CA1220709A - Thermoformable laminate structure with improved acoustical absorption - Google Patents

Abstract

LAMINATE STRUCTURE WITH
IMPROVED ACOUSTICAL ABSORPTION

ABSTRACT

A laminate structure with improved acoustical absorption is provided which has a first and a third layer of foamed thermoplastic material and a second layer, intermediate the first and third layers, which is a material having acoustical properties different from the properties of the material of the first and third layers. A portion of the surface area of each layer is adhesively bonded to the adjacent layer. A
sheet of paper or fabric is adhesively bonded to at least the outer surfaces of the first and third layers.

Description

~2 ~-~17 09 16-21~5001) LAMINATE STRUCTURE
~'ITH IMPROVED ACOUSTICAL ABSORPTION
This invention relates to thermoplastic materials, and particularly to materials comprising S foamed themoplastic resins having substantially improved sound attenuation properties. More particu-larly this invention relates to a laminate structure formed from at least two foamed thermoplastic resins which exhibits improved sound absorption characteristics.
This invention also relates to a thermoplastic laminate structure which may be molded into complex shapes while retaining its sound absorbing qualities. This invention also relates to the use of the laminate of this invention in motor vehicles to provide a quieter passenger compartment and in building construction to provide a quieter living and working space with improved noise attenuation across walls and floors.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
It has been desired for many years to reduce the noise impinging upon individuals at home, at work, and in the multitude of other places in which people find themselves. This effort has, of course, included efforts to reduce the noise within the vehicl~s used in transportation, for example, in automobiles, buses and airplanes. In addi~ion to regulations to reduce noise levels in the workplace, certain municipalities are changing building codes, adopting stricter standards and imposing new specifications for party walls and interior floor/ceiling assemblies between apartments.
3~ For many years increasing the mass density of a wall was considered as being the only way to improve the sound attenuation characteristic of structures. It was then found that separating the two halves of the wall construction produced a slight degree of sound reduction and filling the cavity between the two halves with a low density soundwave-qo~

-2- 16-21(5001) -absorbing membrane such as mineral wool further increased the sound reduction. A further increase in the reduction of sounds in structures was realized when it was found that thermoplastic foams when constructed in certain forms have a degree of sound resistance and inhibit to some extent the transmission of noise from one area to an adjacent area. However, it is also known that current thermoplastic foam constructions are subject to resonant short- comings which create areas where substantial loss of sound attenuation occurs throughout a broad frequency spectrum.
A recent development which has found some acceptance for floor/ceiling noise attenuation is a space filling mat of widely-spaced, three-dimensional, nylon non-woven matting covered on one face by a fabric.
A similar development was taking place in the field of transportation. The first attempt at decorating within an automobile, for example, consisted of support rods on the interior surface of the auto-mobile roof which supported a fabric to cover the roof material. This construction is still in use today;
however, a sound absorbing material such as mineral wool is often installed between the fabric and metal roof of the automobile. For many years a pressed board made of a formable resin material has also been used in automobiles as the headliner, the material covering the interior of the automobile roof. The pressed board has been painted for decoration or a softer decorative trim has been mechanically attached or bonded to the pressed board.
Foamed thermoplastic laminates have also been used in automobiles, particularly in the head liners. These foamed thermoplastic laminates were most often formed as a sandwich structure in which the ~2 2 ~7 09

-3- 16-21~5001) foamed thermoplastic material was enclosed between liner board facings. Such board would be prepared for use by die-cutting and scoring or by pressing the board and applying a resin to fix the pressed shape.
A decorative trim was often applied to the automotive interior side of the headliner. This decorative trim has typically been a thin layer of polyurethane foam covered with cloth or vinyl.
A very similar material is also in use today for headliners in automobiles. A thermoplastic sandwich is formed with a thermoplastic polymer skin.
A layer of foamed styrene-maleic anhydride polymer is bonded to the interior of the thermoplastic sandwich and a themoplastic polymer skin covers the foamed styrene-maleic anhydride polymer. A decorative trim, identical to that described above, is applied to the interior side of the automobile headliner.
The most recent effort to reduce the sound level within automobiles is the use of molde~ fiberglass which contains a phenol-formaldehyde polymer as a binder. A rayon scrim is attached to one side of a fiberglass batt and is compression molded to the desired automotive headliner shape. As with the others, a decorative trim, a thin foamed polyurethane layer covered with cloth or vinyl, is added to the side of the headliner which faces the automotive interlor.
SUMMARY OF T~ INVENTION
The laminate structure of this invention has first and third layers of a foamed thermoplastic material which have an inner surface and an outer surface. A second layer of material, which has different acoustical characteristics from the foamed thermoplastic material of the first and third layers, is intermediate the first and third layers and at least a portion of the second layer is adhesively ~2 ~ ~7 09

-4- 16-21(5001) bonded to the inner surfaces of the first and third layers of thermoplastic material. A sheet of paper, fabric or thermoplastic film is adhesively bonded to at least the outer su~faces of the first and third layers of foamed thermoplastic material.
Alternatively a thermoformable laminate structure of this invention has a resin impregnated fabric adhesively bonded to the outer surfaces of the first and third layers of thermoplastic material. A
thermoformable synthetic polymer resin is used to impregnate the fabric.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figures 1 and 3 are side views of the laminate structures of this invention.
Figure 2 is a side view of the laminate structure of this invention with the decorative trim that is added when such a structure is utilized as an automotive headliner.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Turnin~ now to Figure 1, a side view of the thermoformable laminate structure of this invention is shown. The laminate structure 10 has a first layer of themoplastic material 12 and third layex of thermoplastic material 14. In the following description, both the first layer 12 and third layer 14 are fabricated from the same thermoplastic material; however, the first and third layers may be fabricated from different the~moplastic materials. A second layer of material 13 is located intermediate the first and third layers of thermoplastic material 12 and 14. It is preferred that the second layer 13 be fabricated from a second thermoplastic material, that is a material different from the material used for the first layer 12 and the third layer 14. The thermo-plastic materials utilized for the first layer 12, second layer 13, and third layer 14 are produced as lZZQ7~9

-5- 16-21(5001) a foamed material in a manner that is well-known and will not be further described herein. The first layer 12 and third layer 14 of thermoplastic material each have an inner surface, 16 and 17 respectively, and an outer surface, 18 and 1~ respectively. The inner surface 16 of first layer 12 and the inner surface 17 of third layer 14 are in contact with the surfaces of second layer 13 which is located intermediate the first and third layers 12 and 14 and the surfaces are bonded together. This bonding is most easily achieved by applying an adhesive to the surfaces before the surfaces come in contact with one another. The adhesive may coat the entire surface area of inner surface 16 and inner surface 17, as well as the surfaces of the second layer of thermoplastic material 13; however, it is preferable that the adhesive only be applied to a portion of the surfaces such that only a portion of the second layer 13 is bonded to the first layer 12 and third layer 14 while the remainder of the surfaces are adjacent to and in contact with each other, but are not adhesively bonded to one another.
It has been determined that the thickness of the first and third layers, 12 and 14, of thermoplastic material has a great effect on the acoustical properties of the finished laminate structure 10. Therefore, it is desired that the first and third layers, 12 and 14, have a thickness within a range of from approximately 0.15 cm thick to approximately 1.25 cm thick and it is preferred that the thickness be within a range of from approximatley 0.30 cm thick to approximately 0.65 cm thick.
The second layer 13 of material is fabricated from a material different from that used for the first layer 12 and third layer 14 to have different acoustical ~2~!2709

-6- 16-21(5001) properties. Alternatively, the same material may be used i~ it has been treated or formed by a process to have different acoustical characteristics from the materials used for the first layer 12 and third layer 14. A preferred material for fabricatlon of the second layer 13 is polyurethane and specifically a foamed polyurethane. While the material itself is known, its use in the sandwich-like construction of this invention has been found to provide a greater degree of resistance to the transmittal of sound, that is, the laminate structure has enhanced acoustical properties and has increased the noise reduction that can be achieved. It is also possible to use materials such as foamed polystyrene, foamed polyvinyl-chloride and foamed polyethylene, or batts of polypropylene or polyester fibers for the second layer 13. As with the first layer 12 and third layer 14, the thickness of the second layer 13 of thermoplastic material is critical. The thickness of second layer is desired to be within a range of from approximately 0.15 cm to approximately 2.50 cm and it is preferred that the thickness of the second layer 13 be within a range of from approximately 0.30 cm to approximately 1.25 cm.
Second layer 13 is positioned intermediate first layer 12 and third layer 14. It is possible that the layers of material may be placed adjacent to and in contact with one another without bonding the layers to one another and, in such a configuration, a certain amount of sound absorption or reduction may be achieved. However, it has been found that if the three layers of material are adhesively bonded to one another, the acoustical properties of the laminate are greatly enhanced. The adhesive may coat the entire surface area of inner surface 16 and inner surface 17 as well as the surfaces of the second layer of thermo-plastic material 13; to provide complete bonding of ~L2~709

-7- 16-21(5001) the three layers of thermoplastic material to one another. While applying the adhesive to the entire surface area of inner surfaces 16 and 17 and the surfaces of second layer 13 to adhesively bond the first layer 12 and third layer 14 to the second layer 13 will produce a laminate having improved accoutiscal properties, it has found to be preferable to apply the adhesive to only a portion of the surface areas to be bonded together such that only a portion of the second layer 13 is bonded to the first layer 12 and third layer 14 and the remainder of the surface area is in contact but not bonded together. When the adhesive is applied to only a portion of the surface area, the portion being from approximately 20% to approximately 60% of the total surface area of each of the surfaces which are to be adhesively bonded, the laminate structure 10 exhibited superior acoustical properties, that is a higher degree of absorption, reduction or attenuation of noise, than was exhibited by the aforementioned laminate in which the entire surface areas were adhesively bonded.
A sheet of paper, fabric or thermoplastic film or resin-impregnated fabric 21 is adhesively bond~d to the outer surface 18 of first layer 12 and a second such sheet 22 is adhesively bonded to the outer surface 19 of third layer 14. Preferably the sheets bonded to outer surface 18 and outer surface 19 are identical; however, it is possible that the sheets may be different. This sheet protects the somewhat fragile surface of the foamed material from abrasion and provides durability to the laminate structure. The sheet also provides stiffness so that the laminate structure can be easily handled.
When paper is utilized, the sheet is preferably Kraft paper having a basis weight in the range of 26 to 42 pounds per 1000 s~uare feet (130-205 ~zz~o9

-8- 16-21(5001) g/m2). Other paper or fabric can also be used. In some cases it may be desirable that the sheet comprise a composite f~r instance of Kraft paper and aluminum foil or of Kraft paper and polymeric film.
In many cases it may be desirable that a sheet be on both surfaces of the foamed material.
Moreover since sheets of polystyrene foam with Kraft paper or thermoplastic film on both surfaces are commercially available, such sheets may be advan-tageously and economically utilized in this invention.
The presence of sheets on both sides of polystyrene foam prevents the thin layers of foamed material from bowing, for instance, due to moisture absorption, when there is a change in environment between the time of fabrication of the foamed material and time of fabri-cation of the laminate structure.
To provide a thermoformable laminate structure a resin impregnated fabric 21 is adhesively bonded to the outer surface 18 of first layer 12 and a second resin impregnated fabric 22 is adhesively bonded to the outer surface 19 of third layer 14.
Preferably the resin impregnated fabrics 21 and 22 are the same; however, the fabrics, the resin, o~ both may be different. It is preferred that the fabric be a spun-bonded, non-woven polyester fabric. While the polyester fabric is preferred, non-woven, spun-bonded nylon materials and woven materials such as polyesters, polyester-cotton blends, and nylons are also satis-factory. The fabric is impregnated with a resin which is preferably a synthetic polymer resin chosen for its stability and reproducibility. For this service acrylic resins are preferred although phenolic resins are equally servicable. The acrylic resins are preferred because they contain no formaldehyde and `
they are thermoplastic so that the curing operation 122Q7(~9

-9- 16-21(5001) required for phenolic resins is eliminated. The acrylic resins must be capable of withstanding high heat, greater than 75 C., and have a high moisture resistance. In addition, they must be thermoformable S because the laminate stru~ture 10 is made of thermo-plastic materials which can be heated and reshaped in a molding process. When a phenolic resin is used, the resin is dried to a "B stage", that is, a partially cured state in which the resin is touchable but remains slightly tacky. During the molding process in which the laminate structure 10 is molded into a final shape, the high heat provides a final cure to the phenolic resins which harden and are no longer formable.
Either resin may be applied to the fabric by an 15 aqueous solution, but a methanol solution may be used for application of the acrylic resins. The resin dispersant liquid is removed through heating prior to using the resin impregnated fabric 21 and 22 in the production of the laminate structure 10.
When the laminate structure of this inven-tion is utilized in the manufacture of headliners for use in automobiles, a decorative trim is applied to the surface facing the interior of the automobile.
Figure 2 shows the laminate structure 10 of this invention with the decorative trim applied. The laminate structure 10 shown in Figure 2 is similar to the laminate structure shown in Figure 1 and the corresponding parts of the laminate structure shown in each of Figure 1 and Figure 2 are given the same numbers. The decorative trim 25 is adhesively bonded to the resin impregnated fabric 22 on the outer surface 19 of the third layer 14 of thermoplastic material which is a part o~ the laminate structure 10.
The decorative trim 25 has two components, a thin polyurethane foam layer 26 which provides cushioning on the inside of the automotive headliner and covers

-10- 16-21(5001) any seams, ridges, cracks, or other blemishes in the laminate structure 10 to pLovide a smooth appearance to the inside of the headliner and a cloth covering 27 which is adhesively attached to the polyurethane layer 26 to complete the decorative trim 25. While the decorative trim 25 is desirable for the appearance of the headliner when installed within an automobile, the decorative trim 25 also increases the acoustical properties of the laminate structure 10.
Turning now to Figure 3, a second embodiment of the laminate structure of this invention is shown.
Figure 3 shows laminate structure 30 which includes many parts identical to those disclosed and discussed in conjunction with laminate structure 10 shown in Figure,1 and further includes fourth layer 35, a batt of polyester fibers. Laminate structure 30 has a first layer of thermoplastic material 32, a third layer of thermoplastic material 34, and a second layer of material 33 located intermediate the first layer 32 and the third layer 34. These three layers of - materials correspond to the first layer 12, third layer 14 and second layer 13 respectively shown in Figure 1 and discussed hereinabove. The descriptions of the first, second and third layers of material shown in Figure 1 are equally descriptive of the layers of material used in laminate structure 30.
First layer 32 and third layer 34 have inner surfaces 36 and 37 respectively and outer surfaces 38 and 39 respectively. A resin impregnated fabric 41 is adhesively bonded to the outer surface 38 of first layer 32 and resin impregnated fabric 42 is adhesively bonded to the outer surface 39 of third layer 34. The sheets 41 and 42 correspond to the sheets 21 and 22 shown in Figure 1 hnd the description of those sheets is equally applicable here. Second layer 33, unlike second layer 13 shown in Figure 1, is not adhesively ~7 O9

-11- 16-21(5001) bonded to the third layer 34. In addition to the second layer of material 33 located intermediate first and third layers 32 and 34, laminate structure 30 has a fourth layer 35 positioned intermediate the first and third layers 32 and 34. In Figure 3 second layer 33 is shown adjacent to the inner surface 36 of first layer 32 and fourth layer 35 is adjacent the inner surface 37 of third layer 34; however, the relative positions of the second and fourth layers 33 and 35 may be reversed such that fourth layer 35 will be adjacent first layex 32 and second layer 33 will be adjacent third layer 34. The fourth layer 35, unlike the other layers present in the laminate structure 30, is not a foam material, but is instead a batt of fibers which may be held together by a binder such as a phenolic resin. The batt of fibers is preferably made of polyester fibers but may be made of other fiberous materials. While the batt of fibers is preferred for the fourth layer 35, it is possible to use a fourth layer of foamed thermoplastic material in the laminate structure 30. As in the discussion of the laminate structure 10 shown in Figure 1, it is preferred that the adjacent surfaces of the four layers, 32, 33, 34 and 35, in laminate structure 30 be adhesively bonded together but that they not be a&esively bonded on the entire surface areas. The acoustical properties, the ability to absorb, reduce or attenuate noise, are enhanced if only a portion of each surface is adhesively bonded to the adjacent surface. The adhesively bonded portion of the surfaces should range from approximately 20% to approximately 60% of the surface area and it is preferred that only approximately 35% to approximately 50% of the surface area of each of the surfaces be adhesively bonded to the adjacent surface for the greatest acoustical properties. When the laminate structure 30 is used as ~22Q709

-12- 16-21(5001) an automotive headliner, decorative trim can be added as shown and descrlbed in Figure 2.
The advantages and improved acoustical properties of the laminate structure of this invention may be seen in the following examples and table.
EXAMPLE I
In Example I the acoustical absorption coefficients of a polystyrene foam board, two laminate structures which are constructed in accordance with the teachings of this invention, but are not adhesively bonded, and a fiberglass headliner of the type now used in automobiles were compared. The acoustical absorption coef~icient for a material is the percentage of the sound that will be absorbed by that material.
In each example, the tests for the acoustical absorption coefficient were performed in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard C384-77 (impedance tube).
The polystyrene foam board was a 0.30 cm thick foamed polystyxene. A kraft liner board facing was laminated to each side of the foamed polystyrene board. A decorative trim, formed as a 0.65 cm thick foamed polyurethane layer with a cloth covering, was adhesively bonded to one side of the polystyrene board.
The fiberglass headliner was formed as a fiberglass batt with a rayon scrim attached to one side of the batt. A decorative trim, a 0.65 cm thick polyurethane layer covered with cloth, was adhesively bonded to the side of the fiberglass batt opposite the rayon scrim. The fiberglass headliner, including the decorative trim, had a total thickness of approximately l.90 cm.
Sample l was formed as a laminate structure having first and third layers of polystyrene foam 0.38 cm thick with a second layer of polyurethane foam 0.65 cm thick intermediate the first and third layers of ~22(1709

-13- 16-21(5001) polystyrene. Each layer was placed in physical contact with the adjacent layer but the layers were not adhe~ively bonded together. The outer surfaces of the first and third layers were covered by a resin impregnated, spunbonded, non-woven fabric. Decorative trim, 0.65 cm of polyurethane with a cloth covering, w~s placed adjacent the outer surface of the first layer of polystyrene.
Sample 2, a laminate structure similar to Sample 1, was constructed in accordance with the alternate teachings shown in Figure 3. First and third layers of polystyrene foam were 0.38 cm thick.
The outer surfaces of the first and third layers were covered by a resin impregnated, spunbonded, non-woven fabric. A second layer was formed of 0.65 cm thick polyurethane foam and was located between the first and third layers of polystyrene and adjacent to the inner surface of the third layer. A fourth layer, formed as a 0.65 cm thic~ batt of polyester fibers was positioned between the first layer of polystyrene foam and the second layer of polyurethane foam. The batt of polyester fibers was treated with a phenolic resin to maintain its shape and continuity, that is, to provide a uniform batt. A decorative trim of 0.65 cm thick polyurethane covered by a cloth was placed on the outer surface of the first layer of polystyrene foam.
It is taught in this invention that the layers that form the laminate structure be bonded by adhesive over at least a portion of their surface areas; howe~er, for the purposes of Example I, the layers which form the laminate structures of Sample 1 and Sam~le 2 were laid adjacent to and in physical contact with one another, but were not adhesively bonded. The results of the test for the acoustical absorption coefficients are shown in Table 1.

12~17~9

-14- 16-21(5001 EXAMPLE II
In Example II the acoustical absorption coefficients of two additional samples o~ a laminate structure constructed in accordance with the teachings of this invention were determined.
Sample 3 was similar to the laminate structure of Sample 1. The first and third layers were poly-styrene foam 0.38 cm thick. The outer surfaces of the first and th1rd layers were covered by a resin impregnated, spunbonded, non-woven fabric. A second layer of polyurethane foam 0.65 cm thick was positioned between the first and third layers of polystyrene foam and was adhesively bonded to each. A decorative trim formed of polyurethane foam 0.65 cm thick was positioned against the outer surface of the first layer of polystyrene foam.
Sample 4 was constructed similarly to Sample 3.
First and third layers were formed of polystyrene foam 0.38 cm thick. The outer surfaces of the first and t~ird layers ~lere covered by a resin impregnated, spunbonded, non-woven fabric. A 0.65 cm layer of polyurethane foam was positioned intermediate the first and third layers of polystyrene foam. A
decorative trim of 0.65 cm thick polyurethane foam was positioned against the outer surface of the first layer of polystyrene foam. For Sample 4 the layers which form the laminate structure were adhesively bonded to one another; but, only a portion of the surfaces were bonded to one another such that approxi-mately 35% of the total surface area was adhesively bonded.
The results of the acoustical absorption tests for Samples 3 and 4 are shown in Table I.
EXAMPLE III
For Example III the laminate structure, Sample 5, was constructed using a reticulated poly-~L22~7~)9

-15- 16-21(5001) urethane foam coated with polyvinyl chloride ~PVC) for the intermediate layer of material. The laminate was c~onstructed having first and third layers of polystyrene foam 0.38 cm thick. The outer surfaces of the first and third layers were covered by a resin impregnated, spunbonded, non-woven fabric. A second layer of 0.95 cm thick polyurethane foam coated with PVC was intermediate the first and third layers and was adhesively bonded to each. A decorative trim, 0.65 cm thick polyurethane foam, was bonded to the outer surface of the first layex of polystyrene. The results of the test for the acoustical absorption coefficent for Sample 5 are shown in Table 1.
EXAMPLE IV
Three additional samples were tested for Example IV. Most polystyrene foam exhibits relatively poor sound absorption characteristics. However, polystyrene foam can be made to exhibit very good sound absorption characteristics if the passageways between the cells are opened sufficiently to allow sound to pass through the cells instead of immediately being reflected. When treated to open the cells, the polystyrene foam can best be described as a reticulated material. The laminate structures made for Example IV
used thi~ treated polystyrene foam in place of the polyurethane foam used in the prior Examples. This treated polystyrene foam can be created using any of several methods which will not be discussed here.
Sample 6 was a single layer of polystyrene foam 1.25 cm thick. The foam was very coarse and was treated to open passageways between the cells of the polystyrene. A 0.65 cm thick polyurethane foam layer was bonded to the layer of polystyrene foam as a decorative trim.
Sample 7 was a single layer of polystyrene foam 1.25 cm thick with a 0.6S cm thick polyurethane 12X1~709 ' ' '

-16- 16-21(5001) foam layer bonded to the layer of polystyrene foam as a decorative trim. Unlike Sample 6, Sample 7 was not treated to open the passageways between the cells of the polystyrene foam.
Sample 8 was a laminate structure constructed in accordance with this invention. Sample 8 had first and third layers of polystyrene foam 0.30 cm thick.
The outer surfaces of the first and third layers were covered by a resin impregnated, spunbonded, non-woven fabric. A second layer, intermediate the first and third layers, was polystyrene foam 0.65 cm thick which had the cells opened further. A decorative trim of 0.65 cm thick polyurethane foam was bonded to the outer surface of the first layer of polystyrene foam.
Sample 9 was identical to Sample 8 except that the second layer in Sample 9 was treated poly-styrene foam 1.25 cm thick.
The results of the test performed on Samples 6, 7, 8 and 9 to detexmine their acoustical absorption coefficients are shown in Table 1. The opening of the cells in the polystyrene foam greatly increased the acoustical absorption properties of the material.

122~709

-17- 16-21(5001) TABLE I
Acoustical Absorption Coefficients (~N) Low Frequency High Frequency Material Noise Noise Polystyrene Board 0.06 0.14 Fiberglass 0.12 0.46 Sample 1 0.05 0-43 Sample 2 0.13 0.70 Sample 3 0.20 0.42 Sample 4 0.08 0.82 Sample 5 0.30 0.41 Sample 6 0.02 0.16 Sample 7 0.04 0.12 Sample 8 0.02 0;50 Sample 9 0.02 0.50 From Table I it can be seen that the laminate structure of this invention demonstrates acoustical properties which are equal to or better than the fiberglass headliners and the polystyrene foam board.
The higher the coefficient shown in Table I, the greater the sound absorption exhibited by the material being tested. Samples 3, 4 and 5 which most clearly represents the teachings of this invention are generally superior in their acoustical properties at both the low frequency noise and at the high frequency noise.
The sound frequenci~s utilized in these tests were selected to represent the low frequency noise and the high frequency noise typically found within an automobile as it is driven. The low frequency noise was approxi-mately 500 hertz with a testing range from approximately10 hertz to approximately 700 hertz. The high freguency noise was nominally considered to be 1000 hertz, but the laminated structures were tested within a range of from approximately 750 hertz to approximately 4000 hertz. In addition to the better acoustical properties, ~22Q709

-18- 16-21(5001) the laminate structure of this invention provides a benefit to the automotive industry by being slightly lighter than the fiberglass headliner now in use.
Two theories have been considered to explain why the laminate structure of this invention achieves better acoustical properties than, for example, the fiberglass headliner now in use in automobiles. The first explanation is that the first and third layers are transparent to the low frequency sound which then passes through the first and third layers and is trapped within the second layer in the center of the laminate structure. The second explanation is that the second layer separates the first and third layers of thermoplastic material and that the sound is trapped between the first and third layers and bounces repeatedly between them until it is dissipated. There may, of course, be other explanations for the improved acoustical absorption properties.
EXAMPLE V
This example illustrates a laminate structure according to this invention which has improved acoustical absorption.
A laminate structure was prepared by using two sheets of fabric-faced polystyrene foam as outer layers to a core sheet of polyurethane foam. The fabric-faced polystyrene foam sheets had a thickness of 3.6 milli-meters; a non-woven, spunbonded, polyester fabric having a basis weight of 34 grams per square meter was adhesively bonded to the outer surface of each sheet of polystyrene foam which had a density of 55 kilograms per cubic meter. The polyurethane foam core sheet had a thickness of 6.4 millimeters and a density of 18 kilograms per cubic meter. The three sheets were adhesively bonded together.
EXAMPLE VI
This example illustrates the advantageous acoustical absorption properties of the laminate ~22~709

-19- 16-21(5001) structure of Example V when utilized in the construction of building wall partitions to attenuate noise, for instance between rooms or party walls or from outside sources.
A variety of wall structures were constructed based on modi~ications of standard wall structure utilizing one-half inch (13 millimeter) paper-faced gypsum wall board nailed to nominal 2"x4" wood stud framing. The following wall structures were constructed:
A. One-half inch sheets of paper-faced gypsum wall board nailed to opposing sides of the framing;
B. Same as A with the lamlnate structure of Example V under one of the gypsum sheets.
C. Same as A with R-ll fiberglass batting between the stud framing.
D. Same as C with the laminate structure of Example V under one of the gypsum sheets.
E. Same as A with the laminate structure of Example V under both of the gypsum sheets.
F. Same as E with R-ll fiberglass batting between the stud framing.
The testing of sound transmission loss for building partitions was conducted in accordance with the American Society of Testing of Materials (ASTM) Standard E 90-75, "Standard Method for Laboratory Measurement of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions", incorporated herein by reference.
The Sound Transmission Class (STC) of each wall structure was determined in accordance with ASTM
E 413-73, "Standard Classification for Determination of Sound Transmission Class", incorporated herein by reference, except that analysis was conducted using octave bands instead of one-third octave bands. The ~22(~709

-20- 16-21(5001) determined sound transmission class, as measured in decibels (dB), for each of the wall structures A
~hrough F is shown in Table II~
Table II
Wall Structure Sound Transmission Class ..... ...

Symbolic Structure*
Structure Wall - Insulation - Wall STC(dB) *G refers to gypsum wallboard; G/L refers to gypsum wallboard over the laminate; FG refers to R-11 fiberglass batting.
The wall structure desig~ated F comprising gy~sum wallboard installed over the laminate of Example V on both sides of R-11 fiberglass insulated stud framing has a sound transmission class of 45 decibels which advantageously provides acceptable noise attenuation for partitions between separate living areas or between living areas and cor~idors or public space of average noise. Such noise attenuation has previously generally been achieved by utilizing concrete block walls. By using the laminate structure of this invention building partitions having enhanced sound absorption characteristics can be achieved with substantial economic advantage in building construction.
EXAMPLE VII
This example illustrates the advantageous acoustical absorption properties of the laminate structure of Example V when utilized in the flooring construction to attenuate noise in floor-ceiling ~2;~1)7~

-21- 16-21(5001) separations between living areas. Noise attenuation was determined for a floor-ceiling structure comprising a four inch slab of concrete overlayed with successive layers of the laminate of Example v, 5/8 inch (16 millimeters) plywood and 1/8 inch (3 millimeter) vinyl tile. The laminate of Example V was adhesively bonded to the concrete and plywood with a general construction adhesive. All joints between the material were staggered and grout was applied between plywood joints. Twelve inch (30.5 centimeter) square vinyl tiles were adhesi~ely bonded to the top surface of the plywood. The impact insulation class of the floor structure was determined in accordance with ASTM
E 492-77, "Standard Method of Laboratory Measurement of Impact Sound Transmission Through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies Using the Tapping Machine", incorporated herein by reference. The floor structure was determined to have an Impact Insulation Class of 51 decibels.
EXAMPLE VIII
This example illustrates a further laminate structure according to this invention which has improved acoustical properties.
A laminate structure was prepared by using two sheets of Kraft paper-faced polystyrene foam as outer layers to a core sheet of polyurethane foam.
The Kraft paper-faced polystyrene foam sheets had a thickness of 3.0 millimeters. The polyurethane foam core sheet had a thickness of 6.4 millimeters and a density of 18 kilograms per cubic meter. The three sheets were adhesively bonded together.
EXAMPLE IX
This example illustrates the acoustical absorption of the laminate structures of Examples V
and VIII. Acoustical absorption coefficients were determined in accordance with ASTM Standard C 384-77, "Impedance and Absorption of Accoustical Material by

-22- 16-2].(5001) the Tube Method" incorporated herein by reference.
Average acoustical absorption coefficients determined at frequencies of 500 hertz and 1000 hertz are shown in Table III.
T_ble III
Acoustical Absorption Coefficient Laminate5_0_~ 1_00_~

Example V0.08 0.29 Example VIII 0.13 0.74 While specific embodiments of the invention have been described, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications thereof can be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the scope of the following claims cover all such modifications which fall within the full inventive concept.

Claims (13)

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A thermoformable laminate structure with improved acoustical absorption comprising:
a first layer of a foamed thermoplastic material;
a third layer of a foamed thermoplastic material;
a second layer intermediate said first and third layers, said second layer being a material having acoustical properties different from the acoustical properties of the thermoplastic material of said first and third layers;
at least a portion of said first and second and said second and third layers being adhesively bonded together; and said first and third layers of thermoplastic material having an outer surface, said outer surface having a resin impregnated fabric bonded thereto.

2. The thermoformable laminate structure of Claim 1 wherein said first and third layers of foamed thermoplastic material are foamed polystyene.

3. The thermoformable laminate structure of Claim 1 wherein said second layer of material is selected from a group consisting of foamed polyurethane, foamed polystyrene, foamed polyurethane coated with polyvinyl-chloride, and foamed polyethylene.

4. The thermoformable laminate structure of Claim 1 wherein said second layer of material is a batt of polyester fibers.

5. The thermoformable laminate structure of Claim 1 wherein said resin impregnated fabric comprises a non-woven fabric impregnated with a synthetic polymer resin.

6. The thermoformable laminate structure of Claim 5 wherein said non-woven fabric is a polyester or nylon.

7. The thermoformable laminate structure of Claim 5 wherein said synthetic polymer resin is a thermoformable acrylic resin.

8. A laminate structure with improved acoustical absorption comprising:
a first layer of a foamed thermoplastic material;
a third layer of a foamed thermoplastic material; and a second layer intermediate said first and third layers, said second layer being a material having acoustical properties different from the acoustical properties of the thermoplastic material of said first and third layers; and wherein at least a portion of said first and second and said second and third layers being adhesively bonded together; and wherein said first and third layers have a sheet of paper, fabric or thermoplastic film adhesively bonded to at least the outer surface thereof.

9. The laminate structure of claim 8 wherein said first and third layers of foamed thermo-plastic material are foamed polystyene.

10. The laminate structure of claim 8 wherein said second layer of material is selected from a group consisting of foamed polyurethane, foamed polystyrene, foamed polyurethane coated with polyvinyl-chloride, and foamed polyethylene.

11. The laminate structure of Claim 8 wherein said second layer of material is a batt of polyester fibers.

12. The laminate structure of claim 10 wherein said fabric is a non-woven fabric.

13. A laminate structure with improved acoustical absorption comprising:

first and third layers of foamed polystyrene, each of said first and third layers having an inner surface and an outer surface, wherein a sheet of Kraft paper is adhesively bonded to at least the outer surfaces of said first and third layers of foamed polystyrene; and a second layer of foamed polyurethane, said second layer being intermediate said first and third layers, wherein a portion of said second layer being bonded to said inner surface of said first and third layers of themoplastic material.