CA1277056C - Modified block copolymers, impact resistant compositions containing the copolymers and a process for producing the copolymers - Google Patents

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
MODIFIED BLOCK COPOLYMERS
Thermally stable modified selectively hydrogenated high 1,2-content block copolymer wherein a functional group is grafted to the block copolymer in the monoalkenyl-arene block and impact resistant polymeric compositions comprising:-(a) 3-50% by weight of such modified block copolymers, and (b) 50-97% by weight of polyamide having a number average molecular weight of at least 5,000 or a thermoplastic polyester.

Description

~ 77C3~6 MODIFIED BLOCK OOPOLY~ERS, IMPACT RESISTANT
cQMæosITIoNs CONTArNING THE OOPOLYMERS AND
A PROCESS FOR PRODUCING THE COPOLYMERS

m e invention relates to a functionalized selectively h~dro-genated block copolymer of the formula Bn(AB)oAp where n is 0 or an integer of at least one, o is an integer of at least one and p is 0 or an integer of at least one, A is predominantly a polymerized mDnoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon block and B prior to hydrogenation is predomQnantly a polymerized conjugated diene hydrocarbon block.
m e invention also relates to impact resistant polymeric compositions and to a process for producing a functionalized selectively hydrogenated block copolymer.
It is known that a blw k copolymer can be obtained by an anionic copolymerization of a conjugated diene compound and an aromatic vinyl compound by using an organic alkali metal initiator.
These types of block copolymers are diversified in characteristics, depending on the content of the arcmatic vinyl compound.
When the content of the aromatic vinyl compound is small, the pro~uced block copolymer is a so-called therm~plastic rubber. It is a very useful polymer which shows rubber elasticity in the unvul-canized state and is applicable for various uses, for example as mouldings of shoe sole; impact mcdifier for polyst.yrene resins;
adhesive; binder.
m e block copolymers with a high aromatic vinyl compound content, such as more than 70~ by weight, provide a resin possessing both excellent impact resistance and transparency, and such a resin is widely used in the field of packaging. Many proposals have been made on processes for the preparation of these types of block copolymers, for example in US patent specification U.S. 3,639,517.
The elastcmeric properties of certain aromatic vinyl polymers also appear to be due in part to their degree of branching. While the aromatic vinyl polymers have a basic straight carbon chain . ~1 )56 backbone, those with elastcmeric properties always have pendant alkyl radicals. For example, ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) has a stîucture of pendant mlethyl radicals which appear to provide elasticity and other elastomeric properties. When an essentially unbranched straight chain polymer is formed, such as some poly-ethylenes, the resulting polymer is essentially non-elastomeric or in other words relatively rlgid, and behaves like a typical thermo-plastic without possessing rubber-like resilience or high elongation, tensile strength without yield, low set or other properties charac-teristic of desirable elastomers.
Block copolymers have been produced, see U.S. patent specifi-cation Re 27,145 which ccmprise primarily those having a general structure A B -A
wherein the two terminal polymer blocks A comprise therm~plastic polymer blocks of vinylarenes such as polystyrene, while block B is a polymer block of a selectively hydrogenated conjugated diene. The proportion of the thermoplastic terminal blocks to the centre elastomeric polymer block and the relative molecular weights of each of these blocks is balanced to obtain a rubber ha~ing an optimum cc~bination of properties such that it behaves as a vul-canized ru~ber without requiring the actual step of vulcanization.
Moreover, these block copolymers can be designed not only with this important advantage but also so as to be handled in thermoplastic forming equipment and are soluble in a variety of relatively low cost solvents.
While these block copolymers have a number of outstanding technical advantages, one of their principal limitations lies in their sensitivity to oxidation. This was due to their unsaturated character which can be minimized by hydrogenating the copolymer, especially in the centre section comprising the polymeric diene block. Hydrogenation may be effected selectively as disclosed in U.S. patent specification Re 27,145. These polymers are hydrogenated block copolymers having a configuration, prior to hydrogenation, of A-B-A wherein each of the A's is an aIkenyl-substituted aromatic o~

hydrocarbon polymer block and B is a butadiene polymer block ~herein 35-55 mol per cent of the condensed butadiene units in the butadiene polymer block have 1,2-configuration.
Due to their hydrocarbon nature, these selectively hydrogenated A~A block copolymers are deficient in many applications in which adheslon to a polar surface is required. Examples include the toughening and compatibilization of polar polymers such as ~he engineering thermoplastics, the adhesion to high energy substrates of hydrogenated block copolymer elastomer based adhesives, sealants ]O and coatings, and the use of hydrogenated elastomer in reinforced polymer systems. However, the placement onto the block copolymer of functional groups which can provide interactions not possible with hydrocarbon polymers solves the adhesion problem and extends the range of applicability of this material.
Beyond the very dramatic improvement in interface adhesion in polymer blends, a functionalized styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene (S-EB-S) component can also contribute substantially to the external adhesion characteristics often needed in polymer systems. These include adhesion to fibres and fillers which reinforce the polymer system; adhesion to substrates in adhesives, sealants, and coatings based on functionalized S-EB-S poly~ers, adhesion of decorations such as prLnting inks, paints, primers, and metals of systems based on S-EB-S polymers; participation in chemical reactions such as binding proteins such as heparin for blood compatibility; surfactants in polar-nonpolar aqueous or non-aqueous dispersions.
Functionalized S-EB-S polymer can be described as basically commercially produced S-EB-S polymers which are produced by hydro-g~nation of S-B-S polymer to which is chemically attached to either the styrene or the ethylene-butylene block, chemically functional moieties.
Many attempts have been made for the purpose of improving adhesiveness, green strength and other properties by functionalizing block copolymers, and various methods have been proposed for functionalizing synthetic con~ugated diene rubbers.

7~:)Sti U.S. patent specifications 4,292,414 and 4,308,353 describe a monovinyl-aryllconjugated diene block copolymer with lcw 1,2 content grafted with a maleic acid compound. However, the process is limited to reaction conditions wherein the generation of free radicals is substantially inhibited by using free radical inhibitors or c~nventional stabilizers for example phenol type, phosphorous type or amine type stabilizers. The processes are limited to thermal addition reactions or the so-called "EME" reaction. This reaction scheme depends on unsaturation in the base polymer for reaction sites. A reasonable amount of residual unsaturation must be present in order to obtain an advantageous degree of functionality or grafting onto the base polymer. A substantially ccmpletely hydrogenated base polymer would not react appreciably in this known process.
U.S. patent specification 4,427,828 describes a similar modified block copolymer with high 1,2 content however, again produced by the "ENE" reaction.
me "ENE" process as described in the prior art results in a modified polymer product which is substituted at a position on the polymer backbone which is allylic to the double bond. m e reaction can be shown for maleic anhydride as follows:
a) to main chain unsaturation H H H H H H H H
- C - C= C--C - C - C- C~ C ~ Allylic position H ~ E~ ¦
~! I
/~ h ~ ~ o~c\ /

` \

b) to vinyl unsaturation H ~ H
~C ~ C - ` ~C -C -) Allylic position H ¦ H
f-H CH

~ H
r\ ~
o-C /_o O:C /~-0 O O
wherein a) represents addition across a double bond in the main chain of the base polymer and b) represents addition across a double bond occurring in a side chain. After addition and iso-merization the substitution is positioned on a carbon allylic to the double bond.
The allylically substituted polymers are prone to thermal degradation due to their thermal instability~ It is known in the art that allylic substituents can undergo what has been referred to as a retro-ENE reaction, see B.C. Trivedi, B.M. Culbertson, Maleic Anhydride, (Plenum Press, New York, 1982) pp. 172-173.
Further, because the ENE reaction requires a reasonable amount of unsaturation in the precursor base polymer, as discussed previously, the resulting functionalized copolymer product will have a significant amount of residual unsaturation and will be inhexently unstable to oxidation.
A functionalized selectively hydrogenated thermoplastic block copolymer has now been found which has excellent appearance proper-ties and mechanical properties, which is thermally stable and which is particularly useful in blending with other polymers.
Accordingly, the present inventicn provides a functionalized selectively hydrogenated block copolymer of the formula Bn(AB)oAp where n is 0 or an integer of at least one, o is an integer of at least one and p is 0 or an integer of at least one> A is pre-dcminantly a polymerized monoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon block ~'77~

and B prior to hydrogenation is predominantly a polymerized conju-gated diene hydrocarbon block, to which copolymer has been grafted at least one electrophilic graftable m31ecule or electrophile wherein substantially all of said graftable molecules are grafted to the block copolymer in the monoalkenyl-arene block.
The invention further provides a process for producing a functionalized selectively hydrogenated block copolymer according to the invention which process com~rises contacting hydrogenated block copolymers of conjugated dienes and monovinyl-substituted aromatic ccmpounds with an alkyllithium compound, and a polar oompound selected from the group consisting of tertiary amunes and low molecular weight hydrocarbon ethers, to form a backbone polymer having active lithium atoms along the polymer chain, and thereafter contacting said backbone polymer and at least one electrophilic graftable molecule or electrophile to form backbone polymers with grafted molecules attached wherein substantially all of said graftable molecules which have been grafted are grafted to the block copolymer in the vinylarene block.
According to six preferred embodlments of the present invention:-(1) each A is predominantly a polymerized monoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon block having an average molecular weight in the range of from 1,000 to 115,000;

(2) each polymerized conjugated diene hydrocarbon block has an average molecular weight in the range of from 20,000 to 450,000;

(3) the blocks A constitute in the range of from 1 to 95 per cent by weight of the copolymer;

(4) the unsaturation of the block B is less than 10~ of the original unsaturation;

(5) the unsaturation of the A blocks is above 50% of the original unsaturation; and (6) the grafted molecule contains one or more functional groups.
The feature of the present invention lies in providing modified block copolymers which are thermally stable; have a low residual unsaturation, are excellent in appearance characteristics, melt-flow ``` ~.~7'~

characteristics, and mechanical properties such as tensile strength and impact resistance and are particularly useful in blending with other polymers.
The modified block copolymers according to the present invention are grafted or substituted in the vinylarene block as shown in the exen~lary reactions given below:
H RLi Amine + CO2 H
-~CH2 ~ n -~-CH2 Q n para 2Li ~-CH2-C-~n meta bl ~2Li in which: RLi = Alkyl-Lithium IC02Li ~~CH2~C~~n benzylic (minor product) The structure of the substituted block copol~r specifically determined by the location of the functionality on the polymer backbone in the vinylarene block gives the block copolymer a substantially greater degree of thermal stability.
Block copolymers of conjugated dienes and vinyl-aromatic hydrocarbons which may be utilized include any of those which exhibit elastomeric properties and those which have 1,2-microstruc-ture contents prior to hydrogenation suitably in the range of from 7~ to 100% and preferably of from 35~ to 50%. Such block ccpolymers may be multiblock copolymers of varying structures containing various ratios of conjugated dienes to vinyl-aromatic hydrocarbons including those co~taining up to 60 per cent by weight of vinyl-aromatic hydrocarbon. Thus, multiblock copolymers may be utilized which are linear or radial sy~metric or asymmetric and which have structures represented by the fonmulae A-B, A-B-A, A-B-A-B, B~A, B-A-B, B-A~B-A, ~AB)o 1 2 BA and the like wherein A is a polymer .

.

70~6 block of a vinyl-aromatic hydrocarbon or a conjugated diene/vinyl-aromatic hydrocarbon tapered copolymer block and B is a polymer block of a conjugated diene.
Block A preferably has an average molecular weight in the range of from 500 to 60,000 and block B preferably has an average molecular weight in the range of from 35,000 to 150,000.
The block copolymers may be produced by any well known block polymerization or copolymerization procedures including the well known sequential addition of monomer technique, incremental addition of monomer technique or coupling techniques as illustrated in, for example, U.S. patent specifications ~os.
3,251,905; 3,390,207; 3,598,887 and 4,219,627. As is well known in the block copolymer art, tapered copolymer blocks can be incorporated in the multiblock copolymer by copolymerizing a mixture of conjugated diene and vinyl-aromatic hydrocarbon monomers utilizing the difference in their copolymerization reactivity rates. Various patent specifications describe the preparation of multiblock copolymers containing tapered copolymer blocks including U.S. patent specifications Nos. 3,251,905;
3,265,765; 3,639,521; and 4,208,356.
Conjugated dienes which may be utilized to prepare the polymers and copolymers are those having from 4 to 8 carbon atoms per molecule and include 1,3-butadiene, 2-methyl-1,3-butadiene (isoprene), 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene, 1,3-pentadiene, 1,3-hexadiene, and the like. Mix-tures of such conjugated dienes may also be used. The preferred conjugated diene is 1,3-butadiene.

~7056 - 8a - 63293-2679 The polymer blocks A are prior to hydrogenation preferably polymer blocks of a monoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon, more preferably of a vinyl-aromatic hydrocarbon. Vinyl-aromatic hydrocarbons which may be utilized to prepare copolymers include styrene, o-methylstyrene, p-methylstyrene, p-tert-butyls-tyrene, 1,3-dimethylstyrene, alpha-methylstyrene, vinylnapthalene, vinylanthracene and the like. The preferred vinyl-aromatic hydrocarbon is styrene. The block copolymer is preferably a styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene block copolymer.

0~6 It should be observed that the above-described polymers and copolymers may, if desiredr be readily prepared by the me-thods set forth hereinbefore. ~lowever, since many of these polymers and copolymers are commercially available, it is usually preferred to employ the commercially available polymer as this serves to reduce the number of processing steps involved in the overall process.
The hydrogenation o~ these polymers and copolymer~ may be carried out by a variety of well established processes including hydrogenation in the presence of such catalysts as Raney Nickel, noble metals such as platinum and palladium and soluble transition metal catalysts. Suitable hydrogenation processes which can be used are ones wherein the diene-containing polymer or copolymer is dissolved in an inert hydrocarbon diluent such as cyclohexane and hydrogenated by reaction with hydrogen in the presence of a soluble hydrogenation catalyst. Such processes are disclosed in U.S. patent specifications Nos. 3,113,986 and ~,226,952. The polymers and copolymers are hydrogenated in such a manner as to produce hydrogenated polymers and copolymers having a residual unsaturation content in the polydiene block preferably in the range of from 0.5 to 20 and more preferably from 0.5 to 10 per cent of their original unsaturation content prior to hydroyenation. Most preferably the unsaturation of block ~ has been reduced to a value of less than 5 per cent of its original value. Accordlng to another preferred embodiment of the present invention an average of more than 25~ of the monoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon units have been hydrogenated. The average unsaturation of the hydrogenated block copolymer preferably has been reduced to a value less than 20~ of its original value lB

7C~6 -9a- 63293-2679 According to a further preferred embodiment an average of less than 10~ of the monoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon units have been hydrogenated. Furthermore, the blocks A preferably comprlse ln the range of from 1 to 40 per cent by weight o~ the copolymer.

IB

70~

In general, any materials having the ability to react with the lithiated base polymer, are operable for the purposes of this invention.
In order to incorporate functional groups into the base polymer, reactants capable of reacting with the lithiated base polymer are necessary. These reactants may be polymerizable or nonpolymerizable, however, preferred reactants are nonpolymerizable or slowly polymerizing.
The graft reaction involves nucleophilic attack of a polymer bound lithium alkyl or an electrophile.
The class of preferred electrophiles which will form graft polymers within the scope of the present invention include reactants from the following groups:- carbon dioxide, ethylene oxide, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids and salts and esters thereof, arylhalides, epoxides, sulphur, boron alkoxides, isocyanates, sulphonates and various silicon compounds.
These electrophiles may contain appended functional groups as in the case of N,N-dimethyl-p-aminobenzaldehyde where the amine is an appended functional group and the aldehyde is the reactive electrophile. Alternatively, the electrophile may react to become the functional site itself; as an example, carbon dio~ide (electro-phile) reacts with the metalated polymer to form a carboxylate functional group. By these routes, polymers could be prepared containing grafted sites selected from one or more of the following groups of functionality type carboxylic acids, their salts and esters, ketones, alcohols and alkoxides, amines, amides, thiols, borates, and functional groups containing a silic~n atom.
These functionalities can be subsequently reacted with other modifying materials to produce new functional groups. For example, the grafted carboxylic acid described hereinbefore could be suitably modiied by esterifying the resulting acid groups in the graft by appropriate reaction with hydroxy-containing compounds of varying carbon ato~s lengths. In some cases, the reaction could take place simultaneously with the grafting process but in most eYamples it would be practised in subsequent post modification reaction.

~.~770~

The grafted polymer will usually contain in the range of fram 0.02 to 20, preferably O.l to lO, and most preferably 0.2 to 5 weight per cent of grafted portion.
The block copolymers, as modified can still be used for any purpose for which an unmodified material (base polymer) was formerly used. That is, they can be used for adhesives and sealants, or compounded and extruded and moulded in any convenient manner.
The polymers may be prepared by any convenient manner. An example of a method to incorporate functional groups into the base polymer primarily in the vinylarene block is metalation.
Metalation is conveniently carried out by means of a complex formed by the combination of a lithium component which can be represented by R'(Li)X with a polar metalation promoter. The polar compound and the lithium component can be added separately or can be premixed or pre-reacted to form an adduct prior to addition to the solution of the hydrogenated copolymer. In the cGmpounds represented by R'(Li~X, the R' is usually a saturated hydrocarbon radical of any length whats oever, but ordinarily containing up to 20 carbon atoms, and can be an arc~atic radical such as phenyl, naphthyl, tolyl, 2-methylnaphthyl, etc., or a saturated cyclic hydrocarbon radical of e.g. 5 to 7 carbon atoms, a mono-unsaturated cyclic hydrocarbon radical of 5 to 7 carbon atoms, an unconjugated, unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon radical of l to 20 carbon atoms, or an alkyllithium having one or more aromatic groups on the alkyl group, the alkyl group containing l to 20 carbon atoms. In the fo D la, R'(Li)X x is an integer of 1 to 3. Representative species include, for example: methyllithium, isopropyllithium, sec-butyl-lithium, n-butyllithium, t-butyllithium, n-dodecyllithium, l,4-dilithiobutane, l,3,5-trilithiopentane, and the like. The lithium-alkyls must be more basic than the product metalated alkyl.
Of course, other alkali metal or alkaline earth metal alkyls could be used but the lithium-aIkyls are preferred due to their ready 3l'~ 7~7~S~

co~mercial avallability. In a similar way, metal hydrides could be employed as the metalation reagent but the hydrides have only limited solubility in the appropriate solvents. Therefore, the metal-alkyls are preferred for their greater solubility which makes them easier to process.
Lithium compounds alone usually metalate copolymers containing aromatic and olefinic functional groups with considerable difficulty and under high temperatures which may tend to degrade the copolymer.
However, in the presence of tertiary diamines and bridgehead monoamines, ~etalation proceeds rapidly and smoothly. Scme lithium compounds can be used alone effectively, notably the methyllithium types.
It has been shown that the metalation occurs at a carbon to which an aromatic group is attached, or on an aromatic group, or in more than one of these positions. In any event, it has been shcwn that a very large number of lithium atoms are positioned variously along the polymer chain, attached to internal carbon atoms away from the polymer terminal carbon atoms, either along the backbone of the polymer or on groups pendant therefrom, or both, in a manner depending upon the distribution of reactive or lithiatable positions.
This distinguishes the lithiated copolymer from simple terminally reactive polymers prepared by using a lithium or even a polylithium initiator in polymerization thus limiting the number and the location of the positions available for subsequent attachment. With the metalation procedure described herein, the extent of the lithiation will depend upon the amount of metallating agent used and/or the groups available for metallation~ The use of a more basic lithium-alkyl such as tert-butyllithium may not require the use of a polar metallation promoter.
The polar compound promoters include a variety of tertiary amines, bridgehead amines, ethers, and metal aLkoxides.
The tertiary amines useful in the metalation step have three saturated aliphatic hydrocarbon groups attached to each nitrogen and include, for example:-.

'7~0~;

(a) Chelating tertiary diamines, preferably those of the formula (R )2N-CyH2y ~N(R )2 in which each R can be the same or different straigt- or branched-chain alkyl group of any chain length containing up to 20 carbon atoms or more all of which are included herein and can be any whole number from 2 to 10, and particularly the ethylene diamines in which all alkyl substituents are the same These include, for example:
N,N,Nl,N1-tetramethylethylenediamine (which is preferred), tetraethylethylenediamine, tetradecylenediamine, tetraoctyl-hexylenediamine, tetra-(mixed alkyl) ethylenediamines, and the like.
(b) Cyclic diamines can be used, such as, for example, the N,N,N ,N -tetraalkyl-1,2-diamino-cyclohexanes, the N,N,N ,N -tetraalkyl-1,4-diamino-cyclohexanes, N,N1-dimethylpiperazine, and the like.
(c) The useful bridgehead diamines include, for example, sparteine, triethylenediamine, and the like.
Tertiary monoamines such as triethylenediamine are generally not as effective in the lithiation reaction. However, bridgehead monoamines such as 1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octane and its substituted homologues are effective.
Ethers and the alkali metal alkoxides are presently less ~referred than the chelating amines as activators for the metallation reaction due to somewhat lower levels of incorporation of functional group containing compounds onto the co~olymer backb~ne in the subsequent grafting reaction.
In general, it is most desirable to carry out the lithiation reaction in an inert solvent such as saturated hydrocarbons.
Aromatic solvents such as benzene are lithiatable and may interfere with the desired lithiation of the hydrogenated copolymer. The - solvent/copolymer weight ratio which is convenient generally is in the range of about 5:1 to 20:1. Solvents such as chlorinated hydrocarbons, ketones, and alcohols, should not be used because they destroy the lithiating compound.

.V~77~3 Polar rnetalation prornoters rnay be present in an amount sufficient to enable metalation to occur, eAg. arnounts between O.Ol and 100 or rnore, preferably between O.l to lO and most preferablv between 1 and 3 equivalents per equivalent of lithiun~alk~l.
The equivalents of lithiurn ernployed for the desired arnount of lithiation generally range frorn such as O.OOl to 3 per vinyl-arene unit in the copolyrner, presently preferably O.Ol to 1.0 equivalents per vinyl~arene unit in the copolymer to be modified. The molar ratio of active lithiurn to the polar prornoter can vary fran such as O.Ol to lOØ A preferred ratio is 0.5.
The amount of alkyl-lithiurn employed can be expressed in terrns of the Litviny~arene molar ratio. Ihis ratio may range frorn a value of l (one lithiurn alkyl per vinylarene unit) to as law as 1 x lO 3 (l lithium alkyl per lO00 vinylarene units).
In general, it is most desirable to carry out the lithiation reaction in an inert solvent such as saturated hydrocarbons.
Aromatic solvents such as benzene are lithiatable and may interfere with the desired lithiation of the hydrogenated copoly~ner. The solvent/cop~lymer weight ratio which is convenient generally is in the range of about 5:1 to 20:1. Solvents such as chlorinated hydrocarbon~$ ketones, and alcohols, should not be used because they destroy the lithiating compound.
me process of lithiation can be carried out at temperatures in the range of such as about -70 C to +l50 C, presently preferably in the range of about 25 C to 80 C, the upper temperatures being limited by the thermal stability of the lithium ccan~ounds. The lawer temperatures are limited by considerations of production cost, the rate of reaction beccaning unreasonably slow at low temperatures. me length of time necessary to complete the lithiation and subsequent reactions is largely dependent upon mixing conditions and temperature. Generally the time can range fran a few seconds to about 72 hours, presently preferably fran about l minute to 1 hour.
me next step in the process of preparing the modified block copolyrner is the treatrnent of the lithiated hydrogenated ccpolylTler, 7~0~i in solution, without quenching in any manner which would destroy the lithium sites, with a species capable of reacting with a lithium anion. These reactive species are selected from the class of molecules called electrophiles. The most preferred electrophiles have been listed hereinbefore. These electrophiles either contain or form upon reaction with the polymer bound lithium anion the desired functional groups. Such species contain functional groups including but not limited to o -C-O- carboxyl C- ~ A~une C-OH hydroxyl C-NR2 Amide C-OR ether C-SH Thiol -C-R ketone C-B(OR)2 Borane Containing Il I
-C-H aldehyde C-Si- Silicon Containing The process also includes fur~her chemistry on the modified block copolymer. For example, converting of a carboxylic acid salt containing modified block copolymer to the carboxylic acid form can be easily accomplished.
m e impact resistant polymeric compositions to which the invention also relates contain thermoplastic polyamides, such as nylon 6,6 or thermoplastic polyesters such as poly(l,4-butylene-terephthalate~ (PBT) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). Both are a class of materials which possess a good balance of properties oomprising strength and stiffness which make them useful as structural materials. However, for a particular application, a thermoplastic ~o polyamide or thermoplastic polyester may not offer the combination 1~'7~ 6 of properties desired, and therefore, means to correct this deficiency are of interest.
One major deficiency of thermoplastic polyamides and polyesters is their poor resistance to impact, especially when dry. A particu-larly appealing route to achieving improved impact resistance in athermoplastic is by blending it with another polymer. It is well kncwn that stiff plastics can often be impact modified by addition of an immiscible low modulus rubber. However, in general, physical blending of polymers has not been a successful route to toughen thermoplastic polyamides and polyesters. This is due to the poor adhesion immiscible polymers typically exhibit with each other. As a result, interfaces bet~een blend component domains represent areas of severe weaknesses, providing natural flows which result in facile mechanical failure.
It is well known to those skilled in the art that hydrogenated block copolymers of styrene and butadiene possess many of the properties which are required for impact modification of plastics.
They have a low glass transition, low modulus rubber phase which is required for toughening. Because they contain little unsaturation, they can be blended with high processing temperature plastics without degrading. In addition, they are unique compared to other rubbers in that they contain blocks which are microphase separated over application and processing conditions. This microphase separa-tion results in physical crosslinking, causing elasticity in the solid and molten states. Such an internal strength mechanism is often required to achieve toughness in the application of plastic impact modification. In addition, melt elasticity of the block copolymer dl~ring processing can, under the right conditions, enable it to be finely dispersed with another polymer in a stable inter-penetrating co-continuous phase structure. A stable, fine dispersion is desirable in a rubber modified plastic.
Proof that hydrogenated block copolymers of styrene and butadiene are useful plastic impact modifiers an be seen in their widespread use for modifying polyolefins and polystyrene. For these blends, interfacial adhesion is great enough to achieve toughening.

70~i6 Although the hydrogenated block copolymers do have many of the characteristics required for plastic impact modification, they are deficient in modifying many materials which are dissimilar in structure to styrene or hydrogenated butadiene. Blends of the hydrogenated block copolyner with dissimilar plastics are often not tough due to a lack of interfacial adhesion.
A route to achieve interfacial adhesion between the hydrogenated block copolymer and a dissimilar material is by chemically attaching to the block copolymer functional m~ieties which interact with the dissimilar material. Such interactions include chemlcal reaction, hydrogen bonding, and dipole-dipole interactions.
Epstein in U.S. Patent 4,174,358 discloses a broad range of low modulus polyamide modifiers. However, this patent does not disclose or suggest the use of modified block copolymers of styrene and butadiene.
It has been previously proposed to increase the impact strength of polyamides and polyesters by addition of a modified block copolymer. U.S. patent specification 4l427,828 and International Kokai Application No. W083/00492 disclose blends of thermoplastic polyamide or polyester with a m~dified block copolymer. Specifically, the block copolymer is a partially hydrogenated monovinyl aryl/con-jugated diene to which is attached anhydride moieties by the "ENE"
reaction described hereinbefore.
According to the present invention, there is further provided an impact resistant blend of a thermoplastic polyamide and a thermally stable modified selectively hydrogenated high 1,2 content monovinyl-aromatic/conjugated diene block copolymer wherein at least one functional group is grafted to the block copolymer primarily in the vinyl-aromatic block. Preferred are impact resistant polymeric ccmpositions comprising:-(a) in the range of from 50 to 97 per cent of a polyamide having a number average molecular weight of at least 5,000, or of a thermoplastic polyester, and 70~

(b) in the range of from 3 to 50 per cent by weight of a functio-nalized selectively hydrogenated block copolymer according to the present invention.
The polyamide matrix resin of the toughened compositions of this invention is well known in the art and embraces those semi-crystalline and amorphous resins having a molecular weight of at least 5,000 and ccmmonly referred to as nylons. Suitable polyamides include those described in U.S. patent specifications Nos. 2,071,250;
2,071,251; 2,130,523; 2,130,948; 2,241,322; 2,312,966; 2,512,606;
lo and 3/393,210. m e polyamide resin can be produced by condensation of equimolar amDunts of a saturated dicarboxylic acid containing from 4 to 12 carbon aboms with a diamine, in which the diamine contains from 4 to 14 carbon atoms. Excess diamine can b~e employed to provide an excess of amine end groups over carboxyl end groups in the polyamide. Examples of polyamides include polyhexamethylene adipamide (nylon 66), polyhexamethylene azelaamide (nylon 69), polyhexamethylene sebacamide ~nylon 610), polyhexamethylene iso-phthalamide and polyhexamethylene dodecanoamide (nylon 612), the polyamide produced by ring opening of lactams, i.e., polycaprolactam, polylauric lactam, poly-11-aminoundecanoic acid, bis(paraaminocyclohexyl) methane dodecanoamide. It is also possible to use in this invention polyamides prepared by the ccpolymerization of t~o of the above polymers or terpolymeri2ation of the above polymers or their co~ponents, e.g., for exa~ple, an adipic isophthalic acid hexamethylene diamine copolymer or polyhexamethylene tere-co-isophthalamide. Preferably the polyamides are linear with a melting point in excess of 200 C. As great as 97 per cent by weight of the compDsition can ke composed of polyamide, for example from 60 to 95 per cent; however, preferred compositions contain from 70 to 95 per cent, and more narrowly 75 to 90 per cent, for example 80 to 90 ~y weight of polyamide.
The thermoplastic polyesters employed in this invention have a generally crystalline structure, a melting point over about 120 C, and are thermoplastic as opposed to thermosetting.

1~'7~70~i One par-ticularly useful group of polyesters are those thermo-plastic polyesters prepared by condensing a dicarboxylic acid or a lower alkyl ester thereof, acid halide, or anhydride derivative thereof with a glycol, according to methods well-known in the art.
Among the aromatic and aliphatic dicarboxylic acids suitable for preparing polyesters useful in the present invention are oxalic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, suberic acid, azelaic acid, subacic acid, terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, p-carboxyphenoacetic acid, p,p'-dicarboxydiphenyl, p,p'-dicarboxydiphenylsulphone, p-carboxyphenoxyacetic acid, p-carboxyphenoxypropionic acid, p-carboxyphenoxybutyric acid, p-carboxyphenoxyvaleric acid, p-carboxyphenoxyhexar.oic acid, p,pl-dicarboxydiphenylpropane, p,p'dicarboxydiphenyloctane, 3-aLkyl-4-(~-carboxyethoxy)-benzoic acid, 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, 2,7-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid, and the like.
Mixtures of dicarboxylic acids can also be employed. Terephthalic acid is particularly preferred.
The glycols suitable for preparing the polyesters useful in the present invention include straight chain alkylene glycols of 2 to 12 carbon atoms such as ethylene glycol, 1,3-propylene glycol, 1,6-hexylene glycol, l,10-decamethylene glycol, 1,12-dodecamethylene glycol and the like. Aromatic glycols can be substituted in whole or in part. Suitable aromatic dihydroxy compounds include p-xylylene glycol, pyrocatechol, resorcinol, hydroquinone, or alkyl-substituted derivatives of these compounds. Another suitable glycol is 1,4-cyclo-hexane dimethanol. Much preferred glycols are the straight chain alkylene glycols having 2 to 4 carbon atoms.
A preferred group of polyesters are poly(ethylene tere-phthalate), poly(propylene terephthalate), and poly(butylene terephthalate). A much preferred polyester is poly(butylene tere-phthalate). Poly(butylene terephthalate), a crystalline copolymer, may be formed by the polycondensation of 1,4-butanediol and dimethyl-~7705 Ei terephthalate or terephthalic acid, and has the general formula:
~~
where n varies from 70 to 140. m e molecular weight of the poly-(butylene texephthalate) typically varies frcm about 20,000 to about 25,000. A suitable process for manufacturing the polymer is disclosed in British patent specification No. 1,305,130.
Commercially available poly~butylene terephthalate) is available from General Electric under the tradename V~L~X~ thermoplastic polyester. Other commercial polymers include CEIANEX~ from Celanese, TENTITEo from Eastman Kodak, and VITUF~ from Goodyear Chemical.
Other useful polyesters include the cellulosics. The thermo-plastic cellulosic esters employed herein are widely used as moulding, coating and filmrforming materials and are well known.
These materials include the solid thermoplastic forms of cellulose nitrate, cellulose acetate (e.g. cellulose diacetate, cellulose triacetate), cellulose butyrate, cellulose acetate butyrate, oellulose propionate, cellulose tridecanoate, carboxymethyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose and acetylated hydroxyethyl cellulose as described on pages 25-28 of Modern Plastics Encyclopedia, 1971-72, and references listed therein.
Another useful polyester is polypivalolactone. Polypivalolactone is a linear polymer having recurring ester stxuctural units mainly of the formula:
2 C(CH3)2---C(O)O-i.e., units derived frcm pivalolactone. Preferably, the polyester is a pivalolactone homopolymer. Also include~ however, are the copolymers of pivalolactone with not more than 50 mol per cent, preferably not more than 10 mol per cent of other beta-propio-lactones, such as beta-propiolactone, alpha, alpha-diethyl~beta-propiolactone and alpha-methyl-alpha-ethyl-beta-propiolactone. The term "beta-propiolactones" refers to beta-propiolactone (2-oxetanone) and to derivatives thereof which carry no substituents at the beta-carbon atom of the lactone ring. Preferred beta-propiolactones are those containing a tertiary or quaternary carbon atom in the alpha position relative to the carbonyl group. Especially preferred are the alpha, alpha-dialkyl-beta-propiolactones wherein each of the aIkyl groups independently has from one to four carbon atoms.
Examples of useful monomers are:
alpha-ethyl-alpha-methyl-beta-propiolactone, alpha-methyl-alpha-isopropyl-beta-propiolactone, alpha-ethyl-alpha-n-butyl-beta-propiolactone, alpha-chloromethyl-alpha-methyl-beta-propiolactone, alpha, alpha-bis-(chloromethyl)-beta-propiolactone, and alpha, alpha-dimethyl-beta-propiolactone (pivalolactone).
See generally U.S. patent specifications No. 3,259,607;
3,299,171; and 3,579,489. These polypivalolactones have a molecular weight in excess of 20,000 and a melting point in excess of 120 C.
Another useful polyester is polycaprolactone. Typical poly-(~-caprolactones) are substantially linear polymers in which the repeating unit is O
_ j}--CH2--CH2--{~2--CH2--CH2~ C- ~
These polymers have similar properties as the polypivalol-actones and may be prepared by a similar polymerization mechanism.
See generally U.S. patent spe d fication No. 3,259,607.
Linear and branched polyesters and copolyesters of glycols and terephthalic or isophthalic acid have been commercially available for a number of years and have been described by Whinfield et al in U.S. patent specification 2,465,~19 and by Pengilly in U.S. patent specification 3,047,539.
m ermoplastic polyesters such as PBT and PET are useful as injection mouldable materials which can be formed into articles which exhibit a good balance of properties including s-trength and stiffness. An improvement in impact strength of these materials is desirable, hcwever.

The ccmpositions according to the present invention may contain a thermoplastic polyamide as well as a thermoplastic polyester.
The toughened compositions of this invention can be prepared by melt blending, in a closed system, a polyamide or polyester and at least one modified block copolymer into a uniform mixture in a ~ulti-screw extruder such as a Werner Pfleiderer extruder having generally 2-5 kneading blocks and at least one reverse pitch to generate high shear, or other conventional plasticating devices such as a Brabender, Banbury mill, or the like. ~lternatively, the blends may be made by coprecipitation from solution, blending or by dry mixing together of the components followed by melt fabrication of the dry mixture by extrusion.
The modified polyamide and polyester blends of the present invention resin may be prepared by melt-blending frcm 50 per cent to 97 per cent by weight preferably from 70 per cent to 95 per cent or more preferably 75 per cent to 90 per cent of the polyamide or polyester, and from 3 per cent to 50 per cent by weight preferably from 5 per cent to 30 per cent or more preferably l0 per cent to 25 per cent functionalized block copolymer.
The compositions of the invention may be modified by one or more conventional additives such as stabilizers and inhibitors of oxidative, thermal, and ultraviolet light degradation; lubricants and mould release agents, colourants including dyes and pigments, fibrous and particulate fillers and reinforcements, nucleating agents, plasticizers, etc.
The stabilizers can be incorporated into the ca~position at any stage in the preparation of the thermoplastic composition.
Preferably the stabilizers are included early to preclude the initiation of degradation before the composition can be protected.
Such stabilizers must be compatible with the ccmposition.
The oxidative and thermal stabilizers useful in the ~aterials of the present invention include those used in addition polymers generally. They include, for example, up to l per cent by weight, based on the weight of polyamide or polyester of Group I metal ~ ~'7~70~i6 halides, e.g., sodium, potassium, lithium with cuprous halides, e.g., chloride, bromide, iodide, sterically hindered phenols, hydroquinones, and varieties of substituted members of those groups and combinations thereof.
The ultraviolet light stabilizers, e.g., up to 2.0 per cent, based on the weight of polyamide, can also be those used in addition polymers generally. Examples of ultraviolet light stabilizers include various substituted resorcinols, salicylates, benzotriazoles, benzophenones, and the like.
Suitable lubricants and mould release agents, e.g., up to l.0 per cent, based on the weight of the composition, are stearic acid, stearic alcohol, stearamides, organic dyes such as nigrosine, etc., pigments, e.g., titanium dioxide, cadmium sulphide, cadmium sulphide selenide, phthalocyamines, ultramarine blue, carbon black, etc. up to 50 per cent, based on the weight of the composition, of fibrous and particulate fillers and reinforcements, e.g., carbon fibres, glass fibres, amorphous silica, asbestos, calcium silicate, aluminium silicate, magnesium carbonate, kaolin, chalk, powdered quartz, mica, fildspar, etc.; nucleating agent, e.g., talc, calcium fluoride, sodium phenyl phosphinate, alumina, and finely divided polytetra-fluoroethylene, etc.; plasticizers, up to about 20 per cent, based on the weight of the composition, e.g., dioctyl phthalate, dibenzyl phthalate, butyl benzyl phthalate, hydrocarbon oils, N-normal butyl benzene sulphonamide, ortho and para toluene ethyl sulphonamide, etc. The colourants (dyes and pigments) can be present in an amount of up to about 5.0 per cent by weight, based on the weight of the cO~positiQn.
It is to be understood that in the specification and claims herein, unless otherwise indicated, when in connection with melt-blending, the amount of the polyamide, polyester or block copolymer is expressed in terms of per cent by weight it is meant per cent by weight based on the total amount of these materials which is employed in the melt-blending.
The following Examples further illustrate the invention.

~L2~7~6 xample 1 The base polymer used in this example was a styrene-ethylene/-butylene-styrene (S-E/B-S) type block copolymer (herein referred to as reactant polymer A). Reactant polymer A had a molecular weight of about 50,000 and contained 30% polystyrene.
In a typical experiment, 45.36 kg of a polymer cement containing Polymer A in cyclohexane (5% solids) was lithiated at 60 C using a diamine (tetramethylethylenediamine, TMEDA) pr~moted sec-butylLi reagent ~1.1 mol bas~, 1.8 mol promoter~. A rapid metallation reaction afforded a thixotropic, semisolid cement which immobilized the reactor's stirring mechanism (auger type) within 3-4 minutes.
An aliquot of the lithiated-polymer cement was quenched with D20.
The remainder was transferred through a 3.8 cm diameter line to a vessel containing an excess of C02 (1.36 kg) in tetrahydrofuran ~THF). The carboxylated product was treated with acetic acid (85 g, 1.4 mol) and finished by steam coagulation affording over 1.81 kg of white, functionalized polymer crumb. Analyses of the carboxylated product found 0.84 ~wt - C02H and 0.29 %wt - C02 - for a total polymer bound carboxylate content of 1.13 ~wt.
A deuterium (D) NMR analysis of the D20 treated aliquot found the D resided primarily at aromatic sites, at meta and para positions on the ring, (90% of total D), with the remainder of the tag or label being at either benzylic or allylic positions (10% of total D). The technique cannot discern between allylic and benzylic locations. m us, the label resided principally, at least 90~, and most likely entirely in the polystyrene block of the polymer. We infer from this labelling experiment that essentially all of the lithiation reaction, at least 90~, occurred in the polystyrene block. Therefore, essentially all of the carboxylation must occur at these sites as well.
For this experiment, 50% of the reactant sec-butylLi was converted into polymer bound carboxylate as found in the product (lithiation efficiency). m e product, as finished, contained 74 parts of acid (-C02H) to every 26 parts of salt (-C02-).

~t~ 6 Examples 2-14 Examples 2-14 were conducted as outlined in Example 1. So~e modifications were used as outlined in Table 1.
Reactant polymer B was similar to polymer A with the molecular weight being about 67,000. Reactant polymer C was similar to polymer A with the molecular weight being about 181,000 and a polystyrene content of 33%. Reactant polymer D was an S-E/P type of block copolymer with a total molecular weight of about 98,000 and a polystyrene content of 37~.
The lithiation of polymers A, B and C proceeded with a rapid rise in viscosity in all examples. In some examples, the lithiated product was allowed to digest for longer periods without stirring.
m e lithiation of polymer D proceeded with no observable increase in cement viscosity.
As found in Example l, deuterium NMR analyses of D20 quenched aliquots of the various products found the label to be predominately in the polystyrene block of the polymer. These results are sum~arized in Table 2.
Each of the deuterated samples was analyzed by Gel Permeation Chromatography. The resulting molecular weight information did not differ significantly fram that for the starting unmetallated polymer. This indicates that the metalation technique did not induce any degradation, for example, chain scission or crosslinking in these polymers.
Control experiments using the reaction technique of Example 1 and S-r~bber-S block ccpolymers where the rubber is substantially unsaturated showed that these reactants were lithiated indiscrimi-nately in both the styrene block ~about 50~ and the r~bber block (about 50%). These randomly functionalized products were not preferred~

~1 ~ ~/ ~ NO 1` t~) O 1--u~ ~ ~ ~ u~ ~r ~ co ~ ~ ~ ~D ~ ~ ~
'~ ~ o~

UJ ~ P N O ~D N er ~ ~ D r ~I N
.,1 ~ ~
3 ~ o~
~i ~ ~ ~) N O ~ O ~ N t~ ~ ~1 N ~7 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0~ 0~00 00 ~0~

~ ~1 $ ~d ~) rl N -1 0 ~ ~ N ~I N ~ ~
H r-J 3 ~; ~1 N V~ I ~1 ~ N N ~ ~,, 1~l ~ d ,~ ~1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~-I O
H H ~

~ N N N N N 1` 1~ t` ~ N N N
O ~ N N N N N O O O O N N N

1~ ~^1 o i~ ~ ~ o o o ~ N O O ~ O o O O 11~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ O
~. ~ 11_ ~ 100 oo ~
.~ ~
~ ~ ~ mmmm ~ aaa m ~ ~ ~) eJI Ir) t~ t-- or~ t:S~ O ~ N t~ ~

~:77~

TABLE II
Location of Deuterated Site ExampleLocation of Deuterium Label (Carboxylate) Number Aromatic Benzylic, A11ylic (%) (~) Exa~ple 15 m e nodified block copolymer in Example 14 was converted to the ca-boxylic acid salt formed by the followin~ procedure: 50 g of polymer was dissolved in 500 g of a 90:10 mlxture of cyclohexane:
THF. Next, 4.3 g of a 1 molar aqueous LiOH solution was added. The mixture was allowed to stand 24 hours. m e polymer was then recovered by precipitation with methanol and dried at sub-atmospheric pressure.
By IR analysis, the sample showed complete conversion of acid functionality to lithium salt functionality. The absorbance band of l0the salt occurs at 1560-1600 cm 1, while that of the acid occurs at ]690 cm 1 Example 16 In this example, hydroxyl functionality was placed on the base polymer. The base po_ymer used was Reactant Polymer B.
15Base polymer (100 g) was dissolved in 100 ml of cyclohexane in a glass reactor under an argon purge. 1.02 meq TMEDA per g of polymer was then added. Impurities in the mixture were then re~oved by titration with sec-butyllithium. m e reactor contents were heated to 50 C, and 0.51 meq of additional sec-butyllithium per ~
Of polymer were added. 1000 ml of distilled THF was added and this solution was stirred at 25 C for 16 hours. This mixture was maintained at 40-45 C for 70 minutes. Next, ethylene oxide was bubbled into the vessel and the mixture was stirred for 10 minutes at 45 C. Finally, 1 meq of HCl (in methanol) per g of polymer was ~5 added to the reactor. The polymer was recovered by coagulation into 2-propanol and washed with methanol. A portion of the polymer was dried at sub-atmDspheric pressure at 40 C.
In order to analyze this hydroxylated polymer, the OH func-tionality was converted to acid by reaction with maleic anhydride at 150-160 C in diisopropyIbenzene. The reaction product was precipitated into methanol and washed with 70 C water to remov~
unreacted maleic anhydride. IP~ measurement showed carhonyl bands at 1730 cm 1 characteristic of a maleic ester.
m e polymer was then dried at sub-atmospheric pressure at 50 C. Titration for the half maleic acid ester using potassium methoxide in methanol together with a phenolphthalein indicator gave 0.18 meq acid per g polymer, showing that the original m.odi-fied block copolymer contained 0.18 meq O~ groups per g polymer.
m e moulded bars in the following Examples were tested using the following test procedures in the dry-as-moulded state:
Notched lzod toughness: at each end ASTM D-256-56 Examples 17-19 and Comparative EXperiments A-D
The base polymer used was a styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene hlock copolymer which contained 29wt% styrene and had a molecular weight of 66,000. 2270 g of this polymer were dissolved in 56.8 l of cyclohexane. This mixture was placed in 7.6 1 stainless steel pressurized reaction vessel and pressurized to abDut 1.7 bar. 0.8 meqJg polymer of tetramethylethylene diamine was then added to the vessel. A small amount, 0.5 ml of 1,1 diphenylethylene (an indicator), was then ad~ed to the reactor. Sec-butyllithi~ was then added incrementally until a yellow colour was obtained, indicating the absence of impurities.
The reactor contents were then heated to 60 C. Next, 0.4 meq/g polymer of additional sec-butyllithium was added to the reactor. After 2.5 hours reaction time, the contents of the vessel were transferrecl to another vessel which contained a stirring tnechanism. This second vessel contained 0.9-1.4 kg of dry ice ~solid CO2), 37.9 1 of tetrahydrofuran, and 18.9 l of diethyl ether. The solution was stirred for 30 munutes. Next, 85 g of acetic acid in a 2-propanol solution was added to the reactor. This ~ 2'~

solution was stirred for 16 hours. The modified block was then recovered by steam stripping.
Infrared analysis of the polymer showed the presence of both bound carboxylic acid at 1690 cm 1 and bound lithium carboxylate salt at 1560-1600 cm . By colorimetric titration with 0.01 N KOH
in methanol using a phenolphthalein indicator, it was found that the level of bound acid was 0.3wt% COOH. After repeated washings of the polymer with alcoholic hydrochloric acid, infrared analysis showed that complete conversion of salt to acid took place.
Titration of the washed polymer gave a bound acid level of 0.4wt~
COOH.
The thermoplastic polyamide used in this example was a commer-cial nylon 6,6, Zytel 101, a trade name for a moulding grade obtain~d from Dupont. Prior to all processing steps, the nylon 6,6 and its blends were dried at 120 C for 4 hours under sub-atmospheric pressure with a nitrogen purge.
Blends of nylon 6,6 with both unmodified and modified block copolymer were prepared in a 30 mm diameter corotating twin screw extruder. The blend components were premixed by tumbling in poly-ethylene bags, and then fed into the extruder. m e extruder melt temperature profile varied from 270 C in the feed zone to 285 C
at the die. A screw speed of 300 rotations per minute (rpm) was used. The extrudate was pelletized and injection moulded into test specimens. The formulations and physical properties are shcwn in Table III.

7~s6 TABIE III

Example 17 18 19 Comparative Experiment ~ ~ C D
_ . _ _ _ Nylon 6,6 100 90 80 70 90 80 70 Unmodified Block Copolymer -- 10 20 30 --Modified Block Copolymer -~ -- 10 20 30 3.2 m~l ~ry as Moulded Room Temperature Notched Izod 43 48 53 64 53 107 288 (J/m) The examples 17-19 show that the ccmpositions according to this invention exhibit an unexpected improvement in impact strength over the thermoplastic polyamide or blends of the thermoplastic polyamide with unmodified block copolymer.
Examples 20-22 and Comparative Experiments E-H
. _ The thermoplastic polyester used in this example was a ccmmercial PBT, Valox 310, a moulding grade obtained from General Electric.
Prior to all processing steps, PBT and its blends were dried at 120 C for 4 hours under sub-atmospheric pressure with a nitrogen purge. The mcx~ified block copolymer was identical with that used in the Examples 17-19.
Blends of PBT with both unmcdified and modified block copolymer were prepared in a 30 mm diameter corotatin~ twin screw extruder.
The blend components were premixed by tumbling in polyethylene bags, and then fed into the extruder. The extruder melt temperature profile varied frc~ 230 C in the feed zone to 240 C at the die. A
screw rpm of 300 was used. The extrudate was pelletized and injec-tion moulded into test specimens. The formulations and physical properties are shc~ in Table IV.

~7'7~6 TABLE IV

Example 20 21 22 Comparative Experiment E F G H _ PBT lOt) 90 80 70 90 80 70 Unmodified Block Copolymer -- 10 20 30 -- -- --Modified Block Copolymer -- -- -- -- 10 20 30 3.2 ~m Rocm Temperature Notched Izod (J/m) 37 48 75 91 107 1062 1148 m e examples 20-22 show that the compositions according to this inve~tion exhibit an unexpected improvement in impact stren~th over the thermoplastic polyester or blends of the thermoplastic polyester with unmodified block copolymer.

Claims (56)

1. A functionalized selectively hydrogenated block copolymer of the formula Bn(AB)oAp wherein n is 0 or an integer of at least one, o is an integer of at least one and p is 0 or an integer of at least one, A is predominantly a polymerized monoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon block and B prior to hydrogenation is predominantly a polymerized conjugated diene hydrocarbon block, to which copolymer has been grafted at least one electrophilic graftable molecule or electrophile wherein substantially all of said graftable molecules are grafted to the block copolymer in the monoalkenyl-arene block.

2. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 in which each block A has an average molecular weight in the range of from 1,000 to 115,000.

3. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which said polymerized conjugated diene hydrocarbon block has an average molecular weight in the range of from 20,000 to 450,000.

4. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the blocks A constitute in the range of from 1 to 95 weight percent of the copolymer.

5. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the unsaturation of the block B is less than 20% of the original unsaturation.

6. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the unsaturation of the A blocks is above 50% of the original unsaturation.

7. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 in which the grafted molecule contains one or more functional groups.

8. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 in which prior to hydrogenation, the polymeric blocks A are polymer blocks of a monoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon.

9. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 8 in which the monoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon is styrene.

10. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the conjugated diene is 1,3-butadiene.

11. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the block copolymer is a styrene-ethylene/
butylene-styrene block copolymer.

12. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim or 2 in which the blocks A comprise in the range of from 1 to 40 percent by weight of the copolymer.

13. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 in which the unsaturation of block B has been reduced to less than 10% of its original value.

14. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 13 in which the unsaturation of block B has been reduced to less than 5% of its original value.

15. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim or 2 in which the average unsaturation of the hydrogenated block copolymer has been reduced to less than 20% of its original value.

16. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim or 2 in which an average of less than 10% of the monoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon units have been hydrogenated.

17. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which block A has an average molecular weight in the range of from 500 to 60,000.

18. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which block B has an average molecular weight in the range of from 35,000 to 150,000.

19. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which in the range of from 35% to 50% of the condensed butadiene units having 1,2-configuration.

20. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which an average of more than 25% of the monoalkenyl-aromatic hydrocarbon units have been hydrogenated.

21. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the electrophile is carbon dioxide.

22. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the electrophile is ethylene oxide.

23. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the electrophiles are selected from the group consisting of aldehydes, ketones and carboxylic acids and salts and esters thereof.

24. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the electrophiles are epoxides.

25. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the electrophile is sulphur.

26. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the electrophile is a boron alkoxide.

- 35a- 63293-2679

27. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the electrophile is an isocyanate.

28. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the electrophile is a molecule containing silicon.

29. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2 in which the electrophile is a sulphonate.

30. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 7 in which the functional groups are carboxylic acids or salts or esters thereof.

31. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 7 in which the functional groups are ketones.

32. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 7 in which the functional groups are alcohols and alkoxides.

33. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 7 in which the functional groups are amines.

34. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 7 in which the functional groups are functional groups containing a silicon atom.

- 35b - 63293-2679

35. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 7 in which the functional groups are thiols.

36. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 7 in which the functional groups are borates.

37. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 7 in which the functional groups are amides.

38. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 in which the grafted molecule or a derivative thereof is present in an amount in the range of from 0.02 to 20 percent by weight.

39. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 38 in which the grafted molecule or its derivative is in an amount in the range of from 0.1 to 10 percent by weight.

40. A functionalized block copolymer as claimed in claim 39 in which the grafted molecule or its derivative is present in an amount in the range of from 0.2 to 5 percent by weight.

41. Impact resistant polymeric compositions comprising a) in the range of from 50 to 97 percent of a polyamide having a number average molecular weight of at least 5,000, or of a thermoplastic polyester, and - 35c - 63293-2679 b) in the range of from 3 to 50 percent by weight of a functionalized selectively hydrogenated block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 or 2.

42. An impact resistant polymeric composition as claimed in claim 41 in which the polyamide or polyester is present in an amount in the range of from 70 to 95 percent by weight.

43. An impact resistant polymeric composition as claimed in claim 42 in which the polyamide or polyester is present in an amount in the range of from 75 to 90 percent by weight.

44. An impact resistant polymeric composition as claimed in claim 41 in which the polyamide is nylon 6,6.

45. An impact resistant polymeric composition as claimed in claim 41 in which the polyamide resin is selected from the group consisting of polyhexamethylene adipamide, polyhexa-methylene sebacamide, polycaprolactam, polyhexamethylene iso-phthalamide, polyhexamethylene tere-co-isophthalamide and mixtures and copolymers thereof.

46. An impact resistant polymeric composition as claimed in claim 41 in which the polyester is polybutylene terephthalate.

47. An impact resistant polymeric composition as claimed in claim 41 in which the polyester is polyethylene terephthalate.

48. A process for producing a functionalized selectively hydro-genated block copolymer as claimed in claim 1 which process comprises contacting hydrogenated block copolymers of conjugated dienes and monovinyl-substituted aromatic compounds with an alkyllithium compound, and a polar compound selected from the group consisting of tertiary amines and low molecular weight hydrocarbon ethers, to form a backbone polymer having active lithium atoms along the polymer chain, and thereafter contacting said backbone polymer and at least one electrophilic graftable molecule or electrophile to form backbone polymers with grafted molecules attached wherein substantially all of said graftable molecules which have been grafted are grafted to the block copolymer in the vinylarene block.

49. A process as claimed in claim 48 in which the polar compound is present in an amount in the range of from 0.1 to 10.0 equivalents per equivalent of lithiumralkyl.

50. A process as claimed in claim 49 in which the polar compound is present in an amount in the range of from 1 to 3 equivalents per equivalent of lithium-alkyl.

51. A process as claimed in any one of claims 48 to 50 in which the polar compound is N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine.

52. A process as claimed in claim 48 in which a molar ratio of said alkyl-lithium compound to vinylarene units in the range of from 0.001 to 3 is used.

53. A process as claimed in claim 52 in which said molar ratio is in the range of from 0.01 to 1.0

54. A process as claimed in any one of claims 48 to 50 in which said alkyllithium compound is sec-butyllithium.

55. A process as claimed in any one of claims 48 to 50 in which said metallating step is performed at a temperature in the range of from 25°C to 80°C.

56. A process for producing functionalized selectively hydrogenated block copolymers as claimed in claim 1 or 2 which process comprises contacting hydrogenated block copolymers of conjugated dienes and monovinyl-substituted aromatic compounds with tert-butyllithium to form a backbone polymer having active lithium atoms along the polymer chain, and thereafter contacting at least one electreophilic graftable molecule which upon reaction with the active lithium atoms will produce functional groups selected from the group consisting of carboxyls, alcohols and ethers wherein substantially all of said molecules are grafted to the block copolymer in the vinylarene block.