AU4255993A - Membrane extraction process - Google Patents
Membrane extraction processInfo
- Publication number
- AU4255993A AU4255993A AU42559/93A AU4255993A AU4255993A AU 4255993 A AU4255993 A AU 4255993A AU 42559/93 A AU42559/93 A AU 42559/93A AU 4255993 A AU4255993 A AU 4255993A AU 4255993 A AU4255993 A AU 4255993A
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- liquid
- alcohol
- process according
- membrane
- water
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Landscapes
- Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
Description
MEMBRANE EXTRACTION PROCESS
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a membrane extraction process for selectively removing volatile components from liquid mixtures . Background of the Invention
Whilst the following description is in terms of alcohol reduction from a liquid mixture, it is to be understood that the invention is not so limited .
Alcohol reduction is at present contemplated in many industries . A major area is that of aqueous ferments such as beer and wine . In the present climate, where drink-driving is strongly discouraged , and for which penalties are severe, there is great need to provide beverages which are alcohol-reduced or free of alcohol , but which taste at least very similar to alcohol-containing beverages .
So-called "light" beers have been developed and marketed in recent years, but to produce a palatable product, a complicated multi-stage brewing process must be used .
The situation with regard to "light" wines is far less developed . Those alcohol-reduced wines which have been produced have usually employed a form of distillation , resulting in the unacceptable alteration of the taste of the final product.
Membrane technology for separation of gaseous and liquid components is very well developed . If a multi-component fluid mixture is brought in contact with one surface of n membranous barrier - that is , a solid , homogenous film - under conditions where the other side of the membrane is in contact with another fluid , there may be a transfer of components from one fluid to the other through the membrane .
A known example of alcohol extraction using a membrane has been described in a Membrana brochure titled "New process for alcoholic reduction of Beer and other Alcoholic Drinks by Means of Dialysis" by F. J. Schmitz, Membrana GmbH, Wuppertal, Germany (1983) . In this process a feed stream of beer was passed over a hydrophillic membrane whereby alcohol and other components such as water and other volatiles were transported across the membrane without phase change.. A reduction of alcohol content in the feed stream was reported at R.29% vol°5 to 3.81 vol%. However loss of other components such as flavours and colours, Bitter units (EBC) 27 -22 and colour (EBC) 10.5 -10.0 was also reported together with loss of other organic compounds which were not derived from alcohol . Consequently such dialysis processes are not selective of one volatile component over other components in the solution and result in corresponding loss of water, flavour and colour components. Consequently the change in taste is unacceptable.
To an extent the selectivity of the extraction process for volatile components can be Improved by the use of a microporous hydrophobic membrane has been described in the paper entitled "Evaporation of alcohol/water reactives through hydrophobic porous membranes" by E. Hoffman, et al; Journal of Membrane Science; 34, pp 199-206 (1987) . This process discloses the evaporation of dilute solutions of methanol, ethanol, propanol in water with transport of vapour through a microporous hydrophobic porous membrane.
In this process the feed side of the membrane is maintained at atmospheric pressure whilst the pressure at the vapour phase side of the membrane is 7kPa. The vapour is enriched in alcohol only when the alcohol concentration of the feed solution is beJow a certain level which for ethanol/water solutions was 2% by weight. Consequently, this process is unsuitable for alcohol removal from commonly consumed alcoholic beverages such as beer (5%) and wine (12%) .
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide an improved membrane extraction process for the selective extraction of a volatile component from liquid mixtures.
Description of the Invention
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a process for selectively extracting one or more volatile components from other components in a liquid mixture comprising the steps of : (a) contacting one. surface of a microporous hydrophobic membrane with the liquid mixture;
(b) contacting the other surface of the membrane with a liquid in which one or more volatile components are soluble ; and (c) collecting the liquid mixture; whereby the volatile component or components evaporate from the liquid mixture, pass through the membrane and are dissolved in the liquid .
No special temperature or pressure conditions need to be applied . In another preferred form of the invention the liquid mixture is an aqueous solution and the volatile component is an organic compound . More preferably the liquid mixture is an aqueous solution containing alcohol as the volatile component .
In a preferred form of the invention the process includes the further steps of collecting the liquid and recovering the volatile component. The liquid may be recycled after the volatile component has been at least partially removed from the liquid.
One particularly preferred form is a process for reducing the alcohol content of an aqueous mixture comprising the steps of : (a) contacting one surface of a microporous hydrophobic membrane with the aqueous mixture ;
(b) contacting the other surface of the membrane with water or a dilute aqueous saline solution; and
(c) collecting the aqueous mixture; wherein alcohol evaporates from the aqueous mixture, passes through the membrane and is dissolved in the water or dilute salt solution to form an alcohol enriched liquid.
Preferred additional steps are :
(d) collecting the alcohol enriched extracting liquid;
(e) boiling the alcohol enriched liquid to remove the alcohol therefrom and form an alcohol depleted liquid ; and
(f) recycling at least a part of alcohol depleted liquid to step
(b) .
The extracting liquid is one in which the volatile component to be extracted is highly soluble. The differences in the activity of the desired component in the two liquid phases causes a vapour pressure gradient across the membrane which provides the driving force for the transfer of that component from the liquid mixture into the extracting liquid.
When the liquid mixture is an aqueous solution containing alcohol, and the downstream liquid is water or an aqueous solution of a non-volatile solute the vapour pressure of alcohol at the liquid mixture side of the membrane is higher than on the other side. Consequently, the alcohol evaopσrates from the mixture, moves as vapour across the membrane and dissolves in the downstream liquid. In another preferred form of the invention, the process comprises the further step of adjusting the concentration of solutes in the extracting liquid in order to control the absolute and relative rates of transport of
water and other volatile components between the two liquids . In particular this procedure can be employed to :
(1) remove undesirable components from the liquid mixture;
(2) prevent loss of desirable components from the liquid mixture ; or (3) add to the liquid mixture desirable components not originally present in that solution .
Any microporous membrane the pores of which are not wetted by either liquid phase can be used for this purpose .
If the solution to be processed is aqueous , and the component to be extracted is a volatile solute such as alcohol, a preferred class of membranes which are non-wettable by water and aqueous solutions , but freely permeable to gases and vapours . Examples include microporous polytetrafluorethylene membranes such as those sold under the trade name Goretex, or microporous polypropylene membranes such as those sold under the trade marks Celgard and Accurel.
Any other microporous , non-water-wettable structure available in thin-film or hollow-fiber form , including ceramic and metallic as well as organic polymeric structures are suitable for this application . Such hydrophobic microporous membranes are particularly well suited to the process of the present invention because they are highly permeable to highly volatile solutes such as alcohol , ketones , aldehydes and esters and virtually impermeable to nonvolatile solutes such as sugar or salts , and only slightly permeable to low-volatility solules such as flavour and fragrance components present in most alcoholic beverages and ferments . EXAMPLES
The invention will now be more fully described by reference to further examples .
In the following experiments, the "feed" (or "upstream") liquid is that which contains the component to be removed , and the "downstream" liquid is that to which the volatile component is desired to be passed, through the membrane. Example 1
In the first experiment, the upstream liquid selected was wine and the downstream liquid selected was an aqueous salt solution (or brine) containing 27% sodium chloride by weight. The membrane was a microporous poly tetraflou roe thylene membrane sold under the trade name GoreTex. A reduction of alcohol concentration in the feed stream from about 12° to about 9° within 10 minutes was observed. Thereafter a much slower removal, (accompanied by transfer of water from the wine across the membrane) , occurred, which resulted in unwanted concentration of non-volatiles in the feed stream. The inability of the brine solution to further remove alcohol from the feed stream is a consequence of the fact that the vapour pressure of alcohol over a 3% solution of alcohol in the brine is actually greater than that over a 9% alcohol ferment. Moreover, the reduced vapour pressure of water over the brine relative to that over the wine resulted in the (undesirable) removal of water from the ferment.
Hence, it was believed that by substituting water (or a more dilute brine) as the extracting solution, more efficient removal of alcohol, without concomitant removal of water from the ferment , could be achieved. This illustrates the potential utility of adjustment of the extracting solution composition to optimize alcohol removal without significant alteration in concentration of other ferment components . Moreover, the final alcohol concentration in the processed ferment could be easily controlled by adjusting the alcohol content of the extracting solution to the desired level . It was clear that if the stripping water (downstream fluid) is recycled without the alcohol being distilled off, the process slows as alcohol in the feed decreases and alcohol in the (downstream) solution increases . The
process will stop when the vapour pressures of alcohol over the two fluids are equal .
Example 2
In a second experiment, substantially pure water was used as the downstream fluid . It was found that this arrangement produced rapid alcohol removal , without detectable concentration of non volatile solutes in the feed stream .
In this manner , it was possible to remove virtually all the alcohol from the feed . It was found that the alcohol free wine produced from experiment 2 was found to have retained most of its flavour/ fragrance volatiles , and accordingly the taste of the product was acceptable .
It is considered that the process of this invention prevents removal of those flavour/fragrance volatiles because of the combination of a high rate of alcohol removal and low processing temperature under which conditions the much less volatile flavour and fragrance components remain in the feed liquid .
Example 3
The invention can also be used to manipulate the concentration of any volatile component in the feed . For the purposes of this example , volatile components are divided into three categories :
1) the primary solvent (water in the case of wine) ;
2) the primary volatile solute (alcohol in the case of wine) ; and
3) secondary volatile solutes (flavours and fragrances in the case of wine) .
Through manipulation of the extracting solution ( stripper) composition , the fluxes (rates of transfer across the membrane) of these three categories of volatile components can be varied independently . For
example, adding alcohol to the stripper will decrease the flux of alcohol from the feed to the stripper. Adding a non-volatile solute such as salt or sugar to the stripper will increase the flux of water from the feed to the stripper. Adding high concentrations of fragrances to the stripper will cause a negative flux of fragrances, i.e . , will cause a flow of fragrances from the stripper into the feed . Hence, by manipulating the levels of alcohol , salt and fragrances in the stripper , specified concentrations of alcohol , water and fragrance components can be achieved in the feed. The manipulation of water and alcohol fluxes has been demonstrated experimentally for a GoreTex membrane with a 0.2 μm pore size. Alcohol fluxes have been measured for a range of feed concentrations up to 12% alcohol in wine. According to the relevant microporous membrane gas permeation theory, the flux of a gas or vapour is proportional to the pressure difference of that gas or vapour across the membrane. The measured alcohol fluxes have been correlated by the equation Flux = 1.6 , where the flux is measured in kg of alcohol per square metre of membrane per hour (kg/m2hr) , and δPe is the difference in alcohol vapour pressure across the membrane, measured in kPa. Water vapour fluxes have also been measured for the GoreTex membrane for various concentrations of NaCl in the stripper solution up to 27 wt%. The measured water fluxes have been correlated by the equation Flux = 2.0 , where
is the difference in water vapour pressure across the membrane. Also, alcohol fluxes from wine to a 27 wt% NaCl solution have been measured . The alcohol flux decreases as the feed concentration decreases and the stripper alcohol concentration increases , and alcohol flux was found to cease when the feed contained 9% alcohol and the stripper contained 3% alcohol (in a 27 wt% NaCl solution ) . The presence of NaCl in the stripper in this experiment increased the alcohol activity to such an extent that the vapour pressure of alcohol over the 3% stripper solution was equal to the vapoiir pressure of alcohol over the 9% alcohol wine.
The above experimental correlations can be used to demonstrate the control of alcohol and water fluxes in the practice of the invention . The
Table below shows alcohol and water fluxes from a 9% alcohol wine to various stripper solutions .
Stripper Composition (%) Flux (kg/m2 hr)
Number Alcohol NaCl Alcohol Water
1 0 0 1.0 -0.2 2 0 7 1.0 0 3 0 27 1.0 1.38 4 3 0 0.54 -0.2 5 3 7 0.40 0 6 3 27 0 1 .38
The first three entries in the Table show that by having no alcohol in the stripper, and by varying the NaCl concentration in the stripper , alcohol fluxes can be kept constant , while water fluxes can be varied from -0.2 to 1.38 Entries 1 and 4 , 2 and 5 , and 3 and 6 show that for any given NaCl composition (or any water flux) , alcohol fluxes can be decreased by the addition of alcohol to the stripper solution . In a similar fashion, the flux of any volatile component can be manipulated by adjusting its concentration in the stripper solution .
Claims (16)
1. A process for selectively extracting one or more volatile components from other components in a liquid mixture comprising the steps of : -
(a) contacting one surface of a microporous hydrophobic membrane with the liquid mixture;
(b) contacting the other surface of the membrane with an extracting liquid in which one or more volatile components is soluble; and
(c) collecting the liquid mixture; whereby the volatile component or components evaporate from the liquid mixture, passes through the membrane and are dissolved in the liquid.
2. A process according to claim 1 comprising the further steps of collecting the extracting liquid, and recovering the volatile component.
3. A process according to claim 2 comprising the further step of recycling the liquid after the volatile component has been at least partially recovered from the extracting liquid.
4. A process according to either claim 1 or 2 wherein the liquid mixture is an aqueous solution.
5. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein, the extracting liquid is an aqueous solution of a non-volatile solute.
6. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the extracting liquid is water.
7. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the extracting liquid is an aqueous solution of a non-volatile solute .
8. A process according to claim 7 wherein the solute is a water soluble salt liquid is a dilute brine .
9. A process according to claim 7 wherein the solute is a sugar.
10. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the volatile component is an organic compound .
11. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the liquid mixture is an aqueous solution containing alcohol .
12. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 9 comprising the further step of adjusting the concentration of solutes in the extracting liquid to control evaporation and passage of volatiles or water across the membrane .
13. A process for reducing the alcohol content of an aqueous mixture comprising the steps of :
(a) contacting one surface of a microporous hydrophobic membrane with the aqueous mixture;
(b) contacting the other surface of the membrane with water or a dilute aqueous salt solution ; and
(c) collecting the aqueous mixture; wherein alcohol evaporates from the aqueous mixture, passes through the membrane and is dissolved, in the water or dilute salt, solution to form an alcohol enriched liquid.
14. A process according to claim 11 comprising the further steps of :
(d) collecting the alcohol enriched extracting liquid ;
(e) boiling the alcohol enriched liquid to strip the alcohol therefrom and form an alcohol depleted liquid ; and. (f) recycling at least a part of alcohol depleted liquid to step
(b) .
15. A process according to either claims 10 or 11 comprising the further step of adjusting the concentration of solutes in the water or dilute salt solution to control evaporation and passage of volatiles or water across the membrane.
16. A process according to any one of claims substantially as hereinbefore described by reference to the examples .
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU42559/93A AU4255993A (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1993-04-30 | Membrane extraction process |
AU17793/97A AU708066B2 (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1997-04-09 | Novel methods and apparatus for dealcoholization |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AUPL2190 | 1992-04-30 | ||
AUPL219092 | 1992-04-30 | ||
AUPL280892 | 1992-06-05 | ||
AUPL2808 | 1992-06-05 | ||
AU42559/93A AU4255993A (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1993-04-30 | Membrane extraction process |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU17793/97A Division AU708066B2 (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1997-04-09 | Novel methods and apparatus for dealcoholization |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU4255993A true AU4255993A (en) | 1993-11-29 |
Family
ID=27154144
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU42559/93A Abandoned AU4255993A (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1993-04-30 | Membrane extraction process |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU4255993A (en) |
-
1993
- 1993-04-30 AU AU42559/93A patent/AU4255993A/en not_active Abandoned
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5013447A (en) | Process of treating alcoholic beverages by vapor-arbitrated pervaporation | |
US6162360A (en) | Membrane process for making enhanced flavor fluids | |
US4778688A (en) | Production of low-ethanol beverages by membrane extraction | |
Karlsson et al. | Applications of pervaporation in food processing | |
US5013436A (en) | Production of low-ethanol beverage by membrane extraction | |
US4933198A (en) | Production of low-ethanol beverage by membrane extraction | |
EP2331241B1 (en) | Pervaporation process for separating liquid mixtures | |
AU690723B2 (en) | Organic and inorganic vapor permeation by countercurrent condensable sweep | |
JPH0699005A (en) | Method for organic/aqueous extraction | |
EP0657205A2 (en) | Pervaporation by countercurrent condensable sweep | |
JPH025849A (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing alcohol content of alcoholic beverage | |
US4816407A (en) | Production of low-ethanol beverages by membrane extraction | |
WO1993022036A1 (en) | Membrane extraction process | |
AU654410B2 (en) | Process for removing alcohol from liquids | |
EP1682492A2 (en) | Acetonitrile recycling process | |
US5030356A (en) | Process for recovering organic components from liquid streams | |
EP0590075A1 (en) | Process for recovering organics from liquid streams | |
KR910014501A (en) | How to reduce alcohol content in distilled spirits | |
Brüschke | Removal of ethanol from aqueous streams by pervaporation | |
AU4255993A (en) | Membrane extraction process | |
JPH06199830A (en) | Separation method of trioxane from water-base mixture | |
WO1990008183A1 (en) | Process of treating alcoholic beverages by vapor-arbitrated pervaporisation | |
JPH0330663A (en) | Production of alcoholic drink | |
EP0057785B1 (en) | Process for the preparation of a flavored alcoholic beverage | |
JPS62225207A (en) | Separation of liquid mixture |