CA1063994A - Visual approach and landing system for aircraft with supplementary indicating and warning devices - Google Patents
Visual approach and landing system for aircraft with supplementary indicating and warning devicesInfo
- Publication number
- CA1063994A CA1063994A CA253,387A CA253387A CA1063994A CA 1063994 A CA1063994 A CA 1063994A CA 253387 A CA253387 A CA 253387A CA 1063994 A CA1063994 A CA 1063994A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- bars
- approach
- pilot
- approaching
- predetermined angle
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A visual approach and landing system for aircraft including a basic slope indicator support on or adjacent the ground is predetermined relation to a runway for visually indicating to a pilot the correct path which he should follow when approaching the runway together with supplementary warning devices to provide the pilot with a definite visual warning of a low approach and other indicating and warning devices also provided in the form of signs or symbols indicating to the pilot the direction he should look and fly ahead and upward from the approach or descent path defined by a slope indicator. The system includes three elongated bars, two of the bars mounted in longitudinal alignment with each other and the third bar mounted in parallel spaced relation to the two longitudinally aligned bars and centrally between the two bars. The two bars are longitudinally spaced from each other ? distance slightly greater than the length of the third bar. The bars have visual means mounted on them for direct viewing of the bars themselves as closely space solid line segments in apparent longitudinal alignment with each other while approaching them at a predetermined angle perpendicular to the bars, and the warning devices associated with the bars are apparent when approaching the bars at an angle substan-stantially less than the predetermined angle.
A visual approach and landing system for aircraft including a basic slope indicator support on or adjacent the ground is predetermined relation to a runway for visually indicating to a pilot the correct path which he should follow when approaching the runway together with supplementary warning devices to provide the pilot with a definite visual warning of a low approach and other indicating and warning devices also provided in the form of signs or symbols indicating to the pilot the direction he should look and fly ahead and upward from the approach or descent path defined by a slope indicator. The system includes three elongated bars, two of the bars mounted in longitudinal alignment with each other and the third bar mounted in parallel spaced relation to the two longitudinally aligned bars and centrally between the two bars. The two bars are longitudinally spaced from each other ? distance slightly greater than the length of the third bar. The bars have visual means mounted on them for direct viewing of the bars themselves as closely space solid line segments in apparent longitudinal alignment with each other while approaching them at a predetermined angle perpendicular to the bars, and the warning devices associated with the bars are apparent when approaching the bars at an angle substan-stantially less than the predetermined angle.
Description
~o63994 'l~hi~ ,inv~ntion ~cncrally relates to a visunl npproach and landinp, system for aircraft having su~)plement<lry warning and indicating device~
associated therewi.th to v$sually guide a pilot in his approach to a runway and to warn the yi].ot if llis descent path is too low.
Visual indicating systems for guiding pilots during their approach to runways have been provided and are effective to some degree. Such devices are frequently rather complex and costly and fail to provide sufficient warning to a pilot that tlle approach path is too low and such devices also fail to provide proper guidance when using a two-segment approach for noise control in which the outer segment of the approach is steeper than the inner segment or near segment which is a more shallow approach so that appropriate flare-out and touchdown may be attained.
The following U.S. patents disclose various developments in landing guidance systems which are somewhat related to this invention.
1,349,277 2,991,743
associated therewi.th to v$sually guide a pilot in his approach to a runway and to warn the yi].ot if llis descent path is too low.
Visual indicating systems for guiding pilots during their approach to runways have been provided and are effective to some degree. Such devices are frequently rather complex and costly and fail to provide sufficient warning to a pilot that tlle approach path is too low and such devices also fail to provide proper guidance when using a two-segment approach for noise control in which the outer segment of the approach is steeper than the inner segment or near segment which is a more shallow approach so that appropriate flare-out and touchdown may be attained.
The following U.S. patents disclose various developments in landing guidance systems which are somewhat related to this invention.
1,349,277 2,991,743
2,280,126 3,204,218 2,455,721 3,259,985 2,634,399 3,320,584 2,691,150 3,447,128 2,784,925 3,474,406 An object of the present invention is to provide a visual approach slope indicator for aircraft as disclosed in my U.S. patent No. 3,868,778, , combined with a warning device to indicate to a pilot that his approach is low and therefore dangerous so that he may take corrective action to return to the proper approach path. The warning device may be in the form of a red signal light or lights aimed in the direction of a low approach and so shielded that the red light could only be seen when an aircraft is below.
the proper approach path, in the form of a center bar of light which is normally white and which will turn red when the approach path drops to a predetermined degree below the correct path or in the form of a combination of these two embodiments.
Another object of the invention is to provide a visual approach filope indicator and landing system including supplementary indicating and warn-mb/'~
-` 1063994 ing device~ in the form of slgns or symbols which become visual to the pilot to indicate to tlle pilot that he should take some action such as a change in course or a change in the descent path hy looking ahead with such devices lncluding a red final warning in the event the pilot fails to change his enroute or approach course at the appropriate time.
The invention relates to a visual approach indicator unit including three elongated bars, means mounting two of the bars in longitudinal alignment with each other, means mounting the third of the bars in parallel spaced relation to the two longitudinally aligned bars and centrally between the two bars, the two bars being longitudinally spaced from each other a distance slightly greater than the length of the third bar, visual means mounted on the bars for direct vlewing of the bars themselves as closely spaced solid line segments in apparent ~ -longitudinal alignment with each other while approaching the same at a predetermined angle perpendicular to the bars, and warning means associated with the bars for direct -viewing when approaching the bars at an angle substantially less than the predetermined angle.
Figure 1 is a schematic side elevational view illustrating the positioning of the visual approach slope ~'"r lndicator with a warning device which will warn a pilot when his approach path to a runway is too low.
Figure 2 is a perspective view of a runway and slope indicator with red signal lights which are normally shlelaed asso,ciated therewith which will be revealed eo the pilot should his approach path be too low.
~igure 3 is a group of views illustrating what is observed by a pilot under various conditions of approach to the runway.
mb/~o ~ - 2 -106399~
Figure 4 i8 a side view slmilar to Flg. 1 but lllustratlng an arrangement ln which a center llght bar will turn from white to red in the event of an approach being too low.
Figure 5 is a perspective vlew, simllar to Flg. 2, illustrating this embodiment of the invention.
Figure 6 is a group view, ~imilar to Fig. 3 but illustrating the warning as it is observed by the pilot when the embodiment of Figs. 4 and 5 is in use.
Figure 7 is a schematic slde elevational view of a two-segment approach path in whlch supplementary indicating or warning devices are employed.
Figures 8-12 are group views illustrating what is observed by the pilot when a runway or alrport slope lndlcator ig used in combination with an off runway or off 8 lope indicator.
Figures 13-16 are schematlc slde elevatlonal views illustratlng varlous arrangements of lights, and shields and, ln some instances, red llghts or filters ln front of ~ -whlte lights to provlde a beam of white and/or red llght of definite configurations with the relative directions of the beams also being controlled.
Figure 17 is a schematic side elevational view illustrating sequential arrangements in which the warnlng or indicating lights are sequenced to mb/J0 - 2a -appesr "off", "on", and "changed to red".
Figure 18 i9 a schematic slde elevational view illustrating sequen-tial guidance lights in front of a slope indicator.
Figure 19 is a perspective view of the guidance lights of Fig. 18, the slope indicator and runway observed by the pilot when properly approaching the runway.
Referring now specifically to Figs. 1-3 an airport runway is sche-matically illustrated ant designated by reference numeral 20 with a visual approach slope indicator assembly 22 positioned ad~acent the runway which is in the form of a pair of horizontally aligned bars 24 that are spaced from each other and a central bar 26 is positioned between the bar~ 24 but is located in rearwardly spaced relation from the other two bars 24 to establish a co on line of sight 28 at a predetermined angle to the ground which designates the correct approach path having a desired vertical slope so that s8 a pilot observes the slope indicator 22, he will know that he is on the correct approach path when the bar 26 is aligned with and between the bars 24 as illustrated in the upper portion of Fig. 3. This structure and arrangement is the same a8 that disclosed -~in my aforementioned U.S. patent No. 3,868,778 with the bar~ being illuminated, brilliantly painted, lighted or otherwise constructed for use during various visibility conditions. As the center bar 26 becomes disposed either below or above the bars 24, the pilot will know that his approach is too low or too high.
Inasmuch as the too low condition is re dangerous, the present invention in-volves the addition of red lights 30 positioned alongside of and below the bars 24 with an opaque field 32 normslly occluding the lights 30.
The shields 32 would be dull in color or non-brilliant 80 that they would not be distracting to the pilot. As illustrated in Fig. 3, as the ap-proach path of the aircraft is only slightly lower than the correct path 28, the center b&r 26 will be observed as being slightly lower than the two bars 24.
As the degree of error increases and the actual approach path of the aircraft is lower than would be considered safe, the center bar 26 is not only observed as being lower than the bars 24 but the red light 30 will become visible with the intensity of the red lights increasing as the approach path of the aircraft becomes lower in relation to the correct path. At a predetermined approach path .. , ., . , ,. . , :
~063994 designated 34, the red lights 30 which may be in the form of red spotlights will be observed by the pilot but since the shleld 32 is stlll occludlng mo~t of the light 30, the light 30 will be rather dim or of small intensity. Any path of movement of the aircraft below the "red line" 34 brings the red light 30 into full view and maximum intensity thereby i~ediately warning the pilot of a danger condition 90 that he may take correctlve action to pull his air-craft up to the correct approach path 80 that the center bar 26 becomes aligned with the bars 24 at which time the shields 32 will again occlude the red light 30.
Figs. 4-6 illustrate a similar arrangement of runway 20 and slope indicator 22 including the pair of bars 24 snd the bar 26 oriented in the same manner as in Figs. 1-3. Supported between and below the bars 24 is a tran8-parent shield 36 which may be of plastic material or the like which is nor-mally disposed below the center bar 26 when the pilot and aircraft are on the correct path 28 in which event the pilot observes three white lights 24 and 26 in a row and in alignment with each other as illustrated in the top illustration of Fig. 6. As the approach path of the aircraft is only slightly lower, the center white bar 26 will be observed slightly below the two end bars 24. As the aircraft approaches a path 38 which is too low for proper landing, designated 20 as 38 in Fig. 4, the transparent shield 36 which is red in color will begin to be aligned with the center bar 26 80 that the center bar or center light 26 will appear pink in color. If the aircraft i8 on an approach path 40 which is too low for safe landing because the plane may touch down prior to reaching the threshold of the runway, the transparent shield 36 will be completely disposed in front of the white bar 26 so that a red center bar will be observed by the pilot. The two bottom illustrations in Fig. 6 illustrate the pink transition condition of the center bar 26 and the red or danger condition thereof which red line is designated by numeral 40 in Fig. 4. Thus, if a pilot and his air-craft drops progressively below the correct path 28 where he would see the middle 30 bar as white, he would subsequently see the middle bar as pink, that is a white and red combination, and then completely red. This embodiment of the invention operates in subsfantially the same manner as the embodiment in Fig. 1 and any combination of these two embodiments may be employed and any desirable structure 106399~
may be provided for producing the red light or danger signal to the pllot for indicating to him that he i8 too far below the proper approach path, thus indicating to him thQt corrective action should be taken in order to put his aircraft back on the proper slope or approach to the runway 20.
Figs. 7-12 illustrate a two-segment approach path which i9 now fre-quently required for noise control which, as illustrated in Fig. 7 includes an initial steep segment of an approach path designated by numeral 28' which may be a 6 degree slope and a final approach path 28 which is the same as the approach path illustrated in Fig. 1 in which a slope indicator 22 is em-10 ployed in the same manner as in Figs. 1 or 4 either with or without the lowslope path warning device illustrated in Figs. 1 or 4. In this arrangement, the 6 degree outer segment 28' would be guided by a slope indicator 22' located at a point spaced from the runway such as a point two mile3 off the runway in the approach zone with the slope indicator 22' including the same bars 24 and a center bar 26 oriented to provide a proper 6 degree slope indication to the pilot of the aircraft following the steep approach path 28'.
The aircraft should gradually change from the steep approach segment 28' of the approach path to the shallow 3 degree approach segment 28 with supplementary indicating devices generally designated by numeral 42 indicating to the pilot 20 that he should be going through a transition from the steep se8ment to the low segment ~ust prior to the point at which such transition is being made. In Fig. 7 the point A is a condition illustrated in Fig. 8 in which the slope ~ -indicator 22' indicates to the pilot that he is on the appropriate steep path 28' with the slope indicator 22, of course, indicating that he is too high for ~ -the shallow segment of the approach path 28. As the aircraft reaches point B
in Fig. 7, as illustrated in Fig. 9, the slope indicator 22' indicates that the aircraft is on the proper approach path and the slope indicator 22 indicates that the aircraft is still too high for the approach segment 28. In this con-dition, the supplementary lndicating device 42 come~ into vicw. The supple-30 mentary inticating or warning device 42 is in the form of lights, bars or the like, 44 which may be in the form of a directional control such as an arrow as illustrated in ~ig. 10 but only the initial lights at the tip of the arrow are observed when the aircraft is at point B. As the aircraft proceeds along the flight path 28', the bsrs 24 and 26 in the slope indicator 22' will remain in line indicating that the aircraft is properly following the approach path 28' with the warning device 42 indlcating to the pllot that he should malntaln visual contact and look ahead of the slope indlcator 22' and when the warning devlce 42 reveals all of the lights 44 as the aircraft reaches point C, the pilot ~hould then look ahead toward and be gulded by slope indicator 22 whlch indicates that he is only slightly above the shallow approach path 28 90 that tbe controls of the aircraft may be properly manipulated for transition from the steep approach path 28' to the shallow approach path 28 which is the con-dltion illustrated in Fig. 10. Then, as the alrcraft follows the transitionline from point C to polnt D in Fig. 7, the center bar 26 ln the slope lndlcator 22' properly indicates that the alrcraft 18 too hlgh and the warnlng devlce 42 defined by the lights oriented ln a pattern which illustrates an arrow lndicates that the pilot should follow the flight path designated by the slope lndlcator 22 which intlcates that the alrcraft ls on the appropriate approach path or the shallow approach path 28 to runway 20. In the event the aircraft pllot falls ~-to follow the curved path of transition from the steep path 28' to the shallow path 28 and continues along a dlrect path to the slope indicator 22' and reaches point E, each of the lights 44 in the warning device 42 will t~rn red as the aircraft reaches or approaches point E as illustrated in Fig. 12 80 that the pilot will be immediately warned that he should take corrective action with the red arrow also indicating that he should look ahead for guidance from the ~lope indicator 22 where the pilot will see that the center bar 26 is below the end bars 24, thus indicating that he should immediately pull the aircraft up so that it follows approach llne 28, thus avoiding a danger condi~lon. The transition of the llght 44 from white to red may be accomplished by any of various means such as that illustrated in Figs. 1, 4 and 16.
With this arrangement, the supplementary indicating and warning devices 42 all turn red at point E if the aircraft fails to make the transition from the 6 degree steep approach segment 28' to the 3 degree, shallow segment of the approach path 28. Various arrangements may be provided for designating changes in an approach path from a steep segment to a shallow segment and im-mediately warning the pilot of danger by red lights turning on when a point of ~063994 danger i9 reached in the steep approach segment if he does not cau~e the air-craft to follow the transition path to the shallow segment of the approsch path.
Vsrlation in iight units are typically lllustrated $n Pigs. 13-16 with Flg. 13 illustrating a light unit 46 having an opaque shield 48 confining the light beam to a particular angle of observation while Fig. 14 illustrated the same type of light unit having an opaque shield 48 and red filters oriented as designated by numeral 50 or alternatively in an angular position as designated by numeral 52. Fig. 15 illustrates the light unit in which the opaque shield 48 is oriented at the top of the light beam and Fig. 16 illustrates the light unit with the opaque shield 48 at the upper end of the light beam and the red filter 50 at the lower portion thereof with the light unit 46 in each instance having a reflector or shield 54 associated therewith. The light 46 may be in the form of a spotlight and the opaque shields shut out light in certain direc-tions and the transparent red shields may convert the white light passing through them to red light. By appropriate orientation of the shields, each light can be made to produce a beam of white and/or red light of definite configuration with various angles of spread and in all directions. Also, the relative directions of the beam can be controlled. For example, the direction or angle at which the light can first be seen can be ad~usted for each light unit 80 that these paths can be made more or less parallel, made to diverge, converge, and cross each other before intercepeing the path of an aircraft or made to converge at a point of interception with the flight path. Fig. 17 illu8-trates arrangements of this nature in which the left-hand illustration in Fig.
17 illustrates three lights oriented at points 1, 2 and 3 in which the beam~
cross and intercept the flight path 28 which is directed toward a slope indi-cator 22 at points 1, 2 and 3 so that light number 1 will be observed by the pilot prior to lights 2 and 3 and the lights will be observed in a sequence.
The central illustration in Fig. 17 illustrates an arrangement in which the light beams are parallel to each other and intercept the flight path 28 in the same orientation as they are on the ground. The right-hand illustration in ~ig. 17 illustrates the three lights which converge at a point which intercepts the flight path 28. These arrangements can produce the effect of lightg appear-ing in sequence in either direction or all at once even though the lights are on at all times but appear to be off to the pilot then appear to come on snd can then turn red through the geometry of the ~hielding system. In effect, the motion of the plane on or near the proper flight path or its extension causes the off-on-change-to-red effect without employing extensive switches, mechanical equipment or the like.
Figures 18 and 19 illustrate schematically a slope indicator and runway together with a plurality of sequenced lights 46 which are oriented in a manner to designate or indicate to the pilot his approach path to the end of the runway 20. This arran8ement is especlally useful when oblique approaches to small airports are required where obstructions exist in the straight in normal approach. A sequenced flashing slight turn arrow 3ust before the runway threshold would guide the pilot to the correct landing orientation while suc-cessfully avoiding nearby obstructions with the light units 46 being either ~equenced or flashing in sequence with one of the light units at the end of the guide arrangement being in the shape of an arrow.
These devices are for nighttime use, low visibility use, or at any other time where either lights or a brightly painted fluorescent surface might be used to form the desired guidance and warning for pilots. These signs or symbols which may be in the form of arrows or pointers will indicate to the pilot to look and fly ahead or upward from the descent path defined by a slope indicator where such slope indicator is off the airport and used for enroute guidance or to turn left or right as the plane nears the slope lndicator and/or alignment indicator 80 as to aim toward the next guide unit or the airport itself. The supplementary devices are designed to appear to the pilot at an appropriate time, such as 3ust before he is eo negotiate a change in course, either horizontal, vertical or combination thereof. The lights "come on" thus attracting his attention and in some cases, they turn red as a final warning in the event he fails to change his enroute or approach course at the proper time.
The lights may be constructed to appear to the pilot in sequence either the farthest or the nearest light appearing first according to the situation and the intent of the signal. The lights may be made to change red in sequence although the most significant impact usually can be made by having all of the lights of the device change red at the same time.
The units may be configured as arrows, chevrons, turn arrows or signs such as "Up" or "Turn L" or "Turn R" and the like. The lights or bars may be supported ln any suitable manner from the ground surface or any other suitable supporting structure and effectively provlde supplementary indicating and warning devices to be used with the visual approach slope indicator dis-closed in my patent No. 3,868,778.
~r
the proper approach path, in the form of a center bar of light which is normally white and which will turn red when the approach path drops to a predetermined degree below the correct path or in the form of a combination of these two embodiments.
Another object of the invention is to provide a visual approach filope indicator and landing system including supplementary indicating and warn-mb/'~
-` 1063994 ing device~ in the form of slgns or symbols which become visual to the pilot to indicate to tlle pilot that he should take some action such as a change in course or a change in the descent path hy looking ahead with such devices lncluding a red final warning in the event the pilot fails to change his enroute or approach course at the appropriate time.
The invention relates to a visual approach indicator unit including three elongated bars, means mounting two of the bars in longitudinal alignment with each other, means mounting the third of the bars in parallel spaced relation to the two longitudinally aligned bars and centrally between the two bars, the two bars being longitudinally spaced from each other a distance slightly greater than the length of the third bar, visual means mounted on the bars for direct vlewing of the bars themselves as closely spaced solid line segments in apparent ~ -longitudinal alignment with each other while approaching the same at a predetermined angle perpendicular to the bars, and warning means associated with the bars for direct -viewing when approaching the bars at an angle substantially less than the predetermined angle.
Figure 1 is a schematic side elevational view illustrating the positioning of the visual approach slope ~'"r lndicator with a warning device which will warn a pilot when his approach path to a runway is too low.
Figure 2 is a perspective view of a runway and slope indicator with red signal lights which are normally shlelaed asso,ciated therewith which will be revealed eo the pilot should his approach path be too low.
~igure 3 is a group of views illustrating what is observed by a pilot under various conditions of approach to the runway.
mb/~o ~ - 2 -106399~
Figure 4 i8 a side view slmilar to Flg. 1 but lllustratlng an arrangement ln which a center llght bar will turn from white to red in the event of an approach being too low.
Figure 5 is a perspective vlew, simllar to Flg. 2, illustrating this embodiment of the invention.
Figure 6 is a group view, ~imilar to Fig. 3 but illustrating the warning as it is observed by the pilot when the embodiment of Figs. 4 and 5 is in use.
Figure 7 is a schematic slde elevational view of a two-segment approach path in whlch supplementary indicating or warning devices are employed.
Figures 8-12 are group views illustrating what is observed by the pilot when a runway or alrport slope lndlcator ig used in combination with an off runway or off 8 lope indicator.
Figures 13-16 are schematlc slde elevatlonal views illustratlng varlous arrangements of lights, and shields and, ln some instances, red llghts or filters ln front of ~ -whlte lights to provlde a beam of white and/or red llght of definite configurations with the relative directions of the beams also being controlled.
Figure 17 is a schematic side elevational view illustrating sequential arrangements in which the warnlng or indicating lights are sequenced to mb/J0 - 2a -appesr "off", "on", and "changed to red".
Figure 18 i9 a schematic slde elevational view illustrating sequen-tial guidance lights in front of a slope indicator.
Figure 19 is a perspective view of the guidance lights of Fig. 18, the slope indicator and runway observed by the pilot when properly approaching the runway.
Referring now specifically to Figs. 1-3 an airport runway is sche-matically illustrated ant designated by reference numeral 20 with a visual approach slope indicator assembly 22 positioned ad~acent the runway which is in the form of a pair of horizontally aligned bars 24 that are spaced from each other and a central bar 26 is positioned between the bar~ 24 but is located in rearwardly spaced relation from the other two bars 24 to establish a co on line of sight 28 at a predetermined angle to the ground which designates the correct approach path having a desired vertical slope so that s8 a pilot observes the slope indicator 22, he will know that he is on the correct approach path when the bar 26 is aligned with and between the bars 24 as illustrated in the upper portion of Fig. 3. This structure and arrangement is the same a8 that disclosed -~in my aforementioned U.S. patent No. 3,868,778 with the bar~ being illuminated, brilliantly painted, lighted or otherwise constructed for use during various visibility conditions. As the center bar 26 becomes disposed either below or above the bars 24, the pilot will know that his approach is too low or too high.
Inasmuch as the too low condition is re dangerous, the present invention in-volves the addition of red lights 30 positioned alongside of and below the bars 24 with an opaque field 32 normslly occluding the lights 30.
The shields 32 would be dull in color or non-brilliant 80 that they would not be distracting to the pilot. As illustrated in Fig. 3, as the ap-proach path of the aircraft is only slightly lower than the correct path 28, the center b&r 26 will be observed as being slightly lower than the two bars 24.
As the degree of error increases and the actual approach path of the aircraft is lower than would be considered safe, the center bar 26 is not only observed as being lower than the bars 24 but the red light 30 will become visible with the intensity of the red lights increasing as the approach path of the aircraft becomes lower in relation to the correct path. At a predetermined approach path .. , ., . , ,. . , :
~063994 designated 34, the red lights 30 which may be in the form of red spotlights will be observed by the pilot but since the shleld 32 is stlll occludlng mo~t of the light 30, the light 30 will be rather dim or of small intensity. Any path of movement of the aircraft below the "red line" 34 brings the red light 30 into full view and maximum intensity thereby i~ediately warning the pilot of a danger condition 90 that he may take correctlve action to pull his air-craft up to the correct approach path 80 that the center bar 26 becomes aligned with the bars 24 at which time the shields 32 will again occlude the red light 30.
Figs. 4-6 illustrate a similar arrangement of runway 20 and slope indicator 22 including the pair of bars 24 snd the bar 26 oriented in the same manner as in Figs. 1-3. Supported between and below the bars 24 is a tran8-parent shield 36 which may be of plastic material or the like which is nor-mally disposed below the center bar 26 when the pilot and aircraft are on the correct path 28 in which event the pilot observes three white lights 24 and 26 in a row and in alignment with each other as illustrated in the top illustration of Fig. 6. As the approach path of the aircraft is only slightly lower, the center white bar 26 will be observed slightly below the two end bars 24. As the aircraft approaches a path 38 which is too low for proper landing, designated 20 as 38 in Fig. 4, the transparent shield 36 which is red in color will begin to be aligned with the center bar 26 80 that the center bar or center light 26 will appear pink in color. If the aircraft i8 on an approach path 40 which is too low for safe landing because the plane may touch down prior to reaching the threshold of the runway, the transparent shield 36 will be completely disposed in front of the white bar 26 so that a red center bar will be observed by the pilot. The two bottom illustrations in Fig. 6 illustrate the pink transition condition of the center bar 26 and the red or danger condition thereof which red line is designated by numeral 40 in Fig. 4. Thus, if a pilot and his air-craft drops progressively below the correct path 28 where he would see the middle 30 bar as white, he would subsequently see the middle bar as pink, that is a white and red combination, and then completely red. This embodiment of the invention operates in subsfantially the same manner as the embodiment in Fig. 1 and any combination of these two embodiments may be employed and any desirable structure 106399~
may be provided for producing the red light or danger signal to the pllot for indicating to him that he i8 too far below the proper approach path, thus indicating to him thQt corrective action should be taken in order to put his aircraft back on the proper slope or approach to the runway 20.
Figs. 7-12 illustrate a two-segment approach path which i9 now fre-quently required for noise control which, as illustrated in Fig. 7 includes an initial steep segment of an approach path designated by numeral 28' which may be a 6 degree slope and a final approach path 28 which is the same as the approach path illustrated in Fig. 1 in which a slope indicator 22 is em-10 ployed in the same manner as in Figs. 1 or 4 either with or without the lowslope path warning device illustrated in Figs. 1 or 4. In this arrangement, the 6 degree outer segment 28' would be guided by a slope indicator 22' located at a point spaced from the runway such as a point two mile3 off the runway in the approach zone with the slope indicator 22' including the same bars 24 and a center bar 26 oriented to provide a proper 6 degree slope indication to the pilot of the aircraft following the steep approach path 28'.
The aircraft should gradually change from the steep approach segment 28' of the approach path to the shallow 3 degree approach segment 28 with supplementary indicating devices generally designated by numeral 42 indicating to the pilot 20 that he should be going through a transition from the steep se8ment to the low segment ~ust prior to the point at which such transition is being made. In Fig. 7 the point A is a condition illustrated in Fig. 8 in which the slope ~ -indicator 22' indicates to the pilot that he is on the appropriate steep path 28' with the slope indicator 22, of course, indicating that he is too high for ~ -the shallow segment of the approach path 28. As the aircraft reaches point B
in Fig. 7, as illustrated in Fig. 9, the slope indicator 22' indicates that the aircraft is on the proper approach path and the slope indicator 22 indicates that the aircraft is still too high for the approach segment 28. In this con-dition, the supplementary lndicating device 42 come~ into vicw. The supple-30 mentary inticating or warning device 42 is in the form of lights, bars or the like, 44 which may be in the form of a directional control such as an arrow as illustrated in ~ig. 10 but only the initial lights at the tip of the arrow are observed when the aircraft is at point B. As the aircraft proceeds along the flight path 28', the bsrs 24 and 26 in the slope indicator 22' will remain in line indicating that the aircraft is properly following the approach path 28' with the warning device 42 indlcating to the pllot that he should malntaln visual contact and look ahead of the slope indlcator 22' and when the warning devlce 42 reveals all of the lights 44 as the aircraft reaches point C, the pilot ~hould then look ahead toward and be gulded by slope indicator 22 whlch indicates that he is only slightly above the shallow approach path 28 90 that tbe controls of the aircraft may be properly manipulated for transition from the steep approach path 28' to the shallow approach path 28 which is the con-dltion illustrated in Fig. 10. Then, as the alrcraft follows the transitionline from point C to polnt D in Fig. 7, the center bar 26 ln the slope lndlcator 22' properly indicates that the alrcraft 18 too hlgh and the warnlng devlce 42 defined by the lights oriented ln a pattern which illustrates an arrow lndicates that the pilot should follow the flight path designated by the slope lndlcator 22 which intlcates that the alrcraft ls on the appropriate approach path or the shallow approach path 28 to runway 20. In the event the aircraft pllot falls ~-to follow the curved path of transition from the steep path 28' to the shallow path 28 and continues along a dlrect path to the slope indicator 22' and reaches point E, each of the lights 44 in the warning device 42 will t~rn red as the aircraft reaches or approaches point E as illustrated in Fig. 12 80 that the pilot will be immediately warned that he should take corrective action with the red arrow also indicating that he should look ahead for guidance from the ~lope indicator 22 where the pilot will see that the center bar 26 is below the end bars 24, thus indicating that he should immediately pull the aircraft up so that it follows approach llne 28, thus avoiding a danger condi~lon. The transition of the llght 44 from white to red may be accomplished by any of various means such as that illustrated in Figs. 1, 4 and 16.
With this arrangement, the supplementary indicating and warning devices 42 all turn red at point E if the aircraft fails to make the transition from the 6 degree steep approach segment 28' to the 3 degree, shallow segment of the approach path 28. Various arrangements may be provided for designating changes in an approach path from a steep segment to a shallow segment and im-mediately warning the pilot of danger by red lights turning on when a point of ~063994 danger i9 reached in the steep approach segment if he does not cau~e the air-craft to follow the transition path to the shallow segment of the approsch path.
Vsrlation in iight units are typically lllustrated $n Pigs. 13-16 with Flg. 13 illustrating a light unit 46 having an opaque shield 48 confining the light beam to a particular angle of observation while Fig. 14 illustrated the same type of light unit having an opaque shield 48 and red filters oriented as designated by numeral 50 or alternatively in an angular position as designated by numeral 52. Fig. 15 illustrates the light unit in which the opaque shield 48 is oriented at the top of the light beam and Fig. 16 illustrates the light unit with the opaque shield 48 at the upper end of the light beam and the red filter 50 at the lower portion thereof with the light unit 46 in each instance having a reflector or shield 54 associated therewith. The light 46 may be in the form of a spotlight and the opaque shields shut out light in certain direc-tions and the transparent red shields may convert the white light passing through them to red light. By appropriate orientation of the shields, each light can be made to produce a beam of white and/or red light of definite configuration with various angles of spread and in all directions. Also, the relative directions of the beam can be controlled. For example, the direction or angle at which the light can first be seen can be ad~usted for each light unit 80 that these paths can be made more or less parallel, made to diverge, converge, and cross each other before intercepeing the path of an aircraft or made to converge at a point of interception with the flight path. Fig. 17 illu8-trates arrangements of this nature in which the left-hand illustration in Fig.
17 illustrates three lights oriented at points 1, 2 and 3 in which the beam~
cross and intercept the flight path 28 which is directed toward a slope indi-cator 22 at points 1, 2 and 3 so that light number 1 will be observed by the pilot prior to lights 2 and 3 and the lights will be observed in a sequence.
The central illustration in Fig. 17 illustrates an arrangement in which the light beams are parallel to each other and intercept the flight path 28 in the same orientation as they are on the ground. The right-hand illustration in ~ig. 17 illustrates the three lights which converge at a point which intercepts the flight path 28. These arrangements can produce the effect of lightg appear-ing in sequence in either direction or all at once even though the lights are on at all times but appear to be off to the pilot then appear to come on snd can then turn red through the geometry of the ~hielding system. In effect, the motion of the plane on or near the proper flight path or its extension causes the off-on-change-to-red effect without employing extensive switches, mechanical equipment or the like.
Figures 18 and 19 illustrate schematically a slope indicator and runway together with a plurality of sequenced lights 46 which are oriented in a manner to designate or indicate to the pilot his approach path to the end of the runway 20. This arran8ement is especlally useful when oblique approaches to small airports are required where obstructions exist in the straight in normal approach. A sequenced flashing slight turn arrow 3ust before the runway threshold would guide the pilot to the correct landing orientation while suc-cessfully avoiding nearby obstructions with the light units 46 being either ~equenced or flashing in sequence with one of the light units at the end of the guide arrangement being in the shape of an arrow.
These devices are for nighttime use, low visibility use, or at any other time where either lights or a brightly painted fluorescent surface might be used to form the desired guidance and warning for pilots. These signs or symbols which may be in the form of arrows or pointers will indicate to the pilot to look and fly ahead or upward from the descent path defined by a slope indicator where such slope indicator is off the airport and used for enroute guidance or to turn left or right as the plane nears the slope lndicator and/or alignment indicator 80 as to aim toward the next guide unit or the airport itself. The supplementary devices are designed to appear to the pilot at an appropriate time, such as 3ust before he is eo negotiate a change in course, either horizontal, vertical or combination thereof. The lights "come on" thus attracting his attention and in some cases, they turn red as a final warning in the event he fails to change his enroute or approach course at the proper time.
The lights may be constructed to appear to the pilot in sequence either the farthest or the nearest light appearing first according to the situation and the intent of the signal. The lights may be made to change red in sequence although the most significant impact usually can be made by having all of the lights of the device change red at the same time.
The units may be configured as arrows, chevrons, turn arrows or signs such as "Up" or "Turn L" or "Turn R" and the like. The lights or bars may be supported ln any suitable manner from the ground surface or any other suitable supporting structure and effectively provlde supplementary indicating and warning devices to be used with the visual approach slope indicator dis-closed in my patent No. 3,868,778.
~r
Claims (7)
1. A visual approach indicator unit including three elongated bars, means mounting two of said bars in longitudinal alignment with each other, means mounting the third of said bars in parallel spaced relation to the two longi-tudinally aligned bars and centrally between said two of the bars, said two of the bars being longitudinally spaced from each other a distance slightly greater than the length of said third of the bars, visual means mounted on said bars for direct viewing of the bars themselves as closely spaced solid line segments in apparent longitudinal alignment with each other while approaching the same at a predetermined angle perpendicular to said bars, and warning means associ-ated with said bars for direct viewing when approaching the bars at an angle substantially less than said predetermined angle.
2. The structure as defined in claim 1 wherein said warning means includes a red light, an opaque shield disposed in alignment with the light for occluding the red light when approaching the elongated bars at said predetermined angle and revealing the red light when approaching said bars at an angle sub-stantially less than said predetermined angle to warn the observer that the approach path toward the bars is too low.
3. The structure as defined in claim 1 wherein said central bar is in the form of a light, said warning means including a transparent red shield disposed below the said two of the bars and below the line of sight of a viewer when approaching the bars at said predetermined angle, said transparent red shield overlying and converting the light of the central bar to a red color when approaching the bars at an angle substantially less than said predetermined angle, whereby a viewer will be warned that the approach toward the central bar and said two bars is too low.
4. A visual approach indicator unit including three elongated bars, means mounting two of said bars in longitudinal alignment with each other, means mounting the third of said bars in parallel spaced relation to the two longitudinally aligned bars and centrally between said two of the bars, said two of the bars being longitudinally spaced from each other a distance slightly greater than the length of said third of the bars, visual means mounted on said bars for direct viewing of the bars themselves as closely spaced solid line segments in apparent longitudinal alignment with each other while approaching the same at a predetermined angle perpendicular to said bars, and warning means associated with said bars for direct viewing when approaching the bars at an angle substantially less than said predetermined angle, together with means visually guiding an aircraft pilot along a steep outer segment of an approach path to a shallow inner segment defined by said visual approach indicator unit, said means including an off airport indicator unit visually defining said steep outer segment and supplementary indicator means directly viewable by a pilot when the aircraft reaches a point of transition from the steep segment to the shallow segment of the approach path.
5. The structure as defined in claim 4 wherein said supplementary indicator means includes a plurality of lights arranged in the pattern of a directional arrow direct-ing the pilot's attention to the elongated bars for guidance at said predetermined angle, said lights including means converting the appearance thereof to red lights warning the pilot of danger if he descends below the shallow segment of the approach path in the vicinity of said transition point.
6. The structure as defined in claim 4 wherein said supplementary indicator means is directly viewable by a pilot when an aircraft approaches the point of intersection between the segments of the approach path and indicating a transition from the outer segment to the inner segment, and said supplementary indicator means includes red light means becoming directly viewable by a pilot when the aircraft passes below the shallow segment of the approach path in the vicinity of intersection of the segments of the approach path to warn the pilot of danger.
7. The structure as defined in claim 6 wherein said red light means is a directional arrow indicating the direction that the aircraft should move and the direction to the runway slope indicator.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA253,387A CA1063994A (en) | 1976-05-26 | 1976-05-26 | Visual approach and landing system for aircraft with supplementary indicating and warning devices |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA253,387A CA1063994A (en) | 1976-05-26 | 1976-05-26 | Visual approach and landing system for aircraft with supplementary indicating and warning devices |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1063994A true CA1063994A (en) | 1979-10-09 |
Family
ID=4106050
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA253,387A Expired CA1063994A (en) | 1976-05-26 | 1976-05-26 | Visual approach and landing system for aircraft with supplementary indicating and warning devices |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA1063994A (en) |
-
1976
- 1976-05-26 CA CA253,387A patent/CA1063994A/en not_active Expired
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6193190B1 (en) | Aircraft vertical landing guidance method and system | |
US5287104A (en) | Method and apparatus for aiding a landing aircraft | |
US4916445A (en) | Obstruction proximity indication system for an aircraft | |
US4249159A (en) | Aircraft docking system | |
US2441877A (en) | Beacon system | |
US2316751A (en) | Landing indicator | |
AU2007237472A2 (en) | Lamellar ground marking | |
US4015235A (en) | Aircraft parking guidance indicator | |
US3972125A (en) | Visual approach and landing system for aircraft with supplementary indicating and warning devices | |
US3843263A (en) | Helicopter optical position indicator | |
CA1063994A (en) | Visual approach and landing system for aircraft with supplementary indicating and warning devices | |
US2784925A (en) | Means for aiding the landing of aircraft | |
US6320516B1 (en) | Airport and runway laser lighting method | |
US3964015A (en) | Aircraft approach and landing light system | |
US2475256A (en) | Airplane traffic controlling system | |
US2497427A (en) | Night landing visual localizer and glide path indicator | |
RU2397115C1 (en) | Aircraft landing system | |
US4256366A (en) | Aircraft visual collision and avoidance device | |
US3114892A (en) | Runway guidance system | |
US3152316A (en) | Glide path guidance means for aircraft | |
US20200377226A1 (en) | Runway/taxiway lighting system | |
CA1071741A (en) | Aircraft approach and landing light system | |
GB2155226A (en) | System for determining position on airport taxiways | |
US3581275A (en) | Moire fringe producing device used for interception course indication | |
RU2191143C2 (en) | Airfield light warning system |