AU618706B2 - Damage resistant reflective textured surface system - Google Patents

Description

OPI DATE 01/08/89 APPLN. ID 30393 89 PCT w PCTw AO D E 6 /G 9 jT NUMBER PCT/US89/00008 INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION P IS D E 'HB TE COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (51) International Patent Classification 4 (11) International Publication Number: WO 89/ 06193 B44F 1/02 A (43) International Publicatio, Date: 13 July 1989 (i3.07.89) (21) International Application Number: PCT/US89/00008 (81) Designated States: AT (European patent), AU, BE (European patent), CH (European patent), DE (Euro- (22) International Filing Date: 5 January 1989 (05.01.89) pean patent), FR (European patent), GB (European patent), IT (European patent), JP, KR, LU (European patent), NL (European patent), SE (European pd- (31) Priority Application Number: 142,821 tent).

(32) Priority Date: 11 January 1988 (11.01.88) Published (33) Priority Country: US With international search report.

(71X72)Applicant and Inventor: CHICHESTER, Tebbs [US/US]; P.O. Box 3014, Crofton, MD 21114 (US).

(74) Agents; JEFFERY, Donald, D, et al.; Foley Lardner, Schwartz, Jeffery, Schwaab, Mack, Blumenthal Evans, 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 510, Alexandria, VA 22313 (US).

(54) Title: DAMAGE RESISTANT REFLECTIVE TEXTURED SURFACE SYSTEM (57) Abstract 22 A scar-resistant decorative wall panel (10) has a mirror surface (22) overlaid by a substantially coarse-mesh, common weave wire screen (24) giving a peek-through changng-gwith-angle view of the mirror surface, Viewed at the perpendi.

cular, the mirror surface gives a substantial-area reflection of the viewer. At angles from the perpendicular increasingly ap.

proaching 45 degrees, the view of the mirror surface progressively diminishes because the weave blocks progressively more of the view of the mirror surface and the reflection of the back surface of the mesh appears to occupy increasing areas if the mirror surface. Both these phenomena act together to hidi defacement of the mirror surface and to confuse the casual viewer. The substantially vandal-proof overlying coarse mnesh screen at the same time protects the mirror surface from broad-area-contact type scarring.

w w- i i w i; i; -1I- DAMAGE RESISTANT REFLECTIVE TEXTURED SURFIPCE SYSTEM Field of the Invention .9 *9 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 99 .9 99 99 9 9 9 9 9 .9.9 9 9 9* 99 9 9 9 999999 999.

9 99 9994 9 9 9 999.

999999 9999 99*9 99.949 9 9 This invention relates generally to wall structures and particularly to ornamental wall panels particularly suited for use in areas such as elevators and passageways and characterized by damage resistance with an ornamental appearance.

Background of the Invention Decoratively surfaced, multi-level wallboard of criss- 10 cross relief pattern is disclosed in U. S. Patent No.

2,248,233 issued to C. C. Heritage on July 8, 1941.

Similarly for decorative purposies, multi-level scree,-ns are disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,267, 628 issued to R. F. Seery on August 23, 1960. Multi-level decorator panels with 15 patterning of regular shape and of irregular shape are disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,661,613 issued to R. G.

Contrell et al on May 9, 1972. Multi-level panels with screening layers are disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,353,193 issued to D. S. C. Sanderson on October 12, 1982.

Summarv of The Invention

.A'

However, in spite of the various devices of the type that have been disclosed nono~ is believed to provide the advantages of the present invention in aocordance with the objects set forth, a primary object of which is to provide a textured reflective surface of woven wire cloth over sheet metal that provides a degree of decoration with protection that will become the standard of commerce for the purposes set forth.

Further objects are to provide a system as described that creates the appearance of one space- enhanci3.ng textured reflective surface and protects against and hides vandalism -2 in that scratches and the like tend to be camouflaged by Smultiple obscuration/reflection characteristics and by optical confusion caused by back-reflection of a mirroroverlying grid that fractures the appearance of blemishes.

Said another way, a scar-resistant decorative wall panel has a mirror surface overlaid by a substantially coarse-mesh, common-weave wire screen giving a peek-through changing-with-angle view of the mirror surface. Viewed at the perpendicular to it, the mirror surface gives a substantial area reflection of the viewer that may be as much as 30 to 50% of the mirror surface. At angles from the perpendicular increasingly approaching extinguishment at to 20 degrees, the view of the mirror surface progressively diminishes for two reasons: the weave of the mesh blocks progressively more of the view of the mirror surface and (2) the reflection of the back surface of the mesh appears to occupy increasing areas of this mirror surface, decreasing in this way the view of the mirror surface. Both these Sphenomena act together in a tendency to hide and confuse to I 20 a casual viewer defacement of the mirror surface, and the |substantially vandalproof overlying coarse-mesh screen at the same time protects the mirror surface from broad-areacontact type scarring.

Brief Description of the Drawings The above and othor objects and advantages of this invention will become more readily apparent on examination of the following description in which like reference characters refer to like parts.

Figure 1 is a fragmentary front elevational view of a preferred embodiment panel; Figure 2 is an edge view thereof; Figure 3 is a view similar to that of Figure 1 but viewed at an angle to the perpendicular; and .4R Figure 4 is an edge view similar to that of Figure 2,

T

5 but diagramming lines of sight.

i i 3 Detailed Description em em C C

I

mm...

C,

C C me S

I

em P4 I C

C

PC

CC

P P

C-.

nntC 4 0C 0$4* .5,4 See,,.

In Figures I and 2, the system of the inven~Lvn is generally indicatecd at 10 and comprises a back plate 20 With a reflective or mirror surface 22 throughout, and a imple or common woven mesh screen 24 affixed over the Tirror surface as by bonding 26 at some or all points of contact.

Viewed perpendicularly, a maximum of each portion of the mirroi7 surface 22 shows through the interstices 28 of the weave formed by the strands 30, 32. These are 10 substantially small portions and the viewer is likely to see his or her image (a larger pattern) and to ignore scratched, punched or other defaced bits as at D. On the other hand, the viewer may observe defacements to some degree. However, in the usual case, viewing will be at an angle to the perpendicular, and this will provide further concealment of defacement.

Figures 3 and 4 show this result. At the viewer sees his or her eye. The greater the viewing angle to the perpendicular, the more obscuration of blemishes, as at "b" 20 occurs. Two factors work together to provide this desirable resu7Lt. First, the mirror gives increasingly with incline a view of the back of the strands of screen. This effect continues to increase up to chosen viewing angles of 400 to 800 from the perpendicular, concealing blemishes as at D, depending on strand size and mesh spacing factors.

Second, the foreshortening of the screen provided by the three-dimensional structure of this screen increases obscuration with angle, until obscuration is substantially complete, the interstices vanishing. Both these phenomena together work to suppress visibility of scars on the mirror.

Finally, the coarse screen characteristics are also selected for preventing most scarring contact that might result from bro-d-av'ea contact, with the mirror surface 24.

Preferably the screen is of about 1/16 inch (1.5 mm) 5 diameter wire woven over and under on 1/4 inch (3 mm)

-I

RA

11)-Co L 4 centers, the interstices being farther across than the strand at the perpendicular, preferably.

Bronze, aluminum, stainless steel, or other suitable metal and/or plastic may be used for the screen and the mirror surface.

This invention is not to be construed as limited to the particular forms disclosed herein, since these are to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. It is, therefore, to be understood that the invention may be practiced within the scope of the claims otherwise than as specifically described.

S* 4 4 a 44 4 4 4 4 4 t 4444*

Claims (4)

1. A damage resistant reflective surface system, comprising: a sheet having a surface which is in a plane and at least partially reflective, a mesh screen adapted to be positioned over said reflective surface to protect said surface and camouflage any defacement thereof, said screen being comprised of a first series of spaced strands extending in one direction and a second series of spaced strands extending in a direction at an angle to said first direction, the spacing of said strards providing open areas through which projected and reflected light can pass to and from said reflective surface, said strands having a sufficient thickness to provide with said sheet a three dimensional structure whereby light reflecting from said reflective surface also reflects from said strands, and means for securing said mesh screen to said reflective surface, whereby maximum reflection occurs when viewing said surface from a direction substantially perpendicular thereto, with the amount of reflection viewed decre. .ing as the viewer moves toward the plane of said reflective surface due to the projection of said mesh screen outwardly of said surface and the reflection from said strands, such movement tending to camouflage any defacements appearing on said reflective surface, with continued movement in such direction entirely obscuring said openings.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein said mesh screen is woven in an over and under weave, the under portions of the strands contacting said reflective surface and the over portions of the strands projecting forwardmost from WO 89/06193 PCT/US89/00008 6 said surface, the thickness of said strands being such that a substantial three dimensional structure is formed.

3. The system of claim 2 wherein the thickness of said strands is substantially less than the spacing between adjacent strands.

4. The system of claim 2 wherein said strands are formed wire approximately 1.5 mm in diameter and adjacent strands of each series spaced from each other at least 3 mm, said first and second series of wire strands being perpendicular to each other so as to form a grid- like mesh having openings substantially larger than the thickness of individual wire strands. a*