CA1279450C - Nonwoven fabric-like product using a bacterial cellulose binder and method for its preparation - Google Patents

Abstract

NONWOVEN PAPER OR FABRIC-LIKE PRODUCT USING A
BACTERIAL CELLULOSE BINDER AND METHOD FOR ITS PREPARATION

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
The present invention is a method of bonding a fibrous wet laid nonwoven fabric-like product using bacterial cellulose as a binder. The bacterial cellulose most useful for the invention is the type formed in an agitated culture. Microorganisms of the genus Acetobacter which are genetically adapted to be good cellulose producers under agitated conditions are preferred cellulose producers. From 1-30% of the bacterial cellulose may be added to a water slurry of other sheet forming fibers as a binder.
Preferably 20% or less bacterial cellulose is used since higher amounts retard drainage rates significantly. Bacterial cellulose conveys many desirable properties such as excellent hydrophilicity with low air porosity and high tensile index. It may be used in many cases as a total replacement for the latex binders now used for manufacture of nonwoven fabrics.
Bacterial cellulose is especially well adapted for the manufacture of pattern bonded sheets.

Description

NONWOVEN FABRIC-LIKE PRODUCT USING A
BACTERIAL CELLULOSE BINDER AND METHOD FOR ITS PREPARATION

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a method of making a nonwoven fabric-like product using bacterially formed eellulose as a binding agent. The invention further includes the wet formed products made by the above method. A particularly useful bacterial cellulose is one ~ormed in aerated 5 agitated culture using a microorganism of the genus Acetobacter genetically selected for cellulose production under agitated conditions.
It has been known for many years that cellulose can be synthesized by certain bacteria, particularly those of the genus Acetobacter. This phenomenon has received considerable study in the years 10 following 1930. ~Vhile a great deal has been learned about the production of bacterial cellulose in the past 50 years, it has been primarily of academic interest and only very recently has it been proposed for use in products having potential commercial significance.
Taxonomists have been unable to agree upon a consistent classi-15 fication of the cellulose producing species of Acetobacter. For example,the cellulose producing microorganisms listed in the 15th Edition of the Catalog o~ the American Type Culture Collection under accession numbers 10245, 10821, and 23769 are classified both as Acetobacter aceti subsp.
xylinum and as Acetobacter ~nus. For the purposes of the present 20 invention any species or variety of bacterium within the genus Acetobacter that will produce cellulose under agitated conditions should be regarded as a suitable cellulose producer for the purposes of the present invention.
Acetobacter aceti subsp. x~Tlinum, for purposes of brevity here-after referred to simply as AcetobacteP xylinum, is normally cuItured under 25 static conditions with the cellulose microfibrils being produced at the air medium interface. Most bacteria of this species are very poor eellulose producers when grown in agitated culture. Various reasons have been proposed to account for this phenomenon. It may be that agitated culture induces a tendency to mutation to noncellulose producing types. Perhaps for 30 this reason two recent proposed products using bacterial cellulose have been based on static cultures of Acetobacter xylinum.

' ' 34~0 Brown, in U.S. Patent 4,378,431, describes a method for imparting hydrophilic characteristics to fibrous hydrophobic sub-stances. The Acetobacter bacterium is cultured in the presence of the synthetic substrate. During the culture process, cellulose microfi-brils are produced on and arolmd the surface of the substrate. Thesubstrate is preferably in the form of a fiber which may be either woven or nonwoven. Natural substrates may also be used. The inven-tor notes, without providing an example, that -the strength of paper may be increased. The product is seen as a cambination of a bacterial pel-licle and the substrate. To the present inventors' knowledge thisprocess has not had any cammercial utilization due to several prob-lems. A major one is that -the substrate must be retained in the culture medlum for a long enough period of time for cellulose to grow on the surface. For most proposed applications further treatment, such as a hot caustic leaching, would then be necessary to rem~ve the resid-ual bacteria before use. Such a treatment could seriously damage the integrity of the substrate.
U.K. Patent application 2,131,701A describes formation of bacterial pellicle which is ultimately said to be usable as a wound dressing. This process also employs static culture conditions for formation of the cellulose pellicle.
In our ~.S. Patent No. 4,863,565, we disclose Acetobacter varieties which are vigorous cellulose producers under agitated culture conditions. I`he cellulose produced by the microorganisms and culture conditions disclosed in this application appears to be a unique type, physically quite different from the bacterial cellulose produced in static cultures. It has a highly branched, three dimensional, reticu-lated structure. A normal cellulose pellicle produced in static culture tends to have a lamellar structure with a very much lower amount of branching. This application claims sheets formed from the bacterial cellulose. These sheets are unique in their very low air porosity and high resistance to densification by conventional means.
The present invention is not directed to sheet materials in which bacterial cellulose is a major component. Rather, it is directed to the use of bacterial cellulose as a minor component used as a binder for other fibers in wet formed sheets.

SU~MARY OF THE r~VENTION
The present invention comprises a method for bonding a fibrous wet laid, nonwoven paper or fabri~like product using bacterial cellulose as the binder. The bacteri~l cellulose is present as a minor portion of the total 5 components of the ultimate product. Normally it will be used within a range of 1-30% by weight of the product. More preferably, it is present in an amount of about ~-2096 by weight of the product. Larger amounts of bacterial cellulose result in sheet making slurries which have inordinately long drainage times.
- 1~ The invention is further directed to the nonwoven paper or fabric-like products formed by the above method.
The term "bacterial cellulose" as used herein refers to Q product free of residual bacterial cells m&de under agitated culture conditions by a bacterium of the genus Acetobac er. The strains of bacteria employed and the culturing conditions used may be similar to those disclosed in our U.S.
Patent No. 4,863,565.
The method is suitable for use with virtually any fiber which can be formed into a sheet by a wet process. These fibers may be of either hydrophobic or hydrophilic nature and may be of natural or synthetic origin.
Suitable fibers may be based on cellulose, polyester, polyolefin, nylon, acrylic, ~lass, and metallic materials. Among the cellulose fibers suitable are materials such as wood pulps, which may be of either softwood or hardwood origin. The fibers may be purified by any of the well known processes. These include but are not limited to the well known mechanical, thermomechanical, kraft and sulfite pulping methods. The cellulose fibers may also be of chemically or physically modified nature such as viscose, acetate, or cuprammonium rayons. The polyolefins would include materials made from polyethylene or polypropylene, the latter presently being the more important material.
An apparent unique property of bacterial cellulose is its ability to form pattern bonded sheets. In a pattern bonded sheet some overall bonding occurs. However, the most intense bonding o~ the major fiber constituents occurs in some predetermined geometric pattern. Pattern bonded nonwoven sheet materials, bonded with synthetic resins, are well known in the prior art. To the present inventors' knowledge, this has not been accomplished before using a cellulose binder with other types of fibers .

~794~iO
~P 2 l3680 4 in s;tu. A preferred way of making pattern bonded materials is the use of a geometrically patterned mask overlying the drainage wire on which the sheets are formed. A forming screen made in some predetermined pattern is also suitable.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for making wet laid nonwoven paper or fabric-like products using bacterial eellulose as a binder material.
It is a further object to provide new nonwoven paper or fabric-like products having unique physical properties.
11) These and many other objects will become readily apparent on reading the following detailed description talcen in conjunction with the attached drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE D~AWINGS
Figure 1 is a comparison between an all bacterial ceMulose product and a Douglas-fir kraft pulp showing tensile index as a function of sheet density.
Figure 2 is a plot of the effect of binder concentration on tensile index of various polyester fiber-wood pulp mixtures.
Figures 3-6 show improvements in tensile index when bacterial cellulose and softwood kraft fibers are added respectively to polypropylene, polyester and rayon fibers.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMl~NTS
The procedures of the present invention are best understood by reference to the following examples.

Example 1 Product on of Bacterial Cellulose The bacterial cellulose of the present invention was produced in agitated culture by a strain of Acetobacter aceti var. xylinum grown as a subculture of ATCC Aecession No. 53-263, Deposited September 13, 1985 under the terms of the Budapest Treaty.
The following base medium was used for all cultures. This will - 35 be referred to henceforth as C~L medium.

4P 2 ~'~7~3~1S~
l 3680 5 Ingredient Final Conc. (mM) ~H4~2SO4 25 ~12Po4 7 . 3 MgSO4 1. 0 EeSOal û. 013 CaCl2 0.10 Na2MoO4 0 . 001 ZnSO4 0. 006 MnSO4 0. 006 CuSO4 0. 0002 Vitamin mix 10 mL/L
Carbon source As later specified Corn steep liquor As later specified Antifoam 0.01% v/v 15 The final pH of the medium was 5.0 + 0.2.
The vitamin mix was formulated as follows:
In redient Conc. mg/L
Inositol 200 Niacin 40 20 Pyridoxine HCl 40 Thiamine HCl 40 Ca Pantothenate 20 Riboflavin 20 p-Aminobenzoic acid 20 25 Folic acid 0.2 Biotin 0. 2 Corn steep liquor (CSL) varies in composition depending on the supplier and mode of treatment. A product obtained as Lot E804 from Corn Products Unit7 CPC North America, Stockton, California may be considered 30 typical and is described as follows:

. :., : , ~279~

Major Component %
Solids 43. 8 Crude protein 18 . 4 Fat 0-5 Crude Iiber 0.1 Ash 6.9 Calcium 0 . 02 Phosphorous 1. 3 Nitrogen-free extract 17.8 Non-protein nitrogen 1.4 NaCl o. 5 Potassium 1. 8 Reducing sugars (as dextrose) 2. 9 Starch 1. 6 The pH of the above is about 4. 5.
The bacteria were first multiplied as a pre-seed culture using CSL medium with 4% (w/v) glucose as the carbon source and 5% (w/v) CSL.
Cultures were grown in 100 mL of the medium in a 750 mL Falcon #3028 tissue c~ture flask at 30C for 48 hours. The entire contents of the culture flask was blended and used to malce a 5% (v/v) inoculum of the seed culture.
Preseeds were streaked on culture plates to check for homogeneity and possible contarnination.
Seed cultures were grown in 400 mL of the above-described medium in 2 I. baffled flasks in a reciprocal shaker at 125 rpm at 30C for two days. Seed cultures were blended and streaked as before to check for contamination before further use.
Bacterially formed ceUulose for the work to be described later was formed in a continuously stirred 14 L Chemap fermentor using an initial 12 L culture volume inoculated with 5% (v/v) of the seed cultures. An 30 initial glucose concentration of 32 g/L in the medium was supplemented during the 72-hour fermentor run with an additional 143 g/L added inter-mittently during the run. In similar fashion, the initial 2% (v/v) CSL
concentration was augmented by the addition of an amount equivalent to 2%
by volume of the initial volume at 32 hours and 59 hours. Cellulose 35 concentration reached about 1207 g/L during the fermentation. Throughout the fermentation dissolved oxygen was maintained at about 30% air saturation.

79~

Following fermentation, the cellulose was allowed to settle and the supernatant liquid poured off. The remaining cellulose was washed with deionized water and then extracted with 0.5 M NaO~ solution at 60C for 2 hours. Af~er extraction the cellulose was again washed with deionized water to remove residual alkali and bacterial ceUs. More recent work has shown that 0.1 M NaOH solution is entirely adequate for the extraction step.
The purified cellulose was rnaintained in wet condition for further use. This material was readily dispersible in water to form a uniform slurry.
The bacterial cellulose produced under stirred or agitated conditions, as described above, has a microstructure quite diffsrent from that produced in conventional static cultures. It is a reticulated product formed by a substantially continuous network of branching interconnected cellulose strands.
The bacterial cellulose prepared as above by the agitated ~ermentation has filament widths much smaller than softwood pulp fibers or cotton fiber. Typically these filaments will be about 0.05-0.20 um in width with no definite length due to the contimlous network structure. A softwood fiber averages about 30 um in width and 2-5 mm in length while a cotton ~iber is about half this width and about 25 mm long. The fine, fibrillar structure of the bacterial cellulose provides much more surface area in the wet state than other cellulose fibers. This results in high water holding capacity and sugge9ts the potential for strong bonding.
By itself, when sheeted by conventional papermaking methods the bacterial cellulose tends to form sheets of relatively low density, very low porosity, and unusually high tensile index. (Tensile index is calculated by dividing tensile strength by grammage or basis weight.) However, the bacterial cellulose is a very slow draining material when used by itself.
When used as a minor component in admixture with other ~ibrous materials, bacterial cellulose made as described above conveys many of its desirable properties without seriously decreasing the drainage rate.

Example 2 Effect of Sheet Density on Tensile Index of Bacterial Cellulose and Hemlock Kraft Sheets One characteristic of the bacterial cellulose used with the present invention is its excellent tensile strength even at very low sheet ~Z79~

136~0 8 density. As was seen in the previous example, this characteristic is contributed to blends of bacterial cellulose with various wood pulps.
EIandsheets were made îrom all bacterial cellulose and all Douglas-fir kraft pulp over a r ange of densities~ These handsheets were made to an approximate basis weight of 60 g1m2 according to the procedure described in TAPPI official test method T 205 om81. The bacterial cellulose (1.2 g in 2 L of water) was dispersed in a British disintegrator and sheeted on a 200 mesh wire screen in an automatic sheet mold. Drainage time exceeded 2 hours. The moist handsheets were initially gently pressed between blotters to remove excess water. Sheets were then placed in a TAPPI press between blotters under a 345 kPa load for varying times to produce sheets of various densities. Ultimately the sheets were dried using a conventional Noble and Wood drum dryer.
A Douglas-fir kraft pulp was similarly prepared and sheeted.
However, this pulp was sheeted from unrefined stock and from samples refined in a PFI mill for 1500 and 7500 revolutions to achieve varying densities.
A comparison of tensile indices of bacterial cellulose and Douglas-fir kraft pulp at various sheet densities is shown in ~igure 1. Sheets made from bacterial cellulose have excellent tensile strength at very low sheet densities whereas the hemlock kraft sheets are very weak below densities of Qbout 500 kg/m3.

Example 3 Mixture of Bacterial Cellulose with Thermomechanical Wood Pulp Kraft pulps are frequently added in minor percentages to thermomechanical pulps to enhance tensile and tear strengths. Bacterial cellulose (BAC) was further added to a mixture of thermomechanical (TM) newsprint pulp with 1596 unrefined semibleached softwood kraft (SBK~ pulp.
The thermomechanical pulp was refined to a freeness of 74 ~SF and the kraft pulp was at 659 C~F. Bacterial cellulose of the type described in Example 1 was used to replace thermomechanical pulp in amounts of 0, 1, 2 and 5%. Fiber slurries were prepared in a British Disintegrator and formed into Tappi standard handsheets using the procedure of Tappi method T205 om81. The resulting handsheets were conditioned and tested for tensile and tear strengths with the foUowing resultso ~P 2 ~79~S~
1 3~80 9 Table I
Properties of TM Pulp/SBK Pulp/BAC Blends Tensile Index, Tear Ir~lex TMP ~6 S13K % B~(~, 96 N-/g mN-m /~
? ~ _ 100 0 0 38.2 7.1 85 15 0 38 . 2 10. 1 84 15 1 41 . 910.4 83 15 2 44 . 410 . 3 16 5 46.1 9.5 The data show the very positive contribution of bacterial cellulose to tensile strength improvement without significantly penalizing tear strength.

Example 4 2n Bacterial Cellulose Used in Nonwoven Fabrics .
Bacterial cellulose contributes many desirable properties when used in place of or in conjunction with various resins as a bonding agent for nonwoven fabrics. Among the properties controlled are strength, porosity, hydrophilicity, and hand or feel of the product. Suitable fibers include all 25 those currently used for nonwoven fabrics such as rayon, nylons, polyesters, polypropylerle, and wood fibers. The material is expected to be useful also with glass and other inorganic fibers such as metal, carbon, etc.
It is most preferable that the nonwoven fabric be a vvet-laid type since this process greatly simplifies uniform inclusion of the bacterial 30 cellulose. Control of the formation process also permits the fabrics to be uniformly bonded or pattern bonded in a predetermined geometric form.
Pattern bonding is useful to control drape and hand eharacteristics.
~ series of samples was made using mixtures of polyester fiber and unrefined softwood kraft pulp fiber to simulate a nonwo~en fabric 35 typical of those used in surgical drapes and gowns. These fabrics are usually made from the following materials:
Polyester fibers (3 denier, 13 mm) 2n-35%
Softwood kraft pulp fibers (unrefined) 30-50%
Hemp fibers 0-5%
Soft acrylic latex binder 2û-30%
Fluorocarbon (water repellent)<1%

,~
. ' : -.

4P 2 ~X7~
] 3680 10 P~lyester fibers of the above type were obtained from Mini Fibers, Inc., Johnson City, Tennessee as their product Code No. 6 3050. The softwood pulp was an undried, bleached Douglas-fir kraft pulp.
The bacterial cellulose and wood pulp (~r0.9-1.2 g comhined dry weight) were dispersed in a standard laboratory British disintegrator for 600 counts, or about 5 minutes (1 count is equal to 25 revolutions). Next, the polyester fiber and about 0.5 g of a nonionic surfactant (Triton X-100, Rohm and EIaas Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) were added and dispersed for an additional 600 counts. The fiber slurry was sheeted in a Tappi sheet mold.
Each sheet was drained, removed from the mold on the forming wire, covered with three blotter layers, couched with a standard Tappi roller, pressed 5 minutes at 345 kPa in a standard Tappi press, and dried on a drum dryer.
Samples were made with seven fiber combinations using levels of 0, 5, 10 and 20% bacterial cellulose. Compositions and pertinent physical properties are given in Table II.
Table II
Bacterial Cellulose Bonded Pol~ ster Based Nonwoven Fabrics Tensile Polyester Wood Pulp BAC(l) Densi~y Index Stretch Tear Iry~ex - - ~ % k~ N-m/g %mN m /F
0 138 1.1 1.66.4 0 141 2.3 1.67.7 216 27.3 2.953.7 183 22.6 1.7> 55 176 21.8 2.9> 55 47.5 47.5 5 164 12.5 1.936.5 198 20.6 3.441.3 193 14.4 3.~25.0 219 20.4 4.231.3 245 27.5 2.727.2 0 100 0 167 3.8 2.73.9 40 (1) Bacterial ~ellulose. All sheets were made at a basis weight OI
60-61 glm .
The use of even modest quantities of bacterial cellulose contributed significant tear and tensile strength to the fabric.
The efficiency of the bacteriel cellulose as a binder can be seen by comparing the above samples with those conventionally bonded by a * Trade-r,lark 5~

resin. Dried wet formed sheets using various blends of wood pu1p and polyester fiber were conditioned for two hours at 50~6 R.H. and 20C.
These were placed on squares of polyethylene sheeting and sprayed with a sufficient amount of a resin emulsion tlate2c) to give the desired add-on. The 5 latex used was a soft heat reactive acrylic material, Type 26120, supplied by B. F. Goodrich Co., Cleveland, Ohio, as a 48.5% solids emulsion. This was diluted to 6~6 solids content before spraying. One hour after spraying the wet sheets were placed on steel plates and stacked with brass drying rings to allow overnight air drying. The stacks of dried, latex treated sheets were then placed in an oven for 30 minutes at 150C to cure the latex. Sheets were conditioned and tested as above with the results being reported in Table m.
Table III
Latex Bonded Polyester Based Nonwoven Fabrics Tensile Polyester Wood Pu1p BAC(1) Densi~y Index Stretch Tear In2dex 20 % % _ % Icg/m _N-mtg % mN-m /~
'L5 101as6 1~ .7 6.2 > 55 ~0 20 158 19.7 11.0 ~ 55 25 35 35 30 1û4 25.2 16.8 > 55 22.6 67.5 10 162 11.8 8.2 38.3 20 175 16.5 13.8 40.7 17.5 52.5 30 197 20.2 18.3 33.2 In general, bacterial cellulose is at least equivalent to the latex binder in contribution to tear strength. Bacterial cellulose is superior to the latex binder in all cases in its contribution to tensile strength. ~urther, tensile strength of the products made using the bacterial cellulose binder appears to be essentially insensitive to the ratio of polyester fiber to wood 35 puIp. This is quite in contrast to the use OI any given concentration of latex binder when tensile strength drops when the ratio of wood pulp to polyester is increased. This effect on tensile strength can be readily seen when the data of Tables II and IlI are plotted (Figure 2). All of the points plotted for - the bacterial ce11ulose binder fall closely on the upper curve, even over the 40 wide ratios of polyester to wood pulp of 1:1 to 1:6.7. However, the two ratios of polyester to wood pulp used with latex binder ~11 on individual curves. This phenomenon is important because it indicates that much lower ~P 2 ~ ~7~5~
l3680 12 usages of the expensive polyester fiber would be acceptable using the bacterial cellulose binder. Fxpressed from the standpoint of binder efficiency 1096 bacterial cellulose is equivalent in both tear and tensile strength contribution to 20-30% latex.
Further experiments have shown similar results to the above when all polyester fiber was used. It might be noted that the resin bonded materials are thus far superior to those bonded with bacterial cellulose when retention of tensile strength ~mder wet conditions is a critical property.

lû Example 5 Polypropylene and Pol~7ester Sheets Bonded with Bacterial Cellulose Separate blends of polypropylene and of polyester fibers were made using varying amounts of bacterial cellulose as a binder. These were prepared and formed into sheets in similar manner to the nonwoven fabrics described in Example 4. The polyester fibers were obtained from the supplier noted previously, but for this set of samples were a different length. They were 3 denier by 3.1 mm long and were identified as Code 6 31035. The polypropylene fiber was also supplied by Mini Fibers as Fibrel, Code E-990. These fibers were 1.2 denier by 2.5 mm long. No surfactant was needed to obtain good dispersion of either fiber.
Sheets were made with each synthetic fiber using 0, 2, 5, L0 and 20% bacterial cellulose. The polypropylene sheets having 20% bacterial cellulose stuck to the 200 mesh forming wire and were destroyed during removal. The remaining samples averaged between 60-61 g/m2 basis weight. Polyester sheets made without any bacterial cellulose were so weak they could not be removed from the forming wire without tearing. The remaining samples averaged between 55-57 g/m2 basis weight.
A duplicate set of sheets was also made using Douglas-fir kraft pulp beaten to a freeness of about 400 CSF in equivalent percentages as a replacement for bacterial cellulose. Tensile index was the property of greatest interest. These values are shown on l~igure 3 for the polypropylene samples and Figure 4 for the polyester samples. The marked improvement in tensile index with addition of bacterial cellulose is immediately evident.
This is especially dramatic with the polyester fiber.

4P 2 ~Z7~

Example 6 Rayon Sheets Bonded with Bacterial Cellulose Rayon fibers were used with a bacterial cellulose binder to make nonwoven sheets by a procedure similar to that of Examples 5 and 6. The 5 rayon fibers were also 3 denier of 7 mm length and were obtained from the same supplier as the other fibers. Bacterial cellulose and Douglas-fir kraft pulp refined as before to a freeness of about 400 CSF were used in amounts of 5, 10 and 20%. Sheets were formed to a nominal 60 g/m2 basis weight.
Figure 5 shows results of tensile index tests on the above sheets.
10 Once again, the effectiveness of bacterial cellulose as a binder is clearly shown.

Example 7 Nonwoven Sheets Pattern Bonded with Bacterial Cellulose _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
Observations made on sheets of longer fibers blended with bacterial cellulose, formed on relatively large mesh screens, showed somewhat higher localized concentrations oP the bacterial cellulose around the screen openings. This phenomenon suggested the possibility of a simple way of making pattern bonded fabrics using a bacterial cellulose binder. In 20 a pattern bonded material l:he binder is applied in a predetermined geometric pattern rather than uniformly. This technique enables properties such as drape and hand to be modified according to the desired end use of the mflterials. In general, pattern bonded fabrics tend to be softer and have better drape than uniformly bonded types.
A mask was made of heavy aluminum foil for use over the 150 mesh forming screen in the sheet mold. This was patterned with 6 mm openings placed on a square grid with 12 mm centers. A 60 g/m2 basis weight sheet was made using a furnish of ~5% 12.5 mm, 3 denier, polyester fibers and 5% bacterial cellulose. The sheet was formed and dried as 30 described in the earlier examples.
The resulting sheets were very attractive and had much better drape than conventionally formed sheets. E2~amination showed that the bacterial cellulose binder was concentrated over the areas of the drainage holes in the mask.

;~ .

~' .
.
..

~P 2 9~

Example 8 Effect of Creping on Sheets Bonded with Bacterial Cellulose .

Another way of modifying hand and drape properties of nonwoven fabrics is by creping. A number of creping processes are 5 available. The one used in this example was the Micrex process, a proprietary process of Bird Machine Company, Walpole, Massachusetts.
A number of samples of polyester and softwood kraft fibers were made as described in Example 5. Some were bonded with bacterial cellulose and o$hers with latex. A portion of the resulting sheets were then creped by 10 the Micrex process. These were then compared with their uncreped counterparts for tear index, tensile index, and drape. All samples were in the 60-61 g/m basis weight range. Drape is determined by cantilevering a 150 mm dif~meter circular sheet over the edge of a block 24 mm above a table surface and measuring the distance from the block when the end of the 15 sample first touches the table. All samples were measured felt side up and those that were creped were oriented with the creping direction parallel to the edge of the block. ~abric compositions and the results of tests are given in Table IV.
Table IV
Reslllts of Creping Nonwoven Fabrics Tear Ir~lex Tensile Index Drape CompositionmN-m /~ N-m/g mm PE Pulp BAC Latex % % % % OriginalCreped OriginalCreped OriginalCreped - 54.7 79.133 O 933.7 120 56 ~ 58.0 39.122.4 13.9 130 40 47.5 47.5 5 - 23.0 24.5 6.4 8.9 128 37 - 41.9 32.326.2 17.2 112 4n - 27. l 27.322.5 20.8 93 38 - l~ 80 10 - 23.0 22. ~28.0 21.3 86 47 33 33 - 33 49.3 67.825.4 32.8 110 45 17.5 52.5 - 30 33.8 43.728.0 35.5 100 45 The effect of creping had variable effect on tensile and tear indices. These were increased in both cases for the latex bonded pulps while 40 the bacterial cellulose bonded pulps were, on the average, generally unaMected. Drape length was decreased slightly more for the bacterial cellulose bonded fabrics than for the latex bonded materials.
:.-' .
.

.. , , . . , ' ` .

4P 2 ~Z79~

Example 9 Bacterial Cellulose Compared with Highly Beaten Wood Pulp As has been noted before, the bacterial cellulose used in the present invention is a highly hydrophilic material. As a result of this high 5 water affinity, slurries of the material drain very slowly. In this regard thebacterial cellulose has some resemblance to very highly beaten, or so-called "dead beaten" wood pulps. There are very significant differences, however.
Bacterial cellulose sheets tend to have similar physical properties to highly beaten wood pulp sheets as far as tensile and burst indices are concerned.
10 Air porosity of the bacterial cellulose sheets is at least a full order of magnitude lower than the wood pulp sheets at similar sheet densities. This is shown in the fo~lowing tables:
Table V
15Bacterial Cellulose vs. Hi~hl~ Beaten Kraft Pulp(l) Free- Sheet Tensile Burst ness Densi~yIndex M.O.E. Stretch, Index 20 Sample C.S.F. k~ N m/g GPa % kN/g Bacterial - 373 132.0 4.612.3 8.1 Bacterial - 463 84.0 3.561.9 5.2 Bacterial - 555 88.9 4.311.9 4.4 25 Softwood kraft 75 486 59.0 2.074.0 6.4 Softwood kraft 45 516 75.8 2.942.5 7.5 (1) All sheets were a nominal 60 g/m2 basis weight.
` 30 Table VI
RRcteriRl Cellulose vs. Hi~hly Beaten Sulfi~(l) Wet Tensile Tensile Burst Densit~yIndex Index Stretch Index Porosity Sample k~ N-m/g N-m/g % k~ sec/100 mL
:
40 Bacterial 359 73.8 1.5 2.4 2.7 Baoterial 454 - - - -37,800 Bacterial (2)503 119.1 1.3 1.54.5>6,000 Softwood sulfite 598 54.2 1.62.8 3.1 112 45 Softwood sulfite 670 60.6 1.92.7 3.4 372 Softwood sulfite 711 61.2 2.13.2 3.8 67.2 (1) All sheets were a nominal 60 gjm2 basis weight.
(2j All sulfite pulps were beaten to a freeness of 55 mL C.S.F.

4P 2 Z79~
136û0 16 Highly beaten softwood kraft pulp is much less effectiYe than bacterial cellulose as a binder for nonwoven fiber sheets. Bacterial cellulose gives significantly higher tensile strengths than does highly beaten 5 plllp.
A comparison was made using both polyester and polypropylene fibers with bacterial cellulose and softwood kraft pulp refined to a freeness of 45 C.S.F. Physical properties of the resulting fiber blends are shown in Table VII.

Table VII
Bacterial Cellulose vs. Hi~hly 13eaten Pulp as_onwoven Binder Ratio, Ratio,F;ber/ Basis Tensile Burst Fiber/Wo~ Weig~t I)ensi~y Index Index Fiber TypeBACPulp ) g/m k~ N-m/g kN/g 20 Polypropylene 95/5 - 59 . 9 24~1 6 . 5 0 . 67 Polypropylene - 95/564. 3 228 2 . 9 0 . 34 Polyester90/10 - 56 . 5 192 12.1 Polyester ~ 90/10 45 . 7 158 0 . 6 0 . 42 25 (1) Sof-twood kraft pulp beaten to a freeness of 45 C.S.F.
It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that many departures can be made from the examples just given without departin~ from the spirit of the invention. Many other types, lengths, weights, etc. of fibrous 30 materials beyond those described in the examples are suitable. Various blends of fibers are equally suitable. Bacterial cellulose may be advantageously used in conjunction with a latex binder in some instances. In this regard, the only criterion that should be met is that the bacterial cellulose should be a minor portion by weight of the dry components.
35 Normally the bacterial cellulose should not exceed 30%, more preferably about 20%, of the total dry weight of the furnish.
'~

Claims (22)

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. A method of bonding a fibrous wet laid nonwoven paper or fabric-like product which comprises adding to the fibers thereof as a binder prior to wet forming the product a minor portion of an aqueous dispersion of a bacterial cellulose produced by a microorganism of the genus Acetobacter.

2. The method of claim 1 in which the bacterial cellulose is cultured under agitated aerobic conditions.

3. The method of claim 1 in which the bacterial cellulose binder is present in an amount of 1-30% by weight of the product.

4. The method of claim 3 in which the bacterial cellulose binder is present in an amount of 2-20% by weight of the product.

5. The method of claim 1 in which the fibers are selected from the group consisting of cellulose, polyester, polyolefin, nylon, acrylic, glass, and metal fibers.

6. The method of claim 5 in which the major portion of the fibers are polyester.

7. The method of claim 5 in which the major portion of the fibers are polyolefin.

8. The method of claim 7 in which the major portion of the fibers are polypropylene.

9. The method of claim 5 in which the major portion of the fibers are rayon.

10. The method of claim 5 in which the major portion of the fibers are wood pulp fibers.

11. The method of claim 1 which further includes wet forming the product over a mask-like drainage means to produce a pattern bonded material.

12. A nonwoven paper or fabric-like product comprising a major portion of a fibrous substrate forming material and a minor portion of a bacterial cellulose serving as a binder for the fibrous material.

13. The product of claim 12 in which the bacterial cellulose is cultured under agitated aerobic conditions.

14. The product of claim 12 in which the bacterial cellulose binder is present in an amount of 1-30% by weight of the product.

15. The product of claim 14 in which the bacterial cellulose binder is present in an amount of 2-20% by weight of the product.

16. The product of claim 12 in which the fiber in the substrate forming material is selected from the group consisting of cellulose, polyester, polyolefin, nylon, acrylic, glass, and metal fibers.

17. The product of claim 16 in which the major portion of the fibers are polyester.

18. The product of claim 16 in which the major portion of the fibers are polyolefin.

19. The product of claim 18 in which the major portion of the fibers are polypropylene.

20. The product of claim 16 in which the major portion of the fibers are rayon.

21. The product of claim 16 in which the major portion of the fibers are wood pulp fibers.

22. The product of claim 12 which is pattern bonded in localized areas by the bacterial cellulose.