AU6511194A

AU6511194A - Optical communications dispersion compensation system

Info

Publication number: AU6511194A
Application number: AU65111/94A
Authority: AU
Inventors: Nicholas John Doran
Original assignee: British Technology Group Ltd
Current assignee: BTG International Ltd
Priority date: 1993-04-19
Filing date: 1994-04-19
Publication date: 1994-11-08
Also published as: GB2277651B; GB9407725D0; GB2277651A; CN1125024A; CA2160921A1; JPH08509107A; BR9406430A; EP0695483A1; WO1994024781A1

Description

OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS DISPERSION COMPENSATION SYSTEM

This invention relates to optical communications and, in particular, to methods of enhancing the performance of optical communications systems.

In long-distance, periodically amplified soliton communication systems, the principal limit to transmission line capacity arises from spontaneous emission noise introduced at each optical amplifier. The resulting effect, first analysed by Gordon and Haus (JP Gordon and HA Haus, Opt. Lett. 11 665 ⁽1986⁾) is a timing jitter in the soliton arrival time at the receiver, whose magnitude limits the bit interval and therefore the data rate. Recently it has been shown that soliton timing jitter can be reduced by inline optical filters. (A. Mecozzi , J.D. Moores and Y. Lai Opt. Lett. 16 1841 (1991), Y. Kodoma and A. Hasegawa Opt. Lett. H 31 (1992)) We have found that the jitter can also be substantially reduced by post transmission dispersion compensation.

According to the present invention there is provided an optical communications system having a transmission path including an optical communications fibre having an input port and an output port wherein a compensating element to compensate for a perturbation in an optical signal transmitted along said transmission path is coupled to the output port. According to a particular aspect of the present invention there is provided a soliton communication system in which soliton timing jitter is at least partially compensated by the introduction of post transmission dispersion compensation.

The invention will be described, by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:-

Figures 1 to 3 are graphical representations of experimental results, and Figures 4 and 5 are schematic drawings of communications systems in accordance with specific embodiments of the invention. Analysis shows that the deviation in a soliton's mean position <At²>^1/,2 _t is proportional to the magnitude of the of the fibre dispersion |D|. The principle underlying this dependence is that the amplifier-induced frequency jitter is translated from frequency to time, during propagation between amplifiers, via dispersion. For any individual period complete compensation may be achieved by the addition of linear dispersion of equal magnitude and opposite sign. Analysis indicates that in a concatinated chain of amplified sections <Δt ² can be reduced by one half if post transmission dispersion compensation of half the previous total dispersion is introduced. However, since dispersion leads to temporal broadening, the maximum permissible dispersion compensation may be limited by the soliton bit interval. To estimate the limit to dispersion compensation, we may consider the effect of a purely dispersive element on a Gaussian pulse, E = E₀exp{-t²/2t₀ ²}. At λ •= 1.55μm, the maximum total dispersion Is given by

t₀ IYP t i^{l 2} ^<z- i^Di «aχ - — 1 .275l[Λ(f) - J P^s/nm)

where p, the bit interval half-width, and t₀ are in ps and f is a factor determined by the final fractional energy required within the bit Interval. For example, final fractional energy requirements, E₀/E--_j , of 0.7 and 0.9 correspond to f=l and f=1.6, respectively. Thus for a 5GBit/s system operating with 20ps (fwhm) pulses and f = 1.6, this simple formula predicts a maximum dispersion compensation of 580ps/nm, or approximately 1/5th of the optimum for a transmission line of total dispersion 6000ps/nm.

To demonstrate the effectiveness of dispersion compensation we show Figures 1-3, summarising data for a set of 200 realisations of a 5GBit/s, 6000km long transmission line with

20ps solitons and D = lps/nm. For partial reduction of Gordon-Haus jitter, our calculation has included inline Lorentzian filters of 30x the soliton bandwidth. Their effect is to reduce <Δt²>^1/'² from 8.2ps to 6.6ps after the 6000km propagation, as shown in Figure 1. Figures 2 and 3 show the additional reduction obtainable with increasing dispersion compensation and the corresponding monitors of pulse width and bit interval energy. It can be seen that significant reductions in <Δt²>^l/2 can be achieved, with negligible bit energy leakage for total dispersion compensations of up to lOOOps/nm. Therefore this straightforward and "cheap" post propagation technique may be used to enable soliton operation of already installed and unfiltered communication systems. Moreover, it offers additional returns for weakly filtered soliton systems and possible application to frequency multiplexed systems. The principle 1s to use phase conjugation for compensation of dispersion, non-linearity and amplifier noise induced jitter.

In the systems outlined above, we use a dispersive compensating element of opposite sign at the end of a soliton communication system to reduce temporal pulse jitter. If total dispersion of half the system can be used, the RMS jitter is halved. Linear dispersion in the compensating element, however, leads to temporal broadening thus reducing the compensation which can be achieved.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, we spectrally invert the signal (preferably by phase conjugation) and then re-transmit it in a fibre. The fibre into which the signal is subsequently launched may simply be a compensating loop of appropriate length or it may be a further transmission stage of the communications path. This scheme will perform dispersion compensation but has the advantage of allowing soliton propagation in the compensating part and thus eliminates pulse broadening, permitting a full factor of half post transmission compensation. Additionally, the use of this technique also compensates for linear dispersive broadening (not present in soliton systems) and nonlinear interactions, which latter are very Important in both NRZ and soliton systems.

Our method of compensation uses four-wave mixing (4WM) in a fibre to perform the phase conjugation. In the following description, the term four-wave mixing also includes any other phase conjugation scheme.

Compensation using four-wave mixing can be applied to soliton and NRZ systems but may take slightly different forms in each case. For soliton systems, at the end of the system, the jitter variance is

N <δt²> = Σ (D₁Z_aj)²<δω²> j-i where D_χ is fibre dispersion (ps/n /Km), Z_a is amplifier spacing (Km) and N is the number of amplifiers. Spectral inversion leads to Sω ^■* -δω. If fibre of dispersion +D₂ and length L₂ is added the jitter is then N <δt²> = Σ (D₁Z_aj-D₂L₂) <δω²> j-l which is minimised for D₂L₂ = D_jZ_j /2. Thus if total dispersion of the same sign but half the original system dispersion is added, the RMS jitter is reduced to half its previous value.

For soliton system, other undesirable effects will also be compensated by this approach and in particular soliton-soliton interactions. Solitons attract and collapse if they are too close or propagated too far. This attraction is reversed in the compensating link - but since it is half the effective length only 50% reversal is achieved, i.e. back to half way down the original system.

The principle is that the evolution involves dispersion and nonlinearity and is described by the nonlinear Schroedinger equation θu 1 9²u i— + - + |u|²u = 0

8z 2 at²

* The transformation u ^■* u (phase conjugation) is equivalent to propagation reversal, i.e. running the equation backwards in direction and time. Thus, in principle, exact compensation is possible for pure NLS effects if the compensating element is equal in length to the transmission line. However, only half the length is desirable for the compensation of noise induced jitter (not in the NLS).)

In soliton systems jitter and SPM compensation can be achieved if the phase conjugation is performed at the midpoint of the system. The jitter reduction is exactly as above, i.e reduction to half its otherwise RMS value, but the soliton-soliton interaction and any other NLS effects are exactly balanced at the end of the system. In fact, if the phase conjugation 1s performed two-thirds of the way down the system, the RMS jitter is reduced by a factor of 3 but the NLS undoing is only 50%, as explained above. The absolute optimum is to perform phase conjugation at every amplifier - this eliminates all jitter and finds practical application in shorter distance systems and NRZ systems where it permits larger amplifier spacing.

NRZ systems are not limited by noise induced jitter, but may be limited by nonlinear effects and in particular by spectral broadening.

In these systems phase conjugation can give compensation for nonlinear and dispersive effects either by post transmission processing or by intermediate operation. In the post transmission processing case it is desirable to have a dispersive and a nonlinear length equal to the system length. In the proposed system TAT12/13 trans-Atlantic communications cables, the intention is to operate with D=0. Thus the second fibre must also have D=0. However, its length can be reduced by increasing the power relative to the power in the transmission part. Here again four-wave mixing at the midpoint will give exact compensation provided the effect is due to dispersion and nonlinearity. Any nonlinear or frequency dependent loss will reduce the exact balance.

Referring now to Figure 4, a fibre optic communications system 1 passing signals from A to B includes an optical fibre 2 and has an input port 3 and an output port 4. Coupled to the output port is a compensating element 5 including an optical fibre 6 and adapted to introduce dispersion of equal magnitude but opposite sign to that of the signal which has passed through the system 1. In an alternative embodiment (Figure 5) a four wave mixer FWM is connected between substantially identical components 1,2 7,8 of the communications system.

Claims

1. An optical communications system having a transmission path including an optical communications fibre having an input port and an output port characterised in that a compensating element

5 5 to compensate for a perturbation in an optical signal transmitted along said transmission path is coupled to the output port.

2. An optical communications system as claimed in claim 1 characterised in that said compensation element 5 comprises

10 dispersive means adapted to introduce into the transmission path dispersion of opposite sign to that of dispersion introduced by said optical communications fibre.

3. An optical communications system as claimed in claim 1 characterised in that said compensation element comprises

15 inversion means spectrally to invert a signal transmitted along said path.

4. An optical communications system as claimed in claim 3 including a further optical fibre 8.

5. An optical communications system as claimed in claim 4 20 characterised in that said further optical fibre is a further stage in the transmission path.

6. An optical communications system as claimed in claim 4 characterised in that said further optical fibre 8 is a compensating loop.

257. An optical communications system as claimed in claim 3 characterised in that inversion means comprises four-wave mixing means FWM adapted to perform phase conjugation.

8. An optical communications system as claimed in claim 7 characterised in that phase conjugation is performed at at least

30 one amplifier in said transmission path.

9. An optical communications system as claimed in claim 4 ^• characterised in that the combination of power transmitted along said further optical fibre and the length thereof is selected substantially to compensate for a selected perturbation is said 35 optical signal .

10. An optical communications system as claimed in claim 9 characterised in that the length of said further optical fibre 8 is substantially equal to the length of said optical communications fibre.

11. An optical communications system as claimed in claim 9 characterised in that the length of said further optical fibre 8 is substantially equal to one half of the length of said optical communications fibre.