AU637575B2 - Lightweight proppant for oil and gas wells and methods for making and using same - Google Patents

Lightweight proppant for oil and gas wells and methods for making and using same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU637575B2
AU637575B2 AU39226/89A AU3922689A AU637575B2 AU 637575 B2 AU637575 B2 AU 637575B2 AU 39226/89 A AU39226/89 A AU 39226/89A AU 3922689 A AU3922689 A AU 3922689A AU 637575 B2 AU637575 B2 AU 637575B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
proppant
less
kaolin clay
weight percent
silica
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
AU39226/89A
Other versions
AU3922689A (en
Inventor
Paul Robert Lemieux
David Scott Rumpf
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NORTON PROPPANTS Inc
Alcoa Proppants Inc
Original Assignee
NORTON PROPPANTS Inc
Alcoa Proppants Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US07/297,876 external-priority patent/US4921820A/en
Application filed by NORTON PROPPANTS Inc, Alcoa Proppants Inc filed Critical NORTON PROPPANTS Inc
Publication of AU3922689A publication Critical patent/AU3922689A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU637575B2 publication Critical patent/AU637575B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

637575 S F Ref: 102890 FORM COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PATENTS ACT 1952 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION
(ORIGINAL)
FOR OFFICE USE: Class Int Class Complete Specification Lodged: Accepted: Published: Priority: Related Art: Name and Address of Applicant: Norton Proppants Inc.
C/o Norton Co.
1 New Bond Street Worcester Massachusetts UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Alcoa Proppants Inc.
C/o Aluminum Company of America 1501 Alcoa Building Pittsburgh Pennsylvania UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Address for Service: Spruson Ferguson, Patent Attorneys Level 33 St Martins Tower, 31 Market Street Sydney, New South Hales, 2000, Australia Complete Specification for the invention entitled: Lightweight Proppant for Oil and Gas Wells and Methods for Making and Using Same The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us 5845/3 2 A lightwight oil ard gas well prcppant by 3 sini trAnwdsy mixing and cxirpacting a mixture of kaolin clay 4 which has been calcined at a teqerature low enouh to Prevent the formatioun of rullite arxi crystcibalites to an L01 of 12 or 6 less when tested at 1400* C, and amorphous to microciystalline 7 silica both of whichx have been milled to an average 8 agglomerated particle size of 7 micrais or less to form green 9 pellets, ard then dryin, screening and sintering the pellets to form proppant pellets having a specific gravity of -2.7 or 11 less, the proppant having a c srdactivity of at least 3,000 12 mllidarci-feet as zi~aSr by the Stim-Tab Te&nique after 13 hours at 8,000 psi and 275' F in the presence of deOxYgenatei 14 aqueous 2% solutin of Ml using sandstone shims.
Express Mail B 84774596 LIGHIEIGH PROPPANT FOR OIL AND GAS WLLS AND MEMDS FOR NAKENG AND USING SAME Field of Invention This invention relates generally to lightweight proppants for oil and gas wells and more particularly to lightweight proppants for oil and gas wells which are lighter in weight than existing lightweight proppants but which have strength and conductivity similar to and preferably substantially higher than such existing lightweight proppants, and to methods of making and using such proppants.
Hydraulic fracturing is a process of injecting fluids into a selected oil or gas bearing subsurface earth formation traversed by a well bore at sufficiently high rates and pressures such that the formation fails in tension and fractures to accept the fluid. In order to hold the fracture open once the fracturing pressure is released a propping agent (proppant) is mixed with the fluid which is injected into the formation.
Hydraulic fracturing increases the flow of fluids from an oil or gas reservoir to a well bore in at least three ways: the overall reservoir area in camminication with the well bore is increased, the proppant in the fracture generally has significantly higher permeability than that of the formation, thereby allowing fluids to flow more easily, and N-AO4.APP 1A- January 16, 1989 the high conductivity channel causes large pressure gradients to be created in the reservoir past the tip of the fracture.
Proppants are generally strong, preferably substantially spherical, particulates that should be able to withstand the high temexratures and pressures and corrosive environments experienced in the subsurface formations surrounding an oil or gas well. Early proppants were formed of material such as glass beads, sand, walnut shells and aluminum pellets. These materials did not have sufficient strength or resistance to corrosion to be successful in many wells, particularly where closure pressures above a few thousand psi were experienced.
U.S. Patent No. 4,068,718 to Cooke rslatces to a proppant which Cooke states is formed of "sintered bauxite" that has a specific gravity greater than 3.4. Cooke states that specific gravities above 3.4 are required in order that the proppant have sufficient cmrpressive strength to resist fragmentation under the high stress levels experienced in use. While the proppant described in Cooke's example proved to have sufficient strength to resist crushing, the high specific gravity was undesirable since it required the use of higher viscosity fracturing fluids and resulted in a lower volumetric proppant concentration for. a given weight of proppant loading in a fracturing fluid when ccmpared with that achieved by a proppant of l .oer specific gravity. In general, the higher the volumetric concentration of the proppant in the fracturing fluid, the wider the propped fracture will be after the fracturing pressure is released.
U. S. Patent No. 4,427,068 to Fitzgibbon relates to intermediate strength composite proppants made by mixing calcined diaspore clay, burley clay or flint clay with alumina, "bhauxite" or mixtures thereof such that the ratio of .alumina to silica in the composite mix is between nine to one and one to one. The powdered starting materials are mixed in an Eirich mixer and while the mixing is in progress sufficient N-APO4 .APP 2 January 16, 1989 water is added to cause formation of composite spherical pellets from the powdered mixture. Fitzgibbon states that the rate of water addition is not critical. The pellets are dried and then furnaced to sinter the pellets. The sintered pellets have a specific gravity of between 2.7 and 3.4.
U.S. Patent No. 4,522,731 to Lunghofer relates to an intenrediate strength proppant having an alumina content between 40% and 60% which is produced using a spray agglomeration process and which has a density of less than gr/cc. In a preferred embodiment Lunghofer produces his proppants from "Eufaula bauxite" which it states is bauxitickaolin type material deposited in and around Eufaula, Alabama.
According to Lunghofer, the Eufaula bauxite preferably contains at least some (above gibbsite.
U.S. Patent No. 4,668,645 to Khaund relates to an intermediate strength proppant made from a mined "bauxitic clay" having a specified chemical composition.
The proppants described in the Fitzgibbons, Lunghofer and Khaund patents have specific gravities lower than that of the earlier Cooke proppant and proppants having such lower specific gravities have been used with scme success in intermediate depth wells where the stress on the proppant is in the 5,000 to 10,000 psi range. It will be desirable, however, to have still light weight proppants which are easier to transport in the fracturing fluid and are therefore carried farther into the fracture before settling out and which will yield a wider propped fracture than the known lower specific gravity proppants. The lighter weight proppant should, however, have a conductivity rating at least as high as and preferably substantially higher than those obtainable with the presently available "lightweight" proppants.
The conductivity of a proppant under specific conditions of stress, temperature, corrosive environment and time is the single most important measure of its quality. The conductivity of a packed proppant such as might be deposited N-AP04. APP 3 January 16, 1989 in a fracture is defined as the permeability of the proppant pack multiplied by the width of the propped fracture and is usually stated in units of millidarci-feet The conductivity of currently available intermediate strength proppants is frequently measured by the tentative API 8 hour procedure, "Tentative Fifth Draft of Rec nded Practices For Evaluating Short Term Proppant Pack Conductivity",, (March 1987) (hereinafter the "API 8 hour Procedure"), which procedure is hereby incorporated by reference.
Recently a consortium of same twenty-eight organizations involved in various aspects of the fracturing and stimulation business has sponsored research on ways of evaluating and improving stimulation techniques. Stim-Iab, Inc. of Duncan, OK acts as the testing arm of the consortium to develop consistent and repeatable testing procedures for proppants including tests for determining their permeability and conductivity. The long term conductivity testing techniques developed by Stim-Lab have been widely accepted in the industry and are described in a publication of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, No. SPE 16900, entitled "An Evaluation of the Effects of Environmental Conditions and Fracturing Fluids on the Long-Term Conductivity of Proppants" by G.S. Penny of Stim-Lab, Inc., which publication is hereby incorporated by reference. It should be understood that any gap in the description in the SPE publication should be filled in by reference to the API 8 hour Procedure. The testing techniques used by the applicants to determine the conductivity of the proppants of the present invention as they are intended to be supplied to a customer (referred to as the "Stim-Lab Technique") are essentially identical to those described in SPE publication No. 16900 using Monel-K 500 or sandstone shims in the conductivity cells, as noted herein. A single cell was used rather than stacking 4 cells in the manner described in the SPE publication. This how.ever should have no effect on the measured results. The Stim-Lab Technique is considered to N-AP04.APP 4 January 16, 1989 yield condu-tivity measurements that are repeatable to within about 5-10%.
Summary of the Invention According to a first embodiment of this invention, there is provided a low density proppant comprising solid ceramic pellets comprising mullite and crystobalite and having a dry specific gravity of less than 2.7, said pellets, prior to sintering, consisting essentially of a mixture of a calcined kaolin clay and amorphous to microcrystalline silica, said calcined clay, prior to sintering, having been calcined at a temperature of less than 900 0 C. such that no significant portion thereof undergoes a phase transformation to mullite and crystobalite for a time sufficient to reduce the LOI thereof to 12% or less when tested at 1400 0 said proppant having a conductivity of at least 3,000 md-ft after hours at 8,000 psi and 275 0 F. in the presence of a deoxygenated aqueous 2% solution of KCI as measured by the Stim-Lab Technique using sandstone shims.
According to a second embodiment of this invenion, there is provided a method for making a low density proppant which comprises: providing kaolin clay powder which has been calcined at a temperature of less than 900 0 such that no significant portion thereof undergoes a phase transformation to mullite and crystobalite for a time sufficient to reduce the LOI thereof to 12% or less, when tested at 1400 0
C.;
mixing said calcined kaolin clay powder with amorphous to microcrystalline silica; pelletizing said mixture to form pellets; and sintering said pellets to form proppant particles having a dry specific gravity of less than 2.70.
According to a third embodiment of this invention, there is provided a method of increasing the production of oil or gas from a subsurface earth formation by fracturing, comprising injecting into said formation a fluid at a pressure sufficient to open a fracture therein, wherein said fluid carries a low density proppant according to the first embodiment or prepared by a method according to the second embodiment.
In accordance with the invention there is provided a low density, high strength proppant which is formed of solid ceramic particles comprising mullite and crystobalite and having a dry specific gravity of less than 2.70 and preferably 2.60 or less and a conductivity of at least about 3,000 md-ft and preferably at least 4000 md-ft after hours at 8,000 psi and 275 0 F. in the presence of a deoxygenated 2% aqueous solution of KCI as measured by the Stim-Lab Technique using sandstone shims. Most preferably the conductivity is at least 4400 md-ft as measured under the above conditions.
The proppant of the invention may be produced by milling calcined kaolin clay and an amorphous to microcrystalline silica to an average particle size of preferably less than 7 microns, and more preferably about 3.0 microns or less, and pelletizing a mixture of the resulting powders in a compacting mixer. Preferably the mixture contains between Aweight percent and 90 w/o kaolinite and between 45 w/o and 10w/o silica, iUbW\001 17:TCW although the percentages may fall outside these ranges. Kaolinite is normally the major component of the mixture. However, in the limit the silica content could reach 100% yielding a proppant of essentially all crystobalite having a specific gravity of about 2.33.
The kaolinite and silica are preferably milled together.
In the usual practice of the invention, the kaolin clay is calcined at a temperature of less than 900 0 C to reduce the loss on ignition to 12 w/o or less when tested at 1400°C, and preferably to about 2 w/o LOI when tested at 1400 0 C. In accordance with the broad concept of the invention it is important that the calcining be done at a low enough temperature that the kaolin clay does not undergo a phase transformation to mullite and crystobalite. The silica should not contain any significant amount of crystalline quartz, other than amorphous to ILbW\O0117:TCW 2 o1 2 microcrystalline quartz as hereinafter defined, and is preferably dried to a IOI of about 1 w/o when tested at 1000°
C.
Preferably, an organic binder is first dispersed in the milled material in the mixer and then water is added to the powder at a controlled rate while mixing and compacting the powder to form rough pellets of a desired size. Next, with the mixer still running, additional dry, milled material is slowly added to yield smooth, spherical pellets. The pellets are then dried and fired to convert the material to proppant pellets that preferably coiprise between about 35 and w/o mullite, between about 35 w/o and 60 w/o crystobalite and a minor aount (less than 10 w/o) of a glassy phase. The proppant has a specific gravity of less than 2.70 and preferably of 2.60 or less. Most preferably the pellets comprise between 35 w/o and 50 w/o mullite and 50 w/o to w/o crystobalite.
In accornance with another aspect of the invention, the proppant is mixed with a fluid and injected into a subterranean formation under high pressure to open a fracture, with the proppant remaining in the fracture to prop it open after the fracturing pressure is removed. The measured conductivity of the proppants of the present invention are equal to and usually substantially better than those of other known lightweight proppants which have higher specific gravities and higher weight per unit of volume.
Detailed Description The preferred raw mAterials for use in making the low specific gravity, high strength proppants of the present invention are kaolin clay and amorphous to microcrystalline silica. Preferably the kaolin clay consists largely of kaolinite (A1 2 Si 2 0 5 (OH) 4) and is essentially free of sand quartz). One source of such material is from C. E.
N-AP04.APP 6 January 16, 1989 Minerals, headquartered in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
The kaolinite deposits owned by C. E. Minerals are mined at C.
E. Mineral's Mulcoa operations in Andersonville, Georgia. The Andersonville kaolin deposits ownei by C.E. Minerals are well described in a report by Alfred D. Zapp entitled "Bauxite Deposits of the Andersonviile District, Georgia", U.S.
Geological Survey Bulletin 1199-G. This report is incorporated herein by reference. The report states that the deposit consists largely of the mineral kaolinite and is essentially sand free. The chief impurities are compounds of iron and titanium and small amounts of gibbsite. The kaolin clay is deposited in tabular lenticular masses. Raw materials containing significant amounts of sand (free silica or quartz) produce a weaker proppant, while raw materials containing gibbsite or other hydratd aluminas yield a product having an undesirably high specific gravity.
By amorphous to microcrystalline silica is meant silica which is truly amorphous or is "amorphous" in the sense that the ultimate submicron particles, as seen with the aid of a scanning electron microscope, do not have the angular shape of crystals. One source of amorphous to microcrys -lline silica is from Illinois Minerals Company in Cairo, Illinois. This silica, as described by Illinois Minerals, is an extremely fine-grained microcrystalline silica formed by weathering of silica-rich limestone. Materials from other deposits of kaolinite and of amortphus to microcrystalline silica can also be used in making the proppants of the present invention.
In general the kaolin clay most useful as a raw material in making the proppants in accordance with the invention may contain by chmnical analysis about 45 w/o alumina and 52 w/o silica, less than 1 w/o iron oxide and less than 2 w/o (preferably less than 1 w/o) free quartz. Preferably the kaoline clay approaches 100% kaolinite. Most preferably the amount of free quartz is non-detectable.
Other naturally occurring minerals wtLich may be present in N-AP04.APP 7 January 16, 1989 minor or trace amounts include anatase and rutile. Minerals whose presence in the raw material appear to be samewhat detrimental to the properties of the final product include quartz, pyrite, marcasite, siderite, micas and montmorillonites. The amorphous to microcystalline silica most useful as a raw material in making the proppants in accordance with the invention should contain by chemical analysis at least 94 w/o (preferably 100 w/o) silica.
The kaolin clay is preferably calcined before further processing in order to remove water and organics. In accordance with the invention, applicants have found that the calcining should be performed at a temperature low enough that the kaolin clay does not undergo a phase change to form mullite or crystobalite. Applicants have found that the presence of any significant amount of mullite or crystobalite in the kaolin clay before the final drying and firing steps has a severely detrimental effect on the properties of the proppants produced. Therefore the calcini n e r performed at a temperature below 900" C for a sufficient time that the loss on ignition of the kaolinite is 12 w/o or less and preferably 2 w/o or less wen tested at 1400° C.
The calcining may be performed relatively quickly at temperatures on the order of 7000 to 800° C or may be performed more slowly at lower temperatures. If the calcining temperature is ab-,ve about 450' to 500' C, the kaolinite is converted to amorphous alumina and silica (scmetimes referred to as "meta kaolinite"). Such a transformation, however, has no adverse effect on the product of the invention. The silica should be dried after mining to an 101 of less than 1 w/o when tested at 1,0000 C. This drying is typically done at temperatures of between about 150 and 200° C.
The calcined material and the silica is the- reduced in particle size, preferably by dry ball milling them in a closed loop system containing a particle classifier. The average N-AP .APP 8 January 16, 1989 m
±A
presierCAQi agglaterated particle size in this milled material iskless than 7 microns anpref ably about 3.0 microns or less as measured by a Sedigraph (Micro Meritics Instrument Corp.) or a Granulcmetre' (Cilas Ccpagnie Industrielle des Lasars). The true ultimate particle size, however, of the imilled raw material (both the kaolin and silica) is much finer than microns and is believed to be made up of submicron flakes or particles. Such submicron flakes or particles tend to agglcmerate to form the composite particles which are sensed by the measuring instruments. The calcined kaolin clay and silica are mixed together and preferably are milled together.
The mixture preferably contains between 55 w/o and 90 w/o kaolinite and between 45 w/o and 10 w/o silica, although different percentage mixtures may be used. Kaolinite is normally the major component of the mixture. However, in the limit the amorphous to microcrystalline silica content can reach 100%, yielding a proppant that is essentially entirely crystobalite having a specific gravity of about 2.33. Such a super lightweight proppant would be very useful in shallow wells when closure stresses are on the order of 4000 psi or less.
The milled raw material is pelletized preferably in a compacting mixer. The preferred commercially available machines for this purpose are the Eirich Countercurrent Intensive Mixbers which are manufactured in several sizes of different capacities by the Muschinenfabrik Gustav Eirich of Hardheim, West Germany and distributed in the United States by Eirich Machines, Inc., New York, N.Y.
The Eirich mixer has a rotating mixing pan forming the bottom of the mixing chamber which pan can be either horizontal or inclined at an angle and a 'mixing star" which rotates in the opposite direction from the pan. The mixing star rotates about an axis parallel to and offset from that of the pan and has a diameter of about 20 to 25 percent of that of the pan. The preferred form of mixing star for the .APP 9 January 16, 1989 pelletizing operation is referred to by Eirich as a suction type rotor and has a plurality of vertically extending trapidzoidally shaped mixixxj ements which extend .frcm the periphery of the rotating element. For the Modiel R7 machine, the pan has a single rotational speed of a:Wut 45 rpmn, while the mixing star has a low. and a high speed. The low speed is abouat 700 rpn and the high speed is about twice that, about 1400 rpm. The rotational speeds of the elemnts of the larger mixers are adjusted so that rotating elemnts have similar tip speeds. The mixer may also contain a second mixing star upon which can be mouanted plows for cleaning the sides of the rotating pan. This second mixing star is also imunted eccentrically in the mixer and rotates in the opposite direction from the mixing pan. An examprle of another compacting mixer that is believed suitable for use in the present invention is the Littleford Lodige mixer.
The milled powder charge is preferably first mixed dry in the mixer with up to about 3 w/o (calculated on the basis of the initial milled pokier charge) of an organic biner such as gelatinized cornstarch for a period of abou~t 30 seconds with the suction rotor on the low speed setting in order to fully disperse the binder in the raw material powder.
It is preferred that such binders be such that they are pyrolized or driven off during later firing of the proppant pellets. The amount of the binder is normally on the order of 1 W/o to 3 w/o, of the initial milled pow~der charge. It is possible to make pellets with the method of the invention without a binder but it is believed that the use of a binder results in improved properties and yield.
Next water is added at a controlled rate to the mixer with the suction rotor rnnig at the low speed setting to initially pelletize the material. The rate of water addition should be controlled properly to facilitate the formation of the pellets in the mixer and can affect the quality of the final product. Typically the total amount of water for the N-AP04.APP 10 N-AP4 PP -10 -January 16, 1989 Model R7 Eirich niixe,. is from about 35 to 55 w/o of the initial starting mateial ard preferably about 43 to 50 W/o.
Prefer-ably between about 40 and 60 w/o of the expected total amount of water is added after the birder is disj-*.3ed and mixed for about 2 to 4 minutes. Thereafter additions of about 8 to 10% of the total water are made about every 0.75 to minutes until irregularly shaped pellets ranging iii size from about 1/16 to 1/8 inch in diameter are formed.
Once- pellets have formed in the mixer, which at this point are normally large and irregularly shaped, the suction rotor is switched to the high speed setting ard additional milled calcined raw material (referred to as "dust") is slaily added to the mixer over a period of about 5 to 7 minutes in order to cause the pellets to become smaller, well shaped spheres of a narrower size distribuation, typically 0.02 inches to 0.047 inches. Typically, the amouant of dust required to form the desired size spheres is about 42 to 70 w/o of the starting raw material. Preferably about 46 to 54 w/o dust is added.
In some cases the suction rotor is switched back to the low~ speed setting for a later portion of the 5 to 7 minute period after a major portion of the dust has been added to the mixer. After adding the dust, the suction rotor is then preferably set back to the low speed setting if it has not already been and the mixer run for a further periodl of about 30 seconds in order to improve the sphericity of the pellets and to increase yield of the desired size range.
The axmunt and rate of water and dust additions to the mixer can have a significant impact on the conductivity of the proppant produced by the method of the invention. If too much water is added, the particles are poorly shaped and are too large. If the dust is added too quickly it results in a poor yield of particles in the desired size range. If not enough dust is added the particles are poorly shaped and will stick together in agglomerated masses. If too imuch dust is added the particles have a rough surface and unconsolidated dust N-AP04.APP 11 N-AP4 .AP 1 -January 16, 1989 remains in the mixer. When the right amount of dust is added, the process yields smooth, spherical, well compacted pellets.
The sperical pellets are next discharged from the mixer and dried to a free moisture content of less thzn 10% and preferably less than The drying temperature and time does not appear to be critical and it has been found, for instance, that drying at temperatures of 1500 C. overnight, or of 260- C. for 10 to 15 minutes are suitable. Once dried, the desired size sperical pellets are separated by screening for instance to a 18/35 mesh size. The larger than 18 mesh and finer than mesh are recycled to be repelletized. The screened particles in the desired size range are then sintered, for instance in a rotary kiln, at a t ustlbetween 1300* and 15000 preferably between 1375* to 1425" C.,for about 15 to 30 minutes at temperature. The total time in the kiln is normally from about 1 to 1 1/2 hours. The particles shrink upon firing by about 15% to 20%. The desired finished size is typically between about 0.0167 inches and 0.0331 inches but can be larger or smaller as needed. The particular temperature to which the screened particles are fired is selected in order to maximize their strncrth. This temperature depends on several variables, scue of which are the raw material mineralogy, the milled Tarticle size, the pellet size and the volume of material Ln the kiln.
After firing, the pellets are again scr:ned to the desired final size. A typical product size is 20/40 mesh which contains 90 w/o of its pellets of between 0.0167 inches and 0.0331 inches in size and preferably 90 w/o of the pellets between about 0.0232 inches and 0.0331 inches in size.
The proppants of the invention have been found to have surprisingly and unexpectedly high conductivities for having such low specific gravities. More particularly, the conductivities of the proppants of the preferred embodiment of the present invention are at least 3000 md-ft and preferably at least 4000 md-ft after 50 hours at 8000 psi and 275* F in AP4.APP 12 January 16, 1989 T 0 the presence of a deoxygenated 2% aqueous solution of KCI as measured by the stim-Tab Technique using sandstone shim.
Most preferably the conductivity is at least 4500 md-ft when measured under the above conditions. The proppants of the present invention have specific gravities of less than 2.70, and preferably 2.60 or less, which are lower than those of other commercially available lightweight proppants. In fact, the preferred proppants of the present invention are even lighter than sand (specific gravity 2.64), the lightest proppant which has heretofore been in comnon ccmmercial use.
The conductivity of the proppants of the present invention are between about 3 and 20 times that of sand, however, depending upon operating conditions. Sand is of little use at pressures on the order of 8000 psi while the preferred proppants of the present invention still have high conductivities, on the order of as much as 4500 imd-ft, at such pressures.
COmpared to another heavier comercially available proppant which is considered to be in the lightweight range, the preferred proppants of the present invention have substantially higher conductivities. The commercially available "lightweight" proppant has been measured in accordance with the Stim-Lab technique to have a conductivity of 6067 md-ft after 50 hours at 250° F and 6000 psi closure stress in the presence of deoxygenated aqueous 2% KCL solution using sardstone shims. A proppant in aordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention had conductivity values of 7855 md-ft when measured under the same conditions.
The same commercially available "lightweight" proppant had conductivities measured by the Stimi-Lab technique of 3616 to 3700 md-ft after 50 hours at 275° F and 8000 psi while the proppant of the present invention had a conductivity of 4459 md-ft under similar conditions.
The loose Pack Bulk Density (LPBD) of the proppant of the invention used in the above example is 1.45 gms/cm 3 The N-AP04.APP 13 January 16, 1989 14 LPBD of the commercially available "lightweight" proppant used for comparison in the above example is 1.61 gm/cm 3 Their specific gravities were 2.56 and 2.70 respectively.
From a mineralogical point of view before sintering, the solid ceramic pellets preferably consist essentially of a mixture of a calcined kaolin clay and amorphous to microcystalline silica while after sintering, the sintered pellets of the present invention are preferably between about 35 w/o and 60 w/o mullite and between about 38 w/o and w/o crystobalite and a minor amount (less than 10 w/o) of a glassy phase. It is believed that the glassy phase is best minimized for the highest quality product. By use of the term "consisting essentially of", it is intended that the pellets do not include any component which would materially affect the desired properties imparted by the clay to the proppant.
EXAMPLES
The invention is further illustrated by reference to the following non-limiting examples wherein all percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified. When applicable calcining conditions and milling techniques for each raw material are given with each example. Unless otherwise indicated, the pellets are screened to an 18/35 mesh size after drying and to a 20/30 mesh size after sintering wherein 90% of the pellets are between about 0.0232 inches and 0.0331 inches in size. The typical yield of properly sized pellets in the first screening is about 701. The chemical compositions of the raw materials used in the following examples are summarized in Table I. The mineralogical composition of the calcined kaolin clays as measured by the X-ray diffraction technique is summarized in Table II. The kaolinite in both the Huber 40-C clay and the Mulcoa clay have been transformed to amorphous alumina and silica by being calcined at 750°C and thus are not detected by X-ray diffiaction. The figures in Tables II for the ACCO clay are for the uncalcined materil1 qo that Faolinite is detected.
Mineralogically the silicas used in the examples is of such a fine grain size as to be virtually undeteclrble as measured by X-ray diffraction techniques. The components in Table II are 1367v divided into major minerals which comprise about 95 w/o of the detected minerals present and the minor minerals which together make up less then 5 w/o of the detected minerals present. Kaolinite is approximately 45 w/o Al203. After calcining or drying all the raw materials are milled to an average particle size of about 3 microns as measured by a Granulcnetze. About 90% of the particles were measured to be less than 10 microns in size.
Table I Example 1 Huber 40-C Clay A1 2 0 3 Si02 Ti02 Fe 2 03 2
ACCO
Clay 45.9 51.4 1.8 0.9 3 Mulcoa Clay 43.7 51.8 1.7 0.8 4 (Silica) 0.7 99.0 45.0 53.0 1.8 0.2 Table II Example 1 2 Mineralogy Maior Minerals Kaolinite ND Minor Minerals Anatase Major M Rutile ND T Quartz ND Mullite ND N Amorphous Yes Where "ND" means non-detectable ajor ND lajor "race
ID
ID
To Trace
ND
Trace
ND
Yes One hundred (100) lbs. of a kaolin clay/silica mixture was N-APO4. APP 15 January 16, 1989 produced by combining 86 lbs. of calcined Huber 40-C kaolin clay (manufactured by the J. M. Huber Corporation) and 14 lbs of dried Imsil A-108 microcrystalline silica (manufactured by Illinois Minerals Coupany) in an Eirich Model R-7 Caopacting Mixer and mixing the two ingredients together for 60 seconds.
Both the calcined kaokin clay and the silica had been milled separately to an average particle size of 3 microns as uwasured by a Granulcmetre. Hereafter in this example this mixture will be referred to as "blended material".
A 50 lbs. charge of blended material was placed in an Eirich Ca-'acting Mixer having an inclined pan and a suction type rotor along with 1 1/2 lbs. of gelatinized cornstarch binder and mixed for 30 seconds with the suction rotor in its low speed setting in order to fully disperse the binder in the blended material. With the suction rotor rotating at its low speed setting, 9 1bs. of water was added to the mixer and mixed for a period of two minutes. As the suction rotor continued to operate in the low speed setting, seven 2 lb.
additions, followed by a I lb. addition and then a 1/2 lb.
addition of watex were added sequentially to the mixer with a second mixing period after each addition. At this point irregularly shaped pellets had formed.
The rotor was then switched to the high speed setting and an additional 17 lbs. of the same blended material was slowly added to the mixer over a three minute period. Then the rotor was reset to its low speed setting and additional 11 lbs. of the blender material was added over a period of two minutes.
The mixing was continued with the suction rotor in the low speed setting for an additional period of 30 seconds. At this point the particles had fairly good sphericity but had rather rough surfaces. An additional 7 lbs. of the blended material was slowly arded to the mixer over a 1 minute period and the material mixed for an additional 30 seconds with the suction rotor continuing in the low speed setting. The pellets now had a good spherical shape and smooth surfaces. The pellets were N-AP04.APP 16 January 16, 1989 discharged frcm the mixer and dried overaight at 150 C. in a box oven. After drying the pellez %wsre screened to an 18/35 mesh and fired at 1405 C. in a rotary kiln for a period of about 30 minutes at temperature with a total time in the kiln of approximately 1 hour 15 minutes. After cooling the pellets were screened to a 20/30 mesh. The dry specific gravity of the material was 2.56 as measured by a Beckman air coparison pyCnreter Model 930.
A conductivity test using the Stim-Lab Technique referred to above was conducted with final closure stress of 6,000 psi at 250- F. in the presence a deoxygenated aqueous 2% solution of KCl for 50 hours. TJi accordance with this procedure 63.06 grams of the screened prtppant pellets were loaded into a API Hasteloy-C 10 in 2 linear flow cell to give a loading of 2 lbs./ft 2 of proppant and leveled loosely with a universal bevel blade device. A 3/8 inch thick sandstone core was placed on top of the test pack follaed by an 0 ring fitted to a piston wich was lightly coated with vacuum grease. The loaded test cell was then placed in a 150 ton Dake press and the closure stress was increased to 500 psi at a rate of 100 psi/min. The cell was saturated with deoxygenated aqueous 2 w/o KCl solution and then purged of air at the ambient laboratory temperature of '70- F to 80- F. A Validyne DP15-30 differential pressure transducer connected across the cell was calibrated with water columns to 0001 psi accuracy. Closure stress was then raised to 1,000 psi at a rate of 100 psi/min.
A Reservoir Accuiulator, made up of two 5 gal and two 1 gal nitrogen driven fluid reservoir accumulators which were filled with a 2 w/o KCI aqueous solution that had been deoxygenated with nitrogen to a level of less than 15 ppb and preferably less than 5 ppb of oxygen was connected to the test cell and set at a driving pressure of 400 psi. The connection of the Reservoir Accumulator to the cell is make through two 150ml sample cylinders filled with 100 mesh Oklahcxa #1 sand with ceramic band heaters in order to saturate the test fluid N-AP04 .APP 17 January 16, 1989 with silica. It should be noted that the closui- stresses on the proppant pack in the cell are stated in terms of the net closure stress on the pack which is equal to the gross pressure applied by the press minus the 400 psi pressure applied by the reservoir accumulator.
The system was allowed 30 minutes to come to equilibrium and a series of five conductivity measurements were taken and averaged. The conductivity was calculated from the darci relationship: kwf=26.78/WQ P where kwf=Conductivicy (md-ft) 26.78 factor to account for a 1 1/2 x 5 inch flow area and pressure in psi j=Viscosity of flowing fluid at temperature (cp) Q=Flow rate (ml/min) P=Pressure differential across 5 inch flow path.
After the readings were taken at ambient temperature, the temperature was increased to 2504 F. and held for 8 hours for temperature uniformity. Next readings with the system at 250° F. were taken at 1,000 psi, 2,000 psi, 4,000 psi and 6,000 psi with the closure stress being raised between levels at a rate of 100 psi/min. After reaching each of the 1,00C, 2,000, 4,000 and 6,000 closure stress levels, the system was held at 2500 F. for 1.5 hours before the conductivity readings were taken. At the 6,000 psi level the cell was held at 250° F for hours during which conductivity measurements were taken at hour intervals. The measured conductivity at the 50 hour time was 7,351 md-ft and 7084 md-ft on a second sample of the raw material run at the same time.
EXAMP=E II In this example a kaolin clay was obtained from the American Cyanamid Co., Andersonville, Georgia. The chemical and mineralogical composition of the uncalcined clay as indicated in Table I and II. This kaolin clay was calcined a N-APO4.APP 18 January 16, 1989 480 C for approximately 24 hours then crushed to less than The crushed kaolin clay was combined with 250 grade air-floated microcrystalline silica provided by the Illinois Minerals Company. This mixture contains 75 w/o clay and w/o silica and hereafter will be referred to as "blended material" in this example. The mixture was tumbled in a blende. for approximately 2 minutes to insure complete mixing.
The blended material was next reduc- n particle size using a jet mill manufactured by the Fluid Energy Processing Equipment Copany of Hatfield, Pennsylvania. The average particle size of this milled material was 3.68 micons as measured by the Leads and Northrup Microtrac II particle size analyzer.
A 45 lb. charge of this blended material was placed in the Eirich Model R-7 Czmpacting Mixer describved in kExample I along with 1 1/2 lbs. of cornstarch binder and mixed dry for seconds at the low speed setting. Water was then added to the mixer with the mixer operating at the low speed setting with 9 lbs. being added and mixed for 2 m-utes followed by 4 additions of 2 Ibs. each, one addition of 1 lb. and three additions of 1/2 lb., with a 45 second mixing period after each addition.
The mixer was then set to the high speed mode and 10 Ibs.
of the blended iaterial was slowly added to the mixer over a minute period. The mixer was then switched back to the low speed setting and an additional 7 lbs. of the blerded material 'was slowly added over a 2 minute period, followed by a second low speed mixing. An additional 3 lbs. of the blended material was added over the following minute followed by an additional 30 second mixing period at the low speeds 'Ihen a final 3 lbs. of the blended material was added over th following minute followed by an additional 30 second mixing period at low speed. The particles were thereafter discharged from the mixer and screened, dried and fired in the same manner as described in Example I with the exception that the N-AP04.APP 19 JanrwAry 16, 1989 sintering temperature was 1395° C. After cooling the pellets were screened to a 20-30 mesh size. The dry specific gravity of the material was 2.52. The Stim-Ilab conductivity test described in connection with Example I was then performed except that the readings at the elevated temperature where taken at 275° C and the maximum stress was 8000 psi. The test yielded a measured conductivity after 50 hours at 8,000 psi and 275 F. of 3,351 md/ft.
EXAMPLE III In this example a kaolin clay was obtained from C. E.
Minerals. This clay was mir-d at their Mulcoa operation in Anrdersonville, Georgia. The chemical and mineralogical composition of the calcined clay is indicated in Tables I and II For this example the clay was calcined in a rotary kiln at 750° C and held at that temperature for 2 hours. This clay was next crushed to minus 1/8 inch then milled in a similar method as the material in Example II. The average particle size of the milled clay in this example was 3.01 microns as weaur-d by the Leads and Northrup Microtrac II. This milled clEy was then mixed with Imseil A-108 silica in a sinilar mannr a, in Example I, the ratio again being 86% clay and 14% silica, Again as in the previous examples this mixture will be referred to as "blended material" hereafter in this example.
A 45 lbs. charge of this blended material was placed in the Eirich Model R-7 Compacting mixer described in xample I along with 1 1/2 lbs. of cornstarch binder and mixed with water in the same manner as described in Ex le I with the exception of adding 2 lb. additions to 17 lbs. then 1 lb.
additions to 21 lbs. then a 1/4 lb. addition.
Next 13 lbs. of blended material was slowly added over a minute period with the mixer in the high speed setting. Next the mixer was switched back to the low speed setting and an additional 8 lbs. of blended nm terial was added over a pe-iod N-AP04.APP 20 January 16, 1989 of 2 minutes after which the mixer continued to be operated for an additional 30 seconds mixing time. The pellets formed by this procedure were slightly wet but had a good spherical shape. The pellets were then remved from the mixer and dried, screened (both before and after sintering) and sintered in the same sintering temperature used was 1,385° C.
The Stim-Lab conductivity test described in Example II was then performed on the proppant resulting in a conductivity measurement of 4,459 md-ft. after 50 hours at 8,000 psi at 275 F. The dry specific gravity of the proppant was 2.59.
In accordance with the method of the present invention the low density high strength proppant particles of the present invention may be injected into fractures in subsurface formation as a propping agent. In fracturLng treatment a viscous fluid, often referred to as a "pad" is injected into the well at extremely high pressure to cause the formation to fail in tension and fracture to accept the fluid. The fracturing fluid may be an oil base, water base, acid, emulsion, foam or other fluid. Normally the fluid contains several additives such as viscosity builders, drag reducers, fluid loss additives, corrosion inhibitors, cross linkers and the like. The fluid of the pad is injected until a fracture of sufficient geametry is obtained to permit the placement of the proppant, pellets. Normally the treatment is designed to provide a fracture at the well bore of at leasc 2 1/2 tirmes the diameter of the largest proppant pellet. Once a fracture of the desired geomretry is obtained, the propun-ts are carried suspended in the fluid pad and placed in the fracture.
Followadng placement of the proppant, the well is shut-in for a length of time sufficient to permit the pressure to bleed off into the formation which in turn causes the fracture to close and exert closure stress on the proppant particles. The shut-in period may vary frcon a few minutes to several days.
Ah_/ The proppant particles of the present invention are particularly suitable for u'se as propping agents in wells of N-AP04.APPr- 21 January 16, 1989 depths les than about 14,000 feet.
N-AP04.APP -2 22 January 16, 1989

Claims (24)

1. A low density proppant comprising solid ceramic pellets comprising mullite and crystobalite and having a dry specific gravity of less than 2.7, said pellets, prior to 3 sintering, consisting essentially of a mixture of a calcined kaolin clay and amorphous to microcrystalline silica, said calcined clay, prior to sintering, having been calcined at a temperature of less than 900 0 C. such that no significant portion thereof undergoes a phase transformation to mullite and crystobalite for a time sufficient to reduce the LOI thereof to 12% or less when tested at 1400°C., said proppant having a conductivity of at least 3,000 md-ft after 50 hours at 8,000 psi and 275 0 F. in the presence of a deoxygenated aqueous 2% solution of KC1 as measured by the Stim-Lab Technique using sandstone shims.
2. A proppant according to claim 1, wherein said pellets have a specific gravity of 2.6 or less.
3. A proppant according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said proppant has a conductivity of at least 4000 md-ft after hours at 8000 psi and 275°F. in the presence of a deoxygenated aqueous 2% solution of KC1 as measured by the Stim-Lab Technique using sandstone shims.
4. A proppant according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein said calcined kaolin clay contains less than 2 weight percent quartz and less than 1 weight percent iron. A proppant according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said calcined kaolin clay is substantially free of quartz.
6. A proppant according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said mixture contains between 0 weight percent to 90 weight percent calcined kaolin clay and weight percent to 100 weight percent of amorphous to microcrystalline silica.
7. A proppant according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said pellets are produced by a method which comprises: pelletizing an initial amount of material which N, consists essentially of a mixture of milled, calcined kaolin clay and amorphous to microcrystalline silica by simultaneously mixing and compacting said material while adding water at a controlled rate; adding additional amounts of said material at a controlled rate while continuing said simultaneous mixing and compacting to form pellets therefrom; and drying and sintering said pellets.
8. A proppant according to claim 7, wherein said pelletizing includes dispersing an organic binder in said material prior to adding water.
9. A proppant according to claim 7 or 8, wherein said method further includes: milling said kaolin clay and said silica to an agglomerated particle size of 7 microns or less.
10. A proppant according to claim 9, wherein said calcined kaolin clay and silica are milled together.
11. A proppant according to claim 9 or 10, wherein said calcined kaolin clay and silica are milled to an agglomerated particle size of 3 microns or less.
12. A method for making a low density proppant which comprises: providing kaolin clay powder which has been calcined at a temperature of less than 900 0 such that no significant portion thereof undergoes a phase transformation to mullite and crystobalite for a time sufficient to reduce the LOI thereof to 12% or less, when tested at 1400°C.; mixing said calcined kaolin clay powder with amorphous to microcystalline silica; pelletizing said mixture to form pellets; and sintering said pellets to form proppant particles having a dry specific gravity of less than 2.70.
13. A method according to claim 12, wherein said proppant particles have a conductivity of at least 4000 md-ft.
14. A method according to claim 12 or 13, wherein said mixture contains between 0 and 90 weight percent calcined kaolin clay and between 10 and 100 weight percent of amorphous to microcrystalline silica. 4J A method according to any one of claims 12-14, wherein said calcined kaolin clay contains less than 2 weight percent quartz.
16. A method according to any one of claims 12-15, which includes milling said calcined kaolin clay and said silica to an agglomerated particle size of 7 microns or less prior to the pelletizing step.
17. A method according to claim 16, wherein said calcined kaolin clay and silica are milled to an agglomerated particle size of 3 microns or less.
18. A method according to any one of claims 12-17, wherein said calcining is performed for a time sufficient to reduce the LOI of the kaolin clay to 2 weight percent or less at 1400°C.
19. A method according to any one of claims 12-18, wherein said pelletizing includes pelletizing an initial amount of material which consists essentially of a mixture of said milled, calcined kaolin clay powder and amorphous to microcrystalline silica by simultaneously mixing and compacting said material while adding water at a controlled rate; and adding additional amounts of said material at a controlled rate while continuing said simultaneous mixing and compacting to form pellets therefrom.
20. A method according to claim 19, wherein said pelletizing further includes dispersing an organic binder in said material prior to adding water.
21. A method according to claim 19 or 20, wherein the amount of water added is between 35 weight percent and weight percent of said initial amount of material.
22. A method according to any one of claims 19-21, wherein the additional amount of said material is between 42 weight percent and 70 weight percent of the initial amount of said material.
23. A method of increasing the production of oil or gas from a subsurface earth formation by fracturing, comprising injecting into said formation a fluid at a pressure sufficient to open a fracture therein, wherein said fluid carries a low density proppant according to any one of claims 1-11 or prepared by a method according to any one of claims 12-22.
24. A low density proppant substantially as herein described with reference to any of the Examples. A method for making a low density proppant substantially as herein described with reference to any of the Examples.
26. A low density proppant when made by a method according to any one of claims 12-22 and
27. A method of increasing the production of oil or gas from a subsurface earth formation by fracturing, comprising injecting into said formation a fluid at a pressure sufficient to open a fracture therein, wherein said fluid carries a low density proppant according to claim 24 or prepared by a method according to claim Dated 8 March, 1993 Norton Proppants Inc. Alcoa Proppants Inc. Patent Attorneys for the Applicant/Nominated Person SPRUSON FERGUSON
AU39226/89A 1988-08-02 1989-08-02 Lightweight proppant for oil and gas wells and methods for making and using same Expired AU637575B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US22725888A 1988-08-02 1988-08-02
US227258 1988-08-02
US297876 1989-01-17
US07/297,876 US4921820A (en) 1989-01-17 1989-01-17 Lightweight proppant for oil and gas wells and methods for making and using same

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU3922689A AU3922689A (en) 1990-02-08
AU637575B2 true AU637575B2 (en) 1993-06-03

Family

ID=26921315

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU39226/89A Expired AU637575B2 (en) 1988-08-02 1989-08-02 Lightweight proppant for oil and gas wells and methods for making and using same

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU637575B2 (en)
BR (1) BR8903886A (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4921821A (en) * 1988-08-02 1990-05-01 Norton-Alcoa Proppants Lightweight oil and gas well proppants and methods for making and using same

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0101855A1 (en) * 1982-07-23 1984-03-07 Norton Company Low density proppant for oil and gas wells
EP0169412A1 (en) * 1984-07-05 1986-01-29 Norton Company Proppant for oil and gas wells
AU3922789A (en) * 1988-08-02 1990-02-08 Alcoa Proppants Inc. Lightweight oil and gas well proppant and methods for making and using same

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0101855A1 (en) * 1982-07-23 1984-03-07 Norton Company Low density proppant for oil and gas wells
EP0169412A1 (en) * 1984-07-05 1986-01-29 Norton Company Proppant for oil and gas wells
AU3922789A (en) * 1988-08-02 1990-02-08 Alcoa Proppants Inc. Lightweight oil and gas well proppant and methods for making and using same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR8903886A (en) 1990-03-20
AU3922689A (en) 1990-02-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4921820A (en) Lightweight proppant for oil and gas wells and methods for making and using same
AU637576B2 (en) Lightweight oil and gas well proppant and methods for making and using same
US5030603A (en) Lightweight oil and gas well proppants
US4977116A (en) Method for making lightweight proppant for oil and gas wells
US4427068A (en) Sintered spherical pellets containing clay as a major component useful for gas and oil well proppants
US4879181A (en) Sintered spherical pellets containing clay as a major component useful for gas and oil well proppants
USRE34371E (en) Lightweight proppant for oil and gas wells and methods for making and using same
US4894285A (en) Sintered spherical pellets containing clay as a major component useful for gas and oil well proppants
US4658899A (en) Use of uncalcined/partially calcined ingredients in the manufacture of sintered pellets useful for gas and oil well proppants
US4623630A (en) Use of uncalcined/partially calcined ingredients in the manufacture of sintered pellets useful for gas and oil well proppants
RU2381253C1 (en) Pivotal propping agents and additives, preventing borehole inflow their preparation and application methods
US7067445B2 (en) Extended particle size distribution ceramic fracturing proppant
US4680230A (en) Particulate ceramic useful as a proppant
US8772207B2 (en) Spherical pellets containing common clay particulate material useful as a proppant in hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells
US20230071272A1 (en) Proppant particles formed from slurry droplets and methods of use
US10077395B2 (en) Proppant particles formed from slurry droplets and methods of use
EP0087852B1 (en) Hydraulic fracturing propping agent
EP0353740A1 (en) Low density proppant and methods for making and using same
AU637575B2 (en) Lightweight proppant for oil and gas wells and methods for making and using same
CA2992942A1 (en) Proppant particles formed from slurry droplets and methods of use
JPH0366894A (en) Lightweight protsupant for petroleum and gas wells and methods of manufacturing and using the same
WO2017053664A2 (en) Proppants having fine, narrow particle size distribution and related methods
CA2963249A1 (en) Proppant particles formed from slurry droplets and methods of use
JPH02269292A (en) Light propping-agent for oil and gas well, and preparation and use thereof