CA1151812A - Methods of deinking secondary fibers - Google Patents

Methods of deinking secondary fibers

Info

Publication number
CA1151812A
CA1151812A CA000364507A CA364507A CA1151812A CA 1151812 A CA1151812 A CA 1151812A CA 000364507 A CA000364507 A CA 000364507A CA 364507 A CA364507 A CA 364507A CA 1151812 A CA1151812 A CA 1151812A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
fiber
group
deinking
aqueous
secondary fiber
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA000364507A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
James E. Maloney
Thomas R. Oakes
Richard E. Freis
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ecolab Inc
Original Assignee
Economics Laboratory Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Economics Laboratory Inc filed Critical Economics Laboratory Inc
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1151812A publication Critical patent/CA1151812A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C5/00Other processes for obtaining cellulose, e.g. cooking cotton linters ; Processes characterised by the choice of cellulose-containing starting materials
    • D21C5/02Working-up waste paper
    • D21C5/025De-inking
    • D21C5/027Chemicals therefor
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W30/00Technologies for solid waste management
    • Y02W30/50Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
    • Y02W30/64Paper recycling

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Artificial Filaments (AREA)

Abstract

Abstract of the Disclosure Washing methods of deinking secondary cellulose fiber (i.e., removing unwanted non-cellulose materials therefrom) are disclosed. These washing methods (as opposed to flotation methods) generally involve deinking the fiber with surface active agent (surfactant) comprising:

an oxyethylene glycol chain, wherein one terminal hydroxyl of the chain has been replaced with an ether group selected from the group consisting of an aliphatic ether group and an alkylaromatic ether group, and the other terminal hydroxyl of the chain has been replaced with an ether group selected from the group consisting of a polyoxypropylene group and a benzyl ether group.

The present washing method of deinking reduces or eliminates objectionable foam, potentially provides energy savings yet maintains or improves the quality of the deinked fiber.

Description

S~ L2 Background of the Invention This invention relates to methods of deinking or decontaminating secondary ti.e., not virgin or primary) cellulosic fiber or fiber sources. More particularly, the present invention relates to washing methods of deinking recycled cellulose fiber, and especially to those washing methods which employ aqueous media having therein surface active agents (surfactants).

Field of Invention _ _ Since at least the time of the early Egyptians, man has found it expedient to make and use paper. Until recently the majority of the paper produced world-wide has been produced by the conversion of primary or virgin fiber sources, e.g., plant fiber such as wood or cotton, into paper. More rec~ntly, a significant proportion of the cellulosic fiber stock used in the United States to make paper has become secondary fiber, i.e., fiber which has already been converted to paper at least once. Common classes of secondary fiber include reclaimed fiber which is paper mill processing waste and recycled fiber which is fiber which has previously been completely converted to its intended consumer end use and which has generally been returned to a paper maker for reuse. The present invention preferably utilizes recycled fiber which is capable of being deinked.

To supplement or replace virgin fiber feedstocks with substantially equivalent quality secondary fiber, a source of such fiber, e.g., ledger, newsprint, magazine, computer printout, board, etc., must be treated to remove ink and ~v~

~9l8~2 various other non-cellulosic materials or contaminants (e.g., binders, adhesives, coatings, wet-strength resins, pigments which were originally added to the paper to impart desirable properties thereto such as wet strength, color, gloss, etc.). The first step in any conventional treatment processes for removing unwanted, non-cellulose contaminants is repulping, i.e., treatment of the recycled secondary fiber to return it to its constituent cellulose fibersO
Repulping (which is generally accomplished by contacting the recycled fiber with a heated, usually alkaline, aqueous medium having any of a variety of processing aids or chemicals therein) tends to break up and separate non-cellulosic materials from the cellulose fiber, thus making the non-cellulosic contaminants isolable therefrom.

Conventionally, two distinct, very different methods are employed to isolate the non-cellulosics to produce the deinked fiber after repulping, these two methods being referred to as "flotation" and "washing". Flotation methods of ink isolation generally involve passing a stream of air bubbles through an aqueous stream of dispersed cellulose fiber ti.e., the repulped cellulose fiber slurry), the cellulose fiber slurry having therein flotation agents, which promote the adhesion of ink particles to the air bubbles. The air bubbles rise to the top of fiber slurry and carry the ink particles with them thereby generating foam which can be removed from the flotation cell. This method relies upon an unequal distribution of the ink and fiber in the slurrying-flotation mediumO That is, the fibers are supposed to remain below in the slurry while the ink rises to the top with the bubbles. In the "washing" method, on the other hand, the ink and fiber are more or less uniformly distributed throughout the slurry, and foaming or bubble formation, though present, is not particularly desired. The objective in the "washing" process is to get ~he ink to migrate from the fiber into an aqueous medium and then separate the aqueous medium from the fiber. Thus, the washing method typically comprises repulping, preferably under low-foaming conditions, of secondary fiber in an ink-removing aqueous medium, whereby the ink (and other non-cellulosic contaminants, if present) is mechanically and/or chemically removed from the fiber and distributed more or less uniformly throughout the aqueous medium the repulping step is then typically followed by at least a partial change of the aqueous medium, e.g. dilution and/or screening.

Some removal of ink from the fiber can be accomplished in the "washing" method purely through the action of water being agitated with fiber. However, ~reater removal of ink can be achieved by blending a surface-active agent into the water. The surface-acti~e agent can make the aqueous medium more efficient in removing ink from the fiber.
Unfortunately, some of the surface-active agents (surfactants) which are effective in facilitating the removal of ink from fiber are not particularly effective in maintaining low foaming conditions. Conventional deinking operations which have employed surfactants in a washing-type deinking process have oftentimes generated excessive foam ~in the repulping, washing, separation, or cleaning steps) to the point where vario~s overflow basins or dump boxes had to be installed to receive the periodic over-foaming of the processing equipment. One proposed solution to this problem is to add chemical defoamers to the pulp or slurry to reduce foam. The defoaming chemicals do add to overall deinking efficiency, however, their primary function is merely to reduce foam.

Deinking carried out by the various conventional flo~ation processes can have several drawbacks. First, the capital investment for a flotation process is greater than the capital investment for a washing process. Secondly, a flotation process only operates efficiently if the S~ 2 consistency of the fiber feedstock i5 proper. Variation in feedstock consistency causes variation in the rate at which the air bubbles rise through the fiber stream thereby generating undesirable variation in the rate at which the slurry is decontaminated. Other variations in the feedstock can be troublesome. For example, if the secondary fiber was obtained from specially coated paper, natural or synthetic binding agents present in the paper or other non-cellulosic materials can have undesirable effects upon the flotation medium, as explained in West German laid-open application 2,143,912, published March 8, 1973, page 1, third paragraph. In addition, the weight percent cellulose fiber in the fiber feedstock for a flotation process generally is lower than for a washing process, thus necessitating the use of more water. Thirdly, the size of the bubbles generated in the flotation cell must fall within definite diameter ranges in order to efficiently carxy away the ink particles while leaving the cellulose fiber. The generation of air bubbles having a deined size is not technically difficult, but does complicate the process. Lastly~ by their very nature, flotation processes generate foam or froth which must be collected, dewatered, and returned to the environment.

The present invention contemplates avoidiny or mitigating the drawbacks of washing-type deinking methods while still obtaining the advantages of these methods, particularly as compared to the more complicated, more capital-intensive, and more sensitive flotation methods.

Summary of the Invention The present invention provides an improved washing method in which a particular class of nonionic surfactants provides both foam control (e.g. defoaming effects) and high deinking efficiency7 In this invention, little or no foam is generated during the washing-type deinking .

8~

methods. As a further indication of the efficiency of the process of this invention, it has unexpectedly been found that key process steps ~e.g. repulping) can be carried out at relatively low temperatures. Still further, the nature of the aqueous repulping or washing medium can be simplified, since a single nonionic surfactant from the aforementioned class of surfactants (or a combination of surfactants from this class, if desired) can accomplish both a high level of deinking efficiency and good defoaming effects.

Briefly, the present invention provides an improved washing method for producing substantially decontaminated secondary fiber comprising the step of:

suspending the secondary fiber in a hot aqueous medium, the aqueous medium being heated to a temperature in the range of about 25 to about 85C, preferably 35-60C, in the presence of a surface active agent comprising an oxyethylene glycol chain, wherein one terminal hydroxyl of the chain has been replaced with an aliphatic or alkylaromatic ether group, and the other terminal hydroxyl has been replaced with a polyoxypropylene group or a benzyl ether group.

In the usual practice of the process of this invention, contaminated secondary fiber is blended with water and the surfactant, thereby causing contaminants such as ink to separate from the fiber and become uniformly distributed throughout the aqueous medium, and the substantially decontaminated fiber is then substantially separated or isolated from the contaminated aqueous medium, e~g. by centrifuging, decanting, filtering, or~ preferably, screening. The separation or recovery of the decontaminated fiber from the aqueous medium can be proceeded by a concentration or dilution step and can be followed by additional washing-type steps, e~g. dilution and/or screening, which steps can be accompanied by agitation of dilute fiber slurries. It is particularly preferred in this invention that the deinking begin with the repulping of the secondary fiber, i.e. that the surfactant used in this invention be present during the repulping step.

Surpxisingly, the efficiency of surfactants used in this invention as determined in standard fiber brightness tests does not correlate with similar brightness tests used to determine efficiency of cotton detergency~ Accordingly, it is difficult to explain the high level of deinking efficiency provided by the surfactants used in this invention. This invention is not bound by any theory, but it is presently theorized that a certain balance between hydrophilic and hydrophobic or lipophilic character can be obtained through the aforementioned modifications of an oxyethylene glycol chain, and this balance provides both d~inking efficiency and defoaming. Thus, the aliphatic or alkylaromatic ether of the oxyethylene glycol i5 preferably terminated with either a benzyl ether group or a polyoxypropylene group which makes at least the same contribution to hydrophobe/hydrophile balance as the benzyl ether group would have made in its place. The resulting nonionic surfactant compound has a "foam break temperature"
(defined subsequently) which is typically above room temperature but preferably not above 85C, a typical "foam break temperature" range being 10-85C, optionally less than 60C.

Brief Description of the Drawing Figures 1 and 2 depict "foam break" isotherms ~as defined subsequently) for various surfactants of the present invention.

s~

- ~ -De f i n i t i ons As used in this application, the following terms have the indicated meanings.

"Deinking" means true chemical deinking in which an aqueous medium chemically extracts ink from secondary fiber. Such chemical deinking is to be distinguished from "mechanical"
deinking in which the action of water in a vigorously agitated aqueous pulp physically removes ink from the surface of the fibers and disperses it or distributes it through the aqueous medium.

"Uniformly distributed" means suspended and/or dispersed and/or dissolved. Dispersed materials or dispersed phases are considered to be a colloidal and/or non-s~ttling, while suspended materials may settle with time.

The terms "deinking" and "decontaminating" are generally used interchangeably herein to refer to the removal of non-cellulosic contaminants from secondary fiberO Such contaminants normally include printer's ink or other types of ink (including the ink vehicle, colorants such as dyes or pigments, etc.) but may also include coatings, binders, paper pigments, sizing, adhesives, and any other contaminants typically present in secondary fiber.

"Foam break temperature" is a measurement of surfactant behavior in aqueous media which is intended ~o serve as an alternative to the better-known cloud point test. The assignee of the present invention has discovered that "foam break temperature" measurements provide a more reliable indicator of the foam restriction ability of a given surfactant than the conventional cloud point determinations, particularly in paper mill processing and deinking operations. For some surfactants, the ~foam break temperature" is substantially the same as cloud point . ~, .

llslalz ~

temperature determined in a 1% solution. However, in a nonionic surfactant having a high ethylene oxide-to-propylene oxide ratio (EO/PO ratio), the ~foam break temperat~re" and the cloud point temperature may diverge substantially, particularly under actual dein~in~
conditions.

"Foam break temperatures" are measured by adding approximately 0.1% by weight of the nonionic surfactant to be tested to 3 liters o~ cold water contained in a temperature-controllabler metal 3 liter beaker. Upwardly projecting from the rim of the metal beaker a distance oE
about 2 feet ~60 cm) so as to contain foam generated from the water in the metal beaker is a glass cylinder having a vertical ruler for measurin~ the height of a column oE foam generated therein. Disposed near the open ena of the glass cylinder and directed into the metal beaker is a number 30/15 "V-Je~" spray nozzle which is in communication with a pressure controllable water pump. The water pum~
circulates the con~ents of the beaker through the nozzle.
For purposes of the evaluations herein, a pressure of 10 psi ~70 kPa) was provided by the pump to the nozzle. A
short period of time after activation of the pump, an e~uilibrium foam height is produced in the glass cylin~er, this e~uilibrium foam height being characteristic of given surfactant at a given temperature of the surfactant-water solution. At this point, the temperature of the water in ~he beaker is gradually increased, the height of the foam column being recorded at approxima~ely (F) intervals. The temperature at wh;ch the height of the foam column falls to a height in the range of 3 inches to 5 inches (7.5 cm to 13 cm) above the surface of the water in the metal beaker is defined to be the foam break temperature for the material being tested. This definition of "foam break temperature" has been found to correlate well with the foam restriction ability of the material in actual deinking processes.

.* Trade Mark 1~ 5~8: L~

g Detailed Description of the Invention As noted previously, surfactants used in this invention comprise an oxyethylene chain terminated at either end with ether groups. At one end, the ether group is aliphatic or alkylaromatic in nature~ and at the other end the ether group is an oxypropylene chain which in turn is either hydroxy-terminated or benzyl ether-terminatd.
Alternatively, depending upon the desired hydrophobe/hydrophile balance, a benzyl ether group alone can be the other terminal group.

A typical structural formula for preferred surfactants of this invention would be as follows:

R (Ar)a ~C2H4~n ~~~ 3 6 wherein a is zero or 1, Ar represents an aromatic residue, preferably monocyclic, R represents an aliphatic group, n has a value from about 3 to about 50, m h~s a value from about zero to about 50, and Y is selected Erom the group consisting of hydroxy and benzyl and is benzyl when m equals 0.

The R group is typically saturated and contains at least 6 carbons. When a equals zero, R contains from 6 to 24 carbons; when a equals 1, R normally contains no more than 18 carbon atoms. In short, the R~Ar)a group contains at least 6 aliphatic carbon atoms and up to a total of 24 carbon atoms.

The foregoing structural formula can be considered to encompass two major classes of surfactants, i.e. (a) alkylene oxide adducts of alkylphenols, and ~b~ alkylene oxide adducts of higher (greater than C5~ aliphatic ~ S~8~Z

alcohols. To provide a hydrophilic segment in the nonionic surfactant molecule~ the alkylphenol or the higher aliphatic alcohol is first condensed with ethylene oxide and then combined with a hydrophobic group which can be either an oxypropylene chain (obtained by condensation with propylene oxide) or a benzyl group or an oxypropylene chain terminated with a benzyl group. The oxyethylene chain is sometimes referred to as poly(ethylene oxide), and the polyoxypropylene chain is sometimes referred to as poly(propylene oxide), the vicinal oxide being typically meant.

Alkylphenol poly(ethylene oxide)-poly~propylene oxide) surfactants are generally prepared from alkylphenol-polyethylene oxide starting materials.
Alkylphenol-polyethylene oxide starting materials are a well known class of surfactants that have long been used in many different industrial processes. Such conventional materials generally have a structure Rl ~oc2H4)~oH

wherein Rl is a linear or branched, monovalent alkyl radical having from 6 to 18 carbon atoms, preferably having from 8 to 12 carbon atoms and preferably being empirically representable by the formula CaH2a+l (preferably, there is ~ut one Rl attached to the phenol nucleus~ but multiple Rl's are within the contemplation of this invention); n has a value of from 3 to 50 (preferably 6 to 15), each (-0-C2H4-) unit being derived from the ring opening of ethylene oxide o /\

3 ~:~L8~L2 also known as oxirane. (Alkyl chains are sometimes represented herein by 'IC'la wherein "a" is the number of carbon atoms in the chain, e.g., C12. This is to be understood to represent CaH2a+l where a saturated species is intended.) A particularly well known class of alkylphenol polylethylene oxide) is nonylphenol polyethylene oxide (NP-EO). Nonylphenol-polyethylene oxides are characterized by the presence of a nine carbon atom alkyl chain attached to the aromatic nucleus of the phenol, there also being attached to the aromatic nucleus ~in ortho, meta or para position with respect to the alkyl chain) a hydroxy-terminated polyether chain having from 1 to 40 ethylene oxide units, i.e., n has a value of 1 to 40~ While such conventional NP-EO's can be synthesized in fairly pure fractions with a fairly specific value for n, they are generally sold as mixtures of molecules having a range of n values. These mixtures are characterized by their average value of n and hence, a common material is NP-EOg 5 which has an average of 9.5 ethylene oxide units (moles) per nonylphenol nucleus (n = 9.5).
Nonylphenol-polyethylene oxides having average n values from 1 to 40 are commercially available from various companies including the GAF Company under the trade designation "Igepal"* Rohm and Haas Company under the trade designation "Triton"*and Jefferson Chemical Company under the trade designation "Surfonic"*.

The present invention utilizes alkylphenol polyethylene oxides having attached to the distal end of the polyethylene oxide chain, a plurality of propylene oxide units (-OC3H6-) or a benzyl group, the polypropylene oxide chain (when employed) preferably being hydroxy-terminated (-OH) or benz~l-terminated ~-CH~C6H5) to provide a structure of the sort OC2H4)~(0C3H6)~
* Trade Mark , -1~ 5~812 wherein Rl is defined as above, Y is selected from the group consisting of hydroxy or benzyl, n is defined as above and m has a value in the range of 0 to 50, preferably about 4 to about 48 (Y is benzyl when m = 0~. It has been found necessary for the polyethylene oxide segment to be positioned adjacent to the hydrophobic moiety (i.e., the alkyl phenoxy moiety or the higher molecular weight alcohol moiety) in order for the advantageous aspects of the present invention to be achieved.

It is normally preferred that m have a non-zero value.
When m is not zero but Y is hydroxyl, it is further preferred that the relatively hydrophobic segment represented by (OC3H6)m have sufficient propylene oxide units to make a contribution to the hydrophobic character of the molecule at least equal to that contributed by a benzyl group. It has also been found that replacement of the terminal hydroxyl group of the oxypropylene chain with various other terminal groups such as benz~l has not reduced the utility of the alkylphenol-poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide~ in the present invention. However, if the ratio of propylene oxide (PO) to ethylene oxide (EO) units is sufficiently high, it is ordinarily preferred that Y be a hydroxyl group.

The hydroxy-terminated nonylphenol-polyethylene oxide-propylene oxides (NP-EO-PO-OH) of the present invention are prepared according to methods which are well known to one skilled in the art. For example, NP-EO-PO-OH
may be prepared by reacting NP-EO (e.g., "Igepaln*or "Triton~ with propylene oxide at e.g. 100C to 150C, 1 to 4 atmospheres pressure, in the presence of an alkaline catalyst, e.g., KOH. United States Patent 3,021,372 to Dupre et al specifically describes the preparation of the preferred hydroxy-terminated octylphenol and nonylphenol-polyethylene oxide-polypropylene oxides~ the teaching of the '372 patent being incorporatea by reference * Trade Mark li 5~li!312 herein. Generally, it is preferable that the catalyst used to prepare the NP-Eo material not be removed prior to addition of the PO segments (i.e., unneutralized NP-EO
should be used).

A second type of surfactants within the class of sur~actants found useful in the practice of the present invention includes hydroxy-terminated or benzyl-terminated ethylene oxide-propylene oxide adducts of higher molecular weight or long chain alchols, the polyethylene oxide segment connecting the higher alcohol moiety to the polypropylene oxide segment. "Higher molecular weight" or "long chain" alcohols herein means linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated, primary or secondary alcohols having from 6 to about 24 carbon atoms generally having a molecular weight in the range of about 75 to 300, these materials sometimes being referred to as "fatty alcohols".
Nonionic surfactants p~oduced from the higher molecular weight alcohols can be represented as follows:
R2 (C2H4)n (C3 6 m wherein R2 is a linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated monovalent aliphatic chain having from about 6 to about 24 carbon atoms (preferably 10 to 18), Y is selected from the group consisting of hydroxy or benzyl, n has a value of about 3 to 50 (preferably 6 to 15), m has a value of about O to about 50 (prefera~ly about 4 to about 48), with Y being benzyl when m = O.

The preferred, hydroxy-terminated higher molecular weight alcohol EO-PO adducts may be prepared by adding the EO-PO
polyether segments to saturated or unsaturated alcohols having the desired carbon backbone. Alcohols useful herein may be synthetic alcohols (i~e~, alcohols prepared by ~he well-known Ziegler or carbonylation processes) or alcohols generally prepared by the reduction of naturally occurring - 115;11 3~2 fatty acids to fatty alcohols. Useful fatty acid starting materials may be obtained by extraction from natural sources such as coconut oil, palm oil, tallow, lard, and tall oil. The carbon chain length and structure of the alcohol is determined by the synthetic conditions or the nature of the fatty acid starting material employed~ of course, specific desired alcohol structures may be obtained from natural sources by distillation or the like, or by the above synthetic methods followed by distillation.
Particularly preferred higher alcohol EO-PO adducts for use in the present invention are synthesized from a mixture of primarily 16 carbon atom alcohol and 18 carbon atom alcohol with an EO5(PO)13-OH hydroxy-terminated polyether chain being attached thereto.

As noted above, the nonionic surfactants of the present invention are usually hydroxy-terminated or benzyl-terminated. Of course, hydroxy-termination results when the propylene oxide units are added to the polyethylene oxide chain ~which also would be hydroxy-terminated). A terminating benzyl group could be added to the structure by reacting benzyl chloride with the hydroxy-terminated alkylphenol-EO-PO material after the NP-EO-PO-OH material had been reacted with metallic sodium. Generally this could be accomplished at a temperature in the range of about 200F t93C) to 300~F
(150C).

The balance between hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties in preferred surfactants used in this invention can be considered to be roughly determined by the formula weight ratio of the hydrophilic portion to the hydrophobic portion, When both EO and PO units are present in the surfactant molecule, the EO/PO ratio i~ a major factor in determining hydrophobe/hydrophile balance for any given R(Ar)a terminal group. If no PO is present ~m = 0) r the size of the oxyethylene chain (the value of n) in relation ` - llS~2 to the hydrophobic contribution by the terminal benzyl ether is a major factor in this balance - again, for a given R(Ar)a group.

In those cases wherein the EO/PO ratio is a major factor in determining hydrophobe/hydrophile balance, typical ratios of EO to Po ~i.e. ratios of n to m) range from about 1:4 to 4:1. Lower "foam break temperatures" are typically encountered when the EO/PO ratio is less than 1:1 and particularly when there are at least about 6 propylene oxide units. Selection of a suitable hydrophobe/hydrophile balance is preferably achieved with reference to the aforementioned l'foam break temperature", rather than with reference to either cloud point or theoretically-derived HLB values. As noted previously, the foam break temperatures are considered to be a particularly reliable indicator of the desired balance of water solubility or dispersibility/ defoaming properties, and deinking properties in the context of this invention. Other criteria for selecting preferred nonionic surfactants involve reference to repulping and/or deinking temperatures, deinking efficiency as determined by standard fiber brightness tests, and similar practical criteria.

With reference to the Figures, one technique for selection of the appropriate nonionic surfactant will be described.

In Figure 1, the foam break temperature characteristics of nonylphenol-EO-PO surfactants with hydroxy-termination are summarized. The vertical axis of Figure 1 indicates the number of moles of ethylene oxide condensate (-OC2H4-) and the horizontal axis indicates the number of moles of propylene oxide condensate (-OC3H6) per mole of nonylphenol moiety (CgHlg-C6H4~). The lines on the Drawing which generally radiate from the origin (foam break isotherms) connect the various combinations of EO and PO
which provide the indicated foam break temperature thus .

., ~5~8~2 giving the EO-PO combination which will provide low or no foaming.

In a practice of the present invention, the deinking process is started and run until it attains equilibrium ~i.e., it is run for a period of time sufficient to eliminate major temperature variations). Having reached equilibrium, the temperature profile for the entire deinking process is determined (i.e., the variation of temperature of the deinking medium along the deinking process is recorded). Generally speaking, the greatest potential for foaming will occur where washing, filtering, or agitation, etc., is accomplished at the lowest temperature. Hence, in choosing the surfactant to be used, the lowest temperature encountered in the process will be determined and that temperature will be used to select an isotherm from Figure 1. For example, if the lowest temperature encountered throughout the deinking process is about 60F (15C) then either of NP-EO6 5PO12-OH or NP-EOg 5PO24-OH would appear to give acceptable, equivalent low foaming behavior as indicated by the foam break test.

Figure 2 illustrates foam break isotherms which have been determined for higher molecular weight alochol-EO-PO-OH
surfactants~ the use of which is disclo~ed herein. The particular surfactant tested in Figure 2 is a mixture of 10 carbon atom, 12 carbon atom and 14 carbon atom alcohols (i.e., R~ is about 28-34% C14 35-41% C12 and 27-33%
C10) to which there has been added polyether chains of the indicated composition. Similar isotherms are obtained for C16/C18 (approximately 60% C16, 40~ C18~
C14/C18 and C12/C18 alcohol-EO-PO adducts. It is theorized that similar foam break characteristics would be found for any of the surfactants~ the use of which i~
disclosed herein.

S18:~L2 Hence, in a practice of this invention deinking process optimization could be accomplished ~or any of the classes of surfactants disclosed and any of the individual compounds therein. Such isotherms would be determined by measuring the foam break temperature (as described above) for various combinations of EO and PO units on the particular higher alcohol or alkylphenol.

Selection of the foam break temperature is particularly important to consider in connection with the temperature at which the washing-type deinking process will be carried out. In a conventional deinking process utilizing water as the deinking medium, alone or in combination with the typically used surfactants and/or defoamers, the repulping step generally involves heating the aqueous secondary fiber pulp or slurry to, for example, 70C (160F). As the fiber slurry is processed, it tends to cool. As the slurry cools, it is well known that the surfactants conventionally used tend to promote foam formation. One technique used to reduce foam is to warm the aqueous medium above the temperature at which the particular surfactant will provide some defoaming. (According to findings available to the applicant, the defoaming is most likely to occur at temperatures above the foam break temperature.) In the typical prior art practice, the slurry is warmed by passing steam through the slurry as it proceeds down the deinking process.

In the present invention, these typical prior art temperatures can be used (e.g. temperatures up to ~5C), but lower repulping temperatures are greatly preferred, e.g. temperatures in the range of 30C (86F) to 60C
(140F). It has been found that once the temperature characteristics of a yiven deinking process have been determined, the surfactant can be selected so that foam production may be restricted or eliminated. This may mean that, as the temperature profile of a given deinking 115~ 2 process changes during the year (the temperature of wash water which is usually simply pumped from a convenient outdoor water source may vary by many degrees from the hottest part of the summer to the coldest months of the winter) it may be desirable to select a surfactant having a different hydrophobe/hydrophile balance (e.g. EO/PO or EO/benzyl ratio) so as to reduce foam production. In other ~ords, one would typically match the foam break temperature with the lower end of the repulping temperature range to ensure that the aqueous repulping medium will generally be warmer than the foam break temperature, even after the repulped secondary fiber has started to cool down from the initial processing stages, or even when the outdoor water source happens to be at a winter temperature. Conversely, any advantage provided by the relatively high temperature of an outdoor water source during the summer can be utilized through a different surfactant selection.

The Process As noted previously, repulping of the secondary Eiber is an important step in the typical washing-deinking process.
R~pulping without the presence of a surfactant is suitable for this invention, thereby enabling the skilled artisan to postpone addition of the surfactant to a later step in the process, e.g. a fiber slurrying step following repulping.
However, surfactants useful in this invention can also be present (and preferably are present) during repulping, thereby achieving a considerable amount of chemical separation of ink from the secondary fiber during this key step.

During repulping, the aqueous medium is preferably agitated. The pH of the medium can vary over a wide range (including both acidic and alkaline pH values), the surfactants used in this process being effective over this wide range of pM values. The consistency (i.e~ percent
2 ( solids) during repulping is similar to that of any typica paper pulp. Such paper pulp consistencies are normally well under 10% by weight to avoid excess;ve di~iculty in agitating, pumping, or otherwise manipulating the fiber slurry or pulp. On the other hand, a consistency below about 2% by weight would mean that the process would have to deal with enormous amounts of water. Dur~ng the initial stages of the repulping step, typical consistencies range from about 3 to about 6 or 7% cellulosic ~iber (~ased on the weight of the entire mass of pulp, including additives, etc~). After the initial deinking has been accomplished, it may be desirable to dilute the repulped secondar~ ~iber to a consistency below 3~ to acilitate separation o~ the relatively ink-free fiber from the aqueous pulping medium which now contains the contaminants in a state of ~ore or less uniform distribution.

Adjustments to the p~ of the repulping medium can be desirable, for example, 1% to 3% by wei~ht of caustic soda, based on the weight of cellulosic fiber in the repulping medium can be added. This level of sodium hydroxide addition would be typical for a pulp havin~ a consistenc~
of ~ to 6% and would work out to approximately 20 to 60 pounds of NaOH per ton of fiber.

Any of the commercially available apparatus commonly usea to provide repulping of secondary fiber (e~g~ the "Hydrapulper"~ can be used in the repu~pin~ step.

As noted previously, a typical practice of the repulping step in this invention achieves at least some extraction or separation of the contaminants, particularly ink, from the cellulosic fiber in the repulped mass. Since the contaminants are dispersed and/or dissolved ana/or suspended throughout the aqueous repulping medium, it is desirable to separate the aqueous medium from the fiber so that the contaminants will have less of a tendency to * Trade Mark .~ ' , ' , .
,,, .

l'lS~8~

redeposit on the surfaces of the fiber. The most preferred separation technique involves screening, i.e. deposition of the pulp onto a foraminous surface capable of retaining the fiber while the aqueous medium drains through the holes in this surface. The fiber deposited on the screen can be slurried in water and screened again. In this manner, the relatively pure or relatively contaminant-free fiber can be put through as many separation steps as desired. This technique of carrying away the contaminants is sometimes referred to as "washinq" and is typically the technique which gives the "washing"-type deinking process its name.
Neither flotation steps nor foaming is required during washing. The use of the nonionic surfactants described herein permits the use of conventional washing machinery and thereby avoids the expense and drawbacks of flotation-type equipment. In addition, the versatility of conventional washing equipment is expanded, because more and different grades of secondary fiber can be decontaminated according to the teachings of this invention. Amony the conventional types of washing apparatus suitable for us in this invention are the Lancaster washer, the sidehill washer, and the decker washer, all of which are well known in this art.

In an optional step which can be used in this invention, the repulped fiber may be partially cleaned of foreign matter such as dirt, staples) paper clips, etc. This type of foreign matter can be cleaned from the fiber by means of a series of screens of diminishing mesh size. Centrifugal cleaners have also been utilized to separate this type of foreign matter, si~ce the dirt, staples, paper clips, and other foreign matter of this type typically encountered in the treatment of secondary fiber usually differs quite markedly in density as compared to the cellulose and its normal contaminants.

~.~15~8~L2 After this optional removal o foreign matter, the repulped, cleaned stock may optionally be either concentrated or diluted; that is, water may be either added or taken away. Concentration or thickening of the fiber stock can be accomplished by various techniques such as vacuum-assisted filtration or decker-assisted removal of water.

During the aforementioned washing step or steps, the separation of the fiber from the aqueous medium can be facilitated with vacuum, gravity, centrifugally-assisted filtration, or other concentration techniques. Of the previously discussed types of washing equipment, the sidehill washer is preferred from the standpoint of low capital investment per amount of decontamined fiber produced.

Subsequent to completion of the desired number of washing steps, the decontaminated cellulosic fiber may be further treated (e.g~ by bleaching) to further improve color or other characteristics. Such additional treatments are optional in the context of the present invention.

In conventional deinking operations, there is a tendency to generate foam in any of several of the aforementioned deinlcing steps, e.g. the washing stepsb In the practice of the present invention~ excessive foaming has been substantially reduced if not completely eliminated, but decontamination efficiency has not been sacrificed.
Reduction of foaming increases the efficiency of the processing machinery (particularly in terms of throughput) because the volume handled by the processing machinery is not occupied by a great deal of foam. In addi~ion, reduction of foam reduces machinery down-time caused by over-foaming into the receiving basinsc In effect, reduction of foam in the practice of this invention tends ~S~8~

to increase the cost effectiveness of a washing-type deinking process.

In a paper mill-scale practice of the present invention, a quantity o secondary fiber which is to be deinked is charged to a repulping apparatus (e.g., "Hydrapulper"), to a consistency of 6%, i.e., 6% fiber, 94% H2O, there being mixed with the secondary fiber water which has been heated to a temperature in the range 8~F (25C) to 180F (85C).
Additionally, the nonionic surfactants of the present invention are added, there being 0.1% to 1% by weight surfactant based upon the total weight of the secondary fiber. Optionally, depending upon the specific conditions employed, a base such as caustic soda, sodium silicate, sodium carbonate, sodium phosphate, etc. may be added to the extent of up to 3% of the weight of the secondary fiber (optionally, acids such as sulfuric acid may be employed in the repulping solution). Other processing aids e.g., talc or water conditioner, which do not inhibit operation of the present invention may be added, generally before repulping. At this point the entire mass preferably is vigorously agitated e.g., for 30 minutes to 180 minutes, to assist separation of the non-cellulose materials from the secondary fiber and to promote separation of the cellulose fibers. Such agitation may be accomplished, for example, in attrition or non-attrition pulpers in a batch or continuous process.

After the preferred vigorous agitation, a suspension of repulped cellulosic fiber is produced, there being suspended in the fiber non-cellulosic materials such as inks, binders, etc.~ such non-cellulosic materials being easily washable from the cellulose fiber suspension. This suspension contains the nonionic surfactants of the present invention e.g., nonylphenol (EO~g 5(PO~14-OH, as well as any other additives.

. .

115~L81~

Next, the repulped, partially cleaned fiber is put through one or more washing steps, as described previously, e.g.
washing of the fiber using a sidehill washer, a Lancaster washer, or the like. The resulting decontaminted secondary fiber is suitable for use in a conventional paper making machine, e.g. a Fourdinier.

The principles and practices of the present invention are illustrated in the following non-limiting Examples~

~a~S~L8~;2 Exam~le 1 Illustrating the preparation of hydroxy-terminated nonylphenol (EO)g 5(PO)24.

A purgable, pressurizable 2,0D0 gallon (7,500 liter) stainless steel reactor, having stirring means and a temperature control mechanism is charged with 1,614 pounds (732 kg) nonylphenol. The nonylphenol is stirred (10 minutes) while nitrogen is bubbled through it. Forty-five pounds (20 kg) potassium hydroxide is added to the nonylphenol, the reactor being multiply purged (e.g., 3 times) with nitrogen and being left with a slight N2 overpressure. At this point, the contents of the reactor are heated to 230F (110C) at which temperature, the reactor is again purged with dry nitrogen leaviny a nitrogen overpressure. Heating of the reactants is continued to 250F (120C) at which time heating is discontinued and the vessel is multiply purged as described above. Approximately 3,070 pounds (1,390 kg) ethylene oxide is charged to the reactor at the rate of 5 gallons (19 liter) to the 12 gallons (45 liter) per minute, the rate of ethylene oxide addition and heating or cooling of the reactor being monitored to maintain the stirred reactant medium at a temperature in the range of 290F
1~F ~(143~C + 5.59C). The reactor pressure should be kept to less than 60 psi (400 kPa~ during EO addition. Ethylene oxide is added to the point where the nonylphenol ethylene oxide has a 1~ aqueous cloud point (i.e., in a 1~ aqueous solution of the material~ the temperature at which the material begins to come out of solution, as evidenced by the clouding) in the temperature range of 127~F (53C~ to 137F (58C)o After completion of the EO addition, the mixture is permitted to react at 290F + 10F (143C3 for 20 minutes. Next, PO is added until the cloud point in a 20~ butyl carbitol solution of the EO-PO adduct is 120F
(48C3 to 123F (50C)~ Continued addition of PO further lZ

reauces the adduct cloud point.

After Po addition, the completed product is cooled to 175F
(79C) and 45 pounds (20.4 kg) glacial acetic acid is added to the produc~ to neutralize the KOH, the product being stirred for an additional 30 minutes. This completes synthesis of nonylphenol-EO-PO.

Nonylphenol-~EO)g 5 was employed to synthesiæe surfactants of the present invention with 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 moles propylene oxide. These surfactants then were used to determine their efficacy in cotton detergency and brightness of deinked handsheets prepared from ledger stock as described in Example 2. The results o~ this evaluation are contained in Table I. Unexpectedly, cotton detergency was found to decrease with increasing amounts of PO while the brightness (both when measured as described above and by its difference from a standard, i.e. a delta value) of the hand sheet was found to increase. In effect, the deinking performance of the present surfactants was found to be opposite what would be predicted from their cotton detergency.

Table I
Moles Brightness Cotton Detergency Po Reflectometer DeltaReflectometer Value 0 77.5 13.8 55 6 78 13~6 47 12 80.5 11.2 gl 18 B0.5 11.2 38 2~ 84 7.4 35 Cotton detergency is determined by the brightness of the washed cloth.

.2 -~6-Exam~_e 2 Ill~strating the preparation of handsheets for laboratory evaluation of surfactants.

Fifteen grams of the stock which is to be deinked (e.g., ledger) is charged to a "Waringn*blender with 375 ml water and is agitated for one minute. The contents of the blender are poured into a beaker and the pH of the solution is increased to 10-11 by the addition of about 6 NaOH
pellets (0.6 9). Next 0.1 gram of the surfactants to be tested is added. The entire mixture then is heated to the desired deinking temperature, e.g., 150~F ~65C), while being stirred and is maintain at that temperature for at least 10 minutes.

Next the heated mixture is diluted to about 3 liter with water and poured down a 40 mesh (U.S. standard sieve size) screen maintained at about a 37 degree angle with respect to horizontal. This simulates a sidehill washer and concentrates the fiber while washing away the ink particles. Dilution and washing are repeated to produce the deinked secondary fiber.
.
Next the deinked fiber may be bleached by the addition of liquid bleach (e.g., "Purex") with adjustment of the solution pH to 10-11 (3 pellets NaOH) may be added.

Lastly, hand sheets of the deinked fiber are prepared and their brightness measured as described above. Hand sheets are prepared by any of a number of the methods conventionally used in the U.S., e~g., the method described in TAPPI standard T2-5 OS-71, e~tc. Generally, four hand sheets are prepared by diluting the washed, deinked fiber with three liters of water as disc~ssed above.

* Trade Mark lt;l ~

115~

Example 3 Illustrating the preparation of benzyl-terminaLed higher molecular weight alcohol polyethylene oxide.

A reactor as described in Example 1, was charged with a mixture of 23% by weight 5Of the final mixture) "Alfol"*
C10-C14 alcohol, 0.23~ by weiyht potassium hydroxide (KOH) and heated to a temperature in the range of 240-250F
(116-1~1C) while being purged with nitrogen. To the heated "Alfol"*was added about 77~ b~ weight ethylene oxide, the temperature of the reactor ~eing permitted to rise to 320F (160C) while the pressure in the reactor was maintained at less than 60 psi (400 kPa) until all the ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol were added.

To a new reactor which is similar to the reactor described in Example 1 with the exception that it has an air lock suitable for the addition of metallic sodium, was charged 86~ of the above alcohol-EO product, 12~ metallic sodium, and 12% by weight benzyl chloride. The addition of metallic sodium was accomplished after the alcohol-EO
product was heated to a temperature of about 235F (113C}
and the reaction vessel was multiply purged with nitrogen.
The metal~ic sodium is added (through the air loc~) in small amounts so that sodium addition is completed in a period of about two hours. Hydrogen gas is produced when the metallic sodium is added to the above mixture ana therefore it is important that the sys~em be co~?letely purged with nitrogen on a regular basis.

After completion of sodium addition the temperature of the mixture is maintained at 235F (113~C) for a period of about two hours, the system being multiply purged to remove any hydrogen generated. After about two hours, the system is purgea with air to ensure complete removal of the hydrogen.

* Tra~e Mark ~llS:18~

At this time, the benzyl chloride is added, the reaction mixture being cooled to maintain its temperature in the range of 240-250F (115-121C). The rate of addition of benzyl chloride may be adjusted to maintain the temperature of the reaction mixture within the intended range. When the benzyl chloride has been added, the system is stirred for an additional two hours at a temperature in the range of 240-250F. Once the benzyl chloride has been added, it is necessary ~o remove the sodium chloride produced in the reaction. This can be accomplished by cooling the product to a temperature in the range o~ 200F (93C) to 230F and extracting the sodium chloride with water. To remvve any sodium chloride entrained în the product, it is necessary to heat the product to 275F (135C) and aga~n washing it with water. Lastly, a ilter aid (such as diatomaceous earth) is added to the product and it is filtered to provide the benzyl-terminated alcohol-EO material.

Various modifications and alterations of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention, and it should be understood that this invention is not to be limited to the illustrative embodiments and Examples set forth herein.

, ",

Claims (24)

WHAT I S CLAIMED I S:
1. A washing method for the production of substantially decontaminated secondary fiber from relatively contaminated secondary fiber, comprising the steps of:
(a) suspending the relatively contaminated secondary fiber in an aqueous medium in the presence of a surface active agent comprising an oxyethylene glycol chain, wherein one terminal hydroxyl of the chain has been replaced with an ether group selected from the group consisting of an aliphatic ether group and an alkylaromatic ether group, and the other terminal hydroxyl of the chain has been replaced with an ether group selected from the group consisting of a polyoxypropylene group and a benzyl ether group, the temperature of said aqueous medium being in the range of about 25°C to about 85°C, whereby contaminants of the relatively contaminated secondary fiber become uniformly distributed throughout said aqueous medium, and b) substantially separating the resulting substantially decontaminated secondary fiber from the resulting contaminant-containing aqueous medium.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the aqueous admixture is heated to a temperature in the range of about 80°F (25°C) to 130°F (55°C).
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein the admixture is heated to a temperature in the range of about 80°F (25°C) to 100°F (37°C).
4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the separating step further includes agitating the fiber while it is heated.
5. A method according to claim 4 wherein agitation is accomplished by means of an attrition or a non-attrition pulper.
6. A method according to claim 1 wherein the polyoxypropylene group or the benzyl ether group is hydroxy-terminated.
7. A method according to claim 1 wherein the nonionic surface active agent has the structure ;

R2-(OC2H4)n (OC3H6)m Y;

wherein R1 is a monovalent alkyl chain having from about 6 to about 18 carbon atoms;
R2 is a monovalent alkyl chain having from 6 to about 24 carbon atoms;
n has a value from about 3 to about 50;
m has a value from about 0 to about 50; and Y is selected from the group consisting of hydroxy or benzyl ether and is benzyl ether when m = 0.
8. A method according to claim 7 wherein R1 has from about 9 to about 15 carbon atoms.
9. A method according to claim 7 wherein R2 has from about 10 to about 18 carbon atoms.
10. A method according to claim 7 wherein n has a value from about 6 to about 15.
11. A method according to claim 7 wherein m has a value from about 4 to about 48.
12. A method according to claim 7 wherein R2 is a mixture of 10, 12 and 14 carbon atom monovalent alkyl units.
13. A washing method to produce deinked secondary fiber via an intermediate suspension of secondary fiber having interspersed therein ink particles which are capable of being readily isolated from said suspension by washing comprising the steps of:
separating the ink particles and the secondary fiber to produce the suspension by heating the fiber to a temperature in the range of 120°F (50°C) to 180°F
(85°C) in an aqueous medium having therein a nonionic surface active agent selected from the group consisting of R2 -(0C2H4)n(0C3H6)m Y;

or mixtures thereof, wherein R1 is a monovalent alkyl chain having from about 6 to about 15 carbon atoms;
R2 is a monovalent alkyl chain having from 6 to about 24 carbon atoms;
Y is hydroxy or benzyl ether;
n has a value from about 3 to about 50; and m has a value from about 4 to about 48;
and isolating the ink particles and the surface active agent from the secondary fiber by washing the particles from the suspension to produce said deinked fiber.
14. A method according to claim 13 wherein the aqueous admixture is heated to a temperature in the range of about 80°F (27°C) to 130°F (55°C).
15. A method according to claim 13 wherein the aqueous admixture is heated to a temperature in the range of 80°F
(27°C) to 100°F (37°C).
16. A method according to claim 13 wherein R1 is a mono-valent alkyl group selected from octyl, nonyl or dodecyl.
17. A method according to claim 13 wherein R2 is a mixture of monovalent 10 carbon atom, 12 carbon atom and 1 carbon atom chains.
18. A method according to claim 13 wherein the aqueous admixture is alkaline.
19. A process according to claim 18 wherein the alkalinity is due to the presence of a base selected from the group consisting of alkali metal hydroxides, silicates, carbonates or phosphates.
20. A process according to claim 13 wherein the aqueous admixture is acidic.
21. A method according to claim 13 wherein the isolating step is accomplished by means of vacuum, gravity or centrifugal filtration or concentration of the cellulose fiber.
22. A method according to claim 13 wherein the isolating step comprises washing the ink particles from the fiber by tumbling the slurry down a sidehill washer.
23. A method of reducing foam generated in a washing-type process for deinking secondary fiber, the process utilizing an aqueous deinking medium having therein a nonionic surface active agent comprising;

R2 (OC2H4)n (OC3H6)m Y;
or mixtures thereof, wherein R1 is a monovalent alkyl chain having from about 6 to about 15 caxbon atoms;
R2 is a monovalent alkyl chain having from 6 to about 24 carbon atoms;
Y is hydroxy or benzyl ether, n has a value from about 3 to about 50; and m has a value from about 4 to about 480 the method comprising the steps of:
placing in the deinking medium a selectet nonionic surface active agent having a foam break temperature equal to or lower than the lowest temperature of the aqueous deinking medium during the deinking process;

deinking the secondary fiber with the deinking medium having therein the selected surface active agent by separating the secondary fiber and ink particles and isolating the ink particles from the fiber by washing to produce the deinked fiber.
24. A washing method for the production of substantially dunked secondary fiber from ink-containing secondary fiber, comprising the steps of:
a) repulping said ink-containing secondary fiber, with suppression of foam, in an aqueous repulping medium containing a foam-suppressing amount of a surface active agent of the formula R (Ar)a (OC2H4)m (OC3H6)n Y
wherein R represents a monovalent higher aliphatic group, Ar represents a divalent monocyclic aromatic residue, a is 0 or 1, m is about 3 to about 50, n is about 0 to about 50, Y is selected from the group consisting of hydroxyl and benzyl ether Y being benzyl ether when n = 0, said aqueous repulping medium having a temperature above 25°C but falling below about 60°C before said repulping is completed, the ink present in said ink-containing secondary fiber becoming uniformly distributed throughout said aqueous repulping medium during said repulping, and b) depositing the resulting substantially deinked secondary fiber on a foraminous surface and permitting the resulting, ink-containing aqueous repulping medium to drain through the holes in said foraminous surface.
CA000364507A 1979-11-13 1980-11-12 Methods of deinking secondary fibers Expired CA1151812A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US9374479A 1979-11-13 1979-11-13
US093,744 1979-11-13

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1151812A true CA1151812A (en) 1983-08-16

Family

ID=22240461

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000364507A Expired CA1151812A (en) 1979-11-13 1980-11-12 Methods of deinking secondary fibers

Country Status (7)

Country Link
BR (1) BR8007390A (en)
CA (1) CA1151812A (en)
FI (1) FI73015C (en)
GB (1) GB2063326B (en)
IT (1) IT1134201B (en)
NO (1) NO160385C (en)
SE (4) SE456250B (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4820379A (en) * 1986-10-16 1989-04-11 Ppg Industries, Inc. Method for deinking wastepaper with a halogenated polyethylene oxide and a polymeric material
HUT65017A (en) * 1989-03-15 1994-03-28 Bdl Specialist Prod Process for purifyng waste papers from ink
US5417808A (en) * 1991-08-30 1995-05-23 Lion Corporation Deinking composition for flotation and deinking method
EP0610531B1 (en) * 1993-02-10 1996-06-19 Lion Corporation Deinking composition for flotation and deinking method
MX9603814A (en) * 1994-03-08 1997-03-29 Buckman Labor Inc Method of agglomerating printing ink and formulations for use therein.
US6544383B2 (en) * 2000-08-07 2003-04-08 Kao Specialties Americas Flotation deinking process
WO2015006362A1 (en) * 2013-07-11 2015-01-15 Invista Technologies S.A.R.L. Processes for removal of contaminants from cellulosic material

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IT8025845A0 (en) 1980-11-07
SE456251B (en) 1988-09-19
FI73015C (en) 1987-08-10
SE8601385D0 (en) 1986-03-25
FI73015B (en) 1987-04-30
NO160385C (en) 1989-04-12
SE8007949L (en) 1981-05-14
SE8601384D0 (en) 1986-03-25
IT1134201B (en) 1986-08-13
SE456250B (en) 1988-09-19
SE8601385L (en) 1986-03-25
NO803412L (en) 1981-05-14
GB2063326A (en) 1981-06-03
SE8601384L (en) 1986-03-25
SE8601383D0 (en) 1986-03-25
SE456252B (en) 1988-09-19
FI803553L (en) 1981-05-14
GB2063326B (en) 1984-10-03
BR8007390A (en) 1981-05-26
SE8601383L (en) 1986-03-25
NO160385B (en) 1989-01-02
SE456253B (en) 1988-09-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4518459A (en) Methods of deinking secondary fibers
US5225046A (en) Wastepaper deinking process
US4666558A (en) Process for newspaper deinking using low-foaming surfactant deinking agent
US5227019A (en) Wastepaper deinking process
US5718801A (en) Method for controlling froth and reducing stickies in the flotation process for deinking waste paper using a froth moderating agent
US4960540A (en) Alkoxylated bis-amide defoaming compounds
US4483741A (en) Low-foaming, pH sensitive, alkylamine polyether surface active agents and methods for using
US4561933A (en) Xerographics deinking
JP2620036B2 (en) Waste paper deinking method
US4946625A (en) Particulate defoaming compositions
EP0507325B1 (en) Deinking composition and deinking method
CA1151812A (en) Methods of deinking secondary fibers
US5258099A (en) Office wastepaper deinking process using fatty alcohols
US5660684A (en) Deinking electrostatic waste paper
US4871483A (en) Novel non-depositing defoaming compositions
US4956119A (en) Particulate defoaming compositions
US5837099A (en) Office wastepaper deinking process
US5840157A (en) Deinking agent and method of deinking through flotation using the deinking agent
US5601752A (en) Defoamer compositions and process for defoaming aqueous systems
CA2233002C (en) Office wastepaper deinking process
EP0174825A1 (en) Deinkers comprising a non-ionic surfactant and ethylene glycol
US5827397A (en) Mixed office wastepaper deinking process
WO1997022750A2 (en) Office wastepaper deinking process
JPS60155793A (en) Deinking agent of old paper
NO167216B (en) PROCEDURE TO AA REDUCE FOAM CREATED IN A WASHING PROCESS FOR DEVICING SECONDARY FIBERS.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry