AU3919497A

AU3919497A - Process for shut-down of a membrane operation

Info

Publication number: AU3919497A
Application number: AU39194/97A
Authority: AU
Inventors: William B. Dolan; Kishore J. Doshi
Original assignee: UOP LLC
Current assignee: Honeywell UOP LLC
Priority date: 1996-05-16
Filing date: 1997-09-23
Publication date: 1999-04-15
Anticipated expiration: 2017-09-23
Also published as: CN1115187C; CA2215777C; CA2215777A1; NO307036B1; CN1212175A; NO974330L; NO974330D0; AU737647B2

Description

Vi-'JIJUU awlP Regulallon 3.2(2)

AUSTRALIA

Patents Act 1990

ORIGINAL

COMPLETE

SPECIFICATION

STANDARD

PATENT

Application Number: Lodged: Invention. Title: PROCESS FOR SHUT-DOWN OF A MEMBRANE OPERATION the following statement is a full description of this invention, Including the best method of performing it known to us -Ar

I

IF

I I r

I

r r

I

"PROCESS FOR SHUT-DOWN OF A MEMBRANE OPERATION"

FIELD

This invention relates to a procedure for operating a continuous membrane separation process wherein membrane degradation may be prevented during membrane shut-down, particularly during sudden or unexpected shut-down of the membrane separation zone, and most specifically the invention relates to a method for safe membrane shut-down within a process for the removal of carbon dioxide from light hydrocarbon gases.

BACKGROUND

to Permeable membrane processes and systems are known in the art and have been employed or considered for a wide variety of gas and liquid separations. In such operations, a feed stream is brought into contact with the surface of a membrane, and the more readily permeable component of the feed stream is recovered as a permeate stream, with the less-readily permeable component being withdrawn from the membrane system as a non-permeate stream.

Membrane separation modules are maintained at operating conditions which result in a nonpermeate side pressure at which the feed gas is introduced and the non-permeate stream is withdrawn, and a permeate side pressure at which the permeate stream is withdrawn. The pressure on the non-permeate side of the membrane is higher than the pressure on the permeate side, and the pressure differential between the non-permeate and the permeate sides of the membrane generally determines the degree of separation attained by the membrane separation. Membranes are widely used to separate permeable components from gaseous feed streams. Examples of such process applications may include removal of acid gases from natural gas streams, removal of water vapor from air and light hydrocarbon streams, and removal of 25 hydrogen from heavier hydrocarbon streams. Membranes are also employed in gas processing applications to remove permeable components from a process gas stream. Natural gas as l 9 3? ~-m

W"

i-M -v-fw 1 2 the natural gas by bulk methods employing membrane systems.

The inherent simplicity/of s u ch;fluid sepa ation operations constitutes an incentive in the Sart to expand the use of membrane systems in practical commercial operations. The selectivity and permeability characteristics of such membrane systems must be compatible with the overall producion requirenits of a given application. It is also necessary that the membranes exribit acceptable stability and do not suffer undue degradation of their perfom-r nce properties in the course of practical commercial operations.

t0o Membranes for gas processing typically operate in a continuous manner, wherein a feed gas stream is introduced to the membrane gas separation module on a non-permeate side of a membrane. The feed gas is introduced at separation conditions which include a separation i -pressure and temperature which retains the components of the feed gas stream in the vapor phase, well above thdew point of the gas stream, or the temperature and pressure condition at which is condensationof one of the components might occur. However, if the flow of the feed gas stream is interrupted, or the feed pressure is suddenly reduced, the residual material within the membrane separation zone could reach its dew point and condensation would result. The feed gas stream fed to the gas separation membrane may contain a substantial amount of moisture and :i 1 may cause corrosion and condensation in instrumentation, piping, pneumatic tools, ventilators and other equipment associated with the gas separation membrane. In certain instances, it may Salso lead to inferi performance of the gas separation membrane and/or other equipment such as adsorption traps. In-anticipation of a reasonable amount of condensation, membrane systems are often oversized to compensate for the loss of membrane surface over the useful life of the membrane: For high volume gas treating application, this over design of membrane capacity can 2s be very costly.

For gas drying applications, methods has been disclosed for the employing sweep gases to remove moisture from the membrane before it condenses. For example, in air separation Sapplications which constitute a highly desirable field of use for permeable membranes, oxygen is 3o typically the more readily permeable component of the feed air for particular membranes and is 2 o withdrawn as the permeate gas.- In such embodiments, nitrogen is the less-readily permeable

Q*-

tg' 3 component and is recovered as non-permeate gas. Liquid water is generally removed.from.feed air upstream of the membrane by conventional means such as knockout drums. Any water vapor present in the feed air will permeate the membrane resulting in a dry non-permeate gas. In air separation applications,, the performance characteristics of the membranes are sensitive to the s presence of certain contaminants in the feed air stream. Exposure to such contaminants may result in a significant reduction in the permeability of the membrane in use. Fortunately, most contaminants commonly present in ambient air, such as light hydrocarbons, H20, and CO 2 have been found to result in, at most, a modest decrease in membrane permeability. The presence of even relatively low concentrations, less than 1 ppm by volume as of heavy hydrocarbon oil vapors, such as might enter the feed air stream from an oil lubricated air compressor, can result in rapid and extensive loss of membrane permeability.

In response to such an undesirable decrease in membrane permeability, it is presently common membrane practice to size the active membrane surface area with a safety factor sufficiently large to compensate for the anticipated permeability loss from all sources. Initially the membrane system is significantly oversized for the desired product flow, and the feed gas compressor is typically operated in a turndown mode. As permeability degradation proceeds, either the operating temperature or pressure, or both, are increased to compensate for the decrease in permeability. In some instances, it is necessary or desirable to by-pass some of the 20 modules in the membrane system initially so as to reduce excess membrane area employed when the membranes exhibit their full permeability capability and subsequently to bring such by-passed modules on stream as degradation of the initially employed modules progresses. In addition to a significant capital cost penalty associated with the provision of extra membrane surface area, such a membrane system must operate over a significant portion of its operating life under off design 25 conditions and that the control strategy for such a membrane system is more complex than for a system operating closer to its optimum design conditions...... clse to it optijuum d ;i

-I

o o ~s r i i

P

i;: r~

I~

As an alternative to such over design of membrane systems to compensate for degradation in use, attempts have been made to restore lost performance, but such efforts were initially unsuccessful in developing an economically feasible means for restoring the permeability of degraded membranes. Restoring any portion of the degraded membranes would require

A

4 interruption of the gas treating operation, displacing large quantities of gas. Neither over design.

of the membrane system nor interruption of gas product operations for membrane restoration treatment, or a combination of these approaches is an entirely satisfactory means for overcoming permeability degradation in practical commercial air or other gas separation operations. Further improvement in the response to the problem of membrane degradation is highly desirable in the membrane art.

US-A-4,881,953 discloses an approach to the problem of preventing premature loss of membrane capacity by passing the feed gas mixture through a bed of adsorbent material, such as io activated carbon to adsorb contaminants such as heavier hydrocarbon contaminants without the removal of lighter hydrocarbons. It requires that a means for removing moisture from the feed gas be provided because high moisture levels generally limit the ability of activated carbon Sadsorbents to retain their adsorptive capacity for heavy hydrocarbons.

US-A-5,030,251 relates to the operation of a membrane separator which removes water vapor from a moist air feed to produce a drier air product. When such a membrane operation is stopped, some residual water vapor remains in the membrane separator and when the feed flow is resumed the residual water vapor flows out with the non-permeate stream. This results in a less dry product produced during restarts than during the steady-state operation of the membrane separator. To correct this problem, a portion of the non-permeate product is saved in a storage tank and supplied to the membrane separation at a time when the feed is not being supplied to the S separator to purge the residual water vapor betweencycles. When the feed cycle is off, the air pressure of the non-permeate side of the separator reduces to atmospheric pressure. Because the pressure in the storage tank is greater than atmospheric, some of the stored non-permeate bleeds back to form the purge stream.

US-A-5,383,956, relates to processes and apparati for starting up and shutting down membrane gas separation systems treating a wet gas feed gas stream. The process employs a membrane dryer module and a gas separation membrane module in various start up sequences 3o and shut-down sequences for drying and separating the feed gas stream. In the shut-down of such a process comprising at least one gas separation module and at least one membrane dryer, -7,

V-

r I ccl-F the flow of the feed gas is stopped. to both membrane modules, and the.modules are depressurized by removing pressurized gas from the non-permeate sides of the modules. The pressurized gas is allowed to permeate through the respective membrane modules to the permeate sides, followed by purging both the permeate and non-permeate sides of the membrane modules with a dry gas s stream.

When a natural gas stream is processed in a membrane separation zone, the presence of heavy hydrocarbons, such as C, plus hydrocarbons, and particularly Co plus hydrocarbons under certain conditions such as reduction of temperature and pressure, or a change in composition can to result in the loss of membrane capacity and often permanent damage to the membrane. Processes are sought to prevent such damage to the membrane separation unit.

It is an object of the invention, therefore, to provide an improved shut-down process for a membrane system which process overcomes the problem of degradation of permeability during hydrocarbon gas production operations such as in natural gas production.

It is another object of the invention to provide a membrane system and shut-down process obviating the need for significant over design or for premature replacement of degraded membrane modules and minimizing the need for the interruption of gas producing operations for 20 the treatment of membrane modules for restoration of the permeability characteristics thereof.

SUMMARY

25 The invention provides a process for the safe shut-down of a membrane separation system which miimizes -the risk -of damage to the membrane.. It was discovered Ihat membrane processing streams, comprising less-readily permeable, condensible components such as C, S hydrocarbons in an environment in which condensing of such hydrocarbons may occur, can be subject to catastrophic failure when such hydrocarbon condensation is followed by conventional 3o shut-down procedures such as depressurization of the non-permeate side. -Depressurization of the :A Smembrane upon shut-down was found to be desirable only when it occurred simultaneously with *s s f or after purging of the non-permeate zone of the membrane unit. By the present invention, it was found that condensation followed by drying, preferrably without change in the relative pressures of the permeate and non-permeate sides of the membrane, avoided degradation and surprisingly maintained or even improved selectivity.

In a broad aspect of the present invention is a process for the safe shut-down of a membrane separation zone used for the removal of a readily permeable component from a feed gas mixture comprising the readily permeable component, a non-permeable component, and a less-readily permeable, condensible component. The process comprises intermittently passing the to feed gas mixture at separation conditions to a membrane separation zone to provide a nonpermeate stream and a permeate stream. The membrane separation zone has a non-permeate side and a permeate side. The non-permeate stream is withdrawn from the non-permeate side of the membrane separation zone and a permeate stream at a permeate pressure is withdrawn from the permeate side of the membrane separation zone. When the feed gas mixture is not passed to the is membrane separation zone, a purge stream reduced in the less-readily permeable, condensible component is passed at a pressure greater than the permeate pressure used in the separation step to the non-permeate side of the membrane separation zone to remove at least a portion of a residual gas remaining in the non-permeate side of the membrane separation zone before the residual gas condenses in the membrane separation zone. Thereafter, the shut-down operation is completed by depressurizing the separation zone.

o r .;rs s *6 :iNi c r: W: T.

iQ k f In a specific embodiment of the invention, the invention relates to a process used intermittently for the removal of carbon dioxide from a hydrocarbon gas feed stream to produce a sales gas stream. The hydrocarbon gas feed mixture comprises C, to C, hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide and hydrocarbons. The C6 hydrocarbons are less-readily permeable and Scondensible. The hydrocarbon gas feed mixture is passed to a membrane separation zone having a non-permeate zone and a permeate zone at separation conditions to provide a non-permeate stream withdrawn from the non-permeate zone and a permeate stream at a permeate pressure withdrawn from the permeate zone. The non-permeate stream comprises C 6 hydrocarbons and a 30 reduced amount of carbon dioxide relative to the hydrocarbon gas feed mixture. The permeate stream is enriched in carbon dioxide relative to the hydrocarbon gas feed mixture. Intermittently, i r

I

L:

B

h j g ~-ii -i {1 .r a -4 7 when the hydrocarbon feed mixture is not passed to the membrane separation zone, a.purge.

stream reduced in C, 6 hydrocarbons relative to the C 6 hydrocarbons in the non-permeate stream is intermittently passed at a pressure greater than the permeate pressure to the non-permeate zone to prevent condensation of C 6 hydrocarbons in the non-permeate stream remaining in the nons permeate zone.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of the separation process that is subjected to the shutdown process of the present invention.

SDETAILED DESCRIPTION The invention is useful for the rejection of carbon dioxide from a hydrocarbon or natural gas stream in a membrane separation zone to provide a purified natural gas stream which can be subsequently processed in a natural gas process plant for the further removal of heavy hydrocarbons such as C 6 hydrocarbon to provide a sales gas stream or purified natural gas stream. The gas feed stream may be passed to a membrane separation unit to provide a permeate .i gas stream comprising carbon dioxide and a non-permeate gas comprising light hydrocarbon:.

Preferably, the natural gas feed stream comprises heavy hydrocarbons in an amount greater than 500 ppm and more preferably the gas feed stream comprises 500 ppm to 2 mol-%- heavy hydrocarbons.

S- The term "enriched" as utilized herein is.meant to refer to the concentration of .a component of a product stream in relation to the concentration of that component in the feed stream. For example, the permeate stream from the membrane separation zone will be enriched in the readily permeable component relative to the concentration of: the readily permeable component in the feed. The term "membrane separation zone" means one or more device having S at least one membrane useful for permeating or separating readily permeable components from a feed gas mixture. The term "dew point" means temperature at.a given pressure wherein vapor such as hydrocarbon or water begins to condense- Permeable membranes capable of separating at least one selected component from a fluid s, mixture, either gas or liquids, are considered in the art as convenient, potentially highly advantageous means for achieving desirable fluid separation andlor concentration. Membranes suitable for the present invention include composite membranes such as those membranes disclosed in US-A-4,822,382.

The term "intermittently" refers to a continuous process which has periods of intermission, particularly unplanned or sudden intermissions or interruptions in the normal feed flow. During the period of interruption the membrane must be safely shut-down or damage to the membrane may occur. The present invention provides a process for the safe shut-down of a membrane that is particularly useful for such unplanned, or intermittent shut-downs wherein the conditions identified herein which result in damage to the membrane are mitigated.

Upon shut-down, condensation in a membrane may result from a phenomena known as "retrograde condensation." Retrograde condensation refers to condensation which occurs in a S' manner which is opposite to expected behavior. For example, in a membrane when a mixture of gases is present, condensation may occur when the pressure is reduced. According to the present invention, a feedstream comprising a mixture of a permeable, non-condensible component and a less-readily permeable, condensible component is passed to a membrane unit. The membrane S comprises a non-permeate zone from which a non-permeate stream is withdrawn and a permeate zone from which a permeate stream is withdrawn. When the membrane is subject to a sudden S 25 interruption and the termination of the flow of the feedstream to the membrane, there is a potentil for condensationp the membrane. Although the flowof the feedstream has stopped the permeation of the permeable, non-condensible component continues. This continuation of the permeation process often results in a decrease in pressure in the non-permeate zone of the membrane. Combined with a Joule-Thompson cooling effect, both temperature and pressure on S 30 the nonpermeate side are reduced. As the pressure in the non-permeate zone decreases, the 6 partial pressure of the less-readily permeable, condensible component increases. Unless some change is introduced to the r ,n-permeate zone, the partial pressure of the less-readily permeable, ,7 7 4 -1-I 9 1 L condensible component:may reach a point at which liquid will form and condensation will take place. The present invention acts to mitigate this retrograde condensation by purging the nonpermeate zone of the membrane unit with a purge stream which maintains the partial pressure of the less-readily condensible component in the non-permeate zone above-the dew point, or the point at which condensation will occur. For example, in a process for the treating of a natural gas stream, the invention comprises passing at an operating pressure a mixture of permeable, non-condensible light hydrocarbons such as C, to C, hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide and lessreadily permeable, condensible components such as C 6 or Co- hydrocarbons to a membrane unit having a non-permeate zone and a permeate zone. A non-permeate stream reduced in carbon to dioxide is withdrawn from the non-permeate zone at a pressure essentially equal to the operating pressure, and a permeate stream enriched in carbon dioxide relative to the feedstream is withdrawn from the permeate zone at a low pressure. Suddenly terminating the feedstream flow to the membrane and the blocking of the non-permeate and permeate flows results in the decrease in pressure of the non-permeate zone as carbon dioxide continues to permeate through the membrane. The removal of carbon dioxide from the non-permeate zone by permeation increases the partial pressure of the C' or Co, less-readily permeable, condensible component and, if not prevented, may result in condensation and damage to the membrane. According to the present :i invention, upon interruption of the feedstream flow, the non-permeate zone is purged with a purge stream such that the partial pressure of the less-readily permeable, condensible component is maintained above the point of condensation. This requires that the purge gas stream comprise less of the less-readily permeable, condensible component than the amount of less-readily permeable, condensible component in the non-permeate zone. Preferably, the purge gas stream reduced in the less-readily permeable, condensible component comprises less than 90 mol-% of the less-readily permeable, condensible component in the non-permeate stream, and more 25 preferably, the purge gas stream comprises less than 10 mol-% of the less-readily permeable, condensible component in the non permeate stream, and most preferably, the purge gas stream comprises less than 0.1 mol-% of the less-readily permeable, condensible component in the nonpermeate stream.

Membrane operation is measured by the selectivity of the membrane and the permeability of a component through the membrane. These parameters depend upon the partial pressure "1 driving forces between the non-permeate and permeate zones for each component. In the .S

I

-,1 L E separation of two components in a membrane unit when the molar flow ratio of permeate flow to feed flow is low, the selectivity is the product of the ratio of the mole fractions of the components in the feedstream and the inverse ratio of the partial pressure driving force between the non-permeate and permeate zones, wherein the partial pressure driving force for a given s component of a mixture is the difference between the partial pressure of the component in the feed less the partial pressure of the component in the permeate. As stated in equation form: S x,*(ppe ppp)/x*(ppn PPi) wherein xi and x, are the feed mole fractions of components 1 and 2; ppa and ppu are the partial pressures of the components 1 and 2 in the feedstream; and ppPI and ppa are the partial pressure of the components 1 and 2 in the permeate stream. Permeability for a low molar flow ratio of permeate flow to feed flow, expressed in terms of each component, is the flow of the component through the membrane divided by the product of the surface area of the membrane S is5 and the partial pressure driving force for that component between the feedstream and the permeate partial pressures. In equation form, the permeability of component 1 is expressed as I follows: as o 20 PM F, A, (P*x l'' /*t ',y wherein F is the permeate flow rate from the membrane zone; A is the surface area of the membrane; P, and P, are the total pressures of the feedstream and the permeate stream; and x,, and. x are the mole fractions of component -1 at the permeate end and feedstream end of the membrane.

In one embodiment, the.purge gas comprises the sales gas from the gas processing plant downstream of the membrane separation zone. In another embodiment, the purge gas comprises an adsorber effluent stream derived from the adsorption of the heavier hydrocarbons from a portion of the feed gas stream. According to the invention, a portion of the feed stream is passed to an adsorption bed containing a selective adsorbent for the adsorption of heavy hydrocarbons to produce the adsorber effluent essentially free of hydrocarbons. When the feed to the membrane is resumed, the adsorption bed may be regenerated in the conventional manner with a heated ai 2i ;1 'i .i: -9-

F

1; I, I ;1 11 regeneration gas stream. Although any suitable gas stream may be employed for such purpose, it is preferred that the regeneration gas stream be selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, a fuel gas stream, portions of the sales gas, permeate gas, and non-permeate gas streams, and mixtures thereof. Permeate gas is more preferred because it is essentially free of heavy hydrocarbons such as C. or Co,, hydrocarbons. The spent regenerant gas can be employed for fuel use.

The adsorption zone of the present invention relates to conventional thermal swing processing in which each bed of an adsorption zone undergoes, on a cyclic basis, adsorption at an to adsorption temperature wherein the more readily adsorbable component(s) in the feed stream are selectively adsorbed to provide an adsorption effluent stream enriched in the less-readily adsorbable components, regeneration at a desorption temperature that is higher than the adsorption temperature which is conducted by passing a purge gas at an elevated temperature, equal to or higher than the desired desorption temperature through the bed, and cooling the bed to the adsorption temperature by passing a purge gas therethrough. Such process steps are disclosed, for example, in above-cited US-A-4.484,933.

It is to be understood that the adsorption zone of the present invention contains an adsorption bed containing adsorbent suitable for adsorbing the particular components to be adsorbed therein. It is to be also understood that the term "countercurrent" denotes that the direction of gas flow through the adsorption bed, is countercurrent with respect to the direction of feed stream flow. Similarly, the term "cocurrent" denotes flow in the same direction as the feed S stream flow. The term "enriched" is intended to be with reference to the feed stream composition unless otherwise noted.

r l@ i

E'

It will also be understood that the-invention can be carried out using a suitable adsorbent material in the adsorption bed having a selectivity for various components of a feed stream over other such components, thereby providing a less-readily adsorbable component and a more readily adsorbable component. In the present invention, the more readily adsorbable components are heavy hydrocarbons such as C6 hydrocarbons and water and the less-readily adsorbable components are C, C hydrocarbons. Suitable adsorbents known in the art and commercially available include crystalline molecular sieves, activated carbons, activated clays, silica gels, gi i 8: ~i~ a activated aluminas and.mixtures thereof. The crystalline molecular. sieves..include .zeolitic molecular sieves.

Zeolitic molecular sieves in the calcined form may be represented by the general s formula; Me 2 ,O A1 2 0 3 xSiO, where Me is a cation, x has a value from 2 to infinity, and n is the cation valence. Typical wellknown zeolites which may be used include: chabazite also referred to as zeolite D, clinoptilolite, EMC-2, zeolite L, ZSM-5, ZSM-11, ZSM-18, ZSM-57, EU-1, offretite, faujasite, ferrierite, mordenite, zeolite A, ZK-5, zeolite rho, zeolite Beta, boggsite, and silicalite. The adsorbent of the present invention will be selected from these zeolite adsorbents and mixtures thereof. Detailed descriptions of some of the above identified zeolites may be found in D. W.

Breck, ZEOLITE MOLECULAR SIEVES, John Wiley and Sons, New. York, 1974, hereby incorporated by reference.

It is often desirable when using crystalline molecular sieves that the molecular sieve be agglomerated with a binder in order to ensure that the adsorbent will have suitable particle size.

Although there are a variety of synthetic and naturally occurring binder materials available such as metal oxides, clays, silicas, aluminas, silica-aluminas, silica-zirconias, silica-thorias, silica- S berylias, silica-titanias; silica-alumina-thorias, silica-alumina-zirconias, mixtures of these and the like, silica binders are preferred. Silica is preferred because it may be employed to agglomerate the molecular sieve without substantially altering the adsorptive properties of the zeolite. The choice of a suitable binder and methods employed to agglomerate the molecular sieves are generally known to those-skilled in the art and need notbe-further described herein.-. S- The adsorption process operates most efficiently ;when the adsorption temperature, the temperature at which the adsorption step takes place, is preferably in the range of 5 oC to 80 C. :The desorption temperature, the temperature at which the desorption effluent is recovered, is preferably in the range of 120 oC to 315 "C.

oota ppl-mm gm

I

13 Experimental.results presented hereinbelow show that when a membrane separation unit processing a gas mixture containing a condensible component experiences a sudden loss of feed flow and during the loss of feed flow the non-permeate zone of the separation unit is purged with a purge gas which comprises less condensible component than in the non-permeate zone, damage to the membrane may be successfully prevented and possibly even improved. When condensation is followed by or results from depressurization or when condensation occurs by permitting the permeate zone pressure to rise, damage to the membrane results.

The combination of a separate adsorption zone to provide purge gas for the membrane io during feedstream outages and the use of the permeate stream during normal membrane operation to regenerate the adsorption zone results in a novel approach to maintaining membrane capacity and preventing damage to membrane systems in large commercial processing plants.

*l) 4 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING S In the drawing, the proces.

flow diagram in which such detai circuits, compressors, and simil understanding of the techniques within the purview of one skilled With reference now to F pressure ranging from 700 kPa (1 25s ranging from 25-60 °C is intei 200 and 210. The hydrocarbon g and heavy hydrocarbons such as comprises a non-permeate zone comprising heavy hydrocarbons feed stream is withdrawn from a equal to the sepaiation pressure v withdrawn from the permeate zo s of the present invention is illustrated by means of a simplified Is as pumps, instrumentation, heat-exchange and heat-recovery ar hardware have been deleted as being non-essential to an involved. The use of such miscellaneous equipment is well in the art.

ig. 1, a hydrocarbon gas feed stream 200 at a separation 100 psia) to 10.5 MPa.(1500 psia) and a separation temperature rmittendly passed to a membrane separation zone 400 via lines as feed stream comprises CI-C, hydrocarbons, .arbon dioxide, C6 or C 1 0 hydrocarbons. The membrane separation zone 400 400a and a permeate zone 400b. A non-permeate stream and having a reduced amount of carbon dioxide relative to the non-permeate zone 400a at a non-permeate pressure essentially ia line 220 and a permeate stream enriched in carbon dioxide is ne at a permeate pressure ranging from 100 kPa (15 psia) to 4 14 1050 kPa (150.psia) via line 260 and line 280. The non-permeate stream.220 is.passed.to a separation zone 465 wherein the hydrocarbons such as C 6 hydrocarbons are removed to produce a sales gas stream in line 230 which is withdrawn as a sales gas production line 250.

The process is operated in an intermittent manner such that when the feed stream is unavailable, the membrane separation zone 400 is shut-down. By the process of this invention, when the feed stream 200 flow is interrupted, a portion of the feed stream 200 is passed via line 310, valve 450, and lines 320 and 330 to adsorption zone 460. Adsorption zone 460 contains an adsorbent selected from the group consisting of activated carbon, silica gel, alumina molecular o1 sieves, and combinations thereof to selectively remove at least a portion of the C6' hydrocarbon from the gas feed stream aid produce a purge gas stream in line 360 that comprises less than the non-permeate stream C 6 hydrocarbons. When the feed stream is not passed to the membrane separation zone, the purge gas stream is passed to the non-permeate zone via lines 360, 380, valve 430 and line 390 to sweep any residual non-permeate gas comprising condensible C6,' is hydrocarbons remaining in the non-permeate zone 400a prior to reducing the pressure in the nonpermeate zone.

IV.

The adsorption zone is thus available during intermittent feed stream outages to provide a purge gas stream. Preferably, the purge gas stream comprises a portion of the non-permeate stream depleted in the less-readily permeable, condensible component, and more preferably, the purge gas comprises a portion of the feed gas mixture depleted in the less-readily peimeable, condensible component relative to. the non-permeate stream. When this purge stream is employed to sweep the residual, non-permeate gas from the non-permeate zone, the condensation S of heavy hydrocarbons is prevented and damage to the membrane separation zone is thus 25 prevented. During those periods when the feed stream is passed to the membrane separation zone, theadsorption zone is.regenerated by any one of the following operations: A second purge gas stream such as a portion of the sales gas in line 240; a fuel gas stream in line 500; or a portion of the permeate stream in line 270; is passed via lines 240, 290, and 290' to heater 410 which heats the second purge gas stream to a regeneration temperature ranging from 30 °C to 300 °C to provide a heated regeneration gas stream which is,passed via line 300, valve 420, and line 360 to the adsorption zone 460. Thus the adsorption zone may be regenerated with a second purge gas stream selected from the group consisting of a portion of the sales gas, a fuel gas A 4 S.stream, a portion of. the permeate stream, nitrogen, a portion. of the. non-permeate stream and mixtures thereof. It is preferred that the permeate stream be employed as the regenerant during the normal operation of the membrane unit. The permeate stream is essentially free of heavy hydrocarbons and always available for this regeneration without requiring special storage. A s spent regeneration gas is recovered from the adsorption zone and passed via line 330, line 340, valve 440, and line 350 where it is withdrawn from the system. The spent regeneration gas 350 may be used-to provide fuel gas within the separation zone 465.

to EXAMPLES The following examples of membranes operating in a potentially condensing environment were based on the performance of membrane micromodules, each containing .2800 mm 2 composite membrane surface having a separation layer comprised of at least one poly (tetramethyl) bisphenol A phthalate as disclosed in US-A-4,822,382. The micromodules were S pressurized to a separation pressure of 3.6 MPa (515 psia) with a prepared feed stream without S the withdrawal of a non-permeate stream. The condensible-loaded gas feed stream was prepared S by sparging a hydrogen gas stream of 99.9% purity through a liquid hydrocarbon mixture of vol-% benzene and 90 vol-% hexane.to saturate the hydrogen gas stream with the hydrocarbon mixture at a temperature of 24 oC (75 As part of each test, the selectivity of the membrane was measured before and after the exposure to the saturated hydrogen gas stream by pressurizing the membrane micromodule with a gas mixture of 10 vol-% carbon dioxide and 90 vol-% methane. For these examples, the molar ratio bf the permeate flow to the feed flow was less than 3%y.

-CONTROL EXAMPLE I CONDENSATION FOLLOWED BY DEPRESSURIZATION A hydrogen gas stream was sparged as described herein above and passed to-a membrane microodulefor 6 hours at a pressure of 3.6 MPa and atemperature of 24 "C measured at the sparger while the temperature of the micromodule was maintained at 37 oC (100 OF) without a 16 non-permeate flow from the membrane module. The micromodule was then depressurized to atmospheric pressure. Following depressurization, a gas mixture containing 10 vol-% carbon dioxide and 90 vol-% methane was passed to the membrane micromodule to repressurize the micromodule to 3.6 MPa (515 psia) at a temperature of 49 °C (120 OF) and the selectivity of the membrane was determined. The results are shown in Table 1. Prior to the test, the four samples tested had selectivities of 6 and permeabilities of 4. As shown in column 0, immediately following condensation and depressurization, the average permeability reached a value of 46 and the selectivity was reduced to 1. Clearly, the effect of depressurization following condensation produced severe damage to the membrane. Furthermore, even after the micromembrane samples to were dried with the CO 2 /CH, gas mixture for several days and at a temperature of 37 oC (100 °F) and a pressure of 3.6 MPa (515 psia) the COz/CH, selectivity and CO 2 permeability did not :return to original levels as shown at 4, 11, and 18 days from the point of condensation and depressurization. Thus, depressurization after condensation appeared to catastrophically damage the membrane in a manner which could not be recovered even by drying the membrane module.

TABLE 1 CONDENSATION FOLLOWED BY DEPRESSURIZATION BEFORE DAYS AFTER CONDENSATION

CONDENSATION

0 4 11 18 COz PERMEABILITY 4 46 6 5 COzfCM4 SELECTIVITY 6 1 2 2 2 INVENTION EXAMPLE II NO DEPRESSURIZATION FOLLOWING CONDENSATION The membrane micromodule was supplied with the sparged hydrogen gas of the Control Example I at 3.6 MPa and 37 OC for 6 hours without withdrawing a non-permeate stream. At

A!

17 the conclusion of the 6 hour period, a non-permeate.stream was withdrawn at a rate equal to the feed rate for a period of 30 minutes while still introducing the sparged hydrogen gas. At the end of the 30 minute period and without depressurizing, the CO 2

/CH

4 feed was re-introduced and the permeability and selectivity measured. The results are shown in Table 2 at time periods before s and at 3 and 4 days following condensation. The results show that the membrane properties were maintained and surprisingly were even slightly improved when, following exposure to a condensing hydrocarbon, the membrane was dried with a purge gas essentially free of condensible components while maintaining the differential pressure between the non-permeate and permeate sides of the membrane.

TABLE 2 is NO DEPRESSURIZATION FOLLOWING CONDENSATION

CO

2

PERMEABILITY

COCH SELECTIVITY

BEFORE

4 6 DAY 3 6 7.5 DAY 4 9 20 CONTROL EXAMPLE I CONDENSATION FOLLOWED BY RAISING PERMEATE PRESSURE In this Example, the membrane micromodule was sparged with the hydrocarbon saturated -hydrogen gas ofExample I for 6 hours at the conditions of Invention Example I. The permeate flow from the membrane module was blocked and the permeate side of the membrane was raised to the feed pressure for a period of 10 minutes. The introduction of the sparged hydrogen gas was replaced by the COJfCH 4 feed gas flow of Example I and the permeate and non-permeate flows were established at an operating pressure of 3.6 MPa and a temperature of (49 120 oF.

The measured permeability and selectivity are shown in Table 3 at 1 day following condensation. Following condensation and allowing the permeate pressure to rise to the feed 4 4; 4I

I

18 pressure resulted in the loss. of membrane selectivity.

TABLE 3 PERMEATE BLOCKED WITH NO DEPRESSIJRZATION BEFORE AFTR I DAY

-CO

2 PERMEABL.fIY 5 13 C0 2 1C11 4 SELECTIVITY 7

A)

PS.

Claims

1. A process for the shut-down of a membrane separation zone used for removal of a readily permeable component from a feed gas mixture comprising said readily permeable s component, a non-permeable component, and a less-readily permeable, condensible component, said process comprising the steps of: a) passing said feed gas mixture at separation conditions to said membrane zone having a non-permeate side and a permeate side to provide a non-permeate stream withdrawn from the non-permeate side and a permeate stream withdrawn from the permeate side at a permeate pressure; b) intermittently passing a purge stream at a pressure greater than the permeate pressure used in step reduced in said less-readily permeable, condensible 5 component relative to said non-permeate side of said membrane separation zone when said feed gas mixture is not passed to the membrane separation zone to remove at least a portion of a residual gas remaining in the non- permeate side before said residual gas condenses in said membrane separation zone; and c) completing the shut-down operation by depressurizing said separtion zone.

2. The process of claim 1 further comprising performing step c) simultaneously i withstep(b).

3. The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein said less-readily permeable, condensible S component comprises C 6 hydrocarbons and said readily permeable component comprises carbon dioxide.

4: The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein said readily permeable component comprises carbon dioxide.

I S_ ii' f The process of any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein said purge stream is selected from the group-consisting of nitrogen, methane, ethane, propane, butane, and mixtures thereof.

6. The process of any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein said purge stream comprises a portion of said non-permeate stream depleted in said less-readily permeable, condensible component.

7. The process of any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein said purge stream comprises said feed gas mixture depleted in said less-readily permeable, condensible component relative to thenon-permeate stream.

8. The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the feed gas mixture is a hydrocarbon feed gas mixture comprising C, to C 6 hydrocarbons, C 6 t hydrocarbons, and carbon dioxide.

9. The process of claim 8 wherein the purge stream is reduced in C6' hydrocarbons and comprises less than 90 mol-% of the C, 6 hydrocarbons in the non-permeate stream. The process of claims 8 or 9 wherein the separation conditions include a 20 separation pressure ranging from 700 kPa (100 psia) to 7.5 MPa (1500 psia) and a separation temperature ranging from 25 °C to 60 °C. DATED this 23rd day of September 1997. WATEEKARK PATENT TRRADEVARK A TORNEYS 290 BUJRWooD ROAD HAmMOR. VIC. 3122. 1- i LLi i4i