AU654131B2 - Cell growth substrates - Google Patents
Cell growth substratesInfo
- Publication number
- AU654131B2 AU654131B2 AU77439/91A AU7743991A AU654131B2 AU 654131 B2 AU654131 B2 AU 654131B2 AU 77439/91 A AU77439/91 A AU 77439/91A AU 7743991 A AU7743991 A AU 7743991A AU 654131 B2 AU654131 B2 AU 654131B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- plasma
- cells
- polymeric
- polymeric material
- process according
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
- C08J—WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H
- C08J7/00—Chemical treatment or coating of shaped articles made of macromolecular substances
- C08J7/12—Chemical modification
- C08J7/123—Treatment by wave energy or particle radiation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/28—Materials for coating prostheses
- A61L27/34—Macromolecular materials
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/0068—General culture methods using substrates
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2533/00—Supports or coatings for cell culture, characterised by material
- C12N2533/30—Synthetic polymers
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Dermatology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Transplantation (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)
- Liquid Crystal (AREA)
Description
CELL GROWTH SUBSTRATES
This invention relates to cell growth substrates that possess improved properties with regard to the attachment and growth of cells. The invention relates to the production of novel cell growth substrates from materials that possess suitable bulk properties, but inappropriate surface chemical composition for good attachment and growth of cells. In a particular aspect the materials and method of this invention are useful for the fabrication of substrates for attachment and growth of human cell lines.
Good attachment and growth of cells on the surfaces of an artificial implant is critical for applications such as vascular graf s. However, human cells generally show little tendency to attach and grow evenly on the surface of articles made from polymeric materials. To overcome this deficiency, a number of modifications to the bulk polymer or the polymer surface have been described in the art. The synthesis of bulk polymers is one approach; another is the surface modification of known polymers to provide chemical groups that confer improved performance on the polymer surface. It is important to be able to optimize both the bulk properties and the surface properties with some degree of independence, and surface modification procedures are well suited to this aim.
The interaction between a polymeric material and biomedical constituents such as proteins and cells occurs at the polymer surface. The interfacial forces are very short range, and therefore are determined by the chemical constituents at the surface and in the
sub-surface region of the polymeric material, that is, chemical groups located within only a few molecular layers of the surface of the polymeric material. Surface modification techniques are thus ideally suited to the control of polymer properties governed by interfacial interactions, such as for biomedical applications. The growth of human cells on tissue culture dishes is strongly dependent on the chemical composition of the polymer surface (Griesser, Johnson and Steele, Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering, in press), and it is presumed that the growth of endothelial cells inside a vascular graft following implantation is likewise affected by the composition of the polymer surface of the graft. A number of surface treatment techniques for polymeric materials are known in the art: Corona Discharge, Flame Treatment, Acid Etching, and a number of other methods intended to perform chemical modification of the surface. Disadvantages of these techniques comprise the use of or production of hazardous chemicals, the often excessive depth of treatment, non-uniformity of treatment at a microscopic level, and often severe etching and pitting that leads to changes in surface topography. The depth of treatment is important because with thin polymeric materials such as those required for small diameter vascular grafts the bulk properties soon become affected to an excessive treatment.
Treatment of polymeric surfaces by gas plasmas presents the advantages of very low treatment depth and uniformity on a microscopic scale. A gas plasma (also known as glow discharge) is produced by electrical discharge in a gas atmosphere at reduced pressure ("vacuum"). It creates a stable, partially ionized gas that may be utilized for effecting reactions on the
surface of the polymer substrate because the gas plasma environment activates even chemical compounds that are unreactive under normal conditions. The treatment intensity at the surface is generally relatively strong, and yet, the penetration depth of gas plasma treatment is very low, of the order of 5 to 50 nanometres, at a treatment level sufficient for useful surface modification. Surface topography does not change unless exposure to the plasma is performed for extended periods of time usually much exceeding the time required for achieving the desired chemical modification. There occurs, therefore, much less alteration of the properties of the bulk polymer than with alternative treatment technologies.
A glow discharge in an oxygen containing atmosphere has been claimed to render polymeric surfaces more hydrophilic (US Patent US 4,452,679). The treatment leads to formation of polar, oxygen containing functionalities on the surface. The main disadvantage of this approach is that the treatment is not permanent due to reorientation of the polymer chains with time because polymeric materials undergo unavoidable, thermally driven chain segmental motions. Wettability by water decreases as the hydrophilic surface groups produced by treatment become buried inside the polymer, as described by H. Yasuda et. al. in J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Phys. Ed., 19 1285 (1981). The hydrophilic nature of the surface thus diminishes with storage time. Another disadvantage is that, such surfaces are not good substrates for cell attachment and growth per se, but they require the provision of an adhesion promoting protein prior to cell attachment and growth. An example of this is the surface modification of polystyrene, which has enabled the successful
fabrication of cell culture dishes ("tissue culture polystyrene", TCP) which support good attachment and growth of human cells, but only if the dishes are 5 precoated with adhesive protein such as fibronectin (C. Klein-Soyer, S. Hemmendinger and J.P. Cazenave, Biomaterials 1989, Vol. 10, 85). In the absence of pre-coating, cells grown on top look patchy and irregular. 0
Other hydrophilic surface modification procedures have been utilized in order to improve the attachment and growth of cells on tissue culture dishes and vascular grafts and the like articles where performance is 5 dependent on good cell anchorage. The modification of surfaces in an ammonia plasma has been described and seems to provide cell compatible surfaces. However, chemical groups attached to the surface in this way are subject to the same thermally driven reorientation, 0 which means that the newly created surface groups are slowly lost from the surface. Surface modification techniques are needed that provide permanent surface compositions and good cell response.
5 Tissue culture dishes provide a convenient means of studying the process of attachment and growth of cells, and it is considered that the surface treatment procedures suitable for the optimization of cell culture dishes are also suitable for the optimization of 0 surgical implant materials. One cell growth substrate is available (Falcon Primaria tissue culture plate) which does not require pre-coating with absorbed adhesive protein. The reason for this is stated to be the incorporation of amine and amide groups into the
,[- polystyrene chain. Primaria does, however, suffer from the disadvantage that the adhesion of the extracellular
matrix to the polymer surface is not strong, and that repair of lesions is slower that on other TCP dishes.
In spite of the considerable literature on cell growth substrates, the problem of providing stable surfaces on polymeric articles such that human cells attach and grow well without requiring the step of pre-coating with adhesive protein, the extracellular matrix adheres well, and cells are able to readily execute repair to any damage, has not yet been solved.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention provides a polymeric material having on at least a part of its surface a thin polymeric layer which is suitable for supporting cell growth wherein said polymeric layer comprises reorientation resistant polymer chains presenting amide groups for the attachment of cells. Any bulk polymeric material which is capable of accepting a stable second polymeric layer by a plasma polymerisation process is suitable. Such bulk polymeric materials may be natural and synthetic addition condensation polymers and also include but are not limited to perfluorinated polymers, polyethylene, polyesters, polyurethaners copolymers thereof and mixtures thereof.
In a second aspect, the invention provides a method of cell growth comprising growing cells upon a polymeric material according to the first aspect of the present invention.
In a third aspect, the invention provides a tissue culture dish comprised of a polymeric material according to the first aspect of the present invention.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a biomedical implant comprising a polymeric article having thin polymeric coating layer on at least a portion of its surface, said polymeric coating layer providing reorientation resistant polymer chains presenting amide groups for the attachment of cells.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides a substrate for cell attachment and growth, said substrate comprising a polymeric material wherein a surface of said polymeric material bears a layer formed by plasma polymerization in the presence of one or more organic monomeric compounds selected from amides or mixtures thereof.
The cell growth substrates of this invention may be multilayer materials fabricated by the application of a thin layer coated by plasma polymerization on to a conventional material that serves as the bulk of the multilayer composite.
Dimethylacetamide and dimethlyformamide are examples of two very suitable amides.
The plasma polymerization process serves to incorporate amide groups into the surface layer of the cell culture substrate in order to obtain good attachment and growth of human cells. In contrast to the surfaces produced by plasma modification with ammonia plasma, the surfaces fabricated by plasma polymerization of amides are relatively stable and thus present an improvement over the existing art. The cell growth substrates produced according to the present invention allow the attachment and growth of human cells without requiring pre-coating by adhesive protein and they also show superior
performance in the adhesion of cells and in the repair of lesions.
The invention also provides biomedical implants which have been produced according to the invention.
In further aspects the invention provides a process for the preparation of multilayer polymeric materials which process includes providing a polymeric substrate and depositing a surface layer on said substrate by plasma polymerisation of a vapour composition containing at least one plasma polymerisable amide monomer. If desired intermediate layers may be deposited between said substrate and said surface layer or further layers of any suitable material may be applied to said surface layer.
The plasma polymerisable vapour may include more than one amide. It may also include other organic compounds, or appropriate additives and inorganic gases.
Amides suitable for the performance of the invention include compounds of the structure R 1-CO-N(R2)R3 where R is an aliphatic, alicyclic or aromatic group which may optionally contain one or several
2 halogen atoms, hydroxyl groups and the like, and R
3 and R may each be hydrogen or a saturated alkyl group such as methyl, ethyl or propyl.
Alternatively, the organic amide vapour stream may be formed in situ from precursors.
Other organic compounds such as organic amines may optionally be used in the vapour phase of the invention, to give a mixed monomer vapour, provided that at least
one of the compounds in the mixed vapour phase of the invention is an organic amide compound.
Examples of inorganic gases which may be used in association with the plasma process to control the resultant thin layer composition include oxygen, argon, hydrogen, etc., Argon is particularly useful in assisting the evaporation and plasma ignition of compounds with low vapour pressure.
When vapour of more than one chemical compound is used in the process of the invention, the mixing of vapours can be done in several ways. The streams of two or more vapour and gas components may be united prior to reaching the electric discharge zone in an embodiment as shown in Figure 1. In other embodiments of the invention at least one of the streams passes through an electric discharge zone and becomes excited by partial ionization, while at least one other stream does not pass through a discharge zone and is admixed in an unexcited state to the other, excited vapour stream, and the mixture is then directed to the bulk polymeric material 1 for thin layer formation, as shown in Figures 5 and 6. When three or more chemical components are used, any combination is possible provided at least one vapour becomes electrically excited.
The thin layer produced by plasma polymerization from a monomer vapour containing vapour of at least one of the specified compounds and optionally other organic compounds and/or inorganic gasses effects a modification of the surface of the bulk polymeric material _1 by the application of the thin layer which is stable with time. The multilayer cell growth substrates of the invention thus retain good mechanical and other bulk
properties while excelling by improved cell response. The thin layer may be 0.1mm - lOμm thick, more preferably the thin layer may be 50-500 n thick.
05
The invention will be now further explained by referring to the embodiments shown in the accompanying figures.
Figure 1 is a schematic view showing the parts of a 10 plasma polymerization apparatus 3^ for performing the process of this invention. A vacuum chamber 4 is evacuated by a pumping system 5 connected by an adjustable throttle valve 6_ and an exhaust pipe 1_ . The pressure in the chamber is monitored by a pressure 15 gauge 8. Vapour and gas streams are supplied to a mixing device 9_ and reach the vacuum chamber 4 via an inlet pipe 1Q . Preferably, pressures of 0.5 - 1.0 torr are used.
20 Organic monomer liquids are stored in thermostatted containers \_1 . Evaporation by boil off supplies organic vapour. Inorganic gases, such as argon and oxygen, are supplied from cylinders ^2. All streams are individually controlled by flow control equipment
25 13 prior to reaching the mixing device 9_. All streams may be used singly or in any combination.
High frequency electric power is provided by a source 14 via a matching network L5 to the electrodes 16. On application of electric power a discharge is
30 established in the discharge zone 33 between the electrodes and the vapour activated. From the gas plasma the activated products of organic monomer or monomers are polymerized as a thin layer 2 on to one - - or multiple surfaces of the bulk polymeric material _1.
Figure 2 is a schematic view of a modification of the process of this invention. The apparatus is the same as in Figure 1 except that the high frequency electric 5 power is supplied to a coil 17 and no electrodes are provided.
Figures 3 and 4 schematically show several embodiments of the multilayer polymeric products of this invention. 0 Figure 3 shows a thin layer 2_ applied to one or several faces of a bulk polymeric material 1 of rectangular cross-section. Figure 4 shows a schematic cross-section through a tube-shaped bulk polymeric material 1 that has a thin plasma polymer layer 2 5 both on the inside and the outside. The invention is not restricted to the embodiments shown.
Figure 5 is a schematic view of an embodiment of the process of this invention using two streams of vapour or 0 gas. Each of the streams may direct one or several vapour components to the vacuum chamber via its inlet pipe. As in Figure 1 the organic vapours and inorganic gases are controlled and mixed prior to the inlet pipe. One of the two streams is fed through the electric 5 discharge zone I and the other stream is added to the vacuum chamber downstream of the discharge zone. Figure 6 shows another embodiment of the process where one vapour stream is activated by a coil 37. The process of the invention is not restricted to the particular 0 embodiments shown; three or more inlet pipes may be provided.
Figure 7 shows the difference in morphology (determined by phase contrast microscopy) of human umbilical artery endothelial cells cultured on example 1, tissue culture
- _. polystyrene (panels a-d) , on example 2 Primaria tissue culture plastic (panels e-h), and on example 4, FEP
plasma modified with dimethylformamide (panels i-1). The cells were cultured for 1 day (panels a, b, e, f, i, j) or for 3 days (panels c, d, k, 1) or for 4 days 5 (panels g, h) . The surfaces shown in panels b, d, f, h, j and 1 were precoated with fibronectin prior to seeding of cells. The culture medium for all surfaces included intact serum.
0 Figure 8 is a histogram showing the proportion of HUAE cells that became attached and spread onto TCP (example 1) and plasma-modified (example 5) surfaces during the 4 hour following seeding in culture medium containing intact serum, or serum depleted selectively of 5 fibronectin, or depleted selectively of vitronectin. (Mean, + SEM of triplicate determinations).
Examples of the polymeric materials of this invention will be explained below together with comparative o examples.
Comparative examples 1 to 3
Comparative example 1 was Corning tissue culture 5 polystyrene. Comparative example 2 was Falcon Primaria cell wells. Comparative example 3 was fluorinated ethylene propylene copolymer.
Examples 4 to 5 0
Multilayer cell growth substrates were prepared using the apparatus as shown in Figure 1. Fluorinated ethylene propylene copolymer was used as the bulk polymeric material 1, and attached to the electrodes as 5 in Figure la. For example 4, vapour of dimethylformamide was supplied by evaporating from the
liquid held in a container. Before ignition of the plasma, the vapour was pumped through the reactor and system for several minutes. A plasma polymer layer 2 was then deposited from the vapour onto the surface of the bulk material 1 . Example 5 was fabricated in the same way but using dimethylacetamide vapour. In both cases the plasma was ignited for a duration sufficient to produce a coating to a thickness of the layer 2_ in the range of 50 to 500 nm.
Cell attachment and growth: the attachment, spreading and growth of human endothelial cells onto the modified and onto the control unmodified fluoropolymer surfaces was determined as an indication of the value of the surface modification methods outlined in this patent application for the production of surfaces of potential use in biomaterial and biotechnological applications. Human endothelial cells (HUAE cells) were derived from umbilical arteries and used as the cell strain for attachment and growth assays. It has been our previous experience that the ability of a surface to support the attachment, spreading and growth of HUAE cells is a stringent test of the general usefulness of that surface for growth of tissue cells (including not merely other endothelial cells but also cells of mesenchymal or epithelial origin) . HUAE cells were seeded onto surfaces that had been plasma modified by the methods described for examples 4 to 5 and compared to HUAE cell attachment and growth on:
Example 1, hydrophilic "tissue culture" polystyrene (TCP, from Corning Glass Works, Corning, New York); Example 2, Primaria tissue culture substrate, (from Becton Dickinson and Company, Lincoln Park, NJ); and
Example 3, unmodified fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) .
Sample preparation and cell assay conditions: The samples of examples 4 to 5 were prepared for cell attachment assays by sonication in a solution of 70% Ethanol at 24 urn for 20 seconds per sample, then rinsed in sterile phosphate-buffered saline solution. Samples were then transferred to serum-free culture medium "Medium 199" for equilibration (at least 1 hour incubation) prior to commencing the cell assay. The plasma-modified side of the film was exposed to the cells in the assay. The HUAE cells were derived from umbilical arteries and established in culture by the methods of Jaffe et. al., (1973) and used between passages 5 to 7. These HUAE cells were confirmed to show positive immunostaining for von Willebrand's factor (Factor VIII - related antigen). The cells were routinely maintained in a growth medium consisting of Medium 199 (Flow laboratories) supplemented with 20% v/v foetal bovine serum (Cytosystems, Sydney), 60 ug/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (Collaborative Research), 100 ug/ml porcine heparin (Sigma Chemical Co.,) 60 ug/ml penicillin (Glaxo) and 100 ug/ml streptomycin (Glaxo) on TCP coated with fibronectin (coated with a 40 ug/ml solution of bovine fibronectin at 37 C for 1 hour prior to use) .
HUAE cells became attached, spread and grew when seeded on to TCP (example 1), Primaria (example 2) or the surfaces of examples 4 to 5, see Figure 7 and Table 1 below. The morphology of the attached cells when attached to sample surfaces was taken as an important indicator of the suitability of the surfaces for cell attachment and growth, as only surfaces that do permit
HUAE cells to spread well also permit good cell growth. Some attachment of HUAE cells was observed on unmodified FEP (example 3) but these cells had a spindle-like, fibroblastoid morphology that is characteristic of unsatisfactory endothelial cell attachment, grew poorly, and lifted off the surface after 3 days of culture. To obtain the attachment, spreading and growth of HUAE cells onto TCP (example 1), Primaria (example 2) and plasma-modified surfaces (examples 4 to 5) it was necessary to use a cell culture medium that contained serum. This need for the culture medium to contain serum adhesive glycoprotein to become absorbed onto the polymeric surface and participate in HUAE cell attachment and spreading onto that surface. There are two such serum components, fibronectin (Fn) and vitronectin (Vn) , see Grinnell (1976), Exp. Cell Res., 97, 265-274; Underwood and Bennett, (1989) J. Cell Sci., 93, 641-649; Norris et. al. (1990), J. Cell Sci., 95-255-262). The roles of fibronectin and vitronectin in the attachment of HUAE cells onto TCP (example 1) and onto plasma-modified surfaces (e.g. example 5) was determined by the selective removal of serum fibronectin and vitronectin from the serum component of the culture medium (see Underwood and Bennett (1989) and Norris et. al. , (1990) for methods), and comparing the attachment in this culture medium with attachment in medium containing intact serum. Figure 8 shows that the serum component vitronectin is required for the initial attachment and spreading of HUAE cells onto TCP and that removal of vitronectin from the serum used in the culture medium inhibited the attachment and spreading of the HUAE cells over the first 3 hour period of culture, see also Norris et. al., (1990). In contrast, removal of vitronectin from the serum in the culture medium in which HUAE cells were seeded onto a plasma-modified
surface (e.g. example 5 is shown in Figure 8) failed to inhibit initial cell attachment and spreading. Removal of serum from the culture medium in which HUAE cells were seeded failed to inhibit HUAE cell attachment and spreading onto TCP or the plasma-modified FEP (example 5).
In previous studies it has been shown that when TCP (e.g- example 1) is used as a culture substratum, the attachment and growth of human endothelial cells may be enhanced by pretreatment of the TCP surface with a solution of fibronectin purified from serum and the HUAE cells were routinely maintained on Fn-coated TCP. The assays of the suitability of the plasma-modified surfaces for cell attachment were also conducted using samples of the surfaces which had been precoated with fibronectin. Coating with Fn was achieved by incubating the samples with a solution of 40 ug/ml Fn in PBS at 37 C for 1 hour prior to cell seeding. Excess solution was removed before cells were added.
Table 1 below summarizes the results of the assays of the examples, both with and without prior coating with fibronectin. The morphology of the HUAE cells was determined after 1, 3 and 5 days of culture, and a semi-quantitative assessment of the suitability of the surfaces for HUAE cell attachment and growth, based upon the number and morphology of the attached cells, was made:
The HUAE cells failed to attach to example 3, the unmodified FEP film. Thus any cell attachment that occurred to examples 4 to 5 without pre-coating with purified Fn, would indicate that the plasma-modified surface was more suitable for cell attachment than the
unmodified surface. The plasma-modified surfaces supported HUAE cell attachment and growth to an extent that was clearly improved over the untreated control FEP, and enabled cell attachment and spreading to a level approximately equivalent to that on TCP. Each of the FEP (example 3) and FEP modified by plasma modification (examples 4 to 5) supported HUAE cell attachment and growth when precoated with fibronectin prior to cell seeding and these cells showed a well spread morphology. The cells seeded onto FEP (example 3) coated with fibronectin grew for 3 days in culture, but tended to become detached after a further period in culture, whereas the plasma-modified surfaces (examples 4 to 5), whether coated with fibronectin or not, supported HUAE cell growth over a 7 day period with the cells coming to form a confluent monolayer.
The morphology of HUAE cells attached to the surfaces of examples 4 to 5, as viewed after 3 days after cell seeding, was equivalent to that on TCP, i.e. the HUAE cells attached to the surface of examples 4 to 5 when seeded in the presence of serum and spread, but it should be noted that the cells had not formed the well spread morphology that is typical of HUAE cells that have been seeded onto Fn-coated TCP. For the Fn-coated examples 4 to 5, the number of cells attached and the morphology of the attached cells was equivalent to that on the Fn-coated TCP.
These results clearly demonstrate that the plasma-modified surfaces support cell attachment, spreading and growth of human endothelial cells. These surfaces are therefore suitable for inclusion as components in implants where good cell interactions with
the surface is required, and for use in jLn vitro cell culture applications.
Table 1 Cell Growth Data
Surface Fn precoating Assessment
Example 1 (TCP) no 3+ Yes 5+
Example 2 no 3+
(Primaria)
0 to 0.5+ 3+
3+ 5+
4+
5+
Cell growth data showed that cell responses were equivalent to that on the examples 4 to 5 made by plamsa-deposition onto the FEP substratum.
Tables 2 and 3 demonstrate the stability or instability of plasma coatings produced from dimethylacetamide (DAC) and ammonia. Stability is demonstrated by stable sessile contact angle (SCA) measurements taken over a period. A contact angle is considered stable within an experimental accuracy of -3 degrees.
Table 2 - SCAs on Plasma Treated Surface, Ammonia Plasma
Time (days) SCA (degrees)
0 16
3 21 7 32
18 37
43 43
67 56
Contact Angle is not stable - surface changes over time.
Table 3 - SCAs on Plasma Polymers Fabricated From
Dimethylacetamide, freshly prepared and after 2-1/2 months storage in air.
Sample
1 2 3
Other aspects of the present invention, and modifications and variations thereto, will become apparent to those skilled in the art on reading this specification, and all such other aspects and
modifications and variations are to be considered to be included within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A process for producing a multilayer polymeric material which process includes providing a polymeric substrate and depositing a surface layer on said substrate by plasma polymerisation of a vapour composition containing at least one plasma polymerisable amide monomer.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein said amide monomer has the structure R1-C0-N(R2 )R3 , R1 is an aliphatic, alicyclic or aromatic group and R2 and R 3 are each hydrogen or a saturated alkyl group having less than 5 carbon atoms.
3. A process according to claim 2 wherein R1 is an aliphatic, alicyclic or aromatic group containing at least one of halogen atoms or an hydroxyl group.
4. A process according to claim 1 wherein the at least one amide monomer is chosen from dimethylacetamide, dimethylformamide or mixtures thereof.
5. process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the plasma deposited surface layer has a thickness in the range 50-500nm.
6. A process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the pressure of the vapour during deposition of the surface layer by plasma polymerisation is maintained within the range 0.5 to 1.0 torr.
7. A process according to anyone of claims 1 to 6 wherein the polymeric substrate is formed from a bulk polymeric material selected from perfluorinated polymers, polyethylene, polyesters, polyurethanes, copolymers thereof and mixtures thereof.
8. A polymeric material having on at least a part of its surface a thin polymeric layer which is suitable for supporting cell growth wherein said polymeric layer comprises reorientation resistant polymer chains presenting amide groups for the attachment of cells.
9. A polymeric material which has been produced in accordance with the process of any one of claims 1 to 7.
10. A biomedical implant which includes the polymeric material of claim 8 or claim 9 in its construction.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP91908277A EP0487661A4 (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1991-04-22 | Cell growth substrates |
AU77439/91A AU654131B2 (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1991-04-22 | Cell growth substrates |
PCT/AU1991/000149 WO1991016378A1 (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1991-04-22 | Cell growth substrates |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AUPJ9738 | 1990-04-20 | ||
AUPJ973890 | 1990-04-20 | ||
AU77439/91A AU654131B2 (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1991-04-22 | Cell growth substrates |
PCT/AU1991/000149 WO1991016378A1 (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1991-04-22 | Cell growth substrates |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU7743991A AU7743991A (en) | 1991-11-11 |
AU654131B2 true AU654131B2 (en) | 1994-10-27 |
Family
ID=25638623
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU77439/91A Ceased AU654131B2 (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1991-04-22 | Cell growth substrates |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0487661A4 (en) |
AU (1) | AU654131B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1991016378A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5449383A (en) * | 1992-03-18 | 1995-09-12 | Chatelier; Ronald C. | Cell growth substrates |
AUPN820396A0 (en) * | 1996-02-21 | 1996-03-14 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation | Method for reducing crazing in a plastics material |
AU712565B2 (en) * | 1996-02-21 | 1999-11-11 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation | Method for reducing crazing in a plastics material |
DE19736449A1 (en) * | 1997-08-21 | 1999-02-25 | Gfe Met & Mat Gmbh | Composite |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5980443A (en) * | 1982-10-29 | 1984-05-09 | Toyo Soda Mfg Co Ltd | Method for modifying surface |
JPS59152913A (en) * | 1983-02-21 | 1984-08-31 | Yoshito Ikada | Surface modification of polymeric material |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4395434A (en) * | 1980-09-16 | 1983-07-26 | Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | Method for improving surface properties of shaped articles of synthetic resins |
JPS59182821A (en) * | 1983-04-01 | 1984-10-17 | Kagakuhin Kensa Kyokai | Method for treating plastic |
JPS6261619A (en) * | 1985-09-10 | 1987-03-18 | Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd | Liquid membrane |
JPH0717775B2 (en) * | 1986-07-17 | 1995-03-01 | 三井東圧化学株式会社 | Method for modifying molded polyolefin |
-
1991
- 1991-04-22 EP EP91908277A patent/EP0487661A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1991-04-22 AU AU77439/91A patent/AU654131B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1991-04-22 WO PCT/AU1991/000149 patent/WO1991016378A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5980443A (en) * | 1982-10-29 | 1984-05-09 | Toyo Soda Mfg Co Ltd | Method for modifying surface |
JPS59152913A (en) * | 1983-02-21 | 1984-08-31 | Yoshito Ikada | Surface modification of polymeric material |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO1991016378A1 (en) | 1991-10-31 |
EP0487661A4 (en) | 1995-04-12 |
AU7743991A (en) | 1991-11-11 |
EP0487661A1 (en) | 1992-06-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5449383A (en) | Cell growth substrates | |
Yang et al. | Improving cell affinity of poly (D, L‐lactide) film modified by anhydrous ammonia plasma treatment | |
EP0348969B1 (en) | Method for rapid adherence of endothelial cells onto a surface and surfaces prepared thereby | |
Yang et al. | Enhanced cell affinity of poly (D, L-lactide) by combining plasma treatment with collagen anchorage | |
Ramires et al. | Plasma‐treated PET surfaces improve the biocompatibility of human endothelial cells | |
Hamerli et al. | Surface properties of and cell adhesion onto allylamine-plasma-coated polyethylenterephtalat membranes | |
US4927676A (en) | Method for rapid adherence of endothelial cells onto a surface and surfaces prepared thereby | |
Bearinger et al. | Biomolecular modification of p (AAm-co-EG/AA) IPNs supports osteoblast adhesion and phenotypic expression | |
Dekker et al. | Adhesion of endothelial cells and adsorption of serum proteins on gas plasma-treated polytetrafluoroethylene | |
Ratner | Plasma deposition for biomedical applications: a brief review | |
EP0684309B1 (en) | Cell culture substrates and methods of use | |
Yamaguchi et al. | Surface modification of poly (L-lactic acid) affects initial cell attachment, cell morphology, and cell growth | |
CN1254102A (en) | Coating for biomedical equipment | |
Li et al. | Thin film deposition technologies and processing of biomaterials | |
Kottk–Marchant et al. | Human endothelial cell growth and coagulant function varies with respect to interfacial properties of polymeric substrates | |
Bouaziz et al. | Vascular endothelial cell responses to different electrically charged poly (vinylidene fluoride) supports under static and oscillating flow conditions | |
WO1989011500A1 (en) | Hydrophilic non-swelling multilayer polymeric materials and process for their manufacture | |
AU654131B2 (en) | Cell growth substrates | |
Chou et al. | Surface zwitterionization on versatile hydrophobic interfaces via a combined copolymerization/self-assembling process | |
Doherty et al. | Plasma polymerization using helium atmospheric‐pressure plasma jet with heptylamine monomer | |
US5010009A (en) | Material for cell attachment and growth | |
Hamerli et al. | Enhanced tissue-compatibility of polyethylenterephtalat membranes by plasma aminofunctionalisation | |
Godek et al. | Macrophage serum‐based adhesion to plasma‐processed surface chemistry is distinct from that exhibited by fibroblasts | |
Tzoneva et al. | Poly (ether imide) membranes: studies on the effect of surface modification and protein pre-adsorption on endothelial cell adhesion, growth and function | |
Moby et al. | Polyelectrolyte multilayer films: effect of the initial anchoring layer on the cell growth |