ; calculation in motor load variance or standard i deviation indicates that motor load has become more variable, another indication that gas has entered the pump or pump off has occurred.
~ The pump off/gas locking controlling developed in :~ accordance with the present invention can be utilized in several ways. Thus, it is possible to be used as a . controller subassembly. The developed controller is : 35 wired in series with an existing motor controller to , - ' ' ', , .
augment/replace the underload functions of the existing controller. Alternatively, the apparatus can be inte-grated into a single motor controller package. Thus, it is necessary to replace the underload functions in a motor controller with the gas lock/pump off controller ~ functions. Also alternatively, the apparatus of the - present invention can be integrat~d into an intelligent remote terminal unit. This unit exercises motor control - functions to include pump off/gas lock control and has the additional capabilities of monitoring ESP
operation, storing operation data, and communication with a ~central computer.
; Having thus generally described the apparatus and method of the present invention, as well as its numerous advantages over the art, the following is a more detailed description of a preferred embodiment thereof given in accordance with specific reference to - the drawings.
Step 1: sample current continuously (analog to digital conversion) every 25 second. Step 2: start controller when current exceeds ~ amp (occurs when ESP
is started). Step 3: start controller functions when the current spike on ESP start is over. Step 4: take the most recent sample of current and store it in the ` first position of the data array for use later in the controller computations. Step 5: after the ESP is ; started, begin calculations only after the date array is full (6 seconds of current samples. Step 6:
calculate the most recent one second average of current by averaging the first four values in the data array.
Step 7: if the pump off counter is not equal to zero, then the last calculated difference was more than a 5%
drop, indicating that the ESP already has gas in it and may be pumped off. Step 8: if the ESP is not already at potential pump off, calculate the normal previous .
.. . .
, .
132~297 ~ 5-second average of current by averaging the last 20 i~ samples in the date array. Step 9: if the ESP is already at potential pump off, do not recalculate the previous 5-second average of current. Use the previous average of current calculated when current first dropped in order to compare the most recent current to its original level. Step lO: subtract the most recent l-second average from the previous 5-second average of current. Step 11: if the calculated difference is greater than a S% drop, then gas has entered the pump and the ESP is potentially pumped off. Step 12: shut the ESP off in non-gassy pumping conditions since a current drop greater than 5% will only occur at pump off. Step 13: count the length of time the ESP is in a ~ 15 potential pump off condition (one count equals 25 ; seconds). Step 14: in gassy pumping conditions, the ESP
` has pumped off and is shut down if current does not return to its original 5-second average (before current drop occurred) in lO seconds or less. Step 15: prepare - 20 the date array for the next current sample by bumping the data in the array down one. This effectively erases .. .
the oldest current sample and makes room for the next current sample to be added to the top of the array (first position).
While the above description is primarily directed to detecting electrical pump motor underload which is indicative of gas lock or pump off, the basic invention is more broadly drawn to methods and related apparatus for monitoring and controlling pump operation by measuring changes in pump input power. This is done (a) in pumps with electric motor drives by measuring motor load and comparing present motor loads to previous motor loads, (b) in pumps with hydraulic motor drives by measuring hydraulic power consumed (input pressure and flow rate - output pressure and flow rate) and, as .
., - ~ - .
.
.~ . .
, : ,, - ' .
above, comparing present motor loads to previous motor loads. Potential pump/motor combinations include (1) centrifugal pump with electric motor drive, (2) centri-fugal pump with hydraulic motor drive, (3) positive displacement pump with electric motor drive, (4) positive displacement pump with hydraulic motor drive.
The foregoing description of the invention is merely intended to be explanatory thereof, and various changes in the details of the described method and apparatus may be made within the scope of the appended claims without departing from the spirit of the invention.
, :
J
A, , .:
. ,~, .
. ~
'' ..
`'.
'`
' ' ' ' ' ..
~ The maximum time limit is only a function of how much ; 35 risk of damage it is possible to take with the ESP
. ~
~""' ' . .
~ ~ 7 - 1326297 -' before shutting down (for example, an hour or more would be extreme).
Computation of the differential of m~tor load with respect to time is another way to determine if motor load has dropped.
Motor load is sampled at regular intervals as stated above and the differential motor load is cal-culated by subtracting the previous motor load from the most recent motor load, and dividing the difference by time between the two measurements. The previous and most recent motor load values can each be single point ^ measurements or the averages of several measurements. A
significant negative result indicates a drop in motor load such as when an ESP is gas locked or pumped off.
` 15 The degree to which the differential must be negative depends on sampling rates and the time interval over which the differential is calculated. The ESP is pumped -` off if the differential becomes significantly negative and does not then become significantly positive. The differential method of controller calculation can be performed digitally or in an analog fashion.
- Integration of the motor load for a given period of time is yet another way to calculate average motor ~' loads.
Motor load is sampled at regular intervals as ! stated above and stored in a data array. The area under `1 the motor load versus time curve is calculated for the `~ most recent time period by using an integration tech-nique. The most recent time period can be any length specified by the user depending on the sensitivity required (the shorter the length, the more sensitive the calculation to changes in motor load).
The integration controller calculated method can ; also be performed digitally or in an analog fashion.
Gas locking or pump off is indicated if the most recent ~. .
. .
, .'~.
~' '- .
- 8 - 1 32 g297 integration of motor load is less than the previous integration be a predetermined amount. The length of time over which the integrations are performed, whether the reference integration is calculated at a fixed point in time or on a moving basis, the degree of drop required to be significant, and the time required for the drop to remain down in gassy applications will all - vary similarly as in the first method described above.
Finally, another way to determine if motor load has dropped is by performing a statistical analysis of - motor load. As in the other methods, motor load is sampled at regular intervals and stored in a data array. The sample distribution statistics are cal-culated from the previous motor load samples taken for a given length of time and the most recent motor load .;3 sample is compared to it. Drops in motor load that fall outside of control limits calculated from the previous motor load sample distribution and the desired sample confidence interval indicate a significant drop in motor load has occurred. The confidence interval that is used is dependent on the probability of error that it is possible to accept and can vary accordingly. If the most recent sample of motor load falls below the 1 calculated lower control limit for a predetermined `~ 25 length of time, then the ESP has gas locked or pumped off and is shut down. Additionally, a statistical ; calculation in motor load variance or standard i deviation indicates that motor load has become more variable, another indication that gas has entered the pump or pump off has occurred.
~ The pump off/gas locking controlling developed in :~ accordance with the present invention can be utilized in several ways. Thus, it is possible to be used as a . controller subassembly. The developed controller is : 35 wired in series with an existing motor controller to , - ' ' ', , .
augment/replace the underload functions of the existing controller. Alternatively, the apparatus can be inte-grated into a single motor controller package. Thus, it is necessary to replace the underload functions in a motor controller with the gas lock/pump off controller ~ functions. Also alternatively, the apparatus of the - present invention can be integrat~d into an intelligent remote terminal unit. This unit exercises motor control - functions to include pump off/gas lock control and has the additional capabilities of monitoring ESP
operation, storing operation data, and communication with a ~central computer.
; Having thus generally described the apparatus and method of the present invention, as well as its numerous advantages over the art, the following is a more detailed description of a preferred embodiment thereof given in accordance with specific reference to - the drawings.
Step 1: sample current continuously (analog to digital conversion) every 25 second. Step 2: start controller when current exceeds ~ amp (occurs when ESP
is started). Step 3: start controller functions when the current spike on ESP start is over. Step 4: take the most recent sample of current and store it in the ` first position of the data array for use later in the controller computations. Step 5: after the ESP is ; started, begin calculations only after the date array is full (6 seconds of current samples. Step 6:
calculate the most recent one second average of current by averaging the first four values in the data array.
Step 7: if the pump off counter is not equal to zero, then the last calculated difference was more than a 5%
drop, indicating that the ESP already has gas in it and may be pumped off. Step 8: if the ESP is not already at potential pump off, calculate the normal previous .
.. . .
, .
132~297 ~ 5-second average of current by averaging the last 20 i~ samples in the date array. Step 9: if the ESP is already at potential pump off, do not recalculate the previous 5-second average of current. Use the previous average of current calculated when current first dropped in order to compare the most recent current to its original level. Step lO: subtract the most recent l-second average from the previous 5-second average of current. Step 11: if the calculated difference is greater than a S% drop, then gas has entered the pump and the ESP is potentially pumped off. Step 12: shut the ESP off in non-gassy pumping conditions since a current drop greater than 5% will only occur at pump off. Step 13: count the length of time the ESP is in a ~ 15 potential pump off condition (one count equals 25 ; seconds). Step 14: in gassy pumping conditions, the ESP
` has pumped off and is shut down if current does not return to its original 5-second average (before current drop occurred) in lO seconds or less. Step 15: prepare - 20 the date array for the next current sample by bumping the data in the array down one. This effectively erases .. .
the oldest current sample and makes room for the next current sample to be added to the top of the array (first position).
While the above description is primarily directed to detecting electrical pump motor underload which is indicative of gas lock or pump off, the basic invention is more broadly drawn to methods and related apparatus for monitoring and controlling pump operation by measuring changes in pump input power. This is done (a) in pumps with electric motor drives by measuring motor load and comparing present motor loads to previous motor loads, (b) in pumps with hydraulic motor drives by measuring hydraulic power consumed (input pressure and flow rate - output pressure and flow rate) and, as .
., - ~ - .
.
.~ . .
, : ,, - ' .
above, comparing present motor loads to previous motor loads. Potential pump/motor combinations include (1) centrifugal pump with electric motor drive, (2) centri-fugal pump with hydraulic motor drive, (3) positive displacement pump with electric motor drive, (4) positive displacement pump with hydraulic motor drive.
The foregoing description of the invention is merely intended to be explanatory thereof, and various changes in the details of the described method and apparatus may be made within the scope of the appended claims without departing from the spirit of the invention.
, :
J
A, , .:
. ,~, .
. ~
'' ..
`'.
'`
' ' ' ' ' ..
Claims (20)
1. A method for measuring differential pump fluid power output comprising:
(a) measuring pump power consumption at timed inter-vals;
(b) determining a recent pump motor power consumption from the measurements;
(c) determining a previous pump motor power consumpt-ion from the measurements;
(d) deriving the difference between steps (b) and (c);
and (e) denoting the difference as differential pump fluid power output.
(a) measuring pump power consumption at timed inter-vals;
(b) determining a recent pump motor power consumption from the measurements;
(c) determining a previous pump motor power consumpt-ion from the measurements;
(d) deriving the difference between steps (b) and (c);
and (e) denoting the difference as differential pump fluid power output.
2. The method of claim 1 including shutting the pump down when said differential pump fluid power output exceeds a predetermined amount for a predetermined length of time.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the pump is driven by an electric motor and the pump power consumption is measured by measuring the motor load, the method further comprising the step of:
(a) measuring motor loads at times intervals;
(b) determining a recent motor load from the measure-ments;
(c) determining a previous motor load from the measurements;
(d) deriving the difference between steps (b) and (c);
(e) denoting the difference as indicative of pump motor underload when said difference exceeds a predetermined quantity, and (f) denoting the pump motor underload as indicative of differential pump fluid power output.
(a) measuring motor loads at times intervals;
(b) determining a recent motor load from the measure-ments;
(c) determining a previous motor load from the measurements;
(d) deriving the difference between steps (b) and (c);
(e) denoting the difference as indicative of pump motor underload when said difference exceeds a predetermined quantity, and (f) denoting the pump motor underload as indicative of differential pump fluid power output.
4. The method of claim 3 including shutting the pump motor down when said underload is detected.
5. The method of claim 3 including shutting the pump motor down when said underload is detected which exceeds a predetermined length of time.
6. The method of claim 3 wherein said motor loads are monitored from apparent power utilized by said pump motor.
7. The method of claim 3 wherein said motor loads are monitored from actual power utilized by said pump motor.
8. The method of claim 3 wherein said motor loads are monitored from reactive power utilized by said pump motor.
9. The method of claim 3 wherein said motor loads are monitored from current utilized by said pump motor.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein voltage accompanying said current is utilized to screen out corresponding current fluctuations which are the result of voltage spikes or sags and not pump off or gas locking.
11. The method of claim 3 wherein said recent motor load is an average of measurements computed over a selected time interval, and wherein also said previous motor load is an average of measurements computed over a selected time interval.
12. The method of claim 3 wherein step (d) is based on a computation of the differential of motor load with respect to time.
13. The method of claim 3 wherein step (d) is based on integration of motor load with respect to time.
14. The method of claim 3 wherein step (d) is based on statistical analysis.
15. An apparatus for measuring differential pump fluid power output comprising:
(a) means for measuring pump power consumption at timed intervals;
(b) means for determining a recent pump motor power consumption from the measurements;
(c) means for determining a previous pump motor power consumption from the measurements;
(d) means for deriving the difference between steps (b) and (c); and (e) means for denoting the difference as indicative of differential pump fluid power output when said difference exceeds a predetermined quantity.
(a) means for measuring pump power consumption at timed intervals;
(b) means for determining a recent pump motor power consumption from the measurements;
(c) means for determining a previous pump motor power consumption from the measurements;
(d) means for deriving the difference between steps (b) and (c); and (e) means for denoting the difference as indicative of differential pump fluid power output when said difference exceeds a predetermined quantity.
16. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the pump is driven by an electrical pump motor, the apparatus further comprising:
- means for measuring motor loads at timed intervals;
- means for denoting the motor load as indicative of pump fluid power consumption, and;
- means for denoting the difference between a recent and a previous motor load as indicative of pump motor underload when said difference exceeds a predetermined quantity.
- means for measuring motor loads at timed intervals;
- means for denoting the motor load as indicative of pump fluid power consumption, and;
- means for denoting the difference between a recent and a previous motor load as indicative of pump motor underload when said difference exceeds a predetermined quantity.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 including means for shutting the pump motor down when said underload is detected.
18. The apparatus of claim 17 applied as a controller subassembly wired in series with a motor controller, said controller subassembly being functional to augment or replace underload functions of said motor controller.
19. The apparatus of claim 17 applied as an integrated motor controller package functional to replace underload functions of a motor controller with gas lock/pump off controller functions.
20. The apparatus of claim 17 applied as an integrated intelligent remote terminal unit functional to exercise motor control functions to include pump off/gas lock control and have capabilities of monitoring electrical submersible pump operation parameters, storing operation data and communication with a central computer.
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU19175/88A AU602995B2 (en) | 1988-07-21 | 1988-07-18 | Method and apparatus for controlling a pump |
| DE3824847A DE3824847A1 (en) | 1988-07-21 | 1988-07-21 | Method and device for the measurement of the power consumption difference of a pump |
| CA000572625A CA1326297C (en) | 1988-07-21 | 1988-07-21 | Method and apparatus for measuring differential fluid power output of a pump |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE3824847A DE3824847A1 (en) | 1988-07-21 | 1988-07-21 | Method and device for the measurement of the power consumption difference of a pump |
| CA000572625A CA1326297C (en) | 1988-07-21 | 1988-07-21 | Method and apparatus for measuring differential fluid power output of a pump |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1326297C true CA1326297C (en) | 1994-01-18 |
Family
ID=25672005
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000572625A Expired - Fee Related CA1326297C (en) | 1988-07-21 | 1988-07-21 | Method and apparatus for measuring differential fluid power output of a pump |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| AU (1) | AU602995B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1326297C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3824847A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10197062B2 (en) | 2015-10-21 | 2019-02-05 | Rolls-Royce Plc | Aero-engine low pressure pump |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU7196594A (en) * | 1993-07-08 | 1995-02-06 | Harold Timothy Downs | Pump controller |
| US5833437A (en) * | 1996-07-02 | 1998-11-10 | Shurflo Pump Manufacturing Co. | Bilge pump |
| JP3723866B2 (en) * | 2001-02-07 | 2005-12-07 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Internal pump performance monitoring method and apparatus |
| US6715994B2 (en) | 2001-11-12 | 2004-04-06 | Shurflo Pump Manufacturing Co., Inc. | Bilge pump |
| US7748965B2 (en) | 2005-10-17 | 2010-07-06 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Livewell/baitwell pump featuring rotating transom pickup tube |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0148941A1 (en) * | 1983-07-11 | 1985-07-24 | Square D Company | Mechanically operated pressure switch having solid state components |
| WO1986004119A1 (en) * | 1984-12-31 | 1986-07-17 | Rule Industries, Inc. | Pump control apparatus and method |
| EP0314249A3 (en) * | 1987-10-28 | 1990-05-30 | Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. | Pump off/gas lock motor controller for electrical submersible pumps |
-
1988
- 1988-07-18 AU AU19175/88A patent/AU602995B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1988-07-21 CA CA000572625A patent/CA1326297C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1988-07-21 DE DE3824847A patent/DE3824847A1/en not_active Ceased
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10197062B2 (en) | 2015-10-21 | 2019-02-05 | Rolls-Royce Plc | Aero-engine low pressure pump |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU602995B2 (en) | 1990-11-01 |
| AU1917588A (en) | 1990-05-31 |
| DE3824847A1 (en) | 1990-01-25 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5015151A (en) | Motor controller for electrical submersible pumps | |
| CA2094479C (en) | Monitoring and pump-off control with downhole pump cards | |
| US10409299B2 (en) | Pump controller system and method | |
| US4854164A (en) | Rod pump optimization system | |
| US5915932A (en) | Peristaltic pump having a roller support | |
| US7199557B2 (en) | Apparatus, methods and computer program products for estimation of battery reserve life using adaptively modified state of health indicator-based reserve life models | |
| US4918368A (en) | System for charging batteries and measuring capacities and efficiencies thereof | |
| CA1250823A (en) | Method of and apparatus for filling a container with gas | |
| EP0314249A2 (en) | Pump off/gas lock motor controller for electrical submersible pumps | |
| CA1326297C (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring differential fluid power output of a pump | |
| CN105686699A (en) | Intelligent control method of food processing machine | |
| FI83808B (en) | FOERFARANDE FOER STYRNING AV LUFTPRODUKTIONEN I EN SCREW COMPRESSOR. | |
| KR101790874B1 (en) | Pump consumption power calculation method at revolution per minute in inverter controlled water supply pump | |
| KR101314833B1 (en) | A method of controlling pressurized water supply, an apparatus and a system of thereof | |
| US5678981A (en) | Method to control sucker rod pump | |
| JP2735228B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting underload of a submersible electric pump | |
| CN115728642A (en) | Method and device for determining percentage of electric quantity of battery, electric energy meter and storage medium | |
| JPS59119240A (en) | Water permeability testing method | |
| NL8801918A (en) | Method and device for measuring the differential fluid- delivery capacity of a pump | |
| JPS59119239A (en) | Method and device for water permeability test | |
| NO301855B1 (en) | Procedure for controlling a pump | |
| CN108007705B (en) | Humidification quantity measuring device for air conditioner | |
| CN108775947A (en) | Air conditioner for elevator drip tray level testing methods and system | |
| JP6995672B2 (en) | Pump equipment and management method of pump equipment | |
| CN111811607B (en) | Irregular tank volume measuring system and method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKLA | Lapsed |