AU690701B2 - Polyurethane insecticidal ear tag methods of use and preparation - Google Patents

Polyurethane insecticidal ear tag methods of use and preparation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU690701B2
AU690701B2 AU27275/95A AU2727595A AU690701B2 AU 690701 B2 AU690701 B2 AU 690701B2 AU 27275/95 A AU27275/95 A AU 27275/95A AU 2727595 A AU2727595 A AU 2727595A AU 690701 B2 AU690701 B2 AU 690701B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
weight
polymer
set forth
ectoparasiticidal
active compound
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
AU27275/95A
Other versions
AU2727595A (en
Inventor
Stanley Ackers
Rudolf J. Krzewki
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health USA Inc
Original Assignee
Fermenta Animal Health Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US08/288,598 external-priority patent/US5620696A/en
Application filed by Fermenta Animal Health Co filed Critical Fermenta Animal Health Co
Publication of AU2727595A publication Critical patent/AU2727595A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU690701B2 publication Critical patent/AU690701B2/en
Assigned to BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM VETMEDICA, INC. reassignment BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM VETMEDICA, INC. Alteration of Name(s) in Register under S187 Assignors: FERMENTA ANIMAL HEALTH COMPANY
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

AUSTRALIA
Patents Act COMPLETE SPECIFICATION
(ORIGINAL)
Class Int, Class Application Number: Lodged: Complete Specification Lodged: Accepted: Published: Priority Related Art: Name of Applicant: Fermenta Animal Health Company Actual Inventor(s): Rudolf J. Krzewki Stanley Ackers Address for Service: PHILLIPS ORMONDE FITZPATRICK Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys 367 Collins Street Melbourne 3000 AUSTRALIA Invention Title: POLYURETHANE INSECTICIDAL EAR TAG METHODS OF USE AND
PREPARATION
Our Ref 420458 POF Code: 143076/196372 The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to applicant(s): -1- I I L 1- POLYURETHANE INSECTICIDAL EAR TAG METHODS OF USE AND PREPARATION Background Of The Invention This invention relates generally to insecticidal protective devices for non-human domestic animals and, in particular, to a tag or other device formed from a polyurethane polymer having an ectoparasiticidal active compound within the polymer matrix.
It has long been known that devices such as ear tags impregnated with insecticide are an effective means for providing control of horn flies and other insects on domestic livestock, particularly cattle. The most common material for formulating insecticidal animal tags has heretofore been polyvinyl chloride. In recent years, concern from ecological and human safety viewpoints have been raised with regard to utilizing plasticized polyvinyl chloride on animals intended for human consumption. Also, since polyvinyl chloride must be plasticized to perform satisfactorily as a tag, the quantity of active insecticide which can be incorporated into the product is reduced in direct proportion to the quantity of plasticizer required.
Another disadvantage of present insecticidal tag formulating techniques is that the high loadings of plasticizer and insecticide cause the completed product to exude or "bleed" 25 insecticide. This makes an unacceptable commercial product which requires special packaging to accommodate a relatively long shelf life, necessitates avoiding high temperatures in transport and storage, and demands special handling requirements when the product is removed from the package for 30 application to an animal.
The use of various polyurethanes as a polymer matrix for insecticidal animal collars has been disclosed in U.S.
:Patent No. 4,189,467 to von Bittera et al. Loadings of up to 25% by weight of an ectoparasiticidal carbamate in the polyurethane collar were described by von Bittera et al. While these loadings are generally acceptable for many intended applications, higher loadings would nonetheless be desirable in order to reduce the weight and size of the collar.
I
-2- It has also been previously known to utilize polyurethane resins for forming identification tags for animals. It is further known to attach to a polyurethane I.D.
tag a porous or semi-permeable membrane in the form of a cell for holding a reservoir of insecticide. These membranes are made of a variety of different polymers including polyurethane.
Their construction is shown and described in U.S. Patent No. 4,562,794. The purported advantage to utilizing such a membrane is to provide greater control over the uniformity of release rate of the insecticide and higher insecticide depletion than can be obtained when the insecticide is within the polymer matrix. Some of the polymers which have heretofore been utilized for tags of the type contemplated by the referenced patent would not, however, permit sufficiently high loadings of insecticide to achieve a satisfactory tag by blending directly with an ectoparasiticidal compound.
Inherently, this known construction is costly to manufacture because of the complicated steps of forming and filling the cell as well as making the mechanical fastener for joining the cell to the tag. Also, there is a higher than desirable incidence of product failure because of the membranes being punctured while in use on animals.
Summary of the Invention It is therefore an object of the present invention 25 to provide an insecticidal animal protective tag which will accommodate a higher degree of loading of the insecticidal compound than previously known tags, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of the tag and extending its useful life.
Another object of this invention is to provide an insecticidal animal protective tag and method of preparing same which minimizes insecticide bleeding, thereby improving the shelf life of the product while reducing the risk of contamination by humans handling the ear tags.
S"Another one of the objects of this invention is to 35 minimize environmental and health concerns regarding insecticidal tag devices by utilizing a polymeric matrix which is generally recognized as being environmentally safe and nonthreatening to humans and does not require the addition of potentially dangerous plasticizers.
3 It is also an object of this invention to provide a method of protecting animals from insects, which is more environmentally safe and presents fewer health risks than existing practices.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a single insecticide ear tag which is as effective as two prior art tags using the same active compound so that a single ear tag can be used to provide the same level of protection as two conventional tags.
It is a still further object of this invention to provide a device, such as an ear tag, having high loadings of an ectoparasiticidal component so that smaller and lighter tags can be used to provide insect control for smaller and younger animals such as sheep and calves which have an ear size which 15 cannot support higher weight ear tags without causing undesirable physical changes to the ear.
These and other objects of the invention will be made clear or become apparent from the following specification and claims.
20 The foregoing objects are achieved by an insecticidal tag-like device comprising an ectoparasiticidal component that is blended with a polymer which is the reaction product of S4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, polytetramethylene glycol and 1,4-butanediol. The invention also encompasses a method of 25 preparing such a device by combining the ectoparasiticidal composition with the afore-described polymer.
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a device for protecting animals from insects, said device comprising: a polymer which is the reaction product of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, polytetramethylene glycol and 1,4-butanediol: and an ectoparasiticidal effective amount of an ectoparasiticidal active compound in association with and releaseable from said polymer and selected from the group consisting of pyrethroids, organochlorines and carbamates.
r 3A The invention further encompasses a metnod or protecting non-human domestic animals from ectoparasites by attaching to the animal a device, such as an ear tag, 0 comprising an ectoparasiticidal effective quantity of an ectoparasiticidal compound within a polymer matrix which is the reaction product of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, polytetramethylene glycol and 1,4butanediol.
In one aspect of the invention, the ectoparasiticidal 5 component used in the devices comprises an organophosphate. In another aspect of the invention, the ectoparasiticidal component comprises one or more carbamates, pyrethroids, and organochlorines, including in combination with an organophosphate. Notably, high loadings of the *0
S
1.
4 ectoparasiticidal component can be achieved in the devices of the present invention, including loadings of up to 70% by weight based on the total weight of the device.
Detailed Degscription of the Preferred Embodiments In accordance with the present invention, an insecticidal device is provided for use in protecting non-human domestic animals from ectoparasites. The device comprises an ectoparasiticidal active amount of a compound in association with a polyurethane resin.
The polyurethane resins which are useful in the present invention are polyurethane aromatic polyether elastomers, specifically the polymers which are the reaction product of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, .polytetramethylene glycol and 1,4-butanediol. These resins generally conform to Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number CAS 9018-04-6. Such polymers can be formed by polymerization of the diisocyanate with glycol according to the following reactions: CCN -CH -NCO- H--CH..CHCH.O-.
Mathylononb (4-phenyllaocyanale) Poly(tetramethylene glycol) Un I .,OH H O r o H N-ON CHCH.CH.CH--C- N H S• Isocyanat.loerminated prepolymer
HO-CHHCHCHCH,-OH
1, 4-autanediol O0 H HO 0 H H C. rC:i--C-N\-C-CH- N-C-0-(C Arom- t pothrn e0u1mwo The moieties of the polymerization reaction will generally be present within the ranges of 20% to diisocyanate, 50% to 70% glycol, and 2% to 10% butanediol (all by weight). It should be understood that the invention is not limited to ear tags and could take the form of a tail tag, ear clip, leg bracelet, collar, horse strip, medallion, chain tag or other device which could be attached to an animal. The final polymer will have a Shore hardness of 70-90 A units, a number average molecular weight which is not less than about 5 90,000, and a melting range within the range of about 70 0 C to 190 0
C.
The following commercial resin products, all meeting the foregoing criteria, have been confirmed as satisfying the objectives of the invention and will be referred to hereinafter by the reference letters A through H: Reference Letter Trademark Manufacturer A Texin 985 A Mobay Chemical Pittsburgh, PA USA B Morthane PE-90 Morton Thiokol, Inc.
Chicago, IL USA C Estane 98315 B.F. Goodrich Co.
Cleveland, OH USA D Morthane PE-50 Morton Thiokol, Inc.
Chicago, IL USA E Elastollan 1180A BASF Corp.
Parsippany, NJ USA F Pellethane 2103-80A Dow Chemical Midland, MI USA G Elastollan 1185A BASF Corp.
Parsippany, NJ USA .H Pellethane 2103-70A Dow Chemical Midland, MI USA 25 Various insecticidal compositions, both liquids and solids, can be employed in association with the polymers described above. In one aspect of the invention, the active :.compound will preferably be an ectoparasiticidal active compound which is an organophosphate. Suitable organophosphate insecticides include O,0-diethyl O-2-isopropyl- 6-methylpyrimidin-4-yl phosphorothioate, sold under the trademarkDiazinon (Ciba-Geigy); S-l,2-bis (ethoxycarbonyl) ethyl O,O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate, commonly known as malathion; O,0-dimethyl O-4-nitro-m-tolyl phosphorothioate, sold under the 35 trademark Sumithion by Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd,; and 0,0,0',O'-tetraethyl S,S'-methylene bis(phosphorodithioate), commonly known as ethion and sold by FMC, Inc.
In another aspect of the invention, the active component will preferably be an ectoparasiticidal active compound I I -6 selected from the group consisting of one or more pyrethroids, organochlorines and carbamates.
The pyrethroid insecticides useful in the present invention include cyano (3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl 4-chloro-a- (1methylethyl)benzeneacetate, commonly known as fenvalerate, and the active isomer thereof commonly known as esfenvalerate; cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl 3- 2-dichioroethenyl) -2,2dimethyl-cyclopropanecarboxylate, commonly known as cypermethrin; (3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl 3- 2-dichioroethenyl) 2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, commonly known as permethrin; (3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl 2, 2-dimethyl-3- (2-methyl-ipropenyl) cyclopropanecarboxylate, commonly known as phenothrine; cyano (4-f luoro-3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl 3- (2,2dichloroethenyl) 2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, comamonly known as cyfluthrin; [Ic,3c(Z)-(±)-cyano-(3phenoxyphenyl) methyl 2-chloro-3, 3, 3-trifluoro-l-propenyl) 2, 2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, commonly known as cyhalothrine; [lcx(S*) ,3cx(Z)]p- (±)-cyano- (3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl 3- (2-chloro-3, 3, 3-trifluoro-1-propenyl) 2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, commonly known as Jlaida-cyhalotrin; cyano (3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl-2, 2-dimethyl-3- (2-methyl-ipropenyl)cyclopropanecarboxylate, commonly known as :cyphenothrin; (RS) -cyano- (3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl -4- (difluoromethoxy) (1-methylethyl) benzeneacetate, commonly known as flucythrinate; cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl 2,2dimethyl-3 2, 2, 2-tetrabromoethyl) cyclopropanecarboxylate, commonly known as tralomethrin; and methyl[l, l'-biphenyl]-3-yl)methyl3-(2-chloro-3,3, 3-trifluoro- 1-propenyl) 2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, commonly known as bifenthrin.
organochlorines useful in this invention include endosulfan, also known as C,C'-(l,4,5,6,7,7-hexachloro-8,9,10trinorborn-5-en-2, 3-ylene) (dimethyl, sulf ite) and methoxychlor, also known as 1,1, l-trichloro-2 ,2-bis (4-methoxyphenyl) ethane.
The carbamates can include 2, 3-dihydro-2, 2-dimethylbenzofuran-7-yl methylcarbamate, commonly known as carbofuran; 2isopropoxyphenyl. methylcarbamate, commonly known as propoxur; 1-naphthyl methylcarbamate, commonly known as carbaryl; 2,3isopropylidenedioxyphenyl methylcarbamate, commonly known as 7 bendiocarb; and the like.
In a further embodiment of the invention, the active component will preferably be two or more ectoparasiticidal active compounds comprising an organophosphate in combination with one or more pyrethroids, organochlorines and carbamates.
The organophosphates, pyrethroids, organochlorines and carbamates can include those compounds previously described.
To the extent that the ectoparasiticidal active compounds may exist as optical or geometric isomers, all isomers and racemic mixtures are understood to be included herein. All possible other isomeric forms of the compounds are also included herein.
The ectoparasiticidal active compound should be present in the device which is attached to the animal in an ectoparasiticidal effective quantity, normally at least approximately 20% by weight (based on final product) with levels up to approximately 70% by weight being acceptable.
Thus, the polymer component will be present from 30% to 80% by weight of the final product. The ectoparasiticidal active compound, if liquid, may be introduced into the resin by a heating, absorption process, or if solid, it may first be dissolved in a volatile solvent, such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methylene chloride and the like, followed by soaking in the polymer and removal of the solvent. Generally a blending 25 time of thirty minutes in a high intensity mixer will produce a homogeneous, free flowing, polymer/insecticide mixture (called a "dry blend").
It is, of course, to be understood that ultraviolet light stabilizers such as 2-(2'-hydroxy-5'-methyl phenyl)- 30 benzotriazole, fillers, lubricants, dyes, antioxidants such as octadecyl 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-hydrocinnamate, pigments, and other inert ingredients may be incorporated into the formulation from zero to 2% by weight of the final product for serving their accepted functions which are well known to those skilled in the art. It has been found preferable to utilize up to 20% by weight polyvinyl chloride as a processing component to facilitate production of a free flowing dry blend. All of the foregoing optional substituents are generally added after the insecticide has been absorbed into the polymer. High -8intensity mixing for approximately five minutes is adequate to provide a homogeneous mixture incorporating the optional components.
The previously compounded dry blend may be formed into an acceptable shape, such as an ear tag, for attaching to an animal by various techniques well known to those skilled in the art. Extrusion, injection, and compression molding are all well known techniques, with injection molding being the preferred method of forming the preferred form of the device, namely, ear tags.
As a general process of preparing the components into a dry blend for molding processes, polyurethane beads or pellets are milled or ground to finer than approximately a 16 mesh size. The ground polyurethane is placed in a high intensity mixer and when the powder reaches a temperature of approximately 180 OF, the ectoparasiticidal compound is added until completely absorbed over a five to seven minute period.
The mixture is removed from the mixer and placed in a cooled ribbon blender. As the mixture cools, other and optional ingredients such as polyvinyl chloride, pigments, fillers, lubricants and antioxidants can be added. The resulting freeflowing powder can be processed and molded in a well known manner.
As an alternative to the molding techniques described 25 above, the insecticidal device can be formed by coating the polyurethane resin, ectoparasiticidal active compound and optional additional components onto a substrate. The substrate is typically but not necessarily inactive and can be selected from any of various suitable materials such as porous or 30 homogeneous plastic sheets, fabrics made of natural or synthetic fibers or combinations thereof, natural or synthetic leather, plastic mesh pattern cloths, coated fiberglass screening or cloth, and coated plastic screening. Substrates are typically used in those applications where added mechanical strength is needed for the final product because of very high loadings of the ectoparasiticidal compound in the polyurethane polymer matrix. It may also be desirable to use the higher mechanical strength substrates with comparatively lower loadings of ectoparasiticidal compound in those instances where -9high strength is necessary at the point of attachment of the device to the animal.
Among the various suitable processes which can be used for coating the substrates with the polymer and ectoparasiticidal compound are spread coating, dip coating and extrusion or coextrusion lamination techniques. As but one example, the polyurethane resin, ectoparasiticidal active compound and optional additional components can be dissolved in volatile polar solvents such as tetrahydrofuran, dimethyl formamide, dioxane, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, chloroform and the like, or mixtures of such solvents. The solution is then applied to the appropriately shaped substrate using suitable knife coating, roller coating or transfer coating processes. The mixture can be applied to the substrate as a single layer or multiple layers with the solvents being removed from the product in drying ovens.
In dip coating processes, the substrate is cut to shape and is dipped into the solubilized mixture which has the desired flow properties to obtain a smooth coating and to diminish the tendency fc c the solution to drip from the substrate prior to drying. Following drying, the coated substrate can again be dipped into the mixture to build up the necessary coating thickness.
The substrates can also be coated by melting the 25 polyurethane resin, ectoparasiticidal active compound and e• optional additional components in an extruder and forcing the melt through a slit die onto the substrate. The coated substrate can then be cooled on rollers followed by cutting into the desired shape of the final product such as an ear tag.
A preferred range for polymer and insecticide is 40% to by weight polymer and 30% to 60% ectoparasiticidal active compound with the balance comprising polyvinyl chloride (up to by weight) and up to 2% by weight inert ingredients such as antioxidants, ultraviolet light stabilizers and pigments, all well known to those skilled in the art (all weight percents based on final product).
The following examples are illustrative of some of the possible variations which are contemplated as being within the I 10 scope of the invention.
Throughout the description and claims of the specification the word "comprise" and variations of the word, such as "comprising" and "comprises" is not intended to exclude other additives, components, integers or steps.
EXAMPLE 1 Various polymer compositions incorporating Diazinon insecticide were prepared according to the absorption procedure previously described utilizing technical grade (88% purity by weight) Diazinon and quantities within the preferred range.
Ear tags were formed from the dry blend by injection molding.
Table I summarizes the composition formulations of the ear tags made according to this example.
*O a. a
C
I he 1 00. TabLe I PoLyurethane Tags Made Vith Varying Qantities of Resin C and Diazinon Insecticide Composition, wt.% Lot No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 (minimum 200 tags) Resin C 49.4 51.3 50.8 48.8 52.6 48.5 Diazinon 38.3 46.1 43.1 43.9 46.0 43.7 PVC 12.3 2.6 5.1 6.1 0 UV and antioxidant StabiLizers 0.7 0.8 (approx. 1:1 by weight) CoLorants, Pigments 1.0 0.5 0.6 0.8 Average Tag Weight 14.69 14.43 14.56 14.00 15.83 13.88 12 Table II provides a sumniary of the in~er~ticide released during field trials utilizing the tags identit ~I in Table I.
9 9 9 .9 9.99 9 99 9 9* 99 .9 9*99 09 9 09 9.
.9 9 9 990 9 9.
99 9 9 90 .9 9 9 99 9 9 *999 9 99*9 00 00 0 00* a a a 0* Lot No.
Location Application Date Removal- Date Days on Cattle Total Diazinon Released (9) Average Release Rate rnglday Table 11 Field Trials Average Release Rate Of Diazinon For Tags from Table I 1 2, 3 4 5 6 #1 92 #1 #3 #2 #1 91 #4 #2 #3 #1 #1 1-9-90 5-15-90 1-20-90 3-30-90 5-15-90 3-30-90 3-30-90 5-17-90 6-27-90 7-26-90 11-12-90 11-15-90 7-20-90 10-11-90 7-28-90 8-29-90 11-26-90 9-14-90 10-20-90 10-3-90 10-30-90 11-11-90 3-30-91 4-3-91 191 149 189 151 196 168 204 140 126 108 137 138 2.757 3.604 4.162 4.359 4.259 4.083 3.812 3.920 3.289 2.696 3.191 2.471 14.4 24.2 22.0 28.9 21.7 24.3 18.7 28.0 26.1 25.0 23.3 17.9 14 Example 2 Various polymer compositions incorporating Diazinon insecticide were prepared according to the absorption procedure using technical grade (88% pure by weight) Diazinon and a dry blend was obtained. Ear tags were formed by injection molding. Table III summarizes the composition formulations of ear tags made according to this example and Table IV provides release rate data on these same tags.
0ooe o.
0 o ®00 *550 0*0* I- Reis D, an Fq an Dizo Inecicd S CompositionS *wt.% ReisB ,adFadDiazinon (88ns5.e573ti.c439 de.
Avenrage T00 Wetags 12 243 13.6 138 ResinD 539 42. 51.
ResinB 48.
S S S Table IV Field Trials Average Release Rate Of Diazinon For Tags Froim Table III Lot No.1 Location #1 #1 Application Date 3-31-90 3-30-90 Removal Date 7-21-90 9-15-90 Days on Cattle 112 169 Total Diazinon Released 2.393 3.177 Average Release Rate mg/day 21.4 18.8 2 3 #2 #3 #3 #2 #3 #2 #3 #4 #2 #1 3-23-90 8-29-90 159 5-15-90 10-31-90 168 5- 15-90 10-1-90 140 3-27-90 8-29-90 155 6-27-90 10-30-90 126 7-26-90 11-11-90 108 6-27-90 10-30-90 126 5-25-90 10-29-90 157 6-23-90 1U-01-90 161 11-10-90 4-01-90 141 3.383 3.308 4.860 4.730 2.758 2.807 3.327 4.067 4.061 2.252 25.9 25.2 16.0 21.3 19.7 34.7 21.9 26.0 26.4 17 Example 3 Ear tags from Lot 4 of Example 1 (Tables I and II) and from Lot 2 of Example 2 (Tables III and IV) were attached to the ears of cattle in herds located in New Mexico and Texas.
One tag per animal was used to determine the efficacy against horn flies. In both trials, an untreated cattle herd was located within the vicinity of the tagged herd. On the application day, and weekly thereafter, horn fly counts were taken on at least ten randomly selected tagged and untagged animals. The results are summarized in Table V.
From this data it is evident that a surprising long term efficacy can be achieved with only one tag of the present composition, even under very high fly populations (infestation) for a period of at least six months.
*0 S 09 0* S
S.*
t 0 S S* I LII Table V Efficacy Trials Control of Rorn Flies Lot 4, Example 1; Lot 2, Example 2 #2 4-7-90 Location: Treatment Date: #1 5-17-90 Average of Flies per animal Reduction Lot 4 Ex. 1 22 Untagged Control of Animals Pretreatment Count of Weeks 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 268 440 Average of Flies per animal Lot 2 Untagged Ex. 2 Control 800 800 90 800 150 800 100 900 20 750 12 500 10 500 10 400 6 300 10 200 5 200 6 200 7 250 20 250 30 300 10 300 40 300 14 350 20 300 30 300 20 300 25 300 35 300 30 200 24 250 Reduction 19 Example 4 Ear tags containing 46 wt.% of a polyurethane resin, 46 wt.% of technical grade Diazinon, 6 wt.% of PVC resin and 2 wt.% total of stabilizers, dyes, and pigments were prepared using the following resins previously identified: Tag Lot No. Resin 1 A 2 B 3 C 4 D
E
6 F An efficacy trial with all tags was conducted in Alabama. As in Example 3, only one tag per animal head was employed, and an untagged control herd was kept in the vicinity of the tagged herds. An average number of horn flies from at least ten randomly selected animals in each herd, taken on the application date and every two weeks thereafter, are listed in Table VI.
e *o *o e e Table VI Efficacy Trials Control of Horn Flies Averaoe Numbte of Horn Ftie-q Per Animat Lot No.
of Animals Pretreatment Fly Count treatment date 4-25-91 #of Weeks 2 4 6 8 12 17 Untagged 1 2 3 4 5 6 Control 30 32 63 40 40 35 156 162 167 151 148 141 156 Post Treatment Count 0.4 ilo 0.0 9.0 0.1 5.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.6 0.1 2.6 0.0 0.4 2.1 13.0 11.0 6.9 2.8 0.0 2.3 8.6 14.0 57.0 21 Example Using various techniques, insecticidal ear tags were prepared comprising various polyurethane resins and various pyrethroids. Table VII summarizes the composition formulations and Table VIII provides the preparation methods, number, and average weights for these tags.
0 a i a ~0 Table VII Togs Made With Varying Quantities of Polyurethane Resins and Insecticides 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lot No.
Fenv.'s1erate(95%) Cypermethrin(86X) Resin G Resin C Resin H Resin E
PVC
UV and Antioxidant Stabilizers (approx. 1:1 by weight) CoLorants, Pigments, Lubricant 60.0 21.5 22.7 40.0 87.0 39.5 60.0 56.6 35.8 60.0 75.7 77.0 58.8 40.0 38.6 0.8 38.6 36.0 18.0 10.0 0.8 1.0 18.8 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 2.0 2.0 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.9 3.4 0.6 0.6 3.0 S S S S S 0 0 S *C
S
Lot No. Tag Preparation 1 Injection MoLded 3 Injection MoLded, three 4 Injection Molded Injection MoLded 7 Injection Molded 2,6,8,9,10 Ear tags were cut out wi, with a cutting die from 0.085-0.090 inch thick compression molded pLaqui 11 and 12 inactive placebo tag usei as a carrier of the acti, compound. 4.8 g of the compound was coated on ti surface of placebo tags I dipping into a very visc, tetrahydrofuran solution formulations followed by evaporation of the solve Table VI II Pyrethroid Ear Tags Number of Tags Made Average Wejght(g) 56 14.44 *ize 132 5.11 206 9.90 160 15.10 240 10.27 150 4.75 143 10.02 th15 11.7-13.5 24 Example 6 Ear tags from Lots 3, 4, 11 and 7 were compared with a commercial ear tag available from Fermenta Animal Health Company under the trademark Ectrin and containing 8% by weight fenvalerate in a PVC matrix and utilizing 28% by weight di-2ethylhexyl adipate as a plasticizer. The tags were attached to ears of cattle in herds located in Texas. Two tags per animal were used to determine the efficacy against horn flies using the testing procedures previously described. The results are summarized in Table IX and demonstrate that surprising long term efficacy was obtained with the pyrethroid/polyurethane tags.
0* .ee 0**4 0*444 0*4* I I I, S
S
C S te IX Efficacy Trials Control of Romn Flies Avera Numbr of orn FUntaggedi- Lot No.
of AnimaLs Pretreatment Fly Count Treatment date of Weeks Ectrin 50 Control 22 800 4/10 A0 E 4/10 4)' Post Treatment Count 800 4/09 0.4 0 0 2 0 700 4/09 150 200 16 0 0 0 0 Tag Weight 10 g 10 g .Tags trimmned to 50% size by w~eight 5g9 1 lg 5 g 10 g 26 Example 7 Ear tags comprising endosulfan and polyurethane in amounts within the ranges previously described are prepared using compression molding techniques, also as previously described. The composition formulations for the tags are summarized in Table X below.
S
a.
a
C
S
S S S 00 0 .0 500 .0 so: .0 0*SSSSS TabLe X PoLyurethane Tags Made With Varying Quantities of Resin E and Endosutfan insecticide -Convosition. wt.% Lot No.
Resin E EndosuLfanC98.1%) UV and antioxidant StabiLizers (approx. 1:1 by weight) Cotorants, Pigments, Lubricant 58.4 40.0 38.4 60.0 1.0 0.6 0.6 28 The method of preparing a device for protecting animals from insects according to the present invention comprises combining an ectoparasiticidal active component with a polymer which is the reaction product of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, polytetramethylene glycol and 1,4-butanediol, and then forming the combination into a device which is attachable to an animal, such as an ear tag. The resin and ectoparasiticidal compound are preferably combined by utilizing to 80% by weight polymer and 20% to 70% by weight of the compound. The most preferred method utilizes approximately to 60% by weight of the ectoparasiticidal compound, 40% to by weight polymer, and up to about 20% by weight polyvinyl chloride with up to 2% by weight inert ingredients, such as anti-oxidants, UV stabilizers, and pigment.
The invention also encompasses a method of protecting non-human domestic animals from ectoparasites which comprises attaching to the animal a device formed from a polymer which is the reaction product of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, polytetramethylene glycol and 1,4-butanediol, which polymer has 20 been mixed with up to 70% by weight of an ectoparasiticidal active compound. The preferred method utilizes the percent by 0 weight ranges previously specified for the method of preparing the device according to the invention. All percentages are by weight based on the final product.
25 The ectoparasites which are controllable in accordance with the present invention include flies such as horn, face, stable and house flies; wingless flies known as keds which frequently are an ectoparasite for sheep; lice; fleas; ticks; mites; grubs and the like.
Among the animals which can be protected using the method of the invention are bovine, ovine and porcine animals, as well as other livestock such as horses and poultry and fur-producing animals such as mink and fox. It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to protection of the animals specified but can include other animals as well.
From the foregoing it is apparent that the device and methods of the present invention provide for a highly effective way of protecting domestic animals from insects such as horn i' 29 flies for a prolonged period of time. The devices according to the present invention are able to support surprisingly high loadings of insecticides. Equally surprising is the fact that the devices remain dry without exudation of insecticide, even after prolonged storage at elevated temperatures. Also, notwithstanding the unusually high loading of insecticide, the tags remain flexible and strong for long retention on the animals being protected.
Because of the high loadings of ectoparasiticidal compound(s) which can be obtained in the devices of the present invention, smaller devices can be used to provide effective control of ectoparasitea on animals. The use of smaller devices is particularly advantageous because it allows the devices to be worn by smaller and younger animals with less likelihood of undesirable physical changes in the animals. For example, smaller ear tags can be worn by calves and sheep without causing drooping of the ear of the animal or causing enlargement of the attachment opening in the ear with potential resulting loss of the ear tag. In addition, the smaller sizes 20 obtainable for the devices allows a single device to be used for smaller animals and two or more devices used for larger animals or heavily infested areas. The smaller devices can thus be used for a wider range of applications, thereby allowing for production of a fewer number of standard sized devices instead of numerous different sizes of devices.
•coo o oooo oo oo o8Oo
III

Claims (26)

1. A device for protecting animals from insects, said device comprising: a polymer which is the reaction product of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, polytetramethylene glycol and 1,4-butanediol; and an ectoparasiticidal effective amount of an ectoparasiticidal active compound in association with and releaseable from said polymer and selected from the group consisting of pyrethroids, organochlorines and carbamates.
2. The device as set forth in claim 1, comprising to 80% by weight polymer and 20% to 70% by weight ectoparasiticidal active compound.
3. The device as set forth in claim 2, including up to by weight polyvinyl chloride.
4. The device as set forth in claim 1, comprising to 60% by weight polymer and 30% to 60% by weight ectoparasiticidal active compound. The device as set forth in claim 1, comprising approximately 46% by weight polymer, approximately 46% by weight ectoparasiticidal active compound, approximately 6% by weight polyvinyl chloride and 2% by weight inert ingredients. S. 6. The device as set forth in claim 1, wherein said polymer has a Shore hardness of between 70 and 90 A units and comprises the reaction product of 20% to 40% by weight 4,4'- diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 50% to 70% by weight polytetra- methylene glycol and 2% to 10% by weight 1,4-butanediol.
7. The device as set forth in claim 6, wherein said polymer has a number average molecular weight of not less than about 90,000.
8. The device as set forth in claim 1, wherein said polymer is shaped to form an ear tag.
9. The device as set forth in claim 1, wherein said organochlorines comprise endosulfan and methoxychlor and said 0 0 ectoparasiticidal active compound is endosulfan or methoxychlor.
10. The device as set forth in claim 1, wherein said ectoparasiticidal active compound is one of said pyrethroids.
11. A device for protecting animals from insects, said device comprising: 30% to 80% by weight of a polymer which is the reaction product of 20% to 40% by weight 4,4'- 31 diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 50% to 70% by weight polytetramethylene glycol and 2% to 10% by weight 1,4- butanediol; and 20% to 70% by weight of an ectoparasiticidal active component in association with and releaseable from said polymer, said ectoparasiticidal active component selected from two or more of the group consisting of organophosphates, pyrethroids, carbamates, and organochlorines.
12. The device as set forth in claim 11, including up to 20% by weight polyvinyl chloride.
13. The device as set forth in claim 11, comprising to 60% by weight polymer and 30% to 60% by weight ectoparasiticidal active component.
14. The device as set forth in claim 13, wherein said polymer has a number average molecular weight of not less than about 90,000. The device as set forth in claim 11, comprising approximately 46% by weight polymer, approximately 46% by weight ectoparasiticidal active component, approximately 6% by weight polyvinyl chloride and 2% by weight inert ingredients. 20 16. The device as set forth in claim 11, wherein said polymer has a Shore hardness of between 70 and 90 A units.
17. The device as set forth in claim 11, wherein said polymer is shaped to form an ear tag.
18. A method of preparing a device for protecting animals from insects, said method comprising: combining an ectoparasiticidal effective amount of an ectoparasiticidal active compound selected from the group consisting of pyrethroids, organochlorines and carbamates with a polymer which is the reaction product of 4,4'-diphenylmethane 30 diisocyanate, polytetramethylene glycol and 1,4-butanediol, and forming the combination into a device which is attachable to an animal and from which said ectoparasiticidal active compound is releaseable to protect said animal from insects.
19. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein said device comprises 30% to 80% by weight polymer and 20% to 70% by weight ectoparasiticidal active compound. The method as set forth in claim 19, wherein said device includes up to 20% by weight polyvinyl chloride.
21. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein said 32 device comprises 40% to 60% by weight polymer and 30% to 60% by weight ectoparasiticidal active compound.
22. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein said polymer has a Shore hardness of between 70 and 90 A units and comprises the reaction product of 20% to 40% by weight 4,4'- diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 50% to 70% by weight polytetramethylene glycol and 2% to 10% by weight 1,4- butanediol.
23. The method as set forth in claim 22, wherein said polymer has a number average molecular weight of not less than about 90,000.
24. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein said combination is shaped to form an ear tag. A method of protecting non-human domestic animals from insects, said method comprising: attaching to the animal a device comprising a polymer which is the reaction product of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, polytetramethylene glycol and 1,4-butanediol and an ectoparasiticidal effective amount of an ectoparasiticidal active compound selected from the group consisting of pyrethroids, organochlorines and carbamates in association with and releaseable from said polymer to protect o said animal from insects. ~26. The method as set forth in claim 25, wherein said device comprises 30% to 80% by weight polymer and 20% to 70% by weight ectoparasiticidal active compound.
27. The method as set forth in claim 26, wherein said device includes up to 20% by weight polyvinyl chloride.
28. The method as set forth in claim 25, wherein said device comprises 40% to 60% by weight polymer and 30% to 60% by 30 weight ectoparasiticidal active compound.
29. The method as set forth in claim 25, wherein said polymer has a Shore hardness of between 70 and 90 A units and comprises the reaction product of 20% to 40% by weight 4,4'- diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 50% to 70% by weight polytetramethylene glycol and 2% to 10% by weight 1,4- butanediol. The method as set forth in claim 29, wherein said polymer has a number average molecular weight of not less than about 90,000. 33
31. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein said device is an ear tag.
32. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein said animal is a bovine or ovine animal.
33. The method as set forth in claim 18, wherein said animal is a porcine animal.
34. A device according to claim 1 substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any of the figures and/or examples. A method according to claim 18 substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any of the figures and/or examples. PHILLIPS ORMONDE FITZPATRICK •eAttorneys for: *4 4 34 Abstract of the Disclosure A polymeric device and method for the control of insects on animals is disclosed. The device is in the form of an ear tag or other shape which can be attached to an animal using known techniques. A unique polymer/insecticidal formulation is provided by combining an ectoparasiticidal active compound, such as one or more organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids and organochlorines, with a polyurethane polymer. The polymer is the reaction product of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, polytetramethylene glycol and 1,4-butanediol. By utilizing the particular polymers described, high loadings of insecticides are possible and the resulting product shows no tendency to exude insecticide during prolonged storage. The product made according to the invention can provide effective control of 15 horn flies on cattle for six months or more utilizing a single ear tag or the like where it would take two tags constructed according to the prior art to achieve comparable results. The result is lower costs in product and labor, greater safety to an animal and workers and a lower quantity of residual product to dispose. oee 11076259 C--r -1 -I g
AU27275/95A 1994-08-10 1995-08-01 Polyurethane insecticidal ear tag methods of use and preparation Expired AU690701B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US288598 1988-12-22
US08/288,598 US5620696A (en) 1992-02-26 1994-08-10 Polyurethane insecticidal ear tag and method of use

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2727595A AU2727595A (en) 1996-02-22
AU690701B2 true AU690701B2 (en) 1998-04-30

Family

ID=23107811

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU27275/95A Expired AU690701B2 (en) 1994-08-10 1995-08-01 Polyurethane insecticidal ear tag methods of use and preparation

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU690701B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2155289C (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4189467A (en) * 1977-04-07 1980-02-19 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Polyurethanes having ectoparasiticidal activity
US4562794A (en) * 1984-01-30 1986-01-07 Bend Research, Inc. Pest control in animals

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4189467A (en) * 1977-04-07 1980-02-19 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Polyurethanes having ectoparasiticidal activity
US4562794A (en) * 1984-01-30 1986-01-07 Bend Research, Inc. Pest control in animals

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2727595A (en) 1996-02-22
CA2155289A1 (en) 1996-02-11
CA2155289C (en) 1998-12-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101179930B (en) Device and method for controlling insects
US4544547A (en) Ectoparasiticide-containing polyurethanes
US5620696A (en) Polyurethane insecticidal ear tag and method of use
EP0211207A2 (en) Device and method for controlling insects
KR101719012B1 (en) Pesticidal control device with high load of active ingredient
IE48831B1 (en) Animal ear tags,their manufacture and their use
US5294445A (en) Pesticidal shaped articles
AU690701B2 (en) Polyurethane insecticidal ear tag methods of use and preparation
CA2090764C (en) Polyurethane insecticidal ear tag, methods of use and preparation
JPH05221802A (en) Molded product containing active compound and workable as thermoplastic material, method of making the same and use thereof for removal of harmful bug
US7713537B2 (en) Insect control device for prolonged treatment of animals containing coumaphos and diazinon
AU657612B2 (en) Shaped articles for combating ectoparasites on animals
US20100015191A1 (en) Device and method for controlling insects
AU2002329881A1 (en) Insect control device for prolonged treatment of animals containing coumaphos and diazinon
DD209376A5 (en) SLOW-LOST PESTICIDE COMPOSITION
US20080115737A1 (en) Insect control device for prolonged treatment of animals containing coumaphos and diazinon
AU631645B2 (en) An improved device
US5018481A (en) Insect control device for livestock containing coumaphos
US20100095900A1 (en) Device and method for controlling insects