AU2018100710A4 - Adaptive Neural Network Control Method For Arch-Shaped Microelectromechanical System - Google Patents
Adaptive Neural Network Control Method For Arch-Shaped Microelectromechanical System Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2018100710A4 AU2018100710A4 AU2018100710A AU2018100710A AU2018100710A4 AU 2018100710 A4 AU2018100710 A4 AU 2018100710A4 AU 2018100710 A AU2018100710 A AU 2018100710A AU 2018100710 A AU2018100710 A AU 2018100710A AU 2018100710 A4 AU2018100710 A4 AU 2018100710A4
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- neural network
- arch
- expression
- microelectromechanical system
- state
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000013528 artificial neural network Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 31
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 230000000739 chaotic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 claims description 69
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 210000002569 neuron Anatomy 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010587 phase diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004377 microelectronic Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005312 nonlinear dynamic Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
Abstract
The present disclosure discloses an adaptive neural network control method for an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system. The method includes: a step (a) of constructing a system model of an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system based on an Euler-Bernoulli beam; and a step (b) of constructing an adaptive neural network controller for suppressing chaotic oscillations of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system and ensuring state constraints of the system; and when the controller is constructed, ensuring an unviolated output constraint of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system using a symmetric barrier Lyapunov function, adopting a RBF neural network having an adaptive rule to estimate an unknown nonlinear function with an arbitrarily small error, introducing an extended state tracking differentiator to address a problem of repeated derivative calculations required for a virtual control item in a backstepping control, designing a state observer to obtain immeasurable state information, and fusing the extended state tracking differentiator and the state observer in a backstepping framework. The present disclosure is convenient for an analysis and proof of a stability, and has characteristics including a low requirement on modeling accuracy, a low calculation complexity, a quick arithmetic speed, a good operation stability of the system, and high motion accuracy. vaibl -~ variable X o Cd rl Cd4 , 4 -.--. oil Cd1 cn
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD [2] The present disclosure relates to an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system, and specifically to an adaptive neural network control method for an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system.
BACKGROUND [3] A microelectromechanical system (MEMS) is a complex micro-device or an independent intelligent system that integrates micro sensor, micro actuator, micro energy source, signal processing and control circuits, high-performance electronic integrated device, interfaces, communication, etc. The MEMS technology is a revolutionary new technology involving many subject areas such as microelectronics, information and automatic control, mechanics, material, and dynamics. The MEMS technology is widely used in new high technology industries and is a key technology related to the science and technology development, economic prosperity and security of a nation.
[4] Nonlinear factors (such as uncertainty in modeling, environmental changes, aging of components, and self-excited vibrations) are inevitable. Once a MEMS fails, it will certainly lead to chain reactions, and the failure of an entire equipment, thus causing major safety accidents, economic losses and
2018100710 25 May 2018 adverse social impacts. Due to the influences by factors such as manufacturing defects, external disturbances, hysteresis loops and immeasurable states, and the uncertainty in mathematical models of the MEMS, it is difficult to obtain an accurate model for a control object. An arch-shaped MEMS is a high-order, multi-field coupling and parameter time-variable complex nonlinear system. However, the existing control methods for MEMS cannot properly solve control problems of output constraints, chaotic oscillations, immeasurable states and unknown dynamics in the arch-shaped MEMS.
SUMMARY [5] The purpose of the present disclosure is to provide an adaptive neural network control method for an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system. The present disclosure facilitates the stability analysis and proof, and has characteristics including low requirement on modeling accuracy, low calculation complexity, high arithmetic speed, good operation system stability, and high motion accuracy.
[6] Technical solution provided by the present disclosure: An adaptive neural network control method for an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system includes the following steps.
[7] a) a system model of an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system is constructed based on an Euler-Bernoulli beam to obtain ^(t) + m^(t) + h+ 2.h2aAq(t) — ( 0 )) _τ,π (t) + a,q2 (t) + u(t) = 0 (]_)
20,,^(1 + //-^(/))3 [8] In expression (1), mr h, a, , b, R and bn represent dimensionless parameters, q(t) represents a state variable, w0 represents a frequency, and «(/) represents a control input.
2018100710 25 May 2018 [9] b) an adaptive neural network controller for suppressing chaotic oscillations of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system and ensuring state constraints of the system is constructed. When the controller is constructed, an unviolated output constraint of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system is ensured using a symmetric barrier Lyapunov function, an RBF neural network having an adaptive rule is adopted to estimate an unknown nonlinear function with an arbitrarily small error, an extended state tracking differentiator is introduced to address a problem of a derivative repeatedly required for a virtual control item in a backstepping control, a state observer is designed to obtain immeasurable state information, and the extended state tracking differentiator and the state observer are fused in a backstepping framework.
[10] In the adaptive neural network control method for an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system, if x, = q(t) and x2=$/) are defined as new variables, expression
Error! Reference source not found, of the system model in step a is rewritten as:
4(-=x2,y = x[ b (l + 2A cos (wot 2bn^(l + h-xf [11] In expression (2), the system output 1 satisfies a constraint condition, that is, |r|A r where kcl>0.
[12] In b) of the adaptive neural network control method for an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system, the process of constructing the adaptive neural network controller for suppressing the chaotic oscillations of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system and ensuring the state constraints of the system includes the following steps.
[13] bl) the state observer is constructed and the expression x, +
)) + 3a, Ax,2 — a,x, + u (0 (2) (3) .
2018100710 25 May 2018 is :
|*7= £+ Kfy- fi) f$= G(i/)+ /,(1)+ K,(y- fi) [14] In expression (3), x= [fi,x2J represents an estimation value of x= [χ.χ;] . Through an appropriate selection for /< [/<./<,], „ 4 K, ly
B= ς 1 y e k ou e λ2 Ύ [15] Expression (4) belongs to a Hurwitz matrix, [16] If an error of the state observer and a nonlinear item are defined as z=x.x and z , \ Z?(l+ 2Rcos(wnt/\ , /,(x)= - (l+ 2h~a/)xx + -, - mx, - af+ 3a hx~
2b ^(1+ h- xf
Then,
N= Bz + f (x) (5:
[17] Herein, /(χ)= | /2(x)- /2(*)f and z - [z, z2J [18] A Lyapunov function is selected as
6) [19] In expression (6), p represents a positive definite matrix, and satisfies the relationship btp+pb=-i· [20] Using a Young's inequality, a derivative of h0 is obtained as :
- zrz + 4t||y>||2 (7) .
[21] In step b2, the adaptive neural network controller is constructed, and the process is as follows.
/44
2018100710 25 May 2018 [22]
An estimation value of a nonlinear item the system model is expressed by the following RBF neural network expression:
of [23] In expression (8), ¢ = ,¾ J ek represents a weight vector, />1 represents a node number of a neuron, x^R represents an input vector, and x(X) = [x, (X),x2 (V)-L ,x, (Y)]r eR‘ . xfiX) represents a Gaussian function expressed as:
x,. (Y) = exp (X —m )T (X —ml) i = 1,L ,/ [24] In expression (9) , s, represents a width of the Gaussian function, and mt = [m,,zw2,L .mf\ represents a weight factor.
[25] A first error function is defined as s[=x[-xr, where xr represents a reference trajectory. A symmetric barrier Lyapunov function is selected as:
[26] In expression (15), f=f-xu, and the constraint condition βι|<Α is not violated.
[27] Since the state variable x2 is immeasurable, the state observer is used to estimate it.
[28] A second error function is defined as s2^x2-a2r where a2 represents a virtual control.
[29] A derivative of fi is given as:
2018100710 25 May 2018 s, (s2 + α2 -Jt&+z2) + f&
(16) .
[30] In expression (16), -sj .
[31] The virtual control is obtained as a2=-k^sl+jSi, where ρ>0, thus obtaining:
< -ζ Ί z - c,si + -Et- +1 k, + 4i||p||H2 (17) .
[32] A derivative of - is calculated as: s2 $=fu„ (·)+«(/) (18) .
[33] The RBF neural network is used to approximate a nonlinear function: /„,() = f (t)x2 (ρ, x2) + e2 (x,, x2), where e2(x,,x2)>0 .
[34] A number of weight vectors for the RBF neural network are decreased by taking actions. Using the Young's inequality, the expression is obtained as:
qT2 (i)x2 (x,, x2) = — y 2 (t)xT2 (x,, x2 )x2 (x,, x2) + 2n (19) .
[35] In expression (19), y2 0)=||^ (/)¾ 0)||, «2>0, =y2(t}—yr and y2(t) represents an estimation value of y2(r).
[36] An estimation value of the derivative of a2 is obtained using expression (20) of the extended state tracking differentiator :
=v η -bjxfal{d7j} , \ (20) · 7 =-bj2fal{de,hej) [37] There is a nonlinear function:
fal(de,h^ = < de ‘ , where Zr,y' = l,L,«, and / = 1,2 b p sign(Ae/),k |><
2018100710 25 May 2018 < d, represent feedback gains, hej represents a tracking differentiator error, de >0 and ae >0.
[38] A Lyapunov function is selected as:
[39] In expression (21), g2>0 .
(21) [40] An extended state tracking differential item is used v 22 to estimate and a time derivative of y is given as:
= A (Λ (·) + M 0) ” v 22) + —/°2 (f)i&2 (f) §2 (22) [41] It can be known according to expression (20) that he2=v2l-a2. There exists the inequality \v 22-c&\<hx.
[42] Expressions (18) and (20) are substituted into expression (17) to obtain:
!&<-zrz -c,q2 +s2^j-Ty2(t)xT2 (x, ,x2 )x2 (x, ,x2 ).?2 +kf2 + E +u(t)-v 22 +|,;|/+4£||p||H2 +—7°2(Φ&2(0+γ+ζ
Si 2 (23) .
[43] In expression (23), |<?2(χ,,χ2)|<<?2 .
[44] The actual control input m(/) and its adaptive rule y&(/) are respectively obtained as:
M (/) = -[ C21 +|y2 2 OX (^α)α(αΛ)α +v 22 -c22signs2 (24 ) , (25) .
2018100710 25 May 2018 and
A (0 = (X1 ’ A )-L (a , f )¾ - m 2y 2 (i) ln2 [45] In expression (24) or (25), c21>0, c22>0, and m2>0 .
[46] Beneficial effects: As compared with the existing technologies, the present disclosure has the following advantages. In the adaptive neural network control method for the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system of the present disclosure, a symmetric barrier Lyapunov function is used to ensure that an output constraint of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system is not violated, and meanwhile, it is convenient for an analysis and proof of a stability; a RBF neural network having an adaptive rule is adopted to estimate an unknown nonlinear function with an arbitrarily small error, which lowers requirements of accurately constructing the system model and suppresses impacts from system parameter variations; and a problem that a derivative is repeatedly required for a virtual control item in a traditional backstepping control is addressed by introducing an extended state tracking differentiator, which reduces the calculation complexity and accelerates the arithmetic speed. In the control method of the present disclosure, the extended state tracking differentiator and a state observer are fused in a backstepping framework. According to the method, requirements for measurable state variables and relevant physical sensors are reduced, impacts from the chaotic oscillations and the output constraints on the system are suppressed, and the operation stability and motion accuracy of the system are improved.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [47] Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of an arch-shaped
2018100710 25 May 2018 microelectromechanical system;
[48] Fig. 2 illustrates phase diagrams under different R values;
[49] Fig. 3 illustrates time histories under different R values;
[50] Fig. 4 illustrates a largest Lyapunov exponent;
[51] Fig. 5 is a bifurcation diagram for R - ;
[52] Fig. 6 illustrates tracking performances under different R values;
[53] Fig. 7 illustrates an observer performance between and ή ;
[54] Fig. 8 illustrates an observer performance between x2 and x2 ; and [55] Fig. 9 illustrates control inputs under different R values .
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS [56] The present disclosure is further described below in combination with the accompanying drawings and the embodiment. However, the accompanying drawings and the embodiment are not the bases for limiting the present disclosure.
[57] Embodiment [58] An adaptive neural network control method for an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system includes the following steps.
[59] In step a, in order to reveal inherent properties of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system and easy to design
2018100710 25 May 2018 a controller, the nonlinear dynamics of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system is investigated using phase diagrams, time histories, a largest Lyapunov exponent and a bifurcation diagram, and a system model of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system is constructed based on an Euler-Bernoulli beam, to obtain:
tfy)+mt^t) + {l + 2h2a(}q(t) — ( θ )) _(tj+ayf (t) + u(t) = 0 ( q )
20,,^(1 + /:-7(7))3 [60] In expression (1), m, h, a, , b, R, and bn represents dimensionless parameters, q(t) represents a state variable, w0 represents a frequency, and u(t) represents a control input. The schematic diagram of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system is shown in Fig. 1.
[61] In step b, an adaptive neural network controller for suppressing chaotic oscillations of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system and ensuring state constraints of the system is constructed. When the controller is constructed, an unviolated output constraint of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system is ensured using a symmetric barrier Lyapunov function, a RBF neural network having an adaptive rule is adopted to estimate an unknown nonlinear function with an arbitrarily small error, an extended state tracking differentiator is introduced to address a problem of a derivative repeatedly required for a virtual control item in a backstepping control, a state observer is designed to obtain immeasurable state information, and the extended state tracking differentiator and the state observer are fused in a backstepping framework.
[62] If x,=7(r) and x2=$t) are defined as new variables, expression Error! Reference source not found, of the system model in step a is rewritten as:
(2) .
2018100710 25 May 2018 , , b (l + 2Acos(w0i))
- — rwc2 — il + 2/z a} JXj H-- —axxx + u(t)
Ib/Q + h-x/ [63] In expression (2), the system output y satisfies a constraint condition, that is, |y|<iri, where kcl >0 .
[64] For the convenience of designing the controller, operation mechanisms of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system need to be revealed. Parameters of the system are set to be 6/,=7.993, 6=119.9883 , 6 = 0.3, 7? = 0.02, /«=0.1, w0 =0.4706 and w(i)=0 . The differential equation is solved using the fourth-order Runge-Kutta algorithm. Figs. 2-3 illustrate phase diagrams and time histories under different excitation amplitudes R . It can be known from Figs. 2-3 that chaotic oscillations appear in the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system.
[65] As illustrated in Fig. 4, the Lyapunov exponent becomes a positive value in a short time. It is obvious that chaotic oscillations appear in the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system. Fig. 5 is a bifurcation diagram for R -x, of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system, and further reveals periodic oscillation states and chaos motions.
[66] The chaotic oscillations of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system inevitably lead to the deterioration of the system performance. Therefore, it is necessary to provide an effective control scheme to suppress the chaotic oscillations of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system.
[67] In step b, the process of constructing the adaptive neural network controller for suppressing the chaotic oscillations of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system includes the following steps.
2018100710 25 May 2018 [68] In step bl, the state observer is constructed, and the expression is:
f-p= Ϊ+ K (> - ') |A= G(i/)+ /,(1)+ Kjy- /) ο:
[69] In expression (3), x = [x,,x2J represents an estimation value of x= [x,,x,J . Through an appropriate selection for /< [/<./<,], „ 4 K, iv
5= S u e k 0u e vu [70] Expression (4) belongs to the Hurwitz matrix.
[71] If an error of the state observer and a nonlinear item are defined as z=x- I and z , \ Z?(l+ 2Rcos(wntI\ , /,(x)= -(1+ 2h~a[)xx+ -. - mx , - af+ 3a hx~ 2Z,nW+ h~ X/
N= Bz + f (x) :5) [72] Herein, /(x)= |) /2(x)-/2(*)f and z = [z, zj [73] A Lyapunov function is selected as
V, = zPz [74] In expression (6), P represents a positive definite matrix, and satisfies the relationship btp+pb=-i.
[75] Using the Young's inequality, a derivative of h0 is obtained as :
(7) .
[76] In step b2, the adaptive neural network controller is constructed, and the process is as follows.
2018100710 25 May 2018 [77] An estimation value of a nonlinear item frhJ(x) of the system model is expressed by the following RBF neural network expression:
[78] In expression (8), ¢ = ,<?2,L ,¾ J <=Rl represents a weight vector, />1 represents a node number of a neuron, x-R represents an input vector, and x(Y) = [x, (Y),x2 (Y),L ,x; (Y)]r e/?'. x,(Y) represents a Gaussian function expressed as:
x. (X) = exp
2s:
, and z = l,L ,/ [79] In expression (9) , si represents a width of the Gaussian function, and mi = ,min]T represents a weight factor.
[80] It can be known according to the neural network expression (8) that the following expression is obtained:
SUP \frbr (Χ)-9Γ 0MX)| ~e
XeDx 1 1 (10).
[81] In expression (10), e>0, ty, and Dx represent compact sets of q(t) and X . An ideal parameter f is defined to be equal t Ο arg min sup\frhf (x)-frhf (x,q)\ , and there exists f{t) = q(t\-q (/) at the
XeDj 1 same time.
[82] Assumption 1: A reference trajectory xr is bounded (i.e., |χ,.|<χ„, where x„>0), and A is also bounded.
[83] Assumption 2 : A constant L>0 also exists and satisfies :
|f (x)- f (x)| £ £(|χ, - x,| + L + |x,. - x,|),z = 1,L ,n (11) .
[84] In expression (11), Jftx)= 7(χ)- 7(χ), and f(x) represents an
2018100710 25 May 2018 estimation value of f,(x) .
[85] Lemma 1: For kh >0,/ = 1,L ,n , Z:= {se j :|y| <kh ,i = 1,L cz j and
N:= j ' xZ —> j /+” are defined as open sets.
[86] In consideration of the system, }&=he(t,h) (12) [87] In expression (12), h :=[w. .s]7 eN , and A,: j + xN -> j /+ is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in Z . For U: j ' j + and F : y j ., there are v| S,.|-> kh , and n\ (H)<U(w)<ZM,(||w||) (13) [88] In expression (13), m, and tf represent class K„ functions .
[89] It is assumed that V(h) := Σ Vx (s,.) + U(w) and si e (~kh,kh} . If /-1 there exists an inequality t&= — h <0 dh 1 (14) , [90] A first error function is defined as sx=xx-xr, where % represents the reference trajectory. A symmetric barrier Lyapunov function is selected as:
V, = —ln
-+Vn kl -si ° (15) [91] In expression (15), ^,=^,,-+,,, and the constraint condition k|<U is not violated.
[92] Since a state variable %2 is immeasurable, the state
2018100710 25 May 2018 observer is used to estimate it.
[93] A second error function is defined as s2=x2-a2, where a2 represents a virtual control.
[94] A derivative of f is given as:
p s.(s2+a2-&+z2\ p
1-r-l2 + f& (16) .
[95] [96] g >0
In expression (16), -s( .
The virtual control is obtained as a2 =-ky^ + &-, where thus obtaining:
-c,s( + ^- + / k, + 4L (17) .
[97] A derivative of s2 is calculated as:
^ = Z„(j + “(O^ (18) · [98] In expression (18), = f2(x)~^.
[99] /„„(') has very complicated nonlinear characteristics. Due to impacts from manufacturing defects, external environmental variations, modeling errors, etc., system parameters such as the parameters above may be unknown or less precise, and meanwhile, variations of the system parameters result in chaotic oscillations. In view of the above, it is necessary to search for effective ways to overcome negative factors and nonlinear characteristics in the controller. Therefore, the RBF neural network is used to approximate the nonlinear function fun(-)-qT2 (t) ·χ2 (χι,χ2)+β2 (χ15χ2), wheree2(x[,x2)>0 .
[100] To reduce the computation burden, a number of weight vectors for the RBF neural network is decreased by taking (19;
2018100710 25 May 2018 actions. Using the Young's inequality, the expression is obtained as :
q[ (t)x2 (x,, x2) = — y 2 (t)xT2 (x,, x2 )x2 (¾, x2 ) + ng
2« [101] In expression (19), y2 (/) = |pf (/)¾ (/)||, n2 > 0 , /»(/) =y2 (t)-y2 (/), and y2(0 represents an estimation value of y/) .
[102] For the problem that the derivative of a2 will increase the design complexity and the computation burden, an estimation value of the derivative of a2 is obtained using expression (20) of the extended state tracking differentiator:
(20) [103] There is a nonlinear function:
e/ jl-o.
\hej\^de fal(de,heJ} = '4 ‘ , where b/!,j = l, L,nr and / = 1,2
KPsign(Ae/),|Ae/|><
represent feedback gains, hej represents a tracking differentiator error, de>0 and ae >0 .
[104] A Lyapunov function is selected as (21:
[105] In expression (21), g2>0 .
[106] An extended state tracking differential item v 22 is used to estimate and a time derivative of V2 is given as:
!&=!&+ s2 ( f2 (·) + u(/) - v 22) + — (i)y&2 (/) (23)
2018100710 25 May 2018 [107] It can be known according to expression (20) that he2=v2i-a2. There exists the inequality \v 22--c&,\<ly .
[108] Expressions (18) and (20) are substituted into expression (17) to obtain:
/&<-zrz -cpj -wd -TyJ/jxj (y,x2}x2(y,x2)s2 + d?2 +e2 +u(t)-v 22 +2n
N/ + 4£||P||H2 [109] In expression (23), |e2(x,,x2)|<e2 .
[110] The actual control input (i.e., the adaptive neural network controller) u(t) and its adaptive rule (/) are respectively obtained as:
,(/) = - Ih -7- -2 (07 0 ’ h )h 0 - U)h + v 22 -c22signs2 (24) and
Λ (0 = ^7 (x1,x2)x2(x1,x2)-?2 2 -m2y2(t) (25)
2n2 [111] In expression (24) or (25), c21>0, c22>0, and m2>0 .
[112] Expressions (24) and (25) are substituted into expression (23) to obtain:
I&<-cf -c,f + e,S, \s2\-X/X)y\(t) + ^ + l 82 p2|/ + 4£||7>||2 (26)
In expression (26), y2(t)y/2
It can be known according to Lemma 1 and the Young's inequality that expression (26) can be simplified as:
:27)
2018100710 25 May 2018 + (-61+0.5)^+(-621+0.5)^--0-^)4(/)1 +74 + -^-^2(01 +^+47 2§2 ^§2 [113] Theorem 1: For control problems of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system with unknown system parameters, chaotic oscillations, immeasurable states and partial state constraints under the distributed electrostatic actuation, if the extended state observer is constructed as expression (10), and the adaptive neural network controller integrated with expression (22) of the adaptive rule and expression (20) of the extended state tracking differentiator is designed as expression (24), all signals of a closed-loop system are uniformly ultimately bounded, and meanwhile, the output defined as constraint is not violated.
Proof: The Lyapunov function is
Γ = — In ’’ + —+-y 2 (t)+z TPz
Ί k2-s( 2 2 2g/2K/ [114] Then, its derivative may be obtained as :
A=f&<-zrz-(g-0.5)5(-(e21-0.5).f2 22-^(/)1 + do ^~JoV+do [28'
In expression (28), = min (2x(q-0.5),2χ(η21-0.5),τη2) and , fl-, iTl -, ι , , i2 -)
4,=-+-—^2(O| +^L ^§2 [115] Both sides of expression (28) are integrated to obtain:
< V (/) < + t(/0) - 4 »< 4+K(Zo) \ 70 ) Jq (29;
[116] Therefore, and >4(z) are affiliated with a compact set:
wr / /, S2 ,/» (/)) | V < V (t0)+-j-, vz > t(
130'
2018100710 25 May 2018 [117] From expression (29), the following expression is obtained:
>· 2 2dn lims < —
/.,» 1 j •J n :3i) [118] Since y(t)=sl (z)+p , |.v, (f)| < and |xr|<x„, it can be inferred that |y(z)| <T, +x„ =Ti · Therefore, a conclusion can be drawn that the output y remains within the given constraint range. Up to now, the proof of Theorem 1 is finished.
[119] Simulation result analysis [120] The reference trajectory is selected as x. =0.4sin(2z) and the output constraint is defined to be |y| < kcl = 0.43 . It can be seen from the above description that |g (z)| < /y = 0.03 is tenable. The parameters of the proposed controller are selected as c, = 8, c21=8, c22 = 0.1, g2=l, /72.,=10, and «2 = 5 . The parameters of the extended state observer are designed as K, = 1 and /=1. The parameters of the extended state tracking differentiator are selected as /=3 , /=300, de=0.022 , and ae =0.3. An initial value of y2(z) is 0.02 . Moreover, the RBF neural network includes 9 nodes , the weight factor mt e[-6,6] and the width s =3 of the Gaussian function .
[121] Figs. 6(a)-6(c) show the first error function under different R values. It is obvious that the tracking performance between the reference trajectory and the actual trajectory is achieved. Figs. 6(d)-6(f) show that all the tracking errors are less than ±0.03. |y|</ is guaranteed after the symmetric barrier Lyapunov function is used. In addition,
2018100710 25 May 2018 as compared with the phase diagrams in Fig. 2 and the time histories in Fig. 3, it can be known that the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system immediately attains a steady state and its chaotic oscillations subjected to the distributed electrostatic actuation are also completely suppressed.
[122] Figs. 7-8 reveal observer performances of the state observer. It can be seen from Figs. 7-8 that the state observer can precisely estimates actual signals, and reduce the restrictions on physical sensors. Although the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system has the unknown parameters, the partial state-constraint and the chaotic oscillations, observer errors quickly converge to zero with less oscillation.
[123] Fig. 9 illustrates control inputs of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system under the actuation of static DC voltages and harmonic AC voltages for different R values. It can be seen from Fig. 9 that 4 curves of the control inputs of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system can remain consistent at a fast rate. Meanwhile, it is also illustrated that the proposed controller has a better anti-disturbance ability.
2018100710 25 May 2018
Claims (9)
- WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:1 . An adaptive neural network control method for an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system, comprising:(a) constructing a system model of an arch-shaped microelectromechanical system based on an Euler-Bernoulli beam to obtain $4) + mfff) + (]. + 2h2a x)q(t) — ( 0 )) (tj + afr (t) + u(t) = 0 m, fr a\' f r anc} bn representing dimensionless parameters, representing a state variable, w° representing a frequency, and representing a control input in expression (1); and (b) constructing an adaptive neural network controller for suppressing chaotic oscillations of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system and ensuring state constraints of the system, comprising:ensuring an unviolated output constraint of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system using a symmetric barrier Lyapunov function;adopting an RBF neural network having an adaptive rule 20 to estimate an unknown nonlinear function with an arbitrarily small error;introducing an extended state tracking differentiator to address a need of a virtual control item for repeated derivative calculations in a backstepping control;25 designing a state observer to obtain immeasurable state information; and2018100710 25 May 2018 fusing the extended state tracking differentiator and the state observer in a backstepping framework.
- 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein if ancj are defined as new variables, expression (1) of the system model in (a) is rewritten as:^-=x2,y = xi η ί > \ 6 (l + 2Acos(w0/)) = -mx2 —11 + 2h a{ Ixj H— - 7 + 2a{hx^ —axxx +u(t} (2) , wherein a system output y satisfies a constraint condition , where Ti>0
- 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein in (b), the constructing an adaptive neural network controller for suppressing chaotic oscillations of the arch-shaped microelectromechanical system and ensuring state constraints of the system comprises:(bl) constructing the state observer expressed as:|v= V+ Kfy- 1,) | % = G(i/)+ /, (1)+ K2 (y - 1,) (3) , wherein x t*1’*2! represents an estimation value of [x„x,J ,, V, 4- ί 4- ί Κ=[Κ,Λ,ί L -, and through an appropriate selection of L J „ iK, i«5 = £ 1 « e k 0u e - u wherein expression (4) belongs to a Hurwitz matrix;(4) ,2018100710 25 May 2018 if an error of the state observer and a nonlinear item are defined as z = x~x and . . Z>(l+ 22?cos(Mq)) ,f.fx) “ (1+ 2/Γα,)χ,+ -, __ - mx2 - a]X] + 3a,hx(Bz + f (x) where2b7c h- *7 (5) , /(*) = $ AU)- AU)!Β , and- [zi a! .wherein a Lyapunov function is selected as:V„ = z Pz (6) , where p represents a positive definite matrix, and satisfies the relationship btp+pb=-i- ancj wherein using a Young's inequality a derivative of is obtained as:(7) ; and (b2) constructing the adaptive neural network controller, wherein, wherein an estimation value frhf(X} of a nonlinear item frhf (if) in the system model is expressed by the following RBF neural network expression:Lf(x,q(t)) = qT (t)x(X) <7 = Γ<7ι ,<72>l ,¾ Ί . ,, , / ,i where L 'j represents a weight vector, represents a node number of a neuron, XrzR represents an -P 1- x(X)=[xl(X),x2(X)X ,x,(XW eR1 . _ x, (if) , .input vector, and v ’ 1V 7 2K 7 p with ‘' > being a Gaussian function expressed as:2018100710 25 May 2018m.χ, (%) = exp [X —mf (X —m)2s:i = 1,L , I where s·' represents a width of the Gaussian function, andi. = ,mln]T represents a weight factor;wherein a first error function is defined as si~xi~xrr x,· representing a reference trajectory, and a symmetric barrier Lyapunov function is selected as:V, = —In1. kJ2 kJ — sj 0 (15) , _jy Ls < Zr where b} q , and the constraint condition Nl h' is not violated;wherein a value of the variable is estimated using the state observer, due to an immeasurable state variable %2, ;wherein a second error function is defined as A’2 , where represents a virtual control;wherein a derivative of is given as5i (y+a2-j<fe+z2) + (16) , l· -L· - - v2 , Λ1 h,/·, *-’l where 1 wherein the virtual control is obtained as: fl2C G> 0 where 1 , to obtain:i f <-z ‘ z -c.sJ +^-X+l ‘ ‘ ‘ k, + 4L (17) ;2018100710 25 May 2018 wherein a derivative of ‘2 is calculated as whereL (·) = Λ(χ)-4.(18) , the RBF neural network is used to approximate a nonlinear function: -^0) = ¾ (i)x2 (x„x2)+e2 (x„x2), where e2(x,,x2)>0.wherein a number of weight vectors for the RBF neural network are decreased by taking actions, and the Young's inequality is used to obtain:q( (i)x2 (x,, x2) = — y 2 (t)xT2 (x,, x2 )x2 (x,, x2) + (19) , l20) = |K0k0)||, «2>θ; liO) =12 0)^0), and ^0) i20).where represents an estimation value of wherein an estimation value of the derivative of °2 is obtained using expression (20) of the extended state tracking differentiator:v&t=v i’&2 =-^,2./^ O^-A) (20) , and wherein a nonlinear function exists:fal(de,hei) =KP signOq), > d, represent feedback gains, differentiator error, 4>' where ’ n , and '-I2 hej represents a tracking and Ωρ>θ;wherein a Lyapunov function is selected as:2018100710 25 May 2018 (21) , where “2 >0 ;wherein an extended state tracking differential item v 22 is used to estimate and a time derivative of A is given as :j&+ s2 (f2 (.)+u (t) - v ,2) + — /«2 (ψ* (f) (22) , wherein v 21 a2 ys obtained from expression (20), and there exists the inequality 22 wherein expressions (18) and (20) are substituted into expression (17) to obtain:(&<-zrz-cf +f^^G-y2(t)x[ (xt,x2)x2(xt,x2)s2 + A?2 +e2 + u(t)-v 22 +
- 4~2|/+4£||p||H2 where |e2 (x,,i2 )| < e2 _ (23) , wherein an actual control input and an adaptive rule y H' of the actual control input obtained as:'0) are respectively ί(ή = -[ c21 +| |ί2 “P’-yriz (ήχ2 (xif2)x2 (χιΆ)Α +v 22-c22signs2 f2n2 (2 4), and ln2 (25) , wherein c2i>()f c22>0^ an(g m2 >0 expressyon (24) or (25) .2018100710 25 May 20181/92018100710 25 May 2018Fig. 12/92018100710 25 May 2018Fig. 23/92018100710 25 May 2018CZ) isFig. 3X4/92018100710 25 May 2018 jusuodxs AounduXq xssSjpqFig. 4
- 5/92018100710 25 May 2018Fig. 5
- 6/92018100710 25 May 2018Fig. 6
- 7/92018100710 25 May 2018JOAJOSqO JO J0JJ9 lx ‘(lx)jpqFig. 7
- 8/92018100710 25 May 2018Fig. 8
- 9/92018100710 25 May 2018LOOOIIC\ Ό Ό CMOII cc cc cc cc coΪ3LOOCMOCMO ’stOCDIOIFig. 9
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810263712.0A CN108614419B (en) | 2018-03-28 | 2018-03-28 | Adaptive neural network control method of arc micro-electro-mechanical system |
CN201810263712.0 | 2018-03-28 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU2018100710A4 true AU2018100710A4 (en) | 2018-06-28 |
Family
ID=62635846
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2018100710A Active AU2018100710A4 (en) | 2018-03-28 | 2018-05-25 | Adaptive Neural Network Control Method For Arch-Shaped Microelectromechanical System |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN108614419B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2018100710A4 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110389525A (en) * | 2019-07-15 | 2019-10-29 | 江苏科技大学 | The adaptive backstepping control method of hybrid mechanism based on extreme learning machine |
CN111221250A (en) * | 2020-01-14 | 2020-06-02 | 三峡大学 | Nonlinear system with parameter uncertainty and multiple external disturbances and design method thereof |
CN111781829A (en) * | 2020-06-17 | 2020-10-16 | 西安交通大学 | Neural network control method for backlash compensation of turntable servo system |
CN112180717A (en) * | 2020-10-14 | 2021-01-05 | 河北工业大学 | Heat exchanger temperature fuzzy control method and system based on 2D model |
CN112417750A (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2021-02-26 | 通用汽车环球科技运作有限责任公司 | Virtual sensor for estimating on-line unmeasured variables via successive time derivatives |
CN113031446A (en) * | 2021-03-15 | 2021-06-25 | 贵州大学 | Nonsingular neural self-adaptive tracking control method for uncertain time-lag nonlinear system |
CN113485105A (en) * | 2021-07-02 | 2021-10-08 | 华南理工大学 | Euler-Bernoulli beam self-adaptive iteration control method based on asymmetric output |
CN114721258A (en) * | 2022-02-21 | 2022-07-08 | 电子科技大学 | Lower limb exoskeleton backstepping control method based on nonlinear extended state observer |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109613826B (en) * | 2018-12-17 | 2021-07-27 | 重庆航天职业技术学院 | Anti-oscillation self-adaptive control method of fractional-order arched MEMS resonator |
CN109991852B (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2022-02-22 | 贵州大学 | Control method of fractional order electrostatic driving micro-electromechanical system with hysteresis characteristic |
CN110134011B (en) * | 2019-04-23 | 2022-01-11 | 浙江工业大学 | Inverted pendulum self-adaptive iterative learning inversion control method |
CN110456644B (en) * | 2019-08-13 | 2022-12-06 | 北京地平线机器人技术研发有限公司 | Method and device for determining execution action information of automation equipment and electronic equipment |
CN110501906B (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2022-12-30 | 贵州大学 | Mutual coupling fractional order chaotic electromechanical transducer acceleration self-adaptive fuzzy control method |
CN111427262B (en) * | 2019-11-13 | 2022-03-18 | 西北工业大学 | Intelligent control method for unknown disturbance of MEMS sensor in extreme environment |
CN111308888B (en) * | 2019-12-12 | 2021-05-28 | 山东大学 | Gain strategy-based micro-electromechanical system control method and system |
CN113114156B (en) * | 2021-04-15 | 2022-08-02 | 贵州大学 | MEMS resonator self-adaptive chaotic control circuit and method |
CN117492368A (en) * | 2023-12-12 | 2024-02-02 | 南京工业大学 | Novel criterion of aeroengine control system based on fault-tolerant synchronous control |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9064036B2 (en) * | 2008-04-24 | 2015-06-23 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Methods and systems for monitoring bioactive agent use |
CN102298315B (en) * | 2011-06-21 | 2013-03-27 | 河海大学常州校区 | Adaptive control system based on radial basis function (RBF) neural network sliding mode control for micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) gyroscope |
CN103324087B (en) * | 2013-06-19 | 2015-10-07 | 河海大学常州校区 | Based on the self-adaptation back stepping control system and method for the gyroscope of neural network |
CN104267595A (en) * | 2014-10-21 | 2015-01-07 | 南京理工大学 | Adaptive robust position control method for motor servo system with time-varying output constraint function |
CN105204343B (en) * | 2015-10-13 | 2018-05-15 | 淮阴工学院 | The Nano electro-mechanical system backstepping control methods inputted with output constraint and dead band |
US20170111731A1 (en) * | 2015-10-20 | 2017-04-20 | Sonion Nederland B.V. | Microphone assembly with suppressed frequency response |
CN107479377B (en) * | 2017-08-03 | 2020-06-12 | 淮阴工学院 | Self-adaptive synchronous control method of fractional arc micro electro mechanical system |
-
2018
- 2018-03-28 CN CN201810263712.0A patent/CN108614419B/en active Active
- 2018-05-25 AU AU2018100710A patent/AU2018100710A4/en active Active
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110389525A (en) * | 2019-07-15 | 2019-10-29 | 江苏科技大学 | The adaptive backstepping control method of hybrid mechanism based on extreme learning machine |
CN110389525B (en) * | 2019-07-15 | 2022-06-14 | 江苏科技大学 | Hybrid mechanism self-adaptive backstepping control method based on extreme learning machine |
CN112417750A (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2021-02-26 | 通用汽车环球科技运作有限责任公司 | Virtual sensor for estimating on-line unmeasured variables via successive time derivatives |
CN112417750B (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2024-05-31 | 通用汽车环球科技运作有限责任公司 | Virtual sensor for estimating on-line unmeasurable variables via continuous time derivative |
CN111221250A (en) * | 2020-01-14 | 2020-06-02 | 三峡大学 | Nonlinear system with parameter uncertainty and multiple external disturbances and design method thereof |
CN111221250B (en) * | 2020-01-14 | 2022-06-03 | 三峡大学 | Nonlinear system with parameter uncertainty and multiple external disturbances and design method thereof |
CN111781829A (en) * | 2020-06-17 | 2020-10-16 | 西安交通大学 | Neural network control method for backlash compensation of turntable servo system |
CN112180717A (en) * | 2020-10-14 | 2021-01-05 | 河北工业大学 | Heat exchanger temperature fuzzy control method and system based on 2D model |
CN113031446A (en) * | 2021-03-15 | 2021-06-25 | 贵州大学 | Nonsingular neural self-adaptive tracking control method for uncertain time-lag nonlinear system |
CN113485105A (en) * | 2021-07-02 | 2021-10-08 | 华南理工大学 | Euler-Bernoulli beam self-adaptive iteration control method based on asymmetric output |
CN113485105B (en) * | 2021-07-02 | 2023-02-28 | 华南理工大学 | Euler-Bernoulli beam self-adaptive iteration control method based on asymmetric output |
CN114721258A (en) * | 2022-02-21 | 2022-07-08 | 电子科技大学 | Lower limb exoskeleton backstepping control method based on nonlinear extended state observer |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN108614419B (en) | 2020-12-08 |
CN108614419A (en) | 2018-10-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2018100710A4 (en) | Adaptive Neural Network Control Method For Arch-Shaped Microelectromechanical System | |
Zhao et al. | Adaptive finite-time bipartite consensus for second-order multi-agent systems with antagonistic interactions | |
Wu et al. | Fuzzy adaptive event-triggered control for a class of uncertain nonaffine nonlinear systems with full state constraints | |
Yu et al. | Adaptive finite-time consensus in multi-agent networks | |
Wang et al. | Adaptive finite time coordinated consensus for high-order multi-agent systems: Adjustable fraction power feedback approach | |
Li et al. | Fuzzy modeling and synchronization of two totally different chaotic systems via novel fuzzy model | |
He et al. | Adaptive neural network control of unknown nonlinear affine systems with input deadzone and output constraint | |
Sun et al. | A DSC approach to adaptive neural network tracking control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems | |
Wang et al. | Dynamic learning from adaptive neural control with predefined performance for a class of nonlinear systems | |
Yang et al. | Robust adaptive fault-tolerant control for uncertain nonlinear system with unmodeled dynamics based on fuzzy approximation | |
Asad et al. | Backstepping-based recurrent type-2 fuzzy sliding mode control for MIMO systems (MEMS triaxial gyroscope case study) | |
Wang et al. | Neural learning control of pure-feedback nonlinear systems | |
Si et al. | Decentralized adaptive neural control for high-order stochastic nonlinear strongly interconnected systems with unknown system dynamics | |
Wang et al. | Adaptive event‐triggered consensus control of multi‐agent systems with prescribed performance and input quantization | |
Hua et al. | Adaptive neural event-triggered control of MIMO pure-feedback systems with asymmetric output constraints and unmodeled dynamics | |
Zhang | Adaptive multi-dimensional Taylor network dynamic surface control for a class of strict-feedback uncertain nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics and output constraint | |
Deng et al. | Adaptive fuzzy containment control for nonlinear multi-agent systems with input delay | |
Wu et al. | Adaptive fuzzy output feedback quantized control for uncertain nonlinear hysteretic systems using a new feedback-based quantizer | |
Zhang et al. | Analog circuit implementation and adaptive neural backstepping control of a network of four Duffing-type MEMS resonators with mechanical and electrostatic coupling | |
Cruz‐Zavala et al. | Robust trajectory‐tracking in finite‐time for robot manipulators using nonlinear proportional‐derivative control plus feed‐forward compensation | |
Dávila et al. | On the fixed‐time consensus problem for nonlinear uncertain multiagent systems under switching topology | |
Jmel et al. | Adaptive Observer‐Based Output Feedback Control for Two‐Wheeled Self‐Balancing Robot | |
Bond et al. | Stabilizing schemes for piecewise-linear reduced order models via projection and weighting functions | |
Wu et al. | Adaptive neural network dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems with uncertain time delays | |
Sun et al. | Linear convergence of distributed mirror descent with integral feedback for strongly convex problems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FGI | Letters patent sealed or granted (innovation patent) |