CA1275759C - Method and apparatus for alkaline delignification of lignocellulosic fibrous material - Google Patents

Abstract

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALKALINE
DELIGNIFICATION OF LIGNOCELLULOSIC FIBROUS MATERIAL

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

A process is disclosed for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic fibrous materials prior to delignification. The process in one of its embodiments is comprised of the following steps:

1. Contacting the pulp material with treated filtrate and alkali for a short reaction period of about 1 to 2 minutes at 40°C, 2. Withdrawing part of the liquid phase by filtration, 3. Displacing substantially all of the remaining liquid phase with treated filtrate, and 4. Allowing the pulp to react under conditions normally used for alkaline extraction or oxygen delignification.
The treated filtrate is obtained by subjecting the liquor removed from the pulp at steps 2 and 3 to temperatures of 50 to 60°C for periods of about 5 to 10 minutes. Alternatively, step 3 can be eliminated.

Description

-2~ 75~

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the preparation of papermaking pulps from li~nocellulosic materials it is often desirable to bleach the pulps to obtain a whitened product. Numerous methods of bleaching pulp are practiced and have been described in a variety of publications (1, 2). Certain of these prior art bleachin~ processes re~uire multiple treatment steps to remove liqnin and other "color bodies" from the pulp. It is a characteristic of most bleachinq processes that expensive chemicals and process equipment are required to obtain relatively small chanqes in the purity and bri~htness of the product pulp. For example, to obtain wood pulp of 90 briqhtness from softwood kraft pulp it is often necessary to use five stages of bleaching under conditions such as in Table I. The bleach sequence and conditions outlined in Table I, while typical, only represents one of a larqe number of bleach sequences in common use by the pulp industry.

r~, _3_ ~27~59 Table I

Ty~ical Reaction Conditions for SW Kraft Bleaching Stage Active % Chemical Consistency Temper-Chemical on Pulp % ature Deg. C
1 chlorine 6 3~5 35 2 alkaline 3 12 60 extraction 3 chlorine 1 12 70 lS dioxide 4 alkaline .5 12 60 extraction chlorine .2 12 70 dioxide The waste products of the bleaching process are Xnown to contain BOD, organically bound chlorine and color. Thus, they contribute to the water pollution discharged from the pulp mill.
The efficiency of the bleachin~ reactions is hampered by the existence of condensation reactions.
This can be particularly true in the alkaline extraction step where condensation reactions bloc~ further delignlication. A publication by Seymour (3) reports that the amount of caustic applied in the extraction stage can be doubled beyond normal with practically no reduction in bleach chemical usage in the following stages.

_4_ 1~ 7 ~ 7S 9 _ It i8 a continuing objective of the pulp industry to reduce overall bleaching costs by improving efficiency in the various process steps. Improved efficiency can result in lower costs by reduction o chemical usage or reduction of the number of process stepa. An additional benefit of improved efficiency can be a lowering of pollutant discharge.

Past Attempts to Solve the Problem Lachenal, et al, (4) have found that with sodium carbonate as the pulping agent two stage pulping of wheat ~traw is more efficient than one stage pulping.
If the spent liquor is removed after the first stage, even greater efficiency is achieved. This they cite as evidence of the importance of the condensation reactions in alkaline delignification.
~ ot alkaline extraction of the unbleached pulp has been proposed to improve bleach plant efficiency. This is sometimes referred to as pre-bleaching or pre-deliqnification. The objective is to reduce bleach costs by reducing the kappa number tlignin content) of the pulp before it enters the bleach plant. In this way a ~orresponding reduction in the amount of more-expensive bleaching agents is achieved. More recently, oxygen delignification has been the subject of a number oP U.S. patents (8 thru 11, 13 thru 17) as a pre-bleaching step to lower the ~appa number o~ pulp prior to bleaching. In thl8 in~tance the unbleached pulp is contacted with oxygen and ~lkali under condition~ of elevated temperature and pressure for time periods which are typically about 15 to 30 minutes. The industry has been slow to adopt this technlque, however, because it requires expensive equipment for its implementation.

_5_ iZ7~7~9 _ At an earlier time, the "cold soda~ process was developed (1) principally as a means to remove hemicellulose and thus improve alpha-cellulose content of dis~olving grade pulp. This proces~ can be applied to pulps at any stage ln the bleaching or purification sequence including pulps which have been hot alkaline-extracted. Optimum temperatures for cold caustic extraction range between 15 and 25-C and treatment times, between 15 and 60 minutes.
Oxygen has been used to enhance lignin removal in the extraction stage. Kemph and Dence (5) reported significant reductions in permanganate number after extraction of chlorinated pulp in an oxygen atmosphere.
Tests which they conducted in an air atmosphere Also showed an 1mprovement although it was only about l/Sth as large as the effect noted with oxygen. More recently, based on improved methods of mixing pulp and oxygen such as disclosed in U.S. Patents 3,832,276 and 4,451,332, the commercial use of oxygen in the extraction stage has grown rapidly worldwide.
Elton describes the two most common systems for oxygen extraction (6). For both types of system, sodium hydroxide i~ added to the pulp after it leaves the chlorination stage washer and prior to the addition of oxygen to a mixing device. The alkaline pulp suspension, containing a fine dispersion of oxygen, is either introduced into the bottom of the extraction tower or, when extraction is in a downflow tower, into a pre-retention tube.
While oxygen extraction is ef~ective at improving efficiency, it does create some added problems. These are the need to handle oxygen, a potentially hazardous chemical; the added expense of the oxygen; and the need to provlde adequate ventilation to prevent buildup of toxic and combustible gases.

-6- ~2757~9 The use of hydrogen peroxide has also been used to enhance lignin removal in the extr~ction stage (2).
While this is a relatively simple method, its application does require the added expense of peroxide.
Another method of alkaline extraction of chlorinated pulp is disclosed by Liebergott in US
Patent 3,874,992. In this method, the mixture of pulp and alkali is pressed to a high consistency within about 5 minutes after mixing the hot alkali and the pulp. The method reports results eq~al to those achieved with conventional alkaline extraction.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention teaches an improved method of conducting alkaline extraction of pulp. It is preferably employed in one or more of three locations:

1. Before conventional bleaching, i.e., as a pre-bleach;
2. In the extraction stage of a conventional bleach sequence; or, 3. In conjunction with a conventional oxygen delignificatlon stage.
The present invention is based on a surprising discovery relating to alkaline treatment of pulp. It was found that pulp deligniication can be impr~ved if a portion of the liquid phase is removed from the reacting 30 mixture after only a short time ~0.5 to 10 minutes) of reaction. The pulp is then allowed to continue to react with the remaining liquid solution or a normal period of time (30 to 90 minutes). This suggests that during the initial phase of reaction, substances are formed 35 which either reverse or inhibit pulp delignification.

~%7~ 9 It was further learned that the liquid phase, after being removed from the pulp suspension, can be treated to alter, remove, or otherwise deactivate those substances which reverse or inhibit the delignification s process, thus making the liquid phase suitable for reuse in delignif~cation or extraction. One such method of treatment i6 to heat the liquid phase for a period of time ranging from about 5 minutes or longer, depending on reaction temperature. The reuse of the treated 1~ liquid phase can be accomplished either by adding it to fresh pulp or by re-adding it to the original pulp.
This is not intended to imply that reuse of the liquor is limited to these two means.
Thus, it is an object of this invention to provide a process for improving pulp delignification in a paper making system by mixing the pulp material with alkali and its carrier liquid for a short period, withdrawing the liquid phase of the mixture after a short period and continuing thereafter to react the pulp and the alkali for a normal period.
Another object of this invention is to provide an improved process of pulp bleaching and delignification in a paper making process by reducing condensation reactions between di~solved and undissolved lignin, by the adding o~ an alkaline mixture to the pulp and, a~ter a short period, withdrawing a major portion of the liquid phase of the alkaline mixture and continuing to react the remaining pulp solution.
Another ob~ect of thi~ invention is to provide a proces~ whereby in a paper making system a portion of the liquid phase of an alkaline mixture which is added to the pulp is withdrawn from the pulp suspension and the withdrawn liquid i8 reused as an additive with the alkaline mixture that i8 combined with the pulp.

~:7~759 Other objects, feature3 and advantages of the invention will be understood upon reading the following specification, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing~.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 ifi a flow diagram which illustrates how one process of the invention can be practiced.
Fig. 2 - 7 are flow diagrams, simllar to Flg. 1, .
l0 but lllustrating how alternate proces-~es of the invention can ~e practiced.
Flg~ 8 is a side schematic illustration of wa~hing system used to wash waste liquor from the wood pulp and to add other liquors to the pulp, and which can lS be used to practice an alternate proces~ of the invention.

DETAI~ED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Referrlng now in more detail to the drawings, 20 wherein like numerals indicate like parts throughout the several views, Fig. 1 illustrates the first, most simplified embodiment of the invention, wherein either unbleached chlorinated or partially bleached wood pulp i8 blended with a suitable alkali, such as NaO~, in a 25 mixer 1 at a pulp consistency between about 0.01% and 30~, preferably about 7 to lS%. Alternately, the a~kali can be combined with the pulp by dlstributlng it on a sheet of pulp 80 that the n~tural capillary forces will dl~tribute the alkali throughout the pulp. The amount 30 of alkali added can be the same as, greater or less than the amount normally used for extractlon, delignification or oxygen delignification. The alkaline pulp suspension is next carrled into the reactor 2 where it is treated for 0.5 to 10 minutes or longer depending upon the 35 reaction temperature. Table II shows the approximate relation~hip between optimum reaction time and temperature.

-9~ ;759 TA~3LE I I

Temperature Approximate optimum Deg C time in Reactor 2 in minutes 29 1.5 - 4 1.0 - 3.0 1.0 - 2.0 10 50 0.5 - 1.5 It is important to note that other factors such as effectiveness of mixing, species of lignocellulosic material, and prior treatment of the pulp can influence the optimum time o treatment. The values in Table II, therefore, are approximate; and different specific appl~cations of the invention could show some variance of optimum treatment time. Treatment times longer or shorter than the values reported in Table II can be used; but if the treatment time is too short or too long, the effectiveness of the method is reduced.
Following the relatively short reaction time in reactor 2, a portion of the liquid phase i8 removed by filtration of the alkaline pulp suspension in the filter 3: and the thickened pulp slurry is conveyed to the reaction vessel 6. The amount of filtrate removed rom the pulp slurry at the filter 3 is adjusted to be less than approximately 90~ of the liquid phase o the mixture ard preferably between 40 and 70~ of thR li~uid pha~e present with the pulp in the reactor 2~ The pulp slurry whlch pas~e3 to the reaction ve~el 6 should cont~in sufficient entrained chemical to complete the deli~nifcation reaction in the vessel.
The conditions of time and temperature applied in ve~sel 6 can be those normally applied to the pulp for ~. 27~;759 --1 o--_ the stage of processing at whlch this invention i8 being practiced. Thus, if practiced with alkaline extraction of chlorinated pulp, vessel 6 could be operated at 60 to 70-C and 30 to 90 minutes; and if practiced with oxygen delignification, vessel 6 would be operated at about 100-C and 100 psi for 15 to 45 minutes. Further, if operated as an alkaline pre-delignification, vessel 6 might be operated between 70 and 100~C for 15 to 45 minutes. The amount of alkali present in vessel 6 can be considerably less than is normally used for the corresponding process practiced without the improvement of this~ invention.
The final washer 7 is optional. It i8 included because it represents good bleaching practice. It is lS not meant to limit this invention to systems which include washing after the reaction vessel 6.
A second embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 2. This differs from Fig. 1 by the inclusion of a secon~ mixer S in the process line between the filter 3 and the reaction vessel 6. In this method, the alkali required for reaction is added in two parts, the first part at the mixer 1 and second part at the second mixer 5. By conducting the process in this manner, there are no restrictions on the fraction of the liquid phase removed at the filter 3 other than those imposed by the mechanics of operation of the filter. Thus, when it is possible to remove 95 to 100%, substantially all of the liquid from the pulp exiting reactor 2, this would be acceptable. The relationship between optimum time of treAtment and temperature in reactor 2 ls substantLally the same as that given in Table II for the first embodiment of this invention. Best results are obtained when between 50 to 80%, and preferably about 55 to 70%, of the alkali requirement is added at the mixer 1 and the remainder at the second mixer 5. Conditions in the 27~;~59 reaction vessel 6 and washer 7 are similar to those for Fig. 1.
In a third embodiment of this invention as shown in Fig. 3, a washing step 4 is added between the filter 3 and the mixer 5. This improYes the degree of removal of the liquid phase. Alternatively, the filter 3 and washer 4 can be combined into one unit by using a conventional pulp washer employing a filtration step followed by a displacement wash. The wash liquid used , 10 can be either water or fresh alkali solution. Filtrate from the final washer 7 can be reused as the wash liquid if it is suitable. For alkaline extraction of chlorinated pulp as illustrated in Fig. 3, the optimum dosage of alkali at mixer 1 is between 50 and 80% and lS preferably between 55 and 65% of the total alkali charged, with the remainder applied at the second mixer 5. Conditions in the reaction vessel 6 and washer 7 are ~imilar to those for Figs. 1 and 2.
The fourth embodiment of this invention is ~hown in Fig. 4. The arrangement is the same as in the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 2 with the exception that the entire charge of alkali i8 added at the mixer 1 and filtrate from the filter 3 is collected in a tank 8.
Some of the filtrate is treated in the filtrate reactor 9 and re-added to the pulp either at the mixer or between reactor 2 and filter 3 or at both places. The portion of the filtrate which i8 not treated in reactor 9 can be discarded. The amount of filtrate removed from the system at this point is determined by the consistencies oE the feed pulp and the pulp entering reactor 6. It is possible to operate the process without discarding filtrate at this point but generally it i5 advantageous to discard a volume of filtrate equal to about 40 to 70% of the total volume of liquid contained in the pulp and the -12- ~27~7~9 al~ali entering mixer 1 although larger amounts can sometimes be discarded. Typically, pulp will enter reactor 2 at between 8 to 15% consistency and have a consistency of between 8 and 25% as it enters reactor 6. Reaction conditions in the reactor 2 are similar to those previously given in Table II. Valves (not shown) in the lines of Fig. 4 can be used to control the flow.
It has been determined that holding the filtrate in the filtrate reactor 9 of Fig. 4 for a period of 5 to 12 minutes at 60C, or 8 to 60 minutes at 50C, gives satisfactory results. Consistent with the normal reaction kinetics theory, longer holding times would be required at lower temperatures and shorter times at lS higher temperatures. Heater 12 comprises a provision for adding heat to the filtrate reactor 9 as shown in Fig. 4. Most of the heat requirement for the reaction in vessel 6 could be added to this point.
,Conditions in the reaction ve3sel 6 and washer 7 are similar to those for Figs. 1, 2 and 3.
A fifth embodiment of this invention is shown in Fig. 5. This is the same as Fig. 4 except for the inclusion of a washer 4 between the filter 3 and the mixer 5 in the line of process flow. In this case the pulp i~ washed with treated ~iltrate from the filtrate reactor 9 to remove additional traces of entrained liqui~ pha~e which remaln in the pulp after filtration.
It is possible to use the treated filtrate only at the washer 4 in Fig. 5. ~lternately, in addition to using treated filtrate to wash the pulp at the washer 4, additional treated filtrate can be added to the pulp either at the mixer 5 or between reactor 2 and filter 3 or at both places. Valves (not shown) in the lines of Fig. 5 can be used to control the flow. As in the third embodiment, the filter 3 and washer 4 can be -13- ~27~59 combined into one unit. Additional treated filtrate is added to the pulp at the mixer S if needed, or alternately, the mixer 5 can be eliminated and the pulp conveyed to the reaction vessel 6 for further processing.
Reaction conditions in the filtrate reactor 9 are the same as in the fourth embodiment (Fig. 4).
Conditions in the reaction vessel 6 and washer 7 are sim~lar to those for Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4.
10The sixth and seventh embodiment of this invention are shown in Figs. 6 and 7. ~y utilizing recycle of the treated filtrate, it i5 possible to use higher amounts of alkali at the mixer 1 and reactor 2 thus facilitating the remo~al of lignin.
lSIn the embodiment of the invention shown in Fig. 6, chlorinated or unbleached pulp is blended with treated filtrate from the filtrate reactor 9 in the mixer 1.
Alternatively, the treated filtrate is sprayed or otherwise distributed on a sheet of pulp allowing the natural capillary forces to distribute the filtrate.
The temperature of the pulp suspension at this point will depend on the temperatures of the streams entering the mixer and usually will be in the range of 40 to 60C. After a short retention in reactor 2 following the guidelines of time and temperature ;described in embodiment one and listed in Table II, the slurry is then filtered, or dewatered at filter 3. Prior to the flltration step/ treated filtrate may be used to dilute the pulp although this dilution is optional. The optimum liquid removal by filter 3 in the system of Fig. 6 is between 70 and 90% removal, but 30 to 70% liquid removal would still provide significant benefits. However, liquid eemoval rates of 75 to 90% are easily achieved commerically. Table III shows, for the system of Fig. 6, some values for -14- ~7~759 consistency entering filter 3 and entering the reactor 6 that will result in 67~, 80~ and 90~ removal of the liquid phase at the filter 3.
TABL~ III
. .
Liquid phase~ Consistency % Cons~stency removed at entering entering filter 3 filter 3 reactor 6 1.0 9.2 2.0 1609 3.5 26.6 2.0 9.3 lS 80 3.5 15.4 5.0 20.8 67 3.S 9.9 67 5.0 13.8 67 10.0 25.0 The process operates best when the alkali charge to the first ~tage i8 maximized. After filtration at filteF 3, the resulting thickened pulp slurry will carry forward sufficient alkali in the entrained llquid phase to complete the delignificaton reaction. The conditions of time and temperature in the reaction vessel 6 and washer 7 can be the same A~ tho~e stated in the fir8t embodiments of this inventlon ~Fig~. 1 thru 5).
Some o~ the eiltrate from the ilter 3 of Fig. 6 is collected in the tank 8 and treated in filtrate reactor 9 prior to being recirculated to the mixer 1 and the optional dilution point between reactor 2 and filter 3. The portion of the filtrate which is not received in tank 8 for treatment in reactor 9 can be discarded. As stated in embodiment four of this invention (Fig. 4), it is possible to operate the process without discarding filtrate but an improved result is achieved by discarding a volume of filtrate equal to about 40 ~o 70% of the total volume of liquid contained in the pulp entering the mixer 1 and in the fresh alkali entering the process. Valves (not shown) in the lines of Fig. 6 can be used to control the flow.
Heater 12 comprises a provision for adding heat to the filtrate reactor 9. This provides the elevated temperature desired for filtrate treatment. Holding periods in filtrate reactor 9 ranging from 8 to 60 minutes at 50C have been used successfully. The short treatment time is preferred because it requires lS the smallest reactor size for implemention. As stated in the discussion of embodiment four, at a temperature of 60 in filtrate reactor 9, a holding period between 5 and 12 minutes is sufficient.
The temperature of the pulp mixture entering reactor 2 of Fig. 6 i~ determined by the temperatures and consistencies of the streams entering the mixer 1.
Since it is an advantage to use elevated temperature to treat the filtrate in filtrate reactor 9, the temperature of the pulp stock entering the reactor 2 will be correspondingly high. Typical of the ~values which might be encountered would be pulp stock at 35C
and 15% consistency moving to mixer 1 and filtrate at 60-C reclrculating from filtrate reactor 9 to mixer 1 which re~ults in the feed from mixer 1 to reactor 2 having a temperature of about 50-C and a consistency of 5.6~.
Referring to Fig. 6, fresh alkali can be added to the system either at the tank 8 (point A), at the inlet to the filtrate reactor 9 (point B) or at the outlet of the filtrate reactor 9 (point C). Wherever added, ~27~;~59 Rufficient ag~tation from normal flow conditions in the system should be available to disperse the alkali evenly throughout the filtrate. If not, it would be desirable to provide a means for agitation. It is, of course, possible to add fresh alkali to the pulp at a point beore it enters the Mixer 1, for example, by adding ~t in the pulp conveyor or spraying ~t on the washer or in the pulper of the previous stage (not shown).
The seventh embod~ment of this invention shown in Fig. 7 differs from the sixth by the inclusion of washer 4 in the process flow between the filter 3 and the reaction vessel 6. The washer uses treated f~ltrate from the filtrate reactor 9 to displace li~uor remaining in the pulp after filtration by filter 3. The inclusion of the washer 4 allow~ more complete removal of the liquid phase by replacing it with treated filtrate. It is desirable to operate acc~rding to the guidelines of embodlment 8iX with alkali charge to the reactor 2 as high as practical. This is accomplished by maximizing withdrawal of liquid phase between reactors 2 and 6.
The washing step improves efficiency of liquid phase removal without requiring low consistency entering the filter. As in embodiment 6, the addition of treated filtrate to the pulp between the reactor 2 and the filter 3 is optional. Valves (not shown) in the lines of Fig. 7 can be used to control the flow.

-17- ~7~7~

In the system of Fig. 7 the best point of alkali addition would be point C which causes the fresh alkali to be blended directly with the treated filtrate being recycled to the mixer 1. One skilled in the art will 5 recognize that this maximizes the alkali charge to the reactor 2. Locations A, B and E of the system of Fig. 7 would be alternate locations for alkali addition, and location D the least desirable point of alkali addition. Conditions in the filtrate reactor 9 are similar to those used in Figs. 4, 5 and 6.
As in embodiment six, fresh alkali could be added to the pulp upstream of the mixer 1 of Fig. 7.
Conditions applied to the pulp suspension in the reaction vessel 6 are the similar to those specified in the other embodiments. Further, as in all of the other embodiments, the washer 7 is optional.

Equipment Specifications The mixers 1 of Figs. 1-7 and 5 of Figs. 2-5 can be chosen from equipment already available to the pulp industry including, but not limited to, static mixers, high shear mixers, and stirred tank mixers.

-18- ~27~5~

The reactor 2 can be any vessel of appropriate size - to provide sufficient residence time for the first stage reaction. The vessel should ideally be designed to minimize backmix~ng. Therefore, a long tubular reactor such as a pipeline, tall tower or stand pipe would be suitable. It would be desirable to have the flexibility to adjust the residence time in reactor 2 to allow response to changes in operating temperature. Numerous methods to do this are known to those skilled in mechanical design of reactors.
The filter 3 could be chosen from equipment already available to the industry including but not limited to such devices known as sidehill screens, extractors, deckers, drum filters and belt filters. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that for the embodiment~ in which the filter 3 and washer 4 are used together (Figs. 3, 5 and 7), these can be combined by using a conventional pulp washer employing a filtration step followed by displacement (not shown). If a separate washer is used, those commonly employed by the pulp industry such as diffusion washers, pressure washers or wash presses are acceptable.
If used for alkaline extraction, the reaction vessel 6 can be any one of the types commonly used for extraction. Its ma~or purpose is to provide sufficient residence time and temperature for completion of the extractlon reaction. If the process is to be used in conjunction with oxygen delignlfication, the reactlon vessel 6 can be any o~ the oxygen deligni~ication systems commonly used for that purpose.
The tank 8 (Figs. 4-7) can be any standard filtrate or seal tank commonly used in the pulp industry. Its purpose is to serve AS a collection point for filtrate and provide a barometric seal whenever a vacuum filter is used for fllter 3. Tank 8 could be eliminated from ... .

-19- ~ 27~759 _ the systems without significantly altering the efficiency of the~system.
The filtrate reactor 9 (Figs. 4-7) i8 constructed to provide the necessary residence time (5 to 10 S minutes) for filtrate treatment with a minimum of bac~mixing. Filtrate reactor 9 includes a heater 12 to add the heat to the filtrate, which will raise the temperature of the filtrate to its reaction temperature of 50 to 60-C. A pipeline reactor with indirect steam heating would be acceptable as a filtrate reactor.
An alternative ~ystem which replaces mixer 1, reactor 2, filter 3 and washer 4 is shown in Fig. 8. A
pulp mat 11 i8 formed on a continuous moving belt or filter cloth 10 and dewatered as it passes over the first ~ection of vacuum boxes V0. Alkali solution or treated filtrate is then distributed evenly over the surface of the pulp mat 11 from the shower 51 allowing the natural capillary forces to saturate the pulp mat with extraction liquor. Some of the liquid can be drawn through the pulp mat by the application of vacuum on the underside of the filter cloth at V1. This will have the çffect of improving the uniformity of liquor distribution in the pulp mat. As the pulp is transported along with the moving filter cloth the first stage of reaction takes place. This will require a residence time of the pulp and alkali solution on the movlng filter cloth of up to about 10 mlnutes, depending on the temperature o~ the mixture. ~t could be desirable to add one or more additional filtration stations along the length of the filter cloth to exchange the liquid phase in the moving pulp mat with freshly treated filtrate or fresh alkali ~olution. The ~howers S2, S3 and S4 and the vacuum boxes V2, V3 and V4 are provided for this purpose. At the end of the desired residence time, the liquid phase is wlthdrawn by -20- ~27~7~9 _ vacuum box V4 and after the liquid phase has been withdrawn from the pulp mat, the pulp mat 11 is washed with treated filtrate or fresh alkali solution by shower S5. This washing is accomplished by spraying the wash liquid on the pulp mat from the shower S5 and drawing the liquid through the mat 11 by the action of vacuum applied to the underside of the filter cloth by vacuum box V5. From this point the pulp is ready to proceed to the second stage of reaction.
When the system of Fig. 8 is operated without using the showers S2, S3 and S4 and without the vacuum boxes V2 or V3, it acts as a replacement for combined mixer 1, reactor 2, filter 3 and washer 4 of Figs. 3, S and 7.
When used for embod~ment 3 (Fig. 3), either water or lS fresh alkali is fed to the shower S5. Alternatively, the filtrates F1, F4 and F5 from vacuum boxes V1, V4 and VS are combined for treatment in the filtrate reactor 9.
Then, when the system of Fig. 8 is used for embodlment 5 ~Fig. S), the treated combined filtrate is fed to the shower S5. Or, when used for embodiment 7 (Fig. 7), the treated combined filtrate is used both at the shower SS
and the shower S1.
In the embodiment of Fig. 8, the use of multiple sets of showers and vacuum boxes for filtration is equivalent to using the process of this invention several times in series. This would result in improved performance over a single application of the process~
There are several possible choices of operation when utilizing the shower and vacuum box system of Fig. 8 as a substitute for multiple applicatlons of the mixer 1, reactor 2, filter 3 and washer 4 of Figs. 3, 5 and 7. In one method the filtrates F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5 are combined, alkali added and the mixture treated for 10 minutes at 50-C, as discussed in embodiments 4, 5, 6 and 7. The treated, combined filtrate i9 used to ~ ::7~59 treat the pulp by recycling it to the showers S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5. In another method, the alkali is not added to the combined filtrates before treatment but inRtead is combined with the portion of the treated combined filtrate which is sprayed on the pulp at shower St. In yet another method, alkali is added only to filtrate F1 and the filtrates are not combined.
Instead, the filtrates are treated separately in separate filtrate reactors of the type illu~trated at 9 in Figs. 5-7 for the required time and temperature and recycled to the showers in the following order.
Filtrate F1 is combined with alkali, treated and recycled to shower S1. Filtrate F2 is treated and recycled to shower S2, treated filtrates F3, F4 and F5 are recycled to shower S3, S4 and S5, respectively. In the first method, the concentration of alkali will tend to be distributed evenly along the length of the pulp mat while in the latter method, the highest alkali concentratlon will occur following the shower S1, and alkali concentration wlll diminish step-wise with the lowest value occurring after shower S5.
EXAMPLES
Example 1 To demonstrate the process of Fig. 1, previously dried, unbleached softwood kraft pulp having a kappa number of 25.2 was treated with sodium hydroxide. The pulp was well washed, formed into a pad on a heated buchner funnel and saturated to 7.7g con~istency by distributlng ~ preheated solution o sodium hydroxide over its surace, simulating the first stage of reaction. After one minute, vacuum was applied to the buchner funnel, and 67% of the liquid phase was removed, brlnging the pulp consistency to 20%. The wet pulp was then transferred to plastic bags and placed in a constant temperature bath for 30 minutes, simulating -~2- ~2~759 treatment in reaction vessel 6. As a control, one sample of the same pulp was well washed, blended with sod~um hydroxide solution to a consistency of 7.7% in a pla~tic bag, and placed in a constant temperature bath for 30 minutes to simulate normal alkaline extraction.
At the completion of the extraction period, pulps were dispersed in deionized water to 1% consistency, well washed, formed into sheets and analyzed for kappa number using TAPPI Method T236 m-60. The conditions used and results are listed in Table IV. The dosage of NaOH applied to the pulps is expressed as a weight percentage based on oven dry pulp. Lignin removal is recorded as the change in kappa number of the pulp as a result of treatment.
TABLE IV
First Stage Extraction Run NaO~ Temp. Liquid Temp. Final Kappa No. % Deg. C Removal Deg. C Kappa Change % _ Number Control* 3.0 0 80 22.5 2.7 US 3.0 60 67 80 21.2 4.0 U6 .9~ 60 67 80 22.4 2.8 U3 3.0 50 67 70 22.1 3.1 * No first stage treatment This result shows the bene~it of treatment using the process of this invention. Uslng equivalent amounts of NaOH, a greater amount of lignin removal was achieved in Run No. U5 (48% more) than in the control test as evidenced by the greater change in kappa number. Run No. U6 shows that by using the proces~ of this invention, the NaOH re~uired can be reduced to less than -23- ~27~75~

_ 1/3 that required by the control while still achieving the same amount of lignin removal.
Run No. U3 shows that the process of this invention can also be used to effect a reduction in operating temperature of the extraction while still achieving a small improvement in delignification.

Example 2 A sample of the same unbleached softwood kraft used for Example 1 was delignified with oxygen using the process of Fig. 1. Treatment conditions were the same as in Run No. U3 of example 1 with the exception that after 67% of the liquid phase was removed on the buchner funnel, the sheet was blanketed with oxygen of 99.5% purity. The oxygen wa~ allowed to permeate the sheet under the action of the vacuum. The sheet was lifted carefully from the filter to preserve it~
porosity, placed in an oxygen atmosphere inside a plastic bag and treated at 70-C for 30 minutes. Table V
shows the results of this test.

TABLE V

First Stage Oxygen Stage Liquid Final Run NaOH Temp. Removal Temp. Kappa Kappa No ~ Deg. C ~ Number Chanye __ _ Ul 3.0 60 67 70 21.7 3.5 The result shows that even under the relatively mil~ conditions used, treatment with oxygen removed 9.7%
more lignin than the corresponding test without oxygen.
The following Examples 3 through 12, show the use of thi~ invention for al~aline extraction of chlorinated - ~2~i759 _ pulps. The hardwood kraft pulp chosen for these tests had a kappa number of 15.8, and the softwood kraf t pulp (kappa 25.2) was the same as used for feed stock in Examples 1 and 2. The pulps were chlorinated for 60 minutes at 3.5% consistency and 35-C. In the chlorination procedure used, a measured quantity of concentrated chlorine/water solution was diluted with sufficient water to give the desired test consistency and immediately blended with 50 gm (o.d.
basis) of the prewashed pulp. The reaction mlxture, in covered containers, was then placed in a constant temperature bath to carry out the chlorination.
Periodic mixing of the pulp suspension was provided during the initial heating up period. The chlorine dosage u~ed for the tests was varied and is reported in the examples to follow. All samples were well washed prior to being used.
After treatment of the pulps according to the metho,ds used in Examples 3 through 11, the pulps were well washed, formed into sheets and analyzed for extracted permanganate (CER) number using TAPPI Method T214 m-50. In Example 12, the pulp was well washed and its response to sodium hypochlorite bleaching was measured. Unless stated otherwise, the dosages of chlorine, alkali, and hypochlorite reported in Examples 3 through 12 are expressed as a weight percentage based on oven dry pulp.

Exam~le 3 To demonstrate the process of Fig. 1 on chlorinated pulp, two samples of hardwood which had been chlorinated with 3.2% chlorlne were blended with identical amounts of NaOH solution. The Eirst was allowed to react for 1.25 minutes at 40-C and 10.4% consistency after which 69% of the liquid phase was removed and the thickened ~ -25- ~ ~7~75~ -.. ~ .

pulp, now at 27.2% consistency, was treated for~ an a~ditional 60 minutes at 60~C. As a control, the second sample was simply treated at 10.4~ consistency for 60 minutes at 60-C without removal of the liquid phase.
The amount of alkali blended with the pulps was the same in both cases, 1.91~ based on oven dry pulp weight. The results are shown in Table VI.

TABLE VI
10 Run No. Test Description CE~ No.
. . . .
HW3 A process of Fig. 1 2.1 ~W3 C control 2.3 This result shows clearly that the process of this invention permits a reduction of extracted permanganate number. One skilled in the art will recognize that this will result in a corresponding drop in the amount of chemicals required for subsequent steps in the bleaching proce~s.
Example 4 The process of Fig. 1 was used for oxygen extraction of chlorinated softwood kraft pulp. The pulp, which had been chlorinated with 4% chlorine, was diluted to 1% consistency and formed into a pad on a buchner funnel. The pad consistency was estlmated to be 25%. The pulp was then ~aturated to 11~ consistency by distributing preheated NaOH solution on it~ surface.
The alkall solution contained 3.3% NaOH based on ovendry 3~ pulp weight. The pulp, now at a temperature of about 40-C, was allowed to react for 1.5 minutes. Vacuum was then applied to the buchner causlng the removal of about 67~ of the liquid phase and increasing the pad consistency to about 25%. The thic~ened pulp was then -26- ~27~'759 treated in an atmosphere of pure oxygen gas for 60 mlnutes at 60C and 1 atmosphere total pressure.
As a control, a second sample of the same chlorinated pulp wafi extracted with 3.3% NaOH at 11 consistency for 60 minutes at 60-C. Oxygen was not u~ed for the control experiment.
The results shown in Table VII demonstrate a 21%
reduction in extracted permanganate number.

TABLE VII
.
Run No. est Description CER No.
SW4 G process of Fig. 1 4.5 using oxygen SW4 H control, normal 5.7 extraction Example 5 To show the effect of higher alkali dosage on the process of Fig. 1, softwood kraft pulp chlorinated with 4% chlorine was used. The procedure was identical to that used in example 4 with the exceptions that higher alkali dosages (9.2% V8. 3.3%) were used, the pulp was saturated to 8.3% consistency on the buchner funnel instead of 11%, and after removal of 67% of the liquid phase, the pulp pad had a consistency of 20% instead of 25%. Treatment time in the second stage was 90 minutes lnstead of 60, and second stage treatments with and without oxygen were tested. The control wa~ reacted at 3.1~ alkali and 8.3% consistency for 90 minutes at 60-C.
The results are given in Table VIII.

-27- ~%7~5~

_ TABLE VIII

Run No. Test Descri~tion CER No.
E 10 process of Fig. 1 3.7 2 in second stage E 11 process of Pig. 1 4.0 air in second stage lO E 12 process of Pig. 1, gas- 3.6 excluded from second stage E 8 control, normal 5.7 lS extraction Comparing the value obtained for run No. E10 wlth Example 4 shows the higher alkali charge to give a substantial reduction in CEK No. The results also show a better reduction in extracted CE~ No. without the use of oxygen than when either oxygen or air are present in tbe second stage. While the alkali dosage at stage one is about 3 times normal for Runs E10, E11 and E12, only one third of the alkali containing liquid phase is carried forward into the second stage of reaction while the remainder is separated and available for reuse. The 36.8% reduction in CEK number achieved in Run No. E12 is an exceptionally good re~ult.

Exam~le 6 ~ ardwood kraft pulp was chlorinated with 3.5%
chlorine and used in another demonstratlon of the process of Fig. 1. For this test, flrst stage consistency, first stage time, and alkali charge to the first stage were varied. The procedure differs somewhat -28- ~27~7~9 from that used in the previous examples. For the present example, reaction was conducted in polyethy1ene bags instead of by flooding the buchner funnel. This allowed the use of lower consistencies in the first stage and simulated the use of the mixers. The first stage treatment was conducted ~t ambient temperature (23 to 24-C) followed by partial removal of the liquid phase by filtration on a buchner funnel. Enough liquid was removed to give a pulp consistency of about 30% for the second stage of reaction. As in previous examples, the second stage reaction was conducted in polyethylene bags at 60-C for 60 minutes. The pulps were compacted to exclude qa~ from the second stage except for two tests HW1 K and HW1 L. For these two tests the pulp pad was lS lifted gently from the buchner funnel to retaln its poro6ity, and the second stage of reaction conducted under oxygen for HW1 K and air for test HW1 L. ~he control tests were conducted at 1.91% alkali, 10~
consistency and 60-C for 60 minutes. The results are shown in Table IX where alkali charge is expressed as percent on an oven dry basis.

-29- 127~7~9 TABLE IX

Constant conditions:
First stage temperature = 23 - 24C
Second stage temperature = 60C
Second stage consistency = 30%
Second stage time= 60 min.

First StageSecond_Sta~e lO Run Consist- Time AlkaliGas Liquid, % CEK
No. tencY % min. ~Phase carrYover no.
. . .
HW2 C2 6 7 4.1 excluded 14.9 1.9 HW2 D1 6 7 9.0 excluded 14.9 1.6 HW2 D2 6 3.75- 4.1 excluded 14.9 1.9 l5 HW2 C1 (control) 2.1 HW1 F 1 3.5 5.7 excluded 2.3 2.1 HW1 G 1 3.5 3.8 excluded 2.3 2.4 HWl H 1 4.5 11.5 excluded 2.3 1.8 HW1 J 1 3 11.S excluded 2.3 2.0 HW1 R' 1 3 11.5 oxygen 2.3 1.9 HWl L 1 3 11.5 air 2.3 2.0 HWl A (control) 2.1 The effect of time in the first stage is shown by examination of Runs HW2 C2, HW2 D2, HW1 H and HW1 J. At the temperatures used for these tests (23-24C) the best results were obtained at treatment times between 3.75 and 7 minutes in the first stage. Some reduction in efficiency was noted when only 3 minute~ were used.
Compari~on of Runs HW1 H, HW1 J and HW1 K shows that oxygen appears to improve performance when first stage time is short but when additional time is provided in the first stage, oxygen shows no advantage.
The effect of the amount of alkali charged to the first stage is clearly shown with higher levels of -30_ ~27~759 _ alkali resulting in lower final CEK numbers. This suggests that maintenance of high concentration in the first stage is important to achieve optimal results.
Note that even at the highest levels of NaO~ dosage, only small amounts of the original sodium hydroxide charge is carried forward into the ~econd stage.
Expressed as NaOH charged on an oven dry pulp basis, this amounts to 1.34% for run #HW2 D1 and only 0.26~ for runs number HW1 H through L. These figure~ are 70% and 13.6% of the alkali used for the control test respectively.

Example 7 In this series of runs, chlorinated softwood kraft pulp was treated in accordance with the process of Fig. 3. The pulp had been chlorinated with 4.4%
chlorine and well washed. Sodium hydroxide solution and pulp w~re blended in plastic bags at 10% consistency, and 25-C and immediately placed in a constant temperature bath at 60-C for periods ranging from 1 to 5 minutes. The pulp was then promptly filtered on a buchner funnel, diluted to 1% with deionized water and filtered again removing approximately 95% of the resldual first stage liquid. A second aliquot of NaOH
was then blended with the pulp at 10% consistency and 25-C followed by treatment at 60C for 60 minutes. The total charge of NaOH was 3.3~ which was divided between the two stages. In one test, the entire alkali charge wa~ added to the first stage with water only added to the second stage. After the second stage the pulp was well washed, formed into sheets and analyzed for CEK
number.
Two control tests were run under normal extractton conditions. Alkali charge for the control tests was ~Z7~

3.3X and treatment was at 10% consistency and 60-C for 60 minutes. Table X lists the results.

- TABLE: X
Constant Conditions:
First stage consistency = 10 Second stage consistency - 10%
Second stage temperature = 60~C
Second stage time ~ 60 min.
, 10 First Stage Second Stage Run NaOH Time Maximum NaOH CEK
No. % min. Temp. _% No.
Deg C
SW3 C 1.65 1 50 1.65 4.9 SW3 A 1.98 1 50 1.32 4.6 SW3 E 2.64 1 50 0.66 4.8 SW3 G 3.30 1 50 0 5.7 SW3 K 1.98 5 60 1.32 5.0 SW3 L 2.31 5 60 0.99 5.0 SW3 B control 3.3 5.0 SW3 F control 3.3 5.0 The re~ults clearly demonstrate that the process of thl8 invention results in more efficient extraction of lignin than conventional extraction as evidenced by the lower CEK numbers in runs SW3 C, SW3 A, and SW3 E~ The best result wa8 obtained in run SW3 ~ in which 60~ of the total ~lkali charge wa~ added at the first stage and 40% at the second stage.
It is important to note that when the first stage treatment was continued for 5 minutes reaching a final temperature of about 60-C, the benefits of the process were reduced to the extent that the final CEK number was the same as in the control runs.

~ %7~759 _ Example 8 U~ing the process of Fig. 3, a series of runs were made ~o show the effects of time and temperature in the first stage when the process is used on chlorinated pulps. The softwood samples used were chlorlnated at 4%
chlorine and the hardwood at 3.2% according to the procedures described previously. The procedure used for th~s example is the same as for Example 7 with the exception that the alkali solution used for the first stage was preheated before addition to the pulp to permit better control over reaction temperature. The control tests were conducted at 10~ consistency and 60C
for 60 minutes using 3.3% NaOH for the softwood and 1.91% for the hardwood. Results are given ln Table XI.
lS

i'759 _ TABLE XI

Constant Condition~:
First stage'consistency = 10%
Second stage consistency ~ 10%
Second stage temperature = 60-C
Second stage time 3 60 min.

First Stage Second Sta~e l0 Run NaOH Time Temp. NaOH CEK
No. %min. Deq. C % No~
_ _ _ _ _ SW4 A 1.981.1 41 1.32 5.3 SW4 B 1.982~0 41 1.32 s.4 Sw4 C 1.980.5 41 1.32 5.5 lS SW4 D 1.984.0 41 1.32 5.5 SW4 F ~oftwaod control 3.3 5.6 HW3 E 1.151.0 40 0.76 2.0 HW3 F 1.152.0 40 0.76 2.0 HW3 I 1.151.0 43 0.76 2.1 HW3 H 1.152.0 29 0.76 2.1 HW3 J 1.151.0 28 0.76 2.1 ~W3 R 1.154.0 29 0.76 2.1 HW3 C hardwood control 1.91 2.3 HW3 G hardwood control 1.91 2.2 These results show that at about 40^C, the best re~ult~ are obtained at first stage treatment times between 1 and 2 mlnuto~ although improved extr~ction 18 experienced at all treatment times rom 0.5 to 4 minutes. For a first stage temperature of 29-C, there wa~ no difference noted when reaction time was varled from 1 to 4 minutes. This is in contrast t~ the observation in Example 6 where at 23-C it appeared to be an advantage to conduct the pretreatment for about 4 minutes or longer.

~275'759 Example 9 The processes of Figs. 2 and 3 were used for another series of runs to test the effects of first stage consistency and time on chlorinated hardwood kraft pulp. The pulp used for this example was chlorinated at 3.5% chlorine. The procedure was the same as for Example 7 with the exception that the first stage was conducted at ambient temperature and at 1%
consistency for three of the tests. The tests at 1%
con~istency were not washed between stages 1 and 2 while the 10% tests were. Consistency in the second stage was 10% as in Example 7. The results are shown in Table XII.
TA~LE XII

constant conditions:
First stage NaOH charge z 1.15%
First stage temperature = 25-C
Second stage NaOH charge = 0.76%
Second ~tage consistency - 10%
Second stage temperature z 60C
Second stage time e 60 min.

First Stage __ 25 Run Consistency Time Figure CEK
No. % min. No. No.
.
HW1 C 10 2.0 3 2.0 HW1 D 1 2.0 2 2.0 HW1 E 1 4.0 a 1.9 30 HW1 I 1 3.5 2 2.0 HW1 A control 2.1 The results show no apparent difference between operation at 1% or 10~ consistency in the first stage.
The effect of time in the first stage is small but , -,: i -35- ~ Z7$7~9 shows a sl~ght preference for the longer time of 4 ~inutes.

Example 10 Using the proces~ of Fig. 5, a series of runs were made to demonstrate the reuse of first stage filtrate.
The chlorinated pulps were identical to those used in ~xample 8. The alkali charge was 3.3% for the softwood and 1.91% for the hardwood.
Preheated NaOH solution was blended with the pulps in plastic bags and the mixture allowed to react for 1.5 minutes at 40-C and 10~ consistency. The slurry was then filtered on the buchner funnel and washed with treated first stage filtrate from a previous run on the same species. The filtrate had been treated by holding lt at 60-C for a period of time between 5 and 12 minutes. The filtrates from these two operations (the filtration and the wash) were combined and treated at 60-C as before. The treated combined filtrate was then divided ~into 2 equal aliquots, one of which was re-added to the pulp and the other saved for use on the next run. The pulp was then reacted at 60C for 60 minutes, washed and prepared for CE~ number evaluation.
For run number SW4 J, the pulp wa~ placed in an atmosphere of pure oxygen at 60C for 10 minutes between the washing step following the first stage and before re-adding the treated filtrate. Control tests were the 0ame a8 tho~e used in Example 8 and will be repeated here for cl~rlty~ The result0 are given in Table XIII.

~27~i9 TA~LE XIII

Constant conditions:
Fir~t stage consi~tency ~ 10%
First ~tage time ~ 1.5 min.
First stage temperature ~ 40-C
Fir~t stage NaOH charge - 3.3% for softwood First stage NaOH charge ~ 1.91~ for hardwood Second ~tage consistency - 10%
Second stage temperature 3 60DC
Second stage time - 60 min.

Filtrate Treatment Run Ga~Time Temp. CEK
lS No. U~edm~n. Deg. C No.
SW4 I None12 60 5.2 SW4 J 2 10 60 5.1 SW4 F softwood control 5.6 HW3 B None 5 60 2.0 20 HW3 D None 5 60 2.1 HW3 C hardwood control 2.3 HW3 G hardwood control 2.2 Comparing these data with Example 8 shows about the same result for hardwood and better results for softwood. The treatment of the filtrate for 5 to 10 mlnutes at 60-C, therefore, appears adequate to alter, destroy or otherwi~e render inactive substances in the liquid phase which hinder or retard delignification.

Example 1 1 A serles of runs were made to simulate the process of Fig. 6 using softwood kraft pulp chlorinated with 5.5~ chlorine. Thi~ was accomplished by repeatedly -37- ~27~759 collecting the flltrate from the first stage of an individual test run, adding an amount of concentrated N~OH solution equivalent in volume to 2~ of the total filtra~e volume and 3.0~ NaOH (o.d. pulp basis), and then treating the m~xture at about 50C for periods of time ranging from 10 to 60 minutes. This treated filtrate was then added to a fresh sample of pulp for the next run. This procedure was repeated over 8 cycles with the result that the concentration of dissolved lignin in the recycle liquor reached approximately 55 to 60% of its steady state value. For the first cycle, the NaOH solution added to the pulp contained 9% NaOH (o.d.
pulp basis), a concentration that was estimated to be approximately equal to the amount of NaOH which should build up in the recirculation stream under steady state condition. The first stage reaction was conducted for 1.0 minute at a temperature between 43 and 47C and 3.5%
consistency. In the filtration step which followed the pulp consistency was brought to 23% by removal of 87.8%
of the liquid phase. The second stage was conducted at 60 C for 90 minutes. Two controls were run at 3% NaOH, 60-C, and 10~ consistency for 90 minutes. The results are given in Table XIV.

-38- ~2~59 _ TABLE XIV

- Constant conditions:
First stage time = 1.0 min.
First state conslstency - 3.5%
Second stage consistency = 23%
Second stage temperature - 60C
Second stage time = 90 min.

Filtrate First Stage Treatment Run Cycle Starting NaOH Temp. Temp. Time CEK
No. No. li~uid added Deg C Deg C min. No.
%

SW5 B 1 water 9 46 51 10 3.4 SW5 C 2 Cycle 1 3 45 50 8 3.3 Filtrate SW5 D 3 Cycle 2 3 44 49 13 3.3 Filtrate SW5 E 4 Cycle 3 3 43 53 10 3.3 Filtrate SW5 F 5 Cycle 4 3 - 58 12 3.3 Filtrate 25 SW5 H 6 Cycle 5 3 47 51 10 3.2 Filtrate SW5 I 7 Cycle 6 3 47 60 60 3.3 FiltrAte SW5 J 8 Cycle 7 3 3-3 Filtrate SW5 A control 4.1 SW5 G control 4.0 The results show a stable value of CEK number of 3.3 using the process of Fig. 6. This represents an -39- ~z7~759 18.5~ reduction in CEK number and shows that the process of this invention can achieve excell~nt results.
The result also shows that the process of Fig. 1, when used at high alkali dosage, can be used as a valid simulation of the process of Fig. 6.

Example 12 A high yield kraft pulp was delignified with oxygen and alkali for 30 minute~ at 100C and a pressure of 100 psig. The resulting pulp which had a kappa number of 37.3 was chlorinated as described earlier using a chlorine charge of 7.9% and treated according to the ' process of Fig. 1.
For one of the tests, Run No. OX3, preheated sodium hydroxide solution was blended with the pulp at 3%
consistency in a Pyrex beaker and allowed to react for one minute at 52-C and an alkali charge of 12.87%.
Using a buchner funnel, 86.4% of the liquid phase was removed bringing the pulp consistency to 18.5%. The second stage treatment was then conducted at 60-C for 90 minutes. The high alkali dosage of 12.87% used in this test was intended to simulate the process of Fig. 6 as demonstrated in Example 11.
For Run No. OX4, the same procedure was used as for OX3 with the exception that 1.53% hydrogen peroxide (o.d. pulp basis) was added to the sodium hydroxide solution before it was preheated and added to the pulp.
The temperature in the first stage for Run No. OX4 was 50-C, and only 85.1~ of the liquid phase was removed at the buchner funnel instead o 86.4~. ~hus, the pulp con~istency in the 8econd stage was 17.2~ or Run No. OX4.
Two control runs, OXl and OX2, were normal extractions conducted at 10% consistency and 60C for 90 minutes. Both runs, OX1 and OX2, had a sodium -40- ~Z7~7~9 hydroxide charge of 4.29%. For Run No. OX2, however, a 0.55% charge of hydrogen peroxide was also added with the sodium hydroxide.
Following the alkaline treatments described above, the pulp8 were well washed with deionized water and bleacbed with sodium hypochlorite. The hypochlorite bleach was conducted at 10~ consistency and 50C for 60 minutes at a starting p~ of 11.5. Hypochlorite dosage was 0.70~ expres3ed as active chlorine and was the same for all tests. After bleaching, the samples were - filtered, well washed, formed into pads and analyzed for Elrepho brightne~s according to TAPPI method T452 om-83 and cupriethylenediamine (CED? viscosity by TAPPI method T230 om-82. The spent liquor from the filtration of the lS hypochlorite bleaches was analyzed for residual hypochlorite. This enabled calculation of the amount of hypochlorite consumed during the bleach. This is reported in Table XV along with the brightness and viscosity results.

~41- ~Z7~9 TABLE XV

Constant conditions:
First stage time - 1.0 min.
First stage consistency - 3.0%
First stage alkali - 12.87 Second stage te~erature - 60C
Second stage time = 90 min.
Hypochlorite charge 3 0.70%

Hypochlorite Elephro CED
RunTe~t consumed * Brightness viscosity No. Description ~ % cp.
_ OXlcontrol 0.43 82.5 8.36 alkal~ only .
OX2control 0.36 83.8 8.02 0.55% H22 added OX3Process of 0.33 83.1 8.78 Fig. 1 alkali only OX4Process of 0.27 85.3 8.06 Fig. 1 1.5% H2O2 added * as active chlorine, o.d. pulp b~siR
The results show that the process of this invention can be used to reduce the amount of chemical con~umed in subsequent bleaching steps. In addition, comparison of ~uns OX2 and OX3 shows that the hypochlorite reduction is equal or better than that obtained by adding a 0.5%
charge of peroxide to a normal extraction stage.

-42- ~2~5~

_ Further, Run No. OX4 shows that even greater effectiveness is achieved when peroxide is used in the process of this invention. The improvements in brightness and viscosity achieved by the process of this invention over the corresponding control test shows the product benefits gained by application of the process.
The process of this invention has been demonstrated by the Examples 1 through 12 to be an effective method to improve the efficiency of delignification of unbleached softwood kraft, chlorinated softwood kraft, chlorinated hardwood kraft and chlorinated oxygen delignified kraft pulps by extraction with sodium hydroxide. It is further shown in Example 12 that the process is also effective when hydrogen peroxide and lS sodium hydroxide are u~ed together.
It is proposed that the process of this invention will also improve the efficiency of delignificat$on when other alkaline substances are used. Such alkaline subs~ances as have been used in the prior art for deli~nification are ammonium hydroxide, lithium hydroxide and other alkali metal hydroxides.
It is further proposed that the process of this invention can be used effectively with a broad range of lignocellulosiG materials. A partial list of these ' 25 lignocellulosic materials would include but should not be l1mited to the following: nonwood fibrous materials such as bagasse, kenaf, bamboo, grass and other vegetable fiber, unbleached hardwood krat pulp, unbleached ~o~twood ~ulite pulp, unbleached hardwood sulfite pulp, chlorinated softwood sulfite pulp, chlorinated hardwood sulfite pulp, unbleached and chlorinated pulps from all pulping processes on all types of lignocellulosic material, and partially bleached pulp which has had 3 or more stages of bleaching such as CEH, CED and others.

_43- ~Z7~-~5~

This invention improves the efficiency of pulping and bleaching by providin~ a technique which achieves greater extraction of lignin without the use of additional chemicals. The improvement in efficiency results in a net reduction in chemical usage and additionally produces a product pulp of higher brightness and higher viscosity.
When u~ed on unbleached pulp as a pre-bleaching or pre-dellgnification step, it enables reductlons in the subsequent demand for chlorine containing bleach agents proportional to the kappa number reduction achieved by the in~ention. In addition to reduced bleaching costs, this will result in a corresponding reduction in stream pollution by toxic chlorinated organics and aoD because the filtrate from the process can be recirculated through the brownstock washers and eventually be recovered. Unlike oxygen delignification, the process of this invention does not rely on expensive pressurized reactors for its implementation. Instead the process is simple and uses components which are well tested. In addition, there are no added costs or hazard~ of additional chemicals.
When used for alkaline extraction of chlorinated pulp the process can be operated in a manner to reduce alkali consumption while maintaining the same amount of extraction as measured by the CEK number. This will reduce the operating costs of the bleach plant by an amount equal to the reduc0d alkali usage.
Alternatively, the proce~s ha0 the 1exibility which allows it to be operated at alkali consumptions equal to or higher than used in normal bleach plant practlce~
This enables reductions in CEK number considerably greater than can be achieved by either low presure oxygen extraction or by applying comparable increases in slkali charge to state o~ the art extraction systems.

-44- 27~759 Only pressurized oxygen systems have reported reductions in CE~ number as high or higher than the 36.8% obtained in Example 5, and these require expensive pre~surized equipment. Further flexibility ls also offered by the fact that the process is effective when peroxide is used in the extraction.
The proces~ can also reduce costs and pollution in another way. It i~ possible to use the process to reduce chlorine consumption in the fir~t stage of bleachinq while maintaining normal levels of alkali charge in the extraction stage. In a~dition to reducinq chlorine costs, this also enables a reduction in pollution from the chlorination filtrate, which is highly toxic to aquatic life. ;`
The process can also be used for both applications simultaneously, the delignification of unbleached pulp and the extraction of chlorinated pulp. This allows the benefits of the process to be realized for both.
The process behaves as if one of the materials which is extracted from pulp by alkali can undergo reactions with the remaining lignin which inhibit its further removal. Condensation reactions are known to occur in delignification, and these are likely the reactions rec~ponsible for the inhibition.
When the pulp is first contacted with alkaline solution, these interfering substances are rapidly dissolved. This provides them with greater mobility than they had in the solid phase and condensation reactlons begin to occur. The condens~tion reactions occur somewhat more 610wly than the initial dissolution process. Therefore, if the liquid phase is promptly removed ~rom the pulp suspen~ion after the lnitial dissolution period, the condensation reaction with pulp lignin i8 effectively blocked by physical separation of the pulp and liquor. The best time to separate the ~7~ 9 pulp and liquor is when the competition between the condensation reactions and dissolution process begins to favor condensation. This would correspond to the optimum time in the first stage treatment~ If the alkali is in contact with the pulp for too short a time, an insufficient amount of the interfering substance is dissolved leading to reduced effectiveness of the process. If too long a period of time passes in the first stage of reaction, the condensation reactions are completed, and the process shows little benefit.
By allowing the liquid phase to sit alone for a period of time after it is removed from the pulp, the condensation reactions occur between dissolved materials present in the separated liquid phase. This effectively eliminates the interfering substances from the solution, allowing the filtrate to be safely contacted with fresh pulp or reunited with the original pulp after the condensation has occurred.
There appears to be a relationship between effectiveness of the process and the concentration of alkali in the first stage. The use of filtrate recycle helps to maintain an elevated concentration in the first stage partly because of the excess alkali available. This facilitates removal of the interfering substances pos~ibly by increased solubility.

-4~ 7~9 PVBLICATIONS
1. Rapson, W.~., Editor, The Bleaching of Pulp, TAPPI
Monograph Serles No. 27, TAPPI, New York 1963.
2. Singh, R.P., Editor, The Bleaching of Pulp, Third Edition, TAPPI, Atlanta 1g79.
3. Sey~our, G.W., ~Cost Reducing Bleach Plant Control Strategy," Seminar Notes, 1977 Bleaching Seminar on Chlorination_ and CaustIc Extraction, TAPPI, Wash~ngton, D.C., November 10, 1977.
4. ~achenal, D., Wang, S.J., and Sarkanen, X.V., nNon-sulfur Pulping of Wheat Straw," TAPPI
Proceedings, Pulping Conference, Houston, TX, October 1~3.
5. Kemph, A.W., and Dence, C.W., "Structure and Reactivity of Chlorolignin," TAPPI, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 864-873, May 1970.
6. Elton, E.F., "Oxidative Extraction Process Is Now Well Accepted but Still Has Hazards," Pulp & Paper, pp. 71-73, Au~ust 1984.

7. Ericsson, E.O., and Moody, D.M., "Operating Experience With a New Horizontal Brownstock Washer," TAPPI, Vol. 66,_No. 7, pp. 43-45, July 1983.

8. Verreyne, A.J., Rerolle, P., Richter, J., and Job, L.A., U.S. Patent 3,660,225 - May 2, 1972.

9- Schleinkofer, R.W., U.S. Patent 3,703,435 - Nov. 21, 1972.

10. Samuelson, H.O., and Croon, I.L.A., U.S. Patent 3,759,783 - Sep. 18, 1973.

11. Roymoulik, S.K., and Brown, K.J., "Delignification anA ~leachlng of a Cellulose Pulp Slurry with Oxygen," U.S. Patent 3,832,276 - Aug. 27, 1974.

12. Ericsson, E.O., "Pulp Washer", U.S. Patent 4,154,644 - May 15, 1979.

13. Kikuiri, M., Nakashio, Y., Arai, Y., and Hidaka, T., "Proce~s for Producing Alkali Pulp," U.S.
Patent 4,274,913 - June 23, 1981.

~27~;~759 14. Bentvelzen, J.M., ~eredith, M.n.~ Bepple, H., - Torregros a, L.O., Battan, H.R., and Justice, D.~., ~Treating Pulp with Oxygen," U.S. Patent 4,295,925 - Oct. 20, 1981.

15. Bentvelzen, J.M., Meredith, M.O., Bepple, H., Torregrossa, L.O., Battan, H.~., and Justice, D.H., "Method and Apparatus for Tre.lting Pulp with Oxygen,~ U.S. Patent 4,295,926 - Oct. 20, 1981.

16. Markham, L.D., Elton, E.F., Magnotta, V.L., ~Method and Apparatus for Oxygen Delignification,"
U.S. Patent 4,384,920 - May 24, 1983.

17. Annergren, G.E., Hagglund, T., Lindblad, P., Lindstrom, L.T., and Nasman, L.E., ~Method for Delignification of Lignocellulose-containing Fiber Material with an Alkali Oxygen Extraction Stage," U.S. Patent 4,451,332 - May 29, 8. CU5i~ D.S., and Jolley, P.W.R., "How Bagasse is Pulped by Method Used in Mexico, n Pulp & Paper International, pp. 56-59, June 1968.
19. Venkataraman, T.S., Rangamannar, G., and Torza, S., ~The Roll of High and Low Consistency Impregnation In Chemical Pulping of Bagasse for Newsprint, Fine Paper, and Linerboard," TAPPI Proceedinqs, Pulping Conference, San Francisco, CA, November 1g~4.
20. CU8i~ D.S.
~Method of Producing Cellulosic Pump,~ U.S. Patent 2,913,362 - June 14, 1954.
21. Liebergott, N., Barclay, H.G., and Clayton, D.W., "Rapid Press-caustic Extraction in Pulp Bleaching Sequences", Preprints, TAPPI Alkaline Pulping Conference, Williamsburg, VA, October 1975.
22. Perkins, J.K., "Equipment for Rapid Press-caustic Extraction", Preprints, TAPPI Alkaline Pulping Conference, Williamsburg, VA, October 1975.
30 23. Liebergott, N., Press Alkaline Extraction of Cellusosic Pulp, U.S. Patent 3,874,992, April l, 1975.

-48- ~7~759 Although the terms "pulp" and "wood pulpn are used throughout the specification and claims, the terms are intended to include all types of llgnocellulosic fibrous materials, unless otherwise specified. Moreover, the invention has been described in the ~orm of preferred embodiment~, but it will be understood that many modifications, addition~, and deletions may be made thereto without departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, as set forth in the following claims.

Claims (37)

1. In a process of making paper in which an alkaline solution is added to lignocellulosic fibrous material such as wood pulp to cause a reaction that delignifies the pulp, the improvement comprising mixing wood pulp with an alkaline solution containing from about 1.5% to 25% alkali based on oven dry pulp, partially reacting the mixture at a consistency from about 1% to 25% and a temperature from about 20°C to 60°C for about 0.5 to 10 minutes, withdrawing at least some of the liquid phase from the reacting mixture to raise the pulp to a consistency from about 10% to 45% before the reaction has been completed, and continuing the reaction of the remaining alkali and pulp at a temperature from about 35°C to 120°C for about 30 to 120 minutes.

2. The process of claim 1 and wherein the step of withdrawing at least some of the liquid phase from the reacting mixture comprises withdrawing up to about 80% of the liquid phase.

3. The process of claim 1 and wherein the step of withdrawing at least some of the liquid phase from the reacting mixture comprises withdrawing between 40% and 70% of the liquid phase.

4. The process of claim 1 and wherein the wood pulp is from a group of materials consisting of chlorinated softwood kraft pulp, chlorinated hardwood kraft pulp, unbleached softwood kraft pulp, unbleached hardwood kraft pulp, and chlorinated oxygen delignified kraft pulp.

5. The process of claim 1 and when the wood pulp is from the list below, the alkaline solution added to the fibrous material contains the percentage of alkali based on oven dry pulp, as indicated, and the step of continuing the reaction comprises continuing the reaction in a temperature range from about 40°C to about 80°C.

6. The process of claim 1 and wherein the step of partially reacting the mixture comprises partially reacting the mixture at a temperature from about 23°C to 50°C for about 0.5 to 7 minutes with the time of partial reaction being longer for lower temperatures in the range and being shorter for higher temperatures in the range.

7. The process of claim 1 and wherein the step of continuing the reaction of the remaining alkali and pulp comprises continuing the reaction in the presence of oxygen with the temperature of reaction being from about 60°C to 120°C at a pressure of 0 to 150 psig.

8. The process of claim 4 and wherein the alkaline solution contains up to about 2% hydrogen peroxide based on oven dry pulp.

9. The process of claim 1 and further including the step of adding additional alkaline solution to the pulp after the step of withdrawing at least some of the liquid phase from the reacting mixture and prior to the step of continuing the reaction.

10. The process of claim 9 and further including the step of washing the pulp prior to the step of adding additional alkaline solution.

11. The process of claim 9 and wherein the step of adding additional alkaline solution to the pulp comprises adding between 20% and 50% of the total alkali added to the pulp in the process.

12. The process of claim 1 and further including the step of treating at least some of the withdrawn liquid phase, and adding at least some of the treated withdrawn liquid phase to the wood pulp.

13. The process of claim 12 and further including the step of removing from the process flow a volume of withdrawn liquid phase equal to up to about 80% of the total volume of the liquid contained in the pulp entering the process and in the alkali entering the process.

14. The process of claim 12 and further including the step of removing from the process flow a volume of withdrawn liquid phase equal to between 40%
and 70% of the total volume of the liquid contained in the pulp entering the process and in the alkali entering the process.

15. The process of claim 12 and wherein the step of adding treated withdrawn liquid phase to the wood pulp comprises adding at least some of the treated withdrawn liquid phase to the wood pulp at a point in the process after the step of withdrawing the liquid phase and prior to the step of continuing the reaction.

16. The process of claim 12 and wherein the step of adding treated withdrawn liquid phase to the wood pulp comprises adding at least some of the treated withdrawn liquid phase to the wood pulp entering the process.

17. The process of claim 12 and wherein the step of adding treated withdrawn liquid phase to the wood pulp comprises adding at least some of the treated withdrawn liquid phase to the wood pulp at a point in the process after the step of partially reacting the mixture and prior to the step of withdrawing at least some of the liquid phase from the reacting mixture.

18. The process of claim 12 and wherein the step of mixing alkaline solution with the wood pulp comprises first mixing alkaline solution with the withdrawn liquid phase and then introducing the mixture of alkaline solution and withdrawn liquid phase to the pulp.

19. The process of claim 12 and further including the step of washing the pulp with treated withdrawn liquid phase prior to the step of continuing the reaction.

20. The process of claim 12 and wherein the step of treating the withdrawn liquid phase comprises heating the withdrawn liquid phase.

21. The process of claim 20 and wherein the step of heating the withdrawn liquid phase comprises heating the withdrawn liquid phase for a period of about 5 to 60 minutes.

22. The process of claim 20 and wherein the step of heating the withdrawn liquid phase comprises heating the withdrawn liquid phase to a temperature range from 50°C to 60°C for a period of at least 8 minutes at the lower end of the temperature range and at least 5 minutes at the higher end of the temperature range.

23. The process of Claim 1 and wherein the step of withdrawing the liquid phase comprises moving the reacting mixture of wood pulp and alkali along a path on one surface of a porous conveyor and using a pressure differential to cause movement of the liquid phase through the porous conveyor.

24. The process of Claim 23 and wherein the pressure differential is created by applying a vacuum to the other surface of the conveyor to draw the liquid through the conveyor.

25. The process of Claim 1 and wherein the step of mixing of the alkaline solution with the pulp comprises spreading the pulp on a moving porous conveyor and distributing alkaline solution on the pulp as the pulp is moved by the conveyor.

26. The process of Claim 1 and wherein the pulp and alkaline solution are spread on a moving porous conveyor, and wherein the step of partially reacting the mixture occurs as the pulp and alkali move with the conveyor, and wherein the step of withdrawing the liquid phase from the reacting mixture comprises withdrawing the liquid phase through the conveyor as the conveyor moves.

27. The process of Claim 19 and wherein the step of washing the pulp with treated withdrawn liquid phase comprises distributing at least some treated withdrawn liquid phase on the pulp at least once as the pulp moves on a porous conveyor and inducing movement of at least some of the treated withdrawn liquid phase present on the pulp through the pulp and through the conveyor following the distribution of treated withdrawn liquid on the pulp.

28. The process of Claim 12 and wherein the pulp and alkaline solution are moved along a path by a conveyor, and wherein the step of withdrawing the liquid phase from the reacting mixture comprises withdrawing the liquid phase at a first position along the path, and wherein the step of adding the treated withdrawn liquid phase to the wood pulp comprises distributing the treated withdrawn liquid phase on the pulp at at least one additional position along the path as the pulp moves along the path.

29. The process of Claim 26 and further including the step of distributing additional alkaline solution on the pulp as the pulp is moved by the conveyor.

30. The process of Claim 10 and wherein the step of washing the pulp comprises distributing water on the pulp as the pulp moves on a porous conveyor and inducing movement of at least some of the water present on the pulp through the pulp and through the conveyor following the distribution of the water on the pulp.

31. The process of Claim 1 and wherein the pulp and alkaline solution are moved along a path by a conveyor, and wherein the step of withdrawing the liquid phase from the reacting mixture comprises withdrawing the liquid phase at a first position along the path, and further including the step of distributing additional alkaline solution on the pulp at at least one additional position along the path.

32. A product formed by the process of Claim 1.

33. An apparatus for alkaline delignification of lignocellulosic fibrous material such as wood pulp comprising transport means for moving wood pulp along a pulp processing path, mixing means in said path for adding an alkaline solution to the pulp as the pulp moves along the processing path, a first reaction zone in said path down stream from said mixing means for holding the alkaline solution and the pulp for a period sufficient to permit the pulp and alkali to complete partial reaction, filter means in said path down stream from said first reaction vessel for removing at least some of the liquid phase from the pulp before reaction of the pulp and alkali is complete as the pulp moves along the path, a second reaction zone in said path down stream from said filter for receiving the pulp and continuing the reaction of the alkali and pulp, a conduit for receiving at least some of the liquid phase from said filter means and adding the received liquid phase back to the processing path, and a filtrate reaction means in said conduit for holding and heating the received liquid phase before the received liquid phase is added back to the processing path.

34. In a process of making paper in which an alkaline solution is added to a lignocellulosic fibrous material such as wood pulp to cause a reaction that delignifies the pulp, the improvement comprising moving the pulp along a path, distributing an alkaline solution into the pulp at a first position along the path as the pulp moves along the path, withdrawing at least some of the liquid phase of the mixture at another position along the path and replacing at least some of the liquid with gas within the interstitial spaces of the pulp, delivering the pulp with the remaining liquid and contained gas to a reaction zone, and applying additional gas to the pulp while the pulp is in the reaction zone, whereby a delignification reaction of the pulp takes place.

35. The process of Claim 34 and wherein the step of replacing the liquid with a gas comprises replacing the liquid with an oxygen-containing gas.

36. The process of Claim 34 and wherein the step of applying additional gas to the pulp while the pulp is in the reaction zone comprises applying oxygen to the pulp .

37. A product formed by the process of claim 34.