AU2018204731A1 - Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions - Google Patents

Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2018204731A1
AU2018204731A1 AU2018204731A AU2018204731A AU2018204731A1 AU 2018204731 A1 AU2018204731 A1 AU 2018204731A1 AU 2018204731 A AU2018204731 A AU 2018204731A AU 2018204731 A AU2018204731 A AU 2018204731A AU 2018204731 A1 AU2018204731 A1 AU 2018204731A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
location
boroondara
vcat
kew
display
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
AU2018204731A
Inventor
Andrew Natoli
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2012900407A external-priority patent/AU2012900407A0/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to AU2018204731A priority Critical patent/AU2018204731A1/en
Publication of AU2018204731A1 publication Critical patent/AU2018204731A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving at a first computer a location search request; processing the location search request by the first computer to determine location information; querying a data store accessible to the first computer using the location information, the data store containing records of location-specific administrative or judicial decisions, to identify records associated with locations in a vicinity of a location specified by the location information; and generating code executable to cause a display application to display a cadastral map display, the cadastral map display comprising a location marker for each record identified by the querying, wherein each location marker corresponds to a location affected by or the subject of a respective location-specific administrative or judicial decision; and providing the code to the display application -II ~' E w ww Cl) Ci)> U)) w

Description

invention as it existed before the priority date of each claim of this application.
Summary
Some embodiments relate to a computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving at a first computer a location search request;
processing the location search request by the first computer to determine location information;
querying a data store accessible to the first computer using the location information, the data store containing records of location-specific administrative or judicial decisions, to identify records associated with locations in a vicinity of a location specified by the location information; and generating code executable to cause a display application to display a cadastral map display, the cadastral map display comprising a location marker for each record identified by the querying, wherein each location marker corresponds to a location affected by or the subject of a respective location-specific administrative or judicial decision; and providing the code to the display application.
2018204731 28 Jun 2018
In some embodiments, the location search request may be received from a second computer over a network, such as the Internet. This second computer may receive the code and execute that code on a local display application, such as a browser application, in order to generate the cadastral map display. In other embodiments, the first computer may receive the location search request via a user interface associated with the first computer and the code may be executed by the display application on the first computer to provide the cadastral map display on the user interface associated with the first computer.
Some embodiments provide a website which enables parties to search for and analyse property-related legal decisions using a tool which displays their location graphically on a cadastral map. Whilst some embodiments may be accessed as a website via the internet, other embodiments may provide access locally on a single computer or through a private network of computers which are not publicly accessible.
Some embodiments relate to a system comprising components or means to perform the described methods. Some embodiments relate to executable program code in computer readable storage to cause a computer to perform the described methods or implement the described systems.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The following diagrams are included in this specification:
• Figure 1 is a block diagram which illustrates the client-server architecture which may be employed in some embodiments;
• Figure 2 is an example user interface display of a search interface and a search result list; and · Figure 3 is a flow chart which illustrates the method of the preferred embodiment of the invention.
2018204731 28 Jun 2018
Detailed Description
Referring to Figure 1, there is shown a system 100 for facilitating geo-spatial analysis of legal or administrative decisions, such as planning decisions. The system 100 comprises a client computing device 110 that may communicate over a network 120 with a server system 130. The client computing device 110 may comprise a desktop, mobile or handheld computing device having a processor (CPU) and memory comprising volatile (RAM) and non-volatile memory (a hard disk drive). The user interface may comprise a display including at least one input device such as a keyboard, mouse or touch screen that can provide input to the client computing device. Client system 110 may store executable program code and software applications in the non-volatile memory, including program code stored in memory 112 to implement an operating system 115 and a browser application 118 to enable a user to navigate sites which are accessible over the network
120. Client system 110 has at least one processor 111 that has access to the code in memory 112 in order to execute that code.
Server system 130 comprises at least one processing device 131 to operate a web server (HTTP) 146 or local server functions, data processing functions, data storage and retrieval functions (eg. Using MySQL 145 or SQL) in conjunction with databases 140 and 150. Server system 130 may also comprise scripting language support such as PHP (144) or Microsoft ASP.NET and may also comprise non volatile data storage (memory 132) for storing executable program code including operating system 134 and software modules 135 for managing and processing functions for searching and displaying data. The at least one processing device 131 has access to the code in memory 132 in order to execute that code and perform the functions described herein.
Software modules 135 include a module 136 to search and display map information, a data collection module 137 and a data verification module 138, the functions of which are described in further detail below.
2018204731 28 Jun 2018
Databases 140 and 150 may comprise localised or distributed databases storing data 5 records for mapping and cases. The map database 140 will contain a range of information that will allow the case map 240 to display comprehensive contextual information, including street and place names, street numbers, property boundaries, land features and landmark buildings. Importantly, the map data will include geographic coordinates to enable the precise location of each search location and legal decision to be identified. The map data can be stored within the server system 130 or sourced on line from other websites or commercial providers of cadastral map information.
The case database 150 will include information about various attributes of the decisions, including their street address, geographical coordinates, legal jurisdiction, key words or summaries, reference numbers and URL addresses (if the decision is available online). The decisions may be primarily planning and property-related decisions issued by courts, tribunals or administrative review bodies, for example those decisions involving appeals or reviews of administrative decisions of a council, public authority or other primary decision-making body relating to land use or development. Other decisions may involve appeals or review of decisions by public authorities in relation to the value ascribed to land for purposes of rating / taxing or for determining the amount of compensation payable for public acquisition of the land. Such decisions are location-specific and will include findings about the particular qualities or character of the land or its context and will have implications (and possibly precedential value) for future decisions in or around a similar location.
Case records can be manually inputted into the case database 150 or alternatively, by utilising software modules such as data collection module 137, can be electronically sourced from publicly accessible legal databases available online. On suitable legal databases the data collection module 137 can, when executed, source key case information such as URL, jurisdiction, street address and keywords by crawling or
2018204731 28 Jun 2018 searching web pages containing the full text of legal decisions and then copying the data based on the typical text structure of the decision and pasting it into the case database 150 based on that structure. Where decision text is not structured consistently, the data collection module 137 can also obtain the street address of the decision by finding the first occurrence of a defined range of ‘street types’ (eg. Street, Road or Avenue) and then copying the text surrounding this word and parsing it into the case database 150 based on the typical address structure i.e. [street number] [street name] [street type], [suburb].
In either case, the accuracy of the addresses of the cases will vary and will usually need 10 to be verified, either using a software procedure or manually. Once a street address is completed, the geographic coordinates of the location of the decision can be determined from the map database 140 and then accurately recorded in the case database 150. This can be achieved using the data verification module 138, which provides an interface with the case database 150 and enables any incomplete case records to be verified and completed manually.
In addition to past legal decisions, the case database 150 may also include information relating to pending decisions or proceedings which are yet to be determined. This information may also be displayed on the case map 240 at the election of the user. The purpose of mapping this information would be to provide notice to members of the community or potential parties about pending proceedings concerning nearby land which may affect their interests.
Information regarding pending proceedings can be uploaded to the case database 150 by registered users, including parties to the proceedings, and may include contact information and URL links to other websites which contain information about the proceeding including information about how to become involved in a proceeding or how to support persons or groups who are already parties.
Various embodiments can require users to register their details prior to accessing the search interface on the website. The details of the users can be stored in a user database
2018204731 28 Jun 2018 on the server system 130, which may also save details of their searches for their future reference.
Referring to Figure 3, once registered, users would need to log in prior to each session of 5 use at step 305. Once successfully logged in, the client browser 112 will then send a page request to the server system 130, where the requested page comprises the search interface illustrated in figure 2.
Referring to Figures 2 and 3, a search method 300 commences at step 315 where users are required to enter a location search request into a search interface 205, including entering an address into the search query form in field 210. The location need not be specific to a particular property parcel and may simply identify a street in a particular suburb or just a suburb or postcode location.
The user may choose to specify the time period for cases at field 212 eg. “From years 1999 to 2009”, which would further limit the search to cases which were decided within that time period.
Depending on the number of results returned for a particular location, various embodiments may also allow user to further refine or filter the results by searching for additional criteria such as ‘keywords’ or ‘catchwords’ at field 211. If this option is selected by users, then the database would only return cases proximate to the searched location which included the keywords identified by the user.
Once the location search terms are entered into search interface 205, the client browser 112 will send the query to the server system 130 over network 120 which will query the map database 140 to determine the map coordinates of the search location at step 320.
If coordinates are not available or if the entered search location is not valid, then the user will be directed to re-enter a valid search location at step 315. If coordinates are available for the search location, the server system 120 will then query the case database 150 to
2018204731 28 Jun 2018 determine what decisions relate to land within a predefined or user-defined distance of the searched location (eg. within a 1km to 5km radius) at step 340.
Concurrently to step 340, the server system 130 will also query the map database 140 to 5 assemble necessary cadastral data (step 325) in order to graphically display the case results retrieved at step 355 within a cadastral map as part of display 200.
At step 355, case database 150 will return results according to a pre-defined maximum and minimum number of legal decisions that relate to property parcels within the displayed map area. The results returned may also be limited to cases which meet other optional criteria set by the user in search interface 205 at step 315 (eg. Years, a date range and/or keywords).
At step 350, the server system 120 will generate and then send executable code to enable the client browser to display case map 240 centrally on the display 200, depicting a geographic area centered upon the search location 230. The search location 230 or a centroid of a specified location (where a street address is not provided in the search terms, for example) may be identified with a distinctive marker. The cases retrieved at step 355 are identified with distinctive map markers 250 graphically overlaid on the case map 240.
The extent of the area shown in the case map display 240 may be reduced or enlarged depending on the scale at which the user wishes to analyse the decisions shown on the map. The map display is initially displayed at a default map scale.
By selection or mouseover of the map markers 250 in the client browser 112, a pop-up display window 220 will be shown, so users will be able see the key (summary) details of the particular decision (including case title and street address) in window 220. If the decision is available online, the window 220 may also include a universal resource locator (URL) or active link (such as a hyperlink) to that case in the available online repository.
2018204731 28 Jun 2018
The map markers 250 may also be numbered and a corresponding numbered list 260 may 5 be displayed beneath the map so that users can immediately identify the details of a case shown on the map without selecting map markers 250. The numbered list 260 may also order the cases according to their characteristics, including their date or the particular jurisdiction of the court or tribunal.
2018204731 28 Jun 2018 ίο

Claims (16)

  1. CLAIMS:
    1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving at a first computer a location search request;
    5 processing the location search request by the first computer to determine location information;
    querying a data store accessible to the first computer using the location information, the data store containing records of location-specific administrative or judicial decisions, to identify records associated with locations in a vicinity of a location
    10 specified by the location information; and generating code executable to cause a display application to display a cadastral map display, the cadastral map display comprising a location marker for each record identified by the querying, wherein each location marker corresponds to a location affected by or the subject of a respective location-specific administrative or judicial
    15 decision; and providing the code to the display application.
  2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the code is further executable to cause the display application to display an itemised list of records for which location markers are displayed
    20 on the cadastral map.
  3. 3. The method of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the processing includes processing the location search request to determine date range information, and wherein the querying uses the date range information to only identify records in the data store that have a
    25 decision date within the date range.
  4. 4. The method of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the processing includes processing the location search request to determine one or more key word terms that are different from the location information, and wherein the querying uses the one or more
    30 key word terms to only identify records in the data store that contain the one or more key word terms.
  5. 5. The method of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the code is further executable to cause the display application to display a pop-up window in response to selection or
    35 mouse-over of a location marker.
    2018204731 28 Jun 2018
  6. 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the pop-window includes a hyperlink to a source of a full text or extract of the location-specific administrative or judicial decision.
  7. 7. The method of claim 5 or claim 6, wherein the pop-up window includes summary 5 information of the location-specific administrative or judicial decision.
  8. 8. A system comprising means for performing the method of any one of claims 1 to 7.
  9. 10 9. A system comprising:
    a memory;
    at least one processor having access to the memory;
    wherein the memory stores code, which, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to:
    receive at the system a location search request;
    20 process the location search request by the system to determine location information;
    query a data store accessible to the system using the location information, the data store containing records of location-specific administrative or judicial decisions, to identify records associated with locations in a vicinity of a location specified by the
    25 location information; and generate code executable to cause a display application to display a cadastral map display, the cadastral map display comprising a location marker for each record identified by the querying, wherein each location marker corresponds to a location affected by or the subject of a respective location-specific administrative or judicial
    30 decision; and provide the code to the display application.
    2018204731 28 Jun 2018
    2/3
    2018204731 28 Jun 2018
    Figure 2
    210
    211
    212
    205
    220
    230
    260
    Hap displaying 100 nearest records. Click on <;Ίο move the search point
    1. Domain Ramsay Group v Boroondara CC & Ors [1999] VCAT 1246 (31 July 1999) (1999) - 24 Violet Grove Kew East VIC 3102 (view foil exirad;
    2. Sldcorp Pty Ltd v Boroondara CC [2003] VCAT 313 (20 March 2003) (2003) - 24 Woodlands Avenue Kew East VIC 3102 (viewfull eviraal;
    3. Gaspartni v Boroondara CC [2009] VCAT 250 (19 February 2009) (2009)-796 High Street Kew East VIC 3102 (view hill extract)
    4. Gasparini & Ors v Boroondara CC [2009] VCAT 962 (29 May 2009) (2009) - 796 High Street Kew East VIC 3102 Mewfuil ewvcl)
    5. Ublston Pty Ltd ·.· Boroondara CC & Ors [2001] VCAT 893 (31 May 2001) (2001) - 32
    Woodlands Avenue Kew VIC 3101( :
    6. Ublston Pty Ltd ·.· Boroondara CC & Ors [2001] VCAT 1076 (31 May 2001) (2001)- 792 High
    Street Kew East VIC 3102 Ma '
    7. Cometta Partners Architects y Boroondara CC [2007] VCAT 218 (13 February 2007) (2007)
    - 27 Woodlands Avenue Ke w East VIC 3102 ' ,
    8. Petras Kruzas and Others '.'Boroondara CC [2001] VCAT 478 [31 March 2001) (2001)-14
    Violet Grove Kew East VIC 3102 (vie.· 9. Newport v Boroondara CC & Ors (1997.Ό0572) [1997] VICCAT 247 (10 April 1997) (1997) 763 High StreetKewEastVIC 3102 ( - 10. Jones Architect’.' City of Boroondara [2000] VCAT 1264 (3 July 2006) (2006) - 8-12 Woodlands Avenue KewEastVIC 3102 i - f
  10. 11. Graeme Jones Architect y City of Boroondara [2007] VCAT 1352 (30 July 2007)(2007)8-12 Woodlands Avenue Kew East VIC 3102 i -- *
  11. 12. Kellaway v Boroondara CC [2009] VCAT 738 (29 April 2009) (2009) - 8 Woodlands Avenue Kew East VIC 3102 Mewfull extract)
  12. 13. Savlane Design & Building v Boroondara CC (1997(39987) [1997] VICCAT 716 (29 September 1997) (1997) -16 Oswln Street Kew East VIC 3102 Me w full extrsef;·
  13. 14. Vandee Properties Pty Ltd y Boroondara CC & Ors [2002] VCAT 1352 (11 September 2002) (2002) - 722 High Street Kew East VIC 3102 Maw full attract;·
  14. 15. Simon Greenwood Architects v Boroondara CC [2003] VCAT 893 (4 July 2003) (2003) 89-93 Harp Road Kew East VIC 3102 (view toll extract)
  15. 16. Cometta Partners v Boroondara CC [2005] VCAT 1553 (28 July 2005) (2005)-95 Harp Road KewEastVIC 3102 f.lewfuil ex' - ·’
  16. 17. Plan Printing & Drafting Pty Ltd y Boroondara CC [2008] VCAT 817 (6 May 2008) (2008) - 6 Oxford StreetKewEastVIC 3102 ( -.· '-(tract!
    200
    3/3
    2018204731 28 Jun 2018
    Figure 3
    Nil
    -1-'x 350 logout
AU2018204731A 2012-02-03 2018-06-28 Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions Abandoned AU2018204731A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2018204731A AU2018204731A1 (en) 2012-02-03 2018-06-28 Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2012900407A AU2012900407A0 (en) 2012-02-03 Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions
AU2012900407 2012-02-03
AU2013200222A AU2013200222A1 (en) 2012-02-03 2013-01-16 Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions
AU2018204731A AU2018204731A1 (en) 2012-02-03 2018-06-28 Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2013200222A Division AU2013200222A1 (en) 2012-02-03 2013-01-16 Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2018204731A1 true AU2018204731A1 (en) 2018-07-19

Family

ID=49028700

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2013200222A Abandoned AU2013200222A1 (en) 2012-02-03 2013-01-16 Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions
AU2018204731A Abandoned AU2018204731A1 (en) 2012-02-03 2018-06-28 Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2013200222A Abandoned AU2013200222A1 (en) 2012-02-03 2013-01-16 Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (2) AU2013200222A1 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2013200222A1 (en) 2013-08-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5053283B2 (en) Prioritizing entity display in distributed geographic information systems
US20090132469A1 (en) Geocoding based on neighborhoods and other uniquely defined informal spaces or geographical regions
US20110270705A1 (en) System and Method for Geographic Based Data Visualization and Extraction
Cui A systematic approach to evaluate and validate the spatial accuracy of farmers market locations using multi-geocoding services
Baum et al. “Report a Landslide” a website to engage the public in identifying geologic hazards
Bustamante et al. On the representativeness of openstreetmap for the evaluation of country tourism competitiveness
US20170236224A1 (en) Identifying Points of Interest
US11430076B1 (en) View scores
AU2018204731A1 (en) Geo spatial analysis of legal decisions
Herbreteau et al. GeoHealth and QuickOSM, two QGIS plugins for health applications
Markus Design and development of a prototype mobile geographic information system for real-time collection and storage of traffic accident data
Dong et al. Semantic enhanced WebGIS approach to visualize Chinese historical natural hazards
JP5431698B2 (en) Ground information provision device
US20140330733A1 (en) Systems and methods for graphical display of geographic date for employment opportunities
Pacheco-González et al. Does urban extent from satellite images relate to symptoms of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis and eczema in children? A cross-sectional study from ISAAC Phase Three
Migliaccio et al. A prototype HGIS for managing earthquake data from historical documents
Shakede et al. Unfolding the Potentials of Geographic Information System on Property Taxation in Lagos State
Ali et al. ClimInonda a Web Application for Management the Climate Da-Ta: Case Study of the Flooding Risk in Bayech Transboundary Basin
Neupane et al. E-CAD: Web-based information service for land management
Brovelli et al. Web services and historical cadastral maps: The first step in the implementation of the Web CARTE system
Król The reach and the trends in the use of the map service for the local spatial development plan of Tomice municipality
CA2920968A1 (en) Identifying points of interest
US20190377833A1 (en) Mobile platform for home buying tours
Dowling Finding Your Best-Fit Neighborhood: A Web GIS Application for Online Residential Property Searches for Anchorage, Alaska
Coles et al. The Virginia Stormwater Runoff Calculator–A Geospatial Web Application

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MK5 Application lapsed section 142(2)(e) - patent request and compl. specification not accepted