AU2018359800B2 - Method for processing bauxite - Google Patents

Method for processing bauxite Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2018359800B2
AU2018359800B2 AU2018359800A AU2018359800A AU2018359800B2 AU 2018359800 B2 AU2018359800 B2 AU 2018359800B2 AU 2018359800 A AU2018359800 A AU 2018359800A AU 2018359800 A AU2018359800 A AU 2018359800A AU 2018359800 B2 AU2018359800 B2 AU 2018359800B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
bauxite
preprocessed
calcination
alumina
leaching
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
AU2018359800A
Other versions
AU2018359800A1 (en
Inventor
Yves OCCELLO
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
IB2
Original Assignee
IB2
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by IB2 filed Critical IB2
Publication of AU2018359800A1 publication Critical patent/AU2018359800A1/en
Priority to AU2024203245A priority Critical patent/AU2024203245A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2018359800B2 publication Critical patent/AU2018359800B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01FCOMPOUNDS OF THE METALS BERYLLIUM, MAGNESIUM, ALUMINIUM, CALCIUM, STRONTIUM, BARIUM, RADIUM, THORIUM, OR OF THE RARE-EARTH METALS
    • C01F7/00Compounds of aluminium
    • C01F7/02Aluminium oxide; Aluminium hydroxide; Aluminates
    • C01F7/04Preparation of alkali metal aluminates; Aluminium oxide or hydroxide therefrom
    • C01F7/14Aluminium oxide or hydroxide from alkali metal aluminates
    • C01F7/144Aluminium oxide or hydroxide from alkali metal aluminates from aqueous aluminate solutions by precipitation due to cooling, e.g. as part of the Bayer process
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01FCOMPOUNDS OF THE METALS BERYLLIUM, MAGNESIUM, ALUMINIUM, CALCIUM, STRONTIUM, BARIUM, RADIUM, THORIUM, OR OF THE RARE-EARTH METALS
    • C01F7/00Compounds of aluminium
    • C01F7/02Aluminium oxide; Aluminium hydroxide; Aluminates
    • C01F7/04Preparation of alkali metal aluminates; Aluminium oxide or hydroxide therefrom
    • C01F7/14Aluminium oxide or hydroxide from alkali metal aluminates
    • C01F7/144Aluminium oxide or hydroxide from alkali metal aluminates from aqueous aluminate solutions by precipitation due to cooling, e.g. as part of the Bayer process
    • C01F7/147Apparatus for precipitation

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Compounds Of Alkaline-Earth Elements, Aluminum Or Rare-Earth Metals (AREA)

Abstract

A method for producing alumina from a bauxite pre-processed by a method comprising calcination (2020) and leaching (2030), said pre-processed bauxite being characterised in that it has a loss on ignition of less than 2.5% by mass, said method comprising the steps of: (a) Processing (2120) of the pre-processed bauxite with an aqueous sodium hydroxide solution at a temperature of at least 100°C, said aqueous sodium hydroxide solution having a concentration of between 100 g Na

Description

W02019/086792 1 PCT/FR2018/052678
METHOD FOR PROCESSING BAUXITE
Technical field of the invention
The invention relates to the field of processing ore,
and more particularly the physical and chemical
processing of bauxite. The invention relates in
particular to a method for thermal processing and
chemical processing of bauxite with a low alumina
/ silica mass ratio. In this method, first the ore is
depleted of silicon by thermal preprocessing followed by
leaching, then this preprocessed ore is used in the Bayer
process to extract the aluminum therefrom in the form of
aluminum trihydrate, which can be transformed into
alumina.
Prior art
Aluminum is the third most abundant chemical element
in the Earth's crust, after oxygen and silicon.
Associated with oxygen it is found in a very large number
of rocks. The main industrial ore of aluminum is bauxite,
discovered in 1821 in the village Les Baux (France) by
geologist Pierre Berthier. Bauxite represents a complex
mixture of oxides of aluminum, of iron and of silicon
that can comprise various impurities such as titanium,
calcium, magnesium. More precisely, bauxite is an ore
mainly comprising three aluminum minerals, namely
gibbsite, boehmite, and diaspore, mixed with smaller
quantities of iron minerals, namely goethite and hematite
(which gives bauxite its characteristic color), as well
as aluminosilicates (kaolinite, illite...) and titanium
minerals (anatase, rutile, ilmenite).
W02019/086792 2 PCT/FR2018/052678
The main industrial method used to extract the
aluminum (in the form of oxide) from bauxite is the Bayer
process, developed at the end of the 19th century. It
substantially comprises two steps: a first step of
leaching of the ore under pressure by a solution of
sodium hydroxide (see the patent DE 43 977 from 3 August
1888), and a second step of precipitation of the pure
hydrated alumina from the solution of sodium aluminate
thus obtained, by seeding with crystals of hydrated
alumina (see the patent DE 65604 from 3 November 1892).
This precipitation alumina, hydrated, can then be
subjected to thermal processing to dehydrate it; this
thermal processing also determines the structure and
morphology of the alumina obtained, with a view to its
use (in the Hall-Hroult process to produce aluminum by
electrochemical reduction of the alumina in a molten salt,
or as technical alumina, in particular in the ceramics
industry).
More precisely, the Bayer process mainly involves a
selective attack (digestion) of the hydrates of alumina
contained in the bauxite by a solution (called "liquor")
of hot caustic soda, which is recycled. After separation
by decantation and washing of the bauxite residues (these
residues being called "red mud"), the solution of sodium
hydroxide enriched with sodium aluminate is cooled then
decomposed (crystallization phase) to precipitate and
extract the alumina trihydrate (A1 2 0 3 -3H 2 0); the latter is
then washed then calcined at high temperature to give
alumina (A1 2 0 3 ) . The liquor depleted of sodium aluminate
after the crystallization phase and diluted by the inputs
of water, coming substantially from washing of the
W02019/086792 3 PCT/FR2018/052678
residues of bauxite, is evaporated and recycled to the
attack.
The composition of bauxite depends on its geographic
origin. This variation in composition relates to both its
content of main elements (Al, 0, Si), its content of
impurities, and its mineralogical structure. For example,
the lateritic bauxites (on an aluminosilicate geological
substrate) coming from mines located in Guinea or from
Australia in general have a high content of gibbsite,
which is a trihydrate, and a lower silicon content than
the karst bauxites (on a carbonate geological substrate)
coming from certain mines located in Iran, in Kazakhstan,
in Azerbaijan and in Turkey, in which the aluminum is
mainly in the form of boehmite and diaspore (two
modifications of monohydrates). Thus, a simple parameter
for representing the quality of a bauxite is the ratio of
alumina to silica, abbreviated as "A/S ratio". For
example, the bauxites from Guinea generally have
A1 2 0 3 /SiO 2 ratios of approximately 20 or more, and the
bauxites from western Australia ratios greater than 15.
In the bauxites of North Queensland the aluminum is
present mainly in the form of boehmite and of gibbsite.
The aluminum content is not, however, the only
criterion: it is also necessary for this aluminum to be
in a form chemically and crystallographically capable of
being extracted from the bauxite by the Bayer process. It
is known that the conventional Bayer process does not
allow to solubilize the aluminum contained in the
aluminosilicates: this part of the aluminum is lost in
the red mud. Moreover, it is known that the
aluminosilicates contained in red mud can carry off a
part of the sodium hydroxide and thus increase the
W02019/086792 4 PCT/FR2018/052678
overall consumption of sodium hydroxide of the Bayer
process; this is described in the publication "Basic
Research on Calcification Transformation, Process of Low
Grade Bauxite" by Xiaofeng Zhu et al., published in Light
Metals 2013, p. 239-244 (TMS).
Like most ores, bauxite is traded on a world market
and often transported for thousands of kilometers to its
place of use. However, certain countries prefer limiting
their procurement on the world market in favor of the use
of their domestic mining resources, even if the latter
are of lesser quality. This is in particular the case of
China. China, the largest producer of aluminum in the
world, possesses bauxite deposits and mines that do not
(or no longer) have an A/S ratio as high as the
Australian bauxites, for example. More precisely, in
China, the deposits of alumina with a low silicon content
(A/S > 8 or even > 6) are becoming rare, whereas the
bauxite with a high silicon content exists in
considerable quantities. Moreover, in a plurality of
Chinese bauxites with a high silica content, the silicon
is present for the most part in the form of kaolinite, an
aluminosilicate that also encloses a part of the aluminum
present in the bauxite; they also include a small
fraction of quartz (a silicate) and of muscovite (another
aluminosilicate). However, as indicated above, the
conventional Bayer process does not allow to extract the
aluminum present in aluminosilicates.
For decades the production of primary aluminum (and
consequently the consumption of bauxite) has been
increasing regularly by several percent per year. These
last few years the use of bauxites of lesser quality has
been becoming a major economic and technological issue,
W02019/086792 5 PCT/FR2018/052678
especially in Iran, in Kazakhstan and in China. This
question is also posed in other countries, such as Russia
and Turkey, and it is especially researchers from these
countries that have sought possibilities for using
bauxites having a low A/S ratio. Some of these bauxites
further have a greater iron and/or sulfur content than
the bauxites rich in aluminum.
There are various approaches for preprocessing
bauxite with a view to modifying its mineralogical
structure in such a way as to increase the percentage of
aluminum extractible by the Bayer process, or in such a
way as to facilitate the separation of the silicon
upstream of the Bayer process. There are also methods
aiming to facilitate the separation of the iron upstream
of the Bayer process, with a view to reducing the
formation of red mud and recovering this element in a
usable form.
For example, the article "Pre-beneficiation of low
grade Diasporic bauxite ore by reduction roasting" by K.
Yilmaz et al., published in 2015 in the review Int. J.
Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical
Engineering, vol 9(9), p. 1023-1026, describes a method
for calcination (called "roasting") of bauxite of Turkish
origin with a high Si and Fe content to transform the
iron into phases capable of being separated by a magnetic
process. Other methods for calcination in a reducing
medium use CO (CN 103 614 547 - Central South University;
CN 104 163 445 - China Aluminium) or coal (CN 101 875 129
- Central South University).
For the bauxites with a low A/S ratio a method
called "calcification - carbonation" was described (see
for example "Calcification - carbonation method for
W02019/086792 6 PCT/FR2018/052678
alumina production by using low-grade bauxite" by Ting'an
Zhang et al., K. Yilmaz et al., Light Metals 2013, p.
233-238 (TMS)). This method comprises the processing of
the bauxite by an alkaline liquor in the presence of lime
(leading to the formation of an insoluble calcium
aluminum-silicate phase), and the processing of this
insoluble phase (after decantation) by pressurized C02 to release a part of the aluminum by forming two new
insoluble phases, Ca3SiO 4 and CaC03. A certain number of other methods have been
described, for example the calcination of a solid mixture
of bauxite + Na2CO3 at 600 - 10000C then the dissolution
of the calcined mixture in NaOH at 750C, followed by
seeding to precipitate a phase that carries away the
silicon (CN 102 180 498 and CN 101 767 807, Aifang Pan) ;
in an alternative of this method described in CN
205 603 238 (Hangzhou Jinjiang) the mixture subjected to
the calcination also includes lime; and the Na2CO3 forms
with water a base that allows the leaching of the silica.
Methods are also known in which the bauxite is calcined
without the addition of products. CN 203 408 047
describes such a method (Xi'An University) to desulfurize
bauxites that contain pyrite (FeS2). The idea of a method for thermochemical activation
of bauxite (called "roast-leach process") was described
by Smith and Xu-Parker ("Options for processing of high
silica bauxites", Travaux ICSOBA Vol. 35 (39) , 184-192
(2010)). This method was initially developed for raw
materials of the clay type (see US 2 939 764) and illite
(see T Jiang et al., "Desilication from illite by
thermochemical activation", Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc.
China, Vol 14(5), p. 1000-1005 (2004)), as well as for
W02019/086792 7 PCT/FR2018/052678
aluminum ores containing diaspore and not comprising
silicon (Q Zhou et al., "Temperature dependence of
crystal structure and digestibility of roasted diaspore",
Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, Vol 14(1), p. 180-183
(2004)). Indeed, it comprises two distinct steps, a first
step of calcination of the bauxite at a temperature of
9800C, without additive, during which the kaolin partly
decomposes to form amorphous silica and aluminas called
transition aluminas, and a second step of leaching that
aims to selectively dissolve the amorphous silica in
milder conditions than those of the Bayer process. The
residue (the calcined and leached bauxite) is then
introduced into the conventional Bayer process. This
method presents at first glance the disadvantage of
requiring additional thermal energy for the calcination
of the bauxite, to arrive at a calcined and leached
bauxite that has characteristics comparable to those of a
high-quality bauxite. This overconsumption of energy can
pose an obstacle to the development of the method.
Moreover, the method requires an additional raw material,
namely lime, to precipitate the silicate coming from the
solubilization of the amorphous silica formed during the
calcination of the bauxite.
The roast-leach process has given rise to a rather
large scientific literature, which has focused on the
calcination step, with divergent indications as to the
optimal calcination temperature. The maximum value of the
calcination temperature appears to be given by the
formation of mullite: According to Xu et al. ("Thermal
behaviors of kaolinite-diasporic bauxite and desilication
from it by roasting-alkali leaching process", Light
Metals TMS 2002), the decomposition of meta-kaolinite into amorphous silica and gamma alumina starts at 990°C, but at approximately 1100°C these two phases begin to react to form mullite, insoluble in sodium hydroxide under the conditions of the conventional Bayer process; a temperature between 10000C and 10500C is recommended. Li et al. ("Desilication of bauxite ores bearing multi aluminosilicates by thermochemical activation process", Light Metals TMS 2009, p. 57 - 61) also observe mullite starting from 11000C and note a decrease in the desilication at 1150-1200°C, but conclude that the activation of the bauxite is optimal between 11000C and 11500C. A publication by N. Eremin from 1981 ("Beneficiation of low-grade bauxites by hydrometallurgical methods", ICSOBA 1981, p. 135 - 142) indicates a similar mechanism with an optimal temperature between 9250C and 10000C. The publication by Moazemi et Rezai ("Desilication studies of diasporic bauxite by thermochemical treatment", Proc. XI Int. Seminar on Minerals Processing Technology (MPT-2010), p. 832-838) shows that the curve of the yield of extraction by leaching according to the calcination temperature has a rather narrow maximum at 10000C. Despite this progress in the understanding of the roast-leach process, it is noted that it is hardly used industrially since it adds a significant additional cost of use to the conventional Bayer process. Moreover, this additional cost is related to two items particularly targeted in the establishment of an environmental report, namely energy consumption and water consumption. One or more embodiments of the invention provide a method or an improved and economically viable process for using bauxites with a low alumina content (A/S < 5 and preferably < 4 and even more preferably < 3) in a method of the Bayer process type.
One or more embodiments of the invention provide a method for processing bauxite that comprises a preprocessing of the bauxite, which improves its ability to be used as a raw material in the Bayer process, known per se, and by adapting the Bayer process to this preprocessed bauxite. One aspect of the invention provides a method for manufacturing alumina trihydrate or alumina from a bauxite preprocessed by a method comprising a calcination and a leaching, wherein said preprocessed bauxite has a loss on ignition of less than 2.5% by mass, said method comprising the steps of: (a) Processing (called "digestion") the preprocessed bauxite with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide at a temperature of at least 1000C, said aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide having a concentration of between 100g Na20/L and 220g Na20/L; (b) Separating the solid residue from the liquid phase; (c) Crystallizing the aluminum trihydrate by addition of seeds ; (d) Separating the crystallized aluminum trihydrate from the liquid phase;
9A
(e) optionally, calcining the aluminum trihydrate
obtained in step (d) to obtain the alumina.
Said preprocessing of the bauxite comprises a first
step of preprocessing, which is physical preprocessing,
namely thermal. This thermal preprocessing is intended to
provoke a chemical and crystallographic modification of
the bauxite (or at least of some of these mineralogical
phases that constitute it). This first step of
preprocessing the bauxite is advantageously carried out on
a ground bauxite. It leads to a modified bauxite that can
then be introduced into the Bayer process, or be subjected
to a second, chemical, preprocessing step.
More particularly, said thermal preprocessing is
carried out at a temperature and for a time such that at
least a part of the silicates present in the bauxite are
transformed into amorphous silica. For a diasporic bauxite
this temperature is advantageously located between 10000C
and 10500C, preferably between 10150C and 1030C, and even
more preferably between 10150C and 10250C. For boehmitic
bauxites this temperature is approximately 400C lower and
is located between approximately 9600C and approximately
10000C and preferably between 9700C and 990°C.
W02019/086792 10 PCT/FR2018/052678
This method can be implemented in part on the
industrial site of production of the bauxite or entirely
on the industrial site at which the Bayer process is
installed. It requires dedicated equipment, namely a
furnace. This method is advantageously implemented on
ground bauxite.
According to the invention, the method for
processing the bauxite comprises a second preprocessing
step, which is a chemical step. It comprises the leaching
of the modified bauxite by sodium hydroxide. During this
step, and under the suitable temperature, residence time,
sodium hydroxide concentration and solid/liquid ratio
conditions, the amorphous silica obtained during the
calcination is dissolved while very little of the alumina
goes into solution.
This leaching step must be carried out on a ground
bauxite, and for this reason it is advantageous for the
grinding to be done upstream of the thermal preprocessing
step. The grinding method and the desired particle size
can be similar to those used for the conventional Bayer
process. It is also possible to regrind the processed
bauxite before its introduction into the Bayer process.
The method for preprocessing the natural bauxite by
a method successively comprising a calcination and a
leaching leads to a product called here "preprocessed
bauxite" which differs, both in chemical and
mineralogical terms, from a natural bauxite. A simple
parameter that expresses this particularity of the
preprocessed bauxite is its loss on ignition; this loss
on ignition is much lower (typically by a factor of ten
to twenty) than that of a natural (not preprocessed)
bauxite.
W02019/086792 11 PCT/FR2018/052678
Thus, a first object of the invention is a method
for manufacturing alumina trihydrate or alumina from a
bauxite preprocessed by a method comprising a calcination
and a leaching, said preprocessed bauxite being
characterized in that it has a loss on ignition of less
than 2.5% by mass, preferably less than 2.0%, and even
more preferably less than 1.5%. Advantageously, this
preprocessed bauxite is also characterized by the absence
of diaspore and the presence of amorphous silica.
Said method comprises the steps of:
(a) Processing ("digestion") the preprocessed
bauxite with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide at a
temperature of at least 1000C (typically in an
autoclave), said aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide
having a concentration of between 100g Na20/L and 220g
Na20/L, preferably between 140g Na20/L and 200g Na20/L,
more preferably between 155g Na20/L and 190g Na20/L, and
even more preferably between 160g Na20/L and 180g Na20/L;
(b) Separating the solid residue from the liquid
phase;
(c) Crystallizing the aluminum trihydrate by
addition of seeds;
(d) Separating the crystallized aluminum trihydrate
from the liquid phase;
(e) Calcining the aluminum trihydrate obtained in
step (d) to obtain alumina.
This last step is optional: if the method according
to the invention is aimed at obtaining aluminum
trihydrate, which is a commercial product, it will
suffice to dry the aluminum trihydrate obtained in step
(d). If the method is aimed at alumina, step (e) is
necessary.
W02019/086792 12 PCT/FR2018/052678
Advantageously, the temperature in step (a) is
between 1500C and 3500C, preferably between 2000C and
3000C, more preferably between 2200C and 2800C, and even
more preferably between 2500C and 2700C.
Said preprocessed bauxite advantageously has a mass
ratio of A1 2 0 3 / SiO 2 greater than 8, and preferably
greater than 9, and even more preferably greater than 10.
Its mass content of alumina is advantageously greater
than 60%, preferably greater than 65%, and even more
preferably greater than 70%. Its mass content of silica
is less than 12%, preferably less than 10%, and even more
preferably less than 8%.
In an advantageous embodiment of the method
according to the invention, the liquid phase coming from
step (d) is reintroduced into the aqueous solution of
sodium hydroxide used in step (a).
Advantageously, said preprocessed bauxite has been
preprocessed by calcination at a temperature between
approximately 9200C and approximately 12000C. This
temperature is preferably between approximately 9500C and
approximately 10700C, and even more preferably between
approximately 10000C and approximately 10500C, in
particular in the case of diasporic bauxites; for
boehmitic bauxites, a lower calcination temperature is
preferred, between approximately 9500C and approximately
11000C, more particularly between approximately 9600C and
approximately 10000C, and even more preferably between
approximately 9700C and approximately 9900C.
This calcination leads to a chemical and
crystallographic transformation of the bauxite. More
particularly, the majority fraction by far (and often the
totality) of the diaspore (which is the form in which the
W02019/086792 13 PCT/FR2018/052678
vast majority (and often the quasi-totality) of the
alumina in the bauxites with a low A/S ratio is found) is
transformed into alpha alumina. This transformation is
accompanied by the departure of certain volatile matter
present in the bauxite or formed during said chemical and
crystallographic transformation. The loss on ignition is
a parameter that can be easily determined and that
synthetically expresses the state of this chemical and
crystallographic transformation during the calcination.
The calcined bauxite has a better solubility of the
aluminum contained in particular in the aluminosilicates
under the usual conditions of the step called of
digestion of the bauxite of the Bayer process, and a
better solubility of the silicon under milder conditions
than those of the step of digestion of the Bayer process.
Thus, the processing of the calcined bauxite by leaching
with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide under milder
reaction conditions than those of the step of digestion
of the Bayer process allows to solubilize the silica.
Because of the chemical and crystallographic
transformation that occurs during the calcination, the
preprocessed bauxite has a mass percentage of diaspore
that is much lower than in bauxite; after calcination
this percentage is preferably less than 5%, more
preferably less than 3%, even more preferably less than
2%, and optimally less than 1%. For the same reason, the
mass percentage of kaolinite in the preprocessed bauxite
is preferably less than 4%, more preferably less than 3%,
even more preferably less than 2%, and optimally less
than 1%. These mass percentages of diaspore and of
kaolinite can be determined by the usual methods of X-ray
W02019/086792 14 PCT/FR2018/052678
crystallography, implemented on samples of powder of
preprocessed bauxite.
For example, a preprocessed bauxite preferred for
use in the method according to the invention has a loss
on ignition of less than 2%, a percentage of diaspore of
less than 3% and a percentage of kaolinite of less than
3%, these percentages being mass percentages. More
preferably, this preprocessed bauxite has a loss on
ignition of less than 2%, a percentage of diaspore of
less than 2% and a percentage of kaolinite of less than
2%, and even more preferably a loss on ignition of less
than 1.5%, a percentage of diaspore of less than 1% and a
percentage of kaolinite of less than 2%.
Another object of the invention is a method for
manufacturing alumina trihydrate or alumina from a
bauxite comprising the following steps:
(i) Preprocessing a bauxite to obtain said
preprocessed bauxite, said preprocessing successively
comprising:
- a calcination,
- a leaching with an aqueous solution of sodium
hydroxide,
- the separation of the solid from the leaching
aqueous phase, said separated solid representing said
preprocessed bauxite,
(ii) Processing said preprocessed bauxite by the
method according to the first object of the invention.
Said bauxite, capable, after preprocessing by
calcination and leaching with sodium hydroxide, of
entering the method according to the invention,
advantageously has a ratio of A1 2 0 3 / SiO 2 between 1 and 8,
preferably between 1 and 7, even more preferably between
W02019/086792 15 PCT/FR2018/052678
1 and 5.5, even more preferably between 1 and 4, and even
between 1 and 3 or between 2 and 3. The preprocessing of
the bauxite according to the invention leads to a
significant increase in the A1 2 0 3 / SiO 2 ratio, typically
by a factor of two to three. If the A1 2 0 3 / SiO 2 ratio of
the bauxite that enters the method according to the
invention is greater than 8, the method may not be
economically viable, since using a preprocessed bauxite
rather than a natural bauxite does not lead to a
sufficiently attractive additional yield of alumina, and
the potential for reduction of the consumption of sodium
hydroxide is limited.
Another object of the invention is an alumina
capable of being obtained by the method according to the
invention.
Yet another object of the invention is a facility
for the implementation of the method according to the
invention, comprising:
- a unit for preprocessing the bauxite by
calcination and leaching, allowing to transform a bauxite
into a preprocessed bauxite; and
- a unit for manufacturing alumina from said
preprocessed bauxite for the implementation of the method
according to the invention,
characterized in that:
- said preprocessing unit comprises
-- at least one calcination furnace for calcining
the bauxite, -- at least one leaching unit for leaching the
calcined bauxite with an aqueous solution of sodium
hydroxide (called "leaching solution"), and
W02019/086792 16 PCT/FR2018/052678
-- at least one unit for solid - liquid separation
for separating the calcined and leached bauxite from said
leaching solution;
- said unit for manufacturing alumina from said
preprocessed bauxite comprises
-- at least one chamber (such as an autoclave or a
tubular device) for processing the preprocessed bauxite
with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (called
"Bayer liquor") at a temperature of at least 100°C,
-- at least one unit for solid - liquid separation
for separating the solid residue (called "red mud") from
said Bayer liquor;
-- at least one crystallization unit for
crystallizing aluminum trihydrate from said Bayer liquor
by addition of seeds of aluminum trihydrate;
-- at least one unit for solid - liquid separation
for separating the crystallized aluminum trihydrate from
said Bayer liquor;
-- optionally at least one calcination unit for
transforming said aluminum trihydrate into alumina.
In this facility said Bayer liquor coming from said
unit for solid - liquid separation used to separate the
crystallized aluminum trihydrate from the liquid phase is
recirculated to the digestion step.
Drawings
In figures 1 and 2, the three-digit references
designate physical objects (devices, components or
products), while the four-digit references designate
method steps. After a step of phase separation the letter
"L" designates the liquid phase, the letter "S" the solid
phase.
W02019/086792 17 PCT/FR2018/052678
Figure 1 shows a simplified schema of the Bayer
process according to the prior art.
Figure 2 shows a simplified schema of an embodiment
of the method according to the invention.
Figures 3 and 4 refer to example 3 and show curves
of thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis
(TGA - DTA) of samples of bauxite; the rise in
temperature corresponds to the calcination for obtaining
a calcined bauxite. The curve that refers to the scale on
the left, identical in the two drawings, represents the
mass loss. The curve that refers to the scale on the
right represents the mass loss (ML) per minute (figure 3)
and the heat flow (figure 4).
Figure 5 shows the loss on ignition (measured after
calcination at 10600C) of a diasporic bauxite with a high
silica content that has been calcined at different
temperatures.
Description
1.The conventional Bayer process
The invention will be explained in detail with
respect to the Bayer process according to the prior art
that is shown in figure 1. The bauxite coming from a
bauxite mine is ground (step 1100) in the presence of a
liquid phase, which is aluminate of sodium, as will be
explained in greater detail below. The grinding aims to
increase the specific surface area of the bauxite
accessible to the action of the liquid phase during the
attack with a view to the digestion of the bauxite.
Typically, a particle size of several hundred pm is
targeted. The grinding is carried out with the addition
W02019/086792 18 PCT/FR2018/052678
of lime (step 1102), in the form of milk or in solid form.
The lime exercises a triple action: (i) During the
digestion of the bauxite the lime reduces the consumption
of sodium hydroxide since it favors the precipitation of
the soluble silicates in the form of calcium silico
aluminates rather than in the form of sodium silico
aluminates (which would otherwise carry away a part of
the sodium of the sodium hydroxide, more expensive that
the lime); (ii) the lime promotes the dissolution of the
aluminum and improves the yield of extraction of the
alumina during the digestion; and (iii) the lime improves
the decantation of the mud after attack, since it favors
the transformation of the goethite, difficult to decant
and filter, into hematite, better crystallized.
The ground bauxite is then attacked by an aqueous
solution of sodium hydroxide (step 1110) under pressure
and at high temperature in autoclaves or tubular
exchangers. This attack (called "digestion") leads to the
partial digestion of the bauxite (step 1120), more
precisely, it is the soluble part of the aluminum
minerals (in particular the alumina, whether it is
present in the form of monohydrate or of trihydrate) that
forms ions of aluminate. In numerous cases the digestion
is carried out at a temperature of between 2500C and
2700C in closed autoclaves or in tubular exchangers. Said
aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide is in practice an
aqueous solution of aluminate of sodium. A concentration
of sodium hydroxide of between 235g Na20/L and 245g
Na20/L is typically used. A person skilled in the art
knows how to finely adapt the parameters of this step, in
particular the temperature, the residence time and the
concentration of the sodium, to the composition of the
W02019/086792 19 PCT/FR2018/052678
bauxite; the same observation applies to the quantity of
lime added in step 1102. For example, it is known that
the bauxites with a high content of monohydrate aluminas
(boehmite, and especially diaspore) need higher digestion
temperatures than the bauxites with a high content of
trihydrate (gibbsite).
The temperature range between 2500C and 2700C allows
to ensure that all of the soluble alumina contained in
the bauxite (including the fraction of diaspore, which is
the most difficult to dissolve out of the oxides of
aluminum, and the content of which can be highly variable)
is digested. In particular, the karst bauxites, which are
the main field of use of the present invention, require
this temperature range. Some factories using karst
bauxites are even designed to work with a temperature of
up to 2800C, in order to be able to adapt if necessary to
the use of bauxites with a very specific composition.
During this digestion step 1120, the bauxite can be
placed in contact with the preheated liquor (method
called double flow), or the suspension of bauxite in the
Bayer liquor is formed before being heated (method called
single flow). In certain factories the digestion step
1120 is carried out in two steps, each one being carried
out at a different temperature, in order to first
dissolve the easily soluble fractions, then, at a higher
temperature, the solid residue from the first step. This
alternative with double digestion can save energy, but it
supposes a greater investment and complicates the method.
When the suspension is expanded (step 1124), by
successive expansion steps, a part of the water
evaporates (auto-evaporation).
W02019/086792 20 PCT/FR2018/052678
During the decantation at ambient pressure (step
1130) the residue (called "red mud") is separated from
the liquid phase (liquor); flocculating agents that
increase the speed of phase separation and improve the
clarification of the liquors (i.e. the residual quantity
of dry matter in the liquid) are added. The solid residue
is called "red mud"; it contains all the crystalline
phases coming from the bauxite non-reactive to the
digestion 1120 and those formed during the Bayer cycle.
The residue (called "red mud") is recovered (step 1140)
and washed with water (step 1142) in order to recover as
much of the liquor as possible; this washing is carried
out in general with raw water and countercurrent (in
order to minimize the quantity of water used); it is
followed by a step of decantation and/or filtration (not
shown in the drawing). The red mud is a powdery residue,
the reuse of which is not easy, and which still
frequently ends up in special storage.
The liquid phase ("L") coming from the step 1130 of
separation of phases is a solution of sodium aluminate.
After dilution (step 1150) the aluminum trihydrate is
crystallized (step 1170) by cooling of the aluminate and
addition of seeds of aluminum trihydrate (step 1160).
This crystallization step is usually called
"decomposition"; its duration is approximately 40 hours.
The dilution with cold water (step 1150) reuses the water
for washing the red mud.
This step 1170 requires a certain expertise, known
to a person skilled in the art, in order to best adapt
the numerous parameters of the method (saturation of the
liquor at the input of the decomposition, concentration
of Na20 and of impurities of various natures, starting
W02019/086792 21 PCT/FR2018/052678
and final temperatures of decomposition, seed surface
area, crystallization technology, particle size grading)
to the nature of the desired alumina product; the
physico-chemical phenomena that are involved relate
especially to nucleation (spontaneous formation of fine
particles in a suspension), the agglomeration of the fine
particles, the particle size grading by cycloning and/or
decantation.
The trihydrate precipitated is separated by
decantation and filtration (step 1180) by using various
known technologies; it is recovered (step 1190). A
significant part of the trihydrate must be recycled into
the decomposition step 1160, the rest is dried (step 1192)
and calcined (step 1194) into alumina. The latter is
stored (step 1196) with a view to its transport to a
consumer site. The drying step (step 1192) is typically
carried out as the first step of the calcination (step
1194) which takes place in several stages. During this
rise in temperature first the water of impregnation is
eliminated, starting at approximately 1000C, then the
water of constitution of the trihydrate (at approximately
10000C); the rise in temperature is then continued to
obtain the desired crystalline structure. Two
technologies are used for the most part: calcination in a
furnace with a circulating fluidized bed ("Circulating
Fluid Bed", abbreviated as CFB), and calcination in
suspension in hot gases ("Gas suspension calcination",
abbreviated as GSC). Older factories still have rotary
kilns that are also suitable for implementing this step.
The liquid phase coming from the step of phase
separation 1180 is an aqueous solution of sodium
hydroxide, more diluted than that used in step 1110
W02019/086792 22 PCT/FR2018/052678
because of the various inputs of water into the flow
(water for washing the red mud (step 1142) and the
trihydrate, dilution water (step 1150)). For this reason
it must be concentrated by evaporation of water (step
1210) to be recycled (step 1220) in the solution of
sodium hydroxide used for the digestion step (step 1120).
It is also reused (step 1222) in the step of wet grinding
of the bauxite (step 1100).
The trihydrate obtained in step 1190 can be washed
before drying; this washing water can be reused in the
washing of the red mud in step 1142 (not shown in the
drawing).
In the Bayer process according to the prior art,
sodium hydroxide is consumed during the processing of the
bauxite to produce alumina. More precisely, this
consumption is related to three mechanisms: (i) the
formation of insoluble phases of silico-aluminate of
sodium during the attack (digestion step 1120); (ii) the
residual sodium hydroxide carried away with the mud (1140)
despite its washing (step 1142); (iii) the
coprecipitation with the alumina during the
crystallization phase 1170. These losses must be
compensated for by the addition of new sodium hydroxide
(step 1110). As much as possible all the washing liquid
phases including sodium hydroxide (including during the
chemical cleaning of the tanks and piping) are recycled
in the Bayer liquor.
2. The preprocessing of the bauxite according to the
invention
2.1 General overview
W02019/086792 23 PCT/FR2018/052678
An embodiment of the method according to the
invention is illustrated in figure 2. It comprises a
preprocessing of the bauxite. The preprocessed bauxite is
introduced into the Bayer process. The steps of the Bayer
process noted as llxx and 12xx in figure 1 are designated
in figure 2 by the references 21xx and 22xx, while the
preprocessing steps carry the references 20xx.
According to a very advantageous embodiment of the
invention certain operating conditions of this Bayer
process are adapted to the chemical and mineralogical
composition of the preprocessed bauxite; this will be
explained below in greater detail. The preprocessed
bauxite is a product that does not exist as such in
nature, it is necessarily a product resulting from an
industrial method, namely from the preprocessing method.
Its chemical composition differs from that of the natural
bauxite from which it comes by two essential
characteristics: it has a greater A/S ratio (since it
includes less silicates), and it now includes only very
little crystallization water. Moreover, its
mineralurgical composition is different, after the
transformations that it undergoes during the various
steps of the preprocessing, as will be explained in
greater detail below. For the diasporic bauxites
containing silica for the most part in the form of
kaolinite, the essential differences relate to the
dehydration of the diaspore and its transformation into
alumina which is for the most part alpha alumina, as well
as to the kaolinite which after its dehydration
transforms into meta-kaolinite (as is explained in
section 2.3 below), allowing the solubilization of the
silica by the sodium hydroxide.
W02019/086792 24 PCT/FR2018/052678
The very low content of crystallization water also
distinguishes the chemical composition of the
preprocessed bauxite from that of the natural bauxites
with a similar A/S ratio. The loss of crystallization
water is the main parameter that enters into the loss (of
mass) on ignition. For example, a diasporic natural
bauxite in general has a loss on ignition greater than
approximately 10%, whereas a bauxite preprocessed
according to the invention has a loss on ignition of less
than 2.5%, preferably less than 2.0%, and even more
preferably less than 1.5%. The loss on ignition is a
parameter known to a person skilled in the art;
complementary explanations are given below in section 2.3.
According to the invention, the bauxite coming from
a bauxite mine is ground (step 2000) after the addition
of water (step 2002), filtered (step 2004), and the solid
residue after filtration (step 2004) is calcined (step
2010). Here, this intermediate product is called "calcined bauxite". An aqueous solution of sodium
hydroxide is added (step 2020) and the leaching of the
calcined bauxite is carried out (step 2030). After the
phase separation (step 2040) the solid phase which is
called "leached calcined bauxite" or "preprocessed
bauxite" here is recovered and introduced into the Bayer
process; according to the particle size obtained during
the grinding in step 2000 it may be necessary to regrind
it (step 2100, not shown in figure 2). The liquid phase
coming from the phase separation in step 2040 is
processed with lime to precipitate the silicates (step
2050). After another phase separation (step 2060) the
residue, a white mud, is recovered (step 2070). The
liquid phase coming from the phase separation in step
W02019/086792 25 PCT/FR2018/052678
2060 is an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide; it is
recovered (step 2080) and partly recycled into the attack
solution of the Bayer process. Advantageously the lime
2052 is introduced in the form of milk of lime.
According to the invention this preprocessing method
can include numerous alternatives. For example, the step
of phase separation 2060 can be followed by an additional
step of filtration of the liquid phase (step not shown in
figure 2, designated here as 2062). It can comprise a
washing of the white mud (step not shown in figure 2,
designated here as 2064) after the step of phase
separation 2060, the washing water being recycled into
step 1150. These two alternatives can be combined. The
bauxite can also be dry ground, and in this case the
calcination step (2010) follows directly.
As will be explained below in detail, the
implementation of the preprocessed bauxite in the Bayer
process can be carried out in the same factory, i.e. with
the same equipment, and according to the same process
flow diagram, as the implementation of the non
preprocessed bauxite (the only exception is the
evaporation step 2210 which can be eliminated in certain
alternatives of the method according to the invention).
However, if the same operating parameters (for example
the duration, the temperature and/or the concentration of
the sodium hydroxide) are used for the implementation of
the preprocessed bauxite a different result than that
which would be obtained with an unprocessed bauxite is
obtained. For this reason, in certain advantageous
embodiments of the invention, for certain steps of the
Bayer process implemented with preprocessed bauxite
according to the invention the operating parameters are
W02019/086792 26 PCT/FR2018/052678
modified with respect to a usual operation of the Bayer
process.
The inventors have found that the temperature of the
calcination (step 2010) of the bauxite strongly
influences the yield of extraction of the alumina from
the leached bauxite. According to the invention this
temperature must be greater than 9800C for a diasporic
bauxite. For a calcination temperature of 9800C or less,
the kaolinite is activated and is not completely
transformed; it reacts to the leaching (step 2030) to
give an insoluble compound of the zeolite type. For this
reason a calcination temperature greater than 9900C is
preferred. According to an advantageous embodiment it is
greater than 10000C. For a temperature between 10100C and
10350C the transformation of the kaolinite is total; a
temperature between 10200C and 10300C is preferred. The
calcination method is followed by a leaching that will be
explained below.
The preprocessed, improved bauxite that results from
this calcination - leaching (roast-leach) method can be
introduced as such into the Bayer process.
According to an advantageous embodiment of the
invention this method is modified. More precisely,
certain operating parameters are modified, which allows
to substantially reduce, inter alia, the energy
consumption.
2.2 Specific embodiments
To illustrate embodiments of the invention, here
certain steps of the preprocessing method are specified.
Grinding (step 2000)
W02019/086792 27 PCT/FR2018/052678
In step 2000 the grinding can be carried out in a
cylindrical mill containing balls or steel bars. The
quantity of water (step 2002) can be approximately 0.7m 3
per tonne of bauxite, with a bauxite load of
approximately 1000kg per M 3 . A suspension of water and of
bauxite that can be separated by filtration on a filter
press (step 2004) is thus obtained. A residual
impregnation of water of approximately 10% by mass is
acceptable. The target particle size in the grinding can
be the same as that in the case of the conventional Bayer
process, namely several hundred pm.
Calcination (step 2010)
The calcination in step 2010 can be carried out in a
rotary or static kiln. The progressive heating allows to
eliminate the water of impregnation of the ore, then the
water of constitution, crystalline phases present in the
bauxite, then to carry out the transformation of these
phases, at the temperatures indicated above. In these
conditions, it is observed that: - The silica that was present in the form of
silicates is transformed for the most part into amorphous
silica;
- The diaspore and boehmite phases are transformed
into alumina of the "alpha" type;
- The iron that was present in the form of goethite
(FeO(OH)) is, after the calcination, transformed into
hematite (Fe203); - The phases containing carbon, carbonates and
sulfur are thermally dissociated mainly in the form of
C02 and SO 2 for the volatile part.
W02019/086792 28 PCT/FR2018/052678
Leaching (step 2030)
After the calcination the calcined bauxite is
immersed in a solution of sodium hydroxide (step 2020).
This leaching step (step 2030) allows to solubilize the
transformed silica as well as certain impurities. The
sodium hydroxide content of the liquid phase can be
comprised between approximately 70g NaOH/L and
approximately 160g NaOH/L, preferably between
approximately 90g/L and approximately 150g NaOH/L, and
even more preferably between approximately 110g/L and
approximately 140g NaOH/L. For example, a content of 129g
NaOH/L was used successfully. This solution can be
obtained from a mixture of recycled sodium hydroxide and
soda lye at 50%, the quantities of which are adjusted to
obtain the concentration necessary for the leaching.
Below 70g/L a fraction of the leachable silica that is
too small is dissolved, a residence time (i.e. a time of
contact between the solid phase and the liquid phase)
that is too great is needed, and the stock of solution of
sodium hydroxide circulating in the facilities of the
method is diluted too much. Above 150g/L the risk of loss
of aluminum by dissolution of alumina becomes significant.
The temperature of the aqueous solution of sodium
hydroxide is typically between 800C and 1200C; if the
temperature is too low the silica dissolves poorly, if
the temperature is too high alumina tends to be dissolved.
For example, the calcined bauxite and the solution
of sodium hydroxide (2010) can be introduced into a
stirred reactor tank in such a way as to obtain an
initial suspension containing approximately 80kg/m 3 of
solid. A reaction temperature of approximately 1000C is
W02019/086792 29 PCT/FR2018/052678
suitable; the residence time at the reaction temperature
can be approximately 45 min.
Separation of phases (step 2040)
The separation of phases in step 2040 can be carried
out by filtration on a filter, of the filter press type,
supplied by the suspension coming from the reactor of the
leaching 2030. The solid residue is the "leached calcined
bauxite" or "preprocessed bauxite"; a residual
impregnation of leaching liquor of approximately 10% by
mass is acceptable. The liquid phase is a liquor loaded
with dissolved silica coming during the leaching 2030; it
is purified by adding lime 2052. The raw material
advantageously consists of quicklime (CaO) or milk of
lime (Ca(OH)2). It is preferred to use a quicklime with a
fine particle size distribution, containing at least 85%
CaO; typically it contains between 85% and 95% CaO. The
milk of lime can be manufactured by slaking of this lime
(approximately 100kg of CaO/m 3 ) with hot water in a
stirred reactor tank.
Precipitation of the silicates (step 2050) and flow of
the phases
The step of precipitation of the silicates (step
2050) allows to form an insoluble calcium silicate. The
precipitation of the silica can be carried out in a
reactor tank with stirring in the presence of quicklime
or milk of lime (100g CaO/L) at 1000C for 2 hours. The
stoichiometric ratio of CaO SiO 2 is advantageously
between 1.1 and 1.5. A suspension that contains, at the
end of the operation, approximately 35kg/m 3 to 50kg/m 3 of
W02019/086792 30 PCT/FR2018/052678
solid, preferably between 39kg/m 3 and 46kg/m 3 of solid,
is typically obtained.
The phase separation (step 2060) can advantageously
be carried out by decantation of the suspension.
According to the invention the clear liquid phase
("overflow") is advantageously recycled into the sodium
hydroxide circuit of the method, preferably partly to the
leaching 2030, and partly upstream of the digestion step
of the Bayer process 2120.
The thickened suspension ("underflow") consisting of
calcium silicate (typically from 600 to 700kg of
solid/m 3 ), called white mud (2070), is extracted from the
decanter. It can supply a filter, of the belt filter type,
on which a methodical washing (step 2072) with water is
carried out in order to reduce the concentration of the
impregnation liquor. The washed white mud can have a
residual impregnation of diluted liquor of approximately
10%; the concentration of sodium hydroxide in this
impregnation liquor is typically approximately 6 to lOg
NaOH/L. The white mud is composed of a calcium silicate
that is close to that of tobermorite (approximately
Ca4.31Sis.51Alo.5016 (OH)2 x 4 H 2 0) . It can be directed towards
an intermediate storage while awaiting its reuse.
The water for washing the silicate mud (white mud
2070) recovered after step 2072 can join the circuit of
the liquid phase 2080 obtained in step 2060 to be used in
the leaching step (step 2030) and in the Bayer process
(step 2120). In the latter case it requires a
readjustment of its sodium hydroxide content (step 2110)
which will have become lower than the initial content in
step 2030 (for example 129g NaOH/L). This readjustment is
W02019/086792 31 PCT/FR2018/052678
carried out with the addition of an aliquot of soda lye
at 50%.
The preprocessing according to the invention
generates a certain loss of sodium hydroxide, by
occlusion of sodium in the precipitated silicate and by
impregnation of the white mud. This loss must be
compensated for by the addition of soda lye, typically at
50% (step 2110). However, as will be explained below, the
modified Bayer process according to the invention
consumes less sodium hydroxide than the conventional
Bayer process, per tonne of alumina produced.
The Bayer liquor is recirculated (step 2200); it
consists of a mixture of liquor coming from the step of
filtration of the trihydrate (step 2180) having undergone
or not undergone a concentration by evaporation of water
(step 2210) and addition of soda lye (step 2110).
2.3 Meaning of the loss on ignition
It is known that the loss on ignition is a parameter
that is an integral part of the usual characterization of
a bauxite; this value, expressed in mass percent, is
present on the analysis certificate that accompanies any
delivery of bauxite intended for the Bayer process. It is
determined in general by calcination at 10600C for 2
hours, after a previous drying at 1050C. The calcination
of the bauxite always leads to a net loss of mass, which
is provoked by the departure of volatile matter, even if
there can be oxidation reactions which, taken alone, lead
to an increase in mass. This departure of volatile matter
results from physical (in particular from sublimation)
and chemical (in particular thermal decomposition, such
as dehydration, dehydroxylation and thermal dissociation,
W02019/086792 32 PCT/FR2018/052678
and reduction) phenomena. More precisely, the loss on
ignition corresponds mainly to the elimination of the
water of constitution (i.e. of the molecules of water
that are integrated into the crystallographic structure),
of the carbon dioxide coming from the organic matter and
from the mineral carbonates, and of certain other
volatile compounds, in particular of the oxides of sulfur.
The loss on ignition of bauxite depends on its
chemical and mineralogical composition. For a bauxite
intended for the Bayer process its order of magnitude is
typically located between 10% and 30%. It can be
determined by simple weighing before and after
calcination in the conditions indicated. Differential
thermogravimetry, which also allows to characterize the
mineral species present in the bauxite, can also be used.
The loss on ignition of the diasporic bauxites with
a high silica content, which form a raw material usable
in the context of the present invention to prepare the
bauxite called preprocessed, is typically between 10% and
18%, and more often between 12% and 15%, but these
empirical numbers do not limit the scope of the invention.
Figure 5 shows the loss on ignition (determined after
calcination at 10600C for 2 hours) of a diasporic bauxite
calcined according to the invention at various
temperatures ranging from 9800C to 10300C. It is clear
that the loss on ignition after calcination at 10300C is
extremely low (0.10%), or in other words: when this
material is heated beyond 10300C and up to 10600C, the
quantity of volatile matter that is released is extremely
low.
For example, for the kaolinite phase contained in
the bauxite, the preprocessing by calcination according
W02019/086792 33 PCT/FR2018/052678
to the invention schematically leads to the following
reactions (the indications of the temperatures being
approximative):
- Endothermic dehydration between 400C and 200°C:
A1 2 Si 2 O 5 (OH) 4 x n H 2 0 decomposes into A1 2 Si 2 O 5 (OH) 4 + n H 2 0; - Endothermic dehydroxylation between 5300C and
5900C: A1 2 Si 2 O 5 (OH) 4 decomposes into A1 2 0 3 x 2 SiO 2 (meta
kaolinite) + H 2 0; - Exothermic dissociation between 9000C and 1000°C:
A1 2 0 3 x 2 SiO 2 (meta-kaolinite) decomposes into 2 A1 2 0 3 x 3
SiO 2 (pseudo-mullite) + SiO 2 (amorphous) + y A1 2 0 3
. 3. The modified Bayer process according to the
invention, using the preprocessed bauxite
The phase separation (step 2040) allows, preferably
after filtration, to separate the solid from the liquor
to be able to use the preprocessed bauxite in the step of
digestion (step 2120) of the Bayer process. The inventors
made a certain number of observations that led them to
modifying certain steps of the Bayer process; this
modification constitutes an essential feature of the
present invention.
Digestion (step 2120)
The digestion involves solubilizing the aluminous
phases contained in the preprocessed bauxite in a sodium
hydroxide liquor. The alpha alumina contained in the
preprocessed bauxite, which was generated during the
calcination, is solubilized by the Bayer liquor at high
temperature, at the same time as the preexisting soluble
aluminum. This step can be carried out under temperature
and pressure conditions similar to those of the
W02019/086792 34 PCT/FR2018/052678
conventional Bayer process, namely: a temperature
typically between 2500C and 2700C in closed autoclaves or
in a pressurized tubular system (approximately 50 bar to
60 bar). The heating is advantageously carried out by
progressively increasing the temperature up to the
reaction temperature. The residence time at the reaction
temperature is advantageously between 30 min and 60 min,
preferably between 30 min and 50 min, and even more
preferably between 35 min and 45 min.
According to an essential feature of the method
according to the invention a concentration of sodium
hydroxide significantly lower than that used for a normal
bauxite in the conventional Bayer process can be used for
the digestion of the preprocessed bauxite. More
particularly, this concentration is between 140g Na20/L
and 200g Na20/L, preferably between 155g Na20/L and 190g
Na20/L, and even more preferably between 160g Na20/L and
180g Na20/L. This concentration is advantageously
monitored continuously by the measurement of the
electrical conductivity of the liquor; it can also be the
subject of a chemical analysis in a laboratory.
In one embodiment, the inventors have observed that
despite a greater circulating flow rate of the attack
liquor (12.11m3 /t versus 8.52m 3 /t) due to a lower
concentration of caustic soda (162g/L versus 240g/L) in
the digestion liquor the yields of extraction of the
alumina remain very high; they are greater than 96% on
alumina minus silica by the adaptation of the setting
parameters of the workshop for example, the saturation of
the liquor (concentration of alumina and WR of the
addition of lime (8 to 10.4%) and the temperature (2600C).
W02019/086792 35 PCT/FR2018/052678
Evaporation (step 2210)
At the output of the digestion the suspension is
expanded, that is to say that it is brought to
atmospheric pressure by successive expansions; this
operation allows to evaporate a significant quantity of
water (auto-evaporation).
Since the method according to the invention uses a
Bayer liquor with a concentration of sodium hydroxide
significantly lower than the conventional Bayer process,
the quantity of water to be evaporated is much smaller.
Moreover, the preprocessed bauxite generates less red mud
(2140) than the majority of natural bauxites, which
reduces the required quantity of water for washing 2150
the mud, given that this washing water loaded with sodium
hydroxide will be introduced into the circuit of the
Bayer liquor. In certain cases the evaporation during the
expansion from the autoclave (step 2124) to the digestion
2120 is sufficient to maintain the concentration of the
recycled aluminate liquor (2220); the step of evaporation
2210 can thus be omitted. The step of evaporation 2210
consumes thermal energy and requires a significant
investment in terms of evaporators; being able to
minimize or even eliminate this step is of significant
economic interest.
It is noted that while there are factories using the
conventional Bayer process that do not carry out the
evaporation step 1210, namely factories that exclusively
use a bauxite generating a particularly small quantity of
red mud, the elimination of this step would be totally
impossible in the case of bauxites with a low A/S ratio
digested by the conventional Bayer process.
W02019/086792 36 PCT/FR2018/052678
Decantation of the red mud (step 2130)
At the output of the digestion the suspension is
diluted with a liquor of aluminate coming from the first
stage for washing the red mud in step 2140. This dilution
is regulated according to the input of washing water. It
allows to reach a concentration of the liquor compatible
with the solid-liquid separation and the crystallization
in step 2160.
The decantation is carried out in an apparatus
called "decanter", a tank with a large diameter (most of
the time with a flat or conical bottom) provided with
slow stirring allowing the separation. The decantation is
optimized by the use of additives called flocculants in
order to increase the speed of sedimentation of the solid
particles.
In the method according to the invention, the
absence of certain phases such as goethite, which was
transformed during the calcination of the bauxite in step
2010 and which is known for hampering the flocculation,
allows to reduce the quantity of flocculant used.
Typically, the thickened suspension (underflow) is
sent to the first washing stage. The clarified liquor
(overflow) is sent to the "safety" filtration which has
the goal of eliminating the very fine particles of mud in
order to guarantee a liquor free of impurities towards
crystallization.
Washing of the red mud (step 2140)
The washing of the red mud in step 2140 is carried
out preferably countercurrent; the washing water is
introduced in the last stage of the chain of washers. The
chain of washers can be completed by a filtration of the
W02019/086792 37 PCT/FR2018/052678
mud coming from the last washer by using a filter press.
The use of flocculant allows to improve the sedimentation
in order to ensure better washing of the mud.
Moreover, under equal conditions, the smaller
quantity of red mud and its better aptitude for
decantation allows to vey substantially improve the
washing since the quantity of water available for this
operation remains the same for a lesser quantity of solid.
While preserving identical washing efficiencies (raw
bauxite and preprocessed bauxite) it is possible to
reduce the quantity of water, which has the consequence
of greatly reducing the evaporation, as will be explained
below, and to thus save a significant amount of energy.
More precisely, the small quantity of red mud
generated (typically reduced by approximately 60%) by the
digestion 2120 of the preprocessed bauxite requires a
smaller quantity of water (typically reduced by
approximately 50%) than that necessary for the washing of
the mud generated by the digestion of an unprocessed
bauxite.
For example, the quantity of washing water and the
tonnage of mud are the following: - 3.04m 3 /t of water for 1.063t/t of mud after
washing in the case of a bauxite processed by the method
according to the invention, - 5.70m 3 /t of water for 3.040t/t of mud after
washing in the case of a raw bauxite.
The inventors found that with the bauxite
preprocessed by the method according to the invention,
the judicious adjustment of the main parameters of the
Bayer process, in particular in the attack (residence
time, saturation of the liquors, quantity of lime added,
W02019/086792 38 PCT/FR2018/052678
etc.), allows to preserve excellent yields of
solubilization of the alumina (greater than 96% on
alumina minus silica) with attack liquors with a low
concentration of caustic soda (approximately 160 to
170g/L for 238g/L to 240g/L for the conventional attacks).
These results and the improvement in the efficiency of
the washing of the mud allow to carry out the cycle of
the Bayer liquor with a low concentration of caustic soda,
generating significant savings of energy and of
maintenance costs at the evaporation workshop. In
addition, by eliminating the step of evaporation 2210
there are savings in terms of the investment in an
evaporation workshop in the case of a new production line.
Decantation of the white mud (step 2040)
The method according to the invention leads to a
significant reduction in the quantity of mud, even when
taking into account the fact that the step of
desilication 2050 by precipitation of the silicates
generates specific mud ("white mud") that does not appear
in the conventional Bayer process with non-preprocessed
bauxites: in the method according to the invention it is
noted that the reduction in the quantity of red mud is
much greater than the quantity of white mud. Moreover,
the later fate (and the possible use in usable products)
of these types of mud is not the same. The method
according to the invention reduces the quantity of mud to
be decanted (steps 2040, 2060 and 2130), typically by 10
to 40%, and preferably by 20% to 40%. For the red mud
this reduction can reach 65% (step 2130). Moreover this
mud has a better aptitude for decantation because of the
transformation, during the phase of calcination of the
W02019/086792 39 PCT/FR2018/052678
ore, of the goethite into hematite. These two advantages
lead to numerous other positive effects: the ease of
running the workshop (related to the reduction in the
quantities of mud to be managed), the reduction of the
consumption of electric energy, the reduction of the
consumption of flocculant, the optimization of the
maintenance costs of the workshop.
Consumption of sodium hydroxide and energy consumption of
the method according to the invention
The consumption of sodium hydroxide during the Bayer
process is related to the formation of solid compounds
including sodium (silicoaluminate, sodium crystallized
with the alumina) on the one hand and to the loss of
sodium hydroxide in liquid form (liquor of impregnation
of the red mud, and of the trihydrate) on the other hand.
The method for preprocessing by calcination-leaching also
generates losses by occlusion of sodium (occlusion in the
silicate) and by losses of sodium hydroxide in liquid
form (impregnation of the white mud). All these losses re
compensated for by an addition of soda lye at 50%.
The energy consumption of the Bayer process for
diasporic bauxites with a low Al/Si ratio is
approximately 8GJ per tonne of alumina obtained, without
taking into account the calcination of the trihydrate
(step 1194, 2194); insofar as the energy consumption of
the calcination of the trihydrate does not depend on the
origin of the bauxite, here only the method up to the
trihydrate (1190, 2190) is compared. For a preprocessed
bauxite according to the invention, by using a natural
karst bauxite with a low Al/Si ratio this consumption is
reduced by 1.9GJ/t via the elimination of the evaporation
W02019/086792 40 PCT/FR2018/052678
step 2210. Given that the preprocessing method,
comprising the step of calcination 2010 and the step of
leaching 2030, adds a consumption of approximately 2.2GJ
per tonne of alumina obtained, it is noted that the
method according to the invention leads to an
overconsumption of energy of 0.3GJ per tonne of alumina.
This overconsumption corresponds to approximately 4% of
the energy consumption of the method according to the
invention.
This overconsumption is very low, since the method
according to the invention increases the yield of
extraction of the alumina from the bauxite: in the
example used for the estimation of the energy consumption
above, the method according to the invention allows to
lower the quantity of karst bauxite with a low Al/Si
ratio necessary to obtain a tonne of alumina from 3.5t to
approximately 2.6t.
Moreover, as already mentioned, the method according
to the invention consumes less water and less sodium
hydroxide than the conventional Bayer process applied to
a low-grade karst bauxite. In the above example, the
consumption of sodium hydroxide goes from 490kg of NaOH
to 104kg of NaOH per tonne of alumina produced. The
consumption of lime indeed doubles, from approximately
360kg per tonne of alumina to approximately 800kg per
tonne of alumina, but the cost of the lime is
approximately 10% of the cost of the NaOH.
These savings remain of great interest even when
taking into account the investment necessary for the
additional steps of the preprocessing. This investment
involves adding a preprocessing unit to an existing
factory that uses the Bayer process: no modification of
W02019/086792 41 PCT/FR2018/052678
the equipment is necessary in this existing factory
(except for the integration of the flows of Bayer liquor
between the two "preprocessing" and "Bayer" units which
involves piping): the modification that the present
invention makes to the Bayer process is significant, but
it only concerns the operating parameters of the Bayer
process, and not the industrial equipment.
It is thus clear that in terms of economy, the
method is largely gainful. Moreover, the significant
reduction in the quantity of red mud, which tends to have
a negative economic value, also reduces the cost of its
reprocessing and storage. With regard to the white mud
(substantially silicates), it comprises fewer heavy
metals and other potentially toxic substances (if they
ended up going into solution) than the red mud; its
economic value is not negative. Indeed the mineralogy of
the calcium silicate in the form of tobermorite suggests
uses in particular in the field of construction.
The greatest advantage of the method according to
the invention is certainly the possibility of increasing
the deposits usable in terms of bauxite in accounting
(microeconomic and macroeconomic), by allowing to use
mineral resources that cannot be used with the methods
according to the prior art under economically competitive
conditions. The possibility thus offered to certain
factories of using bauxites coming from geographically
close mines leads to related savings in transport costs.
It is of course possible, and this falls within the
context of the present invention, to supply a Bayer
factory, the method of which has been modified according
to the invention, with preprocessed bauxite that has not
been preprocessed at the same site: this preprocessed
W02019/086792 42 PCT/FR2018/052678
bauxite can come either from a separate factory for
preprocessing bauxite (for example set up near a bauxite
mine, in order to create savings in terms of cost of
transport of the bauxite), or from an integrated factory
(preprocessing unit + Bayer unit) that has excess
capacity in terms of preprocessed bauxite. This first
embodiment with a separate preprocessing unit is not,
however, preferred since the reuse of the liquid phase
loaded with sodium hydroxide coming from the leaching
step 2040 and from the washing of the white mud 2072
cannot in this case be carried out by recirculation in
the Bayer liquor.
4. Other advantages of the method according to the
invention
As indicated above, the method according to the
invention has numerous advantages. Its main advantage is
to allow the implementation, in the context of the Bayer
process, of the bauxites with a low Al/Si ratio that
cannot be used according to the prior art, or only with a
low yield, and with a production cost significantly
higher in comparison to the bauxites with a higher Al/Si
ratio.
Another advantage is that the preprocessing
according to the invention eliminates not only the
silicon, but also the quasi-totality of the organic
carbon and a large part of the sulfur naturally contained
in the bauxite. It is known that organic carbon
accumulates in the liquor of aluminate of soda and a part
can precipitate in the form of oxalate on the trihydrate.
It is known that in the desirable case in which the
concentration of oxalate in the Bayer liquor is low,
W02019/086792 43 PCT/FR2018/052678
there is greater latitude to adapt the parameters of the
step 2160 of decomposition (in particular the temperature,
the residence time and the rate of recycling of the seeds)
to the needs of obtaining a product with a particle size,
a distribution of the size of the particles and a shape
of crystallites that are controlled. Moreover, the yield
of this crystallization step is greater if the
concentration of oxalate in the Bayer liquor is low.
Another advantage is that the quantity of red mud is
reduced (up to 60%). This presents two advantages: in
terms of phase separation, and in terms of its ultimate
processing. More precisely, the method according to the
invention allows to reduce the quantity of red mud; it
does generate a new type of residue, the white mud, but
the sum of the white and red mud is reduced (up to 25%)
with respect to the red mud according to the conventional
Bayer process. In addition to the decrease in the
quantity of mud, it is observed that the red mud
generated in the method according to the invention shows
a better aptitude for decantation (because of the
transformation during the calcination (step 2010) of the
goethite into hematite), which allows to reduce the
quantity of flocculating agent added to the suspensions, for facilitating the management of the decantation
workshop, for reducing the cost of its maintenance, and
for reducing the consumption of electric energy.
Another advantage is the possible decrease in hard
deposits of aluminosilicates on the surfaces of the
various equipment used in the digestion (step 2120) and
downstream of the step of digestion; these hard deposits
tend to hinder the heat exchange and must be removed from
time to time in specific maintenance operations.
W02019/086792 44 PCT/FR2018/052678
Yet another advantage is that the residual iron and
silica content of the alumina obtained by the method
according to the invention is particularly low.
Another advantage, already mentioned above, is the
reduction in the quantity of water to be evaporated in
the step of evaporation of water (step 2210), which can
be eliminated in numerous cases. This significantly
contributes to saving energy.
The method according to the invention includes an
additional calcination step (step 2010) which consumes
thermal energy and sodium hydroxide. However, this sodium
hydroxide can be recycled for the most part in the Bayer
process and the energy consumption of the calcination
step is almost compensated for by the savings made in the
Bayer process.
The method according to the invention can be used
advantageously with a preprocessed bauxite obtained from
the natural bauxites having an A/S ratio between 1 and 8
and preferably between 1.5 and 7. Above a value of 7 or 8
the benefit in terms of additional alumina made available
by the method for preprocessing the bauxite by calcination and leaching becomes smaller, and the
advantage of the reduction in the consumption of sodium
hydroxide is more limited since there is less silica
capable of carrying away sodium hydroxide. This upper
threshold depends on certain technico-economic parameters
that can vary according to the economic data. For a value
of 1 the mineral resource is especially kaolinite, which
has other technical uses. Natural bauxites rarely have an
A/S ratio of less than approximately 2.5 or 2, and the
preferred lower limit of the method according to the
W02019/086792 45 PCT/FR2018/052678
invention is the use of a preprocessed bauxite obtained
from a natural bauxite having an A/S ratio equal to 2.
Examples
Example 1: Bauxite from Jiaokou
A powder of bauxite from Jiaokou (China), the
chemical analysis of which is described in detail in
table 1 below, was supplied.
Table 1 Chemical composition of the bauxite from Jiaokou A1 2 0 3 SiO 2 Fe203 TiO 2 MgO CaO K 20 Total Total C02 S
61.4 13.46 4.4 2.8 0.25 1.15 0.39 0.82 0.05
This raw ore contains a relatively large quantity of
alumina, but is also rich in silicon (low A/S ratio, of
approximately 4.6), and the silica is mainly present in
the form of kaolinite (88%), the rest (12%) being in the
form of muscovite.
Samples of 200g of this bauxite were calcined at
980°C or at 1030°C. The calcination was carried out in a
muffle kiln preheated to 200°C - 250°C, with a rise in
temperature as quickly as possible. The duration of
calcination was 30 minutes at the target temperature 0 (980 C or 1030 0 C). At the end of the calcination the
bauxite was cooled in a desiccator. Its chemical
composition was analyzed by X-ray fluorescence, its
structure by X-ray diffraction, its content of volatile
matter ("loss on ignition", abbreviated as LOI) by
weighing before and after heating to 1060 0 C.
W02019/086792 46 PCT/FR2018/052678
The leaching was carried out on a suspension at a
rate of 90g/L of calcined bauxite, with a solution of
pure sodium hydroxide at 100g/L of Na20, for a suspension
volume of 500mL. The suspension thus obtained was
maintained for one hour at 1000C, and was then filtered
on a Millipore membrane filter (5pm). The filtrate was
preserved in an oven at 900C; an aliquot was taken for
analysis. The leached bauxite was washed and dried.
Another leaching was tried on the bauxite calcined
at 9800C, with a solution of sodium hydroxide at 260g/L
of Na20.
Since the calcination of the bauxite at 9800C did
not allow to obtain a good desilication, the digestion
trials were only carried out with the bauxite calcined at
10300C. The calcined and leached bauxite was attacked at
2600C with a residence time of 40 min or of 60 min,
according to the following protocol:
(i) Rise in temperature 4 0 C/min until a first
plateau at 1750C, duration of the plateau 5 min;
(ii) Rise in temperature 1.5 0 C/min until a second
plateau at 2550C, duration of the plateau 5 min;
(iii) Rise in temperature 1°C/min until a third
plateau at 2600C, duration of the plateau 40 min or 60
min.
The attack aqueous phase was an industrial Bayer
liquor having the composition (in g/L):
Na 2 0 ctq = 238.0; A1 2 0 3 = 128.6; Wr = 0.540; Na20 cbte = 17.2; SiO 2 = 1.5; CaO = 0.001; Fe203 = 0.008; V 2 05 = 0.020; C org = 2.4; Density at 200C = 1.3777
(The designation "Na20 ctq" refers to the useful
("caustic") fraction of the sodium hydroxide, while the
designation "Na20 cbte" refers to the fraction of the
W02019/086792 47 PCT/FR2018/052678
Na 2 0 that corresponds to the carbonate ("cbte") residues;
this distinction is possible by analyzing the liquid
phase by pH-metric titration according to a method known
to a person skilled in the art).
The silicon was precipitated by addition of milk of
lime; the quantity of lime added varied between 2.5% and
4%. This is described in greater detail in example 2
below.
The load of bauxite was adjusted to obtain a value
of WR (alumina / sodium hydroxide ratio) at the end of
the attack that varied between 1.00 and 1.28.
Example 2: Desilication trials
Various desilication trials were carried out,
according to two approaches:
In a first series of trials various raw materials of
lime allowing to purify the leachate (i.e. to precipitate
the silica) were tested, and in a second series of trials
the effectiveness of the purification according to the
concentration of the leachate was tested.
a) Trials on the raw material of lime (comparison solid
lime and milk of lime)
The precipitation of the silica was carried out with
milk of lime at 100g/L of CaO and with solid CaO, at a
temperature of 1000C for 2 hours. The milk of lime was
prepared with stirring at 700C for 90 min then at 850C
for 60 min.
After precipitation and filtration, the filtrate was
analyzed (SiO 2 , CaO and A1 2 0 3 ) and the filter cake was
characterized by chemical analyses (SiO 2 , CaO and A1 2 0 3 ), X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
W02019/086792 48 PCT/FR2018/052678
The precipitation of the silica was carried out on a
volume of 300ml of the solution of first hot filtration
of the trial of leaching a Wanji bauxite calcined at
10200C. Thus, two trials were carried out, one for the
5 precipitation with the milk of lime and the other for the
precipitation with solid lime.
Two preliminary analyses on a leaching solution
showed that the concentration of SiO 2 was 5.79 and
6.10g/L, or an average content of 5.96g/L ([Si] = 0.1M/L).
10 Thus, for a Ca/Si stoichiometry of 1.2, 2.03g of solid
CaO or 20ml of milk of lime must be introduced into the
volume of 300ml of leaching solution.
However, a slightly greater quantity, of 2.53g of
solid lime and of 25ml of milk of lime, was used, which
15 corresponds to a stoichiometry of approximately 1.5.
The results of the analyses in terms of Si0 2 , A1 2 0 3 and CaO, of the solutions before and after precipitation
and of the precipitates, are recorded in table 2 and the
rates of precipitation of Si0 2 and A1 2 0 3 appear in table 3.
20 It is deduced therefrom that the milk of lime
precipitates the silica better (87%) than the solid lime
(74%), but it also precipitates a little more aluminum
(49% instead of 37% for solid CaO). It is also noted that
the milk of lime hardly affects the calcium content of
25 the solution.
Table 2 Analyses of the solutions and of the precipitates of the trials of precipitation of the silica with solid lime and 30 milk of lime; Wanji bauxite calcined at 10200C. Leaching solution Precipitation Precipitate [%] Precipitation
[g/L] filtrate [g/L] with SiO 2 A1 2 0 3 CaO SiO 2 A1 20 3 CaO SiO 2 A1 2 0 3 CaO Solid lime 5.794 1.849 0.012 1.528 1.117 0.035 26.49 3.76 39.05
W02019/086792 49 PCT/FR2018/052678
Milk of lime 6.081 1.830 10.015 10.782 10.937 10.011 126.76 14.03 142.39
Table 3 Rate of precipitation of SiO2 and A1 2 0 3 with solid CaO and the milk of lime, using the solutions for leaching of the 5 Wanji bauxite calcined at 1020°C. ,rcpt o Rate of Precipitation precipitation
% with SiO 2 A1 2 0 3 Solid CaO 74 37 Milk of lime 87 49
The characterization of the precipitates by X-ray
diffraction shows that they are composed of the same
crystallized phases, the tobermorite formed during the
10 precipitation of Si by the portlandite, and the calcite
that was already present in the lime used.
The observations and microanalyses carried out with
the SEM (cf. table 4 below) indicate that the tobermorite
is substituted by Al, Na and sometimes Mg, and that it is
15 in the form of aggregates of particles with a flaky
appearance that recall C-S-Hs (Calcium Silicate Hydrates).
Table 4 Analyses of the lime and of the milk of lime with the SEM Elements Precipitation with
[mass %] Solid lime Milk of lime Na20 3.53 1.21 MgO 0.65 0.83 A1 2 0 3 4.36 3.97 Si0 2 24.66 20.57 CaO 30.48 30.24 20
After leaching, the precipitation of the silica
placed in solution is more effective with the milk of
W02019/086792 50 PCT/FR2018/052678
lime than with the solid lime. A greater insolubilization
of the sodium hydroxide with the solid lime is noted.
b) Trials on the concentration of lime
To define the optimal concentration for the
desilication of the leachates two concentrations were
tested. These trials were carried out using the liquors
from leachings of the Jiaokou bauxite calcined at 1030°C,
as was described in example 1 above.
The precipitation of the silica was carried out with
milk of lime at 100g/L of CaO (lime coming from a Chinese
factory) at a temperature of 980C for 2 hours. Table 5
below indicates the chemical composition of this lime.
Table 5 Chemical analysis of the lime used to manufacture the milk of lime (in mass %) A1 2 0 3 TiO 2 Fe203 SiO 2 CaO Na20 Loss on Total ignition 1.50 0.06 0.50 1.64 90.71 0.03 5.80 100.26
The trials were carried out with a load of CaO
corresponding to 110% of the SiO 2 +Al 20 3 stoichiometry. The
analyses and methods used were the following:
- Mud: LOI, A1 2 0 3 , TiO 2 , Fe203, CaO, SiO 2 , Na20, total
carbon and XRD
- Liquors: MetrohmTM Thermogravimetry, complete ICP,
complete chromatography and Ph6nix Tm (organic carbon,
mineral carbon).
The conditions of the trials are summarized in table
6 below. Table 7 indicates the result of the chemical
analysis of the liquor before desilication, table 8
indicates the result of the chemical analysis of the
W02019/086792 51 PCT/FR2018/052678
liquor after desilication. Table 9 gives information on
the yield of precipitation of the silica and of the
alumina.
Table 6 Operating conditions of the trials of desilication of the liquor for leaching the Jiaokou bauxite calcined at 10300C Desilication 980C Temperature Trial N° 1 2 3(*) 4(*) Na20 ctq g/l 96.1 96.1 48.05 48.05 Volume Leachate ml 150 150 75 75 Density Leachate 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Mass Leachate g 168.9 168.9 84.5 84.5 Mass water g 0 0 75 75 Lime g 2.053 2.053 1.027 1.027 Water of the milk of lime g 18.6 18.6 9.3 9.3 Mass suspension input g 189.6 189.6 169.8 169.8 (*) Tests 3 and 4 were carried out with a leachate diluted by half.
Table 7 Analysis of the liquors used for the desilication Trial N° 1 2 3 4 Na20 ctq g/l 93.23 93.23 46.62 46.62 A1 2 0 3 g/l 7.66 7.66 3.83 3.83 Na20 cbte g/l 1.52 1.52 0.76 0.76 Na20 cbte % 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 SiO 2 g/l 7.81 7.81 3.91 3.91 CaO g/l 0.005 0.005 0.003 0.003 Fe203 g/l 0.005 0.005 0.003 0.003 V 2 05 g/l 0.08 0.080 0.04 0.04 Na20 total g 14.21 14.21 7.11 7.11 A1 2 0 3 in the liquor g 1.15 1.15 0.57 0.57 SiO 2 in liquor g 1.17 1.17 0.59 0.59
Table 8 Analysis of the liquors after desilication
W02019/086792 52 PCT/FR2018/052678
Trial N0 1 2 3 4 Mass of liquor g 186.29 186.18 168.38 168.18 calculated Density 1.104 1.118 1.062 1.061 Volume of liquor ml 168.80 166.51 158.56 158.55 Na20 ctq g/l 91.70 95.25 48.04 47.90 A1 2 0 3 g/l 0.00 0.13 0.51 0.19 Na20 cbte g/l 2.70 2.86 1.83 1.59 Na20 cbte % 2.86 2.92 3.67 3.21 SiO 2 g/l 0.64 0.82 0.94 0.56 CaO g/l 0.018 0.018 0.014 0.015 Fe203 g/l 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 V 2 05 g/l 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 Wr liq 0.000 0.001 0.011 0.004
Table 9 Yields of precipitation of the silica and of the alumina
Precipitation with Precipitation milk of lime rate [%] Al SiO 2 A1 20 3 Leaching at 96g/L 90 99 a20 Leaching at 48g/L 80 90 Na20
It is observed that the reduction by half of the
concentration of the leachate makes the rate of
precipitation of the silica drop by 10%. It is also noted
that the milk of lime hardly affects the CaO content of
the solution.
Table 10 below presents the analysis of the
precipitated silicate (white mud).
Table 10 Analysis of the precipitated silicate Trial N 1 2 3 4 Mass of mud weighed g 3.28 3.39 1.41 1.61 Loss on ignition % 18.90 18.90 19.90 19.90 A1 2 0 3 % 2.5 2.5 2.1 2.1 SiO 2 % 31.96 31.96 30.16 30.16
W02019/086792 53 PCT/FR2018/052678
Fe203 % 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 TiO 2 % 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 Na20 % 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 CaO % 44.28 44.28 43.95 43.95 Total % 98.14 98.14 96.50 96.50 CaO/SiO2 % 1.39 1.39 1.46 1.46 Na 2 0/SiO 2 % 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 Calculated introduced CaO % 55.10 55.10 72.39 72.39 A1 2 0 3 in the mud g 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.03 Na20 in the mud g 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 SiO2 in the mud g 1.048 1.083 0.425 0.486
The X-ray diffractogram shows that the precipitated
silicate phase obtained is tobermorite [Ca 5 Si 6 Oi 6 (OH) 2 x 4
H 2 0] (ML=702). Excess portlandite and calcite are also
found.
The precipitation rate is between 87 and 90%, for
the precipitation with milk of lime, and 74% when solid
lime is used. The insolubilization of the sodium
hydroxide is estimated at 0.0017 points per point of
silica dissolved.
Example 3: Bauxite from Xiao Yi
A powder of bauxite from Xiao Yi (Shanxi, China),
the chemical analysis of which is described in detail in
table 11 below, was supplied.
Table 11 Composition of the bauxite from Xiao Yi A1 2 0 3 SiO 2 Fe203 TiO 2 MgO CaO K 20 Total Total F C02 S 51.59 19.27 8.24 2.67 0.15 0.33 0.38 0.5 0.05 0.1
This raw ore has a composition substantially
different from that of the bauxite from Jiaokou. In
particular, its aluminum content is lower, and its
W02019/086792 54 PCT/FR2018/052678
silicon content is greater: the A/S ratio is very low,
approximately 2.7; the silica is mainly present in the
form of kaolinite. This is a bauxite qualified as "low
grade", the introduction of which into the methods
according to the prior art is avoided. Therefore, it
forms an excellent challenge for the method according to
the invention.
Calcination and leaching: operating conditions
Samples of ore of 30g were placed in crucibles made
of silica; the latter were introduced into a muffle kiln
at 10200C into a muffle kiln with a residence time of 30
min. After calcination the samples were taken out of the
kiln and left to cool in the ambient air; they were then
weighed.
The calcined bauxite was then leached at 1000C for
45 min in a solution at 100g/L of Na20 (corresponding to
130g/L of NaOH), with a solid concentration of 80g/L.
This leaching was carried out in a jacketed reactor
heated with a thermostated oil bath.
After leaching the suspension was filtered on a slow
filter paper (ref. Whatman 589/3) in a Bichner funnel
mounted on a flask connected to a vacuum pump. A first
filtration was carried out while hot, then two other
filtrations were carried out after repulping of the cake
with demineralized water at ambient temperature. The cake
from the second filtration was washed on a filter with
ethanol.
The raw ore, the calcined bauxite and the leaching
residue were characterized by chemical analyses, X-ray
diffraction (XRD), infrared spectroscopy (DRIFTS) and
scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Moreover, for the
W02019/086792 55 PCT/FR2018/052678
bauxite from Xiao Yi (Shanxi), a thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA) coupled with differential thermal analysis
(DTA) was carried out on the raw ore.
Results after the calcination and the leaching
The characterization by X-ray diffraction showed
that the crystallized phases of the starting bauxite are
in order of decreasing importance: diaspore (AlO(OH)),
kaolinite (Al2 Si 2 O 5 (OH)4 ), magnetite (Fe304), anatase
(TiO2 ), rutile (TiO2 ), hematite (Fe203), goethite
(FeO(OH)), quartz (SiO2 ), a mica (illite, muscovite
(A120 3 AlO1 0 (OH) 2 K), calcite (CaC03), palygorskite
(MgAl) 4 Si 8 O 2 o (OH) 2 -8H 2 0. In this ore the high silica
content thus comes substantially from the kaolinite and
secondarily from the quartz and other phyllosilicates
(micas, palygorskite).
The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) coupled with
the differential thermal analysis (DTA) substantially
shows the dehydroxylation of the diaspore and of the
kaolinite (see figures 3 and 4). At around 9000C an
aspect of the curve was observed that suggests the
hypothesis of the crystallization of a neoformed compound
that could be mullite. These results lead the inventors
to set the temperature of calcination to 1020°C.
After calcination of the bauxite from Xiao Yi at
this temperature of 10200C, the characterization by XRD
now only revealed the presence of corundum (c'-Al 2 0 3 ), of magnetite, of hematite, of anatase, of rutile and of
quartz. Via IR spectroscopy it is noted that all the
signals relative to the kaolinite disappear and
consequently, the planetary tetrahedral structure also:
W02019/086792 56 PCT/FR2018/052678
only a highly distributed signal corresponding to
amorphous silica remains of it.
The mass loss during the calcination at 10200C of
the bauxite from Xiao Yi, measured with very good
reproductivity over a plurality of trials, was 14.02%, as
shown in table 12 below.
Table 12 Mass loss by calcination at 10200C Crucib 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Tota le N 1 1
Mass. 30.8 31.0 31.5 30.0 32.9 29.1 30.6 246. bauxit 3 7 8 9 30.1 8 7 4 47 e [g] Calcin ed 26.5 6.71 27.1 25.9 25.8 28.3 25.1 26.3 211. mass 2 9 3 4 7 92
[g] Mass 14.0 14.0 14.1 13.9 13.9 14.0 13.9 13.9 14.0 loss 5 3 1 3 9 9 6 5 2
[%]
Tests of leaching of the calcined mineral in a sodic
solution were carried out under the operating conditions
defined at the beginning of this paragraph. During this
experiment, the mass percentages of dissolution observed
were between 16.8% and 17.8%. The results are gathered
together in table 13 below.
Table 13 Mass percentages of dissolution of the trials of leaching of the bauxite from Xiao Yi Trial N° 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mass calcined bauxite 32 24 152
[g] Mass filter cake [g] 26.6 26.5 26.4 26.3 19.8 125.6 Mass percentage of 16.8 17.2 17.5 17.8 17.5 17.36 dissolution [%]
W02019/086792 57 PCT/FR2018/052678
The percentage of desilication is 74.2%.
The mineralogical characterization by XRD of the
bauxite after leaching reveals the presence of the same
5 crystallized phases as before leaching namely: corundum
(oa-Al2 0 3 ), magnetite, hematite, anatase, rutile and
quartz. However, the IR spectrum indicates that the
product has become globally very hydrophilic, which is
favorable to its suspension, and that the signals
10 relative to the Si-O elongations have considerably
decreased in intensity, which agrees with a dissolution
of the silicate phases.
Table 14 below compares the chemical analyses of the
original bauxite, after calcination and after leaching:
15
Table 14 Chemical analysis of the raw, calcined and calcined leached ("preprocessed") bauxite
A1 2 0 3 SiO 2 Fe 2 0 3 TiO 2 MgO CaO K 20 Na 2 0 Total Total F LOI A/S
[%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] C02 S [%] [%]
Bauxite [%] [%]
raw 51.59 19.27 8.24 2.67 0.15 0.33 0.38 0.03 0.5 0.05 0.1 13.69 2.7
calcined 59.46 22.66 9.97 3.1 0.17 0.38 0.45 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.33 2.6
Leached 71.51 7.08 11.55 3.74 0.2 0.48 0.08 1.85 0.33 0.03 0.07 2.16 10.1
"LOI" refers to the (mass) loss on ignition, "A/S" refers to the alumina to silica mass ratio.
20 The transformation of the ore after processing is
clearly observed: the alumina content goes from 51.59% to
71.51% and the alumina/silica ratio goes from 2.7 to 10.1.
This shows that the method according to the invention is
capable of transforming a "low-grade" bauxite into a
25 good-quality bauxite.
W02019/086792 58 PCT/FR2018/052678
Attack (digestion) of the bauxite from Xiao Yi carried
out under industrial operating conditions
The leached bauxite was ground (all undersize at
300pm) and dried in an oven at 1100C. The attack was
carried out in a 150-ml autoclave brought to 2600C for 40
min. The chemical composition of the attack liquor was
very close to that of the Chinese industrial liquors
mainly: Na20 ctq = 238g/L, WR = 0.540 and Na20 cbte =
17.2g/L.
The lime added to the attack came from a Chinese
alumina factory; it contains 86.02% CaO. The lime was
slaked and was added in the form of milk. Various
quantities of lime were tried.
At the end of the attack, the suspension was
filtered. The solid was washed and prepared for chemical
and crystallographic analyses (loss on ignition, X-ray
fluorescence and X-ray diffraction). The liquor was
analyzed with a Methrom (Na20, A1 2 0 3 , carbonate) .
The main results are reported in table 15 below.
Table 15 Results of the trials of attack of the bauxite from Xiao Yi on raw ore and ore processed by the method according to the invention (calcination and leaching) Raw bauxite Calcined and leached bauxite (invention) Trial N° 351-7 351-8 360-1 360-2 360-3 360-4 Bauxite analysis Loss on ignition 13.4 13.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
[%] A1 2 0 3
[%] 53.7 53.7 71.5 71.5 71.5 71.5 SiO 2 [%] 19 19 6.92 6.92 6.92 6.92 Fe203 [%] 8.8 8.8 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 Na20 [%] 0.05 0.05 1.44 1.44 1.44 1.44 A/S 2.8 2.8 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 Attack
W02019/086792 59 PCT/FR2018/052678
conditions Temperature [°C] 260 260 260 260 260 260 Time [min] 40 40 40 40 40 40 CaO added 9.2 9.1 5.7 7.9 5.9 7.5 (calculated)[%] WR attack liquor 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 Na20 ctq [g/L] 238 238 238 238 238 238 Na20 cbte [% 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 total] Target WR 1.2 1.2 1.11 1.11 1.212 1.212 WR calculated on 1.19 1.184 1.061 1.085 1.106 1.164 the solid Analysis of the mud Loss on ignition 10.2 10.1 7.2 8.2 6.4 8
[%] A1203 [%] 24.8 25.2 25.3 20.1 32 23.2 SiO 2 [%] 23.5 23.4 13.74 14.2 12.57 13.35 Fe203 [%] 10.5 10.7 24.3 25 22.3 25.1 Na20 [%] 13.5 13.4 8.33 7.71 7.57 7.28 Attack yield on A1 2 0 3 - SiO 2 96.6 95.8 91.06 95.56 83.63 92.47
[%] on total A1 2 0 3 61.6 61.5 82.32 86.34 75.65 83.98
[%] The abbreviation WR means: "weight ratio".
Certain analytical results have slight differences
with respect to the table above. This results from
measurements made by different laboratories in order to
confirm the validity of the method.
It is substantially observed that the alumina
contained in the bauxite calcined at 10200C then leached
in a sodic medium is soluble in the operating conditions
of the Chinese factories at high temperature with
absolutely acceptable extraction yields that confirm the
interest of the method according to the invention. This
result clearly shows that the corundum is soluble in a
sodic medium at high temperature according to its degree
of crystallization and its particle size distribution.
W02019/086792 60 PCT/FR2018/052678
The dispersion noted is without a doubt partly
related to the difference in quantity of lime added to
the attack. This important parameter has an influence on
the yield, the curves of yield according to the alumina
/ caustic soda weight ratio, and the quantity of insoluble
sodium hydroxide.
These results allowed to estimate the specific
consumptions of the method according to the invention for
this bauxite.
Table 16 Specific consumptions of a Bayer process according to the prior art and of a Bayer process according to the invention implementing the technology of calcination leaching Material Unit According to According the prior to the art invention Raw materials and energy Bauxite Tonne per tonne 3.46 2.61 A1 2 0 3 produced Total CaO Tonne per tonne 0.361 0.81 A1 2 0 3 produced Total NaOH Tonne per tonne 0.49 0.148 A1 2 0 3 produced Total GJ per tonne A1 2 0 3 11 11.4 energy produced Byproducts Red mud Tonne per tonne 3.04 1.063 A1 2 0 3 produced White mud Tonne per tonne 0 1.24 A1 2 0 3 produced Total mud Tonne per tonne 3.04 2.303 A1 2 0 3 produced
This example shows several advantages of the
invention. It is clear that the method according to the
invention leads to a better use of the bauxites with a
low aluminum content and high silicon content. A very
W02019/086792 61 PCT/FR2018/052678
significant reduction in the quantity of residues of the
red mud type and a significant reduction in the overall
quantity of residues are also observed (it is noted that
the precipitation of the silicates, absent in the Bayer
process according to the prior art, generates its own
residue, of a white color, but in the method according to
the invention the sum of the two residues is
significantly less than the red mud according to the
prior art). Given that the residues represent a cost
factor, this environmental aspect represents linked to
the residues of the method represents a very attractive
advantage for operators; the financial value of this
advantage is difficult to evaluate globally since it
depends on numerous factors related to the factory.
Example 4: Trials of digestion of the bauxite from Xiao
Yi, preprocessed by the method of calcination - leaching
according to the invention, with a low concentration of
sodium hydroxide
On the basis of the excellent results of example 3,
the inventors sought to further improve their method.
Given that the method for preprocessing the bauxite
(roast-leach method) greatly reduces the mass of bauxite
at the input of the Bayer process and thus of the red mud
at the output (with a constant mass of alumina produced)
one might think that the washing of the mud would be more
efficient in the context of the method according to the
invention. If an identical washing efficiency is
preserved the quantity of clear water for washing of the
mud can thus be lowered, which allows to reduce the total
quantity of water to be evaporated in the context of the
Bayer process. Thus the energy consumption at this stage
W02019/086792 62 PCT/FR2018/052678
of the method is greatly reduced. Indeed, in the Bayer
process, the reduction in the evaporation is necessarily
accompanied by a reduction in the concentration of
caustic soda in the liquor used for the digestion. The
inventors thus carried out digestion trials on the
leached bauxite from Xiao Yi at a concentration of Na 2 0 ctq of 171.5g/L which represents a significant reduction
with respect to the first trials (Example 3) carried out
with a concentration of 238g/L. The concentration of
171.5g/L of Na20 ctq corresponds to a Bayer unit (called
a "refinery" in the profession) that would function
without evaporators.
In the present example 4 the bauxite from Xiao Yi
used in example 3 was processed by the same method as
that described in example 3, but its digestion in the
Bayer process was carried out at a reduced concentration
of sodium hydroxide: the concentration of Na20 ctq was
lowered from 238g/L to 171.5g/L. The results are gathered
together in table 17 below.
Table 17 Results of the digestion, at a low concentration of sodium hydroxide, of the leached bauxite from Xiao Yi Raw bauxite Calcined and leached bauxite (invention) Trial N° 351-7 351-8 LOMB3 LOMB4 Bauxite analysis Loss on ignition 13.4 13.4 1.30 1.30
[%] A1 2 0 3
[%] 53.7 53.7 71.50 71.50 SiO 2 [%] 19 19 6.92 6.92 Fe203 [%] 8.8 8.8 12.20 12.20 Na20 [%] 0.05 0.05 1.44 1.44 A/S 2.8 2.8 10.3 10.3 Attack conditions Temperature [°C] 260 260 260 260
W02019/086792 63 PCT/FR2018/052678
Time [min] 40 40 40 40 CaO added 9.2 9.1 8 10.4 (calculated)[%] WR attack liquor 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 Na20 ctq [g/L] 238 238 171.5 171.5 Na20 cbte [% 6.7 6.7 7 7 total] Target WR 1.2 1.2 1.118 1.116 Analysis of the mud Loss on ignition 10.2 10.1 8.1 9 .3
[%] A1 2 0 3[%] 24.8 25.2 16.6 16.5 SiO 2 [%] 23.5 23.4 13.3 12.7 Fe203 [%] 10.5 10.7 22.4 20.5 Na 2 0 [%] 13.5 13.4 7.43 6.68 Attack yield on A1 2 0 3 - SiO 2 [%] 96.6 95.8 97.2 96.6 on total A1 2 0 3 [%] 61.6 61.5 87.5 86.5
It is noted that the yield of solubilization of the
alumina remains very high despite a considerable decrease
in the concentration of caustic soda in the attack liquor.
This result of interest will allow to greatly reduce
the energy consumption and the operating costs of the
alumina refineries that use the technology according to
the invention.
Example 5: Bauxite from Wanji (Henan)
Bauxite from Wanji (Henan province) was supplied.
The calcination and leaching trials as well as the
physico-chemical analyses were carried out under the same
conditions as for the bauxite from Xiao Yi (example 3).
The essential difference between the two ores comes from
the form of the silica in the bauxite. For the ore from
Wanji the characterization by X-ray diffraction indicates
the following crystallized phases:
W02019/086792 64 PCT/FR2018/052678
Diaspore (AlO (OH)), muscovite ( (K1 -, Nax) (Al 2 -yFey)
(AlSi3 ) (01 o (OH) 2 ), kaolinite (Al 2 Si 2 O5(OH) 4 ), quartz (SiO2),
siderite (FeCO3), goethite (FeO(OH)), hematite (Fe203)
, magnetite (Fe 3 04), anatase and rutile (TiO2 )• The SiO 2 content thus comes substantially from the
muscovite and from the quartz, secondarily from the
kaolinite.
The analyses of the raw, calcined (10200C) and
leached bauxite are reported in table 18 below:
Table 18 Chemical analyses of the bauxite from Wanji before and after processing Elemen A1 20 SiO 2 Fe 2 0 TiO MgO CaO K 20 Na 2 0 Tot Tot F Li L.0. A/ ts 3 % 3 2 % % % % al al % pp I. S % % % C02 S m
% Raw 50. 12. 17. 2.8 0.4 0.2 2.3 0.0 4.0 0.6 0.1 18 13.1 4. bauxit 92 58 62 3 2 3 9 31 8 9 7 4 1 0 e Calcin 59. 14. 20. 3.2 0.4 0.2 2.7 0.0 <0. 0.0 0.0 20 0.2 4. ed 51 29 33 6 8 6 4 37 01 8 7 2 2 bauxit e "Leach 62. 8.5 21. 3.6 0.5 0.2 2.5 0.0 <0. 0.0 0.0 10 0.39 7. ed" 35 8 55 3 6 6 33 01 8 7 0 3 bauxit e
After calcination, the characterization by X-ray
diffraction reveals the disappearance of the kaolinite,
the transformation of the diaspore into corundum (a
A1 2 0 3 ), of the siderite and of the goethite into hematite.
The other phases, muscovite (residual structure), quartz,
magnetite, anatase and rutile are still present. The
detection limit of this X-ray characterization is less
than 1% by mass.
W02019/086792 65 PCT/FR2018/052678
The leaching in a sodic medium allows to lower the
SiO2 content from 12.58 to 8.58% or a decrease of 4
points, and a change of the alumina/silica ratio from 4.0
to 7.3 (cf. table Z2 above).
The difference observed with the ore from Xiao Yi
(reduction of 12 points of the silica content) comes from
the fact that in the latter ore the SiO 2 content comes
substantially from the kaolinite whereas in the bauxite
from Wanji it comes from the muscovite which is thus
difficult to leach even after calcination.
Nevertheless the digestion tests carried out show a
reduction of 60% in the consumption of sodium hydroxide
and of 25% in the consumption of bauxite per ton of
alumina.
Example 6: Bauxite from Shanxi
Another bauxite from Shanxi (China) was supplied. It
has an alumina/silica ratio of 1.94. The analysis by X
ray diffraction indicates that it is a diasporic bauxite,
the silicates of which consist substantially of kaolinite,
a small proportion of muscovite, and quartz. The iron is
present substantially in the form of goethite.
This bauxite was calcined for 30 minutes at 1030°C.
The leaching of this calcined bauxite was carried out at
1000C with sodium hydroxide at 100g Na20 / liter for 45
minutes.
The analyses of the raw, calcined (10300C) and
leached bauxite are reported in table 19 below:
Table 19 Chemical analyses of the bauxite from Shanxi before and after processing
W02019/086792 66 PCT/FR2018/052678
Elements A1 2 0 3 SiO 2 Fe 2 0 3 TiO 2 MgO CaO K 20 Na 20 Cr203 MnO P 20S V 20S ZrO 2 L.O.I. A/S
Raw 53.80 27.75 2.20 2.52 0.24 0.35 0.46 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.15 0.05 0.07 13.80 1.94 bauxite
Calcined 61.50 31.30 2.50 2.92 0.22 0.44 0.49 0.07 0.04 0.01 0.18 0.06 0.08 0.10 1.96 bauxite
Leached 73.80 14.49 3.20 3.71 0.35 0.54 0.16 1.18 0.07 0.02 0.12 0.04 0.11 2.20 5.09 bauxite
After calcination, the characterization by X-ray
diffraction reveals the disappearance of the kaolinite,
and the appearance of a siliceous phase, mullite. A bulge
5 in the diffractogram is observed in a 20 zone between 180
and 200, translating the formation of a poorly
crystallized silica phase. The diaspore has disappeared.
The corundum is present. The goethite was transformed
into hematite.
10 After leaching, the characterization by X-ray
diffraction shows that the mullite is still present. The
bulge in the diffractogram has disappeared. Most of the
amorphous silica has dissolved. The corundum, hematite,
rutile and anatase phases are still present.
15 The leaching of the calcined ore in a sodic medium
allowed to the SiO 2 content from 27.75% to 14.49% or an
increase in the alumina/silica ratio from 1.94 to 5.06.
The desilication yield rises to 62.9%. The incorporation
of sodium hydroxide is 0.98%.
Throughout this specification and claims which follow,
unless the context requires otherwise, the word "comprise",
and variations such as "comprises" and "comprising", will
be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer
or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion
of any other integer or step or group of integers or steps.
The reference in this specification to any prior
publication (or information derived from it), or to any
matter which is known, is not, and should not be taken as
an acknowledgment or admission or any form of suggestion
that that prior publication (or information derived from
it) or known matter forms part of the common general
knowledge in the field of endeavour to which this
specification relates.

Claims (13)

THE CLAIMS DEFINING THE INVENTION ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Method for manufacturing alumina trihydrate or alumina from a bauxite preprocessed by a method comprising a calcination and a leaching, wherein said preprocessed bauxite has a loss on ignition of less than 2.5% by mass, said method comprising the steps of: (a) Processing (called "digestion") the preprocessed bauxite with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide at a temperature of at least 1000C, said aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide having a concentration of between 100g Na20/L and 220g Na20/L;
(b) Separating the solid residue from the liquid phase; (c) Crystallizing the aluminum trihydrate by addition of seeds ; (d) Separating the crystallized aluminum trihydrate from the liquid phase; (e) optionally, calcining the aluminum trihydrate obtained in step (d) to obtain the alumina.
2. Method according to claim 1, wherein the temperature in step (a) is between 150°C and 350°C.
3. Method according to claims 1 or 2, wherein said preprocessed bauxite has a mass ratio of A1 2 0 3 / Si0 2
greater than 8
4. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein said preprocessed bauxite has a mass content of alumina greater than 60%.
5. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said preprocessed bauxite has a mass content of silica of less than 12%.
6. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said preprocessed bauxite has a loss on ignition of less than 2%, a mass percentage of diaspore of less than 3%, and a mass percentage of kaolinite of less than 3.
7. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the liquid phase coming from step (d) is reintroduced into the aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide used in step (a).
8. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said preprocessed bauxite has been preprocessed by leaching with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide.
9. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein said preprocessed bauxite has been preprocessed by calcination at a temperature between 9200C and 11200C..
10. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, comprising the following steps: (i) Preprocessing a bauxite to obtain said preprocessed bauxite, said preprocessing successively comprising: - a calcination ,
- a leaching with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, - the separation of the solid from the leaching aqueous phase, said separated solid representing said preprocessed bauxite, (ii) Processing said preprocessed bauxite by the method according to any one of claims 1 to 9.
11. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein
said bauxite has before preprocessing a ratio of A1 2 0 3
/ SiO 2 between 1 and 7.
12. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein: - said preprocessed bauxite has a loss on ignition of
less than 2.0% by mass, and even more preferably less than
1.5; and/or
- said aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide has a
concentration of between 140g Na20/L and 200g Na20/L, more
preferably between 155g Na20/L and 190g Na20/L, and even
more preferably between 160g Na20/L and 180g Na20/L; and/or
- the temperature in step (a) is between 200°C and 300°C,
more preferably between 2200C and 2800C, and even more
preferably between 2500C and 2700C; and/or
- said preprocessed bauxite has a mass ratio of A1 2 0 3
/ SiO 2 greater than 9, and even more preferably greater than 10; and/or
- said preprocessed bauxite has a mass content of
alumina greater than 65%, and even more preferably greater
than 70%; and/or
- said preprocessed bauxite has a mass content of silica
of less than 10%, and even more preferably less than 8%;
and/or
- said preprocessed bauxite has a loss on ignition of
less than 2%, a mass percentage of diaspore of less than
2% and a mass percentage of kaolinite of less than 2%, and
even more preferably a loss on ignition of less than 1.5%,
a mass percentage of diaspore of less than 1%, and a mass
percentage of kaolinite of less than 2%; and/or
- said preprocessed bauxite has been preprocessed by calcination at a temperature between 9500C and 10700C, and even more preferably between 10000C and 10500C; and/or
- said bauxite has before preprocessing a ratio of A1 2 0 3
/ SiO 2 between 1 and 5.5, even more preferably between 1
and 4, and most preferably between 1 and 3.
12. Facility for the implementation of the method
according to any one of claims 10 or 11, comprising:
- a unit for preprocessing the bauxite by calcination and
leaching, allowing to transform a bauxite into
preprocessed bauxite; and
- a unit for manufacturing alumina from said preprocessed
bauxite for the implementation of the method according to
any one of claims 1 to 9,
wherein:
- said preprocessing unit comprises
-- at least one calcination furnace for calcining the
bauxite,
-- at least one leaching unit for leaching the calcined
bauxite with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide
(called "leaching solution"), and
-- at least one unit for solid - liquid separation for
separating the calcined and leached bauxite from said
leaching solution; - said unit for manufacturing alumina from said
preprocessed bauxite comprises
-- at least one chamber for processing the preprocessed
bauxite with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide
(called "Bayer liquor") at a temperature of at least 1000C,
-- at least one unit for solid - liquid separation for
separating the solid residue from said Bayer liquor;
-- at least one crystallization unit for crystallizing
aluminum trihydrate from said Bayer liquor by addition of
seeds of aluminum trihydrate;
-- at least one unit for solid - liquid separation for
separating the crystallized aluminum trihydrate from said
Bayer liquor;
-- optionally at least one calcination unit for
transforming said aluminum trihydrate into alumina.
13. Facility according to claim 12, wherein said Bayer
liquor coming from said unit for solid - liquid separation
for separating the crystallized aluminum trihydrate from
said Bayer liquor is recirculated to the digestion step.
Bauxite
1100 1102 1222 Grinding Lime 1110 1220 NaOH / H2O 1120 Digestion (pressure, temperature)
1124 Expansion
1150 Dilution
L 1142 1130 1140 Decantation and filtration S Red mud Washing with water of the suspension
L 1170 1210 Crystallization of the Evaporation H2O 1160 Seeds of trihydrate trihydrate
1180 1190 Filtration of the S Aluminum suspension trihydrate
L 1191 1200 Washing NaOH / H2O 1192 Drying
1194 Calcination
1196 Alumina
Figure 1
Bauxite
2000 2004 2010 Water 2002 Grinding Filtration Calcination S 2030 2020 Leaching NaOH / H2O
2040 2050 2052 Decantation of the Precipitation of Lime suspension the silicates
2060 2070 Decantation of S White mud S the suspension
2080 2072 NaOH / H2O Washing with water
2110 L 2220 NaOH / H2O
2120 2122 Digestion (pressure, temperature) Lime
2124 2126 Expansion Dilution 2150 L 2140 2130 2140 Washing Decantation of S Red mud with water 2210 the suspension Evaporation H2O L 2150 Dilution H2O
2160 Crystallization of Seeds of 2170 the trihydrate trihydrate
2180 2190 Decantation and filtration S Aluminum of the suspension trihydrate
L 2192 Drying 2200 NaOH / H2O 2194 Calcination
2196 Alumina
Figure 2
AU2018359800A 2017-10-31 2018-10-29 Method for processing bauxite Active AU2018359800B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2024203245A AU2024203245A1 (en) 2017-10-31 2024-05-15 Method for processing bauxite

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1760259 2017-10-31
FR1760259A FR3072956B1 (en) 2017-10-31 2017-10-31 BAUXITE TREATMENT PROCESS
PCT/FR2018/052678 WO2019086792A1 (en) 2017-10-31 2018-10-29 Method for processing bauxite

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2024203245A Division AU2024203245A1 (en) 2017-10-31 2024-05-15 Method for processing bauxite

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2018359800A1 AU2018359800A1 (en) 2020-04-30
AU2018359800B2 true AU2018359800B2 (en) 2024-06-13

Family

ID=62143233

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2018359800A Active AU2018359800B2 (en) 2017-10-31 2018-10-29 Method for processing bauxite
AU2024203245A Pending AU2024203245A1 (en) 2017-10-31 2024-05-15 Method for processing bauxite

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2024203245A Pending AU2024203245A1 (en) 2017-10-31 2024-05-15 Method for processing bauxite

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3704061A1 (en)
CN (2) CN118183811A (en)
AU (2) AU2018359800B2 (en)
FR (1) FR3072956B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2019086792A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4261299A1 (en) * 2022-04-12 2023-10-18 Dubai Aluminium PJSC Method for processing bauxite residues from the bayer process, and mineral product obtained by said method
CN114685016A (en) * 2022-04-13 2022-07-01 广西田东锦鑫化工有限公司 Device and treatment process for efficiently dealkalizing red mud in alumina production
CN115469045A (en) * 2022-09-30 2022-12-13 内蒙古鑫旺再生资源有限公司 Method for measuring surface oxalate in aluminum hydroxide production by Bayer process

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2939764A (en) 1958-03-07 1960-06-07 Vaw Ver Aluminium Werke Ag Method for reducing the silica content of alumina-containing materials of the clay type
FR2715153B1 (en) * 1994-01-18 1996-03-01 Pechiney Aluminium Process for the treatment of bauxite with alumina trihydrate.
CN1273942A (en) * 2000-03-09 2000-11-22 中南工业大学 Process for desiliconizing monohydrated diasporite type bauxite
CN1266816A (en) * 2000-03-09 2000-09-20 中南工业大学 Process for desiliconizing diasporite type bauxite
FR2870535B1 (en) * 2004-05-18 2007-02-16 Aluminium Pechiney Soc Par Act IMPROVEMENT TO THE BAYER PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ALUMINA TRIHYDRATE BY ALKALINE CONTAMINATION OF BAUXITE, THIS METHOD COMPRISING A PRE-ASSESSMENT STEP
CN101607724B (en) * 2008-06-19 2010-12-15 北京化工大学 Method for dissolving out alumina in bauxite by using sodium hydroxide
CN101456572B (en) * 2008-12-26 2011-02-16 东北大学 Method for producing alumina by using high sulphur bauxite
CN101767807B (en) 2010-01-20 2012-12-05 潘爱芳 Method for extracting high-purity aluminum oxide and silica gel from beauxite
CN101875129B (en) 2010-06-08 2012-01-25 中南大学 Method for comprehensive utilization of high-iron bauxite
CN102180498B (en) 2011-01-07 2012-10-31 潘爱芳 Method for extracting alumina from bauxite
CN104108735A (en) * 2013-04-16 2014-10-22 中国科学院过程工程研究所 Method for producing alumina through processing low and medium grade bauxite by KOH solution
CN203408047U (en) 2013-08-28 2014-01-29 哈尔滨医科大学 Electroencephalogram monitor
CN103614547B (en) * 2013-11-28 2014-12-17 中南大学 Method for separating iron, aluminum and silicon from diasporic bauxite
CN103663520B (en) * 2013-12-06 2016-06-22 贵州派腾科技服务有限公司 A kind of grey black Bayer digestion of bauxite alumina-producing method
CN104163445A (en) 2014-07-25 2014-11-26 中国铝业股份有限公司 Bauxite comprehensive utilization method
CN205603238U (en) 2016-02-06 2016-09-28 杭州锦江集团有限公司 System for utilize low -grade bauxite production aluminium oxide

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2019086792A1 (en) 2019-05-09
FR3072956B1 (en) 2024-03-01
CN111315688A (en) 2020-06-19
CN118183811A (en) 2024-06-14
AU2024203245A1 (en) 2024-06-06
EP3704061A1 (en) 2020-09-09
FR3072956A1 (en) 2019-05-03
AU2018359800A1 (en) 2020-04-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2024203245A1 (en) Method for processing bauxite
Cao et al. The phase transition in Bayer red mud from China in high caustic sodium aluminate solutions
RU2554136C2 (en) Method of producing alumina
US2806766A (en) Process of purifying caustic aluminate liquors
US4474736A (en) Treatment of aluminous materials
Ostap Control of silica in the Bayer process used for alumina production
CN1766128A (en) Iron and alumnium extraction method from high iron bauxite
CA2272322C (en) Removal of silica from bauxite
WO2015165152A1 (en) Calcification-carbonization process-based method for producing aluminum oxide without evaporation
KR20220037407A (en) Synthesis of adsorbent material
Meher et al. Extraction of alumina from red mud by divalent alkaline earth metal soda ash sinter process
WO2002010068A1 (en) Production of metal oxides
Meher et al. Recovery of Al and Na Values from Red Mud by BaO‐Na2CO3 Sinter Process
US3966874A (en) Extraction of alumina from bauxite ores
WO1997029992A1 (en) Red mud processing
WO1991009978A1 (en) Process for converting dross residues to useful products
AU2020265794A1 (en) Process for treating bauxite physical enrichment residues
Aglietti et al. Acid process for the extraction of aluminium from argentine weathered basalts
Begum et al. Preparation of aluminum hydroxide from bauxite with alkaline additives
WO2023235913A1 (en) A method for producing an aluminous material
AU716537B2 (en) Removal of silica from bauxite
Baudet A documentary study on alumina extraction processes
Mwase et al. Investigating Aluminum Tri-Hydroxide Production from Sodium Aluminate Solutions in the Pedersen Process. Processes 2022, 10, 1370
Jayaweera The effect of organic impurities on the precipitation of alumina trihydrate in the Bayer process
Kershner et al. Low Grade Bauxites and Clays as Potential Aluminum Resources