AU778517B2 - Device for monitoring and forecasting the probability of inductive proximity sensor failure - Google Patents

Device for monitoring and forecasting the probability of inductive proximity sensor failure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU778517B2
AU778517B2 AU33477/01A AU3347701A AU778517B2 AU 778517 B2 AU778517 B2 AU 778517B2 AU 33477/01 A AU33477/01 A AU 33477/01A AU 3347701 A AU3347701 A AU 3347701A AU 778517 B2 AU778517 B2 AU 778517B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
sensor
attenuation
electric
circuit
sensor current
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU33477/01A
Other versions
AU3347701A (en
Inventor
Josef Frauscher
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Voestalpine Turnout Technology Zeltweg GmbH
Voestalpine Railway Systems GmbH
Original Assignee
Voestalpine VAE GmbH
Voestalpine Weichensysteme GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Voestalpine VAE GmbH, Voestalpine Weichensysteme GmbH filed Critical Voestalpine VAE GmbH
Publication of AU3347701A publication Critical patent/AU3347701A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU778517B2 publication Critical patent/AU778517B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03KPULSE TECHNIQUE
    • H03K17/00Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking
    • H03K17/94Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking characterised by the way in which the control signals are generated
    • H03K17/945Proximity switches
    • H03K17/95Proximity switches using a magnetic detector
    • H03K17/9502Measures for increasing reliability
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/28Testing of electronic circuits, e.g. by signal tracer
    • G01R31/282Testing of electronic circuits specially adapted for particular applications not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/2829Testing of circuits in sensor or actuator systems

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Length, Angles, Or The Like Using Electric Or Magnetic Means (AREA)
  • Electronic Switches (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)

Description

[stamp:] Country: PCT Submitted on: Feb. 15, 2001 -1- Device for the monitoring and the prognosis of the failure probability of inductive proximity sensors The invention relates to a device for the monitoring and prognosis of the failure probability of inductive proximity sensors for monitoring of the position of movable switch rails or rail components, in which the proximity sensor has at least one coil supplied by an oscillator, and the sensor current flowing by means of variable attenuation is measured and then fed to an evaluation circuit.
For the monitoring of the assembly, or disassembly of tongues on jaw rails, inductive sensors may be used, for example. In order to grasp the assembly of the tongue on a jaw rail, the inductive sensor may be attached in the rack of the jaw rail, whereby either the non-attenuated condition of this sensor, or an additional, specifically designed inductive sensor may be used for the assembly of the tongue. Such sensors deliver a certain current depending on the attenuation, and the current reception of the sensor can be monitored, and the distance information can be gained in this way. A method for the monitoring of the condition of switch rails is known from AT 399 851 B, in which additional signals gained during the riding of the switch rails are evaluated, and the smallest reading of each distance is stored, whereby the change of the smallest reading measured, as well as at least a first threshold reading for the smallest distance are compared to one another. A premature wear in the area of the tongue rail of a switch rail should be able to be recognized in this way. It was recommended in WO 97/33784 to design the sensor as a continuous proximity sensor, and to perform two separate evaluations, whereby one evaluation is to yield each distance, and the second evaluation a functional control of the sensor, whereby the predetermined tolerance windows of the characteristic line are considered the standard.
Generally, the sensors designed as continuous proximity sensors are mostly designed as inductive sensors, whereby a coil with a freely oscillating oscillator is used, the resonant amplitude of which changes with the proximity of ferromagnetic, or electrically conductive material, whereby a corresponding change of the current consumption can be measured. The corresponding proximity information can be gained in an evaluation circuit from the measured currency consumption.
In order to monitor the correct function of inductive proximity sensors, it has already been recommended in DE-C-31 50 212 to use test signals. By means of such test signals, an electric attenuation, or de-attenuation should be achieved, whereby the evaluation of the change in the signal with engaged test signal, and without test signal should result in an evaluation of the availability of the proximity sensor. With such circuit arrangements it can be principally recognized whether a sensor was correctly connected, and particularly, whether a sensor is defect, as the engagement of a test signal does not show any changes in this case, that can be evaluated.
The invention aims to create a device for the monitoring and the prognosis of the failure probability of inductive proximity sensors for the monitoring of the position of movable switch rails or rail components, in which the principle of the known test attenuation is used, but whereby a self-test device is to be created for inductive proximity sensors for the entire signal behavior, in order to generate a failure prognosis for the sensor from the changes of a possible characteristic line course. Possible causes for an increased failure probability are particularly a decrease in the isolation resistance between the conductors by water penetration, and therefore a formation of parasitic resistances, mechanical damage, or damage to the assembly components in the circuit, as well as errors in the sensor electronics, which lead to a change in the proximity current characteristic line, whereby the wrong proximity information would be gathered. The inventive device should show such changes in a timely fashion so that the maintenance, or the exchange of a sensor can occur long before its actual failure.
Accordingly, in a first aspect the present invention provides a device for the monitoring and the prognosis of the failure probability of an inductive proximity sensor that monitors a position of a movable switch rail or rail components by measuring a mechanical attenuation, said proximity sensor including: at least one coil supplied by an oscillator, that generates a sensor current flowing by means of variable attenuation, and a comparison and evaluation circuit to measure said sensor current, characterized in that said circuit has stored characteristic lines of the dependence of said sensor current both in the electric not additionally attenuated condition, and in the electric additionally attenuated condition as a function of the position of the movable switch rails, or rail components and furthermore said circuit cyclically scans measured sensor currents corresponding to said mechanical attenuation as well as to the additionally electrically attenuated condition and compares these measured sensor current pairs to those of the stored characteristic lines.
Inductive sensors are usually removed after the adjustment, whereby a characteristic line of the sensor is received for the various positions of the tongue relative to the jaw rail. Due to the fact that this characteristic line, as well as an additional characteristic oo°S S line, in which the sensor was additionally electrically attenuated, are received, and both of these characteristic lines are stored, it is subsequently possible to make predictions for the failure probability independently of the respective position of the tongue relative to the jaw rail. Normally, a defective sensor in a non-attenuated S condition will have a clearly distinguishable signal as opposed to an intact sensor. In :5 a maximum mechanically non-attenuated condition of such a sensor it has been shown, however, that the signals of a defective sensor essentially cannot be differentiated from the signals of an intact sensor. Not until the actual checking of the measurement readings for an electrically attenuated circuit arrangement can the differences between intact sensors and defective sensors be clearly recognized, if a respective comparison with the original characteristic lines of the intact sensor is performed for this purpose. For this purpose, the invention suggests that the measuring currents corresponding to a mechanical attenuation condition, as well as the corresponding additional electrically attenuated measuring currents__ goo* .0 *0 25 are cyclic scanned, and the respective measuring currents, or the measurement reading pairs are fed to a comparison and evaluation circuit. In such a comparison and evaluation circuit, an evaluation can subsequently be performed by means of the stored characteristic lines, whereby the differences to the differences due to the characteristic lines of the intact sensors enable a corresponding prognosis of the failure probability.
In a particularly advantageous way, the embodiment is chosen so that the signals of the measurement reading pairs for at least two different mechanical attenuations are fed to the evaluation circuit. It was shown across the entire signal course that the difference of the measurement readings for an intact sensor and a defective sensor in the electrically non-attenuated condition depends on the actual position, and thereby on the distance of the measurement object. It was particularly shown that this difference is larger with maximum mechanical attenuation, than with minimum mechanical attenuation, i.e. with a disassembled tongue. This behavior of the characteristic line of the intact, and that of a defective sensor without electric attenuation directly results in the fact that exact statements on the extent of a defect cannot be made across a large partial area of the characteristic line, as the difference between the signals of an intact and that of a defective sensor is not significant. Significant changes only appear in the maximum mechanically attenuated position, however whereby here, without the assistance of the characteristic line of an electrically attenuated sensor, the wrong proximity readings could be achieved, as particularly a measuring current that is too low would already signalize an attachment position already at a distance to the attachment, and corresponds to the measuring current that corresponds to the attachment of a tongue on a jaw rail in an intact sensor. Not until the comparison with the measurement readings and the characteristic lines of an additional electrically attenuated sensor, are such differences able to be evaluated, and allow the corresponding conclusions to the errors and the failure probability.
In a particularly simple way, the electric attenuation may occur by means of an increase in supply voltage. This is especially recommended for the use of the socalled two-wire technology, in which a statistical decrease of the failure probability occurs due to the decrease of the amount of electric wires. The circuit for the determination of the additional electric attenuated signal can be advantageously designed so that the electric attenuation occurs by means of a tap of the sensor coil, whereby a transistor is advantageously intended that controls the electric attenuation by means of a resistance at the tap of the sensor coil, the base of which is connected to the voltage source by means of a Zener diode. By simply increasing the supply voltage, the direct switching in of the electric attenuation, and obtaining merely the measuring reading for an exclusive mechanical attenuation by means of decreasing the supply voltage can be achieved in a simple way. In an advantageous way it is proceeded in such a way that at least one evaluation of the difference of the measurement reading pairs occurs in a mechanically non-attenuated position, whereby the evaluation may occur in such a way that a respective constant current is measured at a respective distance.
By means of the cyclic switching in of a resistance to the resonant circuit, an attenuation of the resonant circuit defined in size therefore occurs, and by means of 0 the switching in by increasing the supply voltage, the reach may be found with merely two wires. Functionally seen, the attenuation by the sensor housing, assembly S and measurement objects, is the loss of eddy currents that lead to a decrease of the S resonant amplitude of the oscillator as losses of effect, and therefore to a decrease of current consumption.
o".25 e* ooo: The effect of a resistance parallel to the resonant circuit equals the effect of eddy current losses, and almost every sensor error leading to a change in the signal behavior can be determined by means of a cyclic test attenuation, and a corresponding evaluation of the sensor current in this way.
-6- By means of making a comparison with the corresponding characteristic lines, a prognosis may also be achieved with regard to the sensor behavior in the attenuation by the measurement object, i.e. in the attenuation by the tongue moving from the assembly to the disassembly. When such a prognosis does not achieve the expected sensor current, a sensor error may be the conclusion.
The invention is explained in further detail below according to the drawings. They show in fig. 1 a schematic measurement arrangement of an inductive sensor, fig. 2 shows a detailed circuit diagram, fig. 3 shows the characteristic line course for the dependency of the sensor current from the distance to the measurement object to the sensor measurement surface with different conditions of the sensor in the electrically non-attenuated and electrically attenuated conditions of the sensor, and fig. 4 shows the signal behavior with the cyclic switching in with the electric attenuation.
Fig. 1 shows an inductive proximity sensor 1 that has two electric supply lines 2 and 3.
The measurement object, such as a switch rail tongue, which must consist of ferromagnetic, or electrically conductive material, is schematically implied by the number 4. Due to the currents measured, the distance a between the measurement object and the sensor surface can be closed by means of the sensor 1.
A principal circuit arrangement is illustrated in fig. 2.
Fig. 2 shows a resonant circuit coil identified by the number 5, whereby the LC member characteristic for the resonant circuit has a condenser 6. A proximity of a measurement object to the coil 5 leads to a mechanical attenuation, whereby the oscillator is schematically identified by the number 7, and depending on the resonant amplitude, supplies a corresponding constant current that is supplied by means of the signal line 8.
In the measurement operation of this sensor in two-wire circuit, the oscillator 7 is supplied by a constant current source, or a constant voltage source, and therefore shows no substantial changes with a change in the supply voltage. The supply voltage is fed via the line 2 and 3, whereby the first Zener diode 9 is intended, with which voltage peaks are to be eliminated, which could lead to failures in the circuit arrangement. This first Zener diode 9 is laid out for a higher forward voltage, than the second Zener diode 10 illustrated in FIG. 2.
By increasing the supply voltage from typically 12 to 18 V to 22 V, for example, current can now flow across the resistances 11 and 12 forming a voltage separator, at a corresponding layout of the Zener diode 10, and the base 13 of the transistor 14 can be made conductive in this way so that now current can flow across the resistance the condenser 16, as well as the collector and the emitter of the transistor 14. As this resistance 15 is connected to the line 17 at a disassembled state of the coil 5, an electric attenuation of the resonant circuit occurs in this case, by which the measured amplitude is changed, and additional signals may be gained by means of the line 8.
The constant current source, or the constant voltage source, respectively, controls an amplifier that sounds the sensor signal in the form of an active current signal on the supply line. This amplifier also has no dependency on the voltage. Energy is withdrawn from the resonant circuit by means of tapping of a sensor coil at a switched in electric attenuation, whereby this energy loss that physically corresponds to a loss, which may be caused by eddy current and re-magnetizing losses at the sensor coil, leads to a change of the current readings before and after the defined attenuation, which may then be compared to the respective desired characteristic lines between both points.
Controlled voltage changes simultaneously allow a limited test of the sensor circuit, :o as well as of the cable routing.
0 oo 8 A change in the current signal after the increase or decrease of the supply voltage would mean that either a defect in the cable routing, or in a circuit component of the sensor is present. If the sensor is cyclic tested, the amount of components responsible for the undetected failures of the sensor can be substantially reduced. Controlled by the Zener diode 10, the transistor 14 is thereby used as a circuit that diverts energy from the resonant circuit via the resistance with a defined increase of the supply voltage. Such a circuit operation for the cyclic scanning of the electric attenuated measurement readings can be caused by the temporary increase of the sensor supply voltage. Any undesired parasitic resistances would lead to a current increase with the increased supply voltage, whereby such errors also become recognizable by the circuit arrangement.
The characteristic line courses are illustrated in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4.
FIG. 3 shows the first characteristic line 18, which mirrors the course of the current consumption in dependency of the mechanical attenuation. In a defective sensor, or one that is becoming defective, this current measurement reading decreasing o, according to the curve 19, whereby it is simultaneously clear that the change in measurement readings at the maximum distance, i.e. in the mechanical nonattenuated condition of the sensor, becomes significantly low, and does not become 0 noticeably measurable until the distance is decreased, and therefore the mechanical attenuation is increased. A defective sensor, the characteristic line course of which, for instance, corresponds to the curve 19, would then, however, if it is not recognized 25 that the sensor is defective in a timely fashion, lead to the wrong proximity values, as 25 the minimum current with the assembly of a tongue at point 20 would already be achieved at point 21 with an intact sensor on the characteristic line of the defective sensor, which would therefore result in too large a distance in the corresponding evaluation.
-9- The curve line 22 corresponds to an intact sensor with simultaneous additional electric attenuation. It has now been shown that that significant differences occur in a defective sensor with switched in electric attenuation corresponding to the curve course of the curve 23, even with the disassembly of the tongue, which point to a defective sensor. The difference, as measured for the disassembly of the tongue between the conditions without and with electric attenuation, corresponds here to the difference of the measurement currents b, while in the case of a defective sensor, this difference is significantly higher, and corresponds to c.
If now, as illustrated in fig. 4, the electric attenuation is cyclically switched in, a signal course occurs for each intact sensor, which corresponds to the curve course 24 in fig. 4, whereby clearly the decrease of the current consumption respectively registered with the circuitry of the transistor is evident. This decrease is indicated by the respective partial areas 25, 26, 27 28, 29, and 30, whereby this difference is simultaneously differs for the different mechanical attenuations of the sensor.
If a defective sensor is present, then the difference at the stated points of the curve course increases, whereby the additionally measured current difference is indicated by the curve course at the points 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36. In this case, however, the difference is no longer based on the original characteristic line 24, but instead is recognizable as a measurement reading exactly based on the characteristic line 19 of the defective sensor.
From all of these signal difference, the required prognosis can be made, and particularly the failure probability of inductive proximity sensors for the monitoring of the position of movable switch rails or rail components can be quantified.

Claims (7)

1. Device for the monitoring and the prognosis of the failure probability of an inductive proximity sensor that monitors a position of a movable switch rail or rail components by measuring a mechanical attenuation, said proximity sensor including: at least one coil supplied by an oscillator, that generates a sensor current flowing by means of variable attenuation, and a comparison and evaluation circuit to measure said sensor current, characterized in that said circuit has stored characteristic lines of the dependence of said sensor current both in the electric not additionally attenuated condition, and in the electric additionally attenuated condition as a function of the position of the movable switch rails, or rail components and furthermore said circuit cyclically scans measured sensor currents corresponding to said mechanical attenuation as well as to the additionally electrically attenuated condition and compares these measured sensor current pairs to those of the stored characteristic lines.
S2. Device according to claim 1, characterized in that the measured sensor current pairs for at least two different mechanical attenuations are fed to the evaluation circuit.
3. Device according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the electric attenuation occurs by means of increase of the supply voltage. o 25
4. Device according to any one of claims 1, 2, or 3, characterized in that the o••o° S•electric attenuation occurs by means of a tap of the at least one coil.
Device according to one of the claims 1 to 4, characterized in that a transistor controls the electric attenuation by means of a resistance at the tap of the at least one coil and wherein the base of said transistor is connected to the voltage source by means of a Zener diode. 11
6. Device according to one of the claims 1 to 5, characterized in that at least one evaluation of the difference of the measured sensor current pairs occurs in a mechanically non-attenuated condition.
7. A device substantially in accordance with any one of the embodiments of the invention described herein and illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Dated this 8 t day of October, 2004. VAE Eisenbahnsysteme GmbH and VAE Aktiengesellschaft By their Patent Attorneys MADDERNS
AU33477/01A 2000-02-23 2001-02-15 Device for monitoring and forecasting the probability of inductive proximity sensor failure Ceased AU778517B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT281/2000 2000-02-23
AT0028100A AT412636B (en) 2000-02-23 2000-02-23 DEVICE FOR MONITORING AND FORECASTING THE DEFECTIVE CHANGE OF INDUCTIVE PROXIMITY SENSORS
PCT/AT2001/000037 WO2001063309A1 (en) 2000-02-23 2001-02-15 Device for monitoring and forecasting the probability of inductive proximity sensor failure

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU3347701A AU3347701A (en) 2001-09-03
AU778517B2 true AU778517B2 (en) 2004-12-09

Family

ID=3670744

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU33477/01A Ceased AU778517B2 (en) 2000-02-23 2001-02-15 Device for monitoring and forecasting the probability of inductive proximity sensor failure

Country Status (13)

Country Link
US (1) US6759855B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1261882B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3725073B2 (en)
CN (1) CN1404579A (en)
AT (1) AT412636B (en)
AU (1) AU778517B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2400062A1 (en)
DE (1) DE50104481D1 (en)
ES (1) ES2232595T3 (en)
HU (1) HUP0203877A3 (en)
PL (1) PL356417A1 (en)
PT (1) PT1261882E (en)
WO (1) WO2001063309A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ES2297359T3 (en) * 2004-03-26 2008-05-01 Senstronic, S.A. INDUCTIVE PROXIMITY SENSOR.
BRPI0718119A2 (en) * 2006-10-26 2014-07-08 Abbott Diabetes Care Inc COMPUTER METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND PROGRAMS FOR REAL-TIME DETECTION OF THE ANALYTIC SENSOR SENSITIVITY DECLINE
DE102009022136A1 (en) 2009-05-20 2010-11-25 Prüftechnik Dieter Busch AG Apparatus and method for inductive measurements
US8319500B2 (en) 2010-05-24 2012-11-27 Honeywell International Inc. Proximity sensor with health monitoring
US9464880B2 (en) 2010-07-15 2016-10-11 Metrix Instrument Co., Lp Dual wire dynamic proximity transducer interface for use in proximity transducer system and proximity transducer system including the same
US20140167795A1 (en) * 2012-12-14 2014-06-19 Texas Instruments Incorporated Active feedback silicon failure analysis die temperature control system
US10067256B2 (en) * 2015-03-26 2018-09-04 General Electric Company Proximity probe interchange compensation
US10114071B2 (en) 2016-04-26 2018-10-30 International Business Machines Corporation Testing mechanism for a proximity fail probability of defects across integrated chips
KR102022958B1 (en) * 2018-02-22 2019-09-19 송청담 Capacitive sensor having parasitic capacitance cancel circuit
CN116399402B (en) * 2023-04-18 2024-01-23 南京晓庄学院 Fault early warning system of wireless sensor for ecological environment monitoring

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3600896A1 (en) * 1986-01-15 1987-07-16 Tiefenbach & Co Dr H Signalling system for an automatic railway work gang-warning device or the like
WO1997033784A1 (en) * 1996-03-12 1997-09-18 Vae Aktiengesellschaft Device for detecting the positions of pivotable parts of a point

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4433309A (en) * 1980-03-01 1984-02-21 Gebhard Balluff Fabrik Feinmechanischer Proximity switch with built-in test circuit
DE3110390A1 (en) * 1981-03-18 1982-10-07 Gebhard Balluff, Fabrik Feinmechanischer Erzeugnisse, 7303 Neuhausen TEST AND EVALUATION FOR PROXIMITY SWITCHES IN MACHINE CONTROLS
DE3205737C2 (en) * 1982-02-18 1984-07-05 Ifm Electronic Gmbh, 4300 Essen Circuit arrangement for monitoring a switching device and the external conductors connected to it
DE3220111C1 (en) * 1982-05-28 1983-06-09 Honeywell Gmbh, 6050 Offenbach Monitoring device for proximity switches
DE3327188A1 (en) * 1983-07-28 1985-02-14 Gebhard Balluff Fabrik feinmechanischer Erzeugnisse GmbH & Co, 7303 Neuhausen SELF-TESTING PROXIMITY SWITCH
DE3342710C1 (en) * 1983-11-25 1985-01-24 Werner Turck Gmbh & Co Kg, 5884 Halver Proximity switch having monitoring of the operation and serviceability
EP0308766B1 (en) * 1987-09-24 1991-11-27 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Proximity switch with testing and evaluating circuits
FR2692677B1 (en) * 1992-06-22 1997-12-26 Moulinex Sa SENSOR DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A DEVICE FOR VERIFYING THE OPERATION OF THIS DETECTION SYSTEM.
US6424146B2 (en) * 1999-05-13 2002-07-23 Honeywell International Inc. Proximity sensor method and apparatus that is insensitive to temperature, noise and length of wire

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3600896A1 (en) * 1986-01-15 1987-07-16 Tiefenbach & Co Dr H Signalling system for an automatic railway work gang-warning device or the like
WO1997033784A1 (en) * 1996-03-12 1997-09-18 Vae Aktiengesellschaft Device for detecting the positions of pivotable parts of a point

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1404579A (en) 2003-03-19
JP3725073B2 (en) 2005-12-07
EP1261882A1 (en) 2002-12-04
JP2004511924A (en) 2004-04-15
AU3347701A (en) 2001-09-03
ES2232595T3 (en) 2005-06-01
CA2400062A1 (en) 2001-08-30
ATA2812000A (en) 2004-10-15
AT412636B (en) 2005-05-25
PL356417A1 (en) 2004-06-28
US6759855B2 (en) 2004-07-06
EP1261882B1 (en) 2004-11-10
HUP0203877A3 (en) 2003-10-28
HUP0203877A2 (en) 2003-03-28
PT1261882E (en) 2005-03-31
WO2001063309A1 (en) 2001-08-30
US20030052663A1 (en) 2003-03-20
DE50104481D1 (en) 2004-12-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU778517B2 (en) Device for monitoring and forecasting the probability of inductive proximity sensor failure
US7649350B2 (en) Railcar presence detector
KR101009595B1 (en) Apparatus for measuring ground leakage current in non-grounded dc power line and detecting method therefor
US7633179B2 (en) Passenger detection apparatus for detecting breakage on shield line without being affected by peripheral shield cables
AU2002336464B2 (en) Controller for switch machine
US20080250866A1 (en) Method For Monitoring Function of a Magneto-Inductive Flow Transducer
JP6042220B2 (en) Inspection of measuring instrument system, corresponding measuring instrument system, and inspection system
AU720785B2 (en) Device for detecting the positions of pivotable parts of a rail switch
US20040075450A1 (en) Current multiplex transmission of several sensor signals (vehicles)
US4612445A (en) System for monitoring the operation of input circuits to a central control and monitoring unit for machines and/or devices usable in production and/or product packaging lines
US8074961B2 (en) Magnetic valve with manual override
FI118059B (en) Position Sensor and Method for Diagnosing Position Sensor
EP3049774A1 (en) Magnetic flowmeter with drive signal diagnostics
US20200099334A1 (en) Method for detecting a contact fault in a photovoltaic system
JP2992955B2 (en) Sensor device and operating method thereof
EP0784786A1 (en) Transmitter sensor
KR101472696B1 (en) A method and device, digital input apparatus and control unit for sensing a binary signal
JP2013508706A (en) Method of operating electromechanical conversion system and electromechanical conversion system
RU2334643C2 (en) Device to measure electrified railway track circuit parameters
US11398823B2 (en) Water insensitive capacitive sensor switch
JPH0275087A (en) Magnetic line sensor
JP2005504295A (en) Sensor unit monitoring method and apparatus
US20220113341A1 (en) Circuit device for a vehicle, and method for operating a circuit device
US20230358822A1 (en) Electrical system comprising a redundant electrical transmission path and means for recognizing an error state thereof, and method for recognizing an error state of the redundant electrical transmission path of the electrical system
KR100771202B1 (en) Device for detecting shift range of vehicle