AU720610B2 - Genetic transformation of trees - Google Patents
Genetic transformation of trees Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU720610B2 AU720610B2 AU13883/97A AU1388397A AU720610B2 AU 720610 B2 AU720610 B2 AU 720610B2 AU 13883/97 A AU13883/97 A AU 13883/97A AU 1388397 A AU1388397 A AU 1388397A AU 720610 B2 AU720610 B2 AU 720610B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- shoot
- transformed
- rooted
- site
- incision
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8201—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
- C12N15/8202—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation by biological means, e.g. cell mediated or natural vector
- C12N15/8205—Agrobacterium mediated transformation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H1/00—Processes for modifying genotypes ; Plants characterised by associated natural traits
- A01H1/06—Processes for producing mutations, e.g. treatment with chemicals or with radiation
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
Description
WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 1 Genetic Transformation of Trees This invention relates to the transformation of tree species by the introduction of alien genes, i.e. genes from a source other than the specific tree itself.
The introduction of novel genes into plant species has been discussed at length in the literature, and has become routine for a number of annual and perennial crops including tomato, potato, oilseed rape and rice. Introduced genes have been used to modify a wide variety of specific and general characteristics, including, for example, protein and carbohydrate quality, postharvest physiology, photosynthetic capability and pest resistance, expressed both in the whole plant and in specific plant parts. Depending upon the nature of the plant species, various methods of introduction of the novel genes have been developed, including both direct DNA transfer (microinjection, biolistics, microfibrils, chemical poration, electroporation) and quasi-natural infection by the micro-organisms Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes.
To date genetic transformation of forestry species has been largely limited to the use of marker genes, although some examples have introduced more commercially relevant traits including genes affecting insect resistance, herbicide tolerance, wound responses and lignification.
The genetic transformation of tree species has presented special problems (Jouanin et al 1993), one of which is the recalcitrant nature of .the tissue itself limiting the WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 2 susceptibility to transformation. Many trees show poor growth in vitro, including low rates of multiplication of in vitro shoot systems, and low shoot and root regenerability. In addition, trees usually show a wider range of in vitro behaviour according to individual genotype than do cultivated annual field crops. Furthermore, there is large inter- and intra-specific variation in susceptibility to genetic transformation, and some trees show marked decreasing susceptibility with increasing physiological age. Transient introduction of the novel DNA into the plant cell can be achieved, but without stable integration of the DNA into the plant genome, expression of the introduced genes is shortlived. A further problem is the difficulty in maintaining and propagating tissue in culture, prior to transformation, during selection of transformed cells and during regeneration of transformed whole plants. Tissue health and survival also has implications for the transformation and integration events described above and are relevant to an object of this invention.
The most commonly employed method of obtaining stable transformation is by means of modified strains of Agrobacterium. Many tree species are susceptible to infection by wild type Agrobacterium tumefaciens but stable transformation with additional genes has been achieved in only a few species, e.g. Brackpool et al 1990; DeBlock, 1990 and McGranahan et al, 1990. Success has been restricted to certain genotypes of these species, mainly those genotypes which are easily transformed and propagated.
WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 3 The methods employed generally entail a series of steps such as: i) excision of target explants from the plant tissue, e.g. leaf discs, root fragments, stem sections, hypocotyls, cotyledons, embryos or cell suspensions, ii) pre-culture of the explant on suitable media for a period of hours or days, iii) co-cultivation of the explants with bacterial cells containing the DNA vector to permit infection via the wounded plant cells, iv) transfer to a selective medium to arrest the growth of residual bacterial cells, and select those plant cells which have been transformed, and v) one or more transfers to media to initiate regeneration of complete plantlets from the explantderived callus.
The basic methodology involves subjecting the tissue explants to physical damage caused by the excision, to coincubation with bacteria, and to chemical selection agents, each of which steps exerts severe stress on the transformed cells and tissue pieces, usually adversely affecting the powers of shoot regenerability possessed by the tissue. The effect of these treatments would be diminished if the necessity of using isolated tissue explants, which are therefore compromised in terms of health, survivability, and regenerative capacity, were removed.
In tree crops in particular, the subsequent sexual or asexual propagation of improved germplasm is .an established practice, and this propagation ability is an important characteristic to be maintained in improved material for the purposes of clonal forestry.
The process of producing a transformed plant should not preclude subsequent propagation by any method by which the species which has been transformed is otherwise normally propagated.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome or ameliorate at least one of the disadvantages of the prior art, or to provide a useful alternative.
This invention provides a means for the introduction of any DNA sequence into trees. More specifically, the method can utilise those genes or DNA sequences capable of affecting phenotypic characteristics, for example silvicultural traits, processing quality traits in the timber, fruit or leaves, or the reproductive phenology of the mature tree.
Thus, the method will enable both the production of improved trees by clonal propagation and better control of the outcome of sexual propagation in seed orchards.
Offspring of the transformed trees containing the novel genes can also be subjected to further transformation, if desired, to produce incremental improvement.
A method has been described for the transformation of conifers by Ellis et al, 1992 which comprised introducing wild type Agrobacterium rhizogenes into a cut in the cotyledonary node of seedlings ofLarix decidua. However, this method produced only a tumorous mass of shoot primordia, and regeneration of complete transformed plants was not achieved.
20 The present invention overcomes the problem of tumorous growth and provides a •method suitable for the regeneration of transformed plants from at least one other tree •species which has hitherto been difficult to transform and for which there has been no published report of complete transformed plants.
According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of 25 transformation of trees of the genera, Eucalyptus, Populus, Malus or Prunus, the method comprising the steps of wounding rooted plant tissue, introducing the wounded rooted 0.0• tissue to bacterial cells containing a DNA vector carrying an exogenous DNA sequence, and selecting the transformed cells, wherein the method comprises providing an incision o• into a site capable of shoot initiation of a rooted seedling, shoot or cutting, the site 30 capable of shoot initiation being a cotyledonary node, an axillary meristem or an apical meristem, introducing disarmed Agrobacterium cells carrying one or more exogenous S"DNA sequences into the incision, and a selection step in which the site is brought into DNA sequences into the incision, and a selection step in which the site is brought into contact with a medium containing a nutrient, a growth regulator and a selection agent to which the transformed cells will be resistant, for a time period sufficient to produce transformed shoots containing the exogenous DNA sequences.
Preferably the incision forms a cleft in the site of shoot initiation. The incision may be about 1mm deep or more, depending on the size of the tree being treated. As used herein the term "tree" includes seedlings, shoots (derived from cuttings or otherwise) and cuttings, or larger plants thereof.
The site of shoot initiation may suitably be a cotyledonary node, an axillary meristem or an apical meristem.
a **o o/
/I
21010-OO.DOC WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 6 When the tree to be transformed is a seedling, preferably the site of shoot initiation is a cotyledonary node.
Preferably the method for transforming tree seedlings further includes the step of removing all pre-existing shoot initials, before, during or after the introduction of the Agrobacterium cells. This introduction may be known as the inoculation step.
When the tree to be transformed is a tree shoot preferably the site of shoot initiation is an axillary meristem or an apical meristem. Removal of pre-existing meristematic cells before, during or after the inoculation step may not be required in this particular method.
Preferably the site of shoot initiation is brought into contact with a medium containing a nutrient and a growth regulator for a period of time before the selection step.
This is known as a co-incubation step. When the site of shoot initiation is found in a seedling, preferably the coincubation step takes place with an upright seedling.
Suitably the co-incubation step takes place in a test-tube.
Preferably the medium of the selection step also comprises an antibiotic to kill the Agrobacterium strain.
Preferably the tree exhibits epigeal plant germination.
More preferably the method is applicable to the genera Eucalyptus, Populus, Malus and Prunus, for example, and any one of tree species which is susceptible to infection by Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes. This method is particularly useful for transforming certain species of the Eucalyptus genus, for example Eucalyptus globulus, which have hitherto been notoriously difficult to successfully transform and then produce transformed plants from.
Preferably the trees have an intact root system when they are infected and/or coincubated.
Preferably the tree species is Eucalyptus globulus or Eucalyptus grandis.
The present invention further provides a tree transformed according to the method of the invention.
The present invention even further provides a cell which harbours a gene transformed according to the above method. The invention provides a cell from a tree transformed according to the method of the invention. The invention also provides propagules of a tree transformed according to the method, seedlings of a tree transformed according to the method, seeds of a tree transformed according to the method, and germplasm of a tree transformed according to the method.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words 'comprise', 'comprising', and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of "including, but not limited to".
In order that the invention may be easily understood and readily carried into effect reference will now be made, by way of example, to the following Example.
20 The transformation of Eucalyptus globulus seedlings was effected by the following procedure: Example 1. Preparation of Eucalyptus globulus seedlings for transformation.
E. Globulus seed was surface-sterilised using a solution of household bleach containing sodium hypochlorite and detergent. The concentration and length of time of 25 sterilisation was not critical. Normally seed was incubated in a 10% v/v dilution of o household bleach in sterile reverse-osmosis water, with continuous agitation on an orbital shaker. The sterilising
S
WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 8 solution was renewed after 30 minutes and a second incubation of 60 minutes was performed. During the first incubation period, the bleach solution often became very dark in colour.
Finally, the seed was shaken in clean sterile water, with as many repeated washes as necessary to remove the smell of chlorine and the foaming of residual detergent.
Sterilised seed was sown by laying the seed on the surface of sterile 0.4% water agar medium containing sucrose in Magenta culture vessels. The seed was sown wellspaced on the surface of the medium, at a density of 25 seed per culture vessel. The culture vessels were placed in a growth cabinet at 20 0 C under low light intensity with a 16hour day-length, and the seed allowed to germinate and grow for 10 days. At this stage the majority of the seedlings should have reached the stage where the cotyledons are fully unfurled and the plumule is just visible between them.
The seedlings are of an age such that they are able to provide a robust environment in which the transformed cells will survive and proliferate. The seedlings are also of a sufficient size to permit relatively easy manipulation.
Example 2. Preparation of Arobacterium tumefacien cells for co-cultivation Co-cultivation was performed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 carrying the plasmid which encodes the 0-glucuronidase (GUS) gene and also the NPTII gene conferring resistance to the antibiotic kanamycin.
Transformation of the E.globulus tissue with this plasmid vector would result in the expression of these two marker WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 9 genes in the plant cells, thus enabling the selection of tissue comprising solely or predominantly transformed cells as exhibited by healthy growth in the presence of kanamycin, and subsequent identification of those particular transformed cells by the reaction catalysed by 0-glucuronidase on addition of the chromogenic substrate x-gluc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3indolyl-P-D-glucuronide). The cells were prepared by inoculation of 50ml of L-broth medium containing 50mg/1 kanamycin with a stock culture of the bacterium. After overnight growth at 28 0 C the cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 10ml of 1% glucose prior to use.
L-broth 10g/l bactotryptone yeast extract sodium chloride Example 3. Co-cultivation of E.qlobulus and Aqrobacterium tumefaciens The germinated seedlings prepared by the method of Example 1 were sampled under sterile conditions for cocultivation with the bacterium harbouring the transformation vector. To determine the optimal method of co-cultivation for transformation of E.globulus three different methods of infection with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells prepared by the method of Example 2 were assessed.
Method 1. Seedlings were cut approximately halfway along the hypocotyl and the lower halves plus the roots were discarded. The plumules were excised using a WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 scalpel tip, and the petiole blades were removed.
The excised hypocotyls were then laid horizontally on solid Medium 1 in a petri dish. The tissue was inoculated with A.tumefaci ens by dripping the bacterial suspension onto the horizontal hypocotyl from a disposable pipette.
Method 2.
Method 3.
Seedlings were cut approximately halfway along the hypocotyl and the lower halves plus the roots were discarded. The plumules were excised using a scalpel tip. Then a cleft 1mm deep was cut with a scalpel longitudinally through the cotyledonary node into the top of each hypocotyl. Inoculation with the A. tumefaciens cells was achieved simultaneously by immersing the scalpel blade in the bacterial suspension immediately prior to performing each incision. The inoculated hypocotyls were then stood erect by inserting the base of each into solid Medium 1 in a petri dish. Twenty (20) hypocotyls were so arranged per petri dish.
Plumules were excised from seedlings using a scalpel tip, but the seedlings were left otherwise intact with complete root systems. A cleft 1mm deep was cut with a scalpel longitudinally through the cotyledonary node into the top of each hypocotyl.
Inoculation with the A.tumefaciens cells was achieved simultaneously by immersing the scalpel blade in the bacterial suspension immediately prior WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 11 to performing each incision. The inoculated deplumuled seedlings were transferred into individual 25mm diameter test-tubes and stood erect with their root systems inserted into 20ml of Medium 2.
One hundred (100) seedlings were prepared by Methods 1 and 3 and two hundred seedlings (200) were prepared by Method 2.
Co-cultivation was continued for 10 days at 24°C under low light intensity with a 16-hour daylength. After this period, the explants prepared by Methods 2 and 3 were removed from their respective culture vessels or test-tubes and received further manipulation.
The laminae of the cotyledons were excised from the hypocotyls prepared by Method 2. The laminae of the cotyledons, roots and lower half of the hypocotyl were removed from the seedlings prepared by Method 3.
Any axillary shoots which had appeared on any of the explants prepared by either of the three treatments were also removed. The truncated hypocotyls from all three methods were then lain horizontally on Selection Medium 1 containing the antibiotics claforan (cefotaxime) to remove residual A.tumefaciens cells and kanamycin to select for transformed plant cells expressing the NPTII gene. Twenty (20) excised hypocotyls were arranged per petri dish. These were then transferred to Selection Medium 2 after 10 days, and onto fresh plates of the same medium after a further 4 weeks.
Incubation was performed at 24 0 C under low light intensity with a 16-hour daylength.
WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 12 After a further 4 weeks-, those explants exhibiting green (unbleached) regions of tissue were transferred to new plates of the same medium. Selected tissue was maintained by further transfers to fresh plates at regular intervals.
WO 97/25434 13 Results PCTGB97/00042 Treatment 1 2 3 Hypocotyls 100 200 100 Surviving at 8 weeks 0 9 7 Surviving at 15 weeks 0 4 4 Surviving at 22 weeks 0 3 1 Established Regenerants 0 1 1 Low numbers of regenerants were expected from the transformation of Eucalyptus globulus. No regenerants were obtained from excised hypocotyls co-cultivated horizontally in contact with the culture medium (Method 1) and the tissue rapidly declined in health. Regenerants were obtained with both Methods 2 and 3. The decline in survival with time probably indicates a number of regeneration loci formed by untransformed cells which subsequently succumbed to kanamycin selection. The efficiency of regeneration from tissues prepared and co-cultivated using Method 2 was slightly lower than that of tissues prepared by Method 3.
Method 3 was characterised by minimal but precise wounding of the tissue, maintenance of the vascular system between root and hypocotyl, minimal direct contact between the hypocotyl and the culture medium containing exogenous growth substances, and precise inoculation of the bacterial cells, minimising bacterial overgrowth. Method 3 was selected as the method of choice for transformation of E.globulus tissues.
WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 14 Example 4. Modifications of transformation method and expression of transqenes E.globulus seedlings and the A.tumefaciens suspension were prepared as in Examples 1 and 2. Three modifications of the optimal inoculation method of Example 3 were assessed as follows: 1. Decapitated and cleft entire cotyledonary node and cotyledons removed).
2. Deplumuled and cleft (as Example 3, Method 3).
3. Deplumuled and scored (Hypocotyl surface scored along a portion of its length with a scalpel blade).
In addition, three further modifications were also investigated: 4. Deplumuled and stabbed with a hypodermic needle.
Deplumuled, scored and crushed at the apex using forceps.
6. Deplumuled and crushed.
Following inoculation, all seedlings were transplanted to individual tubes containing Medium 3, and placed on an unlit shelf in the growth room to co-cultivate.
After 3 weeks, seedlings from the three main treatments were sampled for P-glucuronidase activity (GUS+) by x-gluc assay as follows. 3mg x-gluc dissolved in 100L dimethyl fornamide was made up to 10ml with 50mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 0.5% Triton X100 and 1mM EDTA. The sample tissue was incubated in a small volume of this reagent WO 97/25434 PCT/GB9700042 at 370 for 16 hours in darkness. Subsequently the tissue was decolourised by incubation in isopropanol at room temperature for 4 hours to several days. P-glucuronidase activity was detected by the presence of blue-stained regions in the tissue.
Treatment 1 2 3 4 5 6 No. 120 200 200 40 40 Surviving at 3 68 123 88 10 0 2 weeks GUS+ (3wk) 8/12 10/11 21/31 (68%) An x-gluc assay was also performed on seedlings sampled after only one week. This indicated GUS activity in most samples selected from all six methods.
The method of choice established in Example 3, which in this instance is Treatment 2, gives both the highest survival rate, and the greatest, or most persistent, transformation response. This is indicative of stable, rather than transient, expression of the transgenes.
In all cases the major area of blue staining presumably demarking transformed cells were located around the cleft.
With Treatment 1, this took the form of discreet "speckles" of isolated cells, whereas in Treatment 2 there was a greater predominance of larger heavily stained blue areas, suggesting that the regeneration of shoots from these areas would have resulted in transformed plants. The transformation of scored WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 16 hypocotyls was generally much poorer than in those where an apical cleft had been made.
As a further comparison, a number of refinements were also made to the excised hypocotyl transformation method (Example 3, Method These included scoring the hypocotyl with a scalpel to produce varying numbers of wounds of various lengths, and also puncturing the hypocotyl tissue with a sterile wire brush. None of these treatments resulted in successful regeneration of transformants.
Example 5. Regeneration of Shoots expressing transqenes One hundred and twenty (120) seedlings were prepared and cocultivated as described in Example 3. At the end of the cocultivation period, sixteen (16) hypocotyls were selected at random for x-gluc assay. The remaining hypocotyls were prepared for selection and regeneration. The lower half of the hypocotyl plus the root and the laminae of the cotyledons were removed along with any cotyledonary axillaries which had sprouted. The remaining hypocotyl sections were then plated horizontally on plates of Selection Medium 1 at a density of per plate. Plates were sealed in clingfilm and placed on an unlit shelf in the growth room. After 4 weeks the hypocotyls were transferred to fresh plates of the same medium, and were examined for growth of green callus. Any green calli were then transferred to Selection Medium 3, and those which appeared to be close to differentiating shoots were placed on Selection Medium 4.
WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 17 Of sixteen (16) hypocotyls sampled for x-gluc assay, all but one exhibited blue-staining areas.
After 1 week, all hypocotyl explants appeared totally bleached and no cotyledonary axillaries were observed. After 4 weeks on selective medium, eight of the one hundred (100) hypocotyls exhibited callus which was of a very dark green and healthy appearance, and a further ten (10) had midgreen coloured callus. Thirteen (13) calli were transferred to Selection Medium 3 and five to Selection Medium 4.
After transfer to Selection Medium 4, four calli regenerated shoots. After a further 6 weeks these were shown to be GUS+ by x-gluc assay.
The invention places no restriction on the DNA sequence or combination of sequences employed and so it can be applied to introduce any range of characteristics, as mentioned earlier. The invention can also be applied to material which has already been transformed in the same or earlier generations.
In another alternative to the seedling method above a shoot initiation site on a tree shoot in in vitro culture, such as an axillary meristem or apical meristem, can be treated by incising the meristem area in the same way and infecting with the genetically modified Agrobacterium strain.
After a period of time the transformed cells can be removed as explants and cultivated to produce transformed plantlets.
WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 18 References Brackpool Ward M.R. Weir A.F. (1990) "Optimisation of conditions for regeneration and transformation of adventitious shoots from seedling hypocotyls of Eucalypts." 7th International Congress of Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, Amsterdam, 24-26 June, 1990. Poster Al-23 DeBlock M. (1990) "Factors influencing the tissue culture and the Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of hybrid aspen and poplar clones." Plant Physiol. 93 1110-1116.
Ellis Diner A.M. Huang Y. (1992) "Regeneration of the genetically engineered conifer the importance of the biological system." Southern Regional Information Exchange Group Biennial Symposium, Huntsville, AL, 8-10 July, 1992 Jouanin Brasileiro Leple Pilate G. Cornu D. (1993) "Genetic transformation: a short review of methods and their applications, results and perspectives for forest trees." Ann. Sci. For. 50 325-336.
McGranahan Leslie Uratsu S.L. Dandekar A.M.
(1990) "Improved efficiency of the walnut somatic embryo gene transfer system." Plant Cell. Rep. 8 512-516.
Linsmaier E.M. Skoog F. (1965) "Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures." Physiol Plant. 18 100-127 WO 97/25434 PCT/GB97/00042 19
APPENDIX
Culture Media Used All based upon the medium of Linsmaier and Skoog (1965) at full strength, with the exception of Medium 2 which used half-strength medium and Medium 3 which used quarter-strength medium. Media contained the following additions: Medium 1 Medium 2 Medium 3 Selection Medium 1 Selection Medium 2 Selection Medium 3 Selection Medium 4 15 g/1 glucose AM zeatin MM indolyl-3-acetic acid 0.01% pluronic F-68 4 g/1 agar 10 g/1 sucrose 4 g/1 agar 10 g/l sucrose 4 g/1 agar 1 g/1 activated charcoal 15 g/1 glucose AM zeatin AM indolyl-3-acetic acid 250 mg/1 claforan mg/1 kanamycin 7 g/1 agar 15 g/1 glucose 4 AM zeatin 1 MM indolyl-3-acetic acid 250 mg/1 claforan mg/1 kanamycin 7 g/1 agar 5 M zeatin 2 lM indolyl-3-acetic acid 250 mg/1 claforan mg/1 kanamycin 7 g/1 agar 2 MM 6-benzyl amino purine 1 MM indolyl-3-acetic acid 250 mg/l claforan mg/1 kanamycin 7 g/1 agar
Claims (14)
1. A method of transformation of trees of the genera, Eucalyptus, Poplus, Malus or Prunus, the method comprising the steps of wounding rooted plant tissue, introducing the wounded rooted tissue to bacterial cells containing a DNA vector carrying an exogenous DNA sequence, and selecting the transformed cells, wherein the method comprises providing an incision into a site capable of shoot initiation of a rooted seedling, shoot or cutting, the site capable of shoot initiation being a cotyledonary node, an axillary meristem or an apical meristem, introducing disarmed Agrobacterium cells carrying one or more exogenous DNA sequences into the incision, and a selection step in which the site is brought into contact with a medium containing a nutrient, a growth regulator and a selection agent to which the transformed cells will be resistant, for a time period sufficient to produce transformed shoots containing the exogenous DNA sequences.
2. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said incision forms a cleft in the site of shoot initiation.
3. A method according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein said incision is about 1mm deep, or more.
4. A method according to Claim 1, wherein when the rooted plant tissue to be transformed is a seedling, the site of shoot initiation is a cotyledonary node. 20 5. A method according to Claim 4, wherein all pre-existing shoot initials before, during or after the introduction of the Agrobacterium cells are removed. S A method according to Claim 1, wherein when the rooted plant tissue to be transformed is a shoot, the site of shoot initiation is an axillary meristem or apical meristem. 1 25 7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the site of shoot initiation is an axillary meristem or apical meristem from which all pre-existing shoot initials have been ••removed.
8. A method according to Claim 4, wherein after introducing disarmed •Agrobacterium and before the selection step the seedling is incubated in an upright 30 position in a second medium comprising a nutrient and a growth regulator. -21-
9. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the medium of the selection step also comprises an antibiotic to kill the Agrobacterium strain. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said tree is Eucalyptus globulus or Eucalyptus grandis.
11. A tree transformed by a method according to any one of claims 1 to
12. A cell from a tree transformed by a method according to any one of claims 1 to
13. A seedling derived from a tree transformed by a method according to any one of claims I to
14. A seed from a tree transformed by a method according to any one of claims I to Germ plasm from a tree transformed by a method according to any one of claims 1 to
16. A method of transformation of trees of the genera, Eucalyptus, Poplus, Malus or Prunus, the method comprising the steps of wounding rooted plant tissue, introducing the wounded rooted tissue to bacterial cells containing a DNA vector carrying an exogenous DNA sequence, and selecting the transformed cells, wherein the method comprises providing an incision into a site capable of shoot initiation of a rooted seedling, shoot or cutting, the site capable of shoot initiation being a cotyledonary node, an axillary meristem or an apical meristem, introducing disarmed Agrobacterium cells carrying one or more exogenous DNA sequences into the incision, and a selection step in which the site is brought into contact with a medium containing a nutrient, a growth o. regulator and a selection agent to which the transformed cells will be resistant, substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the examples but excluding comparative examples. .25 17. A tree transformed by a method of transformation of trees of the genera, Eucalyptus, Poplus, Malus or Prunus, the method comprising the steps of wounding rooted plant tissue, introducing the wounded rooted tissue to bacterial cells containing a DNA vector carrying an exogenous DNA sequence, and selecting the transformed cells, wherein the method comprises providing an incision into a site capable of shoot o 30 initiation of a rooted seedling, shoot or cutting, the site capable of shoot initiation being a cotyledonary node, an axillary meristem or an apical meristem, introducing disarmed Agrobacterium cells carrying one or more exogenous DNA sequences into the incision, -22- and a selection step in which the site is brought into contact with a medium containing a nutrient, a growth regulator and a selection agent to which the transformed cells will be resistant, substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the examples but excluding comparative examples.
18. A cell from a tree transformed by a method of transformation of trees of the genera, Eucalyptus, Poplus, Malus or Prunus, the method comprising the steps of wounding rooted plant tissue, introducing the wounded rooted tissue to bacterial cells containing a DNA vector carrying an exogenous DNA sequence, and selecting the transformed cells, wherein the method comprises providing an incision into a site capable of shoot initiation of a rooted seedling, shoot or cutting, the site capable of shoot initiation being a cotyledonary node, an axillary meristem or an apical meristem, introducing disarmed Agrobacterium cells carrying one or more exogenous DNA sequences into the incision, and a selection step in which the site is brought into contact with a medium containing a nutrient, a growth regulator and a selection .agent to which the transformed cells will be resistant, substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the examples but excluding comparative examples.
19. A seedling derived from a tree transformed by a method of transformation of trees genera, Eucalyptus, Poplus, Malus or Prunus, the method comprising the steps of wounding rooted plant tissue, introducing the wounded rooted tissue to bacterial cells 20 containing a DNA vector carrying an exogenous DNA sequence, and selecting the 9. transformed cells, wherein the method comprises providing an incision into a site capable of shoot initiation of a rooted seedling, shoot or cutting, the site capable of shoot initiation being a cotyledonary node, an axillary meristem or an apical meristem, introducing disarmed Agrobacterium cells carrying one or more exogenous DNA oo* 25 sequences into the incision, and a selection step in which the site is brought into contact •go9 with a medium containing a nutrient, a growth regulator and a selection agent to which S•the transformed cells will be resistant, substantially as herein described with reference to S. any one of the examples but excluding comparative examples. A seed from a tree transformed by a method of transformation of trees of the ~0 genera, Eucalyptus, Poplus, Ma/us or Prunus, the method comprising the steps of I/ -\wounding rooted plant tissue, introducing the wounded rooted tissue to bacterial cells
21010-00.DOC 23 containing a DNA vector carrying an exogenous DNA sequence, and selecting the transformed cells, wherein the method comprises providing an incision into a site capable of shoot initiation of a rooted seedling, shoot or cutting, the site capable of shoot initiation being a cotyledonary node, an axillary meristem or an apical meristem, introducing disarmed Agrobacterium cells carrying one or more exogenous DNA sequences into the incision, and a selection step in which the site is brought into contact with a medium containing a nutrient, a growth regulator and a selection agent to which the transformed cells -will be resistant, substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the examples but excluding comparative examples. 21. Germ plasm from a tree transformed by a method of transformation of trees of the genera, Eucalyptus, Poplus, Malus or Prunus, the method comprising the steps of wounding rooted plant tissue, introducing the wounded rooted tissue to bacterial cells containing a DNA vector carrying an exogenous DNA sequence, and selecting the transformed cells, wherein the method comprises providing an incision into a site capable of shoot initiation of a rooted seedling, shoot or cutting, the site capable of shoot initiation being a cotyledonary node, an axillary meristem or an apical meristem, introducing disarmed Agrobacterium cells carrying one or more exogenous DNA sequences into the incision, and a selection step in which the site is brought into contact with a medium containing a nutrient, a growth regulator and a selection agent to which the transformed cells will be resistant, substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the examples but excluding comparative examples. V.00 DATED this 12th day of April 2000 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES (CAMBRIDGE) LIMITED Attorney: IVAN A. RAJKOVIC Fellow Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia •o ~of BALDWIN SHELSTON WATERS •go• •go•
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB9600698 | 1996-01-13 | ||
GBGB9600698.6A GB9600698D0 (en) | 1996-01-13 | 1996-01-13 | Genetic transformation of trees |
PCT/GB1997/000042 WO1997025434A1 (en) | 1996-01-13 | 1997-01-09 | Genetic transformation of trees |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU1388397A AU1388397A (en) | 1997-08-01 |
AU720610B2 true AU720610B2 (en) | 2000-06-08 |
Family
ID=10786998
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU13883/97A Ceased AU720610B2 (en) | 1996-01-13 | 1997-01-09 | Genetic transformation of trees |
Country Status (13)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0880592A2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2000517162A (en) |
CN (1) | CN1213404A (en) |
AP (1) | AP9801292A0 (en) |
AR (1) | AR005443A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU720610B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR9706942A (en) |
GB (1) | GB9600698D0 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ325384A (en) |
OA (1) | OA10709A (en) |
UY (1) | UY24435A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997025434A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA97192B (en) |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB9818808D0 (en) * | 1998-08-29 | 1998-10-21 | Cambridge Advanced Tech | Modification of plant fibres |
JP4099898B2 (en) | 1999-05-07 | 2008-06-11 | 王子製紙株式会社 | Methods for transforming adult Eucalyptus plants |
CN1094037C (en) * | 1999-11-23 | 2002-11-13 | 雷州市科技服务中心 | Ultra-low temperature breeding method |
IT1317038B1 (en) * | 2000-06-05 | 2003-05-26 | Vitroplant Vivai Di Zuccherell | METHOD FOR THE REGENERATION OF PLANTS AND ITS USES FOR THE MULTIPLICATION AND / OR TRANSFORMATION OF PLANTS. |
JP3985474B2 (en) * | 2001-07-24 | 2007-10-03 | 日本製紙株式会社 | Gene transfer method to Eucalyptus plants with improved gene transfer efficiency |
JP4170078B2 (en) * | 2002-11-25 | 2008-10-22 | クミアイ化学工業株式会社 | Implant plant transformation method of kenaf plant by Agrobacterium tumefaciens |
CN107849578A (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2018-03-27 | 斯道拉恩索公司 | The generation of biomass |
CN112626105B (en) * | 2020-12-13 | 2022-07-26 | 山东农业大学 | Method and device for obtaining transgenic apple tissue culture seedlings by apple leaf infection |
CN115896160B (en) * | 2022-10-28 | 2023-07-04 | 西北农林科技大学 | Method for efficiently and rapidly obtaining apple stable transgenic plants by using agrobacterium rhizogenes |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0611209B2 (en) * | 1985-09-04 | 1994-02-16 | 王子製紙株式会社 | Mass growth method for woody plants |
US5177010A (en) * | 1986-06-30 | 1993-01-05 | University Of Toledo | Process for transforming corn and the products thereof |
GB2211204B (en) * | 1987-10-20 | 1992-05-20 | Oji Paper Co | Process for production of plant transformant |
WO1994002620A2 (en) * | 1992-07-27 | 1994-02-03 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | An improved method of agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cultured soybean cells |
FR2709496B1 (en) * | 1993-08-30 | 1995-11-03 | Limagrain Holding Groupe | Process for the production of transgenic plants, entirely transformed into generation T0, from meristems. |
JP4075081B2 (en) * | 1994-01-25 | 2008-04-16 | 王子製紙株式会社 | Method for producing transformed Eucalyptus plants |
JP3565284B2 (en) * | 1994-09-22 | 2004-09-15 | 王子製紙株式会社 | Method for producing transformed Eucalyptus plant |
GB2298205A (en) * | 1995-02-17 | 1996-08-28 | Shell Int Research | Genetic transformation of eucalyptus |
-
1996
- 1996-01-13 GB GBGB9600698.6A patent/GB9600698D0/en active Pending
-
1997
- 1997-01-09 JP JP09524975A patent/JP2000517162A/en active Pending
- 1997-01-09 AP APAP/P/1998/001292A patent/AP9801292A0/en unknown
- 1997-01-09 BR BR9706942A patent/BR9706942A/en unknown
- 1997-01-09 CN CN97192880A patent/CN1213404A/en active Pending
- 1997-01-09 NZ NZ325384A patent/NZ325384A/en unknown
- 1997-01-09 WO PCT/GB1997/000042 patent/WO1997025434A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-01-09 ZA ZA97192A patent/ZA97192B/en unknown
- 1997-01-09 EP EP97900294A patent/EP0880592A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1997-01-09 AU AU13883/97A patent/AU720610B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1997-01-10 AR ARP970100116A patent/AR005443A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-01-10 UY UY24435A patent/UY24435A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
1998
- 1998-07-03 OA OA9800107A patent/OA10709A/en unknown
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
ACTA BOTANICA GALLICA, 140(6), 1993, AZMI ET AL.,P 702 * |
PLANT MOL. BIOL.,17,1991, BRASILEIRO ET AL.,PP 441-452 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
BR9706942A (en) | 1999-04-06 |
AU1388397A (en) | 1997-08-01 |
WO1997025434A1 (en) | 1997-07-17 |
GB9600698D0 (en) | 1996-03-13 |
EP0880592A2 (en) | 1998-12-02 |
ZA97192B (en) | 1997-07-23 |
CN1213404A (en) | 1999-04-07 |
OA10709A (en) | 2001-05-09 |
JP2000517162A (en) | 2000-12-26 |
AR005443A1 (en) | 1999-06-23 |
UY24435A1 (en) | 1997-07-01 |
AP9801292A0 (en) | 1998-09-30 |
NZ325384A (en) | 2000-01-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6329571B1 (en) | Method for transforming indica rice | |
CN101528934B (en) | Methods for producing transgenic plants | |
RU2099422C1 (en) | Method of preparing dicotyledonous plants showing resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides | |
AU670316B2 (en) | An improved method of (agrobacterium)-mediated transformation of cultured soybean cells | |
Clarke et al. | High-frequency transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana by Agrobacterium tumefaciens | |
EP0952224B1 (en) | Method for producing transgenic cucumber that produces high levels of superoxide dismutase | |
AU2002213081B2 (en) | Enhanced transformation and regeneration of transformed embryogenic pine tissue | |
US20120192318A1 (en) | Transformation system for Camelina sativa | |
JP2002524056A (en) | Transgene assay using stable hairy root transformation | |
AU720610B2 (en) | Genetic transformation of trees | |
Song et al. | Efficient Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) from stem explants using a two-step kanamycin-hygromycin selection method | |
Wada et al. | Stable and efficient transformation of apple | |
JPH03103127A (en) | Trans-genic plant belonging to cucumis melo species | |
Rajagopalan et al. | Improved cucumber transformation by a modified explant dissection and selection protocol | |
US6255559B1 (en) | Methods for producing genetically modified plants, genetically modified plants, plant materials and plant products produced thereby | |
Koltunow et al. | Regeneration of West Indian limes (Citrus aurantifolia) containing genes for decreased seed set | |
Mohan et al. | Plant regeneration from decapitated mature embryo axis and Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation of pigeonpea | |
Suratman et al. | Cotyledon with hypocotyl segment as an explant for the production of transgenic Citrullus vulgaris Schrad (watermelon) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens | |
Koroch et al. | In vitro regeneration and Agrobacterium transformation of Echinacea purpurea leaf explants | |
AU747514B2 (en) | A method for the production of transgenic plants using apical shoot tips | |
WO1997017429A1 (en) | Method for the commercial production of transgenic plants | |
KR20020067303A (en) | Efficient method for the development of transgenic plants by gene manipulation | |
Moore et al. | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) with genes from citrus tristeza virus | |
KR100375674B1 (en) | A method of regenerating and transforming chinese cabbage(Brassica campestris ssp. pekinensis) using hypocotyl segments | |
Garcia et al. | Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) biotechnology: progress and perspectives |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FGA | Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent) | ||
MK14 | Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired |