AU2015202414B2 - Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling - Google Patents

Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2015202414B2
AU2015202414B2 AU2015202414A AU2015202414A AU2015202414B2 AU 2015202414 B2 AU2015202414 B2 AU 2015202414B2 AU 2015202414 A AU2015202414 A AU 2015202414A AU 2015202414 A AU2015202414 A AU 2015202414A AU 2015202414 B2 AU2015202414 B2 AU 2015202414B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
codebook
pmi
rank
values
user equipment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
AU2015202414A
Other versions
AU2015202414A1 (en
Inventor
Narayan Prasad
Sampath Rangarajan
Guosen Yue
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NEC Corp
Original Assignee
NEC Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2014262186A external-priority patent/AU2014262186B2/en
Application filed by NEC Corp filed Critical NEC Corp
Priority to AU2015202414A priority Critical patent/AU2015202414B2/en
Publication of AU2015202414A1 publication Critical patent/AU2015202414A1/en
Assigned to NEC CORPORATION reassignment NEC CORPORATION Request for Assignment Assignors: NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2015202414B2 publication Critical patent/AU2015202414B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

A method implemented in a base station used in a wireless communications system is disclosed. The method comprises receiving, from a user equipment, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI) (codebook index il), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein, for RI = 2, values 8-15 are assigned to the joint encoding of the RI and the first PMI (IRI/PMII). Other methods, apparatuses, and systems also are disclosed. 10001207 (IRN: P130772D1)

Description

Channel State Information (CSI) Feedback and Codebook Subsampling [0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/832,635, entitled “CSI Feedback and Subsampling of 4-Tx Codebook,” filed on June 7, 2013, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/864,082, entitled “Subsampling of 4-Tx Codebook,” filed on August 9, 2013, the contents of both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
[0002] This application is a divisional application of Australian Patent Application No. 2014262186, filed on June 5, 2014, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND
[0003] The present invention relates to the codebook for wireless or mobile communications systems and, more particularly, to feedback information for the codebook.
[0004] 1. Introduction [0005] In recent 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project) meetings, it has been agreed that 3GPP Release 12 (Rel. 12) or later LTE (Long Term Evolution), also known as LTE-Advanced or LTE-A, adopts a new codebook for the multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) with 4 transmission antennas (4-Tx) based on the double-codebook structure, i.e., the precoder G=W1W2, as for 8-Tx codebook in 3GPP Release 10.
[0006] In the latest RANI meeting, RAN1#73, two codebooks in [1], solution 2a and 2b, have been agreed as the only candidates for new 4-Tx codebook with 4-bit W1 codebook and 4-bit W2 codebook for both rank land 2. They share the same W1 codebook with wide-spaced beams and the W2 entries for rank 1. For rank-2 W2, the two codebooks have different entries.
[0007] Codebook solution 2a in [1] can be adopted as the enhanced 4Tx codebook for rank 1 and 2.
[0008] For rank-3 and 4, it is decided that W1 is an identity matrix and W2 uses Release 8 4-Tx codeword (rank 3 and 4).
[0009] On the other hand, for the uplink periodic channel state information (CSI) feedback in physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), the number of bits packed for each CSI report is limited due to limited channel resources. Therefore, for the periodic CSI feedback based on new 4-Tx codebooks, subsampling is needed in some feedback modes.
[0010] We consider the design of subsampling of 4-Tx codebook for periodic CSI feedback in PUCCH, particularly mode 1-1 submode 1 and submode 2, and mode 2-1.
[0011] Transmission rank (sometimes called “rank”) is the number of transmission layers (sometimes called “layers”). A codebook is a set of codewords. A codeword is also known as a precoder or precoding matrix.
[0012] References [0013] [1] Rl-132738, “Way Forward of 4Tx Rank 1 and 2 Codebook Design for Downlink MIMO Enhancement in Rel-12”, Alcatel-Lucent, et. al.
[0014] [2] 3GPP TS36.211 “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation”, vl 1.2.0, March 2013.
[0015] [3] 3GPP TS36.213 “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical layer procedures”, vl 1.2.0, February 2013.
BRIEF SUMMARY
[0016] In view of the foregoing, a need exists to provide a solution to transmit from a user equipment to a base station feedback information for the codebook.
[0017] An aspect of the present disclosure includes a method implemented in a base station used in a wireless communications system. The method comprises receiving, from a user equipment, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein 5 bits are used for transmission of the jointly encoded RI and first PMI, and wherein first 8 values of values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=1, second 8 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=2, a third value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=3, a fourth value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=4, and remaining 14 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are reserved.
[0018] Another aspect of the present disclosure includes a method implemented in a user equipment used in a wireless communications system. The method comprises transmitting, to a base station, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein 5 bits are used for transmission of the jointly encoded RI and first PMI, and wherein first 8 values of values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=1, second 8 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=2, a third value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=3, a fourth value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=4, and remaining 14 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are reserved.
[0019] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a base station used in a wireless communications system. The base station comprises a receiver to receive, from a user equipment, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein 5 bits are used for transmission of the jointly encoded RI and first PMI, and wherein first 8 values of values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=1, second 8 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=2, a third value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=3, a fourth value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=4, and remaining 14 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are reserved.
[0020] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a user equipment used in a wireless communications system. The user equipment comprises a transmitter to transmit, to a base station, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein 5 bits are used for transmission of the jointly encoded RI and first PMI, and wherein first 8 values of values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=1, second 8 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=2, a third value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=3, a fourth value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=4, and remaining 14 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are reserved.
[0021] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a method implemented in a wireless communications system. The method comprises transmitting, from a user equipment to a base station, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein 5 bits are used for transmission of the jointly encoded RI and first PMI, and wherein first 8 values of values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=1, second 8 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=2, a third value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=3, a fourth value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=4, and remaining 14 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are reserved.
[0022] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a wireless communications system. The wireless communications system comprises a base station; and a user equipment to transmit, to the base station, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein 5 bits are used for transmission of the jointly encoded RI and first PMI, and wherein first 8 values of values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=1, second 8 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are used for RI=2, a third value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=3, a fourth value of the values expressed by the 5 bits is used for RI=4, and remaining 14 values of the values expressed by the 5 bits are reserved.
[0023] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a method implemented in a base station used in a wireless communications system. The method comprises receiving, from a user equipment, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI) (codebook index ii), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein, for RI = 2, values 8-15 are assigned to the joint encoding of the RI and the first PMI (1Ш / PMIl)- [0024] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a method implemented in a user equipment used in a wireless communications system. The method comprises transmitting, to a base station, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI) (codebook index fi), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein, for RI = 2, values 8-15 are assigned to the joint encoding of the RI and the first PMI (Iri/pmii)• [0025] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a base station used in a wireless communications system. The base station comprises a receiver to receive, from a user equipment, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI) (codebook index z'i), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein, for RI = 2, values 8-15 are assigned to the joint encoding of the RI and the first PMI (Iri/pmii)- [0026] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a user equipment used in a wireless communications system. The user equipment comprises a transmitter to transmit, to a base station, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI) (codebook index z'i), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein, for RI = 2, values 8-15 are assigned to the joint encoding of the RI and the first PMI (Iri/pmii)- [0027] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a method implemented in a wireless communications system. The method comprises transmitting, from a user equipment to a base station, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI) (codebook index fi), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein, for RI = 2, values 8-15 are assigned to the joint encoding of the RI and the first PMI (Iri/pmii)- [0028] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a wireless communications system. The wireless communications system comprises a base station, and a user equipment to transmit, to the base station, rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI) (codebook index ii), and a second PMI, the RI and the first PMI being jointly encoded, wherein, for RI = 2, values 8-15 are assigned to the joint encoding of the RI and the first PMI (Iri/pmii)- [0029] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a method implemented in a base station used in a wireless communications system. The method comprises receiving, from a user equipment, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index i2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index z2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices /2 for RI=2 consist of one of {0, 1, 4, 5}, {2, 3, 6, 7}, {2, 6, 14, 15}, and (3, 7, 14, 15}.
[0030] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a method implemented in a user equipment used in a wireless communications system. The method comprises transmitting, to a base station, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index z2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index z2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices z2 for RI=2 consist of one of (0, 1, 4, 5}, (2, 3, 6, 7}, {2, 6, 14, 15}, and {3,7, 14,15}.
[0031] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a base station used in a wireless communications system. The base station comprises a receiver to receive, from a user equipment, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index z2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index z2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices z2 for RI=2 consist of one of {0, 1,4,5}, {2, 3, 6, 7}, {2, 6, 14, 15}, and {3,7, 14,15}.
[0032] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a user equipment used in a wireless communications system. The user equipment comprises a transmitter to transmit, to a base station, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index z2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index z2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices z2 for RI=2 consist of one of {0, 1,4,5}, {2, 3, 6, 7}, {2, 6, 14, 15}, and {3,7, 14,15}.
[0033] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a method implemented in a wireless communications system. The method comprises transmitting, from a user equipment to a base station, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index i2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index i2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=2 consist of one of (0, 1, 4, 5}, (2, 3, 6, 7}, {2, 6, 14, 15}, and {3,7, 14,15}.
[0034] Still another aspect of the present disclosure includes a wireless communications system comprises a base station, and a user equipment to transmit, to the base station, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index i2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI IrXii2 for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index i2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=2 consist of one of{0, 1,4,5}, {2, 3, 6, 7}, {2, 6, 14, 15}, and {3, 7, 14, 15}.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0035] Fig. 1 depicts W1 statistics for codebook 2a and 2b for rank 1 and 2 in cross-polarized (Xpol) antennas with '/2-л antenna spacing.
[0036] Fig. 2 depicts W1 statistics for codebook 2a and 2b for rank 1 and 2 in cross-polarized (Xpol) antennas with 4-X antenna spacing.
[0037] Fig. 3 depicts W2 statistics for codebook 2a and 2b for 2 in cross-polarized (Xpol) antennas with 0.5-Л, antenna spacing.
[0038] Fig. 4 depicts W2 statistics for codebook 2a and 2b for 2 in cross-polarized (Xpol) antennas with 4-X antenna spacing.
[0039] Fig. 5 depicts W2 statistics for codebook 2a and 2b for 2 in cross-polarized (Xpol) antennas (a) with 0.5-Л, antenna spacing and (b) with 4-X antenna spacing.
[0040] Fig. 6 is a block diagram of a MIMO system.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0041] 2 Enhanced 4-Tx codebooks [0042] 2.1 Enhanced 4-Tx codebooks for rank 1 and 2 [0043] In agreed work assumption, two solutions (solution 2a and 2b) in [1] are selected for enhanced 4-Tx codebook candidates for rank 1 and 2, which are described as follows.
[0044] Solution 2a: W, = ^ where n = 0,1,.., 15
L о X„J x„ = \ l L n+24 where qx = е]2жт
[_4i 4i 4i 4i J f 1 Г Y 1 1 Г Y 1 1 Г Y 1 1 Г Y 1]
For rank 1, W2„ ,—j= ,—j= ,—j= [ ' [V2 L«(/)yJ ’ V2 L jam\ V2 L-a(/)YJ yfl j a (i)Y\\ and Y g fe1,e2,e3,e4} and a(i) = q12(‘ I)', Г1 Г Y, Y7 1 1 Г Y, Y7 1]
’ 2" [21Y, -y.J^La -;y2JJ and (Y1sY2)= (et,ek) e {(e1,e1),(e2,e2),(e3,e3),(e4,e4),(e1,e2),(e2,e3),(e1,e4),(e2,e4)}, [0045] Solution 2b: W, = ^" ^ where n = ОД,..,15
L° XJ x„ — „ и+8 и+16 и+24 where qx — e2 l<li 4i 4i 4i \ [ 1 Г Y 1 1 Г Y 1 1 Г Y 1 1 Г Y 1]
Forrankl, W2n e]-r= ,-j= ,-j= ,—j= \ • |V2L«0')yJ &amp;\_ja(j)Y\ V2L-«0')yJ 42l-joc(i)Y\\ and Y e {el,e2,e3,e4} anda(/') = g,12(,_1);
For rank 2, fi[y, y,1 iTy, y.IiTy, y,1 i[ y. y,1], ч , > W2'" £ |"2 Yj Y2 ’2 Yj -Y2 ’2 - Yj Y2 ’2 -Y3 -Y2 j(Yl’Y^6 and W2„ej| у -у \ -fY }(Yi’ Y2)e ^(e?I,),(e2,e2),(e3,e3),(e4,e4)} and W2„ej| у -y ’j(Yi’ Y2)e {(ei,e3),(e2,e4),(e3,),(e4,e2)} [0046] In both codebooks, e, denotes a 4 by 1 vector with the /th entry being 1 and zero for all other entries. We can see the only difference between codebook 2a and 2b are rank-2 W2 entries. Among 16 entries of rank-2 W2 entries, they share 9 entries.
[0047] Following the same W1W2 index structures for 8-Tx codebook in 3GPP TS36.213, we first fix the indices for these two codebooks as follows: [0048] For W1 with index i 1, we have IX ol wi= 0'‘ x , h = 0,1, ,15 where
Г 1 1 1 1 1 7 / ,A X = а =ещ 1 к x8 x16 ^l+24J, ' [0049] For W2 rank 1, denote к as the index for the 4 entries of W Jj-Г Y 1—Г Y 1 _L[ Y 1 _L[ Y 11
2’” [V2 _a(i)Y_ V2 _ja(i)Y_ 42 _-a(i)Y_ 42 - ja(i)Y_ J and l as the index for the column selection e, and со-phasing term cdj) as in YG{el,e2,e3,e4\a(i) = g12(i_1).
[0050] We then define W2 index z2=(z-l)*4+£-l, i= 1, 2, 3, 4, k= 1, 2, 3, 4, for rank-1 precoding matrix.
[0051] For W2 rank 2 in solution 2a, denote k, k=l, 2, as the index for the two entries in ГХ y2 1 TYi Y2 11
Mi*: -vJU -k\\ and i, i=l,8, as the index for the column selection pairs as in (Y1 7 Y2 ) { (e 1 7 ei )> (e2 7 e2 )> (e3 7 e3 )> (e4 7 e4 )> (ei 7 e2 )> (S2 5 ^3 )> 1 7 ^4 )> (S2 5 S4 ) } [0052] We then define rank-2 W2 index i2 as /2=(/-1)*2+A:-1 for solution 2a.
[0053] We can see that rank-2 W2 of z2 =0,..., 7 in solution 2a also appear in solution 2b, we adopt the same index z2 for these 8 entries for rank-2 W2 in solution 2b.
[0054] Then we define z2 =8,..., 11, for following 4 entries in the listed order |Ty y21 [”y, y2 1Г y. y21 Г y. y,1] u u and h =12,..., 15, for following 4 entries in the listed order W2>„g|x J, (Y,, Y2) e {(e,, ) (e,, e4) (e,, e, ) (e4 ,e2)}.
[0055] Note that the rank-2 W2 of z2 = 9 in solution 2b is the same as the entry of z2 =14 in solution 2a.
[0056] 2.2 Enhanced 4-Tx codebooks for rank 3 and 4 [0057] For rank 3 and 4 in the new codebooks, W1 is identity matrix, and W2 uses Release 8 codebook as in [2].
[0058] 3 CSI feedback in PUCCH based on new 4-Tx codbook [0059] For Release 8 4-Tx codebook, there are 16 precoding codewords for each rank, which requires a 4-bit overhead for precoding matrix indicator (PMI) feedback. This can be handled for periodic CSI feedback in PUCCH. Therefore, no subsampling on the codebook is needed.
[0060] However, when double codebook is adopted and each codebook is 4-bit size, the feedback overhead is too large if we send the full CSI feedbacks. To reduce the feedback overhead, we propose the following subsampling schemes on the enhanced 4-Tx codebook for various feedback modes.
Table 1 W1 beam components in enhanced 4Tx codebook.
[0061] 3.1 PUCCH CSI feedback mode 1-1 submode 1 [0062] In PUCCH CSI feedback mode 1-1, users are configured to report a RI, a wideband channel quality indicator (CQI, quantized SINR or signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio) and a wideband precoding matrix indicator (PMI) to the network in a CSI process. The feedback of rank indicator or rank indication (RI), CQI and PMI can be configured with different periodicity. With double codebook structures, two indexes corresponding to W1 and W2 are feedback. Since W1 captures the channel condition in a relatively long term and large bandwidth, the feedback of W1 index (first PMI) can be configured in a longer period than that of W2. In submode lof PUCCH feedback mode 1-1, the feedback of RI and W1 is configured in the same periodicity. Thus joint encoding of RI and W1 information has been adopted. In 3GPP Release 10, 5-bit is used to represent an entry of RI and W1 for 8-Tx codebook. Thus subsampling is required as total number of entries of RI and W1 for 8-Tx would be more than 32.
[0063] With the enhanced 4-Tx codebook, the total number of entries for RI and W1 information is 34 (16 each for rank 1 and 2, 2 entries for rank 3 and 4, assuming agreed 4-bit W1 for 4-Tx codebooks). Thus subsampling is also required for the enhanced 4-Tx codebook.
[0064] We now propose the following solutions for subsampling of RI and W1 (first PMI) entries for PUCCH mode 1-1, submode 1, for 4 antenna ports based on new 4-Tx codebook structure: [0065] I. For the first 16 entries, we select 8 W1 entries (subsampled form 16 W1 codewords as in Section 2.1) each for rank 1 and rank 2, which can be represented by 4 bits. For rank 3 and 4, since W1 is fixed to the identity, we only needs two entries represent the rank. Thus for 4-antenna ports, 4-layer spatial multiplexing, total 5 bits are needed for the feedback of joint encoded RI and first PMI. Thus, there are 14 entries are not in use, which can be reserved for future usage. If 2-layer spatial multiplexing for 4-antenna ports, e.g., a rank restriction is indicated by the network, i.e., rank < =2, only 4-bit payload size is needed for feedback of joint encoded RI and PMI.
[0066] II. To reduce feedback and number of redundant, unused entries, we can pack all entries with a total 4-bit payload size for PUCCH feedback. This can be solved into two following alternatives: [0067] a. For the first 8 entries, we select 4 W1 entries (subsampled form 16 W1 codewords as in Section 2.1) each for rank 1 and rank 2, which can be represented by a 3-bit payload. For rank 3 and 4, additional two entries representing the rank information are included which makes the total 4 bits. Thus for 4-antenna ports, 4-layer spatial multiplexing, total 4 bits are needed for the feedback of joint encoded RI and first PMI. Thus, there are 6 entries are not in use, which can be reserved for future usage. If 2-layer spatial multiplexing for 4-antenna ports, e.g., a rank restriction is indicated by the network, i.e., rank < =2, only 3-bit payload size is needed for feedback of joint encoded RI and PMI.
[0068] b. In this approach, 14 entries are used to represent the joint RI and first PMI for rank 1 and 2. The entries can be equally split, i.e., 7 for each rank. Different numbers can also adopted as the statistics of rank 1 and rank 2 could be different. For rank 3 and 4, additional two entries representing the rank information are included which makes the total 4 bits. Thus total 4 bits are needed for the feedback of joint encoded RI and first PMI with or without rank restriction for the CSI feedback. Compared with 2a, this certainly brings some performance can as more W1 codewords are retained for rank 1 and 2. Compared alternative solution 1, it is expected only a slight performance degradation as only 1 less W1 codewords are in solution 2b than that in 1, but one bit feedback overhead is saved.
[0069] Based on above alternative subsampling schemes for PUCCH CSI feedback mode 1-1 submode 1, feedback of jointly encoder RI and the first PMI, we now provide some detailed design solutions as follows.
Table 1.1 A design subsampling based on Alternative I in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 1 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) stmcture.
[0070] A subsampling design based on Alt. I is provided in Table 1.1. It is a solution with simple specification. We now also provide several other designs which might have a certain performance improvement. First, we resort to the system level simulations to obtain statistics of W1 selections in codebook 2a and 2b. Note that although the W1 codebooks are same in 2a and 2b, the rank -2 codebooks are different, which could affect the W1 statistics slightly. The results of W1 statistics for Xpol antennas with А-к and 4-л antenna spacing are presented in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, respectively.
[0071] We can see that for rank-2, W1 codewords with index /Т=0, 1,..., 7 are most selected for both codebooks (The only exception is for 2a, i\= 15 also has a high percentage.) For simplicity, we can use /'i=0, 1,..., 7 for rank-2. For rank-1, it is a little complicated. For the case of close spaced (0.5-X) antennas, /'i=0, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, have higher selection ratios than others. For the case of wide (4-Л) spaced antennas shown in Fig. 2, W1 with z'i=0, 15 have higher ratios than others. One design criterion for subsampling of W1 for rank-1 could be including {z'i=0, 7, 13, 15} as a subset for any subsampling codebooks for this feedback mode 1-1 submode 1. Since the same column (beam) in two consecutive W1 s have the small beam spacing, thus for rank-1, we can still adopt equal interval subsampling z'i, either the set {1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15} or the set (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14}.
[0072] Also as shown in Table 1, since two Wls with index z'i and z'i+8 consist of same beam components, for rank 2, there are many overlaps on the final codewords among these twoWl codeword sets. Thus one way is taking {z'i}={0,l,..., 7} as the subsampledWl for mode 1-1, submode 1.
[0073] For rank 1, thanks to the со-phasing term, a(i), the codeword redundancy issue due to complete beam overlap among W1 is gone. It would be beneficial to have the beams span in all angle space with a uniform beam spacing for the same beam and co-phasing term selections from a W2 entry. Therefore, it is better to have the subsampling of W1 for rank 1 as {z'i| /4=0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14}.
[0074] The design solution of 4-Tx codebook subsampling for PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 1 is then summarized in Table 1.2 in which we take (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14} for rank-1 based on above discussions.
Table 1.2 A codebook subsampling design based on Alternative I in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 1 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
[0075] Based on subsampling scheme Alt II-а, and the W1 statistics in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, we form a codebook subsampling design solution shown in Table 1.3. Since for rank 2, as shown in Fig. 1, W1 with i 1=0, 7 are quite dominant for close spaced antennas compared their neighbors, we then keep them and select (0, 3, 5, 7} as the subsampling results for rank-2. For rank 1, we still choose the equally spaced Wl’s.
Table 1.3 A codebook subsampling design example based on Alternative II-а in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 1 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
[0076] Based on subsampling scheme Alt П-b, and the W1 statistics in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, we form a codebook subsampling design solution shown in Table 1.4. Since for Alt Il-b, we have total 14 entries for joint RI and the first PMIs for rank 1 and 2, we cannot have equally spaced Wls. Based on the statistics shown in Figs. 1, and 2, we provide a solution in Table 1.4. Here we consider 7 entries for each rank. However, the number of entries can be different as the importance or statistics of rank 1 and rank 2 can be different. For example, for MU-MIMO pairing, it has been shown that paired user with rank-1 transmissions are better. Thus it would be better have more entries (less subsampling) for rank 1 than rank 2.
Table 1.4 A codebook subsampling design example based on Alternative II-а in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 1 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
[0077] If one of the proposed alternatives is adopted, the report type (type-5 report [3]) shall be modified for 4 antenna ports when new codebook is configured. The modified type 5 report is given in Tables 2.1-2.3 for alternative I, II-а, and П-b, respectively.
Table 2.1 Modified report type to accommodate feedback alternative I in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 1 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
Table 2.2 Report type defined for feedback alternative II-а in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 1 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
Table 2.3 Modified report type to accommodate feedback alternative П-b in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 1 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
[0078] 3.2A PUCCH CSI feedback mode 1-1 submode 2 [0079] In submode 2 of PUCCH CSI feedback mode 1-1, the user can be configured to report the CQI and complete preferred precoder information (first PMI for W1 and second PMI for W2). Thus total number of feedback bits would be 12 bits (4-bit CQI, 4-bit W1 and 4-bit W2) for rank 1 CSI feedback, 15 bits (two CQIs 7bit+4-bit Wl, 4-bit W2) for rank 2 feedback, or 11 bits (7 bits for two CQIs, 4 bits for W2) for rank 3 or rank 4 feedback. For PUCCH, currently maximum number of bits for each report is 11-bits. Thus, codebook subsampling is needed for rank-1 and 2 feedback when PUCCH feedback mode 1-1 submode 2 is configured, while there is no need of codebook subsampling for rank-3 and 4.
[0080] We then propose the following two alternatives for rank-1/2 codebook subsampling for enhanced 4-Tx codebook: [0081] III. For both rank-1 and rank -2, we select the total 16 entries for W1/W2 (the first PMI and second PMI). Thus the total number of bits for PMI is 4 for both rank-1 and 2.
[0082] IV. For rank-2, we select 16 entries for W1/W2. But for rank-1 since only one CQI is reported which uses 4 bits, we can subsample less for the rank-1 codewords to improve the performance. One design example is given below in which uses total 7 bits.
[0083] We now discuss the design based on above proposed two alternatives.
[0084] For alternative III, when 4 bits are allocated for W1/W2 reporting, we consider 3/1 splitting, i.e., 3 bits are allocated for W1 and 1 bit for W2.
[0085] For sub-sampling the inner codebook (Wl) we can simply sub-sample the centers in a uniform manner. Note that the wideband codebook has the following 16 centers [0:15]/32.
[0086] To get a 3-bit subsampled version we can simply choose the 8 inner codewords (Wl) with indexes (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14} or as discussed in section 3.1 A, we consider (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14} for rank 1 and (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} for rank-2.
[0087] For sub-sampling the outer codebook (W2), we can enforce a criterion in the rank-2 case that at-least one outer codeword in the sub-sampled codebook enables selecting orthogonal beams from the inner codeword. Using this criterion an example 2 bit rank-2 outer sub-sampled codebook 2a is to use (ei,ei) with the 2 со-phasing options and (e2,e4) with the 2 со-phasing options.
[0088] Or based on the average ratios of W2 selections for rank 2 from the original codebooks obtained via simulations shown in Figs. 3, and 4, we can select two of {(ei,ei), (е2,ег), (ез,ез) (e^)} with the first со-phasing option.
[0089] Also based on the average ratios of W2 selections for rank 1 from the original codebooks obtained via simulations shown in Fig. 5, we can select two of {(ei), (e2), (e3) (в4)} with the first со-phasing option, e.g. {(ei,ei), (e3,e3)} with W2„ a^Y with Ye{ e,„e3\a(i) = ql(1~l).
Table 3.1A A codebook subsampling design example based on Alternative III in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
Table 3.2A A codebook subsampling design example based on Alternative IV in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) stmcture.
[0090] For alternative IV, for rank-1, total payload size is 7 for W1/W2. Thus we only need to sub-sampling rank-1 W2 codebooks. We now consider sub-sampling for the enhanced codebook in the rank-1 case. Since the inner codebooks are identical and the rank-1 outer codebooks are the same for codebooks 2a and 2b, we can consider either one of them in this procedure.
[0091] We consider the case when the sub-sampled outer codebook size is 8 so that Q=(8 choose 2)=28). For rank-1 both Chordal distance and Fubini Study are equivalent distance measures and the following 16 choices were found to have near-optimal metrics:
Columns 1 through 16 0000000011111111 2222222233333333 4444555544445555 6666777766667777 8899889988998899 10 10 11 11 10 10 11 11 10 10 11 11 10 10 11 11 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 [0092] Again, further down selection can be done by comparing with the average ratios of W2 selections from the original codebooks obtained via simulations.
[0093] Certain other criteria can be used (or can be imposed on top of the aforementioned procedures) for sub-sampling.
[0094] Based on the above and simulation results shown in Fig. 5 for average ratio of rank-1 W2 selections, (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14} can be adopted for codebook subsampling for PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2.
[0095] If one of the proposed alternatives is adopted, the report type (type-2c report [3]) shall be modified for 4 antenna ports when new codebook is configured. The modified type 2c report is given in Tables 4.1A-4.2A for alternative III and IV, respectively.
Table 4.1A Modified report type 2c to accommodate feedback alternative III in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
Table 4.2A Modified report type 2c to accommodate feedback alternative IV in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
[0096] 3.2B PUCCH CSI feedback mode 1-1 submode 2 [0097] In submode 2 of PUCCH CSI feedback mode 1-1, the user can be configured to report the CQI and complete preferred precoder information (first PMI for W1 and second PMI for W2). Thus total number of feedback bits would be 12 bits (4-bit CQI, 4-bit W1 and 4-bit W2) for rank 1 CSI feedback, 15 bits (two CQIs 7bit+4-bit Wl, 4-bit W2) for rank 2 feedback, or 11 bits (7 bits for two CQIs, 4 bits for W2) for rank 3 or rank 4 feedback. For PUCCH, currently maximum number of bits for each report is 11-bits. Thus, codebook subsampling is needed for rank-1 and 2 feedback when PUCCH feedback mode 1-1 submode 2 is configured, while there is no need of codebook subsampling for rank-3 and 4.
[0098] We then propose the following two alternatives for rank-1/2 codebook subsampling for enhanced 4-Tx codebook: [0099] III. For both rank-1 and rank -2, we select the total 16 entries for W1/W2 (the first PMI and second PMI). Thus the total number of bits is 4 for both rank-1 and 2.
[00100] IV. For rank-2, we select 16 entries for W1/W2. But for rank-1 since only one CQI is reported which uses 4 bits, we can subsample less for the rank-1 codewords to improve the performance. Two design examples are given below which use total 7 bits.
[00101] We now discuss the design based on proposed two alternatives.
[00102] For alternative III, when 4 bits are allocated for W1/W2 reporting, we first consider 3/1 splitting, i.e., 3 bits are allocated for W1 and 1 bit for W2.
[00103] For sub-sampling the inner codebook (Wl) we can simply sub-sample the centers in a uniform manner. Note that the wideband codebook has the following 16 centers [0:15]/32.
[00104] To get a 3-bit subsampled version we can simply choose the 8 inner codewords (Wl) with indexes (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14} or as discussed in section 3.1B, we can consider (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14} for rank 1 and (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} for rank-2.
[00105] For sub-sampling the outer codebook (W2), we can optionally enforce a criterion in the rank-2 case that at-least one outer codeword in the sub-sampled codebook enables selecting orthogonal beams from the inner codeword. Using this criterion an example 1 bit rank-2 outer sub-sampled codebook is formed by (e2, e4) with the 2 со-phasing options corresponding to i2 in (14, 15}. This choice of W2 can be used with subsampled Wl (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} or more preferably used with Wl indices (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14} for more balanced sampling.
[00106] Alternatively, based on the average ratios of W2 selections for rank 2 from the original codebooks obtained via simulations shown in Figs. 3, and 4, we can select two of {(ei, ei), (e2, e2), (e3, e3) (e4, e4)} with the first со-phasing option. For instance, we can select {( e\, e{), (e3, e3)} as W2 subsampling. Then we can select the first со-phasing entry for each beam pair, i.e, z2=0, 4. However, with this selection, the selected beams are not in uniform beam spacing. Thus, if we do not restrict to have the same subsampling for Wl as in submode 1, we can apply the subsampling of z'ig{0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14} for Wl. Then with subsampling of {(eb e{), (e3, e3)}, we have the beam selections with a uniform separation.
[00107] Also for rank 1 from the original codebooks, we can choose two of {(ei), (e2), (e3) (e4)} which select two orthogonal beams. Thus two rank-1 codewords with same W1 will be orthogonal. Hence we can choose either {(ei), (e3)} or {(e2) (e4)} pair with a fixed cophasing term. For example with {(ei), (e3)}, we have w2.„^ a^Y with Y&amp;{el,e3\a(j) = ql{t~v>.
[00108] For the со-phasing terms, we can simply choose the first entry of each one, i.e. (a(l), k=l) or z2=0 for e\; (a(3), k=l) or z2=8 for e3. We can see for z2=0, the co-phasing term is 1. Then it is just the beam selection. For z2=8, the overall со-phasing term is q\ .
The results are summarized in Table 3.1B.
Table 3.1B A codebook subsampling design example based on Alternative III in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) stmcture.
[00109] If different bit splitting is allowed for rank-1, we can have 2/2 bit splitting, i.e., allocate 2 bits for W1 subsampling and 2 bits for W2 subsampling. Under this option, we can select iie{0, 2, 4, 6} for W1 and {(ei), (e2), (e3) (e4)} for W2 sub sampling with a certain к or set of k. With this solution, we can still cover beam space with a uniform beam spacing, just with a со-phasing term changed for every 4 codewords instead of 8. With k=l, we have overall со-phasing terms given by 1, q\ , q\ , q\ for i=l, 2, 3, 4 (i.e., {(ei), (e2), (e3), (e4)}) respectively. The resulting subsampling for rank 1 W2 is i2e{0, 4, 8, 12}. This subsampling design solution is summarized in Table 3.2B.
Table 3.2B A codebook subsampling design example based on Alternative III in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) stmcture.
Table 3.3B A codebook subsampling design example based on Alternative IV in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) stmcture.
[00110] For alternative IV, for rank-1, total payload size is 7 for W1/W2. We first consider sub-sampling only rank-1 W2 codebook in the enhanced codebook in the rank-1 case.
[00111] We consider the case when the sub-sampled outer codebook size is 8 (so that Q=(8 choose 2)=28). For rank-1 both Chordal distance and Fubini Study are equivalent distance measures and the following 16 choices were found to have near-optimal metrics: Columns 1 through 16 0000000011111111 2222222233333333 4444555544445555 6666777766667777 8899889988998899 10 10 11 11 10 10 11 11 10 10 11 11 10 10 11 11 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 [00112] Again, further down selection can be done by comparing with the average ratios of W2 selections from the original codebooks obtained via simulations.
[00113] Certain other criteria can be used (or can be imposed on top of the aforementioned procedures) for sub-sampling.
[00114] Based on the above and simulation results shown in Fig. 5 for average ratio of rank-1 W2 selections, (0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14} can be adopted for codebook subsampling for PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2, as summarized in Table 3.3B.
[00115] We also note in the rank-1 case with 7 bit total load, we can instead retain the 4 bit W2 codebook and subsample W1 codebook instead. In this case our preference is to uniformly subsample W1 as (0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14} to better cover the beam angular space.
[00116] If one of the proposed alternatives is adopted, the report type (type-2c report [3]) shall be modified for 4 antenna ports when new codebook is configured. The modified type 2c report is given in Tables 4.1B-4.2B for alternative III and IV, respectively.
Table 4.1B Modified report type 2c to accommodate feedback alternative III in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
Table 4.2B Modified report type 2c to accommodate feedback alternative IV in PUCCH mode 1-1 submode 2 based on 4-Tx codebook with double codebook (W1W2) structure.
[00117] 3.3A PUCCH CSI feedback mode 2-1 [00118] In PUCCH CSI feedback mode 2-1, the user can be configured to report the preferred subband with the corresponding preferred PMI and CQI. For the subband CQI/PMI report, L bits are allocated to report user preferred subband index. When double codebook structure is configured, the use needs to report the CQI and second PMI (for W2). With additional L bits for the subband reporting, the feedback payload size for CQI and second PMI is reduced. For 8-Tx codebook, maximum 9 bits are allocated for subband CQI/second PMI reporting. With the same payload size constraint, we propose the following codebook subsampling for different ranks, which is summarized in Table 5.1 A: [00119] For rank 1, only one CQI is reported. Thus subsampling is not needed. The total number of bits would be 8.
[00120] We now first discuss the subsampling of rank 3 and 4 codebook. Note that for W2, Release 8 codebooks have been adopted for rank-3 and 4. With 2 bits subsampling, we need to select 4 out of 16 codewords.
Table 5.1A
[00121] Rank-3: The sub-sampling to select 4 out of 16 codewords can be done using either the Chordal distance or the Fubini-Study distance measure. Typically chordal distance is more suitable for lower SNRs whereas Fubini-Study is good at larger SNRs.
[00122] For any given choice of 4 codewords (comprising a sub-sampled codebook) we have 6 pairs. For each such pair (comprising of two 4x3 semi-unitary matrix codewords) we can compute a distance. The metric for that choice can be defined to be the minimum of the six distances. Finally, we can select the preferred choice as the one whose associated metric is the largest (i.e., maximum metric).
[00123] There can be multiple choices whose associated metrics are either equal to the maximum or are within a small margin (say 2% or 5%) of the maximum. All such choices are valid selections and represent good candidates.
[00124] In total there are 1820 choices (16 choose 4). We find that there are 5 choices whose metrics are equal to the maximum upon using the Chordal distance as the distance measure. Surprisingly these are the same choices whose metrics are again equal to the maximum when using the Fubini-Study distance as the distance measure. These indices are (0 2 8 10}, (0 9 10 11}, {1 2 3 8}, (1 3 9 11}, (12 13 14 15}.
[00125] Indeed no other choices have metrics in either case that are within 5% of the maximum. Thus, any one of these 5 choices is a good selection.
[00126] For rank-4: each codeword is a 4x4 unitary matrix so the distance (either Chordal distance or Fubini-Study) among any two pair of codewords is zero. Thus, a convenient way for sub-sampling is to re-use the indices obtained for the rank-3 case in the rank-4 legacy codebook, to obtain a sub-sampled rank-4 codebook.
[00127] For rank-2, for the enhanced codebooks the situation is a bit more complex since there are multiple inner (wideband) codewords.
[00128] Consider the sub-sampling to obtain a size 4 (2-bit) outer codebook (W2) from the original outer codebook of size 16.
[00129] For each one of the 1820 choices, we can consider each one of the 16 inner codewords and determine the Q distances (where Q is the number of pairs in the sub-sampled outer codebook and is 6 in this example) and then associate the minimum among the Q distances with that inner codeword for that choice. Then, the 16 associated distances (with the 16 inner codewords for that choice) can be combined in a suitable manner into one metric associated with that choice (a suitable way can be a product of the distances or their geometric mean with some regularization etc.). The one or more choices whose metric s are equal to the maximum (or are within a margin of the maximum) can be determined to be suitable candidates.
[00130] Upon performing the aforementioned procedure for rank-2 (with sub-sampled outer codebook size 4 so that Q=6) and the enhanced codebook 2a, we found the following 4 choices (sets of indices out of the 1820 possible ones) that have (near-) maximal metrics under both Chordal distance as well as the Fubini-Study distance: (6 8 11 14}, (6 9 10 15}, (7 8 11 14}, (7 9 10 15}.
[00131] The following 8 choices (out of the 1820) have maximal metrics under Chordal distance: (2 6 14 15}, (2 7 14 15}, (3 6 14 15}, (3 7 14 15}, (6 8 14 15}, (6 9 14 15}, (7 8 14 15}, (7 9 14 15}.
[00132] The following 164 choices (out of the 1820) have (near-) maximal metrics under Chordal distance. Each choice (comprising of 4 indices) is one column in the following:
Columns 1 through 20 00000000000000000000 22222222222223333333 444455556677 14 4444555 6 7 14 15 6 7 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 6 7 14 15 6 7 14
Columns 21 through 40 00000000000000000000 33333344444555556667 5 6 6 7 7 14 6 6 7 7 14 6 6 7 7 14 10 11 14 10 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 15 15 14 15 15
Columns 41 through 60 0 0 111111111111111111 77222222222222233333 11 14 444455556677 14 44445 14 15 6 7 14 15 6 7 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 6 7 14 15 6
Columns 61 through 80 11111111111111111111 33333333444445555566 5 5 5 6677 14 6677 14 6677 14 10 11 7 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 15 15 14
Columns 81 through 100 1 1 1 12222222222222222 67774444444555555567 14 10 11 14 6 6 7 7 12 13 14 6 6 7 7 12 13 14 14 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 15
Columns 101 through 120 33333333333333334444 44444445555555676666 6 6 7 7 12 13 14 6 6 7 7 12 13 14 14 14 8 8 9 9 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 15 14 15 14 15
Columns 121 through 140 44444444444455555555 67777788899966666777 14 8 8 9 9 14 12 13 14 12 13 14 8 8 9 9 14 8 8 9 15 14 15 14 15 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14
Columns 141 through 160 55555555666666777777 77888999888999888999 9 14 12 13 14 12 13 14 10 11 14 10 11 14 10 11 14 10 11 14 15 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 14 15
Columns 161 through 164 8 8 9 9 10 11 10 11 12 13 12 13 15 14 15 14 [00133] Next, upon performing the aforementioned procedure for rank-2 and the enhanced codebook 2b we found the following 54 choices (out of the 1820) that have (near-) maximal metrics under both Chordal distance as well as the Fubini-Study distance: Columns 1 through 20 00001 1 1 1222222222222 44554455666666677777 8 13 8 13 8 13 8 13 8 8 8 9 9 10 12 8 8 8 9 9 11 15 11 15 11 15 11 15 9 10 11 10 11 11 14 9 10 11 10 11
Columns 21 through 40 22222233333333333333 77888966666667777777 10 12 9 9 10 10 8 8 8 9 9 10 12 8 8 8 9 9 10 12 11 14 10 11 11 11 9 10 11 10 11 11 14 9 10 11 10 11 11 14
Columns 41 through 54 33336666777789 8889888988899 10 9 9 10 10 9 9 10 10 9 9 10 10 10 13 10 11 11 11 10 11 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 15 [00134] The following 42 choices (out of the 1820) have maximal metrics under Chordal distance:
Columns 1 through 20 22222222222222223333 666666777777999 10 6666 9 9 9 10 10 13 9 9 9 10 10 13 10 10 13 13 9 9 9 10 10 13 15 13 15 15 10 13 15 13 15 15 13 15 15 15 10 13 15 13
Columns 21 through 40 33333333333366667777 66777777999 10 999 10 999 10 10 13 9 9 9 10 10 13 10 10 13 13 10 10 13 13 10 10 13 13 15 15 10 13 15 13 15 15 13 15 15 15 13 15 15 15 13 15 15 15
Columns 41 through 42 9 9 10 10 12 13 14 15 [00135] A majority (1462 out of 1820) of the choices have near-maximal metrics under Chordal distance which implies that achieving near-optimal metric under both Chordal and Fubini-Study distances is a better option for sub-sampling in this case.
[00136] Further down selection can be done by comparing with the average ratios of W2 selections from the original codebooks obtained via simulations.
[00137] We note that the Chordal distance and Fubini Study distance are more suitable to uncorrelated channels (such as those seen with wide antenna spacing).
[00138] For closely spaced antennas resulting in more correlated channels, we prefer to have more outer codebook entries for which the two columns in the resulting rank-2 codeword comprise of identical beam selections.
[00139] Based on above discussion and results shown in Figs. 3 and 4, we find (0, 2, 4, 8} could be a good option, for W2 subsampling, indicating that for 2a, and 2b, W2>„g|y _Yy J with (Y,, Y2)e {(e,,e, )(e2,e2)(tv,tv)(e4,e4)} are selected.
[00140] Thus the examples of the subsampling solutions for different ranks (each for one rank) for PUCCH feedback mode 2-1 are presented in Table 5.2A.
Table 5.2A PUCCH mode 2-1 codebook subsampling for 4-Tx codebook.
[00141] 3.3B PUCCH CSI feedback mode 2-1 [00142] In PUCCH CSI feedback mode 2-1, the user can be configured to report the preferred subband with the corresponding preferred PMI and CQI. For the subband CQI/PMI report, L bits are allocated to report user preferred subband index. When double codebook structure is configured, the use needs to report the CQI and second PMI (for W2). With additional L bits for the subband reporting, the feedback payload size for CQI and second PMI is reduced. For 8-Tx codebook, maximum 9 bits are allocated for subband CQI/second PMI reporting. With the same payload size constraint, we propose the following codebook subsampling for different ranks, which is summarized in Table 5.IB: [00143] For rank 1, only one CQI is reported. Thus subsampling is not needed. The total number of bits would be 8.
[00144] We now first discuss the subsampling of rank 3 and 4 codebook. Note that for W2, Release 8 codebooks have been adopted for rank-3 and 4. With 2 bits subsampling, we need to select 4 out of 16 codewords.
Table 5.1В [00145] Rank-3: The sub-sampling to select 4 out of 16 codewords can be done using either the Chordal distance or the Fubini-Study distance measure. Typically chordal distance is more suitable for lower SNRs whereas Fubini-Study is good at larger SNRs.
[00146] For any given choice of 4 codewords (comprising a sub-sampled codebook) we have 6 pairs. For each such pair (comprising of two 4x3 semi-unitary matrix codewords) we can compute a distance. The metric for that choice can be defined to be the minimum of the six distances. Finally, we can select the preferred choice as the one whose associated metric is the largest (i.e., maximum metric).
[00147] There can be multiple choices whose associated metrics are either equal to the maximum or are within a small margin (say 2% or 5%) of the maximum. All such choices are valid selections and represent good candidates.
[00148] In total there are 1820 choices (16 choose 4). We find that there are 5 choices whose metrics are equal to the maximum upon using the Chordal distance as the distance measure. Surprisingly these are the same choices whose metrics are again equal to the maximum when using the Fubini-Study distance as the distance measure. These indices are {0 2 8 10}, {0 9 10 11}, {1 2 3 8}, {1 3 9 11}, {12 13 14 15}.
[00149] Indeed no other choices have metrics in either case that are within 5% of the maximum. Thus, any one of these 5 choices is a good selection.
[00150] For rank-4: each codeword is a 4x4 unitary matrix so the distance (either Chordal distance or Fubini-Study) among any two pair of codewords is zero. Thus, a convenient way for sub-sampling is to re-use the indices obtained for the rank-3 case in the rank-4 legacy codebook, to obtain a sub-sampled rank-4 codebook.
[00151] For rank-2, for the enhanced codebooks the situation is a bit more complex since there are multiple inner (wideband) codewords.
[00152] Consider the sub-sampling to obtain a size 4 (2-bit) outer codebook (W2) from the original outer codebook of size 16.
[00153] For each one of the 1820 choices, we can consider each one of the 16 inner codewords and determine the Q distances (where Q is the number of pairs in the sub-sampled outer codebook and is 6 in this example) and then associate the minimum among the Q distances with that inner codeword for that choice. Then, the 16 associated distances (with the 16 inner codewords for that choice) can be combined in a suitable manner into one metric associated with that choice (a suitable way can be a product of the distances or their geometric mean with some regularization etc.). The one or more choices whose metric s are equal to the maximum (or are within a margin of the maximum) can be determined to be suitable candidates.
[00154] Upon performing the aforementioned procedure for rank-2 (with sub-sampled outer codebook size 4 so that Q=6) and the enhanced codebook 2a, we found the following 4 choices (sets of indices out of the 1820 possible ones) that have (near-) maximal metrics under both Chordal distance as well as the Fubini-Study distance: {6 8 11 14}, {6 9 10 15}, {7 8 11 14}, {7 9 10 15}.
[00155] The following 8 choices (out of the 1820) have maximal metrics under Chordal distance: {2 6 14 15}, {2 7 14 15}, {3 6 14 15}, {3 7 14 15}, {6 8 14 15}, (6 9 14 15}, (7 8 14 15}, (7 9 14 15}.
[00156] The following 164 choices (out of the 1820) have (near-) maximal metrics under Chordal distance. Each choice (comprising of 4 indices) is one column in the following:
Columns 1 through 20 00000000000000000000 22222222222223333333 444455556677 14 4444555 6 7 14 15 6 7 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 6 7 14 15 6 7 14
Columns 21 through 40 00000000000000000000 33333344444555556667 5 6 6 7 7 14 6 6 7 7 14 6 6 7 7 14 10 11 14 10 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 15 15 14 15 15
Columns 41 through 60 0 0 111111111111111111 77222222222222233333 11 14 444455556677 14 44445 14 15 6 7 14 15 6 7 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 6 7 14 15 6
Columns 61 through 80 11111111111111111111 33333333444445555566 5 5 5 6677 14 6677 14 6677 14 10 11 7 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 15 15 14
Columns 81 through 100 1 1 1 12222222222222222 67774444444555555567 14 10 11 14 6 6 7 7 12 13 14 6 6 7 7 12 13 14 14 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 15
Columns 101 through 120 33333333333333334444 44444445555555676666 6 6 7 7 12 13 14 6 6 7 7 12 13 14 14 14 8 8 9 9 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 15 14 15 14 15
Columns 121 through 140 44444444444455555555 67777788899966666777 14 8 8 9 9 14 12 13 14 12 13 14 8 8 9 9 14 8 8 9 15 14 15 14 15 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14
Columns 141 through 160 55555555666666777777 77888999888999888999 9 14 12 13 14 12 13 14 10 11 14 10 11 14 10 11 14 10 11 14 15 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 15 14 15
Columns 161 through 164 8 8 9 9 10 11 10 11 12 13 12 13 15 14 15 14 [00157] Two of the aforementioned choices (2, 6, 14, 15} and (3, 7, 14, 15} are particularly interesting since they allow for orthogonal beam selection (Yj, Y2) e {(e2, e4) } ITY! y2 1 Г Yt Y2 11 with both со-phasing terms, W2 n e < , >. These correspond to i2
L^l _ ^2_ _j\ ~ УХ2 _ J indices {14, 15}. In addition beam selections (Yl3 Y2) e {(e2, e2(e4, e4) } with one of the ГГ^ Y2 1 Г Yt Y2 11 two со-phasing terms, W2nel , >is allowed, corresponding to i2
[_^l ~^2_ _J^l ~ ft2_ J {2, 6} or {3,7}.
[00158] Further down selection can be done by comparing with the average ratios of W2 selections from the original codebooks obtained via simulations.
[00159] We note that the Chordal distance and Fubini Study distance are more suitable to uncorrelated channels (such as those seen with wide antenna spacing).
[00160] For closely spaced antennas resulting in more correlated channels, we prefer to have more outer codebook entries for which the two columns in the resulting rank-2 codeword comprise of identical beam selections.
[00161] Based on above discussion and results shown in Figs. 3 and 4, we find {0,2,4,6} could be a good option, for W2 subsampling, indicating that, W2,„g|y j with (Yl, Y2)e {fe,^I )(c,c)fe,A)кA4 ) } are selected.
[00162] However, due the issue of different Wl having the same beam group, with the above beam selections, the codeword redundancy cannot be avoided. One alternative solution is to choose only beam selections (Yl3 Y2) e {(c,,et ), (e,,e,) } with both ГГ^ y2 1 rYt Y2 11 со-phasing terms, W2nel , . . >, which corresponding to the W2
[_^l ~^2_ _/Y1 ~ ft2_ J index i2e{0, 1, 4, 5}. This beam selection scheme can still cover all 32 beams but avoid the codeword redundancy. In addition, it will be benefit to have one more со-phasing term. An analogous selection is (Yx, Y2) e {{e2,e2^,{e4,e4^ } with both со-phasing terms, ffY! Y2 1 Г Yt Y2 11 W2 n g < , к which corresponds to the W2 index i2e {2, 3, 6, 7}.
L^i ~^2_ _J^i ~УХ2_ J
[00163] Thus the examples of the subsampling solutions for different ranks for PUCCH feedback mode 2-1 are presented in Table 5.2B.
Table 5.2B PUCCH mode 2-1 codebook subsampling for 4-Tx codebook.
[00164] Referring now to FIG. 6, a multiple input multiple output (MIMO) system 100 in which the embodiments may be implemented is illustrated. In the downlink of system 100, one or more user equipments (UEs) 102 in cell 106 are served by base station (BS) 104. Each of user equipments 102 includes e.g. a transmitter, and base station 104 includes e.g. a receiver.
[00165] 4. Conclusion [00166] we propose several schemes for PUCCH period CSI feedback based on enhanced 4-Tx codebook with double codebook structure W1W2.
[00167] Appendix [00168] System level simulation parameters are summarized in Table A-l.
Table A-l Simulation Parameters [00169] The foregoing is to be understood as being in every respect illustrative and exemplary, but not restrictive, and the scope of the invention disclosed herein is not to be determined from the Detailed Description, but rather from the claims as interpreted according to the full breadth permitted by the patent laws. It is to be understood that the embodiments shown and described herein are only illustrative of the principles of the present invention and that those skilled in the art may implement various modifications without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Those skilled in the art could implement various other feature combinations without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.

Claims (16)

  1. CLAIMS:
    1. A method implemented in a base station used in a wireless communications system, the method comprising: receiving, from a user equipment, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index i2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI lp\m for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index i2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices /2for RI=2 consist of one of (0, 1, 4, 5}, (2, 3, 6, 7}, (2, 6, 14, 15}, and (3, 7, 14, 15}.
  2. 2. A method implemented in a user equipment used in a wireless communications system, the method comprising: transmitting, to a base station, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index i2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI IrXii2 for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index i2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=2 consist of one of (0, 1, 4, 5}, (2, 3, 6, 7}, (2, 6, 14, 15}, and (3, 7, 14, 15}.
  3. 3. The method as in claim 1 or 2, wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=3 are reused for RI=4.
  4. 4. The method as in claim 1 or 2, wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=3 consist of one of {0, 2, 8, 10}, {0, 9, 10, 11}, {1, 2, 3, 8}, {1, 3, 9, 11}, and {12, 13, 14, 15}.
  5. 5. The method as in claim 1 or 2, wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=4 consist of one of {0, 2, 8, 10}, {0, 9, 10, 11}, {1, 2, 3, 8}, {1, 3, 9, 11}, and {12, 13, 14, 15}.
  6. 6. The method as in claim 1 or 2, wherein codebook indices i2 are for physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) mode 2-1 codebook sub sampling with 4 antenna ports in LTE (Long Term Evolution).
  7. 7. The method as in claim 1 or 2, wherein codebook index z2 for physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) mode 2-1 codebook sub sampling with 4 antenna ports in LTE (Long Term Evolution) is determined according to a table comprising:
  8. 8. A base station used in a wireless communications system, the base station comprising: a receiver to receive, from a user equipment, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index i2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI lp\m for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index i2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=2 consist of one of (0, 1, 4, 5}, (2, 3, 6, 7}, (2, 6, 14, 15}, and (3, 7, 14, 15}.
  9. 9. A user equipment used in a wireless communications system, the user equipment comprising: a transmitter to transmit, to a base station, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index i2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI lp\m for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index i2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1 and wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=2 consist of one of (0, 1, 4, 5}, (2, 3, 6, 7}, (2, 6, 14, 15}, and (3, 7, 14, 15}.
  10. 10. The user equipment as in claim 9, wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=3 are reused for RI=4.
  11. 11. The user equipment as in claim 9, wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=3 consist of one of {0, 2, 8, 10}, {0, 9, 10, 11}, {1, 2, 3, 8}, {1, 3, 9, 11}, and {12, 13, 14, 15}.
  12. 12. The user equipment as in claim 9, wherein codebook indices i2 for RI=4 consist of one of {0, 2, 8, 10}, {0, 9, 10, 11}, {1, 2, 3, 8}, {1, 3, 9, 11}, and {12, 13, 14, 15}.
  13. 13. The user equipment as in claim 9, wherein codebook indices i2 are for physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) mode 2-1 codebook subsampling with 4 antenna ports in LTE (Long Term Evolution).
  14. 14. The user equipment as in claim 9, wherein codebook index i2 for physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) mode 2-1 codebook sub sampling with 4 antenna ports in LTE (Long Term Evolution) is determined according to a table comprising:
  15. 15. A method implemented in a wireless communications system, the method comprising: transmitting, from a user equipment to a base station, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index /2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI IrXii2 for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index i2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices /2 for RI=2 consist of one of (0, 1, 4, 5}, (2, 3, 6, 7}, (2, 6, 14, 15}, and (3, 7, 14, 15}.
  16. 16. A wireless communications system comprising: a base station; and a user equipment to transmit, to the base station, for 4 antenna ports rank indication (RI), a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), and a second PMI (codebook index i2), wherein values 0-15 are assigned to the second PMI Ipmii for RI=1 and values 0-3 are assigned to the second PMI lp\m for each of RI=2, RI=3, and RI=4, wherein codebook index z2 comprises Ipmii for RI=1, and wherein codebook indices /2 for RI=2 consist of one of {0, 1, 4, 5}, {2, 3, 6, 7}, {2, 6, 14, 15}, and (3, 7, 14, 15}.
AU2015202414A 2013-06-07 2015-05-06 Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling Active AU2015202414B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2015202414A AU2015202414B2 (en) 2013-06-07 2015-05-06 Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US61/832,635 2013-06-07
US61/864,082 2013-08-09
US14/295,414 2014-06-04
AU2014262186A AU2014262186B2 (en) 2013-06-07 2014-06-05 Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling
AU2015202414A AU2015202414B2 (en) 2013-06-07 2015-05-06 Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2014262186A Division AU2014262186B2 (en) 2013-06-07 2014-06-05 Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2015202414A1 AU2015202414A1 (en) 2015-05-28
AU2015202414B2 true AU2015202414B2 (en) 2016-08-11

Family

ID=53266733

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2015202414A Active AU2015202414B2 (en) 2013-06-07 2015-05-06 Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2015202414B2 (en)

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120218948A1 (en) * 2010-09-02 2012-08-30 Texas Instruments Incorporated Downlink 8 Tx Codebook Sub-Sampling for CSI Feedback

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120218948A1 (en) * 2010-09-02 2012-08-30 Texas Instruments Incorporated Downlink 8 Tx Codebook Sub-Sampling for CSI Feedback

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2015202414A1 (en) 2015-05-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2874023C (en) Channel state information (csi) feedback and codebook subsampling
KR102577703B1 (en) Csi reporting on small control channels
KR102330265B1 (en) Method and apparatus for reporting channel state information in wireless communication systems
US8913682B2 (en) Apparatus and method for channel state information codeword construction for a cellular wireless communication system
US9408196B2 (en) Method and terminal for feeding back channel state information
EP2564517B1 (en) Multiple-input multiple-output communication system supporting multiple reporting modes
JP6325652B2 (en) Method and apparatus for transmitting channel state information in a wireless communication system
CN101958773B (en) The method of feedback channel information and terminal
EP2683092A1 (en) Method and apparatus for bit-adaptive precoding matrix indicator feedback
EP3416299A1 (en) E-node b and user equipment for acquiring channel state information
CN106160825B (en) Channel information configuration method and device, and feedback method and device
WO2014178615A1 (en) Method and apparatus for transmitting channel state information in wireless communication system
AU2015202414B2 (en) Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PC1 Assignment before grant (sect. 113)

Owner name: NEC CORPORATION

Free format text: FORMER APPLICANT(S): NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC.

FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)