AU611585B2 - Glaucoma testing - Google Patents

Glaucoma testing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU611585B2
AU611585B2 AU40241/89A AU4024189A AU611585B2 AU 611585 B2 AU611585 B2 AU 611585B2 AU 40241/89 A AU40241/89 A AU 40241/89A AU 4024189 A AU4024189 A AU 4024189A AU 611585 B2 AU611585 B2 AU 611585B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
contrast
pattern
person
grating pattern
movement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
AU40241/89A
Other versions
AU4024189A (en
Inventor
Teddy Lee Maddess
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Australian National University
Original Assignee
Australian National University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Australian National University filed Critical Australian National University
Priority to AU40241/89A priority Critical patent/AU611585B2/en
Publication of AU4024189A publication Critical patent/AU4024189A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU611585B2 publication Critical patent/AU611585B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B3/00Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
    • A61B3/02Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient
    • A61B3/06Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient for testing light sensitivity, e.g. adaptation; for testing colour vision
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/16Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
    • A61B5/161Flicker fusion testing

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Psychiatry (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Social Psychology (AREA)
  • Psychology (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • Developmental Disabilities (AREA)
  • Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry (AREA)
  • Eye Examination Apparatus (AREA)

Description

i COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PATENTS ACT 1952-1962 FORK 0 Int. Class COMPLETE SPECIFICATION (Original) FOR OFFICE USE: Class Application Number: Lodged: Complete Specification Lodged: Accepted: Published: Priority: Related Art: Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Actual Inventor(s): THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Acton, Australian Capital Territory 2601 Australia TEDDY LEE MADDESS Address for Service: DAVIES COLLISON, Patent Attorneys, 1 Little Collins Street, Melbourne V 3000, Australia Complete Specification for the invention entitled: "GLAUCOMA TESTING" The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us 1 I i i ~r i S S
S
*SS
S..
S
S S 5*
S
2 Technical Field This invention concerns the detection of glaucoma.
More particularly, it concerns a method and apparatus whereby a person suffering from glaucoma can be diagnosed as such before the disease reaches the stage where the prospects for successful treatment are poor and irreversible blindness is almost inevitable.
Background to the Invention 10 In the eye, the final stage of image processing in the retina is performed by retinal ganglion cells.
The axons of the ganglion cells project out of the eye to form the optic nerve. Glaucoma, which produces irreversible blindness if not treated early 15 enough, destroys these ganglion cells. A typical "early" sign of glaucoma is the loss of a portion of the peripheral visual field, referred to as "scotoma". Unfortunately, by the time a scotoma is detected, the disease has reached a stage where treatment is unlikely to be successful. Another indication of glaucoma is the presence of "cupping" of the optic disc.
One approach that has been used to detect glaucoma at an earlier stage than when a scotoma has developed is to test the intraocular tension of a patient. A symptom of glaucoma is the increase of intraocular tension. Tests of intraocular tension, however, usually involve the use of drugs, are time consuming, and are unpleasant for the patient. Moreover, in the
C.
S1 b 4 9 9 4 o *4 9 9r 94 3 early stages of glaucoma, an increased intraocular tension occurs only transiently in the morning and in the evening, and the susceptibility of patients to pressure damage as a result Of increased intraocular tension varies. Moreover, some glaucoma patients do not exhibit intraocular tensions above about 21 mm of mercury (such patients have what is called "low-tension glaucomas"). Thus testing the intraocular tension of a person is not a reliable method for the early detection of glaucoma.
Another proposal for the early detection of glaucoma has involved the assessment of colour vision defects.
Simple tests of colour vision defects, however, have shown a lack of correlation between the defects noted 15 and the presence of optic disc cupping. More complex tests of colour vision defects involving anomaloscopy are too difficult for clinic use. Moreover, these tests cannot differentiate between colour vision defects caused by glaucoma and colour deficits resulting from amblyopia and optic neuritis. In addition, it has been reported that up to 25 per cent of patients who have glaucomatous scotoma exhibit no colour deficit. Thus assessment of colour deficits in a person's vision is not a reliable method of detecting glaucoma in its early stages, even if it should become practical to perform detailed tests clinically.
*1 V, 4s, I A ri~~j 4 Disclosure of the Present Invention The prime object of the present invention is the provision of a non-invasive, easy to perform, reliable test for glaucoma, which enables the disease to be detected at its early stages.
To achieve this objective, the present invention utilises a pattern recognition phenomenon that is i :believed to be affected by the number of large ganglion cells present in the retina.
10 In 1966, D H Kelly reported, in his paper entitled "Frequency doubling in visual responses" (which was published in the Journal of the Optical Society of America, Volume 56, page 1628, 1966), that when sinusoidal gratings with spatial frequencies below 1 cycle per degree are modulated so that the contrast between the bars or striations of the pattern is varied at rates higher than 10 Hz, the gratings appear as spatial frequency-doubled sinusoids to persons of normal vision. D H Kelly's subsequent work (reported in his paper entitled "Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings", which was published in the Journal of the Optical Society of America, Volume 71, page 1051, 3.981) has shown that this second-harmonic distortion of the human visual response is due to the optical pathway between the eye and the brain having both a linear component and a non-linear component. Ganglion cells are known to be of two types, namely type ganglion cells and type ganglion cells, each of 5 which respond to visual stimuli. However, the P type ganglion cells respond in a sluggish manner and do not contribute to the production of the images with which the present invention is concerned. The M type cells consist of larger "y-type" ganglion cells (usually designated "M cells) and smaller "x-type" y ganglion cells (usually designated "M cells). Each x type of cell is distributed uniformly over the back of the retina. There are significantly fewer M y 10 cells than M cells. Recent work has shown that the x S. M cells are responsible for the non-linear component
Y
of the optical pathway, that the M cells control its
X
linear component, and that the M cells are the more y "00 important in the image forming process. Recent work has also indicated that patients having glaucoma also suffer a diffuse, and not just a localised, loss of ganglion cells. There is also data available, from experimental work with primates, to show that the M cells are affected first at the onset of glaucoma see the paper by H A Quigley et al, entitled "Chronic glaucoma damages large optic nerve fibres", which was published in Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, Volume 28, page 913, 1987.
S.
S
The present inventor hypothesised that, if this latest work is correct, a diffuse loss of ganglion cells over the retina, although affecting both M and M cells, x y would have a greater effect on the non-linear component of the optical pathway because the M cells are relatively few in number, and thus 6 glaucoma sufferers will have a different visual response to intensity modulated patterns from persons with normal vision; in particular, the glaucoma sufferer should find it more difficult than a person of normal vision to detect the frequency doubled sinusoids noted above; the different visual response should be exhibited at an early stage of glaucoma well before the loss of ganglion cells is sufficient 10 to produce a scotoma; and the different visual response should not be exhibited by patients suffering from amblyopia or optic neuritis.
Tests performed with seventeen persons having normal vision and twenty-seven glaucoma suspects (that is, persons who have been clinically diagnosed as suffering from glaucoma) have shown that the different visual responses are exhibited, and that glaucoma sufferers require a greater contrast between 20 the striations of the grating pattern before they can see the frequency-doubled sinusoid pattern.
It should be noted that throughout this specification (including the claims), the term "contrast" is used in the technical sense, and is defined by the relationship lil~ -7- I I I I max min contrast max m I +I max min where Imax is the intensity of the maximum density of the striations in the grating pattern and Imi n is the intensity of the minimum density of the striations in that pattern.
Thus, according to the present invention, a method of testing a person to determine the presence of glaucomatous destruction of ganglion cells in a retina of that person comprises the steps of: monocularly presenting the person with a sinusoidal grating pattern having generally ~elongate striations, the contrast of the grating 15 pattern being modulated at a frequency in the ro range of from about 10 Hz to about 50 Hz, the contrast of the grating pattern being such that the person can observe a frequency-doubled grating pattern; 20 reducing the contrast of the grating pattern until a contrast value at which the o frequency-doubled pattern is no longer observed is attained; and comparing the attained contrast value at which the frequency-doubled pattern is no longer observed with the higest contrast value at which the frequency-doubled pattern is no longer observed by persons of normal vision.
Preferably the frequency of modulation of the contrast of the pattern is in the range of from about 8 -8- Hz to about 50 Hz, and more preferably in the range of from 23 Hz to 45 Hz.
Since it is desirable to use this test to detect glaucoma at its very early stages, it is important to carry out with precision the determination of the threshold value or level of the contrast at which the frequency-doubled pattern is observed. Accordingly, one of two alternative techniques for this purpose is preferably adopted.
The first of these alternative techniques is a multiple staircase, two alternative, forced-choice procedure involving the steps of adopting a first contrast value for the grating pattern, then causing the grating pattern to be moved slowly in a direction at right angles to the elongate direction of the striations of the grating pattern, and checking that the person can identify the direction of movement of the observed pattern; 20 (ii) reducing the contrast of the grating pattern by •o a predetermined proportion of the first contrast value; then (iii) causing the grating pattern to move slowly in a direction at right angles to the elongate direction of the striations of the pattern, and asking the person to identify the direction of movement of the observed pattern; then (iv) if the person correctly identifies the direction of movement of step (iii), repeating steps (ii) and (iii); or
I
!r
-L_
r~ r* lllsll- II- 9 if the person incorrectly identifies the direction of movement of step (iii), increasing the contrast of the grating pattern by a second predetermined amount, then repeating step (iii); whereby a series of contrast values at which the person fails to observe the direction of movement of the observed pattern, and thus fails to observe a frequency doubled pattern, is obtained, an average value of the series of contast values being adopted as the attained or threshold contrast value at which the person no longer observes a frequency doubled pattern of the grating.
The second alternative technique involves a steady 15 downward adjustment of the contrast until the person determines the level at which the frequency-doubled grating pattern just disappears (at this point, some trace of flicker is usually still seen).
Glaucoma sufferers and suspects have consistently shown a much higher contrast threshold for the disappearance of the observed frequency-doubled grating pattern.
:..too The present invention also encompasses apparatus for performing the above-noted tests, comprising a cathode ray tube or an equivalent visual display unit, having a screen upon which a sinusoidal grating pattern can be established under the control of a programmed microprocessor, which can also cause the pattern to be cyclically modulated in contrast.
Preferably the microprocessor is programmed so that 10 it may also cause the pattern to move on the screen in a direction which is orthogonal to the elongate direction of the striations.
A visual display unit operated under the control of such a programmed microcomputer has been used to test the present invention.
To demonstrate the efficacy of the present invention, an example of its use will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawing, which is a S. 10 graphical representation of the variation of contrast level at the threshold of observation of the aforementioned frequency doubled pattern with the modulation frequency of the temporal contrast, for persons having normal vision and for suspected glaucoma suffereis.
Example of the Efficacy of the Invention A group of people comprising 17 persons with normal 08o vision and 27 persons who were glaucoma sufferers were tested using the method of the present invention. Each person's threshold contrast level 6 was measured using each of the alternative techniques 4 for threshold determination, and using modulation frequencies of 12 Hz, 17.5 Hz, 23 Hz, 28.5 Hz, 34 Hz, 39.5 Hz and 45 Hz (except that in the later experiments, the modulation frequencies of 12 Hz and 17.5 Hz were not used partly to reduce the length of the experiment and partly because it was often not J1 the direction of movement of a frequency-doubled pattern at these frequencies).
The equipment used for the testing was a Joyce Electronics cathode ray tube with a white phosphor screen, adjusted to a mean luminance of 297 candelas per square metre. For a number of the persons tested, the mean luminance was reduced to 29.7 candelas per square metre and 2.97 candelas per square metre. With each of these persons, the test results at the lower mean luminances were the same as those obtained with the mean luminance of 297 o' candelas per square metre.
The sinusoidal grating pattern was established by known techniques, using a Joyce Electronics SGR SYS2-02A display driver, driven by a Gemini 2O80 microcomputer. Using this equipment, waveforms of 512 levels could have their contrast adjusted to 1 part in 4096. Temporal moculation of the pattern was sinusoidal and based on a single cycle lookup table of 1000 entries. The frame rate of the cathode ray tube was 100 Hz. Subjects viewed the patterns monocularly while their heads rested against chin and forehead supports. The viewing distance in each case was 72 cm, at which distance the displayed pattern subtended 12.80 in height and 160 in width.
i ii;- :iw 12 When using the drifting pattern technique for determination of the threshold contrast level for observation of the frequency-doubled pattern, the striations of the pattern were vertically oriented and were moved to either the left or the right of the cathode ray screen at a rate of 3.130 per second.
The reduction of contrast levels was to 80 per cent of the previous contrast level, and when a subject failed to identify the direction of movement of the 10 pattern, the contrast level was doubled. Between the testing steps, an unmodulated 0.5 cycles per degree egrating was displayed on the cathode ray tube screen.
In the experiments using this technique, each pattern was typically presented 26 times, and involved about 6 increases in contrast level (that is, the contrast level was reduced six times to a level at which the direction of movement of the pattern could not be *e determined by the subject). The average value of the determined thresholds was used as the threshold value for the subject.
Among the glaucoma suspects tested, two persons had been diagnosed as low-tension glaucomas, having never exhibited intraocular pressures above 21 mm of a mercury. One of these two subjects had a ring scotoma in both eyes; the other had an arcuate scotoma in one eye. Another three subjects had arcuate scotomas in one eye only, these subjects having had intraocular tensions of, respectively, 26 mm Hg, 34 mm Hg and 42 mm Hg in the affected eyes, although at the time of testing, each of these 13 subjects had their intraocular tensions controlled by topical use of TIMOPTAL (Trade Mark) to be about 13.5 mm Hg. The mean age of the normal vision group was 49.9 years. The mean age of the glaucoma suspects was 54.9 years.
Among the normal vision group, the contrast level at the threshold of observation of the frequency-doubled pattern was substantially the same for each subject, showing that there is a "normal threshold" for eq persons having healthy vision. The glaucoma suspects consistently exhibited a higher contrast level at the threshold of observation of the frequency-doubled pattern.
The results of the experiments are shown in graphical form in the accompanying drawing. As will be seen, *the ratio of the threshold contrast levels of the glaucoma suspects to the threshold contrast levels of the normal vision group is approximately 2:1 for all 9" the temporal modulation frequencies used.
Analysis of the variance in the results showed no significant age or gender effects in either of the threshold tests used.
Those skilled in the field of visual neuroscience will recognise that although specific examples of the use of the method of the present invention have been described above, modifications to the method can be made without departing from the present inventive concept.

Claims (5)

  1. 2. A method as defined in claim i, in which the step of reducing the contrast of the grating pattern comprises a steady reduction of the contrast until the frequency-doubled pattern just disappears. t S S S. 15
  2. 3. A method as defined in claim i, in which the step of reducing the contrast of the grating pattern to attain the contrast value at which the frequency-doubled pattern is no longer observed is effected by a multiple staircase, two alternative, forced-choice procedure involving the steps of adopting a first contrast value for the grating pattern, then causing the grating pattern to be moved slowly in a direction at right angles to the elongate direction of the striations of the grating pattern, and checking that the person can identify the direction of movement of the observed pattern; (ii) reducing the value of the contrast of the grating pattern by a predetermined proportion of said first contrast value then; (iii) causing the grating pattern to move slowly in a direction at right angles to the elongate direction of the striations of the pattern, and asking the person to identify the direction of movement of the observed pattern; then (iv) if the person correctly identifies the direction of movement of step (iii), repeating steps (ii) and (iii); or *SS*SS S *SSS SS S. S S. S. S S S 'V~dP S S S 0 16 g 9 e g. C egg *9 C C. C0 9 a. 0@ 9 if the person incorrectly identifies the direction of movement of step (iii), increasing the contrast of the grating pattern by a second predetermined amount, then repeating step (iii); whereby a series of contrast values at which the person fails to observe the direction of movement of the observed pattern, and thus fails to observe a frequency-doubled pattern, is obtained, an average value of said series of contrast values being adopted as said attained contrast value of the person.
  3. 4. A method as defined in claim 3, in which the series of contrast values at which the person fails to observe the direction of movement of the observed pattern comprises at least six contrast values. A method as defined in any preceding claim, in which the modulation frequency of the contrast of the grating pattern is in the range of from 20 Hz to 50 Hz.
  4. 6. A method as defined in any preceding claim, in which the modulation frequency of the contrast of the grating pattern is in the range of from 23 Hz to 45 Hz. I ii 2I~- 17
  5. 7. A method of testing a person to determine the presence of glaucomatous destruction of ganglion cells in a retina of that person, as defined in claim 1, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings. DATED this twentieth day of March 1991 THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY By its Patent Attorneys DAVIES COLLISON 0 te C C CO 0 CC CC C C. CC -c I
AU40241/89A 1988-08-26 1989-08-25 Glaucoma testing Expired AU611585B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU40241/89A AU611585B2 (en) 1988-08-26 1989-08-25 Glaucoma testing

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPJ004988 1988-08-26
AUPJ0049 1988-08-26
AU40241/89A AU611585B2 (en) 1988-08-26 1989-08-25 Glaucoma testing

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU4024189A AU4024189A (en) 1990-03-01
AU611585B2 true AU611585B2 (en) 1991-06-13

Family

ID=25625060

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU40241/89A Expired AU611585B2 (en) 1988-08-26 1989-08-25 Glaucoma testing

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU611585B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU667702B2 (en) * 1992-02-28 1996-04-04 Australian National University, The Glaucoma testing using non-linear systems identification techniques

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AUPM537994A0 (en) * 1994-04-29 1994-05-26 Australian National University, The Early detection of glaucoma
CN110200582B (en) * 2019-07-03 2022-07-12 南京博视医疗科技有限公司 Laser beam control system and method based on fundus imaging technology

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4384768A (en) * 1981-12-28 1983-05-24 Martin J. Steinbach Method and apparatus for manipulating the contrast of sine wave gratings and other visual patterns
US4526452A (en) * 1982-06-08 1985-07-02 Interzeag Ag Method and apparatus for measuring contrast sensitivity

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4384768A (en) * 1981-12-28 1983-05-24 Martin J. Steinbach Method and apparatus for manipulating the contrast of sine wave gratings and other visual patterns
US4526452A (en) * 1982-06-08 1985-07-02 Interzeag Ag Method and apparatus for measuring contrast sensitivity

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU667702B2 (en) * 1992-02-28 1996-04-04 Australian National University, The Glaucoma testing using non-linear systems identification techniques

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU4024189A (en) 1990-03-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5065767A (en) Method for use in diagnosis of glaucoma
US5912723A (en) Method and apparatus for early detection of glaucoma
SJÖSTRAND et al. Contrast sensitivity in macular disease: a preliminary report
Achard et al. Role of the completion phenomenon in the evaluation of Amsler grid results
US5539482A (en) Glaucoma testing using non-linear systems identification techniques
CA2613223C (en) Vision exercising apparatus
US5295495A (en) Glaucoma testing from observations of optokinetic nystagmus
Wanger et al. Pattern-reversal electroretinograms and high-pass resolution perimetry in suspected or early glaucoma
US6068377A (en) Visual test utilizing color frequency doubling
VÄRINEN et al. Contrast sensitivity in evaluation of visual impairment due to macular degeneration and optic nerve lesions
Wist et al. Dynamic vision based on motion-contrast: changes with age in adults
LUNDH et al. Central and peripheral normal contrast sensitivity for static and dynamic sinusoidal gratings
Wanger et al. Pattern-reversal electroretinograms in ocular hypertension
Mack et al. Is perceived motion a stimulus for smooth pursuit
Horn et al. Visual evoked potentials under luminance contrast and color contrast stimulation in glaucoma diagnosis
Odom et al. Visual function deficits in glaucoma: electroretinogram pattern and luminance nonlinearities
US6758823B2 (en) Assessment of retinal function
AU611585B2 (en) Glaucoma testing
Cox Pupillography of a relative afferent pupillary defect
Joosse et al. Quantitative perimetry under binocular viewing conditions in microstrabismus
JP7226736B2 (en) Glare perception inspection device and glare perception inspection method
TEMME et al. Eccentricity perception in the periphery of normal observers and those with retinitis pigmentosa
US7278742B2 (en) Systems and apparatus for assessment of visual field functions
Mehdorn Suppression scotomas in primary microstrabismus—a perimetric artefact
Joosse et al. The optimal stimulus to elicit suppression in small-angle convergent strabismus