CA1058098A

CA1058098A - Gas filter

Info

Publication number: CA1058098A
Application number: CA263,699A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Erhard C. Andreae
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 1975-12-04
Filing date: 1976-10-19
Publication date: 1979-07-10
Also published as: BE847277A; SE7601283L; SE409419B; DE2558659A1; DE2558659B2; ATA814976A; US4008060A; AT364739B; FR2333554B1; JPS5269067A; AU1067276A; DK144694B; CH594437A5; JPS5827968B2; GB1507422A; DK144694C; DK471576A; DE2558659C3; FR2333554A1; NL7612306A

Abstract

Abstract of the disclosure An extensible gas filter comprises three perforated walls with parallel folds, interconnected along alternate folds to allow accordion-like folding of the filter to a maximum value corresponding to the developed length of the shortest third wall, the walls defining chambers with staggered perforations forming a gas-deviating baffle.

Description

~5~

GAS FILTER
;
The invention rela~es to extensible gas filters.
A known gas filter described in U.S~ pat. 3 075 337 comprises two walls having parallel folds, connected along certain of said folds to define therebetween chambers while allowlng extension of the filter in the manner of an accordion.
Perforations in each said wall are staggered in relation to those of the other wall for the passage of gas through said chambers along a sinuous path.
- The invention concerns a gas filter of this type which j 10 is characterized in that it ~rther comprises a perforated third wall having folds parallel to those of the first two walls and being connected to the assembly of the ~irst two walls, in the regions where the first two walls are connected, with its perforations staggered in relation to those of at least one of the flrst two walls, said third wall having a developed length substantially less than thle maximum length to which the assembly of the first two walls alone could be extended and limiting the extension of the filter to said developed length, and hence to an efficient value, less than said maximum.
The accompanying drawings show, by ~ay of example, an embodiment and variation-~ of the gas filter accordiny to the invention. In the drawing:
Fig~ a partlal view in transverse cross-section of an embodiment of gas filter, Fig. 2 is a cut-away plan view corresponding to Fig. 1, and to a smaller scale, Fig. 3 is an end view of a variation of the filter, 5~

F'ig. 4 is a view similar to Fig. 3~ showing fittiny of the varied ~ilter in a working position, and Fig. S is a view similar to Fig. 4, but showing a second variation.
The filter shown ln Figs~ 1 and 2 comprises two walls 1, 2 forming therebe~ween chambers 3. These walls have parallel folds 4, 5 for wall 1, and 6, 7 for wall 2. These two walls are connected together, for example by sticking, along alternate ~olds S, 7. The assembly formed of walls 1 and 2 is thus extensible in the manner of an accoxdion. The wall 1 has per-forations 8 aligned as shown in Fig. 2, and wall 2 has per-~orations 9 also aligned as shown on Fig. 2. The perforations 8 and 9 are offset so that air penetrating per~orations 9 i5 obliged to ~ollow a sinuous path in the chambers 3 to reach perforations 80 This corresponds to the known structure cited at the outset.
In addition to these known elements, the filter shown has a thlrd wall 10 having folds 11, 12 parallel to the folds 4-7 of walls 1 and 2. This third wall 10 has per~orations 13 aligned ~ , as shown on Flg. 2 and offsat in relation to the perforations 9 of the ad~acent wall 2. ~his staggering, which was lateral and longitudinal between per~orations 8 and 9, is here substantially longltudinal, in the direction of the folds, in relation to perforations 9 and 8. The staygering must simply be such that the air which passed khrough the baffle formed by the walls 1 and 2 is ~irstly obliged to ~ollow a sinuous path in the space between walls 2 and 10.

, .

~5~9~
~ The wall 10 is fixed to the assembly formed by the walls : 1 and 2 by its folds 12, fixed to the united folds 7/5. This third wall has, as shown on Fig. 1, a developed length notably less than the maximum to which the walls 1 and 2 could other-; wise be extended. The purpose of this arrangement is to ensure ; that when the filter is put in place and extend~d, the third , wall 10 limits the extension of the filter to an efficient value and notably less than the maxlmum value to which the walls 1 and 2 could otherwise be extended.
:~ .
An advantage of the third wall 10 is to ensure regular folding out of the filter and, consequently, a greater effi-ciency thereof. Moreover, when the filter is placed in the working position, the third wall 10 prevents it being stretched in an excessive manner detrimental to its efficiency, while allowing the user to give to the filter the maximum admissible extension corresponding to the maximum possible extension of this t~rd wall~ Moreover, the presence of the third wall 10 increases the efficiency of the filter by making the air pass therein along a more sinuous path than in the case where there are only two walls.
In the variation according to Figs. 3 and 4, one of the walls of the filter, for example a thlrd wall 21, has a width (measured in the dlrection of the ~olds) greater than that of the two other walls. The protruding part of this largex wall 21 is designated on Fig. 3 by 14. When this filter is put in ; place for operation~ by disposlng it between two parallel, facing U-shaped sections 15, 16 (Fig. 4), the protruding part s~
is crushed in ~he upper section 15, as indicated at 17, to ~orm a joint. In another variation r it would be possible to provide two symmetrlcal projecting parts such as 14, which : -would provide a joint in the upper section 15 and a simllar joint in the lower section 16. This symmetrical construction would avoid the need to take care, when the filter is being put in place, that the projecting part is upwards.
In the variation of Fig. 5, an extenslble fllter 20 is engaged in a ventilation opening 18 of a wall 19 with its third wall 21 larger than the ~irst two in a manner to protrude upwardly and downwardly as indicated at 22 and 23. These pro- :
~ecting parts are applied against the wall 19 to provide a ~ .
~oint along the edges of the f1lter.

'.
., .

.. '

Claims

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. A gas filter of the type comprising two walls having parallel folds, connected along certain of said folds to define therebetween chambers while allowing extension of the filter in the manner of an accordion, and perforations in each said wall staggered in relation to those of the other wall for the passage of gas through said chambers along a sinuous path, characterized in that it further comprises a perforated third wall having folds parallel to those of the fist two walls and being con-nected to the assembly of the first two walls, in the regions where the first two walls are connected, with its perforations staggered in relation to those of at least one of the first two walls, said third wall having a developed length substan-tially less than the maximum length to which the assembly of the first two walls alone could be extended and limiting the extension of the filter to said developed length.

2. A filter according to claim 1, in which all three walls have the same number of folds.

3. A filter according to claim 1, in which one of its walls protrudes from the others along at least one of the edges of the filter perpendicular to the folds.