AU2022271389A1 - Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain - Google Patents
Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2022271389A1 AU2022271389A1 AU2022271389A AU2022271389A AU2022271389A1 AU 2022271389 A1 AU2022271389 A1 AU 2022271389A1 AU 2022271389 A AU2022271389 A AU 2022271389A AU 2022271389 A AU2022271389 A AU 2022271389A AU 2022271389 A1 AU2022271389 A1 AU 2022271389A1
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- genus
- stim
- naive
- mice
- 5xfad
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 137
- 210000004556 brain Anatomy 0.000 title claims abstract description 85
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 206010012289 Dementia Diseases 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 title description 136
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 132
- 210000000274 microglia Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 86
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 74
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 56
- 208000024827 Alzheimer disease Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 210000002442 prefrontal cortex Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 208000037259 Amyloid Plaque Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 230000010189 intracellular transport Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 210000001320 hippocampus Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 230000008172 membrane trafficking Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 claims description 427
- 108010026424 tau Proteins Proteins 0.000 claims description 118
- 102000013498 tau Proteins Human genes 0.000 claims description 118
- 238000011818 5xFAD mouse Methods 0.000 claims description 99
- 210000000857 visual cortex Anatomy 0.000 claims description 93
- 210000002569 neuron Anatomy 0.000 claims description 74
- 210000004092 somatosensory cortex Anatomy 0.000 claims description 50
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 claims description 47
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 39
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 34
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 28
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 26
- 210000004326 gyrus cinguli Anatomy 0.000 claims description 25
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 25
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 claims description 25
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 claims description 25
- 101001092197 Homo sapiens RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 3 Proteins 0.000 claims description 23
- 102100035530 RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 3 Human genes 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000005062 synaptic transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 22
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 claims description 21
- 230000026731 phosphorylation Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000006366 phosphorylation reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000003559 RNA-seq method Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 102000007568 Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos Human genes 0.000 claims description 15
- 108010071563 Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos Proteins 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000003364 immunohistochemistry Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000028973 vesicle-mediated transport Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 102100031181 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase Human genes 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 108020004445 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase Proteins 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000012744 immunostaining Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- OMFXVFTZEKFJBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Corticosterone Natural products O=C1CCC2(C)C3C(O)CC(C)(C(CC4)C(=O)CO)C4C3CCC2=C1 OMFXVFTZEKFJBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000001054 cortical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- OMFXVFTZEKFJBZ-HJTSIMOOSA-N corticosterone Chemical compound O=C1CC[C@]2(C)[C@H]3[C@@H](O)C[C@](C)([C@H](CC4)C(=O)CO)[C@@H]4[C@@H]3CCC2=C1 OMFXVFTZEKFJBZ-HJTSIMOOSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000012099 Alexa Fluor family Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 101150013553 CD40 gene Proteins 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000028709 inflammatory response Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 102100040245 Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 5 Human genes 0.000 claims description 8
- 210000005056 cell body Anatomy 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000001294 liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 102000040650 (ribonucleotides)n+m Human genes 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000004112 neuroprotection Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- LHNKBXRFNPMIBR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Picrotoxin Natural products CC(C)(O)C1(O)C2OC(=O)C1C3(O)C4OC4C5C(=O)OC2C35C LHNKBXRFNPMIBR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 claims description 5
- 210000003140 lateral ventricle Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- VJKUPQSHOVKBCO-AHMKVGDJSA-N picrotoxin Chemical compound O=C([C@@]12O[C@@H]1C[C@]1(O)[C@@]32C)O[C@@H]3[C@H]2[C@@H](C(=C)C)[C@@H]1C(=O)O2.O=C([C@@]12O[C@@H]1C[C@]1(O)[C@@]32C)O[C@@H]3[C@H]2[C@@H](C(C)(O)C)[C@@H]1C(=O)O2 VJKUPQSHOVKBCO-AHMKVGDJSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000003363 transsynaptic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- -1 ShankI Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000030741 antigen processing and presentation Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000012292 cell migration Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000007831 electrophysiology Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000002001 electrophysiology Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 206010052804 Drug tolerance Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000043859 Dynamin Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108700021058 Dynamin Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004900 autophagic degradation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000026781 habituation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- YWXYYJSYQOXTPL-SLPGGIOYSA-N isosorbide mononitrate Chemical compound [O-][N+](=O)O[C@@H]1CO[C@@H]2[C@@H](O)CO[C@@H]21 YWXYYJSYQOXTPL-SLPGGIOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000022256 midbrain development Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000014150 Interferons Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 108010050904 Interferons Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 125000002842 L-seryl group Chemical group O=C([*])[C@](N([H])[H])([H])C([H])([H])O[H] 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000004641 brain development Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000023549 cell-cell signaling Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000001787 dendrite Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 229940079322 interferon Drugs 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000003902 lesion Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000027928 long-term synaptic potentiation Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000014621 translational initiation Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000032258 transport Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 101710149632 Pectinesterase A Proteins 0.000 claims 6
- 101150047684 Gabbr2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 5
- 101150087728 Grm5 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 5
- 101150037222 SYNGAP1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 4
- 101500023984 Drosophila melanogaster Synapsin-1 Proteins 0.000 claims 3
- 101150022990 Grin2b gene Proteins 0.000 claims 3
- 101150025786 PCLO gene Proteins 0.000 claims 3
- 102100030680 SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains protein 2 Human genes 0.000 claims 3
- 102100030681 SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains protein 3 Human genes 0.000 claims 3
- 101710101741 SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains protein 3 Proteins 0.000 claims 3
- 101710067890 SHANK2 Proteins 0.000 claims 3
- 101150037123 APOE gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150082833 DLGAP3 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101100216294 Danio rerio apoeb gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150033186 Dynll1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150111020 GLUL gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150021949 GRIN1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150043308 KCNB1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150009249 MAP2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150060380 Map1b gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150051135 Mink1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101100155340 Mus musculus Uhrf1bp1l gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150034300 Ppfia3 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150117544 Rtn4 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150058175 Sipa1l1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150069400 Slc8a1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150051124 Srcin1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150060298 add2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 230000008908 cell projection morphogenesis Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims 2
- 101150080510 snap25 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 2
- 101150063781 AKAP5 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150052939 APBA1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150018460 ARRB1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150107282 Akap2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150062122 Arhgap44 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150008122 Bcan gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 238000011740 C57BL/6 mouse Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 101150025500 CACNA1D gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150009600 CACNB1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150060249 CHRM3 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150081337 CSPG5 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150057284 CTNND2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150041164 Cacna1a gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150090031 Cacng8 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100128229 Caenorhabditis elegans ldb-1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150117824 Calr gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150012960 Chrm2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 208000035473 Communicable disease Diseases 0.000 claims 1
- 101150042033 Copg1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150028422 Cyth2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 108090000695 Cytokines Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 102000004127 Cytokines Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 101150084160 DPYSL5 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150108602 DVL1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100382998 Danio rerio ccsap gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100028087 Danio rerio opn1lw1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100161150 Danio rerio ywhag1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150021470 Dbn1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150080552 Dlgap1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150020562 Dlgap2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150029598 Dlgap4 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150104043 FLCN gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150093612 GAP43 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150111296 GRIA2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150014889 Gad1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150116308 Golim4 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150033396 Gosr2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150019946 Gsk3b gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 102100036242 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DQ alpha 2 chain Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 101150043239 HSPA8 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150051208 HSPH1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 102000008949 Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 108010088652 Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101000930801 Homo sapiens HLA class II histocompatibility antigen, DQ alpha 2 chain Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150101510 Hsp90aa1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150065069 Hsp90b1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150094082 KIF1B gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150030839 Klc1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150018141 MAGI2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150085666 MYO18A gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101710143111 Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3 Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100269836 Mus musculus Ank1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100383000 Mus musculus Ccsap gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100444073 Mus musculus Dtna gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100038202 Mus musculus Rap1gap gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100309367 Mus musculus Sec23ip gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100478282 Mus musculus Sptb gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100314142 Mus musculus Tnik gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101100314278 Mus musculus Trappc10 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150118199 NRXN2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150011131 PACSIN2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150105989 PDHA1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150014505 PITPNM1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150075026 PRKCB gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150025439 Ppp1r9b gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 102000001253 Protein Kinase Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 101150004420 RAB3A gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150058540 RAC1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150040749 RGS14 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150069258 RPH3A gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150001322 RTN3 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150048506 Rapgef2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 102100022122 Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 101150015746 Rasgrf2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150067145 SCARB1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101710101742 SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains protein 1 Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150098192 SLC1A3 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150057621 SMC3 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 230000021194 SRP-dependent cotranslational protein targeting to membrane Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 101150057210 STXBP1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150038931 Slc12a5 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150041420 Slc1a2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150074280 Slc4a10 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 102000049939 Smad3 Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 101150041109 Snph gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150077078 Sorbs1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150033766 Syn3 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 102000004874 Synaptophysin Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 108090001076 Synaptophysin Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150006549 Syt2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150093559 TRIM2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150036597 TRIM3 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150026222 TUBB3 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150021788 Tbc1d14 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150069601 Tmed10 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150075235 Trim9 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150047050 Tubb4b gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150052372 Unc13c gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150113254 Vps4a gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150083738 YWHAG gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150027038 YWHAH gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150118144 aak-1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 101150039027 ampH gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 230000006907 apoptotic process Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 101150031327 atp2b2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 210000000170 cell membrane Anatomy 0.000 claims 1
- 210000003793 centrosome Anatomy 0.000 claims 1
- 210000003710 cerebral cortex Anatomy 0.000 claims 1
- 230000005340 cerebral cortex cell migration Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 239000003179 convulsant agent Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 230000030793 cytoplasmic translational initiation Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000023747 glial cell migration Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000002518 glial effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 claims 1
- 230000035800 maturation Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 230000008880 microtubule cytoskeleton organization Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000004274 microtubule-based process Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000026326 mitochondrial transport Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000005491 negative regulation of cellular component organization Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 claims 1
- 230000011728 proteasomal protein catabolic process Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 108060006633 protein kinase Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 230000034714 protein localization in mitochondrion Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000016816 proteolysis involved in cellular protein catabolic process Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000001696 purinergic effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 108020003175 receptors Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 102000005962 receptors Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 230000032667 regulation of cytokine-mediated signaling pathway Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000010572 regulation of gene expression by genetic imprinting Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000021424 regulation of microtubule polymerization or depolymerization Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000031022 regulation of transmembrane transport Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000019491 signal transduction Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000003956 synaptic plasticity Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 210000003956 transport vesicle Anatomy 0.000 claims 1
- 229950003873 triciribine Drugs 0.000 claims 1
- 230000001684 chronic effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 140
- 230000004770 neurodegeneration Effects 0.000 abstract description 43
- 230000001537 neural effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 33
- 230000000324 neuroprotective effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 13
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 abstract description 12
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 abstract description 11
- 230000003977 synaptic function Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 230000013016 learning Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 208000036110 Neuroinflammatory disease Diseases 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000006951 hyperphosphorylation Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000003959 neuroinflammation Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000013528 artificial neural network Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000028617 response to DNA damage stimulus Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 66
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 48
- 102400000125 Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activator 1, p25 Human genes 0.000 description 38
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 31
- 238000012347 Morris Water Maze Methods 0.000 description 24
- 238000007492 two-way ANOVA Methods 0.000 description 24
- 238000010172 mouse model Methods 0.000 description 23
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 20
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 19
- 230000007170 pathology Effects 0.000 description 18
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 16
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 15
- 230000000946 synaptic effect Effects 0.000 description 15
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 14
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 14
- 230000003542 behavioural effect Effects 0.000 description 14
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 14
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 14
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 13
- 238000001943 fluorescence-activated cell sorting Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 13
- 108091005981 phosphorylated proteins Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 12
- WEVYAHXRMPXWCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetonitrile Chemical compound CC#N WEVYAHXRMPXWCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 241000283074 Equus asinus Species 0.000 description 11
- 230000031018 biological processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 11
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 description 11
- 108010001441 Phosphopeptides Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 108020001507 fusion proteins Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 102000037865 fusion proteins Human genes 0.000 description 10
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetic acid Chemical compound CC(O)=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 108010036694 Dynamin I Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 102000000108 Dynamin-1 Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 9
- 230000001976 improved effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 230000007470 synaptic degeneration Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000012114 Alexa Fluor 647 Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000011201 multiple comparisons test Methods 0.000 description 7
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 239000012110 Alexa Fluor 594 Substances 0.000 description 6
- 108091006146 Channels Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 230000001594 aberrant effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000003920 cognitive function Effects 0.000 description 6
- BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N methanoic acid Natural products OC=O BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000002025 microglial effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 6
- IGAZHQIYONOHQN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Alexa Fluor 555 Chemical compound C=12C=CC(=N)C(S(O)(=O)=O)=C2OC2=C(S(O)(=O)=O)C(N)=CC=C2C=1C1=CC=C(C(O)=O)C=C1C(O)=O IGAZHQIYONOHQN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 208000019901 Anxiety disease Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 208000024806 Brain atrophy Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 206010010904 Convulsion Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 101000738771 Homo sapiens Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase C Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 108010026552 Proteome Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 102100037422 Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase C Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 230000007792 alzheimer disease pathology Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000036506 anxiety Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 5
- 208000010877 cognitive disease Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 230000005782 double-strand break Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000012202 endocytosis Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000971 hippocampal effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004949 mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000001543 one-way ANOVA Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000017854 proteolysis Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000012103 Alexa Fluor 488 Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000010173 Alzheimer-disease mouse model Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011746 C57BL/6J (JAX™ mouse strain) Methods 0.000 description 4
- 101001046686 Homo sapiens Integrin alpha-M Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 101001111338 Homo sapiens Neurofilament heavy polypeptide Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102100022338 Integrin alpha-M Human genes 0.000 description 4
- AYFVYJQAPQTCCC-GBXIJSLDSA-N L-threonine Chemical compound C[C@@H](O)[C@H](N)C(O)=O AYFVYJQAPQTCCC-GBXIJSLDSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 102100024007 Neurofilament heavy polypeptide Human genes 0.000 description 4
- XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000002354 daily effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229940042399 direct acting antivirals protease inhibitors Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000007625 higher-energy collisional dissociation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010832 independent-sample T-test Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000002372 labelling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000006742 locomotor activity Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000137 peptide hydrolase inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- CCEKAJIANROZEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N sulfluramid Chemical group CCNS(=O)(=O)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)F CCEKAJIANROZEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 210000000225 synapse Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- OSWFIVFLDKOXQC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-(3-methoxyphenyl)aniline Chemical compound COC1=CC=CC(C=2C=CC(N)=CC=2)=C1 OSWFIVFLDKOXQC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 208000028698 Cognitive impairment Diseases 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000012313 Kruskal-Wallis test Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000585 Mann–Whitney U test Methods 0.000 description 3
- MTCFGRXMJLQNBG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Serine Natural products OCC(N)C(O)=O MTCFGRXMJLQNBG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- AYFVYJQAPQTCCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Threonine Natural products CC(O)C(N)C(O)=O AYFVYJQAPQTCCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000004473 Threonine Substances 0.000 description 3
- 108700019146 Transgenes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000004142 Trypsin Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000631 Trypsin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001668 ameliorated effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000001130 astrocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008827 biological function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000019253 formic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000001153 interneuron Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000012139 lysis buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000116 mitigating effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 108010064131 neuronal Cdk5 activator (p25-p35) Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000012346 open field test Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000001243 protein synthesis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000025915 regulation of apoptotic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001953 sensory effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000003238 somatosensory effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009182 swimming Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000014616 translation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012588 trypsin Substances 0.000 description 3
- WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tungsten Chemical compound [W] WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 101150069920 Camk2a gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 208000027647 Cerebral Cortical Thinning Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 108010025454 Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000005778 DNA damage Effects 0.000 description 2
- 231100000277 DNA damage Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 239000012981 Hank's balanced salt solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 102000003964 Histone deacetylase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090000353 Histone deacetylase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000891579 Homo sapiens Microtubule-associated protein tau Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000617536 Homo sapiens Presenilin-1 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000631760 Homo sapiens Sodium channel protein type 1 subunit alpha Proteins 0.000 description 2
- FFEARJCKVFRZRR-BYPYZUCNSA-N L-methionine Chemical compound CSCC[C@H](N)C(O)=O FFEARJCKVFRZRR-BYPYZUCNSA-N 0.000 description 2
- OUYCCCASQSFEME-QMMMGPOBSA-N L-tyrosine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 OUYCCCASQSFEME-QMMMGPOBSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000043131 MHC class II family Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108091054438 MHC class II family Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100040243 Microtubule-associated protein tau Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108700027649 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100024192 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 208000012902 Nervous system disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000025966 Neurological disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 108010004729 Phycoerythrin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100022033 Presenilin-1 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 238000002123 RNA extraction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000700159 Rattus Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000283984 Rodentia Species 0.000 description 2
- 108091006283 SLC17A7 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100028910 Sodium channel protein type 1 subunit alpha Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000030886 Traumatic Brain injury Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 102000046052 Vesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 1 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012190 activator Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108010004469 allophycocyanin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003925 brain function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000005013 brain tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000004899 c-terminal region Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000004202 carbamide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000007623 carbamidomethylation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000032341 cell morphogenesis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000006285 cell suspension Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005754 cellular signaling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006999 cognitive decline Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001149 cognitive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000018417 cysteine Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- XUJNEKJLAYXESH-UHFFFAOYSA-N cysteine Natural products SCC(N)C(O)=O XUJNEKJLAYXESH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000037213 diet Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 2
- VHJLVAABSRFDPM-QWWZWVQMSA-N dithiothreitol Chemical compound SC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)CS VHJLVAABSRFDPM-QWWZWVQMSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229960003722 doxycycline Drugs 0.000 description 2
- XQTWDDCIUJNLTR-CVHRZJFOSA-N doxycycline monohydrate Chemical compound O.O=C1C2=C(O)C=CC=C2[C@H](C)[C@@H]2C1=C(O)[C@]1(O)C(=O)C(C(N)=O)=C(O)[C@@H](N(C)C)[C@@H]1[C@H]2O XQTWDDCIUJNLTR-CVHRZJFOSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000004064 dysfunction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002964 excitative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000021824 exploration behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000013312 flour Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000002546 full scan Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003119 immunoblot Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011532 immunohistochemical staining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004054 inflammatory process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000010468 interferon response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008449 language Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004895 liquid chromatography mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000018977 lysine Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001819 mass spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229930182817 methionine Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 230000004660 morphological change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000626 neurodegenerative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008555 neuronal activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003955 neuronal function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006576 neuronal survival Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007171 neuropathology Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003534 oscillatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000242 pagocytic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001575 pathological effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002360 prefrontal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004321 preservation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- XJMOSONTPMZWPB-UHFFFAOYSA-M propidium iodide Chemical compound [I-].[I-].C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CCC[N+](C)(CC)CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 XJMOSONTPMZWPB-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 238000002731 protein assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000002763 pyramidal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000000384 rearing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004314 regulation of intracellular transport Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003938 response to stress Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004007 reversed phase HPLC Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012353 t test Methods 0.000 description 2
- HWCKGOZZJDHMNC-UHFFFAOYSA-M tetraethylammonium bromide Chemical compound [Br-].CC[N+](CC)(CC)CC HWCKGOZZJDHMNC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 238000012301 transgenic model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009529 traumatic brain injury Effects 0.000 description 2
- OUYCCCASQSFEME-UHFFFAOYSA-N tyrosine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 OUYCCCASQSFEME-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000031836 visual learning Effects 0.000 description 2
- MTCFGRXMJLQNBG-REOHCLBHSA-N (2S)-2-Amino-3-hydroxypropansäure Chemical compound OC[C@H](N)C(O)=O MTCFGRXMJLQNBG-REOHCLBHSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QKNYBSVHEMOAJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol;hydron;chloride Chemical compound Cl.OCC(N)(CO)CO QKNYBSVHEMOAJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000011825 3xTg-AD mouse Methods 0.000 description 1
- HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acrylamide Chemical compound NC(=O)C=C HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010001497 Agitation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102100040121 Allograft inflammatory factor 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- USFZMSVCRYTOJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonium acetate Chemical compound N.CC(O)=O USFZMSVCRYTOJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005695 Ammonium acetate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 206010002091 Anaesthesia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010060159 Apolipoprotein E4 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010009346 Clonus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229920001651 Cyanoacrylate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 102000013717 Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100026865 Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activator 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100026805 Cyclin-dependent-like kinase 5 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000012184 Diffuse Brain injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 201000011240 Frontotemporal dementia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000013446 GTP Phosphohydrolases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091006109 GTPases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100039289 Glial fibrillary acidic protein Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710193519 Glial fibrillary acidic protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710088172 HTH-type transcriptional regulator RipA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000890626 Homo sapiens Allograft inflammatory factor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010001336 Horseradish Peroxidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010021033 Hypomenorrhoea Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010061218 Inflammation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000004472 Lysine Substances 0.000 description 1
- KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Lysine Natural products NCCCCC(N)C(O)=O KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710115937 Microtubule-associated protein tau Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000699660 Mus musculus Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000000020 Nitrocellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930040373 Paraformaldehyde Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 108060005874 Parvalbumin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000001675 Parvalbumin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229920001774 Perfluoroether Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 206010057249 Phagocytosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000004642 Polyimide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001213 Polysorbate 20 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 108091008109 Pseudogenes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000057361 Pseudogenes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 239000012722 SDS sample buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004830 Super Glue Substances 0.000 description 1
- 206010043994 Tonic convulsion Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229920004890 Triton X-100 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 101150044878 US18 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010053752 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000016913 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels Human genes 0.000 description 1
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000005006 adaptive immune system Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000029936 alkylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005804 alkylation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007791 alzheimer disease like pathology Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000001014 amino acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000019257 ammonium acetate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940043376 ammonium acetate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000003941 amyloidogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037005 anaesthesia Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007529 anxiety like behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005775 apoptotic pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003050 axon Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000003376 axonal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003766 bioinformatics method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001925 catabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003915 cell function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001638 cerebellum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000003776 cleavage reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007278 cognition impairment Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003931 cognitive performance Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000024203 complement activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001010 compromised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000877 corpus callosum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007428 craniotomy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004748 cultured cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000003436 cytoskeletal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003412 degenerative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003520 dendritic spine Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229960003964 deoxycholic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- KXGVEGMKQFWNSR-LLQZFEROSA-N deoxycholic acid Chemical compound C([C@H]1CC2)[C@H](O)CC[C@]1(C)[C@@H]1[C@@H]2[C@@H]2CC[C@H]([C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C)[C@@]2(C)[C@@H](O)C1 KXGVEGMKQFWNSR-LLQZFEROSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007599 discharging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010494 dissociation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005593 dissociations Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000005110 dorsal hippocampus Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002222 downregulating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003828 downregulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008482 dysregulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004070 electrodeposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001163 endosome Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010201 enrichment analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001037 epileptic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001787 epileptiform Effects 0.000 description 1
- DNJIEGIFACGWOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethyl mercaptane Natural products CCS DNJIEGIFACGWOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010195 expression analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003194 forelimb Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005194 fractionation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010353 genetic engineering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000005046 glial fibrillary acidic protein Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004295 hippocampal neuron Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 102000057063 human MAPT Human genes 0.000 description 1
- AFQIYTIJXGTIEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydrogen carbonate;triethylazanium Chemical compound OC(O)=O.CCN(CC)CC AFQIYTIJXGTIEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002991 immunohistochemical analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002055 immunohistochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003116 impacting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002757 inflammatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- PGLTVOMIXTUURA-UHFFFAOYSA-N iodoacetamide Chemical compound NC(=O)CI PGLTVOMIXTUURA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FXDLIMJMHVKXAR-UHFFFAOYSA-K iron(III) nitrilotriacetate Chemical compound [Fe+3].[O-]C(=O)CN(CC([O-])=O)CC([O-])=O FXDLIMJMHVKXAR-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 230000004807 localization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003137 locomotive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002669 lysines Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000002826 magnetic-activated cell sorting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013336 milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004080 milk Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102000035118 modified proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091005573 modified proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000006740 morphological transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000015122 neurodegenerative disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000016273 neuron death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008587 neuronal excitability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008062 neuronal firing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005015 neuronal process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002858 neurotransmitter agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001120 nichrome Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229920001220 nitrocellulos Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000020477 pH reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003973 paint Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002866 paraformaldehyde Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000008506 pathogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036285 pathological change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000915 pathological change Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003068 pathway analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012510 peptide mapping method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008782 phagocytosis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009038 pharmacological inhibition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001721 polyimide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000010486 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000256 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000013105 post hoc analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010149 post-hoc-test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004481 post-translational protein modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000035123 post-translationally modified proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091005626 post-translationally modified proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000001176 projection neuron Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004129 prosencephalon Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009822 protein phosphorylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004850 protein–protein interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000575 proteomic method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013138 pruning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010814 radioimmunoprecipitation assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006722 reduction reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000029588 regulation of mitotic cell cycle Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014786 regulation of synaptic transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000030796 regulation of vesicle-mediated transport Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000284 resting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003705 ribosome Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007017 scission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000006886 spatial memory Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008093 supporting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000024891 symptom Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000033504 synapse organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002504 synaptic vesicle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000004885 tandem mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 208000028500 tonic seizure Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000011830 transgenic mouse model Methods 0.000 description 1
- YFDSDPIBEUFTMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N tribromoethanol Chemical compound OCC(Br)(Br)Br YFDSDPIBEUFTMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229950004616 tribromoethanol Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000005166 vasculature Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000032665 vasculature development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003643 water by type Substances 0.000 description 1
- DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N β‐Mercaptoethanol Chemical compound OCCS DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/06—Radiation therapy using light
- A61N5/0613—Apparatus adapted for a specific treatment
- A61N5/0618—Psychological treatment
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M21/00—Other devices or methods to cause a change in the state of consciousness; Devices for producing or ending sleep by mechanical, optical, or acoustical means, e.g. for hypnosis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/06—Radiation therapy using light
- A61N5/0613—Apparatus adapted for a specific treatment
- A61N5/0622—Optical stimulation for exciting neural tissue
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M21/00—Other devices or methods to cause a change in the state of consciousness; Devices for producing or ending sleep by mechanical, optical, or acoustical means, e.g. for hypnosis
- A61M2021/0005—Other devices or methods to cause a change in the state of consciousness; Devices for producing or ending sleep by mechanical, optical, or acoustical means, e.g. for hypnosis by the use of a particular sense, or stimulus
- A61M2021/0022—Other devices or methods to cause a change in the state of consciousness; Devices for producing or ending sleep by mechanical, optical, or acoustical means, e.g. for hypnosis by the use of a particular sense, or stimulus by the tactile sense, e.g. vibrations
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M21/00—Other devices or methods to cause a change in the state of consciousness; Devices for producing or ending sleep by mechanical, optical, or acoustical means, e.g. for hypnosis
- A61M2021/0005—Other devices or methods to cause a change in the state of consciousness; Devices for producing or ending sleep by mechanical, optical, or acoustical means, e.g. for hypnosis by the use of a particular sense, or stimulus
- A61M2021/0027—Other devices or methods to cause a change in the state of consciousness; Devices for producing or ending sleep by mechanical, optical, or acoustical means, e.g. for hypnosis by the use of a particular sense, or stimulus by the hearing sense
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M21/00—Other devices or methods to cause a change in the state of consciousness; Devices for producing or ending sleep by mechanical, optical, or acoustical means, e.g. for hypnosis
- A61M2021/0005—Other devices or methods to cause a change in the state of consciousness; Devices for producing or ending sleep by mechanical, optical, or acoustical means, e.g. for hypnosis by the use of a particular sense, or stimulus
- A61M2021/0044—Other devices or methods to cause a change in the state of consciousness; Devices for producing or ending sleep by mechanical, optical, or acoustical means, e.g. for hypnosis by the use of a particular sense, or stimulus by the sight sense
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M2210/00—Anatomical parts of the body
- A61M2210/06—Head
- A61M2210/0693—Brain, cerebrum
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/06—Radiation therapy using light
- A61N2005/0626—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/06—Radiation therapy using light
- A61N2005/063—Radiation therapy using light comprising light transmitting means, e.g. optical fibres
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/06—Radiation therapy using light
- A61N2005/0635—Radiation therapy using light characterised by the body area to be irradiated
- A61N2005/0643—Applicators, probes irradiating specific body areas in close proximity
- A61N2005/0645—Applicators worn by the patient
- A61N2005/0647—Applicators worn by the patient the applicator adapted to be worn on the head
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/06—Radiation therapy using light
- A61N2005/0635—Radiation therapy using light characterised by the body area to be irradiated
- A61N2005/0643—Applicators, probes irradiating specific body areas in close proximity
- A61N2005/0645—Applicators worn by the patient
- A61N2005/0647—Applicators worn by the patient the applicator adapted to be worn on the head
- A61N2005/0648—Applicators worn by the patient the applicator adapted to be worn on the head the light being directed to the eyes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/06—Radiation therapy using light
- A61N2005/065—Light sources therefor
- A61N2005/0651—Diodes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/06—Radiation therapy using light
- A61N2005/0664—Details
- A61N2005/0667—Filters
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/06—Radiation therapy using light
- A61N5/0613—Apparatus adapted for a specific treatment
- A61N5/062—Photodynamic therapy, i.e. excitation of an agent
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Psychology (AREA)
- Developmental Disabilities (AREA)
- Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
- Neurosurgery (AREA)
- Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
- Psychiatry (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Social Psychology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Anesthesiology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Hematology (AREA)
- Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
- Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Radiation-Therapy Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Devices, systems, and methods for treating dementia or Alzheimer's disease in a subject
in need thereof. In one example, chronic visual stimuli having a frequency of about 30 Hz to
about 50 Hz, and more specifically about 40 Hz, are non-invasively delivered to the subject to
entrain gamma oscillations in multiple brain regions of the subject, including the prefrontal
cortex (PFC) and the hippocampus. The entrained gamma oscillations modulate neuronal
activity across multiple brain regions (e.g., facilitate functional binding of neural networks at low
gamma frequencies) to induce various neuroprotective effects (e.g., amelioration of amyloid
plaques and tau hyper-phosphorylation) and reduce neurodegeneration. Neuronal activity
mediated by the chronic visual stimuli reduces an immune response in microglia and ameliorates
aberrantly modified genes and proteins involved in membrane trafficking, intracellular transport,
synaptic function, neuroinflammation and DNA damage response. Behavior modification
including enhanced learning and memory is observed.
71
Description
[0001] The present application claims a priority benefit to each of the following U.S. provisional applications: Serial No. 62/570,250, filed on October 10, 2017, and entitled "NEUROPROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF COMBINED SENSORY STIMULATION" (Attorney DocketNo. MITX-9699/00US); and Serial No. 62/570,929, filed on October 11, 2017, and entitled GAMMA ENTRAINMENT BINDS HIGHER ORDER BRAIN REGIONS AND OFFERS NEUROPROTECTION" (Attorney Docket No. MITX-0070/00US). Each of these provisional applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application also claims a priority benefit to PCT Application No. PCT/US18/51785, filed on September 19, 2018, entitled "Systems and Methods for Preventing, Mitigating, and/or Treating Dementia," which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is a divisional application of Australian patent application number 2018347366, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
[0002] This invention was made with U.S. Government support under Grant No. RFl AG054321 awarded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The U.S. Government has certain rights in the invention.
[0003] Dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), is a devastating disease of the brain characterized by the deterioration of brain and cognitive functions (Canter et al., 2016; Palop and Mucke, 2016). Multiple factors contribute to the pathogenesis of AD including amyloid deposition, hyper-phosphorylated tau accumulation, microglia- and astrocyte-mediated inflammation, and the loss of neurons and synapses (Ballatore et al., 2007; Huang and Mucke, 2012; Jacobsen et al., 2006; Meyer-Luehmann et al., 2008; Oakley et al., 2006; Ulland et al., 2017; Yoshiyama et al., 2007).
[0004] More recent studies have increasingly examined the physiological aspects of AD pathologies, such as neuronal hyper-excitability, interneuron dysfunction, shifted inhibition/excitation balance, epileptic discharges, and altered network oscillations (Canter et al., 2016; Holth et al., 2017; Hsia et al., 1999; Palop and Mucke, 2010; Palop and Mucke, 2016; Verret et al., 2012). These findings are consistent with the network abnormalities observed in human AD (Guillon et al., 2017; Koenig et al., 2005; Ribary et al., 1991; Stam et al., 2002). Recent studies in AD mouse models have highlighted that these changes occur at the presymptomatic stage (Gillespie et al., 2016; laccarino et al., 2016). Changes in neural activity have been previously shown to impact AD pathology, such as amyloid-p and tau accumulation, in several mouse models (Bero et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2016; Yamada et al., 2014). Given these observations, multiple approaches have been employed to investigate whether manipulating neuronal oscillations can be effective in ameliorating AD pathology (Iaccarino et al., 2016; Martinez-Losa et al., 2018; Verret et al., 2012).
[0005] In particular, oscillations in the gamma frequency band (30- 90 Hz) have been found to be reduced in multiple AD mouse models including hAPP-J20, ApoE4, 5XFAD, but also notably in human AD patients (Gillespie et al., 2016; Guillon et al., 2017; laccarino et al., 2016; Koenig et al., 2005; Ribary et al., 1991; Stam et al., 2002; Verret et al., 2012). Given this, several recent studies have targeted gamma oscillations and their findings suggest that this might represent a promising strategy to alleviate AD pathology.
[0006] In one previous approach, increasing gamma oscillations through expression of the voltage-gated sodium channel subunit Nav1.1 in parvalbumin-positive (PV+) intemeurons, or with brain transplants of Nav1.1 over-expressing interneuron progenitors, alleviated gamma deficits and reduced both epileptiform activity and cognitive decline in hAPP-J20 mice (Martinez-Losa et al., 2018; Verret et al., 2012).
[0007] In a second approach, optogenetic activation of PV+ interneurons at 40 Hz, which has been shown to induce robust gamma frequency oscillations (Cardin et al., 2009; Sohal et al., 2009), was found to reduce amyloid load and enhance morphological transformation of microglia in XFAD mice (Iaccarino et al., 2016). This non-invasive approach of using 40 Hz visual stimulation was similarly effective in decreasing amyloid load and altering microglia in the visual cortex of 5XFAD mice (Iaccarino et al., 2016). However, in this previous study, amyloid levels in the visual cortex returned to baseline 24 hours after acute visual stimulation for one hour. This earlier study found, however, that extending one hour of visual stimulation to one hour per day for seven days reduced not only amyloid levels (soluble and insoluble forms of APl-40 and AP1-42), but also plaque pathology in the visual cortex in 6 month old 5XFAD mice (Iaccarino et al., 2016). Moreover, visual stimulation impacted multiple cell types, including neurons and microglia, to reduce the production and enhance clearance of AP, respectively in 5XAFD mice.
[0008] As disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 15/360,637, filed on November 23, 2016, and entitled "SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREVENTING, MITIGATING, AND/OR TREATING DEMENTIA" (hereby incoroporated herein by reference in its entirety), inducing synchronized gamma oscillations in the brain via visual (as well as auditory and/or haptic) stimulus results in reduced amyloid load and morphological changes in some brain regions. The Inventors have recognized and appreciated, however, that there remains a need for systems and methods of treating dementia and Alzheimer's disease that address circuit-wide disease affecting multiple brain centers significantly responsible for learning and memory and other higher-order brain functions.
[0009] In the present disclosure, inventive methods and apparatus for entraining gamma oscillations in the brain of a subject via chronic non-invasive visual stimuli, referred to herein as "Gamma ENtrainment Using Sensory visual stimuli" (GENUS), has been demonstrated to extend beyond the visual cortext to multiple other brain regions (e.g., the hippocampus, somatosensory and prefrontal cortices), while also enhancing low gamma coherence across these multiple brain regions. Furthermore, chronic GENUS reduced neurodegeneration in 5XFAD, P301S and CK-p25 mice, with the neuroprotective effect evident across multiple brain regions. Collected data highlights how GENUS mediated modulation of neuronal activity across brain regions can influence genes and proteins involved in intracellular transport and synaptic functions in degenerating neurons. These results establish a connection between GENUS driven gamma oscillation, functional binding of neural networks across multiple brain areas, neuroprotection and behavioral performance in a subject.
[0010] In sum, one inventive implementation is directed to method for treating dementia or Alzheimer's disease in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising: A) non-invasively delivering chronic visual stimuli having a frequency of about 30 Hz to about 50 Hz to the subject to entrain synchronized gamma oscillations in multiple brain regions of the subject including at least the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the hippocampus of the subject.
[0011] Another inventive implementation is directed to a method for treating dementia or Alzheimer's disease in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising: A) non-invasively delivering chronic visual stimuli having a frequency of about 30 Hz to about 50 Hz to the subject to entrain synchronized gamma oscillations in multiple brain regions of the subject and ameliorate aberrantly modified genes and proteins in degenerating neurons in multiple brain regions of the subject.
[0012] Another inventive implementation is directed to a method for treating dementia or Alzheimer's disease in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising: A) non-invasively delivering chronic visual stimuli having a frequency of about 30 Hz to about 50 Hz to the subject to concurrently entrain synchronized gamma oscillations in multiple brain regions of the subject to significantly increase gamma coherence having the frequency between 30 Hz to 50 Hz between the multiple brain regions of the subject.
[0013] It should be appreciated that all combinations of the foregoing concepts and additional concepts discussed in greater detail below (provided such concepts are not mutually inconsistent) are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. In particular, all combinations of claimed subject matter appearing at the end of this disclosure are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. It should also be appreciated that terminology explicitly employed herein that also may appear in any disclosure incorporated by reference should be accorded a meaning most consistent with the particular concepts disclosed herein.
[0014] Other systems, processes, and features will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, processes, and features be included within this description, be within the scope of the present invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
[0015] The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color.
[0016] The skilled artisan will understand that the drawings primarily are for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale; in some instances, various aspects of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein may be shown exaggerated or enlarged in the drawings to facilitate an understanding of different features. In the drawings, like reference characters generally see, e.g., like features (e.g., functionally similar and/or structurally similar elements).
[0017] FIGS. 1A through 1J illustrate that visual stimulation entrains gamma oscillations in multiple brain regions of a subject beyond the visual cortex, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0018] FIGS. 2A through 2F illustrate that chronic 40 Hz (but not 80 Hz) visual flicker stimulation reduces amyloid plaques beyond visual cortex in the subject, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0019] FIGS. 3A through 3J illustrate that chronic visual stimulation ameliorates Alzheimer's Disease-associated pathology and significantly reduces or prevents neurodegeneration in a subject, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0020] FIGS. 4A through 4Q illustrate that chronic visual sitmulation reduces inflammatory response in microglia of a subject, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0021] FIGS. 5A through 51 illustrate that chronic visual stimulation modifies synaptic function and intracellular transport in neurons, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0022] FIGS. 6A through 61 illustrate that chronic visual stimulation modifies behavior in multiple subject models of Alzheimer's Disease, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0023] FIGS. 7A through 71 illustrate that chronic visual stimulation entrains gamma oscillations beyond visual cortex in mouse models of neurodegeneration, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0024] FIGS. 8A through 81 illustrate that chronic visual stimulation reduces AD-associated pathology in 5XFAD mice beyond visual cortex, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0025] FIGS. 9A through 9G illustrate that chronic visual stimulation ameliorates AD associated pathology in P301S and CK-p25 mice, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0026] FIGS. 1OA through ION illustrate that chronic visual stimulation modifies microglia, improves intracellular transport and synaptic transmission in neurons, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0027] FIGS. 11A through 11J illustrate behavioral characterization of the effect on a subject of acute and chronic visual stimulation according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0028] FIGS. 12A through 12C illustrate that chronic visual stimulation at 80 Hz did not affect Morris water maze in 5XFAD mice, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0029] Following below are more detailed descriptions of various concepts related to, and implementations of, systems and methods for preventing, mitigating, and/or treating dementia via visual stimulation that binds higher order brain regions, reduces neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation, and improves cognitive function. It should be appreciated that various concepts introduced above and discussed in greater detail below may be implemented in numerous ways. Examples of specific implementations and applications are provided primarily for illustrative purposes to enable those skilled in the art to practice the implementations and alternatives apparent to those skilled in the art.
[0030] The figures and example implementations described below are not meant to limit the scope of the present implementations to a single embodiment. Other implementations are possible by way of interchange of some or all of the described or illustrated elements. Moreover, where certain elements of the disclosed example implementations may be partially or fully implemented using known components, in some instances only those portions of such known components that are necessary for an understanding of the present implementations are described, and detailed descriptions of other portions of such known components are omitted so as not to obscure the present implementations.
[0031] In this disclosure, we demonstrate that inventive techniques involving treatment of a subject with chronic non-invasive visual stimuli, referred to herein as "Gamma ENtrainment Using Sensory visual stimuli" (GENUS), addresses symptoms related to dementia, including Alzheimer's Disease (AD), and impacts AD pathology in brain regions beyond the visual cortex. In illustrative examples, we verified the effects of chronic visual GENUS in multiple mouse models of neurodegeneration, including Tau P301S, CK-p25, and older 5XFAD mice. We observed that chronic visual GENUS entrains gamma oscillations in multiple brain regions (including higher order brain areas) and induces functional binding at low gamma frequencies across these brain regions. Across the several neurodegenerative disease mouse models that we tested, we found that chronic visual GENUS ameliorated multiple AD-associated pathologies including amyloid plaques, tau hyper-phosphorylation and brain atrophy, preventing neuronal and synaptic density loss in multiple higher order brain regions. Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling demonstrated that genes and proteins involved in membrane trafficking, intracellular transport and synaptic function that are aberrantly modified in degenerating neurons in P301S and CK-p25 mice are improved or repaired with chronic GENUS and the immune response in microglia is reduced. In view of these widespread neuroprotective effects, we further investigated the effects of chronic daily GENUS on cognitive function and demonstrate improved performance in behavioral tasks in multiple mouse models of AD. Together, our results highlight the neuroprotective efficacy of visual GENUS in treating a subject for dementia, including AD.
[0032] As will be described in detail below, several studies were conducted to assess the impact on multiple brain regions of chronic visual stimuli. The visual stimuli generally had a frequency of about 30 Hz to 50 Hz, with particular attention paid to a frequency at or about 40 Hz for the visual stimuli. In some examples, a light-emitting diode (LED)-based device was employed to deliver the visual stimuli, and the LED-based device was driven with a square wave current pattern having a duty cycle of 50%. It should be appreciated, however, that various types of devices may be employed (other than LED-based devices) to effectively deliver the visual stimuli at various frequencies within the ranges noted herein. Additionally, waveforms other than square wave forms, as well as duty cycles other than 50%, may be employed to effectively generate the visual stimuli at various frequencies within the ranges noted herein.
[0033] Additionally, various treatment protocols were employed in the several studies described herein, including subject exposure times to visual stimuli of 1 hour per day, and subject exposure periods of 7 days, 22 days (about 3 weeks) and 42 days (about 6 weeks). It should be appreciated, however, that other subject exposure times and subject exposure periods may be employed to deliver visual stimuli at various frequencies within the ranges noted herein and effectively treat dementia, including Alzheimer's Disease. For example, exposure times of greater than 1 hour per day (e.g., delivered in multiple 1 hour increments, shorter increments, or longer increments), and/or exposure periods of less than three weeks, between three weeks and six weeks, and greater than six weeks, may be employed in different combinations and permuations to effectively treat dementia, including Alzheimer's Disease.
[0034] Below we first provide a summary of the experiments and respective observations, followed by additional details of experimental protocol to illustrate the efficacy of visual GENUS on treating a subject for dementia, including Alzheimer's Disease.
[0035] Visual GENUS Affects Higher OrderBrain Areas
[0036] We first aimed to determine if 40 Hz visual stimulation could regulate neuronal activity in brain areas beyond the visual cortex, or if it was confined to visual cortex, by performing c-Fos immunohistochemical staining as a marker of neuronal activation in wild-type C57B1/6J mice (FIG. 1A). A custom-made LED device was employed to deliver visual stimuli at specific frequencies with a 50 % duty cycle (e.g., lights on for 12.5 ms and lights off for 12.5 ms for 40 Hz stimulation) (Iaccarino et al., 2016; Singer et al., in press). Mice were habituated to their environment for 3 days and then exposed to 1 hour of 40 Hz visual stimulation. They were then returned to their home cage for 1 h before they were sacrificed and the brain tissue collected, sectioned, and labeled with c-Fos antibody. We found that 40 Hz visual stimulation resulted in a significant increase in c-Fos positive neurons in visual cortex (V) (FIG. 1A -1B), and also noted significant increases in somatosensory cortex (SS1), hippocampal area CA1, and cingulate cortex (CC) area of the prefrontal cortex (FIG. 1A-1B).
[0037] To understand how 40 Hz visual stimulation might alter ongoing neural activity in these brain areas, we implanted C57B1/6J mice with a custom-made microdrive (tungsten wire electrode; see methods for details) to record local field potentials (LFP) concurrently from VI, SS1, CA1, and the cingulate area of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in freely behaving mice. Mice were confined to a small GENUS box (8 x 8 inches) to reduce exploratory behavior and local field potentials (LFP) were recorded simultaneously fromVI, SS1, CA1, andprefrontal cortex (PFC) as theywere exposed to 40 Hz visual stimulation that was initially occluded and then unblocked for 10 min each (FIG. 1A, FIG. 7A). Acute 40 Hz visual stimulation significantly increased the power of low gamma oscillations around 35-45 Hz, with the peak frequency at 40 Hz in VI (FIG. iC-iD) and a small but significant increase in CA1 (FIG. iC-1D), consistent with previous findings in head restrained mice (Iaccarino et al., 2016). Small but significant increases in gamma power were also observed in SS1 and PFC (FIG. iC-1D), in agreement with the increase in c-Fos positive cells we observed across these regions (FIG. IB).
[0038] To assess if these visual-stimulation-induced oscillations were capable of entraining neuronal firing in brain regions downstream of visual cortex, we implanted a cohort of C57B/6J mice with tetrodes targeted to hippocampal area CA1 to record single unit activity. At baseline conditions where the light was occluded, CA1 pyramidal cells showed strong phase-locking to low gamma (-35-45 Hz) with preferential discharging at the peak, consistent with previous reports (Bragin et al., 1995; Middleton and McHugh, 2016) (FIG. 1E). Visual stimulation at 40 Hz, while not altering the preferred phase, induced more robust phase locking of individual neurons, quantified as an increased mean resultant length (MRL; between stimulation-occluded and 40 Hz visual stimulation, P = 0.01) across the population (FIG. IF), indicating that gamma frequency visual stimulation acts to drive populations of hippocampal neurons in a more temporally organized manner.
[0039] To test the applicability of GENUS to compromised neuronal systems, we used several mouse models of neurodegeneration to verify if we could induce gamma oscillations with visual stimulation, as observed in C57B/6J animals. We utilized the CK-p25 mouse line, in which the expression of the Cdk5 activator p25 is driven by the excitatory neuron-specific CaMKIa promoter in an inducible manner (CaMKIIa promoter- tTA x TetO- p25+GFP) (Cruz et al., 2003). Following withdrawal of doxycycline from the diet, CK-p25 exhibit progressive neuronal and synaptic loss with cognitive impairment, which is severe by 6 weeks of p25 induction (Cruz et al., 2003). Consistent with these findings, at 6 weeks post-induction, in vivo LFP recordings from CK p25 mice showed considerably reduced gamma spectral power at 35-45 Hz compared with control mice in VI, CA1, and PFC (FIG. 7B-7C). Despite these changes, 40 Hz visual stimulation was still able to significantly enhance gamma oscillations in VI, CA1, and PFC (FIG. 7C). We further examined Tau P301S mice, which express high levels of humanized mutant microtubule associated protein tau and have tau aggregates that are associated with frontotemporal dementia as early as 5 months of age (Yoshiyama et al., 2007). 8 months old P301S mice, at which age they have synaptic and neuronal loss and cognitive deficits, exhibited enhanced gamma power upon 40 Hz visual stimulation in V Iand PFC (FIG. 7D-7E). These results indicate that GENUS is sufficient to entrain gamma oscillations in AD mice independent of the specific mode of neuronal compromise in these mice.
[0040] To ensure multiple exposures to the visual stimulation were still able to entrain gamma oscillations even after prolonged time periods, we employed a chronic GENUS protocol whereby C57B/6J and p25-induced CK-p25 mice were exposed to 40 Hz visual stimulation for 42 days (1 h/day) (FIG. 7F, 7H). On day 43, LFPs recorded from VI, SS1, CA1, and PFC showed a significantly enhanced 40 Hz gamma power across all regions in the C57B/6J mice, consistent with a single trial acute GENUS application (FIG. 7F). In a similar manner, CK-p25 mice on day 43 (now 85 days post-p25 induction) also resulted in increased low gamma power in VI, CA1, and PFC (FIG. 7H). These results, together with the c-Fos immunostaining data, indicate that both acute and chronic 40 Hz visual stimulation recruit not only visual cortex, but also other higher order cortices including CAl, SS1 and PFC.
[0041] Since 40 Hz visual stimulation (both acute and chronic) concurrently enhances 40 Hz power across VI, SS1, CA1, and PFC, we also demonstrated that GENUS acts to coordinate neuronal activity between the visual cortex and these other higher order brain structures. We calculated coherence across these brain regions during 40 Hz visual stimulation with and without the light occluded using the weighted phase lag index (WPLI) method, which minimizes potential contamination through volume conduction (Vinck et al., 2011). We analyzed LFP in C57B/6J mice across electrode pairs located in Vi-CA1, V1-SS1, V1-PFC, CAl- SS1 and CAl-PFC. Average velocity was not significantly different in periods during 40 Hz visual stimulation with versus without the light occluded, negating any potential differences in locomotor activity. Acute Hz visual stimulation significantly increased 30 - 50 Hz low gamma coherence between visual cortex and other brain areas examined (compared with occluded light periods), specifically between VI-CA1, V1-SS1 & V1-PFC (FIG. IG, 1H).
[0042] To assess the long-term impact of chronic GENUS on coordinated neuronal oscillations across wider brain structures, we applied WPLI analysis to the LFP collected from V1, SS1, CA1, and PFC in C57B1/6J and p25-induced CK-p25 mice that were exposed for 1 h/day to visual stimulation for 42 days. We observed a significant increase in 30 - 50 Hz low gamma WPLI between VI and CA1 (FIG. 7G), as well as between V1-SS1, V1-PFC, and CAl-PFC during 40 Hz visual stimulation compared to light occluded conditions (FIG. 7G). Similarly, after chronic GENUS, CK-p25 mice also exhibited significant increase in 30 - 50 Hz low gamma WPLI between VI-CA1, CAl-PFC and V1-PFC compared to light occluded conditions (FIG. 71). As a whole, these data suggest that 40 Hz visual stimulation enhances local (40 Hz entrainment) as well as coordinated inter-areal neural oscillatory activities (30 - 50 Hz low gamma WPLI) in multiple higher order cortices in mice. However, it is important to establish if the changes we observed are specific to low gamma frequency stimulation. To test this, we exposed C57B/6J mice to 80 Hz visual stimulation, delivered with a 50% duty cycle to ensure mice received a similar light intensity and duration of exposure as in our 40 Hz stimulation experiments (FIG. 11). We observed no significant changes in 80 Hz spectral power in visual cortex (where we observed the biggest increase in power with 40 Hz GENUS) during 80 Hz visual stimulation compared to pre stimulation period (FIG. 11, 1J).
[0043] Chronic GENUS Ameliorates Amyloid Plaques Beyond the Visual Cortex
[0044] laccarino et al. (2016) demonstrated that acute visual GENUS reduced amyloid levels in VI in young pre-symptomatic 5XFAD mice, whereas 7 days of visual GENUS not only reduced amyloid levels, but also ameliorated amyloid plaques in 6-month old 5XFAD mice with more advanced pathology. We thus aimed to investigate whether 7 days of 40 Hz visual stimulation could affect amyloid plaque pathology in V I- but also CA1, SS1, and PFC - in 11-month old XFAD mice. Toward this aim, we introduced the mice into GENUS stimulation cages (FIG. 8A), subjected them to either 40 Hz or 80 Hz visual stimulation (which deliver a similar amount of light as 40 Hz but did not entrain gamma oscillations in V I(FIG. 11, 1J), for 1 h/day for 7 days and examined amyloid plaque load (FIG. 2A). After 7 days of 40 Hz visual stimulation, we saw reductions of amyloid plaques in visual cortex (FIG. 2A, 2B), but no differences observed in neither SS1 nor CA1 compared to non-stimulated mice (FIG. 2A, 2B). In agreement with the LFP analysis, 5XFAD mice with 80 Hz visual stimulation showed no change in amyloid plaque load in neither V Inor CA1, and a modest increase in SS1 (FIG. 2A, 2B). These results show that reduction of amyloid plaques after 7 days of visual GENUS is restricted to VI and is specific to 40 Hz visual stimulation.
[0045] We next extended the GENUS protocol to 22 days, starting with 5XFAD mice at 9 months old, and quantified amyloid plaques when the mice were around 10 months old (FIG. 2C). We found that 22 days of GENUS significantly decreased the intensity and number of amyloid plaques in VI (FIG. 2C, 2D, and FIG. 8B-8D), consistent with the reduction of amyloid plaques following 7 days of GENUS in 6-month old 5XFAD (laccarino et al., 2016) and in 11-month old XFAD mice (FIG. 2A, 2B). Importantly, 22 days of GENUS was sufficient to also reduce plaque intensity and number in SS1, CA1, and CC area of prefrontal cortex (FIG. 2D, FIG. 8B-8D). This effect was again specific to 40 Hz stimulation, as 22 days of80 Hz stimulation did not alter amyloid plaques in VI, SS1, nor CA1 in the 5XFAD mice when compared with non-stimulated 5XFAD mice (FIG. 2E, 2F).
[0046] We chose to apply long-term GENUS starting at 9 months of age in 5XFAD mice as previous studies have shown that the progressive loss of neurons and synaptic markers begins around 9-months of age in the 5XFAD model (Oakley et al., 2006). Consistent with these studies, we observed significant reductions in neuronal counts in both CA1 and CC in 10-month old XFAD mice, compared with age-matched wild-types littermates (FIG. 8C, 8E). In contrast, XFAD mice receiving 22 days of GENUS, in addition to a reduced amyloid load (FIG. 2C, 2D and FIG. 8B-8D), showed significantly reduced neuronal loss compared with non-stimulated mice (FIG. 8E). Similarly, while we observed a significant loss of bassoon (a synaptic marker protein) puncta in CA1 and CC in non-stimulated 5XAFD mice, chronic GENUS for 22 days reduced synaptic loss (FIG. 8F, 8G). The reduced neurodegeneration and amyloid pathology after chronic GENUS was not the result of altered APP transgene expression, as we detected no difference in the expression of full length APP protein in mice that received GENUS versus non-stimulated controls (FIG. 8H, 81). These results demonstrate that chronic visual GENUS leads to a reduction of amyloid plaque load, and reduced loss of neurons and synapses, in multiple brain regions in XFAD mice.
[0047] Chronic GENUS Reduces Neurodegeneration
[0048] To further explore the potential for chronic GENUS in impacting disease pathology and reducing neuronal loss, as seen in the 5XFAD mice (FIG. 8C, 8E), we next examined Tau P301S and CK-p25 mouse models of neurodegeneration. At 8 months of age, Tau P301S mice exhibit marked neuropathologies (Yoshiyama et al., 2007). We therefore took a cohort of Tau P301S mice, and subjected them to either no stimulation or GENUS 1 h/day for 22 days starting at 7 months old and examined their tau phosphorylation levels and tau associated pathology at around 8 months of age (FIG. 3A- 3E, and FIG. 9A, 9B). We observed higher phosphorylation of tau at S202/T205 residues in VI, SS1, CA1 and CC in Tau P301S mice compared with wild-type naive littermates (WT naive) (FIG. 3A, 3B). However, Tau P301S mice receiving chronic GENUS had significantly reduced S202/T205 tau phosphorylation compared to non-stimulated P301S mice (FIG. 3A, 3B). In both AD and in P301S mice, tau protein becomes hyper-phosphorylated at multiple residues (Hanger yet al., 2007; Wang et al., 2013; Foidl and Humpel, 2018; Kimura et al., 2018), and therefore utilized a non-biased Ser/Thr (S/T) phosphoproteomics approach to examine the extent to which GENUS stimulation can influence tau phosphorylation. We identified 46 S/T residues that were hyper-phosphorylated and a single residue (S451) that was dephosphorylated in Tau P301S mice compared to WT naive littermates (FIG. 3C). Our analysis also revealed that chronic GENUS reduced phosphorylation in the tau protein at 6 S/T sites and increased phosphorylation at S451, indicating that GENUS impacts tau phosphorylation on multiple sites (FIG. 3C).
[0049] We next characterized neuronal loss in the Tau P301S mice, and as previously reported, they displayed a significant reduction in neuron numbers in VI, CA1, SS1, and CC as quantified by the number of NeuN positive cells (FIG. 3D, 3E). Tau P301S mice that received GENUS from 7-months of age (the time point when neuronal loss begins) for 22 days, showed significantly reduced neuronal loss in all brain areas we examined compared to non-stimulated controls (FIG. 3D, 3E). We next examined brain weight and lateral ventricle size and observed no difference between WT non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated P301S mice (FIG. 9B).
[0050] We next turned to the CK-p25 model as they show AD-like pathological features, such as brain atrophy, cortical shrinkage, and aberrant ventricle expansion following 6 weeks of p25 induction (Cruz et al., 2003). To examine the extent to which chronic GENUS might ameliorate these abnormalities we simultaneously induced p25 in CK-p25 mice for 6 weeks whilst also exposing them daily to lh of GENUS (FIG. 3F). Non-stimulated CK-p25 mice showed significantly reduced brain weight and cortical thickness compared to CK naive littermates (CaMKIIa promoter- tTA;Cruz et al., 2003) (FIG. 3G). Chronic GENUS during p25 induction significantly reduced cortical thinning but did not significantly alter brain weight compared to non stimulated CK-p25 mice (FIG. 3G, and FIG. 9D). In both human AD and the CK-p25 transgenic model, cortical shrinkage is tightly correlated with ventricle expansion (Cruz et al., 2003), and we also observed a profound reduction in ventricle expansion in CK-p25 mice that received chronic GENUS (FIG. 3H, and FIG. 9E). Moreover, CK-p25 mice with chronic GENUS during p25 induction also had significantly less neuronal loss in V, SS1, CA, and CC area of the PFC compared with non-stimulated controls (FIG. 31, 3J). It has been previously reported that DNA damage in the form of double strand breaks (DSBs) represent an early marker for neurodegeneration in the CK-p25 mice (Kim et al., 2008). In agreement with both this finding and our GENUS-mediated reductions in neuronal death, we also observed significantly reduced DSBs as analyzed by the number of yH2AX-positive cells, a well-established marker of DSBs, in VI, SS1, and CAl (FIG. 9G). These neuroprotective effects of chronic GENUS were not induced by altering transgene expressions in the mutants, since total tau and p25 expression (in P301S and CK-p25 mice, respectively) was not different between GENUS and non-stimulated groups (FIG. 9A, 9C, 9F). Together, these observations establish that chronic GENUS is neuroprotective in P301S and CK-p25 mouse models with severe neurodegeneration.
[0051] Chronic GENUS Reduces Inflammatory Response
[0052] We also demonstrated that the reduced neurodegeneration we observed in Tau P301S and CK-p25 mice following chronic GENUS may be partially mediated by a beneficial microglia response. We performed unbiased RNA sequencing on visual cortex from P301S tau and CK-p25 mice which received GENUS stimulation for 22 days and 42 days respectively, as well as non stimulated P301S and CK-p25 mice and respective WT controls (FIG. 4A). The visual cortex was dissected out, then enzymatically digested, microglia were identified by CD11b and CD45 immunostaining and then isolated using the fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) as described previously (Mathys et al., 2017) (FIG. 10A, 10B). We isolated 35,000 microglia from each mouse, extracted total RNA from each mouse separately and checked the quality of RNA prior to RNA-seq. An average of 28.69 million reads per sample were obtained and of which 89.42 percent were aligned.
[0053] RNA sequencing revealed that microglia derived from non-stimulated CK-p25 mice, had 2333 upregulated genes when compared with CK naive mice (FIG. 4A). We next performed gene ontology (GO) analysis and observed that the upregulated genes were involved in protein synthesis, ribosomal regulation and immune response (including viral immune-response, antigen presentation and immune response regulation), consistent with a previous report (Mathys et al., 2017) (FIG. 4B). By comparison the 2019 downregulated genes identified were primarily related to cell migration, cell morphogenesis and vasculature development (FIG. 4B). Following chronic GENUS 355 genes were upregulated in CK-p25 mice (compared to non-stimulated CK-p25), and these genes were found be associated with protein synthesis, mitotic cell cycle regulation, membrane trafficking and vesicle mediated transport, whilst the 515 downregulated genes were mostly related to GTPase activity, proteolysis and immune response (including MHC-1 mediated antigen processing presentation and immuno-adaptivity) (FIG. 4C). These results indicate that chronic GENUS significantly impacted microglial functions in the CK-p25 mice and rendered them less inflammatory and possibly more capable of phagocytosis, migration and protein degradation.
[0054] In non-stimulated Tau P301S mice, we found a total of 331 upregulated and 292 downregulated genes relative to their WT naive littermates (FIG. 10C). Gene ontology (GO) analysis associates the upregulated genes with protein synthesis and inflammatory/immune response, whereas the downregulated genes were more related to cytoskeletal organization, cell migration and brain development (FIG. 1OD). Microglia obtained from Tau P301S mice after chronic GENUS (22 days) displayed 238 upregulated and 244 downregulated genes compared to non-stimulated Tau P301S mice. Here, upregulated genes were associated with cellular catabolic proteolysis, cell migration, cell morphogenesis and membrane trafficking with downregulated genes involved in gene expression, translation initiation and interferon response (FIG. 1OC and FIG. 1OD). Therefore, CK-p25 mice with chronic GENUS showed remarkably similar transcriptomic changes as Tau P301S mice with chronic GENUS. Taken together, our microglia specific transcriptomic analyses indicate that chronic GENUS acts to morphologically transform microglia, enhance protein degradation, and decrease the microglia-mediated immune response, independent of the specific transgenic model (P301S or CK-p25) to produce a disease state.
[0055] To further validate these findings, we performed immunohistochemical staining using brain slices from CK-p25 and Tau P301S mice after chronic GENUS (CK-p25: 1 h/day for 42 days during p25 induction; Tau P301S: 22 days) as well as from their respective non-stimulated and naive control groups. The CK-p25 microglial response has been described previously, with an early response characterized by increased proliferation and a late response marked by elevation of MHC class II and interferon pathway (Mathys et al., 2017). We first used the microglia specific marker Ibal to carry out immunohistochemistry and 3-dimensional rendering, which revealed a significant increase in number and extensive changes in morphology of microglia in VI of 6-week induced CK-p25 mice (FIG. 4D - 41 and FIG. 10E). Microglia in CK-p25 animals did not show a significant difference in cell soma volume compared to controls on the whole (FIG. 4F), but many displayed a more complex 'bushy' arborization pattern (arrowheads) (FIG. 4D; lower center panel) that has been associated with axonal and terminal synaptic degeneration (Jensen et al., 1994; Jorgensen et al., 1993). We also noted that a large fraction of microglia displayed an elongated rod-like body without polarized processes (arrow) (FIG. 4D, 41), a phenotype that is known to be present after diffuse brain injury in rats, and in human subjects with traumatic brain injury (Bachstetter et al., 2017; Taylor et al., 2014). In addition, despite reduced processes volume (FIG. 4G), the microglia in CK-p25 were in closer physical proximity to each other compared to CK naive controls, as analyzed by measuring the minimum distance between microglia (FIG. 4D, 4H). This indicates a loss of their territory and contrasts with resting states where each microglial cell generally has its own region of occupation, with little overlap between neighboring territories (Del Rio-Hortega, 1932; Nimmerjahn et al., 2005).
[0056] Chronic GENUS resulted in significantly reduced microglia numbers in CK-p25 mice compared to non-stimulated mice, although it remained higher than in naive CK mice (FIG. 4D, 4E). The total volume of the microglia processes after chronic GENUS revealed less retraction, such that there was no significant difference compared to either CK-p25 and CK naive groups (FIG. 4G). Importantly, the minimum distance between microglia after chronic GENUS was comparable to that in CK naive animals (FIG. 4D, 4H), suggesting the preservation of microglial territories with chronic GENUS. Finally, there was significantly less increase in the overall volume of rod-microglia in CK-p25 animals with chronic GENUS, although it remained significantly higher than CK naive groups (FIG. 41). We next characterized Tau P301S microglia and found that there was a trend towards increased microglia in P301S but it did not reach statistical significance in our Ibal immunostaining (FIG. 4K, 4L). The total volume of microglia soma was also not different in P301S compared to WT naive mice (FIG. 4K, 4M). However, the total volume of the microglia processes in Tau P301S mice after chronic GENUS was significantly different from non-stimulated P301S mice and was comparable to WT naive littermates (FIG. 4K, 4N). These results highlight a range of microglia states in baseline and disease conditions, and overall indicate the effects of chronic GENUS to alleviate disease-associated microglia morphological dysfunction in P301S and CK-p25 mice.
[0057] We next examined the GO term for immune response shown to be impacted by chronic GENUS. Immunohistochemistry using an antibody specific to interferon response gene CD40 revealed that it was significantly elevated in CK-p25 mice compared to CK naive mice (FIG. 4D, 4J), in agreement with previous report (Mathys et al., 2017). Chronic GENUS resulted in significantly reduced CD40 signal intensity in the CK-p25 mice, although it remained significantly higher than in CK naive controls (FIG. 4D, 4J). We next examined another immune response gene, Cl q(classical complement component), that was markedly upregulated in our microglia-specific RNA-seq experiments and has been previously implicated in synaptic loss in an AD mouse model (Hong et al., 2016). Immunohistochemistry for Clq showed elevated signal in VI of non stimulated CK-p25 and Tau P301S mice (FIG. 40, 4P, 4Q), compared to their respective naive control littermates. Chronic GENUS significantly reduced the increase in C Iqin CK-p25 mice, although Ciq intensity remained above CK naive levels (FIG. 40, 4P). In P301S mice, chronic GENUS attenuated the increase in Ci such that there was no significant difference between WT naive and P301S mice with no stimulation (FIG. 40, 4Q). Overall, our immunohistochemistry results consistently indicate that chronic GENUS aids in reducing the immune response of microglia.
[0058] Chronic GENUS Modifies Regulation of Synaptic Transmission and Intracellular Transport in Neurons
[0059] We next isolated NeuN-positive (NeuN+) neuronal nuclei and performed unbiased RNA-seq analysis to study the effects of chronic GENUS on gene expression in neurons in VI of CK-p25 mice and Tau P301S (FIG. 5A, 5B and FIG. 1OF- 10G). Following chronic GENUS (CK p25: 42 days of p25 induction; Tau P301S: 22 days) visual cortices were harvested from the mice. 100,000 neuronal nuclei were subsequently sorted by FACS into a lysis buffer, after which RNA was extracted and sequenced (FIG. 5A, 5B). In agreement with our findings on brain weight and from quantifying NeuN and cortical thinning using immunohistochemistry (FIG. 3G, 31 and FIG. 9D), we found a significantly reduced percentage of NeuN+ nuclei in non-stimulated CK-p25 mice (81.56 3.29) when compared with naive CK littermates (100 3.87), which was not evident in the CK-p25 mice with chronic GENUS (88.56 4.49) (FIG. 1OF, 10H). Similarly, while the percentage of NeuN+ nuclei in non-stimulated Tau P301S mice was significantly lower (86.11± 2.26) than in naive WT littermates (100 3.87), Tau P301S mice with chronic GENUS did not differ from WT mice (96.05 3.99) (FIG. OG,10H), consistent with our immunohistochemistry findings (FIG. 3E, 3J). These results demonstrate a reduction in the loss of neuronal nuclei with chronic GENUS in both CK-p25 and Tau P301S neurodegenerative mouse models and point to an overall neuroprotective effect of GENUS.
[0060] We next performed RNA-seq from these FACS-sorted neuronal RNAs. An average of 18.09 and 22.79 million reads per sample were obtained, of which 85.23% and 84.45% were aligned from CK-p25 and P301S mice, respectively. Unbiased transcriptomic analysis of NeuN+ nuclei revealed that relatively more genes were downregulated in CK-p25 (618 genes) and Tau P301S (351 genes) than upregulated genes (CK-p25: 565 genes; Tau P301S: 229 genes), compared to their respective control mice (FIG. 5A, 5B). Chronic GENUS resulted in a similar number of upregulated versus downregulated genes in CK-p25 (409 up; 422 down) and Tau P301S (220 up; 221 down), compared to their respective non-stimulated controls (FIG. 5A, 5B).
[0061] We subsequently performed GO analysis to examine the biological functions associated with the differentially expressed genes. The neuron-specific downregulated genes in CK-p25 mice after chronic GENUS (618 genes) were involved in chemical synaptic transmission, intracellular transport, autophagy, ATP metabolic process, trans-synaptic signaling, and cell-cell signaling (FIG. 5A). Interestingly, GENUS rescued these biological processes by significantly upregulating genes involved in these processes in neurons in CK-p25 mice (FIG. 5A; right panel). Downregulated genes in Tau P301S (351 genes) were involved in chemical synaptic transmission, trans-synaptic signaling, intracellular transport including vesicle mediated transport, midbrain development and regulation of apoptotic process (FIG. 5B). These same processes - including vesicle mediated transport, intracellular transport, synaptic transmission, midbrain development and regulation of apoptotic process - were all upregulated after chronic GENUS in Tau P301S mice as revealed from the top biological functions associated with the upregulated genes (FIG. 5B, and FIG. 101). On the other hand, some biological processes were upregulated in both CK-p25 and Tau P301S (compared to naive controls), including those involved in DNA double strand breaks and DSB repair, in accord with our immunohistochemistry data for yH2AX (FIG. 9G). Importantly, the downregulated genes in CK-p25 and Tau P301S mice after chronic GENUS included those known to be essential for the apoptotic pathway in response to DNA damage, consistent with a shift in neurons towards a less degenerative state. Together, these data suggest that even in two mechanistically distinct mouse models of neurodegeneration (CK-p25 and Tau P301S) the altered patterns of gene modulation converge on similar cellular and biological functions - including downregulation of synaptic function, intracellular transport and apoptotic regulation - ultimately promoting neuronal demise. Importantly, after chronic GENUS many genes involved in rescuing the defects in synaptic transmission, synapse organization and intracellular transport including vesicle mediated transport are upregulated (FIG. 5A, 5B and FIG. 10H).
[0062] To further characterize and validate these biological processes that are modified by chronic GENUS, we performed unbiased liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS) to probe the differential expression and S/T phosphorylation of proteins in VI of CK-p25 and Tau P301S mice (FIG. 5C, 5D). We first examined all the proteins identified by mass spectrometry in the combined CK-p25 groups (CK naive controls, and CK-p25 with and without GENUS) and in the combined Tau P301S groups (WT naive controls, and P301S with and without GENUS), and compared them to all the RNAs detected from their respective neuron-specific RNA-seq data. We found that 92.75% and 91.95% of the total proteins identified in the combined CK-p25 groups and in the combined Tau P301S groups, respectively, mapped to expressed genes in the neuron-specific RNA-seq data (FIG. 5C, 5D), suggesting that the majority of proteins identified are involved in neuronal function. We next compared differentially S/T-phosphorylated proteins in CK-p25 and Tau P301S mice with their respective naive control littermates and found that there was an overall increase in S/T-phosphorylated proteins in both CK-p25 and Tau P301S mice (FIG. 5C, 5D; bottom left panels), indicating aberrant modification of functional proteins in both neurodegeneration mouse models. Chronic GENUS resulted in reduced S/T phosphorylation of proteins in both CK-p25 and Tau P301S mice (FIG. 5C, 5D; bottom right panels), compared to their respective controls with no stimulation. Consistent with our neuron-specific gene expression analysis (FIG. 5A, 5B), chronic GENUS modified proteins involved in chemical synaptic transmission, dendrite development, long-term potentiation, regulation of vesicle-mediated transport, vesicle-mediated transport in synapse, and regulation of intracellular transport (FIG. 5E and FIG. 1OJ - 1OM), indicating that these processes are altered in degenerating neurons and are improved with chronic GENUS.
[0063] One example protein from our phosphoproteomics analysis implicated in vesicle trafficking, endocytosis, and synaptic transmission is dynamin1 (DNM-1) (Armbruster et al., 2013), which was associated with multiple GO terms in the annotation of differentially S/T phosphorylated proteins after chronic GENUS in both CK-p25 and Tau P301S (FIG. 5E). Phosphoregulation at Ser774 is required for endocytosis of synaptic vesicles (Clayton et al., 2009), and is one of many residues that was found to be hyper-phosphorylated in CK-p25 and Tau P301S mice and reduced with chronic GENUS. We carried out immunohistochemistry and western blotting and found that DMN-1 Ser774 phosphorylation was significantly increased in CK-p25 and Tau P301 mice and was reduced with chronic GENUS (FIG. 5F and FIG. 1OM, ION). We also carried out immunohistochemistry for vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (vGlutl), another protein that is involved in vesicle and neurotransmitter transport, synaptic transmission, and learning and memory (Balschun et al., 2009). We found that vGlutl puncta were significantly reduced in CK p25 mice compared to CK naive mice (FIG. 5G, 5H), with significantly higher vGlutl expression in CK-p25 mice after chronic GENUS (compared to non-stimulated controls) not only in VI, but also in SSi, CA1, and the ACC area of PFC (FIG. 5G, 5H). Similarly, the decreased expression of synaptic marker vGlut Ipuncta in Tau P301S mice across these brain regions was lessened after chronic GENUS in Tau P301S mice (FIG. 51). These data are consistent with reduced neuronal (FIG. 3D and 3I) and synaptic loss (FIG. 40, 4P, 4Q) across these brain regions with chronic GENUS in both neurodegenerative models.
[0064] Chronic GENUS Modifies BehavioralPerformance
[0065] Our results thus far show that GENUS can entrain neural oscillations far beyond VI, including CA1, SS1, and PFC, and reduces AD-associated pathology including amyloid plaques, tau hyperphosphorylation, synaptic loss, and neuronal loss in all of these brain regions in CK-p25 and Tau P301S mice. Our RNA-seq and phosphoproteomic data supports a capacity for chronic GENUS to mitigate some disease-associated deficits in synaptic transmission and intracellular transport that are consistent with preserved synaptic function. We therefore asked if chronic GENUS also improves cognitive function. We first sought to determine if GENUS triggered any systematic behavioral changes that might complicate the interpretation of any cognitive changes. No difference was evident in locomotor activity either during or distance travelled after acute GENUS in C57B/6J mice (FIG. 11A- 1IC). Moreover, both seizure susceptibility by picrotoxin and novel object discrimination were not altered (FIG. 1lB - 1IC). Animals of all groups stimulated chronically with GENUS (C57B6: 7 days; CK-p25: 1 h/day for 42 days during p25 induction; Tau P301S: 22 days) had comparable body weights to non-stimulated controls (FIG. 1ID - 1IF). Finally, seven days of GENUS did not affect stress response marker plasma corticosterone in C57B1/6J mice (FIG. 111).
[0066] To assess the cognitive benefits of GENUS we focused on learning and memory in the CK-p25 mouse models of AD, after induced p25 expression for 6 weeks while chronically stimulating with GENUS in CK-p25 mice. In the final week mice were exposed to an open field (OF) followed by novel object recognition (NOR) tests (FIG. 6A). Our results indicate that GENUS did not affect anxiety in CK-p25 mice, measured by the time spent in the center of the open field arena (FIG. 6A, 6B), nor did it alter plasma corticosterone levels (FIG. 11I), suggesting that chronic GENUS did not affect anxiety or stress in CK-p25 mice. Interestingly, GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice, while did not show any difference in locomotor activity, spent significantly more time exploring the novel object compared to familiar object (FIG. 6A, 6C and FIG. 1IG), indicating that chronic GENUS improved novel object recognition in CK-p25 mice compared with non-stimulated CK-p25 mice. We next conducted Morris water maze (MWM) test in 6 weeks induced CK-p25 mice during the 6 th week of GENUS. In the MWM test, compared to CK naive mice non-stimulated CK-p25 mice displayed impaired spatial learning manifest as higher latencies to find the platform during training (FIG. 6D). Non stimulated CK-p25 mice also exhibited impaired spatial memory as shown by reduced number of platform location visits and less time spent in the target quadrant in the probe test (24h after the last training day) compared with the CK naive group (Fischer et al., 2005)(FIG. 6D). These impairments were significantly improved by chronic GENUS and was not the result of altered swimming velocity which remained comparable across groups and across all training days (FIG. 6D, and FIG. 11J).
[0067] To establish that this GENUS mediated improvement in behavioral performance was not limited to a single mechanism underlying cognitive impairment but was more generally applicable to AD associated cognitive decline, we tested multiple AD model mice. We subjected 8-month old Tau P301S mice to GENUS for 22 days (1 h/day) and on the third week of stimulation, mice were tested in an OF and NOR task and compared to an age matched non-stimulated group (FIG. 6E). As with CK-p25 mice, GENUS did not alter either time spent in the center of the OF arena (FIG. 6E, 6F), nor plasma corticosterone levels in Tau P301S mice (FIG. 11I), suggesting that chronic GENUS did not alter anxiety like behavior in Tau P301S mice. We next performed novel object recognition test and observed that the WT naive and GENUS stimulated Tau P301S mice exhibited higher preference for novel object compared to familiar object (FIG. 6G). Similarly, novel object preference was higher in the non-stimulated Tau P301S mice (FIG. 6G).
[0068] We next performed MWM test during the third week of GENUS in Tau P301S mice. WT naive and GENUS stimulated Tau P301S mice exhibited significantly increased learning curve in MWM training compared to non-stimulated Tau P301S mice (FIG. 6H and FIG. 11J). Finally, we tested the effectiveness of GENUS on improving behavior in amyloid models of AD. We subjected GENUS stimulated 5XFAD mice (22 days - 1 h/day) to MWM test during the third week of training (FIG. 61). While GENUS stimulated 5XFAD mice exhibited slightly lower learning curve during the first four days of MWM training, they improved over multiple training trials compared to WT littermates, in contrast to the non-stimulated 5XFAD mice which were significantly impaired (FIG. 61 and FIG. 1IJ). Finally, employing 80 Hz visual stimulation we investigated whether chronic stimulation with other frequency can affect behavior. Similar to in vivo recordings from VI, 5XFAD mice that experienced 80 Hz visual stimulation for 22 days showed no difference compared to non-stimulated 5XFAD controls (quantified as latency to find the platform and target crossings in the probe test) in the MWM (FIG. 12A - 12C). Together, these results indicate that chronic stimulation specifically at 40 Hz improves the behavioral performance in multiple mouse models of neurodegeneration.
[0069] Increasing evidence supports the notion that manipulating neural network oscillations may represent a promising strategy to alleviate pathological changes and behavioral performance deficits associated with neurological disorders (Cho et al., 2015; laccarino et al., 2016; Kastanenka et al., 2017; Martinez-Losa et al., 2018; Verret et al., 2012). Here, we demonstrated that chronic daily entrainment of low gamma oscillations via 40 Hz visual stimulation was effective in entraining gamma oscillations, even in conditions of advanced neurodegeneration, to reduce neuropathology in multiple brain regions. The neuroprotective effects of chronic GENUS include a reduction of the microglia-mediated inflammatory response, boosting the expression of genes and proteins that facilitate synaptic transmission and intracellular transport in neurons, and improving behavioral performance.
[0070] Chronic Visual GENUS Entrains Low gamma Oscillations and Increases Gamma CoherenceAcross Brain Regions
[0071] We previously showed that acute one hour (1 h) of visual stimulation at 40 Hz entrained neural activity to oscillate in the gamma frequency range and reduced AD-related phenotypes in young, presymptomatic 3-month-old 5XFAD mice (Iaccarino et al., 2016). In the present disclosure, we demonstrated that GENUS significantly increased low gamma (-35-45 Hz) oscillatory power in CK-p25 and Tau P301S mouse models with neurodegeneration, across multiple parts of the brain - including visual cortex (VI), hippocampal CA1, somatosensory cortex (SS1), and prefrontal cortex (PFC) - despite the severe AD-like pathologies and loss of neurons. Locomotor activity can be a confounding factor in the detection of gamma oscillations, although we detected no difference in the velocity nor total distance travelled during the recording session between occluded and visible 40 Hz visual stimulation, making it unlikely that the low gamma entrainment we observed during GENUS is related to differences in activity levels. Moreover, analysis of single unit recordings in CA1 showed that GENUS is capable of recruiting neuronal activation in multiple brain regions downstream from VI (see also Martorell and Paulson et al., accompanying submission) and measures of weighted phase lag index (WPLI), which is less susceptible to volume conductance from uncorrelated noise sources, illustrate that V1, CA1, SS1, and PFC show enhanced low gamma coherence to become more functionally coupled with GENUS. This is significant given that 'communication through coherence (CTC)' has been suggested to be essential for cognitive function (Fries, 2015), and not surprisingly that human AD subjects show defects in inter-cortical area coherence (Stam et al., 2009).
[0072] Visual GENUS Confers Broad Neuroprotection Across Multiple Neurodegeneration Mouse Models
[0073] To determine if chronic application of GENUS could affect pathology in broader brain regions, we focused on visual cortex and other key structures of the default mode network, such as the hippocampus and cingulate part of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which are highly affected in AD. We first applied GENUS for seven days in older 5XFAD mice and found that, as in Iaccarino et al. (2016), although amyloid plaques were significantly reduced in VI, it failed to alter amyloid levels in the hippocampus (FIG. 2A,2B).
[0074] Thus, we extended the GENUS regime for 3 weeks using relatively older 5XFAD mice (10-month old) that have severe pathology, and show that amyloid plaque load was significantly ameliorated in not only VI, but also in other distributed parts of the brain including SS1, hippocampus and PFC. We applied this extended GENUS regime for the entirety of the 6 weeks of p25 induction in the CK-p25 model, and for 3 weeks in Tau P301S and 5XFAD mice at the age when neuronal loss begins in these respective models. We found significant reductions in their respective pathologies - including, hyper phosphorylated tau, synaptic and neuronal loss, and DNA damage - that was not just restricted to V1, but also evident in CA1, SS1, and CC (cingulate part of the prefrontal cortex) across the CK-p25, Tau P301S, and 5XFAD mouse models. The neuroprotective effects of GENUS to prevent neuronal loss was especially evident in the CK-p25 mouse model that normally exhibits dramatic brain atrophy, cortical volume shrinkage, and corresponding ventricle expansion that is associated with human AD when neurons and their extended processes degenerate. Thus, we demonstrate that GENUS confers broad neuroprotective effects across multiple mouse models with differing pathological features.
[0075] Visual GENUS Modifies Synaptic Function, IntracellularTransport, and Behavior
[0076] To examine the impact of GENUS at the molecular level, we next turned to unbiased transcriptomic and proteomic analysis. Our data from isolated/purified Tau P301S and CK-p25 neurons demonstrated a marked dysregulation of multiple genes, proteins, and post-translationally modified proteins that regulate synaptic functions, consistent with the altered neuronal excitability and excitatory/inhibitory balance that has been previously reported in these neurodegeneration models (Fischer et al., 2005; Yoshiyama et al., 2007). AD is also known to cause reduced dendritic spine density and it has been shown that increasing spine density in AD mice by either genetic manipulation, pharmacological inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDACs), or optogenetics alleviates cognitive impairments (Fischer et al., 2007; Graff et al., 2012; Roy et al., 2016). Moreover, we found that chronic visual GENUS alleviated these gene expression and protein phosphorylation defects across CK-p25 and Tau P301S models, and immunohistochemical analysis with markers specific to synaptic proteins (vGlutl, bassoon) confirmed synaptic density comparable to respective control mice. These gene expression changes and rescue of synaptic density, together with the enhanced low gamma coherence we see with chronic visual GENUS, suggest that chronic GENUS modifies the plasticity in the visual cortex and the downstream brain regions.
[0077] Study of post-mortem human AD samples, AD mice, iPSC models and primary cultured cells have also implicated the disruption of intracellular transport, vesicle trafficking, and endosomal functions in AD (Millecamps and Julien, 2013; Small et al., 2017; Israel et al., 2012; Cataldo et al., 2000). The link between endocytosis and AP production is well documented by many studies (Marks and McMahon,1998; Cirrito et al., 2008; Schobel et a., 2008; Wu and Yao, 2009). Our unbiased transcriptomic and proteomic data show that chronic GENUS invokes changes to these intracellular transport, vesicle trafficking and endocytosis processes at the gene expression and post-translational modification of protein levels. Our findings are consistent with the reduction of enlarged early endosomes in CA1 of young 5XFAD mice following acute optogenetically-driven gamma oscillations (Iaccarino et al., 2016). Moreover, our data show that chronic GENUS reduced the S774 dynamin 1 hyper-phosphorylation, which impacts the role of dynamin in endocytosis (Raimondi et al., 2011; Armbruster et al., 2013), in both P301S and CK p25 mouse models of neurodegeneration.
[0078] Taken together, we show that enhanced neuronal survival by chronic GENUS is most likely aided by the rescue (or "repair") of a wide range of genes and proteins involved in regulating DNA damage response, autophagy, synaptic transmission, intracellular transport, vesicle trafficking and reduced neuroinflammation. Supporting the broad neuroprotective effects of chronic visual GENUS to promote neuronal survival and maintain neuronal function, we find improvements in behavioral performance in multiple mouse models after chronic GENUS, including improved novel object recognition and spatial Morris water maze in CK-p25 mice and enhanced spatial water maze learning and memory in Tau P301S mice and 5XFAD mice. While we observed improved behavioral performance, chronic GENUS did not alter body weights (FIG. 1ID-IIF), anxiety by open field exploration, nor stress response as assayed by the marker corticosterone, in C57B/6J, CK-p25, and P301S mice (FIG. 11A, 1IC, 1IG- 11I). Interestingly, Zhang et al., (2015) demonstrated that while chronic 2 Hz visual stimulation (6h per day for 4 weeks) improved cognitive performance, it did not alter AP1-42 in the cingulate cortex in 3xTg mice.
[0079] Visual GENUS Reduces Neuroinflammation
[0080] Inflammatory processes are noted to play a crucial role in AD and in neurodegeneration, and acute GENUS was previously shown to induce a striking morphological activation of microglia (laccarino et al., 2016). The specific role of microglia in neurodegeneration is complex (as it can be beneficial or detrimental) and remains to be thoroughly investigated, and recent studies revealed that microglia phenotypes can morph as disease progresses (Mathys et al., 2017; Lee et al., 2018; Ulland et al., 2017; Deczkowska et al., 2018). In the present disclosure, we carried out a detailed morphological analysis with immunohistochemistry and microglia-specific transcriptomic analysis to more closely examine the underlying processes affected by chronic GENUS. We found that, although chronic GENUS modifies microglia morphology, immune response, and catabolic processes across both CK-p25 and Tau P301S mouse models, there is a range of morphological phenotypes.
[0081] First, Ibal immunostaining reveal that in CK-p25 mice microglia are very proliferative (more microglia; consistent with Mathys et al. (2017) and tend to clump together, which are reduced after chronic GENUS. The total volume of the processes of microglia is reduced, with an exception of subset of rod-like microglia whose total soma and primary process volume was higher in non-stimulated CK-p25 mice, with the chronic GENUS reduces these aberrant microglia phenotype. Intriguingly, rod-shaped microglia was recently reported to be present in diffuse brain injured rat brain, and in human subjects with traumatic brain injury (Bachstetter etal., 2017; Taylor et al., 2014). Next, microglia enter a phagocytic state to uptake AP in 5XFAD mice, this occurs for several modalities of GENUS (visual, auditory or a combination of both), with morphological changes in microglia correlating with a reduced amyloid plaque count (Iaccarino et al., 2016; Martorell and Paulson et al., accompanying submission). Furthermore, the phagocytic state of microglia is accompanied with an increased protein degradation (protein catabolic processes as identified by GO). The inflammatory response of microglia has recently been investigated in the context of neurodegeneration and AD. Our data suggest that chronic GENUS reduced the inflammatory response of microglia in CK-p25 mice, downregulating genes such as those involved in adaptive immune system and MHC class II, which are known to be upregulated in neurodegeneration (Mathys et al., 2017). Perhaps as a result of this reduced inflammatory response, we see a reduction in a marker of synaptic pruning, CIq (Hong et al., 2016), concurrent with increase in synaptic markers vGlutl and bassoon which illustrate a preservation of synaptic density with chronic GENUS. It is important to note that in accompanying paper Martorell and Paulson et al., demonstrate astrocytes response, and vasculature changes after chronic auditory GENUS and combined auditory and visual GENUS.
[0082] In sum, our data demonstrate that visual GENUS can propagate to multiple regions (SS1, CAl, PFC) in the forebrain and elicit response from multiple cell types (neurons, microglia, astrocytes). Gamma entrainment using visual stimuli represents a non-invasive strategy for providing protective effects and improving cognitive function against neurological disorders. We found that chronic visual GENUS reduced the loss of neurons and synapses, and modified genes and proteins associated with synaptic function that, together, supports the behavioral improvements we observed. The present disclosure demonstrates the neuroprotective effect of chronic visual GENUS in AD mouse models to affect AD pathology in multiple brain regions and behavior, indicating the overall efficacy of GENUS to confer neuroprotection.
[0083] DetailedDescriptionsofFigures
[0084] FIGS. 1A through 1J illustrate that visual stimulation entrains gamma oscillations in multiple brain regions of a subject beyond the visual cortex, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0085] In FIG. 1A, 40 Hz visual stimulation with 50 % duty cycle (12.5 ms lights on and 12.5 ms lights off) was delivered using an Arduino system. C57BL/6J mice received either no stimulation or 40 Hz visual stimulation for a lh period, after which they were sacrificed and brains stained for c-Fos expression. Microdrives were implanted in a separate cohort for in vivo electrophysiology.
[0086] In FIG. IB, c-Fos expression was quantified in 40 pm thick coronal brain slices to assess neuronal activity. Representative c-Fos immunostaining images. Scale bar represents 50 im. Right: 40 Hz visual stimulation significantly increased neuronal activity marker c-Fos in the visual cortex (V1; N = 4 mice/group. Independent samples t-test, T = -7.110, P =0.002), somatosensory cortex (SS1; T = -5.239, P = 0.006), hippocampus (CAl; T = -4.989, P = 0.008) and prefrontal cortex (CC; T = -2.938, P = 0.01) compared to non-stimulated mice.
[0087] In FIG. IC, power spectra from C57BL/6J mice LFPs were recorded from VI, SS1, CA1 and PFC. Red line indicates recording during visible 40 Hz visual stimulation presentation, whereas blue line indicates occluded 40 Hz light flicker (LED array was covered to occlude light; see methods; N = 7 mice).
[0088] In FIG. ID, group gamma area power (40 5 Hz) was calculated from FIG. IC. 40 Hz visual stimulation significantly increased gamma power across VI (Wilcoxon-Ranksum, Z= 5.9, P = 3.1 x 10-9), SS1 (Z = 2.4, P = 0.018), CA1 (Z = 3.4, P = 6.9 x 10-4), and PFC (Z = 3.3, P= 9.2 x 10-4) compared to control condition (LED flicker is occluded).
[0089] In FIG. 1E, we implanted custom-made tetrode microdrive in C57BL/6J mice, tetrodes were adjusted to CA1 and single units were isolated. Chart shows the spike probability across 40 Hz phase in light occluded and 40 Hz stimulation periods.
[0090] In FIG. IF, 40 Hz visual stimulation is shown to significantly increase phase locking strength of pyramidal neuronal spikes to local LFP as analyzed by the mean resultant length (MRL) (N = 24 cells from 4 mice. Wilcoxon-Ranksum, Z = 2.5, P = 0.011) compared to light occluded condition (Oc. LED).
[0091] In FIG. IG, LFP coherence between structures was quantified using the weighted phase lag index method (WPLI; N = 7 mice), recording sites are indicated.
[0092] In FIG. 1H, group changes in low gamma band (30-50 Hz) WPLI are illustrated, related to FIG. 1G. 40 Hz visual stimulation induced significant increases in coherence between VI-CA1 (Wilcoxon-Ranksum, Z = 2.2, P = 0.03), V1-SS1 (P = 0.021) and V1-PFC (Z = 2.5, P = 0.014).
[0093] FIG. 11 is a schematic of 80 Hz LED light delivery with 50 % duty cycle (6.25 ms lights on and 6.25 ms lights off).
[0094] FIG. 1J, on the left, shows power spectra of V1 LFP in C57B/6J mice subjected to light occluded (Oc. LED) or 80 Hz visual stimulation. On the right, the area power centered on 80 Hz (±5 Hz) was not significantly different with 80 Hz visual stimulation (N = 5 mice, Wilcoxon Ranksum test, Z = 1.2, P=0.22).
[0095] FIGS. 2A through 2F illustrate that chronic 40 Hz (but not 80 Hz) visual flicker stimulation reduces amyloid plaques beyond visual cortex in the subject, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[0096] FIG. 2A shows amyloid plaque load in 5XFAD mice exposed to either no stimulation, Hz or 80 Hz visual stimulation 1h per day for 7 days, as visualized by immunohistochemistry staining of the D54D2 antibody. Representative images from VI, SS1 and CA1 in each condition, scale bar represents 50 im.
[0097] FIG. 2B illustrates group quantification showing that GENUS ih per day for 7 days reduced amyloid plaques in V, but it did not significantly alter amyloid plaques in SS1 or hippocampal area CA1. 80 Hz visual stimulation exposure did not alter levels of amyloid plaques in Vi or CA1, whereas it significantly increased amyloid plaques in the SS1. N= 8 non-stimulated, and 6 mice each from 40 Hz and 80 Hz group. Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 51) = 5.378, P = 0.0076. Bonferroni's post-hoc multiple comparisons, *** P < 0.001, * P < 0.05.
[0098] FIG. 2C shows representative images of amyloid plaque load in 5XFAD mice exposed to either no stimulation or an extended GENUS protocol of 22 days hourr per day). Scale bars represent 50 im.
[0099] FIG. 2D shows that 22 days of GENUS significantly reduced amyloid plaques in VI, SS1, CA1 and CC. N = 6 mice per condition. Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (1, 40) = 51.00, P < 0.0001. Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01.
[00100] FIG. 2E shows representative images of amyloid plaques inVI, SS1 and CA1 visualized from mice exposed to no stimulation or 80 Hz light flicker for lh per day for 22 days, scale bar represents 50 im.
[00101] FIG. 2F is related to FIG. 2E, showing group data quantifying amyloid plaques in VI, SS1 and CA1. N = 6 mice per group. No significant differences between groups were found in two-way ANOVA measures F (1, 30) = 0.0033, P = 0.9565.
[00102] FIGS. 3A through 3J illustrate that chronic visual stimulation ameliorates Alzheimer's Disease-associated pathology and significantly reduces or prevents neurodegeneration in a subject, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[00103] FIG. 3A provides an experiment outline showing that P301S mice were subjected to no stimulation or GENUS for 22 days (1h per day) followed by immunohistochemical and phosphoproteomics analyses. WT cage littermates that did not undergo stimulation regimen were considered WT naive mice.
[00104] FIG. 3B provides representative images showing S202/T205 phosphorylated tau immunostaining from visual cortex. Scale bar 50 im. Right: P301S tau mice exhibited higher S202/T205 levels in VI, SS1, CA1 and CC, whereas 22 days of GENUS significantly reduced S202/T205 in all areas examined. N = 7 WT naive, 8 non-stimulated P301S mice and 7 GENUS stimulated P301S mice. Two-way ANOVA between group effect F (2, 76) = 45.35, P < 0.0001.
Post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni's correction, **** P < 0.0001,** P < 0.001,** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05.
[00105] FIG. 3C illustrates phosphoproteomic analysis of Serine/Threonine phosphorylated tau protein from visual cortex. Heat-map displays S/T residues of tau protein that were differentially phosphorylated in P301S compared to WT mice. Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 322)= 2146, P < 0.0001. All phosphopeptides were mapped as described in the methods. All S/T residues of tau shown in the heat-map were statistically significant between WT naive and non stimulated P301S. Statistical comparison (P values) between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated P301S mice for specific residues are shown in the chart. GENUS reduced phosphorylation in the tau protein at 6 S/T sites and increased phosphorylation at S451. Commonly known human tau S/T sites are shown on top.
[00106] FIG. 3D shows representative images for the neuronal marker NeuN in visual cortex from WT naive and P301S mice that underwent no-stimulation or GENUS. Scale bar represents im.
[00107] FIG. 3E shows group data indicating P301S mice showed significant loss of neurons in VI, SS1, CA1 and CC compared to WT naive mice. GENUS stimulated P301S group showed significantly reduced neurodegeneration. N = same as in FIG. 3B. Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 76) = 19.73, P < 0.0001. Post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni's correction, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05.
[00108] FIG. 3F provides and experimental overview showing induction of p25 expression in CK-p25 mice for 42 days. This was accompanied by GENUS for lh per day in one experimental group, the non-stimulation control group received room light. CK (CaMK2a-promoter x tTA) cage littermates that did not undergo stimulation regimen were considered CK naive mice.
[00109] FIG. 3G is a photomicrograph showing qualitative differences in brains between CK naive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice, 42 days post induction. Right: CK p25 mice exhibited reduced brain weight (i.e. brain atrophy) compared to CK naive mice, whereas chronic GENUS partially alleviated brain atrophy in CK-p25 mice. N = 13 CK naive mice, 10 mice each for non-stimulated and GENUS CK-p25 groups. ANOVA F (2, 30)= 15.46, P < 0.001. Post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni's correction, **** P < 0.0001, * P < 0.05.
[00110] FIG. 3H provides representative images and size quantification of the lateral ventricles (outlined), scale bar represents 1000 im. Right: compared to CK naive mice, CK-p25 mice exhibited aberrant ventricles expansion, which was significantly reduced after chronic GENUS. N = 9 CK naive mice and 6 mice from each of the non-stimulated and GENUS CK-p25 group. ANOVA F (2, 18)= 12.36, P < 0.001. Post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni's correction, **** P < 0.0001,* P < 0.05. See also FIG. 9E.
[00111] FIG. 31 provides representative images for the neuronal marker NeuN in visual cortex from CK naive and CK-p25 mice that underwent no-stimulation or GENUS. Scale bar represents im.
[00112] FIG. 3J shows that CK-p25 mice exhibited severe neuronal loss in VI, SS1, CAl and CC, whereas chronic GENUS reduced the loss of neurons in CK-p25 mice. N = same as in FIG. 3G. Two-way ANOVA F (2, 72) = 31.38, P < 0.0001. Post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni's correction **** P < 0.001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05.
[00113] FIGS. 4A through 4Q illustrate that chronic visual sitmulation reduces inflammatory response in microglia of a subject, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[00114] FIG. 4A relates to CK-p25 mice that were subjected to no stimulation or GENUS lh per day for 42 days. Microglia from visual cortex were then isolated using the fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS; using a CD1lb and CD45 double positive criteria) after which RNA was extracted and sequenced. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are shown in volcano plots. Group comparisons are shown to the bottom. Left: DEGs between CK naive and non-stimulated CK-p25 mice, N = 4 mice per group. Right: DEGs between non-stimulated and GENUS CK-p25 mice, N = 4 mice group.
[00115] FIG. 4B shows selected gene ontology (GO) terms for biological processes associated with the identified DEGs. Top: GO terms associated with the upregulated (UP) genes in non stimulated CK-p25 mice compared to CK naive mice. Bottom: GO terms associated with the downregulated (DOWN) in non-stimulated CK-p25 mice compared to CK naive mice.
[00116] FIG. 4C shows selected GO terms associated with DEGs. Top: GO terms associated with the upregulated (UP) genes in GENUS CK-p25 mice compared to non-stimulated CK-p25 mice. Bottom: GO terms associated with the downregulated (DOWN) in GENUS CK-p25 mice compared to non-stimulated CK-p25 mice.
[00117] FIG. 4D provides representative images showing microglia marker Ibal (green) and CD40 (red) immunostaining from visual cortex. Scale bar 50 m. N = 7 CK naive mice, 6 mice each for non-stimulated and GENUS groups. Arrow and arrowhead indicate rod-shaped ramified processes and branch volume of microglia processes respectively.
[00118] FIG. 4E shows that non-stimulated CK-p25 mice exhibited higher number of Ibal positive cells compared to CK naive mice, chronic GENUS significantly reduced Ibal cell density in CK-p25 mice. ANOVA F (2,16)= 17.79, P < 0.0001.
[00119] In FIG. 4F, we performed three-dimensional rendering of microglia using Imaris and quantified the volume of soma and processes of microglia. N = 73 microglia per group from the same number of mice as in FIG. 4D. The frequency distribution of the volume (size) of microglia soma, which did not show any statistical significance between groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, H= 0.3529, P = 0.8382).
[00120] FIG. 4G shows the overall volume of microglia processes (excluding rodlike microglia) was significantly lower in non-stimulated CK-p25 mice compared to CK naive mice. GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice did not show difference compared to CK naive mice (H = 9.224, P= 0.009).
[00121] FIG. 4H illustrates quantification of minimum distance between microglia. N = 68 microglia from 9 CK naive, 131 microglia from 6 non-stimulated and 95 microglia from 6 GENUS CK-p25 mice. Microglia in non-stimulated CK-p25 mice aggregated together compared to CK naive mice, whereas GENUS significantly reduced microglia aggregation (H = 100.1, P < 0.0001).
[00122] FIG. 41 illustrates quantification of radial primary processes of rod like microglia. N = 16 microglia from 9 CK naive, 19 microglia per group from 6 mice each from non-stimulated and GENUS CK-p25 group. The overall volume of processes of rod like microglia was significantly reduced after GENUS in CK-p25 mice compared to non-stimulated CK-p25 mice. ANOVA F (2, 51)= 16.27, P < 0.0001.
[00123] FIG. 4J shows that non-stimulated CK-p25 mice exhibited higher signal intensity of interferon response protein CD40 compared to CK naive mice, whereas chronic GENUS significantly reduced CD40 signal in CK-p25 mice. ANOVA F (2, 16)= 36.84, P < 0.0001.
[00124] FIG. 4K provides representative images from visual cortex showing Ibal in green and nuclear stain Hoechst in blue. Scale bar 50 im. Arrowhead indicates the complexity of microglia processes.
[00125] FIG. 4L illustrates that P301S tau mice showed a trend towards increased total number of Ibal positive cells but was not statistically significant compared to WT mice. N = 7 WT naive, 8 non-stimulated P301S mice and 7 GENUS mice. ANOVA F(2,19)= 2.401,P= 0.1190.
[00126] FIG. 4M is a frequency distribution chart showing the size of microglia soma. N = 7 WT naive, 8 non-stimulated P301S mice and 7 GENUS mice. A total of 58 microglia per group was analyzed. The overall volume of microglia soma did not differ between groups. Kruskal Wallis test H = 0.04269, P = 0.9789.
[00127] FIG. 4N shows that the volume of the processes of microglia was smaller in P301S tau mice compared to WT mice, whereas GENUS stimulated P301S mice showed similar process length to that of WT mice. Kruskal Wallis test H = 7.895, P = 0.0193.
[00128] FIG. 40 provides representative images showing Clq (classical complement pathway imitating protein) immunostaining from visual cortex. Scale bar 50 im. Top: N = 7 CK naive mice, 6 mice each for non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated groups. Bottom: N = 7 WT naive, 8 non stimulated P301S mice and 7 GENUS mice.
[00129] FIG. 4P shows that non-stimulated CK-p25 mice exhibited higher Clq signal intensity compared to CK naive mice, whereas chronic GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice showed significantly reduced CIq intensity. ANOVA F (2, 16)= 13.39, P = 0.0004.
[00130] FIG. 4Q shows that non-stimulated P301S mice exhibited higher Clq signal intensity compared to WT naive mice, chronic GENUS did not differ between any groups. ANOVA F (2,
19)= 6.887, P = 0.005. Post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni's correction in E, I, J, L, P, Q **** P < 0.0001, ** P < 0.01,* P < 0.05, n.s- not significant.
[00131] FIGS. 5A through 5I illustrate that chronic visual stimulation modifies synaptic function and intracellular transport in neurons, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[00132] In FIG. 5A, CK-p25 mice were subjected to no stimulation or GENUS lh per day for 42 days. NeuN positive (100,000) nuclei of neurons from visual cortex were isolated using FACS followed by RNA extraction and sequencing. Heat-maps of the DEGs. Number of mice per group is indicated in the heat-maps. Top left: DEGs between CK naive and non-stimulated CK-p25 mice. Bottom left: DEGs between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice, number of genes is indicated on the right. Right: Chart showing the biological processes associated with the downregulated genes in non-stimulated CK-p25 mice compared to CK naive mice, and the overlap of the same biological process associated with the upregulated genes after GENUS in CK-p25 mice.
[00133] In FIG. 5B, P301S mice were subjected to no stimulation or GENUS stimulation 1h per day for 22 days. NeuN positive (100,000) nuclei of neurons from visual cortex were isolated using FACS followed by RNA extraction and sequencing. Heat-maps of the differentially expressed genes. Number of mice per group is indicated in the heat-maps. Top left: DEGs between WT naive and non-stimulated P301S tau mice. Bottom left: DEGs between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated P301S tau mice, number of genes is indicated on the right. Right: Chart showing the biological processes associated with the downregulated genes in non-stimulated P301S mice compared to CK naive mice, and the overlap of the same biological process associated with the upregulated genes after GENUS stimulation in P301S mice.
[00134] In FIG. 5C, CK-p25 mice were subjected to no stimulation or GENUS for 42 days. Total protein expressions and S/T phosphorylated proteins analysis was performed on visual cortex tissue using TMT 10-plex kit and mass spectrometry. N = 3 CK naive, 3 non-stimulated CK-p25 and 4 GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice. Top: Venn diagram showing the overlap of total RNAs identified from neuron specific RNA seq (FIG. 5B, above) and total proteins identified from LC MS/MS. 92.73% of the proteins identified were found to be expressed in neurons. Bottom: Volcano plot of differentially S/T phosphorylated proteins in CK-p25 mice compared to the control littermates (left) and GENUS (right).
[00135] In FIG. 5D, P301S tau mice were subjected to no stimulation or GENUS stimulation for 22 days. Total protein expressions and S/T phosphorylated proteins analysis was performed on visual cortex tissue using tandem mass tag (TMT) 10-plex kit (see methods) and mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). N = 3 WT naive, 3 non-stimulated P301S and 4 GENUS stimulated P301S mice. Top: Venn diagram showing the overlap of total RNAs identified from neuron specific RNA seq (FIG. 5A, above) and total proteins identified from LC-MS/MS. 91.95% of the proteins identified were found to be expressed in neurons. Bottom: Volcano plots of differentially S/T phosphorylated proteins in P301S tau mice compared to the control littermates (left) and GENUS (right). Phosphorylated proteins with fold change of 0.2 and adjusted P value of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
[00136] FIG. 5E shows GO terms for the differentially S/T phosphorylated proteins in CK-p25 and P301S tau mice after chronic GENUS.
[00137] FIG. 5F shows representative images showing neurofilament heavy chain (NFH, a neuronal marker expressed primarily in axons) and Ser774 phosphorylated dynamin1 immunostaining from visual cortex. NFH was used to label neuronal processes. Scale bar 10 im. N = 7 CK naive mice, 6 mice each for non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated groups. Middle: CK-p25 mice exhibited significantly higher levels of pS774-DNM1 signal intensity compared to CK naive, whereas GENUS significantly reduced this aberrant phosphorylation in CK-p25 mice. F (2, 16)= 38.551, P < 0.0001. Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01. Right: Non-stimulated P301S tau mice exhibited significantly higher levels of pS774-DNM1 signal intensity compared to WT naive mice, whereas GENUS significantly reduced this aberrant phosphorylation in P301S mice. N = 7 WT naive, 8 non-stimulated P301S mice and 7 GENUS mice. ANOVA F (2, 19) = 18.69, P < 0.0001. Post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni's correction ** P < 0.01, n.s- not significant.
[00138] FIG. 5G shows representative brain slices immunostained for vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (vGlutl) from visual cortex of CK naive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK p25 mice. Scale bar represents 10 im.
[00139] FIG. 5H shows that while the expression of vGlutl puncta was significantly lower in non-stimulated CK-p25 mice, GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice exhibited higher levels of vGlutl puncta compared to non-stimulated CK-p25 mice in V1, SS1, CA1 and CC. N = 9 CK naive mice, and 6 mice each from non-stimulated and GENUS CK-p25 group. Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 72) = 42.06, P < 0.0001. Post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni's correction **** P < 0.0001, ** P < 0.01,* P < 0.05.
[00140] FIG. 5I shows that the expression of synaptic puncta vGlutl was significantly lower in P301S compared to WT naive mice, GENUS rescued vGlutl expression in V, CA1 and CC in P301S. N = 7 WT naive, and 8 non-stimulated P301S mice and 7 GENUS mice. Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 76)= 23.67, P < 0.0001. Post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni's correction **** P < 0.0001, *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01,* P < 0.05.
[00141] FIGS. 6A through 61 illustrate that chronic visual stimulation modifies behavior in multiple subject models of Alzheimer's Disease, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[00142] In FIG. 6A, p25 expression was induced in two groups of CK-p25 mice for 42 days, only one of which received daily GENUS for 1 h (stimulation was performed between 9 am-12 pm). Mice were subjected to open field (OF) and novel object recognition (OR) tests on day 40 (OF) and day 41 (OR) afternoon (3 pm-7 pm). F and N denote familiar and novel objects, respectively. Representative occupancy heat maps from OF and OR sessions are shown. Color level is mapped to the range of location frequencies in the arena or objects: warm color represents higher time and frequency, whereas cold color represents less time in the specified locations.
[00143] FIG. 6B shows that chronic visual GENUS did not affect anxiety levels in CK-p25 mice. Time spent in the center of OF arena did cold not differ between CK naive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice. ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 49)= 1.198, P = 0.3104.
[00144] FIG. 6C shows preference for novel objects in CK naive and GENUS stimulated CK p25 mice was significantly higher than familiar object, however; non-stimulated CK-p25 mice showed no preference. Two-way ANOVA effects between familiar and novel objects F (1, 70) = 7.742, P = 0.0069. T-test; CK naive, T = 4.421, P = 0.0001; CK-p25 + No stim, T = 1.108, P = 0.0946; CK-p25 + GENUS, T = 3.306, P = 0.0017.
[00145] FIG. 6D shows Morris water maze performance of p25 induced CK-p25 mice with or without GENUS for 42 days (MWM; between day 36 and 41 of p25 induction). Top: Chronic GENUS reduced the latency to find the platform in the training in CK-p25 mice compared to non stimulated CK-p25 mice. Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (2,252)= 18.64, P < 0.0001. Bottom: Number of platform crossings in the probe test which was conducted 24h after the final training session was significantly higher in the GENUS stimulated group compared to non stimulated CK-p25 mice (left: between groups effect F (2, 42)= 5.277, P = 0.0090). Time spent in the target quadrant (right; between groups effect F (2, 42) = 6.35, P = 0.0039) was significantly lower in the non-stimulated CK-p25 mice compared to CK naive mice.
[00146] FIG. 6E relates to P301S tau mice exposed to no stimulation or GENUS for lh per day for 22 days (9 am- 12pm) then assessed in OF (day 20; 3 - 7 pm) and OR (day 21) tests. Representative occupancy heat maps from OF and OR sessions are shown.
[00147] FIG. 6F shows that GENUS did not affect anxiety levels in P301S mice. Time spent in the OF center did not differ between non-stimulated, GENUS stimulated P301S and WT naive groups (ANOVA F (2, 36)= 1.189, P = 0.3163).
[00148] FIG. 6G shows that WT, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated P301S mice all exhibited higher preference for novel objects. Two-way ANOVA effects between familiar and novel objects F (1, 80) = 88.61, P < 0.0001. T-test; WT naive, T = 6.525, P < 0.00001; P301S
+ No stim, T = 2.602, P = 0.0054; P301S + GENUS, T = 10.65, P < 0.00001.
[00149] FIG. 6H shows MWM performance of WT naive, non-stimulated or GENUS stimulated P301S tau mice. Top: Chronic GENUS reduced the latency to find the platform during the training in P301S mice compared to no-stimulated P301S mice. Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 225)= 3.782, P = 0.0242. Bottom: Number of platform crossings in the probe test (left: F (2, )= 2.872, P = 0.067) and time in target quadrant in the probe test (right: F (2, 45)= 3.115, P= 0.054.
[00150] In FIG. 61,5XFAD mice with or without GENUS (1h per day for 22 days) were tested for MWM performance. Left: Latency to find the platform during training. Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 273)= 16.97, P < 0.0001. Number of platform crossings in the probe test (middle: between groups effect F (2, 39) = 4.702, P = 0.0148) and time spent in the target quadrant (right: between groups effect F (2, 39) = 7.289, P = 0.0020) was significantly lower in non-stimulated CK-p25 mice.
[00151] FIGS. 7A through 71 illustrate that chronic visual stimulation entrains gamma oscillations beyond visual cortex in mouse models of neurodegeneration, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[00152] FIG. 7A shows electrolytic lesions to verify recording sites in mice used for main figures IC, ID post- recording. Representative images show the site of recording from VI, SS1, CA1 and PFC.
[00153] In FIG. 7B, CDK5 activator p25 was induced in CK-p25 mice for 6 weeks, followed by microdrive implantation and LFP recording.
[00154] In FIG. 7C, area powers (35- 45 Hz) were significantly lower in CK-p25 mice compared to age matched WT mice in VI, CA1 and PFC (all regions P < 0.01). 40 Hz visual stimulation increased 40 Hz power in VI (Wilcoxon-Rank sum; P = 0.0022), CA1 (P = 0.001) and PFC (P =
0.002) during 40 Hz light flicker exposure in 6 weeks induced CK-p25 mice.
[00155] In FIG. 7D, microdrives were implanted in 8 month old P301S tau mice.
[00156] FIG. 7E shows that significant increases in power (35-45 Hz) were observed during 40 Hz light stimulation in VI (P = 6.01E-05) and PFC (P = 4.11E-05).
[00157] FIG. 7F relates to C57B16/J mice subjected to no stimulation or GENUS 1 h/day for 42. Right: Significant increases in 35- 45 Hz area powers were observed in V (Wilcoxon-Ranksum test; P = 1.54E-06), SS1 (P = 2.88E-04), CA1 (P = 0.04) and PFC (P = 3.39E-06), during 40 Hz visual stimulation.
[00158] In FIG 7G, C57B16/J mice were subjected to no stimulation or GENUS 1 h/day for 42 days. Mice were subjected to 40 Hz visual stimulation on day 43 and LFPs were collected. Between areas significant increases were observed in 30-50 Hz low gamma coherence (measured as the weighted phase lag index) between V1- CA1 (P = 0.002), V1- SS1 (P = 0.008), CAl-PFC (P =
0.04), V1-PFC (P = 0.002), during GENUS. There was no difference in low gamma WPLI between
CA1 and SS1 (P = 0.18).
[00159] In FIG. 7H, p25 was induced in CK-p25 mice for 6 weeks. Six weeks induced CK-p25 mice underwent (from day 43) no stimulation or GENUS 1 h/d for 42 days. Right: Significant increases in low gamma area power (35-45 Hz) were observed in all brain areas studied in CK p25 mice [VI, P = 0.0017), CA1 (P= 0.0379), PFC (P= 0.0030)] (measured on day 85).
[00160] FIG. 71 shows that significant increases were also evident in low gamma coherence between VI- CA1 (P < 0.01), CAl-PFC (P < 0.01), V1-PFC (P < 0.01).
[00161] FIGS. 8A through 81 illustrate that chronic visual stimulation reduces AD-associated pathology in 5XFAD mice beyond visual cortex, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[00162] FIG. 8A is a schematic showing the visual flicker stimulation set up. An array of light emitting diodes (LEDs) was present on the open side of the cage and was driven to flicker at a frequency of 40 Hz with a square wave current pattern using an Arduino system. Since mice freely move in the cage (83 in2 total floor area), the light intensity that they received ranges from -1500 to 300 lux.
[00163] In FIG. 8B, 10 month old 5XFAD mice underwent no stimulation or GENUS lh per day for 22 days. Representative images show amyloid plaques in red and nuclear stain Hoechst in blue from slices containing hippocampus and somatosensory cortex. Scale bar 1000 im. Related to main figure 2C- 2D.
[00164] In FIG. 8C, 10 month old 5XFAD mice underwent no stimulation or GENUS lh per day for 22 days. Representative images show amyloid plaques in red, neuronal marker NeuN in green and nuclear stain Hoechst in blue from cingulate cortex. Scale bar 50 im. Related to main figure 2C- 2D.
[00165] FIG. 8D shows that the number of plaques in GENUS stimulated 5XFAD mice was significantly lower than non-stimulated 5XFAD mice in V, SS1, CA1 and CC. Related to main figure 2C- 2D. N = 6 mice per condition. Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (1, 40) =
30.01, P < 0.0001. *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05.
[00166] In FIG. 8E, 9 month old non-stimulated 5XFAD mice showed significant reductions in neuronal density in CA1 and CC compare to the age matched WT littermates. GENUS significantly reduced neuronal loss in 5XFAD mice in CC. N = 9 WT naive, 6 5XFAD + No stim, and 6 5XFAD + GENUS mice. Two way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 72) = 14.93, P < 0.0001. Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
[00167] In FIG. 8F, 10 month old 5XFAD mice underwent no stimulation or GENUS lh per day for 22 days. Representative images show synaptic marker bassoon. Scale bar 10 im.
[00168] In FIG. 8G, 5XFAD mice exhibited significant reductions in synaptic marker bassoon staining in CA1 and CC, which was significantly reduced by 40 Hz GENUS. N = 9 WT naive, 6 XFAD + No stim, and 6 5XFAD + GENUS mice. Two way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 72)= 16.18, P < 0.0001. Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
[00169] FIG. 8H provides full length immunoblots showing the expression levels of full length APP protein and endogenous GAPDH control. N = 5 WT naive mice, 3 non-stimulated 5XFAD mice and 4 GENUS stimulated 5XFAD mice.
[00170] FIG. 81 shows that APP protein expression was significantly higher in 5XFAD mice compared to WT naive control. Between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated 5XFAD mice it did not differ. Note that we did not measure the C/N fragments of APP proteins. C-terminal specific APP antibody, one way ANOVA F (2, 9) = 4.436, P = 0.046. N-terminal specific APP antibody, one way ANOVA F (2, 9)= 13.194, P = 0.002. Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test, **P < 0.01.
[00171] FIGS. 9A through 9G illustrate that chronic visual stimulation ameliorates AD associated pathology in P301S and CK-p25 mice, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[00172] FIG 9A provides full length immunoblots showing the expression levels of total tau protein and GAPDH from visual cortex of non-stimulated, GENUS stimulated P301S tau mice, and age matched WT naive littermates. Right: Total tau expression in P301S tau mice was increased compared to WT naive mice, however; tau levels did not differ between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated P301S mice. N = 3 WT naive, 3 non-stimulated and 4 GENUS stimulated P301S mice. ANOVA F (2, 7) = 173.275, P < 0.0001. Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test, ***P < 0.001.
[00173] FIG. 9B shows that brains did not differ in weight among WT naive, non- stimulated P301S and GENUS stimulated P301S mice. There was a tendency towards an aberrant expansion of lateral ventricles in P301S tau mice compared to WT naive mice. ANOVA F(2,19) = 2.761, P = 0.079.
[00174] FIG. 9C provides full length immunoblots showing the expression levels of p25 +GFP (fusion protein), p25, p 3 5 and GAPDH from visual cortex of CK naive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice. Right: There was a significant increase in p25+ GFP protein in CK-p25 mice compared to age matched CK naive mice (one way ANOVA, F (2,12) = 13.065, P = 0.002), however; non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 did not differ in p25 + GFP expression. Similarly, p25 expression level was significantly higher in CK-p25 mice compared to CK naive mice but did not differ between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice (one way ANOVA, F (2, 12)= 3.581, P = 0.025). Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test, *P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
[00175] FIG. 9D provides representative images showing the thickness of visual cortex in CK naive, non-stimulated CK-p25 and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice. Nuclear stain Hoechst is shown in blue and neuronal marker NeuN in red. Right: Bar chart shows the difference in visual cortex thickness among groups. Two-way ANOVA between group effect F (2, 36) = 12.93, P < 0.0001. Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
[00176] FIG. 9E provides representative images showing the qualitative differences among CK naive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice detailing changes in hippocampal volume, cortical thickness and ventricle size. Related to main FIG. 3F - 3H.
[00177] FIG. 9F shows that GENUS did not alter the p25 +GFP fusion protein expression level (number of p25: GFP expressing neurons) compared to non-stimulated CK-p25 mice, across all brain regions tested, independent samples t-test between groups, P > 0.05.
[00178] FIG. 9G provides representative images showing expression of the DNA double stranded break marker yH2Ax from CA1 in CK naive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK p25 mice. No yH2Ax positive nuclei were evident in CK naive mice, therefore comparisons were made between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice. N = 6 mice per condition.
Scale bar 100 im. Right: GENUS significantly reduced yH2Ax positive nuclei in VI (independent samples t-test; T = 4.418, P = 0.0006), SS1 (T = 2.944, P = 0.013), CA1 (T = 2.664, P = 0.0143) and CC (T = 1.883, P = 0.055).
[00179] FIGS. 1OA through ION illustrate that chronic visual stimulation modifies microglia, improves intracellular transport and synaptic transmission in neurons, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[00180] FIG. 10A shows microglia separation profile in FACS from representative CK naive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice. Related main FIG. 4A 4C.
[00181] FIG. lOB shows microglia separation profile in FACS from representative WT naive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated P301S tau mice.
[00182] In FIG. 10C, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are shown in volcano plots. Group comparisons are shown to the right. Top: DEGs between WT naive and non-stimulated P301S, N = 5 mice per group. Middle top: DEGs between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated P301S mice, N = 5 mice per group.
[00183] FIG. 1OD shows the top 7 processed gene ontology (GO) terms for biological processes associated with the identified DEGs. Group comparisons are shown to the top.
[00184] FIG. 1OE provides representative images showing Ibal in green and CD40 in red. Merged images presented in main FIG. 4D were separated for clarity.
[00185] FIG. 1OF shows neuronal nuclei separation profile in FACS from representative CK naive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice is shown. Group mean and SEM of % NeuN compare to total nuclei: CK naive, 50 1.48; non-stimulated CK-p25, 40.98 0.719; GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice, 45.08 1.691. ANOVA F (2, 12) = 11.55, P = 0.0016. Bonferroni's post hoc test, CK naive Vs non-stimulated CK-p25, P = 0.001' CK naive Vs GENUS stimulated CK-p25 P = 0.0609. GENUS reduced the loss of neuronal nuclei in CK-p25 mice.
[00186] FIG. lOG shows neuronal nuclei separation profile in FACS from representative WT naive, non-stimulated P301S and GENUS stimulated P301S mice is shown. Group mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) of percentage of NeuN positive nuclei found compare to total
Hoechst positive nuclei: WT naive, 52.45 2.03; non-stimulated P301S, 45.17 1.18; GENUS stimulated P301S, 50.38 2.09. ANOVA F (2,18)= 4.97, P = 0.0191. Bonferroni's post hoc test, WT naive Vs non-stimulated P301S, P = 0.028; WT naive Vs GENUS stimulated P301S mice, P = 0.99. GENUS reduced the loss of neuronal nuclei in P301S tau mice.
[00187] FIG. 10H provides bar graphs showing the percentage of total neurons (NeuN) positive nuclei compare to total nuclei as in FIG. 1OF and OG. Top: Bar graph comparing WT naive, non stimulated and GENUS stimulated P301S mice. N = 7 mice per group. ANOVA F (2,18)= 4.971, P = 0.0191. Bottom: Bar graph comparing CK naive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK p25 mice. N = 5 mice for each group. ANOVA F (2, 12)= 7.72, P = 0.0070.
[00188] In FIG. 101 upregulated genes in P301S tau mice and CK-p25 mice after chronic GENUS were selected based on neurotransmitter transport and vesicle mediated transport clusters with 60 genes. Note that these genes were upregulated only in CK-p25, P301S or in both mice after GENUS compared to non-stimulated mice (analyzed by metascape). Protein-protein interaction network map (Analyzed with Cytoscape V3.6.1 followed by Strings; enrichment P value, 6.66E-15) is shown with tightly linked further functional enrichment GO terms.
[00189] In FIG. 1OJ, the visual cortex from non-stimulated P301S tau-tg mice and GENUS stimulated 1h/d for 22 days were subjected to S/T phosphoproteomics analysis. Heat-map shows the differentially phosphorylated proteins between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated P301S mice that are involved in synaptic transmission and intracellular transport.
[00190] In FIG. 10K, a heat-map shows the differentially phosphorylated proteins involved in synaptic transmission (chemical synaptic transmission, trans-synaptic signaling) between non stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice. Genes (corresponding proteins) names and the specific phospho-sites are shown.
[00191] In FIG. 1OL, P301S tau mice were subjected to no stimulation or GENUS stimulation for 22 days. Total protein expressions and S/T phosphorylated proteins analysis was performed on visual cortex tissue using tandem mass tag (TMT) 10-plex kit (see methods) and mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). N = 3 WT naive, 3 non-stimulated P301S and 4 GENUS stimulated P301S mice. Phosphorylated proteins with fold change of 0.2 and adjusted P value of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. GO terms of biological processes associated with the differentially S/T phosphorylated proteins in CK-p25 and P301S tau mice compared to their respective control mice.
[00192] FIG. 1OM - Top: Western blots show pS774 DNM-1, DNM-1, DNM-3 and GAPDH from CK naive, non-stimulated and 40 Hz GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice. pS774DNM-1 level was significantly higher in CK-p25 mice compare to CK naive mice, whereas 40 Hz GENUS significantly reduced pS774DNM-1 in CK-p25 mice. N = 4 CK naive mice, 5 non-stimulated CK p25 mice and 4 40 Hz GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice (ANOVA F (2,12) = 5.836, P = 0.021). Bottom: Bar chart shows the group difference. Please note that this is an independent verification. Related to main FIG. 5F.
[00193] FIG ION- Top: Western blots show pS774 DNM-1, total DNM-1, DNM-3 and GAPDH from WT naive, non-stimulated and 40 Hz GENUS stimulated P301S mice. Please note that this is an independent verification. *P < 0.05. Related to main FIG. 5F.
[00194] FIGS. 11A through 11J illustrate behavioral characterization of the effect on a subject of acute and chronic visual stimulation according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[00195] FIG 11A- Top: Heat-maps of C57B16/J mice occupancy in 10 minute bins is shown, either with or without GENUS. No difference was evident in exploratory behavior during the first min pre-stimulation baseline period. N = 6 mice per group. T-test, T = 0.3173, P = 0.7576. Similarly, no systematic changes in velocity throughout the 40 Hz stimulation period were detectable when compared to the no-stimulation group. Bottom: Plot shows the velocity every minute, for the 30 minutes. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA: Exploration over 30 min time, F (29, 290) = 6.747, P < 0.0001; interaction between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated WT mice, F (29, 290)= 0.9354, P = 0.5652.
[00196] In FIG. 1IB, C57B16/J mice (4months old) was subjected to no stimulation or 40 Hz light flicker stimulation for ih and immediately afterwards were injected with picrotoxin and placed in an OF. Left: Distance travelled after picrotoxin injection, revealed no difference between GENUS and non-stimulation groups. N = 4 mice per group. Repeated measures ANOVA F =
0.527, P = 0.717. Right: Racine scores. Score 0, normal behavior; score 1, immobility and rigidity; score 2, head bobbing; score 3, forelimb clonus and rearing; score 4, continuous rearing and falling; score 5, clonic-tonic seizure; score 6, death. No difference in seizure susceptibility was evident between the non-stimulated and GENUS groups. Repeated measures ANOVA F = 0.429, P= 0.994.
[00197] In FIG. 1IC, following 3 days of habituation to a novel object, WT mice were tested for NOR. Left: Time spent exploring familiar and novel objects every minute for 30 min duration. Novel object discrimination in percentage is superimposed. Middle: histogram shows the cumulative (entire 30 min) exploration of familiar and novel objects. Both non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated mice spent significantly more time exploring the novel object compared to familiar object. There was no difference between groups, suggesting that acute 40 Hz light flicker exposure did not affect the ability of mice to discriminate novel objects. N = 6 mice per group. Cumulative novel object preference compared to familiar object: No stim, T (6) = -13.055, P = 0.00004; GENUS T (5)= -20.818, P = 0.000004. Novel object preference between groups, t-test T = - 0.314, P = 0.760. Right: histogram of total distance travelled, showing GENUS does not alter locomotor behavior in WT mice. Total distance moved, t-test T = 0.5096, P = 0.6214.
[00198] In FIG. 1ID, C57B16/J mice underwent no stimulation or GENUS lh per day for 7 days. The body weight of mice was measured lh before the stimulation paradigm every day for 7 days and 1-day post stimulation regimen. N = 14 non-stimulated and 12 GENUS stimulated mice. Bar chart show the body weight across 7 days. There was an overall increase in body weight across days in both groups (F (6,144) = 2.889, P = 0.011), however; there was no difference in body weight between non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated group (F (6, 144)= 1.327, P = 0.249).
[00199] FIG. 11E shows that there was significant difference in the body weight between WT naive and P301S tau mice (two-way ANOVA effects between groups F (2, 72) = 8.947, P = 0.0003), however; chronic GENUS (1 h/day for 22 days) did not affect the body weight of P301S compared to non-stimulated P301S tau mice. N = 13 WT naive, 14 non-stimulated and 12 GENUS stimulated P301S mice.
[00200] FIG. 1IF shows that chronic GENUS did not affect body weight of CK-p25 mice compared to non-stimulated CK-p25 mice (two-way ANOVA effects between groups F (2, 122) =2.487, P=0.0874). N= 25 CK naive, 21 non-stimulated and 18 GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice.
[00201] FIG. 1IG is related to main figure 6F. N = same as in FIG. 6F. Total distance travelled in open field test was significant between groups. ANOVA F (2, 36)= 10.27, P = 0.0003. However, GENUS stimulated P301S mice did not differ compared to non-stimulated P301S (P > 0.99).
[00202] FIG. 11H is related to main figure 6B. N = same as in FIG. 6B. Total distance travelled in open field test is shown. There was no difference in total distance travelled during the open field test in non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice. ANOVA F (2, 49) = 0.01552, P = 0.9846.
[00203] FIG. 111 - Left: Plasma corticosterone levels did not differ between non-stimulated and 7 days GENUS stimulated WT mice. N = 12 mice per group. T = 1.17, P = 0.255. Middle: Mice underwent no stimulation or GENUS lh per day for 42 days while p25 was induced in CK-p25 mice. Number of mice per group is indicated in the chart. Plasma corticosterone levels did not differbetween CKnaive, non-stimulated and GENUS stimulated CK-p25 mice (F (2,35)= 0.4871, P = 0.6185). Right: Plasma corticosterone in P301S tau mice (22 days stimulation) was also comparable between WT naive, non-stimulated P301S and 22 days GENUS stimulated P301S mice (F (2, 35) = 0.6874, P = 0.5096). Number of mice in each group is presented in the figure accordingly.
[00204] FIG. 11J is related to main FIG. 7. The mean speed with which mice swam in the Morris water maze test from all the experiments. Left: No differences between any groups across all 6 days of training in CK-p25 mice were evident (FIG. 7D). Two -way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 252) = 0.3832, P = 0.6821. Middle: There was no difference between groups across all 5 days of training in P301S tau mice (FIG. 7H). Two -way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 225)= 0.5726, P = 0.5651. Right: There was a significant difference in 5XFAD mice cohort in swimming velocity (FIG. 71). Two-way ANOVA between groups effect F (2, 273) = 24.24, P<0.0001. Multiple comparison with Bonferroni's correction. There was no difference from Day 1 through D4. Day 5: WT naive vs. 5XFAD + No Stim, P >0.9999. WT naive vs. 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS, P = 0.0022. 5XFAD + No Stim vs. 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS, P = 0.0483. Day6: WT naive vs. 5XFAD + No Stim, P = 0.0005. WT naive vs. 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS, P = 0.0037. XFAD + No Stim vs. 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS, P > 0.9999. Day 7: WT naive vs. 5XFAD + No Stim, P < 0.0001. WT naive vs. 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS, P = 0.0043. 5XFAD + No Stim vs.
XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS, P = 0.5716.
[00205] FIGS. 12A through 12C illustrate that chronic visual stimulation at 80 Hz did not affect Morris water maze in 5XFAD mice, according to the inventive concepts disclosed.
[00206] FIG. 12A shows performance in the MWM of 5XFAD mice exposed to 80 Hz stimulation for lh per day for 22 days. Number of mice per group is indicated in the line chart legends. Latency to find the platform during the training did not differ between non-stimulated and Hz stimulated 5XFAD groups (Two-way ANOVA F (2, 180)= 13.33, P < 0.0001), however; both these groups required more time to find the platform compared to WT naive mice.
[00207] FIG. 12B indicates the number of platform crossings during the probe test. F (2, 30)= 3.622, P = 0.0390. Multiple comparison with Bonferroni's correction. *P < 0.05.
[00208] FIG. 12C shows time spent in the target quadrant during the probe test was significantly less in the non-stimulated and 80 Hz stimulated 5XFAD mice compared to WT naive mice. F (2, )= 5.643, P = 0.0083. Multiple comparison with Bonferroni's correction, compared to WT naive mice, on-stimulated- P = 0.014, 80 Hz- P = 0.0371. *P < 0.05.
[00209] Experiment and Analysis Particulars
REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies
Bassoon (1:500, dilution) Abcam Cat# ab82958, SAP7F407
vGlutl (1:1000) Synaptic Systems Cat# 135 303
NeuN (1:2000) Synaptic Systems Cat# 266 004
IBA1 (1:500) Wako Chemicals Cat# 019-19741
GFAP (1:500) Abcam Cat# ab53554
Ser202/T205 Tau (1:500) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# MN1020
Total tau (1:1000) Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-5587, H-150
j-Amyloid (1:500) Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 8243, D54D2
Clq (1:500) Abcam Cat# ab182451
CD40 (1:200) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# MA5-17852
yH2Ax (1:500) Millipore Cat# 05-636
GFP (1:1000) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A-11122
DNM-1 (1:1000) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# MA5-15285, 3G4B6
Ser774-DNM-1 (1:1000) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# PA5-38112
DNM-3 (1:1000) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# PA1-662
N-terminal APP (1:1000) Millipore Cat# MAB348, 22C11
C-terminal APP (1:1000) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 51-2700
GAD65 (1:500) Abcam Cat# ab26113, GAD-6
p 3 5/p 2 5 (1:1000) In house made N/A
GAPDH (1:2000) Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-32233, 6C5
p-Actin (1:3000) Abcam Cat# ab9485
NFH (1:1000) Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 2836S, RMdO 20
c-Fos (1:500) Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-52
Donkey anti-Rabbit, Alexa Fluor 488 Invitrogen Cat# A21206
Donkey anti-Mouse, Alexa Fluor 488 Invitrogen Cat# A21202
Donkey anti-Rabbit, Alexa Fluor 555 Invitrogen Cat# A-31572
Donkey anti-Rabbit, Alexa Fluor 594 Invitrogen Cat# Al1037
Donkey anti-Goat, Alexa Fluor 594 Invitrogen Cat# Al1058
Donkey anti-Mouse, Alexa Fluor 594 Invitrogen Cat# Al1032
Donkey anti-Guinea pig, Alexa Fluor Invitrogen Cat# A21450 647
Donkey anti-Goat, Alexa Fluor 647 Invitrogen Cat# A21447
Donkey anti-Mouse, Alexa Fluor 647 Invitrogen Cat# A31571
Donkey anti-Rabbit, Alexa Fluor 647 Invitrogen Cat# A31573
Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
Mouse: wild type C57BL/6J Jackson Laboratory JAX: 000664
B6;CBA-Tg(Camk2a-tTA)1Mmay/J Jackson Laboratory StockNo: 003010
C57BL/6-Tg(tetO- Jackson Laboratory Stock No: 005706 CDK5R1/GFP)337Lht/J
XFAD: B6SJL- Jackson Laboratory Stock No: 34840-JAX Tg(APPSwFlLon,PSEN1*M146L*L2 86V)6799Vas/Mmjax
P301S tau-tg: B6;C3-Tg(Prnp- Jackson Laboratory Stock No: 008169 MAPT*P301S)PS19Vle/J
B6.129(Cg)- Jackson Laboratory Stock No: 021882 Fostm1.1(cre/ERT2)Luo/J
Software and Algorithms
MATLAB Mathworks mathworks.com
IMARIS Bitplane bitplane.com
ImageJ NIH imagej.nih.gov/ij
EthoVision XT Noldus noldus.com
TSEsystem TSE Systems tse-systems.com
GraphPad Prism GraphPad graphpad.com
Proteome Discoverer version 1.4.1.14 Thermofisher tools.thermofisher.com
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis Qiagen qiagenbioinformatics.com
SPSS (version 24) IBM Analytics ibm.com
ZEN Zeiss zeiss.com
[00210 Animal models
[00211] All the experiments were approved by the Committee for Animal Care of the Division of Comparative Medicine at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. C57BL6, Tg(Camk2a tTA), Tg(APPSwFlLon, PSEN1*M146L*L286V), Tg(Prnp-MAPT*P301S)PS19, and Fos tml.1(cre/ERT2) were obtained from the Jackson laboratory. Tg(tetO-CDK5R1/GFP) was generated in our lab. All the transgenic mice were bred and maintained in our animal facility.
[00212] C57BL/6J mice used were 3, 10 or 17 months old. CK-control and CK-p25 (Camk2a tTA bred with tetO-CDK5R1/GFP) mice were raised on a doxycycline containing food. Normal rodent diet was given to induce p25-GFP transgene expression. Typically, p25 expression was induced for 6 weeks. At the start of the experiments the age of P301S tau mice were 7 months and XFAD mice were 9 or 11 months. All mice were group housed (2- 5 mice per cage) except those that were implanted with microdrives. All experiments were done using age matched littermates. Immunostaining and electrophysiological experiments were performed twice using mice to the total number as defined in figure legends. All behavioral experiments (except Morris water maze in young and aged WT mice and tau P301S mice) described in this paper were performed once, using the total number of animals as defined in figure legends. No statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes, instead we opted to use group sizes of similar previously published studies from our lab settings (Iaccarino et al., 2016; Nott et al., 2016) to ensure variance was kept to a minimum between groups. Box plot in figure 1 represent median, and upper (75%) and lower (25%) quartile range. Unless noted, all plots in figures 2 to figure 6 with error bars are reported as mean SEM and all samples are reported as number of mice (N).
[00213] 40 Hz lightflicker stimulation
[00214] Light flicker stimulation was delivered as previously described (Iaccarino et al., 2016). Mice were transported from the holding room to the flicker treatment room, located on adjacent floors of the same building. Following habituation under dim light for 1 h before the start of the experiment, mice were introduced to the test cage (similar to the home cage, except without bedding and three of its sides covered with black sheeting). Mice were allowed to freely move inside the cage but did not have access to food or water during the 1 h light flicker. An array of light emitting diodes (LEDs) was present on the open side of the cage and was driven to flicker at a frequency of 40 Hz with a square wave current pattern using an Arduino system. After 1h of 40 Hz light flicker exposure mice were returned to their home cage and allowed to rest for a further minutes before being transported back to the holding room. Normal room light control mice were exposed to the similar cages with similar food and water restriction, however; they experienced only normal room light.
[00215] Tissue preparation
[00216] Immunohistochemistry: Mice were transcardially perused with 40 ml of ice cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by 40 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Brains were removed and post-fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C and transferred to PBS prior to sectioning.
[00217] Western blotting: Visual cortex was dissected out and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a -80°C freezer until processing. Samples were homogenized using a glass homogenizer with RIPA (50 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0,150 mM NaCl,1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) buffer. The concentration of proteins in samples were quantified using a Bio-Rad protein assay. Equal concentrations of proteins were prepared and added with SDS- sample buffer.
[00218] Immunohistochemistry
[00219] Brains were mounted on a vibratome stage (Leica VT1000S) using superglue and 40 pm sections prepared. Slices were subsequently washed with PBS and blocked using 5 % normal donkey serum prepared in PBS containing 0.3% Triton-X100 (PBST) for 2 h at room temperature. Blocking buffer was aspirated out and the slices were incubated with the appropriate primary antibody (prepared in fresh blocking buffer) overnight at 4°C on a shaker. Slices then were washed three times (10 minutes each) with the blocking buffer and then incubated with the Alexa Fluor 488, 555, 594 or 647 conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Following three washes (15 minutes each) with blocking buffer and one final wash with PBS (10 minutes), slices were mounted with fluromount-G (Electron microscopic Sciences).
[00220] The following combination of secondary antibodies were used: (1) Alexa Fluor 488, 594 and 647, (2) Alexa Fluor 555 and 647, and (3) Alexa Fluor 594 and 647.
[00221] Imaging and quantification
[00222] Images were acquired using either LSM 710 or LSM 880 confocal microscopes (Zeiss) with 5x, lOx, 20x, 40x or 63x objectives at identical settings for all conditions. Images were quantified using either ImageJ 1.42q or Imarisx64 8.1.2 (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland). For each experimental condition, two coronal sections from the indicated number of animals were used. The averaged values from the two images per mouse was further used for quantification. Quantification was performed by an experimenter blind to the genotype and treatment conditions wherever possible.
[00223] NeuN, c-Fos and GFP positive cell counting: All images were acquired in Z-stacks- 10 per image and were quantified. An average of every two and sum of all the counts was computed using ImageJ. NeuN counting from P301S tau-tg and 5XFAD was done by an experimenter blind to the treatment condition.
[00224] yH2Axpositive cell counting: The multi-point tool in ImageJ was used to count cells.
[00225] vGlutl, bassoon puncta: LSM 880, with a 63x objective and further zoom of 3 times was used to acquire the images. The deep layers (primarily 4 and 5) from visual and somatosensory cortices, CA1 stratum radiatum and layer 5 of the ventral cingulate cortex were all targeted. A single plane image was acquired. The particle count plugin in ImageJ was used to quantify the number of vGlutl puncta.
[00226] pS202/T205 tau intensities: Using a LSM 710 with a40x objective z-stacks of the entire slice thickness 40 pm (40 images from each field) were acquired. All images were compressed/collapsed and the signal intensity was measured in ImageJ.
[00227] pS774-DNM1 intensities: An LSM 880 with a 63x objective and further 3x zoom, was used to obtain z-stacks of the entire slice thickness 40 pm (40 images from each field). All images were compressed/collapsed and the signal intensity of puncta was measured in ImageJ.
[00228] Plaques: The D54D2 antibody stained overall plaque intensity and the number of plaques was quantified by an experimenter blind to the genotype and treatment conditions. The entire 40 pm slice was z-stack imaged at 0.5 pm intervals, these were then merged and the signal intensity measured using ImageJ. Plaques were counted using the particle analysis tool in ImageJ with a threshold of 5 tm 2. All plaque intensities and plaque number counting were done by an experimenter blind to the treatment condition.
[00229] Clq intensities: Using a LSM 710 with a 40x objective z-stacks of the entire slice thickness 40 pm (40 images from each field) were acquired. All images were compressed/collapsed and the signal intensity was measured in ImageJ.
[00230] CD40: An LSM 880 with a 63x objective was used to obtain z-stacks of the entire slice thickness 40 pm (40 images from each field). All images were compressed/collapsed and the signal intensity was measured in ImageJ.
[00231] Lateral ventricles: LSM 710 microscope with a 5x objective was used to image complete coronal slices at -2.0 bregma (rostral to caudal). Outlines covering the entire area of the lateral ventricles were drawn using the freehand selection tool from ImageJ and the area of the LV was measured.
[00232] Microglia: Ibal immunoreactive cells were considered microglia. Using a LSM 710 with a 40x objective z-stacks of the entire slice thickness 40 pm (40 images from each field) were acquired. Imaris was used for 3D rendering of images to quantify the total volume of soma and processes microglia. Ibal aggregation analysis was performed in Image J 3D rendering plugin. Minimum distance between Ibal was calculated for every microglia from the images. All images were compressed/collapsed and Image J was used to quantify the total number of Ibal positive cells.
[00233] Cortical thickness: LSM 710 microscope with a 5X objective was used to image complete cortical columns. The distance between outer cortical boundary and cortical side of corpus callosum was measured using ImageJ.
[00234] Brain weight measurement: Mice were transcardially perfused with PBS followed by 4% PFA and the brain was post-fixed overnight in 4% PFA. Brains were washed in PBS and any excess removed before being weighed in a wet lab high precision scale (Mettler Toledo, accurate to 1mg). Another cohort of mice were sacrificed, brain was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and brain weight was measured. Brain weight was normalized to CK naive brains in each of these two independent measures.
[00235] Western blotting
[00236] Six to eight pg of protein was loaded onto either 6, 8, 10, or 15% polyacrylamide gels and electrophoresed. Protein was transferred from acrylamide gels to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) at 100 V for 120 min. Membranes were blocked using milk (5% w/v) diluted in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (PBSTw), then incubated in primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The following day they were washed three times with PBSTw and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare) at room temperature for 60 min. After three further washes with PBSTw, membranes were treated with chemiluminscence substrates and the films were developed. Signal intensities were quantified using ImageJ 1.46q and normalized to values of control proteins such as p-actin, GAPDH or total proteins of the corresponding phosphorylated proteins analyses.
[00237] Microdrive implantation and in vivo electrophysiology
[00238] Tungsten wire electrode drives: Microdrives were custom built using a 3D printed drive base with perfluoroalkoxy coated tungsten wire electrodes (50 pm bare diameter, 101.6 coated diameter; A-M Systems) and Neuralynx electrode interface board (EIB-36). Polyimide tubes were used to protect electrodes and reduce electrical noise. Electrodes were arranged to target layer 3 or 4 of visual cortex (co-ordinates relative to bregma, anterior-posterior (AP), -3.0; medial-lateral (ML), + 2.0), SS1 (AP, -2.0; ML, + 2.3), CA1 region of the hippocampus (AP, -1.8; ML, +1.5) and cingulate area of the prefrontal cortex (AP, +1.0; ML, +0.2). Reference electrode was placed in the cerebellum.
[00239] Tetrode drives: Custom microdrives contain four nichrome tetrodes (14 mm; California Fine Wire Company), gold-plated (Neuralynx) to an impedance of 200 to 250 kU, arranged in one row (running along the CA3 to CA1 axis of the dorsal hippocampus) was implanted to dorsal CA1 (AP, -1.8). Reference electrode was placed in the fiber tract above the hippocampus.
[00240] Surgery: Mice were anaesthetized with avertin, restrained in a stereotactic apparatus and craniotomies were made exposing the visual, somatosensory, and prefrontal cortices. Microdrives were implanted and slowly lowered to the target depth. Mice were allowed to recover for a period of 4 days.
[00241] In vivo electrophysiology: Following a 2-3 day habitation period to the chamber, recordings commenced with the animal allowed to move freely in a small open field. Recording sessions were composed a 10-15 minute period in which the LED was flashing at 40 Hz but was completely occluded by a black acrylic polypropylene sheet, immediately followed by a further 10 minutes with the sheet removed and animals exposed to the flickering LED. Data were acquired using Neuralynx SX system (Neuralynx, Bozeman, MT, USA) and signals were sampled at 32,556
Hz. Position of animals was tracked using red light emitting diodes affixed to the microdrive. At the conclusion of the experiment mice underwent terminal anesthesia and electrode positions were marked by electrolytic lesioning of brain tissue with 50-iA current for 10 s through each electrode individually, to confirm their anatomical location.
[00242] Spikes: Single units was manually isolated by drawing cluster boundaries around the 3D projection of the recorded spikes, presented in SpikeSort3D software (Neuralynx). Cells were considered pyramidal neurons if mean spike width exceeded 200 ps and had a complex spike index (CSI) > 5.
[00243] Data analyses: LFPs were first filtered to the Nyquist frequency of the target sampling rate then down sampled by a factor of 20 (to 1628 Hz). Power spectral analyses were performed using the pwelch function in Matlab using a 500 ms time window with a 50% overlap, only segments of LFP data where animal velocity remained >4 cm/s were included in the analyses. The weighted phase lag index (WPLI), a measure of coherence more suited to small rodent brains was used as previously described (Vinck et al., 2011), to negate any potential contamination of coherence by volume conducted signals. WPLI was calculated for pairs of electrodes in anatomically distinct regions, only for periods in which animal speed was > 4 cm/s. All analyses were performed using Matlab.
[00244] Pyramidal Cell 40 Hz Modulation: The relationship between spike firing times and 40 Hz LFP phase was calculated as previously described (Middleton and McHugh, 2016), using the Circular Statistics Toolbox. Briefly, spikes were sorted and LFP traces were filtered using the continuous wavelet transform with a cmor 1.5-1 wavelet centered on 40 Hz, returning the instantaneous signal phase and amplitudes. Spike times were linearly interpolated to determine phase, with peaks and troughs of gamma defined as 0 and 180 degrees respectively. The resulting phase values were binned to generate firing probabilities, for each 20-degree interval. Cells were considered to be phase-locked only if they had a distribution significantly different from uniform (P<0.05 circular Rayleigh test), with the strength of phase locking calculated as the mean resultant length.
[00245] RNA sequencing
[00246] Isolation of microglia: The visual cortex was rapidly dissected and placed in ice cold Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) (Gibco by Life Technologies, catalogue number 14175 095). The tissue was enzymatically digested using the Neural Tissue Dissociation Kit (P) (Miltenyi Biotec, catalogue number 130-092-628) according to the manufacturer's protocol, with minor modifications. Specifically, the tissue was enzymatically digested at 37 °C for 15 min instead of min and the resulting cell suspension was passed through a 40 m cell strainer (Falcon Cell Strainers, Sterile, Coming, product 352340) instead of a MACS SmartStrainer, 70 m. The resulting cell suspension was then stained using allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated CD11b mouse clone M1/70.15.11.5 (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-098-088) and phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated CD45 antibody (BD Pharmingen, 553081) according to the manufacturer's (Miltenyi Biotec) recommendations. FACS was then used to purify CD11b and CD45 positive microglial cells. Standard, strict side scatter width versus area and forward scatter width versus area criteria were used to discriminate doublets and gate only singlets. Viable cells were identified by staining with propidium iodide (PI) and gating only PI-negative cells. CD11b and CD45 double positive ells were sorted into 1.5ml centrifuge tubes which contains 500 pl of RNA lysis buffer (QIAGEN, catalogue number 74134) with 1% p-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, catalogue number M6250). RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN, catalogue number 74134) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA was eluted and then stored at -80 °C until whole transcriptome amplification, library preparation and sequencing.
[00247] Isolation of neurons: Visual cortex was homogenized in 0.5mL ice cold PBS with protease inhibitors and the suspension was centrifuged at 1600 g for 10 minutes. Pellet was resuspended in 5 mL NF-1 hypotonic buffer, incubated for 5 min, and then Dounce-homogenized (pestle A) with 30 strokes. 5mL NF-1 buffer was added to the suspension, washed pestle with 10 ml NF-1 buffer, for a combined total of 20 mL. Collected all in a 50 conical tube and filtered homogenate with 40 pm mesh filter. Pelleted nuclei at 3,000 rpm (1,600 x g) for 15 min. Resuspended in 30 mL NF-1 buffer and mixed well. Rocked homogenate at 4 °C for 1 hour. Washed pellet once with 20 mL NF-1 buffer, centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 min, and resuspended in 2-5 mLPBS+1oBSA+protease inhibitors without disturbing the pellet, on ice for 20 min. Alexa flour 488 or Alexa flour 647 conjugated NeuN antibodies (1:500) were added to the tubes, and incubated for 20 minutes at 4 °C. Unbound antibodies was washed out with suspending and centrifuging with PBS+1%BSA+protease inhibitors. Spun down nuclei at 3,000 rpm for 15 min and resuspended in 0.5 mL (PBS+protease inhibitors) and filter with 40 pm mesh filter for FACS sorting. Two drops of nucblue live ready probes reagent was added (Thermo Fischer Scientific; Cat. No. R37605) for nuclei gating. NeuN positive ells were sorted into 1.5ml centrifuge tubes which contains 500 pl of RNA lysis buffer (QIAGEN, catalogue number 74134) with 1% p mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, catalogue number M6250). RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN, catalogue number 74134) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA was eluted and then stored at -80 °C until whole transcriptome amplification, library preparation and sequencing.
[00248] RNA library preparation: Extracted total RNA was subject to QC using an Advanced Analytical-fragment Analyzer before library preparation. SMARTer Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit - Pico Input was used for the P301S neuronal, CK-p25 neuronal, and P301S microglial RNA-seq. SMART-Seq v4 Ultra Low Input RNA Kit was used for CK-p25 microglia specific RNA-seq. Libraries were prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions, and sequenced on the Illumina Nextseq 500 platform at the MIT BioMicro Center.
[00249] The raw fastq data of 40-bp paired-end sequencing reads were aligned to the mouse mm9 reference genome using STAR2.4. The total number of reads and the percentage of reads aligned are as follows: CK-p25 neurons- total reads 18094674.857 827050.464; percentage aligned 85.323 0.414. P301S neurons- total reads 22792713.18 6308817.636; percentage aligned 84.45 0.548. CK-p25 microglia- total reads 28694964.5 435841.6674; percentage aligned 89.43 0.25. [P301S microglia- total reads 18990369.2 1667316.196; percentage aligned 27.243 4.04. Due to this very low mapping rate, this experiment requires further consideration]. The mapped reads were processed by Cufflinks2.2 (Trapnell et al., 2012) using mm9 reference gene annotation to estimate transcript abundances with library-type as fr secondstrand (for stranded neuron data). Gene differential expression test between groups was performed using Cuffdiff module with p-value < 0.05 (for neuron data). Geometric method was chosen as the library normalization method for Cuffdiff. For microglia data, featureCounts tool was used to quantify gene exonic counts from the non-stranded RNA-Seq data, and DESeq2 was employed to calculate statistical significance. Color-coded scatter plots were used to visualize group FPKM values for differentially expressed genes and other genes.
[00250] Z-scores of replicate expression FPKM values for differentially expressed genes were visualized in heatmaps for different sample groups. Gene ontology for microglia specific DEGs was performed using Metascape tool, whereas for neuron specific DEGs was performed using TOPPGENE
[00251] Proteomics and phospho-proteomics
[00252] Sample preparation, reduction, alkylation, and tryptic digestion: Visual cortex was dissected out and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a -80°C freezer until further use. Samples were subsequently homogenized using a plastic hand-held motor driven homogenizer with freshly prepared 8 M urea solution. The concentration of proteins in samples was quantified using a Bio-Rad protein assay. Samples containing 1 mg of protein per 1 ml were prepared, aliquoted and stored at -80°C freezer until further use. Proteins were reduced with 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for 1 h at 56°C, alkylated with 50 mM iodoacetamide for 1 h at room temperature (RT) and diluted to less than IM urea with 100 mM ammonium acetate at pH 8.9. Proteins were digested using sequencing grade trypsin (Promega; 1 pg trypsin per 50 pg protein) overnight at RT. Enzyme activity was quenched by acidification of the samples with acetic acid. The peptide mixture was desalted and concentrated on a C18 Sep-Pak Plus cartridge (Waters) and eluted with 50% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid and 0.1% acetic acid. Solvent was evaporated in a SpeedVac vacuum centrifuge. 400 g aliquots of each sample were aliquoted and frozen in liquid nitrogen for 5 min, lyophilized and stored at -80°C.
[00253] TMT labeling: TMT labeling and phosphopeptide enrichment: Lyophilized peptides were labeled with TMT-10-plex Mass Tag Labeling Kits (Thermo). For each TMT multiplex, a pooled sample was included consisting of a combination of equal amounts of peptides from WT, non stimulated and 40 Hz entrained mouse model of neurodegeneration, allowing for relative quantification to a normalization channel. For TMT labeling, nine samples from 9 mice peptide aliquots and one normalization channel (400 g peptide for each channel) were resuspended in 100 L of 70% (vol/vol) ethanol, 30% (vol/vol) 0.5 M triethyl- ammonium bicarbonate at pH 8.5, and incubated with TMT reagent resuspended in 40 L anhydrous acetonitrile at RT for 1 h. The samples were concentrated, combined, and concentrated to dryness using a SpeedVac vacuum centrifuge.
[00254] Peptide Fractionation: The TMT-labeled peptide pellet was fractioned via high-pH reverse phase HPLC. Peptides were resuspended in 100uL buffer A (1OmM TEAB, pH8) and separated on a 4.6mm x 250 mm 300Extend-C18, 5um column (Agilent) using an 90 minute gradient with buffer B (90% MeCN, 10mM TEAB, pH8) at a flow rate of1ml/min. The gradient was as follows: 1-5% B (0-10min), 5-35% B (10-70min), 35-70% B (70-80min), 70% B (80 min). Fractions were collected over 75 minutes at 1 minute intervals from 10 min to 85 min. The fractions were concatenated into 15 fractions non-contiguously (1+16+31+46+61, 2+17+32+47+62, etc). The fractions then underwent speed-vac (Thermo Scientific Savant) to near dryness.
[00255] Phosphopeptide enrichment: Phosphopeptides were enriched from each of the 15 fractions using the High-Select Fe-NTA phosphopeptide enrichment kit (Thermo) per manufacturer'sinstructions.
[00256] Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS): Peptides were separated by reverse phase HPLC (Thermo Easy nLC1000) using a precolumn (made in house, 6 cm of 10 pm C18) and a self-pack 5 pm tip analytical column (12 cm of 5 pm C18, New Objective) over a 140 minutes' gradient before nanoelectrospray using a QExactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo). Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid and solvent B was 80% MeCN/0.1% formic acid. The gradient conditions were 0-10% B (0-5 min), 10-30% B (5-105 min), 30-40% B (105-119 min), -60% B (119-124 min), 60-100% B (124-126 min), 100% B (126-136 min), 100-0% B (136 138 min), OB (138-140 min), andthemass spectrometerwas operatedin a data-dependent mode. The parameters for the full scan MS were: resolution of 70,000 across 350-2000 m/z, AGC 3e6 and maximum IT 50 ms. The full MS scan was followed by MS/MS for the top 10 precursor ions in each cycle with a NCE of 34 and dynamic exclusion of 30 s. Raw mass spectral data files (.raw) were searched using Proteome Discoverer (Thermo) and Mascot version 2.4.1 (Matrix Science). Mascot search parameters were: 10 ppm mass tolerance for precursor ions; 15 mmu for fragment ion mass tolerance; 2 missed cleavages of trypsin; fixed modification were carbamidomethylation of cysteine and TMT 1Oplex modification of lysines and peptide N-termini; variable modifications were methionine oxidation, tyrosine phosphorylation, and serine/threonine phosphorylation. TMT quantification was obtained using Proteome Discoverer and isotopically corrected per manufacturer's instructions and were normalized to the mean of each TMT channel. Only peptides with a Mascot score greater than or equal to 25 and an isolation interference less than or equal to were included in the data analysis.
[00257] The washed pre column was connected in series with an in-house packed analytical capillary column [50 m ID x 12 cm packed with 5 m C18 beads (YMC gel, ODSAQ, 12 nm, S
pm, AQ12SO5)] with an integrated electrospray tip (-1 m orifice). Peptides were eluted using a 140 min (phosphopeptides) or 90 min (total peptide) gradient from 9 to 70% acetonitrile in 0.2 M acetic acid at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min, with a flow split of -10,000:1, yielding a final electrospray flow rate of -20 nL/min. A total of 15 fractions from each sample were collected. Phosphopeptides were analyzed using a Thermo Q Exactive Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Plus mass spectrometer with the following settings: spray voltage, 2 kV; no sheath or auxiliary gas flow, heated capillary temperature, 250°C; S-lens radio frequency level of 50%. The Q Exactive was operated in data-dependent acquisition mode. Full-scan MS spectra [mass/charge ratio (m/z), 350 to 2000; resolution, 70,000 at m/z 200] were detected in the Orbitrap analyzer after accumulation of ions at 3e6 target value based on predictive AGC from the previous scan. For every full scan, the 15 most intense ions were isolated (isolation width of 0.4 m/z) and fragmented (collision energy (CE): 32%) by higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) with a maximum injection time of 300 ms and 35,000 resolutions. Total peptide analysis was performed on an LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer with the following settings: spray voltage, 2 kV; no sheath or auxiliary gas flow, heated capillary temperature, 250°C. Analysis was performed in a data dependent acquisition mode; full-scan mass spectra (m/z range 400-2000, resolution 60,000) were detected in the Orbitrap analyzer (ion target value 5x105). For every full scan, the 10 most intense ions were isolated (isolation width 3 Da) and fragmented by HCD (CE: 75%) in the HCD cell followed by detection in the Orbitrap (ion target value ixiO5) for iTRAQ marker ion quantification.
[00258] Mass spectrometry peptide mapping data analysis: Raw mass spectral data files were loaded into Proteome Discoverer version 1.4.1.14 (DBversion: 79) (Thermo) and searched against the mouse SwissProt database using Mascot version 2.4 (Matrix Science). TMT reporter quantification was extracted and isotope corrected in Proteome Discoverer. Tandem mass spectra were matched with an initial mass tolerance of 10 ppm on precursor masses and 15 mmu for fragment ions. Cysteine carbamidomethylation, TMT-labeled lysine and protein N-terminal were searched as fixed modifications. Oxidized methionine, and phosphorylation of serine, threonine, and tyrosine were searched as variable modifications. Minimal peptide length was seven amino acids. The data sets were filtered by ion score >20 for all peptides to ensure high confidence in peptide identification and phosphorylation localization and to achieve an (FDR) below 1% for peptides. Phosphopeptide quantification was normalized based on median relative peptide quantification obtained from the crude peptide analysis to correct for slight variations in sample amount among TMT-channels. For each phosphopeptide, relative quantification was represented as a ratio between TMT ion intensities from each analyzed sample and the included normalization channel.
[00259] Bioinformatics analysis: To identify differentially expressed and phosphorylated peptides with significantly regulated ratios, we chose an arbitrary cutoff of 20 % difference with an adjusted P value of< 0.05. The non-regulated background pool consisted of peptides with ratios between 0.8-1.2. Thus, subsequent bioinformatics analyses included peptides with ratios <0.8 and >1.2 relative to their normalization channel deemed as downregulated and upregulated, respectively. The name of proteins from protein accession numbers were converted to gene list using Uniprot ID mapping retrieval tool. Protein networks were obtained by using the STRING database (version 10.5). All active interaction sources except text mining were included and to ensure high confidence, a confidence score over 0.9 was required. Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis was first performed on terms related to biological processes using the STRING (http://string-db.org), TOPPGENE (toppgene.cchmc.org) and Metascape (http://metascape.org) bioinformatics resources, and later was manually filtered to look for commonly present terms from these three resources. GO terms obtained in TOPPGENE was reported. For each individual mouse line (C57BL6/J, CK-p25, P301S tau-tg and 5XFAD), the analysis included gene sets derived from each pool of differentially regulated total peptide or S/T phosphopeptides (up- and downregulated).
[00260] Behavior
[00261] Open field: Mice were introduced into an open field box (dimensions: length= 460mm, width = 460mm and height = 400mm; TSE-Systems) and were tracked using Noldus (Ethovision) for 5 minutes, with time spent in the center and peripheral area of the arena measured.
[00262] Elevated plus maze (EPM): Mice were introduced into the center area of the EPM (ANY-Maze dimensions: arm length = 35cm, width = 5cm) and were tracked using Noldus program for 10 minutes. Time spent in each arm and the center of EPM was calculated offline.
[00263] Novel object recognition in CK-p25 and P301S tau mice: Mice were introduced into the open field arena and the time spent in the center of an arena is calculated. The next day, mice were re-introduced into the same open field box which now contained an additional two familiar objects (novel objects but will be familiar in the next session) and were allowed to explore the objects for minutes. Following this, they were returned to the same arena 10 minutes after the last exploration, with one of the two objects replaced with the new object. Mice behavior was monitored for 7 minutes. Time spent exploring both the familiar and novel objects was recorded using Noldus and computed offline.
[00264] Seizure susceptibility: Mice were injected with picrotoxin (i.p injection) and placed in an open field arena and recorded for 30 minutes using Noldus and also from a side mounted camera. Distance travelled was calculated offline in Noldus, with seizure severity scored manually.
[00265] Morris water maze: MWM is a test for assessing spatial learning. MWM relies on visual cues to navigate from start locations around the perimeter of an open swimming arena to locate a submerged escape platform. Apparatus consisted of a circular pool (122 cm in diameter), filled with a tap water (22°C-24°C) and a non-toxic white paint added to make the solution opaque. An escape platform (10 cm in diameter) with a blunt protruding edge for better grip was submerged 1 inch under the water level. The pool was divided into four equal quadrants labeled N (north), E (east), S (south) and W (west). Mice were introduced to the maze in a randomized order across trials, from the edge, for trials of 60 seconds. The time required to find the hidden platform (latency) was recorded. The probe test was conducted 24h after the last training trial, with the submerged platform removed. All the training and probe test trials were recorded using Noldus.
[00266] CK-p25, P301S and 5XFAD mice were subjected to GENUS in the morning (until 12pm) and tested in the MWM in the afternoon (3-7pm) which limited behavioral testing time to only 4 hours per day. We ensured a minimum of two and a maximum of 4 trials per day were used during training allowing us to run all groups in the MWM while also maintaining a strict dark/light cycle. Despite differences in number of training days, all AD mice used in MWM performed a comparable number of total training trails.
[00267] Statistical analyses
[00268] Statistical analysis was conducted in SPSS, Matlab or Prism. Samples size was not pre determined. Statistical significance was calculated using independent samples t-test, Wilcoxon Rank-sum test, one-way ANOVA or two-way repeated measures ANOVA with a Bonferroni post hoc analysis and Krushkal Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.
[00269] Conclusion
[00270] Inventive aspects of the present disclosure are directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, kit, and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods, if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the inventive scope of the present disclosure.
[00271] Also, various inventive concepts may be embodied as one or more methods, of which an example has been provided. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.
[00272] All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
[00273] All definitions, as defined and used herein, should be understood to control over dictionary definitions, definitions in documents incorporated by reference, and/or ordinary meanings of the defined terms.
[00274] As used herein, the terms "about" and "approximately," when used in conjunction with numerical values and/or ranges, generally refer to those numerical values and/or ranges near to a recited numerical value and/or range. In some instances, the terms "about" and "approximately" can mean within 10% of the recited value (inclusive of the recited value itself). For example, in some instances, "about 100 [units]" can mean within 10% of 100 (e.g., from 90 to 110). In other instances, the terms "about" and "approximately" can mean within 5% of the recited value (inclusive of the recited value itself). In yet other instances, the terms "about" and "approximately" can mean within 1% of the recited value (inclusive of the recited value itself). The terms "about" and "approximately" can be used interchangeably.
[00275] The indefinite articles "a" and "an," as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean "at least one."
[00276] The phrase "and/or," as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean "either or both" of the elements so conjoined, i.e., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases. Multiple elements listed with "and/or" should be construed in the same fashion, i.e., "one or more" of the elements so conjoined. Other elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified by the "and/or" clause, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, a reference to "A and/or B", when used in conjunction with open-ended language such as "comprising" can refer, in one embodiment, to A only (optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to B only (optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to both A and B (optionally including other elements); etc.
[00277] As used herein in the specification and in the claims, "or" should be understood to have the same meaning as "and/or" as defined above. For example, when separating items in a list, "or" or "and/or" shall be interpreted as being inclusive, i.e., the inclusion of at least one, but also including more than one, of a number or list of elements, and, optionally, additional unlisted items. Only terms clearly indicated to the contrary, such as "only one of' or "exactly one of," or, when used in the claims, "consisting of," will see, e.g., the inclusion of exactly one element of a number or list of elements. In general, the term "or" as used herein shall only be interpreted as indicating exclusive alternatives (i.e., "one or the other but not both") when preceded by terms of exclusivity, such as "either," "one of," "only one of," or "exactly one of." "Consisting essentially of," when used in the claims, shall have its ordinary meaning as used in the field of patent law.
[00278] As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase "at least one," in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase "at least one" refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, "at least one of A and B" (or, equivalently, "at least one of A or B," or, equivalently "at least one of A and/or B") can refer, in one embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, with no B present (and optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, B, with no A present (and optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, and at least one, optionally including more than one, B (and optionally including other elements); etc.
[00279] In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitional phrases such as "comprising," "including," "carrying," "having," "containing," "involving," "holding," "composed of," and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases "consisting of' and "consisting essentially of' shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively, as set forth in the United States Patent Office Manual of Patent Examining Procedures, Section 2111.03.
[00280] It is to be understood that, if any prior art publication is referred to herein, such reference does not constitute an admission that the publication forms a part of the common general knowledge in the art, in Australia or any other country.
[00281] In the claims which follow and in the preceding description, except where the context requires otherwise due to express language or necessary implication, the word "comprise" or variations such as "comprises" or "comprising" is used in an inclusive sense, i.e. to specify the presence of the stated features but not to preclude the presence or addition of further features in various embodiments. Similarly, the word "device" is used in a broad sense and is intended to cover the constituent parts provided as an integral whole as well as an instantiation where one or more of the constituent parts are provided separate to one another.
Claims (10)
1. A method for increasing expression of genes and/or proteins associated with vesicle mediated transport in neurons in a subject for treating dementia or Alzheimer's disease in the subject in need thereof, the method comprising: non-invasively delivering visual stimuli having a frequency of about 30 Hz to about 50 Hz to the subject for at least 6 weeks.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the visual stimuli have a frequency of about 40 Hz.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the non-invasively delivering further includes non invasively delivering the visual stimuli to the subject for at least 1 hour per day.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the non-invasively delivering further includes increasing expression of one or more genes selected from the group consisting of: vGlutl, Slcla3, Chmp2a, Ankl, TmedlO, Apoe, Clu, and Myo6.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the non-invasively delivering further includes increasing synaptic transmission and/or synaptic plasticity in the neurons of the subject.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the non-invasively delivering further includes increasing expression of genes and/or proteins associated with synaptic transmission in the neurons of the subject.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the increasing expression of genes and/or proteins associated with synaptic transmission further includes increasing expression of one or more genes or proteins selected from the group consisting of: Syngap1, Synaptophysin, Grin1, Grin2b, Gabbr2, Snap25, ShankI, Shank2, Shank3, Dlgapl, and Dlgap3.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the non-invasively delivering further includes reducing phosphorylation of dynamin in the neurons of the subject.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the non-invasively delivering further includes concurrently entraining synchronized gamma oscillations in multiple brain regions of the subject including at least the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus of the subject.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the multiple brain regions of the subject further include the visual cortex and the somatosensory cortex of the subject.
11. The method of claim 1, further comprising controlling a light-emitting device to generate the visual stimuli.
12. A method for modifying vesicle mediated transport in neurons in a subject for treating dementia or Alzheimer's disease in the subject in need thereof, the method comprising: non-invasively delivering visual stimuli having a frequency of about 30 Hz to about 50 Hz to the subject for at least 6 weeks.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the visual stimuli have a frequency of about 40 Hz.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the non-invasively delivering further includes non invasively delivering the visual stimuli to the subject for at least 1 hour per day.
15. The method of claim 12, wherein the non-invasively delivering further includes increasing synaptic transmission in the neurons of the subject.
16. The method of claim 12, wherein the non-invasively delivering further includes reducing phosphorylation of dynamin in the neurons of the subject.
17. The method of claim 12, wherein the non-invasively delivering further includes concurrently entraining synchronized gamma oscillations in multiple brain regions of the subject including at least the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus of the subject.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the multiple brain regions of the subject further include the visual cortex and the somatosensory cortex of the subject.
19. The method of claim 12, further comprising controlling a light-emitting device to generate the visual stimuli.
Hz LED Light Flicker c-Fos immunostaining
off off: 12.5 ms
PFC in-vivo electrophysiology
V1
CA1 SS1 1 Second c-Fos immunostaining V1 CA1 PFC-CC SS1 No Stim 40 Hz LED No Stim 40 Hz LED
Hoechst c-Fos
No Stim 50 um 50 um
40 Hz LED
50 um 50 um 50 um 50 um 50 um 50 um
c-Fos Positive Cells (% No Stim)
0 200 400 600
**
V1 **
SS1 No Stim
**
CA1 40 Hz LED
*
CC
25 8 2.5 2.5 * *** *** ***
Norm. Change in Gamma Power 0 0 0 0
V1 SS1 CA1 PFC
0.045 2022271389
Spike Probability
0.015
0 360 720 40 Hz Gamma Phase (deg)
Mean Resultant Length
0 0.45
Oc.LED *
Hz LED
0.2
* * *
Low Gamma Band WPLI 0
V1-CA1 V1-SS1 CA1-SS1 CA1-PFC V1-PFC
80 Hz LED Light Flicker (50% Duty Cycle)
on off on: 6.25 ms off: 6.25 ms
Oc. LED
80 Hz LED
5XFAD male mice No Stim (or) 40 Hz LED (or) 80 Hz LED (11 months old) 1h/d for 7d 1h/d for 7d Day 8; Dissect brain for IHC V1 SS1 CA1
XFAD + No Stim 50 um 50 um 50 um
50 um 50 um 50 um
XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS XFAD + 80 Hz 50 um 50 um 50 um Hoechst.Amyloid Plaques (D54D2) n.s * 120 *** * 2022271389
100 (Signal Intensity, % No Stim) Amyloid Plaque
80
60
40
20
0 V1 SS1 CA1
5XFAD + No Stim 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS 5XFAD + 80 Hz
5XFAD male mice No Stim (or) 40 Hz LED 1h/d for 22d (9 months old) Day 23; Dissect brain for IHC V1 SS1 CA1 CC
XFAD + No Stim 50 um 50 um 50 um 50 um
XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS 50 um 50 um 50 um 50 um Hoechst.Amyloid Plaques (D54D2)
** ** *** *** 2022271389
100 (Signal Intensity, % No Stim) Amyloid Plaque
80
60
40
20
0 V1 SS1 CA1 CC
5XFAD + No Stim 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS
5XFAD male mice (9 months old) No Stim (or) 80 Hz LED 1h/d for 22d Day 23; Dissect brain for IHC V1 SS1 CA1
XFAD + No Stim 50 um 50 um 50 um
XFAD + 80 Hz 50 um 50 um 50 um Hoechst.Amyloid Plaques (D54D2)
Amyloid Plaque (Signal Intensity, % No Stim)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
V1 SS1
XFAD + 80 Hz 5XFAD + No Stim CA1
P301S Tau mice No Stim (or) 40Hz LED 1 h/d for 22d Evaluation for neuroprotection (Immunohistochemistry; (7months old) Tau protein Ser/Thr phosphoproteomics)
V1: S202/T205; Hoechst WT naive P301S + No Stim P301S + 40 Hz GENUS 2022271389
50 um 50 um 50 um
250 n.s ** * ** ** ** * ** ** 200 ** n.s S202/T205 Tau (% WT naive)
n.s ** ** 150 * *
100
50
0 V1 SS1 CA1 CC WT Naive P301S + No Stim P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
V1: NeuN; Hoechst WT naive P301S + No Stim P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
50 um 50 um 50 um
120 n.s n.s n.s n.s
n.s n.s
100 2022271389
NeuN (%WT naive)
80
60
40 V1 SS1 CA1 CC
WT naive P301S + No Strim P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
CK-p25 female mice No Stim (or) 40 Hz LED 1h/d for 42d D43; Evaluation for 9 months old neuroprotection (raised on Dox) p25 induction for 42 days (OFF Dox)
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS 2022271389
* 125
0.053 **** 100 Brain Weight (% WT)
75
50
25
0
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
Lateral ventricles (LV; white outlined) CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS vGlut1 GAD65 2022271389
1000 um 1000 um 1000 um
16
n.s
12 * * * * * LV (Fold Change)
8
4
V1: NeuN; Hoechst
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
50 um 50 um 50 um n.s n.s n.s n.s * * * * * * * * * n.s * * * * * * * * 100 2022271389
NeuN (% CK naive)
80
60
40 V1 SS1 CA1 CC
CK naive CK-p25 + No Strim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS lba1 CD40 Hoechst
50 um 50 um 50 um
300 *
**** *
lba1 + cell (%CK naive) 200 2022271389
100
0
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
Relative Frequency (%) 75 2022271389
50 CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40Hz GENUS 25
0 0 750 1500 2250 Soma Volume (um^3)
100 Relative Frequency (%)
75
CK naive 50 * CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40Hz GENUS
25
0 0 2000 4000 6000 Processes Volume (um^3)
80 Relative Frequency (%) 2022271389
60
40 *** *** 20
0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Min. Distance Between lba1 (um)
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40Hz GENUS
** 250 **** ** 200
Rod- lba1 Volume (% CK naive) 150 2022271389
100
50
0 CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
*** 500
*** * 400 CD40 Signal Intensity (%CK naive)
300
200
100
0 CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
WT naive P301S + No Stim P301S + 40Hz GENUS
lba1 Hoechst
50 um 50 um 50 um lba1 + cells (% WT naive) 100 2022271389
50
0
WT naive P301S + No Stim P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
Relative Frequency (%) 75 2022271389
50
WT naive P301S + No Stim 25 P301S + 40Hz GENUS
0 0 150 300 450 Soma Volume (um^3)
100 Relative Frequency (%)
75
WT naive 50 P301S + No Stim * P301S + 40Hz GENUS
25
0 0 1500 3000 Processes Volume (um^3)
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
Hoechst C1q
50 um 50 um 50 um WT naive P301S + No Stim P301S+ 40Hz GENUS
Hoechst C1q
50 um 50 um 50 um
* 300 *** * 250 C1q Intensity (%CK naive)
200 2022271389
150 CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim 100 CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
50
0
n.s
150 ** n.s C1q Intensity (%WT naive)
100
WT naive P301S + No Stim 50 P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim (N=5) (N=5) CK-p25: No Stim Vs 40 Hz GENUS; Upregulated GO Terms:p value (FDR) 1.0E+00 1.0E-02 1.0E-04 1.0E-06 1.0E-08
565 1.0E+00
1.0E-01
618 ATP Metabolic Process Trans-Synaptic Signaling 1.0E-02 Cell-Cell Signaling CK-p25 Autophagy Intracellular Transport No Stim 40 Hz GENUS (N=5) (N=4) 1.0E-03
GO Terms:p value (FDR)
Differentially Expressed Genes 409 1.0E-04
.. CK na ve Vs CK-p25 + No Stim; Downregulated Chemical Synaptic Transmission 1.0E-05
422 Z-score -2 -1 0 1 2
WT naive P301S + No Stim (N=6) (N=6) P301S: No Stim Vs 40 Hz GENUS; Upregulated GO Terms:p value (FDR)
229 1.0E-01 1.0E-03 1.0E-05 1.0E-07 1.0E+00
351 1.0E-01
Intracellular Transport P301S 1.0E-02 No Stim 40 Hz GENUS (N=6) (N=5) 1.0E-03 Chemical Synaptic Transmission
Differentially Expressed Genes GO Terms:p value (FDR)
220 Trans-Synaptic Signaling
Differentially Expressed Genes 1.0E-04 Midbrain Development Regulation of Vesicle
WT naive Vs P301S + No Stim; Downregulated Apoptotic Process Mediated Transport 1.0E-05
221 Z-score
-2 -1 0 1 2
Neuron Specific RNA-seq
LC-MS/MS 2022271389
92.73% 3433 269 Number of 14735 total proteins Number of total RNAs
Neuron Specific RNA-seq
LC-MS/MS 2022271389
91.95% 3384 296 Number of 13570 total proteins Number of total RNAs
CK naive NFH pS774DNM-1 MERGE CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
10 um 10 um 10 um 10 um 10 um 10 um 10 um 10 um 10 um
** 1200
*** ** 1000 n.s 800 150 ** ** 600 100 400
50
pS774-DNM1 (% CK naive) 200
(% WT naive) pS774-DMN-1 0 0 CK naive WT naive CK-p25 + No Stim P301S + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
V1: vGlut1
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz Genus
10 um 10 um 10 um
n.s 120 n.s n.s n.s n.s * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2022271389
100 vGlut1 (% CK naive)
80
60
40 V1 SS1 CA1 CC
CK naive
CK-p25 + No Stim
CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
120 n.s n.s n.s n.s
* * n.s * n.s * * * * * * * * * 2022271389
100 vGlut1 (% WT naive)
80
60
40 V1 SS1 CA1 CC
WT naive
P301S + No Stim
P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
Time Spent in Center (%) 30 2022271389
20
10
0
CK naive (N=22) CK-p25 + No Stim (N=15) CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS (N=15)
80
**** % Object Preference 2022271389
** 60
40
20
0 CK naive (N=16) CK-p25 + No Stim (N=11) CK-p25 + 40Hz GENUS (N=11)
Familiar Object Novel Object
CK-p25 female p25 induction for 42 days (OFF Dox food) mice (9 months old; No Stim (or) 40 Hz LED 1h/d for 42d; am 1d raised on Dox food) Probe test MWM (day 36-41;pm) 60
40 CK naive (N=19) CK-p25 + No Stim (N=14) 20 ** 0.05 CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS (N=12) *
Latency to Platform(s) ** * ** * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Day 4 40
* 3 30
** ** 2 20
1 10
# Platform Crossings Time in Target Quadrant(s) 0 0
Time Spent in Center (%) 30 2022271389
20
10
0 .. WT na I ve (N=19) P301S + No Stim (N=12) P301S + 40 Hz GENUS (N=12)
80 ** ** **** 2022271389
** % Object Preference
60
40
20
0 WT naive (N=19) P301S + No Stim (N=12) P301S + 40Hz GENUS (N=12)
Familiar Object Novel Object
P301S male mice (8 months old) No Stim (or) 40 Hz LED 1h/d for 22d; am 1d Probe test 60 MWM (day 16-20;pm)
** 40
WT naive (N=16) P301S + No Stim (N=17) 20
* P3013 + 40 Hz GENUS (N=15)
Latency to Platform(s) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Day 4 40
3 30
2 20
1 10
# Platform Crossings Time in Target Quadrant(s)
0 0
XFAD male mice (9 months old) No Stim (or) 40 Hz LED 1h/d for 22d; am 1d Probe test MWM (day 16-20; pm) 60
40
* ** WT naive (N=20) 20 * 5XFAD + No Stim (N=11) 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS (N=11)
Latency to Platform(s) ** 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Day 4 40
3 30
* **
2 20
1 10
# Platform Crossings Time in Target Quadrant(s)
0 0
V1 SS1 CA1 PFC
Hoechst Hoechst Hoechst Hoechst
V1
SS1 CA1 PFC Lesion Post-recording
Occluded 40 Hz LED flickers Visible 40 Hz LED flickers
Occluded 40 Hz LED Flickers
Visible 40 Hz LED Flickers
1.8E-03 ** ** 1.6E-03 1.4E-03 1.2E-03 ** 1.0E-03 8.0E-04 * ** 6.0E-04 ** 4.0E-04 ** **
- 45 Hz Area Power (uV2 ) * ** 2.0E-04
0.0E+00 V1 V1 CA1 CA1 PFC PFC
WT CK-p25 WT CK-p25 WT CK-p25
Microdrive 2022271389
Implantation
P301S tau-tg Recording (8 months age) 3d
2.5E-04
*** 35 - 45 Hz Area Power (uV ) 2
2.0E-04
*** 1.5E-04
1.0E-04
5.0E-05
0.0E+00 V1 PFC No Stim 40 Hz Light Flicker
1.4E-03 *
1.2E-03
C57BI6/J 1.0E-03
8.0E-04 * ** 40 Hz Entrainment 1 hr/day for 42 Days 6.0E-04 * **
35 - 45 Hz Area Power (uV2 ) 4.0E-04 * ** Recording on Day 43 2.0E-04
0.0E+00 V1 SS1 CA1 PFC
No Stim
40 Hz Light Flicker
V1-CA1 V1-SS1 CA1-PFC V1-PFC 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.8
**
** * **
0 0 0 0
Weighted Phase Lag index 10 40 90 10 40 90 10 40 90 10 40 90
CK57BI6/J mice Frequency (Hz)
CK-p25 mice (p25 was induced for 6 weeks) 2.5E-04 ** 2.0E-04 40 Hz Entrainment 1 hr/day for 42 Days 1.5E-04 **
1.0E-04 **
Recording on Day 43 5.0E-05
35-45 Area Power (uV 2 ) 0.0E+00 V1 CA1 PFC
No Stim
40 Hz Light Flicker
V1-CA1 CA1-PFC V1-PFC 0.3 0.8 0.9 **
** **
Weighted Phase Lag index 0 0 0 10 40 90 10 40 90 10 40 90
CK-p25 Mice Frequency (Hz)
LED Strip
2000 lux 1.2"
15.638"
300 lux
7.625"
5XFAD + No Stim 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS
1000 um 1000 um Hoechst Amyloid plaques (D54D2)
5XFAD Male Mice No Stim (or) 40 Hz LED 1h/d for 22d (9 Months Old) Day 23; Dissect Brain for IHC Cingulate Cortex WT naive 5XFAD + No Stim 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS
Merged 50 um 50 um 50 um
NeuN 50 um 50 um 50 um
D54D2; Amyloid Plaques 50 um 50 um 50 um
* 2022271389
Number of >5 um ^ 2 Plaques in ROI
30 *
* ** 20 *
10
0 V1 SS1 CA1 CC
5XFAD + No Stim 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS
n.s 120 n.s * * * * * * n.s * 100 2022271389
NeuN (% WT naive)
80
60
40
20 V1 SS1 CA1 CC
WT naive
5XFAD + No Stim
5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS
WT naive 5XFAD + no Stim 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS
10 um 10 um 10 um
n.s n.s 120 * * * * * * * * 100 2022271389
80 Bsn (% WT naive)
60
40
20
0 V1 SS1 CA1 CC
WT naive
5XFAD + No Stim
5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS
fl. APP (Ab1)
fl. APP (Ab2)
GAPDH
WT naive 5XFAD + No Stim 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS
2.5 ** 2022271389
n.s ** n.s 2.0 Relative Expression
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0 Ab1/ Ab2/ GAPDH GAPDH
WT naive
5XFAD + No Stim
5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS
Tau 2022271389
GAPDH
WT naive P301S + No Stim P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
** * 14000 n.s 12000
10000 Tau Expression
8000
6000
4000
2000
100
Brain Weight (%WT naive) 80 2022271389
60
40
20
0
WT naive P301S + No Stim P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
350
300
250 LV (% WT naive)
200
150
100
50
p25 + GFP
p35 2022271389
p25
p25
GAPDH
CK-control CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
** * 18000 n.s 16000
14000 ** Relative Expression
12000 n.s 10000 8000
6000
4000
2000
0 p25 + GFP p25
CK CK-p25 + CK-p25 + naive No Stim 40 Hz GENUS
.. CK na ve CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
n.s n.s 1000 * * * * 800 * * *
600
400 Cortical Thickness (um)
200
50 um 50 um 50 um 0 Hoechst NeuN Hoechst, NeuN
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
NeuN p25 + GFP
1000 um 1000 um 1000 um
CK-p25 + CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim 40 Hz GENUS
1000 um 1000 um 1000 um
2022271389
120 p25:GFP (% CK-p25 - No Stim)
100
80
60
40
20
0 V1 SS1 CA1 CC
CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS Hoechst yH2Ax 2022271389
100 um 100 um 100 um
120 * ** * * 100 H2Ax (% CK-p25 + No Stim)
80
60
40
20
0 V1 SS1 CA1 CC
CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
CK naive Nov 2022
105 Q1 Q2
104 microglia APC-A 103 Q3 Q4 2022271389
2 10 -1600
0 102 103 104 105 -202 PE-A CK-p25 + No Stim 5
Q2 10
Q1 4 10 CD11b-APC
microglia APC-A 3 10
Q3 Q4 2 10 -1600
-202 0 10 2 103 104 105 PE-A
CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS 5
Q2 10
Q1 4 10
microglia APC-A 3 10
Q3 Q4 2 10 -1600
0 10 2 103 104 105 -202 PE-A CD45-PE
WT naive
105 Q1-1 Q2-1
104 APC-A 103
Q3-1 Q4-1 2 2022271389
0 10 -159
-522 -1020102 103 104 105 PE-A
P301S + No Stim 105
Q1-1 Q2-1 104 CD11b-APC
APC-A 103
Q3-1 Q4-1 -159 0 102
2 -522 -10 010 2 103 104 105 PE-A
P301S + 40 Hz GENUS 105
Q1-1 Q2-1 104 APC-A 103
Q3-1 Q4-1 0 102 -159
-102 102 103 PE-A 104 105 -522 0 CD45-PE
10.0
WT naive Vs P301S 7.5 -log10 (p Value) 2022271389
5.0
2.5
0
-2 -1 0 1 2 log2 Fold Change
5
4 -log10 (p Value)
3
2
1 P301S: No Stim Vs GENUS 0
-2 -1 0 1 2 log2 Fold Change
.. WT na ve Vs P301S + No stim; UP gene-GO terms P301S: No stim Vs 40 Hz GENUS; UP genes-GO terms MHC class II antigen presentation membrane Trafficking Infectious disease cell migration eukaryotic Translation Initiation proteasomal protein catabolic process sa mmp cytokine connection regulation of protein kinase activity SRP-dependent cotranslational protein targeting to membrane cell projection morphogenesis antigen presentation:folding, assembly & peptide of class I MHC microtubule-based process inflammatory response proteolysis involved in cellular protein catabolic process log p-value -8 -6 -4 -2 0 log p-value -4 -2 0
.. P301S: No stim Vs 40 Hz GENUS; DOWN genes-GO terms WT na ve Vs P301S + No stim; DOWN genes-GO terms brain development response to type l interferon centrosome maturation protein localization to mitochondrion glial cell migration cytoplasmic translational initiation cerebral cortex radial glial guided migration regulation of cytokine-mediated signaling pathway cerebral cortex cell migration mitochondrial transport purinergic nucleotide receptor signaling pathway regulation of gene expression by genetic imprinting microtubule cytoskeleton organization mRNA 3' -end processing log p-value -4 -2 0 log p-value -6 -4 -2 0
CK naive
lba1 CD40 2022271389
CK-p25 + No Stim
CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
NeuN Alexa Fluor 647-A 104 103 2022271389
0
CK naive -704
-102 10 2 103 104 105 -315 0 GFP Alexa Fluor 488-A 105 NeuN Alexa Fluor 647-A Alexa Fluor 647-A (NeuN)
0 102 103 104
CK-p25 + No Stim -236
-102 10 2 103 104 105 -282 0 GFP Alexa Fluor 488-A 105 NeuN Alexa Fluor 647-A
-102 102 103 104
CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS -425 0
-102 102 103 104 105 -384 0 GFP Alexa Fluor 488-A
Alexa Fluor 488-A (GFP)
Pacific Blue-A
Pacific Blue-A Pacific Blue-A Pacific Blue-A -171 2 4 5 -171 2 3 4 5 -171 2 0 10 103 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 103 104 105
-51 -51 -51
0 0 0
102 102 102
103 103 103
FITC-A FITC-A FITC-A WT naive
104 104 104
P301S + No Stim
FITC-A (NeuN) P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
105 105
n.s 60 n.s * NeuN (% Total Nuclei) 2022271389
40 WT naive P301S + No Stim P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
20
0
n.s 60 n.s * NeuN (% Total Nuclei)
40
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS 20
Apba1 Atp1A2 Trim9 Copg1 Dynll1 Ywhah Ywhag Tbc1d14
Tmed10 Pik3C2a Ank1 Golim4 2022271389
Kif13b Chmp2a Nrxn2 Sptb Tubb4b Hsph1
Gosr2 Lrrk2 Dvl1 Hsp90aa1 Nsf Ptk2B Hsp90Ab1 Smad3 Nf1 Kif1b Hsp90b1 Vps4a Cptx1 Actb Cyth2 Hspa8 Rac1 Myo6 Syt2 Rph3a Gad1 Calr Ccz1 Rab3a Tubb3 Arpc3
Sec23ip Glul Apoe Unc13c Trappc10 Chrm2 Clu Scarb1 Slc1a2 Dynll1 Pacsin2 Slc1a3 Amph
Vesicle Mediated Transport
Membrane Bound Vesicle
Transport
Intracellular Transport
Vesicle
S1065 Smc3 S69 Flcn S11 Stk32c S33 Phf24 S270 Akap5 S667 lws1 S779 Dlgap3 S46 Srcin1 S372 Shank2 S740 Akap2 S1016 Magi2 S13 Gsk3b S30 Set S373 Pitpnm1 2022271389
T430 Rtn4 S543 Cspg5 S532 Add2 S116 Palm S520 Klc1 S129 Mff S1097 Srrm2 S412 Arrb1 S339 Map1b S869 Cacna1d S283 Map2 S988 Uhrf1bp1l S42 Dnajc6 S19 Glul T1428 Srrm2 S795 Aak1 T533 Add2 S455 Trim3 S134 Rprd1b S493 Arhgap44 T509 Dpysl5 S293 Srcin1 S986 Uhrf1bp1l S36 Dnajc6 T289 Agp4 S152 Palm S664 Tcf20 S692 Shank3 S801 Shank3 S44 Fam219a T231 Pdha1 S752 Syngap1 S203 C2cd4cC2CD4 S247 Slc4a10 S270 Sorbs1 S1611 Sipa1l1 T1784 Map1b S472 Elfn2 S456 Trim2 S441 Rap1gap S805 Rasgrf2 T162 Palm S132 Myo18a S302 Ldb1 S309 Map2 S156 Dlgap4 S344 Rtn4 S399 Slc8a1 S273 Slc8a1 S779 Syngap1 S110 Gap43 S780 Syngap1 S161 Palm S180 Ccsap Site Gene Name Raw z-score WT P301S P301S + NRL + 40 Hz -2 -1 0 1 2
S418 Dlgap1 S1035 Dlgap2 T292 Snph T518 Syn3 S699 Syn1/2/3 S702 Syn1/2/3 T226 Mbp S243 Mbp S752 Rtn3 S666 Dbn1 S577 Chrm3 S49 Slc12a5 2022271389
S507 Stxbp1 S633 Kcnb1 S607 Kcnb1 S666 Syn1 S440 Kncq2 S99 Ppp1r9b T2595 Bsn T3254 Bsn S869 Shank1 S1434 Shank1 S1931 Cacna1a T504 Cacnb1 T499 Cacbn1 S308 Dtna S1232 Ppfia2 S3936 Pclo S4238 Pclo T112 Pclo S894 Mink1 S699 Tnik/Mink1 S880 Gria2 S587 Bcan S890 Grin1 S940 Grin2b S1166 Grin2b S75 Ppfia3 S683 Ppfia3 T772 Gabbr2 S770 Gabbr2 T762 Gabbr2 S773 Gabbr2 T893 Grm5 S839 Grm5 S860 Grm5 T838 Grm5 S870 Grm5 T249 Rgs14 T415 Cacng8 S1238 Shank2 S1372 Sipa1l1 S1192 Sipa1l1 T501 Prkcb/g/a T29 Snap25 S28 Snap25 S7 Ctnnd2 T1134 Ctnnd 2 S1175 Rapgef2 S1022 Rapgef2 S18 Atp2b2 Site Gene Name Raw z-score CK CK-p25 CK-p25 + NRL + 40 Hz -2 -1 0 1 2
-30 -20 -10 log p value
Control Vs No Stim
Regulation of Microtubule Polymerization or Depolymerization
Long-term Potentiation
Dendrite Development
Chemical Synaptic Transmission
Plasma Membrane Bounded Cell Projection Morphogenesis
Regulation of Transmembrane Transport
Negative Regulation of Cellular Component Organization
CK-p25 P301S GO Terms
pS774DNM-1
DNM-1 2022271389
DNM-3
GAPDH
CK naive CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS
* 3.0
2.5 ** * Fold Change
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0 pS774DNM-1 DNM-1 DNM-3
pS774DNM-1 2022271389
DNM-1
DNM-3
GAPDH
WT naive P301S + No Stim P301S + 40 Hz GENUS
n.s 1.6 1.4 * n.s 1.2 Fold Change
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 pS774DNM-1 DNM-1 DNM-3
No Stim/ 40 Hz GENUS C57BI6/J mice Baseline (8 months old) 10min 10min 20min 30min
No Stim 40 Hz GENUS 10 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3
per 10min) 3 No Stim 40 Hz
Velocity (cm/s) 2 2 1 1
Velocity (Mean cm/s) 0 0 No Stim 40 Hz 1 6 11 16 21 26 30 Min
3min C57BL6 mice; Exposure to no stim or 40 Hz light flicker for 1h 450
400 Distance Travelled (cm/s)
350 2022271389
No Stim-PTX 300 250 40 Hz-PTX 200 150 100 50 0 1 6 11 16 21 26 30 Min
Seizure Score Injection of saline or sub-convulsant dose of picrotoxin (1mg/kg b.w.) i.p. 3.5
3.0 Racine Score
2.5 No Stim-PTX 2.0
1.5 40 Hz-PTX
1.0
0.5
0.0 1 6 11 16 21 26 30 Min
C57BI6/J mice - 4 Months Old Familiar Object Habituation (3d) 70 Familiar Object Normal-Light
60 Familiar Object 40 Hz LED-Flicker 50 Novel Object Normal-Light 40 Novel Object 30 40 Hz LED-Flicker
20 Preference Score Normal Light
Novel Object Preference Score (%) Time Exploring (s/min) 10 Preference Score 40 Hz LED-Flicker 0 1 10 20 30 Min
Exposure to No Stim or 40 Hz Light Flicker for - 1h Novel Object Discrimination Test ns ns 1000 4.0 900 *** *** 3.5 800 700 3.0 600 2.5 500 2.0 400 1.5 300 200 1.0 100
Total Time Exploring (s/30 Min) 0.5
Total Distance Moved (km/30 Min) 0 0.0 Familiar Object Novel Object
No Stim 40 Hz GENUS
20
15
10
Body Weight (g) 5
0 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7
No Stim
40 Hz
* * 35 n.s n.s * 30 * 25
20
15
Body Weight (g) 10
5
0 D1 D22 WT naive (N=13) P301S + No Stim (N=14) P301S + 40 Hz GENUS (N=12)
35
30
25
20
15
Body Weight (g) 10
5
0 D1 D42 CK naive (N=25) CK-p25 + No Stim (N=21) CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS (N=18)
Total Distance (cm)
3000 CK naive 2022271389
CK-p25 + No Stim CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS 2000
1000
0
5000 ** 4000 n.s ** * Total Distance (cm)
3000
WT naive 2000 P301S + No Stim P301S + 40 Hz GENUS 1000
40 40 25
20 30 30 15
20 20 10
10 10 5
Plasma Corticosterone (ng/ml) Plasma Corticosterone (ng/ml) Plasma Corticosterone (ng/ml) 0 0 0
WT + No Stim (N=12) WT naive (N=11) CK naive (N=11) WT + 40 Hz GENUS (N=12) P301S + No Stim (N=15) CK-p25 + No Stim (N=13) P301S + 40 Hz GENUS (12) CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS (N=14)
25 25 25
20 20 20
15 15 15
10 10 10
Velocity (cm/s) Velocity (cm/s) Velocity (cm/s) 5 5 5
0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Day Day Day CK naive WT naive WT naive CK-p25 + No Stim P301S + No Stim 5XFAD + No Stim
CK-p25 + 40 Hz GENUS P301S + 40 Hz GENUS 5XFAD + 40 Hz GENUS
Velocity _MM tarining
2022271389
Latency to Platform (s)
40
20
WT naive (N=12)
5XFAD + No Stim (N=11)
5XFAD + 80 Hz (N=11)
0 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 Days
Time in Target Quadrant (s) # Platform Crossings
0 1 2 3 4
10 20 30 *
* *
n.s
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2022271389A AU2022271389B2 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2022-11-15 | Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain |
Applications Claiming Priority (9)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201762570250P | 2017-10-10 | 2017-10-10 | |
US62/570,250 | 2017-10-10 | ||
US201762570929P | 2017-10-11 | 2017-10-11 | |
US62/570,929 | 2017-10-11 | ||
AUPCT/US2018/051785 | 2018-09-19 | ||
PCT/US2018/051785 WO2019074637A1 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2018-09-19 | Systems and methods for preventing, mitigating, and/or treating dementia |
AU2018347366A AU2018347366B2 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2018-10-10 | Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain |
PCT/US2018/055258 WO2019075094A1 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2018-10-10 | Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain |
AU2022271389A AU2022271389B2 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2022-11-15 | Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2018347366A Division AU2018347366B2 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2018-10-10 | Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU2022271389A1 true AU2022271389A1 (en) | 2022-12-15 |
AU2022271389B2 AU2022271389B2 (en) | 2024-09-19 |
Family
ID=83459525
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2018347366A Active AU2018347366B2 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2018-10-10 | Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain |
AU2022271389A Active AU2022271389B2 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2022-11-15 | Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2018347366A Active AU2018347366B2 (en) | 2017-10-10 | 2018-10-10 | Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3694593A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2020536643A (en) |
KR (2) | KR20200086277A (en) |
CN (1) | CN111655319A (en) |
AU (2) | AU2018347366B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA3078739A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2019075094A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2021074448A1 (en) | 2019-10-18 | 2021-04-22 | Institute Of Science And Technology Austria | Stimulation of neuronal plasticity |
KR20210053631A (en) * | 2019-11-04 | 2021-05-12 | 한국과학기술원 | Method of entraining gamma brain wave using visible light and apparatus for providing visible stimulation |
KR102400319B1 (en) * | 2021-12-31 | 2022-05-24 | (주)리솔 | Apparatus and Method for Stimulating a Brain by Entraining Synchronized Vibration in a Plurality of Brain Regions of a User |
CN116407766A (en) * | 2021-12-31 | 2023-07-11 | 株式会社利率 | Customized transcranial alternating current stimulation device and method |
KR102425066B1 (en) * | 2022-03-25 | 2022-07-28 | (주)리솔 | Customized tACS (transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation) Apparatus and Method for Stimulating a Brain wave by Entraining Synchronized Oscillation Based on Real-Time EEG Signal Monitoring |
KR102577515B1 (en) | 2022-11-21 | 2023-09-12 | 이종설 | Wave stimulator for cell activation |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0618968B1 (en) * | 1991-12-06 | 1999-10-13 | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. | Tools for the diagnosis and treatment of alzheimer's disease |
JP3648802B2 (en) * | 1994-09-27 | 2005-05-18 | 松下電工株式会社 | High intensity light irradiation device for phototherapy |
CA2587522A1 (en) * | 2004-11-15 | 2006-05-26 | Christopher Decharms | Stimulation of neural tissue with light |
US20080181882A1 (en) * | 2006-11-15 | 2008-07-31 | The University Of Pennsylvania | Neurgulin 1 (NRG1) - ErbB4 signaling as a target for the treatment of schizophrenia |
WO2008147958A1 (en) * | 2007-05-25 | 2008-12-04 | Thomas Jefferson University | Method of treatment to improve concentration and/or memory in a subject in need thereof |
DE102008012669B8 (en) * | 2008-03-05 | 2011-03-03 | Anm Adaptive Neuromodulation Gmbh | Apparatus and method for visual stimulation |
ITRM20090027A1 (en) * | 2009-01-26 | 2010-07-27 | Alain Rocco | STIMULATION SYSTEM FOR PAIN TREATMENT AND ITS FUNCTIONING METHOD. |
WO2012024243A1 (en) * | 2010-08-16 | 2012-02-23 | Photothera, Inc. | Minimally invasive low level light therapy for neurological disorders |
CN103889495A (en) * | 2011-10-25 | 2014-06-25 | 学校法人金泽医科大学 | Light exposure device for improving cognitive symptoms and depression symptoms, chamber having light exposure device, and lighting equipment for improving cognitive symptoms and depression symptoms |
US9272118B1 (en) * | 2012-03-02 | 2016-03-01 | George Acton | Methods for treating brain malfunctions |
US20150337030A1 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2015-11-26 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Methods to treat alzheimer's disease using apoe inhibitors |
US20140303025A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-10-09 | The Translational Genomics Research Institute | Methods for the diagnosis and prognosis of neurodegenerative diseases |
EP3718597A1 (en) * | 2013-11-04 | 2020-10-07 | Metzger, Steven | Treatment of central nervous system conditions using sensory stimulus |
WO2015149170A1 (en) * | 2014-03-31 | 2015-10-08 | Functional Neuromodulation, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining a trajectory for a brain stimulation lead |
EP3180080B1 (en) * | 2014-08-14 | 2021-01-06 | Functional Neuromodulation, Inc. | Brain stimulation system including multiple stimulation modes |
KR20230161532A (en) * | 2015-11-24 | 2023-11-27 | 메사추세츠 인스티튜트 오브 테크놀로지 | Systems and methods for preventing, mitigating, and/or treating dementia |
WO2017172728A1 (en) * | 2016-03-28 | 2017-10-05 | Duke University | Systems and methods for brain stimulation |
-
2018
- 2018-10-10 CN CN201880077874.3A patent/CN111655319A/en active Pending
- 2018-10-10 EP EP18866752.1A patent/EP3694593A4/en active Pending
- 2018-10-10 AU AU2018347366A patent/AU2018347366B2/en active Active
- 2018-10-10 CA CA3078739A patent/CA3078739A1/en active Pending
- 2018-10-10 JP JP2020520207A patent/JP2020536643A/en active Pending
- 2018-10-10 WO PCT/US2018/055258 patent/WO2019075094A1/en unknown
- 2018-10-10 KR KR1020207013291A patent/KR20200086277A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2018-10-10 KR KR1020237001501A patent/KR20230015501A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2022
- 2022-11-15 AU AU2022271389A patent/AU2022271389B2/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR20200086277A (en) | 2020-07-16 |
CA3078739A1 (en) | 2019-04-18 |
AU2022271389B2 (en) | 2024-09-19 |
JP2020536643A (en) | 2020-12-17 |
EP3694593A4 (en) | 2021-07-21 |
AU2018347366B2 (en) | 2022-09-15 |
WO2019075094A1 (en) | 2019-04-18 |
CN111655319A (en) | 2020-09-11 |
EP3694593A1 (en) | 2020-08-19 |
KR20230015501A (en) | 2023-01-31 |
AU2018347366A1 (en) | 2020-04-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20220040496A1 (en) | Systems and methods for preventing, mitigating, and/or treating dementia via visual stimulation that binds higher order brain regions, reduces neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation, and improves cognitive function | |
AU2022271389B2 (en) | Treating dementia with visual stimulation to synch gamma oscillations in brain | |
Wang et al. | An autism-linked missense mutation in SHANK3 reveals the modularity of Shank3 function | |
ES2943587T3 (en) | Systems to prevent, mitigate and/or treat dementia | |
Qin et al. | Stimulation of TLR4 attenuates Alzheimer’s disease–related symptoms and pathology in tau-transgenic mice | |
Rannals et al. | Psychiatric risk gene transcription factor 4 regulates intrinsic excitability of prefrontal neurons via repression of SCN10a and KCNQ1 | |
Liang et al. | MicroRNA-146a switches microglial phenotypes to resist the pathological processes and cognitive degradation of Alzheimer's disease | |
Lamonica et al. | Elevating expression of MeCP2 T158M rescues DNA binding and Rett syndrome–like phenotypes | |
Zhao et al. | Specific depletion of the motor protein KIF5B leads to deficits in dendritic transport, synaptic plasticity and memory | |
Tanaka et al. | The intellectual disability gene PQBP1 rescues Alzheimer’s disease pathology | |
Slattery et al. | Selective breeding for high anxiety introduces a synonymous SNP that increases neuropeptide S receptor activity | |
Zheng et al. | Trisomy 21–induced dysregulation of microglial homeostasis in Alzheimer’s brains is mediated by USP25 | |
Morandell et al. | Cul3 regulates cytoskeleton protein homeostasis and cell migration during a critical window of brain development | |
WO2016187217A2 (en) | Methods and compositions for treating aging-associated impairments | |
Cabral‐Miranda et al. | Unfolded protein response IRE1/XBP1 signaling is required for healthy mammalian brain aging | |
Guiretti et al. | Specific promoter deacetylation of histone H3 is conserved across mouse models of Huntington's disease in the absence of bulk changes | |
Moigneu et al. | Systemic GDF11 attenuates depression-like phenotype in aged mice via stimulation of neuronal autophagy | |
Pasetto et al. | Defective cyclophilin A induces TDP-43 proteinopathy: implications for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia | |
Eltokhi et al. | Imbalanced post-and extrasynaptic SHANK2A functions during development affect social behavior in SHANK2-mediated neuropsychiatric disorders | |
Bhatti et al. | Molecular and cellular adaptations in hippocampal parvalbumin neurons mediate behavioral responses to chronic social stress | |
Tapella et al. | Deletion of calcineurin from astrocytes reproduces proteome signature of Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy and predisposes to seizures | |
US20220305027A1 (en) | Methods of controlling and improving brain health | |
Rodrigues-Amorim et al. | Multisensory gamma stimulation mitigates the effects of demyelination induced by cuprizone in male mice | |
Huang et al. | Mitochondrial Dysfunction Induces Epigenetic Dysregulation by H3K27 Hyperacetylation to Perturb Active Enhancers in Parkinson’s Disease Models | |
Part | Exploring the Role of Endogenous TDP-43 SUMOylation in Mice: Implications for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia |