AU771576B2

AU771576B2 - Improved preparation for colonic evacuation

Info

Publication number: AU771576B2
Application number: AU72239/00A
Authority: AU
Inventors: Thomas Julius Borody; Nicolas Peter Shortis; Walter George Shortis
Original assignee: PHARMATEL RES AND DEV Pty Ltd; Centre for Digestive Diseases Pty Ltd
Current assignee: RED HILL BIOPHARMA Ltd
Priority date: 1995-11-03
Filing date: 2000-12-12
Publication date: 2004-03-25
Anticipated expiration: 2016-11-01
Also published as: AU7223900A

Description

S&F Ref: 357174D1

AUSTRALIA

PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT

ORIGINAL

Name and Nhomas Julius Bry Address 4 illy S tt of Applicants: Mo e New South Wales 2137 Australia 0. 0 0..

00..

Walter George Shor 144 Great N rhRoad Five ew South Wales 2046 stralia Nicolas Peter Sh pis 144 Great Road Five ck New South Wales 2046 Australia 6-1,8 6"ado~e kw4 09 1 k) 2097p&6 (or M 6Aa4-;t Actual Inventor(s): Address for Service: Invention Title: Thomas Julius Borody Walter George Shortis Nicolas Peter Shortis Spruson Ferguson St Martins Tower 31 Market Street Sydney NSW 2000 Improved Preparation for Colonic Evacuation The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- 5845c Improved Preparation for Colonic Evacuation Technical Field The present invention relates to orthostatic lavage solutions or colonic evacuants for cleansing the gastrointestinal tract, or for the treatment of bowel diseases and/or disorders.

Background Art The advent of colonoscopy brought with it the need for a simplified, routine bowel cleansing protocol or product to achieve a clean colonic mucosa required by the colonoscopist to detect even small lesions in the bowel, e.g. small polyps. Similar 1 o requirements exist for colonic surgery.

In the early days of colonoscopy, during the late 1970's, numerous protocols for bowel cleansing were designed by individual bowel surgeons and gastroenterologists to satisfy the requirements of their particular practices. Such protocols included the use of fasting in combination with various purgatives such as Epsom salts or osmotic agents plus enemas. Though, when complex protocols were followed strictly they often achieved their effect and resulted in a clean bowel. However, the protocols were invariably complex and required on average 3 days of cleansing which made them unpleasant and unacceptable. Furthermore, they were often dangerous because they caused marked fluid and electrolyte shifts in body compartments and on rare occasions predisposed to S"20 arrythmias, hypertension and in fact demise of the patient.

0 To overcome the problem of fluid shifts, Fordtrau developed an orthostatic lavage which combined with a large muscular, non-absorbable polyethylene glycol (PEG) compounded with a balanced electrolyte solution resembling concentrations found in the human serum. Such a lavage achieved very adequate levels of bowel cleansing, with 25 minimal fluid and electrolyte shifts but at the expense of patient compliance and acceptability. PEG solutions produce volumogenic diarrhoea, by requiring ingestion of •o large volumes of the electrolyte solution. Finally 4 to 5 litres of the solution are required to obtain adequate cleansing for colonoscopy or bowel surgery. With such large volumes So. being drunk by the patient and with the taste of the electrolyte and PEG being particularly unpleasant, patients frequently experienced nausea, vomiting and bloating. Those requiring a colonoscopy on repeated occasions would clearly identify the PEG lavage as the most unpleasant aspect of colonoscopy. On occasions the level of discomfort caused by the cleansing lavage proved to be counter productive to reaching the desired aim of colonic cleansing, as patients would terminate ingesting the PEG solution, either due to the bad taste or nausea/vomiting.

It was for the above reasons that an effort was made to develop a favourable flavouring for the PEG lavage solution, and to reduce the need for large volume ingestion from 4 to 3 litres. This was achieved by adding ascorbic acid, which acted as both a T T"Irinni In-f~c.rc flavouring agent and a diarrheogenic compound reducing the volume required for ingestion from 4 to 3 litres. This improvement resulted in the Australian Patent No.

623,627 and equivalent US and European patents. Nevertheless, the still large volume of solution (3 litres) required to cleanse the bowel remained an obstacle to adequate .cleansing in some patients.

As a result, there developed a shift back to osmotic diarrheogenic agents which required the patient to ingest a small volume of foul tasting electrolyte buffered solution (eg. phosphate based FLEET laxative) which would extract by osmotic tension a large volume of fluid from the patient's body and cause diarrhoea. There was therefore a clear lo advantage with this approach, since the patients did not need to keep on drinking a large volume of bad-tasting solution. However, osmotically active agents were notorious for causing electrolyte and fluid shifts, resulting in marked weight loss, hyperphosphataemia and death in children, arrythmias and cardiac deaths in the more frail elderly patients.

The side effects of nausea/vomiting continued to be a problem. To overcome the massive fluid shifts without the patient undergoing cleansing, the phosphate-based products were marketed to be combined with the ingestion of large volumes of pleasant-tasting glucosefree liquids such as water or mineral water. This exogenous input of a volume of water helped to effect fluid shifts. A portion of the fluid for the diarrheogenic effect originated in patients body fluids, while the remainder came from ungested water. Several trials 20 covering palatability and effectiveness of the PEG versus Phosphate solutions, reached the conclusion that both can achieve comparable bowel cleansing and both continue to suffer from unpleasant taste and excessive volume.

Yet another problem to overcome has been the development of hyperphosphataemia and dehydration with potential of arrythmias and resulting syncope and reports of deaths especially in children. With the small volume of the currently available phosphate-based evacuants, patients are able to drink simply the evacuant and not follow on with any further water. It would be therefore prudent to build in a safety system whereby S. numerous capsules will have to be swallowed with a fair volume of water to prevent the 0.0e concentrating effect of the diarrhoea.

It would therefore be of advantage to develop a product which could be free of "foul 0.

0 tasting fluid" and yet achieve bowel cleansing while drinking acceptable amounts of S. liquids such as water, dietary soft drinks or mineral water.

A further problem which frequently presents itself during diagnostic colonoscopy is the foam-like bubbles which obstruct the viewing clarity, especially in the proximal colon.

This foaming is a phenomenon caused by the rapid passage into the colon of bile secreted into the lumen of the bowel by the liver. In a proportion of patients, the caecum and especially the ascending colon are almost totally covered by a film of bile-containing foam, precluding a clear view of the mucosa. Such obstruction of view has on occasions led to a mis-diagnosis by the colonoscopist of colonic polyps and small cancers.

Therefore there is a need to prevent foaming within the colon during the cleansing r ~rn IIMtlO.C~C.C P FEB 2004 14:44 SPRUSON FERGUSON NO. 6077 P. 14 4 process. This has been attempted by injecting anti-foaming agents into the colon during colonoscopy. This method can achieve local de-foaming, but it is time consuming and rarely adequate. There is a need therefore to include an anti-foaming agent into the bowel-preparation formulation, to achieve uniform anti-foaming throughout the 1 metre length of the colon.

The objective of the present invention is to overcome the above-mentioned problems, of bad taste and foaming without sacrificing the excellent bowel-cleansing characteristics of the phosphate-based lavage solution. An added effect of adding an antifoaming agent is the increase in lubrication of the colonic surface, thereby facilitating speed of colonoscopy to the cacum.

Objects of the Invention It is an object of the present invention to provide an osmotic colonic evacuant which does not cause arrhythmia, dehydration, hypotension, marked electrolyte and fluid shifts, marked weight loss, cardiac deaths, nausea/vomiting or fainting when ingested by a patient. It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method of evacuating a patient's colon by administering a treatment regimen of an osmotic colonic evacuant and a diluent. Another object of the present invention is to provide a sequential pack for the oral administration of an osmotic colonic evacuant to a patient. It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method of treating small bowel bacterial overgrowth or irritable bowel syndrome in a patient, Another object of the present invention is to provide a method of treating acute or chronic bacterial bowel infection in a patient- Disclosure of the Invention According to a first embodiment of the present invention there is provided an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in solid oral dosage form comprising an orthostatic lavage in powder form. comprising a sulfate based laxative and at least 250ml .i of a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, diluent and/or adjuvant.

iAccording to a second embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method of evacuating a patient's colon, comprising orally administering to said patient a S""treatment regimen of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative together with at least 250ml of a diluent.

According to a third embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method of treating small bowel bacterial overgrowth or irritable bowel syndrome in a patient in need of such treatment, comprising administering to said patient a treatment regimen of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative together with at least 250ml of a diluent.

(RAtI B VV]33QIteIdccfd ec COMS ID No: SMBI-00611446 Received by IP Australia: Time 14:52 Date 2004-02-10 FEB 2004 14:45 SPRUSON FERGUSON NO. 6077 P. According to a fourth embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method of treating acute or chronic bacterial bowel infection in a patient in need of such treatment, comprising administering to said patient a treatment regimen of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative together with at least 250ml of a diluent.

According to a fifth embodiment of the present invention there is provided a sequential pack for the oral administration of at least two treatment regimens comprising a first treatment regimen comprising an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in solid oral dosage form comprising an orthostatic lavage in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative, in unit dosage form adapted and presented for a first administration period, together with a second treatment regimen comprising an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in solid oral dosage form comprising an orthostatic lavage in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative, in unit dosage form adapted and presented for a second administration period, wherein said treatment regimen is administered together with at least 250ml of a diluent.

According to a sixth embodiment of the present invention there is provided use of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form according to the first embodiment for the manufacture of a medicament to evacuate a patient's colon.

According to a seventh embodiment of the present invention there is provided an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form according to the first embodiment when used for the evacuation of a patient's colon.

According to an eighth embodiment of the present invention there is provided use of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form according to the first embodiment fbr the manufacture of a medicament to treat small bowel bacterial 25 overgrowth or irritable bowel syndrome in a patient in need of such treatment.

According to a ninth embodiment of the present invention there is provided an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form according to the first embodiment when used to treat small bowel bacterial overgrowth or irritable bowel syndrome in a ,patient in need of such treatment.

According to a tenth embodiment of the present invention there is provided use of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder fbrm according to the first 9 embodiment for the manufacture of a medicament to treat acute or chronic bacterial bowel infection in a patient in need of such treatment.

9e [R,\LISVV)Oflilspecidoc qic COMS ID No: SMBI-00611446 Received by IP Australia: Time 14:52 Date 2004-02-10 FEB. 2004 14:45 SPRUSON FERGUSON NO, 6077 P, 16 According to an eleventh embodiment of the present invention there is provided an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form according to the first embodiment when used to treat acute or chronic bacterial bowel infection in a patient in need of such treatment.

s Generally the osmotic colonic evacuant is a phosphate based laxative, for example sodium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium biphosphate, sodium acid pyrophosphate, or mixtures thereof; or a sulfate based laxative for example sodium picosulfate, sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate or mixtures thereof. Typically the preferred colonic evacuant is a mixture of sodium dihydrogen phosphate and disodium hydrogen phosphate or a mixture of sodium picosulfate and magnesium oxide.

The colonic evacuant is a solid oral dosage form. Typically selected from a tablet for example a compressed tablet, a coated tablet and/or an exploding tablet; capsule for example a coated capsule and/or an exploding capsule; lozenge; pill or powder.

Preferably the solid oral dosage form is coated to avoid dissolution in the mouth.

Typically the capsules or tablets may contain sodium starch glycollate, cross linked povidone or cross carmellose sodium to convert the capsules or tablets into exploding capsules or tablets.

Generally the diluent is any liquid suitable for ingestion, Preferably the diluent is water, mineral water, glucose-free mineral water, glucose-free cordial or glucose-free soft drink. The volume of diluent consumed with the osmotic colonic evacuant varies from 250mL to 1500mL, which is approximately one third the volume of diluents consumed with known colonic evacuants.

The amount of osmotic colonic evacuant administered to a patient is usually in the range of lmg to 200g. When the osmotic colonic evacuant is a phosphate based laxative,

S.

25 the range is usually from 5 to 200g, preferably 5 to lOOg, preferably 10 to 50g, more 0@ preferably 20 to 30g. Typically the phosphate based laxative contains 4.9g disodium hydrogen phosphate and 24.7g sodium dihydrogen phosphate. When the osmotic colonic *evacuant is a sulfate based laxative, the range is usually from 1 to 100mg, preferably 5 to preferably 5 to 25mg, more preferably 0 Generally the osmotic colonic evacuant is orally administered to a patient over a period of time. The osmotic colonic evacuant is usually prepared as a number of tablets or capsules which are taken over a period of time.

S

S.

0 .55 6 (K.tABW]O119 lIqe doccac COMS ID No: SMBI-00611446 Received by IP Australia: Time 14:52 Date 2004-02-10 FEB. 2004 14:46 SPRUSON FERGUSON NO. 6077 P. 17 A typical example of a treatment regimen of the invention using phosphate based laxatives involves the preparation of the colonic evacuant into approximately 25 tablets or capsules. Approximately 5 tablets or capsules are ingested with approximately one glass of diluent over a period of 1 second to 20 minutes, typically 5 seconds to 5 minutes, typically 10 seconds to 3 minutes, typically 30 seconds to 15 minutes, typically minutes to 20 minutes, typically 1 minute to 10 minutes, more typically 1 minute to 6 minutes. A further 5 tablets or capsules are ingested with approximately one glass of diluent over 10 seconds to 20 minutes, typically 30 seconds to 15 minutes, or 15 minutes 9 9@9 9 00.9

O

99 0-0o *oo o *oo pIfl=VVO539I)qcLdCOt*nJ COMS ID No: SMBI-00611446 Received by IP Australia: Time 14:52 Date 2004-02-10 to 20 minutes, typically 1 minute to 10 minutes, more typically 1 minute to 6 minutes after approximately 20 minutes to 2.5 hours, typically 25 minutes to 1 hour, more typically 30 to 40 minutes. This regimen is repeated until all the tablets or capsules have been ingested.

A typical example of a treatment regimen of the invention using phosphate based laxatives involves the preparation of the colonic evacuant into approximately 5 to tablets or capsules. Approximately one fifth of the tablets or capsules are ingested with approximately one glass of diluent over a period of 1 second to 20 minutes, typically seconds to 5 minutes, typically 10 seconds to 3 minutes, typically 30 seconds to lo minutes, typically 15 minutes to 20 minutes, typically 1 minute to 10 minutes, more typically 1 minute to 6 minutes. A further one fifth of the tablets or capsules are ingested with approximately one glass of diluent over 10 seconds to 20 minutes, typically seconds to 15 minutes, or 15 minutes to 20 minutes, typically 1 minute to 10 minutes, more typically 1 minute to 6 minutes after approximately 20 minutes to 2.5 hours, typically 25 minutes to 1 hour, more typically 30 to 40 minutes. This regimen is repeated until all the tablets or capsules have been ingested.

Generally the typical examples of the treatment regimen take 2 to 12 hours, preferably 2.5 to 6.5 hours, more preferably 2 to 4.5 hours, even more typically 2 to hours.

20 If the treatment regimen is administered in two parts, there is usually a difference of :4 to 16 hours, typically 4 to 12 hours, preferably 4 to 8 hours, more preferably 4 to 6 0. hours, between the administration of the first treatment regimen and the administration of the second treatment regimen.

The osmotic colonic evacuant of the present invention may further comprise an antifoaming or lubricating agent or antiflatulent, for example simethicone, activated charcoal.

The amount of anti-foaming or lubricating agent or antiflatulent used in the osmotic colonic evacuant ranges from 1 to 500mg, preferably 5 to 300mg, more preferably 50 to 200mg, more preferably 75 to 150mg. Typically 100mg simethicone is used in the osmotic colonic evacuant of the invention.

The osmotic colonic evacuant of the present invention may further comprise an .i antacid. Examples of antacids include magnesium oxide, calcium carbonate, magnesium oo alginate., magnesium hydroxide, magnesium carbonate, magnesium citrate, magnesium aspartate, magnesium trisilicate. The amount of antacid used in the osmotic colonic evacuant ranges from 0.5 to 50g, preferably 1 to 30g, preferably 1 to 20g, more preferably 2 to 16g. Typically 3.5g of magnesium oxide is used in the osmotic colonic evacuant of the invention, alternatively 7.5g magnesium carbonate or 15.5g magnesium citrate is used in the osmotic colonic evacuant of the invention.

The osmotic colonic evacuant of the present invention may further comprise ascorbic acid. The amount of ascorbic acid used in the osmotic colonic evacuant of the present invention ranges from 0.5 to 100g, preferably 1 to 50g, preferably 1 to 25g, more preferably 5 to 15g, more preferably 12 or 14g. The ascorbic acid may be coated with silicone or ethyl cellulose.

The osmotic colonic evacuant of the present invention are also useful in the treatment of certain gastrointestinal conditions such as small bowel bacterial overgrowth and irritable bowel syndrome as well as useful in treating acute or chronic bacterial bowel infections, for example, infection of the bowel with one or more bacteria including Campylobacter jejuni, Yersinia enterocolitica, Clostridium difficile, Cryptosporidium isospora belli. The osmotic colonic evacuant of the present invention can also be used in the treatment of fungal or viral infections in the bowel. The osmotic colonic evacuant of the present invention can also be used in the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis.

Best Mode For Carrying Out The Invention The present invention provides a formulation of an osmotic colonic evacuant in a powder, whose volume is small enough to place in capsules. This is then ingested with water, or other acceptable fluid, e.g. dietary water-based drinks such as diet soft drinks, cordials, mineral water. An adequate volume of fluids needs to be ingested by the patient to minimise osmotic diarrhoea by providing the necessary fluid volume to the body. This prevents dangerous electrolyte and fluid shifts. The invention also describes the addition to the formulation of an anti-foaming lubricating agent, to facilitate mucosal visibility in S: 20 the colon.

S.i The invention describes a powder formulation of reduced ingredients, which can be encapsulated in small enough numbers of capsules to be clinically useful. The capsules house the "foul-tasting" compound which are thereby delivered to the stomach and small bowel without having to be dissolved in water for ingestion. The patient therefore does 25 not taste the compound. Normally the formulation required all ingredients which are too voluminous in powdered form to be placed in capsules. The current reformulation allows for a reduced volume of powder which, when housed in capsules, still results in a small enough number of capsules to be acceptable to most patients to ingest.

The formulation includes either: *o •o°o Ingredient Range Best form sodium dihydrogen phosphate (monohydrate) 5 to 200g 24.7g disodium hydrogen phosphate (anhydrous) 1 to 50g 4.9g with or without simethicone 5 to 300mg 100mg IN vinnot-rF-r

S

S. *5

S..

Ingredient Range Best form sodium picosulfate 1 to 100mg magnesium oxide 1 to 30g citric acid (anhydrous) 1 to 50g 12g with or without simethicone 5 to 300mg 100mg or Ingredient Range Best form sodium picosulfate 1 to 100mg magnesium oxide 1 to 30g ascorbic acid (anhydrous) 1 to 50g 12g with or without simethicone 5 to 300mg 100mg or Ingredient Range Best form sodium picosulfate 1 to 100mg magnesium carbonate (pond) 1 to 30g citric acid 1 to 50g 14g with or without simethicone 5 to 300mg 100mg or Ingredient Range Best form sodium picosulfate 1 to 100mg magnesium citrate 1 to 50g 15.5g with or without simethicone 5 to 300mg 100mg 5 The above powder can be: i. Encapsulated, typically resulting in around 25 capsules. However, depending on compression of powders, size of capsules and method of administration the formulation may result in 7 to 60 capsules.

ii. Compressed in tablet form which may be coated by a film to avoid dissolution in the mouth. High compression can achieve even a smaller number of tablets, e.g. to 20 tablets.

iii. Packaged in sachets for dissolution and ingestion in liquid form.

The formulation is administered in such a way as to maximise compliance in the typical encapsulated form of 25 capsules, one fifth (5 capsules) of the capsules are ingested with each of five standard glasses of water, glucose-free cordial, or glucose-free soft drink. The frequency of ingestion can vary, but typically should take place every minutes to 2.5 hours, typically 25 minutes to 1 hour, more typically 30 to 40 minutes.

The whole procedure can be given twice in one day, especially in patients with stubborn constipation.

rN-.I.IRV1nnI M9-rC.

a a.

Generally the procedure takes from 2 to 12 hours, preferably 2.5 to 6.5 hours, more preferably 2 to 4.5 hours, even more typically 2 to 3.5 hours. However if the formulation is administered in two parts, there is a difference of 4 to 12 hours, typically 4 to 12 hours, preferably 4 to 8 hours, more preferably 4 to 6 hours, between the administration of the first treatment regimen and the administration of the second treatment regimen.

The capsules can also be used as a laxative, but at all times with added fluid, as a longer term basis, e.g. daily or second-daily, in various forms of constipation.

Example 1 fn a 48 year old female patient who had previously taken PEG-balanced salt solution and on a second occasion a Fleet oral phosphate laxative both resulting in severe nausea, bloating and vomiting for the third colonoscopic examination the patient was given capsules of the current formulation. She progressively ingested 5 capsules with a glass of mineral water or "Diet Coke". This resulted in bowel evacuation one and a half hours later and in on-going diarrhoeal stools for the next 5 to 7 hours. The final stools were clear of faecal fragments. At colonoscopy a clear view to the caecum was obtained and an appendiceal luminal mass identified. No evidence of foaming appeared.

Example 2 A 27 year old male patient returned from a holiday trip in Bangkok and complained 20 of abdominal cramping and marked diarrhoea. He was quite anorexic and in quite severe pain. He was advised to ingest 20 capsules of a combination of sodium acid phosphate and sodium phosphate followed by 6 glasses of water. After experiencing profuse diarrhoea the abdominal symptoms were completely relieved within 4 hours. Cramping and anorexia disappeared and by the evening the patient was able to ingest a meal feeling 25 quite hungry. The condition did not recur.

Example 3 A 51 year old male who on previous colonoscopy had abundance of bile product obscuring total view of the ascending colon was given 25 capsules of a combination of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide and citric acid at 12pm and 6pm on the day prior to colonoscopy. After the 6pm ingestion and at 8am on the examination day he was given 200mg dose of simethicone. The endoscopist was able to reach the caecum without obstructed view. A polyp was sighted and removed.

Industrial Applicability The osmotic colonic evacuant of the present invention requires a smaller volume of diluent and is thus a safer alternative to the colonic evacuants on the market because the incidence of arrythmia, dehydration, hypotension, marked electrolyte and fluid shifts, marked weight loss, cardiac deaths, nausea/vomiting or fainting is greatly reduced in a patient.

IN.\IIRVI -1AQ9rF-r

Claims

1. An encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in solid oral dosage form comprising an orthostatic lavage in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative and at least 250ml of a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, diluent and/or adjuvant.

2. The colonic evacuant of claim 1, wherein said encapsulated evacuant is in the form of a coated capsule and/or an exploding capsule.

3. The colonic evacuant of claim 2, wherein said coated capsule is coated to avoid dissolution in the mouth.

4. The colonic evacuant of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein said sulfate based laxative is a mixture of sodium picosulfate and magnesium oxide.

The colonic evacuant of any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising an anti- foaming or lubricating agent.

6. A method of evacuating a patient's colon, comprising orally administering to said patient a treatment regimen of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative together with at least 250ml of a diluent.

7. A method of treating small bowel bacterial overgrowth or irritable bowel syndrome in a patient in need of such treatment, comprising administering to said patient a treatment regimen of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative together with at least 250ml of a diluent.

8. A method of treating acute or chronic bacterial bowel infection in a patient in need of such treatment, comprising administering to said patient a treatment regimen of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative together with at least 250ml of a diluent.

9. The method of any one of claims 6 to 8, wherein said treatment regimen 25 comprises administering an encapsulated solid oral dosage form of an osmotic colonic Sevacuant comprising a sulfate based laxative, together with at least 250ml of a diluent every 30 to 40 minutes for an administration period of 2.5 to 6.5 hours.

The method of any one of claims 6 to 9, wherein said encapsulated evacuant is in the form of a coated capsule and/or an exploding capsule, 30

11. The method of claim 10, wherein said coated capsule is coated to avoid dissolution in the mouth.

12. The method of any one of claims 6 to 11, wherein the volume of said diluent is approximately one third the volume of known diluents.

13. The method of any one of claims 6 to 12, wherein said diluent is a glucose :e 35 free diluent. [n:\LBVV]139spccidoc:jc COMS ID No: SMBI-00611446 Received by IP Australia: Time 14:52 Date 2004-02-10 FEB. 2004 14:46 SPRUSON FERGUSON NO. 6077 P. 19 11

14. The method of any one of claims 6 to 13, wherein said evacuation occurs within 4 to 6 hours.

The method of any one of claim 6 to 14, wherein said sulfate based laxative is a mixture of sodium picosulfate and magnesium oxide. s

16. The method of any one of claims 6 to 15, wherein said osmotic colonic evaduant further comprises an anti-foaming or lubricating agent.

17. The method of claim 8, wherein said bowel infection is caused by Campylobacter jejuni, Yersinia ehterocolitica, Clostridium difficile, or Cryptosporidium isospora belli. i0

18. A sequential pack for the oral administration of at least two treatment regimens comprising a first treatment regimen comprising an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in solid oral dosage form comprising an orthostatic lavage in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative, in unit dosage form adapted and presented for a first administration period, together with a second treatment regimen comprising an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in solid oral dosage form comprising an orthostatic lavage in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative, in unit dosage form adapted and presented for a second administration period, wherein said treatment regimen is administered together with at least 250ml of a diluent.

19. The sequential pack of claim 18, wherein said second treatment regimen is 2D administered 4 to 12 hours after said first treatment regimen.

The sequential pack of claim 18 or 19, wherein said administration period is a treatment regimen every 30 to 40 minutes.

21. The sequential pack of claim 18 or 20, wherein five treatment regimens are administered over 2 to 3.5 hours. z

22. The sequential pack of any one of claim 18 to 21, wherein said encapsulated **evacuant is in the form of a coated capsule and/or an exploding capsule.

23. The sequential pack of claim 22, wherein said coated capsule is coated to avoid dissolution in the mouth.

24. The sequential pack of any one of claims 18 to 23, wherein said diluent is a glucose free diluent.

25. The sequential pack of any one of claims 18 to 24, wherein said sulfate based laxative is a mixture of sodium pieosulfate and magnesium oxide.

26. The sequential pack of any one of claims 18 to 25, wherein said colonic "vacuant further comprises an anti-foaming or lubricating agent. (FLAUfDV]J0339l1tCJddOA:*j. COMS ID No: SMBI-00611446 Received by IP Australia: Time 14:52 Date 2004-02-10 FEB. 2004 14:47 SPRUSON FERGUSON NO 6077 P. 12

27. An encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in solid oral dosage form comprising an orthostatie lavage in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative and at least 250m of a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, diluent and/or adjuvant, substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the examples.

28. A sequential pack for the oral administration of at least two treatment regiments comprising a first treatment regimen comprising an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in solid oral dosage form comprising an orthostatic lavage in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative, in unit dosage form adapted and presented for a first administration period, together with a second treatment regimen comprising an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in solid oral dosage form comprising an ortbostatic lavage in powder form comprising a sulfate based laxative, in unit dosage form adapted and presented for a second administration period, wherein said treatment regimen is administered together with at least 250ml of a diluent, substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the examples. is

29. Use of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5 or 27 for the manufacture of a medicament to evacuate a patient's colon.

An encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5 or 27 when used for the evacuation of a patient's colon.

31. Use of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form as claimed in any one of claims I to 5 or 27 for the manufacture of a medicament to treat small bowel bacterial overgrowth or irritable bowel syndrome in a patient in need of such treatment,

32. An encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form as claimed in any one of claims I to 5 or 27 when used to treat small bowel bacterial overgrowth or irritable bowel syndrome in a patient in need of such treatment.

33. Use of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5 or 27 for the manufacture of a medicament to treat acute or chronic bacterial bowel infection in a patient in need of such treatment.

34. An encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant in powder form as claimed in any one of claims I to 5 or 27 when used to treat acute or chronic bacterial bowel infection in a patient in need of such treatment.

A medicament whenever manufactured by the use of any one of claims 29,31 or 33. [ft \LlVV~OS9Itdq,tjC' COMS ID No: SMBI-00611446 Received by IP Australia: Time 14:52 Date 2004-02-10 FEB. 2004 14:47 SPRUSON FERGUSON N0. 6077 P. 21

36. A method of evacuating a patient's colon, comprising orally administering to said patient a treatment regimen of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant as claimed in claim 27 comprising a sulfur based laxative together with at least 250ml of a diluent.

37. A method of treating small bowel bacterial overgrowth or irritable bowel syndrome in a patient in need of such treatment comprising administering to said patient a treatment regimen of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant as claimed in claim 27 comprising a sulfur based laxative together with at least 250ml of a diluent.

38. A method of treating acute or chronic bacterial bowel infection in a patient in need of such treatment, comprising administering to said patient a treatment regimen of an encapsulated osmotic colonic evacuant as claimed in claim 27 comprising a sulfur based laxative together with at least 250m1 of a diluent. Dated 10 February, 2004 Thomas Julius Borody Walter George Shortis Nicolas Peter Shortis Patent Attorneys for the Applicant/Nominated Person SPRUSON FERGUSON 0*@9 9* pe 9 9* .9 0@ 9 099 @0Se .9 9e*9 S 9@ @055 .5.9 0@e0 9 [H:%ulVVY)lM iped doc I COMS ID No: SMBI-00611446 Received by IP Australia: Time 14:52 Date 2004-02-10