CA1079392A - Method and apparatus for the real-time evaluation of welds by emitted stress waves - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for the real-time evaluation of welds by emitted stress wavesInfo
- Publication number
- CA1079392A CA1079392A CA254,324A CA254324A CA1079392A CA 1079392 A CA1079392 A CA 1079392A CA 254324 A CA254324 A CA 254324A CA 1079392 A CA1079392 A CA 1079392A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- weld
- phase transformation
- signal
- stress
- solid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/34—Generating the ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
- G01N29/341—Generating the ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor with time characteristics
- G01N29/343—Generating the ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor with time characteristics pulse waves, e.g. particular sequence of pulses, bursts
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/22—Details, e.g. general constructional or apparatus details
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/36—Detecting the response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE
REAL-TIME EVALUATION OF WELDS
BY EMITTED STRESS WAVES
Abstract of the Disclosure Spot welds are evaluated using stress-wave emission techniques by detecting and measuring the stress waves emitted from a weld area during a first solid-to-liquid phase transformation period and a second liquid-to-solid phase transformation period of the weld. The stress waves emitted during the first transformation period provide an indication of the weld nugget size, while the stress waves emitted during the second transformation period provide an indication of the amount of post-weld cracking in the weld area. By subtracting the stress-wave energy measured during the second transformation period from the stress-wave energy measured during the first transformation period, an indication of the strength of the weld is obtained.
REAL-TIME EVALUATION OF WELDS
BY EMITTED STRESS WAVES
Abstract of the Disclosure Spot welds are evaluated using stress-wave emission techniques by detecting and measuring the stress waves emitted from a weld area during a first solid-to-liquid phase transformation period and a second liquid-to-solid phase transformation period of the weld. The stress waves emitted during the first transformation period provide an indication of the weld nugget size, while the stress waves emitted during the second transformation period provide an indication of the amount of post-weld cracking in the weld area. By subtracting the stress-wave energy measured during the second transformation period from the stress-wave energy measured during the first transformation period, an indication of the strength of the weld is obtained.
Description
3~
Back~round of the Invention 1. Field of the Invention ~ . .
This invention relates to method and apparatus for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation of welds by stress-wave emission techniques, and more particularly, to method and apparatus which evaluates a weld by measuring stress waves emitted from the weld area cluring the solid-to-liquid phase transformation and the liquid-to-solid phase trans-formation of a weld.
Back~round of the Invention 1. Field of the Invention ~ . .
This invention relates to method and apparatus for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation of welds by stress-wave emission techniques, and more particularly, to method and apparatus which evaluates a weld by measuring stress waves emitted from the weld area cluring the solid-to-liquid phase transformation and the liquid-to-solid phase trans-formation of a weld.
2. Description of the Prior Art The ability to evaluate a weld using real-time, non-destructive methods has always been of .interest to industry. A method of monitoring a welding operation was disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,726,130, issued to R.P. Hurlebaus on April 10, 1973. There, ultrasonic shear wave pulse signals are transmitted into the two pieces to be welded from a transducer positioned opposite the welding electrode while the welding operation is being performed. These signals are refleated from the area between the melting metal and the solid metal to provide real-time d~ta for detecting the degree of penetration of a weld.
Another method for monitoring a welding operation was disclosed in an article entitled, "Forecasting Failures with Acoustic Emissions", by R.E. Herzog published in Machine Design, June 14~ 1973, at pages 132-137. There it was stated that one of the more successful uses of acoustic emissions is in inspecting welds as thsy are being made by detectlng and correlating signals emitted during the liquid-to-solid phase transformation of a weld area to indicate good or bad weLds. The Herzog article further specifies that complex st:ress waves occur in both the weld cycle and .
: ::
".. .: . ,. : . . ,..... , : . ~ .
.
~L0~3~
post-weld cooling period, but only emissions during the post-weld cooling period are used for finding defects, such as cracks, as they occur in the weld area, and that emissions during the weld cycle are ignored.
The prior art method, using stress-wave emission techniques, therefore, only measures the amount of cracking which may occur in the weld area during the post-weld cooling period to determine if a weld is good or bad. The problem still remains of providing method and apparatus which will provide a more accurate real-time, non-destructive evaluakion of both the strength and the quality of a weld.
Brief Summar~ oE the Invention The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation of welds by stress-wave emission techniques, and more particularly, to msthod and apparatus which evaluates a weld by measuring stress waves emitted from the weld area during the solid-to-liquid phase transformation and the liquid-to-solid phase transformation of a weld~
The present invention further relates to method and apparatus for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation of a weld, wherein the stress waves emitted from the weld area durin~ both a first solid~to liquid phase transformation period and a subsequent second liquid-to-solid phase transformation period are measured, and the difference between the stress-wave ~energy measured during the first and the second transformation periods is compared with a predetermined reference value to determine the acceptability of a weld.
~, :
':,' ;
~ 2 -~, ~
~.:
`"` ~L~t~ J
In accordance with one aspe~t of tl~ present invention there is provided a method for the real-t:ime, non-destructive evaluation of a wel.d comprisi.ng the steps of:
measuring stress-wave energy emitted by the material de-formation during the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld area; measuring stress-wave energy emitted from cracks developing during the post-weld l.iquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld area; and determining the strength of said weld by measuring the difference between the stress-wave energy measured during ; the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld area and the stress-wave energy measured during the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided apparatus for detecting and measuring stress waves propagating from a weld area . .
; between a first and a second workpiece being welded during a first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and a second liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval in the weld area for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation : of said weld, the apparatus comprising: a sensor for : detecting stress waves propagating in the material of said : ~ workpieces and generating an electrical output representa-tive of the detected waves; a first signal procesing means : ~ comprising: (i) an amplifier for amplifying the electrical output from said sensor; and (ii) a band-pass filter : connected to the output of said amplifier f,or generating : an analog output signal within a pass-band falling outside : the range of frequencies normally generated by components in proximity to the apparatus; and second signal-processing means, connected to the output of said first-processing - 2a -'`~; ~7 1 . ' ', ~' ' ' . . ' ' : ' ' , ' ' ' ' ' . '. , ,,~ . . . .. .
means, for measuring the stress-wave energy during said first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and said second liquicl-to-solid phase transformation interval in said weld area, and thereafter determining the difference between the measurements oE said first and second phase transformation intervals to provide a measurement of the strength of said weld.
-.
., ~ .
'~ ~
:
I
~ , `
. ..
.
~ .
2b -:
~ ' , : . . .
Other and fuxther aspects of the present invention will become apparent during the course of the following description and by reference to the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.
Briei- Description of the Drawings Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like parts in the several views:
FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of a weld-evaluation system according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 illustrates various waveforms of the type which are displayed on an oscilloscope shown for purposes of explaining the present inven-tion;
FIG. 3 is a simplified block diayram of an encoder for use with the energy processor of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a simplifiPd block diagram of a voltage control oscillator for use in the encoder of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a simplified block diagram of a count and comparator circuit for use in the energy processor of FI G . 1; and FIG. 6 is a simplified block diagram of another count and comparator circuit for use in the energy proce~sor ~: of FIG. 1.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments ,~
:; The welding process occurs by mechanically holding :
articles to be welded together, melting the parts at theix common interface, causing molten material to flow from ~oth ~: .
articles, and resolidifying the molten volume. The volume wher melting occurs is generally called the molten-resolidi-:, ~ fication zone or weld nugget, while the region where grain ~ :
structure modiiication takes place is generally called the heat-affected zone. The required interfacial heat can be .:~ - 3 -:. , .
, ~' :
~ ;:'-~......... - . .... , ' .
supplied in a number of different way.s, one of which is by capacitor discharge weldin~ where a pulse of high current is passed across the weld part interface. The present invention has been described primarily with relation to a capacitance discharge welding device. However, it will be understood that such description is e~emplary only and is for the purposes of exposition and n~t for purposes of limitation.
It will be readily appreciated that the inventive concept is equally applicable for use with any other welding apparatus, such as a laser.
Referring now to FIG. 1, a pair of overlapping articles 12 and 14 comprising the same or di~ferent materials are positioned to be welded to~ether between electrodes 16 and 18 of, for instance, a capacitance discharge welder 20.
When a power source (not shown) is connected to terminals 22 and 24 of welder 20, capacitor 26 becomes charged. The closure of switch 28 discharges capacitor 26 through the primary winding (P) of transformer 30, causing a pulse of current to be delivered by the secondary winding (S) of trans~ormer 30 to electrodes 16 and 18 and across the weld part interface. Capacitor 26 should be of sufficient size to deliver a pulse of current which will melt or plastically ~; deform the weld area at the interface of articles 12 and 14.
~ Stress waves emitted from the weld area during - both the weld pulse and post-weld intervals are detected by a piezoelectric differential transducer 40 (hereinafter referred to as sensor 40) of the present weld e~aluation apparatus. Sensor 40 is shown as mechanically coupled to electrode 18 ~or non-contact detection purposes, but could also, for instance, be mechanically coupled to electrode 16 or either one oE articles 1~ and 14.
' `' ' , . .
: ~, ~ .
The signals which are detected by sensor 40 comprisewaves which are: (a) generated by other electrical components in proximity to the sys-tem of FIG. 1, but no~ shown: (b!
generated in articles 12 and 14, electrodes 16 and 18, or sensor 40 due to nontransient factors such as temperature and strain variations; and tc) stress waves, comprising bulk and surface waves, propagating from the weld nugget in articles 12 and 14, while the articles are being welded.
Whenever a phase transformation occurs in the ; 10 weld nugget, energy is released in the form o s-tress waves, which waves, in turn, excite sensor 40. Depending on wave damping at the interfaces, the traveling mechanical stress impulses will cause sensor 40 to provide output voltage changes which are almost proportional to the amplitude of ; the impulses. Because of the low amplitude of the stress wave pulses, it is advantageous to provide for good trans-mission of the mechanical wave or amplification o the sensor's output voltage.
As shown in FIG. 1, sensor 40 is connected to a low-noise preamplifier 42 over leads 44. Preamplifier 42 should be of a design having a sensitivity which is preferably in the range of 1-4~V, but can include a sensitivity beyond this range, as for example t 6~V.
The output from preamplifier 42 is transmitted over lead 46 to a band-pass filter 48 which has a pass-band that falls at least partially within the natural frequency j of sensor 40, but which falls without the range of noise frequencies generated by other components in proximity to the system. Filter 48 is preferably a fifth order, or higher, high-pass filter which is commercially available. A
resistor 51 is preferably added to line 50 to match the . ' :
.,~,.:
. . .
in~put impedance oE amplifier 52. The output ~f filter ~8 onlead 50 is further amplified by ~mplifier 52. ~mplifier 52 is of a design which advantageously has a fast slewing ra-te, such as, for example, a commercially available model 715 operational amplifier. The output of amplifier 52 is trans-mitted over lead 54 to an energy processor 56.
Energy processor S6 receives the amplified and filtered signal on lead ~4 and measures the stress-wave energy released from the weld area duriny both the solid-to-liquid phase transformation and the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld nugget.
Energy processor 56 can comprise circuitry which operates in accordance with a very fast analog-to digital conversion scheme. Such circuitry, however, is very expensive.
FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate a novel energy processor 56 which provides very fast yet relatively inexpensive circuitry for use in the present weld evaluation system.
; Novel energy processor 56 includes an encoder 57 shown in FIG. 3 as comprising a multiplier circuit 70 which provides an output signal on lead 72 that is the square of the input signal on lead 54, and a voltage control oscillator 74.
Multiplier 70 can comprise any known circuit such as, for example, a model 4456 multiplier from Teledyne-Philbric of Dedham, Mass. Voltage control oscillator 74 converts the squared amplitude modulated input signal on lead 72 into a digital frequency-modulated (FM) output signal, a change in the amplitude of the input signal causing a corresponding ; change in the rate, or frequency, of the digital pulses of the output signal.
, ,: . ,, . - . . ., - --.
Voltage control oscillator 74 should preferably comprise circuitry which provides a frequency range of approximately 1000:1. Since conventional voltage control oscillators generally provide a frequency range of up to 10:1, the novel voltage control oscillator circuitry 74 of FIG. 4 i~ preferably used in the present system. There, separate, commercially available voltage control oscillators (VCO) B0, 81, and 8~ provide a digital FM oukput signal within the range of fl to lOfl, lOfl to lOOfl, and lOOf 10 to lOOOfl, respectively. Each VCO 80, 81 and 82 has a separate respective window comparator 84, 85, and 86 associated therewith. Each window comparator 84, 85, and 86 compares the instantaneous voltage level of the input signal on lead 72 with a different portion of the overall input signal voltage range and provides an enable signal to the associated VCO 80-82 when the input voltage level falls within the associated voltage range under comparison. The input signal on lead 72 is also supplied to each of the VCOs 80-82.
In operation, if the input signal on lead 72 is assumed to include a voltage level which is rising through the entire ranges A and B, then window comparator - 84 supplies an enable signal to VCO 80 for as long as the input voltage level is rising within range A. The enable signal `~ from window comparator 84 causes VCO 80 to generate a digital FM output signa]L on lead 88 which increases from fl to lOf1 as the input vo]Ltage level correspondingly increases through , range A. When lhe input voltage level reaches the lower d~e of range B, window comparator 84 ceases to generate an :` j
Another method for monitoring a welding operation was disclosed in an article entitled, "Forecasting Failures with Acoustic Emissions", by R.E. Herzog published in Machine Design, June 14~ 1973, at pages 132-137. There it was stated that one of the more successful uses of acoustic emissions is in inspecting welds as thsy are being made by detectlng and correlating signals emitted during the liquid-to-solid phase transformation of a weld area to indicate good or bad weLds. The Herzog article further specifies that complex st:ress waves occur in both the weld cycle and .
: ::
".. .: . ,. : . . ,..... , : . ~ .
.
~L0~3~
post-weld cooling period, but only emissions during the post-weld cooling period are used for finding defects, such as cracks, as they occur in the weld area, and that emissions during the weld cycle are ignored.
The prior art method, using stress-wave emission techniques, therefore, only measures the amount of cracking which may occur in the weld area during the post-weld cooling period to determine if a weld is good or bad. The problem still remains of providing method and apparatus which will provide a more accurate real-time, non-destructive evaluakion of both the strength and the quality of a weld.
Brief Summar~ oE the Invention The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation of welds by stress-wave emission techniques, and more particularly, to msthod and apparatus which evaluates a weld by measuring stress waves emitted from the weld area during the solid-to-liquid phase transformation and the liquid-to-solid phase transformation of a weld~
The present invention further relates to method and apparatus for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation of a weld, wherein the stress waves emitted from the weld area durin~ both a first solid~to liquid phase transformation period and a subsequent second liquid-to-solid phase transformation period are measured, and the difference between the stress-wave ~energy measured during the first and the second transformation periods is compared with a predetermined reference value to determine the acceptability of a weld.
~, :
':,' ;
~ 2 -~, ~
~.:
`"` ~L~t~ J
In accordance with one aspe~t of tl~ present invention there is provided a method for the real-t:ime, non-destructive evaluation of a wel.d comprisi.ng the steps of:
measuring stress-wave energy emitted by the material de-formation during the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld area; measuring stress-wave energy emitted from cracks developing during the post-weld l.iquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld area; and determining the strength of said weld by measuring the difference between the stress-wave energy measured during ; the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld area and the stress-wave energy measured during the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided apparatus for detecting and measuring stress waves propagating from a weld area . .
; between a first and a second workpiece being welded during a first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and a second liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval in the weld area for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation : of said weld, the apparatus comprising: a sensor for : detecting stress waves propagating in the material of said : ~ workpieces and generating an electrical output representa-tive of the detected waves; a first signal procesing means : ~ comprising: (i) an amplifier for amplifying the electrical output from said sensor; and (ii) a band-pass filter : connected to the output of said amplifier f,or generating : an analog output signal within a pass-band falling outside : the range of frequencies normally generated by components in proximity to the apparatus; and second signal-processing means, connected to the output of said first-processing - 2a -'`~; ~7 1 . ' ', ~' ' ' . . ' ' : ' ' , ' ' ' ' ' . '. , ,,~ . . . .. .
means, for measuring the stress-wave energy during said first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and said second liquicl-to-solid phase transformation interval in said weld area, and thereafter determining the difference between the measurements oE said first and second phase transformation intervals to provide a measurement of the strength of said weld.
-.
., ~ .
'~ ~
:
I
~ , `
. ..
.
~ .
2b -:
~ ' , : . . .
Other and fuxther aspects of the present invention will become apparent during the course of the following description and by reference to the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.
Briei- Description of the Drawings Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like parts in the several views:
FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of a weld-evaluation system according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 illustrates various waveforms of the type which are displayed on an oscilloscope shown for purposes of explaining the present inven-tion;
FIG. 3 is a simplified block diayram of an encoder for use with the energy processor of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a simplifiPd block diagram of a voltage control oscillator for use in the encoder of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a simplified block diagram of a count and comparator circuit for use in the energy processor of FI G . 1; and FIG. 6 is a simplified block diagram of another count and comparator circuit for use in the energy proce~sor ~: of FIG. 1.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments ,~
:; The welding process occurs by mechanically holding :
articles to be welded together, melting the parts at theix common interface, causing molten material to flow from ~oth ~: .
articles, and resolidifying the molten volume. The volume wher melting occurs is generally called the molten-resolidi-:, ~ fication zone or weld nugget, while the region where grain ~ :
structure modiiication takes place is generally called the heat-affected zone. The required interfacial heat can be .:~ - 3 -:. , .
, ~' :
~ ;:'-~......... - . .... , ' .
supplied in a number of different way.s, one of which is by capacitor discharge weldin~ where a pulse of high current is passed across the weld part interface. The present invention has been described primarily with relation to a capacitance discharge welding device. However, it will be understood that such description is e~emplary only and is for the purposes of exposition and n~t for purposes of limitation.
It will be readily appreciated that the inventive concept is equally applicable for use with any other welding apparatus, such as a laser.
Referring now to FIG. 1, a pair of overlapping articles 12 and 14 comprising the same or di~ferent materials are positioned to be welded to~ether between electrodes 16 and 18 of, for instance, a capacitance discharge welder 20.
When a power source (not shown) is connected to terminals 22 and 24 of welder 20, capacitor 26 becomes charged. The closure of switch 28 discharges capacitor 26 through the primary winding (P) of transformer 30, causing a pulse of current to be delivered by the secondary winding (S) of trans~ormer 30 to electrodes 16 and 18 and across the weld part interface. Capacitor 26 should be of sufficient size to deliver a pulse of current which will melt or plastically ~; deform the weld area at the interface of articles 12 and 14.
~ Stress waves emitted from the weld area during - both the weld pulse and post-weld intervals are detected by a piezoelectric differential transducer 40 (hereinafter referred to as sensor 40) of the present weld e~aluation apparatus. Sensor 40 is shown as mechanically coupled to electrode 18 ~or non-contact detection purposes, but could also, for instance, be mechanically coupled to electrode 16 or either one oE articles 1~ and 14.
' `' ' , . .
: ~, ~ .
The signals which are detected by sensor 40 comprisewaves which are: (a) generated by other electrical components in proximity to the sys-tem of FIG. 1, but no~ shown: (b!
generated in articles 12 and 14, electrodes 16 and 18, or sensor 40 due to nontransient factors such as temperature and strain variations; and tc) stress waves, comprising bulk and surface waves, propagating from the weld nugget in articles 12 and 14, while the articles are being welded.
Whenever a phase transformation occurs in the ; 10 weld nugget, energy is released in the form o s-tress waves, which waves, in turn, excite sensor 40. Depending on wave damping at the interfaces, the traveling mechanical stress impulses will cause sensor 40 to provide output voltage changes which are almost proportional to the amplitude of ; the impulses. Because of the low amplitude of the stress wave pulses, it is advantageous to provide for good trans-mission of the mechanical wave or amplification o the sensor's output voltage.
As shown in FIG. 1, sensor 40 is connected to a low-noise preamplifier 42 over leads 44. Preamplifier 42 should be of a design having a sensitivity which is preferably in the range of 1-4~V, but can include a sensitivity beyond this range, as for example t 6~V.
The output from preamplifier 42 is transmitted over lead 46 to a band-pass filter 48 which has a pass-band that falls at least partially within the natural frequency j of sensor 40, but which falls without the range of noise frequencies generated by other components in proximity to the system. Filter 48 is preferably a fifth order, or higher, high-pass filter which is commercially available. A
resistor 51 is preferably added to line 50 to match the . ' :
.,~,.:
. . .
in~put impedance oE amplifier 52. The output ~f filter ~8 onlead 50 is further amplified by ~mplifier 52. ~mplifier 52 is of a design which advantageously has a fast slewing ra-te, such as, for example, a commercially available model 715 operational amplifier. The output of amplifier 52 is trans-mitted over lead 54 to an energy processor 56.
Energy processor S6 receives the amplified and filtered signal on lead ~4 and measures the stress-wave energy released from the weld area duriny both the solid-to-liquid phase transformation and the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld nugget.
Energy processor 56 can comprise circuitry which operates in accordance with a very fast analog-to digital conversion scheme. Such circuitry, however, is very expensive.
FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate a novel energy processor 56 which provides very fast yet relatively inexpensive circuitry for use in the present weld evaluation system.
; Novel energy processor 56 includes an encoder 57 shown in FIG. 3 as comprising a multiplier circuit 70 which provides an output signal on lead 72 that is the square of the input signal on lead 54, and a voltage control oscillator 74.
Multiplier 70 can comprise any known circuit such as, for example, a model 4456 multiplier from Teledyne-Philbric of Dedham, Mass. Voltage control oscillator 74 converts the squared amplitude modulated input signal on lead 72 into a digital frequency-modulated (FM) output signal, a change in the amplitude of the input signal causing a corresponding ; change in the rate, or frequency, of the digital pulses of the output signal.
, ,: . ,, . - . . ., - --.
Voltage control oscillator 74 should preferably comprise circuitry which provides a frequency range of approximately 1000:1. Since conventional voltage control oscillators generally provide a frequency range of up to 10:1, the novel voltage control oscillator circuitry 74 of FIG. 4 i~ preferably used in the present system. There, separate, commercially available voltage control oscillators (VCO) B0, 81, and 8~ provide a digital FM oukput signal within the range of fl to lOfl, lOfl to lOOfl, and lOOf 10 to lOOOfl, respectively. Each VCO 80, 81 and 82 has a separate respective window comparator 84, 85, and 86 associated therewith. Each window comparator 84, 85, and 86 compares the instantaneous voltage level of the input signal on lead 72 with a different portion of the overall input signal voltage range and provides an enable signal to the associated VCO 80-82 when the input voltage level falls within the associated voltage range under comparison. The input signal on lead 72 is also supplied to each of the VCOs 80-82.
In operation, if the input signal on lead 72 is assumed to include a voltage level which is rising through the entire ranges A and B, then window comparator - 84 supplies an enable signal to VCO 80 for as long as the input voltage level is rising within range A. The enable signal `~ from window comparator 84 causes VCO 80 to generate a digital FM output signa]L on lead 88 which increases from fl to lOf1 as the input vo]Ltage level correspondingly increases through , range A. When lhe input voltage level reaches the lower d~e of range B, window comparator 84 ceases to generate an :` j
3~ enable signal to VCO 80 and window comparator 85 now supplies . ~ .
, ~` .
~ ,~
, ~, . . . .
0~
an enable signal to VCO 81. 'L'he enable signal Erom window comparator 85 causes VCO 81 -to generate a diyital FM out~ut signal on lead 89 which increases from l()fl to 100fl as the input voltage level correspondingly increases through range B. ~he output from each of VCos S0-82 is coupled to a common OR-gate 90 and onto leacl 58 for transmission to a count and comparator circuit 60 of energy processor 56 (FIG. 1).
It is, of course, possible to adcl further window comparators and VCOs in a manner shown in FIC:. 4 to extend the range of operation. The voltage control oscillator circuitry 74 avoids the use of integrators which are generally limited in bandwidth and accuracy.
The digital FM output signal from encoder 57 is transmitted over lead 58 to a count and comparator circuit 60 which forms another portion of energy processor 56.
; Count and comparator circuit 60 functions to separately count the input digital pulses relating to the solid-to-liquid phase transformation and the liquid-to-solid phase transfbrmation of the weld, subtract the latter count from the former count, compare the net count value with a pre-determined threshold value, and generate a go or no-go signal on lead 62 as a result of said comparison. FIGS. 5 ~- and 6 illustrate two t~vpical configurations which can be used in count and comparator circuit 60.
In FIGS. 5 and 6, the digital FM inpu-t signal on lead 58 is received at a first input of each of gates 101 and 102. Apprc3priate trigger pulses are received over leads 64 at a second input of each of gates 101 and 102.
The appropriate trigger pulses first activat~ gate 101 ~ ~ 30 for at least a portion of the weld period during which the ;~ solid-to-liquicl phase transformation occurs in the weld ~ .
, , . . ` . : , . .
.. . . . .
'. ' area, and then activate gate 102 for at least a portion of the post-weld period during which the liquid-to-solid phase transformation occurs in the weld area. The ac-tivation of ga-te 101 permits the pulses on lead 58, representing the stress-wave energy detected during -the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld nugget, to be gated into counter 104. The activation of gate 102 permits the pulses on lead 58, representing the stress-wave energy detected during the liquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld area, to be gated into co~mter 105. The combination of encoder 57 and counters 104 and 105 function in accordance with the equation:
E -~ v2(t)dt within a scale factor. The multiplier 70 squares the instantaneous waveform on lead 54, voltage control oscilla-tor 74 provides a digital representation of the continuous ; integration of the squared waveform, and counters 104 and ; 105 provide a sum of the integration over the time period of the solid-to-liquid and liquid-to-solid phase trans-formations.
, :-~ In FIG. 5 the energy counts stored in counters -~ 104 and 105 are transmitted to display means 106 and 107, respectively, where the results can be visually observed or mechanically recorded for possible research purposes, -~ and to a common comparator circuit 108. Comparator circuit 108 is adapted to subtract the count in counter 105 from '~ the count in counter 104, to compare the net resultant value with a preset threshold value, and to generate a go or no-go signal on lead 62 dependent upon the results of the comparison.
' _ g _ ' , ..
,~
3~
An alternative arrangement for count and comparator circuit 60 is shown in FIG. 6. There, an up-down counter 112 replaces both the counters 104 and 105 in display means 106 and 107 of FIG. 5. In operation, when gate 101 is enabled, counter 112 counts the number of pulses transmitted on lead 58 in an increasing fashion. When gate 102 is next enabled, counter 112 then subtracts each pulse on lead 58 from the iotal count obtained during the period when gate 101 was activated. Comparator 114 compares the net value stored in counter 112, after gate 102 has been deactivated, with a preset threshold value to generate a go or no-go signal on lead 62 dependent on the results of the comparison. The go or no-go signal on lead 62 from count and comparator circuit 60 can be used to energize a visual or audible means (not shown) for indicating a good or bad weld.
It must, of course, be understood that (a~ the greater the higher count in counter 104 differs from the count in counter 105, the greater the strength of the weld, and that (b) the preset thrashold value corresponds to a i 20 minimal acceptable weld strength value, which value can be easily determined by, for example, destructively testing a number of sample welds formed using the present system, and correlating the determined strength with the measurements obtained in counters 104 and 105, or counter 112, for e~ch of the sample welds.
It has been found that a relatively linear relationship exists between the net resultant stress wave energy value, as determined in comparator 108 of FIG. 5 and ~ -~ u~-down counter 112 of FIG. 6, and the pull strength of a ;~ ~ 30 weld, regardless of the composition of each of articles 12 ~ ~ and 14. The relatively linear relationship exists independent ~ - 1 0 -;
. ~
`:.., ~ . : ,..
~ . . . .. . .: , ;~.......... .. . .
of the weld energy s~pplied by welder 20 or the condition, such as cleanliness, of articles 12 and 14 at the inter-facing surfaces being welded. Therefore, variations in weld energy or the condition of articles 12 and 14 will merely be reflected in variations in stress-wave energy along the linear curve, and in turn, in the strength of the weld.
The properly timed trigger pulses transmitted on leads 64 ko gates 101 and 102 are preferably provided by a detecting means ~6 positioned :in welder 20 and a shaping circuit 68 connected between detecting means 66 (FIG. 1) and gates 101 and 102. Detecting means 66 is positioned in welder 20 to both detect the presence of a weld pulse as capacitor 26 discharges, and generate a signal in response thereto on leads 67 to shaping and timing circuit 68. Detecting means 66 can comprise any known form, such . as, for example, a toroidal coil detector mounted in -the secondary circuit of welder 22. Shaping and timing circuit 68 can comprise any known circuit which receives the signal . 20 from detecting means 66 and generates a trigger pulse to (a~ gate 101 duriny the weld period where at least the ~- solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval occurs in the weld area, and (b) gate 102 during the post-weld period where at least the liquid-to-solid phase transformation : : interval occurs in the weld area.
. Referring particularly to FIG. 2, waveforms (A~ to (D) typ:ically illustrate various waveforms as they might normally appear on an oscilloscope connected to . ~ a~propriate poxtions of the present weld evaluation system.
Waveform (A) depicts the current pulse across the weld interface as delivered by secondary winding (S) of trans-.'' :, - 11 -~, !
~, '.
,. ' ~ . . ' . . ' ' ., . . , ' ~. ' ' ': ' ' . ' ' former 30 -to electrodes 16 and 18 upon closure oE switch 28 in welder 20. Waveform (B) depic-ts temperature variations occurring in the weld area in response to the current pulse of waveform (A) passing through the weld interface between articles 12 and 14. The temperature attains a peak during the period where melting or plastic deformation in the weld area occurs. Waveform (C) illustrates typical trigger pulses generated by shaping and timing circuit 68 which are transmitted to gating circuits 101 and 102 over leads 64.
The weld enable pulse is used to enable gate 101 while the post-weld enable pulse is used to enable gate 102. Waveform (D) depicts stress waves detected by sensor 40 during the solid-to-liguid phase transformation interval (during weld period) and the liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval (during post-weld period). Typical waveforms found at various portions of the present system are also shown in FIGS. 1 and 3.
It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are simply illustrative of the principles of the invention. Various other modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art which will embody the principles of the invention and fall within the spirit and scope thereof.
, :.
!
, ~` .
~ ,~
, ~, . . . .
0~
an enable signal to VCO 81. 'L'he enable signal Erom window comparator 85 causes VCO 81 -to generate a diyital FM out~ut signal on lead 89 which increases from l()fl to 100fl as the input voltage level correspondingly increases through range B. ~he output from each of VCos S0-82 is coupled to a common OR-gate 90 and onto leacl 58 for transmission to a count and comparator circuit 60 of energy processor 56 (FIG. 1).
It is, of course, possible to adcl further window comparators and VCOs in a manner shown in FIC:. 4 to extend the range of operation. The voltage control oscillator circuitry 74 avoids the use of integrators which are generally limited in bandwidth and accuracy.
The digital FM output signal from encoder 57 is transmitted over lead 58 to a count and comparator circuit 60 which forms another portion of energy processor 56.
; Count and comparator circuit 60 functions to separately count the input digital pulses relating to the solid-to-liquid phase transformation and the liquid-to-solid phase transfbrmation of the weld, subtract the latter count from the former count, compare the net count value with a pre-determined threshold value, and generate a go or no-go signal on lead 62 as a result of said comparison. FIGS. 5 ~- and 6 illustrate two t~vpical configurations which can be used in count and comparator circuit 60.
In FIGS. 5 and 6, the digital FM inpu-t signal on lead 58 is received at a first input of each of gates 101 and 102. Apprc3priate trigger pulses are received over leads 64 at a second input of each of gates 101 and 102.
The appropriate trigger pulses first activat~ gate 101 ~ ~ 30 for at least a portion of the weld period during which the ;~ solid-to-liquicl phase transformation occurs in the weld ~ .
, , . . ` . : , . .
.. . . . .
'. ' area, and then activate gate 102 for at least a portion of the post-weld period during which the liquid-to-solid phase transformation occurs in the weld area. The ac-tivation of ga-te 101 permits the pulses on lead 58, representing the stress-wave energy detected during -the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld nugget, to be gated into counter 104. The activation of gate 102 permits the pulses on lead 58, representing the stress-wave energy detected during the liquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld area, to be gated into co~mter 105. The combination of encoder 57 and counters 104 and 105 function in accordance with the equation:
E -~ v2(t)dt within a scale factor. The multiplier 70 squares the instantaneous waveform on lead 54, voltage control oscilla-tor 74 provides a digital representation of the continuous ; integration of the squared waveform, and counters 104 and ; 105 provide a sum of the integration over the time period of the solid-to-liquid and liquid-to-solid phase trans-formations.
, :-~ In FIG. 5 the energy counts stored in counters -~ 104 and 105 are transmitted to display means 106 and 107, respectively, where the results can be visually observed or mechanically recorded for possible research purposes, -~ and to a common comparator circuit 108. Comparator circuit 108 is adapted to subtract the count in counter 105 from '~ the count in counter 104, to compare the net resultant value with a preset threshold value, and to generate a go or no-go signal on lead 62 dependent upon the results of the comparison.
' _ g _ ' , ..
,~
3~
An alternative arrangement for count and comparator circuit 60 is shown in FIG. 6. There, an up-down counter 112 replaces both the counters 104 and 105 in display means 106 and 107 of FIG. 5. In operation, when gate 101 is enabled, counter 112 counts the number of pulses transmitted on lead 58 in an increasing fashion. When gate 102 is next enabled, counter 112 then subtracts each pulse on lead 58 from the iotal count obtained during the period when gate 101 was activated. Comparator 114 compares the net value stored in counter 112, after gate 102 has been deactivated, with a preset threshold value to generate a go or no-go signal on lead 62 dependent on the results of the comparison. The go or no-go signal on lead 62 from count and comparator circuit 60 can be used to energize a visual or audible means (not shown) for indicating a good or bad weld.
It must, of course, be understood that (a~ the greater the higher count in counter 104 differs from the count in counter 105, the greater the strength of the weld, and that (b) the preset thrashold value corresponds to a i 20 minimal acceptable weld strength value, which value can be easily determined by, for example, destructively testing a number of sample welds formed using the present system, and correlating the determined strength with the measurements obtained in counters 104 and 105, or counter 112, for e~ch of the sample welds.
It has been found that a relatively linear relationship exists between the net resultant stress wave energy value, as determined in comparator 108 of FIG. 5 and ~ -~ u~-down counter 112 of FIG. 6, and the pull strength of a ;~ ~ 30 weld, regardless of the composition of each of articles 12 ~ ~ and 14. The relatively linear relationship exists independent ~ - 1 0 -;
. ~
`:.., ~ . : ,..
~ . . . .. . .: , ;~.......... .. . .
of the weld energy s~pplied by welder 20 or the condition, such as cleanliness, of articles 12 and 14 at the inter-facing surfaces being welded. Therefore, variations in weld energy or the condition of articles 12 and 14 will merely be reflected in variations in stress-wave energy along the linear curve, and in turn, in the strength of the weld.
The properly timed trigger pulses transmitted on leads 64 ko gates 101 and 102 are preferably provided by a detecting means ~6 positioned :in welder 20 and a shaping circuit 68 connected between detecting means 66 (FIG. 1) and gates 101 and 102. Detecting means 66 is positioned in welder 20 to both detect the presence of a weld pulse as capacitor 26 discharges, and generate a signal in response thereto on leads 67 to shaping and timing circuit 68. Detecting means 66 can comprise any known form, such . as, for example, a toroidal coil detector mounted in -the secondary circuit of welder 22. Shaping and timing circuit 68 can comprise any known circuit which receives the signal . 20 from detecting means 66 and generates a trigger pulse to (a~ gate 101 duriny the weld period where at least the ~- solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval occurs in the weld area, and (b) gate 102 during the post-weld period where at least the liquid-to-solid phase transformation : : interval occurs in the weld area.
. Referring particularly to FIG. 2, waveforms (A~ to (D) typ:ically illustrate various waveforms as they might normally appear on an oscilloscope connected to . ~ a~propriate poxtions of the present weld evaluation system.
Waveform (A) depicts the current pulse across the weld interface as delivered by secondary winding (S) of trans-.'' :, - 11 -~, !
~, '.
,. ' ~ . . ' . . ' ' ., . . , ' ~. ' ' ': ' ' . ' ' former 30 -to electrodes 16 and 18 upon closure oE switch 28 in welder 20. Waveform (B) depic-ts temperature variations occurring in the weld area in response to the current pulse of waveform (A) passing through the weld interface between articles 12 and 14. The temperature attains a peak during the period where melting or plastic deformation in the weld area occurs. Waveform (C) illustrates typical trigger pulses generated by shaping and timing circuit 68 which are transmitted to gating circuits 101 and 102 over leads 64.
The weld enable pulse is used to enable gate 101 while the post-weld enable pulse is used to enable gate 102. Waveform (D) depicts stress waves detected by sensor 40 during the solid-to-liguid phase transformation interval (during weld period) and the liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval (during post-weld period). Typical waveforms found at various portions of the present system are also shown in FIGS. 1 and 3.
It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are simply illustrative of the principles of the invention. Various other modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art which will embody the principles of the invention and fall within the spirit and scope thereof.
, :.
!
Claims (10)
1. A method for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation of a weld comprising the steps of:
(a) measuring stress-wave energy emitted by the material deformation during the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld area;
(b) measuring stress-wave energy emitted from cracks developing during the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld area; and (c) determining the strength of said weld by measuring the difference between the stress-wave energy measured during the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld area and the stress wave energy measured during the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation.
(a) measuring stress-wave energy emitted by the material deformation during the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld area;
(b) measuring stress-wave energy emitted from cracks developing during the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld area; and (c) determining the strength of said weld by measuring the difference between the stress-wave energy measured during the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld area and the stress wave energy measured during the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation.
2. A method according to claim 1 comprising the additional step of:
(d) generating an output signal indicative of a good weld when the magnitude of difference measurement exceeds a predetermined value.
(d) generating an output signal indicative of a good weld when the magnitude of difference measurement exceeds a predetermined value.
3. A method for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation of a weld comprising the steps of:
(a) measuring stress-wave energy emitted by the material deformation during the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld area;
(b) measuring stress-wave energy emitted from cracks developing during the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld area;
(c) generating an electrical signal representative of the magnitude of the difference between the stress-wave energy measured during the solid-to-liquid phase transforma-tion of the weld area and the stress-wave energy measured during the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld area; and (d) generating an output signal indicative of an acceptable weld when the magnitude of the difference determined in step (c) exceeds a predetermined value.
(a) measuring stress-wave energy emitted by the material deformation during the solid-to-liquid phase transformation of the weld area;
(b) measuring stress-wave energy emitted from cracks developing during the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld area;
(c) generating an electrical signal representative of the magnitude of the difference between the stress-wave energy measured during the solid-to-liquid phase transforma-tion of the weld area and the stress-wave energy measured during the post-weld liquid-to-solid phase transformation of the weld area; and (d) generating an output signal indicative of an acceptable weld when the magnitude of the difference determined in step (c) exceeds a predetermined value.
4. Apparatus for detecting and measuring stress waves propagating from a weld area between a first and a second workpiece being welded during a first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and a second liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval in the weld area for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation of said weld, the apparatus comprising:
(a) a sensor for detecting stress waves propagating in the material of said workpieces and generating an electrical output representative of the detected waves;
(b) a first signal processing means comprising:
(i) an amplifier for amplifying the electrical output from said sensor; and (ii) a band-pass filter connected to the output of said amplifier for generating an analog output signal within a pass-band falling outside the range of frequencies normally generated by components in proximity to the apparatus; and (c) second signal-processing means, connected to the output of said first-processing means, for measuring the stress-wave energy during said first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and said second liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval in said weld area, and thereafter determining the difference between the measurements of said first and second phase transformation intervals to provide a measurement of the strength of said weld.
(a) a sensor for detecting stress waves propagating in the material of said workpieces and generating an electrical output representative of the detected waves;
(b) a first signal processing means comprising:
(i) an amplifier for amplifying the electrical output from said sensor; and (ii) a band-pass filter connected to the output of said amplifier for generating an analog output signal within a pass-band falling outside the range of frequencies normally generated by components in proximity to the apparatus; and (c) second signal-processing means, connected to the output of said first-processing means, for measuring the stress-wave energy during said first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and said second liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval in said weld area, and thereafter determining the difference between the measurements of said first and second phase transformation intervals to provide a measurement of the strength of said weld.
5. Apparatus according to claim 4 wherein said apparatus further comprises:
(d) means for generating an output signal to indicate a good weld when the magnitude of the difference between the measurements of said first and second phase transformation intervals exceeds a predetermined value.
(d) means for generating an output signal to indicate a good weld when the magnitude of the difference between the measurements of said first and second phase transformation intervals exceeds a predetermined value.
6. Apparatus according to claim 4 wherein said second signal-processing means comprises:
(i) encoding means, connected to the output of said first signal processing means, for generating a digital signal indicative of the energy of the output signal of said first signal-processing means; and (ii) means for counting the digital pulses from said encoding means during said first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and said second liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval of said weld area, and thereafter determining the difference between said first and second transformation interval counts.
(i) encoding means, connected to the output of said first signal processing means, for generating a digital signal indicative of the energy of the output signal of said first signal-processing means; and (ii) means for counting the digital pulses from said encoding means during said first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and said second liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval of said weld area, and thereafter determining the difference between said first and second transformation interval counts.
7. Apparatus according to claim 6 wherein said apparatus further comprises:
(d) means for generating an output signal to indicate a good weld when the magnitude of the difference between said first and second transformation interval counts exceeds a predetermined value.
(d) means for generating an output signal to indicate a good weld when the magnitude of the difference between said first and second transformation interval counts exceeds a predetermined value.
8. Apparatus according to claim 4 wherein said second signal-processing means comprises:
(i) encoding means, connected to the output of said first signal processing means, comprising:
a multiplier circuit for squaring the output signal from said first signal processing means, and voltage control oscillator circuitry connected to said multiplier circuit for generating a digital frequency-modulated signal indicative of the energy of said squared signal from multiplier circuit; and (ii) means for counting the digital pulses from said encoding means during said first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and said second liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval of said weld area, and there-after determining the difference between said first and second transformation interval counts.
(i) encoding means, connected to the output of said first signal processing means, comprising:
a multiplier circuit for squaring the output signal from said first signal processing means, and voltage control oscillator circuitry connected to said multiplier circuit for generating a digital frequency-modulated signal indicative of the energy of said squared signal from multiplier circuit; and (ii) means for counting the digital pulses from said encoding means during said first solid-to-liquid phase transformation interval and said second liquid-to-solid phase transformation interval of said weld area, and there-after determining the difference between said first and second transformation interval counts.
9. Apparatus according to claim 8 wherein said apparatus further comprises:
(d) means for generating an output signal to indicate a good weld when the magnitude of the difference between said first and second transformation interval counts exceeds a predetermined value.
(d) means for generating an output signal to indicate a good weld when the magnitude of the difference between said first and second transformation interval counts exceeds a predetermined value.
10. Apparatus according to claim 9 wherein said voltage-control oscillator circuitry comprises:
a plurality of window comparators, each window comparator being adapted to both compare the squared signal from said multiplier circuit with a predetermined amplitude range representing a different portion of the maximum possible amplitude range for said squared signal, and generate an enable signal in response to the amplitude of said squared signal being within said respective predetermined amplitude range; and a plurality of voltage-control oscillators, each oscillator being associated with a separate one of said plurality of window comparators and adapted to generate a digital frequency-modulated signal, within a different predetermined frequency range, indicating the energy in said squared signal in response to said enable signal from the associated window comparator.
a plurality of window comparators, each window comparator being adapted to both compare the squared signal from said multiplier circuit with a predetermined amplitude range representing a different portion of the maximum possible amplitude range for said squared signal, and generate an enable signal in response to the amplitude of said squared signal being within said respective predetermined amplitude range; and a plurality of voltage-control oscillators, each oscillator being associated with a separate one of said plurality of window comparators and adapted to generate a digital frequency-modulated signal, within a different predetermined frequency range, indicating the energy in said squared signal in response to said enable signal from the associated window comparator.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US05/592,437 US3965726A (en) | 1975-07-02 | 1975-07-02 | Method and apparatus for the real-time evaluation of welds by emitted stress waves |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1079392A true CA1079392A (en) | 1980-06-10 |
Family
ID=24370643
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA254,324A Expired CA1079392A (en) | 1975-07-02 | 1976-06-08 | Method and apparatus for the real-time evaluation of welds by emitted stress waves |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS528887A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1079392A (en) |
| ES (1) | ES449509A1 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB1545241A (en) |
| IT (1) | IT1071223B (en) |
| SE (1) | SE409762B (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS62133351A (en) * | 1985-12-05 | 1987-06-16 | Nippon Steel Corp | Detecting method for welding defect in welded zone of seam welded pipe |
| JPH0689484B2 (en) * | 1987-10-28 | 1994-11-09 | 株式会社クラレ | Melt spinning method |
| CN114813356B (en) * | 2022-07-01 | 2022-09-23 | 江铃汽车股份有限公司 | Method for detecting welding quality of packaged chip welding leg |
-
1976
- 1976-06-08 CA CA254,324A patent/CA1079392A/en not_active Expired
- 1976-06-21 SE SE7607093A patent/SE409762B/en unknown
- 1976-07-01 IT IT68631/76A patent/IT1071223B/en active
- 1976-07-02 GB GB27605/76A patent/GB1545241A/en not_active Expired
- 1976-07-02 JP JP51077994A patent/JPS528887A/en active Granted
- 1976-07-02 ES ES449509A patent/ES449509A1/en not_active Expired
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| ES449509A1 (en) | 1977-08-01 |
| SE7607093L (en) | 1977-01-03 |
| JPS5644374B2 (en) | 1981-10-19 |
| IT1071223B (en) | 1985-04-02 |
| GB1545241A (en) | 1979-05-02 |
| SE409762B (en) | 1979-09-03 |
| JPS528887A (en) | 1977-01-24 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4007631A (en) | Method and apparatus for evaluating welds using stress-wave emission techniques | |
| US3986391A (en) | Method and apparatus for the real-time monitoring of a continuous weld using stress-wave emission techniques | |
| US3965726A (en) | Method and apparatus for the real-time evaluation of welds by emitted stress waves | |
| US4004456A (en) | Method and apparatus for the real-time, non-destructive evaluation of adhesion bonds using stress-wave emission techniques | |
| CA1105126A (en) | Apparatus for the in-situ detection and location of flaws in welds | |
| US3791199A (en) | Ultrasonic inspection method and apparatus | |
| US4207771A (en) | Method and apparatus for monitoring cracking using stress wave emission techniques | |
| US3237446A (en) | Selective defect detection and thickness measuring method and apparatus | |
| US4068524A (en) | Ultrasonic inspection of articles | |
| GB1572458A (en) | Method of and apparatus for eddy current testing of objects of magnetic material | |
| US4099045A (en) | Ultrasonic testing method and apparatus for resistance welding | |
| US4887025A (en) | Method and apparatus for the non-destructive checking of spot welds between metal sheets produced by electric welding | |
| US4531409A (en) | Test system for defect determination in welding seams | |
| US3798539A (en) | Pulse eddy current testing apparatus using pulses having a 25% duty cycle with gating at pulse edges | |
| US3453871A (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting flaws in materials | |
| CA1079392A (en) | Method and apparatus for the real-time evaluation of welds by emitted stress waves | |
| US4818841A (en) | Method for identifying the power output by a laser onto a workpiece | |
| CN114589396A (en) | Online monitoring method of ultrasonic welding machine | |
| US4086816A (en) | Method and apparatus for distinguishing stress wave emissions from mechanical noise | |
| US4287474A (en) | Method and apparatus for non-destructive quality testing of spot welds | |
| JPS5892859A (en) | Method of detecting defect of metallic material such as steel by using ultrasonic wave and ultrasonic flaw detector executing said method | |
| US4187725A (en) | Method for ultrasonic inspection of materials and device for effecting same | |
| US3591764A (en) | Method of checking metal expulsion in resistance welding | |
| RU2411517C1 (en) | Digital eddy-current flaw detector | |
| McNab et al. | Measurement technique for eddy-current arrays |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |