CA1183792A - Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion - Google Patents
Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversionInfo
- Publication number
- CA1183792A CA1183792A CA000399654A CA399654A CA1183792A CA 1183792 A CA1183792 A CA 1183792A CA 000399654 A CA000399654 A CA 000399654A CA 399654 A CA399654 A CA 399654A CA 1183792 A CA1183792 A CA 1183792A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- catalyst
- vanadium
- vanadia
- metal additive
- metal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Catalysts (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Crude oils or residual fractions from the distillation of petroleum containing substantial amounts of metals such as Ni, V, Fe, Cu, Na and high Conradson carbon values are converted to liquid transportation and distillate heating fuels by contact-ing with a zeolitic containing catalyst containing a metal additive to immobilize the vanadium oxides deposited on the catalyst. As the vanadium oxide level builds up on the catal-yst, the elevated temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone cause the vanadia to melt and liquid vanadia to flow.
Among other things, this vanadia enters the zeolite structure leading to neutralization of acid sites and more significantly to irreversible destruction of the crystalline structure to less active amorphous material (see attached graphs). In addi-tion this melting and flowing of vanadia can, at high levels and for materials with low surface area, also coat the outside of the microscope with liquid, thereby causing coalescence between catalyst particles adversely affecting its fluidization properties. The select metal additives of this invention were chosen so as to form compounds or complexes with vanadia which have melting points above the temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone, thus avoiding zeolite destruction, surface sintering and particle fusion.
These select additives were also chosen with a view of immo-bilizing vanadia while simultaneously avoiding neutralization of acidic sites. Many additional additives which do affect the melting point of vanadia were eliminated due to this negative effect on catalyst activity. Titania and zirconia, in combina-tion with silica, are known to form acidic catalysts with cracking activity in their own right. Alkaline earth metals can be used to immobilized vanadia but are somewhat detrimental to acidic sites. Selection of additives to immobilize vanadia on RCC catalysts is much more confined in comparison but deal-ing with the same problem as vanadia deposited on sorbent materials.
The method of addition of the metal additive can be during manufacture, after spray drying or at any point in the reduced crude processing cycle.
Crude oils or residual fractions from the distillation of petroleum containing substantial amounts of metals such as Ni, V, Fe, Cu, Na and high Conradson carbon values are converted to liquid transportation and distillate heating fuels by contact-ing with a zeolitic containing catalyst containing a metal additive to immobilize the vanadium oxides deposited on the catalyst. As the vanadium oxide level builds up on the catal-yst, the elevated temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone cause the vanadia to melt and liquid vanadia to flow.
Among other things, this vanadia enters the zeolite structure leading to neutralization of acid sites and more significantly to irreversible destruction of the crystalline structure to less active amorphous material (see attached graphs). In addi-tion this melting and flowing of vanadia can, at high levels and for materials with low surface area, also coat the outside of the microscope with liquid, thereby causing coalescence between catalyst particles adversely affecting its fluidization properties. The select metal additives of this invention were chosen so as to form compounds or complexes with vanadia which have melting points above the temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone, thus avoiding zeolite destruction, surface sintering and particle fusion.
These select additives were also chosen with a view of immo-bilizing vanadia while simultaneously avoiding neutralization of acidic sites. Many additional additives which do affect the melting point of vanadia were eliminated due to this negative effect on catalyst activity. Titania and zirconia, in combina-tion with silica, are known to form acidic catalysts with cracking activity in their own right. Alkaline earth metals can be used to immobilized vanadia but are somewhat detrimental to acidic sites. Selection of additives to immobilize vanadia on RCC catalysts is much more confined in comparison but deal-ing with the same problem as vanadia deposited on sorbent materials.
The method of addition of the metal additive can be during manufacture, after spray drying or at any point in the reduced crude processing cycle.
Description
3 ,~
~ACKGRO~ND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to an improved catalyst, one or more methods for its preparation, one or more methods for treatment, and a process for its use in the conversion of reduced crude or crude oil to liquid transportation and/or heating fuels. ~ore particularly, the invention is related to a catalyst composi-tion comprising a catalytically active crystalline alumino-silicate zeolite uniformly dispersed within a matrix containing a metal additive as a select metal, its oxide or salts to immo-bilize the vanadium oxide deposited on the catalyst during pro-cessing. A further embodiment of this invention is the addi-tion of the metal additive for vanadia immobilization during catalyst manufacture, after spray drying by impregnation, or at any point in the reduced crude processing cycle.
The introduction of catalytic cracking to the petroleum indus-try in the 1930's constituted a major advance over previous techniques with the object to inçrease the yield of gasoline and its quality. Early fixed bed, moving bed, and fluid bed catalytic cracking FCC processes employed vacuum gas oils ~VGO) from crude so~rces that were considered sweet and liyht. The terminology o~ sweet refers to low sulfur content and light refers to the amount of material boiling below approximately 1, 000--1, 025F .
The catalysts employed in early homogeneous fluid dense beds were of an amorphous siliceous material, prepared synthetically ,' ~
1~37~12 or from naturally occurring materials activated by acid leach ing.Tremendous strides were made in the 1950's in FCC technol-ogy as to metallurgy, processing equipment, regeneration and new more-active and more stable amorphous catalysts. However, increasing de~and with respect to quantity of gasoline and increased octane number requirements to satisfy the new high horsepower high compression engines being promoted by the auto industry, put extreme pressure on the petroleum industry to increase FCC capacity and severity of operation.
A major breakthrough in FCC catalysts came in the early 1960's, with the introduction of molecular sieves or zeolites, which were incorporated into the matrix of amorphous and/or amor--phous/kaolin materials constituting the FCC catalysts of that time. These new zeolitic catalysts, containing a crystalline alumino-silicate zeolite in an amorphous, amorphous/kaolin, matrix of silica, alumina, silica-alumina, kaolin, etc. were at least i,000-10,000 times more active for cracking hydrocarbons than the earlier amorphous, amorphous/kaolin containing silica-alumina catalysts. This introduction of zeolitic crackingcatalysts revolutioni~ed the ~luid catalytic cracking process.
New innovations were developed to handle these high activities, such as riser cracking, shortened contact times, new regenera-tion processes, new improved zeolitic catalyst developments,etc.
The overall result (economic) of these zeolitic catalyst devel-opments was to give the petroleum industry the capability 1~3~;'92 of greatly increasing throughp~lt of feedstock with increased conversion and selectivity while employing the same units with out expansion and without requiring new unit construction.
The newer catalyst developments revolved around the development of various ~eolites such as type X, Y, faujasite; increased thermal steam stability through the inclusion of rare earth ions or ammonium via ion-exchange techniques and the develop-ment of more attrition resistant matrices.
10After the introduction of zeolitic containin~ catalysts the petroleum industry began to suffer from crude availability as to quantity and quality accompanied by increasing demand for gasoline with increasing octane value. The world crude supply picture changed in the late 1960's - early 1970's. From a sur-plus of light-sweet crudes the supply situation changed to a tighter supply with an ever increasing amount of heavier crudes with higher sulfur contents. These heavier and high sulfur crudes presented processing problems to the petroleum refiner in that these heavier crudes invariably also contained much higher metals and Conradson carbon values, with accompanying significan~ly increased asphaltic content.
Practionation of the total crude to yield cat cracker charge stocks also required much better control to ensure that metals and Conradson carbon values were not carried overhead to con-taminate the FCC charge stock.
The effects of metals and Conradson carbon on a ~eolitic _ 5 _ 1~ ~379Z
containing FCC catalyst have been described in the litera~ure as to their highly unfavorable effect in lowering catalyst activity and selectivity for gasoline production and their equally harmful effect on catalyst life. In particular, we S have shown that vanadia, at high concentrations in the feed, is especially detrimental to catalyst life.
As mentioned previously, these heavier crude oils also contained more of the heavier fractions and yielded less or a lower volume of the high quality FCC charge stocks which norm-ally boils below 1025F, and usually is so processed, as to contain metal contents below 1 ppm, preferably 0.1 ppm and Conradson carbon values substantially below 1.
With this increasing supply of heavier crudes, which meant lowered yields of gasoline and the increasing demand for liquid transportation fuels, the petroleum industry began a search for processing schemes to utilize these heavier crudes in producing gasoline. Most of these processing schemes have been described in the literature. These include Gulf's Gulfining and Union Oil Unifining processes for ~reating residuum, UOP's Aurabon process, Hydrocarbon Research's H Oil process, Ex~on's Flexicoking process to produce thermal gasoline and coke, H-Oil's Dynacracking and Phillip's Heavy Oil Cracking (HOC).
These processes utilize thermal cracking or hydrotreating fol-lowed by FCC or hydrocracking operations to handle the higher content of metals (Ni-V-Fe-Cu-Na) and high Conradson carbon values of 5-15~ Some of the drawbacks of this type of 1~83~9;2 processing are as follows: Coking yields thermally cracked gasoline which has a much lower octane value than cat cracked gasoline and is unstable due to the production of gum from diolefins and requires further hydrotreating and reforming to produce high octane product; gas oil quality is degraded due to thermal reactions to produce a product containing refractory polynuclear aromatics, high Conradson carbons are highly unsuitable in catalytic cracking; hydrotreating requires expen-sive high pressure hydrogen, special alloy multi-reactor sys-tem, costly operations, and a separate costly facility for the production of hydrogen.
To better understand the reasons why the industry has progressed along thé processing schemes described, one must understand the known and established effects of contaminant metals (Ni-V-Fe-Cu-Na) and Conradson carbon on the zeolitic containing cracking catalysts and the operating parameters of a FCC unit. Metal content and Conradson carbon are two very effective restraints on the operation of a FCC unit or a Reduced Crude Conversion unit towards obtaining maximum conver-sion, selectivity and life. As metals and Conradson carbon incre~se, the operating capacity and efficiency of a FCC unit is greatly and final.ly adversely affected or made impossible, although there is enough hydrogen in the feed to produce only toluene and pentane, if a highly selective catalyst could be devised. ~
3'79;i~
The effect of increasing Conradson carbon is to increase that portion of the feedstock converted to carbon deposited on the catalyst. In typical VGO operations employing a ~eolite con-taining catalyst in a FCC unit, the amount of coke deposited on the catalyst averages around about 4-S wt~ of feed. This coke production has been attributed to four different coking mechan-isms, namely, contaminant coke (from metal deposits), catalytic coke (acid site cracking), entrained hydrocarbons (pore struc-ture adsorption - poor stripping) and Conradson carbon. In the case of processing higher boiling fractions, e.g., reduced crudes, residual fractions, topped crude, etc., the coke pro-duction based on feed is the summation of the four types pres-ent in VGO processing plus the higher Conradson carbon value, higher boiling unstrippable hydrocarbons and coke associated with high nitrogen containing molecules which irreversibly adsorb on the catalyst. Thus, coke production on clean catal-yst, when processing reduced crudes, is approximately 4 wt%plus the Conradson carbon value of the feedstock. Thus, there has been postulated, two other types of coke formers present in reduced crudes in addition to the four present in VGO andthey are: 1) adsorbed and absorbed high boiling hydrocarbons not r~moved by nor~al-efficient stripping and, 2) high molecular weight nitrogen containing hydrocarbon compounds adsorbed on the catalyse's acid sites. Both of thse two new types of cok-ing producing phenomena add greatly to the complexity of residprocessing.
-The spent co~ed catalyst i9 brought back to equilibrium activ-ity by burning off the deactivating coke in a regeneration zone in the presence of air and recycled back to the reaction 20ne.
The heat generated during regeneration is removed by the catal-yst and carried to the reaction zone for vaporization of thefeed and to provide heat for the endothermic nature of the cracking reaction. The temperature in the regenerator is norm-ally limited because of metallurgy limitations and the thermal-steam stability of the catalyst.
The thermal-steam stability of the zeolite containing catalyst is determined by the temperature and steam partial pressure at which the zeolite begins to rapidly lose its crystalline struc-ture to yield a low activity amorphous material. The presence of steam is highly critical and is generated by the burning of adsorbed carboneceous material which has a high hydrogen con-tent. This carboneceous material is principally the high boil-ing adsorbed hydrocarbons with boiling points as high as 1500-1700F or above that have a modest hydrogen content and the high boiling nitrogen containing hydrocarbons as well as rela-ted porphyrins and asphaltenes.
As the Conradson carbon value of the feedstock increases, coke production increases and this increased load will raise the regeneration temperature; thus the unit is limited as to the amount of feed that can be processed, due to the Conradson car-bon content. Earlier VGO units opera~ed with the regenerator at 1150-1250F. A new development in reduced crude processing, _ 9 _ ~83~79Z
namely, Ashland Oil's "Reduced Crude Conversion Process" (pend-eanadian Patent 1,168,176 can operate at regenerator tem-peratures in the range of 1350-1400F. But even these higher regenerator temperatures place a limit on the Conradson carbon value of the feed at approxirnately 8. This level is control-ling unless considerable water is introduced to further control temperature, which addition is practiced in the RCC process.
.. l The metal containing fractions of reduced crudes contain Ni-V-~e-Cu, present in porphyrins and asphaltenes. These metal containing hydrocarbons are deposited on the catalyst during processing and are cracked in the riser to deposit the metal or i carried over by the spent catalyst as the metallo-porphyrin or asphaltene and converted to the metal oxide during regenera tion. The adverse effects of these metals as taught in the literature are to cause non-selective or degradative cracking 1, and dehydrogenation to produce increased coke and light gases such as hydrogen, methane and ethane which affects selectlvity, resulting in and poor yield and ~uality of gasoline and light cycle oil. The increased production of light gases, while impairing the yield and selectivity structure of the process, i also puts an increased demand on compressor capacity. The ¦
increase in coke production, in addition to its negative impact on yield, also affects catalyst activity-selectivity, greatly increases regenerator air demand and compressor capacity and ~I
uncontrollable and dangerous regenerator temperature. ~ 1, .. ~
, These problems of the prior art have been greatly minimized by the development at Ashland Oil, Inc, of the Reduced Crude Conversion Process, see Canadian Paten-ts 1,167,793 & 1,16~,176 094~ 6. This new process can handle reduced crudes or crude oils containing high metals and Conradson carbon values previ-ously not susceptible to direct processing. Normally, these cr~des require e~pensive vacuum distillation to isolate suit-able feedstocks, and producing as a by product, high sulfur containing vacu~;m still bottoms. The RCC process avoids all of Ithis.
It was early noted that reduced crudes with high nickel to vanadium levels presented less problems as to catalyst deac-tivation at high metal on catalyst contents, e.g., 5,000-10,000 ppm, at elevated regenerator temperatures. However, when reduced crudes ~ith high vanadium to nickel levels are !
2Q processed over zeolite containing catalysts, especially at high - vanadium levels on the catalyst, rapid deactivation of the zeo-lite containing catalyst is noted. This deactivation manifests i itself as a rapid loss of the zeolite structure at vanadium levels, above 5,000 ppm approaching 10,000 ppm at elevated regenerator temperatures. Published accounts report that it is impossible to operate at vanadium levels higher than 10,000 ppm because of this factor. To date, this rapid vanadium deactiva-tion at high vanadium levels has only been retarded by lowering regenerator tempertures and increasing the addition rate of virgin catalyst. ,j ., , , J
;3~79;~:
SU~IMARY OF THt~ INVENTION
____ The problems of the prior art are now overcome in a process employing the catalyst and select metal additive of this inven-tion which allows the processing of a reduced crude or crude oil of high metals - high vanadium to nickel ratio and Conradson carbon value. A reduced crude or crude oil having a high metal and Conradson carbon value is contacted with a zeo-litic containlng catalyst of high area at tempertures above about 950F. Residence time of the oil in the riser is below 5 seconds, preferably 0.5 - 2 seconds. The particle size of the catalyst is approximately 20 to 150 microns in size to ensure adequate fluidization properties.
The reduced crude - crude oil is introduced at the bottom of the riser and contacts the catalyst at a temperature of 1200-1400F to yield a temperature at the exit of the riser in the reactor vessel of approximately 950-1100"F. Along with the reduced crude or crude oil, water, steamV naphtha, flue gas, etc., may be introduced to aid in vaporiz.ation and act as a lift gas to control residence time and provides other benefits described in Canadian Patent 1,168,176.
Spent catalyst is rapidly separated from the hydrocarbon vapors at the exit of the riser by employing the vented riser concept developed by Ashland Oil, Inc. U. S. Patent No. 4,066,533.
During the coursl~ of the reaction in the riser, the metai and Conradson carbon compounds are deposited on the catalyst.
; - 12 -.
379~
After separation in the vented riser, the spent catalyst is deposited as a dense but fluffed bed at the bottom of the reac-tor vessel, t~ansferred to a stripper and then to the regenera-tion zone. The spent catalyts is contacted with an oxygen con-taining gas to remove the carboneous material through combus-tion to carbon oxides to yield a regenerated catalyst contain-ing less than 0.1 wt~ carbon, preferably less than 0.05 wt%
carbon. The regenerated catalyst is then recycled to the bot-tom of the riser where it again joins high metal and Conradson carbon containing feed to repeat the cycle.
At the elevated temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone, the vanadium deposited on the catalyst is converted to vanadium oxides, in particular, vanadium pentoxide. The melt-ing point of vanadium pentoxide is much lower than temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone. Thus, it can become mobile, flow across the catalyst surface, cause pore plugging, particle coalascence, and more importantly, enter the pores of the zeolite, where our studies have shown that it catalyzes irreversible crystalline collapse to an amorphous material.
This application describes a new approach to offsetting the adverse effect of vanadium pentoxide by the incorporation of select metals, metal oxides or their salts into the catalyst - matrix during manuracture, by impregnation techniques after spray drying, or added during processing at select points in the unit to affect vanadium immobilization through compound or ~18,37~Z
complex formation. These compound~s or complexes of vanadia with metal additives, serve to immobilize vanadia by creating high melting point complexes or compounds of vanadia which are higher than the temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone.
1~379Z
DESC~IPTION OF PREFFRRED EM~ODIMENTS
The select catalysts of this invention will include solids of high catalytic activity such as zeolites in a matrix of clays, kaolin, silica, alumina, smectites, and other 2-layere~1 lamel-lar silicates, silica-alumina, etc. The surface area of these catalysts would preferably be above l00 m2/g, have a pore volume in excess of 0.2 cc/g and a micro-activity or conversion value as measured by the ASTM test method No. D3907-80 of at least or greater than 60, and preferably above 65.
To an aqueous slurry of the raw matrix matrix material and zeo-lite is mixed the metal additive to yield approximately 1-20 wt% concentration on the finished catalyst. The metal additlve can be added in the form of a water soluble compound such as the nitrate, halide, sulfate, carbonate, etc., and/or as the oxide or hydrous gel. This mixture is spray dried to yield the finished promoted catalyst as a microspherical particle of l0-200 microns in size with the active metal additive depositedwithin the matrix and/or the outer surface of the catalyst par-ticle. Since the concentration of vanadia on the spent catal-yst can be as high as ~ wt3 of particle weight, the concentra-tion of metal additive will be in the range of 1-6 wt~ as the metal element to maintain at least a one to one atomic ratio of vanadium to metal additive at all times. The catal~st can be impregnated with the metal additive after spray drying, employ-ing techniques well ~nown in the art, or as metioned above, an active gelatinous precipitate, such as titania or zirconia gel, ., I
1~;379Z
or other gels can be added to the matrix gel prior to spr~y drying.
It is not proposed to define the exact mechanism for the immo bilization of vanadia but the metal additives of this invention will form compounds or complexes with vanadia that have higher melting points than the temperatures encountered in the regen-eration zone. The one to one atomic ratio was chosen as mini-mum, although initially, the metal additive may be considerably above this ratio if it is incorporated in the catalyst prior touse, after which the ratio of additive to vanadia will decrease as vanadia is deposited on the catalyst. Thus, at this one to one ratio (50~ vanadium - 50~ metal additive) the melting point of the binary reaction product is generally well above operat-ing conditions. Alternatively, the metal additive may be addedat the same rate as the metal content of the feed to maintain a one to one atomic ratio. This experimental approach was employed as a practical matter to uncover and confirm suitable metals - metal oxides which can form binary reaction mixtures with vanadium pentoxide so as to yeild a solid compound that has a melting point of approximately 1800F or higher at this one to one ratio. Search for this high melting point reaction product was initiated to help ensure that vanadia would not melt, flow and enter the zeolite cage structure to cau~e destruction of the zeolite's crystalline structure as previous-ly described. The metal-metal oxides of this invention include -the following yroups and their active elements from the Pericdic chart of the elements:
,;
~1~i379~:
M.P. of 1/1 Mixture - F
Group IIA Mg, Ca, Sr, ~a 1740-1900 Group IIIB Sc, Y, La lB00-2100 Group IVB Ti, Zr, H 1700-2000 Group VB Nb, Ta lB00-2000 Group VII~ Mn 1750 Group VIII Fe, Co, Ni 1600-1800 Group IIIA In, Tl 1800 Group VA Bi 1800 Group VIA Te 1500 Lanthanide Series Ce, Pr, etc. 2100 Actinide Series Th, U, etc.
The reaction of the metal additive with vanadia generally yields a binary reaction mixture. This invention also recog-nizes that mixtures of these additive metals with vanadia can occur to form high melting ternary and quaternary reaction mix-tures, e.g., Barium vanadium titanate, and in addition, these ternary and quaternary reaction mixtures can occur with metals not covered in the Groups above. Further, in this invention we have covered the lower oxidation states of vanadium as well as vanadium pentoxide. However, in processing a sulfur containing feed and regeneration in the presence of an oxygen containing gas vanadium will also iikely form such compounds as vanadium sulfides, sulfates, and oxysulfides which can also form binary, ternary, etc., reaction mixtures with the metal additives of this invention as mixed oxides and sulfides.
If the metal additive is not added to the catalyst during manufacuture then it can be added by impregnation technques to the spray dried microspherical catalyst particles. In , ~ .
addition, the ~etal additive can be added as an aqueous o~
hydrocarbon solution or volatile compound during the processing cycle at any point of catalyst travel in the processing unit.
This would include but not be limited to addition of an aqueous solution of the inorganic metal salt or a hydrocarbon solution of organo-metallic compounds at the riser wye 17, along the riser length 4, the dense bed 9 in the reactor vessel 5, strip-per 10 and 15, regenerator inlet 14, regenerator dense bed 12, or regenerated catalyst standpipe 16.
The selective catalyst of this invention with or without the metal additive is charged to a Reduced Crude Conversion (RCC) type unit as autlined in Figure 1. Catalyst particle circula-tion and operating parameters are brought up to process condi-tions by methods well ~nown to those skilled in the art. The equilibrium catalyst at a emperature of 1100-1400F conta~ts the reduced crude of high metals and Conradson carbon values at riser wye 170 The reduced crude can contain steam and/or flue gas injected at point 2, water and/or naphtha injected at point 3 to aid in vaporization, catalyst fluidization, and control-ling contact time in riser 4. The catalyst and vaporous hydro-carbons travel up riser 4 at a contact time of 0.5-5 seconds, preferably 1-2 seconds. The catalyst and vaporous hydrocarbons are separated in vented riser outlet 6 at a final rection tem-perature of 950-1100F. The vaporous hydrocarbons are trans-ferred to cyclone 7 where any entrained catalyst fines are separated and the hydrocarbon vapors are sent to the fractiona-tor via transfer line 8. The spent catalyst is then l~L~37~Z
transferred to stripper lO for removal of entrained hydrocarbon vapors and then to regenerator vessel 11 to form dense bed 12.
An oxygen containing gas such as air is admitted to the bottom of dense bed 12 in vessel ll to combust the coke to carbon oxides. The resulting flue gas i5 processed through cyclones and exits from regenerator vessel ll via line 13. The regen-erated catalyst is transferred to stripper 15 to remove any entrained combustion gases and then transferred to riser wye l~
via line 16 to repeat the cycle.
At such time that the metal level on the catalyst becomes intolerably high such that catalyst activity and selectivity declines, additional catalyst can be added and the deactivated catalyst withdrawn at addition-withdrawal poin~ 18 into dense bed 12 and at addition-withdrawal point 19 into regenerated catalyst standpipe 16. Additions point 18 and 19 can also be utili~ed to add metal additive promoted catalyst. In the case of a non-promoted catalyst, the metal additive as an aqueous solution or an organo-metallic compound in aqueous or hydrocar-bon solvents can be added at addition points 18 and l9 as well as at addition points 2 and 3 on feed line l, addition point 20 in riser 4, addition point 21 to the bottom of vessel 5 intodense bed 9. The addition of the metal additive is not limited to these locations but can be practiced at any point in the reduced crude - catalyst processing cycle.
The regenerator vessel, as illustrated in Figure 1, is a simple one zone-dense bed type. The regenerator section is not limi-ted to this example but can exist of two or more zones, stacked or side by side arrangement, with internal and/or external eir-eulation transfer lines from zone to zone.
In some of the previous reduced crude proeesses, aceeptable eatalyst life and seleetivity eould be obtained with redueed erude feedstocks eontaining low levels of metal contamination, and having a high niekel to vanadium ratios. However, as the vanadium content on the eatalyst inereased or with high vana-dium to niekel ratio reduced crude catalyst activity and selee-tivity decrease rapidly and can only be corrected by economi-cally unacceptable increased catalyst addition rates. Having thus described the observed detrimental effects of vanadium and nickel, the catalyst, metal additive promoters and process of this inven~ion, the following examples are provided to illu-strate the effeet of vanadia flowing and eausing eatalyst deae~
tivation through destruetion of the zeolite's erystalline strueture and steps taken to prevent its occurenee.
37~Z
EXAr~!PLES
The determination that vanadia deposited on a fluid catalytic cracking catalyst would, under the conditions of elevated tem-peratures in the regenerator zone, enter the zeolite and catalyze the destruction of its crystalline structure to the less active amorphous material, with subsequent low activity and selectivity, was noted in our reduced crude demonstration unit.
This phenomenum was then evaluated in the laboratory by depos-iting vanadium and nickel, singly on a specially chosen canadi-date catalyst to study its resistance to severe thermal and steaming conditions. As noted in Figure 2 through S, and Tables l and 2, the overall effect of nickel is to neutralize acid sites, and increase coke and gas production but little or no destruction of the zeolite crystalline cage structure was observed. Vanadium on the other hand, was irreversibly destruc-tive. At suitably severe conditions, as the vanadia content was increased, zeolite content decreased proportionally to the point that at approximately the l wt% vanadium level the zeo~
lite crystalline structure was completely destroyed after 5 hours at 1450F in steam leading to a completely deactivated catalyst.
The determination that vanadia deposited on a catalyst would flow and cause coalescence between catalyst particles at regen-erator temperatures, and what elements and their salts would prevent this processs were studled by three methods; namely, the clumping or lump formation technique, vanadia diffusion from or eompound formation with a metal additive in a alumina-ceramic crucible, and through speetroscopie studies and differ-ential thermal analyses of vanadia-metal additive mixtures.
CLUMPING TES_ A elay, spray dried to yield microspherical particles in 20-150 micron size, had vanadia deposited upon it in varying concen-trations. The clay, free of vanadia, and those containing varying vanadia coneentrations were plaeed in individual eeramic crucibles and ealcined at 1400F in air for two hours.
At the end of this time period the erueibles were withdrawn from the muffle furnace and eooled to room temperature. The surfaee texture and flow eharaeteristies of these samples were noted and the results are reported in Table 3.
V25 Surfaee 25Concentration - ppm Texture Flow Charaeteri ties 0 Free Free flowing 1,000-5,000 Surface Clumped Broke erust-free flowing 5,000-20,000Sur~aee Clumped Total elumping-no flow As shown in Table 3, the elay free of vanadia does not form any erust or elumps or fused partieles at temperatures eneountered in the regenerator seetion of the proeess deseribed in this "
79~
invention. At vanadia concentrations above 5,000 ppm the clay begins to clump and bind badly and does not flow at all.
While liquid at operating temperature, manifestation of this phenomenum is demonstrated by the finding that solidlfication point in a crucible, or the operating unit is cooled down in order to facilitate entrance to the unit for cleaning out plugged diplegs and other repairs. This phenomenum also makes a turn-around timely and complex, as this material must be chipped out.
3 1~3 ~92 CR~CI3LE DIFF~SION - COMPO~ND FORMATION
.
An extension of the clumping test is the use of a ceramic-alumina crucible to determine whether vanadia react with given metal additive.If vanadia does not react with the metal addi-tive or only a small amount of compound formation occurs, thenthe vanadia has been observed to diffuse through and over the porous alumina walls and deposit as a yellowish to orange deposit on the outside wall of the crucible. On the other hand, when compound formation occurs, there is little or no vanadia deposits on the outside of the crucible wall. Two ser-ies of tests were performed. In the first series shown in Table 4, a 1/1 mixture by weight of vanadia pentoxide and the metal additive waS placed in the crucible and heated to 1500F in air for 12 hours. Compound formation or vanadia diffusion was noted.
1 Par~ V2O5 + 1 Part Metal Additive 1500F - Air - 12 Hours Diffusion ofCompound Metal Additive _ adium Formation Titania No Yes Manganese Acetate No Yes 3~ Lanthanum Oxide No Yes Alumina Yes No Barium Acetate No Yes Copper Oxide Yes Partial ~379~
In the second series of tests a vanadia contalning material was tested in a similar manner. A one to one ratio by weight of the vanadia containing material and the metal additive were heated to 15003F in air for 12 hours. The results are shown in Table 5.
l Part V2O5 - Catalyst ~ 1 Part Metal Additive 1500F - Air 12 Hours Vanadia Metal Particle Concentration, ppm Additive Formation 24,000 None Yes l524,000 Calcium Oxide No 24,000 Magnesium Oxide No 24,000 Manganese Oxide No The study of the capability of certain elements to immobilize vanadium pentoxide was extended to DuPont differential thermal analyses (DTA), X-ray diffraction (XRD~ and scanning electron microscope tSEM) instruments. The meta:L additives studied on the DTA showed that titania, barium oxide, calcium oxide, iron oxide and indium oxide all were excellent additives for the formation of high melting metal vanadates, with melting points of 1800F or higher. Copper and manganese gave intermediate results with compounds melting at approximately 1500P. Poor results were obtained with materials such as lead oxide, molybdena, tin oxide, chromia, zinc oxide, cobalt oxide, cadi-mium oxide and some of the r~re earths.
The material reported and produced in Table 5, namely 24,000 ppm vanadia on clay with no metal additive, was fired at 1500F
and then studied in the SEM. The fused particles initially gave a picture of fused particles. However, as the material was continuously bombarded, the fused particles separated due to the heat generated by the bombarding electrons. One was able to notice the melting and flowing of vanadia with the initial single fused particles separating into two distinct microspher-ical particles.
An example of our XRD work is the identification of the com-pound formed when manganese acetate reacted with vanadium pent-oxide. This compound has been tentatively identified as Mn2V27 ' The matrix material for the catalyst of this invention should possess good hydro-thermal stability. Examples of materials exhibiting relatively stable pore characteristics are alumina, silica-alumina, silica, clays such as kaolin, meta-kaolin, hal-loysite, anauxite, dickite and/or macrit:e, and combinations of these materials. Other clays, such as montmorillonite, may be added to increase the acidity of the matrix. Clay may be used in natural state or thermally modified. The preferred matrix of U. S. Patent No. 3,034,g94 is a semisynthetic combination of clay and silica-alumina. Preferably the clay is mostly a kao-linite and is combined with a synthetic silica-alumina hydrogel or hydrosol. This synthetic component forms preferably about lS to 75 percent, more preferably about 20 to 25 percent, of 379~
the formed catalyst by weight. The proportion of clay is such that the catalyst preferably contains after forming, about 10 to 75 percent, more preferably about 30 to S0 percent, clay by weight. The most preferred composition of the matrix contains approximately twice as much clay as synthetically derived silica-alumina. The synthetically derived silica-alumina should contain 55 to 95 pereent by weight of silica (SiO2), preferably 65 to 85 percent, most preferably about 75 percent.
Although catalysts wherein the gel matrix consists entirely of silica gel are also to be ineluded. After introduetion of the zeolite and/or metal additive, the eomposition is preferably slurried and spray dried to form catalyst mierospheres. The particle size of the spray dried matrix is generally in the range of about 5 to 160 microns, preferably 40 to 80 microns.
Generally speaking, the finished eatalyst will also eontain from 5 to 50% by weight of rare earth or ammonia exehanged sieve of both X or Y variety, preferably about 15-45~ by weight and most preferably 20-40% by weight. To further enhance the eatalyst, rare earth exchanged sieve may be caleined and fur-ther exchanged with rare earth or ammonia to create an excep-tionally stable sieve.
Various processas may be used in preparing the synthetically silica-alumina, sueh as those described in U. S. Patent No.
3,034,994. One of these processe~ involves gelling an alXali metal silicate with an inorganic acid while maintaining the p~
'3L1~3379Z
on the alkaline side. An aqueous solution of an acidic alum~-num salt is then intimately mixed with the silica hydrogel 50 that the aluminum salt solution fills the silica hyclrogel pores. The aluminum is thereafter prscipitated as a hydrous alumina by the addition of an alkaline compound.
As a specific example of this method of preparation, a silica hydrogel is prepared by adding sulfuric acid with vigorous agi-tation and controlled temperature time and concentration condi-tions to a sodium silicate solution. Aluminum sulfate in water is then added to the silica hydrogel with vigorous agitation to fill the gel pores with the aluminum salt solution. An ammoni-um solution is then added to the gel with vigorous agitation toprecipitate the aluminum as hydrous alumina in the pores of the silica hydrogel, after whirh the hydrous gel is processed, for instance, by separating a part of the water on vacuum filters and then drying, or more preferably, by spray drying the hydrous gel to produce microspheres. The dried product is then washed to remove sodium and sulfate ions, either with water or a very weak acid solution. The resulting product is then dried to a low moisture content, usually less than 25 percent by weight, e.g., 10 percent to 20 percent by weight, to provide the finished catalyst product.
The silica hydrogel slurry with or without alumina in hydrous form may be filtered and washed in gel form to affect purifica-tion of the gel by the removal of dissolved salts.
1~371~2 This may enhance the formation of a continous phase in the spray dried microspheric particles. If the slurry is prefil-tered and washed and it is desired to spray dry the filter cake, the latter may be reslurried with enough water to produce a pumpable mixure for spray drying. The spray dried product may then be washed again and given a final drying in the manner previously described.
The metal additives to immobilize vanadia includes the metals, their oxides and salts, or organo-metallic compounds of such metals as Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Sc, Y, La, Ti, Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta, Mn, Fe, In, Tl, Bi, T~, the rare eaths, and the actinide and Lanthanide series of elements. These promoters or metal addi-tives in the metal element state, may be used in concentration ranges from about 0.5 to 20 percent, more preferably about 1 to 5 percent by weight of finished catalyst.
The catalytically active promoter in the preferred catalyst composition is a crystalline aluminosilicate zeolite, commonly known as molecular sieves. Molecular sieves are initially formed as alkali metal aluminosilicates, which are dehydrated forms of crystalline hydrous siliceous zeolites. However, since the alkali form does not have appreciable activity and alkali metal ions are deleterious to cracking processes, the aluminosilicates are ion exchanged to replace sodium with some other ion such as, for example, ammonium and/or rare earth metal ions. The silica and alumina making up the structure of the zeolite are arranged in a definite crystalline pattern ~1~3792 containing a large number of small uniform cavities intercon-nected by smaller uniform channels or pores. The effective size of these pores is usually between about 4A and 12A, The zeolites which can be employed in accordance with this invention include both natural and synthetic zeolites. The natural occurring zeolites include gmelinite, clinoptilolite, chabazite, dec~iardite, faujasite, heulandite, erionite, anal-cite, levynite, sodalite, cancrinite, nepheline, lcyurite, scolicite, natrolite, offertite, mesolite, mordenite, brewster-ite, ferrierite, and the like. Suitable synthetic zeolites include zeolites Y, ~, L, ZK-4B, B, E, ~, H, J, M, Q, T, W, X, Z, ZSM-types, alpha, beta and omega. The term "zeolites" as used herein contemplates not only aluminosilicates but sub-stances in which the aluminum is replaced by gallium and sub-stances in which the silicon is replaced by germanium and also the so called pillared clays more recently introduced.
The zeolite materials utilized in the preferred embodiments of this invention are synthetic faujasites which possess silica to alumina ratios inthe range from about 2.5 to 7.0, preferably 3.0 to 6.0 and most preferably 4.5 to ~0/ Synthetic fauja-sites are widely known crystalline aluminosilicate ~eolites and common examples of synthetic faujasites are the X and Y types commercially available from the Davison Division W. R. Grace and Company and the Linde ~ivision of Union Carbon Corporation.
The ultrastable hydrogen exchanged zeolites, such as Z-14XS and ~
Z-14US from Davison, are also particularly suitable. In addi-tion to faujasites, other preferred types of zeolitic materials are mordenite and erionite.
The preferred synthetic faujasite is zeolite Y which may he prepared as described in U. S Patent No 3,130,007 and U. S, Patent No, 4,~10,116, ref-erence. The aluminosilicates of this latter patent have high silica (SiO2) to alumina (A12O3) molar ratios, preferably above 4, to give high thermal stability.
The following is an example of a zeolite produced by the sili-cation of clay. A reaction composition is produced from a mix-ture of sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, and sodium chloride formulated to contain 5.27 mole percent SiO2, i 5 mole percent Na2O, 1.7 mole percent chloride and the balance water. 12.6 parts of this solution are mixed with 1 part by weight of cal-cined kaolin clay. The reaction mixture is held at about 60F ,~
to 75F for a period of about four days. After this low tem-perature digestion step, the mixture is heated with live steam ;, to about 190F until crystallization of the material is com-plete, for example, about 72 hours. The crystalline material : ¦
is filtered and washed to give a silicated clay zeolite having -a silica to alumina ratio of about 4.3 and containing about about 13.5 percent by weight of Na2O on a volatile free basis.
Variation of the components and of the times and temperatures~
as is usual in commercial operatians, will produce zeolite hav-ing silica to alumina mole ratios varying from about 4 to about 5. Mole ratios above 5 may be obtained by increasing the amount of SiO2 in the reaction mixutre. The sodium form of the 5 zeolite is then exchanged with polyvalent cations to reduce 1~3~
the Na2O content to less than about 5 percent by weight, and preferably less than 1.0 percent by weight. Procedures for removing alkali metals and putting the zeolite in the proper form are well-known in the art as described in a. s. Patent ~os. 3,293,192; 3,402,996; 3,446,727; 3,449,070; and 3,537,816;
The zeolites and/or the metal additive can be suitably dispersed in matrix materials for use as cracking catalysts by methods well-known in the art, such as those disclosed, for example, in ~. S. Patent Nos. 3,140,249 and 3,140,253 to Plank, et al.; U. S. Patent No. 3,660,274 to Blazek, et al.; U. S. ¦~
- 15 Patent No. 4,010,116 to Secor, et al.; U. S. Patent No;
3,944,482 to Mitchell, et al.; and U. S. Patent No. 4,079,019 to Scherzer, et al.;
!
The amount of zeolitic material dispersed in the matrix based on the final fired product should be at least about 10 weight percent, preferably in the range of about 25 to 50 weight per- ¦
cent, most preferably about 35 to 45 weight percent.
Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites exhibit acidi~ sites on both interior and exterior surface with the largest proportion to total surface area and cracking sites being internal to the particles within the crystalline micropores. These zeolites are usually crystallized as regularly shaped, discreet parti-cles of approximtely 0.1 to 10 microns in size and, according-3~ ly, this is the size range normally provided by commercial ; - 32 -, .
~A.
1~379Z
catalyst suppliers. To increase exterior (portal) sur~ace area, the particle size of the zeolites for the present inven-tion should preferably be in the range of less than 0.1 to 1 micron and more preferably in the range of less than 0.1 micron. The preferred zeolites are thermally stabilized with hydrogen and/or rare earth ions and are steam stable to about 1,650F.
An example of the effectiveness of the metals of this invention to immobili~e vanadium and reduce its destructiveness towards the crystallinity of the zeolite structure is shown in Table 6.
A standard FCC catalyst was steamed with and without vanadia, as shown in Run l and 2. The presence of vanadium reduces the zeolite content from an intensity of 9.4 down to 3:1~ Runs 3 and 4 illustrate the effectiveness of titania and the need for the titania to be present as the vanadia is being deposited on the catalyst. As shown in runs 4, the titanium and vanadium are deposited as organo-metallics, oxidized to remove th hydro-carbon portion of the organo-metallic compound and oxidize the elements to their corresponding oxides. This is then followed by steaming at 1450F - 5 hrs. During the oxidation and steam-ing, the titanium is present in at least a one to one ratio for the formation of titanium vanadate which is a high melting solid (see Ta~le A).
~1~379Z
TA3L _ St ing Performed at 1450F - 5 Hrs.
V as Vanadium Naphthenate Ti as Tripropyltitanate 5Standard Catalyst V Ti Ti Zeolite Run # ppm ppm Addition Intensity 1 0 0 - ~.4
~ACKGRO~ND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to an improved catalyst, one or more methods for its preparation, one or more methods for treatment, and a process for its use in the conversion of reduced crude or crude oil to liquid transportation and/or heating fuels. ~ore particularly, the invention is related to a catalyst composi-tion comprising a catalytically active crystalline alumino-silicate zeolite uniformly dispersed within a matrix containing a metal additive as a select metal, its oxide or salts to immo-bilize the vanadium oxide deposited on the catalyst during pro-cessing. A further embodiment of this invention is the addi-tion of the metal additive for vanadia immobilization during catalyst manufacture, after spray drying by impregnation, or at any point in the reduced crude processing cycle.
The introduction of catalytic cracking to the petroleum indus-try in the 1930's constituted a major advance over previous techniques with the object to inçrease the yield of gasoline and its quality. Early fixed bed, moving bed, and fluid bed catalytic cracking FCC processes employed vacuum gas oils ~VGO) from crude so~rces that were considered sweet and liyht. The terminology o~ sweet refers to low sulfur content and light refers to the amount of material boiling below approximately 1, 000--1, 025F .
The catalysts employed in early homogeneous fluid dense beds were of an amorphous siliceous material, prepared synthetically ,' ~
1~37~12 or from naturally occurring materials activated by acid leach ing.Tremendous strides were made in the 1950's in FCC technol-ogy as to metallurgy, processing equipment, regeneration and new more-active and more stable amorphous catalysts. However, increasing de~and with respect to quantity of gasoline and increased octane number requirements to satisfy the new high horsepower high compression engines being promoted by the auto industry, put extreme pressure on the petroleum industry to increase FCC capacity and severity of operation.
A major breakthrough in FCC catalysts came in the early 1960's, with the introduction of molecular sieves or zeolites, which were incorporated into the matrix of amorphous and/or amor--phous/kaolin materials constituting the FCC catalysts of that time. These new zeolitic catalysts, containing a crystalline alumino-silicate zeolite in an amorphous, amorphous/kaolin, matrix of silica, alumina, silica-alumina, kaolin, etc. were at least i,000-10,000 times more active for cracking hydrocarbons than the earlier amorphous, amorphous/kaolin containing silica-alumina catalysts. This introduction of zeolitic crackingcatalysts revolutioni~ed the ~luid catalytic cracking process.
New innovations were developed to handle these high activities, such as riser cracking, shortened contact times, new regenera-tion processes, new improved zeolitic catalyst developments,etc.
The overall result (economic) of these zeolitic catalyst devel-opments was to give the petroleum industry the capability 1~3~;'92 of greatly increasing throughp~lt of feedstock with increased conversion and selectivity while employing the same units with out expansion and without requiring new unit construction.
The newer catalyst developments revolved around the development of various ~eolites such as type X, Y, faujasite; increased thermal steam stability through the inclusion of rare earth ions or ammonium via ion-exchange techniques and the develop-ment of more attrition resistant matrices.
10After the introduction of zeolitic containin~ catalysts the petroleum industry began to suffer from crude availability as to quantity and quality accompanied by increasing demand for gasoline with increasing octane value. The world crude supply picture changed in the late 1960's - early 1970's. From a sur-plus of light-sweet crudes the supply situation changed to a tighter supply with an ever increasing amount of heavier crudes with higher sulfur contents. These heavier and high sulfur crudes presented processing problems to the petroleum refiner in that these heavier crudes invariably also contained much higher metals and Conradson carbon values, with accompanying significan~ly increased asphaltic content.
Practionation of the total crude to yield cat cracker charge stocks also required much better control to ensure that metals and Conradson carbon values were not carried overhead to con-taminate the FCC charge stock.
The effects of metals and Conradson carbon on a ~eolitic _ 5 _ 1~ ~379Z
containing FCC catalyst have been described in the litera~ure as to their highly unfavorable effect in lowering catalyst activity and selectivity for gasoline production and their equally harmful effect on catalyst life. In particular, we S have shown that vanadia, at high concentrations in the feed, is especially detrimental to catalyst life.
As mentioned previously, these heavier crude oils also contained more of the heavier fractions and yielded less or a lower volume of the high quality FCC charge stocks which norm-ally boils below 1025F, and usually is so processed, as to contain metal contents below 1 ppm, preferably 0.1 ppm and Conradson carbon values substantially below 1.
With this increasing supply of heavier crudes, which meant lowered yields of gasoline and the increasing demand for liquid transportation fuels, the petroleum industry began a search for processing schemes to utilize these heavier crudes in producing gasoline. Most of these processing schemes have been described in the literature. These include Gulf's Gulfining and Union Oil Unifining processes for ~reating residuum, UOP's Aurabon process, Hydrocarbon Research's H Oil process, Ex~on's Flexicoking process to produce thermal gasoline and coke, H-Oil's Dynacracking and Phillip's Heavy Oil Cracking (HOC).
These processes utilize thermal cracking or hydrotreating fol-lowed by FCC or hydrocracking operations to handle the higher content of metals (Ni-V-Fe-Cu-Na) and high Conradson carbon values of 5-15~ Some of the drawbacks of this type of 1~83~9;2 processing are as follows: Coking yields thermally cracked gasoline which has a much lower octane value than cat cracked gasoline and is unstable due to the production of gum from diolefins and requires further hydrotreating and reforming to produce high octane product; gas oil quality is degraded due to thermal reactions to produce a product containing refractory polynuclear aromatics, high Conradson carbons are highly unsuitable in catalytic cracking; hydrotreating requires expen-sive high pressure hydrogen, special alloy multi-reactor sys-tem, costly operations, and a separate costly facility for the production of hydrogen.
To better understand the reasons why the industry has progressed along thé processing schemes described, one must understand the known and established effects of contaminant metals (Ni-V-Fe-Cu-Na) and Conradson carbon on the zeolitic containing cracking catalysts and the operating parameters of a FCC unit. Metal content and Conradson carbon are two very effective restraints on the operation of a FCC unit or a Reduced Crude Conversion unit towards obtaining maximum conver-sion, selectivity and life. As metals and Conradson carbon incre~se, the operating capacity and efficiency of a FCC unit is greatly and final.ly adversely affected or made impossible, although there is enough hydrogen in the feed to produce only toluene and pentane, if a highly selective catalyst could be devised. ~
3'79;i~
The effect of increasing Conradson carbon is to increase that portion of the feedstock converted to carbon deposited on the catalyst. In typical VGO operations employing a ~eolite con-taining catalyst in a FCC unit, the amount of coke deposited on the catalyst averages around about 4-S wt~ of feed. This coke production has been attributed to four different coking mechan-isms, namely, contaminant coke (from metal deposits), catalytic coke (acid site cracking), entrained hydrocarbons (pore struc-ture adsorption - poor stripping) and Conradson carbon. In the case of processing higher boiling fractions, e.g., reduced crudes, residual fractions, topped crude, etc., the coke pro-duction based on feed is the summation of the four types pres-ent in VGO processing plus the higher Conradson carbon value, higher boiling unstrippable hydrocarbons and coke associated with high nitrogen containing molecules which irreversibly adsorb on the catalyst. Thus, coke production on clean catal-yst, when processing reduced crudes, is approximately 4 wt%plus the Conradson carbon value of the feedstock. Thus, there has been postulated, two other types of coke formers present in reduced crudes in addition to the four present in VGO andthey are: 1) adsorbed and absorbed high boiling hydrocarbons not r~moved by nor~al-efficient stripping and, 2) high molecular weight nitrogen containing hydrocarbon compounds adsorbed on the catalyse's acid sites. Both of thse two new types of cok-ing producing phenomena add greatly to the complexity of residprocessing.
-The spent co~ed catalyst i9 brought back to equilibrium activ-ity by burning off the deactivating coke in a regeneration zone in the presence of air and recycled back to the reaction 20ne.
The heat generated during regeneration is removed by the catal-yst and carried to the reaction zone for vaporization of thefeed and to provide heat for the endothermic nature of the cracking reaction. The temperature in the regenerator is norm-ally limited because of metallurgy limitations and the thermal-steam stability of the catalyst.
The thermal-steam stability of the zeolite containing catalyst is determined by the temperature and steam partial pressure at which the zeolite begins to rapidly lose its crystalline struc-ture to yield a low activity amorphous material. The presence of steam is highly critical and is generated by the burning of adsorbed carboneceous material which has a high hydrogen con-tent. This carboneceous material is principally the high boil-ing adsorbed hydrocarbons with boiling points as high as 1500-1700F or above that have a modest hydrogen content and the high boiling nitrogen containing hydrocarbons as well as rela-ted porphyrins and asphaltenes.
As the Conradson carbon value of the feedstock increases, coke production increases and this increased load will raise the regeneration temperature; thus the unit is limited as to the amount of feed that can be processed, due to the Conradson car-bon content. Earlier VGO units opera~ed with the regenerator at 1150-1250F. A new development in reduced crude processing, _ 9 _ ~83~79Z
namely, Ashland Oil's "Reduced Crude Conversion Process" (pend-eanadian Patent 1,168,176 can operate at regenerator tem-peratures in the range of 1350-1400F. But even these higher regenerator temperatures place a limit on the Conradson carbon value of the feed at approxirnately 8. This level is control-ling unless considerable water is introduced to further control temperature, which addition is practiced in the RCC process.
.. l The metal containing fractions of reduced crudes contain Ni-V-~e-Cu, present in porphyrins and asphaltenes. These metal containing hydrocarbons are deposited on the catalyst during processing and are cracked in the riser to deposit the metal or i carried over by the spent catalyst as the metallo-porphyrin or asphaltene and converted to the metal oxide during regenera tion. The adverse effects of these metals as taught in the literature are to cause non-selective or degradative cracking 1, and dehydrogenation to produce increased coke and light gases such as hydrogen, methane and ethane which affects selectlvity, resulting in and poor yield and ~uality of gasoline and light cycle oil. The increased production of light gases, while impairing the yield and selectivity structure of the process, i also puts an increased demand on compressor capacity. The ¦
increase in coke production, in addition to its negative impact on yield, also affects catalyst activity-selectivity, greatly increases regenerator air demand and compressor capacity and ~I
uncontrollable and dangerous regenerator temperature. ~ 1, .. ~
, These problems of the prior art have been greatly minimized by the development at Ashland Oil, Inc, of the Reduced Crude Conversion Process, see Canadian Paten-ts 1,167,793 & 1,16~,176 094~ 6. This new process can handle reduced crudes or crude oils containing high metals and Conradson carbon values previ-ously not susceptible to direct processing. Normally, these cr~des require e~pensive vacuum distillation to isolate suit-able feedstocks, and producing as a by product, high sulfur containing vacu~;m still bottoms. The RCC process avoids all of Ithis.
It was early noted that reduced crudes with high nickel to vanadium levels presented less problems as to catalyst deac-tivation at high metal on catalyst contents, e.g., 5,000-10,000 ppm, at elevated regenerator temperatures. However, when reduced crudes ~ith high vanadium to nickel levels are !
2Q processed over zeolite containing catalysts, especially at high - vanadium levels on the catalyst, rapid deactivation of the zeo-lite containing catalyst is noted. This deactivation manifests i itself as a rapid loss of the zeolite structure at vanadium levels, above 5,000 ppm approaching 10,000 ppm at elevated regenerator temperatures. Published accounts report that it is impossible to operate at vanadium levels higher than 10,000 ppm because of this factor. To date, this rapid vanadium deactiva-tion at high vanadium levels has only been retarded by lowering regenerator tempertures and increasing the addition rate of virgin catalyst. ,j ., , , J
;3~79;~:
SU~IMARY OF THt~ INVENTION
____ The problems of the prior art are now overcome in a process employing the catalyst and select metal additive of this inven-tion which allows the processing of a reduced crude or crude oil of high metals - high vanadium to nickel ratio and Conradson carbon value. A reduced crude or crude oil having a high metal and Conradson carbon value is contacted with a zeo-litic containlng catalyst of high area at tempertures above about 950F. Residence time of the oil in the riser is below 5 seconds, preferably 0.5 - 2 seconds. The particle size of the catalyst is approximately 20 to 150 microns in size to ensure adequate fluidization properties.
The reduced crude - crude oil is introduced at the bottom of the riser and contacts the catalyst at a temperature of 1200-1400F to yield a temperature at the exit of the riser in the reactor vessel of approximately 950-1100"F. Along with the reduced crude or crude oil, water, steamV naphtha, flue gas, etc., may be introduced to aid in vaporiz.ation and act as a lift gas to control residence time and provides other benefits described in Canadian Patent 1,168,176.
Spent catalyst is rapidly separated from the hydrocarbon vapors at the exit of the riser by employing the vented riser concept developed by Ashland Oil, Inc. U. S. Patent No. 4,066,533.
During the coursl~ of the reaction in the riser, the metai and Conradson carbon compounds are deposited on the catalyst.
; - 12 -.
379~
After separation in the vented riser, the spent catalyst is deposited as a dense but fluffed bed at the bottom of the reac-tor vessel, t~ansferred to a stripper and then to the regenera-tion zone. The spent catalyts is contacted with an oxygen con-taining gas to remove the carboneous material through combus-tion to carbon oxides to yield a regenerated catalyst contain-ing less than 0.1 wt~ carbon, preferably less than 0.05 wt%
carbon. The regenerated catalyst is then recycled to the bot-tom of the riser where it again joins high metal and Conradson carbon containing feed to repeat the cycle.
At the elevated temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone, the vanadium deposited on the catalyst is converted to vanadium oxides, in particular, vanadium pentoxide. The melt-ing point of vanadium pentoxide is much lower than temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone. Thus, it can become mobile, flow across the catalyst surface, cause pore plugging, particle coalascence, and more importantly, enter the pores of the zeolite, where our studies have shown that it catalyzes irreversible crystalline collapse to an amorphous material.
This application describes a new approach to offsetting the adverse effect of vanadium pentoxide by the incorporation of select metals, metal oxides or their salts into the catalyst - matrix during manuracture, by impregnation techniques after spray drying, or added during processing at select points in the unit to affect vanadium immobilization through compound or ~18,37~Z
complex formation. These compound~s or complexes of vanadia with metal additives, serve to immobilize vanadia by creating high melting point complexes or compounds of vanadia which are higher than the temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone.
1~379Z
DESC~IPTION OF PREFFRRED EM~ODIMENTS
The select catalysts of this invention will include solids of high catalytic activity such as zeolites in a matrix of clays, kaolin, silica, alumina, smectites, and other 2-layere~1 lamel-lar silicates, silica-alumina, etc. The surface area of these catalysts would preferably be above l00 m2/g, have a pore volume in excess of 0.2 cc/g and a micro-activity or conversion value as measured by the ASTM test method No. D3907-80 of at least or greater than 60, and preferably above 65.
To an aqueous slurry of the raw matrix matrix material and zeo-lite is mixed the metal additive to yield approximately 1-20 wt% concentration on the finished catalyst. The metal additlve can be added in the form of a water soluble compound such as the nitrate, halide, sulfate, carbonate, etc., and/or as the oxide or hydrous gel. This mixture is spray dried to yield the finished promoted catalyst as a microspherical particle of l0-200 microns in size with the active metal additive depositedwithin the matrix and/or the outer surface of the catalyst par-ticle. Since the concentration of vanadia on the spent catal-yst can be as high as ~ wt3 of particle weight, the concentra-tion of metal additive will be in the range of 1-6 wt~ as the metal element to maintain at least a one to one atomic ratio of vanadium to metal additive at all times. The catal~st can be impregnated with the metal additive after spray drying, employ-ing techniques well ~nown in the art, or as metioned above, an active gelatinous precipitate, such as titania or zirconia gel, ., I
1~;379Z
or other gels can be added to the matrix gel prior to spr~y drying.
It is not proposed to define the exact mechanism for the immo bilization of vanadia but the metal additives of this invention will form compounds or complexes with vanadia that have higher melting points than the temperatures encountered in the regen-eration zone. The one to one atomic ratio was chosen as mini-mum, although initially, the metal additive may be considerably above this ratio if it is incorporated in the catalyst prior touse, after which the ratio of additive to vanadia will decrease as vanadia is deposited on the catalyst. Thus, at this one to one ratio (50~ vanadium - 50~ metal additive) the melting point of the binary reaction product is generally well above operat-ing conditions. Alternatively, the metal additive may be addedat the same rate as the metal content of the feed to maintain a one to one atomic ratio. This experimental approach was employed as a practical matter to uncover and confirm suitable metals - metal oxides which can form binary reaction mixtures with vanadium pentoxide so as to yeild a solid compound that has a melting point of approximately 1800F or higher at this one to one ratio. Search for this high melting point reaction product was initiated to help ensure that vanadia would not melt, flow and enter the zeolite cage structure to cau~e destruction of the zeolite's crystalline structure as previous-ly described. The metal-metal oxides of this invention include -the following yroups and their active elements from the Pericdic chart of the elements:
,;
~1~i379~:
M.P. of 1/1 Mixture - F
Group IIA Mg, Ca, Sr, ~a 1740-1900 Group IIIB Sc, Y, La lB00-2100 Group IVB Ti, Zr, H 1700-2000 Group VB Nb, Ta lB00-2000 Group VII~ Mn 1750 Group VIII Fe, Co, Ni 1600-1800 Group IIIA In, Tl 1800 Group VA Bi 1800 Group VIA Te 1500 Lanthanide Series Ce, Pr, etc. 2100 Actinide Series Th, U, etc.
The reaction of the metal additive with vanadia generally yields a binary reaction mixture. This invention also recog-nizes that mixtures of these additive metals with vanadia can occur to form high melting ternary and quaternary reaction mix-tures, e.g., Barium vanadium titanate, and in addition, these ternary and quaternary reaction mixtures can occur with metals not covered in the Groups above. Further, in this invention we have covered the lower oxidation states of vanadium as well as vanadium pentoxide. However, in processing a sulfur containing feed and regeneration in the presence of an oxygen containing gas vanadium will also iikely form such compounds as vanadium sulfides, sulfates, and oxysulfides which can also form binary, ternary, etc., reaction mixtures with the metal additives of this invention as mixed oxides and sulfides.
If the metal additive is not added to the catalyst during manufacuture then it can be added by impregnation technques to the spray dried microspherical catalyst particles. In , ~ .
addition, the ~etal additive can be added as an aqueous o~
hydrocarbon solution or volatile compound during the processing cycle at any point of catalyst travel in the processing unit.
This would include but not be limited to addition of an aqueous solution of the inorganic metal salt or a hydrocarbon solution of organo-metallic compounds at the riser wye 17, along the riser length 4, the dense bed 9 in the reactor vessel 5, strip-per 10 and 15, regenerator inlet 14, regenerator dense bed 12, or regenerated catalyst standpipe 16.
The selective catalyst of this invention with or without the metal additive is charged to a Reduced Crude Conversion (RCC) type unit as autlined in Figure 1. Catalyst particle circula-tion and operating parameters are brought up to process condi-tions by methods well ~nown to those skilled in the art. The equilibrium catalyst at a emperature of 1100-1400F conta~ts the reduced crude of high metals and Conradson carbon values at riser wye 170 The reduced crude can contain steam and/or flue gas injected at point 2, water and/or naphtha injected at point 3 to aid in vaporization, catalyst fluidization, and control-ling contact time in riser 4. The catalyst and vaporous hydro-carbons travel up riser 4 at a contact time of 0.5-5 seconds, preferably 1-2 seconds. The catalyst and vaporous hydrocarbons are separated in vented riser outlet 6 at a final rection tem-perature of 950-1100F. The vaporous hydrocarbons are trans-ferred to cyclone 7 where any entrained catalyst fines are separated and the hydrocarbon vapors are sent to the fractiona-tor via transfer line 8. The spent catalyst is then l~L~37~Z
transferred to stripper lO for removal of entrained hydrocarbon vapors and then to regenerator vessel 11 to form dense bed 12.
An oxygen containing gas such as air is admitted to the bottom of dense bed 12 in vessel ll to combust the coke to carbon oxides. The resulting flue gas i5 processed through cyclones and exits from regenerator vessel ll via line 13. The regen-erated catalyst is transferred to stripper 15 to remove any entrained combustion gases and then transferred to riser wye l~
via line 16 to repeat the cycle.
At such time that the metal level on the catalyst becomes intolerably high such that catalyst activity and selectivity declines, additional catalyst can be added and the deactivated catalyst withdrawn at addition-withdrawal poin~ 18 into dense bed 12 and at addition-withdrawal point 19 into regenerated catalyst standpipe 16. Additions point 18 and 19 can also be utili~ed to add metal additive promoted catalyst. In the case of a non-promoted catalyst, the metal additive as an aqueous solution or an organo-metallic compound in aqueous or hydrocar-bon solvents can be added at addition points 18 and l9 as well as at addition points 2 and 3 on feed line l, addition point 20 in riser 4, addition point 21 to the bottom of vessel 5 intodense bed 9. The addition of the metal additive is not limited to these locations but can be practiced at any point in the reduced crude - catalyst processing cycle.
The regenerator vessel, as illustrated in Figure 1, is a simple one zone-dense bed type. The regenerator section is not limi-ted to this example but can exist of two or more zones, stacked or side by side arrangement, with internal and/or external eir-eulation transfer lines from zone to zone.
In some of the previous reduced crude proeesses, aceeptable eatalyst life and seleetivity eould be obtained with redueed erude feedstocks eontaining low levels of metal contamination, and having a high niekel to vanadium ratios. However, as the vanadium content on the eatalyst inereased or with high vana-dium to niekel ratio reduced crude catalyst activity and selee-tivity decrease rapidly and can only be corrected by economi-cally unacceptable increased catalyst addition rates. Having thus described the observed detrimental effects of vanadium and nickel, the catalyst, metal additive promoters and process of this inven~ion, the following examples are provided to illu-strate the effeet of vanadia flowing and eausing eatalyst deae~
tivation through destruetion of the zeolite's erystalline strueture and steps taken to prevent its occurenee.
37~Z
EXAr~!PLES
The determination that vanadia deposited on a fluid catalytic cracking catalyst would, under the conditions of elevated tem-peratures in the regenerator zone, enter the zeolite and catalyze the destruction of its crystalline structure to the less active amorphous material, with subsequent low activity and selectivity, was noted in our reduced crude demonstration unit.
This phenomenum was then evaluated in the laboratory by depos-iting vanadium and nickel, singly on a specially chosen canadi-date catalyst to study its resistance to severe thermal and steaming conditions. As noted in Figure 2 through S, and Tables l and 2, the overall effect of nickel is to neutralize acid sites, and increase coke and gas production but little or no destruction of the zeolite crystalline cage structure was observed. Vanadium on the other hand, was irreversibly destruc-tive. At suitably severe conditions, as the vanadia content was increased, zeolite content decreased proportionally to the point that at approximately the l wt% vanadium level the zeo~
lite crystalline structure was completely destroyed after 5 hours at 1450F in steam leading to a completely deactivated catalyst.
The determination that vanadia deposited on a catalyst would flow and cause coalescence between catalyst particles at regen-erator temperatures, and what elements and their salts would prevent this processs were studled by three methods; namely, the clumping or lump formation technique, vanadia diffusion from or eompound formation with a metal additive in a alumina-ceramic crucible, and through speetroscopie studies and differ-ential thermal analyses of vanadia-metal additive mixtures.
CLUMPING TES_ A elay, spray dried to yield microspherical particles in 20-150 micron size, had vanadia deposited upon it in varying concen-trations. The clay, free of vanadia, and those containing varying vanadia coneentrations were plaeed in individual eeramic crucibles and ealcined at 1400F in air for two hours.
At the end of this time period the erueibles were withdrawn from the muffle furnace and eooled to room temperature. The surfaee texture and flow eharaeteristies of these samples were noted and the results are reported in Table 3.
V25 Surfaee 25Concentration - ppm Texture Flow Charaeteri ties 0 Free Free flowing 1,000-5,000 Surface Clumped Broke erust-free flowing 5,000-20,000Sur~aee Clumped Total elumping-no flow As shown in Table 3, the elay free of vanadia does not form any erust or elumps or fused partieles at temperatures eneountered in the regenerator seetion of the proeess deseribed in this "
79~
invention. At vanadia concentrations above 5,000 ppm the clay begins to clump and bind badly and does not flow at all.
While liquid at operating temperature, manifestation of this phenomenum is demonstrated by the finding that solidlfication point in a crucible, or the operating unit is cooled down in order to facilitate entrance to the unit for cleaning out plugged diplegs and other repairs. This phenomenum also makes a turn-around timely and complex, as this material must be chipped out.
3 1~3 ~92 CR~CI3LE DIFF~SION - COMPO~ND FORMATION
.
An extension of the clumping test is the use of a ceramic-alumina crucible to determine whether vanadia react with given metal additive.If vanadia does not react with the metal addi-tive or only a small amount of compound formation occurs, thenthe vanadia has been observed to diffuse through and over the porous alumina walls and deposit as a yellowish to orange deposit on the outside wall of the crucible. On the other hand, when compound formation occurs, there is little or no vanadia deposits on the outside of the crucible wall. Two ser-ies of tests were performed. In the first series shown in Table 4, a 1/1 mixture by weight of vanadia pentoxide and the metal additive waS placed in the crucible and heated to 1500F in air for 12 hours. Compound formation or vanadia diffusion was noted.
1 Par~ V2O5 + 1 Part Metal Additive 1500F - Air - 12 Hours Diffusion ofCompound Metal Additive _ adium Formation Titania No Yes Manganese Acetate No Yes 3~ Lanthanum Oxide No Yes Alumina Yes No Barium Acetate No Yes Copper Oxide Yes Partial ~379~
In the second series of tests a vanadia contalning material was tested in a similar manner. A one to one ratio by weight of the vanadia containing material and the metal additive were heated to 15003F in air for 12 hours. The results are shown in Table 5.
l Part V2O5 - Catalyst ~ 1 Part Metal Additive 1500F - Air 12 Hours Vanadia Metal Particle Concentration, ppm Additive Formation 24,000 None Yes l524,000 Calcium Oxide No 24,000 Magnesium Oxide No 24,000 Manganese Oxide No The study of the capability of certain elements to immobilize vanadium pentoxide was extended to DuPont differential thermal analyses (DTA), X-ray diffraction (XRD~ and scanning electron microscope tSEM) instruments. The meta:L additives studied on the DTA showed that titania, barium oxide, calcium oxide, iron oxide and indium oxide all were excellent additives for the formation of high melting metal vanadates, with melting points of 1800F or higher. Copper and manganese gave intermediate results with compounds melting at approximately 1500P. Poor results were obtained with materials such as lead oxide, molybdena, tin oxide, chromia, zinc oxide, cobalt oxide, cadi-mium oxide and some of the r~re earths.
The material reported and produced in Table 5, namely 24,000 ppm vanadia on clay with no metal additive, was fired at 1500F
and then studied in the SEM. The fused particles initially gave a picture of fused particles. However, as the material was continuously bombarded, the fused particles separated due to the heat generated by the bombarding electrons. One was able to notice the melting and flowing of vanadia with the initial single fused particles separating into two distinct microspher-ical particles.
An example of our XRD work is the identification of the com-pound formed when manganese acetate reacted with vanadium pent-oxide. This compound has been tentatively identified as Mn2V27 ' The matrix material for the catalyst of this invention should possess good hydro-thermal stability. Examples of materials exhibiting relatively stable pore characteristics are alumina, silica-alumina, silica, clays such as kaolin, meta-kaolin, hal-loysite, anauxite, dickite and/or macrit:e, and combinations of these materials. Other clays, such as montmorillonite, may be added to increase the acidity of the matrix. Clay may be used in natural state or thermally modified. The preferred matrix of U. S. Patent No. 3,034,g94 is a semisynthetic combination of clay and silica-alumina. Preferably the clay is mostly a kao-linite and is combined with a synthetic silica-alumina hydrogel or hydrosol. This synthetic component forms preferably about lS to 75 percent, more preferably about 20 to 25 percent, of 379~
the formed catalyst by weight. The proportion of clay is such that the catalyst preferably contains after forming, about 10 to 75 percent, more preferably about 30 to S0 percent, clay by weight. The most preferred composition of the matrix contains approximately twice as much clay as synthetically derived silica-alumina. The synthetically derived silica-alumina should contain 55 to 95 pereent by weight of silica (SiO2), preferably 65 to 85 percent, most preferably about 75 percent.
Although catalysts wherein the gel matrix consists entirely of silica gel are also to be ineluded. After introduetion of the zeolite and/or metal additive, the eomposition is preferably slurried and spray dried to form catalyst mierospheres. The particle size of the spray dried matrix is generally in the range of about 5 to 160 microns, preferably 40 to 80 microns.
Generally speaking, the finished eatalyst will also eontain from 5 to 50% by weight of rare earth or ammonia exehanged sieve of both X or Y variety, preferably about 15-45~ by weight and most preferably 20-40% by weight. To further enhance the eatalyst, rare earth exchanged sieve may be caleined and fur-ther exchanged with rare earth or ammonia to create an excep-tionally stable sieve.
Various processas may be used in preparing the synthetically silica-alumina, sueh as those described in U. S. Patent No.
3,034,994. One of these processe~ involves gelling an alXali metal silicate with an inorganic acid while maintaining the p~
'3L1~3379Z
on the alkaline side. An aqueous solution of an acidic alum~-num salt is then intimately mixed with the silica hydrogel 50 that the aluminum salt solution fills the silica hyclrogel pores. The aluminum is thereafter prscipitated as a hydrous alumina by the addition of an alkaline compound.
As a specific example of this method of preparation, a silica hydrogel is prepared by adding sulfuric acid with vigorous agi-tation and controlled temperature time and concentration condi-tions to a sodium silicate solution. Aluminum sulfate in water is then added to the silica hydrogel with vigorous agitation to fill the gel pores with the aluminum salt solution. An ammoni-um solution is then added to the gel with vigorous agitation toprecipitate the aluminum as hydrous alumina in the pores of the silica hydrogel, after whirh the hydrous gel is processed, for instance, by separating a part of the water on vacuum filters and then drying, or more preferably, by spray drying the hydrous gel to produce microspheres. The dried product is then washed to remove sodium and sulfate ions, either with water or a very weak acid solution. The resulting product is then dried to a low moisture content, usually less than 25 percent by weight, e.g., 10 percent to 20 percent by weight, to provide the finished catalyst product.
The silica hydrogel slurry with or without alumina in hydrous form may be filtered and washed in gel form to affect purifica-tion of the gel by the removal of dissolved salts.
1~371~2 This may enhance the formation of a continous phase in the spray dried microspheric particles. If the slurry is prefil-tered and washed and it is desired to spray dry the filter cake, the latter may be reslurried with enough water to produce a pumpable mixure for spray drying. The spray dried product may then be washed again and given a final drying in the manner previously described.
The metal additives to immobilize vanadia includes the metals, their oxides and salts, or organo-metallic compounds of such metals as Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Sc, Y, La, Ti, Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta, Mn, Fe, In, Tl, Bi, T~, the rare eaths, and the actinide and Lanthanide series of elements. These promoters or metal addi-tives in the metal element state, may be used in concentration ranges from about 0.5 to 20 percent, more preferably about 1 to 5 percent by weight of finished catalyst.
The catalytically active promoter in the preferred catalyst composition is a crystalline aluminosilicate zeolite, commonly known as molecular sieves. Molecular sieves are initially formed as alkali metal aluminosilicates, which are dehydrated forms of crystalline hydrous siliceous zeolites. However, since the alkali form does not have appreciable activity and alkali metal ions are deleterious to cracking processes, the aluminosilicates are ion exchanged to replace sodium with some other ion such as, for example, ammonium and/or rare earth metal ions. The silica and alumina making up the structure of the zeolite are arranged in a definite crystalline pattern ~1~3792 containing a large number of small uniform cavities intercon-nected by smaller uniform channels or pores. The effective size of these pores is usually between about 4A and 12A, The zeolites which can be employed in accordance with this invention include both natural and synthetic zeolites. The natural occurring zeolites include gmelinite, clinoptilolite, chabazite, dec~iardite, faujasite, heulandite, erionite, anal-cite, levynite, sodalite, cancrinite, nepheline, lcyurite, scolicite, natrolite, offertite, mesolite, mordenite, brewster-ite, ferrierite, and the like. Suitable synthetic zeolites include zeolites Y, ~, L, ZK-4B, B, E, ~, H, J, M, Q, T, W, X, Z, ZSM-types, alpha, beta and omega. The term "zeolites" as used herein contemplates not only aluminosilicates but sub-stances in which the aluminum is replaced by gallium and sub-stances in which the silicon is replaced by germanium and also the so called pillared clays more recently introduced.
The zeolite materials utilized in the preferred embodiments of this invention are synthetic faujasites which possess silica to alumina ratios inthe range from about 2.5 to 7.0, preferably 3.0 to 6.0 and most preferably 4.5 to ~0/ Synthetic fauja-sites are widely known crystalline aluminosilicate ~eolites and common examples of synthetic faujasites are the X and Y types commercially available from the Davison Division W. R. Grace and Company and the Linde ~ivision of Union Carbon Corporation.
The ultrastable hydrogen exchanged zeolites, such as Z-14XS and ~
Z-14US from Davison, are also particularly suitable. In addi-tion to faujasites, other preferred types of zeolitic materials are mordenite and erionite.
The preferred synthetic faujasite is zeolite Y which may he prepared as described in U. S Patent No 3,130,007 and U. S, Patent No, 4,~10,116, ref-erence. The aluminosilicates of this latter patent have high silica (SiO2) to alumina (A12O3) molar ratios, preferably above 4, to give high thermal stability.
The following is an example of a zeolite produced by the sili-cation of clay. A reaction composition is produced from a mix-ture of sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, and sodium chloride formulated to contain 5.27 mole percent SiO2, i 5 mole percent Na2O, 1.7 mole percent chloride and the balance water. 12.6 parts of this solution are mixed with 1 part by weight of cal-cined kaolin clay. The reaction mixture is held at about 60F ,~
to 75F for a period of about four days. After this low tem-perature digestion step, the mixture is heated with live steam ;, to about 190F until crystallization of the material is com-plete, for example, about 72 hours. The crystalline material : ¦
is filtered and washed to give a silicated clay zeolite having -a silica to alumina ratio of about 4.3 and containing about about 13.5 percent by weight of Na2O on a volatile free basis.
Variation of the components and of the times and temperatures~
as is usual in commercial operatians, will produce zeolite hav-ing silica to alumina mole ratios varying from about 4 to about 5. Mole ratios above 5 may be obtained by increasing the amount of SiO2 in the reaction mixutre. The sodium form of the 5 zeolite is then exchanged with polyvalent cations to reduce 1~3~
the Na2O content to less than about 5 percent by weight, and preferably less than 1.0 percent by weight. Procedures for removing alkali metals and putting the zeolite in the proper form are well-known in the art as described in a. s. Patent ~os. 3,293,192; 3,402,996; 3,446,727; 3,449,070; and 3,537,816;
The zeolites and/or the metal additive can be suitably dispersed in matrix materials for use as cracking catalysts by methods well-known in the art, such as those disclosed, for example, in ~. S. Patent Nos. 3,140,249 and 3,140,253 to Plank, et al.; U. S. Patent No. 3,660,274 to Blazek, et al.; U. S. ¦~
- 15 Patent No. 4,010,116 to Secor, et al.; U. S. Patent No;
3,944,482 to Mitchell, et al.; and U. S. Patent No. 4,079,019 to Scherzer, et al.;
!
The amount of zeolitic material dispersed in the matrix based on the final fired product should be at least about 10 weight percent, preferably in the range of about 25 to 50 weight per- ¦
cent, most preferably about 35 to 45 weight percent.
Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites exhibit acidi~ sites on both interior and exterior surface with the largest proportion to total surface area and cracking sites being internal to the particles within the crystalline micropores. These zeolites are usually crystallized as regularly shaped, discreet parti-cles of approximtely 0.1 to 10 microns in size and, according-3~ ly, this is the size range normally provided by commercial ; - 32 -, .
~A.
1~379Z
catalyst suppliers. To increase exterior (portal) sur~ace area, the particle size of the zeolites for the present inven-tion should preferably be in the range of less than 0.1 to 1 micron and more preferably in the range of less than 0.1 micron. The preferred zeolites are thermally stabilized with hydrogen and/or rare earth ions and are steam stable to about 1,650F.
An example of the effectiveness of the metals of this invention to immobili~e vanadium and reduce its destructiveness towards the crystallinity of the zeolite structure is shown in Table 6.
A standard FCC catalyst was steamed with and without vanadia, as shown in Run l and 2. The presence of vanadium reduces the zeolite content from an intensity of 9.4 down to 3:1~ Runs 3 and 4 illustrate the effectiveness of titania and the need for the titania to be present as the vanadia is being deposited on the catalyst. As shown in runs 4, the titanium and vanadium are deposited as organo-metallics, oxidized to remove th hydro-carbon portion of the organo-metallic compound and oxidize the elements to their corresponding oxides. This is then followed by steaming at 1450F - 5 hrs. During the oxidation and steam-ing, the titanium is present in at least a one to one ratio for the formation of titanium vanadate which is a high melting solid (see Ta~le A).
~1~379Z
TA3L _ St ing Performed at 1450F - 5 Hrs.
V as Vanadium Naphthenate Ti as Tripropyltitanate 5Standard Catalyst V Ti Ti Zeolite Run # ppm ppm Addition Intensity 1 0 0 - ~.4
2 5500 0 - 3.1
3 5500 5500 Ti added after 3.5 V regeneration
4 .55005500 Ti added with ~.2 V compound Then regenerated
Claims
1) A process for the conversion of reduced crude or crude oil to liquid transportation and light heating oil fuels having a substantial metal and Conradson carbon content, the improvement of which comprises contacting said feedstock with a metal additive promoted catalyst to immobilze vanad-ium compounds, having a catalytic cracking micro-acitivty value of at least 50, preferably above 60, at elevated tem-peratures in a riser fluidized transfer zone followed by rapid separation of the gaseous products and spent catal-yst, subjecting said spent catalyst to regeneration in the presence of an oxygen containing gas, with recycle of the regenerated catalyst to the riser transfer zone for conver-sion of fresh reduced crude or crude oil.
2) The process of Claim 1 wherein the reduced crude or crude oil contains 200 ppm or less of metals consisting of nic-kel vanadium, iron and copper and the Conradson carbon value is 10 wt% or less.
3) The process of Claim 1 wherein the reduced crude or crude oil contains 200 ppm or less of vanadium and the Conradson carbon value is 12 wt% or less.
4) The process of Claim 1 wherein the reduced crude or crude oil contains 100 ppm or less of vanadium and the Conradson carbon value is 10 wt% or less.
5) The process of Claim 1 wherein the reduced crude or crude oil contains 75 ppm or less of vanadium and the Conradson carbon value is 10 wt% or less.
6) The process of Claim 1 wherein said catalyst consists of 10-40 wt% of a crystalline alumino-silicate zeolite dis-persed in an amorphous inert solid oxide matrix containing a metal additive to immobilize vanadium compounds.
7) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive is a water soluble inorganic metal salt or a hydrocarbon soluble organo-metallic compound.
8) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive to immo-bilize vanadium compounds deposited on the catalyst will include the following elements: Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Sc, Y, La, Ti, Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta, Mn, Fe, In, Tl, Bi, Te, the lan-thanide and actinide series of elements.
9) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive can react with vanadium compounds to form binary metal vanadates and their mixtures to form ternary and quaternary compounds or complexes.
10) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive is present in the catalyst in about 1-20 wt%, preferably 1-6 wt% of finished catalyst.
11) The process of Claim 1 wherein the vanadium compounds deposited on the catalyst include vanadium oxides, its sul-fides, sulfites, sulfates and oxysulfides.
12) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive is added to an aqueous slurry of the catalytic ingredients prior to spray drying.
13) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive is added to the spray dried catalyst by impregnation techniques.
14) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive is ion-exchanged into the crystalline alumino-silicate zeolite.
15) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive is util-ized in the preparation of the crystalline silica-metallo zeolite.
16) The process of Claim 1 wherein titanium or zirconium is utilized to prepare a crystalline silica-titanate zeolite or crystalline silica-zirconate zeolite.
17) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive is added as an aqueous solution of the metal salt or a hydrocarbon solution of the organo-metallic species at any point of the reduced crude-catalyst processing cycle.
18) The process of Claim 1 wherein the vanadium concentration on the catalyst ranges from 0.1 to 5 wt% of catalyst weight.
19) The process of Claim 1 wherein the vanadium to nickel ratio in the reduced crude or crude oil ranges from 5/1 down to 1/3.
20) The process of Claim 1 wherein the vanadium proportion of total metal content in the residuum feedstock is greater than fifty percent.
21) The process of Claim 1 wherein the atomic ratio of metal additive being added to the processing cycle is at least 0.5 of the vanaidum present in the feedstock, preferably at least a one to one ratio.
22) The process of Claim 1 wherein the water soluble metal additive is a salt consisting of the halides, nitrates, sulfates, sulfites, carbonates.
23) The process of Claim 1 wherein the hydrocarbon soluble metal additives are alcoholates, esters, phenolates, naphthenates, carboxylates, dienyl sandwich compounds.
24) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive to immo-bilize vanadium compounds is tetraisopropyl titanate.
25) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive to immo-bilize vanadium compounds is titanium tetrachloride.
26) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive to immobilize vanadium compounds is (MMT) 27) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive to immo-bilize vanadium compound is a titanium containing clay.
28) The process of Claim 1 wherein the titanium containing clay is kaolin of at least 1.5 wt% titania content.
29) The process of Claim 1 wherein 0.1 to 20 wt% of the metal additive is incorporated in the pore spray dried gel as a gelatinous precipitate.
30) The process of Claim 1 wherein the metal additive promoted catalyst contains up to 40 wt% of a crystalline alumino-silicate zeolite which can consist of one or more different zeolites.
31) The process of Claim 1 wherein the catalyst composition for processing residual stocks with high metals content con-sisting of silica-alumina, kaolin clay and crystalline alumino-silicate zeolite, which contains in addition 1-5%
titania gel.
32) The process of Claim 1 wherein the catalyst composition for processing residual stocks with high metals content con-sisting of silica or silica alumina, kaolin clay and crys-talline alumino silicate zeolite, which contains in addi-tion 1-5% zirconia gel.
33) The process of Claim 1 wherein the catalyst composition for processing residual stocks with high metals content consis-ting of silica or silica-alumina, kaolin clay and crystal-line alumino-silicate zeolite which contains in addition
1-5% alumina gel.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000399654A CA1183792A (en) | 1982-03-29 | 1982-03-29 | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000399654A CA1183792A (en) | 1982-03-29 | 1982-03-29 | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1183792A true CA1183792A (en) | 1985-03-12 |
Family
ID=4122434
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000399654A Expired CA1183792A (en) | 1982-03-29 | 1982-03-29 | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1183792A (en) |
-
1982
- 1982-03-29 CA CA000399654A patent/CA1183792A/en not_active Expired
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4432890A (en) | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion | |
| CA1175000A (en) | Immobilization of vanadian deposited on sorbent materials during treatment of carbo-metallic oils | |
| US4549958A (en) | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on sorbent materials during treatment of carbo-metallic oils | |
| US4414098A (en) | Upgrading carbo-metallic oils with used catalyst | |
| US4412914A (en) | Endothermic removal of coke deposited on sorbent materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion | |
| EP1220881B1 (en) | Reducing gasoline sulfur in fluid catalytic cracking | |
| GB2341191A (en) | Method for combined fluid catalytic cracking and sulphur content reduction using a metal containing molecular sieve-based catalyst | |
| US4485184A (en) | Trapping of metals deposited on catalytic materials during carbometallic oil conversion | |
| US4588496A (en) | Process for the catalytic cracking of metals-containing feedstocks | |
| US4450241A (en) | Endothermic removal of coke deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion | |
| US4520120A (en) | Vanadium passivation in a hydrocarbon catalytic cracking process | |
| US4425259A (en) | Endothermic removal of coke deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion | |
| EP0074945A1 (en) | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbometallic oil conversion | |
| RU2603964C2 (en) | Improved metal passivator/trap for fcc processes | |
| CA1190879A (en) | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion | |
| US20120118793A1 (en) | Heavy Metal Passivator/Trap for FCC Processes | |
| EP0073874B1 (en) | Immobilisation of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during the conversion of oil that contains coke precursors and heavy metals | |
| JP2000514863A (en) | Catalysts for optimal resid cracking of heavy feedstocks. | |
| EP0271348A2 (en) | A catalytic hydrocarbon conversion process using a strontium-containing colloid system to mitigate adverse effects of metal contaminants | |
| US5174890A (en) | Catalytic cracking using a metals scavenging composition | |
| JP3200072B2 (en) | Binary cracking catalysts showing vanadium passivation and improved sulfur resistance and methods of use thereof | |
| US20050205466A1 (en) | Zn-containing FCC catalyst and use thereof for the reduction of sulfur in gasoline | |
| EP0074349A1 (en) | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on sorbent materials during treatment of carbo-metallic oils | |
| US4750987A (en) | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion | |
| CA1183792A (en) | Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |