AU733752B2 - Permeable packaging film - Google Patents

Permeable packaging film Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU733752B2
AU733752B2 AU16538/99A AU1653899A AU733752B2 AU 733752 B2 AU733752 B2 AU 733752B2 AU 16538/99 A AU16538/99 A AU 16538/99A AU 1653899 A AU1653899 A AU 1653899A AU 733752 B2 AU733752 B2 AU 733752B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
film
permeability
oxygen
layer
carbon dioxide
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU16538/99A
Other versions
AU1653899A (en
Inventor
Gregor Bruce Yeo Christie
Yesim Gozukara
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dow Global Technologies LLC
Original Assignee
Food & Packaging Ct Man Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AUPP1106A external-priority patent/AUPP110697A0/en
Priority claimed from AUPP4624A external-priority patent/AUPP462498A0/en
Application filed by Food & Packaging Ct Man Ltd filed Critical Food & Packaging Ct Man Ltd
Priority to AU16538/99A priority Critical patent/AU733752B2/en
Priority claimed from PCT/AU1998/001074 external-priority patent/WO1999033658A1/en
Publication of AU1653899A publication Critical patent/AU1653899A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU733752B2 publication Critical patent/AU733752B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074
I
Permeable Packaging Film Background to the invention This invention relates to improved controlled permeability films and to improved methods of making such films.
Controlled permeability films are particularly concerned with allowing gases such as oxygen and carbon dioxide to pass through the film. These films find application in the storage of products which are affected by the presence of gases l0 such as ethylene, oxygen and carbon dioxide and which respire and produce or consume these gases. Conditions for the optimal storage of horticultural products are influenced by factors which include crop species, cultivar, maturity, growing conditions, quality, relative humidity, temperature, packaging and storage duration. Control of carbon dioxide and/or oxygen concentration about such products has been shown to increase the product's storage life. Storage under controlled atmosphere involves modifying the concentration of oxygen, carbon dioxide, water vapour, ethylene and other gases. Rates of respiration vary, with broccoli having a high rate and lettuce having a relatively low rate. Controlled atmosphere research with broccoli has shown that oxygen levels below approximately 1% and C02 levels higher than about 15% independently induced offensive off-odors and off-flavors. Optimum oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations reported for broccoli range from approximately 1 to 2. 5% and about 5 to 10% respectively. Product life is extended using controlled atmosphere because respiration is slow and pathogen growth is inhibited.
In modified atmosphere packaging, the respiration behavior of the produce is utilized to control the composition of the atmosphere about the produce. The film permeability is matched to the expected respiration behavior as influenced by temperature and atmosphere conditions to provide an optimum carbon dioxide and oxygen content in the package. The accumulated oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in such a package will be related to the rate at which they are consumed or generated by the produce and the package permeability, by a simple mass balance. The sensitivity of this balance to oxygen and carbon dioxide permeability requires consistent manufacturing processes to make controlled permeability films.
WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01 074 2 Perforated films can produce controlled permeability but have the disadvantage of not acting as a barrier to microorganisms and/or moisture.
Controlled permeability can be achieved by careful selection of the polymers used and patent specification W094/25271 is one example where two different polymers are used in separate layers. This patent also recognizes that clarity, printability, and feel of the film are also critical factors for packaging film used at the retail level. One disadvantage is that the range of permeability is limited.
Another means o; achieving controlled permeability is disclosed in patent specifications W092/02580 and W095/07949. Permeability is achieved by l0 incorporating into the film filler particles larger than the intrinsic thickness of the film. The filler particles are inert and porous. The permeability can be varied by treating the filled film with heat and/or pressure or by stretching the film. The object of such a method is that one film can be treated to provide a range of films with differing permeability. This would enable a food packer to purchase one type of film and treat it on site to produce an appropriate film for each product to be packed. One shortcoming with this type of film is that it is not suitable for retail packaging because the clarity and feel of the film is not acceptable to the majority of consumers.
Another use of controlled permeability films is the storage of nematodes. As disclosed in Patent specification PCT/AU92/00041,the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, nematodes may be successfully packed for storage and transport using controlled permeability films.
It is an object of this invention to overcome the shortcomings of the prior art and provide a consumer acceptable film able to provide a wide range of permeability.
Brief description of the invention In a first embodiment this invention provides a controlled permeability film including A film forming polymer; and A spherical and/or non porous inert filler of a particle size greater than the intrinsic film thickness of the film forming polymer which is present in the film in an amount effective to provide permeability of the film; and the controlled permeability film being further modified to reduce the carbon dioxide to oxygen permeability ratio to approximately 0.5 to without causing any perforations in the film.
The layer containing the filler particles may be a barrier film particularly when lower permeabilities are desired. It is also unexpected that acceptable permeability can be achieved using a barrier film. An advantage in using a barrier layer is that the range of permeability that can be achieved by treating one film will commence with a non permeable film and range upwardly into high permeability films. A preferred barrier layer is a polyolefine barrier film especially one composed of an ethylene/vinyl alcohol co-polymer. The films as taught in specification W092/02580 had a lower permeability limit that was not considered non-permeable.
Where high permeabilities are desired the layer carrying the particles may be a non barrier film such as polyethylene, a copolymer of ethylene/vinyl acetate[EVA] or polyethylene terephthalate.
The particles are substantially spherical and/or non porous as this is thought to provide a more consistent permeability across the film surface. Most available porous particles tend to be of irregular shape and this is thought to contribute to the inconsistency in permeability experienced with porous particles. The majority of non porous particles are of a regular or spherical shape. The loading of the 20 particles in the film is about 0.1% by weight of the film.
The use of non porous filler particles is contrary to current theory which holds that l *the permeability of films containing porous particles is due in part to gas passing through the film via the pores in the filler particles. In some cases better .permeability is achieved using non porous particles. The main advantage of non- S. 25 porous fillers over porous fillers is that all porous fillers are opaque or colored and diminish the clarity of the film, where as non porous particles especially glass are Sa transparent and, in the film, do not adversely effect the film's clarity. Non porous, spherical particles also provide more consistent film permeability once the film has been activated.
In another embodiment the present invention provides a permeable film comprising a multi layer film in which an inner layer consists of a polymer containing inert filler particles of a size larger than the intrinsic thickness of the WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01 074 4 It has surprisingly been found that permeability is still achievable if the inert filler particles are contained in a layer between 2 or more outer layers. These outer layers can be chosen for their properties of clarity, flexibility and stiffness to provide a consumer acceptable film. The permeability of the outer layers is not critical as the permeability treatment renders the whole laminate permeable. Thus a barrier layer may be used as one of the non particle containing layers. The polymers used in the laminate will be determined by the application for which the laminate is intended. For a high permeability film with good clarity, a laminate Or multi layer film made of layers of any combination of polyolefines such as polyethylene polypropylene [PP],and copolymers of ethylene such as ethylene-vinyl acetate [EVA] ethylene-vinyl alcohol [EVOH], ethylene-ethylene acrylate [EEA], polyethylene terephthalate[PET] or polystyrene [PS] such as styrene-butadiene copolymers. Some films may be heat sealable on at least one surface for heat sealing to other packaging items such as sealable lids for trays etc. PE is a common choice for heat sealing but if the container is made of PET then modified EVA resins are usually recommended.
The spherical inert filler particles need not be non porous but may be porous.
There are applications where porous particles are still acceptable because of the benefits provided by the multilayer film structure.
In order to increase the permeability of the extruded film according to any of the embodiments of this invention, the film is subjected to treatment with heat and/or pressure. The method used is disclosed in specification W095/07949. The treatment is preferably carried out by passing the film between pressure rollers some of which may be heated. The temperature of the rollers contacting the film need not all be at the treatment temperature. An increase in permeability can be obtained without heating or by heating one or both surfaces of the film. The temperature selected will be within the range of 10 0 C to 200 0 C preferably 21 to 100C.
The pressure plate or roller applies a compressive force to the film sufficient to thin the film surrounding the particles. The compressive force applied may be in the range of about 2.5kg to 100kg, preferably about 5kg to 75kg. A roller treatment is preferred as it provides a more consistent film thickness. The film may also be subjected to uni-axial stretching. The stretching force applied may be WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01 074 about 2.5kg to 75 kg, preferably about 5 kg to 50 kg.
The term "intrinsic film thickness" as used herein refers to the calculated thickness of the multi layer film. The intrinsic film thickness is the thickness the film would have if the filler particles were absent.
s The term film as used in this specification is intended to include sheet or film suitable for packaging.
When a particular package design is considered for a particular respiring product the required degree of permeability for oxygen and carbon dioxide can be achieved by making only a portion of the surface of the package permeable to a degree sufficient for the volume of the package, the quantity and type of the product and the expected ambient conditions.
In a preferred aspect of this invention the inert filler may be treated to modify its surface behaviour and consequently modify the films permeability characteristics.
The surface modifying agent may reduce the adhesion of the film forming polymer to the inert filler, which may result in the formation of depressions in the film. The depression's may impart micro-perforations to the controlled permeability film.
The net effect of the surface modifying agent is the reduction in the effective film thickness. The carbon dioxide to oxygen permeability ratio for the controlled permeability film may also be altered.
The surface modifying agent may be any suitable substance capable of modifying the surface of the inert filler. Preferably, the agent is suitable to render the surface of the inert filler hydrophobic. The surface modifying patent may be inorganic or and inorganic polymeric material, for example polyolefines, particularly polyethylenes, and oxygenated polyethylene, for example polyethylene glycols, nonyl phenyl polyethylene oxide, poly vinyl alcohols, poly vinyl acetates, paraffins, polysiloxanes and silane coupling agents, metal alkoxides such as those of titanium and aluminium, alcohols such as n-butanol, and combinations there of. The surface modifying agent should be used in an amount sufficient to coat at least 10 percent of the surface of the inert filler. The surface modifying agent or combination of surface modifying agents may be added in quantities greater than needed to coat the total surface of the inert particles, so as to fill or partially fill the available pore volume.
WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074 6 In another aspect of this invention be film only layer containing the inert filler may also contain a dispersing polymer. Generally, the dispersing polymer should not be compatible with the film forming polymer so that when combined with appropriate blowing techniques, it forms distinct sections within the composite film. The inclusion of a dispersing polymer may effect the characteristics of the polymer film. For example, where a linear low density polyethylene [LLDPE] film has been combined with a less dense polyethylene linear very low density polyethylene] these may lead to an increase in the oxygen permeability of the film.
The inclusion of a less viscous polyethylene e.g. high pressure low density l0 polyethylene] may lead to a thinning of the film.
Suitable polymeric material that may be line to form a composite film include polyolefines of differing grades. Particularly preferred polyolefines are polyethylenes and oxygenated polyethylenes, polypropylene, polyester's including polyethylene terephthalate and polybutylene terephthalate, vinyl polymers including polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl acetate, ethylene-vinyl acetate co-polymers and ethylene-vinyl alcohols copolymers, polycarbonates and polystyrene, polyalkyleneoxide polymers including polyethylene oxide polymer; and mixtures there of.
A composite film may comprise to or more polymers blended together. The most third blended films may be selected depending upon the desired characteristics of the film. It is preferred that a composite film comprised 30 to 99% by weight placed on the total weight film, of a polyolefine polymer; and approximately 1 to by weight placed on the total weight of the Composites film of a dispersing polymer selected from polyolefines, polyesters, vinyl polymers, polycarbonates, polystyrenes, polyalkyleneolefine polymers and mixtures thereof.
Modifications of both composite film and to the inert filler may provide improved properties such as higher permeability, better permeability/temperature behaviour, more consistent film properties and better carbon dioxide to oxygen permeability ratios.
A preferred multilayer film has an outer layer ie: a layer used to form the outer layer in a package] to provide clarity, stiffness, crinkle feeling and glossy finish to the multilayer film. This outer layer is also adapted to carry printing. The internal surface of a package formed with this film is provided by an inner layer chosen for WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074 7 its acceptance as a film that can contact food, has heat sealability low temperature seal initiation and ultimate hot tack strength], clarity, toughness and good machinability and must be able to perform in high speed form-fill-seal equipment. Both the inner and outer layers must comply with food regulations such as those set by the F D A in the USA.
The middle or internal layer carrying the inert filler particles may be a barrier film particularly where a lower range of permeabilities is desired.
The controlled permeability films of this invention may be utilized in the packaging of highly sensitive produce ranging from broccoli to organisms such as l0 nematodes. The produce packaged may be any suitable type sensitive to oxygen deterioration. The multilayer film structure allows retail marketing of minimally processed vegetables of very low to very high respiring produce packaged individually or in combinations. Typical processed produce include grated, chopped lettuce of different types ,prepared mixed lettuce, grated, julienned, or diced carrots, prepared stir fry mixtures, broccoli and cauliflower florets, prepared soup mixtures and grated cabbage. Typical whole produce include broccoli, brussels sprouts, beans, cabbage, chicory, celery, cauliflower, radish, artichoke, lettuce, tomato, pepper, leeks, parsley, spinach, asparagus, mushrooms and okra, flowers, berries, cherry, melons, mango, papaya, pineapple, avacado, persimmon, grapefruit, kiwi, nectarine, peach, apple, banana, orange, apricot, grape, cranberry, plum, Pear, and nashi.
The produce packaged with the treated single or multilayer films of this invention have been found to exhibit improved carbon dioxide to oxygen permeability such that the deterioration of the produce is significantly reduced. It will be recognized that the atmospheric oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations may be optimized to be within the optimum ranges for a specific product. Reported optimum oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations for broccoli range of approximately 1 to and approximately five to 10% respectively. It is thought that the controlled permeability package achieves extended produce life because of a slowing in respiration and inhibition of pathogen growth.
The concentration of carbon dioxide will be controlled volume respiration rate of the produce less the amount of carbon dioxide released through the film.
WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074 8 This may be expressed D [CO 2 dt Resp Perm [CO 2 ]x film thickness/film area The concentration of oxygen is directly related to the permeability film to oxygen.
Thus the variation in the ratio of permeability of carbon dioxide to oxygen provides an ability to produce a film having optimum characteristics for any chosen produce.
The single layer controlled permeability film utilized in this aspect of the present invention is preferably a polyethylene film more preferably a low density polyethylene [LDPE] film. The inert filler particle is preferably a non porous l0 particle and in this aspect of the present invention is preferably a glass microsphere filler. It has been found that the broccoli produce may be packaged with produce loadings of approximately 6 to 7 kg per square meter of packaging film. It will be understood that the mass of produce stored relative to the area of polymer film available for gasses to pass through, he is an important parameter affecting internal package atmosphere. Zagory et al [Proc.Sth Int. CA Conference, June 14-16, 1989 Wenatchee Washington] recommended packaging broccoli at loading of approximately 3.2 to 4.5 kg per square meter polymeric film. Such loading ranges were found to be ineffective in producing optimum carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations.
When organisms are packaged which require high levels of moisture and sufficient oxygen, the films of this invention may used. The organisms will include nematodes, live aquatic animals or plants, and aerobic microorganisms.
For nematodes for further transmission rates for oxygen and carbon dioxide are: oxygen greater than 1.2 x 10-17 carbon dioxide greater than 4 x 10-17 These values ensure that adequate oxygen is available and that moisture levels are maintained in the package organism product. Packaging of other organisms can be achieved by adjusting permeability ratios and film thickness to achieve the optimum transmission rates for a given organism.
The unique advantage of the single or multilayer films of this invention is that with one single film a number of packaging applications can be addressed. By varying the conditions of heat and pressure in a pre-packaging step a wide range of film WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074 9 permeabilities can be achieved. This means that a factory processing whole or fresh cut vegetables can purchase one packaging film and treat it on site to produce an appropriate film before each vegetable product from very low respiring products such as chopped cos lettuce or whole carrots, to very high respiring products such as broccoli florets, cauliflower florets, julienned carrots. The film provides optimized combination of properties such as machinability on vertical form, fill, seal equipment, consistent film permeabilities following the heat and/or pressure treatment, good optical characteristics and seal performance.
Detailed description of the invention Examples of single layer films using spherical nonporous inert filler particles were made and tested.
Example 1 A polyethylene film of 15% low density and 85% linear low density was fabricated according to WO92/02580 with 2% Ballotini glass spheres. The intrinsic film thickness was 30 micron and the particle size of the filler was 53 to 61 microns.
The film was processed by passing it between two stainless steel rollers each weighing approximately 7kg. The rollers can be set a predetermined distance between apart and the bottom roller can move against two springs with spring constants of 0.54 kgmm 1 The rollers can be maintained at an elevated temperature bypassing thermostatically controlled heated oil through them. In this example the rollers were at a constant spacing of 40 microns. The permeabilities before and after the treatment are shown in table 1 measured as mole ms'lPa- 1 Table I Oxygen permeability Carbon Dioxide permeability Before 2.5 x 10- 15 6.7x 10-1 After 4.6 x 10 15 7.4x 101 WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01 074 Example 2 The procedure and materials of example 1 were used except the roller spacing was 0 micron. The oxygen and carbon dioxide permeabilities before and after are shown in table 3 as mole m-'s'Pa 1 Table 2 Oxygen permeability Carbon Dioxide permeability Before 2.5 x 10 15 6.7x 10- 1 After 12.4 x 10- 16.2 x 10- 1 Multi layer films The preferred polymer for the outer layer is a styrene-butadiene copolymer. A preferred product is Philips K resin grade KR10 which meets FDA regulations.
The preferred internal polymer is an ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer [EVOH]. A preferred product is Nippon Gohsei's Sornaol ET 3803 which has an ethylene content of 38. Prior to co-extrusion a 10% loading of non porous particles was master batched with EVOH in the presence of nitrogen to avoid undesirable effects of moisture. The master batch was then diluted with EVOH during the film production by co extrusion.
The inner layer that directly contacts fresh food is preferably a polyolefin plastomer particularly an ethylene alpha olefin manufactured by the single site catalyst technology. A preferred polymer is Dow plastics PF 1140 plastomer.
The multi layer film is preferably produced by co extrusion and to ensure bonding between the layers, a tie layer is provided between each pair of functional layers.
The adhesive tie iayer is selected from polymers that have good clarity and adhesion between the barrier layer and the outer or inner layer. Preferably the tie layer between the barrier layer and the outer layer is an anhydride modified ethylene vinyl acetate polymer. The preferred adhesive for the tie layer between the barrier and inner layer is an anhydride modified linear low density polyethylene polymer. Preferred product for the tie layer is Dupont's Bynel products such as 3861 and 41E 557.
WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074 11 Table 3 illustrates the structure of the preferred film of this invention.
Table 3 Thickness Polymer [microns] Outer layer 11 K-resin KR10;Shore hardness 65 light transmission 90; Vicat softening point 87 °C Tie layer 3.5 Bynel 3861; Vicat 56 OC Middle layer 5 Soarnol grade E T 3803; Glass transition temperature 58 This layer contains 0.1% loading of non porous particles[ ballotini spheres] with particles in the size range of 53 to microns. Loading of 0.4 and 0.8% of filler enable the range of film permeability to be increased.
Tie layer 3.5 Bynel 41E557; Vicat 93 C Inner layer 11 Dow Affinity PF 1140 Blended with 2.44% loading of antiblock[50% CaCO 3 3% slip+ 47 LLDPE[ active anti block ingredient is 1.22%]; Clarity 70; 134 gloss at 20 0 C -ASTM D 2457; 1.3% haze- ASTM D1003; Seal initiation temperature 81 °C Total film 34 thickness The co extrusion is preferably carried out using a seven layer blown film co extruder.
Example 3 The permeability of a film can be manipulated by applying pressure to the film.
Rollers at room temperature or higher can be used to provide compressive force on the film. This alters or thins the film thickness surrounding the particles and this event results in increased gas transmission rates. The parameters in the treatment which can be varied to alter transmission rates include 1) application of different pressures by varying the weight of the roller 2) adjusting the spacing between the rollers 3) temperature of the rollers 4) speed of the rollers varying the amount of filler used in the film 6) varying the contact area of the roller WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074 12 There are three preferred treatment methods.
Method 1 Two oil heated rollers are set at a desired temperature between 80 and 110 0
C.
The spacing between the rollers and their speed were altered to manipulate film transmission properties. The variation obtained is shown in table 5 where conditions are shown as temperature, spacing in microns, speed as percentage and indicates two hot rollers.
Method 2 one heated and one cold roller was used in activation. In this method no space setting is used, since the cold roller provides the pressure on the film by its weight 19kg]. The permeability of the film was modified by using different temperatures and speed settings. For this method C/H was used to represent one cold and one hot roller.
The results of using these two methods are set out in table 4.
In the tables 4 to 6, the figures, shown in brackets after the permeability and ratio values, represent the 90% confidence limit calculated from the standard deviation and the students critical point and divided by the mean and are expressed as a percentage.
Method 3 Vary the activation area, by varying the width of the roller from 0.5 cm for slow respiring produce up to the whole width of the film for high respiring produce. For further information see example WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01 074 13 Table 4 Effect of Heat activation on the film permeability of 5 layer film impregnated with non porous silica [ballotini spheres loaded to Activation conditions Film Oxygen Carbon Ratio thickness permeability dioxide [microns] permeability Unrolled tray] 0.016 0.026 1.70[14.3%] °C-10% speed, C/H 42.06 4.177[15.92%] 8.654[16.37%] 2.10 [21.33%] oC-10% speed,C/H 40.43 5.89[13.73%] 4.75[27.19%] 0.81 [24.2%] °C-20% speed, C/H 41.42 3.625 2.705 0.75 [2.98%] °C-20% speed C/H 35.81 4.349 3.327 [10.65%] 0.76 [5.17%] 100 °C -20% speed, C/H 40.56 7.526 5.658 0.75 [2.82%] 100 C -20% speed, C/H 39.87 7.058 5.7 0.80 110 °C-20% speed, C/H 39.73 7.256 5.55 0.77 [3.59%] °C-30% speed, C/H 40.09 3.619 [16.08%] 3.007 [17.89%] 0.82 [6.35%] C-30% speed, C/H 40.18 6.372 4.775 [12.67%] 0.75 [6.93%] 100 oC-30% speed, C/H 39.60 6.479 5.044 [11.45%] 0.78 [8.86%] C- 20 microns, 10%,H/H 40.52 15.23 11.85 0.78 [1.25%] C- 20 microns, 10%,H/H 40.21 12.89 9.927 [feet.09%] 0.77 [3.51%] 100 C- 20 microns, 10%,H/H 38.94 21.51 16.78 0.78 [1.78%] C- 20 microns, 20%,H/H 39.72 12.13 9.668 0.80 [2.58%] C- 20 microns, 20%,H/H 39.52 14.0 [.94 0.78 [1.85%] 100 0 C- 20 microns, 20%,H/H 39.49 17.23 13.39 0.78 20 microns, 30%,H/H 40.42 11.57 9.208 0.80 [2.47%] C- 20 microns, 30%,H/H 40.09 11.58 8.78 0.76 [2.69%] 100 C- 20 microns, 30%,H/H 40.41 17.53 13.97 0.80 [2.04%] 110 C- 40 microns, 10%,H/H 38.51 9.85 7.594 0.77 [4.33%] 110 OC- 40 microns, 20%,H/H 38.09 12.01 9.322 0.78 110 oC- 40 microns, 30%,H/H 36.55 12.22 9.314 0.76 [1.75%] The results of Table 4 are shown graphically in figure one of the drawings where the extrapolated line illustrates the range of that are possible with this invention.
WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074 14 Example 4 Five layer blown film in tubular form was slit and separated for trialling under a variety of activation conditions. The film is slit to ensure that the rolled film is one ply to avoid sticking of inner layers onto each other or other undesirable effects.
The film is then activated under the following conditions Different pressures namely roller weights of 7Kg or 12Kg Roller width is Contact time determined by speed setting within range of 10 30 Temperature from room temperature[RT] to 100 °C Tables 6A and 6B demonstrate the effect of film activation on the permeability of 0.1% ballotini sphere filled film where the inner layer [Dow Affinity] contacts the hot roller and the outer layer K-resin] contacts the cold roller. The permeability is shown as x 10 15 mole m''s' 1 Pa 1 measured at 22 C and 55-60% RH. The permeability is measured for the treated area [15cm x 38cm] only.
Table 5A [Roller weight 7Kg] Activation Film thickness Oxygen Carbon dioxide Ratio Conditions Permeability permeability 40.11 5.59 4.43 0.8 [11.9%] 40.04 5.46 4.08 0.78 [13.6%] 40.09 8.76 6.85 0.78 39.97 9.36 7.43 0.79 40.42 9.14 7.36 0.79 RT-100% 40.13 7.63 5.72 0.75 °C-10% 40.49 6.56 4.85 0.74 °C-20% 40.08 5.67 [10.4%] OC-30% 39.94 5.89 4.52 0.77 OC-10% 40.18 9.9 7.49 0.77 OC-20% 40.11 10.49 8.09 0.77 OC-30% 40.22 8.86 6.74 0.76 C-10% 40.52 9.32 7.7 0.83 C-20% 40.08 7.83 6.86 0.89 [19.2%] C-30% 39.94 5.89 4,52 0.77 0 C-10% 40.03 18.76 14.79 0.79 OC-20% 39.82 19.89 15.72 0.79 C-30% 40.24 19.48 15.49 0.79 WO 99/33658PC/U8O07 PCT/AU98/01074 Table 5B3 [Roller weight 121(g] Activation Film thickness Oxygen Carbon dioxide Ratio Conditions microns Permeability permeability 39.82 10.07 [20.26%] 7.91 0.79 40.18 7.41 5.98 0.80 39.83 7.69 5.99 .77 0 C-1O% 39.88 10.80 8.13 0.75 [1.9%/6 0 C-20% 40.02 10.74([9.0%] 0.75 1.9%] 3000C30% 40.12 10.09 7.82 0.78 GC-1O% 39.88 11.16 8.08 0.72 0 C-20% 40.16 10.76([3.1%] 0.77([5.1%] 4000C30% 40.22 11.52([6.8%] 8.17 0.75([4.4%] 0 C-20% 40.10 9.18 0.83 5000C30% 40.45 8.61 5.68([18.4%] 0.66([20.7% 6C-1 0% 40.22 9.23 7.05 0.76 [14.2%] 00-20% 40.32 8.71 6.19([21.2%] 0.71 6000C30% 40.39 7.59 5.96 0.78 0 C-1 0% 40.56 11.481[5.8%] 9.321[13.7% 0.81 9.7%] 0C-20% 40.65 9.58 7.46([12.3%] 0.78 OC-30% 40.46 6.36 5.01 0.79([16.6%] 0 C-I 0% 40.48 7.131[5.9%] 6.11 0.85 8000C20% 40.47 7.49 6.52 0.87 00-30% 40.23 8.68 7.24 0.79 [20.2%] 0 C-1 0% 40.67 7.39 5.23 0.71 850OC-20% 40.13 8.35([13.6%] 0.72 (14.7%] 8500C30% 40.49 10.75 7.728 0.72 OC-1 0% 40.25 12.52 9.56 0.76 9500C20% 40.13 11.83(13.3%] 8.75([22.7%] 0.74 (20.2%] OC-30% 39.88 11.61 8.665([6.3%] 0.75([4.1%] 100 OC-1 0% 39.80 12.73 9.83 0.77 [4.8% 100 00-20% 39.82 12.66 10.30 0.81 1000-30% 40.17 11.25 8.82 0.82 (12.9%] Example This example measured permeabilities of a given surface area of film which had varying proportions of the area treated. This is one technique for providing a lower range of permeabilities for lower respiring products.
WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074 16 Processing conditions of the film activation process were varied as follows: The width of the metal disc rollers which contacts the film surface during activation were made adjustable, changing from 0.5cm to 25cm or more if required. The activated film area at room temperature[21 OC] provides sufficient increase in oxygen permeability in the range of 7-10 xl 0 15 mole mls' 1 Pa 1 Furthermore the processing temperature can be manipulated further if higher permeabilities are preferred.
Table 6 [variable width rollers] Speed Disc width Film Oxygen Carbon Ratio setting [cm] Thickness permeability dioxide [microns] permeability 1.5 30.58 0.57 0.37 0.61 [35.3%] 2 39.41 0.54 0.76 [14.2%] 3 39.94 0.83 0.98 1.19 4 40.10 1.66 1.23 0.73 [11.3%] 4.5 39.97 1.23 1.15 0.94 [15.6%] 5 39.79 1.57 1.43 0.94 [14.4%] 7 39.94 2.81 2.50 0.89 8 39.73 2.14 1.64 0.77 [13.2%] 4 39.29 1.19 0.90 0.77 [17.8%] 4.5 39.65 1.20 1.09 0.97 [24.6%] 8 39.86 1.75 1.06 0.60 [12.5%] The measured film permeability results as shown in table 6 include all surface area involved during permeability measurement [both activated and non activated area]. The film and treatment used was the same as in example 4 with activation temperature being 21 OC, the roller speed setting being 10% or 30% and the measured surface area being 28cm x 38cm. The permeability is shown as x 1015 mole m-s'lPa 1 measured at 22 C and 55-60% RH.
WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074 17 Example 6 The film activation conditions for packaged cut lettuce were determined for a package having an oxygen permeability of 9.5 x10- 15 mole mlslPa-1 and the following parameters: Surface area 28cm x 32cm Product weight 285g Film thickness 34microns Process speed setting Activation temperature 21 °C Target oxygen concentration is 3% Table 7 Storage temperature Permeability required Disc roller width [cm] x 1015 mole m-'s'Pa-1 to be used 1 0.368 1 0.554 8 0.610 2 1.485 Example 7 The film activation conditions for packaged cut broccoli florets were determined for a package having an oxygen permeability of 9.5 x10 i5 mole m's-'Pa- 1 and the following parameters: Surface area 18cm x 36cm [table 8A] and 28cm x 36cm [table 8B] Product weight 300g [table 9A] and 454g [table 9B] Film thickness 34microns Process speed setting Activation temperature 21 °C Target oxygen concentration is 3% WO 99/33658 Table 8A PCT/AU98/01074 Storage temperature Permeability required Disc roller width [cm] x 1015 mole m''s'Pa 1 to be used 1 0.949 2 1.446 3 8 2.027 4 3.473 Table 8B Storage temperature Permeability required Disc roller width [cm] x 1015 mole m"s-Pa-1 to be used 1 0.923 1.407 4 8 1.972 3.379 The films according to this invention not only enable one feedstock to be transformed into a range of films of differing permeability but all the multilayer 0o films exhibit good clarity and crinkle feel.

Claims (1)

  1. 3. a] an outer layer of a film having good clarity and stiffness properties b] an internal layer of a film containing inert filler particles larger than the intrinsic thickness of the packaging film c] an inner layer of a food grade film having good clarity wherein the carbon dioxide to oxygen permeability of said packaging film is adjustable to within the range of 0.5 to 2 by subjecting the film to a treatment with heat and/or pressure. A packaging film as claimed in claim 4 in which the filler particles are Sa substantially spherical and/or non porous. WO 99/33658 PCT/AU98/01074 6) A packaging film as claimed in claim 3 in which the internal layer is a barrier film. 7) A packaging film as claimed in claim 1 which is a multilayer film consisting of at least two layers selected from polyolefins, vinyl polymers, copolymers of ethylene with vinyl acetate or vinyl alcohol, ethylene acetate co polymers, polyesters and mixtures thereof, wherein at least one of the layers contains said spherical and/or non porous inert filler.
AU16538/99A 1997-12-24 1998-12-23 Permeable packaging film Ceased AU733752B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU16538/99A AU733752B2 (en) 1997-12-24 1998-12-23 Permeable packaging film

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPP1106A AUPP110697A0 (en) 1997-12-24 1997-12-24 Packaging film
AUPP1106 1997-12-24
AUPP4624 1998-07-13
AUPP4624A AUPP462498A0 (en) 1998-07-13 1998-07-13 Packaging film
AU16538/99A AU733752B2 (en) 1997-12-24 1998-12-23 Permeable packaging film
PCT/AU1998/001074 WO1999033658A1 (en) 1997-12-24 1998-12-23 Permeable packaging film

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU1653899A AU1653899A (en) 1999-07-19
AU733752B2 true AU733752B2 (en) 2001-05-24

Family

ID=27152295

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU16538/99A Ceased AU733752B2 (en) 1997-12-24 1998-12-23 Permeable packaging film

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU733752B2 (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1992002580A1 (en) * 1990-08-10 1992-02-20 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Controlled permeability film
WO1995007949A1 (en) * 1993-09-17 1995-03-23 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Film process

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1992002580A1 (en) * 1990-08-10 1992-02-20 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Controlled permeability film
WO1995007949A1 (en) * 1993-09-17 1995-03-23 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Film process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1653899A (en) 1999-07-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mangaraj et al. Applications of plastic films for modified atmosphere packaging of fruits and vegetables: a review
US6579607B1 (en) Permeable packaging film
US20090220739A1 (en) Selectively permeable films
Schlimme et al. Packaging of minimally processed fruits and vegetables
WO1997022470A9 (en) Biaxially oriented polyethylene films
EP0722474B1 (en) Film process
AU1336997A (en) Biaxially oriented polyethylene films
EP1855881A1 (en) Breathable, heat-sealable composite polymeric film
US20050163950A1 (en) Film suitable for food packaging
CN101489782A (en) Article comprising oxygen permeable layer
Akelah et al. Polymers in food packaging and protection
KR20010020564A (en) Fog-resistant packaging film
AU733752B2 (en) Permeable packaging film
Zagory et al. Advances in modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) of fresh produce
Haugard et al. Biobased food packaging
KR20170005266A (en) Film forming composition, packing film prepared therefrom and method of preparing the film
Dash Modified atmosphere packaging of food
TWI803699B (en) Membrane material for storing fruits and vegetables
CA2539942C (en) Film structures and packages therefrom useful for packaging respiring food products
Boonnao High water vapor permeability ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer composite for fresh holy basil (Ocimum sanctum L.) Packaging
WO2005062838A2 (en) Containers
Haugaard Denmark, and G. Mortensen, Arla Foods, Denmark
NZ280007A (en) Multilayer film having a gas barrier layer and an inner heat-sealable layer of ethylene-alpha-olefin polymer for packaging water

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
PC Assignment registered

Owner name: DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Free format text: FORMER OWNER WAS: FOOD AND PACKAGING CENTRE MANAGEMENT LIMITED