CA1162500A - Coal beneficiation - Google Patents

Coal beneficiation

Info

Publication number
CA1162500A
CA1162500A CA000388248A CA388248A CA1162500A CA 1162500 A CA1162500 A CA 1162500A CA 000388248 A CA000388248 A CA 000388248A CA 388248 A CA388248 A CA 388248A CA 1162500 A CA1162500 A CA 1162500A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
solid fuel
coal
salt
water
beneficiation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA000388248A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Matthew A. Mcmahon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Texaco Development Corp
Original Assignee
Texaco Development Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Texaco Development Corp filed Critical Texaco Development Corp
Priority to CA000388248A priority Critical patent/CA1162500A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1162500A publication Critical patent/CA1162500A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Solid Fuels And Fuel-Associated Substances (AREA)

Abstract

COAL BENEFICIATION
(D#76,547F) ABSTRACT
The BTU value of a solid fuel is increased by subjecting the fuel to hydrothermal treatment in the pres-ence of an added decarboxylation catalyst.

Description

s~o This invention relates to the upgrading of solid fuels. More particularly, it is concerned with the benefi-ciation of low rank solid fuels such as sub-bituminous coal and lignite.
Millions of tons of low rank solid fuels exist in this country and, although many of these deposits may be readily mined, they are not used extensively as fuels because for the most part, they are located at a great distance from the point of ultimate use and in addition they have several characteristics wbich make them less valuable as fuels~ For example, these low rank solid fuels, although generally they have a relatively low sulfur content, still contain too much sulfur to permit their use as a fuel and yet meet the current regulations with respect to S02 emissions. In addition, to make these coals economically attractive, means must be found for separating the components of the coal having little or no heating value from those components having a high heating value. Thus, inorganic mineral matter, water and carbon dioxide are desirabl~ removed from quch fuels to produce a fuel having a higher B~U per pound value and thereby produce a fuel which is more economic to transport either by rail or pipeline.
The removal of ash-forming minerals from coal is difficult and ordinary beneficiation techniques such as jigging, tabling and sink and float techniques are not particularly efficient with the lower rank coals. Ash-forming minerals generally occur in mined coals either as "segregated impurities" or as an inherent part of the coal.
The segregated ash forming impurities are those that exist as individual discrete particles when the coal has been ~

sr~o broken down. They are composed, for the most part, of shale, clay, sand, stone and other mineral material derived either from strada interbedded with the coal or from the roof and floor of the coal bed. Ordinarily, they are remov-able by mechani~al means. On the other hand, the term "inherent" or "fixed" ash is used to distinguish that part of the impurity i.n the coal which cannot be separated by mechanical means. For economic and practical reasons, there-fore, it is deQirable to reduce the ash content of the fuel but conventional procedure~ have little effect on the fixed ash.
Another undesirable characteristic, particularly in the case of low quality fuels such as sub-bituminous coal and lignite, is that these fuels contain a considerable amount of combined or bound water. This is a most undesir-able ingredient in that although bound water is present in the solid fuel it does not play any part in the formation of the slurry vehicle and consequently it has little effect on the viscosity or pumpability of a solid fuel-water slurry.
This means that if the fuel is to be transported by pipeline additional energy is consumed in the movement of the slurry.
Additionally, the bound water affects the use of the fuel as its presence in the combustion zone results ~n a reduced flame temperature. It is therefore desirable to remove as much combined or bound moicture a conveniently practical from the solid fuel prior to its transportation or use.
It is also desirable to reduce the oxygen content of the solid fuel and as a result, increase its BTU value.
2-It is therefore, an object of this invention to reduce the sulfur content of solid fuels. Another object is to reduce the bound water content of solid fuels. Still another object is to increase the heating value of solid fuels by reducing the ash and oxygen content thereof. These and other objects will be obvious to those skilled in the art from the following disclosure.
These objects can be fulfilled by subjecting the solid fuel to hydrothermal treatment in the presence of a decarboxylation catalyst.
According to the invention, there is provided a process for the beneficiation of a solid fuel which comprises forming a mixture of particulate solid fuel and water, heating the mixture to a temperature between about 300F. and 706F. at a pressure sufficient to maintain substantially all of the water in liquid state in the presence of an added catalytic amount of a decarboxylation catalyst comprising a soluble salt of copper, nickel or vanadium.
The feed used in the process of our invention includes any solid carbonaceous combustible material containing ash-forming ingredients and/or sulfur compounds and/or bound water and carboxylates and mixtures thereof.
Such materials include bituminous coal, sub-b;tuminous coal, lignite, biomass, organic waste and the like. The feed solid fuel should be ground so ~hat at least 80% and preferably 100% passes through a U.S. Standard 14 mesh sieve, the finer the grind, the faster and more complete the reaction for a given set of reaction conditions.

,i, .~

5-~JO

The particulate solid fuel and water are mixed in an amount to provide a mixture cont:aining from about 30 to 65 weight % solids with 40 to 60% solids being preferred.
If the process is of the batch type, the solid fuel and water may be charged separately to the reaction zone such as an autoc]ave or they may be charged together as a slurry.
In such latter event, the water excluding bound water should be present in the slurry in an amount between about 40 and 60 weight % as, if the water content is less than about 40 percent, the slurry may be difficult to pump. Such a slurry is also used when the process is of the continuous type where the slurry is, for example, passed through an elongated tubular hydrothermal reaction zone.
The hydrothermal or beneficiation trea-tment is well known and is disclosed, for example, in U. S. Patents 4,018,571 and 4,104,035 to Cole et al. As practiced in the process of the invention, it may be effected under either static or dynamic conditions. In one embodiment of the invention, the slurry is introduced into a pressure vessel which is then sealed and heated under autogenous pressure to a temperature between about 300 and 706F, preferably between 400 and 650F, with the pressure being such that water in the liquid state is maintained in the reaction vessel. After a period of time between about one minute and two hours, the vessel is vented and the slurry removed therefrom.
In another embodiment of the invention, the solid fuel-water slurry is passed under conditions of turbulent flow through an elongated tubular reaction ~one. The con-5~

tinuous reaction conditions are substantially the same asthose recited above for the batch I:ype of operatlon.
To assist in the removal of oxygen, the hydro-thermal treatment is carried out in the presence of a decar-~oxylation catalyst comprising a soluble salt of copper, nickel or vanadium such as the chloride, benzoate, ~arbonate, acetate and the like, i.e. any salt that is soluble to at least 0.1 wt. % in the reaction mixture.
The catalyst may be present in the slurry in an amount between about 1 and 15 percent based on the total weight of the slurry with concentrations of from 4 to 8 weight percent being preferred.
When the catalyst is reduced to a lower valence state, it may be regenerated by contact with a free oxygen containing gas such as air, oxygen enriched air or substan-tially pure oxygen. In the batch type of process, the oxygen-containing gas may be pressured into the pressure vessel or introduced into the reaction zone before the run is ~tarted and the reaction vessel sealed. Similarly, in the continuous process the oxygen-containing gas may be introduced with the slurry feed or at one or variou~ stages of the reaction.
The reaction may be promoted by the presence of salts of magnesium, cobalt and barium present in an amount between about 0.001 and 0.2 moles per lOOg of solid fuel.
The following examples are submitted for illustra-tive purposes only and it should not be construed that the invention is restricted thereto.

Srl~3 EXAMPLE I
The feed in this example is a sub-bituminous coal having the following analysis:
TAsLE 1 Ultimate Moisture and Analysis As Received Ash Free Moisture % 23.9 Carbon ~ 45.5 71.21 Hydrogen % 5.9 5-05 Nitrogen % 0.69 1.08 Sulfur % 0.71 1.11 Ash ~ 12.2 Oxygen % (By difference) 11.1 21.57 Calorific Value, BTU/lb. 7637 12088 The coal was air dried at room temperature and pulverized in a hammer mill to minus 60 mesh. Several 200 gram portions of coal were then riffled from the large batch of coal to use for a serieR of hydrcthermal treatment experiments .
To a two liter steel bomb equipped for operation at high pressure were added 200 grams of coal, 400 grams of water and an amount of cupric acetate listed below in Table 2. The bomb was then sealed, flushed with nitrogen and pressured except in Run 1 to 200 psig with nitrogen. The bomb was then heated with rocking to the desired temperature.
After 30 minutes at this temperature the apparatus is cooled to 300F and the water and gas is vented. After cooling to room temperature, the coal is removed from the bomb and washed with 200 ml. of water on a Buchner funnel to remove the residual catalyst from the coal. The product coal is air dried, ground ~o minus 60 mesh and sampled for analysis.
The results of these runs are summarized in Table 2.

Run Temp. Max Pre~sure Cupric Acetate %02(MAF)* BTU/lb.
No. F PSIG ~ in--coal (MAF)*
_, ** - - - 21.57 12088 1 500 700 4 21.24 12019 2 500 1150 8 19.18 12440
3 500 1200 0 22.30 12159
4 400 620 8 20.30 12343 400 630 0 21.93 11813 * Moisture and ash free ** Untreated It is clear from the results presented in Table 2 that the addition of cupric acetate benefically decreases the oxygen content of the coal. When the higher concentra-tion of catalyst is used, the loss of oxygen from the coal is reflected in an increase in the BTU content relative to control runs and feed coal. At low catalyst concentrations, the change in BTU appears to be small and within experi-mental error.
EXAMPLE II
The runs in thi~ example are substantial dupli-cates of the runs in Example I, the differences being that the bomb was initially flushed with oxygen, pressured with oxygen to the pressure designated in Table 3 at room temp-erature and then pressured to a 200 psig total pressure with nitrogen. Data on these runs appear below in Table 3.

-7~

l'lti'~

.~
~^ er ~ ,1 o ~r co CO
:, ~1 m ~ ~ ~ ~ I~
E~
~1 o r~ o~
_l u o O U~ er ~ ~
5~ ~ ~ r-~I
~ o h o o o .c tn n Ir) 1(7 ~) ~ ~ er ~o CO CO CO

Q~ ~ In O O
h H t`~ O O
_I

X

h o o O ,C
o o o ~q o U~

O h Z ~o I` co a~ rl L~ :~

The results in Table 3 clearly demonstrate the beneficial effect of oxygen when used in conjunction with cupric acetate in the hydrothermal treatment of a low qual-ity coal over the runs in Table 2 which were carried out in an inert atmosphere in the absence of added hydrogen. In Runs 7, 8 and 9 the average sulfur reduction was about 10%.
Similar results are obtainable with the soluble salts of nickel and vanadium.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that the use of a decarboxylation catalyst permits the hydrothermal treat-ment to be run at lower temperatures and pressures than con-ventional hydrothermal treatments. Since the catal~stc are water-soluble, they can be recovered and re-used. Additional benefits by way of lower temperatureq and pressures for equivalent decarboxylation are obtained when the water used in the hydrothermal treatment contains from 1 to 5 wt. %
alkali metal compound such as sodium carbonate or sodium hydroxide.
Various modifications of the invention as herein-before set forth may be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof and therefore only such limitations should be made as are indicated in the appended claims.

Claims (8)

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process for the beneficiation of a solid fuel which comprises forming a mixture of particulate solid fuel and water, heating the mixture to a temperature between about 300°F. and 706°F. at a pressure sufficient to maintain substantially all of the water in the liquid state in the presence of an added catalytic amount of a decarboxylation catalyst comprising a soluble salt of copper, nickel or vanadium.
2. The process of Claim 1 in which the solid fuel comprises sub-bituminous coal.
3. The process of Claim 1 in which the solid fuel comprises lignite.
4. The process of Claim 1 in which the salt is a cupric salt.
5. The process of Claim 1 or 4 in which the salt is the acetate.
6. The process of Claim 1 in which the beneficiation treatment is carried out in the presence of a free-oxygen containing gas.
7. The process of Claim 6 in which the salt comprises cupric acetate.
8. The process of Claim 1 in which the hydrothermal treatment is carried out in the presence of added alkali or alkaline earth metal compound.
CA000388248A 1981-10-19 1981-10-19 Coal beneficiation Expired CA1162500A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA000388248A CA1162500A (en) 1981-10-19 1981-10-19 Coal beneficiation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA000388248A CA1162500A (en) 1981-10-19 1981-10-19 Coal beneficiation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1162500A true CA1162500A (en) 1984-02-21

Family

ID=4121202

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000388248A Expired CA1162500A (en) 1981-10-19 1981-10-19 Coal beneficiation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CA (1) CA1162500A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1129797A (en) Hydrothermal alkali metal recovery process
US4092125A (en) Treating solid fuel
US4157246A (en) Hydrothermal alkali metal catalyst recovery process
US4113615A (en) Method for obtaining substantially complete removal of phenols from waste water
US4159195A (en) Hydrothermal alkali metal recovery process
US4097244A (en) Process for removing sulfur from coal
US3393978A (en) Deashing of carbonaceous material
US4304571A (en) Coal beneficiation
US4861723A (en) Microbiological desulfurization of coal and coal water admixture to provide a desulfurized fuel
US4249910A (en) Process for removing sulfur from coal
US4018571A (en) Treatment of solid fuels
CA1102266A (en) Process for removing sulfur from coal
JPS6349719B2 (en)
CA1119542A (en) System for the recovery of alkali metal compounds for reuse in a catalytic coal conversion process
US4047898A (en) Upgrading of solid fuels
US4224038A (en) Process for removing sulfur from coal
CA1162500A (en) Coal beneficiation
Hayashi et al. Removal of calcium from low rank coals by treatment with CO2 dissolved in water
US4657702A (en) Partial oxidation of petroleum coke
US4206033A (en) CO2 Pretreatment prevents calcium carbonate formation
CA1130230A (en) Hydrothermal alkali metal recovery process
CA1106788A (en) Coal desulfurization using silicates
US4954137A (en) Inhibition of sulfide inclusion in slag
US4174953A (en) Process for removing sulfur from coal
US4543104A (en) Coal treatment method and product produced therefrom

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry