AU772067B2 - Method of disinfecting articles - Google Patents

Method of disinfecting articles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU772067B2
AU772067B2 AU14974/00A AU1497400A AU772067B2 AU 772067 B2 AU772067 B2 AU 772067B2 AU 14974/00 A AU14974/00 A AU 14974/00A AU 1497400 A AU1497400 A AU 1497400A AU 772067 B2 AU772067 B2 AU 772067B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
disinfectant
aqueous phase
phase
disinfectant material
disinfected
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
AU14974/00A
Other versions
AU1497400A (en
Inventor
William Bliss
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
WOBELEA Pty Ltd
Original Assignee
WOBELLEA Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AUPP8543A external-priority patent/AUPP854399A0/en
Application filed by WOBELLEA Pty Ltd filed Critical WOBELLEA Pty Ltd
Priority to AU14974/00A priority Critical patent/AU772067B2/en
Publication of AU1497400A publication Critical patent/AU1497400A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU772067B2 publication Critical patent/AU772067B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

Regulation 3.2 -1-
AUSTRALIA
Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT
APPLICANT:
NUMBER:
FILING DATE: WOBELEA PTY.
PP 8543/99 9/ 2/1999
LIMITED
Invention Title: METHOD OF DISINFECTING ARTICLES The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us: METHOD OF DISINFECTING ARTICLES This invention relates to a method of disinfecting articles, and in particular, to a method whereby disinfecting can be carried out under controlled conditions which have previously not been able to be effectively monitored.
Various applications effecting disinfection has been controlled by the use of a Redox probe or the like and, for example, where water is being treated, where it is required that there be a quantity of 2 to 15 parts per million of say chlorine at a pH of 7.5 to 8.5, such probes are perfectly satisfactory and can be used to monitor the dose of chemical being applied to the water. In this specification, for simplicity, we shall refer to chlorine in a generic sense but the system can be used with other disinfectants, such as bromine or complex compounds such as chloro-bromo compounds.
o Where a hard surface, say a piece of fruit or even a wall of a building is to be sterilised it is necessary to use a very much higher concentration, say 20 to 150 parts per million.
It is understood that the reason for this is that it is necessary to break down a surface layer which might be a bio-film layer which is very resistant before the actual surface of the article S. to be sterilised can be attacked by the disinfectant.
Using a standard Redox probe or the like it is not possible to accurately determine dosages at this level, as the output of the probe tends to become constant beyond a particular quantity, say of the order of 15 to 20 parts per million and thus it is unable to differentiate between concentrations at this level and concentrations at higher levels.
There are two basic reasons why the concentration needs to be controlled. For example, if fruit is being treated, the concentration must be sufficiently high to ensure sterilisation but, at the same time, must be such that there is very little residual chemical left on the fruit which is, of course to be eaten. In addition, the use of excessive levels of chlorination or HBPs A AT 9 February, 2000 (halogen by products) may produce unacceptable levels of CPBs (chlorination by products).
While the half life of the active species such as HOBr, HOCI, C10 2 and 03 may be only minutes the life of some CPBs may be weeks and detected by analysis. It is thus essential that the residue be closely controlled.
We have found that it is possible to use a conventional method of controlling the concentration whilst the actual concentration of the other active chemicals are higher than those which are indicated by the probe, but which are nevertheless fully controlled.
The invention provides a method of disinfecting articles using a mixture consisting of at least one disinfectant material, wherein the mixture comprises an aqueous'and a non-aqueous phase, whereby the aqueous phase can be monitored by a standard monitoring device to ascertain a required effective dosage and determine the proportions of disinfectant material required in each phase.
In a second aspect of the invention we provide a disinfectant material in two phases as set out above but in which the material in the non-monitored phase passes through the bio-film layer prior to disassociation, providing effective sterilization in this way.
In order that the invention may be more readily understood we shall describe one embodiment of the invention.
The crux of the invention is the provision of a disinfectant which has disinfectant chemicals in two phases and in particular one of the chemicals being in the aqueous phase and the other being in an oil phase or being a dispersion of solid material in the aqueous phase which material may, if required, be encapsulated.
o.oo•i The disinfectant materials can be of the same species or they could be of different species but which are satisfactory for use in the particular application.
Y:\SPEC\WOBELEACAP2.wpd AT 30 January, 2004 In one preferred application which we will describe in respect of washing fruit, but this is only an exemplification, we can use chloro-bromo compound, at least in the non-aqueous phase but if required in both phases.
The disinfectant mixture is made up of known proportions of the two phases and is adapted to be added to the wash water or the like in such quantities that the liquid phase material can be monitored by a Redox probe or the like.
That is, it would normally be added to provide, say, a chlorine reading of 2 to 15 parts per million and the material in the other phase is added so that the actual total quantity of disinfectant is, say, of the order of 20 to 150 parts per million.
The Redox probe will not give an indication as far as the unassociated second phase is S concerned (and for convenience in this specification I will refer to this as the 'oil phase' ••.although as mentioned above, it does not have to be in an oil dispersion) and so the wash eeeee S• water being used, which may be recycled or be a one time through operation, is monitored for, say, chlorine, and is dosed to provide the required chlorine dosage as determined by the Redox probe.
e. Because of the mixture, however, the fruit or the like being treated is washed with water containing material in both phases and the total chlorine concentration is that which is required.
The aqueous phase tends to provide a rapid short term sterilisation whilst the oil phase tends to provide a longer term sterilisation. This can be particularly satisfactory if the product it to be exported, there can be an ongoing protection of the product and, provided the quantity of disinfectant is properly calculated, the residue will have reached a safe level at the time when the product is to be eaten.
In fact, what we have found is that it appears that the oil phase material actually neutralises AT 9 February, 2000 the bio-film layer on the target surfaces and then dissociates within the pathogen to give a sterilising effect on the surface of the articles being treated (rather than having to first break down the bio-film layer). On evaporation of the carrier oil a film of protectant remains on the surface to provide residual protection.
It may well be that this aspect permits a lower overall concentration of the disinfectant material than would otherwise be expected, as it does appear under normal circumstances that it is the biofilm layer which prevents access to the surface of the article being treated and this is one of the reasons why higher concentrations of disinfectant may be required.
Thus, it is possible that on examination of the surface being disinfected, there could be a higher residue than is desirable or acceptable but the surface can be uncontaminated. Under these circumstances, it would only be necessary to vary the ratio between the aqueous and oil phases of the disinfectant components.
SWe have mentioned above that various materials can be used as the disinfectants and, in particular, the aqueous phase may include an active disinfectant from the group comprising chlorine, organo chlorine, chlorine dioxide, bromine, organo bromine, bromo chlorine, chlorind dioxide or oxygen radical.
Other compounds used could be Ca(OCl) 2 or Sodium hypochlorate and Lithium hypochlorate, BCDMH, DBDMH and BCTMH Di bromo di methyl hydantoin; *2 Bromo chloro tetra methyl hydantoin) Calcium oxide/hydroxide and other alkaline salts of sodium, potassium and lithium, may be combined with the above disinfectants. The ratio of alkali to disinfectant in the aqueous phase shall then nominate the range of ORP probe output.
Either phase of the disinfectant may incorporate additives such as wetting agents, dispersants, corrosion inhibitors and pH buffers.
K\WP51\SPEC\WOBELEACAP.wpd AT 9 February, 2000 A major purpose of the invention is the use of the process in horticulture and agriculture for the control of micro organisms in the following groups.: Plant pathogens in the soil for example: Fusarium sp., Rhizoctonia, Erwinia, Phytophera, Selerotinia, Plasmodiophor.
Plant pathogens in the crop for example: Botrytis, Podosphaera, Monolinia, Venturia Anthracnose (pre-harvest) Plant pathogens in storage and transit (post harvest) for example: Rhizopus, Penicillium, Geotrichum, Mucor.
Plant pathogens occurring during a period when conventional pesticides are not applicable due to phytotoxicity, residues for example: Xanthomonas compestris Pseudomonas syringae Human pathogens occurring in the field by the use of contaminated water for spraying or irrigation (pre-harvest). The same organisms may present a health hazard when fruit and S vegetables are processed, semi-processed or packed. (Post harvest). Examples of these pathogens are: coli, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Listeria, B. ceres.
In each of the above examples, the aim is to combine a rapid kill in the aqueous phase with a residual in the "oil" phase.
As mentioned above, there can be other applications where the process of the invention can be used and one of these is where, for example, a clean room or the like is to be disinfected.
Whilst we have described several applications and alternatives to the compounds which can K:\WP51\SPEC\WOBELEACAP.wpd AT 9 February, 2000 7 be used with the invention, it is to be understood that there can be variations and modification of these without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
CCCC
C
CC
CCC.
C
C
CC
CC C
C.
C
CC..
CC
CCC.
K\WP5\SPECWOBELEACAI'.wpdAT9Fbay,20 AT 9 February, 2000

Claims (13)

1. A method of disinfecting articles using a mixture consisting of at least one disinfectant material, wherein the mixture comprises an aqueous and a non-aqueous phase, whereby the aqueous phase can be monitored by a standard monitoring device to ascertain a required effective dosage and determine the proportions of disinfectant material required in each phase.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein an active species of disinfectant is in the aqueous phase.
3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the disinfectant material in the non-aqueous phase can also exist as a dispersion of solid material in the aqueous phase.
4. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the disinfectant material in the non-aqueous phase can be encapsulated.
A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the disinfectant material can be of the same and/or different species in each phase, suitable for use in the particular application. °oo
6. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the disinfectant material in either phase can be a bromo-chloro compound. .oo: •oooo
7. A method as claimed in any preceeding claim wherein the mixture is composed of known proportions of the two phases and is adapted to be subsequently added to wash water to be used to carry the disinfectant in such quantities that the liquid phase material can be monitored by a Redox probe or the like.
8. A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the wash water being used, is monitored for the disinfectant material in the aqueous phase whereby the required dosage is S •determined by a Redox probe to ensure that the total dosage of disinfectant material will be as required. Y:\SPEC\WOBELEACAP2.wpd AT 30 January, 2004
9. A method as claimed in any one of the above claims wherein the material in the aqueous phase is adapted to provide an immediate disinfecting of the article to be disinfected.
A method as claim in any one of the preceding claims wherein the material in non- aqueous phase is adapted to provide longer term protection, and is capable of passing through the bio-film layer on the article to be disinfected prior to dissociation of the disinfectant material to provide effective sterilization.
11. A method as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the articles to be disinfected can be fruit, vegetables, crops, nuts, seeds, bulbs, corms, rhizomes and cuttings.
12. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11 wherein the surface of the article to be disinfected is targeted for disinfection.
13. A method as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the disinfectant material can be any one of the disinfectant materials as described in the specification herein. DATED this 30 day of January, 2004 WOBELEA PTY. LIMITED By its Patent Attorneys A TATLOCK ASSOCIATES o.o Y:\SPEC\WOBELEACAP2.wpd AT 30 January, 2004 EDITORIAL NOTE APPLICATION NUMBER 14974/00 This specification does not contain a page
AU14974/00A 1999-02-09 2000-02-09 Method of disinfecting articles Expired AU772067B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU14974/00A AU772067B2 (en) 1999-02-09 2000-02-09 Method of disinfecting articles

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPP8543 1999-02-09
AUPP8543A AUPP854399A0 (en) 1999-02-09 1999-02-09 Method of disinfecting articles
AU14974/00A AU772067B2 (en) 1999-02-09 2000-02-09 Method of disinfecting articles

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU1497400A AU1497400A (en) 2000-08-10
AU772067B2 true AU772067B2 (en) 2004-04-08

Family

ID=25615734

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU14974/00A Expired AU772067B2 (en) 1999-02-09 2000-02-09 Method of disinfecting articles

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU772067B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008089089A2 (en) * 2007-01-12 2008-07-24 Albemarle Corporation Microbiocidal treatment of edible fruits and vegetables
US9629376B2 (en) 2007-01-12 2017-04-25 Albemarle Corporation Microbiocidal treatment of edible fruits and vegetables

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000027438A1 (en) * 1998-11-06 2000-05-18 Universite De Montreal Improved bactericidal and non-bactericidal solutions for removing biofilms
DE19960275A1 (en) * 1999-12-14 2001-06-21 Gottard Waldemar Determination of chlorine dioxide, chlorite and/or chlorous acid in aqueous solution, useful for analyzing disinfectant, bleach and deodorizing solutions, involves measuring redox and pH before and after treatment or dilution

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000027438A1 (en) * 1998-11-06 2000-05-18 Universite De Montreal Improved bactericidal and non-bactericidal solutions for removing biofilms
DE19960275A1 (en) * 1999-12-14 2001-06-21 Gottard Waldemar Determination of chlorine dioxide, chlorite and/or chlorous acid in aqueous solution, useful for analyzing disinfectant, bleach and deodorizing solutions, involves measuring redox and pH before and after treatment or dilution

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008089089A2 (en) * 2007-01-12 2008-07-24 Albemarle Corporation Microbiocidal treatment of edible fruits and vegetables
WO2008089089A3 (en) * 2007-01-12 2008-10-02 Albemarle Corp Microbiocidal treatment of edible fruits and vegetables
CN101578048B (en) * 2007-01-12 2013-07-03 雅宝公司 Microbiocidal treatment of edible fruits and vegetables
US9629376B2 (en) 2007-01-12 2017-04-25 Albemarle Corporation Microbiocidal treatment of edible fruits and vegetables

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1497400A (en) 2000-08-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mishra et al. Sodium and calcium hypochlorite as postharvest disinfectants for fruits and vegetables
Ongeng et al. The efficacy of electrolysed oxidising water for inactivating spoilage microorganisms in process water and on minimally processed vegetables
ES2622180T3 (en) Ready-to-use peroxycarboxylic acid antimicrobial compositions, reduced corrosion, storage stable
US20120225135A1 (en) Stabilised Chlorine Dioxide Solution
Al-Haq et al. Fungicidal effectiveness of electrolyzed oxidizing water on postharvest brown rot of peach
Murray et al. Dynamic changes in free-chlorine levels within a commercial post-harvest wash and prevention of cross-contamination between shredded lettuce batches
WO2007023481A1 (en) Non-phytotoxic biocidal compositions for agricultural and veterinary use
US10993448B2 (en) Method for sanitizing fresh produce
AU772067B2 (en) Method of disinfecting articles
CN110248549A (en) Chlorine bleach particle by encapsulation reduces the purposes of the gas evolution during distribution
Smilanick et al. Quantification of the toxicity of aqueous chlorine to spores of Penicillium digitatum and Geotrichum citri-aurantii
JPS6143322B2 (en)
Gibson et al. Surface and suspension testing: conflict or complementary
Chmielewski et al. Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes biofilms using chemical sanitizers and heat
Marriott et al. Sanitizers
US20170188583A1 (en) Biocidal composition for cleaning hard surfaces contaminated with proteinaceous and fatty residues
US20060141111A1 (en) Process to sanitize fruit and vegetables
Shere et al. Effect of bromide-hypochlorite bactericides on microorganisms
Yamaner et al. Evaluation of Neutral Electrolyzed Water as A Potential Fig Processing Surfaces Sanitizer in The Fig Industry
Pourzamani et al. Alternative disinfection methods use to control of microbial quality and shelf-life of raw eaten vegetables (case study)
Drohmann et al. Differentiation of Biocides and Cleaning Agents-Where Is the Boundary?
Popova Disinfection of Fruits with Activated Water
Bartz et al. Sales of vegetables for fresh market: The requirement for hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) and sanitation
JPH08164189A (en) Sterilizing method
Klein et al. Technological breakthrough in postharvest sanitation treatment with the iodine based Isan process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired