AU2021101284A4 - Metabolome-based method for selecting optimal harvest period of Eleutherococcus senticosus - Google Patents

Metabolome-based method for selecting optimal harvest period of Eleutherococcus senticosus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2021101284A4
AU2021101284A4 AU2021101284A AU2021101284A AU2021101284A4 AU 2021101284 A4 AU2021101284 A4 AU 2021101284A4 AU 2021101284 A AU2021101284 A AU 2021101284A AU 2021101284 A AU2021101284 A AU 2021101284A AU 2021101284 A4 AU2021101284 A4 AU 2021101284A4
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
acid
year
phenolic compounds
senticosus
uplc
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU2021101284A
Inventor
Xiaorui GUO
Dewen Li
Jia Liu
Yang Liu
Feiyang SUN
Zhonghua Tang
Hongzheng WANG
Kexin WU
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Northeast Forestry University
Original Assignee
Northeast Forestry University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Northeast Forestry University filed Critical Northeast Forestry University
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2021101284A4 publication Critical patent/AU2021101284A4/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N30/00Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
    • G01N30/02Column chromatography
    • G01N30/04Preparation or injection of sample to be analysed
    • G01N30/06Preparation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N30/00Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
    • G01N30/02Column chromatography
    • G01N30/88Integrated analysis systems specially adapted therefor, not covered by a single one of the groups G01N30/04 - G01N30/86

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
  • Acyclic And Carbocyclic Compounds In Medicinal Compositions (AREA)
  • Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)

Abstract

The present disclosure provides a metabolome-based method for selecting an optimal harvest period of Eleutherococcus senticosus, and relates to the technical field of determination of harvest period. The method determines 19 phenolic compounds in roots and stems of F senticosus of different growth years (three-, five-, and nine-year-old) based on UPLC/Q-TOF-MS-based metabonomics technology; by comparing and analyzing the relative content of the 19 phenolic compounds, an optimal picking age of . senticosus is explicitly determined to provide a theoretical basis for efficiently utilizing limited wild F senticosus resources. The method of the present disclosure features high sensitivity, excellent selectivity, and short analysis time, providing a reference for quality control of Eleutherococci Semticosi Radix et Rhizoma Seu Caulis. 1/1 DRAWINGS 1. AGroup numicla ad Carepc add 0.4 0.2 0 kMyri cid Cynare side Quercetin-O-rhamraside Syrmgic 3A Salieylic acid Quercetin Vanillic acid Gallic acid Gemistemn Three-year Three-year Five-year Five-year Nine-year Nine-year root stem root stem root stem FIG. 1

Description

1/1
DRAWINGS
1. AGroup
numicla ad
Carepc add
0.4
0.2 0
kMyri cid
Cynare side
Quercetin-O-rhamraside
Syrmgic 3A
Salieylic acid
Quercetin Vanillic acid Gallic acid
Gemistemn
Three-year Three-year Five-year Five-year Nine-year Nine-year root stem root stem root stem
FIG. 1
METABOLOME-BASED METHOD FOR SELECTING OPTIMAL HARVEST PERIOD OF ELEUTHEROCOCCUS SENTICOSUS TECHNICAL FIELD
The present disclosure belongs to the technical field of determination of harvest period, and
particularly relates to a metabolome-based method for selecting an optimal harvest period of
Eleutherococcus senticosus.
BACKGROUND
Metabolomics is a science developed in the mid-1990s for the qualitative and quantitative
analysis of all metabolites with a relative molecular mass of less than 1,000 in a certain organism,
tissue or cell. The task thereof is to detect and quantify the components and content of various
metabolites in organisms and change rules thereof, and to reveal life phenomena and processes.
Metabolomics involves the integration of a plurality of disciplines and technologies, especially
the separation and identification technologies of substances, and the analysis and comparison
methods of data.
The development of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) began in the 1960s.
HPLC uses a high pressure infusion system to pump a specified mobile phase into a
chromatographic column packed with a stationary phase, where all components are separated
and enter a detector for detection, so as to realize the analysis of a sample. Ultra-high
performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) is an emerging liquid chromatography technology developed on the basis of HPLC. UPLC features ultra-high efficiency, ultra-high resolution, and ultra-high sensitivity, and has been widely used in the analysis of Chinese herbal medicinal ingredients, metabolomics research, the establishment of fingerprints, and the determination of unknown compounds in combination with mass spectrometry (MS) and other detectors.
Q-TOF-MS tandem technology is an important breakthrough in MS technology. This technology
has the advantages of high sensitivity, high selectivity, high precision, ability to generate
multi-stage MS, and high information acquisition speed. Ultra-high performance liquid
chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC/Q-TOF-MS) is a
tandem MS technology using UPLC as a chromatographic separation system and quadrupole (Q)
and time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF-MS) as analyzers. This technology organically
combines the efficient separation ability and high sensitivity characteristics of UPLC with the
high-resolution characteristics of Q-TOF-MS, and has been more and more widely used in the
field of pharmaceutical analysis.
Eleutherococci Semticosi Radix et Rhizoma Seu Caulis is the dried root, rhizome, or stem of
Acanthopanax senticosus (Rupr. et Maxim.) Maxim., a plant of the family Araliaceae. The drug
is listed as the top grade in the Shennong' Classic of Materia Medica. The drug is warm in
nature and acrid and slightly bitter in taste. The drug belongs to spleen, kidney and heart
meridians, having the effects of Invigorating qi and spleen and tonifying the kidneys to soothe
the nerves. As a widely used traditional Chinese herb, the efficacy of Eleutherococci Semticosi
Radix et Rhizoma Seu Caulis is closely related to the biological activity of secondary
metabolites thereof. Phenolic Compounds are a class of secondary metabolites widely present in
plants. Phenols have become a research hotspot because of natural antioxidant activity, antiviral,
antitumor, and coronary heart disease prevention effects thereof.
The accumulation of phenolic compounds in medicinal plants is closely related to the
picking age. Therefore, the medicinal plants generally have optimal picking age. On the
condition that the picking age is not reached, medicinal material quality will be low because the
accumulation of phenolic compounds does not meet the regulations. On the contrary, on the
condition that the picking age is exceeded, active pharmaceutical ingredients will further be lost.
At present, the research on the pharmacology and chemical components of Eleutherococci
Semticosi Radix et Rhizoma Seu Caulis is relatively concentrated and in-depth, but there is no
report on relevant research on the optimal harvest period of E. senticosus. Therefore, it is
particularly important to investigate the optimal picking age of E. senticosus.
SUMMARY
In view of this, an objective of the present disclosure is to provide a metabolome-based
method for selecting an optimal harvest period of E. senticosus. This method features high
sensitivity, excellent selectivity, and short analysis time, providing a reference for quality control
of Eleutherococci Semticosi Radix et Rhizoma Seu Caulis and a theoretical basis for efficiently
utilizing limited wild E. senticosus resources.
To achieve the above objective, the present disclosure provides the following technical
solution:
The disclosure provides a metabolome-based method for selecting an optimal harvest period
of E. senticosus, including the following steps: separately harvesting stems and roots of E.
senticosus of different ages, determining relative content of phenolic compounds by
UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method, conducting a cluster analysis to obtain the content distribution of
different phenolic compounds in the roots and stems of E. senticosus of different growth years,
and thus obtain an optimal harvest period of different phenolic compounds; where selection
criteria for the optimal period are that there are more types and high content of accumulated
phenolic compounds in the corresponding year and more concentrated accumulation in the same
part; and
the phenolic compounds include p-hydroxycinnamic acid, genistein, apigenin, syringic acid,
cynaroside, naringenin, quercetin-3-0-rhamnoside, chlorogenic acid, salicylic acid, ferulic acid,
myricitrin, luteolin, catechin, cinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, gallic acid, caffeic acid,
and vanillic acid.
Preferably, before using the UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method to measure the relative content of the
phenolic compounds, the method may further include the following steps: washing the roots and
stems of E. senticosus of different growth years with deionized water, air-drying naturally,
pulverizing and sieving, mixing pulverized powder with chromatographic grade acetonitrile and conducting ultrasonic extraction, filtering the mixture through a millipore filter, and adding leucine-enkephalin as an internal standard.
Preferably, the ultrasonic extraction may be conducted at 100 kHz and 40°C for 30 min.
Preferably, after the ultrasonic extraction, the method may further include conducting a
second ultrasonic extraction on filter residues, combining filtrates, and filtering the combined
filtrate through a millipore filter.
Preferably, the millipore filter may be 0.45 pm in pore size.
Preferably, the UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method may include chromatography and mass
spectrometry (MS), where chromatographic conditions may be as follows: chromatographic
column may be Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column equipped with VanGuard pre-column; for
chromatographic separation, column temperature may be held at 30°C; injection volume may be
2 pL; mobile phase A may be a 0.05 wt% acetic acid-water mixture system, and mobile phase B
may be a 0.05 wt% acetic acid-acetonitrile mixture system; gradient elution may be conducted at
a flow rate of 0.25 mL-min-; elution program may be as follows: mobile phase 5% B to 95% B
within 0 to 23 min; 95% B to 5% B within 23 to 25 min; and 5% B within 25 to 31 min; and
MS conditions may be as follows: first order MS scanning detection may be conducted in
ESI+ positive ion mode in the m/z range of 100 to 1,000, with a cone voltage of 3 KV.
Preferably, after determining the relative content of the phenolic compounds by the
UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method, the method may further include using MassHunter software to conduct peak detection and matching on raw data in a metabolic fingerprint, extracting the raw data to obtain a data matrix composed of the retention time, mass number, and response peak area of metabolite fragments, and performing cluster analysis after peak area normalization.
The present disclosure provides a metabolome-based method for selecting an optimal
harvest period of E. senticosus; 19 phenolic compounds in roots and stems of E. senticosus of
different growth years (three-, five-, and nine-year-old) may be determined based on
UPLC/Q-TOF-MS-based metabonomics technology; by comparing and analyzing the relative
content of the 19 phenolic compounds, an optimal picking age of E. senticosus may be explicitly
determined to provide a theoretical basis for efficiently utilizing limited wild E. senticosus
resources. The method of the present disclosure further establishes a UPLC/Q-TOF-MS analysis
method for the simultaneous quantitative detection of the relative content of the 19 phenolic
compounds (p-hydroxycinnamic acid, genistein, apigenin, syringic acid, cynaroside, naringenin,
quercetin-3-0-rhamnoside, chlorogenic acid, salicylic acid, ferulic acid, myricitrin, luteolin,
catechin, cinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, gallic acid, caffeic acid, and vanillic acid) in
E. senticosus. This method features higher sensitivity, better selectivity, shorter analysis time,
providing a reference for quality control of Eleutherococci Semticosi Radix et Rhizoma Seu
Caulis.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 illustrates the heat map distribution of the relative content of 19 phenolic compounds in the roots and stems of E. senticosus of different growth years.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The disclosure provides a metabolome-based method for selecting an optimal harvest period
of E. senticosus, including the following steps: separately harvesting stems and roots of E.
senticosus of different ages, determining relative content of phenolic compounds by
UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method, conducting a cluster analysis to obtain the content distribution of
different phenolic compounds in the roots and stems of E. senticosus of different growth years,
and thus obtain an optimal harvest period of different phenolic compounds; where selection
criteria for the optimal period are that there are more types and high content of accumulated
phenolic compounds in the corresponding year and more concentrated accumulation in the same
part; and
the phenolic compounds include p-hydroxycinnamic acid, genistein, apigenin, syringic acid,
cynaroside, naringenin, quercetin-3-0-rhamnoside, chlorogenic acid, salicylic acid, ferulic acid,
myricitrin, luteolin, catechin, cinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, gallic acid, caffeic acid,
and vanillic acid.
In the example of the present disclosure, the E. senticosus may preferably grow for three,
five, and nine years. The roots and stems of E. senticosus of the above years may be separately
selected and washed with deionized water, air-dried naturally, pulverized into powder with a
pulverizer, and repeatedly sieved; a sieved powder may be mixed with chromatographic grade acetonitrile and subjected to ultrasonic extraction; after filtering through a millipore filter, a certain amount of internal standard may be added. The powder of the present disclosure may preferably pass through a 20-mesh sieve. In the present disclosure, the ultrasonic extraction may be performed after mixing the powder with the chromatographic grade acetonitrile, where the powder and the chromatographic grade acetonitrile may preferably have a mass-volume ratio of
0.5 g: 20 ml. In the present disclosure, the ultrasonic extraction may preferably be conducted at
100 kHz and 40°C for 30 min; in the present disclosure, the ultrasonic extraction may further
preferably be followed by conducting a second ultrasonic extraction on filter residues after the
ultrasonic extraction, combining filtrates, and filtering the combined filtrate through a millipore
filter. In the present disclosure, the millipore filter may preferably be 0.45 pm in pore size during
filtration. In the present disclosure, the internal standard may preferably be leucine-enkephalin.
In the present disclosure, when the UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method is used to determine phenolic
compounds, standards in all lanes may preferably be chromatographic grade acetonitrile
solutions of the phenolic compounds. When preparing the standards, it may be preferable to
separately dissolve the standards of the phenolic compounds in chromatographic grade
acetonitrile and make up to volume to obtain 1 mg/mL standard solutions. The present disclosure
has no particular limitation on the sources of the standards, and the preferred purity may be
>98%.
In the present disclosure, the UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method may be used to determine the relative content of the phenolic compounds and preferably include chromatography and MS, where chromatographic conditions may preferably include as follows: chromatographic column may be Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column equipped with VanGuard pre-column; for chromatographic separation, column temperature may be held at 30°C; injection volume may be
2 pL; mobile phase A may be a 0.05 wt% acetic acid-water mixture system, and mobile phase B
may be a 0.05 wt% acetic acid-acetonitrile mixture system; gradient elution may be conducted at
a flow rate of 0.25 mL min-'; elution program may be as follows: mobile phase 5% B to 95% B
within 0 to 23 min; 95% B to 5% B within 23 to 25 min; and 5% B within 25 to 31 min; MS
conditions may preferably include as follows: first order MS scanning detection may be
conducted in ESI' positive ion mode in the m/z range of 100 to 1,000, with a cone voltage of 3
KV.
In the present disclosure, the relative content may be subjected to data analysis and
processing, preferably including: using MassHunter software to conduct peak detection and
matching on raw data in a metabolic fingerprint, extracting the raw data to obtain a data matrix
composed of the retention time, mass number, and response peak area of metabolite fragments,
and performing cluster analysis after peak area normalization. The content distribution of the 19
phenolic compounds in F senticosus of different growth years may be explained by comparing
the relative content of each phenolic compound.
Using the method of the present disclosure, the 19 phenolic compounds may be divided into three categories according to different growth years: for three-year-old plants: p-hydroxycinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, naringenin, ferulic acid, and cinnamic acid; for five-year-old plants: luteolin, catechin, myricitrin, cynaroside, quercetin-3-0-rhamnoside, gallic acid, genistein, and apigenin; for nine-year-old plants: syringic acid, salicylic acid, quercetin , and vanillic acid. Among the 19 phenolic compounds, there are 7 compounds that are most suitable to accumulate in three-year-old plants, 2 of which have higher relative content in roots than in stems, and 5 of which have higher relative content in stems than in roots; the most compounds accumulate in five-year old plants, and there are 8 compounds in total, and all of the 8 compounds show higher relative content in stems than in roots; there are 4 compounds that are most suitable to accumulate in nine-year-old E. senticosus plants, only one of which has higher relative content in roots than that in stems, and the remaining three of which have higher relative content in stems than that in roots. Therefore, comprehensively considering the natural resources and human resources required for artificial cultivation of E. senticosus, it is recommended to use a five-year-old E. senticosus plant as a raw material for extracting secondary metabolites.
The metabolome-based method for selecting an optimal harvest period of E. senticosus
provided by the present disclosure will be described in detail below with reference to the
examples, but they should not be construed as limiting the protection scope of the present
disclosure.
Example 1
1. Apparatus and reagents
Apparatus: Acquity UPLC-Xevo G2-S QTof MSn Liquid-Mass Spectrometer (Waters, USA);
FZ-06 Chinese Herbal Medicine Pulverizer (Wenling Baile Crushing Equipment Factory,
Zhejiang); 250DC CNC Ultrasonic Cleaner (Kunshan Ultrasonic Instruments Co., Ltd., Jiangsu);
BS124S Electronic Balance (Sartorius, Germany); Millipore Ultrapure Water System (Millipore,
France).
Reagents: acetic acid (chromatographically pure, Dikma); acetonitrile (chromatographically
pure, Dikma); deionized water self-prepared.
Samples: Eleutherococci Semticosi Radix et Rhizoma Seu Caulis were collected from roots
and stems of E senticosus of different growth years (three-, five-, and nine-year-old) in Qitaihe
area, Heilongjiang Province. The roots and stems were air-dried immediately after picking. The
picking time was on September 20. Before the experiment, the roots and stems were pulverized
into powder using a pulverizer, and the powder passed through a 20-mesh sieve for use.
Standards: p-hydroxycinnamic acid, genistein, apigenin, syringic acid, cynaroside,
naringenin, quercetin-3-0-rhamnoside, chlorogenic acid, salicylic acid, ferulic acid, myricitrin,
luteolin, catechin, cinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, gallic acid, caffeic acid, and
vanillic acid were all >98% pure. All reference standards were purchased from Shanghai
PureOne Biotechnology Co., Ltd.; leucine-enkephalin standard was purchased from Sigma.
2. Preparation of test solutions
The roots and stems of three-, five-, and nine-year-old F senticosus plants were washed with
deionized water, air-dried naturally, pulverized into powder with a pulverizer, and repeatedly
sieved. 0.5 g each of powders of senticosus of three different ages was mixed with
chromatographic grade acetonitrile and subjected to ultrasonic extraction; after filtering, residues
were mixed with chromatographic grade acetonitrile and subjected to ultrasonic extraction again;
after filtering again, filtrates were combined, filtered through a millipore filter, and mixed with a
certain amount of leucine-enkephalin as an internal standard.
3. Preparation of standard solutions
Separately, an appropriate amount of standard was weighed, dissolved in chromatographic
grade acetonitrile, and diluted to volume to prepare a 1 mg/mL standard solution, which was
stored in a refrigerator at 4°C for later use.
4. UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method
Detection and analysis were conducted based on a UPLC/Q-TOF-MS (Waters, Japan)
system.
(1) Chromatographic conditions: chromatographic column was Acquity UPLC BEH C18
column (1.7 pm, 2.1 x 50 mm) equipped with VanGuard pre-column (BEHC18, 1.7 pm, 2.1 x 5
mm; Waters); for chromatographic separation, column temperature was held at 30°C; injection
volume was 2 pL; mobile phases were a 0.05 wt% acetic acid-water (A%), and 0.05 wt% acetic acid-acetonitrile (B%); gradient elution was conducted at a flow rate of 0.25 mL-min-1 ; elution program was as follows: 5% B to 95% B within 0 to 23 min; 95% B to 5% B within 23 to 25 min; and 5% B within 25 to 31 min.
(2) MS conditions: first order MS scanning detection was conducted in ESI' positive ion
mode in the m/z range of 100 to 1,000, with a cone voltage of 3 KV.
5. Data processing and analysis: MassHunter software was used to conduct peak detection
and matching on raw data in a metabolic fingerprint, the raw data were extracted to obtain a data
matrix composed of the retention time, mass number, and response peak area of metabolite
fragments, and cluster analysis was performed after peak area normalization (Table 1). The
content distribution of the 19 phenolic compounds in E senticosus of different growth years was
explained by comparing the relative content of each phenolic compound.
Table 1 Normalized data of the 19 phenolic compounds
Three-year-old Root Root Root Stem Stem Stem
P-hydroxycinnamic acid 0.463376541 0.463669578 0.466257038 0.894375549 1 0.864114746
Genistein 0.096173561 0 0.063714183 0.16352709 0.080180942 0.14630427
Apigenin 0 0.053983364 0.056868314 0.238575261 0.141654412 0.197950226
Syringic acid 0.294389736 0.184156391 0.348057892 1 0.8451426 0.863754215
Cynaroside 0.004729405 0 0.001173763 0.059529808 0.018345052 0.046784463
Naringenin 0 0.001400613 0.000567816 0.638894146 1 0.867244577
Quercetin-3-0-rhamnoside 0.00827899 0.006876623 0.007761312 0.086761343 0.097644177 0.16930013
Chlorogenic acid 0.803420307 1 0.907482346 0.568851464 0.652584864 0.68831364
Salicylic acid 0 0.099628713 0.076887376 0.296101485 0.280940594 0.054764851
Ferulic acid 0.399411609 0.66245868 0.660772841 0.857301997 1 0.884057252
Myricitrin 0.000383529 0.000176329 9.43981E-05 0.262661813 0.229642071 0.300200195
Luteolin 0 0.006520247 0.022563487 0.227436513 0.350291695 0.326784489
Catechin 0.226144593 0.233746316 0.268327488 0.207820439 0.321806276 0.535241321
Cinnamic acid 0.156078256 0.509653292 1 0.273720821 0.375493855 0.132511601
P-coumaric acid 0.585432972 0.468130063 0.605613234 0.87088648 1 0.904109527
Quercetin 0.03652968 0 0.021535234 0.346168086 0.255152413 0.391830186
Gallic acid 0.133433848 0.179984923 0.060120618 0 0.038447041 0.051074256
Caffeic acid 0.758651573 0.904278774 0.863598395 0.86969493 0.974513843 1
Vanillic acid 0.062557237 0.086951071 0 0.127338537 0.057324146 0.117902621
Five-year-old Root Root Root Stem Stem Stem
P-hydroxycinnamic acid 0.120070578 0.212845021 0.041636272 0.117938263 0.120132927 0.119447094
Genistein 0.227074683 0.15460813 0.279089138 0.978702137 1 0.918857963
Apigenin 0.255761481 0.190474052 0.311114354 0.971745451 0.965403051 1
Syringic acid 0.165289156 0.302593941 0.243813373 0.084756491 0.12546103 0
Cynaroside 0.006063486 0.000973364 0.002210109 0.826283123 1 0.60796899
Naringenin 0.108806198 0.076213549 0.06123582 0.67504511 0.606654806 0.622616749
Quercetin-3-0-rhamnoside 0.004071888 0.007892663 0.008391025 0.659978057 1 0.717181512
Chlorogenic acid 0.718933112 0.557345329 0.620714393 0.205296472 0.261163405 0.270879344
Salicylic acid 0.036819307 0.012221535 0.021194307 0.062654703 0.050742574 0.048886139
Ferulic acid 0.081465688 0.110240645 0.10627066 0.817089779 0.633891974 0.70933492
Myricitrin 0 3.56219E-06 0.000435775 0.763788059 1 0.645545241
Luteolin 0.225549073 0.201355525 0.162663006 1 0.729495539 0.841026081
Catechin 0.019017644 0.000533454 0.009842231 0.741741461 1 0.607937799
Cinnamic acid 0.917566339 0.239697108 0.517789901 0.516552369 0.656846525 0.552020571
P-coumaric acid 0.123527667 0.143639475 0.127717056 0.126407302 0.124869367 0.153401027
Quercetin 0.250771319 0.292669382 0.245896582 0.394360114 0.27705788 0.198383315
Gallic acid 0.24519412 0.333207689 0.393328308 0.796645307 0.870147003 0.693554467
Caffeic acid 0.437452491 0.449582653 0.45534245 0.230548513 0.234712848 0.206833237
Vanillic acid 1 0.77164101 0.574026427 0.675270376 0.774840827 0.525609437
Nine-year-old Root Root Root Stem Stem Stem
P-hydroxycinnamic acid 0 0.097319642 0.13592578 0.155256907 0.141795884 0.003893659
Genistein 0.326054641 0.371841201 0.521426009 0.358052694 0.391088728 0.558588344
Apigenin 0.344970421 0.37404443 0.400502902 0.380173546 0.3842933 0.457113029
Syringic acid 0.547600209 0.461176098 0.39699098 0.480396334 0.968242182 0.624164668
Cynaroside 0.000647001 0.000229027 0.001162311 0.098847995 0.09659208 0.096769576
Naringenin 0.135140251 0.279277233 0.2113538 0.350279492 0.363919698 0.355061766
Quercetin-3-0-rhamnoside 0.000309062 0.00206685 0 0.047525961 0.053398133 0.053684015
Chlorogenic acid 0.330181148 0.333864591 0.418118538 0.109821135 0 0.107736811
Salicylic acid 0.281404703 0.526454208 0.368966584 1 0.45730198 0.779084158
Ferulic acid 0 0.160802592 0.112795848 0.137045485 0.268078144 0.196106043
Myricitrin 0.000150799 0.000201858 0.00018939 0.0396472 0.02332286 0.042287972
Luteolin 0.157000686 0.1898593 0.017415923 0.334763212 0.286805079 0.160003432
Catechin 0.006321433 0 0.00172039 0.090940613 0.052678607 0.030753637
Cinnamic acid 0.301748789 0.325994372 0.361618694 0.098492701 0 0.076874392
P-coumaric acid 0.050213349 0.055306332 0 0.089761552 0.044609241 0.140869367
Quercetin 0.882882883 1 0.747192398 0.332716278 0.442243613 0.421633963
Gallic acid 0.829438372 0.716170373 1 0.690915944 0.682623445 0.754428948
Caffeic acid 0.286683109 0.271820143 0.270800269 0.00030933 0 0.054737782
Vanillic acid 0.062688064 0.158797043 0.049065675 0.762722951 0.898205486 0.979520082
6. Experimental results
There were significant differences in the relative content of different phenolic compounds in
roots and stems of E senticosus of different growth years, as shown in FIG. 1. The 19 phenolic
compounds were divided into three categories according to different growth years: for three-year-old plants: p-hydroxycinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, naringenin, ferulic acid, and cinnamic acid; for five-year-old plants: luteolin, catechin, myricitrin, cynaroside, quercetin-3-0-rhamnoside, gallic acid, genistein, and apigenin; for nine-year-old plants: syringic acid, salicylic acid, quercetin , and vanillic acid. Among the 19 phenolic compounds, there were 7 compounds that were most suitable to accumulate in three-year-old plants, 2 of which had higher relative content in roots than in stems, and 5 of which had higher relative content in stems than in roots; the most compounds accumulated in five-year old plants, and there were 8 compounds in total, and all of the 8 compounds showed higher relative content in stems than in roots; there were 4 compounds that were most suitable to accumulate in nine-year-old Fsenticosus plants, only one of which had higher relative content in roots than that in stems, and the remaining three of which had higher relative content in stems than that in roots. Therefore, comprehensively considering the natural resources and human resources required for artificial cultivation of F senticosus, it is recommended to use a five-year-old
. senticosus plant as a raw material for extracting secondary metabolites.
The above descriptions are merely preferred implementations of the present disclosure. It
should be noted that several improvements and modifications may also be made by a person of
ordinary skill in the art without departing from the principle of the present disclosure, and such
improvements and modifications should be deemed as falling within the protection scope of the
present disclosure.

Claims (5)

1. A metabolome-based method for selecting an optimal harvest period of Eleutherococcus
senticosus, comprising the following steps: separately harvesting roots and stems of
Eleutherococcus senticosus of different ages, determining relative content of phenolic
compounds by UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method, conducting a cluster analysis to obtain the content
distribution of different phenolic compounds in the roots and stems of Eleutherococcus
senticosus of different growth years, and thus obtain an optimal harvest period of different
phenolic compounds;
wherein selection criteria for the optimal period are that there are more types and high
content of accumulated phenolic compounds in the corresponding year and more concentrated
accumulation in the same part; and
wherein the phenolic compounds comprise p-hydroxycinnamic acid, genistein, apigenin,
syringic acid, cynaroside, naringenin, quercetin-3-0-rhamnoside, chlorogenic acid, salicylic acid,
ferulic acid, myricitrin, luteolin, catechin, cinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, gallic acid,
caffeic acid, and vanillic acid.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein, before using the UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method to
measure the relative content of the phenolic compounds, the method further comprises the
following steps: washing the roots and stems of Eleutherococcussenticosus of different growth
years with deionized water, air-drying naturally, pulverizing and sieving, mixing pulverized powder with chromatographic grade acetonitrile and conducting ultrasonic extraction, filtering the mixture through a millipore filter, and adding leucine-enkephalin as an internal standard.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the ultrasonic extraction is conducted at 100
kHz and 40°C for 30 min.
4. The method according to claim 2 or 3, wherein after the ultrasonic extraction, the method
further comprises conducting a second ultrasonic extraction on filter residues, combining filtrates,
and filtering the combined filtrate through a millipore filter;
wherein the millipore filter is 0.45 pm in pore size.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method comprises
chromatography and mass spectrometry (MS), wherein chromatographic conditions are as
follows: chromatographic column is Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column equipped with VanGuard
pre-column; for chromatographic separation, column temperature is held at 30°C; injection
volume is 2 pL; mobile phase A is a 0.05 wt% acetic acid-water mixture system, and mobile
phase B is a 0.05 wt% acetic acid-acetonitrile mixture system; gradient elution is conducted at a
flow rate of 0.25 mL-min-; elution program is as follows: mobile phase 5% B to 95% B within 0
to 23 min; 95% B to 5% B within 23 to 25 min; and 5% B within 25 to 31 min; and
wherein MS conditions are as follows: first order MS scanning detection is conducted in
ESI+ positive ion mode in the m/z range of 100 to 1,000, with a cone voltage of 3 KV;
wherein, after determining the relative content of the phenolic compounds by the
UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method, the method further comprises using MassHunter software to conduct
peak detection and matching on raw data in a metabolic fingerprint, extracting the raw data to
obtain a data matrix comprising the retention time, mass number, and response peak area of
metabolite fragments, and performing cluster analysis after peak area normalization.
AU2021101284A 2020-10-28 2021-03-12 Metabolome-based method for selecting optimal harvest period of Eleutherococcus senticosus Ceased AU2021101284A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011174767.8A CN112129865A (en) 2020-10-28 2020-10-28 Metabolic group-based method for screening optimum harvesting age of acanthopanax
CN202011174767.8 2020-10-28

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2021101284A4 true AU2021101284A4 (en) 2021-05-06

Family

ID=73852832

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2021101284A Ceased AU2021101284A4 (en) 2020-10-28 2021-03-12 Metabolome-based method for selecting optimal harvest period of Eleutherococcus senticosus

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112129865A (en)
AU (1) AU2021101284A4 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112129865A (en) 2020-12-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Xia et al. Accumulation of saponins in Panax notoginseng during its growing seasons
Peng-Peng et al. Metabolomics analysis and rapid identification of changes in chemical ingredients in crude and processed Astragali Radix by UPLC-QTOF-MS combined with novel informatics UNIFI platform
Yang et al. Characterization of phytochemicals in the roots of wild herbaceous peonies from China and screening for medicinal resources
CN107271577A (en) A kind of analysis of effective component method of stilbene Siberian cocklebur warm kidney medicine for eliminating bursa
Wang et al. Simultaneous determination of ginsenosides in Panax ginseng with different growth ages using high‐performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
Dai et al. Comparing eight types of ginsenosides in ginseng of different plant ages and regions using RRLC-Q-TOF MS/MS
Han et al. High‐throughput ultra high performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry approach for the rapid analysis and characterization of multiple constituents of the fruit of Acanthopanax senticosus (Rupr. et Maxim.) Harms
Sun et al. Quality assessment of Penthorum chinense Pursh through multicomponent qualification and fingerprint, chemometric, and antihepatocarcinoma analyses
Jung et al. Assessment of peeling of Astragalus roots using 1H NMR-and UPLC-MS-based metabolite profiling
Zovko Končić et al. Chemical differentiation of Berberis croatica and B. vulgaris using HPLC fingerprinting
Sharma et al. Comparison of different extraction methods and HPLC method development for the quantification of andrographolide from Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall. ex Nees
Li et al. Rapid quantitative analysis of 12 chemical constituents in wild-simulated and cultivated Astragali Radix based on UHPLC-MS
CN111443154B (en) Research method of medicinal genetic relationship of glycyrrhiza
CN111487350B (en) Quality detection method of salvia miltiorrhiza-panax notoginseng medicine pair
AU2021101284A4 (en) Metabolome-based method for selecting optimal harvest period of Eleutherococcus senticosus
Tai et al. Quantitative analysis of eight triterpenoids and two sesquiterpenoids in Rhizoma Alismatis by using UPLC‐ESI/APCI‐MS/MS and its application to optimisation of best harvest time and crude processing temperature
CN115266976B (en) Ultra-high performance liquid phase detection method for Shenxianshengmai oral liquid
Feng et al. Screening anaphylactoid components of Shuang Huang Lian Injection by analyzing spectrum–effect relationships coupled with UPLC–TOF–MS
Jackson et al. Ginsenoside content of North American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L. Araliaceae) in relation to plant development and growing locations
CN107607654A (en) The analysis method of flavonoids in a kind of walnut flower
CN110398551B (en) Establishment method of ginseng fruit medicinal material fingerprint spectrum and standard fingerprint spectrum thereof
CN103316074A (en) Medicine composite of halenia corni extract, astragalus extract and liquorice extract as well as preparation and application of medicine composite
CN113406257A (en) Callicarpa nudiflora convergence substance evaluation method based on spectrum effect correlation
Liu et al. Simultaneous determination of twelve bioactive constituents in Buyang Huanwu decoction by HPLC‐DAD‐ELSD and HPLC‐TOF/MS
Xue et al. Exploration of habitat-related chemomarkers for Magnoliae officinalis cortex applying both global and water-soluble components-based metabolomics method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGI Letters patent sealed or granted (innovation patent)
MK22 Patent ceased section 143a(d), or expired - non payment of renewal fee or expiry