CA1138330A - Thermal acidization and recovery process for recovering viscous petroleum - Google Patents
Thermal acidization and recovery process for recovering viscous petroleumInfo
- Publication number
- CA1138330A CA1138330A CA000363919A CA363919A CA1138330A CA 1138330 A CA1138330 A CA 1138330A CA 000363919 A CA000363919 A CA 000363919A CA 363919 A CA363919 A CA 363919A CA 1138330 A CA1138330 A CA 1138330A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- formation
- vapor stream
- thermal vapor
- well bore
- injection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT
A thermal acidization and recovery process for increas-ing production of heavy viscous petroleum crude oil and synthetic fuels from subterranean hydrocarbon formations containing clay particles creating adverse permeability effects is described. The method comprises injecting a thermal vapor stream through a well bore penetrating such formations to clean the formation face of hydrocarbonaceous materials which restrict the flow of fluids into the petro-leum-bearing formation. Vaporized hydrogen chloride is then injected simultaneously to react with calcium and magnesium salts in the formation surrounding the bore hole to form water soluble chloride salts. Vaporized hydrogen fluoride is then injected simultaneously with its thermal vapor to dissolve water-sensitive clay particles thus increasing permeability. Thereafter, the thermal vapors are injected until the formation is sufficiently heated to permit increased recovery rates of the petroleum.
A thermal acidization and recovery process for increas-ing production of heavy viscous petroleum crude oil and synthetic fuels from subterranean hydrocarbon formations containing clay particles creating adverse permeability effects is described. The method comprises injecting a thermal vapor stream through a well bore penetrating such formations to clean the formation face of hydrocarbonaceous materials which restrict the flow of fluids into the petro-leum-bearing formation. Vaporized hydrogen chloride is then injected simultaneously to react with calcium and magnesium salts in the formation surrounding the bore hole to form water soluble chloride salts. Vaporized hydrogen fluoride is then injected simultaneously with its thermal vapor to dissolve water-sensitive clay particles thus increasing permeability. Thereafter, the thermal vapors are injected until the formation is sufficiently heated to permit increased recovery rates of the petroleum.
Description
J~K/las . ~
-THERMAL ACIDI2ATION AND RECOVER~
PROCESS FOR-~ECOVERING VISCOUS PETROLEUM
.
The government of the United States of America has rights in this invention pursuank to Contract No. ET-C-03-2046 awarded by the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration (now Department of Energy).
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a method for conditioning a subterranean formation containing clay..particles creating adverse permeability effects around a well bore communicating from the surface of the earth to the formation in order to increase the recovery of heavy viscous hydrocarbon materials, such as petroleum crude oil or synthetic fuels. The presence ~:
of clay particles.may create adverse permeability effects in the formation and particularly around the well bore by swell-ing if water-sensitive clays, particle plugging by dispersal of clay fines or by p~rticle invasion of such fines. Such effects reduce permeability of the formation both to fluids injected for stimulation of production of viscous hydrocarbons and to the production of the hydrocarbons themselves There are many methods known in the art for injecting thermal energy into a formation for the purpose of reducing the viscosity of heavy viscous petroleum crude oil so that it may.be recovered. Such meth~ds are usually classified as "thermal.drive", "single well thermal injection" or the like. Thermal drive processes basically involve injecting . --2 thermal energy, usually from steam boilers or in situ com-busti.on, into an oil-bearing formation by means of an injec-tion well, driving the petroleum towards one or more adjacent producing wells and recovering the petroleum thr~ugh the producing wells ~ingle well thermal injection processes usually involve injecting thermal energy into the oil-bearing formation by means of an injection well and subse-quently withdrawing the resulting heated petxoleum through the same well. Such single well thermal injection processes are also commonly referred to as "huff~and-puff" processes.
There are, of course~ many modified versions.of these basic techniques known in the art which employ a wide variety of thermal energy agents, such as hot water, in situ combustion gases, steam, heated condensable and non-condensable gases, and the like.
Although many thermal injection rnethods have been useful under certain conditions, there are many formations known to contain large volumes of heavy viscous petroleum , from which the petroleum has not been economically and efficiently recovered by the employment of any known thermal injection technique. By way of example, there are many formations located throughout the United States, particularly throughout southern Illinois, western Missouri, southeastern Oklahoma, and southern Kansas, saturated with heavy viscous crudesl e.g., having viscosities greater than 200 centipoises and/or API gravities below about 22 (both at 60 F), which have not been recovered in economic quantities by employment of conventional recovery techniques. Additionally, previous attempts to increase the recovery of such heavy crudes from such formations by the employment of known thermal injection processes, especially direct single well steam injection, have been substantially unsuccessful. As known, one of the primary problems in attempting.to recover such viscous crudes from such formations is that the formations have such low relative permeabilities to oil and water that thermal energy cannot be injected into the formations at economic injection rates. In fact, there are many formations which have such low relative permeabilities to oil and water that , , ~ ~ . . . . , , -33~
they will not accept su~ficient quantities of thermal energy by the employment of known injection processes at any injection rate~
A recent patent discloses a method for enhancing petro-leum production in such formation. For example, U.S. Patent No. 3,993,135 discloses a method comprising initially.heating a well bore penetrating the formation and surrounding sub terranean strata with a thermal ~apor stream containing combustion gases and superheated steam until sufficient heat is imparted.thereto to,permit the therm,al vapor stream.to be injected,into the,formation at a desired high.~njection rate. The, well,bore,.and.surrounding strata are heated by-continuously inject,ing the thermal ~apor. stream.:into ~he well and,simult,an,eously.venting a portio,n of the vapor , 15 strea,m from the well at the surface to remove condensed liquids formed,from,,w~ile-heating the.well-bore..and.formation ...... . . . . . ... . .. . .. .. .. .. .
face. The heated flu~d,ls,then inje,c.ted.directly into the formation at a des~red h~gh.l~jection.rate untll.the.orma-tion and v,iscous pe,trole,um c~ontained therein.are heated and ....
20, the visco,si,ty of the..hydro~arbons is reducedu.. Injection is .. . . .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. .
then discontinued and the.he.ate.d crude is.produced through the well. Surprisin,gly, and contrary to prior~attempts, a .. . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. _ . . . . .
formation havin,g l,ow relative p.ermeabilities .to water and oil will readily,a-ccept a the,rmal vapor stream containing steam at hlgh injection rates wh.en .the heated fluid contain-ing steam.is inje,cted in accorda.nce with the process of U.S.
. .
Patent No. 3,993,135. U.S. Patent 4,118,923 describes apparatus particularly suited for. generating a thermal vapor stream for use in the described method.
Best resul.ts are obtained wi.th the above process when the heated fluid is.injected at the maximum in~ection rate possible so.as to impart heat to the formation as rapidly as possible. But it has now been found that the above process cannot be applied ~o maximum efficiency in those ~ormations which clay particles which cause adverse permeability effects by swelling upon contact with water or being of such fine particle size that the particles migrate through the forma~
tion ultimately plugging the formation. Injection of a ~ 3 ~
thermal vapor stre~m ~s clescribed i~ U.S. Patent 3,993,135 causes the fine particles to migrate through the ~ormation to ultimately plug the formation. Where the clays are water-sensitive, swelling occurs. Such swelling lo~ers the already low permeability of such format:ions which lowers, for practical purposes flow of the therrnal vapor stream into such formations and greatly impeds the recovery of petroleum from such wells. Additionally, when a continuous thermal drive technlque is employed the presence of such clays within the formation around the drive well impeds the ability to drive the petroleum crudes from the field through the use of the injection well. Examples of such clays which adversely affect the permeability of such formation include, for example, illite, smectite, bentonite and montmorillonite.
Traditional treatment of such formations with hydrogen fluoride to dissolve the clay or with clay stabilizers has proved unsuccessful, partly because of the difficulty of removing carbonaneous materials, such as oil, from the clay particles. The coating of crude oil prevents the hydrogen fluoride from attacking and dissolving the clays. This result is partly because hydrogen fluoride reacts with calcium, magnesium and other metals contained in the formation to form insoluble metal fluoride salts which are deposited within the pores of the formation to further limit its permeability. Attempts to solve this problem, such as des-cribed in U.S. Patent 4,136j739 illustrate the difficulty in treating formations with hydrofluoric acid and hydrochloric acid to solve the problems created by clay particles which adversely effect the permeability of oil-bearing formation.
These problems are compounded when heavy viscous hydrocarbons are present in the formation. Further, conventional acidizing with hydrogen fluoride is very corrosive and causes consider-able damage to the well bore.
Treatment similar to that described in the prior art was attempted where a liquid hydrocarbon, in this case diesel fuel, was injected into the formatlon to attempt to remove heavy viscous crude in the presence of such clay particles to make them susceptible to treatment with hydro-fluoric acid failed. No increased permeability was noticed.
3~
S~MMARY OF THE INVENTION
-Applicant has now discovered a method by which the problems created by the presence of clay particles which adversely effect permeability in a format:ion containing highly viscous hydrocarbon.materials such as petroleum crude oils and synthetic fuels are solved, allowing the formation to be stimulated by the injection of a thermal vapor stream comprising steam and combustion gases, such as, for example, carbon dioxide. The method of this invention comprises initially injectin~ the ~thermal vapor stream through the bore hole to clean- that part ~f the formation in the vicinit~
of the bore hole of hydrocarbon crude oil to expose the clay particles; injecting v-aporized hydrochloric acid simul-taneously with the thermal vapor s-tream until calciuml magnesium and other meta}s., if present,.in-the formation about the bore hole have.reacted to form water-soluble chloride salts;-injectin~ vapor~zed hydrofloric acid simul~
taneously with the thermal-vapor stream until sufficient amounts of the clay-in-the forma-t^ion about the bore hole ha~e been dissolved by-the hydrofluoric acid; and, continu-ing to-inject the thermal vapor -into the forma*ion until suff-icient heat has -been imparted.thereto to permit the petroleum therein to be.recovered at an improved recovery rate. -.. . . ..
Where mobile, fine clay particles are present, a known clay stabilizer may be added with any of the injection steps after the crude oil has been cleaned from the clay particles to further assist in curing the problem converted with particulate migration.
Injection of hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride sequentially, o.r simultaneously after some initial HC1 injection, as a vapor at high temperatures insures that the formation about the bore hole may be properly conditioned for a distance.of at least five feet of the bore hole to eliminate the problems caused by clay particles ~hen the thermal vapor stream is employed to stimulate production of the viscous petroleum contained therein.
3~
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ~E DRAWING
The drawing is a schematic drawing, partially in cross-section, of a section of the earth, illustrating a well bore penetrating a petroleum-bearing formatiorl and another means at the surface for introducing a thermal vapor stream into the well and formation. The drawing also illustrates a means for introducing and vaporizing hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride with the thermal vapor stream, as well as the s'abilizing compound, if desired, into the well and formation in accordance with the method of the invention.
In the drawing the casing is partially broken away in order to show the details of one embodiment for in~ection and vaporizing hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride simul-taneously with the injection of the thermal vapor stream.
It will be understood that the instant invention may be employed for the recovery of substantially any type viscous hydrocarbon materials, such as crude petroleum oil or synthe-tic fuel from substantially any type of subterranean formationcontaining clay particles which adversely effect the perme-ability of the formation. One of the primary advantages of this invention is that it provides for the injection of a thermal vapor stream containing combustion gases and steam at high injection rates thereby permitting the formation to be heated to a predetermined desired level at which the cxude oil will be flowable in relatively short periods of time. However, the instant process is particularly useful for recovering heavy viscous crudes; e.g., those having viscosities greater than 200 centipoise (at 60 F~ and/or API gravities (at 60F~ of about 22 or below, from subter-ranean formations having low relative permeabilities to water and oil and containing water-sensitive or fine, mobile paxticulate clays.
More specifically, the instant method is useful for recovering such highly vis~ous crudes from a formation where the low permeability of the formation is due, at least in part, to the swelling of w~ter-sensitive clay p~xticles which, when contacted with the thermal vapor stream, exp~nd to inhibit the migration of the thermal vapor stream into the formation at distances more remote from the well bore or where mobile, fine clay particles migrate and plug the formation.
Many of such viscous crude-bearing formations having low relative permeabilities to oil and water are well-known, and are usually located within the range of from about 500 to about 2,000 ~t. below the earth's surface. I~cluded among such formations, by way of example, are those of Pennsylvanian san~stone,-such as--Bartlesville sandstone of the Cherokee group, which are known to-be located throughout southern Illinois, western Missourij southeastern Kansas and northeastern Oklahoma. ,$uch format,ions often contain about 10~ to 16% of troublesome clay particles.
The pr,acti,cç of t,hls,inv,ention can be most easily understood by reference to the drawingO As illustrated, a producing formation l0-bearing heavy viscous petroleum is penetrated by ,a, well 11 which has--been-dr~lled from the surface of-,the earth-12~ -The we,ll 11 has preferably been completed in a conventional manner and includes a string of casing 13 set within a-well bore 14 to,the petroleum-bearing .. .. . .. . . .
formation-10 and supported by-a cement sheath 15. The well bore 14 has penetrated the petroleum-~earing formation and has been drilled to near the bottom of-the desired formation injection zone. ,The well bore 14 may be left open as in an open hole completion or a,screen or slotted liner or perfora-ted casing (not shown) may be set in the well-bore lower end 14a to support the,walls of the well bore 14 Of course, the casing may be set all the way throuyh the formation, cemented and perforated.
The well 11 also;includes a string of tubing 17 disposed within the casing 13 and the well bore 14 extending through the formation 10 thereby forming annular space 18. Prefer-ably, the tubing 17 extends downwardly to near the well bore lower end 14a. A conventional sealing device ~not shown~ is provided adjacent the top of the well head 19 to seal off ~ 3 ~ 3~ ~
the casing annulus 18 ~nd maintain pressure within the wellO
In an optional embodiment to be discussed subsequently, a second short length of supplemental tubing 37 is included within the tubing 17 and forms a second annulus ~0 there-with. Tubing 37 extends partially the length of tubing 17,terminates in opening 37a and is held in place by centralizer 39 which has openings therein (not illustrated~ to allow fluid flow in tubing 17 pass centralizer 39. ~ conventional sealing device 38 is provided at the top of tubing 17 to seal off the second annulus 40 and maintain pressure within the well.
In the first step of the method of this invention the formation face lOa and suxrounding strata adjacent the well bore 14 is preliminarily "preconditioned" to clean or remove viscous crude, paraffins, or other hydrocarbonaceous materials adhering to the particles of the formation - including clay particles contained therein - which could restrict flow of the thermal vapor stream into the petroleum-bearing formation 10 .
In the first step in carrying out the method of the invention the well bore 14 and surrounding strata through which the well 11 extends to and through the formation 10 is initially heated by injecting a thermal vapor stream contain-ing combustion gases and superheated steam; i.e., particularly carbon dioxide and superheated stoam, into the annulus 18 through a valve-controlled pipe 20. The heated therm~1 vapor stream travels down the annulus 18 where part of it contacts and penetrates the formation face lOa and surround-ing strata adjacent the well bore 14 while the remainder enters the open end 17a of the tubing 17, causing the thermal vapor and any condensed fluid as well as any hydrocarbona~
ceous material removed from the formation about the bore hole to pass upwardly through the tubing 17 where it is vented into suitable collection means (not shown) at the surface through a suitable venting means 23 connected with the surface end of the tubing 17, such as by pipe 22. The venting means 23 include a means for controlling the pressure in the tubing, such as a valve, restriction orifice, auto-matic operating valve or a combination of such devices.
3~
1 This pressure controllin~ means 23 is preferahly instal.led between the end of the pipe 22 and a valve 21.
~ f desired, the -thermal vapor stream may be injec-ted into the tubing 17, such as through piping 24 connected therewi-th and vented at the surEace :Erom the annulus 18 by appropriate ven-ting pressure controlling means 25 mounted with pipe 26. Ilowever, annulus injec-tion and venting through the tubiny 17 for hea-ting and cleaning the well 11, the casing 13 and surrounding strata is preferred~
The injection of the thermal vapor stream into the well 11 contacts the tubing 17, casing 13 and the formation face lOa may cause, depending upon the ormation tempcrature, substantially simultaneous condensation of condensable fluids, e.g~, steam, in the thermal vapor stream which may collect in the wcll bore 1~. If the rate at which the flui.d condenses in ~he we:Ll bore 1~ :is greater than the ra-te which the formation can accept at the injection pressure employed, the well bore 1~ starts to accumulate fluids usually at the bo-ttom l~a. As these fluids accumulate they reduce the area of the Eorma-tion injection zone which in turn reduces the injection rate oE the hea-ted fluid into the formation. As this condition continues, the l.evel of condensed fluids can rise to a level in the well bore 1~ and formation 10 where it effectively seals o:Ef the entire formation injection horizon and the maximum injection ra-te of the heated fluid into the formation may drop to near zero.
However, by simultaneously venting, as described previously and taugh-t by U.S. Patent 3,993l135, the injected thermal vapor stream at the surface throuyh the pressure 3~ control means 23 any condensed liquids formed and collected in the well bore 1~ are forced into the tubing 17 through its 3~
open lower end 17a and are forced or lifted towards the surface. The simultaneous venting step thus sweeps the condensed li~uids from the wel.l bore 14 thereby eliminati.ng -the aforementioned blockage problems.
The thermal vapor s-tream is prefe:rably continuously injected and simul.taneously vented until the well and sur-rounding subterranean strata are heated sufficiently to substan-tially eliminate condensation of the heated fluid within the well 11 or at least reduce the amount of conden-sation to a level which the formation will accept without causing the aforementioned blockage problems. The time requirecl will. vary widely, depending upon well location, dep-th, and surrounding strata temperatures, types oE strata, etc.
and 3 S best determined emperically, such as by direc-tly injecting thc thermal vapoxs into the formation by discon-tinuing venting and observing whether a desi.red high formation injection :rate can be maintained.
The thermal vapors may be injected into the well 11 at any desired rate to impart heat through the well and surround~
~ ing subterranean strata. However, it is preEerred to emplo~
the ma~imum injection rate possible so as to impart heat as rapidly as possible~ Such maximum in]ection rates may be obtained by emp:Loying an injection pressure practiceable below the -fo.rmation frac-ture gradient pressure which may be. readily de-termined, if desired, by known techni~ues. More specifically, i.t is preferred to employ an injection pressure within the range of Erom about 200 to about 1500 psig ~14 ~o about 105 kg/
cm2 gauge). Again, such injeetion procedure is described in U.S. Patent 3,993,135.
Further, the thermal vapor stream is vented at the surface at a rate sufficien-t to keep the gas velocity in tubing .
3~gD
1 17 high enough to lift any condensed liquids formed and collec-ted in the well bore 1~ -towards the sur:Eace so as to keep i-t substantially Eree o:E liquids while maintaining substantially full pressure on the forma-tiorl. This may be readily accomplished by the employment o:E the aforementioned appropriate ven-t pressure con-trol means at the surEace, such as a valve, restric-tion orifice or like devi.ce in -the conven-tional manner to provide a gas velocity in the tubing within the range of from abou-t 10 -to about ~0 ft./sec. (3 to about 1~ 12 meters/second).
During the above-mentioned injecting and venting the hea-ted fluid through the well 11 the formation face lOa adjacent the well bore lower end 14a is conti.nuous:Ly exposed directly to the heated fluid, -thereby gradually increasing its temperature and the temperature of the heavy viscous petroleum therein~ This "pre-conditioning" of the adjacent formation face cleans the. well bore 14 ana formation face lOa of viscous crude, paraffins, or materials which could tend to rest:rict flow of the -thermal vapors into the petroleum-
-THERMAL ACIDI2ATION AND RECOVER~
PROCESS FOR-~ECOVERING VISCOUS PETROLEUM
.
The government of the United States of America has rights in this invention pursuank to Contract No. ET-C-03-2046 awarded by the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration (now Department of Energy).
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a method for conditioning a subterranean formation containing clay..particles creating adverse permeability effects around a well bore communicating from the surface of the earth to the formation in order to increase the recovery of heavy viscous hydrocarbon materials, such as petroleum crude oil or synthetic fuels. The presence ~:
of clay particles.may create adverse permeability effects in the formation and particularly around the well bore by swell-ing if water-sensitive clays, particle plugging by dispersal of clay fines or by p~rticle invasion of such fines. Such effects reduce permeability of the formation both to fluids injected for stimulation of production of viscous hydrocarbons and to the production of the hydrocarbons themselves There are many methods known in the art for injecting thermal energy into a formation for the purpose of reducing the viscosity of heavy viscous petroleum crude oil so that it may.be recovered. Such meth~ds are usually classified as "thermal.drive", "single well thermal injection" or the like. Thermal drive processes basically involve injecting . --2 thermal energy, usually from steam boilers or in situ com-busti.on, into an oil-bearing formation by means of an injec-tion well, driving the petroleum towards one or more adjacent producing wells and recovering the petroleum thr~ugh the producing wells ~ingle well thermal injection processes usually involve injecting thermal energy into the oil-bearing formation by means of an injection well and subse-quently withdrawing the resulting heated petxoleum through the same well. Such single well thermal injection processes are also commonly referred to as "huff~and-puff" processes.
There are, of course~ many modified versions.of these basic techniques known in the art which employ a wide variety of thermal energy agents, such as hot water, in situ combustion gases, steam, heated condensable and non-condensable gases, and the like.
Although many thermal injection rnethods have been useful under certain conditions, there are many formations known to contain large volumes of heavy viscous petroleum , from which the petroleum has not been economically and efficiently recovered by the employment of any known thermal injection technique. By way of example, there are many formations located throughout the United States, particularly throughout southern Illinois, western Missouri, southeastern Oklahoma, and southern Kansas, saturated with heavy viscous crudesl e.g., having viscosities greater than 200 centipoises and/or API gravities below about 22 (both at 60 F), which have not been recovered in economic quantities by employment of conventional recovery techniques. Additionally, previous attempts to increase the recovery of such heavy crudes from such formations by the employment of known thermal injection processes, especially direct single well steam injection, have been substantially unsuccessful. As known, one of the primary problems in attempting.to recover such viscous crudes from such formations is that the formations have such low relative permeabilities to oil and water that thermal energy cannot be injected into the formations at economic injection rates. In fact, there are many formations which have such low relative permeabilities to oil and water that , , ~ ~ . . . . , , -33~
they will not accept su~ficient quantities of thermal energy by the employment of known injection processes at any injection rate~
A recent patent discloses a method for enhancing petro-leum production in such formation. For example, U.S. Patent No. 3,993,135 discloses a method comprising initially.heating a well bore penetrating the formation and surrounding sub terranean strata with a thermal ~apor stream containing combustion gases and superheated steam until sufficient heat is imparted.thereto to,permit the therm,al vapor stream.to be injected,into the,formation at a desired high.~njection rate. The, well,bore,.and.surrounding strata are heated by-continuously inject,ing the thermal ~apor. stream.:into ~he well and,simult,an,eously.venting a portio,n of the vapor , 15 strea,m from the well at the surface to remove condensed liquids formed,from,,w~ile-heating the.well-bore..and.formation ...... . . . . . ... . .. . .. .. .. .. .
face. The heated flu~d,ls,then inje,c.ted.directly into the formation at a des~red h~gh.l~jection.rate untll.the.orma-tion and v,iscous pe,trole,um c~ontained therein.are heated and ....
20, the visco,si,ty of the..hydro~arbons is reducedu.. Injection is .. . . .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. .
then discontinued and the.he.ate.d crude is.produced through the well. Surprisin,gly, and contrary to prior~attempts, a .. . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. _ . . . . .
formation havin,g l,ow relative p.ermeabilities .to water and oil will readily,a-ccept a the,rmal vapor stream containing steam at hlgh injection rates wh.en .the heated fluid contain-ing steam.is inje,cted in accorda.nce with the process of U.S.
. .
Patent No. 3,993,135. U.S. Patent 4,118,923 describes apparatus particularly suited for. generating a thermal vapor stream for use in the described method.
Best resul.ts are obtained wi.th the above process when the heated fluid is.injected at the maximum in~ection rate possible so.as to impart heat to the formation as rapidly as possible. But it has now been found that the above process cannot be applied ~o maximum efficiency in those ~ormations which clay particles which cause adverse permeability effects by swelling upon contact with water or being of such fine particle size that the particles migrate through the forma~
tion ultimately plugging the formation. Injection of a ~ 3 ~
thermal vapor stre~m ~s clescribed i~ U.S. Patent 3,993,135 causes the fine particles to migrate through the ~ormation to ultimately plug the formation. Where the clays are water-sensitive, swelling occurs. Such swelling lo~ers the already low permeability of such format:ions which lowers, for practical purposes flow of the therrnal vapor stream into such formations and greatly impeds the recovery of petroleum from such wells. Additionally, when a continuous thermal drive technlque is employed the presence of such clays within the formation around the drive well impeds the ability to drive the petroleum crudes from the field through the use of the injection well. Examples of such clays which adversely affect the permeability of such formation include, for example, illite, smectite, bentonite and montmorillonite.
Traditional treatment of such formations with hydrogen fluoride to dissolve the clay or with clay stabilizers has proved unsuccessful, partly because of the difficulty of removing carbonaneous materials, such as oil, from the clay particles. The coating of crude oil prevents the hydrogen fluoride from attacking and dissolving the clays. This result is partly because hydrogen fluoride reacts with calcium, magnesium and other metals contained in the formation to form insoluble metal fluoride salts which are deposited within the pores of the formation to further limit its permeability. Attempts to solve this problem, such as des-cribed in U.S. Patent 4,136j739 illustrate the difficulty in treating formations with hydrofluoric acid and hydrochloric acid to solve the problems created by clay particles which adversely effect the permeability of oil-bearing formation.
These problems are compounded when heavy viscous hydrocarbons are present in the formation. Further, conventional acidizing with hydrogen fluoride is very corrosive and causes consider-able damage to the well bore.
Treatment similar to that described in the prior art was attempted where a liquid hydrocarbon, in this case diesel fuel, was injected into the formatlon to attempt to remove heavy viscous crude in the presence of such clay particles to make them susceptible to treatment with hydro-fluoric acid failed. No increased permeability was noticed.
3~
S~MMARY OF THE INVENTION
-Applicant has now discovered a method by which the problems created by the presence of clay particles which adversely effect permeability in a format:ion containing highly viscous hydrocarbon.materials such as petroleum crude oils and synthetic fuels are solved, allowing the formation to be stimulated by the injection of a thermal vapor stream comprising steam and combustion gases, such as, for example, carbon dioxide. The method of this invention comprises initially injectin~ the ~thermal vapor stream through the bore hole to clean- that part ~f the formation in the vicinit~
of the bore hole of hydrocarbon crude oil to expose the clay particles; injecting v-aporized hydrochloric acid simul-taneously with the thermal vapor s-tream until calciuml magnesium and other meta}s., if present,.in-the formation about the bore hole have.reacted to form water-soluble chloride salts;-injectin~ vapor~zed hydrofloric acid simul~
taneously with the thermal-vapor stream until sufficient amounts of the clay-in-the forma-t^ion about the bore hole ha~e been dissolved by-the hydrofluoric acid; and, continu-ing to-inject the thermal vapor -into the forma*ion until suff-icient heat has -been imparted.thereto to permit the petroleum therein to be.recovered at an improved recovery rate. -.. . . ..
Where mobile, fine clay particles are present, a known clay stabilizer may be added with any of the injection steps after the crude oil has been cleaned from the clay particles to further assist in curing the problem converted with particulate migration.
Injection of hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride sequentially, o.r simultaneously after some initial HC1 injection, as a vapor at high temperatures insures that the formation about the bore hole may be properly conditioned for a distance.of at least five feet of the bore hole to eliminate the problems caused by clay particles ~hen the thermal vapor stream is employed to stimulate production of the viscous petroleum contained therein.
3~
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ~E DRAWING
The drawing is a schematic drawing, partially in cross-section, of a section of the earth, illustrating a well bore penetrating a petroleum-bearing formatiorl and another means at the surface for introducing a thermal vapor stream into the well and formation. The drawing also illustrates a means for introducing and vaporizing hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride with the thermal vapor stream, as well as the s'abilizing compound, if desired, into the well and formation in accordance with the method of the invention.
In the drawing the casing is partially broken away in order to show the details of one embodiment for in~ection and vaporizing hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride simul-taneously with the injection of the thermal vapor stream.
It will be understood that the instant invention may be employed for the recovery of substantially any type viscous hydrocarbon materials, such as crude petroleum oil or synthe-tic fuel from substantially any type of subterranean formationcontaining clay particles which adversely effect the perme-ability of the formation. One of the primary advantages of this invention is that it provides for the injection of a thermal vapor stream containing combustion gases and steam at high injection rates thereby permitting the formation to be heated to a predetermined desired level at which the cxude oil will be flowable in relatively short periods of time. However, the instant process is particularly useful for recovering heavy viscous crudes; e.g., those having viscosities greater than 200 centipoise (at 60 F~ and/or API gravities (at 60F~ of about 22 or below, from subter-ranean formations having low relative permeabilities to water and oil and containing water-sensitive or fine, mobile paxticulate clays.
More specifically, the instant method is useful for recovering such highly vis~ous crudes from a formation where the low permeability of the formation is due, at least in part, to the swelling of w~ter-sensitive clay p~xticles which, when contacted with the thermal vapor stream, exp~nd to inhibit the migration of the thermal vapor stream into the formation at distances more remote from the well bore or where mobile, fine clay particles migrate and plug the formation.
Many of such viscous crude-bearing formations having low relative permeabilities to oil and water are well-known, and are usually located within the range of from about 500 to about 2,000 ~t. below the earth's surface. I~cluded among such formations, by way of example, are those of Pennsylvanian san~stone,-such as--Bartlesville sandstone of the Cherokee group, which are known to-be located throughout southern Illinois, western Missourij southeastern Kansas and northeastern Oklahoma. ,$uch format,ions often contain about 10~ to 16% of troublesome clay particles.
The pr,acti,cç of t,hls,inv,ention can be most easily understood by reference to the drawingO As illustrated, a producing formation l0-bearing heavy viscous petroleum is penetrated by ,a, well 11 which has--been-dr~lled from the surface of-,the earth-12~ -The we,ll 11 has preferably been completed in a conventional manner and includes a string of casing 13 set within a-well bore 14 to,the petroleum-bearing .. .. . .. . . .
formation-10 and supported by-a cement sheath 15. The well bore 14 has penetrated the petroleum-~earing formation and has been drilled to near the bottom of-the desired formation injection zone. ,The well bore 14 may be left open as in an open hole completion or a,screen or slotted liner or perfora-ted casing (not shown) may be set in the well-bore lower end 14a to support the,walls of the well bore 14 Of course, the casing may be set all the way throuyh the formation, cemented and perforated.
The well 11 also;includes a string of tubing 17 disposed within the casing 13 and the well bore 14 extending through the formation 10 thereby forming annular space 18. Prefer-ably, the tubing 17 extends downwardly to near the well bore lower end 14a. A conventional sealing device ~not shown~ is provided adjacent the top of the well head 19 to seal off ~ 3 ~ 3~ ~
the casing annulus 18 ~nd maintain pressure within the wellO
In an optional embodiment to be discussed subsequently, a second short length of supplemental tubing 37 is included within the tubing 17 and forms a second annulus ~0 there-with. Tubing 37 extends partially the length of tubing 17,terminates in opening 37a and is held in place by centralizer 39 which has openings therein (not illustrated~ to allow fluid flow in tubing 17 pass centralizer 39. ~ conventional sealing device 38 is provided at the top of tubing 17 to seal off the second annulus 40 and maintain pressure within the well.
In the first step of the method of this invention the formation face lOa and suxrounding strata adjacent the well bore 14 is preliminarily "preconditioned" to clean or remove viscous crude, paraffins, or other hydrocarbonaceous materials adhering to the particles of the formation - including clay particles contained therein - which could restrict flow of the thermal vapor stream into the petroleum-bearing formation 10 .
In the first step in carrying out the method of the invention the well bore 14 and surrounding strata through which the well 11 extends to and through the formation 10 is initially heated by injecting a thermal vapor stream contain-ing combustion gases and superheated steam; i.e., particularly carbon dioxide and superheated stoam, into the annulus 18 through a valve-controlled pipe 20. The heated therm~1 vapor stream travels down the annulus 18 where part of it contacts and penetrates the formation face lOa and surround-ing strata adjacent the well bore 14 while the remainder enters the open end 17a of the tubing 17, causing the thermal vapor and any condensed fluid as well as any hydrocarbona~
ceous material removed from the formation about the bore hole to pass upwardly through the tubing 17 where it is vented into suitable collection means (not shown) at the surface through a suitable venting means 23 connected with the surface end of the tubing 17, such as by pipe 22. The venting means 23 include a means for controlling the pressure in the tubing, such as a valve, restriction orifice, auto-matic operating valve or a combination of such devices.
3~
1 This pressure controllin~ means 23 is preferahly instal.led between the end of the pipe 22 and a valve 21.
~ f desired, the -thermal vapor stream may be injec-ted into the tubing 17, such as through piping 24 connected therewi-th and vented at the surEace :Erom the annulus 18 by appropriate ven-ting pressure controlling means 25 mounted with pipe 26. Ilowever, annulus injec-tion and venting through the tubiny 17 for hea-ting and cleaning the well 11, the casing 13 and surrounding strata is preferred~
The injection of the thermal vapor stream into the well 11 contacts the tubing 17, casing 13 and the formation face lOa may cause, depending upon the ormation tempcrature, substantially simultaneous condensation of condensable fluids, e.g~, steam, in the thermal vapor stream which may collect in the wcll bore 1~. If the rate at which the flui.d condenses in ~he we:Ll bore 1~ :is greater than the ra-te which the formation can accept at the injection pressure employed, the well bore 1~ starts to accumulate fluids usually at the bo-ttom l~a. As these fluids accumulate they reduce the area of the Eorma-tion injection zone which in turn reduces the injection rate oE the hea-ted fluid into the formation. As this condition continues, the l.evel of condensed fluids can rise to a level in the well bore 1~ and formation 10 where it effectively seals o:Ef the entire formation injection horizon and the maximum injection ra-te of the heated fluid into the formation may drop to near zero.
However, by simultaneously venting, as described previously and taugh-t by U.S. Patent 3,993l135, the injected thermal vapor stream at the surface throuyh the pressure 3~ control means 23 any condensed liquids formed and collected in the well bore 1~ are forced into the tubing 17 through its 3~
open lower end 17a and are forced or lifted towards the surface. The simultaneous venting step thus sweeps the condensed li~uids from the wel.l bore 14 thereby eliminati.ng -the aforementioned blockage problems.
The thermal vapor s-tream is prefe:rably continuously injected and simul.taneously vented until the well and sur-rounding subterranean strata are heated sufficiently to substan-tially eliminate condensation of the heated fluid within the well 11 or at least reduce the amount of conden-sation to a level which the formation will accept without causing the aforementioned blockage problems. The time requirecl will. vary widely, depending upon well location, dep-th, and surrounding strata temperatures, types oE strata, etc.
and 3 S best determined emperically, such as by direc-tly injecting thc thermal vapoxs into the formation by discon-tinuing venting and observing whether a desi.red high formation injection :rate can be maintained.
The thermal vapors may be injected into the well 11 at any desired rate to impart heat through the well and surround~
~ ing subterranean strata. However, it is preEerred to emplo~
the ma~imum injection rate possible so as to impart heat as rapidly as possible~ Such maximum in]ection rates may be obtained by emp:Loying an injection pressure practiceable below the -fo.rmation frac-ture gradient pressure which may be. readily de-termined, if desired, by known techni~ues. More specifically, i.t is preferred to employ an injection pressure within the range of Erom about 200 to about 1500 psig ~14 ~o about 105 kg/
cm2 gauge). Again, such injeetion procedure is described in U.S. Patent 3,993,135.
Further, the thermal vapor stream is vented at the surface at a rate sufficien-t to keep the gas velocity in tubing .
3~gD
1 17 high enough to lift any condensed liquids formed and collec-ted in the well bore 1~ -towards the sur:Eace so as to keep i-t substantially Eree o:E liquids while maintaining substantially full pressure on the forma-tiorl. This may be readily accomplished by the employment o:E the aforementioned appropriate ven-t pressure con-trol means at the surEace, such as a valve, restric-tion orifice or like devi.ce in -the conven-tional manner to provide a gas velocity in the tubing within the range of from abou-t 10 -to about ~0 ft./sec. (3 to about 1~ 12 meters/second).
During the above-mentioned injecting and venting the hea-ted fluid through the well 11 the formation face lOa adjacent the well bore lower end 14a is conti.nuous:Ly exposed directly to the heated fluid, -thereby gradually increasing its temperature and the temperature of the heavy viscous petroleum therein~ This "pre-conditioning" of the adjacent formation face cleans the. well bore 14 ana formation face lOa of viscous crude, paraffins, or materials which could tend to rest:rict flow of the -thermal vapors into the petroleum-
2~ bearing formation 10. It also exposes the clay particl.eswhich adversely eEfects permeability and ma~ces them suscep-tible to fur-ther treatment.
The thermal vapor stream preferably employed to heat and clean the formation face of the well 11 and surrounding sub-terranean strata is usually a mixture of superheated steam and combustion gases essentially free of solid carbonaceous particles. Such a mix-ture of s-team and combustion gases are preferably produced as described in V.S. Patents 3l993,135,
The thermal vapor stream preferably employed to heat and clean the formation face of the well 11 and surrounding sub-terranean strata is usually a mixture of superheated steam and combustion gases essentially free of solid carbonaceous particles. Such a mix-ture of s-team and combustion gases are preferably produced as described in V.S. Patents 3l993,135,
3,948,322 and ~,718,925. Any process and apparatus known in the ar-t can be employed for injecting such steam-gas mix-tures with a mix-ture o:E carbon dioxide and steam ~eing particularly - useful.
~L31~3~
It is preferrecl to employ a steam-gas mixture which is produced by initially burning a hydrocarbon ~ue], such as diesel oil, ga~o~ine, hea-ting oil, natural gas, propane, bu-tane, lease crude, e-tc. in the presence of subs-tantially stoichiometric ~uan-tities o-E pressurized air under relatively high pressures, e.g., within the range of from about 200 to about 1500 psig and contacting the resulting pressurized combustion gas stream with water as described in the a~oremen-tioned paten-ts. ~s illustra-ted in the drawing, this may be carried out by simultaneously injecting a hydrocarbon fuel :Erom a suitable fuel storage supply 30 and a pressurized stream of air produced by a suitable air compressor 31 through suitable piping 32 ancl 33 respectively, into a pressurized combustion chamber 34 specifically designed ~or high pressure combustion, such as the one described in U.S.
Patent 4,118,925, wherein the fuel is burned under high pressure. The quantities o~ Euel and pressurized air are regulated to provide essentially complete combus-tion in the pressurized combustion chamber 34, resulting in a pressurized ;~
-lla-combustion ~as stream essentially free of solid carbonaceous particles, e.g., soot.
The pressurized combustion ~ases, usually having a temperature within the range of from about 2,000~ to about
~L31~3~
It is preferrecl to employ a steam-gas mixture which is produced by initially burning a hydrocarbon ~ue], such as diesel oil, ga~o~ine, hea-ting oil, natural gas, propane, bu-tane, lease crude, e-tc. in the presence of subs-tantially stoichiometric ~uan-tities o-E pressurized air under relatively high pressures, e.g., within the range of from about 200 to about 1500 psig and contacting the resulting pressurized combustion gas stream with water as described in the a~oremen-tioned paten-ts. ~s illustra-ted in the drawing, this may be carried out by simultaneously injecting a hydrocarbon fuel :Erom a suitable fuel storage supply 30 and a pressurized stream of air produced by a suitable air compressor 31 through suitable piping 32 ancl 33 respectively, into a pressurized combustion chamber 34 specifically designed ~or high pressure combustion, such as the one described in U.S.
Patent 4,118,925, wherein the fuel is burned under high pressure. The quantities o~ Euel and pressurized air are regulated to provide essentially complete combus-tion in the pressurized combustion chamber 34, resulting in a pressurized ;~
-lla-combustion ~as stream essentially free of solid carbonaceous particles, e.g., soot.
The pressurized combustion ~ases, usually having a temperature within the range of from about 2,000~ to about
4,000 ~, is th~n passed into a steam ~enerator 35 where it is contacted with water provided through suitable piping 36 to form steam. The resulting mixture of combustion gases and superheated steam forming the thermal vapor stream, can then be injected into the well annulus 18 through piping 20 or into the well tubing 17 through piping 24 under any pressure within the range of from about 200 to about 1500 psig, depending upon the formation fracture pressure gradient to enter the formation at a temperature within the range of from about 550 to about 700F. The temperatures stated are illustrative, with the important consideration being that the thermal vapor stream enters the formation with super-heated steam. At such temperatures and pressures, the thermal vapor stream is injected into the well 11 for heating it and the surrounding strata, described hereinabove, or directly into the formation at steam~gas injection rates within the range of from about 200,000 to about 2 million standard cubic feet per day (scfd) and heat injection rates within the range of from about 20 million to about 250 million BTU heat per day.
In accordance with the inventive method, after the sur-rounding strata is sufficiently heated and the clay particles substantially cleaned of hydrocarbaneous materials, vaporized hydrochloric acid is injected simultaneously with the thermal vapor stream through the well bore and thereafter vaporized h~drofluoric acid is injected simultaneously with the thermal vapors. This injection allows for solubilization or stabilization of the clay particles which would, without this treatment, adversely effect the permeability of the formation.
With reference to the drawing, acid injection may be accomplished by adding it directly to the supply line 24 through which the heated fluid is injected into the well.
After that, the acid added to the supply line will vaporize 3~
as a result OI contact with the heated fluid. This method is not preferred because it exposes the mild steel of the supply line to the corrosive effect of the acid. The acid in the vapor phase is less corrosive than its liquid counter-part. Thus it is preferred to vaporize the acid prior toits admixture with the heated fluicl. This may be accom-plished by employing hydrogen chloride or hydrogen fluoride gas rather than aqueous solutions of these acids. In this event, it is merel~ necessary to inject the hydrogen chloride or hydrogen fluoride,directly into the thermal vapor injection line 24. Upon mixture.~ith the thermal vapors, the hydrogen chloride or hydrogen fluoride will become heated to the same temperature of the thermal vapors. It is important to avoid corrosion that the tempe,rature,of the mixture of thermal 15 ~ vapors and the acid mix,,ture be,,a,bove the . ~ at which the ~' hydrogen chloride or.hydrogen fluoride, as the case may be, will condense. , .. -.- .. : . . .
Alternately, an aqu.,eous-ac,id solution may be heated tp vaporization in a heater-43,-prior-to injection via conduit 46 into tubing.17 where-it heçomes mixed with the thermal vapor, which is simultaneously injected into tublng 17.
This,method requires a heater 43 constructed of a corrosive resistant metal. - , -In a preferred methpd of acid injection, the heat value of the therrnal fluid i,s utilized to vaporize an acid solutionand raise it to a sufficient temperature such that the mixture enters the formation at-a temperature above the dew point of the mixture. In this embodiment, acid solution i.s pumped from reservoir 47 or 48 to supplementary tubing 37.
Supplementary tubing 37 is constructed of a corrosive resis-tant steel such as.Hastelloy B~ Simultaneously with the injection of acid solution through supplementary tubing 37, thexmal vapors are being injected into tubing 17 and passing down annulus.40 in a heat exchange relationship with supple-mentary tubing 37O Tubing 17 and supplementary tubing 37 form a heat exchanger in which acid flowing through supple-mentary tubing 37 becomes vaporized prior to passing through opening 37a where it becomes mixed ~ith the thermal vapors in one preferred embodiment of this invention.
~ -14~
3~
Sufficient h~drochloric acid is injected into the formation surrounding the bore hole in order to react with such calcium and magnesium compounds as may be contained in the formation to form water soluble metallic chlorides. '~he hydrogen chloride treatment when such compounds are present prepares the formation for hydrofluoric acid injection. If hydrofluoric acid were injected without pxior hydrochloric treatment, the hydrofluoric acid would react with the calcium and magnesium, if present in the formation, to form insoluble metallic fluorides which would deposit within the pores of the formation and impair its permeability. rrhe amount of hydrochloric acid needed can be readily determined by core analysis of the formation.
Preferably a 35~/ by weight, aqueous solution of hydro-chloric acid is used as a source of hydrogen chloride eventhough anhydrous hydrogen chloride gas may be used. The rate of addition is adjusted such that about 5 to about 30 gallons of such 35~ solution is used per hour preferably from about 5 to about 10 gallons per hour. Greater or lesser amounts of hydrochloric acid may be used with the heating time being varied accordingly.
The injection of hydrochloric as a vapor at elevated temperatures above the dew point simultaneously with the injection of the thermal vapor is important to insure that the hydrochloric acid will be carried into the formation adjacent the well bore for a distance of at least 5 feet.
The amount of hydrochloric acid necessary to treat the formation around the well bore for the required distance of at least 5 feet may readily be determined by determining the calcium and magnesium content of the formation from a core sample or samples of formation fluids. It is preferred to employ an excess of hydrochloric acid to ensure that the formation is properly preconditioned for the subsequent hydrofluoric acid treatment.
After the hydxochloric acid injection, the well is acidized with hydrofluoric acid in order to remove the troublesome clay particles in that part of the formation which surrounds the well bore 11. Hydrofluoric acid injec-tion r,lay be accomplished in substantially the same manner, and with the same te~perature requirements, as hydrogen chloride injection. That is, the hydrofluoric acid may be added as a gas to the heated fluid supply line 24 as an aqueous solution, usually 70% by weight hydrofluoric acid, which is vaporized in a heater 43 prior to injection, or injected as an aqueous solution which is vaporized by in-direct heat exchange with the thermal vapors in the same manner as previously described which is simultaneously injected into the well.
The hydrofluoric acid usually amounts to about 3%, by ~olume, of the amount of thermal vapor being injected.
Lesser amounts may be acceptable but would require addi-tional time of injection and greater amounts may cause corrosion and do,not normally,,result in significant reduction in injection tlme. The preferred range is from about 2% to about 6%. This,amount is easlly accomplished by injection of from about 5 to about 30 gallons per hour, preferably . .
from about 5 to about lQ gallons per hou,r, of a 70% weight solution of aqueous hydrofluoric acid.
Injection o~ hydrofluoric acid as,a heated vapor simul-taneously with the injection of the thermal vapors at tempera-tures above the dewpoint of the,mixture insures that the hydrofluoric acid will be carried into the formation surround-ing the bore hole for a distance,of about 5 feet or more.
The hydro~luoric acid then reacts,with the clay particles of the formation in the immediate vicinity of the well bore to render them incapable of swelling. A surfactant may option-ally be added to the hydrofluoric,acid to be injected to increase the activity of such acid in its removal of the clay particles.
In those formations where plugging of the pores within the formation is caused by the migration of very fine clay particles which are either,removed from the sandstone sub-strate or are suspended in the pore volume fluids~ known clay stabilizing compounds may be added J usually simultaneously with hydrofluoric acid injection. This clay stabili~ing compound added to the 70% weight solution of aqueous hydro-fluoric acid in quantities of from about .003 ~allons to ~ 3 ~ 3~
about 0.5 gallons o~ cl~y stabilizing compound per ~allon of 70~ by weight hydrofluoric acid with a rate of about 0.1 tQ about 0.30 gal. o~ clay stabilizing compound per gallon being n ~c~. The acid stable organic clay stabilization com~
`:` 5 pound will attach itsel~ to these very fine clay particles and rendex them in~obile; thus, preventing their migration and subsequent plugging. Of course, once the clay particles have been cleaned of the hydrocarbonaceous coating the stabilizing additive can be used. One particularly useful clay stabilizer is "Cla-Sta B" sold by the Halliburton Company which is an aqueous solution of ammonium chloride containing 30% by weight of a quaternary polymer.
In accordance with the inventive method, after the well 11 and surrounding strata have been suficiently heated and cleaned and the permeability has been increased by the treat-ment described hereinabove, injection of the thermal vapors is continued directly into the formation at the maximum injection rate possible as described in the aforementioned patents. Formation injection is then continued until suff~
cient thermal vapor has been injected to raise the formation temperature sufficiently to permit the heated petroleum to flow to the well bore 14 for recovery to the surface by the employment of conventional production means. The injec-tion necessary depends upon formation permeability, crude viscosity, formation fluid composition and the like, all well-known to those having ordinary skill in the axt.
In carrying out the inventive method, the thermal vapors are continuously injected into the formation until it has sufficiently heated the formation, usually about 150 millio~ BTUs. It is preferred to establish and maintain a formation injection rate averaging at least 50 million BTU
per day and at least 500,000 scfd thermal vapor in order to permit petroleum recovery as rapidly as practicable. However, often times such injection rates are not obtained at initial formation injection and oftentimes the ormation injection rate diminishes below such levels before the formation has bePn heated to the desired extent due to blockage problems caused by condensed liquids forming and collecting in the ~3~133d3 well bore and adjacent injection zone of the fo~mation. It is believed that this is cau~ed.by the well and ~urrounding strata being insufficiently heated. However, it has been dis-covered that this problem can be overcome by discontinuing direct formatior. injection and further heating the well 11 and surrounding strata.by injecting and simultaneously venting the steam-gas mixture through the wel~ as described above. By alternating the well heating :injection and direct formation.injection, the direct formation injection rate is increased and stabilized. Also, the injection can ~e halted and the.formati.on allowed to "soak" with the injected thermal vapors further improving permeability to accept additional thermal vapor inj.ection.
Therefore, whenever the formation injection rate dimi-nishes or is initially. established.at a rate below about 20 .
milltion BTU per day heat, preferably below about 50 million BTU per day.heat, the alternate injection procedure may be employed.
After the formation 10 has.been heated to the desired extent, direct formation.injection is discontinued at the surface and the heated,.now mobile petroleum is withdrawn and collected at the surface through the well 11 by the .. . .
techniques, such as natural flow, pumping, and the like, all well-known in the art. If desired~ the formation may be allowed to "soak" for a desired length of time prior to petroleum withdrawal to allow the thermal vapor to dissipate through the formation interstices, impart heat to the forma-tion strata and petroleum and to allow the petroleum, in its heated, more mobile state, to be easily removed from the formation 10 through the well 11.
Into a well in southwestern Missouri containing a 21 API gravity crude was injected a thermal vapor stream prepared as described in.U.S. Patent 4,118,923. A total amount of about 300 million BTU were injected. Upon entering the production cycle, only about 6 barrels of oil was recovered per day for five days and the production dropped to near zero.
33~
It was attempted to acidize the well by cleaning clay particles at normal ~eservoir temperatures (70-80 F~ with diesel oil followed by injection of liquid 70~ HF to which Cla-Sta B (The Hallibuxton Co.) had been added. ~ttempts to stimul~te the ~ormation followed by the injection of thermal vapors but no production of crude oil resulted.
The well was then treated by injecting sufficient thermal vapors, carrying approximately 50 million BTUs of heat at a temperature of from about 550-650 F and about 300 psig. Without ceasing the heat injection, over the next two hour period, 55 gallons of 35% (wt) aqueous hydrochloric acid was added to the thermal vapors. Then, over a two hour period 55 gallons of 70% (wt) aqueous hydrofluoric ac:id was added to the thermal vapor stream. One quart of Halliburton Cla-Sta B was added to the hydrofluoric acid. After the addition of the hydrofluoric acid was complete additional thermal vapors were injected until a total of about 150 million BTU had been put into the formation. The well then began production at a rate of about 35 barrels of oil per ' day. Another well in the same field and pay zone was similarly treated and had a production rate as high as 60 barrels per day. Of course, in fields of this nature it is well known that production falls off as the formation cools and requires more heat injection. The period of time how-ever can be as long as 4-6 months.
From the foregoing description, those skilled in the art will be able to arrive at many variations of the same without departing from the scope of the claimed invention.
In accordance with the inventive method, after the sur-rounding strata is sufficiently heated and the clay particles substantially cleaned of hydrocarbaneous materials, vaporized hydrochloric acid is injected simultaneously with the thermal vapor stream through the well bore and thereafter vaporized h~drofluoric acid is injected simultaneously with the thermal vapors. This injection allows for solubilization or stabilization of the clay particles which would, without this treatment, adversely effect the permeability of the formation.
With reference to the drawing, acid injection may be accomplished by adding it directly to the supply line 24 through which the heated fluid is injected into the well.
After that, the acid added to the supply line will vaporize 3~
as a result OI contact with the heated fluid. This method is not preferred because it exposes the mild steel of the supply line to the corrosive effect of the acid. The acid in the vapor phase is less corrosive than its liquid counter-part. Thus it is preferred to vaporize the acid prior toits admixture with the heated fluicl. This may be accom-plished by employing hydrogen chloride or hydrogen fluoride gas rather than aqueous solutions of these acids. In this event, it is merel~ necessary to inject the hydrogen chloride or hydrogen fluoride,directly into the thermal vapor injection line 24. Upon mixture.~ith the thermal vapors, the hydrogen chloride or hydrogen fluoride will become heated to the same temperature of the thermal vapors. It is important to avoid corrosion that the tempe,rature,of the mixture of thermal 15 ~ vapors and the acid mix,,ture be,,a,bove the . ~ at which the ~' hydrogen chloride or.hydrogen fluoride, as the case may be, will condense. , .. -.- .. : . . .
Alternately, an aqu.,eous-ac,id solution may be heated tp vaporization in a heater-43,-prior-to injection via conduit 46 into tubing.17 where-it heçomes mixed with the thermal vapor, which is simultaneously injected into tublng 17.
This,method requires a heater 43 constructed of a corrosive resistant metal. - , -In a preferred methpd of acid injection, the heat value of the therrnal fluid i,s utilized to vaporize an acid solutionand raise it to a sufficient temperature such that the mixture enters the formation at-a temperature above the dew point of the mixture. In this embodiment, acid solution i.s pumped from reservoir 47 or 48 to supplementary tubing 37.
Supplementary tubing 37 is constructed of a corrosive resis-tant steel such as.Hastelloy B~ Simultaneously with the injection of acid solution through supplementary tubing 37, thexmal vapors are being injected into tubing 17 and passing down annulus.40 in a heat exchange relationship with supple-mentary tubing 37O Tubing 17 and supplementary tubing 37 form a heat exchanger in which acid flowing through supple-mentary tubing 37 becomes vaporized prior to passing through opening 37a where it becomes mixed ~ith the thermal vapors in one preferred embodiment of this invention.
~ -14~
3~
Sufficient h~drochloric acid is injected into the formation surrounding the bore hole in order to react with such calcium and magnesium compounds as may be contained in the formation to form water soluble metallic chlorides. '~he hydrogen chloride treatment when such compounds are present prepares the formation for hydrofluoric acid injection. If hydrofluoric acid were injected without pxior hydrochloric treatment, the hydrofluoric acid would react with the calcium and magnesium, if present in the formation, to form insoluble metallic fluorides which would deposit within the pores of the formation and impair its permeability. rrhe amount of hydrochloric acid needed can be readily determined by core analysis of the formation.
Preferably a 35~/ by weight, aqueous solution of hydro-chloric acid is used as a source of hydrogen chloride eventhough anhydrous hydrogen chloride gas may be used. The rate of addition is adjusted such that about 5 to about 30 gallons of such 35~ solution is used per hour preferably from about 5 to about 10 gallons per hour. Greater or lesser amounts of hydrochloric acid may be used with the heating time being varied accordingly.
The injection of hydrochloric as a vapor at elevated temperatures above the dew point simultaneously with the injection of the thermal vapor is important to insure that the hydrochloric acid will be carried into the formation adjacent the well bore for a distance of at least 5 feet.
The amount of hydrochloric acid necessary to treat the formation around the well bore for the required distance of at least 5 feet may readily be determined by determining the calcium and magnesium content of the formation from a core sample or samples of formation fluids. It is preferred to employ an excess of hydrochloric acid to ensure that the formation is properly preconditioned for the subsequent hydrofluoric acid treatment.
After the hydxochloric acid injection, the well is acidized with hydrofluoric acid in order to remove the troublesome clay particles in that part of the formation which surrounds the well bore 11. Hydrofluoric acid injec-tion r,lay be accomplished in substantially the same manner, and with the same te~perature requirements, as hydrogen chloride injection. That is, the hydrofluoric acid may be added as a gas to the heated fluid supply line 24 as an aqueous solution, usually 70% by weight hydrofluoric acid, which is vaporized in a heater 43 prior to injection, or injected as an aqueous solution which is vaporized by in-direct heat exchange with the thermal vapors in the same manner as previously described which is simultaneously injected into the well.
The hydrofluoric acid usually amounts to about 3%, by ~olume, of the amount of thermal vapor being injected.
Lesser amounts may be acceptable but would require addi-tional time of injection and greater amounts may cause corrosion and do,not normally,,result in significant reduction in injection tlme. The preferred range is from about 2% to about 6%. This,amount is easlly accomplished by injection of from about 5 to about 30 gallons per hour, preferably . .
from about 5 to about lQ gallons per hou,r, of a 70% weight solution of aqueous hydrofluoric acid.
Injection o~ hydrofluoric acid as,a heated vapor simul-taneously with the injection of the thermal vapors at tempera-tures above the dewpoint of the,mixture insures that the hydrofluoric acid will be carried into the formation surround-ing the bore hole for a distance,of about 5 feet or more.
The hydro~luoric acid then reacts,with the clay particles of the formation in the immediate vicinity of the well bore to render them incapable of swelling. A surfactant may option-ally be added to the hydrofluoric,acid to be injected to increase the activity of such acid in its removal of the clay particles.
In those formations where plugging of the pores within the formation is caused by the migration of very fine clay particles which are either,removed from the sandstone sub-strate or are suspended in the pore volume fluids~ known clay stabilizing compounds may be added J usually simultaneously with hydrofluoric acid injection. This clay stabili~ing compound added to the 70% weight solution of aqueous hydro-fluoric acid in quantities of from about .003 ~allons to ~ 3 ~ 3~
about 0.5 gallons o~ cl~y stabilizing compound per ~allon of 70~ by weight hydrofluoric acid with a rate of about 0.1 tQ about 0.30 gal. o~ clay stabilizing compound per gallon being n ~c~. The acid stable organic clay stabilization com~
`:` 5 pound will attach itsel~ to these very fine clay particles and rendex them in~obile; thus, preventing their migration and subsequent plugging. Of course, once the clay particles have been cleaned of the hydrocarbonaceous coating the stabilizing additive can be used. One particularly useful clay stabilizer is "Cla-Sta B" sold by the Halliburton Company which is an aqueous solution of ammonium chloride containing 30% by weight of a quaternary polymer.
In accordance with the inventive method, after the well 11 and surrounding strata have been suficiently heated and cleaned and the permeability has been increased by the treat-ment described hereinabove, injection of the thermal vapors is continued directly into the formation at the maximum injection rate possible as described in the aforementioned patents. Formation injection is then continued until suff~
cient thermal vapor has been injected to raise the formation temperature sufficiently to permit the heated petroleum to flow to the well bore 14 for recovery to the surface by the employment of conventional production means. The injec-tion necessary depends upon formation permeability, crude viscosity, formation fluid composition and the like, all well-known to those having ordinary skill in the axt.
In carrying out the inventive method, the thermal vapors are continuously injected into the formation until it has sufficiently heated the formation, usually about 150 millio~ BTUs. It is preferred to establish and maintain a formation injection rate averaging at least 50 million BTU
per day and at least 500,000 scfd thermal vapor in order to permit petroleum recovery as rapidly as practicable. However, often times such injection rates are not obtained at initial formation injection and oftentimes the ormation injection rate diminishes below such levels before the formation has bePn heated to the desired extent due to blockage problems caused by condensed liquids forming and collecting in the ~3~133d3 well bore and adjacent injection zone of the fo~mation. It is believed that this is cau~ed.by the well and ~urrounding strata being insufficiently heated. However, it has been dis-covered that this problem can be overcome by discontinuing direct formatior. injection and further heating the well 11 and surrounding strata.by injecting and simultaneously venting the steam-gas mixture through the wel~ as described above. By alternating the well heating :injection and direct formation.injection, the direct formation injection rate is increased and stabilized. Also, the injection can ~e halted and the.formati.on allowed to "soak" with the injected thermal vapors further improving permeability to accept additional thermal vapor inj.ection.
Therefore, whenever the formation injection rate dimi-nishes or is initially. established.at a rate below about 20 .
milltion BTU per day heat, preferably below about 50 million BTU per day.heat, the alternate injection procedure may be employed.
After the formation 10 has.been heated to the desired extent, direct formation.injection is discontinued at the surface and the heated,.now mobile petroleum is withdrawn and collected at the surface through the well 11 by the .. . .
techniques, such as natural flow, pumping, and the like, all well-known in the art. If desired~ the formation may be allowed to "soak" for a desired length of time prior to petroleum withdrawal to allow the thermal vapor to dissipate through the formation interstices, impart heat to the forma-tion strata and petroleum and to allow the petroleum, in its heated, more mobile state, to be easily removed from the formation 10 through the well 11.
Into a well in southwestern Missouri containing a 21 API gravity crude was injected a thermal vapor stream prepared as described in.U.S. Patent 4,118,923. A total amount of about 300 million BTU were injected. Upon entering the production cycle, only about 6 barrels of oil was recovered per day for five days and the production dropped to near zero.
33~
It was attempted to acidize the well by cleaning clay particles at normal ~eservoir temperatures (70-80 F~ with diesel oil followed by injection of liquid 70~ HF to which Cla-Sta B (The Hallibuxton Co.) had been added. ~ttempts to stimul~te the ~ormation followed by the injection of thermal vapors but no production of crude oil resulted.
The well was then treated by injecting sufficient thermal vapors, carrying approximately 50 million BTUs of heat at a temperature of from about 550-650 F and about 300 psig. Without ceasing the heat injection, over the next two hour period, 55 gallons of 35% (wt) aqueous hydrochloric acid was added to the thermal vapors. Then, over a two hour period 55 gallons of 70% (wt) aqueous hydrofluoric ac:id was added to the thermal vapor stream. One quart of Halliburton Cla-Sta B was added to the hydrofluoric acid. After the addition of the hydrofluoric acid was complete additional thermal vapors were injected until a total of about 150 million BTU had been put into the formation. The well then began production at a rate of about 35 barrels of oil per ' day. Another well in the same field and pay zone was similarly treated and had a production rate as high as 60 barrels per day. Of course, in fields of this nature it is well known that production falls off as the formation cools and requires more heat injection. The period of time how-ever can be as long as 4-6 months.
From the foregoing description, those skilled in the art will be able to arrive at many variations of the same without departing from the scope of the claimed invention.
Claims (19)
- Claim 1 continued...
(e) continuing the injection of said thermal vapor stream into the formation until sufficient heat has been imparted into the formation and viscous hydrocarbon material contained therein to permit the hydrocarbons to be recovered at an improved recovery rate while maintaining the formation pressure well below the formation fracture gradient pressure required for acid fracturing; and (f) recovering the hydrocarbons from the formation. - 2. The method of Claim 1 wherein the thermal vapor stream comprises nitrogen, carbon dioxide and steam.
- 3. The method of Claim 1 wherein the thermal vapor stream is injected into the formation at a temperature sufficient to maintain steam in the superheated range and above the dew point of the acids being injected.
- 4. The method of Claim 3 wherein the temperature is from about 550° to about 700°F.
- 5. The method of Claim 3 wherein hydrochloric acid is injected at about the temperature of the thermal vapor stream.
- 6. The method of Claim 3 wherein hydrofluoric acid is injected at about the temperature of the thermal vapor stream.
- 7. The method of Claim 1 wherein the hydrochloric acid is introduced into the well bore as an aqueous solution and is vaporized by the heat content of the thermal vapor stream.
- 8. The method of Claim 1 wherein hydrochloric acid is introduced into the well bore as a gas.
- 9. The method of Claim l wherein the hydrofluoric acid introduced into the well bore as an aqueous solution and is vaporized by the heat content of the thermal vapor stream.
- 10. The method of Claim l wherein hydrofluoric acid is introduced into the well bore as a gas.
- 11. The method of Claim l wherein the hydrofluoric acid comprises at least about 3% by weight of the thermal vapor stream,
- 12. The method of Claim l wherein steps (a) through (c) are continued until that part of the formation within a radius of about five fee-t of the bore hole is treated.
- 13. The method of Claim l wherein the hydrocarbons in the formation is a viscous crude oil having an API gravity at 60°F
of less than about 22° and a viscosity of greater than 200 centipoises at 60°F. - 14. The method of Claim 13 wherein the formation is a Pennsylvanian sandstone.
- 15. The method of Claim l wherein a clay stabilizer is added simultaneously with the acidizing steps or the formation heating steps.
16. A method for recovering a heavy viscous petroleum crude oil having an API gravity, at 60°F, of 22° or less from a subterranean formation containing clay particles creating adverse permeability effects, penetrated by a well bore, consisting of the steps of:
injecting a thermal vapor stream through the well bore, into the subterranean formation at high rates, to contact clay particles at a temperature of from about 550° to about 650°F; - Claim 16 continued...
and at a maintained pressure of from about 200 to about 1500 psig, which is below the formation fracture gradient pressure required for acid fracturing, to remove crude oil from the clay particles adjacent the well bore to expose the particles to the thermal vapor stream, said thermal vapor stream comprising combustion gases obtained from combustion of hydrocarbon fuels at high pressures mixed with superheated steal;
injecting into the thermal vapor stream sufficient quantities of hydrogen chloride at a rate of from about 5 to 30 gallons of about 35 wt % of aqueous hydrochloric acid per hour to contact the exposed clay particles to react with magnesium and calcium salts in the particles;
injecting into the thermal vapor stream sufficient quantities of hydrogen fluoride at a rate of from about 5 to 30 gallons per hour of aqueous hydrofluoric acid having a concentration of about 70 wt % for a time sufficient to dissolve clay particles and improve permeability of the formation;
ceasing acid injection;
continuing injection of the thermal vapor stream into the formation for sufficient time to reduce the viscosity of the petroleum crude while maintaining the formation pressure well below the formation fracture gradient pressure required for acid fracturing; and recovering the crude oil from the formation. - 17. The method of Claim 16 wherein the injection of hydro-gen chloride is ceased prior to the injection of hydrogen fluoride.
- 18. The method of Claim 16 wherein a clay stabilizing compound is injected with the thermal vapor stream after removal of crude oil from clay particles.
- 19. The method of Claim 16 wherein no hydrogen chloride is injected because of the absence of magnesium and calcium salts.
1. A method for recovering heavy viscous hydrocarbon materials from a subterranean formation, containing clay particles creating adverse permeability effects, penetrated by a well bore, consisting essentially of the steps of:
(a) injecting a thermal vapor stream through the well bore into the subterranean formation at high injection rates and at an injection pressure below the formation fracture gradient pressure required for acid fracturing to clean -the clay particles adjacent to the well bore, of viscous hydro-carbonaceous material, said thermal vapor stream comprising combustion gases obtained from combustion of hydrocarbon fuels at high pressure mixed with superheated steam;
(b) then additionally, injecting a sufficient quantity of vaporized hydrochloric acid simultaneously with said thermal vapor stream through the well bore into the formation at a temperature above the dew point of the acid until a substantial part of calcium and magnesium salts contained in that part of the formation adjacent the well bore have been reacted and solubilized by said hydrochloric acid;
(c) injecting vaporized hydrofluoric acid simultaneously with said thermal vapor stream through the well bore into the formation at a temperature above the dew point of the acid until sufficient amounts of water-sensitive clay particles contained by that part of the formation within close proximity of said well bore have been dissolved, to improve permeability of such formation adjacent the well bore;
(d) ceasing injection of acid;
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US9176479A | 1979-11-06 | 1979-11-06 | |
| US091,764 | 1979-11-06 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1138330A true CA1138330A (en) | 1982-12-28 |
Family
ID=22229551
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000363919A Expired CA1138330A (en) | 1979-11-06 | 1980-11-04 | Thermal acidization and recovery process for recovering viscous petroleum |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1138330A (en) |
-
1980
- 1980-11-04 CA CA000363919A patent/CA1138330A/en not_active Expired
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4454917A (en) | Thermal acidization and recovery process for recovering viscous petroleum | |
| CA2094088C (en) | Gas well treatment compositions and methods | |
| CA1072005A (en) | Method for oil recovery using a horizontal well with indirect heating | |
| US4565249A (en) | Heavy oil recovery process using cyclic carbon dioxide steam stimulation | |
| US3838738A (en) | Method for recovering petroleum from viscous petroleum containing formations including tar sands | |
| Mackay et al. | PWRI: Scale formation risk assessment and management | |
| CA2349234C (en) | Cyclic solvent process for in-situ bitumen and heavy oil production | |
| US9376901B2 (en) | Increased resource recovery by inorganic and organic reactions and subsequent physical actions that modify properties of the subterranean formation which reduces produced water waste and increases resource utilization via stimulation of biogenic methane generation | |
| CA2707283C (en) | Viscous oil recovery using electric heating and solvent injection | |
| US3948323A (en) | Thermal injection process for recovery of heavy viscous petroleum | |
| WO1989012728A1 (en) | In-well heat exchange method for improved recovery of subterranean fluids with poor flowability | |
| US6273192B1 (en) | Method for strengthening a subterranean formation | |
| McLeod et al. | The use of alcohol in gas well stimulation | |
| Gidley | Stimulation of sandstone formations with the acid-mutual solvent method | |
| US3993135A (en) | Thermal process for recovering viscous petroleum | |
| US4293035A (en) | Solvent convection technique for recovering viscous petroleum | |
| US2876838A (en) | Secondary recovery process | |
| US3782470A (en) | Thermal oil recovery technique | |
| CA1134261A (en) | Method of controlling scale in oil recovery operations | |
| US3645336A (en) | Method for plugging highly permeable zones | |
| GB2062065A (en) | Oil recovery using a demthylamide in a fluid carrier | |
| US3565174A (en) | Method of in situ combustion with intermittent injection of volatile liquid | |
| CA1138330A (en) | Thermal acidization and recovery process for recovering viscous petroleum | |
| Gidley et al. | An improved method for acidizing oil wells in sandstone formations | |
| Liu et al. | A Novel Stimulation Technique for Horizontal Openhole Wells in Carbonate Reservoirs—A Case Study in Kuwait |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |