CA1037296A - Aluminum alloy system - Google Patents
Aluminum alloy systemInfo
- Publication number
- CA1037296A CA1037296A CA209,968A CA209968A CA1037296A CA 1037296 A CA1037296 A CA 1037296A CA 209968 A CA209968 A CA 209968A CA 1037296 A CA1037296 A CA 1037296A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- alloy
- copper
- magnesium
- zinc
- total
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Preventing Corrosion Or Incrustation Of Metals (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Aluminum base alloys which contain zinc, magnesium and copper, especially X7016 type alloy containing 4 to 5% zinc, 0.8 to 1.4% magnesium and 0.6 to 1.4% copper and which are adapted for extruding, solution treatment, hot working, quenching, aging and anodizing to achieve a bright surface appearance in artificially aged temper; and related wrought articles having a recrystallized metallurgical structure characterized by its resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
Aluminum base alloys which contain zinc, magnesium and copper, especially X7016 type alloy containing 4 to 5% zinc, 0.8 to 1.4% magnesium and 0.6 to 1.4% copper and which are adapted for extruding, solution treatment, hot working, quenching, aging and anodizing to achieve a bright surface appearance in artificially aged temper; and related wrought articles having a recrystallized metallurgical structure characterized by its resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
Description
~1037296 This application is directed to aluminum base alloys - of the type containing both zinc and magnesium, together with a controlled addition of copper, yet substantially free of recrystallization-inhibiting elements such as chromium, manganese and zirconium, and adapted for making wrought articles having a recrystallized metallurgical structure characterized by its resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
In general, the present invention relates to Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys consisting essentially of aluminum, 3.5 to 5.5% zinc, 0.5 to 2% magnesium and 0.3 to 1.5% copper by weight, with silicon, iron and other residual elements and impurities up to about 0.5% total, including manganese, chromium, nickel, titanium and zirconium not exceeding.05% each and 0.15% total. -~-~
In accordance with the present invention it has been ;` found that wrought articles made from such alloys, and having a recrystallized structure, not only exhibit excellent resis-tance to stress corrosion cracking, in artificially aged condition, but, particularly in the case of preferred alloy compositions hereinafter described, are readily anodized to achieve a bright surface appearance. This is contrary to what would be expected on the basis of published literature regarding the role of copper, which generally is considered as an undesirable addition to Al-Zn-Mg alloys for anodizing purposes, except at very low levels of about 0.1% by weight.
- It is also unexpected and surprising that a recrytal-- lized structure of such an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy would be resistant ~ to stress corrosion cracking, even in underaged condition, - since it has been considered by some experts in the art that a fibrous structure would be necessary in this regard. ~
''' ~'~
,: :
:
.: .
1037296 .
The present invention is a result of efforts to develop a heat-treatable alloy system suitable for making automotive vehicle bumpers, or other wrought articles, and adapted for extruding, solution treatment, hot working, quenching, aging and anodizing to achieve a bright surface appearance in artificially aged temper. In accordance with a preferred aspect of the invention, an aluminum base alloy (type X7016) is provided which meets all of these criteria, and is believed to be the only known 7000 series alloy capable of providing a recrystallized structure which exhibits the property of being resistant to stress corrosion cracking, in combination with the ability to be bright anodized. The registered composition limits of alloy X7016 are silicon 0~10%
(max.), iron 0.10% (max.), copper 0.6 to 1.4%, manganese .Q3%
(max.), magnesium 0.8 to 1.4%, zinc 4 to 5%, titanium .03%
(max.), others (including chromium, nickel and zirconium) not exceeding .03% each and 0.10% total.
The use of copper in 7000 series sheet and plate alloys containing both zinc and magnesium has been known and prac-ticed commercially for many years. However~ apparently due to ~; concern about its adverse effect on weldability, copper has been used typically at very low levels where welding was anticipated. It has been reported, for example, that small controlled additions of copper (~ 0~20/o) to a range of Al-Zn-Mg alloys in a variety of wrought forms improved the stress corrosion resistance of parent metal and weldments without reducing weldability. The literature further notes that copper has been found to promote microfissuring in the heat-affected zone of weldments, but that copper up to 0.4% is satisfactory _ 3 '',' ~:
~037;~6 in the presence of zirconium. Others have also suggested ` that minor additions of copper in medium strength weldable alloys may be beneficial in reducing stress corrosion susceptibility of recrystallized weldments of such alloys.
; -; Apparently no studies have been reported on the effect of copper levels above 0.4% in recrystallized structures.
However, as hereinafter discussed, our work shows that a higher copper content is effective to increase resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
On the other hand, with regard to copper-bearing alloys of the 7000 series, it has been proposed that factors such as controlling the heat treatment to achieve overaging, and including alloying additions of various elements (especially Cr, Mn~ Zr) to inhibit recrystallization, are helpful in achieving stress corrosion resistance of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu systems; also, that the presence of copper in these alloys is detrimental to their general corrosion resistance, as indicated by increased tendency toward pitting, although a small amount of copper (such as 0.1%) is generally advan-tageous for bright anodizing purposes. Although the general . .
corrosion resistance of base Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys is impaired by increasing the copper content from 0.1% to 1.0%, we find that the corrosion resistance of anodized X7016 alloy is not.
.."
Consequently, in view of the recognized disadvantages : .
; of copper with respect to impairment of weldability, and the general reluctance to use recrystallized structures, it is ,; . .
surprising and unobvious to find, in accordance with the present invention, that Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys typically containing about 0.3 to 1.5% copper, and substantially free of 1037Z~fi ;; recrysta~ization-inhibiting elements, can be used successfully - to produce wrought articles having a recrystallized structure characterized not only by its resistance to stress corrosion cracking, but also adapted for anodizing in solution treated and artificially aged condition to achieve a bright surface finish.
Without being bound to any theoretical explanation of the invention, it may be noted that the MgZn2 phase is highly anodic to solid solutions of Al-Zn-Mg. When it is precipi-tated predominantly in the grain boundaries, the alloy can be highly susceptible to cracking. Consequently, additions of copper may have at least two significant effects. First, some copper apparently coprecipitates in solid solution in the grain boundary MgZn2 phase, making its corrosion potential more - cathodic. second, copper in the grain matrix promotes pitting, and thus provides an alternate mechanism for the discharge of corrosive agents such as dissolved oxygen or hydrogen ions.
When it occurs, pitting can actually retard stress corrosion cracking either by providing active anodes throughout the ~` 20 matrix which, in turn, afford cathodic protection to less active but susceptible grain boundaries, or by inhibiting :,........................................................................ .
localized dissolution at the boundary and thus prevent the . :: . .
- formation of cor~-osion paths of sufficiently small radius of -~
J ' ' ' curvature to propagate as a crack under the existing streæs condition.
The foregoing analysis is compatible with and helps `- to explain the observed phenomenon that using an accelerated Boiling Salt Test to predict stress corrosion susceptibility, although found to be an acceptable approach for copper-free '` :
, ~037Z96 alloys of the 7000 series, does not provide reliable data for ` X7016 alloy. In a standard Boiling Salt Test, the dissolved oxygen content is low, which may tend to minimize pitting and accentuate cracking tendencies, so that the results do not adequately reflect the presence of copper.
For purposes of the invention, the upper limit of copper, at least below the level of about 1.9% for which the alloy's propensity to stress corrosion cracking becomes severe, depends upon the acceptable degree of yellow coloration developed during conventional H2SO4 anodizing. A maximum of about 1.1% copper is preferred in this respect. It has also been found that using an anodizing current density of about 10 amps per square foot (asf), plus or minus about 2 asf, is helpful in minimizing the depth of coloration without requiring prolonged treatment. A distinctive characteristic of X7016 alloy is its ability to be anodized to provide a clear bright ;~ coating exhibiting a specular reflectance factor of about 85 to 95% for anodic film thickness up to about one-half mil.
Alloys suitable for purposes of the invention include those containing approximately 4 to 6% total of zinc and magnesium, preferably about 5.30 to 5.85% total, and particu-larly with a copper content in the range of about 0.7 to 1.1%.
. :' ; The alloy may be solution treated at about 900-925F., for example, and quenched in water or by air blast, but a relatively ast quench rate of about 100F./sec. is preferable ; for best specularity and optimum stress corrosion resistance - properties as determined by Alternate Immersion Testing.
Suitable aging practices are about 3 to 8 hours at 200-225 F. plus 3 to 8 hours at 275-325F., to achieve an ` 1037Z96 underaged temper and, for alloy X7016, a minimum yield strength o~ 42 Ksi.
When the fabricating sequence involves extruding, solution treating, hot forming, quenching, aging and anodizing the alloy, it is preferable for best anodizing results (and freedom from grain growth) to avoid cold working the extruded alloy, such as by stretch straightening the extrusion. However, routine cold finishing operations may be performed between the quenching and aging operations.
The following exemplary practices of the invention and its presently preferred alloy compositions are provided for the purposes of illustration:
ExamPle I -Tests were conducted by alternate immersion treatment (using Test Method 823 of Fed. Std. No. 151) and by exposure to the atmosphere at an outdoor location in Richmond, Virginia.
Samples taken from an extruded section were tested in the long transverse direction, which was considered permissible because .
; the structure was fully recrystallized and exhibited no signi-; 20 ficant anisotropy.
(a) Test Material A 30-inch length by 10-inch round billet (S-23891), homogenized 16 hours at 1075F, was extruded to form a bumper blank. The composition was .04 Si, .04 Fe, .26 Cu, C.01 Mn, 7' - ' 1.06 Mg, C.ol Cr, C.01 ~i, 4.65 zn and <.01 Ti, balance aluminum.
(b) Press Practice:
Extrusion Ratio - 98/1 - Cylinder temperature ~ 800F.
. .
~ 7 ~
Billet temperature - 920F.
; Ram Speed - 12 IPM ram speed Cooling - air quench (fans) (c) Testing Conditions In all tests, specimens were strained by three-point loading to a permanent set at a value of 12 mils/inch.
Specimen dimensions were 0.250" wide, about 3" long, and 0.126" thick. Test results for various conaitions noted are -given in Table 1.
Table 1: Deflected Beam Stress-Corrosion Test Results Condition Alternate ImmersiOn Richmond AtmosPhere Failure ~o Failure NO
- Time Failure Time Failure ys) 500 days (Days) 500 Davs " 69 ` B x x . . .
:.
- " x x ". C 19 . . .
~ 7 :. ~
~ 20 D x x ...
,. " x x E x x ~-" x x F x " x ` Condition A - As press-fan quenched, stretched and naturally aged for 11-1/2 months, followed by a solution heat treatment (one hour at 900F ~ CWQ) and a 16-20 day natural age.
., 1~37296 Condition B - condition A followed by a two-step age of 7 hours at 225F + 8 hours at 300F (50F/hr. heat-up rates). TS =
54.2 KSI, YS = 48.0 KSI, Elong. = 16.5%.
condition C - as press-fan quenched, stretched and naturally aged for 11-1/2 months.
Condition D - naturally aged for 12-1/2 months, followed by a solution heat treatment (one hour at 900OF ~ CWQ) + 20 hours at 250F. (5ooF/hr. heat-up rate).
- Condition E - naturally aged for 12-1/2 months, followed by 8 hours at 250F + 8 hours at 300 F. TS = 54.5 KSI, YS = 49.1 KSI, Elong. = 13.0%.
Condition F - naturally aged for 12-1/2 months, followed by - 20 hours at 250F. (5ooF~hr. heat-up rate).
EXAMPLE II
Stress corrosion resistance of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys having various copper levels (.51, .75, .99, 1.46, 1.93) was determined by both alternate immersion testing and following exposure in the Richmond atmosphere.
(al Test Material Test material was extruded from 14-inch . ;.,: "
. .,~, round by 30-inch length billets which had been homogenized as noted below. Alloy compositions were as follows:
Alloy Compositions Sample I.D. Si Fe Cu Mn Mq Cr Ni Zn Ti S-28902 .04 .06 .51 ~ 01 .98 <~01 ~01 4.65 <.01 S-28903 ~04 .06 .75 ~01 .98 ~.0~ <.01 4.61 <.01 S-28898 .04 .06 .99 ~01 1.03 ~01 ~.01 4.64 <.01 S-28904 .04 .07 1.46 ~01 ~96 ~01 ~.01 4.75 <.01 S-28888 .04 .06 1.93 ~ 01 .95 <.01 ~.01 4.55 ~01 - :.
:: _ g _ ''' .
`::;;
103~296 ~omogenizinq Treatments - Alloy I.D. Practice S-28902 14 hours at 1030F
S-28903 14 hours at 1030F
S 28898 14 hours at 10650F
S-28904 14 hours at 1030F
S-28888 14 hours at 10650F
(b) Extrusion data were as follows:
.. ~,, ;
Break Extrude Indicated Table Billet Charge Pressure Pressure Ram SPeed SPeed TemPerature - 10 S-~8902 2800 2400 5 30 875 ' S-28903 - 26 875 , . . .
, -, ; S-28888 3600 3000 5 28 850 ~' Container Temp. ~ 8000F.
;` COOling - air quench (fans) ` Structure - fully recrystallized (c) Sample Preparation and Results : -.
Residual stresses were introduced by indenting specimens with the Olsen Ball Penetrator. Samples were indented with various loads in both the T4 and aged conditions, and after bright anodizing. The T4 condition was obtained ~- using a 10-minute solution heat treatment at 900F followed by a fan quench and a caustic etch. Aging was for 8 hours at 225F followed by 8 hours at 300OF using a 50F/hr. heat-up ,` rate. The order of treatments is shown in the appropriate table. Aging was done within four days after either quenching - ~r indenting. Indenting was done within ten days after quen-ching and within ten days after aging.
~' ' 1037~6 All samples were indented under the following :`
conditions after facing off to .240-.250 inches:
7/8" ball diameter 1-1/2" I.D. top die 1-3/8" I.D. bottom die ;
2000# clamp down load Tests results are shown in Tables 2 and 3, for the high and low.copper content alloys having the following physical propertieæ:
:, S-28902 - (.51 Cu) Aged properties - UTS = 51.3 KSI,-YS = 47.2 KSI, Elong. = 16.8%. .
.;, .. ~ .
*: - .~ .
S-28888 - (1.93 Cu) Aged Properties - UTS = 54.6 KSI, YS = 50.1 KSI, Elong. = 17.0%.
' .:- . .~.:
. '. :
. '~ , , . .
: . ~
. . . .
. :. :
: .
,": ': .
'''' ' ' ~'' ``.:
. ~ .
:' ~
, j ~ :
.. ' ~
.: .
'''' .
, - 11 - ~
1 " .
1 ' ' - : -; . ' ~ ' , ,:
` 1(~3~Z96 ..
` ,~ ~ ~
~ ~ a) O~ ~ XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX X
9~ ~ :~
al S h `1 0 : ~ ~
a,~ ta :':. ~ O
Q Ei a ~q ~ ~^
- o~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~r , ~ \~/ ' ' .
o ~
O ~:
E~ O a~ ~
U ~ ~ ~ lR
rl h O ~ ~ C) Z~ ~XX XX XXX XXx Xxx XXX x Q~ ~ ..
.~ H 1~ J O :~
J
h ~ ~Q d' d' d' `~
o O ,~ , 1` r` ~`
-1 ~ \J/
h h --H ~:: r-l I
~D r~ O ~ :
+ ~ ~ ~
a ::
h ,1 ~ ~ ~3: = N ~
,~ O O rl ,1 ~,1 ~: ~ h 1: ~1 1~ ~ R +
~ ~ ~iS + ~
O ,,1 ~ N
,-1 h t~ : = C) ~: -~ a~ R ,1 ~ ~ ~ - o ~ ,~
J ~ I ~ + + ,1 ~ + ,~ ' -In, ~ ~ U ~ : ~: ~
.- O + + + + + ~ +
J
'' a~ o~
,1 ,~
~ o ~ a~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~I r~1 a~ 1 o ~ 1 o _I ~ o o ~ o ~ o ~ ~ o o ~I o o .,,, a) ~1 _ ,Q ~ OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO 000 1~lq OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO OOo E-~ r l la R o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o m ~-- , ~
.
:
; `
. ' !
.. _ o~
h h a) ~ ~ ~
~ 0~1 ~ XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
O a~ h ~1 O
F:
0~
m O
'.. : ~ ~i )I^
g ~
. ~1 ~
,~ . ~ ~ .
~4 --'.
'.. ,~
. ~ .,~ ~ ~
m h O ~ .
O ~ i ~ ..
:. td ~ ~ X ~e x ., ~ ~ X X X; X X X
.. ~ H h ~`1 0 . ,1 h ~ ~U
h ~
H ~ rl ~a . V ~ V ~ V ~ ~ y V V ~t V
~1 ,a ~
a~ ~C h--..
s~
.~ Q) ~U N
I
. . _l ~ ~
. . ,¢ ,1 0~ I
. . ~
a~ = ' ~;
.-. N r~
.,, ~ r~
O u~ ~ N t~ ~:
,, 8 ~ ~ " ~
: _ ~ R
rl ~ n~ +
~,. o X.' ~ O ~ ~ _ _ N
C R ~ C c:-~ ~: + ~ 5~ J +
U~ (U O ~
+ + + + ~ + +
,.~.` . ';' - = = = = E~ = = ^ = = = E-~ = =
.,...... .~
:. ~ o ~
~ co ~ ~ oo. ~ o ~ ~ o ~1 ~
. ~ a~ O O N If) O 1~ ~ t~l : - ` ~ h 0~ ~ O --I ~ O --I ~ O O ~ o _I ~) ~ t` U ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ) --~ , . O O IY~ O ~1 ~ O O N
.'. E~
.,""' ; _~
O O O O O O ~ O O O O O
OOO OOO OOO 'C~OO' , ~ ~O-1 OOO OOO OOO OOOIOOO oOO OOO
(d) Others (.75, .99, 1.46 Cu) ~ o failures occurred in alternate immersion or in the atmosphere over 220 days on test at these three inter-mediate copper levels.
Additional comments on the Results of Example II.
., , Susceptibility at the highest Cu level (1.9%) was found in alternate immersion for various sample conditions, including the aged + indented specimens. With only one exception, other samples which were deformed after aging have not failed. This one exception applied to a comparison specimen at lower copper content (.1 Cu) in the atmosphere test using the highest load (12 KIP). Even then, the failure had more the appearance of accelerated intergranular corrosion than cracking. Contrary to the results found with the Boiling - Salt Test, samples indented in the T4 condition and exposed to alternate immersion showed some susceptibility, while all other . ~ -.
conditions did not (with the exceptions at the 1.9 Cu level).
Similarly, in the atmosphere, three failures have been observed, none of which are indented-after-aged conditions (again with the exception of the 1.9 Cu alloy). Below the 1.9 Cu level, .. :
five failures total have occurred in both alternate immersion - and the atmosphere at the .1 Cu level, one at the .51 Cu level, .
and none at .75, .99, and 1.46% CU. This indicates increasing resistance with increasing copper content.
Perhaps the two most relevant sample conditions tested were those that were aged after indenting (simulates aging after cold forming) and those that were indented after aging (simulates field damage to the fully hardened bumper).
Belsw the 1.9 Cu level, no failures have occurred for either :-. . ~.
. .
1037Z~6 condition in alternate immersion, and with the one exception previously mentioned of the indented after-aging sample, no failures have occurred in the atmosphere.
Time on test (~ 200 days) has been sufficiently long to allow these unfailed specimens to be described as very resistant and possibly immune.
Example III
In forming several automotive wrap-around bumper components of X7016 Alloy on prototype production tooling, extruded sections (F-temper) were preheated at 900-9250F. for twenty minutes, cooled by air blast to a suitable hot working temperature of about 800F., hot formed to shape the wrap-around end portions, and quenched in water. After final finishing operations cold, i.e., at ambient temperature, the `- thus fabricated components were sectioned at the most heavily cold worked portions and aged for 8 hours at 225F. plus 8 hours at 30CF.
The alloy contained approximately 4.69% zinc, 1.01% magnesium and 0.93% copper, with .04% silicon, 0.6% iron i 20 and less than .01% each of manganese, chromium, nickel and titanium, balance aluminum.
The heat treated specimens exhibited good resis-tance to stress corrosion cracking under Alternate Immersion ` Testing, after being deformed to the point of incipient fractureand releasing the load just beyond the stress level producing instability.
:
~ ,
In general, the present invention relates to Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys consisting essentially of aluminum, 3.5 to 5.5% zinc, 0.5 to 2% magnesium and 0.3 to 1.5% copper by weight, with silicon, iron and other residual elements and impurities up to about 0.5% total, including manganese, chromium, nickel, titanium and zirconium not exceeding.05% each and 0.15% total. -~-~
In accordance with the present invention it has been ;` found that wrought articles made from such alloys, and having a recrystallized structure, not only exhibit excellent resis-tance to stress corrosion cracking, in artificially aged condition, but, particularly in the case of preferred alloy compositions hereinafter described, are readily anodized to achieve a bright surface appearance. This is contrary to what would be expected on the basis of published literature regarding the role of copper, which generally is considered as an undesirable addition to Al-Zn-Mg alloys for anodizing purposes, except at very low levels of about 0.1% by weight.
- It is also unexpected and surprising that a recrytal-- lized structure of such an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy would be resistant ~ to stress corrosion cracking, even in underaged condition, - since it has been considered by some experts in the art that a fibrous structure would be necessary in this regard. ~
''' ~'~
,: :
:
.: .
1037296 .
The present invention is a result of efforts to develop a heat-treatable alloy system suitable for making automotive vehicle bumpers, or other wrought articles, and adapted for extruding, solution treatment, hot working, quenching, aging and anodizing to achieve a bright surface appearance in artificially aged temper. In accordance with a preferred aspect of the invention, an aluminum base alloy (type X7016) is provided which meets all of these criteria, and is believed to be the only known 7000 series alloy capable of providing a recrystallized structure which exhibits the property of being resistant to stress corrosion cracking, in combination with the ability to be bright anodized. The registered composition limits of alloy X7016 are silicon 0~10%
(max.), iron 0.10% (max.), copper 0.6 to 1.4%, manganese .Q3%
(max.), magnesium 0.8 to 1.4%, zinc 4 to 5%, titanium .03%
(max.), others (including chromium, nickel and zirconium) not exceeding .03% each and 0.10% total.
The use of copper in 7000 series sheet and plate alloys containing both zinc and magnesium has been known and prac-ticed commercially for many years. However~ apparently due to ~; concern about its adverse effect on weldability, copper has been used typically at very low levels where welding was anticipated. It has been reported, for example, that small controlled additions of copper (~ 0~20/o) to a range of Al-Zn-Mg alloys in a variety of wrought forms improved the stress corrosion resistance of parent metal and weldments without reducing weldability. The literature further notes that copper has been found to promote microfissuring in the heat-affected zone of weldments, but that copper up to 0.4% is satisfactory _ 3 '',' ~:
~037;~6 in the presence of zirconium. Others have also suggested ` that minor additions of copper in medium strength weldable alloys may be beneficial in reducing stress corrosion susceptibility of recrystallized weldments of such alloys.
; -; Apparently no studies have been reported on the effect of copper levels above 0.4% in recrystallized structures.
However, as hereinafter discussed, our work shows that a higher copper content is effective to increase resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
On the other hand, with regard to copper-bearing alloys of the 7000 series, it has been proposed that factors such as controlling the heat treatment to achieve overaging, and including alloying additions of various elements (especially Cr, Mn~ Zr) to inhibit recrystallization, are helpful in achieving stress corrosion resistance of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu systems; also, that the presence of copper in these alloys is detrimental to their general corrosion resistance, as indicated by increased tendency toward pitting, although a small amount of copper (such as 0.1%) is generally advan-tageous for bright anodizing purposes. Although the general . .
corrosion resistance of base Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys is impaired by increasing the copper content from 0.1% to 1.0%, we find that the corrosion resistance of anodized X7016 alloy is not.
.."
Consequently, in view of the recognized disadvantages : .
; of copper with respect to impairment of weldability, and the general reluctance to use recrystallized structures, it is ,; . .
surprising and unobvious to find, in accordance with the present invention, that Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys typically containing about 0.3 to 1.5% copper, and substantially free of 1037Z~fi ;; recrysta~ization-inhibiting elements, can be used successfully - to produce wrought articles having a recrystallized structure characterized not only by its resistance to stress corrosion cracking, but also adapted for anodizing in solution treated and artificially aged condition to achieve a bright surface finish.
Without being bound to any theoretical explanation of the invention, it may be noted that the MgZn2 phase is highly anodic to solid solutions of Al-Zn-Mg. When it is precipi-tated predominantly in the grain boundaries, the alloy can be highly susceptible to cracking. Consequently, additions of copper may have at least two significant effects. First, some copper apparently coprecipitates in solid solution in the grain boundary MgZn2 phase, making its corrosion potential more - cathodic. second, copper in the grain matrix promotes pitting, and thus provides an alternate mechanism for the discharge of corrosive agents such as dissolved oxygen or hydrogen ions.
When it occurs, pitting can actually retard stress corrosion cracking either by providing active anodes throughout the ~` 20 matrix which, in turn, afford cathodic protection to less active but susceptible grain boundaries, or by inhibiting :,........................................................................ .
localized dissolution at the boundary and thus prevent the . :: . .
- formation of cor~-osion paths of sufficiently small radius of -~
J ' ' ' curvature to propagate as a crack under the existing streæs condition.
The foregoing analysis is compatible with and helps `- to explain the observed phenomenon that using an accelerated Boiling Salt Test to predict stress corrosion susceptibility, although found to be an acceptable approach for copper-free '` :
, ~037Z96 alloys of the 7000 series, does not provide reliable data for ` X7016 alloy. In a standard Boiling Salt Test, the dissolved oxygen content is low, which may tend to minimize pitting and accentuate cracking tendencies, so that the results do not adequately reflect the presence of copper.
For purposes of the invention, the upper limit of copper, at least below the level of about 1.9% for which the alloy's propensity to stress corrosion cracking becomes severe, depends upon the acceptable degree of yellow coloration developed during conventional H2SO4 anodizing. A maximum of about 1.1% copper is preferred in this respect. It has also been found that using an anodizing current density of about 10 amps per square foot (asf), plus or minus about 2 asf, is helpful in minimizing the depth of coloration without requiring prolonged treatment. A distinctive characteristic of X7016 alloy is its ability to be anodized to provide a clear bright ;~ coating exhibiting a specular reflectance factor of about 85 to 95% for anodic film thickness up to about one-half mil.
Alloys suitable for purposes of the invention include those containing approximately 4 to 6% total of zinc and magnesium, preferably about 5.30 to 5.85% total, and particu-larly with a copper content in the range of about 0.7 to 1.1%.
. :' ; The alloy may be solution treated at about 900-925F., for example, and quenched in water or by air blast, but a relatively ast quench rate of about 100F./sec. is preferable ; for best specularity and optimum stress corrosion resistance - properties as determined by Alternate Immersion Testing.
Suitable aging practices are about 3 to 8 hours at 200-225 F. plus 3 to 8 hours at 275-325F., to achieve an ` 1037Z96 underaged temper and, for alloy X7016, a minimum yield strength o~ 42 Ksi.
When the fabricating sequence involves extruding, solution treating, hot forming, quenching, aging and anodizing the alloy, it is preferable for best anodizing results (and freedom from grain growth) to avoid cold working the extruded alloy, such as by stretch straightening the extrusion. However, routine cold finishing operations may be performed between the quenching and aging operations.
The following exemplary practices of the invention and its presently preferred alloy compositions are provided for the purposes of illustration:
ExamPle I -Tests were conducted by alternate immersion treatment (using Test Method 823 of Fed. Std. No. 151) and by exposure to the atmosphere at an outdoor location in Richmond, Virginia.
Samples taken from an extruded section were tested in the long transverse direction, which was considered permissible because .
; the structure was fully recrystallized and exhibited no signi-; 20 ficant anisotropy.
(a) Test Material A 30-inch length by 10-inch round billet (S-23891), homogenized 16 hours at 1075F, was extruded to form a bumper blank. The composition was .04 Si, .04 Fe, .26 Cu, C.01 Mn, 7' - ' 1.06 Mg, C.ol Cr, C.01 ~i, 4.65 zn and <.01 Ti, balance aluminum.
(b) Press Practice:
Extrusion Ratio - 98/1 - Cylinder temperature ~ 800F.
. .
~ 7 ~
Billet temperature - 920F.
; Ram Speed - 12 IPM ram speed Cooling - air quench (fans) (c) Testing Conditions In all tests, specimens were strained by three-point loading to a permanent set at a value of 12 mils/inch.
Specimen dimensions were 0.250" wide, about 3" long, and 0.126" thick. Test results for various conaitions noted are -given in Table 1.
Table 1: Deflected Beam Stress-Corrosion Test Results Condition Alternate ImmersiOn Richmond AtmosPhere Failure ~o Failure NO
- Time Failure Time Failure ys) 500 days (Days) 500 Davs " 69 ` B x x . . .
:.
- " x x ". C 19 . . .
~ 7 :. ~
~ 20 D x x ...
,. " x x E x x ~-" x x F x " x ` Condition A - As press-fan quenched, stretched and naturally aged for 11-1/2 months, followed by a solution heat treatment (one hour at 900F ~ CWQ) and a 16-20 day natural age.
., 1~37296 Condition B - condition A followed by a two-step age of 7 hours at 225F + 8 hours at 300F (50F/hr. heat-up rates). TS =
54.2 KSI, YS = 48.0 KSI, Elong. = 16.5%.
condition C - as press-fan quenched, stretched and naturally aged for 11-1/2 months.
Condition D - naturally aged for 12-1/2 months, followed by a solution heat treatment (one hour at 900OF ~ CWQ) + 20 hours at 250F. (5ooF/hr. heat-up rate).
- Condition E - naturally aged for 12-1/2 months, followed by 8 hours at 250F + 8 hours at 300 F. TS = 54.5 KSI, YS = 49.1 KSI, Elong. = 13.0%.
Condition F - naturally aged for 12-1/2 months, followed by - 20 hours at 250F. (5ooF~hr. heat-up rate).
EXAMPLE II
Stress corrosion resistance of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys having various copper levels (.51, .75, .99, 1.46, 1.93) was determined by both alternate immersion testing and following exposure in the Richmond atmosphere.
(al Test Material Test material was extruded from 14-inch . ;.,: "
. .,~, round by 30-inch length billets which had been homogenized as noted below. Alloy compositions were as follows:
Alloy Compositions Sample I.D. Si Fe Cu Mn Mq Cr Ni Zn Ti S-28902 .04 .06 .51 ~ 01 .98 <~01 ~01 4.65 <.01 S-28903 ~04 .06 .75 ~01 .98 ~.0~ <.01 4.61 <.01 S-28898 .04 .06 .99 ~01 1.03 ~01 ~.01 4.64 <.01 S-28904 .04 .07 1.46 ~01 ~96 ~01 ~.01 4.75 <.01 S-28888 .04 .06 1.93 ~ 01 .95 <.01 ~.01 4.55 ~01 - :.
:: _ g _ ''' .
`::;;
103~296 ~omogenizinq Treatments - Alloy I.D. Practice S-28902 14 hours at 1030F
S-28903 14 hours at 1030F
S 28898 14 hours at 10650F
S-28904 14 hours at 1030F
S-28888 14 hours at 10650F
(b) Extrusion data were as follows:
.. ~,, ;
Break Extrude Indicated Table Billet Charge Pressure Pressure Ram SPeed SPeed TemPerature - 10 S-~8902 2800 2400 5 30 875 ' S-28903 - 26 875 , . . .
, -, ; S-28888 3600 3000 5 28 850 ~' Container Temp. ~ 8000F.
;` COOling - air quench (fans) ` Structure - fully recrystallized (c) Sample Preparation and Results : -.
Residual stresses were introduced by indenting specimens with the Olsen Ball Penetrator. Samples were indented with various loads in both the T4 and aged conditions, and after bright anodizing. The T4 condition was obtained ~- using a 10-minute solution heat treatment at 900F followed by a fan quench and a caustic etch. Aging was for 8 hours at 225F followed by 8 hours at 300OF using a 50F/hr. heat-up ,` rate. The order of treatments is shown in the appropriate table. Aging was done within four days after either quenching - ~r indenting. Indenting was done within ten days after quen-ching and within ten days after aging.
~' ' 1037~6 All samples were indented under the following :`
conditions after facing off to .240-.250 inches:
7/8" ball diameter 1-1/2" I.D. top die 1-3/8" I.D. bottom die ;
2000# clamp down load Tests results are shown in Tables 2 and 3, for the high and low.copper content alloys having the following physical propertieæ:
:, S-28902 - (.51 Cu) Aged properties - UTS = 51.3 KSI,-YS = 47.2 KSI, Elong. = 16.8%. .
.;, .. ~ .
*: - .~ .
S-28888 - (1.93 Cu) Aged Properties - UTS = 54.6 KSI, YS = 50.1 KSI, Elong. = 17.0%.
' .:- . .~.:
. '. :
. '~ , , . .
: . ~
. . . .
. :. :
: .
,": ': .
'''' ' ' ~'' ``.:
. ~ .
:' ~
, j ~ :
.. ' ~
.: .
'''' .
, - 11 - ~
1 " .
1 ' ' - : -; . ' ~ ' , ,:
` 1(~3~Z96 ..
` ,~ ~ ~
~ ~ a) O~ ~ XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX X
9~ ~ :~
al S h `1 0 : ~ ~
a,~ ta :':. ~ O
Q Ei a ~q ~ ~^
- o~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~r , ~ \~/ ' ' .
o ~
O ~:
E~ O a~ ~
U ~ ~ ~ lR
rl h O ~ ~ C) Z~ ~XX XX XXX XXx Xxx XXX x Q~ ~ ..
.~ H 1~ J O :~
J
h ~ ~Q d' d' d' `~
o O ,~ , 1` r` ~`
-1 ~ \J/
h h --H ~:: r-l I
~D r~ O ~ :
+ ~ ~ ~
a ::
h ,1 ~ ~ ~3: = N ~
,~ O O rl ,1 ~,1 ~: ~ h 1: ~1 1~ ~ R +
~ ~ ~iS + ~
O ,,1 ~ N
,-1 h t~ : = C) ~: -~ a~ R ,1 ~ ~ ~ - o ~ ,~
J ~ I ~ + + ,1 ~ + ,~ ' -In, ~ ~ U ~ : ~: ~
.- O + + + + + ~ +
J
'' a~ o~
,1 ,~
~ o ~ a~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~I r~1 a~ 1 o ~ 1 o _I ~ o o ~ o ~ o ~ ~ o o ~I o o .,,, a) ~1 _ ,Q ~ OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO 000 1~lq OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO OOo E-~ r l la R o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o m ~-- , ~
.
:
; `
. ' !
.. _ o~
h h a) ~ ~ ~
~ 0~1 ~ XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
O a~ h ~1 O
F:
0~
m O
'.. : ~ ~i )I^
g ~
. ~1 ~
,~ . ~ ~ .
~4 --'.
'.. ,~
. ~ .,~ ~ ~
m h O ~ .
O ~ i ~ ..
:. td ~ ~ X ~e x ., ~ ~ X X X; X X X
.. ~ H h ~`1 0 . ,1 h ~ ~U
h ~
H ~ rl ~a . V ~ V ~ V ~ ~ y V V ~t V
~1 ,a ~
a~ ~C h--..
s~
.~ Q) ~U N
I
. . _l ~ ~
. . ,¢ ,1 0~ I
. . ~
a~ = ' ~;
.-. N r~
.,, ~ r~
O u~ ~ N t~ ~:
,, 8 ~ ~ " ~
: _ ~ R
rl ~ n~ +
~,. o X.' ~ O ~ ~ _ _ N
C R ~ C c:-~ ~: + ~ 5~ J +
U~ (U O ~
+ + + + ~ + +
,.~.` . ';' - = = = = E~ = = ^ = = = E-~ = =
.,...... .~
:. ~ o ~
~ co ~ ~ oo. ~ o ~ ~ o ~1 ~
. ~ a~ O O N If) O 1~ ~ t~l : - ` ~ h 0~ ~ O --I ~ O --I ~ O O ~ o _I ~) ~ t` U ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ) --~ , . O O IY~ O ~1 ~ O O N
.'. E~
.,""' ; _~
O O O O O O ~ O O O O O
OOO OOO OOO 'C~OO' , ~ ~O-1 OOO OOO OOO OOOIOOO oOO OOO
(d) Others (.75, .99, 1.46 Cu) ~ o failures occurred in alternate immersion or in the atmosphere over 220 days on test at these three inter-mediate copper levels.
Additional comments on the Results of Example II.
., , Susceptibility at the highest Cu level (1.9%) was found in alternate immersion for various sample conditions, including the aged + indented specimens. With only one exception, other samples which were deformed after aging have not failed. This one exception applied to a comparison specimen at lower copper content (.1 Cu) in the atmosphere test using the highest load (12 KIP). Even then, the failure had more the appearance of accelerated intergranular corrosion than cracking. Contrary to the results found with the Boiling - Salt Test, samples indented in the T4 condition and exposed to alternate immersion showed some susceptibility, while all other . ~ -.
conditions did not (with the exceptions at the 1.9 Cu level).
Similarly, in the atmosphere, three failures have been observed, none of which are indented-after-aged conditions (again with the exception of the 1.9 Cu alloy). Below the 1.9 Cu level, .. :
five failures total have occurred in both alternate immersion - and the atmosphere at the .1 Cu level, one at the .51 Cu level, .
and none at .75, .99, and 1.46% CU. This indicates increasing resistance with increasing copper content.
Perhaps the two most relevant sample conditions tested were those that were aged after indenting (simulates aging after cold forming) and those that were indented after aging (simulates field damage to the fully hardened bumper).
Belsw the 1.9 Cu level, no failures have occurred for either :-. . ~.
. .
1037Z~6 condition in alternate immersion, and with the one exception previously mentioned of the indented after-aging sample, no failures have occurred in the atmosphere.
Time on test (~ 200 days) has been sufficiently long to allow these unfailed specimens to be described as very resistant and possibly immune.
Example III
In forming several automotive wrap-around bumper components of X7016 Alloy on prototype production tooling, extruded sections (F-temper) were preheated at 900-9250F. for twenty minutes, cooled by air blast to a suitable hot working temperature of about 800F., hot formed to shape the wrap-around end portions, and quenched in water. After final finishing operations cold, i.e., at ambient temperature, the `- thus fabricated components were sectioned at the most heavily cold worked portions and aged for 8 hours at 225F. plus 8 hours at 30CF.
The alloy contained approximately 4.69% zinc, 1.01% magnesium and 0.93% copper, with .04% silicon, 0.6% iron i 20 and less than .01% each of manganese, chromium, nickel and titanium, balance aluminum.
The heat treated specimens exhibited good resis-tance to stress corrosion cracking under Alternate Immersion ` Testing, after being deformed to the point of incipient fractureand releasing the load just beyond the stress level producing instability.
:
~ ,
Claims (17)
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A heat-treatable aluminum base alloy adapted for making wrought articles having a recrystallized metallurgical structure characterized by its resistance to stress corrosion cracking, said alloy consisting essentially of aluminum, 3.5 to 5.5% zinc, 0.5 to 2% magnesium and 0.3 to 1.5% copper, by weight, with silicon, iron and other residual elements and impurities up to about 0.5% total, including manganese, chromium, nickel, titanium and zirconium in amounts not exceeding .05% each and 0.15% total.
2. The alloy of claim 1, having a magnesium content of about 0.8-1.4%.
3. The alloy of claim 1, having a zinc content of about 4-5%.
4. The alloy of claim 1, having a copper content of about 0.6-1.4%.
5. An aluminum base alloy (type X7016) adapted for hot working, solution heat treatment, artificial aging and anodizing to produce wrought articles having a recrystallized metallurgical structure characterized by its bright surface appearance in anodized condition and its resistance to stress corrosion cracking, said alloy consisting essentially of aluminum, about 4 to 5% zinc, about 0.8 to 1.4% magnesium and about 0.6 to 1.4% copper, by weight, with residual elements and impurities in amounts not exceeding 0.10% silicon, 0.10%
iron, .03% each and 0.10% total of manganese, chromium, nickel, titanium and zirconium.
iron, .03% each and 0.10% total of manganese, chromium, nickel, titanium and zirconium.
6. The alloy of claim 5, containing from about 5.30% to about 5.85% total of zinc and magnesium.
7. The alloy of claim 6, containing from about 0.70% to about 1.1% copper.
8. A wrought article of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy exhibiting a recrystallized metallurgical structure characterized by its resistance to stress corrosion cracking, said alloy consisting essentially of:
aluminum, 3.5 to 5.5% zinc, 0.5 to 2% magnesium and 0.3 to 1.5% copper, by weight, with silicon, iron and other residual elements and impurities up to about 0.50% total, including manganese, chromium, nickel, titanium and zirconium in amounts not exceeding .05% each and 0.15% total.
aluminum, 3.5 to 5.5% zinc, 0.5 to 2% magnesium and 0.3 to 1.5% copper, by weight, with silicon, iron and other residual elements and impurities up to about 0.50% total, including manganese, chromium, nickel, titanium and zirconium in amounts not exceeding .05% each and 0.15% total.
9. The article of claim 8 wherein said alloy has a magnesium content of about 0.8-1.4%.
10. The article of claim 9, wherein said alloy has a zinc content of about 4-5%.
11. The article of claim 10, wherein said alloy has a copper content of about 0.6-1.4%.
12. The article of claim 11, in solution treated, artifi-cially aged and anodized condition, further characterized by a bright surface appearance as indicated by a specular reflectance factor (SRF) of about 85 to 95% for anodic film thicknesses up to one-half mil.
13. An automotive vehicle bumper of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy in solution treated and artificially aged temper, adapted for anodizing to achieve a bright surface appearance and exhibiting a recrystallized metallurgical structure characterized by its resistance to stress corrosion cracking, said alloy consisting essentially of:
aluminum, 4 to 5% zinc, 0.8 to 1.4% magnesium and 0.6 to 1.4% copper, by weight, with residual elements and impurities in amounts not exceeding 0.10% silicon, 0.10% iron, .03% each and 0.10% total of manganese, chromium, nickel, titanium and zirconium.
aluminum, 4 to 5% zinc, 0.8 to 1.4% magnesium and 0.6 to 1.4% copper, by weight, with residual elements and impurities in amounts not exceeding 0.10% silicon, 0.10% iron, .03% each and 0.10% total of manganese, chromium, nickel, titanium and zirconium.
14. The article of claim 13, wherein said alloy contains from about 5.30% to about 5.85% total of zinc and magnesium.
15. The article of claim 14, wherein said alloy contains from about 0.7% to about 1.1% copper.
16. A wrought article according to claim 8, prepared by fabricating operations which include the steps of hot working and heat treating said alloy, wherein said heat treating comprises aging the alloy for about 3 to 8 hours at 200-225°F. and for about 3 to 8 hours at 275-325°F.
17. An automotive vehicle bumper according to claim 13, prepared by fabricating operations which include the steps of extruding, forming and heat treating said alloy, wherein said heat treating comprises aging the alloy for at least 3 hours at about 200-225°F. and at least 3 hours at about 275-325°F. to obtain an underaged temper and a minimum yield strength of about 42 Ksi.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA209,968A CA1037296A (en) | 1974-09-23 | 1974-09-23 | Aluminum alloy system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA209,968A CA1037296A (en) | 1974-09-23 | 1974-09-23 | Aluminum alloy system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1037296A true CA1037296A (en) | 1978-08-29 |
Family
ID=4101213
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA209,968A Expired CA1037296A (en) | 1974-09-23 | 1974-09-23 | Aluminum alloy system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA1037296A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160333453A1 (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2016-11-17 | Uacj Corporation | High-strength aluminum alloy and manufacturing method thereof |
JP2017517632A (en) * | 2014-04-30 | 2017-06-29 | アルコア インコーポレイテッド | Improved 7XX aluminum casting alloy and method for producing the same |
-
1974
- 1974-09-23 CA CA209,968A patent/CA1037296A/en not_active Expired
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160333453A1 (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2016-11-17 | Uacj Corporation | High-strength aluminum alloy and manufacturing method thereof |
US10208370B2 (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2019-02-19 | Uacj Corporation | High-strength aluminum alloy and manufacturing method thereof |
JP2017517632A (en) * | 2014-04-30 | 2017-06-29 | アルコア インコーポレイテッド | Improved 7XX aluminum casting alloy and method for producing the same |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2485524C (en) | Method for producing a high strength al-zn-mg-cu alloy | |
EP0124286B1 (en) | Aluminium alloys | |
CA2519387C (en) | High strength al-zn alloy and method for producing such an alloy product | |
US5888320A (en) | Aluminum alloy having improved damage tolerant characteristics | |
EP1831415B2 (en) | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A HIGH STRENGTH, HIGH TOUGHNESS A1-Zn ALLOY PRODUCT | |
US20070102071A1 (en) | High strength, high toughness, weldable, ballistic quality, castable aluminum alloy, heat treatment for same and articles produced from same | |
GB2245592A (en) | Rolled aluminum alloy adapted for superplastic forming and method for making | |
AU738447B2 (en) | Aluminium alloy for use in a brazed assembly | |
EP0062469B1 (en) | Method for producing fine-grained, high strength aluminum alloy material | |
EP0665901B1 (en) | Strength anisotropy reduction in aluminum-lithium alloys by cold working and aging | |
US3706606A (en) | Thermomechanical treatment process for heat treatable aluminium alloys | |
US4569703A (en) | Aircraft stringer material | |
EP0953062B1 (en) | Al ALLOY AND METHOD | |
US4584173A (en) | Aluminium alloys | |
US4410370A (en) | Aircraft stringer material and method for producing the same | |
US4629517A (en) | High strength and corrosion resistant aluminum article and method | |
US4113472A (en) | High strength aluminum extrusion alloy | |
US3542606A (en) | Hot worked metal article of aluminum base alloy and method of producing same | |
US3674448A (en) | Anodic aluminum material and articles and composite articles comprising the material | |
CA1037296A (en) | Aluminum alloy system | |
GB2137227A (en) | Aluminium-Lithium Alloys | |
WO1994020646A1 (en) | Improving mechanical properties of aluminum-lithium alloys | |
US3640781A (en) | Two-phase nickel-zinc alloy | |
US5164157A (en) | Copper based alloy | |
JPS602644A (en) | Aluminum alloy |