CA1069347A - Corrosion-resistant dental alloy having improved handling characteristics - Google Patents

Corrosion-resistant dental alloy having improved handling characteristics

Info

Publication number
CA1069347A
CA1069347A CA294,906A CA294906A CA1069347A CA 1069347 A CA1069347 A CA 1069347A CA 294906 A CA294906 A CA 294906A CA 1069347 A CA1069347 A CA 1069347A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
particles
alloy
weight
composition
dental
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA294,906A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Joseph Aliotta
Louis F.(Jr.) Alcuri
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals Corp
Original Assignee
Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals Corp filed Critical Engelhard Minerals and Chemicals Corp
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1069347A publication Critical patent/CA1069347A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C5/00Alloys based on noble metals
    • C22C5/06Alloys based on silver
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K6/00Preparations for dentistry
    • A61K6/80Preparations for artificial teeth, for filling teeth or for capping teeth
    • A61K6/84Preparations for artificial teeth, for filling teeth or for capping teeth comprising metals or alloys
    • A61K6/847Amalgams

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Dental Preparations (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)

Abstract

Abstract of the Invention A corrosion-resistant dental alloy is disclosed which has improved handling characteristics during the filling of a dental cavity. The alloy particles are characterized by having a higher than average silver and copper content at the surface, by their unique shape differing from either flake or spherical alloys, and a surface area of about 0.23-0.26 m2/gm. Handling characteris-tics of an amalgam prepared from such an alloy is similar to those of flake-like particles and differs from amalgams prepared from spherical particles as quantified by newly-described physical tests which have been found to correlate subjective experience. The alloy particles may be combined with other particles having conventional shapes to produce amalgams having handling characteristics required by the user.

Description

lQ69347 Back~round of the Invention .
The invention relates generally to the dental ~lloys which are used for filling teeth from which decayed portions have been removed. More particuiarly, the invention relates to an improved dental alloy having both corrosion resistance and improved handling characteristics compared to alloys of the prior art.

. ` ` ~ ... ..

`;` 10~93~7 The prior art emphasized the development of alloys which are corrosion resistant. While typical dental alloys are principally composed of silver and tin, they usually contain small amounts of copper and zinc. A typical alloy of the prior art would contain S at least 65 wt.% silver, about 1-2 wt.% zinc, and about 2-4 wt.%
copper, with the remainder being tin. Such alloys are not completely resistant to corrosion. It has been found that increasing the copper content of such alloys provides increased strength and also avoids the formation of what is known in the art as the gamma-two phase, a tin and mer~ury phase which has low resistance to corrosion and thus may lead to early deterioration of fillings. Typical of such high copper alloys are those disclosed in United States Patent 3,871,876 and United States Patent 3,997,328. Such dental alloy compositions increase the copper content from the typical 2-4 wt.% to the range of 8-27 wt.
in the first-mentioned patent and in the latter patent, from 20-40 wt.%.
While such alloys have improved corrosion resistance, another important characteristic of dental alloys has been neglected heretofore. The success of a dentist in filling a dental cavity is related to the handling characteristics of the alloy after it is amalgamated with mercury. For example, the high copper alloy disclosed in U.S. 3,871,876, is typically produced by air atomization from the molten state which results in a spherical or spheroidal form for the finished alloy. It is characteristic of alloys having a spherical shape that they feel relatively soft to the dentist and appear to require delicate handling. They are sometimes difficult to pack into a dental ,, ; , ~ :

cavity since they have a tendency to be forced up the wall of the cavity if too much pressure is exerted or an instrument is used which has a small bearing area. Consequently, many dentists find that such spherical material is not well-adapted to their individual technique. As a result, they may be unable to take advantage of the corrosion resistance inherent with spherical alloys having a high copper content.
One method of improving handling characteristics of conven-tional dental alloys is disclosed and claimed in United States Patent 3,997,327. In that invention a major portion of spherical particles is combined with a minor portion of microcut irregular particles, or flakes. Typical dental alloys in the prior art generally have been of the flake type, which inherently requires a higher pressure in order to pack it into a dental cavity than is characteristic of the spherical particles. By combining spherical particles with flake particles having the same composition, it is possible to improve the handling characteris-tics of the resulting mixture. Such a combination, having a conventionally low copper content, has less resistance to corrosion than the higher copper content alloys previously dis-cussed.
The present invention has as its objective providing improve handling characteristics to corrosion-resistant dental alloys.

Summary_of the Invention The dental alloy of the invention combines corrosion resis-tance and good handling qualities. It is corrosion resistant in that it has a relatively high copper content. Its composition ``
I ` 106934~7 corresponds generally to that of the spherical material disclosed in United Sta~es Patent 3,871,876 being within the range of about 47~ to 70~ by weight silver, 20~ to 32~ by weight tin, and 7% to 27% by weight copper. As is true of the '876 patent, the particles have a higher than average silver and copper content at the surface of the particles.
In the present invention the alloy is produced in an irregular shape rather than the spherical form typical of the '871 patent, but differing from the irregular flake-like particle typical of the prior art. The alloy particles according to the present invention characteristically have a surface area of about 0.23-0.26 m2/gm, which is 20-30% greater than the typical spherical particle and about 20-30% less than typical flake-like particles. They may be produced by a variant of the air atomi-zation process used to form spherical particles, although othertechniques may be used.
When amalgamated with mercury, the alloy particles of the invention have handling qualities similar to those of flake particles as shown by empirical tests as described hereinafter, which have been found to relate to subjective experience with the condensation and carving characteristics of amalgams.
In another aspect of the invention, the corrosion-resistant alloy particles having the unique shape of the invention may be combined with particles of conventional shapes, either spherical and/or flake-like forms. One type of particle may be the spherical material disclosed in United States Patent 3,871,876, having a composition within the range of about 47% to 70% by weight silver, 20~ to 32% by weight tin, and 7~ to 27% by weight copper. Another useful type of particle has the relatively low 10~934'~
copper and high silver content typical of the prior art and has a flake-like shape. In a preferred embodiment, such particies will have a composition of about 55% to 75% by weight silver, 20% to 40~ by weight tin, 0% to 10% by weight copper and 0% to 2~ by weight 2inc. By combining suitable proportions of spherical particles, randomly-shaped microcrystalline particles of this invention and flake-like particles, the handling characteristics of amalgams prepared from such mixtures can be adjusted to suit the requirements of the individual user. Although any proportions may be used of the particles which have a substantial copper content, the particles having a relatively low copper content are limited to a maximum of 25% by weight of the alloy mixture in order to retain the corrosion resistance provided by the particles having higher copper content.
In another aspect of the invention the dental alloy is prepared by the steps of formulating a metal composition as given above, melting said composition, microcasting particles according to the invention, pelletizing said particles, and heat treating said pellets to adjust the handling characteristics of amalgams made with said pellets to correspond with characteristics of amalgams made directly with said particles. When particles of conventional spherical or flake-like shapes are added, they will be mixed with the irregular particles of the invention prior to the pelletizing step.

Brief Descri~tion of the Drawinys Figure la shows the spherical particles of the prior art corresponding to United States 3,871,876.

Figure lb shows particles corresponding to a dental alloy of the present invention.

~ 10~i9347 Figure lc shows particles corresponding to microcut or flake-like particles of the prior art.
Figuxe ld shows a mixture of the particles of la and lb.
Figure le shows mixtures of the particles of la, lb, and lc.
Figure 2 plots the results of tests described herein and applied to several dental amalgams.

Description of the Preferred Embodiments A dentist in packing an amalgam prepared from a dental alloy and mercury into a dental cavity considers two factors to be of particular importance. First, what may be termed "condensation"
relates to the resistance of the alloy to being packed into the cavity by the dentist using typical instruments. It will be clear that an amalgam must have sufficient plasticity when under pressure to enable it to flow into and completely fill all portions of the cavity, thereby preventing the formation of open spaces in the finished filling which could weaken it or permit further decay to the tooth structure. At the same time, the amalgam must not be so fluid as to flow out from beneath the dental instruments during condensation of the amalgam and move up the wall of the cavity. In such situations, a nonuniform degree of packing necessarily results, with poor adaptation to the cavity and increased porosity which weakens the filling and may result in further decay. Thus, one important handling characteric _ tic of an amalgam is its ability to be pressed into a dental cavity to fill all the smàll openings under the desired conden-sation pressure, while not being so soft that the dentist cannot adequately compact the amalgam. This condens~ation pressure may be approximated by an empirical test which will be hereinafter des-cribed and which is useful in connection wit~ the present inven-tion.

i - , - .

10~ '7 The second h~ndllng chLIrllcterL:~lc oE lmport.lnce ~o ~he dentist is the ab:Llity of an amal~am to bc c~rvcd or shaped in order to finish the exterior surface of the compacted filling.
An amalgam also must be of a desired plasticity in order to be satisfactorily carved or shaped. An amalgam may be satisfact-orily packed into a dental cavity but be difficult to smooth and shape when the packing process is completed. On the other hand, an amalgam which is easy to carve and shape may be difficult to pack properly into a dental cavity. Another empirical test to be described hereinafter may be related to the carving characteristic of the amalgams derived f~om various dental alloys.
As described in U.S. Patent 3,253 9 783 and elsewhere, the gas atomization technique may be used to product spherical or spheroidal particles from molten dental alloys. Particles are screened after cooling to provide a powdered alloy having particles in the size range of about 1 micron to about 65 microns. Larger and smaller particles are separated and recycled to be remelted and recast. Spherical particles such as are illustrated in Figure la have an average surface to volume ratio of about 0.21 m2/gm as measured by the usual BET apparatus, which is a well-known conventional apparatus for the measurement of surface by the Brunover, Emmett and Teller method. Flake alloys of approximately the same size as illustrated in Figure lc are substantially different, having a surface to volume ratio of about 0.33 m /gm. A mixture of spherical particles with flake particles as disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,997,~27 will have a ratio between the two extremes. Rather than mixing spherical and flake particles9 the alloy of the present invention is preferably produced in a single step process to provide a new particle shape.

jl/ -7-10693~7 The air atomization technique or other microcasting method may be altered to cause distortion of the particles, which otherwise freeze in a spherical or spheroidal shape. A suitable morphology is illustrated in Figure lb. The spherical form of Figure la is no longer predominant. Neither do the particles have the distinctive shape of microcut, flake-liXe particles, as seen in Figure lc, nor do they have the striations characteristic of such particles.
The alloy particles according to the invention need not be exactly the same as those of Figure lb. Rather, the particles of the invention may be characterized by their surface area and the handling characteristics measured as herein~efore described.
Typically, particles of the invention will have a surface area within the range of 0.22 to 0.31 m2/gm and preferably in the range of 0.23 to 0.26 m /gm. Specifically, the particles of Figure 2 have a median surface area of about 0.24 m /gm. It should be noted that the surface area is related in part to the particle size, thus the values give~ herein relate to a particle size distribution suitable for dental alloys and as specifically reported hereinafter for the alloy of the invention.
It should be further noted that the surface area measured by the BET apparatus is much larger than the geometric exterior surface of the particles. For example, a perfect sphere would have a surface area only about 10% of that measured for the generally spherical particles of Figure la. The additional 90%
of the measured surface is evidently due to surface roughness and porosity. Since this additional surface seems less likely to have a large effect on the handling properties of amalgams than the geometric surface, ~he geometric surface of the particles 10~i93~7 , should be compared rather than the BET surface. However, the l geometric surface has not been measured although it may be ¦ approximated by subtracting about 90~ of the BET value for l comparison purposes.
5 ¦ Amalgams are produced by mixing mercury with dental alloys of the invention. At the completion of the amalgamation process, the amalgam is condensed into a tooth cavity by a dentist and then the filling is carved or shaped until the amalgam has become so hard that it cannot be worked. This period is typically about six minutes. The dentist packs or condenses the amalgam into the tooth cavity while the amalgam is still soft enough to do so. The pressure required i5 quite important to the dentist as has been previously discussed and to characterize dental alloys of the invention we have chosen to designate the resistanc~
of the amalgam one minute after amalgamation is complete as the condensation factor. A lower value indicates that an amalgam is stiffer and requires more pressure to pack or condense it into a tooth cavity than an amalgam having a higher numerical value.
The test used to obtain values reported herein for conden-sation factors may be described as follows. A pellet of dental alloy is mixed with the recommended amount of mercury in an amalgamator for the manufacturer's recommended time. A com-A mercially a~ailable Wig-L-Bug Model 5AR manufactured by Crescent Corporation was used in the tests reported herein, although other amalgamators would be acceptable. After the amalgamation is complete, the amalgam is immediately placed on a flat glass plate and covered b~ another such glass plate and pressed to a one millimeter thickness, as determined by one millimeter spacers 101~9~7 placed between the plates. The top plate is removed and measure-ments are made of the resistance of the flattened amalgam disc during the hardening period. For the measurements reported hereir an Instron testing unit model 1101 produced by Instron Corporatio was employed. A constant load of five pounds was placed on a two millimeter steel ball in contact with the amalgam. The depth of the indentation made by the ball when the load was applied for fifteen seconds is used as a measure of the resistance of the amalgam. Tes~s were made at one minute intervals for a period of five minutes, or until no further change in the resistance was measured. The period of time during which measurements were ; made approximates the time which a dentist uses to fill a tooth cavity and to car~e the filling. Test results obtained with prior art dental alloys in spherical and flake form are compared with the dental alloy of the invention in the example~ below.
The carvability factor relates to the ability of a hardening dental amalgam to be carved and shaped by dental instruments after it has been compacted. It will be apparent that after the compaction or condensation period (about 2 minutes) the dentist will have a limited time in which to shape or carve the hardening amalgam. A variant of the test previously described is used to obtain a carving factor. The two millimeter ball loaded by a five pound weight is replaced with a one pound Gilmore needle having a one millimeter poi~t. The Gilmore needle is normally used for measuring setting rates of cements and plastic materials and has been described in an article by Peyton and Craig in Restorative Dental Materials, 4th ed., 1971. It has been found that the lighter loaded Gilmore needle will fail to penetrate an amalgam after it is sufficiently hardened. The time between the end of the amalgamation process and the failure of the Gilmore needle to penetrate the hardening amalgam may be used as an index of the carvability of the amalgam.

:: . . . .

lOti9347 A dental alloy is prepared by mixing individual metal powderc and resulting in an overall composition 58 wt.% Ag, 29 wt.% Sn, 13 wt.% Cu. The powdered mixture is melted and processed in an air atomization apparatus modified to minimize the formation of spherical particles by contacting the molten droplets during the cooling process, thereby producing the randomly-shaped micro-crystalline particles of the invention. The particles formed hav~
a surface area of 0.24 m2/gm. They are sieved to produce a powdered alloy according to the invention as shown in Figure lb and having particles sized within the range of 1 micron to 45 microns. The powdered alloy is then pelleted and mixed with suf~
ficient mercury to form an amalgam having an alloy to mercury ratio of 1:1. The amalgann is measured for its resistance to condensation pressure according to the test hereinbefore describe and the results plotted on Figure 2.

A dental alloy is prepared by mixiny individual metal powder and resulting in an overall composition 58 wt.% Ag, 29 wt.~ Sn, 13 wt.~ Cu. The powdered mixture is melted and processed in an air atomization apparatus according to U.S. 3,871,~76 to produce spherical particles and shown in Figure la. The particles have a surface area of 0.21 m2/gm. After sieving the particles are within the range of 1 micron to 40 micron. The powdered alloy is then pelleted and mixed with sufficient mercury to form an amalgan having an alloy to mercury ratio of 1:1. The amalgam is subjectec to the condensation factor test described hereinbefore and the results plotted on Figure 2.

~ 10ti9347 A dental alloy is prepared by mixing individual metal particles and resulting in an overall composition 68 wt.% Ag, 27 wt.% Sn, 4.4 wt.~ Cu, 0.6 wt.~ Zn. The powdered mixture is melted and cast into a bar, from which it is cut on a lathe into ; flake-like particles as shown in Figure lc according to the usual technique of the prior art. The particles have a surface area of 0.33 m2/gm. After sieving the particles are within the range of 2 microns to 50 microns. The powdered alloy is then pelleted and mixed with sufficient mercury to form an amalgam having an alloy to mercury ratio of 1.2:1. The amalgam is sub-jected to the condensation factor test described hereinbefore and the results plotted on Figure 2.
As shown in Figure 2 flake-like alloys of the prior art (Figure lc and Example 3) are firmer when freshly amalgamated thar amalgams made with spherical particles. Amalgams made with flake particles require heavier pressure when being condensed or packed into a tooth cavity. The condensation factors expressed as milli-meters indentation after one minute from completion of the amalgamation process are 10.75, 18, and 10.3 for the alloys of Examples 1-3 respectively. The spherical particles of Example 2 and Figure la produce an amalgam which is soft when freshly mixed with mercury. As previously indicated, dentists often find amalgams made with spherical particles to be delicate to handle and difficult to condense properly. The alloy of the invention (Figure lb and Example 1) has a unique morphology and ic neither spherical nor flake-like. The handling characteristics are similar to those of the flake-like particles of the prior art during the condensation of the amalgam into a tooth cavity.

` 101~9347 The carving period (typically 2 to 5 minutes after amalga-mation) represents the time period when the dentist shapes the compacted filling to suit the patient's bite. After a certain period the amalgam becomes unduly hard and can no longer be worked with the usual dental instruments. After about one hour a typical amalgam has reached substantial strength and can with-stand the pressure of normal use. As is indicated by Figure 2, the effect of particle shape on the handling characteristics of amalgams is more significant during the condensation period than during the carving period. In fact, one might conclude from Figure 2 that amalgams made according to the invention would be more difficult to carve than those made with either spherical or flake-like particles. However, measurements of the three particles in the preceding examples were made by substituting a Gilmore needle for the two millimeter ball as previously described, with the following results.
TABLE I

Carvino Factor Particle Type Time, minutes - Penetration Ceasec .
Spherical (Ex. 2) 4.15 Microcrystalline (Ex. 1) 3.15 Flake (Ex. 3) 2.15 The above results indicate that spherical particles can be carved with less force and for a longer time than the randomly-shaped microcrystalline particles of the invention, which in turn can be carved with less force than the flake-like particles.

10693~7 As previously discussed, the alloy of the invention may ~e produced by modification of the air atomization process so that molten metal is distorted instead of frozen into spherical form.
Such particles may be produced by other processes, for example, by splat~cooling of a stream of molten alloy and by modifying the convPntional metallizing process. However produced, the particle~
will have a surface area intermediate that of spheres and that of flakes in the preferred form characterized by having a surface area of 0.23-0.26 m2/gm, which is 20-30~ greater than the typical spherical particle and 20-30% less than the typical flake-like particles.
The composition will be within the range of about 47% to 70 by weight silver, 20% to 32~ by weight tin, and 7% to 27~ by weight copper which corresponds to that of the spherical particle of U.S. 3,871,876. It has been found that the alloy in the unique form of the invention still has corrosion resistance as measured by the anodic polarization test described in U.S. Patent 3,997,329, even though the particles are no longer spherical in form. The anodic polarization test indicates by the absence of the gamma-two phase that the amalgam is resistant to corrosive attack. It is believed that the higher than average silver and copper content found at the surface of the irregular particles of the invention as well as in the spherical particles of U.S.
3,871,876 is related to the relatively high copper content of the alloy and the speed at which it is cooled from the molten state. It is expected that many methods of forming particles from molten metal which involve rapid cooling can be employed.

10~à93~ ~

Although no explanation is presently available, it has been found that if the alloy of the invention is prepared as a mixture of about 60~ by weight spheres and about 40% by weight flakes having the same composition, the handling properties are similar to that of particles of the invention, but the amalgam is no longer corrosion resistant by the anodic polarization test.
However, with their unique morphology the particles of the invention unexpectedly combine both corrosion resistance and improved handling characteristics.

A dental alloy is prepared by mixing 40% by weight of the randomly-shaped microcrystalline particles of Example 1 with 60%
by weight of the spherical particles of Example 2. The mixed particles ha~e a surface area of about 0.23 m2/gm and are within the size range of 1 micron to 45 microns. The powdered alloy is then pelleted and mixed with sufficient mercury to form an amalgan having an alloy to mercury ratio oE 1:1. The amalgam is sub-jected to the condensation factor test described hereinbefore.
The mixed particles of Example 4 provide amalgams having handling properties intermediate amalgams made with the spherical particles of Example 2 and the randomly-shaped particles of Exam-ple 1. The condensation factors expressed as millimeters indenta-tion after one minute from completion of the amalgamation process are 10.75, 18, and 14.5 for the alloys of Examples 1, 2, and 4 respectively. The spherical particles of Example 2 and Figure la produce an amalgam which is soft when freshly mixed with mercury.

10~9347 As previously indicated, dentists often find amalgams made with spherical particles to be delicate to handle and difficult to condense properly. The randomly-shaped particles (Figure lb and Example 1) have a unique morphology which provides handling characteristics similar to those of the flake-like particles of the prior art during the condensation of the amalgam into a tooth cavity. The mixture of spherical particles and randomly-shaped particles (Figure ld) provides intermediate handling characteris-tics which will be experienced by the dentist as a moderately soft amalgam which requires less pressure for proper condensation into a cavity. The combination of Example 4 is only one possible mixture. Clearly, mixtures of any prGportions could be made to suit the individual requirements of the user. Another satis-factory mixture combines 85% by weight of the particles of Example 1 with 15~ of the particles of Example 2. The surface ~ area of such a mixture is about 0.22 m2/gm and the size distri-c bution is within the range of about 1 micron to about 45 microns.
' An amalgam made of such a mixture will be generally firmer than the mixture of Example 4 and its condensation factor after one minute would be about 12 millimeters.
Measurements of the individual types of particles with the mixture of Example 4 were made by substituting a Gilmore needle for the two millimeter ball as previously described, with the ~ following results.

;~ 25 TABLE II
Carvinq Factor Particle Type Time, minutes - Penetration Ceased Spherical (Ex. 2) 4.15 Microcrystalline (Ex. 1) 3.15 Mixed spherical and 3.50 microcrystalline (Ex. 4) 10~i93~7 The above results indicate that spherical particles can be carved with less force and for a longer time than the randomly-shaped microcrystalline particles. The mixture, as would be expected, can be carved with less force for a longer period than the amalgams made with the randomly-shaped particles of Example 1 but the mixture is firmer and hardens quicker than amalgams made with spherical particles.
Mixing particles provides a means by which the handling characteristics of dental amalgams may be adjusted to suit the .
requirements of the individual user. At the same time, when only spherical and irregularly-shaped particles are used, both the component particles are corrosion resistant and the resulting mixtures preserve the corrosion resistance of the components.
For this reason no composition limits need be set on mixtures of these particles, which may be varied to meet the handling characteristics of the intended user, and thus could approach the softness characteristic of amalgams made solely of spherical particles or the firmness characteristic of randomly-shaped micrycrystalline particles.

- 20 ~XAMPLE 5 A dental alloy is prepared by mixing 25% by weight of the irregularly-shaped microcrystalline particles of Example 1 with 60% by weight of the spherical particles of Example 2 and with 15~ by weight of the flake-like particles of Example 3. The mixed particles have a surface area of about 0.24 m2/gm and are within the size range of 1 micron to 45 microns. The powdered alloy is then pelleted and mixed with sufficient mercury to form an amalgam having an alloy to mercury ratio of 1:1. The amalgam is subjected to the condensation factor test described herein-before.

llD69347 The mixed particles of Example 5 and Fig~re le provideamalgams having handling properties intermediate amalgams made with the spherical particles of Example 2 and the flake-like particles of Example 3. The condensation factors expressed as millimeters indentation after one minute from completion of the amalgamation process are 10.75, 18, 14.0, and 13.0 for the alloys of Examples 1, 2, 3, and 5 respectively. The mixture of spherica particles with randomly-shaped particles and flake-like particles (Figure le) provides intermediate handling characteristics which will be experienced by the dentist as a moderately soft amalgam which requires less pressure for proper condensation into a cavity~ The combination of Example 5 is only one possible mixture. Clearly, other mixtures could be made to suit the individual requirements of the user. Another satisfactory mixture combines 60% by weight of the particles of Example 1 with 25% by weight of the particles of Example 2 and 15% by weight of the particles of Example 3. The surface area of such a mixture is about 0.25 m2/gm and the size distribution is within the range of about 1 micron to about 45 microns. An amalgam made of such a mixture will be generally firmer than the mixture of Exampl~ 4 and its condensation factor after one minute would be about 12.5 millimeters.
The particles of Examples 1 and 2, having a relatively high copper content overall and a higher than average silver and copper content at the surface are corrosion resistant and may be combined in any proportions found desirable to adjust the handling characteristics of amalgams made from alloys of the invention. The relatively high silver and low copper content of the flake-like particles of Example 3 are not so resistant to corrosion.

106~3~7 Consequently, the flake-like particles may be included in an alloy according to the invention as desired to adjust handling characteristics of amalgams made therewith, but limited to a maximum of 25% by weight of the alloy in order to retain the corrosion resistance of the other two particles. The flake-like particles typically will have a composition of about 55% to 75%
by weight silver, 20% to 40% by weight tin, 0% to 10% by weight .-copper, and 0% to 2% by weight zinc.
Measurements of the three particles in the preceding example made by substituting a Gilmore needle for the two millimeter ball as previously described, give the following results.

, TABLE III

Carving Factor Particle TypeTime, minutes - Penetration Ceasec Spherical (Ex. 2) 4.15 Microcrystalline tEx. 1) 3.15 Flake-like (Ex. 3) 2.15 Mixed particles (Ex. 5) 3.50 The above results indicate that spherical particles can be carved with less force and for a longer time than the randomly-shaped microcrystalline particles, which have the same advantage over flake-like particles~ The mixture of particles, as would be expected, can be carved with less force for a longer period than the amalgams made with the flake-like particles of the alloy of the invention (Example 1) but the mixture is firmer and hardens quicker than amalgams made with spherical particles.
Mixing particles according to the invention provides a means by which the handling characteristics of dental amalgams may be adjusted to suit the requirements of the individual user. At the same timer when the flake~ e particles are limited to a maximum of 25 weight percent, the resulting mixtures are found to have satisfactory corrosion resistance.

~1 -19- ~

lC~3~7 After the particles have been produced, they are sieved to provide a typical particle size distribution as follows:

Microns Wt.%
52 0.3 to 1.4 44-52 1.4 to 12.2 ` 38-44 1.6 to 8.9 30-38 20.9 to 24.6 20-30 26.1 to 35.7 10-20 24.0 ~o 35.4 ~ 10 10 3.6 to 7.2 f The mean particle size is typically 20 to 26.5 microns. Although some variation about the above typical size distribution may be ; made to adjust the handling characteristics, an amalgam prepared with particles having a siqnificantly different size distribution from that given above will have handling characteristics differin from those reported herein. In general, the smaller the average particle size, the firmer the amalgam will be and the shorter the working time.
As previously discussed, the surface area of the alloy particles of the invention having the size distribution as given above will be found to have a surface to volume ratio of about 0.23-0.26 m2/gm. With other size distributions, the surface to volume ratio may be as wide as 0.22 to 0.32 m2/gm.
Particles may be us~d directly to form amalgams, especially if employed in pre-mixed dental capsules. Often the particles are pelletized for use in dispensers designed to provide the desired amount of mercury needed to amalgamate with the pelleted alloy.
The pelletizing process has been found to alter the handling properties of the resulting amalgam, generally providing a dry and less plastic amalgam than if the powdered alloy were used .~: -- ~

~0~;3~7 directly. It has been found that by heat treating the pellets in a vacuum for a suitable time, the mechanical properties and useful working time of the alloy can be returned to their original and more desirable values. Typically a vacuum of about ten microns (0.01 mm Hg absolute pressure) has been found to be acceptable, the determining factor being the need to avoid oxidation of the metals with the consequent degradation of physical properties and corrosion resistance. The heat treatment is carried out typically between 100 and 700F (37.8 to 370C) as required until the handling characteristics of an amalgam made from the pellets matches those of the unpelleted powder, as measured by the condensation and carving factors.
The foregoing discussion of the preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims which follow.

, :~ , .. ., :

Claims (10)

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A corrosion resistant dental alloy in particulate form for use as a filling for dental cavities after amalga-mation with mercury having a composition of about 47% to 70%
by weight silver, about 20% to 32% by weight tin, and about 7% to 27% by weight copper, and a higher than average silver and copper content at the surface of particles wherein the improvement comprises the particles of said alloy being characterized by being randomly-shaped and microcrystalline and having a mean particle size of about 20 to 26.5 microns and a surface area about 20% to 30% greater than spherical particles and about 20% to 30% less than flake-like particles, whereby said alloy retains the resistance after amalgamation of spherical particles of the same composition and has handling characteristics similar to those of flake-like particles.
2. A corrosion resistant dental alloy of Claim 1 having a BET surface area between about 0.23 m2/gm to 0.26 m2/gm.
3. The alloy of Claim 1 amalgamated with about one part by weight of mercury per part of alloy to form a dental amalgam.
4. A corrosion resistant dental alloy composition in particulate form for use as a filling for dental cavities after amalgamation with mercury, said composition comprising about 15% to 40% by weight of the alloy of Claim 1 and about 85% to 60% by weight of a second alloy having essentially the same composition and mean particle size and having a spherical shape.
5. A corrosion resistant dental alloy composition in particulate form for use as a filling for dental cavities after amalgamation with mercury, said composition comprising about 25% to 60% by weight of the alloy of Claim 1, about 60%

to 25% by weight of a second alloy having essentially the same composition and mean particle size and having a spherical shape, and about 15 to 25% by weight of a third alloy having a composition consisting essentially of about 55% to 75% by weight of silver, 20% to 40% by weight tin, 0% to 10% by weight copper, and 0% to 2% by weight zinc and being in the form of flake-like particles having a mean particle size in the range of 25-30 microns.
6. A method of preparing a corrosion-resistant dental alloy adapted for amalgamation with mercury comprising: (a) formulating a metal composition of about 47% to 70% by weight silver, about 20% to 32% by weight tin, and about 7% to 27%
by weight copper; (b) melting the composition of (a); (c) forming by microcasting randomly-shaped microcrystalline alloy particles having a higher than average silver and copper content at the surface of said particles and characterized by having a mean particle size in the range of about 20 to 26.5 microns and a BET surface area about 20% to 30% greater than spherical particles and about 20% to 30% less than flake-like particles.
7. The method of Claim 6 further comprising the steps of: (d) pelletizing the particles of (c); (e) heat treating the pellets of (d) at a temperature between about 100°F and 700°F for a period of time sufficient to match the handling characteristics of amalgams made with said pellets to amalgams made with the particles of (c).
8. The method of Claim 6 wherein said particles of (c) have a surface to volume ratio of about 0.23 m2/gm to 0.26 m2/gm.
9. The method of Claim 7 further comprising the step prior to pelletizing step (d) of mixing, with the particles of step (c), particles of a second alloy having essentially the same composition and mean particle size and having a spherical shape, in an amount to yield an alloy composition containing about 15% to 40% by weight of particles of step (c) and about 60% to 85% by weight of particles of said second alloy.
10. The method of Claim 7 further comprising the step prior to pelletizing step (d) of mixing, with the particles of step (c), particles of a second alloy having essentially the same composition and mean particle size and having a spherical shape, and particles of a third alloy having a composition consisting essentially of about 55% to 75% by weight silver, 20% to 40% by weight tin, 0% to 10% by weight copper, and 0% to 2% by weight zinc and being in the form of flake-like particles having a mean particle size in the range of 25-30 microns, in amounts to yield an alloy compos-ition containing about 25% to 60% by weight of the particles of step (c), about 60% to 25% by weight of particles of said second alloy, and about 15% to 25% by weight of particles of said third alloy.
CA294,906A 1977-01-17 1978-01-13 Corrosion-resistant dental alloy having improved handling characteristics Expired CA1069347A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US76018377A 1977-01-17 1977-01-17
US76018277A 1977-01-17 1977-01-17
US76018177A 1977-01-17 1977-01-17

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1069347A true CA1069347A (en) 1980-01-08

Family

ID=27419533

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA294,906A Expired CA1069347A (en) 1977-01-17 1978-01-13 Corrosion-resistant dental alloy having improved handling characteristics

Country Status (5)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS5390122A (en)
CA (1) CA1069347A (en)
DE (1) DE2801721A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2377191A1 (en)
GB (1) GB1594643A (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4255192A (en) * 1979-12-17 1981-03-10 Pennwalt Corporation Homogenous bonding of dispersed phase alloy
WO1983002959A1 (en) * 1982-02-18 1983-09-01 Sybron Corp Admix dental alloy and amalgam
JPS58171540A (en) * 1982-04-02 1983-10-08 Atsushige Satou Alloy for dental amalgam containing selenium and its production
DE3240256C1 (en) * 1982-10-30 1983-09-29 Blendax-Werke R. Schneider Gmbh & Co, 6500 Mainz Process for the production of silver-tin master alloys for dental amalgams
JPS6075540A (en) * 1983-07-08 1985-04-27 ジエフリ−・ジエイムス・チ−タム Dental amalgam alloy

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3841860A (en) * 1973-07-11 1974-10-15 Dentsply Res & Dev Dental alloy
US3871876A (en) * 1974-03-18 1975-03-18 Kamal Asgar Dental Amalgam
US3997328A (en) * 1975-12-29 1976-12-14 Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation Dental amalgams
US3997327A (en) * 1975-12-29 1976-12-14 Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation Dental composition
US3997330A (en) * 1975-12-29 1976-12-14 Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation Dental amalgams

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2377191B1 (en) 1983-08-12
FR2377191A1 (en) 1978-08-11
JPS5390122A (en) 1978-08-08
DE2801721A1 (en) 1978-07-20
GB1594643A (en) 1981-08-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3871876A (en) Dental Amalgam
US4235631A (en) Corrosion-resistant dental alloy having improved handling characteristics
CA1069347A (en) Corrosion-resistant dental alloy having improved handling characteristics
US5730600A (en) Method for forming a dental restoration
US4226622A (en) Corrosion-resistant dental alloy
CN109794862A (en) Stainless steel pulp cavity reamer combined binder CBN grinding wheel and its application
CA1054398A (en) Dental amalgams
US3980472A (en) Dental amalgam
US3997329A (en) Dental composition
US4234339A (en) Corrosion-resistant dental alloy
US4080199A (en) Lathe cut dental alloy powder
US4129944A (en) Dental constructions and dental alloys
CA1154616A (en) Corrosion-resistant dental alloy having improved handling characteristics
EP0225700A1 (en) Method for producing amalgamable alloy and alloy produced thereby
CA1067316A (en) Dental alloy and amalgam
CA1066924A (en) Dental alloy and amalgam
Powers et al. Apparent modulus of elasticity of dental amalgams
US5354353A (en) Amalgamable composition and method of production
EP0033628A2 (en) A product to be used in dental amalgams
US6103383A (en) High tungsten, silicon-aluminum dental alloy
JPH0581655B2 (en)
US5490870A (en) Amalgamable composition and method of production
US4268308A (en) Dental alloys
CA2229896C (en) Method for forming a dental restoration
KR820002313B1 (en) Non metal dental alloy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry