AU2022203563A1 - Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles - Google Patents

Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2022203563A1
AU2022203563A1 AU2022203563A AU2022203563A AU2022203563A1 AU 2022203563 A1 AU2022203563 A1 AU 2022203563A1 AU 2022203563 A AU2022203563 A AU 2022203563A AU 2022203563 A AU2022203563 A AU 2022203563A AU 2022203563 A1 AU2022203563 A1 AU 2022203563A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
hydrophobic
water
particles
hydrophobic liquid
low
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
AU2022203563A
Other versions
AU2022203563B2 (en
Inventor
Roe-Hoan Yoon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties Inc
Original Assignee
Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties Inc filed Critical Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties Inc
Priority to AU2022203563A priority Critical patent/AU2022203563B2/en
Publication of AU2022203563A1 publication Critical patent/AU2022203563A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2022203563B2 publication Critical patent/AU2022203563B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03BSEPARATING SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS
    • B03B1/00Conditioning for facilitating separation by altering physical properties of the matter to be treated
    • B03B1/04Conditioning for facilitating separation by altering physical properties of the matter to be treated by additives
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10LFUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
    • C10L1/00Liquid carbonaceous fuels
    • C10L1/32Liquid carbonaceous fuels consisting of coal-oil suspensions or aqueous emulsions or oil emulsions
    • C10L1/324Dispersions containing coal, oil and water
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03BSEPARATING SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS
    • B03B5/00Washing granular, powdered or lumpy materials; Wet separating
    • B03B5/28Washing granular, powdered or lumpy materials; Wet separating by sink-float separation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03BSEPARATING SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS
    • B03B9/00General arrangement of separating plant, e.g. flow sheets
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03BSEPARATING SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS
    • B03B9/00General arrangement of separating plant, e.g. flow sheets
    • B03B9/005General arrangement of separating plant, e.g. flow sheets specially adapted for coal
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10LFUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
    • C10L1/00Liquid carbonaceous fuels
    • C10L1/32Liquid carbonaceous fuels consisting of coal-oil suspensions or aqueous emulsions or oil emulsions
    • C10L1/328Oil emulsions containing water or any other hydrophilic phase

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Extraction Or Liquid Replacement (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Solid-Sorbent Or Filter-Aiding Compositions (AREA)
  • Separation Of Suspended Particles By Flocculating Agents (AREA)
  • Physical Water Treatments (AREA)
  • Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
  • Solid Fuels And Fuel-Associated Substances (AREA)

Abstract

A process for cleaning and dewatering hydrophobic particulate materials is presented. The process is performed in in two steps: 1) agglomeration of the hydrophobic particles in a first hydrophobic liquid/aqueous mixture; followed by 2) dispersion of the agglomerates in a second hydrophobic liquid to release the water trapped within the agglomerates along with the entrained hydrophilic particles. 18751764 1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.3

Description

METHODS FOR SEPARATING AND DEWATERING FINE PARTICLES
This application is a divisional application of Australian Application No. 2020201982 the
original disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[001] This application is a continuation in part of U.S. Provisional Application No. 13/576,067,
filed January 17, 2013, which is a U.S. National Phase Application of PCT/US2011/023161,
filed January 31, 2011, which claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Application No.
61/300,270, filed February 1, 2010; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/658,153, filed June
11, 2012; which are incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[002] The instant invention pertains to methods of cleaning fine particles, particularly
hydrophobic particles such as coal, of its impurities in aqueous media and removing process
water from products to the levels that can usually be achieved by thermal drying.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[003] Coal is an organic material that is burned to produce heat for power generation and for
industrial and domestic applications. It has inclusions of mineral matter and may contain
undesirable elements such as sulfur and mercury. Coal combustion produces large amounts of
ash and fugitive dusts that need to be handled properly. Therefore, run-of-the mine coal is
cleaned of the mineral matter before utilization, which also helps increase combustion
efficiencies and thereby reduces C02 emissions. In general, coarse coal (50 x 0.15 mm) can be
1 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 cleaned efficiently by exploiting the specific gravity differences between the coal and mineral matter, while fine coal (approximately 0.15 mm and smaller) is cleaned by froth flotation.
[004] In flotation, air bubbles are dispersed in water in which fine coal and mineral matter are
suspended. Hydrophobic coal particles are selectively collected by a rising stream of air bubbles
and form a froth phase on the surface of the aqueous phase, leaving the hydrophilic mineral
matter behind. Higher-rank coal particles are usually hydrophobic and, therefore, can be attracted
to air bubbles that are also hydrophobic via a mechanism known as hydrophobic interaction. The
hydrophobic coal particles reporting to the froth phase and subsequently to final product stream
are substantially free of mineral matter but contain a large amount of process water. Wet coal is
difficult to handle and incurs high shipping costs and lower combustion efficiencies. Therefore,
the clean coal product is dewatered using various devices such as cyclones, thickeners, filters,
centrifuges, and/or thermal dryers.
[005] Flotation becomes inefficient with finer particles. On the other hand, low-grade ores often
require fine grinding for sufficient liberation. In mineral flotation, its efficacy deteriorates rapidly
below approximately 10 to 15 m, while coal flotation becomes difficult below approximately
44 m. Furthermore, it is difficult to dewater flotation products due to the large surface area and
the high-capillary pressure of the water trapped in between fine particles. Flotation also becomes
inefficient when particle size is larger than approximately 150 m for minerals and 500 m for
coal.
[006] Many investigators explored alternative methods of separating mineral matter from fine
coal, of which selective agglomeration received much attention. In this process, which is also
referred to as oil agglomeration or spherical agglomeration, oil is added to an aqueous
2 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 suspension while being agitated. Under conditions of high-shear agitation, the oil breaks up into small droplets, collide with particles, adsorb selectively on coal by hydrophobic interaction, form pendular bridges with neighboring coal particles, and form agglomerates. The high-shear agitation is essential for the formation of agglomerates, which is also known as phase inversion.
Nicol et al. (U.S. Patent No. 4,209,301) disclose that adding oil in the form of unstable oil-in
water emulsions can produce agglomerates without intense agitation. The agglomerates formed
by these processes are usually large enough to be separated from the mineral matter dispersed in
water by simple screening. One can increase the agglomerate size by subjecting the slurry to a
low- shear agitation after a high-shear agitation.
[007] In general, selective agglomeration gives lower-moisture products and higher coal
recoveries than froth flotation. On the other hand, it suffers from high dosages of oil.
[008] The amounts of oil used in the selective agglomeration process are typically in the range of
to 30% by weight of feed coal (S,C. Tsai, in Fundamentals of Coal Beneficiation and
Utilization, Elsevier, 2982, p. 335). At low dosages, agglomerates have void spaces in between
the particles constituting agglomerates that are filled-up with water, in which fine mineral matter,
e.g., clay, is dispersed, which in turn makes it difficult to obtain low moisture- and low-ash
products. Attempts were made to overcome this problem by using sufficiently large amounts of
oil so that the void spaces are filled-up with oil and thereby minimize the entrapment of fine
mineral matter. Capes et al. (Powder Technology, vol. 40, 1 84, pp. 43-52) disclose that the
moisture contents are in excess of 50% by weight when the amount of oil used is less than 5%.
By increasing the oil dosage to 35%, the moisture contents are substantially reduced to the range
of 17-18%.
3 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
[009] Keller et al. (Colloids and Surfaces, vol. 22, 1987, pp. 37-50) increase the dosages of oil to
5 - 5 6 % by volume to fill up the void spaces more completely, which practically eliminated the
entrapment problem and produced super-clean coal containing less than 1-2% ash. However, the
moisture contents remained high. Keller (Canadian Patent No. 1,198,704) obtains 40% moisture
products using fluorinated hydrocarbons as agglomerants. Depending on the types of coal tested,
approximately 7- 3 0 % of the moisture was due to the water adhering onto the surface of coal,
while the rest was due to the massive water globules trapped in the agglomerates (Keller et al.,
Coal Preparation, vol. 8, 1990, pp.1-17).
[0010] Smith et al (U.S. Patent No. 4,244,699) and Keller (U.S. Patent No. 4,248,698; Canadian
Patent No. 1,198,704) use fluorinated hydrocarbon oils with low boiling points (40-159°F) so
that the spent agglomerants can be readily recovered and be recycled, These reagents are known
to have undesirable effect on the atmospheric ozone layer. Therefore, Keller (U.S. Patent No.
4,484,928) and Keller et al. (U.S. Patent No, 4,770,766) disclose methods of using short chain
hydrocarbons, e,g., 2-methyl butane, pentane, and heptane as agglomerants. Like the fluorinated
hydrocarbons, these reagents have relatively low boiling points, which allowed them to be
recovered and recycled.
[0011] Being able to recycle an agglomerant would be a significant step toward eliminating the
barrier to commercialization of the selective agglomeration process. Another way to achieve this
goal would be to substantially reduce the amount of the oils used. Capes (in Challenges in
Mineral Processing, ed. by K.V.S. Sastry and M.C. Fuerstenau, Society of Mining Engineers,
Inc., 1989, pp. 237-251) developed the low-oil agglomeration process, in which the smaller
agglomerates (<1 mm) formed at low dosages of oil (0.5-5%) are separated from mineral matter
by flotation rather than by screening. Similarly, Wheelock et al., (U.S. Patent No. 6,632,258) 4 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 developed a method of selectively agglomerating fine coal using microscopic gas bubbles to limit the oil consumption to 0.3-3% by weight of coal.
[0012] Chang et al. (U.S. Patent No. 4,613,429) disclose a method of cleaning fine coal of
mineral matter by selective transport of particles across the water/liquid carbon dioxide interface.
The liquid C02 can be recovered and recycled. A report shows that the clean coal products
obtained using this liquid carbon dioxide (LICADO) process contained 5-15% moisture after
filtration (Cooper et al., Proceedings of the 25th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering
Conference, 1990, August 12-17, 1990, pp. 137-142).
[0013] Yoon et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,459,786) disclose a method of dewatering fine coal using
recyclable non-polar liquids. The dewatering is achieved by allowing the liquids to displace
surface moisture. Yoon et al. report that the process of dewatering by displacement (DBD) is
capable of achieving the same or better level of moisture reduction than thermal drying at
substantially lower energy costs, but do not show the removal of mineral matter from coal.
[0014] As noted above, Keller (Canadian Patent No. 1,198,704) attributed the high moisture
contents of the clean coal products obtained from his selective agglomeration process to the
presence of massive water globules. Therefore, there remains a need for a process that can be
used to clean hydrophobic particles, especially coal, of hydrophilic impurities with low water
content.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0015] The instant invention may provide methods for cleaning hydrophobic particulate
materials of hydrophilic contaminants. The instant invention may provide a clean hydrophobic
5 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 fine particulate material that contains moisture levels that is substantially lower than can be achieved by conventional dewatering methods. In this invention, the particulate materials include, but are not limited to, minerals and coal particles smaller than about 1 mm in diameter, preferably smaller than about 0.5 mm, more preferably smaller than about 0.15 mm. Significant benefits of the present invention can be best realized with the ultrafine particles that are difficult to be separated by flotation.
[0015A] In the instant invention, there is provided a process of upgrading low-rank coal particles
comprising the steps of:
a. adding water to the low-rank coal particles to form an aqueous slurry;
b. hydrophobizing the low-rank coal particles;
c. adding a first hydrophobic liquid to the slurry;
d. agitating the slurry to form agglomerates of hydrophobized low-rank coal particles;
e. separating the agglomerates of hydrophobized coal particles from the aqueous slurry;
and
f. dispersing the agglomerates in a second hydrophobic liquid to liberate the water
molecules entrapped within the agglomerate structure along with the hydrophilic mineral matter
dispersed in the water, thereby removing water and mineral matter from the low-rank coal and
increasing its heating value.
[0015B] Also disclosed herein is a process of upgrading a low-rank coal comprising the steps of
a. heating said low-rank coal in a hydrothermal reactor in the presence of C0 2 ;
b. displacing the water released during the hydrothermal process with liquid C0 2 ; and
c. transporting the dewatered coal under a C02 atmosphere, thereby minimizing the
possibility of spontaneous combustion.
6 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
[0016] In the instant invention, a hydrophobic liquid is added to an aqueous medium, in which a
mixture (or slurry) of hydrophobic and hydrophilic particles are suspended. The hydrophobic
liquid is added under conditions of high-shear agitation to produce small droplets. As used
herein, "high shear", or the like, means a shear rate that is sufficient to form large and visible
agglomerates, which is referred to phase inversion. As noted above, under conditions of high
shear agitation, oil breaks up into small droplets, which collide with the fine particles, and
selectively form pendular bridges with neighboring hydrophobic particles, and thereby produce
agglomerates of hydrophobic particles. The intensity of agitation required to form the
agglomerates should vary depending on particle size, particle hydrophobicity, particle shape,
particle specific gravity (S.G.), the type and amounts of hydrophobic liquid used, etc. Ordinarily,
agglomerate formation typically occurs at impeller tip speeds above about 35 ft/s, preferably
above about 45 ft/s, more preferably above about 60 ft/s. In certain embodiments, the aqueous
slurry is subjected to a low-shear agitation after the high-shear agitation to allow for the
agglomerates to grow in size, which will help separate the agglomerates from the hydrophilic
particles dispersed in the aqueous phase.
[0017] The agglomerated hydrophobic particles are separated from the dispersed hydrophilic
particles using a simple size-size separation method such as screening. At this stage, the
agglomerates are substantially free of the hydrophilic particles, but still contain considerable
amount of the process water entrapped in the interstitial spaces created between the hydrophobic
particles constituting the agglomerates. The entrapped water also contains dispersed hydrophilic
particles dispersed in it.
[0018] To remove the entrained water, a second hydrophobic liquid is added to the agglomerates
to disperse the hydrophobic particles in the liquid. The dispersion liberates the entrapped process 7 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 water and the hydrophilic particles dispersed in it from the agglomerates. The hydrophobic particles dispersed in the second hydrophobic liquid are then separated from the hydrophobic liquid. The hydrophobic particles obtained from this final step are practically free of surface water and entrained hydrophilic particles. Typically, the amount of hydrophilic particles associated with the clean hydrophobic particles are less than 10 % by weight, preferably less than about 7 %, more preferably less than about 3 %; and less than about 10 % water, preferably less than about 7 % water, more preferably less than about 5 % water. Importantly, the present invention is able to remove over 90 % of hydrophilic particles from the hydrophobic particles, preferably 95 %,more preferably 98%; and 95 % of water from the hydrophobic particles, preferably 95 ,more preferably 99 %.
[0019] The invention may separate hydrophobic particles from hydrophilic particles and
simultaneously remove the water from the product using a hydrophobic liquid. The hydrophobic
hydrophilic separation (HHS) process described above can also be used to separate of one type
of hydrophilic particles from another by hydrophobizing a selected component using an
appropriate method. The invention, for example, may be practiced with different types of coal
including without limitation bituminous coal, anthracite, and subbituminous coal.
[0020] This invention may further reduce the moisture of clean coal product to the extent that
they can be dried without using excessive heat, and thus energy.
[0021] The invention may recover the spent hydrophobic liquid for recycling purposes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
8 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
[0022] Figure 1 is a graph showing the contact angles of n-alkanes on a hydrophobic coal
immersed in water (Yoon et al., PCT Application No. 61/300,270, 2011) that are substantially
larger than those (~65°) of water droplets on most hydrophobic coal (Gutierrez-Rodriguez, et al.,
Colloids and Surfaces, 12, p.1, 1984).
[0023] Figure 2 is a schematic of one embodiment of the process as disclosed in the present
invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0024] The present invention provides methods of separating a mixture of hydrophobic fine
particulate materials suspended in water. The present invention may also provide a method to
dewater at least one of the products to a level that is substantially lower than can be achieved by
conventional dewatering methods. In this invention, the fine particulate materials include but not
limited to minerals and coal particles, smaller than about 1 mm in diameter, preferably smaller
than about mm, more preferably smaller than about 0.5 mm more preferably less than about 0.15
mm. The hydrophobic particulate materials amenable to the present invention include, but are
not limited to, coal, base-metal sulfides, precious metallic minerals, platinum group metals, rare
earth minerals, non-metallic minerals, phosphate minerals, and clays.
[0025] The present invention provides a method of separating hydrophobic and hydrophilic
particles from each other in two steps: 1) agglomeration of the hydrophobic particles in a first
hydrophobic liquid/aqueous mixture; followed by 2) dispersion of the agglomerates in a second
hydrophobic liquid to release the water trapped within the agglomerates along with the entrained
hydrophilic particles. The second hydrophobic liquid can be the same as the first hydrophobic
liquid in many cases. Essentially, the agglomeration step removes the bulk of hydrophilic 9 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 particles and the water from the fine hydrophobic particles by selectively agglomerating the latter; and the dispersion step removes the residual process water entrapped within the structure of the agglomerates.
[0026] In the agglomeration step, a hydrophobic liquid is added to an aqueous medium, in which
a mixture (or slurry) of fine hydrophobic (usually the product of interest) and hydrophilic (the
contaminants) particles are suspended. The hydrophobic liquid is added under conditions of
high-shear agitation to produce small droplets. The agitation must be sufficient to induce
agglomeration of the hydrophobic particles. In general, the probability of collision between oil
droplets and fine particles increases with decreasing droplet size. Further, the high-shear
agitation helps prevent and/or minimize the formation of oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by
hydrophobic particles. The hydrophobic liquid is chosen such that its contact angle (0) on the
surface, as measured through aqueous phase, is larger than 90. Use of such a liquid allows it to
spontaneously displace the moisture from the surface. High shear agitation produces small oil
droplets that are more efficient than larger droplets for collecting the hydrophobic fine particles
and forming agglomerations of those particles. The hydrophilic particles (usually undesired
material) remain in the aqueous phase.
[0027] When oil and water are mixed in the presence of spherical particles, water-in-oil
emulsions are formed when 0 > 90°, and oil-in-water emulsions are formed when 0 < 900 (Binks,
B.P., Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, 7, p.21, 2002). The former is likely the
case when using the hydrophobic liquids that give contact angles greater than 900. In the instant
invention, this problem is eliminated and/or minimized by adding a hydrophobic liquid to
aqueous slurry under conditions of high-shear agitation.
10 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
[0028] While high-shear agitation can minimize the formation of water-in-oil emulsions, it may
not prevent the residual process water from being entrapped in the interstitial spaces created in
between the particles constituting agglomerates. In the dispersion step, the entrapped water can
be removed by breaking the agglomerates and dispersing the hydrophobic particles in a
hydrophobic liquid. The hydrophobic particles readily disperse in a hydrophobic liquid due to the
strong attraction between hydrophobic particles and hydrophobic liquid. On the other hand,
water has no affinities toward either the hydrophobic particles or the hydrophobic liquid;
therefore, it is released (or liberated) from the agglomerates and are separated from the
hydrophobic particles. During the dispersion step, the hydrophilic particles in the entrained water
are also removed, providing an additional mechanism of separating hydrophobic and hydrophilic
particles from each other.
[0029] The bulk of the hydrophobic liquid used in the instant invention is recovered for recycle
purpose without involving phase changes by using appropriate solid-liquid separation means
such as settling, filtration, and centrifugation. Only the small amount of the residual hydrophobic
liquid adhering onto the surface of hydrophobic particles can be recovered by vaporization and
condensation. Thermodynamically, the energy required to vaporize and condense the recyclable
hydrophobic liquids disclosed in the instant invention is only a fraction of what is required to
vaporize water from the surface of hydrophobic particulate materials.
[0030] In floatation, for a bubble to collect a hydrophobic particle on its surface, the thin liquid
film (TLF) of water (or wetting film) formed in between must thins and ruptures rapidly during
the short time frame when the bubble and particle are in contact with each other. In a dynamic
flotation cell, the contact times are very short typically in the range of tens of milliseconds or
less. If the film thinning kinetics is slow, the bubble and particle will be separated from each 11 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 other before the film ruptures. It has been shown that the kinetics of film thinning increases with increasing particle hydrophobicity (Pan et al., Faraday Discussion, 146, p.325, 2010). Therefore, various hydrophobizing agents, called collectors, are used to increase the particle hydrophobicity and facilitate the film thinning process.
[0031] At the end of a film thinning process, the film must rupture to form a three-phase. A
wetting film can rupture when the following thermodynamic condition is met,
where ys is the surface free energy of a solid (or particle) in contact with air, whileysw and Tw
are the same at the solid/water and water/air interfaces, respectively. The term on the left, i.e.,
ys - ysw, is referred to as wetting tension. Eq. [1] suggests that a particle can penetrate the TLF
and from a three-phase contact if the film tension is less than the surface tension of water. The
free energy gained during the film rupture process (AG) is given by ys - ysw - yw; therefore, the
lower the wetting tension, the easier it is to break the film.
[0032] It follows also that for a wetting tension to be small, it is necessary thatysw be large.
According to the acid-base interaction theory (van Oss, C.J., Interfacial Forces in Aqueous
Media, CRC Taylor and Francis, 2"dEd., p. 1 60), the solid/water interfacial tension can be
calculated by the following relation,
YY" =Y + ". -[2]
where yf is the Lifshitz-van der Waals component of ys and yL is the same of yw; ys+ and ys
are the acidic and basic components of ys, respectively; and y' and y-, are the same for water.
12 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
Essentially, the acidic and basic components represent the propensity for hydrogen bonding.
According to Eq. [2], it is necessary to keep y,+ and y,- small to increase ysw, which can be
accomplished by rendering the surface more hydrophobic. When a surface becomes more
hydrophobic, ys decreases also, which helps decrease the wetting tension and hence improve
flotation.
[0033] In the present invention, a hydrophobic liquid (oil), rather than air, is used to collect
hydrophobic particles. In this case, oil-particle attachment can occur under the following
condition,
r"1- Z-ov 131
where yso represents the interfacial tension between solid and oil. According to the acid-base
theory,
where the subscript 0 represents hydrophobic liquid phase. The hydrophobic liquids that can be
used in the instant invention include, but are not limited to, n-alkanes (such as petane, hexane,
and heptanes), n-alkenes, unbranched and branched cycloalkanes and cycloalkenes with carbon
numbers of less than eight, ligroin, naphtha, petroleum naptha, petroleum ether, liquid carbon
dioxide, and mixtures thereof. The acidic and basic components of these hydrophobic liquids,
i.e., y- and y', are zero as they cannot form hydrogen bonds with water, which makes the last
two terms of Eq. [4] to drop out. Since 7o is nonzero, one may be concerned thatyso > ys.
However, the value of the third term of Eq. [4], i.e., 2 ySLWyLW, is substantial. For n-pentane
interacting with Teflon, for example, 7o = 16.05 mJ/m 2 and 7s = 17.9 mJ/m 2. Since both of
13 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 these substances are completely non-polar, yo = yowand ys= WFromthosevalues,one obtains the fourth term to be -33.9 mJ/m 2 , the magnitude of which is larger than that ofyo.
Therefore, in reality yso < ys and hence,
Ko- Y'I , - Yv[5]
which suggests that the wetting film formed between n-pentane and a hydrophobic surface can
more readily rupture than the same formed between air bubble and a hydrophobic surface.
[0034] According to the inequality of Eq. [5], an oil droplet placed on a hydrophobic surface
immersed in water should give a higher contact angle than an air bubble can. Figure 1 shows the
contact angles of various n-alkane hydrocarbons placed on a hydrophobic coal. As shown, all of
the contact angles are larger than 90 and increase with decreasing hydrocarbon chain length. In
comparison, the maximum contact angles of the air bubbles adhering on the surface of the most
hydrophobic bituminous coal placed in water is approximately 65 (Gutierrez-Rodriguez, et al.,
Colloids and Surfaces, 12, p.1, 1984). The large differences between the oil and air contact
angles supports the thermodynamic analysis presented above and clearly demonstrates that oil is
better than air bubble for collecting hydrophobic particles from an aqueous medium.
[0035] When an air bubble encounters a particle during flotation, it deforms and causes a change
in curvature, which in turn creates an excess pressure (p) in the wetting film. The excess pressure
created by the curvature change (peur) can be predicted using the Laplace equation; therefore, it is
referred to as Laplace pressure or capillary pressure. The excess pressure causes a wetting film to
drain. When its film thickness (h) reaches -200 nm, the surface forces (e.g., electrical double
layer and van der Waals forces) present at the air/water and bitumen/water interfaces interact
with each other and give rise to a disjoining pressure (II). A pressure balance along the direction
14 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 normal to a film shows that the excess pressure becomes equal to the Laplace pressure minus disjoining pressure, i.e., p = pcur - H. Under most flotation conditions, both the double-layer and van der Waals forces are repulsive (or positive) in wetting films, causing the excess pressure to decrease and hence the film thinning process be retarded.
[0036] The disjoining pressure can become negative when the particle becomes sufficiently
hydrophobic by appropriate chemical treatment. In this case, the excess pressure (p) in the film
will increase and hence accelerate the film thinning process. It has been shown that the negative
disjoining pressures (H < 0) are created by the hydrophobic forces present in wetting films. In
general, hydrophobic forces and hence the negative disjoining pressures increase with increasing
particle hydrophobicity or contact angle (Pan et al., Faraday Discussion, vol. 146, 325-340,
2010).
[0037] Thus, it is essential to render a particle sufficiently hydrophobic for successful flotation.
An increase in particle hydrophobicity should cause the wetting film to thin faster, while at the
same time cause the wetting tension to decrease. If the wetting tension becomes less than the
surface tension of water, then the wetting film ruptures, which is the thermodynamic criterion for
bubble-particle attachment.
[0038] A fundamental problem associated with the forced air flotation process as disclosed by
Sulman et al. (U.S. Patent No. 793,808) is that the van der Waals force in wetting films are
always repulsive, contributing to positive disjoining pressures which is not conducive to film
thinning. When using oil to collect hydrophobic particles, on the other hand, the van der Waals
forces in wetting films are always attractive, causing the disjoining pressures to become
negative. As discussed above, a negative disjoining pressure causes an increase in excess
15 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 pressure in the film and hence facilitates film thinning. For the reasons discussed above, oil agglomeration should have faster kinetics and be thermodynamically more favorable than air bubble flotation. An implication of the latter is that oil agglomeration can recover less hydrophobic particles, has higher kinetics, and gives higher throughput.
[0039] In the instant invention, the hydrophobic liquid is dispersed in aqueous slurry. In general,
the smaller the air bubbles or oil droplets, the higher the probability of collision, which is a
prerequisite for bubble-particle or oil-particle attachment. At a given energy input, it would be
easier to disperse oil in water than to disperse air in water. The reason is simply that the
interfacial tensions at the oil-water interfaces are in the range of 50 mJ/m 2, while the same at the
air/water interface is 72.6 mJ/m2
[0040] In the instant invention, hydrophobic liquid, rather than air, is used to collect hydrophobic
particles to take advantage of the thermodynamic and kinetic advantages discussed above. On the
other hand, hydrophobic liquid is generally more expensive than air to use. Further, oil flotation
products have high moistures. In the instant invention, the first problem is overcome by using
hydrophobic oils that can be readily recovered and recycled after use, while the second problem
is addressed as discussed below.
[0041] There are three basic causes for the high moisture content in oil agglomeration products
(the agglomerated fine particles recovered by hydrophobic/hydrophilic separation). They include
i) the film of water adhering on the surface of the hydrophobic particles recovered by oil
flotation; ii) the water-in-oil emulsions (or Pickering emulsions) stabilized by the hydrophobic
particles; and iii) the water entrapped in the interstitial void spaces created by the hydrophobic
particles constituting agglomerates. In the instant invention, the water from i and ii are removed
16 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 in the agglomeration stage by selecting a hydrophobic liquid with contact angle greater than 90.
The surface moisture (mentioned in i) is removed by using a hydrophobic liquid that can displace
the water from the surface. Thermodynamically, the surface moisture can be spontaneously
displaced by using a hydrophobic liquid whose contact angles are greater than 90°.
[0042] The water entrainment in the form of water-in-oil emulsions (mentioned in ii) is
eliminated by not allowing large globules of water to be stabilized by hydrophobic particles. This
is accomplished by subjecting aqueous slurries to high-shear agitation. Preferably, the high shear
agitation produces hydrophobic liquid droplet sizes to be smaller than the air bubbles used in
flotation, which allows the process of the instant invention to be more efficient than flotation.
Typically, the droplet sizes are in the range of 0.1 to 400 tm, preferably 10 to 300 tm, more
preferably 100 to 200 tm. The agitation can be accomplished by using a dynamic mixer or an
inline mixer known in the art. In-line mixers are designed to provide a turbulent mixing while
slurries are in transit.
[0043] Under conditions of high-shear agitation, hydrophobic particles can be detached from oil
water interface and, thereby, destabilize water-in-oil emulsions or prevent them from forming.
The amount of energy (E) required to detach hydrophobic particles from the interface can be
calculated by the following relation (Binks, B.P., Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface
Science, 7, 2002, p.21),
= wr'y,(1 ±cos8) [61
where yo/w is the interfacial tension, r is particle radius, and 0 is the contact angle. The sign
inside the bracket is positive for removal into hydrophobic phase and is negative for removal into
water phase. Therefore, the higher the contact angle, the easier it is to remove particles to the 17 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 hydrophobic phase. Conversely, the lower the contact angle, the easier it is to remove particles to water phase. Thus, the high-shear agitation employed in the instant invention offers a mechanism by which less hydrophobic particles are dispersed in water phase, while more hydrophobic particles are dispersed in oil phase. Eq. [6] suggests also that the smaller the particles, the easier it is to detach particles from the oil- water interface and achieve more complete dispersion.
[0044] The interstitial water trapped in between hydrophobic particles (mentioned in iii) is
removed by dispersing the agglomerates in a second hydrophobic liquid. Upon dispersion, the
trapped interstitial water is liberated from the agglomerates and are separated from the
hydrophobic particles and subsequently from the hydrophobic liquid. As has already been noted
in conjunction with Eq. [6], the smaller the particles and the higher the contact angles, the easier
it is to disperse agglomerates into the hydrophobic liquid in which the hydrophobic particles are
dispersed. The second hydrophobic liquid (used for dispersion) can be the same of different from
the hydrophobic liquid used in the agglomeration step. The second hydrophobic liquid can be,
but is not limited to, n-alkanes (such as petane, hexane, and heptanes), n-alkenes, unbranched
and branched cycloalkanes and cycloalkenes with carbon numbers of less than eight, ligroin,
naphtha, petroleum naptha, petroleum ether, liquid carbon dioxide, and mixtures thereof.
[0045] The hydrophobic liquid recovered from the process is preferably recycled. The
hydrophobic particles obtained from the solid/liquid separation step are substantially free of
surface moisture. However, a small amount of the hydrophobic liquid may be present on the coal
surface, in which case the hydrophobic particles may be subjected to a negative pressure or
gentle heating to recover the residual hydrophobic liquid as vapor, which is subsequently
condensed back to a liquid phase and recycled.
18 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
[0046] Figure 2 shows an embodiment of the instant invention. A mixture of hydrophobic and
hydrophilic particulate materials dispersed in water (stream 1) is fed to a mixing tank 2, along
with the hydrophobic liquid recovered downstream (stream 3) and a small amount of make-up
hydrophobic liquid (stream 4). The aqueous slurry and hydrophobic liquid in the mixing tank 2 is
subjected to a high-shear agitation, e.g. by means of a dynamic mixer as shown to break the
hydrophobic liquid into small droplets and thereby increase the efficiency of collision between
particles and hydrophobic liquid droplets. As noted above, collision efficiency with fine particles
should increase with decreasing droplet size. Further, high-shear agitation is beneficial for
preventing entrainment of water into the hydrophobic liquid phase in the form of water-in-oil
emulsions. Upon collision, the wetting films between oil droplets and hydrophobic particles thin
and rupture quickly due to the low wetting tensions and form agglomerates of the hydrophobic
particulate material, while hydrophilic particles remain dispersed in water. The agitated slurry
flows onto a screen 5 (or a size separation device) by which hydrophilic particles (stream 6) and
agglomerated hydrophobic particles (stream 7) are separated. The latter is transferred to a tank 8,
to which additional (or a second) hydrophobic liquid 9 is introduced to provide a sufficient
volume of the liquid in which hydrophobic particles can be dispersed. A set of vibrating meshes
installed in the hydrophobic liquid phase provides a sufficient energy required to break the
agglomerates and disperse the hydrophobic particles in the hydrophobic liquid phase. Vibrational
frequencies and amplitudes of the screens are adjusted by controlling the vertical movement of
the shaft 11 holding the screens. Other mechanical means may be used to facilitate the breakage
of agglomerates. The hydrophobic particles dispersed in hydrophobic liquid (stream 12) flows to
a thickener 13, in which hydrophobic particles settle to the bottom while clarified hydrophobic
liquid (stream 14) is returned to the mixer 2 (in this case, the hydrophobic liquids in the
19 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 agglomeration and dispersion steps are the same). The thickened oily slurry of hydrophobic particles 15 at the bottom of the thickener 13 is sent (stream 15) to a solid-liquid separator 16, such as centrifuge or a filter. The hydrophobic particles (stream 17) exiting the solid-liquid separator 16 are fed to a hydrophobic liquid recovery system consisting of an evaporator 18 and/or a condenser 19. The condensate is recycled back to the mixer 2. The hydrophobic particles (stream 20) exiting the evaporator 18 are substantially free of both moisture and of hydrophilic impurities. The hydrophilic particles recovered from the screen 5 and the disperser 8 may be rejected or recovered separately.
[0047] The hydrophobic liquids that can be used in the process described above include shorter
chain n-alkanes and alkenes, both unbranched and branched, and cycloalkanes and cycloalkenes,
with carbon numbers less than eight. These and other hydrophobic liquids such as ligroin (light
naphtha), naphtha and petroleum naphtha, and mixtures thereof have low boiling points, so that
they can be readily recovered and recycled by vaporization and condensation. Liquid carbon
dioxide (C02 ) is another that can be used as a hydrophobic liquid in the instant invention. When
using low-boiling hydrophobic liquids, it may be necessary to carry out the process described in
Figure 2 in appropriately sealed reactors to minimize the loss of the hydrophobic liquids by
vaporization.
[0048] When processing high-value fine particulate materials, such as precious metals, platinum
group metals (PGM), and rare earth minerals, it may not be necessary to recycle the spent
hydrophobic liquids. In this case, hydrocarbons of higher carbon numbers, such as kerosene,
diesel, and fuel oils may be used without provisions for recycling. When using those
hydrophobic liquids, the instant invention can be similar to the conventional oil agglomeration
20 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 process, except that agglomeration products are dispersed in a suitable hydrophobic liquid to obtain lower-moisture and lower-impurity products.
[0049] In the process diagram presented in Figure 2, a hydrophobic particulate material (e.g.,
high-rank coals) is separated from hydrophilic materials (e.g., silica and clay), with the resulting
hydrophobic materials having very low surface moistures.
[0050] The processes as described in the instant invention can also be used for separating one
type of hydrophilic materials from another by selectively hydrophobizing one but not the
other(s). For example, the processes can be used to separate copper sulfide minerals from
siliceous gangue minerals by using an alkyl xanthate or a thionocarbamate as hydrophobizing
agents for the sulfide minerals. The hydrophobized sulfide minerals are then separated from the
other hydrophilic minerals using the process of the present invention.
[0051] Further, the process disclosed in the instant invention can be used for further reducing the
moisture of the hydrophobic particulate materials dewatered by mechanical dewatering methods.
For example, a filter cake consisting of hydrophobic particles can be dispersed in a hydrophobic
liquid to remove the water entrapped in between the void spaces of the particles constituting the
filter cake, and the hydrophobic liquid is subsequently separated from the dispersed hydrophobic
particles and recycled to obtain low-moisture products.
[0052] In addition, the process disclosed in the instant invention can be used for dewatering low
rank coals. This can be accomplished by heating a coal in a hydrothermal reactor in the presence
of C02. The water derived from the low-rank coal is displaced by liquid C02 in accordance to
the DBD and the HHS mechanisms disclosed above. The product coal obtained from this novel
21 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 process will be substantially free of water and can be transported under C02 atmosphere to minimize the possibility of spontaneous combustion.
[0053] Further, low-rank coals can be dewatered and upgraded by the present invention by
derivatizing the low-rank coal to make it hydrophobic. It is well known that low-rank coals are
not as hydrophobic as high-rank coals, such as bituminous coal and anthracite. Some are so
hydrophilic that flotation using conventional coal flotation reagents, such as kerosene and diesel
oils do not work. Part of the reasons is that various oxygen containing groups such as carboxylic
acids are exposed on the surface. When a low-rank coal is upgraded in accordance to the present
invention, it is preferably derivatized to render the surface hydrophilic surface hydrophobic. In
one embodiment, the low-rank coal is first esterified with an alcohol, e.g. methanol, ethanol, and
the like, using methods known in the art. The esterification renders the low-rank coal more
hydrophobic (than before esterification). The reaction between the carboxyl groups (R-COOH)
of the low-rank coal and alcohol (R-OH) is indicated as follows:
0 Ht -0H~
CH O-R
The reaction produces esters (R-COOR) on the surface of the low-rank coal and water.
Preferably, the reaction takes place at about 25-75°C, more preferably about 45-55°C, and most
preferably at about 50°C. A catalyst, such as H' ions may also be used for the esterification. The
production of water by the condensation reaction represents a mechanism by which "chemically
bound" water is removed, while the substitution of the hydrophilic carboxyl groups with short
hydrocarbon chains (R) renders the low-rank coal hydrophobic. Once esterified, the low-rank
coal can be subjected to the HHS process disclosed in the instant invention to remove the
22 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 residual process water and the entrained hydrophilic mineral using the agglomeration/dispersion steps as disclosed in the present invention.
[0054] Without further description, it is believed that one of ordinary skill in the art can, using
the preceding description and the following illustrative examples, make and utilize the present
invention. The following examples are given to illustrate the present invention. It should be
understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific conditions or details described in
the examples.
Example 1
[0055] A sample of rougher concentrate was received from a chalcopyrite flotation plant
operating in the U.S. The sample assaying 15.9 %Cu was wet ground in a laboratory ball mill for
12.5 hours to reduce the particle size to 80% finer than 20 m. The mill product was subjected to
a standard flotation test, and the results were compared with those obtained from an oil
agglomeration test. In each test, a 100 g mill product was treated with 4 lb/ton of potassium amyl
xanthate (KAX) to selectively hydrophobize chalcopyrite.
[0056] The flotation test was conducted using a Denver laboratory flotation cell. The oil
agglomeration test was conducted using a kitchen blender with 100 g mill product, 80 ml n
pentane, and 400 ml tap water. The mixture was subjected initially to a high-shear agitation for
s and subsequently to a low-shear agitation for another 40 s. Here, the dividing line between
the high- and low-shear agitations is the impeller speed that can create agglomerates of
hydrophobic (and/or hydrophobized) particles, which is referred to as phase inversion. For the
case of bituminous coal, the phase inversion occurs at the rotational speeds above approximately
8,000 r.p.m. The slurry in the blender was then poured over a screen to separate the 23 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 agglomerated hydrophobized chalcopyrite particles from the dispersed hydrophilic siliceous gangue. The agglomerates recovered as screen overflow were then dispersed in n-pentane, while being agitated by means of an ultrasonic vibrator to assist dispersion. The hydrophobized chalcopyrite particles dispersed in pentane were then separated from pentane and analyzed for copper and moisture.
[0057] As shown in Table 1, oil agglomeration gave 92.3% copper recovery, as compared to
55.4% recovery obtained by flotation. The large improvement can be attributed to the differences
in wetting tensions and the nature of the van der Waals forces present in the respective wetting
films. On the other hand, the oil agglomeration test gave a little lower copper grade than the
flotation test.
[0058] A problem associated with the oil agglomeration process was that the moisture content of
the agglomerates was high (48.6%) due to the presence of the water trapped within the
agglomerate structure. It was possible, however, to overcome this problem by dispersing the
agglomerates in a hydrophobic liquid (n-pentane) and thereby liberating the residual process
water entrapped within the agglomerate structure. The moisture content of the chalcopyrite
concentrate obtained in this manner was only 0.6 %, as shown in Tale 1.
Table 1
Copper Moisture twt} Recovery Grade Agglomerates Dispersed N (%]:U) Flotation 554 - •
Agglomeration 92.3 23.1 48.6 0.6
24 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
[0059] This example shows that oil droplets are more efficient than air bubbles for the recovery
of ultrafine hydrophobic particles from aqueous media, and that that the HHS process can be
used to overcome the high moisture problem associated with the oil agglomeration process.
Example 2
[0060] In this example, the process of the present invention was compared with flotation. The
copper rougher concentrate assaying 15.9 %Cu was wet ground in a ball mill using tap water.
The grinding times were varied to obtain mill products of different particle sizes, and the
products were subjected to both flotation and HHS tests.
[0061] Table 2 compares the flotation and HHS test results obtained on a mill product with a
particle size distribution of 80% finer than 22 m. Each test was conducted using -250 g samples
with 17.6 lb/ton potassium amyl xanthate (KAX) as a selective hydrophobizing agent (collector)
for the copper mineral (chalcopyrite). As shown, flotation gave a concentrate assaying 28.0
% Cu with a 67.4 % copper recovery, while the HHS process gave a concentrate assaying 23.1
% Cu with a 91.9 % recovery. In the latter, the mill product was first agglomerated with pentane in
a kitchen blender, which provided a high-shear agitation, and the agglomerates were
subsequently separated from dispersed materials by means of a screen. The agglomerates were
then dispersed in pentane so that the residual process water entrapped within the agglomerate
structure is liberated from the agglomerates. A gentle mechanical agitation facilitated the
dispersion by breaking the agglomerates.
25 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
Table2
weight Assays {%wt] Copper Product rams % wt CIi Moistur Recovery Concentrate 151.1 68. 28.0 - 67.4 Rotation Tailing 692 31.4 8.4 - Feed 220.3 100.0 15.9 - Hydrophobfc- Concentrate 238.2 983 23.1 0.14 91.9 Hydrophilic Tailing 4.0 1.7 3.5 - Separation (HRS) Feed 242.2 100.0 15.9
[0062] The results presented in the table demonstrated that the present invention is more efficient
in recovering fine particles. That the present process gave a slightly lower copper grade than the
flotation process can be attributed to high recovery. Since the droplets of hydrophobic liquid
(pentane) are more efficient than air bubbles in collecting hydrophobic particles, the former can
recover composite particles that are less hydrophobic than fully liberated chalcopyrite particles,
resulting in a lower-grade product. When the present process (HHS) was conducted at lower
dosages of xanthate, the concentrate grade was improved.
Example 3
[0063] Monosized silica spheres of 11 m in diameter were hydrophobized and subjected to oil
agglomeration, followed by a dispersion step as described in the foregoing examples. The silica
particles were hydrophobized by immersing them in a 0.002 moles/liter octadecyltrichlorosilane
(OTS) solution. After a 10 minute immersion time, the particles were washed with toluene and
subsequently with ethanol to remove the residual OTS molecules adhering on the surface.
[0064] An aqueous suspension containing 50 g of the hydrophobized silica at 10% solids was
placed in a kitchen blender and subjected to a high-shear agitation for 40 s in the presence of 20
26 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 ml of n-pentane, followed by 40 s of low-shear agitation. The agglomerates showed 19.5% moisture by weight.
[0065] The agglomerates were then dispersed in n-pentane while being agitated mechanically to
facilitate the breakage of the agglomerates and thereby release the water trapped in between
hydrophobic particles. The mechanical device that was used to help break the agglomerates was
a set of vibrating meshes located in the pentane phase. The tiny water droplets liberated from the
agglomerates fall to the bottom, while the hydrophobic particles remain dispersed in the organic
phase. The hydrophobic particles separated from the organic phase were practically dry
containing only 0.7% by weight of moisture. This example clearly demonstrates that the process
of the present invention is efficient for recovering and dewatering ultrafine particles.
Example 4
[0066] Fundamentally, dewatering is a process in which solid/water interface is replaced by
solid/air interface. For hydrophobic solids, the interfacial free energies at the solid/oil interface
(yso) is lower than the same at the solid/air interface (ys) as discussed in view of Eqs. [4] and [5].
It should, therefore, be easier to displace the solid/water interface with solid/oil interface than
with solid/air interface.
[0067] In this example, 200 ml of tap water and 50 g of monosized silica particles of 71 m were
agitated in a kitchen blender for a short period of time to homogenize the mixture. A known
volume of a cationic surfactant solution, i.e., 4x10-6 M dodecylaminium hydrochloride (DAH),
was then added to the mixture. The slurry was agitated for 3 minutes at a low speed to allow for
the surfactant molecules to adsorb on the surface and render the silica surface hydrophobic. A
volume of n-pentane (25 ml) was then added before agitating the slurry at a high speed for 40 s, 27 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 followed by another 40 s of agitation at a low speed. The agitated slurry was poured over a screen to separate the agglomerates, formed in the presence of the hydrocarbon oil, from the water. The agglomerates were analyzed for surface moisture after evaporating the residual n pentane adhering on the silica surface. The tests were conducted at different DAH dosages, with the results being presented in Table 3. As shown, the moisture of the agglomerates decreased with increasing DAH dosages. Nevertheless, the moistures remained high due to the presence of the water trapped in between the particles constituting the agglomerates.
Table 3 DAH Dosage Moisture (%wt)
(lb/ton) Agglomerate Dispersed 212 24,20 7
44 23.67 0.9 is 22.5 0.06
[0068] Another set of agglomeration tests were conducted under identical conditions. In this set
of experiments, the agglomeration step was followed by another step, in which the agglomerates
were added to a beaker containing 100 ml of n-pentane. After a gentle agitation by hand, the
hydrophobic silica particles dispersed in pentane was transferred to a Buchner filter for solid
liquid separation. Additional pentane was added to ensure that most of the entrapped water was
displaced by the hydrophobic liquid. The filter cake was analyzed for moisture after evaporating
the residual n-pentane from the surface. As shown in Table 3, the moisture contents of the
filtered silica were substantially lower than those of the agglomerates.
Example 5
28 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
[0069] Screen-bowl centrifuges are widely used to dewater clean coal products from flotation.
However, the process loses ultrafine particles smaller than 44 m as effluents. In this example, a
screen-bowl effluent received from an operating bituminous coal cleaning plant was first
subjected to two stages of flotation to remove hydrophilic clay, and the froth product was
dewatered by vacuum filtration. The cake moisture obtained using sorbitanmonooleate as a
dewatering aid was 20.2% by weight. The filter cake was then dispersed in a hydrophobic liquid
(n-pentane) while the slurry was being agitated by sonication to facilitate the breakage of the
agglomerate. Since the bituminous coal particles are hydrophobic, they can readily be dispersed
in the hydrophobic liquid, while the water droplets trapped in between the particles were released
and fall to the bottom. The ultrafine coal particles dispersed in the hydrophobic liquid phase
contained only 2.3% moisture, as analyzed after appropriately separating the n-pentane from the
coal. The results obtained in this example showed that most of the moisture left in the filter cake
was due to the water trapped in the void spaces in between the particles constituting the cake,
and that it can be substantially removed by the method disclosed in the instant invention.
Example 6
[0070] Recognizing the difficulty in cleaning and dewatering ultrafine coal, many companies in
the U.S. remove ultrafine coal by cyclone prior to flotation and subsequently dewater the froth
product using screen -bowl centrifuges. A sample of cyclone overflow containing particles finer
than 400 mesh (37 m) and 53.6% ash was subjected to a series of selective agglomeration tests
using n-pentane as agglomerant. The tests were conducted by varying oil dosages, agitation
speed, and agitation time. As shown in Table 4, low-shear agitation resulted in high-ash and
high-moisture products. Combination of high- and low-shear agitation gave better results. In
general, selective oil agglomeration did an excellent job in ash rejection. However, product 29 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 moistures were high due to the entrapment of water within the structure of the agglomerates as has already been discussed.
Table 4
Product (%wt] Combuotible Oil Dosage Agitation Speed
& Moisture Ash Recovery (K wt) (%w) Time (min) 61.2 19.1 74.1 25 low shear(2) 24.8 11.1 67.0 50 high shear (0.5) & low shear (2) 43.1 10.4 66.1 30 high shear (0.5) & low shear (2)
50.9 11.0 72.2 20 high shear (0.5] & low shear (2)
45.2 13.2 75.8 10 high shear (0.5) & low shear (2)
[0071] The same coal sample was subjected to a series of oil agglomeration tests as described
above. The amount of n-pentane used in each test was 20% by weight of feed, and the mixture
was agitated for 30 s at a high speed and then for 2 min at a low speed. The results presented in
Table 5 show that the moistures of the clean coal products were substantially reduced further
from those obtained in the agglomeration tests (Table 4). The improvements can be attributed to
the liberation of the interstitial water by dispersing the agglomerates in a hydrophobic liquid.
Note also that by releasing the interstitial water, the mineral matter dispersed in it was also
removed, resulting in a further reduction in ash content beyond what was obtainable using the
selective agglomeration process alone. Thus, the process of the instant invention can improve
both moisture and ash rejections.
30 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
Table 5
Product (% wt) Combustible Moisture Ash Recovery M% wt) 3A 2.3 78.8 3.5 3.9 84.7 3. 2.9 83.4 10.6 3.0 78.8 10.0 2.5 78.7 4A 3.0 80.1 !.1 3.7 86.7
Example 7
[0072] A sample of screen bowl effluent was received from a metallurgical coal processing plant
and used for the process of the present invention. The effluent, containing 11% ash, was
processed at 5% solids as received without thickening. The procedure was the same as described
in the preceding examples. The amount of n-pentane used was 20% by weight of feed, and the
slurry was agitated for 20 s in a kitchen blender at a high agitation speed. The results presented
in Table 6 show that low-moisture and low-ash products were obtained from the screen bowl
effluent. Since the coal was very hydrophobic, it was not necessary to have a low-shear agitation
after the high- shear agitation.
[0073] The fourth column of Table 6 gives the %solids of the coal dispersed in n-pentane. The
data presented in the table show that product moistures become higher at higher %solids.
However, other operating conditions such as the amount of mechanical energy used to break
agglomerates and facilitate dispersion also affected the moisture. In this example, the mechanical
energy was provided by a set of two vibrating meshes moving up and down in the pentane phase.
31 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
The solid content in dispersed phase is important in continuous operation, as it affects throughput
and product moisture.
Table 6 Product (% wt) Ieject Ash %Solid Combustible Moisture Ash (% wt) Pentane Recovery% 8.1 2.3 84.0 7.1 98.0 6.1 2.0 $4.3 63 98.0 6.8 2.7 83.8 7.3 98.1 2.8 2.2 $3.0 1.7 97.8
Example 8
[0074] A bituminous coal processing plant is cleaning a 100 mesh x 0 coal assaying
approximately 50% ash by flotation. Typically, clean coal products assay 9 to 11% ash. A coal
sample was taken from the plant feed stream and subjected to the method of the present
invention. As shown in Table 7, the process produced low-ash (3.2 to 4.2%) and low-moisture(
1%) products with approximately 90% combustible recoveries. Without the additional dispersion
step, the agglomerates assayed 37.2 to 45.1% moistures.
Table 7
Feed Product Moisture (% wt) Ash (%wt) Combustible Ash (%wt Agglomerate Dispersed Clean Coal Reject Recovery (%)
51,0 45.1 1. 4.2 90.0 88.9 52.5 45.2 01 3.5 91.4 89.9 52.6 37.2 1.0 16 91.7 90.3
Example 9
32 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
[0075] Two different bituminous coal samples were subjected to continuous process of the
present invention, n-pentane was used as a hydrophobic liquid. The process was substantially the
same as described in Figure 2, except that an ultrasonic vibrator rather than a set of vibrating
mesh was used to break the agglomerates and facilitate dispersion in n-pentane. As shown in
Table 8, the oil agglomeration followed by a dispersion step reduced the ash content of a
metallurgical coal from 51 to 3.6% ash with a 92% combustible recovery. With another coal
sample assaying 40.4% ash, the ash contents were reduced to 3.3 to 5.0% with combustible
recoveries in the neighborhood of 80%.
[0076] The bulk of the spent pentane was recycled without phase changes. However, a small
amount of the hydrophobic liquid adhering onto coal surfaces was recycled by evaporation and
condensation. The amount of n-pentane that was lost due to adsorption or incomplete removal
from coal was in the range of 1.5 to 4 lb/ton of clean coal. The energy cost for evaporating n
pentane is substantially less than that for water in view of the large differences in boiling points
(36.1°C vs. 100°C) and heats of vaporization (358 kJ/kg vs. 2,257 kJ/kg) for pentane and water.
Table8 Feed Product [%wt) Reject Combustrble Ash (%wt) Moistur Ash Ash (%wt] Recovery (%wt) 51.0 2.9 3.6 92.6 92.0 40.4 l. 5.0 80.6 84.8 40.4 3.9 3.3 801 839
Example 10
[0077] In this example, a subbituminous coal (-1.18 + 0.6 mm) from Wyoming was dry
pulverized and hydrophobized in water using sorbitanmonooleate (Reagent U) in the presence of
33 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 water. The coal sample assayed 28% moisture by weight of as-received moisture, 8.5% ash, and
8,398 Btu/lb. As shown in Table 9, the process of the present invention substantially reduced the
moisture and hence increased the heating values. In general, the moisture reductions were higher
at higher reagent dosages and longer agitation times. As has been the cases with bituminous
coals, the hydrophobized subbituminous coal also formed agglomerates in the presence of a
hydrophobic liquid (n-pentane) but the agglomerate moistures were high due to the entrapment
mechanism discussed in the foregoing examples. When the agglomerates were dispersed in
n-pentane, however, the moisture contents were substantially reduced and the heading values
increased accordingly.
Table 9
ReagentU Agglomerale Product Dosage Agtn. Time Moisture Mosture Ash Heating Value (lb/ton) (min) {%Wt)t) (%wt) (BlulAb) 33.3 15 44.6 38.2 8.2 7,562 333 30 27.1 208 5.8 9,814 50 5 48.2 6.0 5.8 11,560 50 30 28.1 4.1 6.0 11,759
Example 11
[0078] In this example, a Wyoming coal sample was hydrophobized by esterification with
ethanol and then subjected to the process of the present invention. The reaction took place at
°C in the presence of a small amount of H' ions as a catalyst. As has already been discussed,
the esterification reaction removes the chemically bound water by condensation and renders the
coal hydrophobic. The hydrophobized coal sample was then subjected to the process of the
present invention (HHS) as discussed above to remove the water physically entrapped within the
34 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2 agglomerate structure and the capillaries of low-rank coals. As is well known, much of the
'inherent moistures' in low-rank coals is due to the water trapped in macropres (Katalambula and
Gupta, Energy and Fuels, vol. 23, p. 3392, 2009).
[0079] The ethanol molecules may be small enough to penetrate the pore structures and remove
the water by condensation and the displacement mechanisms involved in the HHS process. A
strong evidence for this possibility may be that even the coarse particles were readily dewatered
as shown in Table 10. Also shown in that table is that the hydrophobized low-rank coals form
agglomerates, which trap large amount of moistures. When they were dispersed in n-pentane,
however, the moisture was substantially reduced.
Table 1D
Top Size of Agglomerate HHS Product Coal Sarnples Moisture Moisturs Ash Heating Value (mM) MV) (%wA (%wt) (Btulb) 0.350 40.3 3.20 9.92 10,827 0.600 25.62 3.20 9,82 11,01a 1.1BO 28.34 2.87 8.4 11,216 6.300 37.63 2.30 6.27 11,529
[0080] Table 11 shows the results obtained with different alcohols for esterification. As shown,
the shorter the hydrocarbon chains of the alcohols, the lower the moistures of the Wyoming coal
samples treated by the HHS process. This finding suggests that smaller molecules can more
readily enter the pores and remove the chemically-bound water by the mechanisms discussed
above.
35 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
Table 11
Agglomerate HHS Product Alcohol Moisture Moisture Ash Heating Value (%Wt) (%wtt) (%wt) (BuAb) Methanol 25.39 8.32 2.35 11,625 Elhanol 30.92 9-14 3.20 11,125 2-Propanol 29.82 10.12 0.93 10,693 1-Pentanol 31.5 15.12 3.8 10,092
[0081] Although certain presently preferred embodiments of the invention have been specifically
described herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains that
variations and modifications of the various embodiments shown and described herein may be
made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended
that the invention be limited only to the extent required by the appended claims and the
applicable rules of law.
[0082] It is to be understood that, if any prior art publication is referred to herein, such reference
does not constitute an admission that the publication forms a part of the common general
knowledge in the art, in Australia or any other country.
[0083] In the claims which follow and in the preceding description of the invention, except
where the context requires otherwise due to express language or necessary implication, the word
"comprise" or variations such as "comprises" or "comprising" is used in an inclusive sense, i.e.
to specify the presence of the stated features but not to preclude the presence or addition of
further features in various embodiments of the invention.
36 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2

Claims (18)

What is claimed is:
1. A process of upgrading low-rank coal particles comprising the steps of: a. adding water to the low-rank coal particles to form an aqueous slurry; b. hydrophobizing the low-rank coal particles; c. adding a first hydrophobic liquid to the slurry; d. agitating the slurry to form agglomerates of hydrophobized low-rank coal particles; e. separating the agglomerates of hydrophobized coal particles from the aqueous slurry; and f. dispersing the agglomerates in a second hydrophobic liquid to liberate the water molecules entrapped within the agglomerate structure along with the hydrophilic mineral matter dispersed in the water, thereby removing water and mineral matter from the low-rank coal and increasing its heating value.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein the low-rank coal particles are hydrophobized with a surfactant.
3. The process of either of claims 1 or 2, wherein the low-rank coal particles are hydrophobized by esterification.
4. The process of any one of claims I to 3, wherein the low-rank coal particles are hydrophobized by adding an alcohol.
5. The process of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said alcohol from the group consisting of: methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol and 1-pentanol.
6. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein said first or second hydrophobic liquid is selected from the group consisting of n-alkanes, n-alkenes, unbranched and branched cycloalkanes and cycloalkenes with carbon numbers of less than eight, ligroin, naphtha, petroleum naptha, petroleum ether, liquid carbon dioxide, and mixtures thereof.
37 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
7. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein said first hydrophobic liquid is selected from gasoline, kerosene, diesel fuel, and heating oils.
8. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein at least one of the first hydrophobic liquid and the second hydrophobic liquid is recycled.
9. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the coal is smaller than 1 mm in diameter.
10. The process of any one of the preceding claims, further comprising the step of evaporating any hydrophobic liquid attached to the hydrophobic particles substantially free of hydrophilic contaminant and water produced in step d.
11. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein step a produces hydrophobic droplet sizes ranging from about 0.1 m to about 400 [m.
12. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein step c also includes agitation to promote dispersion.
13. The process of claim 12, wherein the agitation is selected from the group consisting of sonication, ultrasonic vibration, agitation with a dynamic mixer, agitation by a static mixer, and vibrating screens.
14. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein step e is accomplished by sedimentation, vacuum filtration, pressure filtration, centrifugal filtration, or centrifugation.
15. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the hydrophobic particles substantially free of hydrophilic contaminant and water have a water content of about 0.1% to about 10%.
38 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
16. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the hydrophobic particles substantially free of hydrophilic contaminant and water have a hydrophilic particulate material content of about 1% to about 10%.
17. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein step c is accomplished by creating an upward current of the second hydrophobic liquid to keep heavy minerals in suspension.
18. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein agglomerates formed with the first hydrophobic liquid are washed with the second hydrophobic liquid to recover the first hydrophobic liquid.
39 12183923_1 (GHMatters) P98786.AU.2
AU2022203563A 2012-06-11 2022-05-26 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles Active AU2022203563B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2022203563A AU2022203563B2 (en) 2012-06-11 2022-05-26 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles

Applications Claiming Priority (9)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261658153P 2012-06-11 2012-06-11
US61/658,153 2012-06-11
US201313576067A 2013-01-17 2013-01-17
US13/576,067 2013-01-17
PCT/US2013/045199 WO2013188419A1 (en) 2012-06-11 2013-06-11 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
AU2013274408A AU2013274408B2 (en) 2012-06-11 2013-06-11 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
AU2018202003A AU2018202003A1 (en) 2012-06-11 2018-03-21 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
AU2020201982A AU2020201982A1 (en) 2012-06-11 2020-03-19 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
AU2022203563A AU2022203563B2 (en) 2012-06-11 2022-05-26 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2020201982A Division AU2020201982A1 (en) 2012-06-11 2020-03-19 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2022203563A1 true AU2022203563A1 (en) 2022-06-16
AU2022203563B2 AU2022203563B2 (en) 2024-06-20

Family

ID=49758669

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2013274408A Active AU2013274408B2 (en) 2012-06-11 2013-06-11 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
AU2018202003A Abandoned AU2018202003A1 (en) 2012-06-11 2018-03-21 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
AU2020201982A Abandoned AU2020201982A1 (en) 2012-06-11 2020-03-19 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
AU2022203563A Active AU2022203563B2 (en) 2012-06-11 2022-05-26 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2013274408A Active AU2013274408B2 (en) 2012-06-11 2013-06-11 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
AU2018202003A Abandoned AU2018202003A1 (en) 2012-06-11 2018-03-21 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
AU2020201982A Abandoned AU2020201982A1 (en) 2012-06-11 2020-03-19 Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles

Country Status (12)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2861352B1 (en)
CN (2) CN108452936A (en)
AP (1) AP2015008183A0 (en)
AU (4) AU2013274408B2 (en)
BR (1) BR112014030622B1 (en)
CA (2) CA2875024C (en)
CL (1) CL2014003345A1 (en)
IN (1) IN2014DN10312A (en)
PL (1) PL2861352T3 (en)
RU (1) RU2644181C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2013188419A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA201409026B (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2950586C (en) * 2014-06-05 2022-06-28 Somerset Coal International Fine particle coal, and systems, apparatuses, and methods for collecting and using the same
CN105935631A (en) * 2016-04-13 2016-09-14 中国矿业大学 Efficient desliming method for low-grade argillaceous zinc oxide ores
CN106669977B (en) * 2016-06-20 2019-02-15 中国矿业大学 A kind of oxidized coal slime method for separating
CN106984440B (en) * 2017-03-31 2019-05-10 太原理工大学 A kind of waste oil is used for the device and technique of coal flotation
CN106861920B (en) * 2017-03-31 2019-03-29 太原理工大学 A kind of technique that waste oil is used for flotation
CN107051750B (en) * 2017-03-31 2019-01-15 太原理工大学 A kind of device and technique using waste oil flotation
CN107583741B (en) * 2017-09-07 2019-03-15 北京安康科创节能环保科技有限公司 A kind of Rare Earth Mine crushing and screening device
CN112111031B (en) * 2019-06-19 2021-12-03 中昊晨光化工研究院有限公司 Recovery device and recovery method for preparing polytetrafluoroethylene resin by suspension method

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4249699A (en) * 1974-01-14 1981-02-10 Otisca Industries, Ltd. Coal recovery processes utilizing agglomeration and density differential separations
CA1198704A (en) 1981-03-24 1985-12-31 Douglas V. Keller, Jr. Agglomeration type coal recovery processes
US5167798A (en) * 1988-01-27 1992-12-01 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Apparatus and process for the separation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic particles using microbubble column flotation together with a process and apparatus for generation of microbubbles
US5161694A (en) * 1990-04-24 1992-11-10 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Method for separating fine particles by selective hydrophobic coagulation
RU94038258A (en) * 1992-01-06 1996-06-10 Хайдро Проусессинг энд Майнинг Лтд. (CA) Method and device for separation of particles in suspension
RU2182292C2 (en) * 1994-04-18 2002-05-10 Вирджиния Тек Интеллектуал Пропертис, Инк. Method for dehydration of wet particles
US5458786A (en) * 1994-04-18 1995-10-17 The Center For Innovative Technology Method for dewatering fine coal
RU2099146C1 (en) * 1995-12-13 1997-12-20 Томский политехнический университет Method of recovering useful minerals from ore slimes
US6632258B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2003-10-14 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Coal beneficiation by gas agglomeration
US6526675B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2003-03-04 Roe-Hoan Yoon Methods of using natural products as dewatering aids for fine particles
CN101289265A (en) * 2007-04-20 2008-10-22 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 Treating method for dezincifying from zinc-containing sludge of blast furnace
US8408395B2 (en) * 2007-07-17 2013-04-02 Basf Se Process for the beneficiation of ores by means of hydrophobic surfaces
CN101733193B (en) * 2009-12-10 2013-04-10 湖南华菱湘潭钢铁有限公司 Method for preparing highly dispersed sintered ash suspension
CN102834181B (en) * 2010-02-01 2015-07-15 弗吉尼亚科技知识产权公司 Cleaning and dewatering fine coal

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL2861352T3 (en) 2019-08-30
RU2014152482A (en) 2016-07-27
WO2013188419A1 (en) 2013-12-19
CL2014003345A1 (en) 2015-07-31
EP2861352A1 (en) 2015-04-22
RU2644181C2 (en) 2018-02-08
AU2018202003A1 (en) 2018-04-12
AU2013274408B2 (en) 2017-12-21
CA3117573C (en) 2023-08-01
AU2022203563B2 (en) 2024-06-20
CA3117573A1 (en) 2013-12-19
EP2861352A4 (en) 2016-03-30
CA2875024C (en) 2022-05-17
IN2014DN10312A (en) 2015-08-07
CN104582856B (en) 2018-03-27
BR112014030622A2 (en) 2017-06-27
AU2020201982A1 (en) 2020-04-09
AU2013274408A1 (en) 2014-12-18
CA2875024A1 (en) 2013-12-19
CN104582856A (en) 2015-04-29
AP2015008183A0 (en) 2015-01-31
ZA201409026B (en) 2018-11-28
BR112014030622B1 (en) 2020-09-08
CN108452936A (en) 2018-08-28
EP2861352B1 (en) 2019-04-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10913912B2 (en) Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
AU2018282374C1 (en) Cleaning and dewatering fine coal
AU2022203563B2 (en) Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles
Wang et al. Recent advances in the beneficiation of ultrafine coal particles
US6799682B1 (en) Method of increasing flotation rate
WO2007102819A1 (en) Processing asphaltene-containing tailings
US20220010226A1 (en) Methods for Separating and Dewatering Fine Particles
Nie et al. Environmentally-friendly emulsion-like collector prepared from waste oil: Application in floatation recovery of unburned carbon in coal fly ash
Coleman et al. Agglomeration-flotation: recovery of hydrophobic components from oil sands fine tailings
US11331676B2 (en) Cleaning and dewatering fine coal
Yoon et al. Cleaning and dewatering fine coal
Rahman et al. Removal of heavy metal impurities from dredged river sediment
AU2002246613B2 (en) Methods of increasing flotation rate
Li Hydrophobic-Hydrophilic Separation Process for the Recovery of Ultrafine Particles