AU2014253462A1 - Apparatus and method for detecting DNA damage - Google Patents
Apparatus and method for detecting DNA damage Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2014253462A1 AU2014253462A1 AU2014253462A AU2014253462A AU2014253462A1 AU 2014253462 A1 AU2014253462 A1 AU 2014253462A1 AU 2014253462 A AU2014253462 A AU 2014253462A AU 2014253462 A AU2014253462 A AU 2014253462A AU 2014253462 A1 AU2014253462 A1 AU 2014253462A1
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- well
- cells
- plate
- dna
- base
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Landscapes
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
H:sxd\lnterwoven\NRPortbl\DCC\SXD\6907247 1docx-21/10/2014 The invention relates to an apparatus and an in-situ method for detecting cellular DNA damage. The invention is particularly suited for use in Comet assays and for automation of such assays. The apparatus comprises a multiwell plate, 5 the plate comprising an array of wells held in fixed relationship with each other and each well having an axis, side walls, and a base and wherein the well is provided with electrode pairs disposed therein, and wherein there is provided means for parallel connection of the electrode pairs to an external voltage supply. N- IQ N'r
Description
H:sxd\lnterwoven\NRPortbl\DCC\SXD\6907247 1docx-21/10/2014 1 Apparatus and Method for Detecting DNA Damage This is a divisional of Australian patent application No. 2008333180, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. 5 Technical Field The present invention relates to an apparatus and an in-situ method for detecting cellular DNA damage. The invention is particularly suited for use in Comet assays and for automation. 10 Background to the Invention Damage to the integrity of a cell's DNA may occur through a variety of mechanisms. DNA breakage may be caused through chemical reaction as a result of ingestion or absorption of a drug or other chemical agent which reacts with DNA ( Exon, J.H., J.Toxicol.Environ.Health B Crit. Rev., (2006), 9(5), 397 15 412). Alternatively DNA damage may be induced by via physical means, such as exposure to ionising radiation (Brendler-Schwaab,S. et.al. Mutat.Res., (2004), 566(1), 65-91), either alone, or in combination with a chemical agent by a photochemical mechanism. Any such DNA damage has the potential to lead to an inheritable defect in the genetic information carried by a cell and hence to 20 potentiate the development of cancer. Regulatory guidelines require that all registered drugs undergo assessment for DNA damage in a panel of assays. These assays include measurement of gene mutation in bacteria and determination of DNA damage in mammalian cells 25 in-vitro and in-vivo. The assays are typically extremely time consuming and expensive to perform (-$50,000 /compound), and thus tend to be restricted to the end of the drug discovery process. Estimates of the cost of failure or inability to accurately predict toxicity early in drug development have been put as high as $8 billion/year, around 30% of all drug failure costs (Cambridge Healthtech 30 Advances Life Sciences Report Dec 2004: Toxicogenomics and Predictive Toxicology: Market and Business Outlook). In addition to testing of new drugs, there is increasing regulatory activity to extend 2 testing to other chemicals and materials, such as food dyes and cosmetics that are intended for human consumption or use, or which may be indirectly or accidentally consumed or ingested (OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals, draft proposal for a new guideline 487, June 2004). 5 In addition to testing newly developed drugs and other chemicals for induction of DNA damage there is increasing evidence that environmental factors may contribute to DNA damage, including diet (Young, G.P., Forum Nutr., (2007), 60, 91-6), pollution (Moller, P., Basic Clin.Pharmacol.Toxicol., 10 (2006), 98(4), 336-45), and occupational exposure to mutagens (Faust, F. et.al., Toxicology, (2004), 98(1-3), 341-50). The potential for a wide range of chemical, physical and physiochemical mechanisms to induce DNA damage requires that methods are available for screening and monitoring of individuals at risk (Lee, E. et.al., Toxicol. Sci., (2004), 81(1), 121-32) by analysis of DNA 15 damage in blood, cell or tissue samples taken from such individuals. The Comet assay is a single cell electrophoresis assay for detection of DNA damage in mammalian cells (Ostling, 0., Johanson, K.J., Biochem.Biophys.Res.Commun., (1984), 123(1), 291-8). Exposure of cells to 20 compounds inducing DNA damage may produce single or double strand breaks in genomic DNA as well as chemical modifications. In the Comet assay treated cells are embedded in agarose, lysed, and treated with alkali to denature DNA. Subsequent electrophoresis leads to migration of fragmented DNA and/or relaxation of chromatin away from the nucleus, thereby producing 25 the appearance of a Comet (from which the assay is named) which is imaged by fluorescence microscopy. The amount of DNA liberated from the head of the Comet into the tail is quantified as a measure of DNA damage. The Comet assay has become widely used for assessing genotoxicity 30 (DNA damage with the potential to lead to a heritable deletion or mutation) as it is very sensitive, provides single cell statistics and requires only small samples of cells. The assay is most commonly carried out using lymphocytes, but 3 recent developments have focussed on the use of cells which may be obtained using minimally invasive procedures such as buccal cells from mouth swabs (Szeto, Y.T., et.al., Mutat. Res., (2005), 578(1-2), 371-81). 5 There is a current move within genotoxicity testing towards greater use of the Comet assay, as it is perceived as being equally sensitive to the in-vitro micronucleus assay, while providing higher specificity towards test compounds (Witte, I. et.al., Toxicol. Sci., (2007), 97(1), 21-6). Increasing the use of the Comet assay will generate a requirement for more efficient, higher throughput 10 Comet assays to replace current laborious and subjective manual processing and analysis methods. The Comet assay detects DNA damage by electrophoresis of cellular DNA. Cells to be tested are harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 15 buffer solution. Cells are combined with a molten solution of low melting point agarose and spread on a microscope slide. The agarose suspension of cells is then cooled and allowed to set. The slide is then immersed in a lysis solution to break open the cells and the cellular DNA is denatured by immersion of the slide in an alkaline solution. This lysis and denaturation 20 procedure removes most of the cellular components except nuclear structural proteins and DNA which remain as discrete nucleoids. Following DNA lysis, the slide is washed several times with electrophoresis buffer and the slide transferred to a horizontal electrophoresis apparatus and subjected to an electric current. At this stage, any small DNA fragments resulting from 25 damage to the cell DNA migrate in the electric field away from the bulk DNA which is retained in the nucleoids. Following electrophoresis, the slide is fixed in ethanol, stained for DNA using a fluorescent DNA binding dye and visualised by microscopy. Cells in which DNA damage has occurred show a staining pattern of a bright nucleoid head with a tail of DNA fragments trailing 30 in the direction of electrophoresis.
4 Since the first use of the Comet assay a range of protocols using different lysis and denaturation reagents have been developed, and semi automated image analysis is taking the place of manual scoring, although such automation does not constitute very high-throughput at 50 samples/day 5 (Frieauff, W. et.al., Mutagenesis (2001) 16(2), 133-7). Some attempts have been made to adapt cell treatment steps of the protocol to the use of 96 well plates (Kiskinis, E. et.al., Mutagenesis, (2002), 17(1), 37-43); however assays continue to be carried out using microscope slides for electrophoresis and imaging, the preparation of which limits the potential throughput of the assay. 10 US patent application No.2003/0175821 describes an apparatus for microscopic Comet assay comprising a light-tight box, a stage and stage movement motors located within the box adapted to hold at least one slide. The apparatus is furnished with fluorescence illumination and a CCD image 15 sensor for recording images of cells stained with a fluorescent compound. Additionally, the apparatus comprises an automated algorithm for measurement of the comet head and tail intensity, so as to define a tail moment value indicative of the presence or absence of DNA damage. While this method provides an improvement over manual scoring of Comet assays, 20 the method still uses microscope slides for electrophoresis separation of DNA and is therefore subject to most of the throughput limitations of traditional Comet assay methods. US 4,695,548 describes the use of gel inserts comprising a solidified 25 liquid such as agarose suitable for use in an electrophoretic method. Lysed cells entrapped within a matrix formed by the solidified liquid and macromolecules such as DNA or intact chromosomes derived from the lysed cells may be advantageously used in electrophoretic separations. The gel inserts are placed directly in a suitable support medium and subjected to one 30 or more electric fields to separate the macromolecules. However this method is intended for use with DNA separations of genomic DNA specifically for the purpose of avoiding physical damage to the DNA by shearing caused by 5 pipetting of DNA solutions, and does not relate to handling of samples for measurement of DNA damage, nor to high-throughput analysis of DNA. Consequently there is a need for an apparatus and a method for 5 performing DNA damage assays by the Comet method which allow rapid quantitative analysis, are robust and do not rely on subjective interpretation, and which can be carried out at high-throughput and low cost to maximise the utility of the methods for screening. 10 Recent developments in high-content screening (HCS) platforms, such as IN Cell Analyzer 1000 (GE Healthcare), have allowed automation of image acquisition and data analysis for cell based assays and therefore have significant potential to automate testing for DNA damage. Automation of these assays and the subsequent reduction in time and cost, through the removal of 15 manual scoring, has the potential to allow larger numbers of samples to be tested. Within the pharmaceutical industry, this advance has the potential to allow testing of new chemical entities at an earlier stage in drug development than possible with traditional approaches, with associated savings by highlighting compounds causing DNA damage prior to expenditure of time and 20 resources in medicinal chemistry programs. In other areas, such as in the development of new dyes for foodstuffs, cosmetics and other domestic products, the availability of lower cost automated DNA damage assays will serve to offset rising costs associated with increased testing demanded by regulatory authorities. 25 Summary of the Invention In one aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus for determining DNA damage in cells, the apparatus comprising a multiwell plate 30 such as a microtitre well plate, said plate comprising an array of wells held in fixed relationship with each other and each well having an axis, side walls, and a base and wherein said well is provided with electrode pairs disposed therein; 6 and wherein there is provided means for parallel connection of said electrode pairs to an external voltage supply. The apparatus of the invention is particularly suitable for conducting Comet assays. 5 In a second aspect, the invention provides an in-situ method for determining DNA damage in cells by the use of the apparatus as defined herein, the method comprising: a) providing cells to be tested in one or more wells of the apparatus as defined herein in the presence of a fluid medium; 10 b) optionally exposing the cells to a test agent; c) overlaying the cells with an immobilising matrix; d) treating the cells with a cell lysis and a denaturation reagent so as to provide a matrix comprising denatured cellular DNA; e) contacting the denatured cellular DNA with an electrophoresis solution; 15 f) applying a voltage to electrodes in said one or more wells under conditions to cause electrophoretic separation of DNA fragments; g) contacting said DNA fragments with a staining agent; and h) using detection means to observe a pattern of DNA fragments. 20 The present invention therefore provides a high-throughput, automated assay for detecting DNA damage in cells derived from a variety of tissue and cell types, by use of the apparatus as described herein. The method of the invention is particularly suitable for conducting Comet assays. The Comet 25 assay is a single cell based technique that enables the detection and/or quantitation of DNA damage. Use of the apparatus as described herein, therefore provides a convenient platform for high-throughput testing of agents for mutagenic activity in-vitro and in-vivo, and for high-throughput monitoring of cells and tissues for DNA damage caused by environmental factors. 30 Suitably, the side walls of the wells of the multiwell plate are opaque and the base of each well of the multiwell plate is optically transparent.
7 Preferably, each well of the multiwell plate is furnished with one electrode pair having positive and negative electrodes. In one embodiment, the base of each well comprises means for 5 orienting cell positioning to aid in analysis of DNA comets. Thus, the base plate of each well may comprise an array of structural features, such as micro channels and/or pits which serve to orientate cells such that the distribution of cells over the surface of the base is non-random. 10 The multiwell plate may include a plate lid that, in one embodiment, supports the electrodes and electrical connection means for applying an electrophoretic current to each well. In one embodiment, the positive and negative electrodes disposed within each well are located to be at the same level one with the other, so as to achieve electrophoresis in a plane parallel 15 with the base of the vessel. In an alternative embodiment, the electrode pairs are orientated such that positive and negative electrodes are on a different plane relative to the base of the well in order to achieve electrophoretic separation of DNA 20 fragments in a direction which is not parallel to the base of the well. In one embodiment, the positive and negative electrodes comprise straight bars which may be attached to opposite sides of the well. 25 In another embodiment, the electrodes may be curved to conform to the curvature of the walls of the wells, thus producing a varying field strength across the well, due to the differences in electrode separation at different positions in the well. 30 In a further embodiment, the base plate of the multiwell plate comprises an array of electrode pairs extending through the plate, the electrode pairs 8 being held in fixed relationship one pair with another and wherein each electrode pair is located so as to fit within a separate well of the multiwell plate. Suitably, the multiwell plate contains an array of 24-, 48-, 96-, or 384 5 wells. In one embodiment, a test agent is contacted with cells that have been pre-dispensed into one or more wells of the multiwell plate. In another embodiment, cells or tissue taken from human or animal subjects may be 10 tested for DNA damage arising from exposure to mutagens and/or other agents of environmental origin, e.g. analysis of DNA damage in blood cells or other isolated cells. The test agent may be a chemical agent, such as a drug, a food dye, a 15 hormone, a toxin, an alkylating agent, an oxidising agent, a carcinogen, or a mutagen. Other agents include physical effects such as electromagnetic radiation (e.g. UV, X-ray, microwave), P- radiation and heat. Suitably, in the method according to the second aspect, an immobilising 20 matrix is added to the cells following exposure to the test agent. Suitably, the matrix comprises an isotonic aqueous gel or polymer solution which may be added to live cells under conditions of temperature that do not damage cells. Examples of suitable matrices include, but are not limited to, low melting point agarose (LMPA) and temperature responsive polymers. LMPA may be 25 prepared as a low percentage solution, suitably 0.2-2% (w/v), preferably 0.5% 1% (w/v), in an isotonic buffer such as phosphate buffered saline. To immobilise cells, an LMPA solution is melted at 370C and added to cells in wells of the apparatus of the current invention. Temperature responsive polymers with reverse temperature phase change characteristics may also be 30 used, wherein the polymer is liquid at low temperature and solid at higher temperature. Suitable temperature sensitive polymers include CyGel (Poly methyl-oxirane, Biostatus) which is liquid at 00-4'C and solid at temperatures 9 of 1 5'C and above. Such polymers may be added to wells of the apparatus as a cooled solution and allowed to set at room temperature. The cell lysis reagent is preferably a detergent, which may be cationic, 5 anionic, zwitterionic or non-ionic in nature. Examples of suitable detergents include dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (DTAB); cetyl pyridinium chloride (CPC); benzethonium chloride (BZC); sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), and N dodecyl-N,N-dimethyl-3-ammonio-1 -propane sulphonate (DDAPS). DTAB, CPC and BZC are cationic surfactants; DDAPS is a zwitterionic surfactant and 10 SDS is an anionic surfactant. The use of these detergents as cell lysis agents is well known in the field, Typical concentrations of the active agent are in the range of 0.4 - 4% w/v. Suitable staining agents suitable for staining DNA and DNA fragments 15 may be selected from well known classes of DNA-binding dyes, for example ethidium bromide (EtBr), propidium iodide, DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2 phenylindole), YOYO@-1 iodide, TOTO@-3 and Acridine Orange. (See "A Guide to Fluorescent Probes and Labeling Technologies", 10 h Edition, Molecular Probes Inc.). Preferred DNA staining dyes are those that fluoresce 20 in the red region of the spectrum. Suitably, detection of patterns of labelled DNA fragments is accomplished using an automated microscope with an objective lens of sufficient magnification to resolve individual cells. Preferably, lenses of 2x to 25 60x magnification may be used; more preferably lenses of 4x to 20x magnification. According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided the use of an apparatus for determining DNA damage in cells, the apparatus 30 comprising a multiwell plate, the plate comprising an array of wells held in fixed relationship with each other and each well having an axis, side walls, and a base and wherein the well is provided with electrode pairs disposed therein; 10 and wherein there is provided means for parallel connection of said electrode pairs to an external voltage supply. This aspect is particularly suited for determining DNA damage in cells using the Comet assay. 5 Description of the Drawings Figure 1 shows a 96-well plate suitable for electrophoretic separation of DNA fragments and microscopy imaging according to the first aspect; Figure 2 illustrates the positioning of a curved pair of electrodes within the 10 wells of a multiwell plate; and Figure 3 illustrates an embodiment of the invention in which the base plate of each well contains an array of micro-channels etched into the surface of the base. 15 Detailed Description Figure 1 shows a diagram of a 96-well plate [1] suitable for electrophoretic separation and microscopy imaging of DNA fragments (e.g. Packard View Plate, Packard). The plate [1] comprises an array of wells 20 having optically transparent bases [2] which can be used to provide an array of separate vessels in which to carry out Comet assays. Cells are added to the wells [2] and where required, incubated with a test agent for an appropriate time period to allow potential DNA damage activity of the test agent to occur. Cells are overlaid with a suitable matrix to immobilise the cells. Cells are then 25 treated with lysis and alkaline denaturation solutions by adding solutions to the wells, incubating and decanting. The wells of the plate are then filled with electrophoresis buffer, typically TBE (45mM Tris-Borate, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.3) buffer and a moulded plastic plate lid [3] placed over the 96 well plate. The plate lid [3] supports electrodes and electrical connections suitable for applying 30 an electrophoretic current to each well of the 96 well plate for the purposes of separating DNA fragments from the nucleoid bodies of the cells under study. One side of the plate lid [3] is furnished with an electrical connector [4] leading 11 to a first insulated power rail running the length of the plate lid [5]. The power rail [4] is connected in parallel to a series of electrodes [6] supported on moulded pins pointing downwards from the underside of the lid [3] and spaced such that when the lid [3] is placed on the plate [1] an electrode [6] is located in 5 each well. Similarly, on the opposite side of the plate lid [3] there is a second electrical connector [7] and a second power rail provided to support a second series of electrodes [8] which are spaced so as to enter the wells of the plate and provide electrode pairings with the opposing electrodes connected to the first power rail [5]. Connection of the electrodes through the connectors [4] 10 and [5] to a suitable power supply (e.g. EPS 3501 XL, GE Healthcare) and application of a suitable voltage (e.g. 1 volt/cm electrode separation) results in current flow between the electrode pairs in each well and subsequent migration of DNA fragments resulting from any DNA damage in the cells. 15 The design and disposition of the electrodes within the wells may be varied to achieve different patterns of electrophoretic separation of DNA fragments from nucleoid bodies. For example, electrodes may be oriented to be at the same level within the wells so as to achieve electrophoresis in a plane parallel with the bottom of the plate. Such an orientation of electrodes is 20 useful where it is desired to have all DNA fragments migrating in a single plane such that when the DNA is stained, all comets may be imaged in focus in a single image. Alternatively, the electrodes may be orientated such that positive and negative electrodes are on a different plane relative to the base of the plate in order to achieve electrophoretic separation of DNA fragments in a 25 direction which is not parallel to the base of the plate. Such an electrode orientation may be advantageous where the density of cells (i.e. the number of cells/well) brings cells into close proximity such that electrophoresis in a plane parallel to the base of the plate would lead to overlapping of stained DNA comets. Orientating the electrodes on different planes will generate DNA 30 comets which point upwards from the plate base at an angle determined by the voltage field between the electrodes and the shape of the electrodes. DNA comets orientated away form the base of the apparatus may be analysed by 12 confocal or pseudo-confocal imaging by acquisition of two or more images in planes parallel to the plate base and analysing DNA intensity in three dimensional reconstructions based on the planar images. Alternatively, DNA intensity may be measured in a single image acquired using confocal or 5 pseudo-confocal imaging to out of plane fluorescence such that only DNA that has migrated into the imaging plane is visualised. Varying the shape of the electrodes may also be used to change the pattern of separation of DNA comets from cells immobilised in the wells of the 10 plate of the current invention as desired to achieve efficient separation and analysis. For example, where both electrodes are orientated in the same plane, electrodes may comprise straight bars on opposite sides of the well such as to induce a voltage field comprising parallel force lines between the electrodes across the well resulting in parallel orientation of DNA comets 15 during electrophoresis. Alternatively, the electrodes may be curved to conform to the curvature of the well walls producing a varying field strength across the well due to the differences in electrode separation at different positions in the well. The latter design of electrodes may be advantageous where it desired to have a range of DNA comet lengths within the test sample to be able select 20 regions for analysis where comets from closely spaced cells are non overlapping. Where electrodes are situated on different planes within the wells, in order to achieve upwards migration of DNA fragments away from the base of 25 the plate, the electrodes may be orientated on opposite sides of the wells and at different heights so as to achieve an angled separation relative to the plane of the plate. For example, electrodes of the same size and shape may be placed on opposite sides of the well such that one electrode is at the base of the well and the second electrode is half way up the well. Application of a 30 separation voltage to such electrodes will result in migration of DNA fragments producing comets at an angle of approximately 450 to the plane of the plate allowing comets arising from closely spaced cells to be resolved. Alternatively, 13 electrodes may comprise a ring shaped electrode in the base of the plate and a point electrode situated above the base of the plate. In this electrode orientation, DNA migration is upwards from the base of the plate towards the central point electrode following a cone shaped voltage field producing DNA 5 comets angled up from the base plate towards a common point. To produce vertically orientated DNA comets suitable for analysis by single plane imaging at a defined height above the plate base, electrodes may comprise rings placed at the base of the well and at a distance above the base of the well. Such electrodes will induce a uniform barrel shaped voltage field within the 10 well, thereby causing migration of DNA fragments in a direction substantially perpendicular to the plane of the plate. Consequently, optical sectioning using confocal or pseudo-confocal imaging may be used to image migration of DNA fragments to a pre-selected height above the base of the plate and hence determine the number of cells in the sample in which DNA damage has 15 occurred. The detection of patterns of labelled DNA fragments may be accomplished using high-throughput automated instruments incorporating a charge coupled device (CCD) imager (such as an area imager) to image all of 20 the wells of the multiwell plate. Thus, to quantify DNA damage, the plate lid [3] is disconnected from the power supply and removed, the electrophoresis buffer decanted and DNA stained with a suitable fluorescent stain (e.g. Acridine Orange, Ethidium Bromide, DAPI, TOTO-3, or YOYO-3) and the plate imaged using a high throughput automated microscope (e.g. IN Cell Analyzer 1000, 25 GE Healthcare) using fluorescence excitation and emission filters suitable for the DNA stain used. Acquired images are analysed using suitable image analysis software (e.g. IN Cell Investigator, GE Healthcare) to segment images, identify regions of DNA staining and make appropriate quantitative measurements (e.g. comet tail intensity, length and moment) to determine the 30 amount of DNA damage in each sample under test.
14 In a further embodiment, the electrode pairs may be integrated into and extend through the plate base forming the multiwell plate such that electrodes are located within each well upon welding the flat base plate to a multi-well injection moulded upper. Techniques for manufacturing multi-well imaging 5 plates using optically transparent glass or plastic bases and optically opaque well uppers are well known. For example, US 6463647 (Corning) describes a method of making a multi-well plate involving joining a top plate that has been extruded and has a plurality of open ended channels, with a bottom plate that is substantially flat. The top plate forms the sidewalls of the wells of the plate 10 and the bottom plate forms the bottoms of the wells. In this embodiment of the current invention (Figure 2) an optically transparent glass or plastic base plate [8] comprises a regular array of discrete well areas [9]. Each well area comprises electrode pairs [11] and [13], wherein the individual electrodes are connected to common rails [10] and [12] thereby allowing parallel connection 15 of the electrodes to an external power supply for electrophoresis to provide a voltage across the electrodes to permit the separation of DNA damage fragments and the generation of DNA comets [14]. Electrodes may be fabricated by application of metal foil or by screen printing using conductive ink. The shape and size of the electrodes may be configured to achieve the 20 desired voltage field shape and hence the desired orientation of DNA comets as described for the first embodiment. Methods for printing conductive materials onto glass and plastic are well known and characterised. For example, US 7192752 (ACEA) describes the application of electrodes to the base of multi-well plates for the purposes of performing impedance 25 measurements on living cells. Once fabricated, the base is attached to a bottomless well plate in order the form the assay apparatus. In this embodiment, optionally, the sides of the wells may be etched, roughened or chemically treated to promote adhesion of 30 LMP agarose to prevent movement of the agarose gel during lysis and denaturation. The disposable plate may be supplied with a matching re-usable lid for the purposes of connecting the plate to a suitable power supply. The lid 15 may comprise additional features with similar functionality as the lid of a conventional horizontal electrophoresis tank, e.g. power leads, safety interlocks etc. Comet assays may be performed using apparatus according to this embodiment the invention essentially as hereinbefore described. Thus, 5 cells are placed in the wells of the plate, immobilised in a gel and processed using appropriate reagents as previously described. Application of an appropriate voltage to the plate results in separation of DNA fragments from nucleoid bodies in a plane parallel to the base of the plate allowing DNA comets to be may be imaged by high throughput automated microscopy. 10 As shown in Figure 3, the base of each well may comprise means for orienting cell positioning to aid in analysis of DNA comets. Thus, the base plate [15] may comprise micro-channels, grooves [16], or other structures such as pits or channels which serve to orientate cells [17] such that the distribution 15 of cells over the surface is non-random. The spacing and/or periodicity of the structures are selected to provide an optimum cell spacing for analysis, i.e. to separate cells in the direction of electrophoresis such that DNA comets are non-overlapping. Immobilisation of cells [17] in structures [16] when cells are overlaid with agarose [18] and subjected to electrophoresis by voltage applied 20 to electrodes on either side of the well base [19] leads to DNA comet formation orientated perpendicular to the structure direction [20] where the separation of the structures ensures that the comet [20] will not be obscured by a comet arising from a cell behind it in the electrophoretic field [17]. 25 It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that further variations of the apparatus and method as described herein are possible which fall within the scope of the present invention providing means for in-situ DNA comet analysis. For example, further variations in electrode design, configuration and orientation are possible, including but not limited to, the use of more than two 30 electrodes per well. Multiple electrode configurations are widely used for pulsed field analytical separation of DNA (Lai, E. et.al., Biotechniques, (1989), 1, 34-42) wherein voltage is applied to multiple electrodes in sequence in order 16 to control the direction of migration of DNA to yield a longer effective separation distance. Application of multiple electrodes to the method of the current invention combined with automated switching of voltage may be used to improve DNA comet separation, both within and between DNA comets by 5 controlling separation in 3 dimensions. Similarly, there is considerable scope for variation in substrate patterning approaches for controlling the spacing and orientation of cells on the base of the apparatus. Current techniques for fabricating and coating cell 10 growth and attachment surfaces provide many approaches to defining cell position and spacing on surfaces (Hasirci, V. and Kenar, H. 1 Nanomed., (2006), 1(1), 73-90) which may be used in the apparatus of the present invention for controlling cell to cell spacing for optimal DNA comet analysis. 15 The apparatus and method of the current invention provide a significant enhancement in speed, efficiency and throughput of Comet assays when compared to the prior art. By allowing parallel processing of assay samples in wells of multi-well plates and enabling in-situ electrophoresis of DNA in the same wells, methods employing the present apparatus will obviate the need for 20 many of the operations, including centrifugation of cell suspensions and application of agarose cell suspensions to microscope slides, used in traditional Comet assay protocols. Since all procedures for each test sample are carried out in the same well from gel immobilisation to imaging, the method of the present invention is compatible with automation using automated liquid 25 handling and robotics. In addition to throughput and efficiency advantages over prior art methods, the present invention provides means for carrying out Comet assays in-situ rather on disaggregated cells or cells in suspension. Conventional 30 Comet assay protocols require cells for analysis to be suspended in a solution of gel, typically low melting point agarose. This confers two disadvantages. Firstly, when cells are analysed by electrophoresis and imaging, the cells are 17 dispersed randomly at different depths within the agarose. As a consequence, at any given plane some DNA comets will be in focus while others will be out of focus making quantitative analysis by imaging difficult. Secondly, since cells need to be in suspension to mix with agarose, analysis of adherent cells in 5 culture, or cells from tissue entails disruption of the sample, typically by enzyme treatment, to yield a cell suspension thereby destroying the morphological and population distribution of the sample. In the method of the present invention, Comet assays may be 10 performed in-situ on cell cultures grown in the wells of the apparatus. Cells may be immobilised in agarose and treated without removal from the growth substrate allowing DNA damage as measured by the Comet assay to be correlated with other cellular parameters measurable by automated microscopy, or study of differential DNA damage in different sub-populations of 15 cells within the sample. An additional advantage of the method is that since cells may be overlaid with agarose in-situ while attached to the base of wells, the depth of agarose is minimised to that needed to cover the cells, hence constraining electrophoretic separation of DNA to a thin plane compatible with imaging. 20 Alternatively the method may be used for analysis of DNA damage in tissue sections in-situ. By placing thin sections of frozen tissue in the wells of the apparatus of the present invention and overlaying with agarose, the method of the present invention may be used to study the occurrence of DNA 25 damage in different cells within the tissue. Variations in electrode design and disposition described above may be used to optimise the direction of electrophoresis to enable analysis of closely packed cells in tissue sections to be achieved. 30 Alternatively the method may be used for analysis of DNA damage in blood cells or other isolated cells taken from animal or human subjects for evaluation of test or environmental agents. By placing cells in the wells of the 18 apparatus and subjecting the plate to centrifugation, cells to be tested may be distributed as a monolayer in the base of the wells and then overlaid with an immobilising matrix.
Claims (14)
1. Apparatus for determining DNA damage in cells, said apparatus comprising a multiwell plate, said plate comprising an array of wells held in 5 fixed relationship with each other and each well having an axis, side walls, and a base and wherein said well is provided with electrode pairs disposed therein; and wherein there is provided means for parallel connection of said electrode pairs to an external voltage supply. 10
2. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said base is generally perpendicular to the axis of the well.
3. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the side walls of the wells of the multiwell plate are opaque. 15
4. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the base of each well of the multiwell plate is optically transparent.
5. Apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein each well of 20 the multiwell plate is furnished with one electrode pair.
6. Apparatus according to claim 5, said multiwell plate includes a plate lid that supports the electrodes and electrical connection means for applying an electrophoretic current to each well. 25
7. Apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the base plate of the multiwell plate comprises an array of electrode pairs extending through the plate and wherein each electrode pair is located so as to fit within a separate well of the multiwell plate. 30 20
8. Apparatus according to claim 6 or claim 7, wherein the positive and negative electrodes within each well are located to be at the same level one with the other. 5
9. Apparatus according to claim 6 or claim 7, wherein the positive and negative electrodes within each well are located to be on a different plane relative to the base of the well.
10. Apparatus according to any of claims 1 to 9, wherein the base of each 10 well comprises an array of micro-channels and/or pits etched into the base.
11. An in-situ method for determining DNA damage in cells by the use of an apparatus according to any of claims 1 to 10, the method comprising: a) providing cells to be tested in one or more wells of said apparatus in the 15 presence of a fluid medium; b) optionally exposing the cells to a test agent; c) overlaying the cells with an immobilising matrix; d) treating the cells with a cell lysis and a denaturation reagent so as to provide a matrix comprising denatured cellular DNA; 20 e) contacting the denatured cellular DNA with an electrophoresis solution; f) applying a voltage to electrodes in said one or more wells under conditions to cause electrophoretic separation of DNA fragments; g) contacting said DNA fragments with a staining agent; and h) using detection means to observe a pattern of DNA fragments. 25
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein said detection comprises imaging means to image all of the wells of the multiwell plate.
13. The method according to either of claims 11 or 12, wherein a Comet 30 assay is used for determining DNA damage in cells. 21
14. Use of an apparatus for determining DNA damage in cells, the apparatus comprising a multiwell plate, said plate comprising an array of wells held in fixed relationship with each other and each well having an axis, side walls, and a base and wherein said well is provided with electrode pairs 5 disposed therein; and wherein there is provided means for parallel connection of said electrode pairs to an external voltage supply.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2014253462A AU2014253462A1 (en) | 2007-12-05 | 2014-10-21 | Apparatus and method for detecting DNA damage |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0723725.8 | 2007-12-05 | ||
AU2008333180A AU2008333180A1 (en) | 2007-12-05 | 2008-12-05 | Apparatus and method for detecting DNA damage |
AU2014253462A AU2014253462A1 (en) | 2007-12-05 | 2014-10-21 | Apparatus and method for detecting DNA damage |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2008333180A Division AU2008333180A1 (en) | 2007-12-05 | 2008-12-05 | Apparatus and method for detecting DNA damage |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
AU2014253462A1 true AU2014253462A1 (en) | 2014-11-13 |
Family
ID=51869871
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
AU2014253462A Abandoned AU2014253462A1 (en) | 2007-12-05 | 2014-10-21 | Apparatus and method for detecting DNA damage |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU2014253462A1 (en) |
-
2014
- 2014-10-21 AU AU2014253462A patent/AU2014253462A1/en not_active Abandoned
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2234724B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting dna damage | |
Nandhakumar et al. | Evaluation of DNA damage using single-cell gel electrophoresis (Comet Assay) | |
CN104302400B (en) | System and method for accommodating biological sample | |
EP3782722B1 (en) | Microfluidic devices | |
EP2184602A1 (en) | Micro-channel chip for electrophoresis and method for electrophoresis | |
JP6875052B2 (en) | Gel electrophoresis device for single-cell electrophoresis, gel electrophoresis system, support plate, method for performing comet assay using the system, and software for performing the method. | |
JP7550055B2 (en) | Analytical system including a microfluidic device, a microfluidic device and related methods | |
EP2587257A1 (en) | Slide holder assembly for comet assay | |
US20120082978A1 (en) | Cell Analysis On Microfluidic Chips | |
WO2017184998A1 (en) | A device for high-throughput multi-parameter functional profiling of the same cells in multicellular settings and in isolation | |
JP2023532183A (en) | Devices and methods for cytogenetic analysis | |
US11712693B2 (en) | Integrated selective capture, sequestration, fluidic isolation, electrical lysis and analysis of single cells | |
WO2006062149A1 (en) | Plate for biological sample analysis | |
AU2014253462A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting DNA damage | |
EP3074533B1 (en) | Method and device for accelerated surface-based reactions | |
WO2020079211A1 (en) | Electrophoresis assembly | |
EP4006536A1 (en) | Electrophoresis assembly and methods | |
US7276369B2 (en) | Method for detecting a substance and microtiter plate | |
JP2007075051A (en) | Plate for judging biological sample | |
Liao et al. | Lossless and Contamination-Free Digital PCR | |
JP2006308447A (en) | Plate for biological sample analysis and biological sample analysis method | |
US10247656B2 (en) | Single-cell microchamber array | |
Herr et al. | Electromigration of Charged Analytes Through Immiscible Fluids in Multiphasic Electrophoresis | |
EP4327090A1 (en) | Device for volume coupling in epitachophoresis | |
JP2004219313A (en) | Method for cleaning equipment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MK1 | Application lapsed section 142(2)(a) - no request for examination in relevant period |