AU663525B2 - Activation of a mineral species - Google Patents

Activation of a mineral species Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU663525B2
AU663525B2 AU27182/92A AU2718292A AU663525B2 AU 663525 B2 AU663525 B2 AU 663525B2 AU 27182/92 A AU27182/92 A AU 27182/92A AU 2718292 A AU2718292 A AU 2718292A AU 663525 B2 AU663525 B2 AU 663525B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
mineral
oxygen
milling
sulphide
leaching
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU27182/92A
Other versions
AU2718292A (en
AU663525C (en
Inventor
John Ernest Angove
Ian James Corrans
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Western Minerals Technology Pty Ltd
Original Assignee
Dominion Mining Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=27153077&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=AU663525(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Dominion Mining Ltd filed Critical Dominion Mining Ltd
Priority to AU27182/92A priority Critical patent/AU663525C/en
Publication of AU2718292A publication Critical patent/AU2718292A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU663525B2 publication Critical patent/AU663525B2/en
Assigned to WESTERN MINERALS TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD reassignment WESTERN MINERALS TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD Alteration of Name(s) of Applicant(s) under S113 Assignors: DOMINION MINING LIMITED
Publication of AU663525C publication Critical patent/AU663525C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • Y02P10/234

Landscapes

  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Description

I i_ _j II AUTRA 6 3 5 2 Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION For a Standard Patent
ORIGINAL
Name of Applicant: Actual Inventor(s): DOMINION MINING LIMITED IAN JAMES CORRANS JOHN ERNEST ANGOVE Address for Service: WRAY ASSOCIATES, Primary Industry House, 239 Adelaide Terrace, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6000.
Attorney code: WR f, 0 Invention Title: "ACTIVATION OF A MINERAL SPECIES" The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me:- 4 .0 t As I~ -C i 0 -2- This invention relates to a method for the activation of a mineral species prior to the processing of that mineral species by methods of oxidative hydrometallurgy such as by oxidative leaching.
The mineral species may be such as sulphide minerals, arsenide minerals, telluride minerals, mixed minerals of sulphides, arsenides or tellurides, or any other like mineral species.
The processing methods of oxidative hydrometallurgy are commonly used in many different applications. These applications generally require oxidation conditions of high temperature and pressure and require substantial supplies of oxygen. For example, base metals such as copper, nickel, zinc and others can be recovered by hydrometallurgical processes which usually embody pretreatment, oxidative leaching, solid/liquid separation, solution purification, metal precipitation or solvent extraction and electrowinning.
According to conventional technology, oxidative leaching processes usually require severe physico-chemical conditions in order to achieve acceptable rates of oxidation and/or final recoveries of metal. Under these severe physicochemical conditions, which often mean temperatures in excess of 200 0 C and total pressures in excess of 2000 kPa, the chemical reactions which occur use large quantities of oxygen, both on stoichiometric considerations and in practice where amounts in excess of stoichiometric requirements are used.
An example of oxidative hydrometallurgy is the treatment of refractory gold ores or concentrates. Refractory gold ores are those gold ores from which the gold cannot readily be leached by conventional cyanidation practice. The refractory nature of these gold ores is essentially due to i ,i 31. V T: -3- 3 very fine (sub microscopic) gold encapsulated within the sulphide minerals. This gold can often only be liberated by chemical destruction (usually oxidation) of the sulphide structure, prior to recovery of the gold, which is usually done by dissolution in cyanide solution. Of course, other lixivants such as thiourea and halogen compounds and the like may also be used.
A number of processing options are available for treating refractory gold ores which contain sulphide minerals like pyrite, arsenopyrite and others. Pressure oxidation, typified by the so-called Sherritt process, is one such process which typically consists of the steps of feed 0 preparation, pressure oxidation, solid/liquid separation, liquid neutralisation and solids recovery and waste management, and solids to gold recovery usually by cyanidation.
O An oxygen plant is usually required to supply the substantial levels of oxygen demand during the pressure oxidation step, which is the heart of the Sherritt process.
Typically, the conditions for the pressure oxidation step require temperatures in the region of 190°C to 210°C, a total pressure of 2100 kPa, a pulp density equivalent to 4 20% to 30% solids by mass, and a retention time of two hours.
The typical oxidative hydrometallurgical processing methods referred to above generally have oxidation reactions that o o are carried out in multicompartment autoclaves fitted with agitators. In order to withstand the generally highly aggressive conditions of the reactions, the autoclaves are very costly, both to install and maintain. These vessels must be capable of withstanding high pressure, and linings of heat and acid resistant bricks need to be used. The agitators are made of titanium metal, and the pressure N relief systems utilised are also costly and require high f 7~r
;PA
T
-4maintenance. These high costs and the sophistication of the technology (skilled operators are generally required) detract from the wider acceptance of high pressure/high temperature oxidation, particularly for use in remote areas or by small to medium size operators.
It is an aim of the present invention to avoid, or at least partly alleviate, the difficulties and expenses referred to above with traditional processing methods of oxidative hydrometallurgy, and in particular with the oxidative leaching of a mineral species.
The present invention provides a method of processing a mineral species which comprises the steps of milling the mineral species to P80 of 30 micron or less, and oxidative leaching of the milled mineral species under relatively mild conditions of pressure and temperature and in the presence of substoichiometric o levels of oxidant. The milled mineral species may be subjected to oxidative leaching under relatively mild conditions of pressure and temperature due to the milling producing minerals which are activated, and which thus react far more readily with oxidants such as oxygen. Furthermore, the oxidative leaching is able to be conducted under conditions requiring less than stoichiometric levels of oxidant, again due to the activated nature of the minerals.
In particular, the present invention provides a method of processing a sulphide mineral, said method comprising the steps of milling the sulphide mineral in a vertical stirred mill to P80 of 15 micron or less and leaching the milled sulphide mineral with substoichiometric levels of ,r U if 1- ii" it-i i' 5 oxygen at a temperature below about 120 C and an oxygen pressure below about 1000 kPa.
While the present invention is applicable to any mineral species such as sulphide minerals, arsenide minerals, telluride minerals, or mixed minerals of sulphides, arsenides or tellurides, the invention is particularly useful for the activation and subsequent leaching of sulphide minerals. Accordingly, the following description will be limited by reference to sulphide minerals only.
However, it is to be appreciated that this is not to limit the scope of the present invention.
The preferred type of milling of the sulphide minerals is generally referred to as fine or ultra fine milling and produces a product in which the sulphides are activated, and which subsequently react far more readily with oxidants such as oxygen. The activation of the sulphide minerals is not fully understood, although it is expected to be a result of a number of factors, such as an increase in the surface area, a reduction in linear dimensions, the straining of crystal lattices, the exposure of regions of high activity in the lattice, and the enhancement of socalled "galvanic" effects.
A preferred type of apparatus which may be suitable for producing fine or ultra fine sulphides in activated form is a vertical stirred mill. However, it will be appreciated that other types of comminution apparatus may also be used to provide the fine or ultra fine milling of the invention.
In the preferred form, vertical stirred mills generally consist of a tank filled with, small diameter grinding media (for example 6mm diameter steel or ceramic balls) which are agitated by means of a vertical shaft usually fitted with horizontal arms. The sulphide minerals (usually contained in the form of a concentrate) are milled by the sheering action produced by ball to ball contact, or between balls 7',
C-
-6and the stirrer or balls and the walls of the tank. The milling may be carried out dry or wet. These vertical stirred mills have been found to be satisfactory in providing the required degree of fineness, and in satisfying energy and grinding media consumption requirements. Furthermore, the activity of the ground product as measured by its response to subsequent oxidation, has also found to be satisfactory. In this respect, a ground product size of P80 of 30 microns or less is preferred, with particular benefits being found with a between 2 and 15 microns.
The relatively mild conditions of pressure and temperature in the oxidative leach that follows the milling, are low S when compared with the relatively high pressure and S temperature conditions of known pressure oxidation techniques such as the Sherritt process. As indicated S above, the Sherritt process typically requires temperatures in the order of 190 to 210°C and total pressures in the order of 2100 kPa. However, the activation of the mineral species in accordance with the present invention allows the oxidative leach to be conducted at temperatures below about 120 C and with oxygen pressures below about 1000 kPa.
With the preferred operating conditions being at about to 100 0C and an oxygen pressure of about 900 kPa, a relatively low cost reactor, being polypropylene lined mild steel or stainless steel, is sufficient. There also is no need for the use of titanium metal agitators. Furthermore, abrasion problems are substantially reduced as are settling problems, due primarily to the fine nature of the feed.
Further still, the heat exchange and pressure let down systems are simple and low cost and the fast kinetics of the subsequent reactions make possible the use of low cost pipe reactors.
-7- The activation of the mineral species also substantially reduces the oxygen requirements during leaching of the milled product which in turn reduces both capital and operating costs. Furthermore, neutralisation costs are reduced because of the reduced production of sulphuric acid, particularly when the mineral species is a sulphide mineral. Indeed, with use of the present invention in relation to sulphide minerals and with the milder conditions in the oxidation stage, oxidation of all of the sulphides does not proceed to completion. It has been established by X-ray diffraction techniques that the residues produced from the leaching of sulphide minerals in accordance with the present invention contain elemental sulphur, together with various oxides and hydroxides of iron.
In this respect, the oxidation of sulphide to elemental sulphur probably proceeds according to the following reaction:-
S
2
S
0 2e Oxygen accepts the electrons according to- 2H+ 2e 1/202 H2 0 Thus for partial oxidation of sulphide sulphur to elemental sulphur, 1 mass unit of sulphur (as sulphide) requires approximately 0.5 mass unit of oxygen. For the total oxidation of sulphide to sulphate, i.e. S2- 202 2-
SO
4 the approximate mass ratio is one sulphur to two oxygens. Thus, there is a potential theoretical saving of oxygen of a factor of four by carrying out partial oxidation, although this theoretical saving generally cannot be achieved since some sulphide sulphur is totally oxidised. However, tests have demonstrated reductions in -8the usage of oxygen compared to conventional technology of factors of two to three, with the exact reduction being dependent primarily on the mineralogy of the material being oxidised. In this respect, some sulphides, for example pyrrhotite, are more readily oxidised than other sulphides and usually form sulphates.
Tests carried out under the conditions of the present invention have also indicated that iron is usually selectively precipitated and remains in the leach residue as goethite, haematite or some form of hydrated oxide, whilst valuable minerals like nickel, copper or zinc remain in solution. This is a further advantage of the current t invention over existing technologies, such as acidic ferric chloride or acidic ferric sulphate oxidative leaching, where substantial quantities of iron remain in solution.
Iron which remains in solution has to be selectively removed by some other means, prior to recovery of valuable metal, which contributes to extra, unwanted processing costs.
The present invention will now be described in relation to four examples. However, it will be appreciated that the ,4 generality of the invention as described above is not to be limited by the following description.
Example One A refractory ore from Western Australia yielded about gold recovery when treated by conventional cyanidation technology.
A flotation concentrate produced from this ore contained the minerals pyrite (FeS 2 and arsenopyrite (FeAsS). About of the gold was submicroscopic in form (less than 1 micron) and was locked within the arsenopyrite. The flotation concentrate itself typically contained 90%-95% of i'
I
-9the gold from the original ore feed sample. Conventional cyanidation of the flotation concentrate typically only yielded 15%-20% of its contained gold being the free particulate gold which reported to the concentrate. Even after ultra-fine milling of the concentrate to 5 micron, the incremental recovery of gold amounted to less than Conventional pressure oxidation of the concentrate was carried out at the following conditions:- 200°C 2100 kPa total pressure 900 kPa Oxygen partial pressure
I
r a s
P
8
I
1 hr retention time solids by weight I
'C-
"a.
The solids were recovered by filtration and washing and then treated by conventional cyanidation. Gold recovery was in excess of 98%, due to the destruction of the sulphides and liberation of the sub-microscopic gold.
Oxygen consumption during this conventional oxidative leach amounted to 330 kg oxygen per tonne of concentrate, or approximately 110% of the stoichiometric requirement for oxidation of all sulphide to sulphate.
The same concentrates were milled to a size of 100% passing micron in a vertical stirred mill similar to that described above, having a batch chamber of 5 litres and a continuous chamber of 15 litres. The milled pulp was directly transferred to a reaction vessel and oxidised at a temperature below 100 C and an oxygen overpressure below 1000 kPa. The reaction was exothermic and became 10 autogenous with respect to heat production. Subsequent cyanidation of the washed residue gave 99% gold extraction.
Oxygen consumption during this mild oxidation was oxygen per tonne of concentrate, i.e. about 22% of the oxygen requirement of the conventional technology.
Elemental sulphur, goethite and other hydrated oxides of iron occurred in the residue after mild-oxidative leaching.
Under the above mild conditions of oxidation, the following chemical reactions predominate: (Pyrite) t FeS 2 20 FeSO 4
S
(Arsenopyrite) S 2FeAsS 7/202 2H2SO4 H20 2H3AsO 4 2.-eSO 4 2S 0 The formation of elemental sulphur does not retard the reaction because of the very small linear dimensions of the feed particles. The reaction temperature is below the melting point of sulphur, hence sulphur does not coalesce and coat mineral or gold particles or interfere with oxidation or subsequent cyanidation.
Other ores or concentrates of metal sulphides which contain S. gold can be treated according to this invention. These Sconcentrates can be treated to remove metals, eg copper, which interfere with cyanidation or any other method of subsequent gold recovery.
Example Two A concentrate containing 15% copper (as chalcocite) iron (as pyrite) and 90 ppm gold was fine milled to a size Jf) 11 of 100% passing 15 micron, again in a vertical stirred mill. Subsequent mild pressure oxidation at a temperature 0 below 100 C and an oxygen overpressure below 1000 kPa, dissolved approximately 99% of the copper, 2% of the iron and virtually 0% of the gold. The soluble copper was washed from the leach residue, which could then be cyanide leached for its gold content, using economical amounts of cyanide and yielding a gola extracticn in excess of Example Three A nickel concentrate containing 22% nickel (as pentlandite), 26.2% iron and 22% sulphide sulphur was milled to a size of 100% passing 15 micron in a vertical stirred mill.
The milled pulp was oxidatively leached at a temperature below 120 0 C and an oxygen overpressure below 1000 kPa.
Greater than 90% of the nickel was dissolved while less than 3% of the iron was dissolved.
The consumption of oxycen during the above test was l.lkg of oxygen per kg of nickel leached, i.e. about 50% of the conventional technology which requires oxidation under severe conditions of temperature and pressure and utilises a minimum of 2.1kg of oxygen per kg of nickel leached.
Example Four A copper concentrate containing 29% copper (as chalcopyrite), 29% iron and 32% sulphide sulphur was milled to a size of 100% passing 15 micron in a vertical stirred mill.
The milled pulp was oxidatively leached at a temperature below 120 C and an oxygen overpressure below 1000 kPa.
/D2 'r v 12 Greater than 90% of the copper was dissolved while less than 3% of the iron was dissolved.
Oxygen consumption was 0.99kg of oxygen per kg of copper leached. However, when the above copper concentrates were treated in three stages (namely, by milling, leaching, remilling, re-leaching and further re-milling and releaching) then the consumption of oxygen wse 0.35kg of oxygen per tonne of copper leached. This illustrates that a multiple-stage system may advantageously be used to further reduce the consumption of oxygen.
When the above copper concentrates were treated by conventional high temperature/high pressure leaching, the consumption of oxygen was 2.41kg of oxygen per kg of copper leached.
A similar result has been obtained with a zinc concentrate ccntaining 50% zinc (as sphalerite). High extraction of zinc, low extraction of iron and low usage of oxygen was observed.
It will be appreciated that there may be other variations and modifications to the methods described above that also fall within the scope of the present invention.
I
II
f 1; _1

Claims (9)

1. A method of processing a mineral species, said method comprising the steps of milling the mineral species to P80 of 30 micron or less, and oxidative leaching of the milled mineral species under relatively mild conditions of pmrssure and temperature and in the presence of substoichiometric levels of oxygen.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the milling is conducted in a vertical stirred mill.
3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the mineral species is a sulphide mineral, an arsenide mineral, a telluride mineral, or a mixed mineral of sulphides, arsenides and/or tellurides.
4. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the oxidative leach is conducted at temperatures blow about 120°C and oxygen pressures below about 1000 kPa.
A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the milling reduces the size of the mineral species to P80 of 15 micron or less.
6. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the steps of milling and oxidative leaching are repeated in multiple stages.
7. A method of processing a sulphide mineral, said method comprising the steps of milling the sulphide mineral in a vertical stirred mill to P80 of 15 micron or less and leaching the milled sulphide mineral with substoichiometric levels of oxygen at a temperature below about 120°C and an oxygen pressure below about 1000 kPa. S-14-
8. A method according to claim 1 substantially as herein described in relation to any one of the Examples.
9. A method according to claim 7 substantially as herein described in relation to any of the Examples. DATED THIS FOURTEENTH day of AUGUST 1995. DOMINION MINING LIMITED Applicant Wray Associates Perth, Western Australia Patent Attorneys for the Applicant. i i ii Rk
AU27182/92A 1991-10-25 1992-10-20 Activation of a mineral species Ceased AU663525C (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU27182/92A AU663525C (en) 1991-10-25 1992-10-20 Activation of a mineral species

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPK9121 1991-10-25
AUPK912191 1991-10-25
AUPL3016 1992-06-17
AUPL301692 1992-06-17
AU27182/92A AU663525C (en) 1991-10-25 1992-10-20 Activation of a mineral species

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU40963/96A Division AU4096396A (en) 1991-10-25 1996-01-12 Activation of a mineral species

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2718292A AU2718292A (en) 1993-04-29
AU663525B2 true AU663525B2 (en) 1995-10-12
AU663525C AU663525C (en) 2008-01-31

Family

ID=27153077

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU27182/92A Ceased AU663525C (en) 1991-10-25 1992-10-20 Activation of a mineral species

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU663525C (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU671037B2 (en) * 1991-10-25 1996-08-08 Mount Isa Mines Limited Beneficiation process
US5356457A (en) * 1991-12-18 1994-10-18 Corporacion Nacional Del Cobre De Chile Hydrometallurgical process for the treatment of copper-bearing ore
WO1996015279A1 (en) * 1994-11-14 1996-05-23 The University Of Western Australia Processing of sulphides
AU693946B2 (en) * 1994-11-14 1998-07-09 University Of Western Australia, The Processing of sulphides
UA93865C2 (en) 2004-12-15 2011-03-25 Мелгвин Минерал Сервисез Африка (Пропрайетери) Лимитед Method for reduction metals such as gold and platinum, from feed materials, which includes fine crushing, formation of pulp and oxidation
EP1939310A1 (en) 2006-12-28 2008-07-02 Asturiana De Zinc, S.A. Recovery of zinc from sulphide concentrates by atmospheric leaching with sulphuric acid at a controlled acidity

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4552589A (en) * 1984-01-27 1985-11-12 Getty Oil Company Process for the recovery of gold from refractory ores by pressure oxidation
AU1336988A (en) * 1987-03-26 1988-09-29 Metprotech Pacific (Proprietary) Limited Fine milling of subdivided materials and recovery processes employing same
AU2715992A (en) * 1991-10-25 1993-04-29 Mount Isa Mines Limited Beneficiation process

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4552589A (en) * 1984-01-27 1985-11-12 Getty Oil Company Process for the recovery of gold from refractory ores by pressure oxidation
AU1336988A (en) * 1987-03-26 1988-09-29 Metprotech Pacific (Proprietary) Limited Fine milling of subdivided materials and recovery processes employing same
AU2715992A (en) * 1991-10-25 1993-04-29 Mount Isa Mines Limited Beneficiation process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2718292A (en) 1993-04-29
AU663525C (en) 2008-01-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5232491A (en) Activation of a mineral species
AU700850B2 (en) Atmospheric mineral leaching process
US3637371A (en) Direct pressure leaching of copper-iron sulphides
JP2007297717A (en) Method for recovering copper from sulfide ore material using high temperature pressure leaching, solvent extraction and electrowinning
US5917116A (en) Method for the processing of copper minerals
AU2019204300B2 (en) Process for the selective removal of copper compounds and other impurities with respect to molybdenum and rhenium, from molybdenite concentrates
US5364444A (en) Metal leaching and recovery process
CA2974905A1 (en) Process for extraction of copper from arsenical copper sulfide concentrate
WO2014056034A1 (en) Gold recovery from refractory ores and concentrates
AU663525B2 (en) Activation of a mineral species
AU2002317121A1 (en) Heap bioleaching process for the extraction of zinc
WO2003006696A1 (en) Heap bioleaching process for the extraction of zinc
US3477927A (en) Hydrometallurgical process for treating sulphides containing non-ferrous and ferrous metal values
AU9720898A (en) Activation of a mineral species
AU4096396A (en) Activation of a mineral species
US4030917A (en) Hydrometallurgical processing of metal sulfides
McClincy Unlocking refractory gold ores and concentrates
AU2006201600B2 (en) Method for the Processing of Copper Minerals
AU2022204322B2 (en) Alkaline oxidation process and device for treating refractory sulfide ore, in particular refractory gold ore
RU2190678C1 (en) Method of recovering and separating tungsten and cobalt
AU4886700A (en) Method for the process of copper minerals
WO1995023240A1 (en) A process for extraction of uranium
WO1993020249A1 (en) Mineral processing
AU698136B2 (en) A process for extraction of uranium
GENERAL LEACHING WITH ACIDS

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
CH Opposition withdrawn

Opponent name: OP="TECHNOLOGICAL" RESOURCES PTY LIMITED

ON Decision of a delegate or deputy of the commissioner of patents (result of patent office hearing)

Free format text: OPPOSITION TO ALLOWANCE OF AN AMENDMENT OF THE PATENT SPECIFICATION UNDER SECTION 104 OF THE PATENTS ACT. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS COMPLY WITH SECTION 102 OF THE PATENTS ACT AND ARE ALLOWABLE. COSTS AWARDED AGAINST THE OPPONENT AND IN FAVOUR OF THE APPLICANT DOMINION MINING LIMITED.

Opponent name: WMC RESOURCES LTD.

Effective date: 20000921

DA3 Amendments made section 104

Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT IS AS WAS NOTIFIED IN THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL DATED 19971113

PC1 Assignment before grant (sect. 113)

Owner name: WESTERN MINERALS TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD

Free format text: THE FORMER OWNER WAS: DOMINION MINING LIMITED

DA2 Applications for amendment section 104

Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS AS SHOWN IN THE STATEMENT(S) FILED 19980408

CH Opposition withdrawn

Opponent name: M.I.M. HOLDINGS LIMITED AND HIGHLANDS GOLD PROPERT

ON Decision of a delegate or deputy of the commissioner of patents (result of patent office hearing)

Free format text: THE OPPONENT HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON THE GROUND OF LACK OF NOVELTY AND INVENTIVE STEP. APPLICATION REFUSED.

Opponent name: WESTERN MINING CORPORATION LIMITED

Effective date: 20010712

ON Decision of a delegate or deputy of the commissioner of patents (result of patent office hearing)

Free format text: THE OPPONENT HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON TWO MAJOR GROUNDS AND THERE IS NO PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER IN THE SPECIFICATION.

Opponent name: WESTERN MINING CORPORATION LIMITED

Effective date: 20010802