AU4875799A - Rules based electronic message management system - Google Patents
Rules based electronic message management system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU4875799A AU4875799A AU48757/99A AU4875799A AU4875799A AU 4875799 A AU4875799 A AU 4875799A AU 48757/99 A AU48757/99 A AU 48757/99A AU 4875799 A AU4875799 A AU 4875799A AU 4875799 A AU4875799 A AU 4875799A
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- rules
- electronic
- electronic message
- message
- messages
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L51/00—User-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, transmitted according to store-and-forward or real-time protocols, e.g. e-mail
- H04L51/21—Monitoring or handling of messages
- H04L51/214—Monitoring or handling of messages using selective forwarding
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Description
IL
S F Ref: 399190D1
AUSTRALIA
PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT °o oo
ORIGINAL
Name and Address of Applicant: Actual Inventor(s): CompuServe Incorporated 5000 Arlington Center Boulevard Columbus Ohio 43220 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Michael S. Finney, Michael L. Snider, Robin R. Bard, James W. Paynter and Randall S. Wright Spruson Ferguson, Patent Attorneys Level 33 St Martins Tower, 31 Market Street Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia Rules Based Electronic Message Management System 0008 Address for Service: Invention Title: The following statement is a full description of this Invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- 5845 RULES BASED ELECTRONIC MiNESSAGE MANAGEMfENT SYSYE__1 BACKGROUND AIND SUMNMARY OF ThE INV-\ENTION The present invention relates generally to a system for managing electronic messages, and particularly, to a system for managing delivery of electronic messages according to the message recipient's preferences.
Electronic mail, or e-mail, provides a convenient and easy means for two or more individuals to communicate electronically. E-mail systems today help users send text-based :and binary messages through extensive communication networks so that two or more users, who may be in remote locations, can communicate. E-mail may also be used for delivery of important business, financial, sports and other types of information from centralized *..repositories. The use oP e-mail today has become so pervasive that many users now need a a way to manage the influx of messages sent to their electronic mailboxes.
Today, most e-mail messages are stored in an electronic mailbox until the recipient .reads them. To aid the recipient in reading, the e -mail system presents a list of messages in chronological order. Users manage these messages by manually selecting and reading those a messages that are of interest. Users often scan either the sender information or the subject 2o heading to locate messages of interest. When the number of incoming messages is very large, the process of scanning and selecting messages to read may be very time consuming. Actually reading and responding to or forwarding the messages takes additional time. All message management decisions and related actions are left to the user.
Some e-mail systems today provide more sophisticated mechanisms-sometimes referred to as "filter and forward" mechanisims--for sorting, selecting, and responding to messages. With the mechanisms, users may d efine specific criteria-or rules-by which M
-M
messages are presented and handled in order to meet their personal preferences. For example, users define a rule so that all incoming messages are routed automatically to a different uail'box or perhaps, a paging device. A rule may be defined so that an inconaing maessage triggers the automatic sending of a related message to a specific group of users. Another rule may result in the sorting and presentation of messages according to a priority assigned by the sender. Some systems may allow users to define a list of senders from whom the recipient is willing to receive messages while all other messages are discarded automatically. Some systems may also allow users to accept only those messages relating to particular topics. In many instances, messages may be presented according to a combination of preferences or rules so that, for example, messages relating to a particular topic and from a specific sender may be forwarded automatically to a select group ofusers interested in the topic.
In addition to providing different rule sets for the filtering and forwarding of messages, e-mail systems may apply the rules at different times. For example, in many e-mail systems responsiblt for the filtering and forwarding of messages is distributed among the servers responsible for distributing the messages to individual users. If the recipient's server is not available, then the rules are not applied. Therefore, a message that should be forwarded to interested parties will not be sent until the recipient's server is available to apply the rules and perform the necessary actions. As a result, there may be a significant time delay between the time that a message is sent and the time that other interested parties learn of the message.
2 c Even if the server is available, time delays may result because the message must go to the server responsible for servicing the recipient before the rules are applied. If the recipient has defined a rule for the message to be forwarded automatically, the message makes an unnecessary, intermediate stop at the server before being forwarded according to the intended recipient's rule.
Rules may also be applied when messages arrive at a client that performs mail services. However, significant time delays may result if the client is not available. In addition, network traffic may increase as messages from the client must travel to a central distribution point before being forwarded to the appropriate location. The same problems that exist when a server applies rules late in the distribution process are present when a client applies the rules. The forwarding of messages to others is delayed until the message arrives at the client and the client is able to apply the rules.
The present invention addresses the problems that result when filter and forward rules are applied to electronic messages late in the distribution process.
10 According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided an electronic messaging system comprising: a first device capable of sending an electronic message; a second device capable of receiving said electronic message; a wide area network adapted for communication with said first device and said 15 second device and adapted for transmission of electronic messages from said first device to said second device; a set of rules defining which electronic messages should be sent to said second device; a memory unit for storing said set of rules; 20 a distributor connected to said wide area network capable of applying said set of *go* rules to said electronic message from said first device during transmission of said electronic message to said second device.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for managing electronic messages, said method comprising the steps of: providing a first device capable of sending an electronic message; providing a second device capable of receiving said electronic message; providing a computer network adapted for communication with said first device and said second device and adapted for transmission of electronic messages between said first device and said second device; defining a set of rules for accepting electronic messages at said second device; submitting said electronic message to a distributor at said computer network for application of said set of rules to said electronic message during transmission of said electronic message to said second device; and [R:\LIBL]00344.doc:BFD -3Atransmitting to said second device said electronic message that conforms to said set of rules, said transmission of said electronic message being performed by said computer network.
According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided an electronic messaging system comprising: a first device for sending an electronic message; a second device for receiving an electronic message; a computer network for accepting electronic messages from said first device and 10 l0 for sending electronic messages to said second device; i a set of rules defining which electronic messages should be sent to said second device; a memory unit for storing said rules; a distributor that is part of said computer network for retrieving said rules from said memory unit, interpreting and applying said rules to said electronic message from said first device during transmission of said electronic message to said second device, and for transmitting said electronic messages in conformance with said rules.
In the present invention, message management rules defined by the intended °recipient are applied soon after the originator sends the message so that messages may be 20 forwarded or new messages generated and sent to other users regardless of whether the a.
message may be delivered immediately to the intended recipient. Using the present invention, users specify message selection criteria based on attributes of incoming messages. Next, users specify the action to be associated with messages that meet the selection criteria. A distributor then applies the rules at the beginning of the message distribution process so that the intended recipient's specified actions are carried out even if the intended recipient is unable to receive the message. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the rule definition and application services are provided by an information service that has the ability to support a large number of users and the ability to accept incoming messages from a variety of other sources. The advantages of the present invention are explained further by the accompanying drawings and detailed description.
[R:\LIBL]00344.doc:BFD BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a flow chart of the steps for defining rules to be applie-d to a recipient's incoming messages;, Figure 2 is a diagrammatic view of the system organization for a preferred embodiment; S Figure 3 is a flow chart of the steps for applying the user-defined rules to a recipient's incoming messages; and Figure 4 is a flow chart of the steps for applying the rules during message distribution.
DETAILED DESCRIPTON OF PREFERRED
EMEBODIMNT(S)
Referring now to Figure 1, there is a preferred embodiment of the system of the present invention. Preferably, to send a message to User C 22, User A connects to an information service wide area network 14 via a modem 12. User A may be, but is not required to be, a subscriber of the information service. User A may use other means for connecting to S the information service without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
15 User A's message may pass through one or more information service mail servers before User C's workstation 22 may retrieve it via a modem 20. In some instances, the servers through wich the message passes perform one or more operations on the message before sending it to the next server. Additionally, one server may call another server to provide information necessary to complete an operation.
When User A's message arrives at the information service to be delivered to User C at the point of distribution), User C's message delivery preferences are examined to determine if any, special rules should be applied to User A's message. Preferably, the information service distributor 18 is responsible for applying the rules to User A's message.
[K for example. User C wants a copy of all messages from User A to be sent directly to Users B 26 and D 28, the distributor will ensure that arrangements are made to send User A's message 24 to Users B and D, even if User C's electronic nmailbox is unavailable or User C is not logged in.
Referring now to Figure 2, there is shown a diagrammatic view of a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2 shows the organization of servers responsible for the rule definition and application as well as message distribution.
Referrzing now to Figure 3, preferably, the rule definition process begins with the user specifing the message selection criteria 12. The selection criteria described herein is exemplary only. Fewer criteria or more detailed criteria may be used without departing from lo the scope and spirit of the present invention. Preferably, the user specifies the range of dates during which each nile will be active 14. Another selector may be an importance value such as a ahigh, normal or low 16. A message type, such as text or binary, may be specified 18.
Preferably, the user may specify a subject or originator value 20, 22.
Next, the user specifies a message action to be performed when the message selection criteria are met 24. The actions described herein are exemplary only. Other actions may be specified as well without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. I-f the associated action is to create a new message 26, then preferably, the user specifies a list of new message recipients as well as a subject and body for the new message 28. Other options may be specified for the new message such as importance or type. If the associated action is to forward the message 30, then preferably, the user specifies the forwarding address 32. If the associated action is to delete the incoming message 36, then preferably, an indicator for this action is associated with the message selection criteria 36.
lIn the next step 38, the validity of the rule is established so that the distributor is able to carry out the specified actions when the message selection criteria are met. In step 40, the valid rules are stored for later retrieval by the distributor. The same process may be used to define multiple rules. Preferably, the user is given the option of specifying an order in which the rules should be applied to incoming messages.
Referring now to Figure 4, there is shown the steps for applying the user-defined rules during message distribution. Initially, the message is sent to a mail server capable of retrieving information about the recipient 12. The mail server determines whether the recipient has defined rules for incoming messages 14. If the recipient has not defined message management rules, then the message is delivered directly to the recipient 16. If the recipient has defined message management rules, then the recipient's rules are retrieved 18 and applied to the 10 message 20. Finally, the message is delivered according the rules 22. For example, if the incoming message should result in the distribution of a new message to 5 other users, the mail server and distributor coordinate activities to ensure that the new message is created according to the rules specified by the recipient and that the new message is delivered to each of the other users.
Preferably, the retrieval and application of the message management rules are performed by a distributor working in conjunction with one or more mail servers. In an alternative embodiment, the rule retrieval and application and message delivery functions may be performed by one entity. Additionally, the functions may be performed by several entities.
More important than the number of entities involved is the point at which the rules are applied.
The present invention applies the rules soon after the message is sent by the originator so that greater efficiencies result.
The ability of the distributor to interpret user-defined rules and arrange for delivery of message based on those rules is unique to the present invention. The intended recipient's rules for message management are carried out regardless of whether the intended recipient is able to receive the naessave because the rules are applied substantially at the Primlary point of distribution. Several benefits result from the approach of the present invention. First, network traffic nny be reduced because any additional messages that should be sent as a result of the intended recipient's preferences are generated and sent from the central distribution point when User A's message arrives rather than from an alternative point that requires messages to be routed through the central distribution point anyway. Second, if the message should be forwarded directly to another recipient, network traffic may be reduced by eliminating the stop at the intended recipient's mailbox-especialy if the message must return to the centralized distribution point. Finay, the present invention results in better resource utilization because io messages that the intended recipient does not want to see may be discarded early in the distibution process. Ihe elimination of unnecessary message stops, the elimination of the :a dependency of message delivery on the availability of intended recipient's mailbox, and the reduction in network traffic result in the more timely delivery of important personal and business information in the form of electronic messages.
Claims (7)
1. An electronic messaging system comprising: a first device capable of sending an electronic message; a second device capable of receiving said electronic message; a wide area network adapted for communication with said first device and said second device and adapted for transmission of electronic messages from said first device to said second device; a set of rules defining which electronic messages should be sent to said second 10 device; a memory unit for storing said set of rules; °oo a distributor connected to said wide area network capable of applying said set of rules to said electronic message from said first device during transmission of said
9...i electronic message to said second device. S- 2. The system of claim 1, wherein a rule from said set of rules applied to said electronic message may cause the generation of one or more new messages to be sent to one or more different devices. o 3. The system of claim 1, wherein a rule from said set of rules applied to °said electronic message may cause a message to be forwarded to a different device. 4. The system of claim 1, wherein said distributor is part of an information service wide area network. The system of claim 1, wherein said set of rules includes a rule based on the originator of an electronic message, the subject of an electronic message, or the priority of an electronic message. 6. The system of claim 1, wherein a recipient of messages at said second device defines said set of rules. 7. A method for managing electronic messages, said method comprising the steps of: providing a first device capable of sending an electronic message; [R:\LIBL]00341 .doc: BFD providing a second device capable of receiving said electronic message; providing a computer network adapted for communication with said first device and said second device and adapted for transmission of electronic messages between said first device and said second device; defining a set of rules for accepting electronic messages at said second device; submitting said electronic message to a distributor at said computer network for application of said set of rules to said electronic message during transmission of said electronic message to said second device; and transmitting to said second device said electronic message that conforms to said 00°o, 10 set of rules, said transmission of said electronic message being performed by said computer network. 8. The method of claim 7, wherein a recipient of electronic messages at .to said second device defines said set of rules. *0 The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of generating one or more new electronic messages to be sent to one or more different devices in accordance "with a rule from said set of rules applied to said electronic message.
10. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of forwarding said I electronic message to one or more different devices in accordance with a rule from said set of rules applied to said electronic message.
11. An electronic messaging system comprising: a first device for sending an electronic message; a second device for receiving an electronic message; a computer network for accepting electronic messages from said first device and for sending electronic messages to said second device; a set of rules defining which electronic messages should be sent to said second device; a memory unit for storing said rules; a distributor that is part of said computer network for retrieving said rules from said memory unit, interpreting and applying said rules to said electronic message from said first device during transmission of said electronic message to said second device, and for transmitting said electronic messages in conformance with said rules. [R:\LIBL00341 .doc:BFD I I
12. The system of claim 11 wherein a recipient of electronic messages at said second device defines said set of rules.
13. An electronic messaging system, substantially as herein described with reference to Figs. 1 and 2.
14. A method of managing electronic messages, substantially as herein described with reference to Figs. 3 and 4. 10 DATED this Sixteenth Day of September, 1999 CompuServe Incorporated Patent Attorneys for the Applicant SPRUSON FERGUSON 0 [R:\LIBL]00341.doc:BFD
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU48757/99A AU731288B2 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 1999-09-16 | Rules based electronic message management system |
| AU54152/01A AU766895B2 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 2001-06-29 | Rules based electronic message management system |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/436571 | 1995-05-08 | ||
| AU59194/96A AU706649B2 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 1996-05-08 | Rules based electronic message management system |
| AU48757/99A AU731288B2 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 1999-09-16 | Rules based electronic message management system |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU59194/96A Division AU706649B2 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 1996-05-08 | Rules based electronic message management system |
Related Child Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU54152/01A Division AU766895B2 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 2001-06-29 | Rules based electronic message management system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU4875799A true AU4875799A (en) | 1999-11-25 |
| AU731288B2 AU731288B2 (en) | 2001-03-29 |
Family
ID=3744386
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU48757/99A Expired AU731288B2 (en) | 1995-05-08 | 1999-09-16 | Rules based electronic message management system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| AU (1) | AU731288B2 (en) |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5317568A (en) * | 1991-04-11 | 1994-05-31 | Galileo International Partnership | Method and apparatus for managing and facilitating communications in a distributed hetergeneous network |
| US5283856A (en) * | 1991-10-04 | 1994-02-01 | Beyond, Inc. | Event-driven rule-based messaging system |
-
1999
- 1999-09-16 AU AU48757/99A patent/AU731288B2/en not_active Expired
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU731288B2 (en) | 2001-03-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| AU706649B2 (en) | Rules based electronic message management system | |
| US5057935A (en) | Method for confirmation of document recipient in a data processing system | |
| USRE40804E1 (en) | Filter-in method for reducing junk e-mail | |
| US20030115270A1 (en) | High performance email relay system technical field | |
| US6816884B1 (en) | System and method for creating conversationally-styled summaries from digesting email messages | |
| US8280965B2 (en) | Method and system for managing electronic mail | |
| US6779022B1 (en) | Server that obtains information from multiple sources, filters using client identities, and dispatches to both hardwired and wireless clients | |
| US6195686B1 (en) | Messaging application having a plurality of interfacing capabilities | |
| US6941304B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for performing enterprise email management | |
| US6768790B1 (en) | Message automated information system and importance navigator | |
| US20100198930A1 (en) | E-Mail Client with Programmable Address Attributes | |
| WO2000029988A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for performing enterprise email management | |
| US20040219936A1 (en) | Method of distributing messages | |
| EP0958560A1 (en) | System for routing electronic mails | |
| CN102710538B (en) | For message server and the method for notifying user to arrive about electronic information | |
| JP2008504632A (en) | Message transmission / reception and posting system, transmission / reception and posting method, and computer-readable storage medium storing a program embodying the method | |
| AU731288B2 (en) | Rules based electronic message management system | |
| AU766895B2 (en) | Rules based electronic message management system | |
| US7269417B1 (en) | Information services enhancements | |
| US20020184323A1 (en) | Hybrid electronic e-mail server system and method | |
| US20030135574A1 (en) | Independent notification of urgent messages | |
| CN1825847B (en) | Multi-information processing system and implementing method thereof | |
| US20030212748A1 (en) | Mail-incoming rejection system, mail-incoming rejection method, and mail-incoming rejection program | |
| KR20040028066A (en) | Internet Networking Method for Reserving and Sending Massive Message | |
| Jakobs | User requirements vs. OSI application services |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGA | Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent) | ||
| PC | Assignment registered |
Owner name: CRANBERRY PROPERTIES, LLC Free format text: FORMER OWNER WAS: COMPUSERVE INCORPORATED |