CA1174192A - Immobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion - Google Patents

Abstract

IMMOBILIZATION OF VANADIA DEPOSITED
ON CATALYTIC MATERIALS DURING
CARBO-METALLIC OIL CONVERSION
Abstract A process is disclosed for catalytic cracking a hydro-carbon oil feed having a significant vanadium content to produce lighter products. The catalyst, from the cracking step, coated with coke and vanadium in an oxidation state less than +5, is regenerated in the presence of an oxygen-containing gas at a temperature high enough to burn off a portion of the coke under conditions keeping the vanadium in an oxidation state less than +5.

Description

1 1'7 ~1~Z

6117B April 6, 1981 ON CATALYTIC MATERIALS DURING
CARBO-METALLIC OIL CONVERSION
~escription Technical Field This invention relates to processes for converting heavy hydrocarbon oils into lighter fractions, and especial-ly to processes for converting heavy hydrocarbons containing high concentrations of coke precursors and heavy metals into gasoline and other hydrocarbon fuels.
~ackground Art The introduction of catalytic cracking to the petroleum industry in the 1930's constituted a major advance over pre-L5 vious techniques with the object of increasing the yield ofgaseoline and its quality. Early fixed bed, moving bed, and fluid bed catalytic cracking FCC processes employed vacuum gas oils (VGO) from crude sources that were considered sweet and light. The terminology of sweet refers to low sulfur content and light refers to the amount of material boiling below approximately 1000-1025F.
The catalysts employed in early homogenous fluid dense beds were of an amorphous siliceous material, prepared syn-thetically or from naturally occurring materials activated by acid leaching. Tremendous strides were made in the 1950's in FCC technology in the areas of metallurgy, pro-cessing equipment, regeneration and new more-active and more stable amorphous catalysts. ~owever, increasing demand with respect to quantity of gasoline and increased octane number requirements to satisfy the new high horsepower-high com-pression engines being promoted by the auto industry, put extreme pressure on the petroleum industry to increase FCC
capacity and severity of operation.
A major breakthrough in FCC catalysts came ln the early 1960's with the introduction of molec-llar sieves or zeo-lites. These materials were incorporated into the maerix of li74192 amorphouY and/or amorphous/kaolin material~ constituting the FCC catalyst~ of ~hat time. These new zeolitic cata-lyst~, containing a crystalline aluminosilic~te zeolite in an amorphous or amorphous/kaolin matrix of silica, alumina, silica-alumina, kaolin, clay or the like were at least lO00-lO,000 times more active for cracking hydrocarbons than the earlier amorphous or amorphous/kaolin containing silica-alumina catalysts. This introduction of zeolitic cracking catalysts revolutionized the fluid catalytic cracking pro-cess. Innovations were developed to handle these high ac-tivities, such as riser cracking, shortened contact times, new regeneration proce~ses, new improved zeolitic catalyst developments, and the like.
The new catalyst developments revolved around the de-velopment of various zeolites such as synthetic types X andY and naturally occurring faujasites; increased thermal-steam (hydrothermal) stability of zeolites through the in-clu~ion of rare earth ions or ammonium ions via ion-exchange technique~; and the development of more attrition resistant matrices for supporting the zeolites. These zeolitic cata-lyst developments gave the petroleum industry the capability of greatly increasing throughput of feedstock with increased conversion and selectivity while employing the same units without expansion and without requiring new unit construc-tion.
After the introduction of zeolite-containing catalysts the petroleum industry began to suffer from a lack of crude availability as to quantity and quality accompanied by in-creasing demand for gasoline with increasing octane values.
The world crude supply picture changed dramatically in the late 1960's and early 1970's. From a surplus of light, sweet crudes the supply situation changed to a tighter sup-ply with an ever-increasing amount of heavier crudes with higher sulfur contents. These heavier and higher sulfur crudes presented processing problems to the petroleum re-finer in that these heavier crudes invariably also contained much higher metals and Conradson carbon values, with accom-panying significantly increased asphaltic content.
Fractionation of the total crude to yield cat cracker charge stockq also required much better control to ensure that metals and Conradson carbon values were not carried overhead to contaminate the FCC charge stock.
The effects of heavy metals and Conradson carbon on a zeolite-containing FCC catalyst have been described in the literature as to their highly unfavorable effect in lowering catalyst activity and selectivity for gasoline production and their harmful effect on catalyst life.
These heavier crude oils also contained more of the heavier fractions and yielded a lower volume of the high quality FCC charge stocks which normally boil below about 1025F and are usually processed so as to contain total me-tal levels below 1 ppm, preferably below 0.1 ppm, and Con-radson carbon values substantially below 1Ø
With the increasing supply of heavier crudes, Which yield les~ gasoline, and the increasing demand for liquid transportation fuels, the petroleum industry began a search for processes to utilize these heavier crudes in producing gasoline. ~any of these processes have been described in the literature and include Gulf's Gulfining and Union Oii's Unifining processes for treating residuum, UOP's Aurabon process, Hydrocarbon Research's ~-Oil process, Exxon's Flexi-coking process to produce thermal gasoline and coke, H-Oil's Dynacracking and Phillip's Heavy Oil Cracking (HOC) proces-ses. These processes utilize thermal cracking or hydro-treating followed by FCC or hydrocracking operations to han-dle the higher content of metal contaminants (Ni-V-Fe-Cu-Na) and high Conradson carbon values of 5-15. Some of the draw-backs of these types of processing are as follows: coking yields thermally cracked gasoline which has a much lower oc-tane value than cat cracked gasoline, and is unstable due to the production of gum from diolefins, and requires further hydrotreating and reforming to produce a high octane ?ro-~uct; gas oil quality is degraded due to thermal reactions which produce a product containing refractory ?olvnuclear ii741~2 aromatics and high Conradson carbon levels which are highly unsuitable for catalytic cracking: and hydrotreating re-quires expen~ive high pressure hydrogen, multi-reactor sys-tems made of special alloys, costly operations, and a sepa-rate costly facility for the production of hydrogen.
To better understand the reasons why the industry hasprogressed along the processing schemes described, one must understand the known effects of contaminant metals tNi-V-Fe Cu-Na) and Conradson carbon on the zeolite-containing crack-ing catalysts and the operating parameters of an FCC unit.Metal content and Conradson carbon are two very effective restraints on the operation of an FCC unit and may even im-pose undesirable restraints on a Reduced Crude ConverSiOn (RCC) unit from the standpoint of obtaining maximum conver-sion, selectivity and catalyst life. Relatively low levelsof these contaminants are highly detrimental to an FCC unit.
As metals and Conradson carbon levels are increased still further, the operating capacity and efficiency of an RCC
unit may be adversely affected or made uneconomical. These adverse effects occur even through there is enough hydrogen in the feed to produce an ideal gasoline consisting of only toluene and isomeric pentenes (assuming a catalyst with such ideal selectivity could be devised).
The effect of increased Conradson carbon is to increase that portion of the feedstock converted to coke deposited on the catalyst. In typical VGO operations e~ploying a zeolite-containing catalyst in an FCC unit, the amount Or coke de-posited on the catalyst averages around about 4-S wt~ of the feed. This coke production has been atrributed to four dif-ferent coking mechanisms, namely, contaminant coke from ad-verse reactions caused by metal deposits, catalytic coke caused by acid site cracking, entrained hydrocarbons resul-ting from pore structure adsorption and/or poor stripping, and Conradson carbon resulting from pyrolytic distillation of hydrocarbons in the conversion zone. There has been pos-tulated two other sources of coke present in reduced cruces in addition to the four present in VGO. ~hey are: (1) ad-1 1'~"~192 sorbed and absorbed high boiling hydrocarbons which do notvaporize and cannot be removed by normally efficient strip-ping, and (2~ high lecular weight nitrogen-containing hy-drocarbon compounds adsorbed on the catalyst's acid sites.
Both of these two new types of coke producing pheDomena add greatly to the complexity of resid processing. Therefore, in the processing of higher boiling fractions, e.g., re-duced crudes, residual fractions, topped crude, and the like, the coke production based on feed is the sum-ation of the four types present in VGO processing (the Conradson car-bon value generally being much higher than for VGO), plus coke from the higher boiling unstrippable hydrocarbons and coke associated with the high boiling nitrogen-containing molecules which are adsorbed on the catalyst. Coke produc-tion on clean catalyst, when processing reduced crudes, maybe estimated as approximately 4 wt3 of the feed plus the Conradson carbon value of the heavy feedstock.
The coked catalyst is brought back to equilibrium ac-tivity by burning off the deactivating coke in a regenera-tion zone in the presence of air, and the regenerated cata-lyst is recycled back to the reaction zone. The heat gen-erated during regeneration is removed by the catalyst a~d carried to the reaction zone for vaporization of the feed and to provide heat for the endothermic cracking reaction.
The temperature in the regenerator is normally limited be-cause of metallurgical limitations and the hydrothermal sta-bility of the catalyst.
The hydrothermal stability of the zeolite-containing catalyst is determined by the temperature and steam par-tial pressure at which the zeolite begins to rapidly loseits crystalline structure to yield a low-activity amorphous material. The presence of steam is highly critical and is generated by the burning of adsorbed and absorbed (sorbed) carbonaceous material which has a significant hydrogen con-tent (hydrogen to carbon atomic ratios generally greaterthan about 0.5). This carbonaceous material is ?rlnci?ally the high-boiling sorbed hydrocarbons with boillng ?oints as ~17'~1~Z

high as 1500-17000F or above that have a modest hydrogen content and the high boiling nitrogen containing hydro-carbons, as well as related porphyrins and asphaltenes.
The high molecular weight nitrogen compounds usually boil above 1025F and may be either basic or acidic in nature.
The basic nitrogen compounds may neutralize acid sites while those that are more acidic may be attracted to metal sites on the catalyst. The porphyrins and asphaltenes also generally boil above 1025F and may contain elements other than carbon and hydrogen. As used in this specification, the term "heavy hydrscarbons" includes all carbon and hydrogen compounds that do not boil below about 1025F, regardless of the presence of other elements in the compound.
The heavy metals in the feed are generally present as porphyrins and/or asphaltenes. However, certain of these metals, paxticularly iron and copper, may be present as the free metal or as inorganic compounds resulting from either corrosion of process equipment or contaminants from other refining processes.
As the ~onradson carbon value of the feedstock increases, coke production increases and this increased load will raise the reseneration temperature; thus the unit may be limited as to the amount of feed that can be processed because of its Conradson carbon contents. Earlier VGO units operated with the regenerator at 1150-1250 F. A new development in reduced crude processing, namely, Ashland Oil's "Reduced Crude Conversion Process", as described in pending Canadian applications 364,647; 364,655, 364,665, and 364,666, all filed November 14, 1980, can operate at regenerator temperatures in the range of 1350-14000F. But even these higher regenerator temperatures place a limit on the Conradson carbon value of the feed at approximately 8, which represents about 12-13 wt% coke on the catalyst based ~n the weight of feed. This level is controlling unless considerable water is introduced to further control temperature, which addition is also practiced in Ashland's RCC processes.

i~

11'7~ Z

The metal-containing fractions of reduced crudes con-tain Ni-V-Fe-Cu in the form of porphyrins and asphaltenes.
These metal-containing hydrocarbons are deposited on the catalyst during processing and are cracked in the riser to deposit the metal or are carried over by the coked catalyst as the metallo-porphyrin or asphaltene and converted to the metal oxide during regeneration. The adverse effects of these metals as taught in the literature are to cause non-selective or degradative cra~ing and dehydrogenatic,n to produce increased amounts of coke and light gases such as hydrogen, methane and ethane. These mechanisms adversely affect selectivity, resulting in poor yields and cuality of gasoline and light cycle oil. The increased production of light gases, while impairing the yield and selectivity of the process, also puts an increased demand on gas compressor capacity. The increase in coke production, in addition to its negative impact on yield, also adversely affects cata-lyst activity-selectivity, greatly increases regenerator air demand and compressor capacity, and may result in uncon-trollable and/or dangerous regenerator temperatures.
These problems of the prior art have been greatly mini-mized by the development at Ashland Oil, Inc., of its Re-duced Crude Conversion (RCC) Processes described in the co-pending applications reference above and incorporated here-in by reference. The new processes can handle reducedcrudes or crude oils containing high metals and Conradson carbon values previously not susceptible to direct proces-sing-It has long been known that reduced crudes with high nickel levels present serious problems as to catalyst !e-activation at high metal on catalyst contents, e.g., 5000-lO,OOO ppm and elevated regenerator temperatures. It has now been recognized that when reduced crudes with high vana-dium levels are processed over zeolite containing catalvsts, especially at high vanadium levels on the catalyst, ra?id deactivation of the zeolite can occur. ThiC deactiva~ion manifests itself as a loss of zeolitic structure. This loss 117'~192 has been observed at vanadium levels of 1000 ppm by weight or less. This loss of zeolitic structure becomes more ra-pid and severe with increasing levels of vanadium and at vanadium levels about 5000 ppm, particularly at levels ap-proaching 10,000 ppm complete destruction of the zeolite mayoccur. Prior to the present invention, it was believed im-possible to operate economically at vanadium levels higher than 10,000 ppm because of this phenomenon. Previously, de-activation of catalyst by vanadium at vanadium levels of less than lO,000 ppm has been retarded by lowering regenera-tor temperatures and increasing the addition rate of virgin catalyst. Lowering regenerator temperatures has the disad-vantage of requiring higher catalyst to oil ratios which in-crease the amount of coke produced and adversely affect yields. Increasing catalyst addition rates is costly and can result in an uneconomical operation.
It has been found that vanadium is especially detrimen-tal to catalyst life. The vanadium deposited on the cata-lyst under the reducing conditions in the riser is in an oxidation state less than +5. At the elevated temperatures and oxidizing conditions encountered in the regenerator the vanadium on the catalyst is converted to vanadium oxides, in particular vanadium pentoxide. The vanadium pentoxide has a melting point lower than temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone, and it can become a mobile liquid, flow-ing across the catalyst surface and plugging pores. This vanadia may also enter the zeolite structure, neutralizing the acid sites and, more significantly, irreversibly de-stroying the crystalline aluminosilicate structure and form-ing a less active amorphous material. In addition, thismolten vanadia can, at high vanadia levels, especially for catalyst materials having a low surface area, coat the cata-lyst microspheres and thereby coalesce particles which ad-versely affects their fluidization.
Summary of the Invention In accordance with this invention a process has been 117'~192 provided for converting a vanadium-containing hydrocarbon oil feed to lighter product~ comprising th~ steps of con-tacting said oil feed under conversion conditions with a cracking catalyst to form lighter products and coke, whereby vanadium in an oxidation state less than +5 is deposited on said catalyst together with coke. The lighter products are separated from the spent catalyst and the catalyst is re-generated by contacting it with an oxygen-containinq gas under conditions whereby said coke is burned forming CO and CO2 and said vanadium is maintained in an oxidation state less than +5.
This invention, by retaining vanadium in an oxidation state wherein the vanadium has a high melting point, per-mits the recycle of catalyst to levels of vanadium as high as 10,000 ppm, or even 20,000 ppm or 50,000 ppm. The ad-verse effects, such a~ clumping of the catalyst and pore clo-sings brought about by molten pentavalent vanadium, are thus avoided. Inasmuch as the catalyst can withstand a much high-er vanadium loading than previously experienced the amount of make-up catalyst is reduced.
3rief Description of the Drawinqs Figs. l and 2 are schematic designs of catalyst regen-eration and associated cracking apparatus which may be used in carrying out this invention.
3est and Various Other Modes For CarrYing Out the Invention The invention may be carried out by controlling the re-generatisn of the spent, vanadium-containing catalyst using several methods, alone or in combination. The objective of these methods is to retain vanadium in a low oxidation state, either by not exposing the vanadium to oxidizing con-ditions, or by exposing vanadium to oxidizing conditions for 3S too short a time to oxidize a significant amount of vanadium to the +S state.
The concentration of vanadium on the catalyst ?articles 11711~

increases as the catalyst is recycled, and the vanadium on the caialyst introduced into the reactor becomes coated with coke formed in the reactor. In one method of carrying out the invention, the generator conditions are selected to ensure that the concentration of coke is retained at at least a minimum level on the catalyst. This coke may serve either to ensure a reducing environment for the vandium or to provide a barrier to the movement of oxidizing gas to underlying vanadium. The concentration of coke on the catalyst particles is at least about 0.05 percent and the preferred coke concentration is at least about 0.15 percent.
In one method of carrying out this invention, which may be combined with the foregoing method of retaining at least about 0.05 percent coke on the catalyst or may be used to achieve lower concentrations of coke, the regeneration is carried out in an environment which is non-oxidizing for the vanadium in an oxidation state less than +5. This may be accomplished by adding reâucing gases such as, for example, CO or ammonia to the regenerator, or by regenerating under oxygen-deficient conditions. Oxygen-Aeficient regeneration - increases the ratio of CO to CO2 and in this method of pro-viding a non-oxidizing atmosphere the CO/CO2 ratio is at least about 0.25, preferably is at least about 0.3, and most preferably is at least about 0.4. The CO/CO2 ratio may be controlled by controlling the extent of oxygen deficiency within the regenerator.
The CO/CO2 ratio may be increased by providing chlorine in an oxidizing atmosphere within the regenerator, the concentration of chlorine preferably being from about 100 to 400 ppm. This method of increasing the CO/CO2 ratio is disclosed in Canadian application No. 398,960 filed 1 1'7~ 2 - lOa -March 23, 1982 for "Addition of MgC12 to Catalyst" and U.S. Patent No. 4,375,404 for "Addition of Chlorine to Regenerator", both in the name of George D. Myers.
The use of a reducing atmosphere within the regenerator is especially useful in combusting coke in zones where the coke level approaches or is reduced below about 0.05 per-11'7~192 cent, and it is preferred to have a CO/C02 ratio of at leastabout 0.25 in zones where the coke loading is less than about 0.05 percent by weight.
It is especially useful to keep the vanadium in a re-duced state under conditions wherein the particles are in contact or in relatively frequent contact with each other.
Consequently, it is especially contemplated, in carrying out this method, of maintaining a reducing atmosphere in zones within the regenerator wherein the catalyst particles are in a relatively dense bed, such as in a dense fluidized or set-tled bed. A reducing gas such as CO, methane, or ammonia may be added to a zone having a dense catalyst phase, such as for example a bed having a density of about 25 to about 50 pounds per cubic foot.
In another method of carrying out this invention, a ri-ser regenerator is used as one stage in a multi-stage regen-erator to contact the catalyst with an oxidizing atmosphere for a short period of time, such as for example less than about two seconds and preferably less than about one second.
The riser stage of the regenerator has the advantage in re-ducing the carbon concentration to a level less than about 0.15 percent or less than about 0.05 percent, that vanadium, which is no longer protected by a coating of carbon, may not be in an oxidizing atmosphere for a long enough time to form molten +S vanadium. Further, the low density of the parti-cles in the riser-regenerator, minimizes coalescence of those particles which may have liquid pentavalent vanadia on their surfaces.
In the preferred method of using a riser regenerator, the particles are contacted with a reducing atmosphere, such as one containing CO or other reducing gas, after leaving the riser. The particles may then be accumulated, as for example, in a settled bed, before being recycled to contact additional fresh feed. The catalyst particles to be accu-mulated are contacted with a reducing atmosphere, ?referablyimmediately after leaving the riser and before acc~mulat1ng in a dense bed of regenerated particles, and in the ?re-11~7'~
-l2-ferred method of carrying out this process the particles are retained in a reducing atrnosphere within such dense bed, and in the most preferred method a reducing atmosphere is provided for the particles until about the time they are contacted with fresh feed.
The preferred riser regenerator is similar to the vented riser reactor as is disclosed in U . S . Patents 4, 066, 533 and 4, 070 ,159 to Myers et al which achieves ballistic separation of gaseous products from catalyst. This apparatus has the advantages of achieving virtually instantaneous separation of the regenerated catalyst, now containing some vanadia to which any oxygen present would have access, from the oxidizing atmosphere.
In the preferred method of reducing the coke concentration to a level less than about 0 .15 and especially to less than 0 . 05% the catalyst is contacted with a reducing atmosphere, preferably immediately after its separation from the oxidizing atmosphere and most preferably also in collection zones for the regenerated catalyst .
This invention may be used in processing any hydrocarbon feed containing a significant concentration of vanadium, and FCC as well as RCC processes are contemplated. It is, however, especially useful in processing reduced crudes having high metal and high Conradson carbon values, and the invention will be described in detail with respect to its use in processing an RCC feed.
The carbo-metallic feed comprises or is composed of oil which boils above about 650F. Such oil, or at least the 650F+ portion thereof, is characterized by a heavy metal content of at least about 4, preferably more than about 5, and most preferably at least about 5 . 5 ppm of Nickel Equivalents by weight and by a carbon residue on pyrolysis of at least about 1% and more preferably at least about

2% by weight. In accordance with the invention, the carbo-metallic feed, in the form of a pumpable liquid, is brought into contact with hot conversion catalyst in a weight ratio of catalyst to feed in the ranse of about 3 to about 18 and preferably more than about 6.
The feed in said mixture undergoes a conversion step which includes cracking while the mixture of feed and catalyst is flowing through a progressive flow type reactor. The feed, catalyst, and other materials may be introduced at one or more points. The reactor includes an elongated reaction chamber which is at least partly vertical or inclined and in which the feed material, resultant products and catalyst are maintained in con-tact with one another while flowing as a dilute phase or stream for a predetermined riser residence time in the range of about 0.5 to about 10 seconds.
The reaction is conducted at a temper~ture of about 900 to about 1400F, measured at the reaction chamber exit, under a total 2ressure of about 10 to about 50 ?sia (pounds per square inch absolute) under conditions suffi-ciently severe to provide a conversion ?er pass in the range of about S0~ or more and to lay down coke on the catalyst in an amount in the range of about 0.3 to about

3~ by weight and preferably at least about 0.5g. The overall rate of coke production, based on weight of fresh feed, is in the range of about 4 to about 14~ by weight.
At the end of the predetermined residence time, the cata-lyst is separated from the products, is stripped to remove high boiling components and other entrained or adsorbed hydrocarbons and is then regenerated with oxygen-contain-ing combustion-suprorting gas under condi~ions of time, temperature and atmosphere sufficient to reduce the carbon on the regenerated catalyst to about 0.25~ or less.
Depending on how the process of the invention is ?racticed one or more of the following additional advantages may be reali~ed. If desired, and preferably, the process may be 1 1'7~

operated without added hydrogen in the reaction chamber. If desired, and preferably, the process may be operated without prior hydrotreating of the feed and/or without other process of removal of asphaltenes of metals from the feed, and this is true even where 5 the carbo-metallic oil as a whole contains more than about 4, or more than about 5 or even more than about 5 . 5 ppm Nickel Equivalents by weight of heavy metal and has a carbon residue on pyrolysis greater than about 1%, greater than about 1.4% or greater than aboug 2% by weight. Moreover, all of the converter feed, as 10 above described, may be cracked in one and the same conversion chamber. The cracking reaction may be carried out with a catalyst which has previously been used (recycled, except for such replacement as required to compensate for normal losses and deactivation) to crack a carbo-metallic feed under the above 15 described conditions. Heavy hydr-ocarbons not cracked to gasoline in a first pass may be recycled with or without hydrotreating for further cracking in contact with the same kind of feed in which they were first subjected to cracking conditions, and under the same kind of conditions; but operation in a substantially 20 once-through or single pass mode (e . g . less than about 15% by volume of recycle based on volume of fresh feed) is preferred.
Accordirg to one preferred embodiment or aspect of the invention, at the end of the predetermined residence time referred to above, the catalyst is projected in a direction established by the 25 elongated reaction chamber or an extension thereof, while the products, having lesser momentum, are caused to make an abrupt change of direction, resulting in an abrupt, substantially instantaneous ballistic separation of products from catalyst. The thus separated catalyst is then stripped, regenerated and recycled 30 to the reactor as above described.
According to another preferred embodiment or aspect of the invention, the converter feed contains 650F+ materi-t2 al which has nvt been hydrotreated and is characterized in part by containing at least about 5 . 5 parts per million of nickel equivalents of heavy metals. The converter feed is brought together not only with the above mentioned cracking catalyst, but also with additional gaseous material including steam whereby the resultant suspension of catalyst and feed also includes gaseous material wherein the ratio of the partial pressure of the added gaseous material relative to that of the feed is in the range of about 0.25 to about 4Ø The vapor residence time is in the range of about 0. 5 to about 3 10 seconds when practicing this embodiment or aspect of the invention.
This preferred embodiment or aspect and the one referred to in the preceeding paragraph may be used in combination with one another or separately.
According to another preferred embodiment or aspect of the invention, the carbo-metallic feed is not only brought into contact with the catalyst, but also with one or more additional materials including particularly liquid water in a weight ratio raltive to feed ranging from about 0.04 to about 0.25, more preferably about 0.04 to about O . 2 and still more preferably about O . 05 to about O .15 .
Such additional materials, including the liquid water, may be brought into admixture with the feed prior to, during or after mixing the feed with the aforementioned catalyst, and either after or, preferably, before, vaporization of the feed. The feed, catalyst and water (e . g . in the form of liquid water or in the form 25 of steam produced by vaporization of liquid water in contact with the feed) are introduced into the progressive flow type reactor, which may or may not be a reactor embodying the above described ballistic separation, at one or more points along the reactor. While the mixture of feed, catalyst and steam produced by vaporization of 30 the liquid water flows through the reactor, the feed undergoes the above mentioned conversion step which includes cracking. The feed material, catalyst, steam and reasultant products are maintained in contact with one another in the above mentioned elongated reaction chamber while flowing as a dilute phase or stream for the above mentioned predetermined riser residence time which is in the range of about 0.5 to about 10 seconds.
The present invention provides a process for the continuous catalytic conversion of a wide variety of carbo-metallic oils to lower molecular weight products, while maximizing production of highly valuable liquid products, and making it possible, if desired, to avoid vacuum distillation and other expensive treatments such as hydrotreating. The term "oils", includes not only those predominantly hydrocarbon compositions which are liquid at room temperature (i.e., 68F), but also those predominantly hydrocarbon compositions which are asphalts or tars at ambient temperature but liquify when heated to temperatures in the range of up to about 800~. The invention is applicable to carbo-metallic oils, whether of petroleum origin or not. For example, provided they have the requisite boiling range, carbon residue on pyrolysis and heavy metals content, the invention may be applied to the processing of such widely diverse materials as heavy bottoms from crude oil, heavy bitumen crude oil, those crude oils known as "heavy crude"
which approximate the properties of reduced crude, shale oil, tar sand extract, products from coal liquification and solvated coal, atmospheric and vacuum reduced crude, extracts and/or bottoms (raffinate) from solvent de-asphalting, aromatic extract from lube oil refining, tar bottoms, heavy cycle oil, slop oil, other refinery waste streams and mixtures of the foregoing. Such mixtures can for instance be prepared by mixing available hydrocarbon fractions, including oils, tars, pitches and the like. Also, powdered coal may be suspended in the carbo-metallic oil. Persons skilled in the art are aware of techniques for demetalation of carbo-metallic oils, and demetalated oils may be converted using the invention; but it is an advantage of the invention that it can employ as feedstock carbo-metallic oils that have had no prior demetalation treatment. Likewise, the invention can be applied to hydrotreated feedstocks; but it is an advantage of the invention 5 that it can successfully convert carbo-metallic oils which have had substantially no prior hydrotreatment. However, the preferred application of the process is to red~ced crude, i . e ., that fraction of crude oil boiling at and above 650F, alone or in admixture with virgin gas oils. While the use of material that has been subjected 10 to prior vacuum distillation is not excluded, it is an advantage of the invention that it can satisfactorily process material which has had no prior vacuum distillation, thus saving on capital investment and operating costs as compared to conventional FCC processes that require a vacuum distillation unit.
In accordance with the invention one provides a carbo-metallic oil feedstock, at least about 70%, more preferably at least about 85%
and still more preferably about 100% (by volume) of which boils at and above about 650F. All boiling temperatures herein are based on standard atmospheric pressure conditions. In carbo-metallic oil 20 partly or wholly composed of material which boils at and above about 650F, such material is referred to herein as 650F+ material;
and 650F+ material which is part of or has been separated from an oil containing components boiling above and below 650F may be referred to as a 650F+ fraction. But the terms "boils above" and 25 "650F+" are not intended to imply that all of the material characterized by said terms will have the capability of boiling. The carbo-metallic oils contemplated by the invention may contain material which may not boil under any conditions; for example, certain asphalts ; and asphaltenes may crack thermally during 30 distillation, apparently without boiling. Thus, for example, when it is said that the feed comprises at least about 70% by volume of material which 1174~92 boils above about 650F, it should be understood that the 70~ in question may include some material which will not boil or volatilize at any temperature. These non-boilable ~
materials when present, may frequently or for the most part be concentrated in portions of the feed which do not boil below about 1000F, 1025F or higher. Thus, when it is said that at least about 10~, more preferably about 15~ and still more preferably at least about 20~
(by volume) of the 650F+ fraction will not boil below about 1000F or 1025F, it should be understood that all or any part of the material not boiling below about 1000 or 1025F, may or may not be volatile at and above the indicated temperatures.
Preferably, the contemplated feeds, or at least the 650F+
material therein, have a carbon residue on ?yrolysis of at least about 2 or greater. For example, the Conracson czrbon content may be in the range of about 2 to about 12 and most rre~uently at least about 4. A particularly common range is about 4 to about 8.
Preferably, the feed has an averaqe composition character-ized by an atomic hydrogen to carbon ratio in the range of about 1.2 to about 1.9, and preferably about 1.3 to about 1.8.
The carbo-metallic feeds employed in accordance with the invention, or at least the 650F+ material therein, may con-tain at least about 4 parts per million of Nickel Equiva-lents, as defined above, of which at least about 01. ?pm isvanadium. Carbometallic oils within the above range can be prepared from mixtures of two or more oils, some of which do and some of which do not contain the quantities of Nic-kel Eauivalents and vanadium set forth above. It should also be noted that the above values for Nickel Equivalents and nickel represent time-weighted averages for a substan-tial period of operation of the conversiOn unit, such as one month, for example. It should also be noted that the heavy metals have in certain circumstances exhibited some less-ening of poisoning tendency after repeated oxidations and reductions on the catalyst, and the literature describes criteria for establishing "effective metal" values. For example, see the article by Cimbalo, et al, entitled "Deposited Metals Poison FCC Catalyst", Oil and Gas Journal, May 15, 1972, pp 112-122. If considered necessary or desirable, the contents of Nickel Equivalents and vanadium in the carbometallic oils processed according to the invention may be expressed in terms of "effective metal"
values. Notwithstanding the gradual reduction in poisoning activity noted by Cimbalo, et al, the regeneration of catalyst under normal FCC regeneration conditions may not, and usually does not, severely impair the dehydrogenation, demathanation and aromatic condensation activity of heavy metals accumulated on cracking catalyst.
It is known that about 0.2 to about 5 weight per cent of "sulfur" in the form of elemental sulfur and/or its compounds ( but reported as elemental sulfur based on the weight of feed) appears in FCC feeds and that the sulfur and modified forms of sulfur can find that way into the resultant gasoline product and, where lead is added, tend to reduce its susoeptibility to octane enhancement. Sulfur in the product gasoline often requires sweetening when processing high sulfur containing crudes. To the extent that sulfur is present in the coke, it also represents a potential air pollutant since the regenerator burns it to SO2 and SO3.

i..
d 1 1 '7'~

- l9a -However, we have found that in our process the sulfur in the feed is on the other hand able to inhibit heavy metal activity by maintaining metals such as Ni, V, Cu and Fe in the sulfide form in the reactor. These sulfides are much less active than the metals themselves in promoting dehydrogenation and coking reactions. Accordingly, it is acceptable to carry out the invention with a carbo-metallic oil having at least about 0.3~, 117~19;~
_~?0_ acceptably more than about 0.8% and more acceptably at least about 1.5% by weight of sulfur in the 650F+ fraction.
The carbo-metallic oils useful in the invention may and usually do con tain significant quantities of compounds containing nitrogen, 5 a substantial portion of which may be basic nitrogen. For example, the total nitrogen content of the carbo-metallic oils may be at least about 0.05% by weight. Since cracking catalysts owe their cracking activity to acid sites on the catalyst surface or in its pores, basic nitrogen-containing compounds may temporarily neutralize these 10 sites, poisoning the catalyst. However, the catalyst is not permanently damaged since the nitrogen can be burned off the catalyst during regeneration, as a result of which the acidity of the active sites is restored.
The carbo-metallic oils may also include significant quantities 15 of pentane insolubles, for example at least about 0 . 5% by weight, and more typically 2% or more or even about 4% or more. These may include for instance asphaltenes and other materials.
Alkali and alkaline earth metals generally do not tend to vaporize in large quantities under the distillation conditions 20 employed in distilling crude oil to prepare the vacuum gas oils normally used as FCC feedstocks. Rather, these metals remain for the most part in the "bottomst' fraction (the non-vaporized high boiling portion) which may for instance be used in the production of asphalt or other by-products. However, reduced crude and 25 other carbo-metallic oils are in many cases bottoms products, and therefore may contain significant quantities of alkali and alkaline earth metals such as sodium. These metals deposit upon the catalyst during cracking. Depending on the composition of the catalyst and magnitude of the reger.eration temperatures to which it 30 is exposed, these metals 11741~Z

may undergo interactions and reactions with the catalyst (including the catalyst support) which are not normally experienced in processing VGO under conventional FCC
processing conditions. If the catalyst characteristics and regeneration conditions so require, one will of course take the necessary precautions to limit the amounts of alkali and alkaline earth metal in the feed, which metals may enter the feed not only as brine associated with the crude oil in _ts natural state, but also as components of water or steam which are supplied to the cracking unit.
Thus, careful desalting of the crude used to prepare the carbo-metallic feed may be important when the catalyst is particularly susceptible to alkali and alkaline earth metals.
In such circumstances, the content of such metals (herein-after collectively referred to as ~sodium") in the feed can be maintained at about 1 ppm or less, based on the weight of the feedstock. Alternatively, the sodium level of the feed may be keyed to that of the catalyst, so as to main-tain the sodium level of the catalyst which is in use sub-stantially the same as or less than that of the replacement catalyst which is charged to the unit.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the carbo-metallic oil feedstock consti'utes at least about 70~ by volume of material which boils above about 650F, and at least about 10~ of the material which boils above about 650F will not boil below about 1025F.
The average composition of this 650F+ material may be fur-ther characterized by: (a) an atomic hydrogen to carbon ra-tio in the range of about 1.3 to about 1.8; (b) a Conrad-son carbon value of at least about 2; (c) at least about four parts per million of Nickel Equivalents, as defined above, of which at least about two parts per million is nickel (as metal, by weiqht), at least about 0.1 part per million vanadium; and (d) at least one of the following:
(i) at least about 0.3% by weight of sulfur, (ii), at least about 0.05% by weight of nitrogen, and (iii) at least about 11'~41~2 -22- , 0.5% by weight of pentane insolubleg. Very comrnonly, the preferred feed will include all of (i), (ii) and (iii), the other components found in oil~ of petroleurn and non-petro-leum origin may also be present in varying quantities pro-viding they do not prevent operation of the process.
Although there is no intention of excluding the possibilityof usin~ a feedstock which has previously been subjected to some cracking, the present invention has the definite advantage that it can successfully product large conver-sions and very substantial yields of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from carbo-metallic oils which have not been subject-ed to any substantial amount of cracking. Thus, for example, and preferably, at least about 85%, more prefe-ably at least about 90~ and most preferably substantially all of of the carbo-metallic feed introluced into the present process is oil which has not previously been contactad with cracking catalyst under cracking conditions. ~ore-over,the process of the invention is suitabla for oparation in a substantially once-through or singla pass mode. Thus, the volume of recycle, if any, based on the volume of fresh feed is prefarably about 15% or less and more preferably about 10~ or less.

In general, the weight ratio of catalyst to fresh feed (feed which has not previously been exposed to cracking catalyst under carcking conditions) used in the process is in the range of about 3 to about 18. Preferred and more preferred ratios are about 4 to about 12, more prefer-ably about S to about 10 and still more preferably about6 to about 10, a ratio of about 10 presentlv being con-sidered most nearly o?timum. ~ithin the limitations of product quality reauirements, controlling the catalyst to oil ~atio at relatively low levels within the afo-esaid rarges tends to reduce the coke yield of the ?rocess, based on 'resh feed.

117~19;~

In conventional FCC processing of VGO, the ratio between the nu~ber of barrels per day of plant through-put and the total number of tons of catalyst undergoing circula-tion throughout all phases of the process can vary widely.
For purposes of this disclosure, daily plant through-put is defined as the number of barrels of fresh feed boiling above about 650F which that plant processes per average day of operation to lisuit products boiling below about 430F. For example, in one commercially successful type of FCC-VG0 operation, about 8 to about 12 tons of catalyst are under circulation in the process ?er 1000 barrels per day of plant through-put. In another commercially successful process, this ratio is in the range of about 2 to 3. While the present invention may be practiced in the range of about 2 to about 30 and more typically about 2 to about 12 tons of catalyst inventory per 1000 barrels of daily plant through-put, it is preferred to carry out the process of the present invention with a very small ratio of catalyst weight to daily plant through-put. ~ore specifically, it is preferred to carry out the proc~ss of the present invention with an inventory of catalyst that is sufficient to contact the feed for the desired residence time in the above indicated catalyst to oil ratio while minimizing the amount of catalyst inventory, relative to plant through-put, which is undergoing circulation or being held for treatment in other phases of the process such as, for example, stripping, regeneration and the li~e.
Thus, more particularly, it is preferred to carry out the process of the present invention with about 2 to about 5 and more preferably about 2 tons of catalyst inventory or less per thousand barrels of daily plant through-put.
In the practice of the invention, catalyst may be added continuously or periodically, such as, for e~ample, to make up for normal losses of catal st from the system.
.~loreover, catalyst addition may be conduc_-d in con~_nc-tion with withdrawal of catalyst, such as, Cor e~ ?le, -o m~intain or increase the average activity level of ~he li7'1 ~f catalyst in the unit. ~or exannple, the rate at which virgin catalyst is adAed to the unit may be in the range of about 0.1 to about 3, more preferably about 0.15 to about 2, and most preferably to about 0.2 to about 1.5 pounds per barrel of feed. If on the other hand equilibrium catalyst from FCC operation is to be utilized, replacement rates as high as about 5 pound per barrel can be practiced. Where circumstances are such that the catalyst employed in the unit is below average in resistance to deactivation and/or conditions prevailing in the unit are such as to promote more rapid 10 deactivation, one may employ rates of addition greater than those stated above; but in the opposite circumstances, lower rates of addi-tion may be employed. By way of illustration, if a unit were operated with a metal(s) loading of 5000 ppm Ni + V in parts by weight on equilibrium catalyst, one might for example employ a replacement rate of about 2 . 7 pounds of catalyst introduced for each barrel (42 gallons) of feed processed. However, operation at a higher level such as 10,000 ppm Ni + V on catalyst would enable one to substantially reduce the replacement rate, such as for example to about 1.3 pounds of catalyst per barrel of feed. Thus, 20 the levels of metal(s) on catalyst and catalyst replacement rates may in general be respectively increased and decreased to any value consistent with the catalyst activity which is available and desired for conducting the process.
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it appears that a 25 number of features of the process to be described in greater detail below, such as, for instance, the residence time and optional mixing of steam with the feedstock, tend to restrict the extent to which cracking conditions produce metals in the reduced state on the catalyst from heavy metal sulfide(s), sulfate(s) or oxide(s) 30 deposited on the catalyst particles by prior exposures to carbo-metallic feedstocks and regeneration conditions. Thus, the process appears to afford significant control over the poisoning effect of heavy metals on the catalyst even when the accu-mulations of such metals are quite substantial.
Accordingly, the process may be practiced with catalyst5 bearing high accumulations of heavy metal(s) in the form of elemental metal(s), oxide(s), sulfide(s) or other compounds. Thus, operation of the process with catalyst bearing heavy metals accumulations in the range of about 3000 or more ppm Nickel Equivalents, on the average, is contemplated. The concentration of 10 Nickel Equivalents of metals on catalyst can range up to about 50,000 ppm or higher. More specifically, the accumulation may be in the range of about 3000 to about 30,000 ppm, preferably in the range of about 3000 to 20,000 ppm, and more particularly about 3000 to about 12,000 ppm . Within these ranyes just mentioned, operation at metals levels of about 4000 or more, about 5000 or more, or about 7000 or more ppm can tend to reduce the rate of catalyst replacement required. The foregoing ranges are based on parts per million of Nickel Equivalents, in which the metals are expressed as metal, by weight, measured on and based on regenerated equilibrium catalyst. However, in the event that catalyst of adequate activity is available at very low cost, making feasible very high rated of catalyst replacement, the carbo-metallic oil could be converted to lower boiling liquid products with catalyst bearing less than 3,000 ppm Nickel Equivalents of heavy metals.
For example, one might employ equilibrium catalyst from another unit, for example, an FCC unit which has been used in -the cracking of a feed, e. g. vacuum gas oil, having a carbon residue on pyr olysis of less than 1 and containing less than about 4 ppm Nickel Equivalents of heavy metals.
. 30 In any event, the quilibrium concentration of heavy metals in the circulating inventory of catalyst can be controlled (including maintained or varied as desired or needed ) by manipulation of the rate of catalyst addition discussed above. Thus, for example, li7~1'32 addition of catalyst may ~e maintained at a rate which will control the heavy metals 117~1~Z

accumulation on the catalyst in one of the ranaes set forth above.
In seneral, it is preferred to employ a catalyst having a relatively high level of cracking activity, proviaing high levels of conversion and productivity at low residence times. The conversion capabilities of the catalvst mav be expressed in terms of the conversion produced ~uring ac-tual operation of the process and/or in terms of conversion produced in standard catalyst activity tests. For exa~ple, it is preferred to em~loy catalyst which, in the course of extended operation under prcvailing process conditions, is sufficientlv active for sustaining a levcl of conversion of at least about 50~O and more preferably at least about 60~.
In this connection, conversion is expressed in liauid vol-ume percent, based on fresh ~eed.

Also, for example, the preferred catalyst may be definedas one which, in its virgin or eouilibrium state, e~hibits a s?ecified activity expressed as a percentage in terms of ,~AT (micro-activity test) conversion. For pur~oses of the present invention the foregoing percentage is the vol-ume percentage of standard feedstock which a catalyst uncer evaluation will convert to 430F end point gasoline, light-er ?roducts and coke at 900F, 16 WHSV (weight hourly space velocity, calculated on a moisture free basis, usinc clean catalyst which has been dried at 1100F, weighed and thenconditioned, for a period of at least 8 hours at about 28C
and ;Og relative humidity, until about one hour or less prior to contacting the feed) and 3C/O (catalyst to oil weiqht ratio) by AST~ ~-3Z MAT test D-390~-aO, using an a?-propriate standard feedstock, e.g. a sweet light ?rimarygas oil, such as that used bv Davison, Division of W.R.
Grace, having the following analvsis and ?ro?e-ties:
3S API Gravity at 60F, degrees 31~0 S?eci'ic Gr~vity at 50F, ~/cc 0.~-~08 Ramsbottom Carbon, wt . % 0.09 Conradson Carbon, wt. % (est. ) 0.04 Carbon, wt . % 84.92 Hydrogen, wt . % 12.94 Sulfur, wt . % 0.68 Nitrogen, ppm 305 Viscosity at 100F, centistokes 10.36 Watson K Factor 11.93 Aniline Point 182 Bromine No. 2.2 Paraffins, Vol . % 31.7 Olefins, Vol . % 1.6 Naphthenes, Vol . % 44.0 Aromatics, Vol . % 22.7 Average Molecular Weight 284 Nickel Trace Vanadium Trace Iron Trace Sodium Trace Chlorides Trace BS&W Trace Distillation ASTM D-1160 10% 601 30% 664 50% 701 70% 734 90% 787 The gasoline end point and boiling temperature-volume percent relationships of the product produced in the MAT conversion test may for example be determined by simulated distillation techniques, for example modifications of gas chromate graphic "Sim-D", ASTM
D-2887-73. The results of such simulations are in reasonable agreement with the results obtained hy subjecting larger samples of material to standard laboratory distillation techniques.

-2~s-Conversion is calculated by subtracting from 100 the volume percent (based on fresh feed) of those products heavier than gasoline which remain in the recovered product.
On page 935-937 of Hougen and Watson, Chemical Process Principles, John Wiley & Sons, Inc ., N . Y . (1947), the concent of "Activity Factors " is discussed . This concept leads to the use of "relative activity" to compare the effectiveness of an operating catalyst against a standard catalyst. Relative activity measurements facilitate recognition of how the quantitiy requirements of various catalysts differ from one another. Thus, relative activity is a ratio obtained by dividing the weight of a standard or reference catalyst which is or would be required to produce a given level of conversion, as compared to the weight of an operating catalyst (whether proposed or actually used) which is or would be required to produce the same level of conversion in the same or equivalent feedstock under the same or equivalent conditions. Said ratio of catalyst weights may be expressed as a numerical ratio, but preferably is converted to a percentage basis. The standard catalyst is preferably chosen from among catalysts useful for conducting the present invention, such as for example zeolite fluid cracking catalysts, and is chosen for its ability to produce a predetermined level of conversion in a standard feed under the conditions of temperature, WHSV, catalyst to oil ratio and other conditions set forth in the preceding description of the MAT
conversion test and in ASTM D-32 MAT test D-39û7-80. Conversion is the volume percentage of feedstock that is converted to 430F
end point gasoline, lighter producs and coke. ~or standard feed, one may employ the above-mentioned light primary gas oil, or equivalent.
For purposes of conducting relative activity determinations, one may prepare a "standard catalyst curve", a chart or li'7~ 2 graph of conversion (as above defined) vs. reciprocal WHSV for the standard catalyst and feedstock. A sufficient number of runs is made under ASTM D-3907-80 conditions (as modified above) using standard feedstock at varying levels of WHSV to prepare an 5 accurated 'tcurve" of conversion vs. WHSV for the standard feedstock. This curve should traverse all or substantially all of the various levels of conversion including the range of conversion within which it is expected that the operating catalyst will be tested. From this curve, one may establish a standard WHSV for 10 test comparisons and a standard value of reciprocal WHSV
corresponding to that level of conversion which has been chosen to represent 100% relative activity in the standard catalyst. For purposes of the present disclosure the aforementioned reciprocal WHSV and level of conversion are, respectively, 0.0625 and 75%.
15 In testing an operating catalyst of unknown relative activity, one conducts a sufficient number of runs with that catalyst under D-3907-80 conditions (as modified above) to establish the level of conversion which is or would be produced with the operating catalyst at standard recirpocal WHSV. Then, using the 20 above-mentioned standard catalyst curve, one establishes a hypothetical reciprocal WHSV constituting the reciprocal WHSV which would have been required, using the standard catalyst, to obtain the same level of conversion which was or would be exhibited, by the operating catalyst at standard WHSV. The relative activity may 25 then be calculated by dividing the hypothetical reciprocal WHSV by the reciporcal standard WHSV, which is 1/16, or .0625. The result is reltaive activity expressed in terms of a decimal fraction, which may then be multiplied by 100 to convert to percent relative activity. In applying the results of this determination, a relative activity of 0.5, ro 50%, means that it would take twice the amount of the operating catalyst to give the same conversion as the standard catalyst, i . e ., the production catalyst is 50% as active as the reference catalyst.

~174192 The catalyst may be introduced into the process in its virgin form or, as previously indicated, in other than virgin form; e. g .
one may use equilibrium catalyst withdrawn from another unit, such as catalyst that has been employed in the cracking of a different 5 feed. Whether characterized on the basis of MAT conversion activity or relative activity, the preferred catalysts may be described on the basis of their activity "as introduced" into the process of the present invention, or on the basis of their "as withdrawn" or equilibrium activity in the process of the present 10 invention, or on both of these bases. A preferred activity level of virgin and non-virgin catalyst "as introduced" into the process of the present invention is at least about 60% by MAT conversion, and preferably at least about 20%, more preferably at least about 40%
and still more preferably at least about 60% in terms of relative 15 activity. However, it will be appreciated that, particularly in the case of non-virgin catalysts supplied at high addition rates, lower activity levels may be acceptable. An acceptable "as withdrawn" or equilibrium activity level of catalyst which has been used in the process of the present invention is at least about 20% or more, but 20 about 40% or more and preferably about 60% or more are preferred values on a relative actcivity basis, and an activity level of 60% or more on a MAT conversion basis is also contemplated. More preferably, it is desired to employ a catalyst which will, under the conditions of use in the unit, establish an equilibrium activity at or 25 about the indicated level. The catalyst activities are determined with catalyst having less than 0.01 coke, e.g. regenerated catalyst.
One may employ any hydrocarbon cracking catalyst having the above indicated conversion capabilities. A particularly preferred class of catalysts includes those which has pore structures into 30 which molecules of feed material may enter for adsorption and/or for contact with active cataly-RI-6117B ~ 3~ _ tic sites within or adjacent the pores. Various types of catalysts are available withi~ this classification, includ-ing for exa~ple the layered silicates, e.g. smectites.
Although the ~ost widely available catalysts within this classification are the well-known zeolite-containing catalysts, non-zeolite catalysts are also contemplated.
The preferred zeolite-containing catalysts may include any zeolite, whetl~er natural, semi-synthetic or synthetic, alone or in admixture with other materials which do not significantly impair the suitability of the catalyst, ?ro-vided the resultant catalyst has the activity and pore structure referred to above. For example, if the virgin catalyst is a mixture, it may include the zeolite compo-nent associated with or dispersed in a porous refr~ctory inorganic oxide carrier, in such case the catalyst may for e~ample cont~in about 1~ to a~out 60~, more ~referably about 15 to about 50%, and most typically about 20 to about 45~ by weight, based on the total weisht of catalyst (water free basis) of the zeolite, the balance of the catalyst being the porous refractory inorganic oxide alone or in combination with any of the known adjuvants for promoting or suppressing various desired and undesired reactions.
For a general explanation of the genus of zeolite, mole-cular sieve catalysts useful in the invention, attention is drawn to the disclosures of the articles entitled "Refinery Catalysts Are a Fluid ~usiness" and "Making Cat Crackers Work On Varied Diet~, appearing respectively in the July 26, 1978 and September 13, 1978 issues of Chemical Week magazine.

For the most part, the zeolite components of the zeol: e-containing catalysts will be those which are known to be use'ul in FCC crac~ing processes. In general, these are crystalline aluminosilicates, ty?ically ~ade U2 of tetra coordinated aluminum atoms associated throush o~ysen atoms with adjacent silicon atoms in the crystal structure.

117~1~tZ

However, the term "zeolite" as used in this disclosure contemplates not only aluminosilicates, but also substances in which the aluminum has been partly or wholly replaced, such as for instance bv gallium and/or other metal atoms, and further includes substances in which all or part of the silicon has been replaced, such as for instance by ge~æ-.ium. Titanium and zirconium substitution may also be practiced Most zeolites are prepared or occur naturally in the sodium form, so that sodium cations are associated with the elec:ro-negative sites in the crystal structure. The sodium cations tend to m~e zeolites inactive and much less stable when exposed to hydrocarbon conversion conditions, particularly high temperatures. ~ccordingly, the zeolite may be ion exchanged, and where the zeolite is a component of a catalyst composition, such ion exchanging may occur before or after incorporation of the zeolite as a component of the composition. Suitable cations for replacement of sodium in the zeolite crystal structure include a~onium (decomposable to hydrogen~, hydrogen, rare earth metals, alkaline earth metals, etc. Various suitable ion exchange procedures and cations which may be exchanged into the zeolite c ystal structure are well known to those skilled ir. the art.
Examples of the naturally occuring crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites which may be used as or included in the catalyst for the present invention are faujasite, mordenite, clinoptilote, chabazite, analcite, crionite, as well as levynite, dachiardite, paulingite, noselite, ferriorite, heulandite, scolccite, stibite, harmotome, phillipsite, brewsterite, flarite, datolite, gmelinite, ca~mnite, leucite, lazurite, s_721ite, mesolite, ?toL te, ne?hline, matrolite, offretlte and sodalite.
Exa ples of the synth2tic crys_all;ne a um nosll:_ te 1 1~7~1~t2 zeolites which are useful as or in the catalyst for carry-ing out the present invention are Zeolite X, U. S. Patent No. 2,882,244, Zeolite Y, U. S. Patent No. 3,130,007:
and Zeolite A, U. S. Patent No. 2,882,243; as well as Zeolite B, U. S. Patent No. 3,008,803; Zeolite D, Canada Patent No. 661,981; Zeolite E, Canada Patent No. 614,495;
Zeolite F, V. S. Patent No. 2,996,358; Zeolite ~. U. S.
Patent No. 3,010,789; Zeolite J., U. S. Patent No.
3,011,869; Zeolite J., Belgian Patent No. 575,177; Zeolite M., U. S. Patent No. 2,995,423, Zeolite O, U. S. Patent No. 3,140,252; Zeolite Q, U. S. Patent No. 2,991,151;
Zeolite S, U. S. Patent No. 3,054,657, Zeolite T, U. S.
Patent No. 2,950,952; Zeolite W, U. S. Patent No.
3,012,853; Zeolite Z, Canada Patent No. 614,495; and Zeolite Omega, Canada Patent No. 817,915. Also, ZK-4HJ, alpha beta and ZSM-type zeolites are useful. Moreover, the zeolites described in U. S. Patents Nos. 3,140,249, 3,140,253, 3,944,482 and 4,137,151 are also useful, The crystaliine aluminosilicate zeolites having a fauja-site-type crvstal structure are particularly preferred for use in the present invention. This includes particularly natural faujasite and Zeolite X and Zeolite Y.
The crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites, such as synthetic faujasite, will under normal conditions crystallize as regularly shaped, discrete particles of about one to about ten microns in size, and, accordingly, this is the size range frequently found in commercial catalysts which can be used in the invention. Preferably, the particle size of the zeolites is from about 0.1 to about 10 mic_ons and more prefe-ably is from about 0.1 to about 2 mic-ons or less.
For example, zeolites prepared in situ from calcined ~aolin may ~e characterized by even smaller crystallites. Crvs_al-line zeolites exhibit both an interior and an exte-ior 11'7'~1~tZ
-3~-surface area, which we have defined as "portal" surface area, with the largest portion of the total surface area being internal. By portal surface area, we refer to the outer surface of the zeolite crystal through which reactants are considered to pass in order to convert to lower boiling products. Blockages of the internal channels by, for example, coke formation, blockages of entrance to the internal channels by deposition of coke in the portal surface area, the contamination by metals poisoning, will greatly reduce the total zeolite surface area. Therefore, to minimize the effect of contamination and pore blockage, crystals larger than the normal size cited above are preferably not used in the catalysts of this invention .
Commercial zeolite-containing catalysts are available with carriers containing a variety of metal oxides and combination thereof, including for example silica, alumina, magnesia, and mixtures thereof and mixtures of such oxides with clays as e . g .
described in U. S. Patent No. 3,034,948. One may for example select any of the zeolite-containing molecular sieve fluid cracking catalysts which are suitable for production of gasoline from vacuum gas oils. However, certain advantages may be attained by judicious selection of catalysts having marked resistance to metals. A metal resistant zeolite catalyst is, for instance, described in U.S. Patent No. 3,944,482, in which the catalyst contains 1-40 weight percent of a rare earth-exchanged zeolite, the balance being a refractory metal oxide having specified pore volume and size distribution. Other catalysts described as "metals-tolerant" are described in the above mentioned Cimbalo et al article.
In general, it is preferred to employ catalysts having an over-all particle size in the range of about 5 to about 16U, more preferably about 40 to about 120, and most preferably about 40 to about 80 microns. For example, a useful catalyst may have a skeletal density of about 150 RI-6117~

117'~192 pounds per cubic foot and an averaae particle size of about 60-70 micronS, with less than 10~ of the particles havinq a size less th n ~bout 40 microns and less than 80~ having a size less than about 50-60 microns.
Although a wide variety of other catalysts, including both zeolite-containing and non-zeolite-containing mqy be employed in the pr~ctice of the invention the following are e~am21es of commercially available catalysts which may be emoloyed in practicing the invention: ' Specific Weiqht Percent Surface Zeolite m2/Content A12O3 SiO2 Na2O Fe2O TiO2 AGZ-290 30011.0 29.5 59.0 0.40 0.11 0.59 GRZ-l 16214.0 23.4 69.0 0.10 0.4 0.9 CCZ-220 12911.0 34.6 60.0 0.60 0.57 1.9 Super DX lSS 13.0 31.0 65.0 0.80 0.57 1.6 F-87 24010.0 44.0 50.0 0.80 0.70 1.6 FOX-90 2408.0 44.0 52.0 0.65 0.65 1.1 HFZ 20 31020.0 59.0 40.0 0.47 0.54 2.75 HEZ SS 21019.0 59.0 35.2 0.60 0.60 2.5 The AGZ-290, GRZ-l, CCZ-220 and Su2er DX catalysts re'erred to above are products of W. R. Grace and Co. F-87 and FOC-90 are product~ of Filtrol, while HFZ-20 and HEZ-SS
are 2roducts of Engelhard/Houdry~ The above are ?roperties of virgin catalyst and, except in the case of zeolite con-tent, are adjusted to a water free basis, i.e. based on material ignited at 1750F. The zeolite content is derived by comparison of the X-ray intensities of a catalyst sam21e and of a standard material com?osed of high ?ur-ty sodlum Y zeolite in accordance with draft ~6, dated January 9, 1978, of proposed AST~5 Stand3rd ~5ethod er.ti~led "De~ na-3j 'ion o' the raujasite Content of a Cat~lvst."

Among the above mentioned commercially available catalyst, the Super D family and especially a catalyst designated GRZ-1 are particularly preferred. For example, Super DX has given particularly good results with Arabian Light crude. The GRZ-1, 5 although substantially more expensive than the Super DX at present, appears somewhat more metals tolerant.
Although not yet commercially available, it is believed that the best catalysts for carrying out the present invention will be those which, according to proposals advanced by Dr. William P.
10 Hettinger, jr. and Dr. James E. Lewis, are characterized by matrices with feeder pores having large minimum diameters and large mouths to facilitate diffusion of high molecular wieght molecules through the matrix to the portal surface area of molecular sieve particles within the matrix. Such matrices preferably also 15 have a relatively large pore volume in order to soak up unvaporized - portions of the carbo-metallic oil feed. Thus, significant numbers of liquid hydrocarbon molecules can diffuse to active catalytic sites both in the matrix and in sieve particles on the surface of the matrix. In general it is preferred to employ catalysts with matrices 20 wherein the feeder pores have diameters in the range of about 400 to about 6000 angstrom units, and preferably about 1000 to about 6000 angstrom units.
It is considered to be an advantage that the process of the present invention can be conducted in the substantial absence of tin 25 and/or anitmony or at least in the presence of a catalyst which is substantially free of either or both of these metals.
The process of the present invention may be operated with the above described carbo-metallic oil and catalyst as substantially the sole materials char~ed to the reaction zone. But the charging of 30 additional material is not excluded.

117 ~1~2 The charging of recycled oil to tne reaction zone has already been mentioned. As described in greater detail below, still other materials fulfilling a variety of functions may also be charged. In such case, the carbo-metallic oil and catalyst usually represent the major proportion by weight of the total of all materials charged to the reaction zone.
Certain of the additional materials which may be used perform functions which offer significant advantages over the process as performed with only the carbo-metallic oil and catalyst.
Among these functions are: controlling the effects of heavy metals and other catalyst contaminants; enhancing catalyst activity; absorbing excess heat in the catalyst as received from the regenerator; disposal of pollutants or conversion thereof to a form or forms in which they may be more readily separated from products and/or disposed of; controlling catalyst temperature; diluting the carbo-metallic oil vapors to reduce their partial pressure and increase the yield of desired products; adjusting feed/catalyst contact time; donation of hydrogen to a hydrogen deficient carbo-metallic oil feedstock, for example as disclosed in Canadian application 398,945 entitled "Use of Naphtha in Carbo-Metallic Oil Conversion" and filed March 22, 1982, assisting in the dispersion of the feed; and possibly also distillation of products. Certain of the metals in the heavy metals accumulation on the catalyst are more active in promoting undesired reactions when they are the form of elemental metal, than they are when in the oxidized form produced by contact with oxygen in the catalyst regenerator. ~owever, the time of ll';~ ~lS~Z
- 37a -contact between catalyst and vapors of feed and product in past conventional catalytic cracking was sufficient so that hydrogen released in the cracking reaction was able to reconvert a signifcant portion of the less harmful oxides back to the more harmful elemental heavy metals. One can take advantage of this situation through the introduction of additional materials Z
-3~-which are in gaseoue (including vaporous) form in the reaction zone in admixture with the catalyst and vapors of feed and products.
The increased volume of material in the reaction zone resultin~ from the presence of such additional materials tends to increase the 5 velocity of flow through the reaction zone with a corresponding decrease in the residence time of the catalyst and oxidized heavy metals borne thereby. Because of this reduced residence time, there is less opportunity for reduction of the oxidized heavy metals to elemental form and therefore less of the harmful elemental 10 metals are available for contacting the feed and products.
Added materials may be introduced into the process in any suitable fashion, some examples of which follow. For instance, they may be admixed with the carbo-metallic oil feedstock piror to contact of the latter with the catalyst. Alternatively, the added 15 materials may, if desired, be admixed with the catalyst prior to contact of the latter with the feedstock. Separate portions of the added materials may be separately admixed with both catalyst and carbo-metallic oil. Moreover, the feedstock, catalyst and additional materials may, if desired, by brought together substantially 20 simultaneously. A portion of the added material smay be mixed with catalyst and/or carbo-metallic oil in any of the above described ways, while additional portions are subsequently brought into admixture. For example, a portion of the added materials may be added to the carbo-metallic oil and/or to the catalyst before they 25 reach the reaction zone, while another portion of the added materials is introduced directly into the reaction zone. The added materials may be introduced at a plurality of spaced locations in the reaction zone or along the length thereof, if elongated.
The amount of additional materials which may be present in the 30 feed, catalyst or reaction zone for carrying out the above functions, and others, may be varied as desired; but said amount will preferably be sufficient to substantially heat balance the process. These materials may for example be introduced into the reaction zone in a weight ratio relative to feed of up to about 0.4, 5 preferably in the range of about 0.02 to about 0.4, more preferably about 0 . 03 to about 0 . 3 and most preferably about 0 . 05 to about 0.25.
For example, many or all of the abcve desirable functions may be attained by introducing H20 to the reaction zone in the form of 10 steam or of liquid water or a combination thereof in a weight ratio relative to feed in the range of about 0 . 04 or more, or more preferably about 0.05 to about 0.1 or more. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it appears that the use of H20 tends to inhibit reduction of catalyst-borne oxides, sulfites and sulfides to 15 the free metallic form which is believed to promote condensation-dehydrogenation with consequent promotion of coke and hydrogen yield and accompanying loss of product. Moreover, H20 may also, to some extent, reduce deposition of metals onto the catalyst surface. There may also be some tendency to desorb 20 nitrogen-containing and other heavy contaminant-containing molecules from the surface of the catalyst particles, or at least some tendency to inhibit their absorption by the catalyst. It is also believed that added H20 tends to increase the acidity of the catalyst by Bronsted acid formation which in turn enhances the 25 activity of the catalyst. Assuming the H20 as supplied is cooler than the regenerated catalyst and/or the temperature of the reaction zone, the sensible heat involved in raising the temperature of the H20 upon contacting the catalyst in the reaction zone or elsewhere can absorb excess heat from the catalyst. Where the H20 30 is or includes recycled water that contains for example about 500 to about 5000 ppm of H2S dissolved therein, a number of additional advantages may accrue. The ecologically unattractive H2S need not be vented to the atompshere, the recycled water does not require further treatment to remove H2S and the H2S may be of assistance in reducing coking of the catalyst by passivation of the heavy metals, i . e . by conversion thereof to the sulfide form which has a 5 lesser tendency than the free metals to enhance coke and hydrogen production. In the reaction zone, the presence of H20 can dilute the carbo-metallic oil vapors, thus reducing their partial pressure and tending to increase the yield of the desired products. It has been reported that H20 is useful in combination with other 10 materials in generating hydrogen during cracking; thus it may be able to act as a hydrogen donor for hydrogen deficient carbo-metallic oil feedstocks. The H20 may also serve certain purely mechanical functions such as: assisting in the atomizing or dispersion of the feed; competing with high molecular weight 15 molecules for adsorption on the surface of the catalyst, thus interrupting coke formation; steam distillation of vaporizable product from unvaporized feed material; and disengagement of product from catalyst upon conclusion of the cracking reaction. It is particularly preferred to bring together H20, catalyst and carbo-metallic oil 20 substantially simultaneously~ For example, one may admix ~I20 and feedstock in an atomizing nozzle and immediately direct the resultant spray into contact with the catalyst at the downstream end of the reaction zone.
The addition of steam to the reaction zone is frequently 25 mentioned in the literature of fluid catalytic cracking. ~ddition of liquid water to the feed is discussed relatively infrequently, compared to the introduction of steam directly into the reaction zone. However, in accordance with the present invention it is particularly preferred that liquid water be brought into intimate 30 admixture with the carbo-metallic oil in a weight ratio of about 0.04 to about 0 . 25 at or prior to the time of in troduction of the oil into the reaction zone, whereby the water (e . g ., in the form of liquid water or in the form of steam produced by ~1'7 ~

vaporization of liquid water in contact with the oil) enters the reaction zone as part of the flow of feedstock which enters such zone. Although not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that the foregoing is advantageous in promoting dispersion 5 of the feedstock. Also, the heat of vaporization of the water, which heat is absorbed from the catalyst, from the feedstock, or from both, causes the water to be a more efficient heat sink than steam alone. Preferably the weight ratio of liquid water to feeds to about O . 04 to about O . 2 more preferably about O . 05 to about O .15 .
Of course, the liquid water may be introduced into the process in the above described manner or in other ways, and in either event the introduction of liquid water may be accompanied by the introduction of additional amounts of water as steam into the same of different portions of the reaction zone or into the catalyst 15 and/or feedstock. For example, the amount of additional steam may be in a weight ratio relative to feed in the range of about 0.01 to about 0.25, with the weight ratio of total H20 (as steam and liquid water) to feedstock being about O . 3 or less . The charging weight ratio of liquid water relative to steam in such combined use of 20 liquid water and steam may for example range from about 15 which is preesntly preferred, to about 0.2. Such ratio may be maintained at a predetermined level within such range of varied as necessary or desired to adjust or maintain heat balance.
Other materials may be added to the reaction zone to perform 25 one or more of the above described functions. For example, the dehydrogenation-condensation activity of heavy metals may be inhibited by introducing hydrogen sulfide gas into the reaction zone. Hydrogen may be made available for hydrogen deficient carbo-metallic oil feedstocks by introducing into the reaction zone 30 either a conventional hydrogen donor diluent such as a heavy naphtha relative-F~I-6117B

1 1'7'~

ly low molecular weight carbon-hydrogen fragment contributors, including for example: light paraffins; low molecular weight alcohols and other compounds which permit or favor intermolecular hydrogen transfer; and compounds that chemically combine to 5 generate hydrogen in the reaction zone such as by reaction of carbon monoxide with water, or with alcohols, or with olefins, or with other materials or mixtures of the foregoing.
All of the above mentioned additional materials (including water), alone or in conjunction with each other or in conjunction 10 with other materials, such as nitrogen or other inert gases, light hydrocarbons, and other, may perform any of the above-described functions for which they are suitable, including without limitation, acting as diluents to reduce feed partial pressure and/or as heat sinks to absorb excess heat present in the catalyst as received from 15 the regeneration step. The foregoing is a discussion of some of the functions which can be performed by materials other than catalyst and carbo-metallic oil feedstock introduced into the reaction zone, and it should be understood that other materials may be added or other functions performed without departing from the spirit of the 20 invention.
The invention may be practiced in a wide variety of apparatus.
However, the preferred apparatus includes means for rapidly vaporizing as much feed as possibie and efficiently admixing feed and catalyst (although not necessarily in that order), for causing 25 the resultant mixture to flow as a dilute suspension in a progressive flow mode, and for separating the catalyst from cracked products and any uncracked or only partially cracked feed at the end of a predetermined residence time or times, it being preferred that all or at least a substantial portion of the product should be 30 abruptly separated from at least a portion of the catalyst.
For example, the apparatus may include, along its elongated i ~17 ~1~2 reaction chamber, one or more points ror introduction of carbo-metallic feed, one or more points for introduction of catalyst, one or more points for introduction of additional material, one or more points for withdrawal of products and one or more points of withdrawal of catalyst.
The means for introducir.g feed, catalyst and other material may range from open pipes to sophisticated jets or spray nozzles, it being preferred to use means capable of breaking up the liquid feed into fine droplets. Preferably, the catalyst, liquid water twhen used) and fresh feed are brought together in an apparatus similar to that disclosed in Canadian Application No. 341,829, filed January 11, 1982.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the liquid water and carbo-metallic oil, prior to their introduction into the riser, are caused to pass through a propeller, apertured disc, or any appropriate high shear agitating means for forming a "homogenized mixture" containing finely divided droplets of oil and/or water with oil and/or water present as a continuous phase.
It is preferred that the reaction chamber, or at least the major portion thereof, be more nearly vertical than horizontal and have a length to diameter ratio of at least about 10, more preferably about 20 or 25 or more. Use of a vertical riser type reactor is preferred. If tubular, the reactor can be of uniform diameter throughout or may be provided with a continuous or step-wise increase in diameter along the reaction path to maintain or vary the velocity along the flow path.
In general, the charging means (for catalyst and feed) and the reactor configuration are such as to provide a 117~
-;`1 ~-relatively high velocity of flow and dilute suspension of catalyst.
For example, the vapor or catalyst velocity in the riser will be usually at least about 25 and more typically at least about 35 feet per second. This velocity may range up to about 55 or about 75 feet or about 100 feet per second or higher. The vapor velocity at the top of the reactor may be higher than that at the bottom and may for example be about 80 feet per second at the top and about 40 feet per second at the bottom. The velocity capabilities of the reactor will in general be sufficient to prevent substantial build-up of catalyst bed in the bottom or other portions of the riser, whereby the catalyst loading in the riser can be maintained below about 4 or 5 pounds, as for example about 0.5 pounds, and below about 2 pounds, as for example 0 . 8 pound, per cubic foot, respectively, at the upstream (e . g . bottom) and downstream (e . g .
top) ends of the riser.
The progressive flow mode involves, for example flowing of catalyst, feed and products as a stream in a positively controlled and maintained direction established by the elongated nature of the reaction zone. This is not to suggest however that there must be strictly linear flow. As is well known, turbulent flow and "slippage" of catalyst may occur to some extent especially in certain ranges of vapor velocity and some catalyst loadings, although it has been reported advisable to employ sufficiently low catalyst loadings to re~trict slippage and back-mixing.
Most preferably the reactor is one which abruptly separates a substantial portion or all of the vaporized cracked products from the catalyst at one or more points along the riser, and preferably separates substantially all of the vaporized cracked products from the catalyst at the downstream end of the riser. A preferred type of reactor embodies ballistic separation of catalyst and products;

11'7~ 2 that is, catalyst is projected in a direction established by the risertube, and is caused to continue its motion in the general direction so established, while the products, having lesser momentum, are caused to make an abrupt change of direction, resulting in an 5 abrupt, substantially instantaneous separation of product from catalyst. In a preferred embodiment referred to as a vented riser, the riser tube is provided with a substantially unobstructed discharge opening at i~s downstream end for discharge of catalyst.
An exit port in the side of the tube adjacent the downstream end 10 receives the products. The discharge opening communicates with a catalyst flow path which extends to the usual stripper and regenerator, while the exit port communicates with a product flow path which is substantially or entirely separated from the catalyst flow path and leads to separation means for separating the products 15 from the relatively small portion of catalyst, if any, which manages to gain entry to the product exit port. Examples of a ballistic separation apparatus and technique as above described, are found in U . S . Patents 4, 066, 533 and 4, 070 ,159 to Myers et al the disclosures of which patents are hereby incorporated herein by 20 reference in their entireties. According to the particularly preferred embodiment, based on a suggestion understood to have emanated from Paul W. Walters, Roger M. Benslay and Dwight F.
Barger, the ballistic separation step includes at least a partial reversal of direction by the product vapors upon discharge from 25 the riser tube; that is, the product vapors make a turn or change of direction which exceeds 90 at the riser tube outlet. This may be accomplished for example by providing a cup-like member surrounding the riser tube at its upper end, the ratio of cross-sectional area of the cup-like member relative to the 30 cross-sectional area of the riser tube outlet being low i.e. Iess than 1 and preferably less than about 0.6. Preferably the lip of the cup is slightly downstream of, or above the downstream end or top of the riser tube, and the cup is preferably concentric with the riser il7~19~
-4t,-tube. By means of a product vapor line communicating with the interior of the cup but not the interior of the riser tube, having its inlet positioned within the cup interior in a direction upstream of the riser tube outlet, product vapors emanating from the riser tube and entering the cup by reversal of direction are transported away from the cup to catalyst and product separation equipment.
Such an arrangement can produce a high degree of completion of the separation of catalyst from product separation equipment. Such an arrangement can produce a high degree of completion of the separation of catalyst from product vapors at the riser tube outlet, so that the required amount of auxiliary catalyst separation equipment such as cyclones is greatly reduced, with consequent large savings in capital investment and operating cost.
Preferred conditions for operation of the process are described below. Among these are feed, catalyst and reaction temperatures, reaction and feed pressures, residence time and levels of conversion, coke production and coke laydown on catalyst.
In conventional FCC operations with VGO, the feedstock is customarily preheated, often to temperatures significantly higher than are required to make the feed sufficiently fluid for pumping and or introduction into the reactor. For example, preheat temperatures as high as about 700 or 800F have been reported.
But in our process as presently practiced it is preferred to restrict preheating of the feed, so that the feed is capable of absorbing a larger amount of heat from the catalyst while the catalyst raises the feed to conversion temperature, at the same time minimizing utilization of external fuels to heat the feedstock. Thus, where the nature of the feedstock permits, it may be fed at ambient temperature. Heavier stocks may be fed at preheat temperatures of up to about 600F, typically about 200F to about 500F, but higher preheat temperatures are not necessarily exluded.

117~1~2 The catalyst fed to the reactor may vary widely in temperature, for example from about 1100 to about 1600F, more preferably about 1200 to about 1500F and most preferably about 1300 to about 1400F, with about 1325 to about 1375 being considered optimum at present.
As indicated previously, the conversion of the carbo-metallic oil to lower molecular weight products may be conducted at a temperature of about 900 to about 1400F, measured at the reaction chamber outlet. The reaction temperature as measured at said outlet is more preferably maintained in the range of about 965 to about 1300F, still more preferably about 975 to about 1200F, and most preferably about 980 to about 1150F. Depending upon the temperature selected and the properties of the feed, all of the feed may or may not vaporize in the riser.
Although the pressure in the reactor may, as indicated above, range from about 10 to about 50 psia, preferred and more preferred pressure ranges are about 15 to about 35 and about 20 to about 35.
In general, the partial (or total) pressure of the feed may be in the range of about 3 to about 30, more preferably about 7 to about 25 and most preferably about 10 to about 17 psia. The feed partial pressure may be controlled or suppressed by the introduction of gaseous (including vaporous) materials into the reactor, such as for instance the steam, water and other additional materials described above. The process has for example been operated with the ratio of feed partial pressure relative to total pressure in the riser in the range of about 0.2 to about 0.8, more typically about 0.3 to abou tO .7 and still more typically about 0.4 to about 0.6, with the ratio of added gaseous material (which may include recyclecl gases and/or steam resulting from introduction of H20 to the riser in the form of steam and/or liquid water) relative to total pressure in the riser correspondingly ranging from about 11'7'~1~2 -~i~-0 . 8 to about 0 . 2, more typically about 0 . 7 to about 0 . 3 and still more typically about 0.6 to about 0.4. In the illustrative operations just described, the ratio of the partial pressure of the added gaseous material relative to the partial pressure of the feed has been in the range of about 0.25 to about 4.0, more typically about 0 . 4 to abou-t 2. 3 and still more typically about 0 . 7 to about 1. 7 .
Although the residence time of feed and product vapors in the riser may be in the range of about 0 . 5 to about 10 seconds, as described above, preferred and more preferred values are about 0.5 to about 6 and about 1 to about 4 seconds, with about 1.5 to about 3 . 0 seconds currently being considered about optimum . ~or example, the process has been operated with a riser vapor residence time of about 2.5 seconds or less by introduction of copious amounts of gaseous materials into the riser, such amounts being sufficient to provide for example a partial pressure ratio of added gaseous materials relative to hydrocarbon feed of about 0 . 8 or more. By way of further illustration, the process has been operated with said residence time being about two seconds or less, with the aforesaid ratio being in the range of about 1 to about 2.
The combination of low feed partial pressure, very low residence time and ballistic separation of products from catalyst are considered especially beneficial for the conversion of carbo-metallic oils. Additional benefits may be obtained in the foregoing combination when there is a substantial partial pressure of added gaseous material, especially H20 as described above.
Depending upon whether there is slippage between the catalyst and hydrocarbon vapors in the riser, the catalyst riser residence time may or may not be the same as 117~
~9 that of the vapors. Thus, the ratio of average catalyst reactor residence time versus vapor reactor residence time, i . e . slippage, may be in the range of about 1 to about 5, more preferably about 1 to about 4 and most preferably about 1 to about 3, with about 1 to 5 about 2 currently being considered optimum.
In practice, there will usually be a small amount of slippage, e . g ., at least about 1. 05 or 1. 2 . In an operating unit there may for example be a slippage of about 1.1 at the bottom of the riser and about 1.05 at the top.
In certain types of known FCC units, there is a riser which discharges catalyst and product vapors together into an enlarged chamber, usually considered to be part of the reactor, in which the catalyst is disengaged from product and collected. Continued contact of catalyst uncracked feed (if any) and cracked products in 15 such enlarged chamber results in an overall catalyst feed contact time appreciably exceeding the riser tube residence times of the vapors and catalysts. When practicing the process of the present invention with ballistic separation of catalyst and vapors at the downstream (e.g. upper) extremity of the riser, such as is taught 20 in the above mentioned Myers et al patents, the riser residence time and the catalyst contact time are substantially the same for a major portion of the feed and product vapors. It is considered advantageous if the vapor riser residence time and vapor catalyst con~act time are substantially the same for at least about ~0%, more 25 preferably at least about 90% and most preferably at least about 95%
by volume of the total feed and product vapors passing through the riser. By denying such vapors continued contact with catalyst in a catalyst disengagement and collection chamber one may avoid a tendency toward re-cracking and diminished selectivity.

-sn-In general, the combination of catalyst to oil ratio, temperatures, pressures and residence times should be such as to effect a substantial conversion of the carbo-metallic oil feedstock.
It is an advantage of the process that very high levels of conversion can be attained in a single pass; for example the conversion may be in excess of 50% and may range to about ~0% or higher. Preferably, the aforementioned conditions are maintained at levels sufficient to maintain conversion levels in the range of about 60 to about 90% and more preferably about 70 to about 85%. The 10 foregoing conversion levels are calculated by subtracting from 100~o the percentage obtained by dividing the liquid volume of fresh feed into 100 times the volume of liquid product boiling at and above 430F (tbp, standard atmospheric pressure).
These substantial levels of conversion may and usually do 15 result in relatively large yields of coke, such as for example about

4 to about 14% by weight based on fresh feed, more commonly about 6 to about 13% and most frequently about 10 to about 13%. The coke yield can more or less quantitatively deposit upon the catalyst.
At cor.templated catalyst to oil ratios, the resultant coke laydown 20 may be in excess of about 0 . 3, more commonly in excess of about 0 . 5 and very frequently in excess of about 1% of coke by weight, based on the weight of moisture free regeneration catalyst. Such coke laydown may range as high about 2%, or about 3%, or even higher .
In common with conventional PCC operations on VGO, the present process includes stripping of spent catalyst after disengagement of the catalyst from product vapors. Persons skilled in the art are acquainted with appropriate stripping agents and conditions for stripping spent catalyst, but in some cases the 30 present process may require somewhat more severe conditions than are commonly employed. This may result, for example, from the use of 117'11~1~

a carbo-metallic oil having constituents which do not volatilize under the conditions prevailing in the reactor, which constituents deposit themselves at least in part on the catalyst. Such adsorbed, unvaporized material can be troublesome from at least two

5 standpoints. First, if the gases (including vapors) used to strip the catalyst can gain admission to a catalyst disengagement or collection chamber connected to the downstream end of the riser, and if there is an accumulation of catalyst in such chamber, vaporization of these unvaporized hydrocarbons in the stripper can 10 be followed by adsorption on the bed of catalyst in the chamber.
More particularly, as the catalyst in the stripper is stripped of adsorbed feed material, the resultant feed material vapors pass through the bed of catalyst accumulated in the catalyst collection and/or disengagement chamber and may deposit coke and/or 15 condensed material on the catalyst in said bed. As the catalyst bearing such deposits moves from the bed and into the stripper and from thence to the regenerator, the condensed products can create a demand for more stripping capacity, while the coke can tend to increase regeneration temperatures and/or demand greater 20 regeneration capacity. For the foregoing reasons, it is preferred to prevent or restrict contact between stripping vapors and catalyst accumulations in the catalyst disengagement of collection chamber.
This may be done for example by preventing such accumulations may be done for example by preventing such accumulations from 25 forming, e. g. with the exception of a quantity of catalyst which essentially drops out of circulation and may remain at the bottom of the disengagement and/or collection chamber, the catalyst that is in circulation may be removed from said chamber promptly upon settling to the bottom of the chamber. Also, to minimize 30 regeneration temperatures and demand for regeneration capacity, it may be desirable to employ conditions of time, temperature and atmosphere in the stripper which are sufficient to reduce potentially volatile hydrocarbon material borne by ~7~19f~

the stripped catalyst to about 10~i or less by weight of the total carbon loading on the catalyst. Such stripping may for example include reheating of the catalyst, extensive stripping with steam, the use of gases having a temperature considered higher than 5 normal for FCC/VGO opertaions, such as for instance flue gas from the regenerator, as well as other refinery stream gases such as hydrotreater off-gas (H2S containing), hydrogen and others. For example, the stripper may be operated at a temperature of about 350F using steam at a pressure of about 150 psig and a weight 10 ratio of steam to catalyst of about 0.002 to about 0.003. On the other hand, the stripper may be operated at a temperature of about 1025F or higher.
Substantial conversion of carbo-metallic oils to lighter products in accordance with the invention tends to produce sufficiently large 15 coke yields and coke laydown on catalyst to require some care in catalyst regeneration. In order to maintain adequate activity in zeolite and non-zeolite catalysts, it is desirable to regenerate the catalyst under conditions of time, temperature and atmosphere sufficient to reduce the percent by weight of carbon remaining on 20 the catalyst to about 0.25% or less . The amounts of coke which must therefore by burned off of the catalysts when processing carbo-metallic oils are usually substantially greater than would be the case when cracking VGO. The term coke when used to describe the present invention, should be understood to include any 25 residual unvaporized feed or cracking product, if any such material is present on the catalyst after stripping.
Regeneration of catalyst, burning away of coke deposited on the catalyst during the conversion of the feed, may be performed at any suitable temperature in the range of about 1100 to about 30 160ûF, measured at the regenerator catalyst outlet. This temperature is preferably in the range of about 1200F to about 1500F, more preferably about 1275 to about 1425F and optimally about 1325 to about 1375F. The process has been operated, for :;

li7'~192 ., --~) 3--example, with a fluidized regenerator with the temperature of the catalyst dense phase in the range of about 130û to about 1400F.
In accordance with the invention, regeneration is conducted while maintaining the catalyst in one or more fluidized beds in one 5 or more fluidization chambers. Such fluidized bed operations are characterized, for instance, by one or more fluidized dense beds of ebulliating particles having a bed density of, for example, about 25 to about 50 pounds per cubic foot. Fluidization is maintained by passing gases, including combustion supporting gases, through the 10 bed at a sufficient velocity to maintain the particles in a fluidized state but at a velocity which is sufficiently small to prevent substantial entrainment of particles in the gases. For example, the lineal velocity of the fluidizing gases may be in the range of about 0.2 to about 4 feet per second and preferably about 0.2 to about 3 15 feet per second. The average total residence time of the particles in the one or more beds is substantial, ranging for example from about 5 to about 30, more preferably about 5 to about 20 and still more preferably about 5 to about 10 minutes.
Heat released by combustion of coke in the regenerator is 20 absorbed by the catalyst and can be readily retained thereby until the regenerated catalyst is brought into contact with fresh feed.
When processing carbo-metallic oils to the relatively high levels of conversion involved in the present invention, the amount of regenerator heat which is transmitted to fresh feed by way of 25 recycling regenerated catalyst can substantially exceed the level of heat input which is appropriate in the riser for heating the vaporizing the feed and other materials, for supplying the endothermic heat of reaction for cracking, for making up the heat losses of the unit and so forth. Thus, the amount of regenerator heat transmitted to fresh feed may he controlled, or restricted where necessary, within certain approximate ranges.
The amount of heat so transmitted may for example be in the range of about 500 to about 1200, more particularly about 600 to about 900, and more particularly about 650 to about 850 BTUs per pound of fresh feed. The aforesaid ranges refer to the combined heat, in BTUs per pound of fresh feed, which is transmitted by the catalyst to the feed and reaction products (between the contacting of feed with catalyst and the separation of product from catalyst) for supplying the heat of reaction (e . g . for cracking) and the difference in enthalpy between the products and the fresh feed.
Not included in the foregoing are the heat made available in the reactor by the adsorption of coke on the catalyst, nor the heat consumed by heating, vaporizing or reacting recycle streams and such added materials as water, steam naphtha and other hydrogen donors, flue gases and inert gases, or by radiation and other losses .
One or a combination of techniques may be utilized for controlling or restricting the amount of regeneration heat transmitted via catalyst to fresh feed. For example, one may add a combustion modifier to the cracking catalyst in order to reduce the temperature of combustion of coke to carbon dioxide and/or carbon monoxide in the regenerator. Moreover, one may remove heat from the catalyst through heat exchange means, including for example heat exchangers (e.g. steam coils) built into the regenerator itself, whereby one may extract heat from the catalyst during regeneration. Heat exchangers can be built into catalyst transfer lines, such as for instance the catalyst return line from the regenerator to the reactor, whereby heat may be removed from the catalyst after it is regenerated. The amount of heat imparted to the catalyst in the regenerator may be restricted by reducing the amount li7419;~

of insulation on the regenerator to permit some heat loss to the surrounding atmosphere, especially if feeds of exceedingly high coking potential are planned for processing; in general, such loss of heat to the atmosphere is considered economically less desirable 5 than certain of the other alternatives set forth herein. One may also inject cooling fluids into portions of the regenerator other than those occupied by the dense bed, for example water and/or steam, whereby the amount of inert gas available in the regenerator for heat absorption and removal is increased.
Another suitable and preferred technique for controlling or restricting the heat transmitted to fresh feed via recycled regenerated catalyst involves maintaining a specified ratio between the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide formed in the regenerator while such gases are in heat exchange contact or relationship with 15 catalyst undergoing regeneration.
Still another particularly preferred technique for controlling or restricting the regeneration heat imparted to fresh feed via recycled catalyst involves the diversion of a portion of the heat borne by recycled catalyst to added materials introduced into the reactor, 20 such as the water, steam, naphtha, other hydrogen donors, flue gases, inert gases, and other gaseous or vaporizable materials which may be introduced into the reactor.
In most circulstances, it will be important to insure that no adsorbed oxygen containing gases are carried into the riser by 25 recycled catalyst. Thus, whenever such action is considered necessary, the catalyst discharged from the regenerator may be stripped with appropriate stripping gases to remove oxygen containing gases. Such stripping may for instance be conducted at relatively high temperatures, for example about 1350 to about 30 1370F, using steam, nitrogen or other inert gas as the stripping gas(es). The use of nitrogen i 1'7~ 2 and other inert gases is beneficial from the standpoint of avoiding a tendency toward hydrothermal catalyst deactivation which may result from the use of steam.
The following comments and discussion relating to metals 5 management, carbon management and heat management may be of assistance in obtaining best results when operating the invention.
Since these remarks are for the most part directed to what is considered the best mode of operation, it should be apparent that the invention is not limited to the particular modes of operation 10 discussed below. Moreover, since certain of these comments are necessarily based on theoretical considerations, there is no intention to be bound by any such theory, whether expressed herein or implicit in the operating suggestions set forth hereinafter.
Although discussed separately below, it is readily apparent 15 that metals management, carbon management and heat management are interrelated and interdependent subjects both in theory and practice. While coke yield and coke laydown on catalyst are primarily the result of the relatively large quantities of coke precursors found in carbo-metallic oils, the production of coke is 20 exacerbated by high metals accumulations, which can also significantly affect catalyst performance. Moreover, the degree of success experienced in metals management and carbon management will have a direct influence on the extent to which heat management is necessary. Moreover, some of the steps taken in support of 25 metals management have proved very helpful in respect to carbon and heat management.
As noted previously the presence of a large heavy metals accumulation on the catalyst tends to aggravate the problem of dehydrogenation and aromatic condensation, resulting in increased 30 production of gases and coke for a feedstock of a given Ramsbottom carbon value. The introduction of substantial quantities of H20 into the reactor, either in the form ,~, of steam or liquid water, appears highly beneficial from the standpoint of keeping the heavy metals in a less harmful form, i . e .
the oxide rather than metallic form. This is of assistance in maintaining the desired selectivity.
Also, a unit design in which system components and residence times are selected to reduce the ratio of catalyst reactor residence time relative to catalyst regenerator residence time will tend to reduce the ratio of the times during which the catalyst is respectively under reduction conditions and oxidation conditions.
This too can assist in maintaining desired levels of selectivity.
Whether the metals content of the catalyst is being managed successfully may be observed by monitoring the total hydrogen plus methane produced in the reactor and/or the ratio of hydrogen to methane thus produced. In general, it is considered that the hydrogen to methane mole ratio should be less than about 1 and preferably about 0 . 6 or less, with about 0 . 4 or less being considered about optimum. In actual practice the hydrogen to methane ratio may range from about 0 . 5 to about 1. 5 and average about 0.8 to about 1.
Careful carbon management can improve both selectivity (the ability to maximize production of valuable products ), and heat productivity. In general, the techniques of metals control described above are also of assistance in carbon management. The usefulness of water addition in respect to carbon management has already been spelled out in considerable detail in that part of the specification which relates to added materials for introduction into the reaction zone. In general, those techniques which improve dispersion of the feed in the reaction zone should also prove helpful, these include for instance the use of fogging or misting devices to assist in dispersing the feed.
Catalyst to oil ratio is also a factor in heat management. In common with prior FCC practice on VGO, the reactor temperature ;

11'~'1192 may be controlled in the practice of the present invention by respectively increasing or decreasing the flow of hot regenerated catalyst to the reactor in response to decreases and increases in reactor temperature, typically the outlet temperature in the case of 5 a riser type reactor. Where the automatic controller for catalyst introduction is set to maintain an excessive catalyst to oil ratio, one can expect unnecessarily large rates of carbon production and heat release, relative to the weight of fresh feed charged to the reaction zone .
Relatively high reactor temperatures are also beneficial from the standpoint of carbon management. Such higher temperatures foster more complete vaporization of feed and disengagement of product from catalyst.
Carbon management can also be facilitated by suitable 15 restriction of the total pressure in the reactor and the partial pressure of the feed. In general, at a given level of conversion, relatively small decreases in the aforementioned pressures can substantially reduce coke production. This may be due to the fact that restricting total pressure tends to enhance vaporization of high 20 boiling components of the feed, encourage cracking and facilitate disengagement of both unconverted feed and higher boiling cracked products from the catalyst. It may be of assistance in this regard to restrict the pressure drop of equipment downstream of and in communication with the reactor. But if it is desired or necessary 25 to operate the system at higher total pressure, such as for instance because of operating limitations (e. g. pressure drop in downstream equipment) the above descrihed benefits may be obtained by restricting the feed partial pressure. Suitable ranges for total reactor pressure and feed partial pressure have been set forth 30 above, and in general it is desirable to attempt to minimize the pressures within these ranges.
The abrupt separation of catalyst from product vapors and i 11'7~:19Z

unconverted feed (if any) is also of great assistance. It is for this reason that the so-called vented riser apparatus and technique disclosed in U . S . Patents 4, 070 ,159 and 4, 066, 533 to George D .
Myers et al is the preferred type of apparatus for conducting this 5 process. For similar reasons, it is beneficial to reduce insofar as possible the elapsed time between separation of catalyst from product vapors and the commencement of stripping. The vented riser and prompt stripping tend to reduce the opportunity for coking of unconverted feed and higher boiling cracked products 10 adsorbed on the catalyst.
A particularly desirable mode of operation from the standpoint of carbon management is to operate the process in the vented riser using a hydrogen donor if necessary, while maintaining the feed partial pressure and total reactor pressure as low as possible, and 15 incorporating relatively large amounts of water, steam and if desired, other diluents, which provide the numerous benefits discussed in greater detail above. Moreover, when liquid water, steam, hydrogen donors, hydrogen and other gaseous or vaporizable materials are fed to the reaction zone, the feeding of 20 these materials provides an opportunity for exercising additional control over catalyst to oil ratio. Thus, for example, the practice of increasing or decreasing the catalyst to oil ratio for a given amount of decrease or increase in reactor temperature may be reduced or eliminated by substituting either appropriate reduction 25 or increase in the charging ratios of the water, steam and other gaseous or vaporizable material, or an appropriate reduction or increase in the ratio of water to steam and/or other gaseous materials introduced into the reaction zone.
Heat management includes measures taken to control the amount 30 of heat released in various parts of the process and/or for dealing successfully with such heat as may be released. Unlike conventional FCC practice using VGO, wherein it is usually a 1 1'7'~

problem to generate sufficient heat during regeneration to heat balance the reactor, the processing of carbo-metallic oils generally produces so much heat as to require careful management thereof.
Heat management can be facilitated by various techniques 5 associated with the materials introduced into the reactor. Thus, heat absorption by feed can be maximized by minimum preheating of feed, it being necessary only that the feed temperature be high enough so that it is sufficiently fluid for sucessful pumping and dispersion in the reactor. When the catalyst is maintained in a 10 highly active state with the suppression of coking (metals control), so as to achieve higher conversion, the resultant higher conversion and greater selectivity can increase the heat absorption of the reaction. In general, higher reactor temperatures promote catalyst conversion activity in the face of more refractory and higher boiling 15 constituents with high coking potentials. While the rate of catalyst deactivation may thus be increased, the higher tcmperature of operation tends to offset this loss in activity. Higher temperatures in the reactor also contribute to enhancement of octane number, thus offsetting the octane depressant effect of high carbon lay 20 down. Other techniques for absorbing heat have also been discussed above in connection with the introduction of water, steam, and other gaseous or vaporizable materials into the reactor.
As noted above, the invention can be practiced in the above-described mode and in many others. an illustrative, 25 non-limiting example is described by the accompanying schematic diagrams in the figures and by the description of these figures which follows.
Referring in detail to the drawings, in Figure 1 petroleum feedstock is introduced into the lower end of riser reactor 2 30 through inlet line 1 at which point it is mixed with hot regenerated catalyst coming from regenerator 9 through line 3.

~'.` Rl-6117B

li~7~1~?2 -~>:1 -The feedstock is catalytically cracked in passing up riser 2 and the product vapors are separated from spent catalyst in vessel 8. The catalyst particles move upwardly from riser 2 into the space within vessel 8 and fall downwardly into dense bed 16. The S cracking products together with some catalyst fines pass through horizontal line 4 into cyclone 5. The gases are separated from the catalyst and pass out through line 6. The catalyst fines drop into bed 16 through dipleg 19.
The spent catalyst, coated with coke and vanadium in a 10 reduced state, passes through line 7 into upper dense fluidized bed 18 within regenerator 9. The spent catalyst is fluidized with a mixture of air, C0 and C02 passing through porous plate 21 from lower zone 20. The spent catalyst is partially regenerated in bed 18 and is passed into the lower portion of vented riser 13 through line 11. Air is introduced into riser 13 through line 12 where it is mixed with partially regenerated catalyst. The catalyst is forced rapidly upwards through the riser and it falls into dense settled bed 17. Line 14 provides a source of reducing gas such as C0 for bed 17 to keep the regenerated catalyst in a reducing atmosphere 20 and thus keep vanadium present in a reduced oxidation state.
Regenerated catalyst is returned to the riser reactor 2 through line 3, which is provided with a source of a reducing gas such as C0 through line 22.
In Figure 2, spent catalyst coated with coke and vanadium in a 25 reduced state flows into dense fluidized bed 32 of regenerator 31 through inlet line 33. Air to combust the coke and fluidize the catalyst is introduced through line 34 into air distributor 35. Coke is burned and passes upwardly into riser regenerator 36. The partially regenerated catalyst which reaches the riser 35 is 30 contacted with air from line 37 which completes the regeneration.
The regenerated catalyst passes upwardly from the top of the riser 36 and falls down into dense settled bed 37. Dense bed 37 and the zone above 37 through which the regenerated catalyst falls are 1~7'~

supplied with a reducing gas such as CO through lines 40 and 41.
The regenerated catalyst is returned to the cracking reactor through lin~ 38. The CO-rich flue gases leave the regenerator through line 39.
5Having thus described this invention, the following Example is offered to illustrate it in more detail.
Example A carbo-metallic feed at a temperature of about 400F is fed at a rate of about 2000 pounds per hour into the bottom of a vented 10riser reactor where it is mixed with a zeolite catalyst at a temperature of about 1275~F and a catalyst to oil ratio by weight of about 11.
The carbo-metallic feed has a heavy metal content of about 5 ppm Nickel Equivalents, including 3 ppm vanadium, and has a 15Conradson carbon content of about 7 percent. About 86 percent of the feed boils above 650F and about 20 percent of the feed boils above 1025F.
The temperature within the reactor is about 1000F and the pressure is about 27 psia. About 75 percent of the feed is 20converted to fractions boiling at a temperature less than 430F and about 53 percent of the feed is converted to gasoline. During the conversion, about 11 percent of the feed is converted to coke.
The catalyst containing about one percent by weight of coke contains about 20,000 ppm Nickel Equivalents including about 12,000 25ppm vanadium. The catalyst is stripped with steam at a temperature of about 1000F to remove volatiles and the stripped catalyst is introduced into the upper zone of the regenerator as shown in Figure 1 at a rate of about 23,000 pounds per hour, and is partially regenerated to a coke concentration of about 0.2 percent 30by a mixture of air, CO and C02. The CO/C02 ratio in the fluidized bed in the upper zone is about 0.3.
The partially regenerated catalyst is passed to the bottom of a riser reactor where it is contacted with air in 1 ~ '7'~1~2 an amount sufficient to force the catalyst up the riser with a residence time of about. 1 second. The regenerated catalyst, having a coke loading of about 0.05 percent exits from the top of the riser and falls into a dense bed having a reducing atmosphere comprising 5 CO. The regenerated catalyst is recycled to the riser reactor for contact with additional feed.

Claims (33)

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property of privilege is claimed, are defined as follows:

1. A process for converting a vanadium-containing hy-drocarbon oil feed to lighter products comprising:
contacting said oil feed under conversion conditions with a cracking catalyst to form lighter products and coke, whereby vanadium in an oxidation state less than +5 and coke are deposited on said catalyst;
separating said lighter products from the spent cata-lyst carrying vanadium in an oxidation state less than +5 and coke:
regenerating said spent catalyst by contacting it with an oxygen-containing gas under conditions whereby said coke on the spent catalyst is combusted, forming gaseous products comprising CO and CO2, said regeneration being carried out under conditions whereby vanadium is maintained in an oxida-tion state less than +5; and recycling the regenerated catalvst to the regenerator to contact fresh feed.

2. A process according to claim 1 wherein said feed contains 650°F+ material characterized by a carbon residue on pyrolysis of at least about 1 and a Nickel Equivalent content of heavy metals of at least about 4.

3. A process according to claim 2 wherein said 650°F+
material represents at least about 70% bv volume of said feed and includes at least about 10% bv volume of material which will not boil below about 1000°F.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein the feed contains at least about 0.1 ppm vanadium.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein the feed contains at least about 1 ppm vanadium.

6. The process of claim 1 wherein the feed contains from about 1 to about 5 ppm vanadium.

7. The process of claim 3 wherein the feed contains more than about 5 ppm vanadium.

8. The process of claim 1 wherein the cracking cata-lyst comprises a zeolite molecular sieve catalyst contain-ing from about 1 to about 60% by weigh of sieve.

9. The process of claim 1 wherein the cracking cata-lyst comprises a zeolite molecular sieve catalyst contain-ing about 15 to about 50% by weight of sieve.

10. The process of claim 1 wherein the cracking cata-lyst comprises a zeolite molecular sieve catalyst containing about 20 to about 45% by weight of sieve.

11. The process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of vanadium on said catalyst is greater than about 0.05% of the weight of the catalyst.

12. The process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of vanadium on said catalyst is greater than about 0.1% of the weight of the catalyst.

13. The process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of vanadium on said catalyst is greater than about 5% by weight of the catalyst.

14. me process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of vanadium on said catalyst is from 0.1 to about 5% by weight of the catalyst.

15. me process of claim 1 wherein coke in the amount of 0.3 to 3% by weight of the catalyst is deposited on said catalyst.

16. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst is re-generated at a temperature from about 1100° to about 1600°F.

17. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst is re-generated at a temperature from about 1200° to about 1500°F.

18. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst is regenerated at a temperature in the range of about 1275° to about 1425°F.

19. The process of claim 1 wherein sufficient coke is retained on the regenerated catalyst to provide vanadium de-posited on the catalyst with a non-oxidizing environment.

20. The Process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of coke on the regenerated catalyst is at least about 0.05%.

21. The process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of coke on the regenerated catalyst is in the range of about 0.05 to about 0.15 percent.

22. The process of claim 1 wherein the regeneration is carried out in at least two stages and at least one stage contains CO and CO2 in a molar ratio of at least about 0.25.

23. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst is regenerated in at leant two stages, in the first stage of which said spent catalyst is contacted in a dense fluidized bed with a gas containing less than a stoichiometric amount of oxygen to convert the hydrogen in said coke to H2O and the carbon in said coke to CO2, and in the final regenera-tion stage of which partially regenerated catalyst is con-tacted with a stoichiometric excess of oxygen for a period of time of less than about 2 seconds.

24. The process of claim 23 wherein the catalyst in said final stage comprises a dispersed phase having a den-sity less than about 4 pounds per cubic foot.

25. The process of claim 23 wherein the residence time of the catalyst in said dense fluidized bed is at least about 5 minutes.

26. The process of claim 23 wherein said fluidized bed has a density from about 25 to about 50 pounds per cubic foot.

27. The process of claim 23 wherein the partially re-generated catalyst is contacted with at least a stoichio-metric amount of oxygen in a riser regenerator, the resi-dence time of the catalyst in the riser regenerator is less than about 2 seconds, and the regenerated catalyst is sepa-rated from the gaseous products.

28. The process of claim 27 wherein the residence time of the catalyst in the riser regenerator is less than about 1 second.

29. The process of claim 27 wherein the separated, regenerated catalyst is contacted with a reducing gas.

30. The process of claim 27 wherein the separated, regenerated catalyst is immediately contacted with a redu-cing gas and is then collected in a dense bed maintained un-der a reducing atmosphere.

31. The process of claim 27 wherein the density of the catalyst within the riser regenerator is less than about 4 pounds per cubic foot.

32. The process of claim 27 wherein the density of the catalyst within the riser is less than about 2 pounds per cubic foot.

33. The process of claim 27 wherein the regenerated catalyst is separated from the gaseous products by being projected in a direction established by the riser regenera-tor, or an extension thereof, while the gaseous products are caused to make an abrupt change of direction resulting in an abrupt, substantially instantaneous ballistic separa-tion of gaseous products from regenerated catalyst.