AU631714B2 - Detergent composition - Google Patents

Description

I I I I I I II I r

I

j i 1I 631714

AUSTRALIA

PATENTS ACT 1952 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION Form

(ORIGINAL)

FOR OFFICE USE Short Title: Int. Cl: Application Number: Lodged: 0oo0 o O a a o* 00 00 o 0 00 ooo fa o 00 0 ftC Complete Specification-Lodged: Accepted: Lapsed: Published: Priority: Related Art: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Name of Applicant: UNILEVER PLC 00 0 0I fle Address of Applicant: UNILEVER HOUSE

BLACKFRIARS

LONDON EC4

ENGLAND

RA~

REG

S22. 0 L Actual Inventor: Address for Service: 0d 00 000 000000 G-;r-FF-ItH-Hfed(-&-ee J.JI .IEi .Z .x u rTr-E 6e--1-S-toe-V -e-t-era Cl- Rr j -Atstra-ti-a-; )p rN~-c~u~~q Complete Specification for the invention entitled: DETERGENT COMPOSITION.

The following statement is a full description of this invention including the best method of performing it known to me:this 25th day of March 19 91 Signed------- Position: Authorised Signatory

IWS

4' prima sulph natur atoms in al myris of f a, talloi talloi or lii produi brand C3362 1 4 'fit CO Ce 4. C Lit DETERGENT COMPOSITION CO C) to e O 09 4o 0 0009 t14*4* C I

(IC

44 I

I

C CC 4l( I This invention relates to a detergent composition, in particular to a detergent composition for washing fabrics.

Fabric washing compositions contain, as an essential ingredient, a surfactant system whose role is to assist in the removal of soil from the fabric and its suspension 10 in the wash liquor. Suitable detergent active materials fall into a number of classes, including anionic, nonionic and cationic materials and marketed products contain materials selected from one or more of these classes.

15 The most widely used anionic detergent active materials are the alkyl benzene sulphonates and these provide satisfactory results especially at high temperatures. There has been a desire to find alternative anionic surfactants for use in circumstances when alkyl benzene sulphonates are undesirable, but generally speaking the performance of other anionic detergent active materials is unsatisfactory.

I

'I

I

:1 i O 9 1909

C

il i rII *i~ say 1 washi and G which alky1 Howev its p trend serioi possi also tempe satis ta1lol

I.

'TT:

I-

C3362 Among such alternative anionic surfactants are the primary alcohol sulphates (PAS) otherwise known as alkyl sulphates. PAS may be derived from both synthetic and natural alcohols containing from about 8 to 18 carbon atoms. Examples of suitable alcohols which can be used in alkyl sulphate manufacture include decyl, lauryl, myristyl, palmityl and stearyl alcohols and the mixture of fatty alcohols derived by reducing the glycerides of tallow and coconut oil. Natural alcohols, for example 10 tallow or coconut alcohol, give rise to straight chain, or linear, PAS. Synthetic alcohols for example those produced by the Oxo process can give rise to straight or branched chain PAS.

*0001 0 4I *9 00 o 4 a o o o 15 *o 4 20 0 0 So 4 t t In the past PAS derived from tallow fat that is to say linear PAS has been recommended for use in fabric washing compositions. Thus, GB 1 399 966 (The Procter and Gamble Company) discloses a detergent composition in which the surfactant system is a mixture of sodium tallow alkyl sulphate and a nonionic detergent active material.

However, tallow PAS suffers from the disadvantage that its performance at low temperatures is poor. With the trend towards lower wash temperatures this becomes a serious disadvantage., GB 1 399 966 referred to above also discloses the possibility of using the PAS derived from coconut oil, also linear. The performance of tallow PAS at low temperatures is poor.

The consumer expects a single product to perform satisfactorily both at high and low temperatures, neither tallow PAS nor coconut PAS can achieve this.

L1 i F -3 C3362 In our patent application EP 342 917A it is suggested that a PAS which has a wider spread of chain lengths than is derivable from either tallow or coconut alcohol can perform better than tallow PAS at low temperatures and better than coconut PAS at higher temperatures. The PAS disclosed in EP 342 917A are derived from either synthetic or natural alcohols but are all linear PAS.

US 3 480 556 discloses Cl/C 2 branched PAS in a formulation for dishwashing. JP 721 232 discloses a detergency negative for the replacement of C 1 n linear PAS with branched PAS of unspecified branching.

fo 9 We have now found that there are benefits in performance, 15 particularly in the removal of oily soil when branched PAS materials are used, especially when they are combined with certain types of nonionic surfactant. These benefits can S" *be seen over a range of temperatures.

20 Thus according to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a detergent composition for washing fabrics, the composition containing from 15 to 60% by :weight of a detergency builder and 2 to 50% by weight of a surfactant system comprising an anionic surfactant, the major ingredient of which is a branched chain primary alkyl sulphate with primary alkyl chain length between v rand 20 carbon atoms.

In compositions of this invention, the branched PAS preferably contains more than 10% by weight of branching based on the total weight of PAS, more preferably between and 70% by weight of branching, most preferably between 30% and 65% of branching based on the total weight of PAS.

C3362 The branc,.s preferably contain at least four carbon atoms, and comprise at least 5% by weight of the branching based on the total weight of PAS.

It is preferred to use branched PAS having a range of primary alkyl chain lengths for example between 12 and 18 carbon atoms, or between 12 and 16 carbon atoms, most preferably between 13 and 15 carbon atoms.

The water soluble salts of these anionic surfactants are preferred, especially the alkali metal salts thereof.

Compositions according to the invention include from 2% to IC 50%, preferably from 4% to 30% by weight of the surfactant system.

In addition to the branched PAS materials according to the invention, other PAS materials may be included in the composition, for example linear PAS.

The compositions of the invention also preferably contain a nonionic surfactant. We have found it to be of advantage if such a nonionic surfactant has an HLB of less than 10.5, preferably less than Suitable nonionic surfactants which may be used are the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example aliphatic alcohols, acids, -Amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide. Specific nonionic detergent compounds are alkyl (C 6

-C

22 phenol s-ethylene oxide condensates, the condensation products of aliphatic (C 8

-C

1 primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, and products made by condensation of ethylene C3362 oxide with the reaction products of propylene oxide and ethylenediamine.

When alkylene oxide adducts of fatty materials are used as the nonionic surfactants, the number of alkylene oxide groups per molecule has a considerable effect upon the HLB of the nonionic surfactant. The chain length and nature of the fatty material is also influential, and thus the preferred number of alkylene oxide groups per molecule depends upon the nature and chain length of the Sfatty material.

o o We have found it of advantage that the weight ratio os between the anionic surfactant and the nonionic 15 surfactant lies between 10:1 and 1:4, most preferably "0*o between 4:1 and 1:3.

The surfactant system may include other surfactant materials in addition to the specified alkyl sulphate and the above mentioned nonionic materials. These other Ssurfactant materials may be selected from other anionic detergent active materials, zwitterionic or amphoteric detergent active materials or mixture thereof.

25 Any such further surfactant materials should preferably be present at a level which is no more than 25% preferably not more than 10% of the total amount of surfactant in the composition.

The other anionic detergent active materials may be the usual water-soluble alkali metal salts of organic sulphonates having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term alkyl being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals.

Examples of suitable synthetic anionic detergent L_ ;sai-~ C3362 compounds are sodium and potassium alkyl (C 9

-C

20 benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl (C10-C15) benzene sulphonates; sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum; sodium coconut oil fatty monoglyceride sulphates and sulphonates; the reaction products of fatty acids such as coconut fatty acids esterified with isethionic acid and neutralised with sodium hydroxide; sodium and potassium salts of fatty acid amides of methyl taurine; alkane monosulphonates such as those derived by reacting alpha-olefins (C 8

-C

20 with sodium bisulphite and those derived from reacting o L paraffins with SO and Cl2 and then hydrolysing with a 15 base to produce a random sulphate.

The compositions of the invention -any contain a detergency builder material, this may be any material capable of reducing the level of free calcium ions in the S 20 wash liquor and will preferably provide the compositions with other beneficial properties such as the generation of an alkaline pH and the suspension of soil removed from the fabric. The amount of builder material in a composition of this invention may in particular be from 15% to 60% by weight of the composition.

Examples of phosphorous-containing inorganic detergency builders, when present, include the water-soluble salts, especially alkali metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates, metaphosphates, polyphosphates and phosphonates. Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders include sodium and potassium tripolyphosphates, orthophosphates and hexamataphosphates.

S- 7 C3362 Examples of non-phosphorous-containing inorganic detergency builders, when present, include water-soluble alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, silicates and crystalline and amorphous aluminisilicates. Specific examples include sodium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), potassium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), sodium and potassium bicarbonates and silicates.

Examples of organic detergency builders, when present, include the alkali metal, ammonium and 00; substitutea ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, polyacetyl carboxylates and <polyhydroxysulphonates. Specific examples include f 15 sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted 4 4 ammonium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, i nitrilotriacetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, melitic acid, benzene polycarboxylic acids and citric acid.

1 20 It is preferred that the compositions according to the invention be alkaline, that is at the concentration of 1 g/l in distilled water at 25°C the pH should be at j least 8, preferably at least 10. To this end the compositions may include a water-soluble alkaline salt.

S 25 This salt may be a detergency builder or a non-building [1 alkaline material.

Apart from the ingredients already mentioned, a number of optional ingredients may also be present.

Examples of other ingredients which may be present in the composition include fabric softening agents such as fatty amines, fabric softening clay materials, lather boosters such as alkanolamides, particularly the monoethanolamides derived from palm kernel fatty acids -8 C3362 and coconut fatty acids, lather depressants, oxygen-releasing bleaching agents such as sodium perborate and sodium percarbonate, peracid bleach precursors, chlorine-releasing bleaching agents such as tricloroisocyanuric acid, inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate, and, usually present in very minor amounts, fluorescent agents, perfumes including deodorant perfumes, enzymes such as proteases, cellulases and amylases, lipases germicides and colourants.

Although detergent compositions generally include S* sodium sulphate it may sometimes be desirable to have ompositions which are sulphate free or contain low levels of sulphate.

"j The detergent compositions according to the invention may be prepared by a number of different methods according to their physical form. In the case of granular products they may be prepared by dry-mixing or S 20 coagglomeration. A preferred physical form is a granule incorporating a detergency builder salt and this is most conveniently manufactured by spray-drying at least part of the composition. In thij process a slurry is prepared containing the heat-insensitive components of the composition such as the surfactant system, builder S' material and filler. The slurry is spray-dried to form Sbase powder granules with which any solid heat-sensitive ingredients may be mixed, such ingredients including bleaches and enzymes. The specified nonionic surfactants can be liquidified by melting or solvent dissolution and sprayed onto the base powder granules, rather than including them in the slurry for spray-drying. The invention will now be described in more detail in the following non-limiting examples.

L: i-

I

1 9 C3362 Examples 1 to 4 Wash liquors were prepared in water having a hardness of 24 0 FH (equivalent to a fr~ee calcium ion concentration of 2.4 x 10-3 molar). The wash liquor contained the'equivalent of 6g/l of a composition containing (by weight) 1 2 6 0000 *0 04 0 9 9 9**9 0999 *900 9 9 9 I 99 I I 44.9 I-%9449 t1#~ 4 1

I

I 1(1 C (41 1$ 4 4 Coconut PAS (ELFAN 280) SYNPROL SULPHATE DOBANOL 45 SULPHATE LIAL 145 SULPHATE SYNPERONIC A7 SYNPERONIC A3 Zeolite SOKALAN CP5 Soluble silicate Sodium carbonate Sodium sulphate Sodium metaborate -6 6 -6 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 24 24 24 24 4 4 4 4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 10 10 10 20 20 20 11 11 11 11 10 C3362 The sodium metaborate was included as being equivalent in ionic strength to 8% sodium perborate monohydrate which would be present in practice. The bleach is left out of these experiments to avoid confusion between detergency and bleaching effects in the interpretation of the results. The anionic surfactants used were as set out in the following table: Example Anionic Chain No. branching branching Length (4 or (atoms) 0 a greater) o a 1 ELFAN 280 none none (12/14/ 0 16/18) 2 SYNPROL SULPHATE 46 2.3 (13/15) 3 DOBANOL 45 18 8.8 14/15 00 SULPHATE 0 4 LIAL 145 61 30 14/15

SULPHATE

*0 ELFAN 280 is ex Akzo, SYNPROL SULPHATE is ex ICI, DOBANOL 45 SULPHATE is the sulphate of DOBANOL 45 alcohol ex Shell, LIAL 145 SULPHATE is the sulphate of LIAL 145 alcohol ex Enichem.

In examples 1 to 4 the nonionic surfactant was SYNPERONIC A7 (ex ICI) which is principally C 13

/C

1 alcohol ethoxylated with an average of 7 moles of ethylene oxide mixed with SYNPERONIC A3 (ex ICI) which is L/ i.

11 C3362 principally C 13 15 alcohol ethoxylated with an average of 3 moles of ethylene oxide. This mixture has an HLB of approximately 9.

The wash liquors were used to wash a fabric load at liquor to cloth ratio of 50:1. The load included a number of polyester monitors to which had previously been applied an amount of H 3 tagged triolein. Measurement of the level of tagged triolein after washing, using 10 standard radio-tracer techniques, gives an indication of the degree of detergency, i.e. soil removal, obtained.

The wash time was 20 minutes with an agitation of rpm. Washes were isothermal at 400C.

S44, 4 0 as a* SQ a Oe a 0455 0544P a a 88 O @0 a a The results obtained were as follows: Example No.

Anionic Branched soil removal a O 0000 0. 8 8 48 a ELFAN 280 21.4 23.3 II SYNPROL SULPHATE Yes DOBANOL 45 SULPHATE LIAL 145 SULPHATE Yes 27.6 Yes 28.6 From these results it is apparent that the chain PAS outperforms the linear chain PAS.

branched 1 12 C3362 Examples 5 to 7 Experiments were conducted in a similar manner to Examples 1 to 4 excepting that the wash temperature was 30°C and the water used was 25 0 FH (equivalent to 2.5 x t -3 3 mol/l of calcium).

Example 6 7 ELFAN 280 9 o o SYNPROL SULPHATE 9 **oo t DOBANOL 45 SULPHATE 9 SYNPERONIC A7 1 1 1 SYNPERONIC A3 3 3 3 4 Zeolite 24 24 24 Sokalan CP5 4 4 4 Sodium Carbonate 12 12 12 Sodium sulphate 18 18 18 Soluble silicate 3 3 3 Sodium Chloride 4.68 4.68 4.68 L l Y- L 13 C3362 In this case sodium chloride was included as being equivalent in ionic strength to 8% sodium perborate monohydrate.

In Examples 5 to 7 the nonionic surfactant mixture had an HLB of approximately 9.

The results were as follows: Example No. Anionic 0 o o a0o0 o i *0 t 0 4 644 Branched No Yes soil removal 27.8 30.0 ELFAN 280 SYNPROL SULPHATE 15 6 DOBANOL 45

SULPHATE

Yes 34.9 40446.

I (4 I I +q 4140 0 0 1 These results show that branched PAS outperforms the linear PAS.

Examples 8 to 11 Experiments using the method and compositions as used in Examples 6 and 7 were carried out at 30 0 C and 0 C on a different soiled polyester.

L

14 14 C3 362 Example Anionic No.

Temip oC Branching (4 and greater) soil Removal 8 9 SYNPROL SULPHATE DOBANOL 45

SULPHATE

2.3 30 8.8 piftA 0 90*4 09 0 9 9 00*0 9 9990 *990 9 40 99 0 9 99 9,9 9 009* 10 10 SYNPROL SULPHATE 60 2.3 39.5 11 DOBANOL 45 60 8.8 49.5 These results show that a higher level of C 4 or greater braxnching in the PAS gives rise to a higher percentage of oily soil removal at both low and high temperatures.

0 *44444 9 9 ftft&ft 0 09 90 0 0905 ii 4 1 11

I

K

A

15 C3362 Examples 12 to 13 Wash liquors were prepared in water having a hardness of 24 0 FH to give a product concentration of 6g/l from a composition containing (by weight) 12 13 SYNPROL SULPHATE (PAS) 1 13 2 ACROPOL SULPHATE (PAS) 13 I 0t 4Zeolite 24 24 o Sokalan CP5 4 4 :Sodium carbonate 12 12 Sodium sulphate 10 Sodium metaborate 11 11 1 is C13/C15 sulphate with 46% branching of which 78% is methyl and 5% is butyl or higher.

S2 is a sulphate with 35% branching of which 50% is I methyl and 21% is butyl or higher.

The wash liquors were used to wash a fabric load as in Example 1.

The results obtained were as follows.

6 Example No. Anionic soil removal 12 SYNPROL SULPHATE 45.8 13 ACROPOL SULPHATE 49.1 16 C3362 From these results it is apparent that branched PAS with a high percentage of butyl branching outperforms PAS with a low percentage of butyl branching.

Examples 14 to Examples 12 and 13 were repeated with nonionic detergent active in the formulation.

14 "0 SYNPROL SULPHATE (PAS) 6 SACROPOL SULPHATE (PAS) 6 I* SYNPERONIC A7 2 2 SSYNPERONIC A3 6 6 ZEOLITE 24 24 SOKALAN CP5 4 4 SODIUM CARBONATE 12 12 SODIUM SULPHATE 10 SSODIUM METABORATE 11 11 The results obtained were as follows.

Example No. Anionic soil removal 14 SYNPROL SULPHATE 35.1 ACROPOL SULPHATE 38.0 i 17 C3 362 Examples 16-18 Example 12 was repeated using three different PASs in place of SYNPROL SULPHATE. The results obtained were as follows: Example No. Anionic soil removal t 0 I I A 4 0i t C16 staight chain PAS C 15 -2-methyl PAS C12- 2utyl PAS 4.1 0.8 58 .9 2 .3 60.2 These results show that branched PAS performs better than straight chain PAS.

0 g4,0~ a 4 fIji I *0 0

Claims (4)

1. 2. A detergent composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the primary alkyl sulphate contains more than by weight of branching used on the total weight of primary 15 alkyl sulphate.
2. 3. A detergent composition as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the branches contain at least four carbon atoms and comprise at least 5% by weight of the branching 20 based on the total weight of primary alkyl sulphate.
3. 4. A detergent composition as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the surfactant system additionally comprises from 0 to 25% by weight of a nonionic surfactant. A detergent composition as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the nonionic surfactant has an HLB of less than 10.5.
4. 6. A built detergent composition for washing fabrics comprising from 15 to 60% by weight of a surfactant system comprising an anionic surfactant the major ingredient of which is a branched chain alkyl sulphate with primary alkyl chain length of between 10 and 20 carbon atoms and with more than 10% by weight ot branching containing at 'r ^:fB 0 Ae L 18a -C3362 least 4 carbon atoms based on the total weight of prim~ary alkyl sulphate. DAT~ED THIS 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1992 UNILEVER'PLC By its Patent At':-(bneys: GRIFFITH HACK CO Fellows Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia. I A