AU593371B2 - Staggered spiral splitters - Google Patents

Description

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 5F 371 PATENTS ACT 1952 COMPLETE SPEC IF I CAT ION FOR OFFICE USE: Class Int.Class Application Number: Lodged: Complete Specification Lodged: Accepted: Published: Priority: e n elated Art: Thia document contains the maendments made under Section 49.

and is omrect or pri*tag.

o •J 'Name of Applicant: 9 4 Address of Applicant: Actual Inventor:

C

Actual Inventor: t ft A MINERAL DEPOSITS LIMITED 81 Ashmore Road BUNDALL QLD HANS JURGENS GROBLER Address for Service: SHELSTON WATERS, 55 Clarence Street, Sydney *Complete Specification for the Invention entitled: "STAGGERED SPIRAL SPLITTERS" The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- 1 Complete of PH7044 Dated 21-7-86 I. t -u

J

This invention relates to staggered splitters for use iiith a spiral separator, i.e. an apparatus for the separation of particles of higher density from particles Sof lower density when a mixture of such particles suspended in a slurry is fed through the separator. The separator is in the form of a generally helical sluice supported with the helix axis upright.

It is usual to feed a stream of slurry, for example water containing suspended solids, into the upper part of WQ. such a sluice and to permit the liquid and solids to flow down the sluice under gravity. If the shape of the sluice is correctly chosen, the denser particles tend to travel more slowly than the less dense particles and under the influence of gravity tend to concentrate towards the inner edge of the sluice, where a fraction of concentrated heavy iparticles may be removed by means of a splitter and a take-off.

Australian Patent Application No. 46168/72 describes a splitter having a blade extending vertically and o mounted for rotation about an upright pivotal axis in relation to a conical or cylindrical take-off in the floor of the sluice with the vertical blade diverting adjustable proportions of concentrate into the take-off. Such devices have the disadvantage that the maximum adjustment i range is limited by the necessarily planar face to the top J of the take-off where the splitter rotates and the I incorporation of such a planar surface into the floor of the helical sluice causes severe distortion to the normal 2-

I

il l- -w n- w H- l^ gi

I.

2 t- e *I t€ I t t 4- Ct- 2.

ai i a .6 shape~of the latter with consequent flow distortion if the take-off is of excessive diameter. In this case also, the Protruding splitter blade causes severe flow disturbance when rotated to a position such that little or no concentrate is taken.

In some separators the blade is mounted for translation in a radial direction as is described in Australian Application 37175/78. Other separators have been provided with a splitter blade which is mounted for rotation about an axis normal to the floor of the volute, that is to say substantially parallel to the axis of the Volute. In such cases the position of separation is adjusted by rotating the splitter blade about its axis. A portion of the splitter blade upstream of the axis, upon rotation, traverses the volute, and so adjustment is achieved.

A plurality of splitters have previously been used in spiral separators wherein a pair of splitter blades are positioned side-by-side at the bottom of the sluice wherein a concentrate/middlings splitter is positioned in the inner part of the sluice and a middling/tailings splitter is positioned adjacent to but further outward in the same radial area of the sluice with particles of high density being referred to as concentrates, of intermediate density as middlings and of low density as tailings although high or low density fractions may be the valuable compound. Such an arrangement is shown in Australian Patent No. 536,090 by Douglas Charles Wright.

3

'OPFIC-V

A

The splitter blades operate side-by-side as shown in Figure 1 of that patent specification and this avoids flow interaction between the two splitter blades. However this also results in some limitations in the effective range over which each splitter blade may be adjusted. The problem is that the arcs of movement of the splitter a blades may not overlap since the shapes of the surfaces on which the splitters seat on the sluice conflict.

For some applications, it is desirable that the effective ranges of each splitter blade should overlap particularly to permit the middlings/tailings splitter blades to move within the range of the concentrate/ middlings splitter blade so that small middlings quantities may be taken even when small concentrate Squantities are taken. This can be accomplished by moving the middlings/tailing splitter blade down the sluice so ti.'.c its arc of travel overlaps the arc of travel of the concentrate/middlings splitter blade when measured l t radially. The second splitter blade is located a S 0.:i sufficient distance downstream on the helical sluice to avoid overlapping of the splitter blade seating surfaces.

SIf the inner limit of travel of the middlings/tailing splitter blade is moved radially inwards to effectively Scoincide with the axis of rotation of the concentrate/middlings splitter blade, the middlings product quantity may be reduced to zero whatever the setting of the concentrate/middlings splitter blade.

Although the sluice surface is distorted upstream of the 4 7,

I

1 1 1 1 1 k middlings/tailing splitter blade by the concentrate/ middlings splitter blade and its seating surface, it is possible to profile these upstream distortions to reduce the consequent losses of spiral separator efficiency to extremely low levels.

The invention consists in a splitter assembly for dividing a flow of particles or slurry decending a sluice of a spiral separator, said assembly comprising a first Ci 1 pivotally mounted splitter blade having an upstream iDY'"t working edge and a second pivotally mounted splitter blade positioned downstream of said first splitter blade, said S i second splitter blade having an upstream working edge moveable from a position adjacent to the downstream end of outwardly.

According to a second aspect of the invention the Ssecond splitter blade is moveable in an arc extending outwardly from the first splitter blade.

The present invention will now be described by way of 2Q example only with reference to the accompanying drawing which shows a plan view of a splitter arrangement according to the i vention.

Referring to the drawing, a spiral separator 1 i- comprises a sluice 2 helically mounted on a separator column 3, the sluice having an inner wall 4 immediately adjacent said column and an outer sluice wall 5. On the floor of the'sluice is positioned first splitter blade 6 pivotally mounted on pin 7. Downstream from splitter t k y i I r's i' *11.it,

I

i ft t t Cc C cC I C .0 00 blade 6 is mounted splitter blade 8 on pivot 9. As can be seen from the drawing splitter blade 6 is moveable through an arc of approximately 550 and splitter blade 8 which is mounted below blade 6 and nearer the outer wall 5 is also moveable through an arc of approximately 510 Splitter blade 8 may be positioned with its upstream point adjacent outer wall 5 or may be moved to a location behind pivot 7 of splitter 6. As shown in the drawing a flow of particles or slurry decending the sluice of the spiral separator encounters the first splitter blade 6. By adjustment of splitter blade 6 concentrate is directed via discharge 10 (defined between ba2fle walls 13 and 14) while the residue is directed toward the area nearer outer sluice wall 5. As the residue continues downwardly it encounters second splitter blade 8. As can be seen from the drawing the middlings and tailings "D" are directed by blade 8 toward the outer sluice wall 5 and discharge 12. A portion may be redirected as middlings via discharge 11 (defined between baffle walls 14 and 15) by adjustment of the splitter blade 8.

Flows is further directed towards discharge by sloping parts of the trough floor indicated at 16 and 17. Flow is directed towards discharge opening 11 by sloping parts of the trough floor 18 and 19, while flow is directed towards discharge 12 by slope The present invention extends to spiral separators having two or more volute discharges like those indicated at 10 and 11 and 12 in the drawing. A plurality of spiral 6 (k N/iL i,: ;I .tra ~2~J separators according to the present invention may be envisaged and are usually employed for greater efficiency and conservation of plant space and the splitters of one spiral may be ganged with those of another.

9 o S. S OS *O 0 4

S

S'S.

a a 9* S

~S

9 945

S.

4 q~ 1' C~ t *c S 5.

ttt *514

S

o 55

S.

-7

Claims (1)

11- 11 i a aU C *CT C C Cc a c a CC Ct THE CLAIMS DEFINING THE INVENTION ARE AS FOLLOWS:- 1. A splitter assembly for dividing a flow of particles or slurry decending a sluice of a spiral separator, said assembly comprising a first pivotally mounted splitter blade having an upstream working edge and a pivotally mounted second splitter blade positioned downstream of said first splitter blade, said second splitter blade having an upstream working edge moveable from a position adjacent to the downstream end of the first splitter to a position spaced therefrom radially outwardly. 2. A splitter assembly according to claim 1 wherein said second splitter blade is moveable in an arc extending outwardly from said first splitter blade. 3. A splitter assembly according to claim 1 or 2 wherein each splitter blade has a working edge moveable to a position substantially tangential to a portion of the flow of said particles or slurry. 4. A splitter assembly according to claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein said first splitter blade is moveable through an arc of 550 and said second splitter blade is moveable through an arc of 510 5. A splitter assembly according to claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein said first splitter blade directs one portion of said flow of said particles toward a first discharge outlet and said second splitter blade directs a second portion of said flow of particles to a second discharge outlet. Fellow 1 ii. a a *o a a **aC attt 6. Ac third pC outer sl DATED t MINERAL CC Cc c r: t( r cl rr r c c rte aeca a. ac a a ae a #1c C IC C Ga C Cv eaca a *6 ai ma II -8 t I I r i: i_- r i. 1 i.-3 6. A splitter assembly according to claim 5 wherein a third portion of said flow of particles is directed to an outer sluice wall by said second splitter blade. DATED this 20th day of July 1987 MINERAL DEPOSITS LIMITED Attorney: IAN T. ERNST Fellow Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia of SHELSTON WATERS t'* 4 4 I4 c* t t AI 4 C C -9 t-9-