CA1122192A - Low temperature regeneration of carbonaceous adsorbent - Google Patents

Low temperature regeneration of carbonaceous adsorbent

Info

Publication number
CA1122192A
CA1122192A CA000347215A CA347215A CA1122192A CA 1122192 A CA1122192 A CA 1122192A CA 000347215 A CA000347215 A CA 000347215A CA 347215 A CA347215 A CA 347215A CA 1122192 A CA1122192 A CA 1122192A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
gas
adsorbent
coal
spent
regeneration zone
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA000347215A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Peter Steiner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Foster Wheeler Energy Corp
Original Assignee
Foster Wheeler Energy Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Foster Wheeler Energy Corp filed Critical Foster Wheeler Energy Corp
Priority to CA000347215A priority Critical patent/CA1122192A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1122192A publication Critical patent/CA1122192A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)

Abstract

LOW TEMPERATURE REGENERATION OF CARBONACEOUS ADSORBENT

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

A gas desulfurization process is disclosed wherein a particulate, partially oxidized coal is used as an ad-sorbent for gaseous sulfur oxides and is regenerated by contact with a low temperature recycled stream of its own desorbed off-gas containing a-t least 40% steam and 15%
SO2. A bleed stream of the desorbed off-gas may be reacted with coal at 1150°F to 1550°F to partially oxidize the coal and transform it into an adsorbent suitable for use in the adsorber.

Description

BACKGRt)UND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to pollution control systems and, more particularly, to a pollution control system for the removal of sulfur oxides from flue gases and the reduction of the sulfur oxides to sulfur.

It is known in the field of atmospheric pollution control to use an adsorptive process for the desulfurization of flue gases in which the sulur-containing material is adsorbed in the porous system of an activated carbonaceous material. In one such process, adsorption is carried out in a gas-solid contacting device in which the flue gases are contaoted with acti~ated char and sulfur dioxide in a diluted form in the gas stream passing through the activated char is adsorbed and oxidized to sulfuric acid by the oxygen ~` 15 and water vapor present in the gas stream. Qther acid gases, such as nitrogen oxides, are similarly adsorbed, and particulate matter entrained in the gas stream is filtered by passage of the stream through the activated char.

In the prior art process developed by 3erg~au Forshung and depicted in Figure l, the acid-laden or saturated char is thermally regenerated in a desorption vessel, or the like, by a process in which the sulfur-containing material is chemically changed in form, resulting in the decomposition of sulfuric acid to sulfur dioxide and water, whereby a portion of the carbonaceous adsorbent is oxidized to carbon dioxide. The by-product of the regeneration process is a gas stream containing 20-30% by volume of sulfur dioxide, which is directed to an off-gas treatment facility for further pxocessing.
2-The prior art system of Fig. 1 is composed of three basic subsystems: adsorption, regeneration or desorption, and off-gas treatment. In the adsorption subsystem, an adsorber 10 recelves flue gases from the S vapor generator after they have passed through a particulate matter separator, or the like (not shown), and the flue gases are contacted with adsorbent material in pellet form loaded into the adsorber. The adsorbent material used in the adsorber 10 is usually in the form of a pre-oxidi~ed bituminous coal, or activated char.

In the regeneration subsystem, an inert, heatexchange medium, such as sand, is heated in a sand heater 12 to a predetermined, elevated temperature, and is supplied to a regenerator 14, through which the heated sand and the saturated char pellets pass in intimate contact. This contact raises the temperature of l:he mixture to a pre-determined level to cause the sulfuric acid in the porous system of the activated char to be converted first to sulfuric acid anhydrate (~2SO3) and then to SO2, and the nitrogen comp~unds to N2. A highly~concentrated, SO2-rich off-gas stream is produced, containing 20-30~ by volume, and is usually directed to an exterior unit for further processing.
The sand/char mixture leaving the regenerator 14 goes through a separator 16, which separates the regenerated char from the sand. The separated sand is returned to the sand heater 12, again heated to the proper elevated tempera-ture, and recycled into the regenerator 14. The separated char is directed to a char cooler 18, in which it is cooled and recycled to the adsorber 10 for re-use.

In this type of prIor a~t syste~ the S02-rich off-gas is usually treated further to produce elemental sulfur, which is storable and which has certain commercial applications. To this end the off-gas can be reacted with crushed coal to produce the elemental sulfur. Fo~ example, in the system disclosed in the above identified application, the S02-rich off-gas is introduced into a reactor, shown in general by the reference numeral 20 in Fig. 1, and is initially reacted with crushed coal which is continuously supplied to the vessel to yield gaseous elemental sulfur, which i5 then passed to a condenser 22 and condensed into liquid sulfur. The li~uid sulfur may be stored in appro-priate containers, or may be cooled into solid form.

In the above-described system of Fig. 1, a certain ~uantity of the acti~ated char is consumed by the chemical ; reaction which occurs in the regenerator 14, and as a result of the continuous recycling of the regenerated char, a portion of this material becomes physically reduced to such a size which renders it ineffective in the adsorption process.
Thus, a source of additional activated char is provided to the adsorber 10 to replenish the char consumed in the regenerator 14 and to make up for the quantity which is ; physically reduced. (In the reactor 20, the crushed coal supplied thereto is consumed in the reaction process, yield-ing coal ash as a by-product, which is not otherwise utilized in the process.) The major problem w~th the pr~or art process of Fig. 1 resides ln the inherent difficulty in separating the regenerated adsorbent from the sand for recycle to the adsorber. Also, with increased emphas~s on encrgy and .~

. 3 ~31~D.~O .~D

natural resource conservation, a need exists for replacing that commercial proces~ with a process which is more energy efficientJ specifically, one which achieves regeneration wi-th like efficiency at lower temperature.

It is also well known in the art to regenerate activated carbons by contact with a hot regenerating gas. For example, U.S. 2,933,454 discusses regenera-tion with mixtures of air and steam. ~owever, where it is desirable to treat the desorbed gas for recovery, for example, o sulfur value, regeneration of the adsorbent by contact with a hot regenerating gas poses a problem of dilution of the desorbed volatiles to the point where they cannot be economically treated for the recovery of some value contained therein. One solution to this problem is disclosed in U.S. 3,667,910 wherein it is taught that the regenerating gas may be recirculated through the desorber to elevate the concentration of sulfur dioxide to facilitate recovery (Col. 4, lines 40 - 45). lrhe problem with this prior art process is that to achieve adequately effective regeneration, carbon monoxide gas and/or hydrogen gas must be continuously generated and combined with the circulating desorbent.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
. _ _ The present invention comprehends a process for desulfurizing a flue gas with a carbonaceous adsorbent and reactivating the spent carbonaceous adsorbent. The process -i~, ~5~

f~ 9;2 comprises using a partially oxidized coal as the carbonaceous adsorbent and continuously passing the spent adsorbent through a regeneration zone as a non-static bed. The process further comprises passing an initial charge o~ an inert gas into a regenerating gas loop and through the regeneration zone in a direction countercurrent to the flow of -the spent adsorbent for contact with the spe~t adsorbent to desorb adsorbed volatiles including sulfur oxides and water vapor from the spent adsorbent. ~he temperature of the regeneration zone at the gas - 10 inlet is maintained within the range of 800 - 1000F by externally heating and recycling the desorbed volatiles through the regeneration zone. A water vapor concentration of at least 40 mole percent and an SO2 concentration of at least 15 mole %
are maintained in the regeneration gas loop and the spent adsorbent is continuously regenerated. A portion of the gas is continuously removed from the regenerating gas loop at the rate at which volatiles are desorbed to maintain ready-state operation, and the gas removed ~rom the regenerating gas loop is processed to recover the sulfur value contained therein. In a preferred embodiment, the gas bleed stream, containing at least 40~ steam and at least 15% SO2, is passed into a reaction zone wherein it is contacted with raw coal at a temperature within the range of from 1150F to 1550F to convert the sulfur dioxide to gaseous elemental sulfur and to partially oxidize the coal .

2~

wnich may then be used as adsorbent.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE D~AWINGS

The above description, as well as further objects, features and advantages of the present invention, will be more fully appreciated by reference to the following description of a presently-preferred embodiment illustrative of the present invention, when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram showing the flow of materials in a pollution control system of the prior art for the removal of sulfur oxides in flue gases; and Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the flow of materials in a preferred embodiment of the regeneration system invention.

~5 DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The carbonaceous adsorbent used in the present lnvention is a partially oxidized coal. Exemplary of such adsorbents is vanadium-treated anthracite derived RECOAL

(E'oster Wheeler trademark for by-product coal from its 'O RESOXR sulfur dioxide reduction process) which is preferred from the viewpoint of its low cost. Another advantage of RECOALTM is in its relatively high resistance to attrition and the fines which it does generate are relatively coarse and easily separated. This RECOALTM may have 0.04 to about 0.25 weight % ~ deposited on it and ~ay be prepared by its immersion in a sulfuric acid solution of V205 and "drying" at about 1400F. An adsorbent preferred from the viewpoint of its superior adsorption capacity is a char commercially available from Bergbau Forschung (BF). The BF char is derived from bituminous coal which is crushed and then partially oxidized.

The regeneration zone is operated with a maximum temperature, i.e., at the gas inlet, within the range of 800-1000F and, preferably, within a range of 800-850F.

The regenerating gas loop is initially charged with an inert gas such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen or a mix-ture thereof. If desired, steam may be added to the initial charge. As the operation progresses, the initially charged gas will be gradually displaced by recirculated desorbed volatiles until a steady-state operation is achieved wherein the composition in the regenerating gas loop will be approxi-ately that of the desorbed gas.

By"steady-state operation" is meant that pressures at gi~en points within the regenerator remain approximately constant. To achieve steady-state operation, gas is removed from the regenerator at a ~olumetric rate equal to that at which the volatiles are desorbed from the spent adsorbent in the regeneration zone. This is conveniently accomplished by a pressure-responsi~e control system with the regenerating gas loop maintained at approximately atmospheric pressure.
Typically, the pressure at the suction of the regenerating gas blower (shown as 32 in Fig. 2) will be about 10" water (gauge) and about 75"-100" water (gauge) at the blower discharge.

In the des~ulfurization process of the present invention flue gas is routed through a dust collector and then through an adsorber wherein it is passed through a bed of carbonac~ous adsorbent. The adsorbex may be of any conventional type and may contain the carbonaceous adsorbent as a fixed bed, moving bed or fluidized bed.
The spent adsorbent from the adsorber is routed to the regeneration system of the present invention, a preferred embodiment of which is deplcted in Fig~ 2 of the drawings. The regeneration system includes a regenerating gas loop 30 which recycles, by means of blower 32, the main portion of the desorbed volatiles through the regenerator 34 and heat exchanger 36 which heats the gas entering the regenerator to 800-1000F, preferably to 800-~50~F. The gas in the regenexating gas loop, after it reaches steady-state will have the compo~ition of the desorbed gas. This desorbed gas typically contains 20-65 mole~ SO2 (dry basis), 50-75 mole C2 (dry basis) and 50 mo~ ~ or more H2O (steam). A por-tion of this gas is split off and routed to a RESOXR reactor 38 wherein it is reacted with crushed coal at 1150F to 1550Fto - yield gaseous elemental sulfur which is then passed to a condenser ~0 wherein it becomes liquified. Subsequently, the liquid sulfur may be solidified by further cooling.
The RESOX reactor 40 and regenerator 34 are preferably moving bed vessels, but they may also provide means for fluidized bed or static bed operation. The terminology "non-static bed", as used herein is meant to cover both moving bed operation and fluidized bed operation.
For a definition of what i.s meant by moving bed operation refer to column 5, lines 36-41,of V. S. 2,383,333 issued April 21, 1959 to R.C. Oliver.

A more detailed description of the RESOXR process pe~ se is provided in U. S . patent No. 4,147,762.
In the embodiment of Fig. 2 both the elemental sul~ur and the RECOALT~ adsorbent are valuable by-products.
The RECO~TM is fo~med fr~m raw crushed coal in the RESOXR
reactor wherein it is partially oxidized and imparted a surface porosity by ~he action of the SO2, 2~ and steam in the bleed gas stream. The mole ratio of steam to SO2 is preferably ln the range of 2:1 to 3:1 and the contact time `~ is preferably 5.1 to 9.1 seconds. The operating parameters are controlled to produce a RECOALTM product containing 50-60~ by weight of the oriainal coal.
. EX~LE 1 Anthracit~ derived RECOALTM was soaked in a solution of 300 grams ~25~ 2000 cc sulfuric acid and 1000 cc water. The wet RECOALTM was "dried" at 1400~ in an electric furnace. In this manner three batches of RECOALTM were prepared containing 0.11, 0.21 and 0.14 wt.4 V, respec~ively.
~ 20 ~a~ch No. 1 was prepa~ed from a RECOALTM which had been : subjected to 50 cycles of SO2 adsorption and steam regenera-; tion at 1300~F. Batch No. 2 was prepared from a RECOALTM
that had been subjected to 61 cycles and batch No. 3 was pr~pared with fresh ~ECOALT~.
During the adsorption portion of each te~t cycle, a simulated flue gas mixture composed of 0.2~ SO2, 15.0% CO2,
3.0% O , 10.0% H2O, and a balance of N2 (percentages being v~ .

volume percentages) was fed at 275DF into a 2 cubic foot vessel filled with RECOAL adsorhent as a fixed bed.
The gas residencetime (open volume) was 6 seconds.
Since two reactor vol~mes had been discharged duriny regeneration, two batchwise adsorption tests per cycle were required.

For regeneration, the reactor and its feed hopper were filled to capacity. This required three reactor volumes or batches of vanadium treated RECOALTM. The start-up bed, which was held stationary within the reactor, wasbrought to temperature within a circulatillg mixture of hot gases, composed of an initial charge of carbon dioxide and evolving off~gas. As the temperature increased, more gas was driven off the bed so that the composition of the gas within the loop eventually approached that of the off-gas.
The recycle loop was maintained at constant pressure via its pressure control valve ~ hen the solids within the reactor vessel reached the proper temperature and test conditions were stabilized, the vibrating feeder was turned on and the withdrawal of the initial batch began. The second batch of the RECO~lTM which was stored on the bottom of the hopper, started to flow by gravity into the reactor ~essel. The testing began when the second batch completely replaced the first batch and ended when the third batch completely displaced the second batch in the reactor vessel.

The third batch, which was now in the reactor, became the start-up batch for the regeneration test of the next cycle.

The ti~e interval spent wlthin the reactor vessel varied from 1.5 to 2.75 hours (dwell time) for the test batches of RECOALTM.

The results are shown in Table 1.

EXAr~LE 2 The same 2 cubic foot vessel was again used as a boxed fixed bed adsorber and as a moving bed regenerator.
In this test BF char was used as the adsorber. For adsorp-tion, the recycle blower was isolated from the other components and a simulated flue gas mixture, identical to that employed in Example 1, was fed at 250C through the fixed bed adsorber filled with the BF char. The gas residence time (open volume) was again 6 seconds.

For regeneration, the synthesi~ing flue gas system ~i 15 was isolated from the other components and the loop was placed on line by circulating hot gases t:hrough the recycle loop.
The blower and the fired heater, both part of the loop, provided the motive force and the necessary heat. The circulating gas was at first carbon dioxide but changed in composition to that of the regenerator off-gas as the bed approached steady-state operation with a gas inlet tempera-ture at 850F. Various batches of spent BF char from the adsorber, containing from 4.4 to 5.56% by weight sulfur di-oxide were fed at feed rates as high as 60 pounds per hour, equivalent to a dwell time within the vessel of 1.3 hours.
The recycle blower which, along with the solids feeder, determined the overall capacity of the power plant, circulated up to 10 scfm of gas while developing a discharge head of 75" - 100" water (gauge).

During the adsorption portion of the test, the analysis of gas samples for sulfur dioxide content was accomplished with two on-stream Theta sensors, Model U.S.
5,000. The results of seven test runs are shown in Table 2 below.

~z~

O C ~ O~ O
u~ r~ ~ I ~ co Lo ~Q ~t~ . . . .
I I ~ r~ r ~ ~ o o ~r~
~, r~ ~ ~ r~ o~ r~ o ~ o n ~ ~ r~ 0 o r~ ~ o o I I ~
~0 ~ .
: ~ r~
. ~ ~ o r~ r~ D o ~r u~ I~ I r~ ~D o r~ o . . . . . . I
.' ~ Ul o o I 1 0 .~

o ~ r co In o ,1 ~ r~ o Lf) L~
O I I ~ o u~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ o ~ o o I I

O 1 1~ r~ o, ~1 u~ I r~ a~ r~ ~ a~ I I
I ~ OO I I ~ , ::
:
i U~ o n o u~
( I ~~o Ln ~ ~ ~o co o o o I I
,~ 0 .~
.. ~
E~ ~ ~1 , ~ ~ ~ a) ~ .
~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 ::~ Z ~ ~ o ~ Z
Z H 3 a ~ ~ tn o z ) o ~ ~ s~
~ ,, ~ I ~1 .,, ~J ,~ 0 ~1 z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 a ~ ~ ~ ~ .
C~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ E~
~ ~3 ~ tn E~ t~ ~ H ~ 1 1 C~ ~ H l¢ O ~O

r~
r~ o r~ ,~
N ~ ~ t~l ~ n O CO ~D
u~ ~ ~ r ~r In r~ ~ m _~
,~
~_ ol ~ ,~~ r-- ,, '~ ~ ~D ,, ~1 ~
E~ ~
~D ~ 1~ ~ CO ~ ', ft~
~:
I` ~000 O~DlnL~l Ll~ D N 1`
I N ~

R ~ Q rL, ~0 ~0 ~ o~ ' u~ ra ~ I .Q u~ S (d I R ~n ~ ~ h ~ ~ O S~
Z o ~ O ~ ~) ~,~ ~ O ~
. O Q, ,~ n~ u~ o ~ 4~ ~ ~ O
O H ~) ~ O ~ ~ m . ~ o ~ 5:
~; ~ ~ '~ ~ , ~
I L] h 1:~ t~ n O N - U~
,~ o 0 a~ o ~ , ~ o ~ a~
C~ u~ H U~ H U~

~7' .~

~2~92 ~ ~ ~~ D Ln ~ ~ ~I ~ N ~1 o o ~ I
r-l l l 1~ ~ oo Ln ~ n ~ ~ o ~1 ~ I ~ ~ Ln 1~ OD cn ~ Ifl o O I
~J o I I ~1 o r~ Lll o c~ Ln ~1~1~ o o I ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ Ln o O I I ~

~r ~
I I ~ 01` 0 1` ~ ~ ~ ~
Ln ~ i o o l c~ a) n ~ ~ ~ 0 ~7 ~i , , , ~r o Ln ~i I ~ ~ o r-l o o ~! co ,,~ Ln~
~;

I I ,~ Ln co ~ O 'r ~ 'r) ~ o ~
r~ ~ I ~ 0~ ~ O OD . ~ ~ ~ O O I I ,4 ~1~ 9 Ln ~ ~ ~ ~n ~ ~ o~ o~ ~
~1 ~ O
æ o ~ ~
Z H $ ~ ~ ~ Ln ~1 o o o N O X ~N
I'-iZ .~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~s . ~ ~ ~i . I
o ~ a) ~ ~
~ ~! H U~ H ~ ~ ~ *

.~;, .

I. r~ ,~ I . ~D
~~ ~ .

CO U~
~D O In ~9 o~
~ ,. ~ ,~ I . ,`

O ~D~D O ~ r~ ~D O n ~ ,. ~ ,~ , . l`
-a~ ~~ co In ., ~

.

O~ ~O C~ D O
o ,.w~ , .
a~ ~ ~~ ~ ,, ,, : . t~ u:~ o ~ u~ 1- ~ o In . I r~ ~1 1 . o~ ~1 ~~) N ~ ~) ~
' . . _. . .~
R ~
~10 ~10 o . o .
E~ o ~4 o n.
~ ~ g ~ ~ .
,: ~:1 ~ O ~1 . ~1 u, ta ~ I R u~ ~ td I R u~

P:l U ~ O ~ ~ t) ~ h . ~ " ~n o ~ ~, ~ tn o o ~ ~ ~ <~ ~ m ~q ,, o Z E~ l .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~Ll ~; h ~: ~ O t`
~ O d O O ~ O a) ~ O
?~ IJ H u~ H u~

'~

9;~

~DLn'O
i_ ~n m Lr) L~ o ~ I~ o In . . . -o o o ~D ~ O 1` ~ ~
I I I o n n o ~~ ~ O I I
W
o ~ ~ ~
u~ ~ ~r ~ o u~ ` ~ ~ co ~
I I I co ~ ~ 0~ ~r ~ ~ ,~ O O I
r~ ~u~ ~ ~Ln ~r ~ ~ r o ,~
. ~ ~ ~ o o ~
$

~- ~ ~ ~o co ~.
I I I ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 1 ~ ~
~,~ oo~sLn~Ln.~ ~ o ~1 a) m mh ~ ~ I` o rl t~
III L~ OOOII (D

~, rVC

~1- '~ 1~ o a~ r I Q
I I I ~1 o ~ If"1 ~ ~ ~ N O O I I ~D

~..
. ~ ~0 ~ '~
* ,s~
~ z ~ m ~ m I ~ z;
H 0 V ~ ~ ~ l O
~ E-l O Ql~ 3 ~4 P~ ; r-~ C~ I O O ~o o m ~ 0 z ~ I m ~ ~ E~ u~ o æ c) ~ ~ x 5 ~rl ~ ~ ~ 0 Z ~ s~ a ~ ~ ~: 0 0 ~
c~ c~ a H U~ H ~ ~ I *

l~

Ln ~r 10 ~ Ln Lf) o n ~r:
;

~q~ ~ ~
~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ .
. ~
: : In , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r co u~ ~ ,;
~ ~ :

Q h Qo~ ~ :
E ,, o _~ E o ~ E

tl~ rd ~) I Qu~ ~: d ~Qrn z -$ ~ o ~ ~ ~, ~ o ~ ~ .
. O ~ ~1 ~ ~n o ~ ~ ~ ul o Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ s~ ~: ~ ~ a) ~ ~
~ o ~ ~ o,~ ~ ~ o,~

Claims (15)

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. A process for desulfurizing a flue gas with a carbonaceous adsorbent and reactivating the spent carbonaceous adsorbent comprising:
using a partially oxidized coal as the carbonaceous adsorbent and continuously passing the spent adsorbent through a regeneration zone as a non-static bed;
passing an initial charge of an inert gas into a regenerating gas loop and through the regeneration zone in a direction countercurrent to the flow of the spent adsorbent for contact with the spent adsorbent to desorb adsorbed volatiles including sulfur oxides and water vapor from the spent adsorbent;
maintaining the temperature of the regeneration zone at the gas inlet within the range of 800 - 1000°F by externally heating and recycling the desorbed volatiles through the regeneration zone whereby a water vapor concentration of at least 40 mole percent and an SO2 concentration of at least 15 mole % in the regeneration gas loop are maintained and whereby the spent adsorbent is continuously regenerated;
continuously removing a portion of the gas from the regenerating gas loop at the rate at which volatiles are desorbed to maintain steady-state operation; and processing the gas removed from the regenerating gas loop to recover the sulfur value contained therein.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the gas inlet temperature is 800 - 850°F.
3. The process of claim 1 or 2 wherein the adsorbent is a vanadium-containing partially oxidized anthracite coal.
4. The process of claim 1 or 2 wherein said partially oxidized coal has been oxidized to the extent of removal of 40-50% of the original coal.
5. The process of claim 1 or 2 wherein the said initial charge is an inert gas selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, steam and mixtures thereof.
6. The process of claim 1 or 2 wherein the average solids dwell time within the regeneration zone is 1.5 to 3 hours.
7. The process of claim 1 or 2 wherein the recycled regenerating gas at a steady-state operation contains at least 50 mole% steam and at least 20 mole % SO2.
8. A process for desulfurizing a flue gas with a carbonaceous adsorbent and reactivating the spent carbona-ceous adsorbent, comprising:
using a partially oxidized coal as the carbonaceous adsorbent and continously passing the spent adsorbent through a regeneration zone as a non-static bed;
passing an initial charge of an inert gas into a regenerating gas loop and through the regeneration zone in a direct on countercurrent to the flow of the spent adsorbent for contact with the spent adsorbent to desorb adsorbed volatiles including sulfur oxides and water vapor from the spent adsorbent;
maintaining the temperature of the regeneration zone at the gas inlet within the range of 800-1000°F by externally heating and recycling the desorbed volatiles through the regeneration zone whereby a water vapor concentration of at least 40 mole % and an SO2 concentration of at least 15 mole %

is maintained in the regeneration gas loop and whereby the spent adsorbent is continuously regenerated;
continuously removing a bleed portion of the gas from the regenerating gas loop at the rate the volatiles are desorbed to maintain steady-state operation;
continuously feeding said bleed gas portion to a reaction zone containing coal and maintained at a temperature of from 1150°F to 1550°F to convert the sulfur dioxide to gaseous elemental sulfur and to partially oxidize the coal;
continuously removing and condensing said gaseous sulfur from the reaction zone; and continuously removing the partially oxidized coal from the reaction.
9. The process of claim 8 wherein at least a portion of the partially oxidized coal removed from the reaction zone is recycled for use as adsorbent.
10. The process of claim 8 wherein the gas inlet temperature is 800-850°F.
11. The process of claim 8 or 10 wherein the adsorbent is a vanadium-containing, partially oxidized anthracite coal.
12. The process of claim 8 or 10 wherein said partially oxidized coal has been oxidized to the extent of removal of 40-50% of the original coal.
13. The process of claim 8 or 10 wherein said initial charge is an inert gas selected from, the group consisting of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, steam and mixtures thereof.
14. The process of claim 8 or 10 wherein the average solids dwell time within the regeneration zone is 1.5 to 3 hours.
15. The process of claim 8 or 10 wherein the recycled regenerating gas at a steady-state operation contains at least 50 mol% steam and at least 20 mole% SO2.
CA000347215A 1980-03-07 1980-03-07 Low temperature regeneration of carbonaceous adsorbent Expired CA1122192A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA000347215A CA1122192A (en) 1980-03-07 1980-03-07 Low temperature regeneration of carbonaceous adsorbent

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA000347215A CA1122192A (en) 1980-03-07 1980-03-07 Low temperature regeneration of carbonaceous adsorbent

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1122192A true CA1122192A (en) 1982-04-20

Family

ID=4116430

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000347215A Expired CA1122192A (en) 1980-03-07 1980-03-07 Low temperature regeneration of carbonaceous adsorbent

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CA (1) CA1122192A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4219537A (en) Desulfurization and low temperature regeneration of carbonaceous adsorbent
US5304234A (en) Gas separation process and unit therefor
US4113849A (en) Recovering sulfur from gas streams containing hydrogen sulfide
CA1121741A (en) Apparatus for continuous recovery of solvent
CA1070620A (en) Apparatus for the continuous purification of exhaust gas containing solvent vapours
US3438728A (en) Two-stage regeneration of absorbent for sulfur oxides
US3438727A (en) Absorbent regeneration using carbon regenerant
CA1104792A (en) Pollution control system and method for the removal of sulfur oxides
KR870000915B1 (en) Controlled temperature expansion in oxygen production by molten alkali metal salts
US4710364A (en) Continuous recovery of sulfur oxide from flue gas
EP0254402B1 (en) Improved gas/solid contact method for removing sulfur oxides from gases
EP0042174B1 (en) Process for dry desulfurization of flue gas
CA1122192A (en) Low temperature regeneration of carbonaceous adsorbent
CA1207512A (en) Process for preparing a sulfur dioxide containing gas stream for reaction with coal
US4829036A (en) Regeneration process for spent SO2 -NOX sorbents
CZ283662B6 (en) Desorption process of grained adsorption material containing carbon and apparatus for making the same
US5130097A (en) Apparatus for hot-gas desulfurization of fuel gases
US3559296A (en) Process for the regeneration of hydrocarbon adsorbents
US3507051A (en) Regeneration process
US3438733A (en) Sulfur production using carbon regenerant
US3552921A (en) Removing sulfur dioxide from hot gas
US3667908A (en) Removal and recovery of sulfur oxides from gases
JPS646124B2 (en)
JPH0975722A (en) Fluid adsorbing method, device and carbonaceous adsorbent
US3917799A (en) Sulfur oxide adsorption and recovery

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry