AU641253B2 - Stretch wrapping of a horizontal beam - Google Patents

Description

OPI DATE 23/01/92 p AOJP DATE 27/02/92 APPLN. ID 80052 91 PCT NUMBER PCT/CA91/00226 INTERNATIOri. rr r iJ..ii I u1u.ur EATY (PCT) (51) International Patent Classification 5 (11) International Publication Number: WO 92/00344 CO8J 5/18, C08L 23/16 B29C 47/00 Al (43) International Publication Date: 9 January 1992 (09.01.92) (21) International Application Number: (22) International Filing Date: Priority data: 9014181.3 26 June 1 PCT/CA91/00226 21 June 1991 (21.06.91) 990 (26.06.90) (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): DU PONT CANADA INC. [CA/CA]; Box 2200 Streetsville, Mississauga, Ontario L5M 2H3 (CA).

(72) Inventor; and Inventor/Applicant (for US onlv): CLIMENHAGE, David, Charles [CA/CA]; R.R. Orono, Ontario LOB IMO

(CA).

(74) Agents: VERNON, Robert, E. et al.; Box 2200 Streetsville, Mississauga, Ontario L5M 2H3 (CA).

(81) Designated States: AT (European patent), AU, BE (European patent), CA, CH (European patent), DE (European patent), DK (European patent), ES (European patent), FI, FR (European patent), GB (European patent), GR (European patent), HU, IT (European patent), JP, KR, LU (European patent), NL (European patent), NO, PL, SE (European patent), SU, US.

Published With international search report.

Before the expiration of the time limit f, amending the claims and to be rept~blished in the event of the receipl of amendments.

65425 3 6 IM M^ 1 J V4 (54) Title: STRETCH WRAPPING OF A HORIZONTAL BEAM (57) Abstract A process for wrapping articles, particularly large or heavy articles, with a stretch wrap film is disclosed. The film is at least p.m thick and is made from a polymer blend, such blend comprising from I to 20 of at least one polybutene having a number average molecular weight of from 500 to 10,000 and (ii) a polyethylene selected from the group consisting of at least one linear ethylene/C 4 -Cio u-olefin copolymer having a density of from 0.915 to 0.940 g/cm 3 and blends of such copolymer with a second polymer, selected from a homopolymer of ethylene and a copolymer of ethylene and vinyl acetate, said second polymer having a density of from 0.910 to 0.940 g/cm 3 said polyethylene having up to 70 of said second polymer, and wherein said film has a low crystallinity.

WO 92/00344 PCT/CA9 1/00226 STRETCH WRAPPING OF A HORIZONTAL BEA Technical Field The present invention relates to the wrapping of an article with a stretch wrap film. In particular it relates to wrapping of a rolled and other products, e.g.

of paper, carpet, non-woven fabric, fibre spools, with a stretch wrap film.

Background Art Stretch wrap films are known. For example, U.S.

Patent 4 657 982 to Breck and Mollison, which issued 1987 April 14, discloses stretch wrap films made fror 80-90 percent by weight of a polyethylene, 0.5 to 10.0 percen by weight of a polybutene having a number average molecular weight of from 500 to 1500 and 0.5 to 10.0 percent by weight of a polybutene having a number average molecular weight of from 1700 to 10 000. -West German Patent 2 821 733 A49, to British Cellophane Limited, published 1978 November 30, discloses a method of manufacturing a wrapping film suitable for use in spin wrapping applications, comprising extruding a blend of polyethylene and 0.5 to 10 percent by weight of polyisobutylene to form a film, and treating one surface of the film with corona discharge. Low density polyethylenes are exemplified. U.S. Patent 4 337 188 to Climenhage and Eadie, which issued 1982 June 29 also describes cling films made from polyolefins, an elastomer and one or more of an :1,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl) alkylamine, a mineral oil, a liquid polyolefii, and organic phosphate ester, polyethylene glycol, glycerol oleate and N-(3 alkoxy-2-hydroxypropyl) ethanolamine.

It is also known to wrap articles in a spin wrap operation whereby the articles are rotated about a vertical axis. The film used to wrap such articles is usually made from low density polyethylene or linear low density polyethylene blended with at least one polyLutene in a conventional blown film process. Film thicknesses are generally from 20 gm to 30 im. Unsuccessful attempts have been made to wrap large roll stock, e.g. paper, WO 92/00344 PCT/CA91/00226 2 carpets and the like, on a horizontal beam, or heavy articles, e.g. bricks on a pallet, with linear low density polyethylene film, where such film has been made using a conventional blown film process and has a thickness of about 51 pm. Such attempts showed non-uniform stretching of the film, especially if it is prestretched to at least about 100%. Prestretching at higher ratios tends to cause a higher frequency of breaks in the film. Such processes are wasteful. The present invention is intended to alleviate the aforementioned difficulties: Disclosure of Invention Accordingly the present invention provides in a process for wrapping an article with a stretch wrap film, an improvement wherein the film is at least 45 ji thick and is made from a polymer blend, such blend comprising i) from 1 to 20 wt.% of at least one polybutene having a number average molecular weight of from 500 to 10 000 and ii) a polyethylene selected from the group consisting of at least one linear ethylene/C 4

-C

1 0 a-olefin copolymer having a density of from 0.905 to 0.940 g/cm 3 and blends of such copolymer with a second polymer, selected from a homopolymer of ethylene and a copolymer of ethylene and vinyl acetate, said second polymer having a density of from 0.910 to 0.940 g/cm 3 said polyethylene having up to 70.wt.% of said second polymer, and wherein said filn has a low crystallinity.

Preferably the article is cylindrical, and circular in cross-section.

In one embodiment the article has a ratio of length to height of at least about In another embodiment of the process the film is prestretched at least 200%, preferably at least 250%, and more preferably at least 400%, immediately prior to wrapping the article.

In yet another embodiment the ethylene/C_-Ci a-olefin copolymer is an ethylene/octene-1 copolymer or an ethylene/hexene-l copolymer having a density of from 0.910 WO 92/00344 PCT/CA91/00226 -3 to 0.930 g/cm3.

In a further embodiment the polybutene has a number average molecular weight of from 700 to 5000, especially from 900 to 3000.

In yet another embodiment the polymer blend contains from 2 to 12 wt.% of polybutene, especially from 3 to 10 wt.%.

In a further embodiment the film is from 50 pm to 110 pm in thickness.

In a further embodiment the gloss of the film is at least about 90%, measured using ASTM Procedure D-2457 at a 20' reflectance angle.

In another embodiment the gloss of the filr is from 90 to 120%.

In another embodiment the haze of the film is from about 4% to as measured using ASTM Procedure D-1003.

The present invention is particulary suited to wrapping large or heavy articles. In one embodiment the article is a beam of paper, fabric or carpet. The article is more usually wrapped on a horizontal wrapping machine because it is more convenient to support the weight of the article or roll horizontally, although a vertical wrapping machine may be used, if convenient.

Molecular weights of the polybutenes referred to herein, unless otherwise specified, are number average molecular weights determined using ASTM Procedure D-2503-67.

The term "polybutene" as used herein in relation to the present invention, refers to polymers having a backbone predominantly based on n-butene or isobutylene.

Polybutenes known in the trade as polyisobutylenes may be made by catalytically polymerizing an isobutylene-rich mixtures, with more 1- and 2-butenes being incorporated in the lower weight polyisobutylenes than in the* higher molecular weight polyisobutylenes. Polybutenes may also be synthesized, by a low temperature catalytic process, WO 92/00344 PCT/CA91/00226 4 from a refinery gas stream containing polymerizable olefins, particularly isobutylene.

The constituents of the composition of the film may be blended by methods known in the art, e.g. the constituents may be preblended, the polybutene may be incorporated in a masterbatch concentrate and then "let down" by admixing with polyethylene, or the polybutene may be directly injected into the film extruder. In any event, the polybutene should be well mixed with the polyethylene in order to provide as uniforr a film as possible. The blend may be directly extruded into filr form in a flat film or blown film process which causes the film to have low crystallinity, as described more fully hereinafter.

Crystallinity is not easily measured in films of the present invention but an indication of crystallinity may be given by the clarity of the film. Indicators of crystallinity are gloss and haze levels of the film.

Gloss is measured by ASTM Procedure D-2457, measured at a 20" reflectance angle and haze is measured by ASTM Procedure D-1003, both with 51 pm thick films. In the context of the present invention, gloss levels of at least are desirable, with preferred levels being from 90% to 120%. Haze levels of from about 4% to about 6% are preferred, and especially from 4% to For comparison, films made by conventional processes have gloss levels of from about 35% to 70% and haze levels of from 7% to The blown film process is the preferred process for forming the film useful in the present invention. In the blown film process the polymer blend is extruded through a circular die. The resulting film is pulled from the die by cooperating nip rollers which collapse the tubular film at the nip. The tubular film, between the circular die and the nip is sometimes referred to as a bubble. While in the molten or plastic formative state the tubular film is expanded by air or inert gas admitted WO 92/00344 PCT/CA91/00226 into the bubble through an orifice in the centre of the circular die. The film may be cooled.by directing air onto the exterior of the film while in the plastic formative state. The film is cooled until it is in the solid state. Cooling to the solid state is often referred to as quenching. The faster the film is cooled the lower the level of crystallinity. Fast quenching, in the blown film process, may be accomplished by passing the expanding film about a cooled mandrel which is situated within the bubble. One such process, using a cooled mandrel, is disclosed in Canadian 893 216 which issued 1972 February to M. Bunga and C.V. Thomas. Fast heat transfer fror.

the film to the mandrel can be improved by using a gas inside the bubble which has excellent heat transfer properties, such as helium. Such a process would provide the level of crystallinity required in the present invention. Conventional blown film processes do not have rapid quenching and do not permit development of the required level of crystallinity.

It is to be understood that the films used in the present invention may contain ultra-violet light stabilizers, pigments, antioxidants and other modifiers known in the art.

The invention may also be better understood by reference to the following examples: Example I: On a horizontal stretch wrapping apparatus, a large roll of non-woven fabric was attempted to be stretch wrapped with a 51 Am thick stretch wrap film (Control).

Such film was made from a blend of polybutene and linear low density polyethylene, which had been made into film using a conventional blown film process. The apparatus was capable of prestretching film at ratios from 50 to 650%. The film yielded in a non-uniform manner, and tended to lack high prestretch capability ana have insufficient cling, at prestretch ratios of 50 to 100%.

The film tended to stretch and then fail to stretch, WO 92/00344 PCT/CA91/00226 6 forming transverse lanes 25 to 50 mm wide, 51 gm thick, followed by a length 1 m thick. The unstretched portions were hazy and the stretched portions were clear. Above stretch ratios of 100% the film tended to break more frequently, which caused a loss of productivity. Similar performance was noted with stretch wrap films having a thickness of 51 gm, made from non-linear polyethylene in a conventional blown film process.

A similar film composition to the Control was blown into film form, using a blown film process in which there was a cooled metal mandrel and helium gas insid? the film bubble. The film (Film A) was substantially less crystalline than the Control film, as evidenced by the clarity of Film A as opposed to the lack of clarity in the Control film and the lack of haze of Film A compared to the Control film. While gloss and haze was not measured for Film A as used in this example, films with the same composition, made under similar conditions, had a gloss of 100.2% and haze of 5.1% (the averages of ten measurements) Film A was used to wrap large rolls of paper at prestretch ratios of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400,' 450,- 500, 550, 600 and 650%. No film breaks were experienced over the entire prestretch ratio range.

Additionally the film stretched evenly at all prestretch ratios and cling properties were retained. Furthermore the film was crystal clear after stretching. This example clearly demonstrates the surprising improvement in performance of films having low crystallinity.

Example II Eighteen spools of synthetic fibre were wrapped into a three-layer unit on a vertical stretch wrap machine. Two three-layer units were then wrapped together using a second vertical stretch wrap machine. The film used to stretch wrap the spools and units was a 30.5 4im thick commercially available conventional stretch wrap polyethylene film. The prestretch ratio was about 120%.

The film, after being wrapped around the spools and units WO 92/00344 PCT/CA91/00226 was hazy and exhibited non-uniform stretch, sometimes called zebra stripes in the art. Additionally, although the process generally ran well, there was one period of film breakage. About 200 g of film was required for each package.

The film was then replaced with Film A of Example I, of the present invention, and operated at prestretch ratios of from 350 to 450%. While a low breakage frequency was experienced at a prestretch ratio of 450%, there were no breaks at 350, 375 and 425%. The film stretched uniformly and was clear. About 125 g of film was required for each package. This example clearly demonstrates the improved performance of the present invention.

Claims (11)

1. A process comprising stretch wrapping an article with a stretch wrap film, wherein: the film is at least 45 p~m thick and is made from a polymer blend, such blend comprising 1) f rom, 1 to 20 wt.% of at least one polybutene hiaving a number average molecular weight of from 500 to 10 000 and ii) a polyethylene selected f rom the group consisting of at least one linear ethylene/C 4 -C1 0 a-olef in copolymer having a density of from 0.905 to 0.940 g/cm 3 and blends of such copolymer with a second polymer, selected from a .homopolymer of ethylene and a copolymer of ethylene and vinyl acetate, said second polymer having a density of f rom, 15 0.910 to 0.940 g/cm 3 said polyethylene having up to wt.% of said second polymer, and wherein said film has a low crystallinity.

2. A process according to Claim 1 wherein t'4e gloss *of the f ilm is at least about

3. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the haze of the f ilm. is from about 4% to about 6%.

4. A process according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein the article is cylindrical, and circular in cross -section.

5. A process according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein the article has a ratio of length to height of at least about 1.

6. A process according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein the process the film is prestretched at least 200% immediately prior to wrapping the ar~ticle.

7. A process according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein the process the f ilm, is prestretched at least 400% immediately prior to wrapping the article.

8. A process according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein the ethylene/C 4 -C, 1 a-olefin copolymer is selected from an ethylene/octene-1 copolymer and an ethylene/hexene-1 copolymer, said copolymer having a density of from 0.910 to 0.930 g/cm 3

9. A process according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein the polybutene has a number average molecular weight of from 700 to 5000. A process according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein the polymer blend contains from 2 to 12 wt.% of polybutene. l. 11. A process according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein the ethylene/C 4 -C, 0 a-olefin copolymer is selected from an ethylene/octene-1 copolymer and an S 15 ethylene/hexene-1 copolymer, said copolymer having a density of from 0.910 to 0.930 g/cm 3 and the polymer blend contains from 2 to 12 wt.% of polybutene.

12.. A process according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein the film is from 50 pm to 110 pm in 20 thickness. DATED THIS 2ND DAY OF JULY 1993 DU PONT CANADA INC By its Patent Attorneys: GRIFFITH HACK CO Fellows Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia. A I I INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT International Application No PCT/CA 91/00226 1. CLASSIFICATION or SUBJECT KATTER (if several classification symbols apply, indicate 111)6 According to lntersatlonal Patent Classlflcao (IC or to both National, Classiflmzloeaend IPC Int.Cl. 5 CO&J5/18 CO8L.23/16 B29C47/O0

13. FIELS SE&RCHED Minimumn Documentation Searcedl CIlasication System Cazifleaauon Symbols Int.Cl. 5 C08J ;C08L ;B29C Documentation Searched other than Minimsum Documentation to the Extent that such Documents are Included in the Fields Searchede Ml. DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED TO HE RELEVANT9 Category 0 ctation of Document, I t with indication, wlsac appropriate, of the relevant passaii" 2 f Reant to Clamu No. t3 Y US,A,4 657 982 K. BRECK ET AL) 14 April 1987 1-12 cited in the application see column 2, line 33 column 3, line claims 1-2 Y FR, A, 2 580 224 (PLASTIQUES DE LA DEOME) 17 1-12 October 1986 see page 1, line 1 page 4, line 33 A EP,At0 291 166 (MOBIL OIL) 17 November 1988 1 see column 4, line 27 column 5, line 53; claim 1 A EP,A,O 317 166 (EXXON CHEMICAL PATENTS) 24 May 1 1989 ABSTRACT Special categwkls of cited doctuments: 10 Tr later document published eIher the International filing date WA* ocuentdefn~ngthegenral~ ~or pflority dais an not in coaflict with the WlictiOo but '!dcunsidefin toe aw releancr oieanwih st ted to understand the principle ofrtheory unerlying the coaddred o be f paticulr releanei bm on "alier document but published o or after the Interttoa 411 document of p rti c sz eevn the claimed Invention filing date e~atb co nvel or cannot be consiered to 'V document which may throw doubts on daoltycam(s) or involve an inventive step which is cited to establish the publ] Atio date of another document of partcLazr relevance; the claimed Invention citation or other special reason (u specified) cannot be considered to Involve an Inv'entive step when the 'CQ document referring to an oral disclosure, use, ehibtion or document is combined with one or more other such docu. other 5fls "mn sutch corabination being obvious to a person sklled qP documtent published prior to the intemnaiona filing date but in thel= Law~ than theI priority date claimed document aember of the same P410at family tV. CETI1CATION Date of the Actual Complodon of tLze InternationalI Search Dale of Mailing of this interational Searc Iteport OCTOBER 1991 3. 11.9 International Sesrching Athority Signature of Anthoiia Officer EVROPFAN PATENT OFFICE GOOVAERTS Ieva PCr/IISA120 It.i &NOW OW")r If" I ANNEX TO THE INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT ON INTERNATIONAL PATENT APPLICATION NO. CA 9100226 SA 48552 Tbis annex lists the patent family menoers relating to the patent documents dcited in tL above-mentioned international search report he nmbers are as contained in the European Patent Office EDP file on The European Patent Office is in no way liable for thee particulars whi are merely given for the purpose of information. 25/10/91 Patent documaent Publication Patent family Publication ceitd in search report date member(s) date US-A-4657982 14-04-87 CA-A- 1206675 24-06-86 FR-A-2580224 17-10-86 None Er-A-0291166 17-11-88 US-A- 4833017 23-05-89 US-A- 4963388 16-10-90 EP-A-0317166 24-05-89 JP-A- 1198672 10-08-89 a r moe dil t t x O Jol of the an Pnt OffNo. 12/ C For more details about this annex see Official Jowual of the European Patat Office, No. 12/82