CA1057648A - Plugging high permeability earth strata - Google Patents
Plugging high permeability earth strataInfo
- Publication number
- CA1057648A CA1057648A CA247,089A CA247089A CA1057648A CA 1057648 A CA1057648 A CA 1057648A CA 247089 A CA247089 A CA 247089A CA 1057648 A CA1057648 A CA 1057648A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- steam
- foam
- formation
- active agent
- oil
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Detergent Compositions (AREA)
Abstract
PLUGGING HIGH PERMEABILITY EARTH STRATA
Abstract of the Disclosure A method is provided allowing close control of the steam back pressure in a highly permeable formation during the temporary plugging of the formation using foam produced by introducing steam and a foaming agent into the formation forming a foam having a steam as its gaseous phase which collapses upon condensation of the steam. The method comprises intermit-tently interrupting the steam flow into the formation to inject a slug of surfactant dissolved or dispersed in a solvent such as water, oil or alcohol.
Abstract of the Disclosure A method is provided allowing close control of the steam back pressure in a highly permeable formation during the temporary plugging of the formation using foam produced by introducing steam and a foaming agent into the formation forming a foam having a steam as its gaseous phase which collapses upon condensation of the steam. The method comprises intermit-tently interrupting the steam flow into the formation to inject a slug of surfactant dissolved or dispersed in a solvent such as water, oil or alcohol.
Description
~57~
PLUGGING HIGH PERMEABILITY E~RTH STRATA
Background of the _v ntion This invention relates to a process for plugging highly permeable earth strata encountered in a well bore. In one of its aspects this -lnvention relates to a method of plugging earth strata by forming therein a foam having ~ ~
1 a condensible gas as its gas phase. In still another aspe~t, it relates to ~ ~ ;
; a method of producing a well by cyclic steam stimulation or direct drive ~
.
~i~ steam injection by plugging the high permeability strata with a foam havlng ~ ~ ;
a condensible gas as its gaseous phase. In yet another aspect, it relates to closely controlling the back pressure of steam injected into a high ` 10 permeability strata by introducing foam into the strata which has as its gas phase a gas condensible at temperatures and pressures obtained within I the strata.
,, :
~`~ In oil well production, it is quite common to inject various gases, ; including steam, into oil wells to increase the production of oil from those ~ ~
:,- ~ ::
wells. One common method of increasing production ls the cyclic steam stimulation me~hod, wherein production of oil from the well is periodically -interrupted and steam is injected in the well. The steam serves to melt ~ ; some~of the waxe~ in the~strata, and reduce the viscosity of the oil i surrounding the well bore so that it will flow more readily into the well .. j, , ;: i ~, , bore and be produced therefrom. A second me~hod is the diract drive injection of steam or other gases continuously into one well whereby oils in the various I earth strata are pushed ahead of the steam or gas being injected and are `; 1 , , produced from another nearby well. ~ ~`
One of the problems faced in either type of injection of gases or ~ -steam into the well arises Erom the varying permeability of the different earth strata. ~here there is a considerable difference in the permeability ` ~, of different strata, the injected gas will flow into the more permeable strata preferentially, or on occasion almost exclusively. Since the oil to be produced may be very largely in the less permeable strata, a considerable ~`1, 30 quanti~y of gas or steam will be injected into the well with little success.
~5769L8 ,:
` A method for plugging a highly permeable formation with a foam that upon condensation of the steam lntroduced as the gaseous phase of the foam collapses to restore the permeability of the strata plugged as ~set forth in ! U.s. 3,412,793 in which a small amount of a surface-active agent is inJected dlrectly into the steam line at the surface of the well to be carried in a solu~ion in the small amount of condensed water in the steam lnto ~he well where upon reaching the permeable sand or rock strata, the surface-active agent enters that strata and is foamed by the action of steam pushing through the surfaces of the strata. The foam produced is relatively stable only so long as the temperature of the foam remains above the bolling point of water at the reservoir pressure. When the temperature of the foam drops below the ;
, boiling point the foam automatically collapses and the blocked zones recover j their original permeability. ~.
. . 1 . .
~ I have discovered that by alternating the injection of steam and ., .
'~'!,' slugs of a surface-active agent into the highly permeable formation a high .. ~ .
, degree of control of the back pressure of the steam used in producing the : ~
`' well can be attained. ~, . ~, . .
`~ It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a process for ~-producing a well by plugging more permeable strata with a self-destructive ~foam.l It is another object of this invention to provide a method for ~;
;, ; controlling the steam back pressure within a producing well while temporarily ~, plugging permeable strata.
~, Other aspects, ob~ects and the various advantages of this invention ;~
l~ will become apparent from a reading of this specification and the appended ,l~ claims.
~!l Statement of the Invention In accordance wieh ehls invention a method is provided for controlling the back pressure of seeam injected into a highly permeable formation in thelproduction of an oil bearing formation by steam injection.
" . ! ~, :
~l~ 30 By this method steam~is injected into the formation and then the steam flow ,~i is interru~ted and a elug of surface-active agent dissolved or dispersed in ~ 2 ''' ~'~
~5'7648 ~
; a suitable solvent or carrier is in~ected into the formation. By repeating the in~ection of steam, the interruption of this inJection and the in~ection of surface-active agent a foam is continuously produced and driven into - -the formation in a sufficient amount to maintain a desired back pressure on the steam that is in~ected into the formation.
~' In a specific embodiment of the invention surface-active agent ~ can be injected simultaneously with the injection of steam and with the 1 interruption of the steam in~ection the in~ection of surface-active agent is continued. This embodiment can be stated as in~ecting steam and surface-active agent simultaneously with the interruption of this injection to ;~
allow the iniection of a slug of surface-active agent.
~; It is quite common for various strata in a formation to have ~ permeabilities sufficiently clos~ to each other so that some amount of foam ', will be formed in the less permeable strata. When foam enters both types :~ of strata the permeability of the more permeable stratum is reduced to a , greater degree than that of a less permeable stratum. One of the factors causing this is a recogni~ed phenomona that foam will reduce the effective -~
permeability of a high permeability sand to a larger extent than it wlll affect a low permeability sand. Also, the more ready flow of steam into the -more permeable stratum causes a larger heat input lnto that stra~um compared to the heat loss from that stratum than there is in a less permeable sand.
This results in a higher quality steam injected into the higher permeability stratum, and foam produced by this high quality steam will be longer lasting because it must lose more heat before the foam will collapse. The high steam ~;
flow rate into the high permeability stratum during the initial injection of the foaming agent will carry the foaming agent to a greater depth in the ! high permeability zone and, therefore, form a much thicker wall of foam in ~-`~1 that zone than is formed in the less permeable zones. It can be seen that ~, the invention is workable in strata of any relative permeability.
~ 3 ~
.`'~ ' .' ' . .. "
~L~S~''648 Among the advantages of interrupting steam in~ection and then injecting surfactant so that there is a pattern of alternate steam and surfactant injections is that the back pressure of the steam in the formation can be observed and from this back pressure it can be determined lf the foam is forming as desired from the surfactant as it is being injected. It ~ ;
is apparent that by observing the back pressure the injection of surfactant can be tailored to the particular formation being produced. This tailoring of the injections can be carried through the whole period of time within which the well is being produced by steam injection. After steam and surfactant have been alternately in~ected for a period of time it will ~ become apparent by the back pressure of the steam whether the foam is ``~ breaking down. If the foam is breaking down, steam injection can be in~errupted and additional surface-active agent can be injected to increase the foam in the formation as needed to maintain the back pressure of the steam at a certain desired level.
Although the invention has been described with respect to the use of steam as the condensible gas, it should be evident that any gas which is ~ ;~
~i condensible at the temperature and pressure conditions in the particular ~` strata should be equally useful to produce a temporary, self-destructive `-' 20 foam. Similarly, small amaunts of non-condensible gases can be mixed with . the condensible gas to vary the length of life of the foam. In general, .. . .
however, because of the low cost and ready availability of steam the invention would be practiced with steam alone. ~;
Various types of surface-active agents could be used in the process of my invention, either nonionic, anioAic, or cationic. Commercial surface-active agents of the alkyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol class and commonly available household cleansers have been tested and found satisfactory in the practice of my invention. For example, Trend*detergent manufactured by Puréx Corporation, Ltd., has proved satisfactory, as well as other household -cleaning compounds, hand and laundry soaps, and rug shampoos. ~-* Trademark ~ 4 ~
.:~,~., .
" , .:
. .
'-~'', . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ~. , . . . . .~ : .
~)576~
~ Nonionic type surface-actlve agents such as Triton X-100 and Igepal ; C0-990 are examples of the alkyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol class which are satisfactory in the practice of my lnvention. Anionic type surface-active agents such as Alconox and Trend are examples of the alkyl aryl sulfonate class usable in the practice of my inventlon. ~thomeen 18/60 and Arquad C-50 are examples of cationic surface-active agents which are usable in carrying out my invention, and are identified chemically as stearyl amine polyethylene oxide and n-alkyl trimethyl ammonium chlorlAe, respectively.
To practice this invention it is desirable to in~ect a liquid ` lO solution or dispersion of the surfactant, or mixture of surfactants which cause the steam to foam. Since a wide range of conditions exist at the well-head and a wide range of foa~ing surfactants are usable, it is also within the scope of the invention to have a wide range of carrier liquids.
Liquids which are frequently used in the marketing and transportation of surfactants are alcohols, oils and water or mixtures thereof. Such fluids can also be used to advantage in conjunction with the steam foam producing ., ~ .
surfactants to clean some of the mineral and organic deposlts from the well ;
although the main function in this invention is as a carrier for the surfactant. It is also desirable to have a liquid which does not become ~, 20 viscous or freeze at winter conditions.
Alcohols containing 3 to 8 carbon atoms can be used with the surfactants which are injected into the well. Hydrocarbon oils having a boiling range of 250 to 850F can serve as the liquid carrier for the surfactants. Water substantially free of salt is used in the steam generators.
However, the water used as a carrier for the surfactants may be salt free or .... .
contain up to about 5 weight percent of salt. Produced water containing 2-5 :!
~ ~ weight percent salt can be employed.
. , ~ To illustrate the benefit of in~ecting the surfactant solution from ; which the foam is produced instead of injecting a substantial amount of steam with the sur~actant solution, consider the two cases presented in the follow-ing example. Using a readily available surfactant such as sodium linear : ' ~, .
; .: ::
~57~
alkalate sulEonate (Stepan Agent Bio Soft D-40) which i8 a detergent base, requires about 10,500 pounds or two zones each fLve feet thick with the well spacing being 5-acre~ The concentration would be about 3 percent for the first 2500 pounds oE surfactant in about 240 barrels of water, and 1 percent for an additional 8000 pounds in 2300 barrels of water. In fresh water such compositions are known to produce foam readily upon agitation and the surfactantis known to be thermally stable at temperatures above 325F, a temperature used in many steam applications in oil recovery in Californla.
EXA~LE
Consider two zones of equal pore volumes having permeabillties of 225 millidarcys and 4000 millidarcys. Using the laboratory data presented on ; pages 268 and 269 of "Effect of Foam on Permeability of Porous Media to Gas"
~-^ by George C. Bernard and L. W. Holm in Soc. of Pet. Engr. Jour., Sept., 1964, pp. 267-274, the following two cases were calculated.
Case A: Sufficient surfactant solution and steam are injected to fill 10 percent of the pore volume of both of the zones. Before the injection o the surfactant soIution and steam, because of the permeability difference, ~`
about 95 percent of the steam injected will go into the more permeable zone and only about 5 percent will enter the less permeable zone. After injection ~1 20 of the surfactant solution with the steam, because of the increased back .', ~ i ~ pressure resulting from the presence of the foam, subsequent steam injectlon i' ~'1'~ ' ~'.
-` will distribute about 35 percent into the high permeability (4000 md) zcne ~ and 65 percent into the lower permeability (225 md) zone.
.. . .
, Case B: The same amount of surfactant solution as in Case A is . , ;
injected to fill 10 percent of the pore volume of both zones with foam being produced upon the subseqoent injection of steam. Before the surfactant solutlon was injected the injected steam would distribute about 95 percent into the more permeable (4000 md) zone and about 5 percent into the less ' l ~ permeable (225 md) zone. Since the surfactant solution would distribute in ' 30 a similar manner, about 95 percent of the solution will enter the most ~ - 6 -:.':'i :.
: .~
~,:
~5'764~
permeable ~one and about 5 percent will enter the less permeable zone. After the lnjection of steam to create a foam, the back pressure will increase and the continued steam injection will be distributed 15 percent into the high permeability (4000 md) zone and 85 percent into the less permeable (225 md) zone.
It can thus be seen that when the surfactant solution is in~ected without the accompanying steam, the less permeable zone takes 85 percent of the subsequent steam injection; whereas, when the surfactant solution and steam a~e injected simultaneously, the less permeable zone takes only 65 . .:
10 percent of the subsequen~ injection of steam. This improvement results ~
because the presence of foam decreases the permeability of higher permeability ~ -porous media to a greater extent than lower permeability porous medla.
In Case A the volume of foam which is generated in the more permeable zone is limited by the generation of foam before the in~ection of the surfactant solution is completed. The use of the injection procedure of Case B results when this invention is applied. The stea~ back pressure -resulting from the injection sequence of Case B would be expected to exceed `
the reservoir pressure by an amount about 2 to 3 times that obtained in Case A.
For example, if the back pressure in Case A exceeded the reservoir pressure by 200 psi, then in Case B the steam back pressure would be expected to ;: / ~
' exceed the reservoir pressure by 400 to 600 psi. ;"~ ' ~
:.
.: . :
.', : .~
, ., . - - . :~
.
:, :
. ::: :
.. ~:
. 3 .- . :,':
`. ! _ 7 ~
: j . .
~,., ' !
1"'', , ' ' . ~ . .
''' ~ j .
`' ;i764~ .
SUPPLEMEiNTARY DISCLOSURE
Among the various types of sur~ace-active agents that can be used -~
in the process of this invention a preferred type includes the nonlonic surface-active agents having cloud points above 200F (93C~ - as set out in Nonionic Surf~ctants, 1967, edited by Martin J. Shlck, Also preferred for use in this invention are commercial nonionic surface-active agents of the alkyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol class containing 10 to 100 mol ethylene- :
oxide per mol of surfactant. Some specific surface-active agents useful in : the invention are Igepal C0-880*, an example of the alkyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol class, and such anionic surfactants as Biosoft B-40* manufactured by , the Stepan Chemical Company, Sulframin 45* manufactured by Witco Chemical Company, and Siponate DS-4* manufactured by Aloolac~ Inc.
.,.~, ~
''' ,~ . '' "~''`. ~''~
., ~
.~, .
., ~''`''.,1 ~.
~''''";'' ':
~'.', '1 ':. , * Trade~ark " ., :i. .,- ' .~'''". :, ,.
PLUGGING HIGH PERMEABILITY E~RTH STRATA
Background of the _v ntion This invention relates to a process for plugging highly permeable earth strata encountered in a well bore. In one of its aspects this -lnvention relates to a method of plugging earth strata by forming therein a foam having ~ ~
1 a condensible gas as its gas phase. In still another aspe~t, it relates to ~ ~ ;
; a method of producing a well by cyclic steam stimulation or direct drive ~
.
~i~ steam injection by plugging the high permeability strata with a foam havlng ~ ~ ;
a condensible gas as its gaseous phase. In yet another aspect, it relates to closely controlling the back pressure of steam injected into a high ` 10 permeability strata by introducing foam into the strata which has as its gas phase a gas condensible at temperatures and pressures obtained within I the strata.
,, :
~`~ In oil well production, it is quite common to inject various gases, ; including steam, into oil wells to increase the production of oil from those ~ ~
:,- ~ ::
wells. One common method of increasing production ls the cyclic steam stimulation me~hod, wherein production of oil from the well is periodically -interrupted and steam is injected in the well. The steam serves to melt ~ ; some~of the waxe~ in the~strata, and reduce the viscosity of the oil i surrounding the well bore so that it will flow more readily into the well .. j, , ;: i ~, , bore and be produced therefrom. A second me~hod is the diract drive injection of steam or other gases continuously into one well whereby oils in the various I earth strata are pushed ahead of the steam or gas being injected and are `; 1 , , produced from another nearby well. ~ ~`
One of the problems faced in either type of injection of gases or ~ -steam into the well arises Erom the varying permeability of the different earth strata. ~here there is a considerable difference in the permeability ` ~, of different strata, the injected gas will flow into the more permeable strata preferentially, or on occasion almost exclusively. Since the oil to be produced may be very largely in the less permeable strata, a considerable ~`1, 30 quanti~y of gas or steam will be injected into the well with little success.
~5769L8 ,:
` A method for plugging a highly permeable formation with a foam that upon condensation of the steam lntroduced as the gaseous phase of the foam collapses to restore the permeability of the strata plugged as ~set forth in ! U.s. 3,412,793 in which a small amount of a surface-active agent is inJected dlrectly into the steam line at the surface of the well to be carried in a solu~ion in the small amount of condensed water in the steam lnto ~he well where upon reaching the permeable sand or rock strata, the surface-active agent enters that strata and is foamed by the action of steam pushing through the surfaces of the strata. The foam produced is relatively stable only so long as the temperature of the foam remains above the bolling point of water at the reservoir pressure. When the temperature of the foam drops below the ;
, boiling point the foam automatically collapses and the blocked zones recover j their original permeability. ~.
. . 1 . .
~ I have discovered that by alternating the injection of steam and ., .
'~'!,' slugs of a surface-active agent into the highly permeable formation a high .. ~ .
, degree of control of the back pressure of the steam used in producing the : ~
`' well can be attained. ~, . ~, . .
`~ It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a process for ~-producing a well by plugging more permeable strata with a self-destructive ~foam.l It is another object of this invention to provide a method for ~;
;, ; controlling the steam back pressure within a producing well while temporarily ~, plugging permeable strata.
~, Other aspects, ob~ects and the various advantages of this invention ;~
l~ will become apparent from a reading of this specification and the appended ,l~ claims.
~!l Statement of the Invention In accordance wieh ehls invention a method is provided for controlling the back pressure of seeam injected into a highly permeable formation in thelproduction of an oil bearing formation by steam injection.
" . ! ~, :
~l~ 30 By this method steam~is injected into the formation and then the steam flow ,~i is interru~ted and a elug of surface-active agent dissolved or dispersed in ~ 2 ''' ~'~
~5'7648 ~
; a suitable solvent or carrier is in~ected into the formation. By repeating the in~ection of steam, the interruption of this inJection and the in~ection of surface-active agent a foam is continuously produced and driven into - -the formation in a sufficient amount to maintain a desired back pressure on the steam that is in~ected into the formation.
~' In a specific embodiment of the invention surface-active agent ~ can be injected simultaneously with the injection of steam and with the 1 interruption of the steam in~ection the in~ection of surface-active agent is continued. This embodiment can be stated as in~ecting steam and surface-active agent simultaneously with the interruption of this injection to ;~
allow the iniection of a slug of surface-active agent.
~; It is quite common for various strata in a formation to have ~ permeabilities sufficiently clos~ to each other so that some amount of foam ', will be formed in the less permeable strata. When foam enters both types :~ of strata the permeability of the more permeable stratum is reduced to a , greater degree than that of a less permeable stratum. One of the factors causing this is a recogni~ed phenomona that foam will reduce the effective -~
permeability of a high permeability sand to a larger extent than it wlll affect a low permeability sand. Also, the more ready flow of steam into the -more permeable stratum causes a larger heat input lnto that stra~um compared to the heat loss from that stratum than there is in a less permeable sand.
This results in a higher quality steam injected into the higher permeability stratum, and foam produced by this high quality steam will be longer lasting because it must lose more heat before the foam will collapse. The high steam ~;
flow rate into the high permeability stratum during the initial injection of the foaming agent will carry the foaming agent to a greater depth in the ! high permeability zone and, therefore, form a much thicker wall of foam in ~-`~1 that zone than is formed in the less permeable zones. It can be seen that ~, the invention is workable in strata of any relative permeability.
~ 3 ~
.`'~ ' .' ' . .. "
~L~S~''648 Among the advantages of interrupting steam in~ection and then injecting surfactant so that there is a pattern of alternate steam and surfactant injections is that the back pressure of the steam in the formation can be observed and from this back pressure it can be determined lf the foam is forming as desired from the surfactant as it is being injected. It ~ ;
is apparent that by observing the back pressure the injection of surfactant can be tailored to the particular formation being produced. This tailoring of the injections can be carried through the whole period of time within which the well is being produced by steam injection. After steam and surfactant have been alternately in~ected for a period of time it will ~ become apparent by the back pressure of the steam whether the foam is ``~ breaking down. If the foam is breaking down, steam injection can be in~errupted and additional surface-active agent can be injected to increase the foam in the formation as needed to maintain the back pressure of the steam at a certain desired level.
Although the invention has been described with respect to the use of steam as the condensible gas, it should be evident that any gas which is ~ ;~
~i condensible at the temperature and pressure conditions in the particular ~` strata should be equally useful to produce a temporary, self-destructive `-' 20 foam. Similarly, small amaunts of non-condensible gases can be mixed with . the condensible gas to vary the length of life of the foam. In general, .. . .
however, because of the low cost and ready availability of steam the invention would be practiced with steam alone. ~;
Various types of surface-active agents could be used in the process of my invention, either nonionic, anioAic, or cationic. Commercial surface-active agents of the alkyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol class and commonly available household cleansers have been tested and found satisfactory in the practice of my invention. For example, Trend*detergent manufactured by Puréx Corporation, Ltd., has proved satisfactory, as well as other household -cleaning compounds, hand and laundry soaps, and rug shampoos. ~-* Trademark ~ 4 ~
.:~,~., .
" , .:
. .
'-~'', . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ~. , . . . . .~ : .
~)576~
~ Nonionic type surface-actlve agents such as Triton X-100 and Igepal ; C0-990 are examples of the alkyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol class which are satisfactory in the practice of my lnvention. Anionic type surface-active agents such as Alconox and Trend are examples of the alkyl aryl sulfonate class usable in the practice of my inventlon. ~thomeen 18/60 and Arquad C-50 are examples of cationic surface-active agents which are usable in carrying out my invention, and are identified chemically as stearyl amine polyethylene oxide and n-alkyl trimethyl ammonium chlorlAe, respectively.
To practice this invention it is desirable to in~ect a liquid ` lO solution or dispersion of the surfactant, or mixture of surfactants which cause the steam to foam. Since a wide range of conditions exist at the well-head and a wide range of foa~ing surfactants are usable, it is also within the scope of the invention to have a wide range of carrier liquids.
Liquids which are frequently used in the marketing and transportation of surfactants are alcohols, oils and water or mixtures thereof. Such fluids can also be used to advantage in conjunction with the steam foam producing ., ~ .
surfactants to clean some of the mineral and organic deposlts from the well ;
although the main function in this invention is as a carrier for the surfactant. It is also desirable to have a liquid which does not become ~, 20 viscous or freeze at winter conditions.
Alcohols containing 3 to 8 carbon atoms can be used with the surfactants which are injected into the well. Hydrocarbon oils having a boiling range of 250 to 850F can serve as the liquid carrier for the surfactants. Water substantially free of salt is used in the steam generators.
However, the water used as a carrier for the surfactants may be salt free or .... .
contain up to about 5 weight percent of salt. Produced water containing 2-5 :!
~ ~ weight percent salt can be employed.
. , ~ To illustrate the benefit of in~ecting the surfactant solution from ; which the foam is produced instead of injecting a substantial amount of steam with the sur~actant solution, consider the two cases presented in the follow-ing example. Using a readily available surfactant such as sodium linear : ' ~, .
; .: ::
~57~
alkalate sulEonate (Stepan Agent Bio Soft D-40) which i8 a detergent base, requires about 10,500 pounds or two zones each fLve feet thick with the well spacing being 5-acre~ The concentration would be about 3 percent for the first 2500 pounds oE surfactant in about 240 barrels of water, and 1 percent for an additional 8000 pounds in 2300 barrels of water. In fresh water such compositions are known to produce foam readily upon agitation and the surfactantis known to be thermally stable at temperatures above 325F, a temperature used in many steam applications in oil recovery in Californla.
EXA~LE
Consider two zones of equal pore volumes having permeabillties of 225 millidarcys and 4000 millidarcys. Using the laboratory data presented on ; pages 268 and 269 of "Effect of Foam on Permeability of Porous Media to Gas"
~-^ by George C. Bernard and L. W. Holm in Soc. of Pet. Engr. Jour., Sept., 1964, pp. 267-274, the following two cases were calculated.
Case A: Sufficient surfactant solution and steam are injected to fill 10 percent of the pore volume of both of the zones. Before the injection o the surfactant soIution and steam, because of the permeability difference, ~`
about 95 percent of the steam injected will go into the more permeable zone and only about 5 percent will enter the less permeable zone. After injection ~1 20 of the surfactant solution with the steam, because of the increased back .', ~ i ~ pressure resulting from the presence of the foam, subsequent steam injectlon i' ~'1'~ ' ~'.
-` will distribute about 35 percent into the high permeability (4000 md) zcne ~ and 65 percent into the lower permeability (225 md) zone.
.. . .
, Case B: The same amount of surfactant solution as in Case A is . , ;
injected to fill 10 percent of the pore volume of both zones with foam being produced upon the subseqoent injection of steam. Before the surfactant solutlon was injected the injected steam would distribute about 95 percent into the more permeable (4000 md) zone and about 5 percent into the less ' l ~ permeable (225 md) zone. Since the surfactant solution would distribute in ' 30 a similar manner, about 95 percent of the solution will enter the most ~ - 6 -:.':'i :.
: .~
~,:
~5'764~
permeable ~one and about 5 percent will enter the less permeable zone. After the lnjection of steam to create a foam, the back pressure will increase and the continued steam injection will be distributed 15 percent into the high permeability (4000 md) zone and 85 percent into the less permeable (225 md) zone.
It can thus be seen that when the surfactant solution is in~ected without the accompanying steam, the less permeable zone takes 85 percent of the subsequent steam injection; whereas, when the surfactant solution and steam a~e injected simultaneously, the less permeable zone takes only 65 . .:
10 percent of the subsequen~ injection of steam. This improvement results ~
because the presence of foam decreases the permeability of higher permeability ~ -porous media to a greater extent than lower permeability porous medla.
In Case A the volume of foam which is generated in the more permeable zone is limited by the generation of foam before the in~ection of the surfactant solution is completed. The use of the injection procedure of Case B results when this invention is applied. The stea~ back pressure -resulting from the injection sequence of Case B would be expected to exceed `
the reservoir pressure by an amount about 2 to 3 times that obtained in Case A.
For example, if the back pressure in Case A exceeded the reservoir pressure by 200 psi, then in Case B the steam back pressure would be expected to ;: / ~
' exceed the reservoir pressure by 400 to 600 psi. ;"~ ' ~
:.
.: . :
.', : .~
, ., . - - . :~
.
:, :
. ::: :
.. ~:
. 3 .- . :,':
`. ! _ 7 ~
: j . .
~,., ' !
1"'', , ' ' . ~ . .
''' ~ j .
`' ;i764~ .
SUPPLEMEiNTARY DISCLOSURE
Among the various types of sur~ace-active agents that can be used -~
in the process of this invention a preferred type includes the nonlonic surface-active agents having cloud points above 200F (93C~ - as set out in Nonionic Surf~ctants, 1967, edited by Martin J. Shlck, Also preferred for use in this invention are commercial nonionic surface-active agents of the alkyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol class containing 10 to 100 mol ethylene- :
oxide per mol of surfactant. Some specific surface-active agents useful in : the invention are Igepal C0-880*, an example of the alkyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol class, and such anionic surfactants as Biosoft B-40* manufactured by , the Stepan Chemical Company, Sulframin 45* manufactured by Witco Chemical Company, and Siponate DS-4* manufactured by Aloolac~ Inc.
.,.~, ~
''' ,~ . '' "~''`. ~''~
., ~
.~, .
., ~''`''.,1 ~.
~''''";'' ':
~'.', '1 ':. , * Trade~ark " ., :i. .,- ' .~'''". :, ,.
Claims (9)
1. A method for controlling the back pressure of steam in a highly permeable formation in the production of an oil bearing formation by steam injection, said method comprising:
(1) injecting steam into said formation;
(2) interrupting the steam injecting;
(3) injecting a slug of an anionic surface-active agent of the alkyl aryl sulfonate class dissolved and dispersed in a suitable solvent or carrier during the interruption of the steam flow to produce a foam with steam as its gaseous phase; and (4) repeating steps (1) through (3) to continue to produce foam and drive a sufficient amount of said foam into said highly permeable formation to maintain a desired back pressure on the steam injected.
(1) injecting steam into said formation;
(2) interrupting the steam injecting;
(3) injecting a slug of an anionic surface-active agent of the alkyl aryl sulfonate class dissolved and dispersed in a suitable solvent or carrier during the interruption of the steam flow to produce a foam with steam as its gaseous phase; and (4) repeating steps (1) through (3) to continue to produce foam and drive a sufficient amount of said foam into said highly permeable formation to maintain a desired back pressure on the steam injected.
2. A method of claim 1 wherein the surface-active agent is inject-ed simultaneously with the steam injection of step 1.
3. A method of claim 1 wherein said solvent or carrier is chosen from among water, oil and alcohol.
4. A method of claim 2 wherein said solvent is chosen from among water, oil and alcohol.
CLAIMS SUPPORTED BY SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE
CLAIMS SUPPORTED BY SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE
5. A method for controlling the back pressure steam in a highly permeable formation in the production of an oil bearing formation by steam injection, said method comprising:
(1) injecting steam into said formation;
(2) interrupting the steam injecting;
(3) injecting a slug of nonionic surface-active agent having cloud point above 200°F (93°C), said surface-active agent dissolved or dispersed in a suitable solvent or carrier during the interruption of the steam flow to produce a foam with steam as its gaseous phase; and (4) repeating steps (1) through (3) to continue to produce foam and drive a sufficient amount of said foam into said highly permeable forma-tion to maintain a desired back pressure on the steam injected.
(1) injecting steam into said formation;
(2) interrupting the steam injecting;
(3) injecting a slug of nonionic surface-active agent having cloud point above 200°F (93°C), said surface-active agent dissolved or dispersed in a suitable solvent or carrier during the interruption of the steam flow to produce a foam with steam as its gaseous phase; and (4) repeating steps (1) through (3) to continue to produce foam and drive a sufficient amount of said foam into said highly permeable forma-tion to maintain a desired back pressure on the steam injected.
6. A method of claim 5 wherein the nonionic surface-active agent is of the alkyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol class.
7. A method of claim 5 wherein surface-active agent is injected simultaneously with the steam injection of step 1.
8. A method of claim 5 wherein said solvent or carrier is chosen from among water, oil and alcohol.
9. A method of claim 7 wherein said solvent is chosen from among water, oil and alcohol.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US59497675A | 1975-07-11 | 1975-07-11 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1057648A true CA1057648A (en) | 1979-07-03 |
Family
ID=24381197
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA247,089A Expired CA1057648A (en) | 1975-07-11 | 1976-03-04 | Plugging high permeability earth strata |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1057648A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4458759A (en) * | 1982-04-29 | 1984-07-10 | Alberta Oil Sands Technology And Research Authority | Use of surfactants to improve oil recovery during steamflooding |
| US10214683B2 (en) | 2015-01-13 | 2019-02-26 | Bp Corporation North America Inc | Systems and methods for producing hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon bearing rock via combined treatment of the rock and subsequent waterflooding |
-
1976
- 1976-03-04 CA CA247,089A patent/CA1057648A/en not_active Expired
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4458759A (en) * | 1982-04-29 | 1984-07-10 | Alberta Oil Sands Technology And Research Authority | Use of surfactants to improve oil recovery during steamflooding |
| US10214683B2 (en) | 2015-01-13 | 2019-02-26 | Bp Corporation North America Inc | Systems and methods for producing hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon bearing rock via combined treatment of the rock and subsequent waterflooding |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1056301A (en) | Producing heavy oil from tar sands | |
| US3508611A (en) | Molecular weight of hydrocarbon influencing the thermostability of a micellar dispersion | |
| US3412793A (en) | Plugging high permeability earth strata | |
| US4508170A (en) | Method of increasing the yield of hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation | |
| US4447342A (en) | Method of clay stabilization in enhanced oil recovery | |
| US3303896A (en) | Process for drilling boreholes in the earth utilizing amine oxide surfactant foaming agent | |
| US2800962A (en) | Surface-active agents in well treating | |
| US3994345A (en) | Method of recovering oil using steam | |
| US3208515A (en) | Method of recovering oil from underground reservoirs | |
| US3369602A (en) | Secondary recovery of petroleum | |
| US4175618A (en) | High vertical and horizontal conformance thermal oil recovery process | |
| CA1136840A (en) | Microemulsions which compatibly incorporate viscosifiers and their use in enhanced oil recovery | |
| US5110487A (en) | Enhanced oil recovery method using surfactant compositions for improved oil mobility | |
| US3482631A (en) | Secondary recovery process utilizing a pre-slug prior to a displacing fluid | |
| US2920041A (en) | Waterflooding method of secondary recovery | |
| US4291765A (en) | Water flooding process using multiple fluids | |
| US3796266A (en) | Surfactant oil recovery process | |
| US2765851A (en) | Process for improving oil recovery processes | |
| US3208517A (en) | Method of secondary recovery | |
| US4607695A (en) | High sweep efficiency steam drive oil recovery method | |
| US3376924A (en) | Foam drive for secondary recovery | |
| US3116791A (en) | Secondary recovery of petroleum | |
| US3938591A (en) | Intermediate fluid systems for long distance oil displacement | |
| US3915230A (en) | Surfactant oil recovery process | |
| CA1057648A (en) | Plugging high permeability earth strata |