CA1084325A - Dry developer particle of resistivity higher than 10 su14 xx ohm-cm comprising thermoplastic resin and magnetic material - Google Patents
Dry developer particle of resistivity higher than 10 su14 xx ohm-cm comprising thermoplastic resin and magnetic materialInfo
- Publication number
- CA1084325A CA1084325A CA252,614A CA252614A CA1084325A CA 1084325 A CA1084325 A CA 1084325A CA 252614 A CA252614 A CA 252614A CA 1084325 A CA1084325 A CA 1084325A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- developer
- particles
- particle
- charges
- image
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03G—ELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
- G03G15/00—Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern
- G03G15/06—Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing
- G03G15/08—Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing using a solid developer, e.g. powder developer
- G03G15/09—Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing using a solid developer, e.g. powder developer using magnetic brush
- G03G15/0914—Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing using a solid developer, e.g. powder developer using magnetic brush with a one-component toner
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03G—ELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
- G03G9/00—Developers
- G03G9/08—Developers with toner particles
- G03G9/083—Magnetic toner particles
Abstract
Abstract of the Disclosure A dry developer particle for use in electrophotography including thermoplastic synthetic resin and magnetic materials to have an electric resistance higher than 1014 .OMEGA.cm to possess mag-netically attractive and electrically insulating properties.
There is further provided a method for developing an electrostatic charge image on a photosensitive element by such developer parti-cles under the action of electric and electrostatic forces gener-ated therebetween.
There is further provided a method for developing an electrostatic charge image on a photosensitive element by such developer parti-cles under the action of electric and electrostatic forces gener-ated therebetween.
Description
~L~84325 ~ -~,~
: .
-Background of~the Invention ~ Th;s~invention~relates to~dry developer particles;~or : developing~an electros~ati~c~charge 1ma~ge:ln~electrophotography and also:~to a method for developing such an image by the particles.
~; ; Dry~developer particles which are magnetically attrac~ive ;~
- ~ and electrically~conduct:ive has~been developed:for devel.oping~an ; ~ electrostatic image formed on a photosensitive element or an : el~ectrostatlc record;ng~pàper ln electrophotography. Such de~
veloper particles are used ;n a developlng~process compris;ng steps~ :
of~magnetically~attracting the part;~cles onto a surface of an ~ :~
electrically conduc.t;ve sl~eeve wh;ch ;s earthed, and contact;ng the ~, : :: : . 4~ ~
.
:;, .
' ~LC3~3~ 3 ~5 particles attracted to the sleeve with the surface of the photo-sensitive element on which the electrostat1c image is held, thereby forming an electrically conductive path through the particles be-tween the sleeve and the photosensitive element. In this case, the developer particles positioned adjacent to the surface of the photosensitive element are affected by two forces, i.e. coulomb force of an intensity corresponding to the amount of charges de-posited on the surface portion of the element with which said de- ;
veloper particles are contacting, and magnetically attracting `~
force caused by a magnet mounted within the sleeve. When the intensity of said coulomb force is larger than that of said mag-netically attracting force, the developer particles are applied to the surface portion of the photosensitive element, whereas when the intensity of the coulomb force is smaller than that of the mag-netically attracting force the developer particles are not applied to the surface portion of the element. In this manner, the de-veloper particles are applied to the surface of the element ln accordance with the distribution of the electrostatic charges on ~ -the element thereby developing the electrostatic image.
In such a developing process, there is formed a plurality of rows of the developer particles extending radially from the ele trically conductive sleeve, and the developing mechanism will be described below in reference to one row of the developer parti- ~;
cles formed on the sleeve.
(l) When the row of the developer particles is not contacted with the surface of the photosensitive element, no electrically con-ductive path is formed through the row of the developer particles ;
,; ~ .
~ .
' ~.
~843~5 between the sleeve and the element, but an induced charge or charges of a polarity opposite to the polarity of the electrostatic charges deposited on the element are electrostatically induced on the sleeve and the induced charges are moved through the row of the developer particles towards an outer or free end thereof.
: .
-Background of~the Invention ~ Th;s~invention~relates to~dry developer particles;~or : developing~an electros~ati~c~charge 1ma~ge:ln~electrophotography and also:~to a method for developing such an image by the particles.
~; ; Dry~developer particles which are magnetically attrac~ive ;~
- ~ and electrically~conduct:ive has~been developed:for devel.oping~an ; ~ electrostatic image formed on a photosensitive element or an : el~ectrostatlc record;ng~pàper ln electrophotography. Such de~
veloper particles are used ;n a developlng~process compris;ng steps~ :
of~magnetically~attracting the part;~cles onto a surface of an ~ :~
electrically conduc.t;ve sl~eeve wh;ch ;s earthed, and contact;ng the ~, : :: : . 4~ ~
.
:;, .
' ~LC3~3~ 3 ~5 particles attracted to the sleeve with the surface of the photo-sensitive element on which the electrostat1c image is held, thereby forming an electrically conductive path through the particles be-tween the sleeve and the photosensitive element. In this case, the developer particles positioned adjacent to the surface of the photosensitive element are affected by two forces, i.e. coulomb force of an intensity corresponding to the amount of charges de-posited on the surface portion of the element with which said de- ;
veloper particles are contacting, and magnetically attracting `~
force caused by a magnet mounted within the sleeve. When the intensity of said coulomb force is larger than that of said mag-netically attracting force, the developer particles are applied to the surface portion of the photosensitive element, whereas when the intensity of the coulomb force is smaller than that of the mag-netically attracting force the developer particles are not applied to the surface portion of the element. In this manner, the de-veloper particles are applied to the surface of the element ln accordance with the distribution of the electrostatic charges on ~ -the element thereby developing the electrostatic image.
In such a developing process, there is formed a plurality of rows of the developer particles extending radially from the ele trically conductive sleeve, and the developing mechanism will be described below in reference to one row of the developer parti- ~;
cles formed on the sleeve.
(l) When the row of the developer particles is not contacted with the surface of the photosensitive element, no electrically con-ductive path is formed through the row of the developer particles ;
,; ~ .
~ .
' ~.
~843~5 between the sleeve and the element, but an induced charge or charges of a polarity opposite to the polarity of the electrostatic charges deposited on the element are electrostatically induced on the sleeve and the induced charges are moved through the row of the developer particles towards an outer or free end thereof.
(2) When the element and the sleeve are moved relative to each other and the free end of the row of the developer particles is contacted with the surface of the element, the induced charges have reached the free end of the row, and since the induced charges have the oppo-site polarity to that of the charges on the element the coulomb force is caused between those charges to contact the free end of the particle row with the element.
(3) Under this condition, the charges on the element are moved to -~
the developer particle row because of the developer particles being electrically conduct;ve, thereby neutralizing the induced charges, and thus the coulomb force attracting the developer particles to the photosens;tive element is lowered. However, when the sleeve is moved far away from the element during the time when the coulomb force is larger than the magnetically attracting force affecting the developer particle row, some of the developer particles at or ad-jacent the free end of the developer particle row remain attracted to the surface of the element. While the above-described steps are continuously repeated, the electrostatic charge image formed on the element is developed by the developer particles in rows.
Such conventional developer particles are disadvantageous in that in order to achieve a good developing operation a precise control has to be provided for the developing time, i.e. the time ~ ~ . . . .
~0843Z5 during which the developer particle row ~s contacted with the surface of the element. In case of the developing time being too short, there will not exist on the free end portion of the developer parti-cle row an amount of the induced charges for generating an intensity of the coulomb force sufficient ~o apply Isome of the developer particles at the free end portion of the row to the surface of the element so that any developer particle can not be applied to the latter and thus the electrostatic charge image on the element can not be developed. In case of the developing time being too long, the electrostatic charges on the element will move to the developer particle row to neutralize the induced charges held on the free end portion of the developer row, thereby lowering the intensity of the coulomb force and thus the electrostatic charge image on the element can not be developed. Furthermore, the above-described developer particles are disadvantageous in that when they are applied to an electrophotographic process in which a developer image is formed on the photosensitive element and the developer image is then transferred to a receptor sheet, such as a plain paper, the developer image transferred to the receptor sheet is blurred and thus a de-s1red quality of p~cture can not be obta~ned.
~ , .
Summary of the Invention It is an object of the present invention to provide new and improved dry developer particles for use in electrophotography and whi h have not the disadvantages described heretofore and~si~ply and conveniently form a good qual1ty of picture.
It lS another object of the present invention to provide . ~
the developer particle row because of the developer particles being electrically conduct;ve, thereby neutralizing the induced charges, and thus the coulomb force attracting the developer particles to the photosens;tive element is lowered. However, when the sleeve is moved far away from the element during the time when the coulomb force is larger than the magnetically attracting force affecting the developer particle row, some of the developer particles at or ad-jacent the free end of the developer particle row remain attracted to the surface of the element. While the above-described steps are continuously repeated, the electrostatic charge image formed on the element is developed by the developer particles in rows.
Such conventional developer particles are disadvantageous in that in order to achieve a good developing operation a precise control has to be provided for the developing time, i.e. the time ~ ~ . . . .
~0843Z5 during which the developer particle row ~s contacted with the surface of the element. In case of the developing time being too short, there will not exist on the free end portion of the developer parti-cle row an amount of the induced charges for generating an intensity of the coulomb force sufficient ~o apply Isome of the developer particles at the free end portion of the row to the surface of the element so that any developer particle can not be applied to the latter and thus the electrostatic charge image on the element can not be developed. In case of the developing time being too long, the electrostatic charges on the element will move to the developer particle row to neutralize the induced charges held on the free end portion of the developer row, thereby lowering the intensity of the coulomb force and thus the electrostatic charge image on the element can not be developed. Furthermore, the above-described developer particles are disadvantageous in that when they are applied to an electrophotographic process in which a developer image is formed on the photosensitive element and the developer image is then transferred to a receptor sheet, such as a plain paper, the developer image transferred to the receptor sheet is blurred and thus a de-s1red quality of p~cture can not be obta~ned.
~ , .
Summary of the Invention It is an object of the present invention to provide new and improved dry developer particles for use in electrophotography and whi h have not the disadvantages described heretofore and~si~ply and conveniently form a good qual1ty of picture.
It lS another object of the present invention to provide . ~
- 4 - ~
. ~ . - - . . . ,, ........... ~ . - . , . :
~ , . . . .. . . . . . .. ..
~8~3Z~
dry developer particles for use in electrophotography and which do not require any carriex therefor in use.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method for developing by such new dry developer particles an electrostatic image formed in electrophotography and which method has not the disadvantages described heretofore and simply and conveniently forms a good quality of picture.
Brie Explanation of the Drawing The accompanying drawing is a schematic illustration in part section of an example of a developing-device to which the developer particles and method accordinq to the present invention are applied.
Description o the Preferred Embodiment The developer particles according to the present in-vention are, for example, made hy a process in which magnetite ~ -fine particles having a mean particle size of about OO5 micron meters, thermoplastic synthetic resin, such as epoxy or styrene, and solvent, such as dichloroethylene or trichloroèthy-lene, are mixed in a weight ratio of about 1.5-3-: about 1 : about 8-12, and these are agitated to dissolve the resin by the solvent. The mixture is then injected by compressed air into a spray dryer from its upper portion to be formed into a plurality of fine droplets. At the same time, hot air heated at a temperature of about 120C- 170C is also blown into the dryer so that the solvent is evaporated from the droplets '~
B~
1~843Z5 to dry the latter, thereby producing developer particles of about 2 micron - 35 micron diameters. The developer particles so pro-duced contain about 25-40 weight % of the synthetic resin and about 75-60 weight % of the magnetite particles. Fùrthermore, the developer particles are colored in black by the magnetite component and are magnetically attractive and have electric re-sistance higher than 1014Jlcm when measured by the method de-scribed later.
The developer particles made as described above are schematically illustrated by reference numeral 1 in the drawing, and the particles 1 are attracted by the magnetic force generated from a cylindrical permanent magnet 2, to an outer peripheral surface of an electrically conductive carrying member or rotary sleeve 3. In this example, the magnet 2 has an intensi~y of the magnetic force to produce 700 Gauss of the flux density, and the -sleeve 3 ;s earthed through suitable means. As the sleeve 3 ro- ~;
tates in a clockwise direction as seen ~n the drawing, the amount of deposition of the particles 1 on the sleeve3 is controlled by a doctor blade 4 to a predetermined thickness to move to a photo~
sensitive element 5.
The photosensitive element 5 in this example comprises an electrically conductive base layer 6 earthed through suitable means, a photoconductive layer 7, an Insulating layer 8 and these layers being integrally bonded in the order mentioned above.
The element 5 is subjected to a suitable image forming process to form an electrostatic charge image on the surface of the insulaing layer 8 in accordance with the original image. While the element '...
.
- 6 - ~ `
.~ ' `:'~ ' ' ' -;
1C~843~5 .
s moves in a direction indicated by an arrow with 1ts insulating layer 8 contacted with the developer particles 1, the electro-static charge image on the insulating 'layer is developed in such a manner as will be described below.
For simplicity, the developing process according to the present invention will next be expla1ned in reference to the case in which developer particles 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 participate in deveiopment of the electrostatic image on the insulating layer 8 of the element 5.
The developer particle 9 is attracted to the electri-y cally conductive sleeve 3 under the action of the magnetic force of the magnet 2 affecting the magnetic fine particles contained in the developer particle, and in turn, the developer particle 10 to the particle 9 under the similar action, ~he developer part~cle 11 to the particle 10,the developer particle 12 to the particle 11 and the developer particle 13 to the particle 12~ thereby forming a developer particle row 14. Further developer particles are attracted 'to the particle 13 in a developer container 15, but these excess developer particles are.removed by the blade 4 from the particle 13.
As the sleeve 3 rotates and when the particle 13 of the row'l4 contacts with the surface of the insulating layer B of the photosensitive element 5, dielectric polarization is caused in the particle 13 by means of the electric field generated by the electro-static charges on the insulating layer 8, so that an attracting force is generated to attract the particle 13 to the insulating layer 8. Furthermore, the particle 13 is subject~d to a gradient .
~. , . - . ~, - ., , `r`
343~5 force caused by the non-uniform eLectric field Erom the electro-static charges on the layer 8, thereby generatlng a further at-tracting force to attract the part~cle 13 to the layer 8, and there is also generated a still further attracting force by the electrlc double layer between the charges on the l~yer 8 and the charges on the particle 13 to attract the particle to the layer 8. Accordingly, the intensity of the resultant force of these attractive forces de-pends upon the amount of the electrostatic charges deposited on the portion of the insulating layer with which the developer particle ?
13 is contacting. .
In case that an amount of the charges is desposited on the portion of the insulating layer 8 in contact with the particle 13 to generate a larger resultant force than the magnetically at-tracting force affecting the particle 13, as the sleeve 3 and the element 5 move relative to each other the particle 13 is separated from the particle 12 to remain attracted to that portion of the layer 8, but the particles 9, 10, 11 and 12 are moved together with the sleeve 3. On the contrary, when the particle 13 contacts with a portion of the insulating layer 8 which is provided with an amount of the electrostatic charges generàting a smaller resultant force than the magnetic force affecting the particle 13 from the magnet 2, the particle i3 is not separated from the particle 12 to move together therewith and thus the particle 13 can not be applied ~.
to that portion of the layer 8.
Practically, a plurality of developer particle rows simi-lar to the row 14 is provided over the substantial portion of the peripheral surface of the sleeve 3 so that as the sleeve 3 and the ' : ~ ' B
., ~ . , ~ . ... . .. . ... .. . . .
. . ~ . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . .
~LCD~3~a3 2 S
element 5 move relative to each other the electrostatic charge image on the layer 8 of the element 5 successively developed in such a manner as described above.
The following experiments were made to confirm the differences and effects of the present invention over the prior 'I art.
i Experiment l A photosens1tive element was used in which an aluminium base plate, a cadmium sulphide photoconductive layer and a polyester insulating thin layer were integrally bonded in turn. An electro-static charge image was formed on the insulating layer by the method described in U.S. Patent Spe~ification No. 3,536,4839 and the initial i surface potentials at the dark and llght portions of the image were !j 700 Volts and O Volt, respectively.~ By using the magnetlcally at~
¦ tractive and electrically conductlve developer particles described in U.S. Patent Specification No. 3,639,245, and the developing device shown in ~he drawing of the present application, the electro-static charge image was developed wlth the element moved~at a~speed of l25 mm/sec. Immediately after the completion of developmPnt, measurement was made to obtain the result that the surface potential j of th~ dark portlon of thelcharge image on the insulating layer was oo Volts. Compressed air was then blown to the developer parti-cles desposited on the insulating layer of the photosensitive element so that all the particl~es were removed therefrom, and khen measure-ment was also made to obtain the result that the surface potential of the dark portlon of the charge image on the insulating layer was !
, ; i g , ;' `
i ,.,; . . . . -~t8432S
310 Volts.
Further experiment was malie sim~lar to the above ex periment. In this experiment, the init;al surface potentials at the dark and light portions of the electrostatic char~e image form-ed on the insulating layer of the element were the same as thosemeasured in the above-described experiment. The image was de-veloped under the same condition as in the above experiment and thereafter a result was obtained that the surface potential at the dark portion of the image was 100 Volts, and after the removal of the developer particles from the insulating layer the surface po-tential at the dark portion of the image was 380 Volts.
From these experiments, it will be understood that when the electrostatic charge image on the element is developed by the ;~
conventional electrically conductive developer particles the surface potential on the element after the~developing step is decreased to about one half of that before development, and this proves the fact that some of the cha~rges on the insulating layèr ;
of thé element are moved through the rows o~ d.eveloper partlcles :` : ..... -during the developing process.
- ~ A vislble image was formed by the conventional developer particles on~the insulating layer or the element in such a manner as descrlbed above, and then a plain paper was overlapped thereon and corona discharge was applied by a 6000 Volts corona discharger to the paper during the time of 0.12 seconds to transPer the de~
velper image~from the element to the paper and then the latter was removed from the element. As a result, the developer image trdns ferred~to the paper was blurred and i~s~resolving power was i ~
'., ; . ~ ' ' ' ; ~' ~ - 1 0 -.. . . . .
, B
~
. ~ .
~ [)l3~32~;i relatively low. This results from the fact that since the con-ventional developer particles are electrically conductive the charges of the particles once adherlng to the paper under the action of the voltage applied to the latter are neutralized by the applied voltage during the transfer step and then the parti-cles are charged with the same polarity as that of the paper thereby generating a force in a direction of separating them from the paper and thus the particles are 3umped or moved away from the paper.
. ~ ,,j.
Experiment 2 ~`
By using the magnetically attractive and electr~cally insulating developer particles of the present invention, an ex-periment was made similar to Experiment 1. The pa~ticles were , made by the method-described and had a mean particle size of 13 I micron meters. Each of the particles was composed of 30 weight - % of polystyrene, 66 weight % of magnetite having a particle size of from 0.05 micron meters to 0.1 micron meters and 4 weight % of . .
stear;c acid, and the particles had black color by the magnetite.
The electric resistance of the developer particles was about 2 x 1014 ncm. This electric resistance was measured by the method described in U.S. Patent Specification No. 3,639,245 in which a circular through hole having a cross-sectional area of 0.073 cm2 was vertically formed in a polytetrafluoroethylene insulating sleeve, the lower end of the hole being closed by an electrode , j , i i plate, the sample of the developer particles being contained in the ~ hole, an electrically conductive piston being placed on the sample ,.'~ I .
.,, ' ' ' ;.' ; 11 .~, , .
.
, ` ~
~08~3~5 to give a pressure of 1,370 g/cm2 to provide a spacin~ of about 0.05 - 0.1 cm between the electrode plate and the piston, a voltage being applied across them and varied such that the electric field affecting the sample was varied froln 0 V/cm ~o about S,000 V/cm during the period of 10 milli-seconds, and dur;ng this period the electric current flowing between the electrode plate and the piston being measured to determine the electric resistance of the developer particles.
In the same manner as in Experiment 1, an electrostatic charge image was formed on the insulating layer of the photosensi-tiv~ element used in Experiment 1 and the initial surfaoe potentials at the dark and light portions of the image were 700 volts and 0 Yolt, respectively. Th2 image was then developed by the developer ;~
part~cles of the present invention described above under the same ~1 condition as in Experiment 1, and the surface potential at the dark portion of the image measured immediately after the completion of development was 640 volts. After removal of the developer parti~
cles from the lnsulating layer ln such d manner as in Experiment 1, ~ `
measurement was made that the surface potential at the dark portion ~ `~
of the image~was 700 volts.
;: ` ~' ' `~ Further experiment was made similarly and the results ~ ; ;
.~ ~ were obtained that the initial surface poten~ials at the dark and ! light portions of ~he charge image formed on the insulating layer 1 were 700 volts and 0 volt~ respectively, and the potential at the ;i dark portion of the image after developm~nt by the developer par~
cles of the present invention was 625 volts, and the potential at i the dark portion after removal of the particles from the element was ; - 1 2 ~, I
3;~
690 volts.
From these experiments, it is proved that when the electrically insulating developer particles of the present invention are u~ed to develop the electrostatlc charge lmage on the photo-sensitive element the surface potential on the element after development is ma;ntained at a substantially same level as the potential thereon before development and no substantial flow of the electrostatic charges on the element is caused through the rows of developer particles.
.
Practical Example The same photosensitive element as used in Experiment 1 was used and an electrostatic charge image was formed on the insu- ~ ~
1ating layer of the element by the same developing process as in ~:
Experiment 1 under the condition that the rate of project~on of the original light image to the-element was 3.8 Lux-second.~ ~ The surface potentia!s at the dark and light portions of the electro-static charge image were 700 volts and 50 volts, respectively.
The charge image was then developed by the same developer part~l-cles as used in Experiment 2 under the same condition as in Ex~
periment l to form a developer image on the insulating layer of the ;:
~ .
element, and then a plain paper was overlapped on the insulating ; layer of the element and the developer image w~s transferred to the P
paper under the action of corona discharge from a corona discharger to which 6jOOO votlage were applied, and~then the paper was sepa-rated from the element. As a result, the developer image trans-ferred to the paper had a high resolving power and there was found ': ~ ''' ~',:., l - 13 -~ .
B ~
-~ I .
.
~........ . . .
. . ~ . . ~`
.. ~ - ;... ..
, , , ,. , ,.,;
~843;;:5 no substantial blur in the developer image.
~ Though the present invention has been described above, : ; the invention will be practicable if any substance or substances other than the components described are contained in the developer particles with the condition that the partic1es are made to be magnetically attractive and have an electric resistance higher than 1014 Qcm. It should be appreciated that the invention can be . .
: applied to development of an electrostatic charge t?mage formed on a photoconductive layer of a photosensitive element which is not provided with an insulating cover layer.
i, ~
~. ~.. . .
L i ' ~ ' .': I :
?
?
~', i ,:
., I
'` I .
. - 14 - .
?
~`' l ., 1- ,, ... -. I
. ~ . - - . . . ,, ........... ~ . - . , . :
~ , . . . .. . . . . . .. ..
~8~3Z~
dry developer particles for use in electrophotography and which do not require any carriex therefor in use.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method for developing by such new dry developer particles an electrostatic image formed in electrophotography and which method has not the disadvantages described heretofore and simply and conveniently forms a good quality of picture.
Brie Explanation of the Drawing The accompanying drawing is a schematic illustration in part section of an example of a developing-device to which the developer particles and method accordinq to the present invention are applied.
Description o the Preferred Embodiment The developer particles according to the present in-vention are, for example, made hy a process in which magnetite ~ -fine particles having a mean particle size of about OO5 micron meters, thermoplastic synthetic resin, such as epoxy or styrene, and solvent, such as dichloroethylene or trichloroèthy-lene, are mixed in a weight ratio of about 1.5-3-: about 1 : about 8-12, and these are agitated to dissolve the resin by the solvent. The mixture is then injected by compressed air into a spray dryer from its upper portion to be formed into a plurality of fine droplets. At the same time, hot air heated at a temperature of about 120C- 170C is also blown into the dryer so that the solvent is evaporated from the droplets '~
B~
1~843Z5 to dry the latter, thereby producing developer particles of about 2 micron - 35 micron diameters. The developer particles so pro-duced contain about 25-40 weight % of the synthetic resin and about 75-60 weight % of the magnetite particles. Fùrthermore, the developer particles are colored in black by the magnetite component and are magnetically attractive and have electric re-sistance higher than 1014Jlcm when measured by the method de-scribed later.
The developer particles made as described above are schematically illustrated by reference numeral 1 in the drawing, and the particles 1 are attracted by the magnetic force generated from a cylindrical permanent magnet 2, to an outer peripheral surface of an electrically conductive carrying member or rotary sleeve 3. In this example, the magnet 2 has an intensi~y of the magnetic force to produce 700 Gauss of the flux density, and the -sleeve 3 ;s earthed through suitable means. As the sleeve 3 ro- ~;
tates in a clockwise direction as seen ~n the drawing, the amount of deposition of the particles 1 on the sleeve3 is controlled by a doctor blade 4 to a predetermined thickness to move to a photo~
sensitive element 5.
The photosensitive element 5 in this example comprises an electrically conductive base layer 6 earthed through suitable means, a photoconductive layer 7, an Insulating layer 8 and these layers being integrally bonded in the order mentioned above.
The element 5 is subjected to a suitable image forming process to form an electrostatic charge image on the surface of the insulaing layer 8 in accordance with the original image. While the element '...
.
- 6 - ~ `
.~ ' `:'~ ' ' ' -;
1C~843~5 .
s moves in a direction indicated by an arrow with 1ts insulating layer 8 contacted with the developer particles 1, the electro-static charge image on the insulating 'layer is developed in such a manner as will be described below.
For simplicity, the developing process according to the present invention will next be expla1ned in reference to the case in which developer particles 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 participate in deveiopment of the electrostatic image on the insulating layer 8 of the element 5.
The developer particle 9 is attracted to the electri-y cally conductive sleeve 3 under the action of the magnetic force of the magnet 2 affecting the magnetic fine particles contained in the developer particle, and in turn, the developer particle 10 to the particle 9 under the similar action, ~he developer part~cle 11 to the particle 10,the developer particle 12 to the particle 11 and the developer particle 13 to the particle 12~ thereby forming a developer particle row 14. Further developer particles are attracted 'to the particle 13 in a developer container 15, but these excess developer particles are.removed by the blade 4 from the particle 13.
As the sleeve 3 rotates and when the particle 13 of the row'l4 contacts with the surface of the insulating layer B of the photosensitive element 5, dielectric polarization is caused in the particle 13 by means of the electric field generated by the electro-static charges on the insulating layer 8, so that an attracting force is generated to attract the particle 13 to the insulating layer 8. Furthermore, the particle 13 is subject~d to a gradient .
~. , . - . ~, - ., , `r`
343~5 force caused by the non-uniform eLectric field Erom the electro-static charges on the layer 8, thereby generatlng a further at-tracting force to attract the part~cle 13 to the layer 8, and there is also generated a still further attracting force by the electrlc double layer between the charges on the l~yer 8 and the charges on the particle 13 to attract the particle to the layer 8. Accordingly, the intensity of the resultant force of these attractive forces de-pends upon the amount of the electrostatic charges deposited on the portion of the insulating layer with which the developer particle ?
13 is contacting. .
In case that an amount of the charges is desposited on the portion of the insulating layer 8 in contact with the particle 13 to generate a larger resultant force than the magnetically at-tracting force affecting the particle 13, as the sleeve 3 and the element 5 move relative to each other the particle 13 is separated from the particle 12 to remain attracted to that portion of the layer 8, but the particles 9, 10, 11 and 12 are moved together with the sleeve 3. On the contrary, when the particle 13 contacts with a portion of the insulating layer 8 which is provided with an amount of the electrostatic charges generàting a smaller resultant force than the magnetic force affecting the particle 13 from the magnet 2, the particle i3 is not separated from the particle 12 to move together therewith and thus the particle 13 can not be applied ~.
to that portion of the layer 8.
Practically, a plurality of developer particle rows simi-lar to the row 14 is provided over the substantial portion of the peripheral surface of the sleeve 3 so that as the sleeve 3 and the ' : ~ ' B
., ~ . , ~ . ... . .. . ... .. . . .
. . ~ . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . .
~LCD~3~a3 2 S
element 5 move relative to each other the electrostatic charge image on the layer 8 of the element 5 successively developed in such a manner as described above.
The following experiments were made to confirm the differences and effects of the present invention over the prior 'I art.
i Experiment l A photosens1tive element was used in which an aluminium base plate, a cadmium sulphide photoconductive layer and a polyester insulating thin layer were integrally bonded in turn. An electro-static charge image was formed on the insulating layer by the method described in U.S. Patent Spe~ification No. 3,536,4839 and the initial i surface potentials at the dark and llght portions of the image were !j 700 Volts and O Volt, respectively.~ By using the magnetlcally at~
¦ tractive and electrically conductlve developer particles described in U.S. Patent Specification No. 3,639,245, and the developing device shown in ~he drawing of the present application, the electro-static charge image was developed wlth the element moved~at a~speed of l25 mm/sec. Immediately after the completion of developmPnt, measurement was made to obtain the result that the surface potential j of th~ dark portlon of thelcharge image on the insulating layer was oo Volts. Compressed air was then blown to the developer parti-cles desposited on the insulating layer of the photosensitive element so that all the particl~es were removed therefrom, and khen measure-ment was also made to obtain the result that the surface potential of the dark portlon of the charge image on the insulating layer was !
, ; i g , ;' `
i ,.,; . . . . -~t8432S
310 Volts.
Further experiment was malie sim~lar to the above ex periment. In this experiment, the init;al surface potentials at the dark and light portions of the electrostatic char~e image form-ed on the insulating layer of the element were the same as thosemeasured in the above-described experiment. The image was de-veloped under the same condition as in the above experiment and thereafter a result was obtained that the surface potential at the dark portion of the image was 100 Volts, and after the removal of the developer particles from the insulating layer the surface po-tential at the dark portion of the image was 380 Volts.
From these experiments, it will be understood that when the electrostatic charge image on the element is developed by the ;~
conventional electrically conductive developer particles the surface potential on the element after the~developing step is decreased to about one half of that before development, and this proves the fact that some of the cha~rges on the insulating layèr ;
of thé element are moved through the rows o~ d.eveloper partlcles :` : ..... -during the developing process.
- ~ A vislble image was formed by the conventional developer particles on~the insulating layer or the element in such a manner as descrlbed above, and then a plain paper was overlapped thereon and corona discharge was applied by a 6000 Volts corona discharger to the paper during the time of 0.12 seconds to transPer the de~
velper image~from the element to the paper and then the latter was removed from the element. As a result, the developer image trdns ferred~to the paper was blurred and i~s~resolving power was i ~
'., ; . ~ ' ' ' ; ~' ~ - 1 0 -.. . . . .
, B
~
. ~ .
~ [)l3~32~;i relatively low. This results from the fact that since the con-ventional developer particles are electrically conductive the charges of the particles once adherlng to the paper under the action of the voltage applied to the latter are neutralized by the applied voltage during the transfer step and then the parti-cles are charged with the same polarity as that of the paper thereby generating a force in a direction of separating them from the paper and thus the particles are 3umped or moved away from the paper.
. ~ ,,j.
Experiment 2 ~`
By using the magnetically attractive and electr~cally insulating developer particles of the present invention, an ex-periment was made similar to Experiment 1. The pa~ticles were , made by the method-described and had a mean particle size of 13 I micron meters. Each of the particles was composed of 30 weight - % of polystyrene, 66 weight % of magnetite having a particle size of from 0.05 micron meters to 0.1 micron meters and 4 weight % of . .
stear;c acid, and the particles had black color by the magnetite.
The electric resistance of the developer particles was about 2 x 1014 ncm. This electric resistance was measured by the method described in U.S. Patent Specification No. 3,639,245 in which a circular through hole having a cross-sectional area of 0.073 cm2 was vertically formed in a polytetrafluoroethylene insulating sleeve, the lower end of the hole being closed by an electrode , j , i i plate, the sample of the developer particles being contained in the ~ hole, an electrically conductive piston being placed on the sample ,.'~ I .
.,, ' ' ' ;.' ; 11 .~, , .
.
, ` ~
~08~3~5 to give a pressure of 1,370 g/cm2 to provide a spacin~ of about 0.05 - 0.1 cm between the electrode plate and the piston, a voltage being applied across them and varied such that the electric field affecting the sample was varied froln 0 V/cm ~o about S,000 V/cm during the period of 10 milli-seconds, and dur;ng this period the electric current flowing between the electrode plate and the piston being measured to determine the electric resistance of the developer particles.
In the same manner as in Experiment 1, an electrostatic charge image was formed on the insulating layer of the photosensi-tiv~ element used in Experiment 1 and the initial surfaoe potentials at the dark and light portions of the image were 700 volts and 0 Yolt, respectively. Th2 image was then developed by the developer ;~
part~cles of the present invention described above under the same ~1 condition as in Experiment 1, and the surface potential at the dark portion of the image measured immediately after the completion of development was 640 volts. After removal of the developer parti~
cles from the lnsulating layer ln such d manner as in Experiment 1, ~ `
measurement was made that the surface potential at the dark portion ~ `~
of the image~was 700 volts.
;: ` ~' ' `~ Further experiment was made similarly and the results ~ ; ;
.~ ~ were obtained that the initial surface poten~ials at the dark and ! light portions of ~he charge image formed on the insulating layer 1 were 700 volts and 0 volt~ respectively, and the potential at the ;i dark portion of the image after developm~nt by the developer par~
cles of the present invention was 625 volts, and the potential at i the dark portion after removal of the particles from the element was ; - 1 2 ~, I
3;~
690 volts.
From these experiments, it is proved that when the electrically insulating developer particles of the present invention are u~ed to develop the electrostatlc charge lmage on the photo-sensitive element the surface potential on the element after development is ma;ntained at a substantially same level as the potential thereon before development and no substantial flow of the electrostatic charges on the element is caused through the rows of developer particles.
.
Practical Example The same photosensitive element as used in Experiment 1 was used and an electrostatic charge image was formed on the insu- ~ ~
1ating layer of the element by the same developing process as in ~:
Experiment 1 under the condition that the rate of project~on of the original light image to the-element was 3.8 Lux-second.~ ~ The surface potentia!s at the dark and light portions of the electro-static charge image were 700 volts and 50 volts, respectively.
The charge image was then developed by the same developer part~l-cles as used in Experiment 2 under the same condition as in Ex~
periment l to form a developer image on the insulating layer of the ;:
~ .
element, and then a plain paper was overlapped on the insulating ; layer of the element and the developer image w~s transferred to the P
paper under the action of corona discharge from a corona discharger to which 6jOOO votlage were applied, and~then the paper was sepa-rated from the element. As a result, the developer image trans-ferred to the paper had a high resolving power and there was found ': ~ ''' ~',:., l - 13 -~ .
B ~
-~ I .
.
~........ . . .
. . ~ . . ~`
.. ~ - ;... ..
, , , ,. , ,.,;
~843;;:5 no substantial blur in the developer image.
~ Though the present invention has been described above, : ; the invention will be practicable if any substance or substances other than the components described are contained in the developer particles with the condition that the partic1es are made to be magnetically attractive and have an electric resistance higher than 1014 Qcm. It should be appreciated that the invention can be . .
: applied to development of an electrostatic charge t?mage formed on a photoconductive layer of a photosensitive element which is not provided with an insulating cover layer.
i, ~
~. ~.. . .
L i ' ~ ' .': I :
?
?
~', i ,:
., I
'` I .
. - 14 - .
?
~`' l ., 1- ,, ... -. I
Claims (2)
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A dry developer particle for use in electrophotography without requiring, in use, any carrier therefor consisting essentially of about 25-40 weight % of a thermoplastic syn-thetic resin material and about 75-60 weight % of a magnetic material in particulate form and said developer particle having an electric resistance higher than 1014 ohm-cm to have magnetically attractive and electrically insulating properties.
2. A method for developing an electrostatic charge image formed on a photosensitive element used in electrophotography comprising steps of placing magnetically attractive and elec-trically insulating dry developer particles consisting es-sentially of about 25-40 weight % of a thermoplastic synthetic resin material and about 75-60 weight % of a magnetic material in particulate form and said developer particle having an electric resistance higher than 1014 ohm-cm to have magneti-cally attractive and electrically insulating properties, in substantially uniform contact with an electrically conductive carrying surface under the action of a magnetically attracting force, and contacting said developer particles with said photosensitive element so that said developer particles are subjected to an attracting force caused by the dielectric polarization in said particles, an attracting force caused by the electric double layer formed between the charges on said element and the charges on said particles and an attracting force caused by the gradient force generated by the non-uniform electric field from the charges on said element, thereby ap-plying said developer particles to said element against the action of said magnetically attracting force.
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP56786/75 | 1975-05-15 | ||
| JP50056787A JPS51133028A (en) | 1975-05-15 | 1975-05-15 | Electrophotographic development method |
| JP5678675A JPS51133026A (en) | 1975-05-15 | 1975-05-15 | Electrophotographic developing method |
| JP56787/75 | 1975-05-15 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1084325A true CA1084325A (en) | 1980-08-26 |
Family
ID=26397785
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA252,614A Expired CA1084325A (en) | 1975-05-15 | 1976-05-14 | Dry developer particle of resistivity higher than 10 su14 xx ohm-cm comprising thermoplastic resin and magnetic material |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1084325A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE2620660A1 (en) |
| FR (1) | FR2311337A1 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB1535972A (en) |
| NL (1) | NL7605152A (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4121931A (en) * | 1976-06-30 | 1978-10-24 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Electrographic development process |
| JPS5396840A (en) * | 1977-02-04 | 1978-08-24 | Toshiba Corp | Electrostatic image developing toner |
| JPS53132352A (en) * | 1977-04-22 | 1978-11-18 | Sharp Corp | Electrophotographic copier |
| JPS556308A (en) * | 1978-06-28 | 1980-01-17 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Magnetic toner composition for electrostatic transfer |
| FR2436423A1 (en) * | 1978-09-12 | 1980-04-11 | Cii Honeywell Bull | POWDER FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LATENT IMAGES AND ITS MANUFACTURING METHOD |
| JPS5588070A (en) * | 1978-11-28 | 1980-07-03 | Mita Ind Co Ltd | Developer for electrostatic image |
| JPS6046428B2 (en) * | 1978-11-28 | 1985-10-16 | 京セラミタ株式会社 | electrostatography |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3563734A (en) * | 1964-10-14 | 1971-02-16 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Electrographic process |
| US3455276A (en) * | 1967-05-23 | 1969-07-15 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Magnetically responsive powder applicator |
| ZA73911B (en) * | 1972-03-15 | 1973-11-28 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Electrographic development process |
-
1976
- 1976-05-11 DE DE19762620660 patent/DE2620660A1/en not_active Ceased
- 1976-05-12 GB GB1957176A patent/GB1535972A/en not_active Expired
- 1976-05-14 CA CA252,614A patent/CA1084325A/en not_active Expired
- 1976-05-14 NL NL7605152A patent/NL7605152A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1976-05-14 FR FR7614577A patent/FR2311337A1/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE2620660A1 (en) | 1976-12-02 |
| FR2311337B1 (en) | 1982-03-12 |
| NL7605152A (en) | 1976-11-17 |
| FR2311337A1 (en) | 1976-12-10 |
| GB1535972A (en) | 1978-12-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US3084043A (en) | Liquid development of electrostatic latent images | |
| CA1064335A (en) | Process for developing electrographic images by causing electrical breakdown in the developer | |
| US2874063A (en) | Electrostatic printing | |
| US2914403A (en) | Electrostatic printing | |
| US2638416A (en) | Developer composition for developing an electrostatic latent image | |
| US2951443A (en) | Image reproduction | |
| US3166432A (en) | Image development | |
| US4804994A (en) | Compact electrophotographic printing apparatus having an improved development means and a method for operating the same | |
| US3117884A (en) | Electrostatic printing process and apparatus | |
| US3739748A (en) | Donor for touchdown development | |
| CA1084325A (en) | Dry developer particle of resistivity higher than 10 su14 xx ohm-cm comprising thermoplastic resin and magnetic material | |
| US3811765A (en) | Contact-transfer electrostatic printing system | |
| CA1061654A (en) | Charge pattern development with stream of oppositely charged droplets | |
| US2979403A (en) | Electrostatic printing | |
| US3234904A (en) | Device for tesiprinting | |
| US3894512A (en) | Electrostatic developing apparatus | |
| US3806355A (en) | Electrostatic printing apparatus and method | |
| EP0173621B1 (en) | Method for forming a toner imager in electrophotographic printing | |
| US3935327A (en) | Copying using pyroelectric film | |
| US3386822A (en) | Solvent capsule fixing of powder images | |
| JPS6360390B2 (en) | ||
| US3719482A (en) | Imaging system | |
| US3986872A (en) | Method of increasing the image exposure and developing sensitivity of magneto-electric printing system | |
| US3741761A (en) | Non-electrostatic printing electrography | |
| US3341326A (en) | Dark decay controlled xerography |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |