CA1087246A - Method to determine the suitability of diaphragm for use in electrolytic cell - Google Patents
Method to determine the suitability of diaphragm for use in electrolytic cellInfo
- Publication number
- CA1087246A CA1087246A CA302,608A CA302608A CA1087246A CA 1087246 A CA1087246 A CA 1087246A CA 302608 A CA302608 A CA 302608A CA 1087246 A CA1087246 A CA 1087246A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- diaphragm
- primary
- electrolyte
- electrodes
- voltage
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
- Y02E60/10—Energy storage using batteries
Landscapes
- Electrolytic Production Of Non-Metals, Compounds, Apparatuses Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
An electrical method to determine the suitability of a diaphragm for use in an electrolytic cell. The method comprises inserting the diaphragm between a primary anode and a primary cathode immersed in an electrolyte and then impressing a known direct current electromotive force between the electrodes. The change in electrical proper-ties across the electrolyte resulting from insertion of the diaphragm is determined. Such change is indicative of the suitability of the diaphragm for use in an electrolytic cell and can be a measure of diaphragm uniformity.
An electrical method to determine the suitability of a diaphragm for use in an electrolytic cell. The method comprises inserting the diaphragm between a primary anode and a primary cathode immersed in an electrolyte and then impressing a known direct current electromotive force between the electrodes. The change in electrical proper-ties across the electrolyte resulting from insertion of the diaphragm is determined. Such change is indicative of the suitability of the diaphragm for use in an electrolytic cell and can be a measure of diaphragm uniformity.
Description
METHOD TO DETERMINE THE SUITABILITY OF
DIAPHRAGM FOR USE IN AN ELECTROLYTIC CELL
This invention pertains to diaphragms and more in particular to a method to predetermine the suitability of a diaphragm for use in an electrolytic cell.
It has heretofore been difficult and occasionally impossible to predetermine whether a specific diaphragm would be suitable for employment in an electrolytic cell.
It is known that the diaphragm construction material should be substantially nonreactive, i.e. physically and chemically 16,447A -1-, -- - - - . .. . ..
10~72~6 inert with the electroly~e within the electrolytic cell; however, a means ¦ to accurately predetermine the cffect of the configuration and surface i characteristics of a specific foraminous diaphragm on the efficiency of a ! cell has been generally unknown. It is, therefore, highly desirable to provide a means to determine whether a diaphragm will be effective in a cell before insertion of such diaphragm into the electrolytic eqùipment.
The present invention provides a method to predetermine the suitability of the metallic diaphragm for use in an electrolytic cell, ` comprising the steps of: (a) impressing a known direct current electro-motive force between a primary anode and a primary cathode immersed in a test cell containing an electrolyte; (b) measuring an electrical property across a predetermined portion of said electrolyte with two measuring electrodes positioned between said primary anode and cathode and communicating with said predetermined portion of said electrolyte by a first salt bridge and a second salt bridge having orifices spaced apart a predetermined distance;
i ~c~ inserting a metallic diaphragm into said solution between said measuring electrodes, said electrolyte having a conductivity such that the insertion of said metallic diaphragm produces a voltage change between said primary electrodes insufficient to convert said metallic diaphragm into a bipolar electrode; and ~d) remeasuring the electrical property across said predetermined portion of said electrolyte as in ~b).
As used herein, the term diaphragm is defined as a porous barrier positioned between an anode and a cathode in a electrolytic cell. Such .
diaphragm can be, '' ' , ' i ' ;
for example, constructed of asbestos, conductive porous plate or screen, sintered porous material, and like materials.
Since the efficiency of a diaphragm is at least partially dependent upon both the diaphragm's por-osity and surface characteristics, such as roughness, aflow-through test alone (i.e. measuring the quantity of liquid which passes through a known area of diaphragm in a given time interval) to determine porosity is not generally an accurate measure of future diaphragm efficiency under operating electrolytic conditions. The present method of determining, for example, the elec-trical current passing through the pores in the diaphragm has been found to be dependent upon both the physical porosity and surface characterisitics of the diaphragm~
The voltage, resistance and/or electrical current measure-ments obtained in accord with the described method have surprisingly been found to provide an accurate indication of diaphragm effectiveness. The described method can be - used for testing, for example, the suitability of the diaphragm for electrolytic purposes or as a means to periodically or continuously monitor the quality control in the production of and/or operation of such diaphragms.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
~ .
The single Figure shown in the drawing is a schematic representation of one embodiment of an appa-ratus useful in the practice of the present method.
; DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to the drawing, primary electrodes, such as a primary anode 60 and a primary cathode 61 6,447A -3-., 108724~
are immersed in an electrolyte 62 and connected to a power source 64. Suitable electrolytes are compatible with the primary electrodes 60 and 61 and with a diaphragm 66, and have a sufficient electrical conductivity to afford an accurate determination of the electrical effect of insertion of the diaphragm 66 into electrolyte 62. The primar~ electrodes 60 and 61 and electrolyte 62 are selected to form a cell capable of a reversible electrolytic reaction. Additionally, when a metallic diaphragm is tested, the conductivity of electrolyte 62 should prefe-rably be such that insertion of diaphragm 66 into elec-trolyte 62 will produce an insufficient voltage change between the primary electrodes 60 and 61 to result in the metallic diaphragm 66 becoming a bipolar electrode.
Examples of generally satisfactory electrolytes include inorganic, aqueous salt or acid electrolytic ;solutions, suc~ as the chlorates, chlorides, nitrates and sulfates of metals. Suitable metals are, for example, alkali, alka-line earth and transition metals and preferably the alkali and alkaline earth metals, such as Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba. The materials employed as primary electrode material are those generally known in the art to be useful as electrodes, for example, graphite, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Os, Ir, Pt and Au. Silver-silver chloride electrodes have proven to be especially suitable for use ; as primary electrodes and are preferred.
The primary electrodes 60 and 61 are suitably positioned within substantially electrically nonconductive retaining members 68 and 69 to space surface 65 of elec-trode 60 a predetermined distance, for example one inch apart, 16,447A _4_ 10~7246 from surface 67 of electrode 61. The retaining members68 and 69 can be constructed from, for example, a methyl acrylate plastic and adapted to direct substantially all of the electrical current passing between the elec-5 v trodes 60 and 61 through the diaphragm 66 when suchdiaphragm is abuttingly detachably attached to the retain-ing members.
Two auxiliary calomel measuring electrodes 70 and 72 are connected to the electrolyte 62 by a first salt bridge 74 and a second salt bridge 76. Orifices 78 and 80 and salt bridges 74 and 76, respectively, pass through the retaining members 68 and 69 at a predetermined position between the primary electrodes 60 and 61 and communicate with the electrolyte 62. The orifices 78 and lS 80 are positioned apart to define a predetermined dis-tance, for examper 3/4 inch, of electrolyte 62 between the center of such orifices as represented by center lines B
and C.
The measuring or auxiliary electrodes 70 and 72 suitable for use in the present invention are well-known.
For example, calomel, cadmium, hydrogen, mercury electrodes and the like can be used as measuring electrodes.
In the practice of the present invention, a direct current electromotive force is impressed between the primary anode 60 and the primary cathode 61 to produce a constant current flow between such primary electrodes.
16,4~7A -5-~087Z~6 The electromotive force impressed between the primary electrodes 60 and 61 should produce a volt~ge across the electrolyte which is less than the potential needed to decompose the electrolyte 62.
For example, when an aqueous solution of NaCl is the electrolyte, the voltage across the electrolyte should be at least less than the decomposition potential of H2O.
An electrical property, preferably the voltage, across the predetermined distance between the salt bridge orifices 78 and 80 is measured by the measuring electrodes 70 and 72. The resistance of the electrolyte 62 is determined by dividing the measured voltage between the measuring electrodes 70 and 72 by the known current flow.
The diaphragm 66 is placed in electrolyte 62 between the primary electrodes 60 and 61 and the salt bridge orifices 78 and 80 to thereby alter the elec-trical resistance between the measuring electrodes across the predetermined distance between salt bridge orifices 78 and 80. As aforementioned, the diaphragm 66 is placed in contact with the retaining member 68 in a manner suited to maximize the flow of current through the area of the diaphragm defined by the retaining member 68 and to mini-mize the passage of current through any openings at the interface between the surface of the retaining member 68 and the diaphragm 66 or around the edges of diaphragm 66.
The diaphragm 66 is positioned in electrolyte 62 between the primary electrodes 60 and 61 and the salt bridge orifices 78 and 80 to the measuring electrodes 70 .
16.447A -6-i 10~7246 and 72 to thereby alter the electrical resistance between the measuring electrodes. At a constant known current, the change in voltage across the predetermined portion of electrolyte 62, as measured by the measuring electrodes 70 and 72, is an amount characteristic of the porosity and surface characteristics or effectiveness of the diaphragm in an electrolytic diaphragm cell. Such diaphragm cells are suitable for electrolytically producing, for example, chlorine from a sodium chloride brine or, more preferably, a multivalent metal, such as titanium from titanium tetrachloride.
The present method can be employed to determine the uniformity of a diaphragm by using primary electrodes of such size and shape that the direct current produced therebetween passes only through a known area of the dia-phragm. An electrical property, such as voltage, resis-tance or current flow, between the primary electrodes can be measured across a predetermined portion of the elec-trolyte before and after the insertion of the diaphragm between such primary electrodes. After each measurement, the diaphragm is moved with respect to the primary elec-trodes so that the subsequent measurement relates to a different portion of the diaphragm. Comparison of the results of two or more measurements will then reflect the uniformity or lack thereof in diaphragm permeability and surface characeristics. The tests can be carried out at any temperature or pressure, provided that they are held constant.
The hereinbefore method has been found to be acceptable for porous metallic screen, plate, or grid 16,447A -7-.
1087Z~6 diaphragms and especially suitable for porous woven metal screen with a metal plating thereon.
The following examples illustrate the method of the present invention.
Example 1 Employing an apparatus substantially as shown in the Figure, the suitability of a two inch diameter by ten inch long cylindrical nickel plated, woven nickel screen for use as an electrolytic cell diaphragm was determined using a 0.1 molar sodium chloride aqueous electrolyte (reagent grade sodium chloride with a purity of 99.5 weight percent was dissolved in distilled water), two 1-1j4 inch by 1/2 inch by 1/16 inch thick rectangular silver-silver chloride primary electrodes spaced one inch apart, and two standard calomel electrodes suitably physically connected between the primary electrod~s by salt bridges to afford measurement of a voltage impressed across a 3/4 inch distance of sodium chloride solution.
The silver-silver chloride electrodes were suitably mounted in methyl acrylate plastic frame adapted to permit insertion of the screen diaphragm between the electrodes.
A direct current electromotive force of suf-ficient voltage was impressed across the primary electrodes to produce a 2 milliampere (ma) current flow between the primary electrodes. The voltage and direct current across the measuring electrodes was determined before and after positioning the screen diaphragm between the electrodes.
The tests were carried out at constant room temperature (about 20C) and one atmosphere pressure.
16,447A -8-72~6 The voltage of the sodium chloride electrolyte was determined to be 68 millivolts (mv) and the current was verified at
DIAPHRAGM FOR USE IN AN ELECTROLYTIC CELL
This invention pertains to diaphragms and more in particular to a method to predetermine the suitability of a diaphragm for use in an electrolytic cell.
It has heretofore been difficult and occasionally impossible to predetermine whether a specific diaphragm would be suitable for employment in an electrolytic cell.
It is known that the diaphragm construction material should be substantially nonreactive, i.e. physically and chemically 16,447A -1-, -- - - - . .. . ..
10~72~6 inert with the electroly~e within the electrolytic cell; however, a means ¦ to accurately predetermine the cffect of the configuration and surface i characteristics of a specific foraminous diaphragm on the efficiency of a ! cell has been generally unknown. It is, therefore, highly desirable to provide a means to determine whether a diaphragm will be effective in a cell before insertion of such diaphragm into the electrolytic eqùipment.
The present invention provides a method to predetermine the suitability of the metallic diaphragm for use in an electrolytic cell, ` comprising the steps of: (a) impressing a known direct current electro-motive force between a primary anode and a primary cathode immersed in a test cell containing an electrolyte; (b) measuring an electrical property across a predetermined portion of said electrolyte with two measuring electrodes positioned between said primary anode and cathode and communicating with said predetermined portion of said electrolyte by a first salt bridge and a second salt bridge having orifices spaced apart a predetermined distance;
i ~c~ inserting a metallic diaphragm into said solution between said measuring electrodes, said electrolyte having a conductivity such that the insertion of said metallic diaphragm produces a voltage change between said primary electrodes insufficient to convert said metallic diaphragm into a bipolar electrode; and ~d) remeasuring the electrical property across said predetermined portion of said electrolyte as in ~b).
As used herein, the term diaphragm is defined as a porous barrier positioned between an anode and a cathode in a electrolytic cell. Such .
diaphragm can be, '' ' , ' i ' ;
for example, constructed of asbestos, conductive porous plate or screen, sintered porous material, and like materials.
Since the efficiency of a diaphragm is at least partially dependent upon both the diaphragm's por-osity and surface characteristics, such as roughness, aflow-through test alone (i.e. measuring the quantity of liquid which passes through a known area of diaphragm in a given time interval) to determine porosity is not generally an accurate measure of future diaphragm efficiency under operating electrolytic conditions. The present method of determining, for example, the elec-trical current passing through the pores in the diaphragm has been found to be dependent upon both the physical porosity and surface characterisitics of the diaphragm~
The voltage, resistance and/or electrical current measure-ments obtained in accord with the described method have surprisingly been found to provide an accurate indication of diaphragm effectiveness. The described method can be - used for testing, for example, the suitability of the diaphragm for electrolytic purposes or as a means to periodically or continuously monitor the quality control in the production of and/or operation of such diaphragms.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
~ .
The single Figure shown in the drawing is a schematic representation of one embodiment of an appa-ratus useful in the practice of the present method.
; DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to the drawing, primary electrodes, such as a primary anode 60 and a primary cathode 61 6,447A -3-., 108724~
are immersed in an electrolyte 62 and connected to a power source 64. Suitable electrolytes are compatible with the primary electrodes 60 and 61 and with a diaphragm 66, and have a sufficient electrical conductivity to afford an accurate determination of the electrical effect of insertion of the diaphragm 66 into electrolyte 62. The primar~ electrodes 60 and 61 and electrolyte 62 are selected to form a cell capable of a reversible electrolytic reaction. Additionally, when a metallic diaphragm is tested, the conductivity of electrolyte 62 should prefe-rably be such that insertion of diaphragm 66 into elec-trolyte 62 will produce an insufficient voltage change between the primary electrodes 60 and 61 to result in the metallic diaphragm 66 becoming a bipolar electrode.
Examples of generally satisfactory electrolytes include inorganic, aqueous salt or acid electrolytic ;solutions, suc~ as the chlorates, chlorides, nitrates and sulfates of metals. Suitable metals are, for example, alkali, alka-line earth and transition metals and preferably the alkali and alkaline earth metals, such as Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba. The materials employed as primary electrode material are those generally known in the art to be useful as electrodes, for example, graphite, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Os, Ir, Pt and Au. Silver-silver chloride electrodes have proven to be especially suitable for use ; as primary electrodes and are preferred.
The primary electrodes 60 and 61 are suitably positioned within substantially electrically nonconductive retaining members 68 and 69 to space surface 65 of elec-trode 60 a predetermined distance, for example one inch apart, 16,447A _4_ 10~7246 from surface 67 of electrode 61. The retaining members68 and 69 can be constructed from, for example, a methyl acrylate plastic and adapted to direct substantially all of the electrical current passing between the elec-5 v trodes 60 and 61 through the diaphragm 66 when suchdiaphragm is abuttingly detachably attached to the retain-ing members.
Two auxiliary calomel measuring electrodes 70 and 72 are connected to the electrolyte 62 by a first salt bridge 74 and a second salt bridge 76. Orifices 78 and 80 and salt bridges 74 and 76, respectively, pass through the retaining members 68 and 69 at a predetermined position between the primary electrodes 60 and 61 and communicate with the electrolyte 62. The orifices 78 and lS 80 are positioned apart to define a predetermined dis-tance, for examper 3/4 inch, of electrolyte 62 between the center of such orifices as represented by center lines B
and C.
The measuring or auxiliary electrodes 70 and 72 suitable for use in the present invention are well-known.
For example, calomel, cadmium, hydrogen, mercury electrodes and the like can be used as measuring electrodes.
In the practice of the present invention, a direct current electromotive force is impressed between the primary anode 60 and the primary cathode 61 to produce a constant current flow between such primary electrodes.
16,4~7A -5-~087Z~6 The electromotive force impressed between the primary electrodes 60 and 61 should produce a volt~ge across the electrolyte which is less than the potential needed to decompose the electrolyte 62.
For example, when an aqueous solution of NaCl is the electrolyte, the voltage across the electrolyte should be at least less than the decomposition potential of H2O.
An electrical property, preferably the voltage, across the predetermined distance between the salt bridge orifices 78 and 80 is measured by the measuring electrodes 70 and 72. The resistance of the electrolyte 62 is determined by dividing the measured voltage between the measuring electrodes 70 and 72 by the known current flow.
The diaphragm 66 is placed in electrolyte 62 between the primary electrodes 60 and 61 and the salt bridge orifices 78 and 80 to thereby alter the elec-trical resistance between the measuring electrodes across the predetermined distance between salt bridge orifices 78 and 80. As aforementioned, the diaphragm 66 is placed in contact with the retaining member 68 in a manner suited to maximize the flow of current through the area of the diaphragm defined by the retaining member 68 and to mini-mize the passage of current through any openings at the interface between the surface of the retaining member 68 and the diaphragm 66 or around the edges of diaphragm 66.
The diaphragm 66 is positioned in electrolyte 62 between the primary electrodes 60 and 61 and the salt bridge orifices 78 and 80 to the measuring electrodes 70 .
16.447A -6-i 10~7246 and 72 to thereby alter the electrical resistance between the measuring electrodes. At a constant known current, the change in voltage across the predetermined portion of electrolyte 62, as measured by the measuring electrodes 70 and 72, is an amount characteristic of the porosity and surface characteristics or effectiveness of the diaphragm in an electrolytic diaphragm cell. Such diaphragm cells are suitable for electrolytically producing, for example, chlorine from a sodium chloride brine or, more preferably, a multivalent metal, such as titanium from titanium tetrachloride.
The present method can be employed to determine the uniformity of a diaphragm by using primary electrodes of such size and shape that the direct current produced therebetween passes only through a known area of the dia-phragm. An electrical property, such as voltage, resis-tance or current flow, between the primary electrodes can be measured across a predetermined portion of the elec-trolyte before and after the insertion of the diaphragm between such primary electrodes. After each measurement, the diaphragm is moved with respect to the primary elec-trodes so that the subsequent measurement relates to a different portion of the diaphragm. Comparison of the results of two or more measurements will then reflect the uniformity or lack thereof in diaphragm permeability and surface characeristics. The tests can be carried out at any temperature or pressure, provided that they are held constant.
The hereinbefore method has been found to be acceptable for porous metallic screen, plate, or grid 16,447A -7-.
1087Z~6 diaphragms and especially suitable for porous woven metal screen with a metal plating thereon.
The following examples illustrate the method of the present invention.
Example 1 Employing an apparatus substantially as shown in the Figure, the suitability of a two inch diameter by ten inch long cylindrical nickel plated, woven nickel screen for use as an electrolytic cell diaphragm was determined using a 0.1 molar sodium chloride aqueous electrolyte (reagent grade sodium chloride with a purity of 99.5 weight percent was dissolved in distilled water), two 1-1j4 inch by 1/2 inch by 1/16 inch thick rectangular silver-silver chloride primary electrodes spaced one inch apart, and two standard calomel electrodes suitably physically connected between the primary electrod~s by salt bridges to afford measurement of a voltage impressed across a 3/4 inch distance of sodium chloride solution.
The silver-silver chloride electrodes were suitably mounted in methyl acrylate plastic frame adapted to permit insertion of the screen diaphragm between the electrodes.
A direct current electromotive force of suf-ficient voltage was impressed across the primary electrodes to produce a 2 milliampere (ma) current flow between the primary electrodes. The voltage and direct current across the measuring electrodes was determined before and after positioning the screen diaphragm between the electrodes.
The tests were carried out at constant room temperature (about 20C) and one atmosphere pressure.
16,447A -8-72~6 The voltage of the sodium chloride electrolyte was determined to be 68 millivolts (mv) and the current was verified at
2 milliamperes (ma) before insertion of the diaphragm. The voltage across the measuring electrodes increased to 93 millivolts after the diaphragm was inserted into the test cell; the current was maintained at a constant 2 milli-amperes ~ma).
The increase in voltage of 25 millivolts was calculated by standard method to be equivalent to an increase in test cell resistance of 12.5 ohms or 0.276 inch of sodium chloride electrolyte between the electrodes.
Several diaphragms of identical material were tested as above described and employed in an electrolytic cell for producing titanium metal from titanium tetra-chloride. The diaphragm coefficient (Cd) or diaphragmelectrolyte equivalent (inches) was determined by the following formula and compared for the satisfactory and unsatisfactory diaphragms. A satisfactory diaphragm coefficient (Cd) range was thereby determined.
The diaphragm coefficient is represented by the formula:
Cd = Vd+s/Id+s ~ Vs/Is X D where:
..
' ' VS/I S
Vd+s is measured voltage (millivolts) across a pre-determined portion of an electrolyte as determined by measuring electrodes com-municating with the electrolyte by salt bridges with orifices to such salt bridges 16,447A -9--spaced apart by a predetermined distance (D), a diaphragm being positioned between said salt bridge orifices during operation Id+S is the measured electrical current (milliamperes) between the primary electrodes in the electrolyte with a diaphragm posi-tioned as for V
d+s ~s is the measured voltage (millivolts) deter-mined under identical conditions as for Vd+s, but without the diaphragm s is the measured electrical current (milliamperes) between the primary electrodes in the electrolyte as determined for Id+S, but with-out the diaphragm D is the predetermined distance between the salt bridge orifices Examples 2-4 In a manner substantially in accordance with that described in Example 1, the coefficients (Cd) of other metal screen diaphragms were determined. The testing conditions and results are reported in Table I.
Additional metal screen diaphragms were evaluated by the present process using (a) 0.01 molar H2SO4 as the electrolyte and graphite as the primary electrodes and (b) 0.01 molar NaCl as the electrolyte and silver-silver chloride as the primary electrodes. Satisfactory results were obtained.
16,447A -10-~1~18724 .,, S ~
~1 N
_ . . O O OC~
~t ~:
. ~ .
u~
. . ~n ul c~ t~
. ~ U~ ' .
m o ~ ~ ~ u~ ~ .
. 5~i ~, p . !
. ~' . , .' '.
,i . ,~
.~ ., Ct , ~ r-t N
i X
1~, . ~
. ' ' , ' ' . .
. .
The increase in voltage of 25 millivolts was calculated by standard method to be equivalent to an increase in test cell resistance of 12.5 ohms or 0.276 inch of sodium chloride electrolyte between the electrodes.
Several diaphragms of identical material were tested as above described and employed in an electrolytic cell for producing titanium metal from titanium tetra-chloride. The diaphragm coefficient (Cd) or diaphragmelectrolyte equivalent (inches) was determined by the following formula and compared for the satisfactory and unsatisfactory diaphragms. A satisfactory diaphragm coefficient (Cd) range was thereby determined.
The diaphragm coefficient is represented by the formula:
Cd = Vd+s/Id+s ~ Vs/Is X D where:
..
' ' VS/I S
Vd+s is measured voltage (millivolts) across a pre-determined portion of an electrolyte as determined by measuring electrodes com-municating with the electrolyte by salt bridges with orifices to such salt bridges 16,447A -9--spaced apart by a predetermined distance (D), a diaphragm being positioned between said salt bridge orifices during operation Id+S is the measured electrical current (milliamperes) between the primary electrodes in the electrolyte with a diaphragm posi-tioned as for V
d+s ~s is the measured voltage (millivolts) deter-mined under identical conditions as for Vd+s, but without the diaphragm s is the measured electrical current (milliamperes) between the primary electrodes in the electrolyte as determined for Id+S, but with-out the diaphragm D is the predetermined distance between the salt bridge orifices Examples 2-4 In a manner substantially in accordance with that described in Example 1, the coefficients (Cd) of other metal screen diaphragms were determined. The testing conditions and results are reported in Table I.
Additional metal screen diaphragms were evaluated by the present process using (a) 0.01 molar H2SO4 as the electrolyte and graphite as the primary electrodes and (b) 0.01 molar NaCl as the electrolyte and silver-silver chloride as the primary electrodes. Satisfactory results were obtained.
16,447A -10-~1~18724 .,, S ~
~1 N
_ . . O O OC~
~t ~:
. ~ .
u~
. . ~n ul c~ t~
. ~ U~ ' .
m o ~ ~ ~ u~ ~ .
. 5~i ~, p . !
. ~' . , .' '.
,i . ,~
.~ ., Ct , ~ r-t N
i X
1~, . ~
. ' ' , ' ' . .
. .
Claims (8)
1. A method to predetermine the suitability of the metallic diaphragm for use in an electrolytic cell, comprising the steps of: (a) impressing a known direct current electromotive force between a primary anode and a primary cathode immersed in a test cell containing an elec-trolyte; (b) measuring an electrical property across a predetermined portion of said electrolyte with two measuring electrodes positioned between said primary anode and cathode and communicating with said predetermined portion of said electrolyte by a first salt bridge and a second salt bridge having orifices spaced apart a predetermined distance; (c) inserting a metallic diaphragm into said solution between said measuring electrodes, said electrolyte having a con-ductivity such that the insertion of said metallic diaphragm produces a voltage change between said primary electrodes insufficient to convert said metallic diaphragm into a bipolar electrode; and (d) remeasuring the electrical property across said predetermined portion of said elec-trolyte as in (b).
2. The method of Claim 1, wherein the elec-trolytic solution is aqueous sodium chloride of about 0.1 molar sodium chloride.
3. The method of Claim 1 or 2, wherein the electrical property measured is voltage, and wherein the voltage across said predetermined portion of the electro-lyte is less than that necessary to cause decomposition of the electrolyte.
4. The method of Claim 1 or 2, wherein the electrical property measured is resistance or current flow.
5. The method of Claim 1, including the steps of moving the diaphragm relative to the measuring electrodes to effect electrical current passage through another portion of the diaphragm; and remeasuring the voltage across said predetermined portion of said sodium chloride solution as in step (b) to thereby obtain comparative voltage measurements indicative of diaphragm uniformity and suitability for use in the electrolytic cell.
6. The method of Claim 1, including the step of selecting the primary anode as a silver electrode, the primary cathode as a silver chloride electrode, and the measuring electrodes as calomel electrodes.
7. The method of Claim 1, including the steps of positioning the diaphragm between the measuring electrodes to pass substantially all of the current passing between the primary anode and primary cathode through the diaphragm, and abuttingly detachably attaching the diaphragm to substantially electrically nonconductive retaining means having the primary anode and primary cathode positioned therein.
8. The method of Claim 1, including the steps of suitably positioning the diaphragm apart from the primary anode and primary cathode and between the measuring electrodes to pass substantially all of the current passing between the primary anode and primary cathode through the diaphragm.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA302,608A CA1087246A (en) | 1978-05-04 | 1978-05-04 | Method to determine the suitability of diaphragm for use in electrolytic cell |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA302,608A CA1087246A (en) | 1978-05-04 | 1978-05-04 | Method to determine the suitability of diaphragm for use in electrolytic cell |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1087246A true CA1087246A (en) | 1980-10-07 |
Family
ID=4111387
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA302,608A Expired CA1087246A (en) | 1978-05-04 | 1978-05-04 | Method to determine the suitability of diaphragm for use in electrolytic cell |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1087246A (en) |
-
1978
- 1978-05-04 CA CA302,608A patent/CA1087246A/en not_active Expired
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Kakiuchi et al. | Polarizability and electrocapillary measurements of the nitrobenzene-water interface. | |
| US6478950B1 (en) | Sensing liquids in oil well using electrochemical sensor | |
| US4227974A (en) | Electrochemical cell having a polarographic device with ion selective electrode as working electrode and method of use | |
| AU664326B2 (en) | Anodic electrode for electrochemical fluorine cell | |
| US4163698A (en) | In situ reference electrode for diaphragm cells | |
| Barnartt | The Oxygen‐Evolution Reaction at Gold Anodes: I. Accuracy of Overpotential Measurements | |
| Bianchi | Fundamental and applied aspects of the electrochemistry of chlorine | |
| CA1111125A (en) | Method and apparatus for control of electrowinning of zinc | |
| US4090924A (en) | Method to determine the suitability of diaphragm for use in an electrolytic cell | |
| Stromatt | Studies on the Electroreduction of Uranyl (VI) in Molten Equimolar KCl‐NaCl by Chronopotentiometric and Electrode Impedance Measurements | |
| US4470894A (en) | Nickel electrodes for water electrolyzers | |
| CA1087246A (en) | Method to determine the suitability of diaphragm for use in electrolytic cell | |
| Armstrong et al. | The kinetics of the silver/silver rubidium iodide electrode | |
| Beck et al. | Oxygen Overvoltage in Concentrated Acid Solutions: I. Perchloric Acid | |
| US4219401A (en) | Metal electrowinning feed cathode | |
| US20080128294A1 (en) | Semi-permanent reference electrode | |
| US4208253A (en) | Method for measuring the concentration of sodium in a flow of mercury-sodium amalgam | |
| GB1602665A (en) | Method to predetermine the suitability of a metallic diaphragm for use in an electrolyte cell | |
| US4636294A (en) | Apparatus for detecting and measuring hydrogen sulfide gas in the presence of carbon monoxide | |
| US4113584A (en) | Method to produce multivalent metals from fused bath and metal electrowinning feed cathode apparatus | |
| JP2012097334A (en) | Method for recovering bromine and device for the same | |
| CA1249332A (en) | Non-polarizable electrode | |
| JPS5923385B2 (en) | Method for measuring the concentration of sodium in a mercury-sodium amalgam flow | |
| US3578569A (en) | Anode polarization detector | |
| CN215066966U (en) | Anode surface potential detection device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |