AU700325B2 - Method of increasing the yield of herbicide-resistant crop plants - Google Patents
Method of increasing the yield of herbicide-resistant crop plants Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU700325B2 AU700325B2 AU74979/94A AU7497994A AU700325B2 AU 700325 B2 AU700325 B2 AU 700325B2 AU 74979/94 A AU74979/94 A AU 74979/94A AU 7497994 A AU7497994 A AU 7497994A AU 700325 B2 AU700325 B2 AU 700325B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- plants
- glutamine synthetase
- synthetase inhibitors
- yield
- glufosinate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
- C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
- C12N15/8271—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
- C12N15/8274—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for herbicide resistance
- C12N15/8277—Phosphinotricin
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N57/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic phosphorus compounds
- A01N57/18—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic phosphorus compounds having phosphorus-to-carbon bonds
- A01N57/20—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic phosphorus compounds having phosphorus-to-carbon bonds containing acyclic or cycloaliphatic radicals
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
- C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
- C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
- C12N15/8271—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
- C12N15/8274—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for herbicide resistance
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A40/00—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production
- Y02A40/10—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production in agriculture
- Y02A40/146—Genetically Modified [GMO] plants, e.g. transgenic plants
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
- Enzymes And Modification Thereof (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
The invention concerns a method of increasing the yield of crops which are resistant to glutamine synthetase inhibitors, the method calling for crop plants to be treated with small amounts of glutamine synthetase inhibitors. The invention also concerns the use of glutamine synthetase inhibitors to increase the yield of transgenic crop plants.
Description
I -L i NQO 95/05082 1 PCT/EP94/02598 Description Method of improving the yield of herbicide-resistant crop plants The compound glufosinate (glufosinate-ammonium, ammonium DL-homoalanin-4-yl(methyl)phosphinate, Schwerdtle et al., Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz., 1981, Special Edition IX, page 431) acts as a glutamine synthetase (GS) inhibitor since it is a structural analog of glutamic acid. GS plays a central role in the metabolism of all plants. It is responsible for the detoxification of NH 3 is, and, as a consequence, all terrestrial plants are damaged severely or destroyed after application of glufosinate since the assimilation of ammonia is inhibited.
Plants which are resistant to the herbicidal activity of GS inhibitors were successfully produced by transferring and expressing a glufosinate acetyltransferase gene isolated from from strains of Streptomycetes which produce bialaphos (phosphinothricin-alanyl-alanine) (EP- Bl-0 242 236 and EP-B1-0 257 542). Stands of such transgenic, herbicide-tolerant crop plants can be kept weedfree in an efficient manner by post-emergence tVoAtment with glucosinate.
Unexpectedly, field trials with such transgenic plants showed that the glufosinate-treated plants give a measurably higher yield than untreated plant stands. This higher yield is not a result of the excellent weed control by glufosinate and its complete compatibility with the stands of transgenic crop plants, but a positive effect of the 3erbicide treatment on growth and yield.
The invention therefore relates to a method of improving the yield of crop plants which are resistant to glutamine synthetase inhibitors, which comprises treating the application rates which are not harmful to the plants.
8 UJ, r 2 In particular, the invention relates to a method in which glutamine synthetase inhibitors are employed for a yieldimproving treatment of plants which are protected against the herbicidal activity of the glutamine synthetase inhibitors by expression of an N-acetyltransferase gene.
The invention furthermore relates to the use of a glutamine synthetase inhibitor for improving the yield of crop plants which are resistant to this inhibitor. In particular, it relates to the use of glutamine synthetase inhibitors for improving the yield of transgenic crop plants.
The glutamine synthetase inhibitor used is preferably the compound glufosinate or bialaphos (Tachibana et al., Abstr. 5th Int. Congr. Pestic. Chem., IVa, Abstract 19; Mase, Jpn. Pestic. Inf., 1984, No. 45, p. 27). In this context, the term glufosinate embraces the racemate (DLhomoalanin-4-yl(methyl)phosphinic acid as well as the biologically active L isomer and the corresponding salts.
The herbicide can be employed in the commercially available formulations. A further example of a GS inhibitor is the compound phosalacin (Omura et al., J. of Antibiotics, Vol. 37, 8, pages 939-940, 1984).
The yield-improving effect of the treatment with glufosinate is particularly pronounced when the herbicidal treatment is carried out in the 2 to preferably the 3 to 6-leaf stage of the crop plants before flowering or, in the case of perennial plants, at any desired point in time.
In the method according to the invention, the plants are treated at least once with the herbicide at application rates as they are also employed for weed control, for example 150 g 1000 g of glufosinate/ha.
However, the application rate required may vary as a function of the plants, their height and the climatic
L-
o jj'.
I- -3conditions.
It is particularly advantageous to carry out the process using application rates of 350 700 g of glufosinate/ha.
Within this range of application rates, the effect achieved is proportional to the application rate of glufosinate, but not based on differences in the level of weed control. It is possible to achieve a weed control effect which is similar to the effect which can be achieved at higher application rates even when the application rate of PTC is low.
It is particularly advantageous to treat the plants repeatedly with low dosages in the lower range of the application concentrations, the treatment interval being a few days, i.e. between 2 and 30 days, preferably between 5 and 20, particularly preferably between 8 and days. It is particularly advantageous to treat the plants with low dosages, the treatment interval being from 9 to 11 days.
The method according to the invention can generally be used for the treatment of plants which are resistant to GS inhibitors. Resistant plants can also be obtained by conventional breeding methods. If the resistance level of plant obtained by conventional selection is similar to that of the transgenic plants, the plants obtained by conventional selection can also be treated by the method according to the invention. However, the method is particularly suitable for the treatment of glufosinateresistant plants which have been obtained by transferring a gene for resistance to the herbicide. EP-B1-0 242 236 and EP-B1-0 257 542 describe methods for producing such plants.
SIn this context, the term plants embraces crop plants from the group of the angiosperms and the gymnosperms.
A, The method according to the invention allows individual plants, but also crops of plants, to be treated.
aa i
I
i
I
4 Particularly interesting among the gymnosperms is the class of the conifers.
Particularly interesting among the angiosperms are the plants from the families of the Solanaceae, Cruciferae, Compositae, Liliaceae, Vitaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Rutaceae, Bromeliaceae, Rubiaceae, Theaceae, Musaceae or Gramineae and the order of the Leguminosae. Representatives of the families Solanaceae, Cruciferae and Gramineae are preferably treated.
The method is of particular interest for the treatment of crop plants in which high yields are important, such as, for example, maize, soybeans, spring and winter oil seed rape, sugar beet, lucerne, sunflower, cotton, potatoes, wheat, barley and rice. However, it can also be used advantageously in tomatoes and other vegetables, such as cucumber, and fruits, such as melon, strawberries, raspberries, and kiwi fruit.
The use of the method in herbicide-resistant woody species is also particularly important, for example in plantations and nurseries.
Application of GS inhibitors, such as, for example, PTC and its analogs and derivatives, to young specimens of woody species can accelerate the juvenile development. In this context, mention must be made, in particular, of walnut trees, oil palms, fruit trees, poplars and other cultivated plants which are woody species.
The method according to the invention is therefore important both in agriculture and horticulture since Sapplication of the herbicidal glutamine synthetase inhibitor allows a clearly measurable increase in yield Sto be achieved without an additional application of fertilizer and plant growth regulators. The term increase S 6RAL in yield means in this context that the plant yield up to R 50% more. Herbicides having different mechanisms of
JO/'
1 I~ -s 5 action either do not show such an effect or, frequently, have an adverse effect on yield.
The growth-enhancing activity of the glufosinate treatment can be measured in field trials and pot trials, by comparing yields of stands of plants which are treated with conventional herbicides or which were kept free from weeds by non-chemical methods.
The examples which follow are intended to illustrate the invention without thereby imposing any restriction.
Example 1 Transgenic glufosinate-tolerant maize or soybean plants were planted in plots (10 m 2 and, in the 3 5 leaf stage, treated with various amounts of glufosinate. The weed control level was scored 42 days after the application. When the crops were ripe, the plots were harvested, and the seed yield was determined by weighing the kernels obtained.
When the maize plants were examined, Laddock® (a mixture of atrazine and bentazone) was employed as comparison product. .wo products were employed for the treatment of the soya bean plants. Comparison product 1 contained a mixture of 134 g of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl/ha and 425 g of fomesafen/ha; comparison product 2 contained 2240 g of metolachlor/ha and 840 g of Storm® (a mixture of bentazone and acifluorfen)/ha. The comparison products are known from "The Pesticide Manual", 9th Edition, Brit.
Crop Prot. Council, 1991.
The treatment described in Table 2, in which two low glufosinate dosage rates were used, was carried out at a 10 day interval.
-6 Table 1 Application rates of Capari son Comparison glufosinate product (g of active substance/ha) 150 450 650 Weed control 92 97 98 78 level in Yield in of 118 121 125 100 the plot with the comparison pr A Table 2 Orain yield of glufosinate-tolerant soybean plants after application of glufosinate Application rates of glufosinate: Comparison product g of active substance/ha, 350 450 550 650 150 250 350 450 1 2 +150 +250 +350 +450 Weed control 85 93 95 94 96 96 98 99 98 level in Yield in 88 108 120 132 104 132 148 152 100 92 (based on plot with comparison product 1) fl.
Claims (4)
1. Glutamine synthetase inhibitors when used to improve- 'oon normal yield levels of crop plants which are resistant to glutamine inhibitors by applying said glutamine synthetase inhibitors to said p1i~ dplication rates which are not harmful to the plants.
2. Glutamine synthetase inhibitors as claimed in claim 1 which are glufosinate and salts thereof and are used to treat crop plants protected against the herbicidal property of glutamine synthetase inhibitors by expression of a n-acetyl-transferase gene,
3. Glutamine synthetase inhibitors as claimed in claim 1 or 2 when applied to plants to be treated at least once in rates equivalent to those employed in weed control.
4. Glutamine synthetase inhibitors as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3 when applied at least once to the plants to be treated using 150-1000g of glufosinate /ha. Glutamine synthetase inhibitors as claimed in any one of claims I to 4 when applied at least once to the plants to be treated using 350-700g of glufosinate /ha. 6, Glutamine synthetase inhibitors as claimed in claim 1 which are glufosinate and salts thereof when applied to transgenic plants. DATED this 13th day of November, 1998 HOECHST SCHERING AGRE GME\ WATERMARK PATENT TRADEMARK ATTORNEYS (290 BURWOOD ROAD 'AWFIHORN VICTORIA 3122 PiUSTRALIA KJS-:DM doc 23 AU7497994.WPC "C I 9 Abstract of the Disclosure Method of improving the yield of herbicide-resistant crop plants Method of improving the yield of crop plants which are resistant to glutamine synthetase inhibitors, in which plants are treated with glutamine synthetase inhibitors at low application rates, and to the use of glutamine synthetase inhibitors for improving the yield of transgenic crop plants. z] 0,
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE4327056 | 1993-08-12 | ||
DE4327056A DE4327056A1 (en) | 1993-08-12 | 1993-08-12 | Process for increasing the yield of herbicide-resistant crops |
PCT/EP1994/002598 WO1995005082A1 (en) | 1993-08-12 | 1994-08-05 | Method of increasing the yield of herbicide-resistant crop plants |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU7497994A AU7497994A (en) | 1995-03-14 |
AU700325B2 true AU700325B2 (en) | 1998-12-24 |
Family
ID=6495008
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU74979/94A Expired AU700325B2 (en) | 1993-08-12 | 1994-08-05 | Method of increasing the yield of herbicide-resistant crop plants |
Country Status (19)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0714237B2 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH09501179A (en) |
KR (1) | KR100311838B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1089555C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE172847T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU700325B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR9407237A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2169282C (en) |
CZ (1) | CZ286623B6 (en) |
DE (2) | DE4327056A1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK0714237T4 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2124906T5 (en) |
HU (1) | HU220775B1 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ271372A (en) |
PL (1) | PL180005B1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2166850C2 (en) |
UA (1) | UA37243C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1995005082A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA946038B (en) |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5633434A (en) * | 1990-02-02 | 1997-05-27 | Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft | Transgenic plants displaying virus and phosphinothricin resistance |
US5739082A (en) * | 1990-02-02 | 1998-04-14 | Hoechst Schering Agrevo Gmbh | Method of improving the yield of herbicide-resistant crop plants |
CA2249332C (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 2006-10-10 | Monsanto Europe S.A. | New use of n-(phosphonomethyl)glycine and derivatives thereof |
DE19836660A1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2000-02-17 | Hoechst Schering Agrevo Gmbh | Use of a synergistic herbicide combination including a glufosinate- or glyphosate-type, imidazolinone or protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitory azole herbicide to control weeds in soya |
DE19836659A1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2000-02-17 | Hoechst Schering Agrevo Gmbh | Use of synergistic herbicide combination including glufosinate- or glyphosate-type, imidazolinone, protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitory azole or hydroxybenzonitrile herbicide, to control weeds in cotton |
DE19836726A1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2000-02-17 | Hoechst Schering Agrevo Gmbh | Use of a synergistic herbicide combination including glufosinate- or glyphosate-type, imidazolinone or protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitory azole herbicide to control weeds in oil seed rape |
DE19836684A1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2000-02-17 | Hoechst Schering Agrevo Gmbh | Use of a synergistic herbicidal combination including a glufosinate- or glyphosate-type, imidazolinone or protoporphyrinogen oxidase to control weeds in rice |
PL218413B1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2014-12-31 | Bayer Cropscience Ag | Use of herbicide combinations for controlling harmful plants in crops of maize and a method for controlling harmful plants in tolerant crops of maize |
DE19836673A1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2000-02-17 | Hoechst Schering Agrevo Gmbh | Use of a synergistic herbicidal combination including a glufosinate- or glyphosate-type or imidazolinone herbicide to control weeds in sugar beet |
DE19836700A1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2000-02-17 | Hoechst Schering Agrevo Gmbh | Use of a synergistic herbicide combination including a glufosinate- or glyphosate-type, imidazolinone or protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitory azole herbicide to control weeds in cereals |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3200486A1 (en) * | 1982-01-09 | 1983-07-21 | Hoechst Ag, 6230 Frankfurt | Use of (3-amino-3-carboxy)alkylmenthylphosphinic acid and derivatives thereof for increasing the yield in plants |
AU7167387A (en) * | 1986-03-11 | 1987-10-09 | Biogen, Inc. | Plant cells resistant to glutamine-synthetase inhibitors, made by genetic engineering |
EP0481407A1 (en) * | 1990-10-18 | 1992-04-22 | Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft | Process for enhancing the formation of carbohydrates in plants |
-
1993
- 1993-08-12 DE DE4327056A patent/DE4327056A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
1994
- 1994-08-05 EP EP94924848A patent/EP0714237B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-08-05 KR KR1019960700694A patent/KR100311838B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1994-08-05 JP JP7506716A patent/JPH09501179A/en active Pending
- 1994-08-05 AU AU74979/94A patent/AU700325B2/en not_active Expired
- 1994-08-05 NZ NZ271372A patent/NZ271372A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1994-08-05 WO PCT/EP1994/002598 patent/WO1995005082A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1994-08-05 DE DE59407241T patent/DE59407241D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-08-05 AT AT94924848T patent/ATE172847T1/en active
- 1994-08-05 CN CN94193033A patent/CN1089555C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-08-05 HU HU9600295A patent/HU220775B1/en unknown
- 1994-08-05 DK DK94924848T patent/DK0714237T4/en active
- 1994-08-05 UA UA96030963A patent/UA37243C2/en unknown
- 1994-08-05 CA CA002169282A patent/CA2169282C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-08-05 ES ES94924848T patent/ES2124906T5/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-08-05 RU RU96107216/04A patent/RU2166850C2/en active
- 1994-08-05 PL PL94312982A patent/PL180005B1/en unknown
- 1994-08-05 CZ CZ1996412A patent/CZ286623B6/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1994-08-05 BR BR9407237A patent/BR9407237A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1994-08-11 ZA ZA946038A patent/ZA946038B/en unknown
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3200486A1 (en) * | 1982-01-09 | 1983-07-21 | Hoechst Ag, 6230 Frankfurt | Use of (3-amino-3-carboxy)alkylmenthylphosphinic acid and derivatives thereof for increasing the yield in plants |
AU7167387A (en) * | 1986-03-11 | 1987-10-09 | Biogen, Inc. | Plant cells resistant to glutamine-synthetase inhibitors, made by genetic engineering |
EP0481407A1 (en) * | 1990-10-18 | 1992-04-22 | Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft | Process for enhancing the formation of carbohydrates in plants |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0714237A1 (en) | 1996-06-05 |
PL312982A1 (en) | 1996-05-27 |
CZ286623B6 (en) | 2000-05-17 |
KR960703516A (en) | 1996-08-31 |
EP0714237B2 (en) | 2003-09-17 |
CN1089555C (en) | 2002-08-28 |
ES2124906T3 (en) | 1999-02-16 |
DK0714237T3 (en) | 1999-07-19 |
EP0714237B1 (en) | 1998-11-04 |
ATE172847T1 (en) | 1998-11-15 |
CN1128938A (en) | 1996-08-14 |
ES2124906T5 (en) | 2004-06-01 |
CA2169282C (en) | 2005-03-29 |
CZ41296A3 (en) | 1996-05-15 |
DK0714237T4 (en) | 2007-12-03 |
AU7497994A (en) | 1995-03-14 |
WO1995005082A1 (en) | 1995-02-23 |
KR100311838B1 (en) | 2002-11-22 |
HU220775B1 (en) | 2002-05-28 |
UA37243C2 (en) | 2001-05-15 |
BR9407237A (en) | 1996-09-24 |
DE59407241D1 (en) | 1998-12-10 |
JPH09501179A (en) | 1997-02-04 |
HUT74593A (en) | 1997-01-28 |
PL180005B1 (en) | 2000-11-30 |
HU9600295D0 (en) | 1996-04-29 |
RU2166850C2 (en) | 2001-05-20 |
ZA946038B (en) | 1995-03-20 |
CA2169282A1 (en) | 1995-02-23 |
NZ271372A (en) | 1997-10-24 |
DE4327056A1 (en) | 1995-02-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5739082A (en) | Method of improving the yield of herbicide-resistant crop plants | |
US5908810A (en) | Method of improving the growth of crop plants which are resistant to glutamine synthetase inhibitors | |
DE69837916T2 (en) | USE OF GLYPHOSATE RESISTANT MAIN LINES | |
Cranston et al. | Dicamba resistance in kochia | |
Wilson et al. | Combinations of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn, Zea mays, and soybeans, Glycine max | |
AU700325B2 (en) | Method of increasing the yield of herbicide-resistant crop plants | |
Parker et al. | Weed control in glyphosate-resistant corn as affected by preemergence herbicide and timing of postemergence herbicide application | |
EP0461355B1 (en) | A method for the prevention of crop injury in the presence of synergistic pesticide combinations | |
Ramsel et al. | Use of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and herbicides in aiding weed control in an ecofallow corn (Zea mays) rotation | |
Pornprom et al. | Ammonia accumulation as an index of glufosinate-tolerant soybean cell lines | |
Huckaba et al. | Joint effects of acifluorfen applications and soybean thrips (Sericothrips variabilis) feeding on soybean (Glycine max) | |
Yamasue et al. | Paraquat resistance and its inheritance in seed germination of the foliar-resistant biotypes of Erigeron canadensis L. and E. sumatrensis Retz. | |
Dotray et al. | Effects of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors on root cell transmembrane electric potentials in graminicide-tolerant and-susceptible corn (Zea mays L.) | |
Bagonneaud‐Berthome et al. | A new experimental approach to the chemical control of Striga using simplified models in vitro | |
Van den Berg et al. | Development of a chemical control strategy for Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in grain sorghum | |
Nonnecke et al. | Strawberry production using corn gluten meal as a natural nitrogen source and weed control product | |
Clay et al. | An association between triazine resistance and powdery mildew resistance in Epilobium ciliatum and Senecio vulgaris | |
UA67786C2 (en) | Method for selective use of herbicide imazetapir against the parasite weeds foxtail in emerged sunflower cultures | |
Peterson | Some physiological effects of atrazine on Douglas-fir seedlings | |
Eshel et al. | Tolerance of cotton to five triazine herbicides | |
Blair | Glufosinate-tolerant cotton: tolerance and weed management | |
Arteca et al. | Weed control | |
Rice | Efficacy and economic evaluation of weed management systems in sugarbeets | |
Gylling | Studies on perennial weed control in South Dakota | |
RH et al. | Morphoanatomical and Structural Alterations in Psoralea corylifolia (L.) Induced by Glyphosate |