AU2652895A - A process for improving the effectiveness of a process catalyst - Google Patents

A process for improving the effectiveness of a process catalyst

Info

Publication number
AU2652895A
AU2652895A AU26528/95A AU2652895A AU2652895A AU 2652895 A AU2652895 A AU 2652895A AU 26528/95 A AU26528/95 A AU 26528/95A AU 2652895 A AU2652895 A AU 2652895A AU 2652895 A AU2652895 A AU 2652895A
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
catalyst
reformer
refinery
reducing agent
mekor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
AU26528/95A
Other versions
AU704259B2 (en
Inventor
Todd L Foret
William D. Mansfield
Hubert P. Vidrine Jr.
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ashland Inc
Original Assignee
Drew Chemical Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Drew Chemical Corp filed Critical Drew Chemical Corp
Publication of AU2652895A publication Critical patent/AU2652895A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU704259B2 publication Critical patent/AU704259B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J38/00Regeneration or reactivation of catalysts, in general
    • B01J38/48Liquid treating or treating in liquid phase, e.g. dissolved or suspended
    • B01J38/50Liquid treating or treating in liquid phase, e.g. dissolved or suspended using organic liquids
    • B01J38/52Liquid treating or treating in liquid phase, e.g. dissolved or suspended using organic liquids oxygen-containing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/90Regeneration or reactivation
    • B01J23/96Regeneration or reactivation of catalysts comprising metals, oxides or hydroxides of the noble metals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G35/00Reforming naphtha
    • C10G35/04Catalytic reforming
    • C10G35/06Catalytic reforming characterised by the catalyst used

Description

A PROCESS FOR IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PROCESS CATALYST
TECHNICAL FIELD This invention relates to a process for improving the effectiveness of a process catalyst. The process comprises treating the process catalyst with a reducing agent selected from the group consisting of hydrazine, oximes, hydroxylamines, carbohydrazide, erythorbic acid, and mixtures thereof.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Catalytic reforming is used in the refining of crude oil to increase the yield of higher octane gasoline which sells at higher prices. In catalytic reforming, the paraffins and naphthenes are passed through the reformer with the goal of minimizing cracking. Instead their structure is rearranged to form higher octane aromatics. Essentially catalytic reforming converts low octane paraffins to naphthenes. Naphthenes are converted to higher octane aromatics. Aromatics are left essentially unchanged.
Refineries generally use a platinum catalyst or platinum alloy supported on a silica or silica-aluminum substrate as the reforming catalyst, although other catalysts, including the oxides of aluminum, chromium, molybdenum, cobalt, and silicon can be used.
In the strong reducing environment and elevated temperatures (500°C to 600°C) of the reformer, the catalyst becomes contaminated with metals, such as lead, iron, nickel, vanadium, sulfur compounds, arsenic, and coke. The result is that the catalyst becomes inactive and the efficiency of the reformer decreases. In order to reduce contamination of the reformer catalyst, most reformer catalysts have a guard bed for the catalyst which removes contaminants from the feed stream. Over a period of time. contaminants still break through to the reformer catalyst and reduce catalytic activity.
As the activity of the catalyst decreases, the reaction temperature of the reformer is increased to maintain the desired output. Additionally, organic chloride containing compounds are fed to the reformer to reactivate the catalyst on a periodic basis or continuously at a low dosage. The activity of the reformer catalyst is a function of surface area, pore volume, active platinum and organic chloride content. The efficiency of the reformer is reduced during operation by coke deposition, chloride loss, and contaminants such as sulfur, lead, heavy metals, and oxygen.
When the catalyst becomes depleted, it is necessary to regenerate the catalyst. The activity of the catalyst can be restored by high temperature oxidation of the coke followed by chloriding. This regenerative process allows the reformer to operate for up to a 24 month period between regenerations. Normally the catalyst can be regenerated at least three times before it has to be replaced and returned to the manufacturer for reclamation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a process for improving the effectiveness of a process catalyst which comprises: treating said process catalyst with an effective amount of a reducing agent selected from the group consisting of hydrazine, oximes, hydroxylamines, carbohydrazide, erythorbic acid, and mixtures. Indirect evidence and direct evidence indicates that the treatment of the process catalyst by the subject process reduces or retards the formation of metal contaminants, oxygen, sulfur, and coke on the process catalyst. Thus the process could be alternatively characterized as a process for reducing and/or retarding the contamination of a process catalyst.
Reducing or retarding the contamination of the process catalyst results in the increased effectiveness of the reformer. This is shown by yields across the reformer, higher octane gasoline, and less benzene in the reformate. Moreover, since yields of higher octane gasoline are increased, the refinery can blend lower grade fuels into the gasoline. Furthermore, the reformer can also be operated at lower temperature and pressure thus minimizing coking and cracking while making the same octane gasoline and improving yield. Finally, the refinery can save money and time spent on catalyst regeneration by increasing the life of the catalyst and the time between regenerations.
Process catalysts which benefit from this treatment include reforming, hydrotreating, hydrocracking, isomerization, hydrogenation, and guard bed catalysts. Treating the process catalyst involves adding the reducing agent to a process stream which will enable the reducing agent to come into contact with the process catalyst. Examples of process streams which will provide such contact between the reducing agent and the process catalyst include stripper steam, crude overhead, naphtha, splitter feed, refining feed, and feedlines for chloriding chemicals used in the reformer.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a simple refinery.
DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
BZE — benzene.
CCAT — catalyst contamination after treatment.
CCBT — catalyst contamination before treatment, CYH — cyclohexane.
DREWCOR — DREWCOR is a registered trademark of Ashland Oil, Inc. DREWCOR 2130 corrosion inhibitor is chemically defined as a blend of amines and MEKOR such that the amount of MEKOR is about 5 percent by weight.
FEED POINT — place where reducing agent is injected into the sulfur containing hydrocarbon process stream.
REFINERY PROCESS CATALYST — a refinery process catalyst is a catalyst used in refining crude oil, particularly catalysts used in the reforming of gasoline.
REFINERY PROCESS STREAM — any refinery stream which comes into contact with a refinery process catalyst, particularly hydrocarbon streams which flow through the reformer of the refinery and come into contact with the reformer catalyst, most particularly three phase refinery process streams which carry a liquid hydrocarbon phase, a gaseous hydrocarbon phase, and an aqueous phase.
MCP — methyl cylcopentane.
MEKOR — MEKOR is a registered trademark of Ashland Oil, Inc. and is chemically defined as methyl ethyl ketoxime [H3C(C==NOH)CH2CH3] .
MOTOR OCTANE NUMBER (MON) — motor octane number measured by ASTM D-357 and is a guide to engine performance at high speeds or under heavy load conditions. PETROLEUM PRODUCTS — products produced by refining crude oil including gasoline, diesel fuel, propane, jet fuel, kerosene, propane, naphtha, benzene, gasoline, aniline, etc. ppm — parts per million MEKOR. REFORMATE — reformed aromatics, primarily naphtha, which is upgraded in octane by means of catalytic reforming.
RESEARCH OCTANE NUMBER (RON) — research octane number measured by ASTM D-2699. A standardized test engine operating under standardized conditions (600 rpm) is used. Results are comparable to those obtained in an automobile engine operated at low speed.
SAMPLE POINT — place where a sample of a treated hydrocarbon stream is taken to determine if there was a reduction in catalyst contaminants.
SUM C6 — sum of compounds having 6 carbon atoms.
R + M = average of RON and MON. 2
YIELD — a percentage calculated by subtracting the liquid weight of the product that comes out of the reformer from the liquid weight of the feed which goes into the reformer and then dividing by 100.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF DRAWING
FIG. 1 illustrates the flow chart of a simple refinery. It shows the sample points 1-12 for the process streams tested, feedpoints for MEKOR 21-27, storage tanks
31-34, reformers 41-44, vessels 51-61, boiler 71, and hydrogen flare 72. Raw untreated crude oil 31 is fed to the desalter 54 where it is desalted and pumped into the crude tower 51. From the crude tower, a crude gasoline fraction is pumped into the raw gas accumulator 53 and then to the splitter tower 55. Fractions of the separated gasoline are pumped from the splitter tower to the depropanizer 57, the reformer 41-44, and to the hydrogen separator 59. The fraction from the hydrogen separator is pumped to the stabilizer tower 60. MEKOR is fed into the process at feedpoints 21-27. Sample points include 1-12.
The specific components in Fig. 1 are identified as follows: SAMPLE POINTS
1 RAW CRUDE
2 CRUDE OUT OF DESALTER 3 WATER OUT OF DESALTER
4 DIESEL TO STORAGE TANK
5 WATER OUT OF RAW GAS ACCUMULATOR
6 SPLITTER BOTTOMS
7 STABILIZER BOTTOMS 8 WATER OUT OF STABILIZER ACCUMULATOR
9 STABILIZER PROPANE 0 WATER OUT OF SPLITTER ACCUMULATOR 1 WATER OUT OF DEPROPANIZER ACCUMULATOR 2 DEPROPANIZER PROPANE
CHEMICAL FEED POINTS 1 MEKOR INTO RAW CRUDE MEKOR INTO STRIPPING STEAM TO CRUDE TOWER 3 MEKOR INTO CRUDE TOWER REFLUX 4 DREWCOR 2130 INTO CRUDE TOWER REFLUX MEKOR INTO SPLITTER TOWER FEED 6 1,1,1 TRICHLOROETHANE INTO REFORMATE FEED MEKOR INTO REFORMERS
STORAGE TANKS
RAW CRUDE
DIESEL
GASOLINE
PROPANE
REFORMERS
REFORMER #1
REFORMER #2
REFORMER #3 44 REFORMER #4
VESSELS
51 CRUDE TOWER
52 DIESEL DRIER
53 RAW GAS ACCUMULATOR
54 DESALTER
55 SPLITTER TOWER 56 SPLITTER ACCUMULATOR
57 DEPROPANIZER TOWER
58 DEPROPANIZER ACCUMULATOR
59 HYDROGEN SEPARATOR
60 STABILIZER TOWER 61 STABILIZER ACCUMULATOR
OTHER
71 BOILER 72 HYDROGEN FLARE
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
This process relates to improving the effectiveness of a refinery process catalyst. It is believed this improved effectiveness results because the treatment reduces and/or retards the contamination of the refinery process catalyst. Sources of catalyst contamination are metals, such as lead, iron, vanadium, and nickel, sulfur compounds, arsenic, and coke.
The reducing agents used in this process for improving the effectiveness a process catalyst are selected from the group consisting of hydrazine, oximes, hydroxylamines (such as N,N-diethylhydroxylamine) , erythorbic acid, and mixtures thereof. These reducing agents are described in U.S. Patents 5,213,678 and 4,350,606 which are hereby incorporated by reference. Preferably used as reducing agents are oximes such as the ones described in U.S. Patent 5,213,678 as having the formula:
wherein Rx and R2 are the same or different and are selected from hydrogen, lower alkyl groups of 1-8 carbon atoms and aryl groups, and mixtures thereof. Most preferably used as the oxime are aliphatic oximes, particularly methyl ethyl ketoxi e.
An effective amount of reducing agent used to improve the effectiveness of the process catalyst will depend somewhat upon the specific result wanted: improvement of the reformer yield, improved yield of high octane gasoline, reduced yield of benzene, reducing or retarding the contamination of the refiner. Actually, all these benefits are interrelated, and it is difficult to relate an effective amount of reducing agent to one of these parameters, or state an exact amount of reducing agent which will relate to all benefits wanted. However, it can be stated in general that an effective amount will range from 5 ppm to 100 ppm of reducing agent based upon the catalyst feed stock, preferably from 50 ppm to 100 ppm. The catalyst feed stock typically consists of splitter bottoms, reformer feed, and process streams entering the reformer catalyst. Preferably the reducing agent is added to the process stream continuously. The following detailed operating examples illustrate the practice of the invention in its most preferred form, thereby permitting a person of ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. The principles of this invention, its operating parameters, and other obvious modifications thereof will be understood in view of the following detailed examples.
EXAMPLES The following examples will illustrate the use of
MEKOR to improve the efficiency of a process catalyst used in the reformer of a refinery and the octane rating of the gasoline coming out of the reformer which is typically operated at temperatures of 500°C to 525°C and is under a pressure of 200 to 300 psig. The process catalyst was a platinum catalyst arranged on a fixed bed. MEKOR was added to the reformer 41-44 to a pressurized naphtha feed line 25. The temperature of the naphtha feed line was about 250 °C to about 300°C. The refinery used to test the effect of adding
MEKOR to a process stream was a small refinery which refines approximately 10,000 barrels of crude oil per day. The diagram of the refinery is shown in Figure 1.
EXAMPLES
Control Examples C1-C3 in Table I show how the catalyst was working in the reformer before adding MEKOR.
Examples 1-2 in Table II show how the addition of 50 ppm
MEKOR into the naphtha feed line 25 flowing to the splitter tower 55 affected the effectiveness of the catalyst in terms of hours of operation and output. TABLE I (Control) (Reformer Length of Operation - Before MEKOR Addition)
TABLE II (Reformer Length of Operation - After MEKOR Addition)
Example Start of End of Run Hours of Throughput Run Operation Bbls.
1 10/8/93 1/11/94 2,304 149,125
2 1/16/94 3/26/94 1,668 100,238
3 1,986 124,681 Average
A comparison of the data in Tables I and II clearly shows that the addition of MEKOR to the reformer more than doubles the hours of operation and barrels of throughput when MEKOR is added to the naphtha process stream feeding the reformer and comes into contact with the reformer process catalyst.
A sample of the reformate leaving the reformer before and after the treatment is measured for octane rating, benzene, and aniline. Table III, IV, and V show how the reformer was operating relative to these outputs before MEKOR was introduced into the reformer. Table IV shows how the reformer operated after adding 75 ppm of MEKOR to the naphtha stream (feedpoint 25) flowing to the reformer. TABLE III (Control) Reformer Catalyst Performance Data Before MEKOR Addition
Example Reformer Hours Into Bbls. Octane R+M Aniline Yield % Feed (bpd) Run Thruput 2 Since Startup
C4 1750 168 9837 93.90 -15 77.99
C5 1715 192 11670 93.80 -14 78.57
C6 1647 216 13429 93.50 -11 79.06
C7 1571 240 15108 93.50 -10 79.72
C8 1469 264 16677 93.60 -14 81.09
Avg. 1630 93.66 -12 79.29
Table IV
(Reformer Catalyst Performance Data After MEKOR Addition)
Example Reformer Hours Into Bbls. Octane Aniline ϊield % Feed (bpd) Run Thruput R+M 2 Since Startup
3 1550 132 8884 93.00 -12 91.24
4 1550 156 10541 93.00 -10 89.75
5 1335 180 11968 97.00 -25 91.99
6 1606 252 17211 97.00 -20 86.55
7 1573 276 18891 97.00 -20 87.74
Avg. 1523 95.40 -17 89.45
Tables III and IV show the addition of MEKOR increases yield and octane number and decreases the aniline number. Table V Benzene Produced From Hydrocracking Reaction
Example Hexane MCP CYH BZE Sum C6 BZE from MEKOR Hydro- ppm Cracking
CIO 2.337 0.367 0.030 9.245 9.642 2.508 0.0 |
10 2.462 1.010 0.045 7.120 8.175 1.041 20.0 |
Table V shows that the addition of MEKOR lowers the amount of benzene produced from the hydrocracking reaction. This is significant because future regulations by the Environmental Protection Agency will limit the amount of benzene in gasoline to less than one percent by weight. Furthermore, if higher octane gasoline can be produced in a higher yield with less benzene, undesirable side reactions will be reduced.

Claims (8)

CLAIMSWe claim:
1. A process for improving the effectiveness of a refinery process catalyst which comprises: treating said refinery process catalyst with an effective amount of a reducing compound selected the from the group consisting of hydrazine, oximes, hydroxylamines, carbohydrazide, erythorbic acid, and mixtures thereof.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said process catalyst is a catalyst used in the reformer of a refinery operation.
3. The process of claim 2 wherein the reducing agent is contacted with refinery process catalyst by feeding the reducing agent through a refinery process stream selected from the group consisting of stripper steam, crude overhead, naphtha, splitter feed, refining feed, and chloriding chemicals used in the reformer.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein the catalyst is a platinum catalyst.
5. The process of claim 4 wherein said reducing agent is an oxime.
6. The process of claim 5 wherein the amount of reducing agent used is from 5 ppm to 100 ppm based upon the weight of the catalyst feed stock.
7. The process of claim 6 wherein the oxime is fed into the naphtha stream.
8. The process of claim 7 wherein the oxime is methyl ethyl ketoxime and said methyl ethyl ketoxime is used is an amount of from 50 ppm to 100 ppm based upon the weight of the catalyst feedstock.
AU26528/95A 1994-06-01 1995-05-30 A process for improving the effectiveness of a process catalyst Ceased AU704259B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US25201294A 1994-06-01 1994-06-01
US08/252012 1994-06-01
PCT/US1995/006717 WO1995032801A1 (en) 1994-06-01 1995-05-30 A process for improving the effectiveness of a process catalyst

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2652895A true AU2652895A (en) 1995-12-21
AU704259B2 AU704259B2 (en) 1999-04-15

Family

ID=22954267

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU26528/95A Ceased AU704259B2 (en) 1994-06-01 1995-05-30 A process for improving the effectiveness of a process catalyst

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US5648305A (en)
EP (1) EP0762937A4 (en)
JP (1) JPH10503704A (en)
AU (1) AU704259B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2191743A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1995032801A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA954204B (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10047703A1 (en) * 2000-09-25 2002-04-11 Basf Ag Process for the regeneration of catalysts
US6918443B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2005-07-19 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of an oil shale formation to produce hydrocarbons having a selected carbon number range
AU2002356854A1 (en) 2001-10-24 2003-05-06 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V Remediation of a hydrocarbon containing formation
WO2005016518A1 (en) * 2003-08-08 2005-02-24 Total France Hydrotreating and/or hydrocracking catalyst of hydrocarbons and preparation thereof
DE102004010014B4 (en) * 2004-03-01 2011-01-05 Enerday Gmbh Reformer and method for converting fuel and oxidant to reformate
CA2626970C (en) 2005-10-24 2014-12-16 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Methods of hydrotreating a liquid stream to remove clogging compounds
US7673786B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2010-03-09 Shell Oil Company Welding shield for coupling heaters
EP2074279A2 (en) 2006-10-20 2009-07-01 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Moving hydrocarbons through portions of tar sands formations with a fluid
CA2684485C (en) 2007-04-20 2016-06-14 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Electrically isolating insulated conductor heater
RU2510601C2 (en) 2007-10-19 2014-03-27 Шелл Интернэшнл Рисерч Маатсхаппий Б.В. Induction heaters for heating underground formations
US20110054227A1 (en) * 2009-08-26 2011-03-03 Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp Process to Protect Hydrogenation and Isomerization Catalysts Using a Guard Bed

Family Cites Families (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2336598A (en) * 1939-11-03 1943-12-14 Du Pont Stabilization of organic substances
US2483778A (en) * 1946-08-14 1949-10-04 Standard Oil Dev Co Inhibition of resin growth from diolefins
US2446969A (en) * 1946-08-14 1948-08-10 Standard Oil Dev Co Inhibition of diolefin polymer growth
US2947795A (en) * 1958-12-05 1960-08-02 Du Pont Process for stabilizing monovinylacetylene containing impurities
US3683024A (en) * 1968-06-18 1972-08-08 Texaco Inc O-polyalkoxylated high molecular weight-n-alkanone and n-alkanal oximes
US3879311A (en) * 1973-04-26 1975-04-22 Nat Distillers Chem Corp Catalyst regeneration
GB1566106A (en) * 1976-03-17 1980-04-30 Nat Res Dev Additives for aviation and similar fuels
US4101444A (en) * 1976-06-14 1978-07-18 Atlantic Richfield Company Catalyst demetallization utilizing a combination of reductive and oxidative washes
US4190554A (en) * 1976-12-22 1980-02-26 Osaka Gas Company, Ltd. Method for reactivation of platinum group metal catalyst with aqueous alkaline and/or reducing solutions
US4237326A (en) * 1979-05-30 1980-12-02 Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited Method of inhibiting polymerization of styrene
US4269717A (en) * 1980-04-17 1981-05-26 Nalco Chemical Company Boiler additives for oxygen scavenging
US4350606A (en) * 1980-10-03 1982-09-21 Dearborn Chemical Company Composition and method for inhibiting corrosion
US4551226A (en) * 1982-02-26 1985-11-05 Chevron Research Company Heat exchanger antifoulant
FR2523149A1 (en) * 1982-03-15 1983-09-16 Catalyse Soc Prod Francais NEW CATALYST SUPPORTING PALLADIUM-OR, ITS PREPARATION AND USE IN SELECTIVE HYDROGENATION REACTIONS OF DIOLEFINIC AND / OR ACETYLENE HYDROCARBONS
US4497702A (en) * 1982-08-09 1985-02-05 Atlantic Richfield Company Corrosion inhibition
JPS59199042A (en) * 1983-04-28 1984-11-12 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Catalyst for reforming methanol
US4487745A (en) * 1983-08-31 1984-12-11 Drew Chemical Corporation Oximes as oxygen scavengers
US4556476A (en) * 1984-08-10 1985-12-03 Atlantic Richfield Company Method for minimizing fouling of heat exchanger
JPS6413041A (en) * 1987-07-07 1989-01-17 Hakuto Kagaku Kk Agent for suppressing growth of polymer in olefin-production apparatus
US4927519A (en) * 1988-04-04 1990-05-22 Betz Laboratories, Inc. Method for controlling fouling deposit formation in a liquid hydrocarbonaceous medium using multifunctional antifoulant compositions
US5100532A (en) * 1990-12-05 1992-03-31 Betz Laboratories, Inc. Selected hydroxy-oximes as iron deactivators
US5213678A (en) * 1991-02-08 1993-05-25 Ashchem I.P., Inc. Method for inhibiting foulant formation in organic streams using erythorbic acid or oximes
US5243063A (en) * 1991-11-12 1993-09-07 Ashchem I.P., Inc. Method for inhibiting foulant formation in a non-aqueous process stream
US5282957A (en) * 1992-08-19 1994-02-01 Betz Laboratories, Inc. Methods for inhibiting polymerization of hydrocarbons utilizing a hydroxyalkylhydroxylamine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0762937A4 (en) 1997-08-13
ZA954204B (en) 1996-01-22
WO1995032801A1 (en) 1995-12-07
EP0762937A1 (en) 1997-03-19
US5648305A (en) 1997-07-15
JPH10503704A (en) 1998-04-07
CA2191743A1 (en) 1995-12-07
AU704259B2 (en) 1999-04-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5396084B2 (en) Selective naphtha hydrodesulfurization with high-temperature mercaptan decomposition
AU756565B2 (en) Production of low sulfur/low aromatics distillates
US5648305A (en) Process for improving the effectiveness of process catalyst
CA2488239C (en) Process to remove sulfur contaminants from hydrocarbon streams
JPH05508172A (en) How to reduce benzene in gasoline
CA2048066C (en) Method of start-up of a contaminated hydrocarbon-conversion system using a contaminant-sensitive catalyst
WO1997003150A1 (en) Process for the hydrogenation of a thiophenic sulfur containing hydrocarbon feed
US9656232B2 (en) Method for producing aromatic hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbon production plant
US6835301B1 (en) Production of low sulfur/low aromatics distillates
EP0463851B1 (en) Catalytic reforming process comprising removal of sulfur from recycle gas streams
US5108582A (en) Cleanup of hydrocarbon-conversion system
JP4856837B2 (en) Production of low sulfur / low aromatic distillate
US5770781A (en) Method for eliminating carbon oxides in feeds to a C5 and C6 paraffin isomerization process
WO2005061677A1 (en) A process for reducing sulfur and olefin contents in gasoline
US6558532B1 (en) Catalytic reforming process
KR20040020921A (en) Improved catalytic reforming process
EP1546289A1 (en) Process for hydrogenation of aromatics in hydrocarbon feedstocks containing thiopheneic compounds
Egolf et al. The Honeywell UOP CCR Platforming™ Process for BTX Production (Case Study)
JP4294569B2 (en) High octane method for petrochemical raffinate
WO1999049002A1 (en) Hydrogenation process
EP1702045A1 (en) A process for reducing sulfur and olefin contents in gasoline
AU2001267007A1 (en) Improved catalytic reforming process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired